20170025 Ver 1_401 Application_20161216

Environmental Consultants,.
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone]
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Samantha Dailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Re: Gatehouse Self Storage
Clayton, NC
Updated December 30, 2016
S&EC Project # 12802.W2
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 91h Floor
512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604
On behalf of the owner, Clayton Self Storage Group, LLC, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the
N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 39
and General Water Quality Certification 3890. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or
require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Gatehouse Self Storage
Project Type
Commercial Development
Owner / Applicant
Clayton Self Storage Group, LLC
County
Johnston
Nearest Town
Clayton
Waterbody Name
Little Creek
Index Number
27-43-12
Class
C;NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.30 (permanent)
0.07 (temporary
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.37
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
0
Attachments: PCN & Supplemental Information
Mitigation Acceptance Letter
NCWAM Wetland Assessment Form & Rating Sheet
DWR Permit Application Fee

4,34F W ATR¢G
7 r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
GATEHOUSE SELF -STORAGE
2b.
County:
Johnston
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Clayton
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Clayton Self Storage Group, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book- 04717 Page- 0350
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Robert Stephenson
3d.
Street address:
5540 Yates Mill Pond Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bob Zarzecki
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c.
Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-846-5900
5f.
Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 15

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
164900-88-7093
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.666273 Longitude: 078.499780
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
3.12 Acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Little Creek (27-43-12)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property is vacant and consists of some forested (buffer areas mostly) and some cleared areas (portion of wetlands and
uplands). Commercial developments exist to the east and south, while mostly undeveloped and farm land exists to the
north and west, to include the NCSU-NCDA Central Crops Research Station (CCRS) property to the north.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.5 Acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
395 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To construct a self-storage facility on the property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
To construct a 31,500 sf (footprint), 3 story tall storage facility building, associated parking, outside storage and
loading/unloading areas, and underground stormwater Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork
such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ElUnknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary Action ID: (SAW-2016-01495)
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Bob Zarzecki
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE- Samantha Dailey with the Corps verified jurisdictional areas on August 08, 2016
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number-
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.30
W1 ❑ P ®T
Fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.07
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.37
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts -F-0
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
#1 ❑P❑T
#2 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments:
Page 4 of 15

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6i. Comments: The project avoids all impacts to the Neuse buffers.
Page 5 of 15

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify natural
resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The initial conceptual plan
proposed fill and development up to the Neuse buffer, to include a wet detention pond within the now verified jurisdictional
wetlands. The plans were revised to remove the pond from the wetland area and instead install a very expensive
underground sand -filter and stormwater detention device to minimize the wetland impacts.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
As per the project engineer; Standard Erosion Control measures will be incorporated such as silt fencing, inlet
protection of all upstream structures and appropriately sized sediment riser basins will be utilized during
construction. Post -construction water quality will be protected by means of the underground sand filter and
stormwater detention device.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Wetland
Quantity: 0.30 Acres
3c.
Comments: S&EC completed an NCWAM assessment of the wetlands requested to be impacted (see attached). The
wetland
area within the proposed impact location were rated as "LOW". For this reason, and the fact that the applicant has
proposed significant wetland, stream and buffer avoidance, along with a SMP that includes an underground sandfilter and
stormwater detention device, the applicant proposes a 1:1 mitigation ratio. The mitigation bank acceptance letter is provided.
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: The project avoids all impacts to the Neuse buffers.
Page 7 of 15

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within
® Yes ❑ No
one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The SMP includes an underground sandfilter that will discharge to a riprap
❑ Yes ® No
dissipater at non-erosive velocities prior to entering the wetland outside of the buffer.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
46.6%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The attached impact exhibit shows the location of the underground sand filter & detention vault. The SMP will be
reviewed by Johnson County and has received a cursory review by Clayton. The underground BMP will discharge
from a pipe to a riprap dissipater designed to discharge at non-erosive velocities prior to entering the wetland.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Johnston County
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs apply
® NSW
❑ USMP
(check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached?
❑ Yes ® No
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached?
® Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ❑ No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
❑ Yes ❑ No
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the `Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in-fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The
Gatehouse Self-storage project is a private commercial self-storage facility. Additionally, the project is located within the
Town of Clayton jurisdiction, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the
following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection
regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area, in addition to "diffuse flow"
requirements and could require Best Management Practices that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved;
2) the Phase II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post-construction stormwater management requirements.
We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connection to the existing municipal sanitary sewer system. The County/City and State will ensure adequate capacity.
Page 9 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC -Natural Heritage Programs Data Explorer Map was used to search for elemental occurrences of federally protected
species listed within 1 mile of the project boundaries. It was determined based on the search that there are no elemental
occurrences that are listed as federally Threatened/Endangered within 1 mile of the project boundaries. Please note the
interim 4(d) rule identifies the Northern Long-eared Bat as a Threatened species within Johnston County.
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Search [November 21, 2016]. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. http://www.ncnhp.orp/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Project located in Johnston County. This project is not located near any designated Essential Fish Habitat areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
❑ Yes ® No
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of online records maintained by the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was conducted in
November 2016 and no impacts are perceived.
[SHPO] North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office Online Database Search. [November 16, 2016]. Department of
Cultural Resources, Raleigh, NC. Available at http://pis.ncdcr.pov/hpoweb
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Digitally signed by Oob Zarzecki
Bob Zarzecki DNc 3.b Zarzecki,.=5&EC, PA,ou=Wetlands Department
b=a e`""'anile"°m,`=°s
Soil & Environmental
Date: 301 fi.11.3011:19 09 -05'00'
December
Consultants, PA
Applicant/Agent's Signature
30, 2016
- Bob Zarzecki
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is
provided.)
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Page 10 of 15

Environmental Consultants,
V,27615 • Phone. C)19) W{ -594X)
eAiidec,com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION f AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: GATEHOUSE SELF -STORAGE S&EC Project #12802
Date: 2016
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Samantha Dailey Field Off -ice: USACE Raleigh RegulatoEy Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 164900-88-7093
Site Address: 12984 US 70 BUS HWY, Clayton, Johnston Co., NC
Lat/Long: 35.666273/-078.499780
Watershed: Little Creek, Neuse River, 27-43-12, "C;NSW", 03020201
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Clayton Self Storage Group, LLC
Address: 5540 Yates Mill Pond Road, Raleigh, NC 27606-9688
Phone No.: (4/4� 3 71--/ 3 3 7 Fax No.: ( } Mobile No.: ( }
Email: T 54 a J, a sa c o C bn"
r� �� S 1►en o �r ��/ y%�b
Property Owner (please print} /I�f AHc,,rr Date
Property Owner Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

§
/
§
)
2
�
. ..
.:.. .
)§ƒ}<
`
\
Fk0
»
Mzo«
- »
®- ,
$/$.
z
�»
7
- - � »
Keg
Nc0
n o
0)M
--o a< —: >
��t
2 \m
kd
! &®-.
a
nM
, y/: .
/\
co
CO)
--= 2
/
m
§
/
}
§
i
ƒ
0'
&:
&
2
\
CD
7

fires
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability November 14, 2016
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ms. Samantha Dailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Gatehouse Self Storage
This document confirms that Clayton Self Storage Group, LLC (Applicant) for the Gatehouse Self
Storage (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.60 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from
the EBX-Neuse sponsored Bank: Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically the
Howell Woods Site in the Neuse HUC 03 02020 1. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, LLC,
attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1052.
Best Regards,
Cara S. Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Gatehouse Self -Storage (SAW -2016-01495) Date of Evaluation August 18, 2016
Applicant/Owner Name Clayton Self Storage Group LLC Wetland Site Name Wetlands
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization B. Zarzecki / S&EC
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Little Creek
River Basin Neuse USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03020201
County Johnston NCDWR Region Raleigh
;Yes FNo Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.666273/-078.499780
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? F,Yes r-, No
Regulatory Considerations Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes
No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
F Anadromous fish
F Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
R NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
F_ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
F Publicly owned property
F N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
F Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
F Designated NCNHP reference community
F Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
F Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes); Lunar [—,Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ;Yes, No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ;Yes F, No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
A A Not severely altered
B; B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <- 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
r°,A r—
.,A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C,C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B+, B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
+; D; D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
E A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
CA CA CA >_ 500 acres
CB C B C B From 100 to < 500 acres
CC C C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
CD C D C D From 25 to < 50 acres
CE C E C E From 10 to < 25 acres
C F C F C F From 5 to < 10 acres
G E; G C G From 1 to < 5 acres
CH CH E;H From 0.5 to<1 acre
C I C I C I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
CJ CJ CJ From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
CK CK CK < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
CA Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
C B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
CA CA >_ 500 acres
C B CB From 100 to < 500 acres
CC E;C From 50 to < 100 acres
CD CD From 10 to < 50 acres
C E CE < 10 acres
F CF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
CYes C No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
CA 0
CB 1 to
E;C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
CA Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
CB Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
CA Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
EB Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
CC Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure - assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
Yes C No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
CA
>- 25%
coverage of vegetation
C B
< 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each
column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
'�+, I�' ,fir `+�
AA
WT
oFA
CA
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
C:
CB
E;B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
v
EC
CC
Canopy sparse or absent
o
CA
CA
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
CB
E;B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
EC
CC
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
CA
E;A
Dense shrub layer
t
CB
CB
Moderate density shrub layer
0
E;C
CC
Shrub layer sparse or absent
CA
E;A
Dense herb layer
�5
EB
CB
Moderate density herb layer
_
CC
CC
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
CA Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
EB Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
CA Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
CB Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
E C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
CA Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
E:B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion - wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation
and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
CA CB CC
CD
^. r �-- •�-._ f`'�- �'•. (' ;•-_,-
'�+, I�' ,fir `+�
22. Hydrologic Connectivity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
E;A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
F, B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
CC Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
CD Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetlands
Headwater Forest
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date August 18, 2016
Assessor Name/Organization B. Zarzecki / S&EC
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Hydrology
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

�e,�aficate of Completi
presented to /
Bob Zarzecki
for having successfully completed the following training
sponsored by the North Carolina Association of Environmental Professionals.
North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method
Instructors: John Dorney (Moffatt & Nichol), Sandy Smith (Axiom), LeiLaoi Paugh (NCDOT)
worth a total of
Ward Marotti
President
13-16 September 2016
26.5
Hours
professional development hours.
N CA E p North Carolina Association of 16 September 2016
Environmental Professionals Date Issued
Promoting excellence in the environmental profession

Project Number:
12802.W3
Project Manager:
BZ
Scale:
1" = 300'
Date:
6/20/16
�-L X350
40jOe
0 /-OP
'QFB
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Gatehouse Self Storage
Johnston County, NC
Source: USGS Garner
and Clayton Quadrangle
0 300 600 N
Feet
Soil et Environmental Consultants,
M12 -.N.1%. R—O.4.j. I"R.06p6.\C 2%15•Ph.—(919)U6.59 -Fac:(919)

was
� .�' c� GSA
NoBr
,ft.
NoS.
• f '
0
i
t IN,
Project Number: Map Title: N
12802.W3 0 375 750
Project Manager:
Figure 2 -Soil Survey Map I i i i I i i i I
BZ Gatehouse Self Storage Feet
Scale: 1 375' Johnston County, NC
" =
Source Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Johnston CountyM12 F.U..ENc R -d. tiW. 1" HNip),442MI S'Ph r.(919)ki6.590 +E'ix:(919)N &96
6/20/16 Soil Survey Sheets 1 13 ..—

Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only
S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped
using
topographic maps, air photos and ground truthing. If the site is going
to be disturbed, S&EC's detailed delineation should be approved and
permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by
S&EC, they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to
locate S&EC's flagging.
•
• r.
1
24
21
19
18
17
.Y
IT
k-
)U y
Legend
Parcel Boundary
o Stream,
50ft Buffer Town Centre Blvd Y .
Jurisdictional Wetland
Project Number: Map Title: N
12802.W3 0 125 250
Project Manager: Figure 3 -Sketch Map I i i i I i i i I
BZ Gatehouse Self Storage Feet
Scale: 1"=125' Johnston County, NC MRWI— A
Source' Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: : Johnston County GIS %317 V.&ur N—R-d. ti.ii lUy HNtiP).N437615. 17—(919)A -590-F—(919)Y Rib
6/20/16 NC One Map --k—

rrwr •wruxn•s
LINKB
Fish 1 Wildlife
National Wetlands Inventor Wetlands Map
� I y
• • �, Vow «.
• � : � � 'mss �' d• � _ .
5
1:3,886
0 0.0325 0.065 0.13 mi
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earths r G aphics, CNESlAirbus
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
• DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IG IGswisstopd, and
r � • =
June 20, 2016
M Estuarine and Marine Deepwater IM Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other
E] Estuarine and Marine Wetland F-] Freshwater Pond F� Riverine
❑ Freshwater Emergent Wetland ® Lake
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This page was produced by the NWI mapper

W40
Legend
Flood Map
Jun 20, 2016
Panay Flood Hazard Areas
0 PolitioaIAre as — AE
Stream Centerline jffrj&W Floodway(AE)
Cross Sections 0.2 % Chanoe Annual Flood Hazard
r Levee"fir-''moi Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
1 11 AESM. MJ4 .
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
N+C
-
n
M
Legend
Flood Map
Jun 20, 2016
Panay Flood Hazard Areas
0 PolitioaIAre as — AE
Stream Centerline jffrj&W Floodway(AE)
Cross Sections 0.2 % Chanoe Annual Flood Hazard
r Levee"fir-''moi Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
1 11 AESM. MJ4 .
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
N+C

70
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Result 1
id: 05GOI 199X
Tag: 05G01 199X
Tax Unique Id: 4434046
NCPin: 164900-88-7093
j Mapsheet No: 1649
Owner Name 1: CLAYTON SELF STORAGE
GROUP, LLC,
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 5540 YATES MILL POND RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: RALEIGH, NC 27606-9688
Site Address 1: 12984 US 70 BUS HWY
Site Address 2: CLAYTON, NC 27527 -
Book: 04717
�A Page: 0350
Market Value: 539770
Assessed Acreage: 3.12
Calc. Acreage: 3.106
Sales Price: 543000
Sale Date: 2016-02-08
& w
NoB �.
Scale: 1:902 - 1 in. = 75.16 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 11 x 17 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
February 25, 2016

fl
• n
U N
EXTEND BEYOND WETLANDS NG DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FIELD LOCATED Underground Sandfilter &
z
PROPERTY CENTRAL CROPS RESEARCH STATION JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS Stormwater Detention Devise
A
PIN: 154900-57-5937
Z W U
BONING S-3
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (W2)
a �'" Q
5D' STREAM BUFFER CJRRENT 115E TEMP JD WETLAND = 4.07 AC. (3,233.98 SF)
FROM
Q q ,0 :�
(50' TOP OF (AGRL TESTING}
BANK EACH SIDE)
<110
��. ,� 0
Qom,,++
W w o, w,
Y W W W W W W W w W w W W W W W w W W WPERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (b'V1)
Q ;E '3;; CWS
W W W W W w W p JD WETLAND = 0.30 AC. (12,996.10 SF)
S 43714624v, �EW W U f 9. �
w i�W _�• �• W/L
f
,Y
�•>
w +Yx,� ' 'i •t W
W $ //' W W W
^
W W W W W{ W W f W w W � W W W W / /
f
jjj
W W W''. W y W W f �/ W W W i W f f
i.
W
b�•
z
�\ �,,. W / W W..W � W .W W •Y W. W W .y J'.•�f f,�,r _. W V w W W W w �'V �` � ' !1 �
v /'�
1i `+•'�"(- rY
�
�
r�,
W W W W W L W Y W V �,f r• ff fW.- W W W W W1,`` W W
\ '. W Y! W _ f✓ f ff f f'r" / f r. " W W W W W `� -..jII //Q!
+�
�' f-.
7- 0
a�.d 'CC,
`s �`+� N �f
W�-_�Y• � W W W W .N eY 51w W W
W
C) L
,� x�
FIELD LOCATED
C)
TOP OF BANK W W W W W W W W: {I
W W�-W W... W W W WF W W � b • e 1 � } J � L �� 1 ���/
C
�
,
WETLANDS EXTEND �� r9 STQ}RP4G FACI jf ITYT
v ! "� w w W W W 1 w
F^
� W
t 1,5 D SAF O`fP INT
INTO RIGHT OF WAY �� �� W W '' 94 5D4 5F T A I W f
YI L �j �]
3 T IE. (L " HEIG Tj
1694
TS} f
I`
Riprap Dissipater at end of BMP
discharge pipe to provide non-erosive
velocities prior to entering wetlands. I�C, _ �. ..�
3 w
WH CAPITAL, LLC
a a a
3 1 PIN: 164900-87-9890
W �? x
ZONING: B-3 I
W Q a
-._ - CURRENT USE
FIELD LOCATED �`�' - j (COMMERCIAL) !
Cn Z © Z
-!� z
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS I
AS DETERMINED BY S&EC
a
NOTES:
1. WETLAND DELINEATION DETERMINED BY SOIL AND
ULTANTS, PA (S&EC), JUNE
ENV20
6I AND VERIFIED BY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENG NEERS. LEGEND
�
'� `°`�,
2. WETLANDS SURVEY PERFORMED BY BRL STREAM CHANNEL _ ,� �
3,9"
YbW'N CIF C'CnYT17NP7[Q1F`C-I =
ENGINEERING, SEPTEMBER 21, 2416.STREAM BUFFER
IMPACT AREA: JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND_
20I5 -31 -SP
NOVEMBER 10, 2016
`-!
1. PERMANENT JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND = 0.30 AC. (W1) JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACT
2. TEMPORARY JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND = 0.07 AC. (W2)
TEMPORARY JURISDICTIONAL rY,
co SCALE 1"=i60' `` t
WETLAND IMPACT p
WETLAND
z '•.`-.'--� �,��
EXHIBIT
ADDRESS: 1000 NORTONBRIDGE ROAD, RALEIGH, NC 27603 EMAIL: pborbeouCgmail. corn Phone: 919.79&2651
CAROLINA LAND DEVELOPMENT