20051283 Ver 3_Staff Report_20080528

Staff Report
Project Num: 20051283 Version: 3
Name: Timberlodge S/D c/o Clearwater Enterprises Inc
County: Bladen
Location: White Lake White Lake
Latitude: +34°37'52"
SW Plan Location:
Owner: Underwood, Theodore
Contact Person: Underwood, Theodore
Inspection Date: 05/28/2008
Reason for Inspection: Routine
On-Site Representative(s):
Primary Inspector: Kenneth L Averitte
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 11:30 AM
Status: Received
Project Type: Single Family Residence
Region: Fayetteville
Longitude: -78°29'50"
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:45 AM
Inspection Type: Staff Report
Phone: [phone] Ext.703
Question Areas:
N Site Visit
Inspection Summary:
There have been multiple visits to this site, which was filled several years ago. Mr. Underwood has finally agreed to put deed
notifications on the remaining lots (per current application from Gary Mitchell). This includes a map signed by Jennifer Frye of the
Corps of Engineers.
(Mr. Underwood has made the point that he did not want to rule out future development of those lots.) Item VIII (1) of the current PCN
indicates that the signed wetland map and deed notice has been recorded with the Register of Deeds in Bladen County, specifying
that Lots 73,74,75, and 76 are subject to 404 regulation, require permits for modification, etc
With this now in place, it is the recommendation of this office that the requested 401 Certification be approved, AFTER the appropriate
fees have been collected. The 401 should reiterate the notice requirement concerning lots 73 thru 76.
Page: 1
Project Num: 20051283 Owner: Underwood, Theodore
Inspection Date: 05/28/2008 Inspection Type: Staff Report
Reason for Visit: Routine
Site Visit Yes No NA NE
Do impacts described in the application differ those seen in the field? ? E ? ?
If yes.. please describe differences:
Are the Intermittent/Perennial calls different in the application? ? ? M ?
If yes, please describe differences. and how mitigation ratios are affected:
Are there additional impacts not described in the application? ? ¦ ? ?
If yes please describe and quantify:
Were the impacts in place prior to the application for the 401 Certification? ? ? ?
Additional conditions recommended for the Certification:
Recommended project modifications:
Is this a modification request to an existing Certification? ? ¦ ? ?
Are there additional stromwater conditions that should be required due to the following classifications: ? m ? ?
# 303(d)list, Class WS, NSW, ORW, HQW
Describe:
Is this a subdivision or otherwise part of a larger project? ? ? ¦ ?
# If yes, what phase is this?
Are there prior impacts from prior phases? ? ? ¦ ?
If yes, what are the cumulative imacts for this project?
Possible secondary impacts noted:
Comment:
Page: 2
ted Underwood, 0512830
Subject: ted underwood, 0512830
From: Ken Averitte <[e-mail]> 1
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:07:07 -0400 I C o
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
Ian,
I put comments into BIMS today regarding this project.
Finally, it looks like something that we can live with. The PCN says that they have
recorded the map and notification language concerning the wetlands on Mr.
Underwood's remaining wet lots.
If they have paid the required fees, I'm ok with issuing it, as long as we include
standard deed notice language as well.
thanks
ken
1 of 1 5/28/2008 11:57 AM