The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20161278 Ver 1_NCDOT_Macon Bridge 53_404 and 401 Application_20161230Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name Bridge 53 on SR 1119 (McClure Mill Road) 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC Department of Transportation 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: N/A *Agenl authorization needs to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A 5. Site Address: N/A 6. Subdivision Name: N/A 7. City: Franklin 8. County: Macon 9. Lat: 35.083031 ° N Long: -83388482 ° W (Approx. Project Center) 10. Quadrangle Name: Prentiss 11. Waterway: Coweeta Creek (B Tr) 12. Watershed: Little Tennessee River (06010202) 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 3 General Permit # Jurisdictional Determination Request _ Pre-Application Request The following information will be completed by Corps office: AID: Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date �;� Authorization: _ Section 10 _ Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Putpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: Transportation December 29. 2016 Ms. Lori Beckwith, NCDOT Regulatoiy Project Manager U. S. Anny Coips of Engineers 15I Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-2714 PAT McCRORY corernor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretnq Snbject: Nationwide 3 Permit Application Replace Bridge No. 53 on SR 1 l 19 (McClure Mill Road) over Coweeta Creek Macon County Statc P�roject No. 15B.22.27, SF-550053 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $240.00) Dear Ms. Beckwith: The North Carolina Department of Transport�tion (NCDOT) is proposing to replace bridge no. 53 in Macon Cow�ry which waslied-out in December 2015. The proposed replacement structure is a 45' L x 27' W cored sl�b bridge that will be built on the same location. An off-site detour is being used currently and will continue to be used during construction. Enclosed are a PCN application, preliminaryjurisdiction form, plan sheets showiug the proposed work, � USGS quad map, photographs, and other pertinent project information to assist in your consideration of this request. The U.S. Fish and W ildlife Service and Noitli Carolina Nlhual Heritage Progr�m datab�ses �vere checked for records of threatened and endangered species in Macon County. Carolina no�tliern Elying squirrel (G/ca�com��s sabrn�us coloralrrs), spotfin chub (Erniioncrz monachas), Appalachian elktoe (Alnsmido�Nn rnvenelinna), littlewing pearlynmssel (Pegins fnbidn), small wl�orled pogonia (Isoh•in me�leoloides), Virginia spiraea (Spiraen virgininnn), rock gnome lichen (Gyimrorlernin lrneare), and nortliern long-eared bat (A�Lyotis sepreiin•ionalis, NLEB) are listed as either threatened or endaiigered and are kno�vn from current records. Gray bat (�Llyo�is g��rsescens) and [ndian� bat (dl��orrs sorl�rlrs) are listed species that are likely To occur in Macon County. Appalachian elktoe, littlewing pelrlymussel, and spotfin chub aily occur in Macon County in the Little Tennessee River �nd a few of its tributaries do�vustream Lake Emory in Franklin. Coweeta Creek is too small and cold for mussels and this bridge is several miles upstream of Lake Emory. Therefore, the project will not affect these species. Virgnia spiraea occurs along the Little Tennessee River upstream of Lake Emory and has been found along a small tributaq� to the river fer below the dam. However, there are no scoured �Nothing Compares�.._ SInN ofNorth Carolina I Utparm�ent ofl'ranspona�ion I Dici�ian IJ 2>3 \Vcbalu RoaA I Sylva, Notlh Carolinn 28]79 Nhone8)8-536-21d1 I Fn<323S8G-101i B53, Macon Page 2 December 29, 2016 banks or gravel bars at tlie bridge that could suppo�t this plant. And, the plant �vas not seen during visits to tlie bridge site. Gray bats usually roost in caves or in/on structures year-round while Indiana bats and NLEB only winter in caves or mines �vith stable, but not freezing, cold temperatures. During warm seasons Indiana bats and NLEB usually roost on structures, under the shaggy bark of Iive trees such as white oaks, sycamores, and hickories, or in cavities and under the loose peeling bark of dead trees. This project will not require bridge demolition or blasting, so gray bats will not be affected. The bridge is not situated in an a��ea where NLEB hibernacula or maternity roost trees are an identified concem, so the project is consistent with exceptions for incidental take outlined in the NLEB Final 4(d) rule. To protect Indiana bats, the hvo ti�ees that appear to conflict witli construction will be removed from October 15 to April l5 (winter clearing). With this measure, we recommend a"may affect, not likely to adversely affecY' detennination for Indiana bat. Small whorled pagonia most often occurs in open, dry, deciduous woods witli acid soil, though habitats can include slopes along streams and mesic forest with white pine and rhododendron. Land use adjacent to the bridge consists of the maintained roadway and residential drives, road shoulders and bridge approaclies, landscaped lawns, and wooded creek banks. Small whorled pagonia, if present in the wooded areas, would not be affected since construction will only occur in currenHy maintained and recenHy disturbed areas near the road. The Carolina northern flying squin•el and rock gnome lichen are found in spruce-fir forests and other isolated high elevation locations in westem North Carolina. However, rock gnome lichen can occasionally be found at lower elevations in deep river gorges with high humidity or on some vertical rock faces that are periodically wet The bridge site is much too low in elevation and lacks rock faces and other habitat conditions required by these species. The project is small in scale. Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be used to minimize adverse effects of the work on aquatic habitats. Habitats for listed species appear lacking at the project site and none of the species knowu from Macon County were observed during field visits. For these reasons and those discussed above, �ve recommend that a determination of "no effecY' on listed species, with exception to L�diana bats, apply to this project. This project was reviewed by NCDOT's Humau Environment Unit in 2016 and it was detennined tliat surveys were not necessary for historic structures or archeological resources (see attached foims). NCDOT best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and erosion on this project. Impacts to Waters of the United States Coweeta Creek (DWQ Class: B Tr) is shown on the USGS topographic map as a perennial stream. It has a well-defined channel approximately 30 feet in widtli with a substrate of sand, gravel, and rock. Coweeta Creek Flows to the Little Tennessee River, whicli meets the definition of a Traditional Navigable Water (TN W). For these reasons, we believe Coweeta Creek is a Relatively Pe�manent Water (RPW) and is under tlie jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Co�ps of Engineers. In order to construct the project, it will be necessary to impact �vateis of the United States in tlie Little Tennessee River Basin (CU 06010202). Specifically, NCDOT is ��equesting to B53, Macon Page 3 December 29, 2016 replace Bridge No. 53 with cored slab bridge. Listed belo�v is a summaty of the proposed impacts: Net Site No. Existing Conditiou Proposed Condition Impacts (feet) 1 Washed-Out 30.5' L x 20' W 47' L x 27' W Cored Slab Bridge 0 Timber Bridge lA Coweeta Creek Channel Impe�vious Dikes and Temporary 65 Flo�v Diversions 1 B Coweeta Creek Channel and Rip Rap Abutment Scour 65 Banks101d Bridge Fill Protection Permits Requested NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed witli the construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, I am asking Mrs. Marla Chambers, Western NCDOT Review Coordinator with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), to comment directly to you conceming the 404 Natiomvide Permit request. We also ��equest authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act fi•om the No�th Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Water Resot�rces (DWR). In addition, I am asking Mrs. Chambers and Mr. Reid Whitehead, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to canment directly to me concerning this permit request. Please contact me at (828) 586-2141 if you liave any questions aboirt this application or need additional infonnation. Your prompt review and consideratiou of this request will be greatly appreciated. Sin ely, �� G Dave McHenry Division 14 Environmental Officer Enclosures ec: Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of Water Resources — DEQ, Raleigh Ms. Kristi Carpenter, Division of Water Resources — DEQ, Raleigh Mr. Kevin Barnett, Division of Water Resources — DEQ, Asheville Mr. Andre�v Henderson, Biologist, US Fish &Wildlife Service, Asheville Ms. Marla Chambers, Western NCDOT Review Coordinator, NC�VRC, Albemarle Mr. Josh Deyton, PE, Bridge Management Engineer, NCDOT Division l4 Mr. Reid Whitehead, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Appticant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from lhe � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit Corps: 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Qualily Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For lhe record only for DWQ 401 For lhe record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? CeAification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance lelter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is lhe project located in any of NC's lwenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes below. �� . �� . 1h. Is the project located within a NG DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? I � Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 53 on SR 7119 (McClure Mill Road) over Coweeta Creek 2b. County: 2c. Nearest municipality / town: 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or State Project No; 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Rewrded Deed: 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Macon Franklin N!A (SS-550053) 15B.22.27 North Carolina Department of Transportation N/A Dave McHenry, Division 14 Environmehtal OKcer 253 Webster Rd. Syiva, NC 28779 828-586-2141 828-586-4043 Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from ownet) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: N/A 4c. Business name N�A 4d. Street address: N/A 4e. City, slate, zip: N/A 4f. Telephone no.: N/A 4g. Fax no.: N/A 4h. Email address: N/A 5. AgenNConsultant InFormation (if applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name WA 5c. Street address: N/A Sd. City, state, zip: N/A 5e. Telephone no.: N/A 5f. Fax no.: N/A 5g. Email address: N/A Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Praperty Identification 1a. Properly identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 1c. Propertysize; 2. Surtace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, eic.) to proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. 2c. River basin: N/A Latilude: 35.083031 N/A acres Coweeta Creek -83.388482 B Tr Little Tennessee River Basin (HUC 06010202) 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of lhis application: The site is location of a washed-out timber bridge on a secondary road. Landscape near the bridge consists of lawns, driveways and single family residences. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the propeAy: N/A 3a List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermiltent and perennial) on the property: 200 3d. Explain the purpose of lhe proposed project: To replace the washed-out iimber bridge with a 47' L x 27' W cored slab bridge on existing location. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Erosion and sedimentation measures will be installed. The bridge will be constructed with an off-site detour handling traffic during conslruction. Track hoes, dump trucks, bulldozers, paving equipment, water pumps, sandbags, diversion oioe and various hand tools will be used. 4. Jurisdicdonal Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinalions by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: N!A 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determinalion, what lype of determination was made? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated ihe jurisdictional areas? AgencylConsultant Company: N/A Name (if known): N!A Other: N!A 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinalions or State determinations and attach documentation. N/A 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or ceAifications been requested or obtained for I � yes this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' inslructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? 6b. If yes, explain. � No ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes � No Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Slreams-tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora W1 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A ❑ Yes ❑ Corps N/A ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts N/A 2h. Comments: NIA 3. Stream Impacts If lhere are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 39• Stream impact Type of impact Slream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary ("n (INn� other) (feet) feet) S1 � P � T Bridge Replacement Coweeta Creek � PER � Corps 30 0 ❑ INT � DWQ S1A ❑ P� T Impervious Dikes Coweeta Creek � PER � Corps 30 65 and Flow Diversions ❑ INT � DWQ S1 B� P � T Rip Rap Coweeta Creek � PER � Corps 30 65 ❑ INT � DWQ S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total Permanent Stream Impacts for Bridge �� Total Temporery Stream Impacts for Impervious Dikes and Flow Diversions 65' Total Permanent Stream Impacts for Rip Rap Bank Stabilization 65' 3i. Comments: 7emporary impacts may not be necessary to protect stream from soil faliback as determined at time of construction. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, lributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody lype Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 01 ❑ P � T N/A N/A N/A N/A 02 ❑POT 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P�T 4f. Total open water impacts N/A 4g. Comments: N!A 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Floode d Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N(A N/A N/A N/A P2 5f. Total N/A N/A N/A N!A N/A N/A N/A 5g. Comments: N/A 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no: N/A 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): N/A 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): N/A 5k. Method of construclion: N/A 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impacl a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Seclion D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin7 N!A ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Siream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora im act re uired? B1 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A O Nas N/A N!A B2 ❑P�T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts NIA N/A 6i. Comments: N!A Yage o or w D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The bridge was designed to meet the hydraulic needs and roadway constraints of the site. This bridge will not impede or impair aquatic life passage. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All instream work will be performed in dry work areas using impervious dikes and diversions (as needed) to divert water around the project sites during bridge abutment removal. Appropriate BMPs according to the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be installed on the proJect prior to the bridge work. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, miligation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ OCorps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation opiion will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type N/A Quantity N/A 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-Ileu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: N/A linear feet 4c. If using stream miligation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑ cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): N/A square feet 4e. Riparian welland mitigation requested: N/A acres 4f. Non-riparian wetiand mitigation requested: N/A acres 4g. Coastal (lidal) wetland miligation requested: N/A acres 4h. Comments: N!A 6. Complete if Using a Permtttee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permiltee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. N/A Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitfgation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the p�oject resull in an impact wilhin a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identity the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate lhe amount of miiigaiion required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impacl Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 N/A N/A 3(2 for Catawba) N/A Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: NIA 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what lype of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permiltee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). N/A 6h. Comments: N/A Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes � No wilhin one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse Flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does lhis project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Project is covered by NCDOT Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000250. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwaler Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenPs jurisdiction is this project? N!A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs applY ❑ ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other. 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet lhe appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page S of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expendilure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (Norlh Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to lhe above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House7 (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetiand Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered °yes° to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of lhe violation(s): N/A 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered'yes° to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. This is a rural secondary road. The bridge is being replaced to standard load limits and width to improve safety for the traveling public. The bridge upgrade is not anticipated to have any significant impact on future development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of lhe subject facility. N!A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federelly protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? � Yes copied applic. ❑ No ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field O�ce you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NoAh Carolina Natural Heritage Database and site specific surveys conducted during the bridge scoping process. Page 9 of 10 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will lhis project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat7 ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat7 N/A—There are no marine or estuarine communities wilhin the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requlrement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The project was reviewed by NC�OT's Human Environment Unit in 2016 for potential effects an historic architecture and archaeology. No surveys were required (see aitached forms). 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meats FEMA requirements: The bridge is designed to meet tloodplain hydraulic requirements. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program and NCDOT Hydraulics Unit. Dave McHenry �%�//� Division 14 Environmental Officer s�.� `t�F'/ �2 -Z y� ApplicanUAgenPs Sign ure Date ApplicanUAgellPs Pflnted Name (AgenCs signature is valid only if an authorization letter Gom the appltcant is provided.) Page 10 of 10 Macon Bridge No. 53 ( before washout) .�!► f �► � • - .� � ' �. • � ` µe: � f,.�r,:+: R , t . • . � � ,� ��.,,� ,s .,, Z", y � � �j� y� �' �/f w �'� a-�. . rf'�'�... y' �`� P . ;� , , y .� y �� ri � ,�, ' �, �� '. �tl .-. � e= •,L . �' ti" , . �,�' *'°r. ' • * �i i � p,t � s d _ gr�; - . , ,1�'.�.. '�+�:r . r� -�,�:'^,.r. � '•�_ �: . r � s' � `"�"� 1.w � � d . . � �{ , ,. �:� � 4 • � . �' � y �, � ��•� .+� �� . t � , ",�•.°'` � � � ' \� � "i ` ' � . i e y.sr� � �I . 1., � 1 �. f r, . ... � � ^`� f ��` � �� . ...�� 1,••.'� R'� . � �- .. a � 1� �� 11r•a . .� , — " '�` . . . ' , -�� y ' �� ♦ � • v ' Y„ � , i� � �� i� ,,1 � r +�'". - �/ i �", �� y'{? � '� u: � �"'1 "� �� t. 11 �! �. �} � J'\ • ..l!( � � � ° , . '-- - ' - ^� � �r`c, d� «�� . *r ,,� � `\ '..' .... I ` '� �:..�. ) �t� ��4 ' BridgeNo.53 , • r ��'Y n -�. � � ♦ _'. . �.� r��' �ir�, ; �� : :M f � ' , . �'�• t .�, ` • ��+i.y`,� - � ':`A'.�`, , � � j• • �. � "'_��:Q`. L� ��' ` t ' '.;� �e, ,�� ; , �, " � f ,`"'.�` . � /�,�y �"'�.�•.. � ' tu� i i � �y i - . � q �M1 � ��. �e � . ��.. �_,,� ;� �^ . y. � 'r� � . r • • I' � ,�.� i a M� � ' . �1 ... ' 1' ' �-�. ..�'�. r.:. .� ��} S �, ` .n_.� .'�.�� , .� �. .� ��l �. ,f . t w , � �c �c .,,' .t � : ;� , . �i ''` . ^ }.. . _ - .. f '�F�� . � i ." r � � ' y�,.,•,, , � �` '+ x + l `, .� , �'"`a"' • � .. � � � � ./ t' �1 � w y �� , �� 1 � � , , . � `� . . _. � -, '�. ,� �'r r • � '`�'� � � �� :4 � i� .. � ' �.�� , � - .� � :..�.� � � , �' �_.4. �@ � � �. ' ' N�C:QneMap� NC.CenterforG'eographieln�for,m�'�a� . 0 25 50 100 Feet - � � � � c ' �4`r"+i �tF�— — .•' ' � � � �� ti�. � � . � ��' � . Cp � ��i � � 1i � ;J i.�.11l 1 �il . tsr�yh=�.11 ; � : !:) fl,�� `� �' ��. ' `.� , . �, �:r4 � " �l � �.�� 1 �.�� i� .- - a �� i �'. �P=��Y �.\♦ � th;'_ ��: �� ir `�3 �� ' . i ., t � ��A�.= � -:�: '�,. ✓�,. >� ,., ,�,�' ,: � . �. �� < < .� � >.\k �iA ,A<:�,., � , � i ._ � 'wge � ,"� �� A. i � � �.`�'� ' �� . r _' (t ��kY ,'/:, II . � ! �-{«=. � d' -� :� b.wi.C1�] .. -.-��. � ��'� . k�-' �r� .... -- �.-� . '- iLf .�r1� { `� � . . �� i : . � r- � iit i t� � j �.', y r;' - .. ' � r ' / , ,; � � . , .. . . . ; � .. -_ . - ,. .. . ._, r . � . �. . .. , . � �. . NIT ._:� ,"'. '.. : _� I. .i � . �'' ,.- : . _ .. /��J� � _ � Z �' Y � - � � �% �.F � )VA t Fi."f'I �,. � � .. I ' �� .. � �� JF<,p�J ( � q� � )YS � h. i °� _ ! 1 � i ,. r, 6��MIl �-� .; T i�-.�p �, f F� , �d i .�.fr �'` <�er�� _ ' ` �vh vl r,�� ,�1``1 t}�.�a�" �� ./. ` 4�,�-' ��e' a y/,... �lI►�'�aM��,t_� y •� � p � ��r� � Y � � � , r % r, � , �6 �•r � ;-i� � ✓ �� t -i � ..t,! :^�� +�� .r-,.. �� . . `t� � f- � ��;1 i .-. - . . '�� f`i9 °� : � - ` "� � � � � �li�� ry , t. ' ' 'f� �.. . ' � r ' / : � \Y�. "" i� � �' .'� -� �A' , �: . � . � � /fj I \P . i� y �, '° / 9Pt i`.' � � . §�' � �., i � �� ..'� ...... .....� ,. . �� . , ., 9 � �V` _. d _ Looking north at Coweeta Creek from west side of old bridge no. 53 location. i � � �� '� �vyi�, . '. ,. // . 1! � -�: :i.. 1� '- '1 .`i,.� ,`-�.n. �,}(: ,� ,. - - �� p,.�,�, .k.� il ��' � .. .. f .i I, �� i � � I . . � t:lY .i 1{ � 1`e '�-: 4 . ^—�� l � 1 � � �' �� ,, IU � ii' . �Rtt � [' 1` !!� � . . 1� . 11�� i �ltl`n i ll ' �� ,( . _ ". 4 3 i/ ��,��IhA� i�' FJ)�'i�.` � ,�� V . ' ��. �i � t _ �� .. � � �J��1� _ � 1 S o �� , �'��y�y, 4'Gi 7�A�i�v.�J. � . . .�.=� � . � i . � �r � �' � �I' �� G�1 "G`, � n•':., t �- � ' -'�- . -_—_�`..�'_.' :.,.2 • - , � ^�;iz� ., ' - . . . r�� 4 � :�� .;��s t,i , i� __ j . 5, +^ W Y r� ,� t� _+�y,� -. t / � _ y -� � .�� 'S �f' �' Z, 4 �� _� .- '`Ye.�R3is.�;7 r,� 'd+ � i,it `i, - i.._ � ��Aa[,l� J� ��s �y li e, t�., . �1_� v.��...� `'_,s� .+9 y � i!'t.'ii 1 �'3��ifi�� \i' t�'..s��ki. �'!( sqjti k� ,'�S � � c� �� i' `,.�s�ii�icy.Y CS J - RSl � �� > i.�m:.$R�� [ `� � � �1 .! Jr1,�-t',# 'i t �j Yl � l ( � 'F � �.�A�" ��i@ 1 .! � y�:` { • 1 (� pyy� C �gu :. � ,/ , / l�\ Y . �i'� N' ' y� � ",�'� h �q� ��, f `�""� ',� � '.aC . �+�c e1e� �� ,� ti`��'�"'y�.i`v 3•A�� $ i�- � �i A r � '� . 1 � � �_ A '' t _�. " p�,� 'Y' td .r�� '�S � � F . t�, r�'S`"-�' •• f� 7U" � i�9f.at J :. ,_-` 1 i �, „� �� " . t ...� f,'� � , '�� t.� � ' r ' +t �,� �, � � x . 1 y` Y^�( -j I,�,l� � � e S, a!!� �/�f-.s "`�i .1 �,y \fi-r'�'��M'g} � -i� �+'t��;q�Il� S= � '�37 �v�''��-=d ,si�i�� .' 1 �r" �tl.'i..ey�� ', , �rc'+'�`'_r il � . e ..._. % ✓� �'�- � 3' �" i . i n: :�r , - -� .: �_ "�_!, �� r:. _ ,i. <;,�� . . _ �... . __ . �_a �.`,�' - . � �. ..� -, , r " ,, � -,, `G�� ; Looking northeast across Coweeta Creek from west side of old bridge no. 53 location. �U. .'. ATTACHMENTA PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): +2-z8-zo�s B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: NC Deparimenl of Transporlation, Dave McHenry, Division 14 Environmental Otficer 253 Websler Road, Sylva, NC 28779 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Replace bridge 53 on SR 7179 (McCWre Creek Road) in MaconCounty (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Ma�� Clty: Franklin Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): La{. 35.083031 °N; Long. -83.�e8482 °W U niversal Transverse Mercator: 2822as.s, sasaeso.e zo�e n Name of nearest waterbody: cowee�a c�eek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: xoo linear feet: 30 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: R3u6� StfeatTt FIoW: veRenia� Wetlands: �a acres. Cowardin Class: �a Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: �a Non-Tidal: �✓a E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑� Office (Desk) Determination. Date: �z-za-zo�s � Field Determination. Date(s): SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Ncoo-r ❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the app�nUconsultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: ��2ak Preo��s5 ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: � 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑✓ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or Q Other (Name & Date): sePi. zs, zois � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: � Other information (please specify): � 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of ihe United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWAjurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation ofjurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: later iurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) �,,..� .,. /2—LS-/C ignature and d te of person requesting pr iminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Estimated amount of aquatic Class of resource in aquatic Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class review area resource 1 35.083031 -83.388482 R3UB1 200 linear feet Non Section 10 — non-wetland COWEETA CREEK IMPACTS ROPO EDBBIRIDGE DIMEN90N5 30' S"X Z�0'`ISNGLE SPAN)!�90�DEG. SKEW 5 Length Typo Dmcription TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 200' ro�mono�. 65rr Stmambank CIas511RipRaponGeotex[ile STkEAM IMPACTS Siabilizaeion Ero:ion conirol memurc far �,{� ^ Pormonont 65 h Imporvloos Dlko �om�al aburmont Installmlon 7'°�. \� o � L I 0\�S \�o t � ��,. SITE 1A � �� '*Rour � � � � � IMPFRVIOVS / I—_— coNc _=u.,.�= �� _I � DIKE _...J m _ / BEGIN�LE � � I�`., ``1S� • � ' I �1a.8.205624.1 0 -i-sTn.»+so.00 SITE 1B � ClASS II RIP RAP �. m O ISTRUCTURES : PRE-FX Ti�G ITEMI (TYP.1 �, , i Pp ~ /m' � BRIDGE ' - --"_ , ?i „ (APPROX.) _.� .... �� . ',,._, waoos �., F i I III _. F � �o .-C I � � h* _I K i� � F eMP R��` � D ---�.. � �� < o � � li� � m �� . � ------� -.. -,� � GR JPa� NOTES: 1. COwEETA CREEK IS IN THE LITfLE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 2. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRP.INS. 3. CLE4RING SHnLL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT MEfHOD II. GILIPHIC Sfa/F t0 � 0 ll ]0 Yrtn � F'.EMOV: PROP. ASPHALT DkIVE woaos � / / esr � / / / / > GRA55 E%ISfING RIP PAP LINED �SLOf BE SUPPLE�MENTED ANo�h�ae WRH CL�SS II RIP RAP PS NEI RIP��SMALL NOT BE/PWCE[ �STR WARD OF EYISTING STREANIFACE GRADE ;�� y� a .,. "�C _�•:I 'I � � I�r_I F � � j�'I� L� ko \\ T \\ TOn � ACED\ m PERMIT DRAWING FOR BRIDGE #550053 MACON COUNTY SNaP woaos - �"� PROP.ASPHALT � �/ Q I �DRIVE 4� ,I m � y� `^'�'/ l �i'' C(`� � < � : 2^ ''• SPG'PF / m N\ ��/y'�il\'. � O END PROI� 1a.810S6Y4.1 �� ., \ �O �� -L- STA. 13+50 \ I \ \ 4 waoos � �. � �� PROP.ASPHALT„� � \ � DRIVE m GR ' I �� v �—\\ � 3r E%ISTINGBNDGEDIMENSIONS-30'�"X20'fSINGLESPAN),90DEGSKEW PERMIT DRAWING -rc��; COWEETA CREEK IMPACTS PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS - 45' X 2T (SINGLE�SPAN�, 90 DEG. SKEW � �„ Longfh Typv Doscription TOTA� PRaeR �e��H - zoo• FOR BRIDGE #550053 ��..� -_ Strnambank MAC�rf C�UNN �r q�'n�� ro�me�om es k stabi�ii�tioo Class ll Rip Rap on 6eotextile STREAM IMPACTS 0 Parmancnt 65 h Impomo�: �iko Ero: on nmol moo:vra for �m� u m ' \ r\ �� \ I r vorticol abvfmom m:tallm on � � o` „� �� \ � q � �� o\JS \ \� s<a � �' — � V Av �- I � � � � �� /A �� •1� i�� i$�� a � I_—� — a\ �I � i�. �,�lx �. ryoo � CONC_,our � fIYOUi / ;�� I �� T'•� � �y�� 1 . . �.. ,. , , � � -_ � � � � x �� OUFF �� O I � I� i i I .$ OP � � taB20562a.1 ..._ r � I I J '. � i I ol I._. m�ll .,\`c; 2P IM crV _ $EGIN PRO� � �- � �Ir STA 11+50.00 �� f A ' ' � I `� I R, I� II I � �I i � �,__C, ,' � ISTRUCTURFS � I i � � I � � .� CL455 II RIP RAP � � ` � � '. ._._ ITEM� �ttP.I I � � n � �� PRE EXIST G � ,�- -� � . `. � - . , i" D � �'BRIDGF�� , � :. � S�' i " . I� ereoxT � . � � A -�. 5 . _____ ___. � ° �. I 3 i � � � � � 4 P F � ,, � � � . \ waaos � � �� F I �'1 i �i �i c a � ____--�� I IR , _ . �M°F. 4 i I I�� '� F I � O` � c .� ♦ � \ lOb . . ____ — ' �. � 2� \. ,- � •, r � ..� '. - . � � ,. � •� � �II� �., �.. _ - � �� - _ � -_ � � � .— � . i � . t,.o `:� . ' w000s �F. �� '�, � Y Ili\ � �_ � � -L 1 I ,�, , „ �'- . � �� I, Ii� �� I � � `. ... � ( \/ �i �+ � I �� ' �' ., �� FFMov� � i I � ' � " . i,, � � . � � I 1s . ° � � �//r� �F�/ +l / �M1f�� _O,�Mi : I Ir'. I� I,_.. \�� .�- ry II,;' �i I RIYEASPH�T I II' I _ �� I � � I � .�q � .r I�' ��fiy�l _ �� C��' � �� .� I�' ..�"''J �'� y � �. ,P I y � I +40 0 � '^s � k,. ��-� I I � 1 � �I� V l F � I I � , � � �a Fx.,ww,� � �� I � P J� II 0��I1' 1 i � �" �''� �'��.�� I �� e�o vxgi.�ST ' jl , \. �d�y+'�/,�f"" �- " � � I � ia;s.los6zalT _ i ////m90Z,,,f. x �d _ �_'clil'ili IY�� I� � \�, ` /�o �I li�l I ;wsrniaFso � � �� f � PROP. ASPHALT S� I� F� I C1� i I R V ';� :� j I I % DRIVE. � � I ��"r��-(�� W00 `�. ,� � I�, � �� . �� I� �I� , I � � �� j � , . � � / 1 \ .� I I IN' � , � I ' I ,/-.- �/�i'" � �� esr'- � ��I � ��i � �-!,� �''.. , �; I �� ii 'i W000k i j�, � � � �I n N � � �� I , � �_.� a 1 ' '� '-F � �� '�, �? , � ;i � �.� �� I', I � � � � '� � i � � � �' � �� 1. COWEETA CREEK IS IN THE LITfLE �,,,;�� \ TENNESSEF RIVER &4SIN „� '�, � \ �� °c � �'' �� \ � ?�I��I � � � � i I I 2. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRP.INS . ¢.i,,,kppp, , , c I � � .�y,� ; � l; i' � '. o � � 1 , . � � � � � � I � y� �+ � 0� � � I � I il � L�in55 . �N '�� bkOP.ASPF{ALT ` � � I ' 1 � . . _ 3. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED u � '�� I `.�.� ' IDRIVE PER NCDOT METHOD II. �� J, I GR ��'i ' \, � � X K� � �,, a IXISTING /�.IP RqP PNED S PE TO I N BE SUPPLEMENTED AN�RKREPL4GFD �� I . I N I I � V A� 1��W� k� GfNPNlC Sf.Al.E �' �WITH CLA$$ II RIP RAP pS�N�EDED.I ,�/ i�I m � } \ io 5 o a 2o I IP q� �$YJ.LL NOT BE�PL4C20 �� I I.� ��° � I Ul � i A� � ��' ii7�� ' SxREA�MWARD OF EXISTING I � I � �, I � � I � �� .,�� ' � � � � ��I � � �� I I I ��'�E IT�RAWI G, E � OF I STR�FACE GRADE (�tiP'� l i � � I �� I , I � I � � � .• �� I i r-i- I I �� I I' . �—V � �•.��",. � �� '..' o. � / 2,06_0 2,_0_5_0_ I_ '� lN RA ��_ I G1- L- STA. 12 +50.00 � � ' � I N GR F � � - ---- ' —;PROP:1@45',-18' CSU------ �--- f - } K // I 5 Pl = �3+19.00 - - _EV �= 2.0555/� � ��, - � � ELEV 205620 , 6• EL 2A5a20' . ' �C _..65� _ _ IISKEVJ- .. 7 100 iYR W 5 �VC 60' . � � � � :� `��'�, \ 'QS = l5 MI PH I- PROP. 90 DE- 2053.0 YR W 5 2056 bl7' DS '�5 MPH -' .��• ��... \�;_� ____ —`-._ - 3.7 i . . � . ... i � �5 — >,, I ev. I zo5 I ,N'�'�6� b'S7/i _. - '-- � ', (+JO5000% . � _,.. (+10 5000/-- � � � r - i ' - NG LT. ... . . . .. ::._._. .... �. �\ �� ..�, I' i �� . . . . PROP. GRADE _ ' .. . . . . �I . . c � . . �___ "" " i i I . . . NG RT. . . _. .. .. `. , !_ — i II �- i° � i -. I EXfSTING GRADE I. ... ... PRE-EXISTING . BRIDGE. . �.,.. � � � � (APPROX) �``'. I', _ �� SUSTING RIP RAP LINED SLOPE TO � BE _ . � � EXPPLEMENTED��ANNOR REPLACED WITH �� .. .. �. r � I� �. �� . C4A55 II RIP RAP AS NEEDED. RIP RAP -� I LOW SIDE LOW CHORD �� , ____ .... . . , . . `.�, . . I ;�.. i .. . SHALL NOT BE PLACED STREA.MWARD OF ._.. _... �� I � � ��,� ✓.' ISTING STREAMFACE GRADE (NP.) � 2,04_0_ i APPROX. W S ELEY.�= 2045:5'�� ON-DATE OF FIELD VI51T ! 12+00 SiRUCTURE H1'DRAULIC DATA DESIG/✓ DISCHARGE = 2300 CFS DESIGN FREOUfNCY = l0� YRS DESIGN hW ELEVATION = 2053J F7 BASE DISCHPRGE = 4370 CFS BASE FREOUENCY = l00 YRS BASE NW ELEVATION = 20565/ FT OVER70PPlNG DfSCHARGE = 2700 CFS OVERTOPPING FREOUENCY= l0+ YRS OVER70PPlN6 ELEVA7/ON = 20539^ FT �PROPOSEO BRIDGE IMPROVES EX/STING LEVEL OF SERVICE. �•OVER70PPlNG ELEVATION REPRESEN75 LOWEST HI�H POlN7 ON DECK/ROADWAY. WHICH OCCURS � -L- STA /2+/p LT. � . ,�. .. .. . .. . �. �� iy F . ...\' I './ / ... . _ ... ....... . ,.. . . ... .. .... ... Z .. � _ .... .... ..... ... .... _.. . .. . . . �I—�_._.�: 13+00 J["��ll' �JV1Lj PERMIT DRAWING SHEEf 3 OF 3 PERMIT DRAWING FOR BRIDGE #550053 MACON COUNN � � T , J' �.-��,. � r _ -- I.� � Fb�3��pi'aP�VJTJZT � 000 � � �I �— : i —� — I �o` — _..�_��_ �� u � i I N' c � % .M ._. _',_ I� " ___ A-- _�� ' i _ Me �.�.'.��,� o. _ ' �.� m -I � ' ,,'e � _ � , -, rt— � ' �,_, � I i I OO+SL mros�wrnr�oLSXxor�o� eeds �, : o.y.: orbq......nw. i., r�wM�.._ ...... o... xv�,i. .n. Oo� PON OFebm� _.. �a]0. .. cf� !^9�M'.. W....y^. Ow� :p.N._.➢. o.�+auo-.o�pwm..- :pw ._c�r r.�y.�xv.. .lo.......n [In. vme.v'._.n. .. Fp;DROLOGY:. v.cs s� zaov-8w. �uva.ucass�on.�a�nnon : . ...... . .... . ... ..!nL�KKOG eceyJ.lnw[)oul.._ ....... .. ...__.. ......_. . n — ... ..... ._.._. o - ..�. r aoo a 9-. n o n. .+oo e. .,.. _ ... ._.. ...._. 4,'. ^ ^ . ...... ..__ .... . - e ].W A a u� ym d� ._�t_ � � . . .. _. ...__......... . ._...... ._..... ....._....._. ........_....... ___._.. ......... rtww y-um t. N:m iv x¢o .wo te n rcw, cw�wi� w,�rl .... .. _ 0 TO S.. _. x0 ovrt .�e.- ru: �e Mncwm�mrtno�T-I ._.. .... �: n.M1l 1 1 . . .. ... __. .. ....... . __.. .� ._.�. ....� .....� __.. —�s �I:,e,,, - - `� �:.�,. �� - �� - r�� I I I �� J__ e. � OOi-4L � 00� � �:�' ._�... _�� I . t£L �.00 ZL _ �I OOttl_ 3� onin aemev�,..__.. 16.O:c.�i........._. Aw vFSsv..anr.pwn�ru�.mml....._.. �:�r6nln N�ll.![xi62[.. <I�aan�.I� M.. J[rtl4ma'M1...__... :Me.a.nomaCwe.i.w�. Mm;vw.i....<IA.�.e:ri+m...........__....... oa., e: �..ro �.. ...��P»s-. wvti noo. o.�. i+cw .. nwe. F.. µo..e,. '. . . . . . . ... ..4'.°rw.c9rt... ......... ..._.....?.Ww.nMow.W .__J obe ra.nbi we�.^w a. ++e v.ie. �aM� v. [ .. ... y. �. w.. ...�wa. x on ... o,a a H� vP . �.., �n �wau :�o»«coo. . i�,�a�aa. ma._._ cw+r oq ov�w.x-n.SAlJI.1.b.N.1Y+,1COWlIpC4L.9.�l��.f1! NJ.�41']S'+1'.COW:W...... dmp[iVA.. q.m0.0'J,W.%.ICPv[Rnpqni.U}P.IUOWu.�p.LOV!L�NS[.np]'4GeC. w Gmw ... , An.1Y..4. �caa¢rno 6nmm �w-n v,[ ni n[c-u.. �. v.:� N%ron ON GOP:a��wHe .!M_._._...._.. M1nofof� .c . ....__.w. �..�a .. —.. w. oi..n,m. ..._...... om....— . _ .._ ..._.. w�.weinoou�a�amo.� �mw<w om vo� � . �. > e . x. r..n.. � �°.,.°,ee`� �.a � m M arcu+G.. • .. • �n Ovr�.IO)�..Ow �051.. 4� Fq. a�.'- MSNry muuw.PM.0 �.u� .�Mbe� .Ic..M .....i�.n�.ee•..... Oaro._._e.........n.[n.%rv... ni^vR...__.. ........ _yn H.n,wa .a, . ..Ai._—. n .�....—... i x ..— ..n. do.� hn 9 I�T� M d .ul .. .li. MvmW�n: 0 GcmIQ4'O p0 . ... � flwd:rud�/.qw .. .1 .. p0.% �0"� ... �bW5uM14M�WeN� an.c wmlwveA.r.ni ...h�wLvmrM.n ��. f�i Yw. n JOL^ $[$Ifi OATA Ny]m4ykvxaA� i 5!fOMut �[ ON[ ONSRMOiOWG ! p.WS, MNmv vO�ew 6d ........ ^P_.� .n_C_�.} _.. Flw4 Felw W f 4' 0.dp paJ alviry �O v p�Avyinon N . Itw lON.9... ._- v. _. Olp a] ovi 0) v N) _._]W 3ow,V.... �1.. ,..- 9� �_.. WWRWV. ....A9o.. ...ioNe).. . I.e . .._.F:o........ we�...ar on mme.e w.�.w+e nan __ .. ". � am. . . zw a o n...�.. +w. a.e... v.wF Oa M.. a �s.. e..�w v.e.b Pa rl . �....r.v� n �m+n �m+e.e : ...—. n w��... o:ron n�=i... avion....n. noro.a.w ��.av...�w..�� ...._... ...._ . � _I.:.�_._.:_I <a::+l... - - — ��o� �.�� I � I �� '� � W�.a � 90Z W. a , .�,...OLOZ ��.- I, , , ��. f ' BWDGE SURVfY 8 HYORP,UIIC DFSIGN REPORT �.� °' N_c.omun�mor.urvsronwnou �i� .\'I. OhliIIVWYtCMGXWPI3 `.1'.r N.0 �: o,, ow'x�.aos�. r�.Mn. . .a+.� rei:wm,....•-n.w.w .. �n-......wcw ... o. o.. . wu. . w�r w.. en�... w a nb�.-w..1+Ewrc:v'Nw.. n� w u��m... am .. �.wur'.`mu.s.��i.... �'; ummm.ia�a A n .............. �S cv ,vmm vemeu uur.uevn ... �': um.m.MN wa n a N�.^r ir-10'.4W.4 �wonnY,)T.d G1�.I0. G4! Yw...'^ .�.�?..... „, L.emm.wi bmx... F IW.�o-...F%�+�..-n... �.w�v C.o.Jno . ................. 4; i..�e.n.o r.od,aiir c :�+w.�wn� a . Ze...iw.ne . �.+.a..�.a�. � m ��ne.e. 4.... .'.o.._.... . vmymirt.nxC ....__.. ..., tw_. . . . n.Ca�..:.. ue`^.f^..... �:, i�nrnerv CmuXo ........ M?R MOV� .... a ._...._..... ............_....... R._ . _'_ '__ . ._- _ _ _ _ —_— �I � I`r -L � �� 'R f♦ �$�1+• £ r ta�M � va� . � i ' � _.. ' �.�. �� . .. .I �� J92X CeiU ' C.�.,iv�o �i,FG �: u.b�.e M: w . r[m rt 0: wcm[m.l ... �- vGt ��/. s� �� n..Ms4:.HIHvi_...f..fF..... .. Wi...ix✓Av .. �.�nl.'�T114, r.elo4�4��, `/ c.w.rt . ... "•�hoo�ec`.c� t u......a W ie� ��i^�.. f= �/� i� ��• i I lip,htti dV North Carolina Dopartment ot Transportation tiior�ii��atcr. ��) . . , ., , Highway 5tormwatcr Prog2m �� / STORMWATER MANAGEMENTPLAN \-1 �Vp .ion Y.UT: Roloaeatl OcfoEer ZOt6) FOF NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: �562227 TIP No.: SF-550053 Coun ics : Macon Pa e '1 of 'I General Project InformaUon WBSElement: i5B222� TIPNumber. SF-550053 Pro'ectT e: BritlqeRelarnment Date: �211l20t6 NCDOT Contact: Marc T. Shown, PE Contractor/ Desi ner: TGS Enqineers (David 6. Pett ) Address: g90 Mail Senice Center Adtlress: �O6 Hillsborough St. Raleigh, NC 27699 Suite 200 Raleiqh. NC 2i603 Phone: 919407-G75t Phone: 9�9-7738687 (EM. t04 Email: mshown nctlot.qov Email: d e tqsenqineers.com Ci lTown: Otto Coun ies: Macon River Basin s: Litlle Tennessce CAMA Coun 7 No Wetlantls within Project Limifs? No Pro'ectDescri ion Pro ett Len th lin. miie5 or feet : 200 k. Surrountlin Lantl lJse: Forest antl mral re5idential Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'e<tBuilt-U onArea ac. O.t ac. 0.� ac. Typicai Cross Section Description: Two 9' witle pavetl travel lanes w/ shoulders pavetl to face of guardraiis, 3' wide gras5ed Two appmx. 6' gravel travcl lanes with sitle slopes ranging from 3(H):1(V) to shoultlers behlnd guartlrail antl grassetl side slopes ranging from 2(H)'.1(V) to 1 t(H)'.�(V). tt(H):i(V). AnnualAvgDailyTraffictyeh/htlday): Oesiqn/FUNre: 200 Year.20�6 Existinq: 20� Yeac 20'I6 General Project Narrative: Replacement of pre-existing Dritlge No. 550053 on SR � � 19 (McCWre Mill Rd) over Coweeta Creek in Macon County north of Otto, NC. The bndge washed out tluring a flood (Description of Minimization of Wator event in December 2015. Remnan5 of the britlge antl vertical abutments wem removed and abutmenl fiil was excavated to match adjacent streambank slopes. Impac[ed Quality Impacts) streambanks wem linetl with rip rap. Proposetl 45' long by 27' witle singlrspan b�itlge to replace pre-existing 30'-6" long by 20' wide single-span britlge. The pmposed b�idge will have no direct discharge into the water. No tleck tlrains will be installed. Stormwaler mnoff is discharged at minimum p�aclicabie slopes, yielding minimum velocities and diffusetl whem possible, All proposetl stormwater mnoH is tlischargetl as far away From Ne stmam antl al lowest velocities as practicable. Watorpod Inhrtnation SuRace Water Botl 1: Coweeta Creek NC�WR Strcam Index No.: 2-�0 NCDWRSurfaceWaterqas5ificationforWater6ody Prima ClassiTication: ClassB Su Icmenfai qassifi<ation: Trout Waters (Tr Other Stream Classification: None Im airments: None A uaticTBES ecics? No Comments: NRTR $tream ID: N/A Buffer RWes in Effect: N/A Pro'ect Includes Brid c 5 annin Water Botl 7 Yes Deck D2in5 Dischar e Over Buffer7 N/A Dissi ator Pads Provitletl in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Botl ? No Qf yes, provitle justification In the General Project Narative) Qf yes, desaibe in the General Project Narrative: if no, justify in the Qf yes, providejustifcation in the General Project Nartative) General Project Narrative) ProjeclNo: WBS No.: Ald No: Pmjn! Tmrking No. (Ix(mml Uu) 16-12-0023 HISTORICARCHITECTURCANDLANDSCAPES RECEIVED NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Iandscapes for this project. I� is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with Q�e� � 0 2016 ArchaeoloQy Group. ISB.22.27 f�1/� Federn[ I� 1'es U No Counry: Macon Document MCC T e: Funtling: State Pernrit NWP3 DIVISION 14 Proiect Descriptlon: Replace Bridge No. 53 on SR 11 l9 (McClure Mill Road) over Coweeta Creek. OF HISTORIC Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on December 20, 2016. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 75' from each end of the btidge and 50' fi•om the centerline each way. A survey site, the McClure Mill (MA0250) falls outside of the APE and will not be affected by this project. All other structures within the APE are one-story homes built in the 1970s and 1980s based on Macon County GIS/tax information. Bridge No. 53 was not eligible for National Register listing based on the NCDOT Historic Bridge Inventory. There are no National Register listed or eligible proper[ies and no survey is required. If design „I�n� c.han�e_ additional review will be renuired. nre no urilrlen(ifred sianirrnnf historic nrc/tifecturnl or lnnrlscnve resorirces f�t Nie vroiect nren: HPO quad maps and GIS information i�ecording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for tlie Macon Couuty survey, Macon County GIS/Tax information, and Google Maps are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no Netional Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required. y.��, SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION p�Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos OCorrespondence ❑Design Plans 1` FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL ffiSTORIAN His ori Arc itectur a d Landscape --NO SURVEY REQUIRED I NCDOT Architectural Historian Date Ni�mric Archila(urcmxl Laubmpes AOSUHVHYRIIQUIFEU/amforAliiwrTrarrpanalia� Projens luQnA�ed'n� Ihe7007 ProgmmmMirAgrcrman. Page 1 of 4 � Olto�.Coirvenlence'.CenlerO �tici':'��u"�, . � . . � ��,., � Itrn ky _ � � ,. � . 1.. 1191� • .• � ,. C:UIIIC%�i�: �%�.^ .. ��IVI�;iL IHISI` �. �'r(I � ' .�J�ICyS��UfCIQII . .. (��1U�URC�lil�f ', 1, �I .. l� .. . � ll� � �� r' � �E;� „ �; i»} � / (,'. i i �,, � �� , ��r � ��ii�s� }'; .a' . ��DTrinlly�A,seinblyolC,od ;; ;� ' <,`� I� CxrdinalRiUt�c < �j Parin RV�onJ��.�1C:) L i i. '{J � i�(. I1116I �'� � r ��j �� I� . . � `l U I � `�� . <.:7 'p .. ,'I ( i: �j � �i � � (�1flli,r�&OwensPumilurc �� I�, i Ii � �i 'n` �(Crk i j �� r :i � ��S[i �IEI1� : \\'Vllhi�� I� �IIISI �/� �, �1114� '�...•I' .� �:%XOII�.Q � . � � L i ", ��i )n� �, pi'f. -.. �� %I�C'.UlO.11li]�� (� MII��.. � .' �In.l� ' „pmAi�n . "� __- ;23, . . i" �i�i�t) . . .. . I� ' �� n b�y':�� I�� IIE96I ,- � �Y �li .. . . . i ' I� il 1' ' - .�.r F iiqrllJ � ��;�. ti] �)'�,�'(l I �\ IF /: �Il . . I16151 - � � CulpopperR (:o.f�) .. '. � I., �� . .. lia�al I' Z; ��(,)USPoslOflice . 1'1'O�CC[ LOC:1[lUll. Hi�twic Areliiletlurc mu//�mdrcapas h'O SUHI9i Y IlFC)(/lll/iD/onolor Afino� Tnwa(wrm�ia� Prujralr nr Qm/ifiedin !he 1007 /'rogrommnlic ASr:rmenl. Page 2 of 4 HPO GIS. Hirmrlc AnAilealure nud /anJvrnpu A'0 SURV(iY RIiQUIItliD%ani fur'dfluor Tmnsrwiln0on PioJe<la ni (,Amh�eJ iu Ih. IRO7 Progrturnumlc ABrmnieal. PTg� 3 ot'a S .\ � � ; �\� .\ !�� - �' �\ �' ��v �_;' �/ � Qao �,�" .A � 1�� l � � �� 2 � � . ��. � �� J��' '}i J(((7i�'��f�`,�(��'%��(�,,i��% ;a��i.i�:�, l� : ) ; I ! >�� % �.-' '�� r' � � � l ��/ � � l� �'�` =� � �, , �, .J: � ; 0 f � �� ,;' 1;i ,+ �/ � \ . �. I � \ l"' � i f` ' � t ��'1�/��..r��`�� l' ` `/\"\.:,` 1 � �' 1//`�'` �0��'' . 1 i� �� i \\ , , � \1 ��. . ,a(� / \ 1 ^, , � � � e •1�� 1 . ,1 '.Y � % �t � ff� \, �t,'�� • ( � � �� iij�r� 1 �` �\/ \\sN'`o�M I � .;�d��,e�;� ��„ i!% ' � �� ;,. � �� '; r � Farm f9 a- �\ \ / �� , �� ` � ) � �--� , �� // �1��1 ��,r� � � i �o��^n�s�� e .i J �' 1 r ` l ` - � . ' Ferni . / / � -�.�/( �� ♦ �� y� J � , , ��l . � /�` / ,/ i - ,� 10�/ ��1_ ' ��. : '� � • � ��:��4� , /' v 4 �� (��:,,.�,(� �:�. _ �1 �.,;c,� .; �. :� • a 1 � f ,�_ „� �. ' � ' !�'� `) � � ` '� `� p:�° � � ltaoi o i�w e\� '! I /� , 1 y �f ,rrqoz � c�ne��bI ` • .�� l : ,l �c 1 f } r! �._%MC f,ufef,� ��v� G/'��r 1 � ` t � , ' i ; �� ti �' { , � e /, .0281 l!-P mCerFErl�� -al\ �' �� f �. Ae j �'� ��HouiQ•.• \ ./ , I,qAJO] Dr.Alexentle� �• � � � � � f C.Bt�6�nHcu e�1f�.0 . ., � 1 ( ( t9 I \ ! a; 1 \ �- ) / `� � ! � - 1 ��`� t __=�' _� ' !. . �� I�/ ��`lf —� �, :� , �� -/� ;�:� � \ . /1AW]4 F Oe \ \ � �., S ; �, ��r t � ' Ha� sa � � � \t.+am�i � � � ♦ � 6 }iouse( ��1�(j(;, ��, `.,� �.� « � ��; �� ( �l ; � hs � ' � �1;:I -� �C /" �� ;:, % �j�I( `'�`�, � i''\. ; �'I' �. , , �„� / ,� ``' j ' / • � �, '�7� ' � , �,/i�; 4' r . `/'a�1,; ,�;/� , �::� � I � ,.�� ,/r`�,.j, ,�; �� ,.• , ` / ( o< < �; f � ii � ,\ � �ii' � /�.: �/� 'o"a/`,' � y � \ j�� %� 'a°n��'r! ` . -L�J !�� - -, . /i�•/ _�� /_. �-� / �9r_ ._ USGS TOPO M�p. %� � � � �'� BII � i/ � a e�r(N: lf � ( %//! -� . SrmelesAe) ` l �� 111 //I ! , � � � < `'��, ,', S � } �,r�(, ��_� 1 t�� ' �� : � � � \ ��i.. f .. �� ; � �� ;%�� `� - -- �. �� ° /I h �iwo<so KE �<<H��E: j\ 1� . _.. !. DnI 1\ I II.. . _ . Hiumic Ardrilcrn�rc mid LmWrcnpts NO SUf219i Y RGQUlf7GUJo�m JarAfinur iian �yorinliou Piajrcls ns Qunl frAin IGt 1007 /'rogrmnrnmic AFmrmrnl. Yage 4 of 4 COWEETA CREEK IMPACTS ca ro��o awD� ow�eisporsas � 65'X 2>0' �6I�N��p/J�Q,90 DEG.SKEM' TOTAL PROJKT IENGl11 - 200' ^ ^M. so occ. s�tw IrneM Tfw or.a�olon r�„�w�� ssx $°�""�"k WsnRipRaOonGeo:cztile SfREAM IMPACI'S Sxab�fu6on Pwmmwm 65 h ImPen'vc 0.b Scien �wmol �ro hr = ��I \� ; . � �� \ . ;�+� �\ � :�\ vortimleWFoo�nirciollelion ` �-� ��a ��C�� 4 c J C: � � �' � � � '. � �� i � � � �� ( �_\__ �\� I� _ LV�V^ ,/ +O.l1 C ��.� C-�� _w,, � , l� ��, o,r =;��F ,�� g[{� q ( ,-7-,F--� � , - 1� ,� / ��.�, , �, , : �-Ir�50.W � .''� • �' y 1 �I��..'�'� ��_�� : � . / cuu 'n wv a.r I� �� _ I o�. � �.;, I I� srl�oa � \ \\� O � lS[aoCtunC �� . I J I III � , �� IL��.� I � b . . . ... �� I', �l waos a� V�'� - � � � .�oo� � � �- � =�%�;�� ' `',,�,,,,. ` ? ; � `, _ . : := . r -� � � s t co'M�t�w a�F�c a w TnE umF � 1 �, /]� IENNESSEE PlVe�. 0131N ,l ` '�, � 2 DO nOT INSfAIt DEOC DBPIt�6 l �-.\ LRGSS 3. CLFAGNG SNPtI 8E PECFORvr9 � �_. PER NCDOT NkTHOD LL ., '. N WSTIYG �IP WV ItNED GILIf6RC5GlIf � ��SUPREmFNIED'FNb ' �Wftil„CIJ�ST II Cll FN % 10 0 ro �''. � p�� NOT LE/I ��-- SSRFJ7w ARD OF^FT379 ��.� �r PERMIT DRAWING FOR BRIDGE �550053 MACON COUMY ' .� � �\�'I�I ,��I 11 � �� 9 �� I"� i I h �� i R � O / � i' �' °I�I i� � �` �\ � �� . � I° � � �'�� %'��,, , ; � , 1 p � ,I I � /� I \ \�.. 1 � ` j III 1 ' \ � c I �� t'', � I �t , o �'.' \ �`n� ' I I � I P.PS�F'AL?� � . � ro � 4 \"'. 11 aervE i � %AQD 1 �`. 1 I� I I'� � N .. / mmi';� S\\ �� ` II I/, .,� I\ I i� I �\ �%1��1e�� \' 1f, ','i� `� I' �4��pp,p�� I' 1 �+�'�-i I� � PROP.65PHPU: .: I r� � IORrvEr F : � ' , � ' � I I 1� '��, � � �� . ��. � I ' i". � u0 rr. . I I � li 42�'%]s.�l l I'�. �'• 1 � '� '-IF STA t] 50 ;'� � I II� I � I I I� . I I� Iti�l I � I � i I I I, I�I � i' i u000s i�'! � I I I I ��'I' i �; ''� I �I n�I • I � `� \` ;��.'� . . ; : � , _ e ProJeetTin�kbigNo.: 16-12-0023 ,o�a- NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY RE UIRED FORM l � �,.�. Q ,�''' � �9 �� F.�� This fom� only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this projecL [t is not ��?> � a�� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately wiUi the �� ;;�� Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. �g"" . PROJECT INFORMATION Projecf No: Bridge 53 WBS No: 15B.22.27 F.A. No: Federal Pern�il Regr�ired? Coemty: Macon Docmnent: MCC Funding: � State � Yes ❑ No PernritType: NWP3 RECEIVED DEC 2 9 ?p� ❑ Fed��I�ION 14 Projec[Descrlpllar: Replacement of Bridge No. 53 over Cowetta Creek on SR 1119 (McClure Mill Road) in Macon County, North Carolina. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) measures 600R in length (300ft from each bridge end-point) and 150R in width (75ft from each side of the SRI l 19 center-line). SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Briejdescrip�Jox ojrevieiv nc�ivitles, res�dls of revieiv, nu�/ concl�isTons: Permltting and funding informatfon was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required by sta[e and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources revfev/' form, the project is state- funded with federal permit interaction. As such, Section 306 of the Na[lonal Hlstoric Preservation Act will apply. Next, construction design and other data was examined (when applicable) [o define the character and ex[ent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing the proJect locale. The dimenslons of the APE were formulated to capture any federal permit area. Once an APE was outlined, a map revlew and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday, December 20, 2016. No previously documented archaeological sites are located within the APE. Historic structure locations often harbor archaeological deposits and features related to the former occupation of a property. An InspecHon of National Register of His[oric Places (NRHP), Siate Study Listed (SL), Lowlly Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) proper[ies employfng the NCSHPO website evidenced none of these historic resources within the immedfate project area. In addition, historic maps of Macon Caunty were appraised to Identity former structure locations, land use patterns, or other confirmallon of historic occupahon in the projec[ vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were Inspetted as well. In general, the cultural background review established that no NRHP listed properties, previously recorded archaeological sites or cemeteries are located within the APE. Based on cultural-historical factors, the APE fs considered to have a low potentlal for the documentatlon of archaeological resources. Further, topographic, geologic, (lood boundary, lidar, and NRCS sail survey maps (RSA, HaC2) were referenced to evaluate pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determfnants that may have resulted in past occupatlon a[ this lowtion. Aerial and on-ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data ViewerJ and the Google Street View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utillzed for additional assessment of disturbances, both natural and human induced, which compromise the Integrity of archaeological sites. Environmental/impaU facrors do not suggest a hefghtened potential for archaeological resource recovery. 'No AIK:1/AGOLOGY3UI7V(iY IfF.'QUIRL•'U"Jo,m/orllm AmemkdAlinor7Ymupoim�ia� ProJrra mQudefieAb� tlm 10/S PrugmmexlllcAgrerwrnl. I of2 Pro/eaTrnckOrgNo.: 16-12-0023 Brief Expinnnlfon of ivLy lGe nvnllnble infornrn�tou Nrovldes n re/!able bnsJs jor rensounb/y predtctiug thnl there nre iio wrirleidified /iistorlc propertles in N1e APE: No documented archaeological sftes or cemeteries are contafned wlthin the current APE Iimlts for the Bridge 53 bridge replacement proJect In Macon County, North Carolina. Soil data and topographic maps confirm that the APE is underlain by eroded or frequently Flooded graund surfaces. Furthermore, the entire APE is residentially disturbed. In such contexts, intact NRHP archaeological sites are unlikely to be present or preserved. No further consultation is advocated. A finding of "no archaeological survey required" is considered appropriate. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attacLed: � Map(s) � Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence ❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other: RINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST NO ARCHALOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRCD "No AftCNAliOlAGYSORVEYRi'QUINliO'/otm/o� IfmAxieexleAAl/norThvuyosla�la� ProJrctra'QiW�rAL� dre IOIS PmgmnmmirAgrsraiaN. 20t2 Prenliss topographic map displaying ihe location and boundaries of the archaeological APE in Macon Counly, Norlh Carolina. �IL . "'��'r�w' s � � ''_ '-i ,,,�i ;�� , , ;;a�,;, ' �. �, ,a . � _- � �r :�. � { ` ' � yx � K ;. �'' �: �'' � � .T? Y ` � ' ;, r � � d � �� • f � � " � y. s �� . � . � � � �� :r_ - � , . Y. �,y�V�' .` .. �� '. {`-.-•�.�i1�' ..� � ' !` � � �' � - . � •' � �� 4 �_. ;_� �.t r �� -� �.+ .: � y � t _ , . ' , . �, _' _ � .v, P � 'i'yti}. . :� e.. ,. i , � ��y�` `. 1�" �� F � . , ,� �. ,_ L._ �/ � � . �±� . � � ,� 'L• 'T' .?P�.tiy ; t: /,� t �� . • . �I : ��' ' '�1: - , t� �. � F ' �� . . . , . . � , �� , � � •1'` J . �.. f J _y .A at' � F � • + � -,, .J;i r. 1 ' � �y �jR� '� � . ,X. , ♦ � � � . . ' -�rl�i!""� v • . jwA 1,.. , '' 4 . .. �� ,' .y it j Lv _�i« � ,�,�". ' _ r' '�f .r;F � ' 1 )� ' �t 1' � .�F�_� -�� y. ' .-J' ! • . w 1 a 5�yw�; .: . .n� . . i _�� '� � �S� *��a�.t � � I �,.•.. �~�� . l— � , ��Y' ,,� . � .y . ' )t .r) � � ti� . �,, � y�F . ,. ,�, �r .�;� , y ,�`-'� ,,r ., . _'r; � • y �• � . �^ / p i � Y'r � • � m'��' f .�♦ J • r . �L . � «. y,t`,�' . .;' � ' � � , �' � . • r . �:�� = - . . ,.Y .�` .. � � ► a• � �' � "� ' � .. �� ! ,., � s �. � . .. � _ f++► � . ' � I �..a�� i' i � .� ��. .: ' �F � �� r � � . ''• • �:. � , ' � , � �.F . y � , '; r . • t � ., . � .r� rY• �r � �,� -� � •., .. � - � � .,� ♦ +y,•� � • '� �- .%{$ . '1' ` .< � i?.��/� ,y �.r, . 1`�,J'` , , � • . . � �I � . . , i� �, '}�� '.. � � � � � 1 A� . . �� . �.r • � - ';°`�{_ - — ;, .� ,r~ � �. .'t. ��,�� r • , - , , , � "t., - . :. ,s''.<� #''„• , COWEETA CREEK IMPACiS e�xoroseos��cf ou.,e"�i.a°o� �o•.n•x za�5wc� sru.p,00 occ.src�w TOTni PROJECT IENGCH _ zpp' °5 X 2�' (SINGi[ SlqN�, 90 DEG. $KEW tenv�ti Typo Dm.oipfion Pormanone 65fi Svcambank �IIRipRaPonGcro:Cttilc �EQ,jV� IMPACTS Sob�lutipn Fam+emm 65 N Impon:w.:0:ke ��^^ «^+•u��^ocvro b. - � \\ wmwlab�mmeromaeoarien �� \ � � � � � \ � C, l, _ �1� �" � � o-v � � � ��,� � � ��\ \.i\` � � � . �\ �'\1 ��; �f i ,-- �n� as �.,, �� ' � ,N �'„ � s Y � ��/ ''}� ; —��_. . I/ DIK-' ,��' C /,y( -/I BEQN tROEIT�—. � � �� I � � � ,�('� /�'I . 1� 1 m3T,u z� 1 C, � . � . 4 I I �' �,�-�_..:z� / i I i 1: woa�s �/ � �'i � \�PDRO�PPSPHALT � `_ � !. � \ � � �/� WOOSS '�� I ."- / �/ \ � � � 1 1. COwEETA CSEEK 6 IN TYE tI�RF �� 1 . TFNNESSEE RNFR 6.�SIN j �-., �, / 2. DO NOT INRPIL pKK DR.VNS '� � � 3. CtFARING SXui BE PECFOW+,FD �°SS . �FR NCDOT METNOD II. \ . � . � `` N IX6TIVG FIP'M➢ N�� / ��C S,G� � OF $UPPILNEAfILD`ANobi \�M'141 C{iSS,II U' P GP I.. YTYII��—J \ P � �� OT eE/Y� SSRbvny�ARD OF D1S1A(f _ � 'i S'mFwN.F'2 GFaDE �?�9 � -: i. �I'.,�i i !i5x i i i � '. i PERMIT DRAWING FOR BRIDGE �550053 MACON COUN7Y I .' C'. c � �� AS)IUC!£ � I R Gp � ' N I i I � ' � r I � �\ . � � i : � � � � " � �\ \ `� \ '' Si `, \ �I.E � \ � �\) . � i �,Yi C'. � �! `� �i I ' �' �'\ :�pt5iro�op3 I : � : I ' ' '', . I ii' I��Du°rvPE�PH�� I li � I I! � �;� � ill. �� r r NO �'Q1 � � � 9 B�.L'b'J�024� � �� -lr STA 1] 50 I i I I� ( i � � i ' . I (: ' I • I, I I, I I ti � i I �� I ii :� W0005 i i I: II I y � I�� I II � I I I � I I I P I �\ \ �� =1 '• 1 ' ��:�= , � . �'..�_�V� A OF _� Iill^�('..CSLV � � �i�6� c�d -�:O Gh'a �`j.�i5 �.hp.�,�.� N n - - � u= - c" 5� � c L `g�.// � \ti � ' ��i y F.U;:,`5� M1.[c:4;-e Fili r�.s:�s; �r3rier.a;;.i�� H_�se c s C c = � r:v..,^-a 2a5�n Fys�e F�ise tvL=.97'^ L�ons� Ply�� HaC2—Hayesville clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Map Unit Selting • Notional mop unif rymbol: 19zy • Elevotion: 1,790 to 2,280 feet • Mean annual precipifafion: 50 [0 58 inches • Mean onnual air temperoture: 46 to 57 degrees F • Fros[-/�ee period: 124 to 176 days • Farminnd clossiJicotion: Farmland of statewide Importance Map Unit Composition • Hayesville,mode�atefyeroded,ondsimilnrsoils:80percent • Minorcomponents:20pertent • Esfimotes o�e based on oGservations, descriptions, ond transects o/the mapunit. Description of Hayesville, Moderetely Eraded Setting • LandJorm: Rldges • Landfornrposition(two�dimensionnlJ:Summit • LandJormposition(three-dimensionolJ:lnterfluve • Dawn-slapesl�ape: Convex • Aaoss-slopeshope: Linear • Porent moteriol: Residuum weathered from homhlende gneiss and/or amphibolice 7ypical protile • Ap-Oto6lnches:clayloam • Bf-6fo33fnches:clayloam • BC-33to457nches:loam • C-45[o80lnches:Onesandyloam Properties and qualitfes • Slope: 8 to IS percent • Depth ta restdcflve feature: More than 80 fiches • Natural drolnage dass: Well drained • Runofjclass: Medlum • CapacityoJfhemos[limiting/ayertof�ansmitwa[er(Ksaf):Moderetelyhightohigh(0.57to1.98in(hr) • Depth to woter table: More than SO inches • FrequencyoJJlooding:None • FrequencyaJponding:None • Avoila6le waterstoroge fn proJile: High (about 9.7 fnches) Interpretive groups • Landcapablliryclassi/lcaUon(lnigated):Nonespeclfied • Landmpa611iryclassiJlcatfon(noniniga[edJ:3e • Hydro(ogltSoil Group: B • Hyddcsollrating:No Minor Campanents Cowee, stony • PercentoJmop uni[: 8 percent • Land/orm:Rfdges • LandJorm poslfion (two-dimenslonolJ: Summit • LandJo�mpositfon(three-dlmenstonal):Interfluve • Down-slopeshape:Convex • Across-slopeshope: Linear • Hydricsoilrating: No Fannln • Percentofmapunil:7percent • Landfarm: Ridges • Landfoim posifion (two-dimensionalJ: Summit • tandjorm position (tb�ee-dimenslonof): Interfluve • Down-slopeshope:Canvex • Anoss-slapeshope:linear � Nydrlcsoilrating:No Ur6an land • Pe�centofmopunit:5percent • Hydricsoll rafing: No HSA—Rosman flne sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, trequently tlooded Map Unit Settfng • NotianalmapunitsymboF.Ib06 • Elevotlon: 1,200 to 2,000 feet • Mean annual preclpltatlon: 45 to 70 inches • Mean annuql ol� [empera[ure: 46 to 57 degrees F • Fiost fiee period: 116 to 170 days • Farmland classlfcation: Prime farmland if protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season Map Unft Compositton • Rosman,/�equently/loaded,andsfmllarsolfs:90percent • Mlnorcomponents:5percent • Estimates ore 6ased on observatlans, desntptlons, ond transects o/ the mop�nit. Descrlption of Rosman, Frequently Flooded Setting • Landjarm: flood plalns • Down-slopeshape:Linear • Acrassalapeshope:Linear • Parentmoter7ah.Loamyalluvium Typical protile • A- 0 to 16lnthes: flne sandy loam • Bw-16to80fnches:loam Properties and qualities • Slope: 0 to 2 percent • Depth to restrlctive Jeature: More than 80lnches • Noturoldralnageclass:Welldrained • Runo/(class:Verylow • Capacftyoffhemostlimiting/ayeitotransmltwafer(Ksotf:High�1.98to5.95in/hr) • Depth to watertable: About 42 to 60 Inches • FrequenqofJlooding:Frequent • F�equency of ponding: None • Availa6le waterstorage In p�ojlle: Moderate (about 8.5 inches) Interpretive groups • Cand capabillty clossi/imtion (IvigotedJ: None spedfied • Londcapabilitycfatsificotio�(nonlnigatedJ:6w • HydrofoglcSoll Group: A • Hydrlcsoll ratfng: No Minor Components Hemphill, undralned • Peicento/mapunit.5percent • Land%rm: Depressions on stream terraces • Downalopeshape:Concave • Acrass-slopeshape:Concave • Hydr7c soll ra[Ing: Yes