20060404 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20080527

BEAVERDAM CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT FOR 2006-2007 (YEAR 1)
Project Number: D05016-1

I
Submitted to:
xosystem
December, 2007
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite I H 103 z
Raleigh, NC 27604 rl
r] 1 r.) ` ?'t \.. S coo
?c%LP?DS MAO S10RM \ Y
Prepared for: River Works, Inc.
R IVER,
' W O R K S
8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511

Prepared by: Baker Engineering ` ;_
0
y

1447 South Tryon St., Ste. 200 ?' ;
Charlotte, NC 28203

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. i
' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................1
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 2
' 1.1
1.2 Project Location ............................................................................................................... 2
Mitigation Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................... 2
1.3 Project Description and Restoration Approach ................................................................ 2
' 1.4
1.5 Project History and Background ...................................................................................... 4
Project Plan ...................................................................................................................... 8
2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING ...................................................................................... 8
' 2.1 Soil Data ............. ............................................................................................................ 8
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol ............................................................. 9

' 2.3
2.4 Vegetation Success Criteria ...........................................................................................
Results of Vegetative Monitoring .................................................................................. .. 9
10
2.5 Vegetation Observations ................................................................................................ 12

' 2.6
2.7 Vegetation Problem Areas .............................................................................................
Vegetation Photos .......................................................................................................... 12
12
3.0 STREAM MONITORING .............................................................................................. 12
' 3.1 Description of Stream Monitoring ................................................................................. 12
3.2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria .............................................................................. 13
3.3 Bankfull Discharge Monitoring Results ......................................................................... 13
' 3.4 Stream Monitoring Data and Photos .............................................................................. 14
3.5 Stream Stability Assessment .......................................................................................... 14

' 3.6
3.7 Cross-section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results...
Areas of Concern ............................................................................................................ 15
15
4.0 HYDROLOGY ................................................................................................................. 16
' 5.0
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................
WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ...................................................................................... 17
17
' 7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 17
APPENDICES
' APPENDIX A - Project Photo Log
APPENDIX B - Stream Monitoring Data
APPENDIX C - As-built Plan Sheets
APPENDIX D - Baseline Stream Summary for Restoration Reaches
APPENDIX E - Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary - Year 1 Monitoring
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Project Mitigation Approach
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Table 4. Project Background
Table 5. Soil Data for Project
Table 6. Tree Species Planted
Table 7. Year 1 Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 9. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table 10. Comparison of Historic Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
Table 11. Hydrologic Monitoring Results for Year 1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Topographic Map
Figure 3. Restoration Summary Map
Figure 4. Stage Recorder Locations
Figure 5. Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
ii

I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Annual Report details the monitoring activities during the 2007 growing season on the Beaverdam
Creek Stream Restoration Site ("Site"). Construction of the Site, including planting of trees, was
completed in March 2007. In order to document project success, twenty-four vegetation monitoring plots,
eighteen permanent cross-sections, 9,576 linear feet (LF) of longitudinal profile survey, one rain gage,
and two automated stage recorders were installed and assessed across the restoration Site. The 2007 data
represents results from the first year of vegetation and hydrologic monitoring for streams.
Prior to restoration, stream and buffer functions on the Site were historically impaired as a result of heavy
land timbering and subsequently farmed aggressively. Recently some areas have been reforested within
the project site, but it has continued to be actively farmed and grazed or converted to medium density
residential developments. After construction was finalized the project restored or enhanced 13,203 linear
feet (LF) of channelized stream on two unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Creek: UTl and UT2, and
preserved an additional 1,641 LF of Beaverdam Creek and 962 LF of UT2 to total 15,806 LF of restored,
enhanced, or preserved stream.
Weather station data from the for NRCS National Climate and Water Center (Charlotte WSO AP WETS
Station in Mecklenburg County - NC 1690) and the USGS Water Data for North Carolina (USGS
35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg County, NC) were used to document precipitation
amounts. For the 2007 growing season, March 2007 through October 2007 rainfall was recorded as
below normal for greater than 87% of the time.
Twenty-four monitoring plots that are 10 meter by 10 meters or 0.025 of an acre in size were used to
assess survivability of the woody vegetation planted on Site. They are randomly located to represent the
different zones within the project. The vegetation monitoring indicated a survivability range of 440 stems
per acre to 1000 stems per acre with an overall average of 572 stems per acre. Overall, the Site is on track
for meeting the initial vegetation survival criteria of 320 stems per acre surviving after the third growing
season and the final success criteria of 260 trees per acre by the end of year five.
In general, dimension, pattern, profile and in-stream structures remained stable during the first growing
season. Minor bed scour was noted in a few isolated areas along UTl. These areas are the result of the
large storm event that occurred shortly after construction was completed. One bankfull event was
documented during the month of February.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Beaverdam Creek site is located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, and lies within the Catawba River Basin (Figure 1). The site lies within North
Carolina Department of Water Quality (NCDWQ) sub-basin 03-08-34 and U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS)
hydrologic unit 03050101170040. The recent land use of the site consists of agriculture and medium
density residential development.
' The project involved the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of 15,806 LF of stream along
Beaverdam Creek (the mainstem) and two unnamed tributaries (UT 1 and UT2).
1.1 Project Location
' The Beaverdam Creek sited is located approximately 3 miles southwest of the Charlotte-Douglas
International Airport. The site extends from the newly constructed Interstate 485 corridor to Brown's
' Cove of Lake Wylie, an impounded reservoir on the Catawba River. The site can be accessed from Dixie
River Road (UT1 to the north and UT2 to the south) 1.5 miles northeast of the intersection with Steele
Creek Road. See Figures 1 and 2 for an overview of the project site.
' 1.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The specific goals for the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project were as follows:
' • Preserve/Restore/Enhance 15,806 LF of stream channel.
0 Create geomorphically stable stream channel and floodplain conditions along UT1, UT2 and their
associated tributaries within the Beaverdam Creek watershed.
' • Improve the local hydrology through increased groundwater recharge, groundwater storage, and
hydrologic connectivity between the channel and the adjacent floodplain.
• Improve water quality in the Beaverdam Creek watershed by increasing dissolved oxygen
' concentrations and reducing nutrient and sediment loads.
• Improve aquatic and riparian terrestrial habitat through improved hydraulic and biologic
diversity.
1.3 Project Description and Restoration Approach
For analysis and design purposes, Beaverdam Creek and the two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and UT2)
' were subdivided into 15 individual reaches based on their hydrologic and geomorphic characteristics.
The mainstem of Beaverdam Creek consists of only 1 of the 15 design reaches, where only preservation
and no restoration activities were proposed. The remaining 14 reaches exist within UT1 (8 reaches) and
' UT2 (6 reaches). Among these 14 reaches, 12 were scheduled for restoration, the upstream reach of UT1
was scheduled for enhancement and the downstream reach of UT2 was scheduled for preservation. All
reach locations are shown in Figure 3. The following describes the site's preconstruction conditions.
' The project constraints on UT1 began at I-485 flowing from the northeast direction. UT1 was divided
into 5 reaches starting in the upstream with Reach 1 and continuing downstream to Reach 5 and changing
designation at tributary confluences or at significant grade breaks. The three tributary confluences were
' included within the design parameters on UT1 and were identified as UT113, UT1C, and UT1D from the
upstream confluence and continuing downstream.
UT2 watershed abuts the UT1 watershed to the south, is bordered by Dixie River Road, and is generally
flows in the southwest direction. The mainstem of UT2 was divided into four reaches starting upstream at
Reach 1 and continuing downstream to Reach 4. One tributary confluence, UT2A, was included within
the design parameters of UT2. Reach UT2A, upstream of station 10+00, consisted only of a non-
'
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 2
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
YADKIN
03-07-04
t
I------- ----- _
CATA BA 03-08-33
YADKIIN 03-07?11 j
21
__-__--- ------- Y KIN d3-0 12
??C?ITAWBA ? ? ??
29
?. '
C A
-08-36 CATAWBA 03-08-34 of
t charlotte-Dj(-jia, Charlotte
?`Internatlonal Anpon `?? `\
CATA BA
03-08-37 74 _v
i
a 521
Project Site
CATAWBA 03-08-38 YADKIN 03 14?
Map Inset LEGEND EEP Contract No.: D05016-1
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map
rte. ? T?T? w O 11(1c: C=? c;,,u?nc. Beaverdam Creek
1:1 mu) Sub-basu, Year 1 Monitoring
r?
11,a)System a Mecklenburg County, NC
•
krnhwg couui}. NC December 2007
The site can be accessed from
Dixie River Road / ?T1 to the north
and UT2 to the south) 1.5 miles r?
northeast of the intersection with
Steele Creek Road.
?I

I
1r?n
N4
L , ockI' cv

C Aigh Soh a?,
Cente line Or

`---- EEP Contract No.: D050164 Figure 2: Site Topographic
LEGEND Map
Project Watcrshcd Boundan Crccks
Beaverdam Creek
Project Reaches - Rt,ads Year 1 Monitoring
[A" S ell] Mecklenburg County, NC

r....,. 0 800 1,600 3,200
Feet

©
D
2007
b

,
ecem
er

L

` s
np?ton'#Te?'

r y? W . 1
?'•. - . ,: ,'22344 ?. - `y /.. .. ".
y ,
"'------- EEP Contract No.: D05016-1 Figure 3: Restoration
LEGEND
____ Summary Map
r-a?l Project Watershed Boundary - Creeks Beaverdam Creek
Preservation Easement Roads Year 1 Monitoring
Ecosystem Mecklenburg County, NC
0 900 1,800 3,600
Feet
December 2007

' disturbance area (not for credit). The downstream section of UT2A, from a headcut at station 10+00 to its
confluence at the terminus of Reach 2, was 1138 LF with a channel slope of 1.4 percent.
' Preservation was proposed for reaches within the project area that were currently in stable, functioning
condition and did not warrant restoration. The two reaches proposed for preservation were along the
mainstem of Beaverdam and the downstream section of UT2. The reach along the mainstem of
' Beaverdam Creek proposed for preservation had reach length of 1,641 LF. It began at the confluence
with UTl and extended downstream to the confluence of UT2. The reach along the mainstem of UT2
proposed for preservation had a length of 962 LF. It began immediately downstream of UT2 Reach 4 and
ended at its confluence with the mainstem of Beaverdam Creek.
Throughout most of UT1, the restoration approach identified the existing evolutionary process and
established a naturally successional stable C/E-type stream channel. Additionally, soil bioengineering,
' structural reinforcement, and revetments were applied to promote stability immediately following
construction when the stream was most vulnerable. Given the wide floodplain, relatively flat slopes,
generally stable nature of the soil, and favorable growing conditions at the site, this restoration approach
was an achievable goal. Removal of the majority of invasive species and planting of native vegetative
species throughout the existing riparian buffer complemented the channel restoration and promoted
climax successional habitat.
' Similar to UT1, the restoration approach throughout UT2 entailed establishing a successional C/E-type
stream channel while maintaining the ability to accommodate subsequent natural channel evolution
towards an E-type channel, as warranted by future influences to the discharge and sediment regime. This
' was accomplished through application of a Priority 1 design throughout with short segments of Priority 2
design to tie into the incised channels.

Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
Table 1. Proiect Mitigation Aooroach
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Si te: Project No. D 05016-1

?
O
O #
Z
rJ
C
O
O
G
O
pp
p

Project Segment p d0
= c ?#
o ?
a L b0 b0
a o R e0 O
or Reach ID ° .
' ° Comment
UT1 Reach l 542 E El 567 1.5:1 378 10+00 - 15+67 Low slope, minimal meander and flood lain benching.
The beginning of channel utilizes the existing wide,
flat floodplain then narrows through the valley and
straightens through the Duke Power easement and
connects into the mainstem of Beaverdam through a
UTI (Reach 2-5) 57% R P1 6,310 1:1 6,310 15+67 - 78+77 wide, flat flood lain.
The valley is pinched so floodplain grading will create
UT I B 743 R P2 778 1:1 778 10+00 - 17+78 adequate benching.
Step-pool design dominated by log drops. The valley
UT1C 744 R P1 624 1:1 624 10+00 - 16+24 is narrow resulting minimal meander.
The channel will have the appropriate belt width
throughout the ample floodplain. A series of drop
UT1D 323 R PI 338 1:1 338 10+00 -13+38 structures at the end of the reach will tie into UT I.
Increase sinuosity, pool development, and reestablish
connection with the floodplain and construct in
channel step-pools in areas where the valley is
UT2 3130 R P l 3,448 1:1 3,448 10+00 - 44+48 confined and steep.
A step-pool channel will be constructed in the areas
where the valley is confined and steep. Transition
connections constructed between the constructed
UT2A 886 R P1 1,138 1:1 1,138 10+00 - 21+38 channel and the existing channels.
Beaverdam Creek 1641 P --- 1,641 1:5 328 -

UT2
962
P
---
962
1:5
192
- -
Total linear ft of c hannel restored or 15,806 t
Mitigation Unit Summation for Streams: 13,534
* R = Restoration ** P I =Priority I
E = Enhancement P2 = Priority II
P = Preservation P3 = Priority III
El = Enhancement I
1.4 Project History and Background
The chronology of the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project is presented in Table 2. The contact
information for all designers, contractors, and relevant suppliers is presented in Table 3. Relevant project
background information is presented in Table 4.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
4
Table 2. Proiect Activitv and Renorting Historv
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Scheduled Data Collection Actual
Activity or Report Completion Complete Completion or
Deliver
Restoration Plan Prepared Nov-05 N/A
Restoration Plan Amended Dec-05 N/A
Restoration Plan Approved Dec-05 N/A
Final Design - (at least 90% complete) Dec-05 N/A
Construction Begins May-06 N/A Jun-06
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area N/A N/A Jan-07
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area Mar-06 N/A Jan-07
Planting of live stakes Nov-06 N/A Jan-07
Planting of bare root trees Nov-06 N/A Jan-07
Survey of As-built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring-
baseline Jan-07 Mar-07 Apr-07
Repair work
Year 1 Monitoring Dec-07 Nov-07 Dec-07
Year 2 Monitoring Dec-08 Unknown Unknown
Year 3 Monitoring Dec-09 Unknown Unknown
Year 4 Monitoring Dec-10 Unknown Unknown
Year 5 Monitoring Dec-11 Unknown Unknown
fable 3. Yroiect contact
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Full Service Delivery Contractor
Riverworks 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Designer
Baker Engineering 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Kevin Tweedy, Tel [phone]
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 5
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Table 3. Proiect Contact
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Construction Contractor
Riverworks 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Planting Contractor
Riverworks 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Riverworks 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Seed Mix Sources Mellow Marsh Farm, 919-742-1200
Nursery Stock Suppliers Mellow Marsh Farm, 919-742-1200
International Paper, 1-888-888-7159
Monitoring Performers
Baker Engineering 1447 S. Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact: Ian Eckardt, Tel.[phone]
Vegetation Monitoring Point of
Contact: Ian Eckardt, Tel. [phone]
ranee 4. rro ect isac rounci
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Project County: Mecklenbura County. NC
Drainage Area:
UTl (Reach 1) 0.70 mil
UT1 (Reach 2-5) 1.73 mil
UTiB 0.34 mil
UT1C 0.15miZ
UT1D 0.16 mil
UT2 0.3 miZ
UT2A 0.1 miZ
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
UT1 (Reach 1) 15%
UTl (Reach 2-5) 12%
UT1 B 10%
UT1C 5%
UT1D 21%
UT2 4%
UT2A 2%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 6
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

1

Table 4. Project Background Table
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Stream Order:
UT1 (Reach 1) 1
UTl (Reach 2-5) 2
UT1B 1
UT1C 1
UT1D 1
UT2 1
UT2A 1
Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont
Ecore ion Southern Outer Piedmont
Ros en Classification of As-Built
UT1 Reach 1 C/E
UTl Reach 2-5 C/E
UTl B C/E
UTl C C/E
UT1 D C/E
UT2 C/E
UT2A C/E
Riverine, Upper Perennial,
Cowardin Classification Unconsolidated Bottom, Cobble-
Gravel
Dominant Soil Types
UTl (Reach 1) MO
UT1 (Reach 2-5) MO, Dal), CeD2, PaE
UT1B MO
UT1C MO, PaE, CeD2
UT11) MO, PaE, CeD2
UT2 MO, CeD2
UT2A MO
Spencer Creek, UT to Spencer
Creek, McDowell Park, Latta
Reference site ID Plantation, McClintock Creek
(McNair & Stockwood), UT to
Cleghorn, UT to Lake Jeanette,
UT to Big Lost Cove
USGS HUC for Project and Reference sites 3050101170040
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-08-34
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference C
An portion of an project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a No
303d listed se ment?
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor? N/A
% of project easement fenced 10%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
1.5 Project Plan
' Plans depicting the as-built conditions of the major project elements, location of permanent monitoring
cross-sections, and locations of permanent vegetation monitoring plots are presented in Appendix C of
this report.
2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING
2.1 Soil Data
The soil data for the Site is presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Soil Data for Project
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
%u Clay on
Series Max Depth in Surface K T OM %
Cecil Sandy Clay Loam (CeD2) 80 20-35 0.28 5 0.5-1
Monacan Loam (MO) 80 7-27 0.43 5 2-3
Davidson sandy clay loam (DaD) 75 20-35 0.28 5 0.5-2
Pacolet sandy loam (PaE) 62 8-20 0.2 5 0.5-2
Pacolet sandy loam (PaF) 62 8-20 0.2 5 0.5-2
NKCS, USDA. Official Soil Series Descriptions (http://soiis.usda.gov/soils/technical/classification/osd/index html)
General taxonomy of soils:
Cecil: The Cecil series consists of well-drained soils with moderate permeability on and near
floodplains. They formed in residuum weathered felsic igneous and metamorphic rock, such as granite.
Slopes range from 8 to 15 percent.
' Monacan: Soils of the Monacan series are deep, moderately well and somewhat poorly drained with
moderate permeability. They formed in recent alluvial sediments of the Piedmont and Coastal Plain.
Slopes are commonly less than 2 percent.
' Pacolet: The Pacolet series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed
in material weathered mostly from acid crystalline rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly are
15 to 25 percent but range up to 2 to 60 percent.
Davidson: The Davidson series consists of very deep, well drained moderately permeable soils that
' formed in materials weathered from dark colored rocks high in ferromagnesian minerals. These soils are
on gently sloping to moderately steep uplands in the Piedmont. Slopes are commonly 2 to 15 percent but
range up to 25 percent.
1
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2111, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
' The Site was planted in bottomland hardwood forest species in early - mid March of 2007. There were
twenty-four vegetation-monitoring plots established throughout the planting areas.
The following tree species were planted in the restoration area:
' Table 6. Tree Species Planted in the Beaverdam Restoration Area
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1

(Radford, et al., 1968 and Resource Management Group, Inc., 1999)
ID Scientific Name Common Name FAC Status
1 Alnus serrulata Tag Alder FACW+
2 Asimina triloba Paw paw FAC
3 Cercis canadensis Redbud FACU
4 Celtis laevigata Sugarberry FACW
5 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush OBL
6 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood FACW+
7 Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood FACU
8 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon FAC
9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash FACW
10 Juglan nigra Black Walnut FACU
11 Liriodendron tulipiferra Tulip poplar FACW
12 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore FACW-
13 Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum FAC
14 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut oak FACW-
15 Quercus phellos Willow oak FACW-
16 Quercus rubra Red oak FACU
17 Sambucus candensis Elderberry FACW-
18 Viburnum dentatum Arrow-wood viburnum FAC
The following monitoring protocol was designed to predict vegetative survivability. Twenty-four plots
were established throughout the Beaverdam Creek Site. The number of sites was based on the
species/area curve method and their location was based on EEP monitoring guidance. The size of
individual quadrants was 100 square meters for woody tree species, 25 square meters for shrubs, and 1
square meter for herbaceous vegetation. The locations of the vegetation plots are shown on the as-built
plan sheets in Appendix C.
Individual quadrant data provided includes density and coverage quantities. Relative values were
calculated, and importance values were determined. Individual seedlings were marked to ensure that they
can be found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality was determined from the difference between the
previous year's living, planted seedlings and the current year's living, planted seedlings.
' 2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 3-year old
' planted trees per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period. The final vegetative success
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 9
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
criteria will be the survival of 260 5-year old planted trees per acre at the end of year five of the
monitoring period.
' 2.4 Results of Vegetative Monitoring
The following tables present stem counts for each of the monitoring plots. Each planted tree species is
identified down the left column, and each plot is identified across the top row. The numbers on the top
row correlate to the ID column of the table. Trees are flagged in the field on an as-needed basis before
the flags degrade. Flags are utilized, because they will not interfere with the growth of the tree.
Volunteer species are also flagged during this process.
During the initial counts of species totals during the as-built monitoring report, some tree species were
unidentifiable (no buds or leafs) and documented as Unknown Quercus in the stem plot counts or were
labeled incorrectly. During Year 1 vegetative monitoring, three of the four Unknown Quercus have been
identified as Quercus michauxii and updated in the Year 1 vegetative totals in Table 7. In addition, tree
species that were labeled incorrectly have been updated and coded within Table 7 to represent the
' correction.
The average stem count per acre for Year 1 Monitoring was 572. The range of stem counts throughout
the 24 vegetative monitoring plots was from 440 -1000. The current survivability rate for Year 1 is
' 91.5%. The data reflects that the overall site is on trajectory for meeting the minimum success interim
criteria of 320 trees per acre by the end of year three and the final success criteria of 260 trees per acre by
the end of year five.
No volunteer species were noted in any of the Site's vegetation plots, or were too small to verify. If any
woody volunteer species are observed in subsequent monitoring years they will be flagged and added to
' the overall stems per acre assessment of the Site.
t
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 10
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Table 7. Year 1 Stem Counts for Each Snecies Arranged by Plot
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016.1
i
UTl UT2 Initial
T
t
l Year 1
Total %
rviv
l
S
. - - o
a
s s u
a
Alnus serrulata 2 2 2 100.0
Asimina tuiloba 4 5 4 4 1 21 18 85.7
Cercis canadensis 1 1 1 3 3 100.0
Celtis laevi ata 1 2 6 3 50.0
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
1
1
1
100.0
Cornus amomum 1 0 0.0
Cornus lorida 1 2 2 3 150.0
Dios ros vir iniana 1 1 1 3 3 100.0
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 4 4 7 1 6 1 1 3 3 3 6 5 3 13 2 8 5 1 77 76 98.7
Ju lan ni ra 1 2 1 1 4 1 2 8 1 3 2 1 1 31 28 90.3
Liriodendron tali i erra 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 36 29 80.6
Platanus occidentalis 2 2 4 5 2 7 3 1 1 1 2 7 7 1 1 54 46 85.2
N ssa s lvatica 4 1 2 4 1 1 1 7 3 3 5 3 3 2 8 2 55 50 90.9
uercus michauxii 1 4 7 2 2 7 1 2 3 3 2 1 4 5 3 7 2 1 55 57 103.6
Quercus hellos 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 20 20 100.0
Quercus rubra 1 1 1 100.0
Sambucus candensis 1 0 0.0
Vibernum dentatum 2 2 2 100.0
Unknown Quercus 1 4 1 25.0
Stems/ lot
1 13 11 13 15 14 12 15 25 11 14 11 17 18 12 14 15 15 17 13 11 16 17 17 7 375 343 91.5
Stems/acre 520 440 520 600 560 480 600 1000 440 560 440 680 720 480 560 600 600 6)I I -!+ ?? M ar ??t ;3F
Tree # 3-7 was mislabeled as Platanus occidentalis in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 3-16 was mislabeled as Liriodendron tulipifera in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 7-10 was mislabeled as Asimina tuiloba in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 7-2, -3, -4 were mislabeled as Fraxinus pennsylvanica in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 14-5, -8, -10 were mislabeled as unknown in As-built Initial Counts
Tree # 7-21 was labeled as Liriodendron tulipifera in the field but was not added in the As-built Initial Counts
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016.1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
11
2.5 Vegetation Observations
Just following construction of the site, a 3.5-inch precipitation event occurred and caused minor bank
destabilization and required various sections of UT1 to be reseeded. At this time, channel degradation
that was caused by the storm event was repaired. During repair of the channel, large equipment accessed
1 the site. Additional live stakes were replanted along the channel where needed for restabilization.
During the Year 1 Monitoring site visit the stream-side vegetation was noted as being successfully
' reestablished. In addition, the annual herbaceous plant Bidens frondosa (tickseed sunflower) intended as a
nurse crop, to discourage aggressive weeds while the permanent seedlings become established, has been
successful throughout the Site (USDA, 2007). See Project ID photos in Appendix A.
2.6 Vegetation Problem Areas
At this time, there seem to be no invasive species problem areas throughout the project site. However,
though none seem to be posing any problems, invasive species can very quickly affect the survivability of
the planted stems the weedy species should be maintained aggressively to prevent any major mortality
issue.
2.7 Vegetation Photos
Photos of the project showing the on-site vegetation are included in Appendix A of this report
3.0 STREAM MONITORING
3.1 Description of Stream Monitoring
To document the stated success criteria, the following monitoring program was instituted following
' construction completion on the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project:
Bankfull Events: The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period was documented by the
use of two automated stage recorders. The University of North Carolina (UNCC) installed and monitored
the readings from both stage recorders. Gauging station BD2 was installed on UT1 and gauging station
BD3 was installed on UT2. Each data logger recorded the watermark at 15 minute intervals at each Site
and was checked at each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event had occurred. Data from stage
' recorder BD1 was used when BD2 was out of order during the monitoring year. Documentation photos
of the bankfull events were not available from UNCC. Figure 4 shows the locations of the stage
recorders.
' Cross-Sections: Two permanent cross-sections were installed per 1,000 linear feet of stream restoration
work, with one located at a riffle cross-section and one located at a pool cross-section. Twenty-four total
cross-sections were established. Each cross-section was marked on both banks with permanent pins to
' establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark was used for cross-sections and consistently
referenced to facilitate comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-sectional survey included
points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge of water, and
' thalweg, if the features are present. Riffle cross-sections were classified using the Rosgen stream
classification system (Rosgen, 1994). Permanent cross-sections for 2007 (Year 1) were surveyed in
October 2007.
' Longitudinal Profiles: A representative longitudinal profile was surveyed for 2007 (Year 1). The initial
3000 linear feet of profile was collected for the mainstem reaches of UTland UT2. The entire lengths of
UT1B, UT1C, UT1C, and UT2A were also surveyed. Measurements included thalweg, water surface,
bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of these measurements was taken at the head of each feature (e.g.,
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 12
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Cl Idol
------- LEGEND EEP Contract No.: D05016-1 Figure d: Stage Recorder
---- Locations
.r O Crest Gauges -- - Creeks
As-built Alignments - Roads Beaverdam Creek

Os Ste11l
Project Watershed Boundary Year 1 Monitoring

Mecklenburg Count NC
k' 11 1`11('1
D
b
2007
ecem
er

' riffle, pool, glide). In addition, maximum pool depth was recorded. All survey was tied to a single
permanent benchmark.
' Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts were conducted for the permanent cross-sections (100 counts per
cross-section) on the project reaches. Pebble count data were plotted on a semi-log graph and are
included in Appendix B.
' Photo Reference Stations: Photographs were used to visually document restoration success. Fifty-one (51)
reference stations were established to document conditions at the constructed grade control structures
' across the Site. These photos are provided in Appendix A. The GPS coordinates of each photo station
were noted as additional reference to ensure the same photo location was used throughout the monitoring
period. These stations are included in the As-built Plan Sheets in Appendix C. Reference photos were
taken once per year.
' Each streambank was photographed at each permanent cross-section photo station. For each streambank
photo, the photo view line followed a survey tape placed across the channel, perpendicular to flow
' (representing the cross-section line). The photograph was framed so that the survey tape is centered in the
photo (appears as a vertical line at the center of the photograph), keeping the channel water surface line
horizontal and near the lower edge of the frame. These photos are presented along with the cross-section
monitoring data in Appendix B.
' 3.2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
' The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream restoration success:
• Bankfull Events: Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five-year monitoring
period. The two bankfull events must occur in separate years.
' • Cross-Sections: There should be little change in as-built cross-sections. If changes to channel cross-
section take place, they should be minor changes representing an increase in stability (e.g., settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
' • Longitudinal Profiles: The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining
stable (not aggrading or degrading). The pools should remain deep with flat water surface slopes and
the riffles should remain steeper and shallower than the pools.
• Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts should indicate maintenance of bed material.
• Photo Reference Stations: Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or
' degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel, no excessive
bank erosion or increase in channel depth over time, and maturation of riparian vegetation.
' 3.3 Bankfull Discharge Monitoring Results
' On-site data loggers documented the occurrence of one bankfull flow event during the first year (2007) of
the post-construction monitoring period (Table 8). During the bankfull occurrence data logger BD2 was
inoperable, so BD1 on Beaverdam Creek, upstream of the confluence with UT1, was used to document
' the bankfull event. UNCC inspection of the Site revealed visual evidence of out-of-bank flow,
confirming the data logger reading. The largest stream flow documented by the data loggers during Year
1 monitoring were a stage height of 2.75 feet for BD1 and 0.84 feet for BD3.
' Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 13
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events

1
1
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Date of Occurence of Method of Gage
Station Number Date of Data Collection Data Height
Bankfull Event
Collection (feet)
BD1 N/A 2/13/2007 Datalogger 2.75
BD3 N/A 2/14/2007 Datalogger 0.84
BD2 was out of order on the date of the bankfull event
3.4 Stream Monitoring Data and Photos
A photo log of the project showing each of the fifty-one (51) permanent photo locations is included in
Appendix A of this report. Survey data and photos from each permanent cross-section are included in
Appendix B of this report.
' 3.5 Stream Stability Assessment
Table 9 presents a summary of the results obtained from the visual inspection of in-stream structures
' performed during Year 1 of post-construction monitoring. The percentages noted are a general overall
field evaluation of how the features were performing after the repair work had been completed at the time
of the last photo point survey on November 21, 2007. These percentages are solely based on the field
evaluator's visual assessment at the time of the site visit.
Visual observations of the various structures throughout Year 1 growing season indicated that structures
' were functioning as designed and holding their elevation grade. Root wads placed on the outside of
meander bends provided bank stability and in-stream cover for fish and other aquatic organisms. Cover
logs placed in meander pool areas allowed scour to keep pools deep and provide cover for fish.
The result of a large storm event that produced 3.5 inches of rain on the project site shortly after
construction was completed resulted in a few minor scour areas along UTl. Scour was evident
immediately underneath a few cover log and log vane structures resulting in a minor decrease in
performance. This was observed at stations 41+50, 53+80, 56+00, 56+50, and 63+90. In addition,
isolated pockets of bed scour, resulting in a performance score of 99%, were also observed at stations
50+15, 56+00, 56+50, and 63+90. All of the areas of scour are minor and should not result in any future
problems with stream stability.
Table 9. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Beaverd am Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
Performance Percentag e
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwe 100% 100% p
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 99%
Vanes / J Hooks etc. 100% 97%
Wads and Boulders

100%
L

100%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
14

1

1

3.6 Cross-section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results
Cross Sections
Year 1 cross-section monitoring data for stream stability was collected during October 2007 and
compared to as-built conditions (collected March 2007).
The twenty four permanent cross-sections along the restored channels (twelve located across riffles and
twelve across pools) were re-surveyed to document stream dimension at the end of the first monitoring
year (Year 1). Cross-sections are provided in Appendix B, and data from the cross-sections are
summarized in Appendix E. The cross-sections show that there has been minor adjustment to stream
dimension within the last year.
A few cross-sections show point bar formation along UT1 and include cross-sections 3, 10, 11, and 13,
which are located across pools found at the apex of a meander bend. Flow through a meander bend
possesses higher conveyance velocity along its boundary with the outer bank of the bend, and lower flow
velocity along its boundary with the bend's inner bank. As flow reduces, its sediment transport capacity
also reduces, causing flow to drop some of its transported sediment as it slows down. Point bar formation
along the inside of a meander bend indicates flow velocity vectors occurring as designed, and is therefore
expected. Cross-section 10 has slightly aggraded along the outside bank of a meander. This channel
geometry reflects a plug of sediment deposited during the large storm event that occurred shortly after
construction was completed. Drought conditions haven't allowed flow to correct channel geometry in
this meander bend.
Longitudinal Profiles
The Year 1 longitudinal profile was conducted during November 2007. The initial 3,000 LF of channel
was surveyed along the mainstem of UT1 and UT2. The entire lengths of UT1B, UT1C, UT1D, and
UT2A were also collected. The longitudinal profile is included in Appendix B. A summary of
parameters measured are provided in Appendix D. Please note that this summary represents only the
portion of project that was surveyed.
The representative longitudinal profiles along the restored channels were resurveyed to document stream
profile at the end of monitoring Year 1. Drought conditions resulted in little to no water within the
restored channels and therefore profile data such as riffle slopes and pool-to-pool spacing could not be
calculated. Sinuosity for all restored reaches has remained the same and there's been no measurable
change in stream pattern. Though there was some minor areas of bed scour, as mentioned in Section 3.5
of this report, none of the areas need to be addressed, at this time, nor should result any future problems.
Inspections of these areas will be performed in subsequent monitoring periods.
Bed Material Analysis
Year 1 bed material samples were collected at each permanent cross-section during October 2007. The
pebble count data were plotted on a semi-log graph and will be compared with future monitoring data.
Data should indicate a relative coarsening of the riffles (or maintenance of a coarse bed in constructed
riffles) and a relative fining in the pools. All pebble count data are provided in Appendix B.
3.7 Areas of Concern
Adjacent to the Site's property boundaries are new residential developments under construction. During
Year 1 Monitoring, several Best Management Practices (BMPs) were noted as areas of concern within
and immediately outside the conservation easement along UT2 and UT2A of the Restoration Project.
The BMPs consist of both temporary and permanent detention ponds which are discharging stormwater
into the Project Site, and a retaining wall. Locations of the BMPs are shown on the as-built plans
included in Appendix C.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 15
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Currently, none of the BMPs are causing any significant degradation of the restored channels; however,
' discharge from the BMP adjacent to Station 20+00 along UT2 has caused some minor headcutting below
the riffle at the log sill. See Appendix A for photo documentation of the BMP structure and the in-stream
impact.
' Monitoring of these areas of concern will continue throughout the Project's monitoring period and will be
discussed accordingly.
' 4.0 HYDROLOGY
1

1

Rainfall data were collected to document the hydrologic conditions throughout the project area in the
2007 growing season. Since no rain gauges were installed within the project boundaries, monthly rainfall
totals were calculated from data downloaded from the Withers Cove USGS gauge 35090308100454 in
Mecklenburg County, NC. Historical rainfall data were collected from the Charlotte WSO AP WETS
Station in Mecklenburg County (NC 1690) using NRCS National Water and Climate Data Center web-
site. Hydrologic monitoring results are shown in Table 10 and Figure 5.
Table 10. Comparison of Historic Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: EEP Contract No. D05016-1

Month
Average (in.)
30% (in.)
70% (in.) Observed 2007
Preci itation (in.)
January 4.00 3.21 5.15 3.25
February 3.55 2.34 4.42 1.88
March 4.39 3.01 5.54 3.93
April 2.95 1.98 3.73 3.51
May 3.66 2.33 4.29 0.61
June 3.42 2.43 4.68 3.18
July 3.79 2.49 4.76 1.72
August 3.72 2.34 4.57 0.56
September 3.83 2.00 4.68 1.11
October 3.66 1.80 4.49 0.41
November 3.36 2.51 4.24 -
December 3.18 2.11 3.81 -
Total Rainfall 43.51 28.55 54.36 20.16*
(USDA, 2003 and USGS, 2007)
A Monthly rainfall data was calculated based on rainfall data from 10/1/07 - 10/23/07 using the nearest USGS rain gauge
data (USGS 35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg County) to the project site. (USGS, 2007)
*Total Observed Rainfall does not include data from October 23 - 31, November, nor December of 2007.
' Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
16
Figure 5. Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
Comparison of Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
_ 6.00 -Average
a 5.00 - -
4.00 - -
30%
M-A
3.00

70%n
2.00
a 1.00 observed tom
0.00 Precipitation

Month
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Vegetation Monitoring. Vegetation monitoring efforts have calculated the range of stems per acre
for each plot to be from 440 to 1000 stems per acre on the 24 vegetation plots. The average
number of stems per acre is 572, which is a survival rate of greater than 91%, based on the initial
planting count of 625 stems per acre. Assuming that preventative methods will be used to
maintain the invasive exotics, vegetation survivability should remain excellent on the Site and
vegetative success criteria will be met.
Stream Monitoring. The total length of stream channel restored and/or preserved on the Site was
15,806 linear feet. This entire length was inspected during Year 1 of the monitoring period
(2007) to assess stream performance. Based on the data collected, all riffles, pools, and other
constructed features along the restored channel are stable and functioning as designed. Minor bed
scour was noted at isolated pockets along UTl. The lack of major problem areas along the length
of the restored channels after the occurrence of a stream flow event larger than bankfull discharge
further supports functionality of the design. It is expected that stability and in-stream habitat of
the system will improve in the coming years as permanent vegetation becomes more established.
6.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS
Observations of deer and raccoon tracks are common on the Site. During certain times of the year, frogs,
turtles, turkey, and fish have also been periodically observed.
7.0 REFERENCES
Radford, Albert E., Harry E. Ahles, and C. Ritchie Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 17
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Resource Management Group, Inc. 1999. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands.
' Dickinson Press, Inc., Grand Rapids, MI..
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
' Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
' 2006. Soil Series Descriptions. http://soils.usda.gov/soils/technical/classification/osd/index.html
USDA, NRCS. 2003. Climate Information for Mecklenburg County in the State of North Carolina (1971-
2000). TAPS Station : CHARLOTTE WSO AP, NC1690
ftp://ftp.wcc.nres.usda. og v/support/climate/taps/nc/37119.txt
I USDA, NRCS. 2007. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda. ov, 28 November 2007). National Plant
Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.
' U.S. Geological Service (USGS). 2007. Real-Time Data for North Carolina - Precipitation USGS Water-
Data Site Information for North Carolina. USGS 35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg
County, NC. Retrieved on 2007-10-25 12:30:56 EDT
' http://waterdata.usg_s.2ov/nc/nwis/current/?type=precip&2roup key=county cd
' Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 18
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

1

1
1

1
1

1

APPENDIX A
Photo Log

PHOTO LOG - UTI
UTI - PID I
a ? ? 11y? ? K -'t
n?aY Y 1 p?.b'
„? { ?yv
s
+? s r ?'y'
?,
t:
;All

' A
°°°°PPPP r
UTI-PID3
z0t ",.k
WO
? ??i. P rc µY > 7. ?iuu.i:? ?f T ? ?
K i
UTI - PID 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
UTI - PID 2
UTI - PID 4
UTI - PID 6
PHOTO LOG - UTI

P
.
aM
.Gr
1

7

d? f - 1C y "?
'
J
C
C
' 4
^1 f?r2 M
?
f
'x
1
?
,
+
, ?
:
3tr r
, W! ))3 •L
5'
"rA" ..
/`sb 3 I. fir v1 yC0 } M?..Ir*3 p4Mj, { 4
,
d[
N
??
'4L
,
P 0 vl
?.•
, e?r? ? A ?
.f.-
?I
yp.3;
?,
'f ,
F I
.
l? v/1
=
??
a
?
,?
rA t L x ?" 4
}
*
6
a
y,
4
R! !` t'???R 1. ri 1v

UTI - PID 8
M
9
of d.-a .. r 1 •.r , _
i '.. :.' re ? i•P.ri. a -,';
+ 1?5i? 1 V + ? 'F ?i). 7 µ
N ?1
4 e J . ' '? RI tuM 7`?} r9tr r ....
UTI - PID 10
1 R

._
y ,rt-q
lL
q y ?? ,,,11
y
.
I A?p .g
F
, A,
,

UTI - PID 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
UT 1- PID 7
UTI - PID 9
UTI - PID 11
PHOTO LOG - UTI
&I I } r:
?? M1Y?j 1?
? a
f
T CTJ
EEA ?' Y?,.
t r . 4? f
xi
ft ti 1 {
k f'
a
d k ` 1
i xx i,
k; t r
UTI - PID 13
k? t
?< s ;!fig ??""t? J ;;?I{ ,ra rr f
UTI - PID 15
p f 1 T?4?'.
?
X?}'t
R,p}y/ Yii r . ?}.L w Y!I
:
i Sw?t-: ? ttY. y d? ?r ylp1
z,?.,•?''? s „?3 ,..? . _ Wit.
UTI - PID 17

UT1- PID 14
.
UTI - PID 16
!F ,
??* ?„ ???;:. ?; y??'t?i'• ? ???? Sri r ''mss
Sii
tl2r'r.?f^? 1 - It l l,\'k ? yt?
UTI - PID 18
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UT1
UT1- PID 19

- 14,
< .c ? y
UT1- PID 21
1-4
c? i4s
UT1- PID 23
1
6. ,+Vyr? Y?? Y
1
?? '' ,+ ? xar?Bys 't r 1
l N, 7 d qN a` `
404
UT1- PID 22
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT1- PID 20
PHOTO LOG - UT1B, UT1C, & UT1D
4i
Ju
4-'? 'k FFlg{_t :, ^3 ds°'ayyr M,+l•r} ?'?slf''1
J .?rP"'g .? ? r max al af? 7- ?,?atj
?t! r'
P F?..Q .' 1, k`. ., .\ ._i ?___. ltl?w,'A??• .;..? ?• ?
UT1B - PID I
F 1} 1J ' I f m /+r
4.r:? . ?YTSIAt• t}Ay Y F+
y ?1;•+ - fib,, ,?A+?.,? ??f?? ','??
-41 1
UT1B - PID 3
3 wk] .
' f#,'• a `f5 s ;1 X,
J' ? Js 1?s?G
lf7 ? yak`-_:i.,x .'r..-
UT1B - PID 2
11 Til Firm
o s ?•? 1
/
J .Y. J ' r r'"4'?'?yq?Fy,`?y!gPM?"? +?' ? 9? `? ?F • f "?:
,y xi b
g c4 t I ,t. a'U u
UT1B - PID 4
it wr } a < tis , r„
! •'3t ' ? 0?? ?,4 ?t tr ?rp"?rltiSaY rd? -Y
UT1C - PID 6
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT1B - PID 5
PHOTO LOG - UTIB, UTIC, & UTID
M
3 ?
f'

s
d, , i•.

.? t

^ &x ` + T J

I.? A
wyl

?' Al

UTIC - PID 7
t
1{ ; s a
n

UTIC - PID 9
UTID - PID I I
UTIC - PID 8

UTID - PID 10
. ??c?C'*•''„ "s 3a . ? i of v • '
tNt?
3 Nr , a by 'Zs id{,}
C.1 „rg. J i r ]t
T ?,?e?6• a i
1.'qZ. .1k•?'`'I'r +b" '. t X14 r`{? <'` ?:. 1'?' I ,{'T?•;y ?,
41
v 3N rater
UTID - PID 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
UT2 - PID 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
t
?

t
i

^ ,4v a^ ??.A v ??+IM i
4, 6

UT2 - PID 4
UT2 - PID 6
UT2 - PID I
UT2 - PID 2
172 - PID 3
PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A

V N h
r i.'!9
r

t„ ;
/ A li
a.
41
w c I
+

UT2 - PID 7
,. w
?
S R2 ih? g t i
#' .?ALt ?tv 1?
.
f
' ?.,
.
+M
w ?. ,h
a
kt ? .
j

UT2 - PID 9

UT2 - PID 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT2 - PID 8
UT2 - PID 10
UT2 - PID 11
PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
t

UT2A - PID I

uv l^ T f?I
F ,.

q'

x,
i
` ?? r
h 4
q¢

UT2A - PID 3

UT2A - PID 2
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT2A - PID 4
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT1 & UT1B - UT1D
N,F
?? ?+•??.?. 'rte ?! ?.??'? _
we 4
UT1- Veg Plot 1

W

}
a
?

j
t
? F
r is?t ?.
?
W47
?k

rK
.
UTI - Veg Plot 3
1 t
p?
'IA
>,
3F • y r(a'{ t
te
} Y ems; ?,? „ `?.
UT1- Veg Plot 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
tF !
l
r ?S r { Y 1 + r.
? , `? `"i Sta. t ,.i•
' ?.
V.-I
UT1- Veg Plot 4

y i r 1? '
µ
S
ya py?Y y? ?, r { F
a
p
?t
Y
n
Ak
a ?'- v?}ti 1'ua a #a} 'X s
A

? cy Rr
A r Q
9 7r - «, L 6;C

UTI - Veg Plot 6
UT1- Veg Plot 2
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT1 & UT1B - UT1D
UT1- Veg Plot 7
UT1- Veg Plot 9
UT1- Veg Plot 8
UT1- Veg Plot 10

4
..
r '
?K
4
?
r dry,
.
4
a XPS

/F SA c '
S

is I ?r

UTI - Veg Plot 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT1- Veg Plot 11
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UTI & UT1B - UT1D

: l ?r
47
f. J w5? 1 ? f ? ??• ,y ???1 r
UT1B - Veg Plot 15

1
? °
'
4 1y,' Q
1 !vy ". #
q ; 5 y
:
i r
k 'i ie n

UT1D - Veg Plot 17
Y
N?
s r
i
tiY r a ' ?
r
UT1C - Veg Plot 16
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT1- Veg Plot 13
UTI - Veg Plot 14
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT2 & UT2A
.* ; ,
tv: V '01 f
!
UT2A - Veg Plot I
UT2 - Veg Plot 3

jii

ht

44

UT2 - Veg Plot 6
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
UT2A - Veg Plot 2
UT2 - Veg Plot 4
UT2 - Veg Plot 5
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT2 & UT2A
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
UT2 - Veg Plot 7
1
1
AREA OF CONCERN PHOTOS
PHOTO LOG - UT2 at STATION 20+00
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Detention Pond -Adjacent
to UT2 at STA 20+00
Beginning headcut below
riffle at STA 20+00 on UT2
APPENDIX B
I STREAM MONITORING DATA

UT1 Mainstem Profile (2007 Monitoring)
610
605
600
g 595
c
0
m
w 590
585
580
575
Station (ft)
m m m m m s i m m m m m m m m m m m m
UT1 B Profile (2007 Monitoring)
608-
606
604
F 602
c
0
ea
d
W 600
598
596
.
¦
..
. . . . i
¦
No.
¦
•a
594
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Station (ft)

UT1 C Profile (2007 Monitoring)
600
598
596
F 594
c
0
?o
d
w 592
590
588
586-
Station (ft)
? ? ? ? I? ? I? ? ? ? ? I? ? I? ? il• ? I? ?
UT1C Profile (2007 Monitoring)
w
591
590
589
588
587
586
co
m
585
584
583
582
581
Station (ft)

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X1-Pool (Reach 1)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
I DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 100 100% 100%
's Very Fine .063-125 100%
S ( Fine .125-25 100%
a
. ' t A
Medium
.25-50
100%
D Coarse .50-1.0 100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
00 Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
G
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 100%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 100%
O E
( Medium 11.0-16.0 100%
V L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
7 O ?Cn Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
29?6 Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc
' December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reach 1)
X1 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% --?- Riffle Data
80% - -77
70%
60%
m
c

50%
m
m
IL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: IJT1 X2-Riffle (Reach 1)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 10 10% 10%

i Very Fine .063-125 10%
r
S ` Fine 125-25 10%
A
Ns
D Medium

Coarse .25-50

.50-1.0 10%

10%

------------- Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 10%
1 Very Fine 2.0-2.8 10%
30 Very Fine 2.8-4.0 10%
O Fine 4.0-5.6 1 1% 11%
G
R

C
Fine
5.6-8.0
11%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 11%
V
E

C
Medium
11.0-16.0
1
1 %
12%
L
O Coarse 16.0-22.6 12%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 10 10% 22%
7 O Q?n Very Coarse 32 - 45 32 32% 54%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 25 25% 79%
0 Small 64 - 90 12 12% 91%
2 Small 90 - 128 9 9% 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reach 1)
X2 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100% -
90% -?- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
d
c
LL
c 50%
d
d
IL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

I

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 B X3-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 37 37% 37%
i°
? Very Fine .063-125 3 3% 40%
S Fine .125-25 29 29% 69%
A
N E Medium .25-50 20 20% 89%
D Coarse .50-1.0 11 11% 100%
$ Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 100%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 100%
E
C Medium 11.0-16.0 100%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
n O Q0n Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
0 2M Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BO LDER Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:

(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 B
X3 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% -4 Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
m
c
LL
c 50%
d
CL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000
10000

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
1

BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 B X4-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 77 77% 77%
Very Fine .063-125 77%

S Fine 125-25 11 11% 88%
A
N "
D Medium

Coarse 25-50

.50-1.0 11

1 11%

1 % 99%

100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%

O
CO,
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
100%
I qop? F Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
G
R

C
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 100%
V
E

4
(
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
L -

C C
oarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
OQC? Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
9E Small 64 - 90 100%
2 Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
? ? ? l? l? ? ? ? ? l? li• l? l? li• ? l? ? I? I?
Beaverdam Creek UT1 B
X4 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
--
100%- 111111111
90% -?- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
m
c

c 50%
d
d
CL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

1
1

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X5-Riffle (Reach 2-5)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
I DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 5 5% 5%
Very Fine .063-125

S Fine .125-25 5%
A Medium 25-50 5%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
2%
7%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 1 1 % 8%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 2 2% 10%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 1 1 % 11%
O Fine 4.0-5.6
1
1%
12%
?
R Fine 5.6-8.0 1 1% 13%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 1 1% 14%
V
E

C
Medium
11.0-16.0
1
1%
15%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 15%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 9 9% 24%
n OOnn(? Very Coarse 32 - 45 26 26% 50%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 21 21% 71%
Small 64 - 90 15 15% 86%
Small 90 - 128 10 10% 96%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 4 4% 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2-5)
X5 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% t Riffle Data
80%-
70%
60%
m
C
U.
5 50%
d
d
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

1
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UTi X6-Pool (Reach 2-5)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 35 35% 35%
I: Very Fine .063-125 4 4% 39%

S Fine .125-25 16 16% 55%
A Medium .25-50 84 34% 89%
N
D
Coarse
Very Coarse
.50-1.0
1.0-2.0
10
10%
99%
99%
0
0 Very Fine 2.0-2.8 99%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 99%
Fine 4.0-5.6 99%
G
R

C
Fine
5.6-8.0
99%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 99%
V
E

C
Medium
11.0-16.0
99%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 99%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 1 1% 100%
n O n Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
2qE Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2-5)
X6 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100% -
90% ?-- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
c
LL
c 50%
d
d
IL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

1

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1C X7-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 10 10% 10%
Very Fine .063-125 10%

S Fine .125-25 1 1 % 11%
A
? N Medium .25-50 11%
p Coarse .50-1.0 11%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 1 1 %
Very Fine 2.0-2.8 11%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 1 1
%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 11%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 11%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 11%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 11%
L
O
C
Coarse
16.0-22.6
11%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 10 10% 21%
n O ?Cn Very Coarse 32 - 45 31 31% 52%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 19 19% 71%
0 2M Small 64 - 90 23 23% 94%
Small 90 - 128 3 3% 97%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 3 3% 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
512
M 362
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 C
X7 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100% --
90% ?- Riffle Data
80%-
70%
L 60%
m
c
U.
c 50%
m
d
CL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

1
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT

BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 C X-8 Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
I DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 72 72% 72%
Very Fine .063-125 72%

S Fine .125-25 13 13% 85%
A
N
D Medium

Coarse .25-50

.50-1.0 10 10% 95%

95%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 95%
C Very Fine 2.0-2.8 95%
qj Very Fine 2.8-4.0 95%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 95%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 95%
Q A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 95%
E
C Medium 11.0-16.0 95%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 2 2% 97%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 1 1 % 98%
n0 0n Very Coarse 32 - 45 1 1 % 99%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 99%
29E Small 64 - 90 1 1 % 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
m r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
Beaverdam Creek UT1 C
X8 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% Riffle Data
80%-
70%
60%
ar
c
LL
c 50%
m
L
d
CL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

1

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X-9 Riffle (Reach 2-5)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay <.063 10 10% 10%
Very Fine .063-1125 10%

S Fine .125-25 2 2% 12%
A Medium .25-50 12%
N
D
I
Coarse
.50-1.0
5
5%
17%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 17%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 17%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 17%
O
G Fine 4.0-5.6 17%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 17%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 17%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 2 2% 19%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 3 3% 22%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 15 15% 37%
n OOnnR Very Coarse 32 - 45 31 31% 68%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 13 13% 81%
0 2qZ Small 64 - 90 7 7% 88%
Small 90 - 128 9 9% 97%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 1 1% 98%
Large 180 - 256 2 2% 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BO LDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2-5)
X9 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% -?- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
m
c
LL
c 50%
m
d
a 40%
30%
20%
10%--
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X-10 POOI (Reach 2-5)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay <.063 64 64% 64%

i Very Fine .063-125 5 5% 69%

S Fine .125-25 8 8% 77%
s. A
^t N Medium .25-50 4 4% 81%
p Coarse .50-1.0 7 7% 88%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 88%
I Very Fine 2.0 - 2.8 88%
W
N; Very Fine 2.8-4.0 88%
G Fine 4.0-5.6 88%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 88%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 1 1% 89%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 2 2% 91%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 1 1% 92%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 3 3% 95%
O inn Very Coarse 32 - 45 4 4% 99%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 1 1 % 100%
29E Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE
<
Large
128- 180 °
100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
I?B Small
362 - 512
100%
QU
LQER Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Workds, Inc.
December 2(li)7, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
m IIIIIIIIN m m = i = = m m m = 1111111110 m = i = m IIIIIIIIIN
Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2-5)
X10 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% -+- Riffle Data
80%
70%
L 60%
as
c
U.
E 50%
d
m
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

1
1

1
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1-D X-11 Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/IE
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 61 61% 61%
Very Fine .063-125 6 6% 67%

S Fine .125-25 22 22% 89%
A Medium .25-50 89%
N
€ D
Coarse
.50-1.0
89%

t
.t
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
89%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 89%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 89%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 89%
R

C Fine 5.6-8.0
1 1% 90%
? A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 3 3% 93%
E
C Medium 11.0-16.0 1 1 % 94%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 4 4% 98%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 1 1 % 99%
n OOon(9
Very Coarse
32 - 45
1
1 %
100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
0 Rq?6 Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 D
X11 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% -?-- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
m
c
LL
c 50%
as
d
IL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000
10000

1
1

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
EB-AKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1-D X-12 Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
IDATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 2 2% 2%
Very Fine .063-125 2%
S Fine .125-25 3 3% 5%
A
$ Medium .25-50 5%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
5%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 5%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 5%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 1 1 % 6%
Fine 4.0-5.6 6%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
6%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 6%
V
E

C
Medium
11.0-16.0
1
1%
7%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 1 1% 8%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 8 8% 16%
n O ??n? Very Coarse 32 - 45 37 37% 53%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 22 22% 75%
0 Small 64 - 90 11 11% 86%
2 -4 Small 90 - 128 11 11% 97%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 3 3% 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
_R7 -
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
1 December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 D
X12 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100% --
90% -+-- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
d
C
LL
c 50%
m
d
CL 40%
30%
20%
10%--
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X-13 Pool (Reach 2-5)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt/ Clay <.063 24 24% 24%
Very Fine .063-125 24%
S Fine .125-25 17 17% 41%
A
N Medium .25-50 31 31% 72%
D Coarse .50-1.0 20 20% 92%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 1 1% 93%
WN Very Fine 2.0-2.8 93%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 93%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 93%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 93%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 1 1% 94%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 94%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 1 1 % 95%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 4 4% 99%
n O MDn Very Coarse 32 - 45 1 1 % 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
29?6 Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%

COBBLE < Large 128 - 180 100/
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BO
ULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2-5)
X13 Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
90% -?- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
d
c
U.
c 50%
d
d
IL 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000 10000
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 1 st Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X-14 Riffle (Reach 2-5)
DATE COLLECTED: 10/15/2007
FIELD COLLECTION BY: RR/1E
DATA ENTRY BY: IE
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 10 10% 10%

a Very Fine .063-125 10%

S Fine .125-25 12 12% 22%
A Medium .25-50 12 12% 34%
N
k D
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
2%
36%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 36%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 36%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 36%
O
G Fine 4.0-5.6 36%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 2 2% 38%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 38%

O V
E
Medium
11.0-16.0
2
2%
40%
U L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 4 4% 44%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 8 8% 52%
n o Din Very Coarse 32 - 45 14 14% 66%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 16 16% 82%
0 29?6 Small 64 - 90 8 8% 90%
Small 90 -128 10 10% 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
' December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
irr Ir iir Ir rr rr r Ir r Ir r Ir Ilr r ,? Ir liiir I. lir
Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2-5)
X14 Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100% -
90% -?- Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
d
C
U.
E 50%
m
2
as
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size (mm)
1000
10000
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X1
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

F
eature Strea
Typ m
e
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
I

R

KF Elev

OB Elev
Pool 33.1 22.14 1.49 3.13 14.82 1 3.4 599.5 599.5
X1 Pool
605 -
- -- - --
603
•----
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
601
c
0

>
599- ...................

597-

595
F - o - Bankfull o - - Floodprone 0 Year l * As Built
593

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek- NEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)
r .
y
b
y4l
j -
-i

Feature Stream
Tye
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 18.8 13.12 1.43 2.06 9.17 1 5.7 598.82 598.82
X2 Riffle
602

601
600
599
0
:r
> 598
m
W
597
596
595 0 Bankfull 0 - - Floodprone -0 Year l - As Built
594

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1. River Works, Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
r
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)
r?r r r y
G e,
;s
?? sra ?` aG

F
eature Strea
Typ m
e
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 16.4 15.32 1.07 2.31 14.29 1 4.9 599.7 599.7
X3 Pool
603 - --- - --- -
--
602 ----- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
601
600
c
0 599
eo

W 598

597
596

595 Bankfull o - Floodprone-Year 1 As Built
594

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2(9)7, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 16.5 11.83 1.39 2.33 8.5 1 6.3 599.79 599.79
X4 Riffle

603 -
--------- ------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------------
601
600
C ------------ -
o
599
m
w
598
597
596 0 - - Bankfull o - - Floodprone Year 1 -- As Built
595

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev

Riffle C/E 23.7 15.19 1.56 2.26 9.72 1 4.9 597.88 597.88
X5 Riffle
601 -

600 ---••--•-•---•----•------------------------------------•--•------•---------------••-------
599
598
0 ------------
597
m
w
596
595

594 ° Bankfull o - - Floodprone 0 Year 1 n- As Built
593

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, FFP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2(N)7, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)
Looking at the Left Bank
Str eam BKF Max BKF
Feature T ype BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 41.1 23.5 1.75 3.53 13.43 1 3.2 596.98 596.99
X6 Pool
602 - - -

600 ... ...---•-----....---•--..-..-•-•-•---•-•-•-••-• --•--•-----• ....................... ....
598
c
c
'
P
596
d i
W ?
594
592
o - - Bankfull 0 . - Floodprone 0 Year 1 X As Built
590

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X7
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

F
eature Stre
Ty am
pe
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev

Riffle B 8.8 12.04 0.73 1.09 16.49 1 5.9 594.83 594.83

X7 Riffle
597
5
. _.?
596.5

595.5 •- ---------•---•-----••----•----••--•-------•------------------ -----------------
C
0
m

94.5
w
593.5

592.5
o - - Bankfull o - - Floodprone -? Year l --As Built

591
5
.
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X8
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Tye
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 31.6 13.56 2.33 3.24 5.82 1 5.5 593.41 593.41
X8 Pool
599 -
--- - --------- -----
597
595
c
o_

593
m 4. 6
W
591

589
o - Bankfull > - - Floodprone -4--Year 1 -X As Built
587

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
I
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works. Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
1
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X9
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Fe
ature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Dept h
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 29.3 17.8 1.64 2.65 10.83 1 4.2 590.77 590.77
X9 Riffle
594 -- _-. ?_-._...._.-- ._.-... ------------ -

593 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
592
591 v
------- -------

eo 590
W 589

588
587

586 ° Bankfull o - - Floodprone 0 Year 1 -4 As Built
585

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Reaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X10
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Pool
593
592
591
590
c 589
:r0
> 588
m
w 587
586
585
584
583

;F Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOR Elt
22.23 2.02 3.34 11.03 1 3.4 588.69 588.7
X10 Pool
`G---- ----'-------•------------- ---------------•-------------------------------------------A
o Bankfull o - - Floodprone --*--Year 1 -X As Built
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X11
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)
X11 Pool
593

592
591
590 - - -

589 <-
w 588
587 ,
586
585 o Bankfull o - . Floodprone --*--Year 1 -# - As Built
584

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1. River Works, Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X12
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Strea
Type m
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 9.2 12.67 0.73 1.07 17.46 1 6 589.02 589.03
X12 Riffle
590
5 - --
. - - -
590
589.5
0 589 -- ------------
588.5
w
588

587.5 X-
587 0 - Bankfull o - - Floodprone --? Year 1 -As Built
586
5
.
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Rcaverdam Creck. FIT Contract No. D050 16- 1. River Works. Inc.
December 2007. Moniloring Year I - Draft
1
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X13
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Str
Ty eam
pe
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 71.7 29.99 2.39 5.33 12.55 1 3 586.89 586.89
X13 Pool
594

592 ---- -----------------•-•-•-- -------------......... ..-------------------------------------
590
588
- -
C
M

> 586 .........
..--..-..--..--_
.

W
584
582
580 o Bankfull o - - Floodprone --*--Year 1 - R-- As Built
578

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1. River Works, Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X14
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 37.9 19.09 1.99 3.07 9.61 1 3.9 584.86 584.87
X14 Riffle
589 - -- --
-
-
-
588 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o
587
586
u 585
.2 ---------------------

584
d
w 583
582
581

580 ° - Bankfull o - -Floodprone -Year 1 As Built
579

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Reaverdam Creek, HT Contract No. 1)0 f016-1. River Works. Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X15
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 59.7 26.86 2.22 4.05 12.1 1 2.9 579.57 579.57
X15 Riffle
586 -
- - -- ---------- -
584
--------------••---------.....-----•---....-..----------........------------•-------•----
582
0 580

m .............................
W 578
576
574
o - - Bankfull o - - Floodprone --*--Year 1- As Built
572

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
I
Beaverdam Creek, I'IT Contract No. D05016- 1. River Works, Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Drafi
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X16
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Dept h W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 36.8 20.92 1.76 3.44 11.88 1 2.5 576.7 576.7
X16 Pool
582 -------
580 .......................................•--••--- -----------..........--------.......-•-••o
578
c
0
576
m ?
W
574
572

o Bankfull o . • Floodprone Year 1 As Built
570-
1 1
100 110 120 130 140 150
Station
lieaverdam Creek. 14FP Contract No. D05016-1. River Works. Inc.
1 December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X17
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

F
eature Strea
Typ m
e
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
De th
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 33.2 27 1.23 2.51 21.94 1 2.5 573.79 573.79
X17 Pool
577 --- -
--- - -- ----

576 ----•----------------••------••-•------••-••-•- -------•-•-------• ---•---------•--•-•-----o
575 ---? ?

574

----

-----
- ?

0 --
------

573
m
W
572
e
571
570 0 - - Bankfull o - - Floodprone + Year l - X- As Built
569

100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Station
Beaveo lain Creek, IIT Contract No. DO i016-1. River Works. Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Dratt
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X18
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 34.7 22.49 1.54 2.66 14.59 1 3.6 574.12 574.11
X18 Pool
578 --------- -----._._ -
--- - _._ ??_--- --
577
576
575
c - + -.
574 ----••--------•---------
w 573
572
571

570 0 - Bankfull o - - Floodprone -? Year 1 As Built
569

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05010-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Ilr r Ir i?r r r Ir Ir irr r r r Ir Ir r Ir r Illr Ir
UT2 Mainstem Profile (2007 Monitoring)
640
630
620
F 610
c
0
ca
d
w 600
590
580
570
0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Station (ft)
Ilr Ir Ir Ir r r s r r r r Ilr Ir r r? r r r
UT2A Profile (2007 Monitoring)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Station (ft)
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

«'i Rtt
a „

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 20.4 20.12 1.01 1.93 19.83 1 2 611.43 611.43
X2 Pool
614 -----
-
-
------ -- -- - ------ -
613
612
c

611
m
W
610
609
O - - Bankfull o - • Floodprone t Year 1 -- As Built

608
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. 205016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)
^i Rl-j
y?r

r'af°j;'w

Feature Stream

T e

BKF Area

BKF Widt

h BKF

De th Max
BKF
De

/D

BH Ratio

ER

BKF Elev

TOB Elev
Riffle C 10.9 16.14 0.67 ±
1. .92 1 2.5 623.07 623.07
X3 Riffle
625 -- --- --
-
624 ----- --- ----------------- ---------------------

.2
? 623 ----------- - - - -------- - -- -
m
W
622 - -
o Bankfull o - Floodprone 0 Year l -x- As Built
621

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2(X)7. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Fe
ature Str
Ty eam
e
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 25.8 20.88 1.24 2.46 16.9 1 1.9 619.54 619.3
X4 Pool
623
622
---- -----------------------------------------------------•------...-..-------------------o
621
620. -

o -------• ....................................
:r
619
m
W
618 ?^-
I
617
616
o Bankfull o Floodprone -4--Year 1 -x- As Built
615

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdarn Creek. FY.P Contract No. D05016-1. River Works. Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth

W/D

BH Ratio

ER

BKF Elev

TOB Elev
Riffle C 22.6 16.63 1.36 1.92 12.23 1 2.4 585.91 585.92
X5 Riffle
588 -

---------
--------------------- - ---- -------
----------------------------------- ---------------
---------------------------
587
586 • -••
c
0
M
585
d
'
w
584
583
O Bankfull o - -Floodprone --0 Year l x As Built
582

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works. Inc.
December 2(9)7, Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Lett Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 1 Monitoring Data - collected October 2007)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
De th
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev

Pool 23.2 14.04 1.65 2.55 8.5 1 2 583.52 583.52

X6 Pool
587 - -----v- -- -- -- -- -
---- --- -
586 --------- ------------------------------------------------------
585
584
------------------
583

w
582
x'
581
580
L o Bankfull o Floodprone --0 Year l --As Built
579

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works. Inc.
December 2007. Monitoring Year I - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank

APPENDIX C
AS-BUILT PLAN SHEETS
0
W ?? Q1
_W
P4
0
P13
P
Q?
A
Q?
i?
DIXIE RIVER ROAD
Q
A
C) CENTER OF I
PROJECT jj
90 !i W
}
1
?9 p
1
O
L?
?Z
1
n
o?
W ?
R ?? jON R0PO O
or
k o?rr,
ROq? ?qNp
500 500 1000
VICINITY MAP
SCALE (FT)
BEAVERDAM CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
AS-BUILT PLANS
WITH BIVIP LOCATIONS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. FEET NO.
108528 T,
PROJECT ENGINEER
(
\ KLT
P APPROVED BY
WAH
O 1
10/11/200
INDEX OF SHEETS
TITLE SHEET T1
LEGEND T2
REFERENCE SHEET R1-R4
AS-BUILT PLANS P1-P23
CENTER OF PROJECT:
LAT: 35-10-21.7
LONG: 80-59-08.5
UT1
PRE-PROJECT STREAM LENGTH = 8,148 LF
AS-BUILT STREAM RESTORATION LENGTH = 8,617 LF
UT2
PRE-PROJECT STREAM LENGTH = 4,016 LF
AS-BUILT STREAM RESTORATION LENGTH = 4,377 LF
PRESERVATION LENGTH = 962 L F
BEAVERDAM CREEK
PRESERVATION LENGTH = 1,641 LF
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
TITLE SHEET
REFERENCE SHEET
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT1
too S0 100 CALE (FT) 200 BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
10528 R2
PROJECT ENGINEER
KLT
P APPROVED BY
WAH
O DALE
10/11/2007
mom
UT1 REACH 4 UT1 REACH 5 •`• ? I' 000
'I •, fi
P7 ----------- ------
\ \ \`\\ p8 i - :±?3An \ 90
?.
p9
•\
------ - ---------- -- -------- - ------
FLOW ?-? r,` FUo
~ I
100 100 2100
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT1 \\ SCALE (FT)
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
REFERENCE SHEET
L juth 2ISC AS-IUIT-KMSHEETS-NU-b.v./p Oel 11. 2007
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
108528 r R3
PROJECT ENGINEER
KLT
P APPROVED BY
n waH
O DATE
10/11/2007
P20 +
' P17 FLOW /?-? UT2 REACH 51
X, P1 s
JO \ UT2 REACH
l % o ?, r r l
w r f
rn Z ? r f /;
0
o r f --
,.
a: o r r
loo loo zoo
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT2 SCALE (FT)
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
REFERENCE SHEET
Il: mFcts02BYC Wqn AS-BUILT-PLANSHEETS-with-bmp.dwq Oct 11, 2007
?P
Q
PROPOSED BEREWICK
_ ,j,enNS PARK
FLOW /\?-?
--- -----------------------
1', 1 1

1
1 I
I ~
? t
? I l
1
I 1
I 1
I
1,
1
%

?. m,° me mn \ 1111 a 1
I
UT2A REACH I
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT2
UT2A
100 0 100 200
SCALE (FT)
n
1
ry 1
1,1 \
N
tO \
i
1
1
N
A 11
I
1
(1 I
u ?
1
,
I
1 11
I
7 11
D. SHEET NO.
PROJECT ENfinEER
KLT
APPROWD BY
WAH
DATE
10/11/2007
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
REFERENCE SHEET

KLT
APPROVED BY
WAH
O DATE

MATCHLINE - SHEET P13 - STA 14+58
1` \ U 60th` _ $ \\?\
03314 I - \
\`009--_
?I
+1 ?
H
a ?

10/11/2007
1111 ? T __ <F`i /,
f ?1?4? 1DO
LLJ
Z
a V)
1
-600, 00 \ -009--
F-
PHOTO POINT 1
Un-t
? PHOTO POINT eoo-
x UTl-3 u ' - _605.".1
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 3
1 REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT.
TAX 14117112 / 3 1
D8 14350 PG 408
DIXIE RIVER ROAD
1 /3 I
I 3/ 3
3 /
3 / ; I 20 20 40
3 /
.3 I SCALE FT
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
UT1/UT1-B SITE PLAN
I
3- 3 3_ 3- 3_ 3
i
3\
3 \
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
108528 SHEET 140.
P3
PROJECT ENGINEER

KLT
APPROVED BY
WAH
O DATE
10/11/2007
I r.? .,?n.tr.

a
a
r
w
w
x
N
w
z
U
F_
a
SCALE (FT)
F BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS -BUILT WITH BMPS
MATCHLINE - SHEET P4 - STA 26+81
UT1 SITE PLAN
13?
3 ? MECKLENBURG COUNTY
REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT.
3 TAX 14117112
DB 14350 PG 408
\ 3 DIXIE RIVER ROAD
3
3
? \ 3
3
4 \ 3\
PROJECT ENONEER

KLT
P APPROVED BY
WAH
O DATE
10/11 2007
O
n
I`'1
r
(D
a
w
w
w
z
x
U
r
20 20 40
SCALE (FT)
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
' JUT1/UT1-C SITE PLAN
PROJECT REEEREN(I NO. SHEET NO.
108528 P6
PROJECT ENGINEER
X
\ KlT
?
P APPROVED AY
WAH
O DATE

/2
1
10/11/2007

Mq rah( f\ .
S,
\\ E `E\\
E \E
co
0
N
a
n
a
w
w
x
rn
w
z
x
U
F
a
SCALE
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
UT1/UT1-D SITE PLANT
MATCHLINE - SHEET P15 - STA 12+16
\
,
,
/ MECKLENBUR COUNTY X
/ REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT.
TAX 14117112
/ DB 14350 PC 408
/
DIXIE RIVER ROAD /
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
108528 P
PROJECT ENGINEER

\ KLT
APPROVED BY
\ n
P WAH
O
DATE
\ 10/111/2007

\ W.h
\ . • I",%, Tl_
Srym Awi

\
\

\
MECKLENB® COUNTY \Z3
C2 3 / REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT. -
TAX 1411711 3 ` \ 3
3 DB 14350 PC 401
DIXIE RIVER ROAD
3
3 3? 33
4G \ \ /
/ I
.1
\ a
/. - EAIiYFRN, Poa
v
\ = 1 ..
OT 09
1.J
Z
-590--- - I J?J / IQ
ffaTO / PI?IOTO t /
UTt-11 -595- - E _ E C / EPHDAUtAL POOL
F
/ E E E E --E
/ E E E E E \ \f \f \ `
E
E E E E ?-?E Q \ F \f \
F / -- .• ? -E --_E E E-=
. WILLIAM A. SHAW JR. F \ f
/ TAX 14129103 \ \ f ?I
DS 1766 PC 188
/ ADDRESS \
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
UT1 SITE PLAN
SCALE (FT)

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
108528 1 -79-
PROJECT ENGINEER
(
KLT
P APPROVED BY
WAH
O DATE
10/11/2007
MECKLENBURG COUNTY / 3 3
REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT. / 3 3
TAX 14117111 3 3
DB 1 PG 402
DIXE4RIVER ROAD 3 3 / \ 3 3
i
ss
3- 3- 3- 3?
9?
I E -E
-E
_ .-E "?E E E -E -E -E -E -E -E --E -E --
E E \
1
E -E
? E
- E E '? E \ WILLIAM A. SHAW JR.
DB 1788 PC 186
1- E TAX ADDRESS
1 \ ADDRESS
I
E -E -E --E EI
I

N
N
N
Q
F-
(n
rn
a
W
W
V)
1
Iv
z
J
U
I-
Q
SCALE (FT)
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
UT1 SITE PLAN
MpIr E/
n
1
1
--
E
E ?
d
3
3
d
d
EPIOERIL
7 POOL \
J
MATCHLINE - SHEET P10 - STA 60+91
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
108528 P
PROJECT EMQNEER

\ KLT
P APPROVED RT
WAH
O DATE
10/11/2007
20 20 40
SCALE (FT)
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
UT1 SITE PLAN
55+9?
STp/
PROJECT ENGINEER
6 KLT V
3
3? 3- 3 3 3?
3 3-
r
DIXIE RIVER L
COMPANY LLC
PAPPAS PROPERI
TAX 141171
DB 12722 PG
DIXIE RIVER R
AEBM
? i
N 524210.95
1/0715259
ELEV.- 57993
PliOip PONS
\\\\ T11-11 u
Lr)
- -
(D VEG PLOT J13 / -575-
)
<
O / F
Q_ v
w
w 1 i
S
? I
I I
ZI \\ I
S o
<I I
I I
?I?E \
E --E -E -E _E ---E _E
-I E -E --_E E
\ E ?
BURRIS®DING LLC \
TAX 14129105 \
OB 12002 PO 826 \
10827 GARRISON ROAD
P APPROVED

? WAH
\ \ DATE
O 1011/2
Sel'
3__ w,

ME rm..ra.us
I
og
?
3-_ 3
\
\ 3_ 3
D \ 3 3?
VD
i LLC 3'
3 I

12 \
\ 3
3? 3-4
O \
\ I

\ I

\
I ?
l
/
1 /
I

TO
,
\
220
,,, l
? ?ro
? ? /
?
?
Nnc„K /

- 9[9_

PHOTO PONT
?F0 PLOT p4 I
L

E
?E
?E
E ?E
E

-? E
, E
__E ___ E
007
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
20 20 4.0
SCALE (FT)
UT1 SITE PLAN
•E _E
__ P

'X
cy(i?F \
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 9ffET NO.
108528 P1
PROJECT ENGINEER
20 2O 40I
UT2 SITE PLAN
SCALE (FT)
M
0)
O
CV
Q
f-
a
w
w
x
V)
Li
z
J
2
U
H
Q
f
PROJECT REFERO
108529
?P
BELLASERA B® M1CK, LLC. O
C/o THOMAS A SAIEED JR.
/ TAX 19925111
OB 18271 PG 145
WINDY GAP ROAD
36 OUTLET PIPE WITH HEADWALL
(PIPE LOCATION APPROXIMATE)

BCP 01496

N 52110
1.0
0
7
?
? .. , .. .
E t?p
F1EV.- 86909.67
0 .

,
POOL
?4,
COMPANY''

PROJECT ENGINEER
KLT
APPROVED BY
WAH
DATE
10/11/2007
Pnw?>?a>,?sJ
I
PHOTO 10

17 AND PAPPA OPERT¢.5' 112;,
Of TAX 1 4
O Pi PHOTO ip DB 13089 PG
CN 0 1B LANE O
_ s
r =H a ` / n
N I iAX 19925101 eMF*q
I Q
DB 12629 PG 886
r
r WINDY GAP ROAD 'NNE 01722 to
d _ N 521645.54
r I E 144080660217! N¢ CON 1 2510PANY, INC.
w / 1 9 PG 902
w RIVER ROAD 0.
r r
L 7
JLLLLij
w 3 3? \ Ito
Z_ I 3?
_j
ILL)
3? \ 4 / Z
Q 3? 3 n
f I 3 ? r'P' 9 ?U
3 3 3 / _ / Q
.3 3 PHOTO 10 PONT
-
\ 3 UT2-6
_ t
fir 1,- 3? 3? 9
3
I ?? -- i \ a W __` 3_ 3 I
3 \ \ ??
- \ ?w
L ? ay
BEAVERDAM CREEK
I / AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
MATCHLINE - SHEET P23 - STA 19+72 20 20 40 1111111 y UT2/UT2-A
'w r\Pnws, > 1n bep4" Oct 1, 2007 SCALE (FT) SITE PLAN

IL
RIP RAP CHECK
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET N0.

08528
1
P19
PROJECT ENGINEER

KLT
P APPROVED BY
WAH
O DATE
10/11/2007
BELLASERA REREWICK, LLC.
c/o THOMAS A SAIEED JR.
TAX 19925111
DB 18271 PO 145
WINDY CAP ROAD
__ E E
?
? E
E E
I ?
?E
E --- E
E __ E _ E
E __- i
E
I
E --- E --- E ?

dMgp
39+00
C"I
I ? - - 7 +
f
PHOTO ID POINT to
I UT2-9 iEG PLOT #d__ M7
CNIfYUIK 1n
? ?8 I I
C"I
A
2
2111+00 #10
I /BN401ERA
+ 521767.32
3 -_ N V)
:EBAR l'I'LCEP 35
,. 916
C%q / ? _ » m
to
PHOTO iO POINT
uTZ-0
4 3- 3?
3
?
W
?
41 3
33 3
3
3- 3?
W
2
Q
I /
.3 3 w
- 3s 3? 3? Z
-3
3
3
3 3? 3? II_
UtAo
a
rn a
mC
I?
NN
-
ZH
WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
TAX 19925106
DEI 12629 PC 686
MS 33 PC 515
WINDY CAP ROAD I
_ BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BAPS
20 20 40 moomm- -SCALE (FT)
Y Rti Mln Om0.0?a Oct 11 M707 UT2 SI TE PLAN
1 PROJECT ENGINEER

\ KLT
APPROVED BY
Q' WAH
O DALE
10/11/2007
Mrfry?Ff M,Ic
. ?
I 1s4Y. AMU]

MI HOMES OF
CHARLOTTE, LLC
TAX 19925112
DB 19186 PC 179
F GLENBURN LANE

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

MATCHLINE - SHEET P21 - STA 40+05
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
SCALE
UT2 SITE PLAN
h ?
36" OUTLET PIPE WITH
RIP RAP CHECK DAM
MI HOMES OF
CHARLOTTE, LLC
TAX 19925112
DB 19186 PO 179
GLENBURN LANE
/ E E
?E ?E ?E -?E - E ?-E E /
E /
/E E ? F /E /
/ \ E
PHOTO ro POINT \i E
uTt-iz
h
off. -? "'
?P
-774
? R
3
SAR
N 5224a7.55 3?
E 1406
3
}- 3- 3
_aLi i
/ Zw WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
ra a TAX 19925106 04
Li DB 12629 PC 886 REBAR
MB 33 PC 515 N 522657.63
1405a 42
Ir W
NDY CAP ROAD
U
Ow
-e (n
210 20 40
SCALE (FT)
11
WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. INC.
- -1O ,nA
PROJECT ENGINEER
?X\ KLT
P APPROVED BY
n waH
O
DATE
10/1 1/
1/2007
WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. INC.
TAX 19925103
DB 12629 PO 902
DIXIE RIVER ROAD
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
SCALE
UT2-A SITE PLAN
/E -t ?-E ?E
?E-E E E
BCP #2360 E- E - E
-)
REBAR
E /E li
[N 522361.76 1.08
EL7MMX? REBAR
11
WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
TAX 19925103
DB 12629 PG 902
DIXIE RIVER ROAD
I
I

3-

3-
O
O 3- 3- 3- 3- 3

N
Q I
F-
N
N
N
Q
w
S
N
w
z
J
= VEO ROT /I
Q I A??
PHOTO ID POINT
UTIA-2
i
i
i
3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3
3- 3 3- 3- 3
PHOTO ID POINT
UTIA-3
PROJECT ENGINEER
KLT
<?
P APPROVED BY
WAH
DATE
O
10/11/200
7
I
3- 3- 3 3-` I
3 ?
3
3? 3 I?
n
\ 3? r
3?2
f?
I
m
/ I
T
8 8 Y I00
1
?1-? 8 I N-1
"re Roi R
O
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS-BUILT WITH BMPS
UT2-A SITE PLAN
SCALE

APPENDIX D
BASELINE STREAM SUMMARY FOR
RESTORATION REACHES

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site - UT1 (Reach 1)
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Nfemn Max
Bankfull Width (ft) 14.6 ----- 12.5 ----- ----- 13.1 -----
Floodprone Width (ft) ----- 45.0 ----- ----- 74.6 ----- ----- 74.6 -----
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ----- 1.5 ----- ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 1.4 -----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ----- 2.1 ----- ----- 2.0 ----- ----- 2.1 -----
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) ----- 21.0 ----- ----- 18.0 ----- ----- 18.8 -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- 10.0 ----- ----- 8.7 ----- ----- 9.2 -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- 3.1 ----- ----- 6.0 ----- ----- 5.7 -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 -----
Bankfull Velocity (fps) ----- 3.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- 0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ..
Radius of Curvature (ft) 0 ----- 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) 0 ----- 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- 0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0067 ----- 0.009 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
----- ----- -----
Pool Spacing (ft) ----- 43.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -
----Substrate andTTranspori Parameters
d16 / d35 / d5U / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 25 / 36 / 42 / 75 / 105
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 555 ----- ----- 567 ---- ----- 568
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.7 ----- ----- 0.7 ----- ----- 0.7
Rosgen Classification ----- Bc ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ----- 75 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- 1.02 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.05 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restorat ion Site - UT1 (Reach 2-5)
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
Din"Moo - Riffle Min Mean Max Min Mean Ma 1000 Mean lb?az
Bankfull Width (ft) 16.8 ----- 20.0 15.4 ----- 23.0 15.2 ----- 26.9
Floodprone Width (ft) ----- 100.0 ----- 74.9 ----- 80.7 74.9 ----- 80.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.7 ----- 2.0 1.7 ----- 2.1 1.5 ----- 2.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.4 ----- 2.9 2.5 ----- 4.1 2.3 ----- 4.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 28.0 ----- 40.0 25.6 ----- 26.8 23.8 ----- 59.7
Width/Depth Ratio 9.8 ----- 10.1 9.2 ----- 13.9 9.6 ----- 14.6
Entrenchment Ratio 5.0 ----- 6.0 3.4 ----- 4.9 2.9 ----- 4.9
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 -----
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 3.1 ----- 3.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 84 ----- 100 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) 34 ----- 60 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) 134 ----- 200 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio 2 ----- 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0048 ----- 0.012 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Spacing (ft) 101 ----- 120 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sabmxm?w Tmasoort - tr rs ,
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.17-25 / 0.75-37 / 30-45 / 70-85 / 110-120
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
ll 1''dl"#t#?3F

_.._ .
600 ft"C

°

.
.
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 6155 ----- ----- 5897 ----- ----- -
30,
21
Drainage Area (SM) 0.7 ----- 1.75 0.7 ----- 1.75 0.7 ----- 1.75
Rosgen Classification ----- C/E ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 105 ----- 155 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity 1.1 ----- 1.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) 0.002 ----- 0.006 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
tseaveraam Creek, EEP Contract No. DOU16-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site - UT1B
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
Obbe4slon - Riffle Min Mean . Max Min Mean Max Min Mean htaxx
Bankfull Width (ft) ----- 10.4 ----- ----- 11.1 ----- ----- 11.8 -----
Floodprone Width (ft) ---- 100.0 ----- ----- 75.0 ----- ----- 75.0 -----
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ----- 1.1 ----- ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 1.4 -----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 2.3 ----- ----- 2.3 -----
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) ----- 11.0 ----- ----- 15.3 ----- ----- 16.5 -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- 9.7 ----- ----- 8.0 ----- ----- 8.5 -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- 9.6 ----- ----- 6.8 ----- ----- 6.3 -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 -----
Bankfull Velocity (fps) ----- 4.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- 52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) 21 ----- 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) 83 ----- 104 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio
proffle ----- 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0104 ----- 0.0138 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Spacing (ft) ----- 52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
bstr*tt an 'f r$t lort Po
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- <0.063 / <0.063 / <0.063 / 0.2
/ 0.4
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 790 ----- ----- 778 ----- ----- 775
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.34 ----- ----- 0.34 ----- ----- 0.34
Rosgen Classification ----- C/E ----- ----- C ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ----- 45 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- 1.15 ----- ----- 1.1 ----- ----- 1.1 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- 0.003 ----- ----- 0.013 ----- ----- ----- -----
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restora tion Site - UT1C
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
Di tlssiott - Riffle Min Mean Max Min Mean M" Min ai Max,
Bankfull Width (ft) ----- 11.2 ----- ----- 11.0 ----- ----- 12.0 -----
Floodprone Width (ft) ---- 100.0 ----- ----- 70.2 ----- ----- 70.6 -----
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ----- 0.8 ----- ----- 0.7 ----- ----- 0.7 -----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ----- 0.9 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.1 -----
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) ----- 8.0 ----- ----- 7.8 ----- ----- 8.8 -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- 14.8 ----- ----- 15.6 ----- ----- 16.5 -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- 8.9 ----- ----- 6.4 ----- ----- 5.9 -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 -----
Bankfull Velocity (fps) ----- 3.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
?tte?-n
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0191 ----- 0.0265 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Spacing (ft) ----- 44.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 26 / 37 / 42 / 75 / 100
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
lor lrptettars
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 628 ----- ----- 616 ----- ----- 615
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.15 ----- ----- 0.15 ----- ----- 0.15
Rosgen Classification ----- B ----- ----- C ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ----- 27 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- 1.05 ----- ----- 1.1 ----- ----- 1.1 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- 0.017 ----- ----- 0.013 ----- ----- ----- -----
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restora tion Site - UT1D
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
:Ri#ll a Min mean Max Min . .. Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft) ----- 10.4 ----- ----- 11.4 ----- ----- 12.7
Floodprone Width (ft) ---- 100.0 ----- ----- 75.5 ----- ----- 75.5 -----
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ----- 0.9 ----- ----- 0.8 ----- ----- 0.7 -----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 1.1 -----
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) ----- 10.0 ----- ----- 9.0 ----- ----- 9.2 -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- 11.2 ----- ----- 14.4 ----- ----- 17.5 -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- 9.6 ----- ----- 6.6 ----- ----- 6.0 -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 -----
Bankfull Velocitv (fps) ----- 2.9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- 52 ----- ----- --- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) 21 ----- 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) 83 ----- 104 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio 8 ----- 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Spacing (ft) ----- 52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
yam. ?pyy??y???gg
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 32 / 38 / 43 / 85 / 120
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
NWIIFEORO?-"' !!W
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 352 ----- ----- 338 ----- ----- 334
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.16 ----- ----- 0.16 ----- ----- 0.16
Rosgen Classification ----- C/E ----- ----- C ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ----- 28 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- 1.15 ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 1.2 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- 0.007 ----- ----- 0.014 ----- ----- ----- -----
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
M = = M = = = = = = M = = M = r s
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site - UT2
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
lfiir> Min Wan Max Min
MOW'
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.2 ----- 15.6 16.8 ----- 16.9 16.1 ----- 16.6
Hoodprone Width (ft) 30.0 ----- 80 39.9 ----- 39.9 39.9 ----- 39.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.92 ---- 1.5 0.7 ----- 1.4 0.7 ----- 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3 ----- 2.3 1.1 ----- 2.1 1.1 ----- 1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (112) 9.9 ----- 23.9 12.2 ----- 23.4 10.9 ----- 22.6
Width/Depth Ratio 10.2 ----- 12.6 12.1 ----- 23.4 12.2 ----- 23.9
Entrenchment Ratio 2.8 ----- 5.9 2.4 ----- 2.4 2.4 ----- 2.5
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- 1 ----- 1.0
Bankfull Velocitv (fps) 4.7 ----- 5.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 20 ----- 75 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) 23 ----- 100 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) 100 ----- 300 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio 9.6 ----- 27.8 -----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0122 ----- 0.0279 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----
-----
Pool Spacing (ft) 40 ---- 105 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 26-27 / 35 / 39-39 / 53-5 9 / 95
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 3290 ----- ----- 3293 ----- ----- 3142
Drainage Area (SM) 0.1 ----- 0.3 0.1 ----- 0.3 0.1 ----- 0.3
Rosgen Classification ----- C ----- ----- C ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 48 ----- 120 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity 1.03 ----- 1.21 ----- 1.3 ----- ----- 1.3 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) 0.008 ----- 0.019 ----- 0.0138 ----- ----- ----- -----
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft
i = M = = = w = = i = = = = M = = =
Beaverdam Creek Restora tion Site - UT2A
Parameter Design As-built MY-1 (2007)
tic u - Riffle Min Mean Max Min Mean Max wit WMI Max
Bankfull Width (ft) ----- 15.6 ----- ----- 13.3 ----- ----- 12.2 -----
Floodprone Width (ft) ---- 80.0 ----- ----- 39.8 ----- ----- 39.8 -----
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 0.8 ----- ----- 0.8 -----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 1.1 -----
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) ----- 10.2 ----- ----- 10.6 ----- ----- 9.6 -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- 10.2 ----- ----- 16.6 ----- ----- 15.5 -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- 5.9 ----- ----- 3.0 ----- ----- 3.3 -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1.0 ----- ----- 1 -----
Bankfull Velocity (fps) ----- 5.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 40 ----- 55 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) 24 ----- 30 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) 100 ----- 120 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio 9.8 ----- 11.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.02 ----- 0.0273 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Spacing t ----- 57 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 26 / 30 / 35 / 53 / 78
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Channel length (ft) ----- ----- 1099 ----- ----- 1131 ----- ----- 1121
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.1 ----- ----- 0.1 ----- ----- 0.1
Rosgen Classification ----- C/E ----- ----- C ----- ----- C -----
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ----- 51 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- 1.21 ----- ----- 1.25
-----
----- 1.22 -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- 0.012 ----- ----- 0.015 ----- ----- ----- -----
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2007, Monitoring Year I - Draft

1

APPENDIX E
MORPHOLOGY AND HYDRAULIC
MONITORING SUMMARY -YEAR 1

1

Beaverdam Cree k Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
Aea1s: f averdam Cmek' '
Cross Section 1 Cross Section 2
1. Cross-Section Parameters Pool Riffle
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 M75
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 22.1 13.1
Floodprone Width (ft) 75.1 74.6
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 33.1 18.8
BF Mean Depth (ft) 1.5 1.4
BF Max Depth (ft) 3.1 2.1
Width/Depth Ratio 14.8 9.2
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 5.7
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 25.1 16.0
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.3 1.2
Substrate
d50 (mm) <0.063 42
d84 (mm) <0.063 75
II
R
h
id
P
t MY-1 2006 MY-2 2007 MY-3 2008 MY-4 2009 MY-5 20010
.
eac
w
arame
ers
e Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 540
Channel Length (ft) 568
Sinuosity 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) -
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification C
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
Reach: Beaverdam Civek UT1 (Rrscha 24)
Cross Section 5 Cross Section 6 Cross Section 9 Cross Section 10
1. Cross-Section Parameters Riffle Pool Riffle Pool
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 15.2 23.5 17.8 22.2
Floodprone Width (ft) 74.9 75.0 75.09 74.9
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 23.8 41.1 29.26 44.8
BF Mean Depth (ft) 1.6 1.8 1.64 2.0
BF Max Depth (ft) 2.3 3.5 2.65 3.3
Width/Depth Ratio 9.7 13.4 10.83 11.0
Entrenchment Ratio 4.9 3.2 4.22 3.4
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 18.3 27.0 21.1 26.3
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.7
Substrate
d50 (mm) 45 0.2 36 <0.063
d84 (mm) 85 0.45 72 0.7
II
R
h
id
P
t MY-1 2006 MY-2 2007 MY-3 2008 MY-4 2009 MY-5 2010
.
eac
w
e
arame
ers Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft) - - -
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio - - -
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 2370
Channel Length (ft) 3021
Sinuosity 1.3 - -
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft -
BF Slope (ft/ft
Ros en Classification C - -
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
Rees : bmerdsm Gawk UT1 imeachES2- can#!d " .
Cross Section 13 Cross Section 14 Cross Section 15 Cross Section 16
1. Cross-Section Parameters Pool Riffle Riffle Pool
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 30.0 19.1 26.9 20.9
Floodprone Width (ft) 90.9 75.2 77.9 52.1
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 71.7 37.9 59.7 36.8
BF Mean Depth (ft) 2.4 2.0 2.2 1.8
BF Max Depth (ft) 5.3 3.1 4.1 3.4
Width/Depth Ratio 12.6 9.6 12.1 11.8
Entrenchment Ratio 3.0 3.9 2.9 2.5
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 34.8 23.1 31.3 24.4
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 101.6 81.4 86.0 59.0
Substrate
d50 (mm) 0.3 30 - -
d84 (mm) 0.8 70 -
each: averdam Creek iT1(Reac1es 2 * 7ttt1*
Cross Section 17 Cross Section 18
1. Cross-Section Parameters Pool Riffle
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 27.0 22.5
Floodprone Width (ft) 67.2 80.7
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 33.2 34.7
BF Mean Depth (ft) 1.2 1.5
BF Max Depth (ft) 2.5 2.7
Width/Depth Ratio 21.9 14.6
Entrenchment Ratio 2.5 3.6
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 29.5 25.6
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 72.3 86.0
Substrate
d50 (mm) - -
d84 (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1

77 7 7
iitesit: I3e?ttYerd?lta?lii rce14
Cross Section 3 Cross Section 4
I. Cross-Section Parameters Pool Riffle
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 15.3 11.8
Floodprone Width (ft) 75.1 75.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 16.4 16.5
BF Mean Depth (ft) 1.1 1.4
BF Max Depth (ft) 2.3 2.3
Width/Depth Ratio 14.3 8.5
Entrenchment Ratio 4.9 6.3
Wetted Perimeter (ft) ITS 14.6
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.9 1.1
Substrate
d50 (mm) 0.16 <0.063
d84 (mm) 0.42 0.2
II. Reachwide Parameters MY-1 (2006) MY-2 (2007) MY-3 ( 2008) MY-4 (2009) MY-5 20010)
Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 680
Channel Length (ft) 775
Sinuosity 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) -
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification C
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
t #? #1!eeprtanH Creeit 1 :... ,
Cross Section 7 Cross Section 8
1. Cross-Section Parameters Riffle Pool
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 12.0 13.6
Floodprone Width (ft) 70.6 75.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 8.8 31.6
BF Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 2.3
BF Max Depth (ft) 1.1 3.2
Width/Depth Ratio 16.5 5.9
Entrenchment Ratio 5.9 5.5
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 13.5 18.2
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.7 1.7
Substrate
d50 (mm) 42 <0.063
d84 (mm) 75 0.23
II. Reachwide Parameters MY-1 (2006) MY-2 (2007) MY-3 (2008) MY-4 (2009) MY-5 (20010
Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft) -
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 544
Channel Length (ft) 615
Sinuosity 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) -
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification C
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
777777
7 77

vttiisilfit '.
Cross Section 11 Cross Section 12
I. Cross-Section Parameters Pool Riffle
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 15.3 12.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 75.7 75.5
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 20.9 9.2
BF Mean Depth (ft) 1.4 0.7
BF Max Depth (ft) 2.5 1.1
Width/Depth Ratio 11.3 17.5
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 6.0
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 18.0 14.1
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.2 0.7
Substrate
d50 (mm) <0.063 43
d84 (mm) 0.22 85
II
Reachwide Parameters MY-I (2006) MY-2 (2007) MY-3 (2008) MY-4 (2009) MY-5 (20010)
. Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 300
Channel Length (ft) 334
Sinuosity 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) -
BF Slope (ft/ft) -
Rosgen Classification C
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1

Cross Section 1 Cross Section 2
1. Cross-Section Parameters Riffle Pool
MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 12.2 20.1
Floodprone Width (ft) 39.8 40.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 9.6 20.4
BF Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 1.0
BF Max Depth (ft) 1.1 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 15.5 19.8
Entrenchment Ratio 3.3 2.0
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 13.7 22.1
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.7 0.9
Substrate
d50 (mm) 35 <0.063
d84 (mm) 53 <0.063
II
Reachwide Parameters MY-1 (2006) MY-2 (2007) MY-3 (2008) MY-4 (2009) MY-5 (20010)
. Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 920
Channel Length (ft) 1121
Sinuosity 1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) -
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification C
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1

Cross Section 3 Cross Section 4 Cross Section 5 Cross Section 6
1. Cross-Section Parameters Riffle Pool Riffle Pool
MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft) 16.1 20.9 16.6 14.0
Floodprone Width (ft) 40.0 40.1 39.9 28.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 ) 10.9 25.8 22.6 23.2
BF Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.7
BF Max Depth (ft) 1.1 2.5 1.9 2.6
Width/Depth Ratio 23.9 16.9 12.2 8.5
Entrenchment Ratio 2.5 1.9 2.4 2.0
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 17.5 23.4 19.4 17.3
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.3
Substrate
d50 (mm) 39 <0.063 38 <0.063
d84 (mm) 59 <0.063 59 <0.063
II. Reachwide Parameters MY-1 (2006) MY-2 (2007) MY-3 (2008) MY-4 (2009 ) MY-5 (2010)
Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) -
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft) 2470
Channel Length (ft) 3142
Sinuosity 1.3
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) -
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification C
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
November 2007, Monitoring Year 1 - Draft