HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDI-5REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
25 August, 2015 l
Re: Comments Generated: Shallow Draft Inlet -5 (SDI -5), Towns of Emerald Isle, Topsail
Beach, Holden Beach, Ocean Isle Beach, and New Hanover County; Action ID Numbers SAW -
2014 -02004, SAW -2004-02005, SAW -2014-02006, SAW -2014-02007, and SAW -2014-02009
Mr. Daniel Ramsey
O'Brien and Gere Engineers, Inc.
3214 Charles B. Root Wynd, Suite 130
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
The purpose of this letter is to relay the comments and concerns generated from a 24
June, 2015 electronic public notice (e -PN) to Federal agencies. The e -PN provided a description
of the proposed projects and an .ftp site for the agencies to download the entire CAMA major
permit application and submitted plans. Several agencies responded within the comment period.
Below is a summary of the comments received. Please provide more information to address the
following comments:
By email dated 26 June, 2015- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Region 4):
1.) At this time the EPA has no comments or concerns with the project as described per
the documents forwarded to us.
By letter dated 17 July, 2015 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Comments:
Any discrepancies between authorized final project depth and actual depths of
previous dredging efforts should be clarified. In addition, it is unclear whether all of
the inlets have been subjected to stringent sediment analysis at the authorized final
project depth. If the applicants propose to dredge deeper than previous Navigation
Program or other dredging efforts, sediment analyses should be conducted to ensure
that the material above and at the proposed depth is compatible with the proposed
disposal area(s).
2.) The applicants should clarify the methods for ensuring that only compatible material
is placed on the beach and in nearshore disposal areas.
0�
-2-
3.) Because sand placement activities, even those conducted during the winter, may
adversely affect sea turtles, the Service cannot concur with the Corp' determination
of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect for the Kemp's Ridley, loggerhead,
leatherback, and green sea turtle. In addition, it is unclear to the Service whether
work may be conducted during the sea turtle nesting season. The Service concurs
with the Corp's determination of Not Likely to Adversely affect the West Indian
Manatee. We understand that the Corps intends to initiate formal consultation
pursuant to ESA Section 7(a)(2), and we recommend that the consultation include all
of the species above, with the exception of the West Indian Manatee.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has reviewed all comments to the Public Notice
and requests that you address those items above, in order to facilitate our regulatory review. In
addition to the above comments, the Corps requests that you also address the following
request(s) for information in order to further facilitate our regulatory review of the proposed
project:
1.) All dredging operations must be proposed to follow the deepest water. The Corps
will need to define the dredging areas prior to any work being performed. Please describe
in more detail, the proposal to follow the deepest water and maintain the channel as is
currently conducted by the Corps.
2.) All beach compatible disposal will need to be conducted at least 1500' from the
navigational channel as is currently conducted by the Corps on all authorized projects.
Please ensure the project proposal conforms to this requirement.
3.) The Lockwoods Folly Inlet authorization is for dredging to -12', but these depths
have never been achieved in this inlet. The Corps has only dredged to -8' in this inlet. The
proposal to conduct deeper dredging within this inlet constitutes new work that may affect
the federally authorized project. This proposal will require a 408 evaluation to determine
the effects ofthe proposal on the federal project.
4.) Shallotte Inlet is not a federally authorized navigation project. This inlet is a
borrow area for a Coastal Storm Damage Reduction (CSDR) project. The proposal to
conduct navigation dredging within this inlet constitutes new work that may affect the
federally authorized project. This proposal will require a 408 evaluation to determine the
effects of the proposal on the federal project.
5.) Sediment criteria for the proposed depths of Shallotte Inlet and Lockwoods Folly
Inlet have not been provided in detail to ensure confidence. The material at the proposed
depths will need to be analyzed to ensure it meets disposal criteria under the various
options.
-J-
6.) Lockwoods Folly Inlet Disposal: The Town cannot use Disposal Area (DA) 286
for placement of non -beach compatible material. The Corps only allows for beach
compatible material to be placed within that disposal area. The next closest disposal area
we would recommend is DA 284 (to the east).
7.) Bogue Inlet Disposal: A consent agreement will be required to utilize DA 60 for
placement of non -beach compatible material. Additionally, the change in existing depths
from -8' to -6' occurs in the vicinity of Bouys 6A and 7. South of these buoys the project
is -8' at 150' wide. North of these buoys the depth is only 6'. Please be advised of this
discrepancy within the proposal.
8.) New Topsail Inlet Disposal: The disposal of non -beach compatible material in
DA 203 will not be authorized. DA 205 could be authorized for that material, but a consent
agreement will be required prior to usage of that location.
9.) Please better define or eliminate the request for proposing nearshore disposal.
There are currently no privately available vessels with the ability to conduct nearshore
disposal in the proposed locations. Please further define the viability of such a proposal
and explicitly state the methodology and construction sequence of this option (dredging
method, disposal method, piping, etc.).
10.) The potential for impacts to cultural resources in the project area of the
Lockwoods Folly inlet is not addressed adequately in the proposal. The request for
deepening the channel beyond what is currently authorized in this location may affect
cultural resources. Additionally, the proposal to create a navigational channel within (and
potentially outside) of the current federal borrow area of Shallotte Inlet may affect cultural
resources not previously considered in the original authorization.
11.) We see the proposal to dispose of material into the near shore system as a trigger
for formal consultation with the NMFS Protected Resources Division (PRD) and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service due to the new listing of protected critical habitat and species
(Right Whale and Loggerhead Turtle). It is our understanding that a more robust
Environmental Assessment is currently being drafted that will cover the effects to all other
endangered and threatened species. Formal consultations will be initiated after review of
that documentation.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We request that you respond to this office
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please
contact Mr. Tyler Crumbley at 910-251-4170.
Sincerel —
jz�_` Dale Beter
Regulatory Field Office Chief
-4 -
Copies Furnished:
CESAW-RG/McLendon
CESAW-RG/Wicker
CESAW-RG-L/Beter
CESAW-RG-L/Crumbley
CESAW-OP-N/Horton
CESAW-ECP-PE/Owens
CESAW-OC/McCorcle
Ms. Karen Higgins
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Ms. Heather Coats
Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Fritz Rohde
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Pace Wilber
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9110
-5 -
Mr. Todd Allen Bowers
US EPA Region 4 Life Scientist
Water Protection Division
61 Forsyth. Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
BOSN3/Mr. Joseph M. Edge
United States Coast Guard
Sector North Carolina Waterways Mgmt
2301 E. Fort Macon Rd
Atlantic Beach, North Carolina 28512
Ms. Debra Wilson
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Ms. Tara McPherson
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Mr. Chad Coburn
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Ms. Joanne Steenhuis
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Mr. Doug lluggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557