19950153 Ver 5_Email_20161219

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: Wehner, Judy
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 3:48 PM
To: Burdette, Jennifer a
Subject: FW: Martin Merrietta Channel Inspection
Attachments: Martin Marietta -Benson 12.19.2016 photos.docx
Fyi/
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 3:21 PM
To: Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>, Boyer, Janet <[e-mail]>, Vinson, Toby
<[e-mail]>, Holley, John <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Martin Merrietta Channel Inspection
Would it be beneficial to have someone from RRO or RCO DWR inspect the channel as well to provide their position on
whether or not it is stabilized enough to turn the water into the channel? If they concur with us, then it should be clear
that the channel stabilization is not adequate and must be improved/stabilized before both agencies can approve its use.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Wehner, Judy
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 3:13 PM
To: Davis, Tracy <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Martin Merrietta Channel Inspection
Fyi
From: Valentine, Thad
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 2:49 PM
To: Boyer, Janet <[e-mail]>, Vinson, Toby <[e-mail]>, Holley, John
<[e-mail]>, Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>
Subject: Martin Merrietta Channel Inspection
Janet
I walked the whole channel with Nuwan and although it's well constructed, it needs a lot more stabilization before I would
turn the water into the channel. The lower end of the channel is flooded and will probably stay that way all winter. I told
Nuwan that even if they could get a good stand of vegetation throughout the project this winter, which I doubted, they
would still need to pump out the lower end, muck it out, reshape the banks and restabilize the area. After some back and
forth he finally seemed to except that. I have attached some photo's for your review, 0101 & 0102 is the lower end I am
referring to. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns
1

ON
r�