20161242 Ver 1_401 Application_20161216

124 Goldberry Lane . Pi
BIOCENOSIS
December 8, 2016
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
To whom it may concern,
2 0 1 6 1 2 4 2
�. (919) 542 — 6787 . www.biocenosis.org
[1@[10W.FE
D
OE(: 15 2016
4
DEO-WATER BUFFER PERMITTING
Please find enclosed the PCN application and supporting maps and documentation for the
Triple Crown Farms residential development project proposed in Orange County, NC. This
project will result in the construction of a twenty lot residential subdivision consisting of two
roadways totaling approximately 4300 LF and associated subdivision improvements. The
subdivision improvements will include the installation of 1491f of 48" and 66" RCP culvert
pipes and approximately 63 if of 42'-9" x 19'-7" bridge span that will cross three unnamed
tributaries to Morgan Creek. Standard earth moving equipment (excavators, dump trucks,
front end loaders) will be used in the earth moving operations and setting of the culverts;
sizes of each will be based upon the contractor selected to perform this work. The bridge
span will be set with a crane to minimize stream impacts. Less than one acre of wetlands and
less than 150 feet of streams will be impacted.
If you have questions, please contact me at 919-726-0025. Thank you.
Best,
�ell
Karen Hall, Ph.D.
Senior Ecologist
Biocenosis
919-726-0025
Promoting community stewardship of our natural resources.

�oF warE�p Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o < DWQ project no.
L J Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit E]Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ YesX❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Triple Crown Farms
2b.
County:
Orange
2c.
Nearest municipality /town:
Chapel Hill
2d. Subdivision name:
Triple Crown Farms
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
16 Parkside Lane, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3943/523
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Danny Jones
3d.
Street address:
2807 Homestead Rd
3e.
City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-593-0852
3g.
Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent(Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Karen Hall
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Biocenosis, LLC
5c. Street address:
124 Goldberry Lane
5d. City, state, zip:
Pittsboro, NC 27312
5e. Telephone no.:
919-726-0025
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9850910030
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.95249 Longitude: -79.136753
1c. Property size:
104 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Morgan Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
WS-11 HQW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property is a former dairy fans that consists of rolling hills, open pastures, wooded areas and several beaver swamp complexes within the bottom
land area. Fortner open pastures are now used as hay fields. Streams and beaver wetland complexes are more or less buffered in the upper reaches
with bottomland hardwood trees. A residential development unaffiliated with this project lies to the northeast of this proposed residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 6.23
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 4,106
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construction of a twenty (20) lot residential subdivision consisting of two (2) roadways totaling approximately 4300 LF and associated subdivision imprc
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of a twenty (20) lot residential subdivision consisting of two (2) roadways totaling approximately 4300 LF and associated subdivision impro
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: in 2006 a delineation was performed but Corps requiff
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary © Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Unknown
Agency/Consultant Company: S&EC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
2006. Documentation unavailable.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtainedfor
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
ElYes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to 'help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
© Wetlands Streams — tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acnes)
W1 -
Fill
Seep
Yes
Corps
0.05
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.05
2h. Comments:
This is a small seep wetland adjacent to the stream. It drains into the stream.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e. 3f.
Type of Average
jurisdiction stream
width
(fit)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P Bridge Unnamed TributaryA
PER
Corps
0
S2 P Culvert Unnamed Tributary B
PER
Corps
70
S3 P Culvert Unnamed Tributary C
INT
Corps
79
S4 - Choose one
-
-
S5 - Choose one
-
-
S6 - Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
149
3i. Comments:
See construction plans for culvert and bridge details.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (awes)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acnes):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project Will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ® Other. Jordan Lake
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary Mfeet
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: Orange County will oversee buffer impacts through the erosion control and stommater management program.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Erosion control measures (silt fence, sediment traps, crushed stone construction access drives) have been designed to minimize construction impacts
such as sediment; the measures proposed will prevent discharge of sediment into sensitive areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A bridge section is being proposed at the major site stream crossing; also, the proposed culvert lengths at the other crossings have been minimized.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes © No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Poogram
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
6. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
E] Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
This project is within the Jordan Lake buffer. However, Orange County has been delegated to oversee buffer impacts through its erosion and
stonnwater management program. Buffer impacts will be addressed in the Stormwater Mangament Plan.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
© Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
This project is within the Jordan Lake buffer. However, Orange County has been delegated to oversee
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer impacts through its erosion and stormwater management program.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
6%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stormwater management plan is required per the Orange County Unified Development Ordinanoe.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Orange County Stormwater Division
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Orange County
❑ Phase 11
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
rxl Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes © No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
[]Coastal counties
®HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSession Law 2006-246
[]Other
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
[]Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no; provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Septic systems will be designed for each individual lot. These systems will be reviewed/approved by the Orange County Health Deparbnent.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ® No
habitat?
6b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
[] Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes. indicate the USFWS Feld Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US FWS Endangered, threatened and FSC GIS Database
US FWS Critical Habitat mapper
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ©No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources dirt you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIS Database
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 104 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Floodplain maps
tb rRii4e L.oe1
`Qq
_ 57- [t
n ri % Z r) Q
Appli y/ ge s Signature
Applicant(A6enrs Printed Name
Date
(Agents signatuileit valy if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Vicinity
I
0 , `00.11
id
Orange County, NC GIS
Vicinity
EU NKS RD
Uj
BRI JDR;
o C
0
GEWNA RD
ARROORO)
Tj
WIWS -()W t NI
I T)
rr
13
It,
z
1OASIS M 0
Uj
1 inch = 4000 feet
Parcel Search - [PIN = '9850910030'] - 1 parcels found streets Municipal Boundary Outline
Page I of 2
http://server2.co.orange.nc.us/OrangeNCGIS/default.aspx 3/11/2016

Vicinity
Major Streets
Interstate
� iocSymbol 0
SNC HWY
—US HWY
—HWY Ramps
—Main Roads
County Boundary
13
Municipal Boundary
■ CARRBORO
CHAPEL HILL
DURHAM
HILLSBOROUGH
■ MEBANE
Created on 3/11/2016. Orange County, North Carolina.
Page 2 of 2
http://server2.co.orange.nc.us/OrangeNCGIS/default.aspx 3/11/2016

ll t
fill
A
I Zill,
Sil
/Yj/
—R 1-11.2
000 DODD fill
L
TRIPLE CROWN FARMS 16 PARKSIDE LANE, LLC
DAIRYLAND ROAD M7 HOAE�
ORMU COUNTY, NORTH CAROLIM HM4 � clnvµ Mid
SITE PLAN

TRIPLE CROWN FARMS
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
ORANGE COUNTY
ORIG SUBMISSION DATE
REVISED SUBMISSION DATE
PREPARED FOR:
OW NERIDEVELOPER
16 PARKSIDE LANE
2807 HOMESTEAD ROAD
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514
[phone]
LOCATION MAP
s W: r.2OW
PREPARED BY:
PHILIP POST401
C1,111 lift Providence2 5 4 �
ASSOCIATES
F 919.49165448
A Division of �
Sheet List Table
Sheet Number Sheet Title
.—R—T
P8P GAUM FD%CROSSING
dPG FO%CROSSING
dP SECRETARIATC RT
5 W SECRETAPoAT COURT
6E— CONiRh PUN
7 SITE pETAIlS
e siTE OE7a�s
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

0
�
a ti A tt 6
5
••E.
�$
�
�I 1. ��
I
.i,
j IE
�ppg�E
i
i
O
A �cT
I
n 5 �
Z
D , '
E
Ii��i�g�6i�.,
TRIPLE CROWN FARMS
y"° °w
PHILIP POST
b ASSOgATES
tli
"� t °
tial! i�aiatl �
GALLANT FOX,CROSSING -
PLAN 6 PROFILE
O
m ',
j i
�f�It�i�t,1li6
ieo�rasneuue uc
rwioN�uocwm we

g
i -
MA
\
l
V
1
44
NA
�,,...
.
y
ea
I
u
i
y
F
f
\
\ a
i I
\•
O
A
Z
i
C
I
R
ga� ii
TRIPLE CROWN FARMS
PHILIP POST
�'
�7 j
64LlANT FOX CR0881NG- 17+00 27+00
PLAN 6 PROFILE
nnRNs��oE uuE
S ASSOGATES
nom.a.,a�'^•^
Pyixow^nanocum Nc

t
g
.
9 a
iar 1 1
a
e
\.
2
O
7oal
a ��t
t1
� • /
i
'
9 itl� I+��+�
TRIPLE OARMS CRWN F,,�„
PHILIP POST
W
laj`1�I I
SECRECOURT-0+DOO+50
9, PROFILE
PLANT5
&ASSOUATMTARIAT

i
E I E
I
i6 °•S
a
9 — 3
I,
E
z
0
a
0
5 �
i
p d$
2
TRIPECR=ARMS
PHILIP
&ASSOC kM
SECRETARIAT COURT -8+50 TO 17+00
PLAN 6 PROFILE
16P1FN610EUNE
•owrwa®.,..-".
PBIpN MWCM�FA NC.

CL
m
—
Q
`s
m.tl�
—gym _s. aw&%tr.
77=,Z7
M5PN
0
M
aw
DMI
gill
TYPICAL ROAD SECTION
MI
or
-------- --- ----
OL
TeMPORMY STWM GROSSING
�f_STA�­IM
--vig
igm—T-r
N C�
C88002

•
d
1w
qLlilt
n
[®r
HIRED

Sv +
a 4
F s>
NA
z
a, 71
� d �
zz� Or
00,
i100
op
,cl`i`l.=ul((((`�7''',/'J/°�`i"� � C��yyO¢�,1h� Co��S'��0/�0'��((�a((y'j���� 0']U SC�'•,.Y� '0�',{0 .ry0�(� Ute.
M 3 MU l�_J@JlY & L'I� m-, u = , 1 - ul 0 0 kD U A 0 G IIL�O U UPJ , Dap,
o t:1aj ltra Ca -GQ,

Stream Call B
Stream Call Al
N..Stream Call E
3� beaver dams
streets
planned culverts
planned roads
project study area
NWI Wetlands
Flood Harzard Areas
B �
m .,
Stream Call F
Stream Call A3
Stream Call D
AE (1 %annual Chace flood)
0
0.2 % annual chance flood ti
k
.. NOTE: This map is intended for information pruposes
only and does not constitute a certified survey of the area
Triple Crown Farms
Wetland Delineations & Stream Calls 71)tk-t
ORANGE
Ac Lower Beaver
WetlandAl perennial D perennial
IDURHAM2.0
4.0 Ac Seep A2 perennial E not on property, but flagged
A3 perennial F intermittent
Ac Upper Beaver B perennial G ephemeral (spring)
kMANCE
.05
Wetland C intermittent off of C flagged but too small
CHATHAM
to show on map
streams
Date: 10/26/2016

wetlands
1.9 Acres M Lower Beaver Wetland
0.03 Acres seep
4.3 Acres upper Beaver wetland
Q Beaver Dams
20 Ft. Base Contour
100 Ft. Base Contour
Triple Crown Farms

BRIGHTS
\ o
z
Y' GeB
L TRIPLE CROWN
TaD„y
GeB
Ge$ ' 1
HrB
TaD
1)c til
1
Ch
2ft elevation countours
project study area
streams 1,000
wetlands
planned culverts
GeC
\Ty
�a
------ planned roads NOTE: This map is intended for information pruposes
streets - only and does not constitute a certified survey of the area
Triple Crown Farms
Soils
ORANGE MUSYM _
,
DURHAM
WAKE
Date: 10/26/2016

0 Photo Sites
streets
planned culverts
planned roads
project study area
0
1.000
Feet
NOTE: This map is intended for information pruposes
only and does not constitute a certified survey of the area
Triple Crown
Farms
Wetland Delineations & Stream Calls Photo Sites
Lower Beaver
1- stream call Al
9 - SW upland soil sample
Wetland
2 - stream call B
10 - LBW wetland soil sample
Seep
3 - stream call C
11 - LBW upland soil sample
4 - UBW upland soil sample
12 - stream call F
Upper Beaver
5 - UBW wetland soil sample
13 - stream call A3
Wetland
6 - stream call A2
14 - stream call stream call D
7 - old dam
streams
8 - SW wetland soil sample
Date: 11f7/2016

L�
Ao
v Ir

r -
a
�\

UBW Upland Soil
UBW Wetland Soil

L•
a

i s 1
}SS� .R.
t I \

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projewsite: Triple Crown Farms city/county. Orange Sampling Date: 9-12-2016
Applicantrowner. 16 Parkside Lane LLC State: NC Sampling Pant: UBW-2U
Investigator(s): Karen Hall Section, Township, Range. Chapel Hill
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let 35.9509923 Long: -79.13976252
Son Map unit Name. Tate (TaD) NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / h drollogic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F71 No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegaSoil or Hydrology =significantly disturbed�Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes F7-1No
Are Vegetation Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Datum:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No within a Wetland? Yes = No l r t
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes j'---1 No r�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (86)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (B1)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquiitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
Sphagnum moss (D6) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes = No D Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes= No 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes= No Q Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= Nor . r
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Point 533 upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UBW-2U
(Plot size: 11100 ac '
Tree Stratum) % Cover Species - Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 90 y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 X.- FACU Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata:
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
Total % Cover of:
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Piot size: 1 /100 ac )
1.
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
2.
FACW species
3.
FAC species
4.
FACU species
5.
UPL species
6.
Column Totals:
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1. Elaeagnus umbellata 15 FACU
2. Lindera benzoin 20 FAC
3.Polygonum pensylvanicum 5 FACW
4. Ligustrum sinense 15 FACU
5.
6.
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
rophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
55 = Total Cover Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (1381-1).
1 Microstwium vimineum 75 FAC Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2_ Verbesina altemifolia 15 FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4• Shrub - W plants, excluding Woody p , g w oody vines,
5 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover
woody vine Stratum (Plot size: 11100 ac )
1. Lonicera japonica 2 FAC
2.
3.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, LU woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height.
IWoody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
2 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover Present? Yes= Nor
US Anny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant: UBW-2U
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (mast) %
Color (moist) % Twee
Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 3/2 100
SCL
2-12 7.5YR 5/8 100
SCL
'Type: C --Concentration, D --Depletion, RM --Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains.
location: PL=Pare Lining M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SopsP—
Histosd (Al)
Payvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Mudd (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
ed Parent Material (TF2)
Mudd Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Pother
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 91ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umlxic Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type: I
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yeses No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projecvsite: Triple Crown Farms city/county. Orange Sampling Date: 9-12-2016
Applicanvowner. 16 Parkside Lane LLC State: NC Sampling Pant: UBW-1 W
Investigator(s): Karen Hall Section, Township, Range: Chapel Hill
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex. none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat 35.95144845 Long: -79.13941853 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla Ch NWI classification: 11/8
Are climatic / h dro1 is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes M No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed�Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes r No
Are Vegetation= Soil or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features. etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesl ✓ 1 No L__j Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No = within a Wetland? Yes C1 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesrT-I No r----1
Beaver wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired4 check all that apply)
=Surface Water (Al) =Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (610)
✓=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (816)
=Water Marks (61)
_✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (83)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=FAC -Neutral Test (135)
71 Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes =
No D Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0
No= Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes 0
No = Depth (inches): 10
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Point 534 wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1 Liquidambar stymciflua
suedes? "Status
60 y FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30 FACW
3.
FACW species
4.
FAC species
5.
FACU species
6.
UPL species
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plat size: 1/100ac )
1. Liouidambar stvraciflua
90 = Total Cover
20% at total cover.
30 y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1/100ac )
_ = Total Cover
20% of total cover
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1.Ludwida altemifolia
= Total Cover
20% of total cover.
70 FACW
2,Boehmeria Cylindrica
20 FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. _
9.
10.
11. _
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. _
Woody Vine Stratum (Piot size: 1/100 ac )
1. Lonicera iaponiCa 1 FAC
2.
3.
4.
Sampling Point: UBW-1 W
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BfA =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
12 - Dominance Test is >50%
I3 - Prevalence Index is.,53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size,rW woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
IWoody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5. Hydrophytic
1 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total carer. Present? Yeses No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant: UBW-1 W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (mast) —% Type Loci Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 5/1 96
7.5 YR 5/8 4 RM PL
SCL
'Type: Concentration, D=De etion, RM --Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains.
location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils .
Histosol (A1)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
L Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
ed Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)ery
Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Maw Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 91ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F78) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sols (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yeses No=
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
project/site: Triple Crown Farms City/County. Orange Sampling Date: 9-12-2016
Applicant/Owner. 16 Parkside Lane LLC State: NC Sampling Pant SW -2U
Investigator(s): Karen Hall Section, Township, Range: Chapel Hill
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%)_ 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat 35.95187039 Long: -79.13858612 Datum:
Sod Map Una Name: Tate (TaD) NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes =✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil= or Hydrology=significantly disturbedC=Are `Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No =
Are Vegetation Soil= or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0(�
Welland Hydrology Present? Yeses,r✓�
No warn a Wetland? Yes �1 No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquafic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Moss Trim Lines (616)
=Water Marks (131)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (84)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (85)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
=FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes = No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes Q No 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes = No Q Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
includes ca H lary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Point 536 upland
US Arany Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 aC
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
Sbecies? Status
10 y FAC
2. Pinus taeda
5 yFAC
3,Quercus alba
85 FACU
4.
x3=
5.
x4=
6.
x5=
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 1 /100 ac )
1. Liauidambar styraciflua
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
70 y FAC
2.Carya spp.
15 n FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1. Elaeagnus umbellata
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
15 FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1.
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
2-
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: SW -2U
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AiB)
Total % Cover of:
Multioly by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrephytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6 Herb - All herbaceousnon-woody) ( Doty) plants, including
7. herbaceous vines, regardless of size, XQd woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8. 3 It (1 m) in height.
9.
10. Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless or height.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1. Lonicera FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
1Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. Present? Yes= No
US Arany Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
or
Sampling Point: SW -2U
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe�oc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 3/2 100 SCL
2-12 7.5YR 5/8 100 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sa
Hydric Soil indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosd (Ai)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Rede x (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) L_t 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside AALRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
Dark Surface (F7)
ed ParentMateriF2),Depleted
Redaac Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sols (F20) (INLRA 149A, 153q 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yeses No[Z]
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Triple Crown Farms City/County: Orange Sampling Date: 9-12-2016
Applicanvowner: 16 Parkside Lane LLC state: NC Sampling Point: SW -1W
Investigator(s): Karen Hall
Section, Township, Range: Chapel Hill
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let; 35.95158708 Long: -79.13859366 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla Ch NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSoil= or Hydrology =significantly disturbedi=Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No=
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No = wOln a Wetland? Y"= No=
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Seep wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
=Surface Soil Cracks (86)
✓=Surface Water (A1)
=Aquatic Fauna (613)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓=High Water Table (A2)
=Mad Deposits (615) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (610)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
r7,/Water Marks (51)
_✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (63)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (BS)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No D Depth (inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes Q
No Q Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No = Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No =
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Point 535 seep wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: SWA W
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac ) %Calver Sflecies? Status •tea' _-_-
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2' Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total caner.
Saplina Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Carer
Tctal % Cover at
Multiply by,
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.Alnus serrulata 2 OBL
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1.Lobelia cardinalis
2 = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
5 FACW
2_Boehmeria cylindrice
5
FACW
3,Carex spp.
35
FACW
4. Impatiens capensis
5
FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
f. Mikania scandens
50 = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
10 FACW
2.
3.
4.
'Indicators or hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, gg, j woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 it (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5. Hydrophytic
10 = Total Carer Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. Present? Yesr7l No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

�2
to the depth
or
Depth Matrix Redco( Features
(inched Color (moist) % Color (mast) % Type, —LocS
0-3 2.5YR 3/1 100
3-12 GLEY 17/1 OY 98 2.5 YR 6/8 2 RM PL
'Type: C --Concentration, D --Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Histosd (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Sampling Point: SW -1W
Texture Remarks
SCL
SCL
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR 3, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redcar Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
ed Parent Material (TF2)
RedcK Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
9lndicaters orhydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) ('MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (1718) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yeses No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region –Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiect/site: Triple Crown Farms City/County: Orange Sampling Date: 9-12-2016
Applicant/Owner: 16 Parkside Lane LLC state: NC
Sampling Pant LBW -W
Investigator(s): Karen Hall Section, Township, Range: Chapel Hill
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let 35.95016459 Long: -79.13557542 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla (Ch) NWI classification n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil or Hydrology = significantly disturbed'
"Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No=
Are Vegetation Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No = within a Wetland? Yes = No=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No r�
Lower beaver wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that 112P21)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (613)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=INarl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (810)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (B1)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (82)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (83)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CO
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (85)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water-tained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No D Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0✓
No = Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes Q✓
No = Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes^
m No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Point 542 lower beaver wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Posaure uommam macarw
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1/100 aC ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Taal Cover
50% of total ever: 20% of total cover.
Sapling stratum (Plot size: 1/100 ac )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plat size: 1/100 ac )
1.Alnus serrulate 5 OBL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plat size: 1 /100 ac )
1 Juncus effusus 15 FACW
2.Boehmeria cylindrica 4 FACW
3,Carex spp. 80 FACW
4. Impatiens capensis 1 FACW
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
10.
11.
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Pia size: 1/100 ac )
1. FACW
Sampling Point: LBW -W
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for HydrophyBc Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, Including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, Md woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
2.
3.
4.
5• Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. Present?
YesM NoF-1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

-r�
to the depth
or
Sampling Pant: LBW -W
Depth Matrix Redac Features
(inches) Color (moist) _ % Color (moist) % Tme'r—Loci Texture Remarks
0-12 1OYR 5/1 95 7.5 YR 5/8 5 RM PL SCL
Hydric Boll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Salle:
Histosd (Al)
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR 3, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedcn (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR B, T, U)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Z iLoanry Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
lAnomalous Bright Loamy Sacs (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
L Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
ed Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redac Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicatas of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redac (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? YesFTNo[=
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version ZO

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ecnite: Triple Crown Farms City/County: Orange Sampling Date: 9-12-2016
Applicant/Owner: 16 Parkside Lane LLC state: NC Sampling Point: LBW -U
Investigator(s): Karen Hall Section, Township, Range: Chapel Hill
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 35.95016643 Long: -79.1353502 Datum:
Soil Map unit Name: Tate (TaD) Nwl Classification: n/a
Are climatic / h drol is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology= significantly disturbed?=Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No=
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(H needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No within a Wetland? yes= No Q
Welland Hydrology Present? Yesl No 177-7-1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators tminimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (1216)
=Surface Water (Al)
QAquabc Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (81)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (85)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes = No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes = No Q Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes = No 0 Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No L�
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Point 541 upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strap) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Sampling Point: LBW -U
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
MuMiDW by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B(A =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. 1 - Rapid Test for H
ydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
20% of total cover. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Festuca spa. 80 y FAC
2. Sorghum halepense 60 y_ FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
140 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) In height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. I
Present? Yes= No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
(Describe to the
or
Sampling Point: LBW -U
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Twe Loci Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5YR 312 100 SCL
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LI
Histosd (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic(A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (87) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Salle:
Pdyvalue Below Surface (88) (LRR 8, T, U) Q1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redax Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
ed Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depicted Ochric (F71) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umtxic Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F77) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yesa Nor -T
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 _
Nu Uwq btream wentrirCRitoH norm YelSlan �tJL i
''
I pig_ ..^... . � RrojectlSiie. . - . Latitude: -
i Evaluator: County: Longitude: _
Total Points: / _ Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stteem ;s at least irrtemarhmt - iEphemeral lntermitterrr Peiennial i e.g. Quad Name:
dr 19 or dz3v' {
A,_Geamar�hQy (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong _
Li- Conbnuq of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3 +
_
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3.-
3. In -channel structuex. [itfiej,)W, step -pool.
p
1
2
3
se uencc�
1.5
i
0.5
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3 1
5. Active/relid floodplain
w 0
i
2
� 3
''
6. Depositional or benches
0
1
2 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits ---
0
1
tt 2 -j.. ,....
[ 8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade cdntto3
2
1
0
20, Mmoberttnos fnow dMn4 and aWW*noe)
110. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
_
11. Second or greater order channel
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
22. Fish _..
'artifit=W d are not talod. see m rnamW
tomes
r
B. Hydralagy$Ubtotal = r_:
112. Presetx a of Easeflow
0
1
2
3
r 13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
i
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5.
- j ^ A 3
1.5
( 16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
e
1 _.
1.5
�.
17 -Sod -based evkkmm of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3 ,
C. Biobgy, , (Subtotal -_
18. Fibrous roots in sbeambed
3-
2
1
0
t 19 Rooted upland plants in skeambed
3 .,
2
1
0
20, Mmoberttnos fnow dMn4 and aWW*noe)
0
3
2
3
4 21. Aquatic Mollusks
_.�
�.
1
2
3
22. Fish _..
0
1
i.5
23 Crayfish
0
0.5
1
15
24. Amphibians
0
0.5 -
.. i
1.5
L25- AJ ae
0
2fi: iiYetiend plants in streambed
FACUY - 0.75; OSL = 1.5 Other = 0
I 'perennial streams may affix be Kfenb6ed using ("her meNrods. Sae P. 35 of marRol
Notes:
-_._-
- --.
Q1

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC i)WO Strum identification Farm Version 4.11
Dow: �
Proiectisite: �? {
Latitude:
Evaluator. F
County: ' f r
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
r at least eif-- ai(tent
Ephemeral tntermithm t Perennial
e.g. Ovad Name:
#;* 1.m
i! 219 or if 3Q' .""" `"'
24. Amptaibians
3
A_ GeomorphologySubtotal =� .r ---
At t
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Cont wiry of gannet bed and bank
0
':
2 -
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
T_
5
24. Amptaibians
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rit1le-pool, step -pool.
_
0
_2
26. Weiland plants in streambed
_. r�-Pie-Foot sequence
'paromi al streams my x1w be ideneied using other inethods. See p. 35 or manual. yy
Notes:
_
_
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/reiict min
?
S
2
3
_3
6. Depositional tsars or beaches
2
~
7. Recent aikrvial deposits
- 0 _
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(. 0
1
2 i
3
_..._.,
9. Gracie control0
0.5
i s
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 T
0.5
1
1.5
_ .._
11. Second or greater Ord -,-channel
No = p
Yes = 3
ma�
.artificial ditchm are not rated: swin manual
_. .. _
B. Hydrology (Subtotal -�
B.
12. Presence of Baseftow 0
1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing batter......
0
1
2
_
14. leaf fitter
! 1.5
i.a
15. Sedinaent on plants or debris m
0
0 5
1
1 5
15. Organic debns lines or piles
_ 0 {
0.5
1
17. Soit-based evidence of high water table?
, No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Bioloav (Subtotal = - !
$ 18. fibrous roots in t; eambed
3
0
` 19. Rooted uptand plants to steambed _.`3.M
- -- 1 % 0 _
20. Macrnbentfaos (nota di -e ty :ane abundance) 0
1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks _ _
22. Fish
i 0
) 0
1 2
0.5 1; . 1.5
23. Crayfish
00-5
s 1 1.5
24. Amptaibians
0_
0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1 L5 j
-�
26. Weiland plants in streambed
FACW - 0.75_2LL = ESOther - 0
'paromi al streams my x1w be ideneied using other inethods. See p. 35 or manual. yy
Notes:
i
Sketch:
4

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
0
Lafitude*.
Evaluator.
County:
Longitude:) IV
1 14 Continuity of channel bed and bank
Stream 00tennination (,cirTd!eg-anejZt
Ith
Other
Total Points:
Sa nam i$
Ephmeral hftmwittGnQ��
eg. Quad Narw*
if;! 19 orpwwwAW ifz 30*
1
2
A- Geomorphology (Subtotal::/.
0
Weak
NloderaLe
0
Strong
1 14 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
21. Aromatic NOoiEtkSics
3
2 Sinuosity of channel thalweg
0
1
2
0
3
3. In-channO sinxture, ex. Mle-poo►. step -Pool,
np;*-.pool sequence
4 Particle we of stream substrate
0
0
i
1
2
2
A-1—
3
2
5. AoweireJict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
7, Rm el alluvial deposits
0
0
1
2
26.. Wetland plants in streambed
wrem,W streams may aW be identified usog othm nx*iod& See p. 35 of mamjW.
Notes: r75-1
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
1
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
Ls
11. Second or greater order channel
No= 0
- amum awtes are not raw: see cusamsms Fn man"
A Hvrlmlnnv t.11"uhinfal = .7- 1
12. Presence of Base#ow
0
1
0
3
13. lion oxidizing bacteria
2
21. Aromatic NOoiEtkSics
3
0
IS. Sedkrmht on plants or debris -0 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
17. Sod -based evidence of hqlrwater table?
A-1—
No = 0
1'es,=13
24 Amphibians
U- 81olociv (Subtotal = —7 1 � )
IS. Fbrous roots in streanbed
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
3
3
2
2
0
21. Aromatic NOoiEtkSics
r"� 0
2
3
22. Fish
Q,
01
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
24 Amphibians
0
0.515
25. Algw
0 1
1.5
26.. Wetland plants in streambed
wrem,W streams may aW be identified usog othm nx*iod& See p. 35 of mamjW.
Notes: r75-1
FACW = 0.75, OBL 1.5
Other 0
Z, t, -Y
Sketch:

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NU VwV stream weanticauton corm version 44.xi
I Date: P"qecUSite: Latitude:
7
Long Evaluatort.County:
Z­
Lonli
Total Points: Stream Det circle one) Other
Sbvwn is of !bast L.!Phemnial eral 1 0,9 Quad Norm.
if 2! 19 orparenaW if a: 30' I I
A. GeomoTto-109Y—V5u
I' Continuity of channel bed and banit
2. S!n4
. 2!tof channel a" that
3. hi-channet structure: ex. M"001, stela -Pool,
[-4.,-,Particle size of stream substrate
5. Activefrelict floodplain
S. Depositional bars or benches__
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
11. Second or greater order channel
Absent Weak
0
0
Moderate Strong
2
02
3
0
3
0
.2—
2
2 3
0.5 _
b0.75;'
0015
No -O
5
aldidal ditches are not rated. soe disck*%�,Ons in manual
B. Hydrol2gy (Subtotal
12. Presence of Saseflow 1 0
13. Iron oxidizWq bacteria 0
-,14.' Leaf- iiiter 1,5
S. Sediment on plants or debris"--- 0
16.Organic debris fines or piles 0
17. Soit-bawd evidence of high wales tabic? No
C. Biol2gy, (Subtotal
1& Fibrous
brous roots in strearnbed 3
1j. iio e��pland plants in streamw 3
F-
20. Macroberithos (note diversity and abundance)
21, Aquatic Mollusks 0
22, Fish 0
23, Crayfish 0
24. ArAphibians 0
i 25. Akpe
26. Weiland plants in streambed
;jreams may aiso w toentrfied using other methoft See ix 35 0 manzw
Sketch:
. L
41
2. 3
2 3
Yes r 3
2
2
2
0.5 _
b0.75;'
1
At H - 0.75;' OOL 1.5
Odv,,r'= 0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification Of laMMIttent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form version 4.11
Date: ProjectiSite:
Evaluator County:
Total Points. Stream Detwmkudion (4
stmem is at kladintnrmiltcYd
d �!! 19 orpemnrW #2:30* Ephemeral IntermiUlent
Latitude: C7
-7c"
Longitude:
0001 Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A- Geomorphology (SuWW—==j--
0
Absent
Weak-
20. Macipberifts (note dhoersily and alwndan-:u)-- I I
21. Aquatic VIO&WAM,-, 2
Moderate I
strong
ja Confinuity of dwW bed and bank
24. Amphibians 0 0.05 1.
a
1
i
2 ---3---
'perennial streams may also ba idenlified using wi;;wnaeihods. See p. 35 of manual
2. Sinuosity of channel 210% thallweg
0
Sketch?
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. iffe-pool. step -pool,
0
2
3
4. Particle sde of stream substraEe --------------
0
3
2
3
E. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent aOuvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
3
9 Grade con"
1.5
10. Natural valley
01,5
No= a
yes
11. Second or greater order channel
artifical d - z are not rated; sea in manual
B. Hydrol
12, Presence of Saseflow 0 1 3
L 13. Iron ojddbft bacteria 0 3
14. Lee fiftr0
1-5
or debris
15. Sediment on plants
16, Organic debris lines or DjWs 0
17. Soi-based evidence of high WaW ti"O No 0 Yes = 3,_)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
23
0
19 Rooted upland plants in stleambed 3 2
0
20. Macipberifts (note dhoersily and alwndan-:u)-- I I
21. Aquatic VIO&WAM,-, 2
3
122- Fish 0 0.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5
7-15
24. Amphibians 0 0.05 1.
1.5
25. Algae, _0.5
-15
26. Vfttland plants in strearnbed T FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5 Other -0
'perennial streams may also ba idenlified using wi;;wnaeihods. See p. 35 of manual
Sketch?
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v_ 4.11
N(' f1W(4 �trpAm Tdentifi"tinn Form Vemian 4.11
date°= r projecusite
Absent
Evaluator: County:
Longitude:
Total Points: Strum t]etefjuna2twkcircle one)
Other
Stream is at Mew arAermittanf Epherneraf irrtermitterCPerennial
e.g- Quad Mame:
A-19 or peranaW d z 30'
�...
A. GeornoThotog f_(Subtolal = .,)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong�M1
_
1' Continuity of channel beand bank
0
1
2
�...
2. Sinuosity of channel a thalweg
0
1
- 2 (
3
i 3. in -channel structure: ex, riffle --Pow, steplxxA,
1 r4oi sequence
0
0
1
1
( 2 i
2
3
3
4. Par#icle size of stream substrate
5. Arm/relict floodplain
0
1
...
-2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
K-
2
3
J 7. Recent alkwial deposits - N
Q
1
2
3
i 8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
0.5
0.5 _.
1
i k
1-5
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channet
No = 0
....... __.. Yes =,3-,
i
`ariifooW ditches are not rated; see discussiom in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =._--
1? Presence o1€ia5eflow -�
0
1.. r._...,.._.....
2
-
_
13 iron oxidizing; bacteria
__
0
1
2
3
! 14. Leaf fitter
1.5
1 i_
0.5
0-
15. µSediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris fires ar piles
fl
0.5
1,
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of filth water table?
tato 0
Yes
G. Biome + , ubtotal �•
18. Fibrous roaLs in streasrtbed
0 ;
- - 1
X19. Rooms upland plants in strearnbed 3 2F •..•.�
p`GV. Mar�obentdlos (note W#4 .'rt! Is�NJ at}tirtWi)
..
0,
...
--
1 . i ""..�_..
.,..�- ._.-... CS ..
..
3 ....--•l
21. Aquatic MollusksQ
1 €
2
3
22. Fish.0
Yr
.
Q51
1.5
11-5-1
23. Crayfish _ 0 0.5 1
V
24. Amphibians
0
0-51-5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1,5 a _;
26. Wettand plants in streacnbed
FACVV = 0.75, OBL _ 1.5 Other - 0 _
'perernti.-J Streams may arra be identified usuV otter methods. Sec p.
35 of manusi
)
Nafes.
3
Sketch:
1
i
a
1
41
qi
B { ,µ±
l
r:
fj,,L '+2-

NC Division of WaterQtWitY -MethOC10109Y for identification Of Inumittentand
Perennial Sheams and Their Origins v. 4.11 7,
w1r,'"wa-k c+-- m-*;ri Linn Pstrm Vorcinn d_11
Date:Latitu
Evaluator.
Absent
Weak
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
S&vam is at t"* ftnniffentEptmnefW
I,rw
Stream DeWy*MVft4,d . one)
I
Other
-
(rq!jTW Perennial
eq. Qjad Mame:if
a 19 or perenrml ff �,, -V'
1
2
A- Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
2. Sinuosity Of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structurw, ex, fiffleiX101, Step -pool.
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
2
3
4, Particle SM at stream
5. Aarmirelict floodplain
0
1 r
2
3
6, Deposkjonal bars or benches
0
24. Amphibians
3
-
7- Recent a)luvi2I deposits
T 0
2
3
a. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade Control
*perwmw ztreama may Min be identified using offw rrelPtOft. See P. 35 Of mmuRt.
1.5
10. Natural viiilj�
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channet
-d4ches
Zra-r0ocial are rot rated', see ciLmV90-mm ;;Utnu-al
Sketch:
$- Hydrology Subtotal
12. Presence of Basellow
0
t t
2
3
13. Iron oxidWriq bacteria
0
2
3
14, Leaf fiUW
1.5
0
15- Sediment on plants or debriS0.5
1
1.5
16, Organic debris lines or piles
C
1
1.5
17. Soihbas@d eviderCe of high water table?
No = 0
es
;=,- roots -,-n-s-b-w- mbed
3
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20. Mac robenttios note dimrs.,ty and abundance)
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
--.2
22- Fish
0.5 1
1.5
23- Crayfish
0.,
0.5_ 1 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
' 0
I D.
t 1�-� 1
1.5
25. Aiyae M
0
0.5)"- 1
1.5
26, V*Uand plants in slre;anlbed
FA6W;f-
.7514 08L =1.5 Other= 0
*perwmw ztreama may Min be identified using offw rrelPtOft. See P. 35 Of mmuRt.
Notes.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Sim:
Latitude:
Evaluator_
County:
_Stream DhAerminxapon (circle one)
Longitude:,:.. _ 1
Other
Total Points:
Beam is of least euvandlixit
AZ- 19 or if � 3!T'
Ephemeral 7htermitbcnt Perennial
e.g. Quad Mame:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= J
Absent
Weak
Moderate i
Strong
l 1, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
Z
3
2. Sinuosity of channel
0
1
2 -
3
3. In -charnel sbtichxe: ex. riffle -pool, step pool,
0
1
2 '
#
3
4. Particle sure of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Act Wm4ict floodplain
0
1
2
3
' 6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headaats
01
2
3
9. Grade control Y - ---
10 Naiurai valley0
11. Second or greater order channel
0
- 0.5
0.5
No = 0
S
1
Yes 3
1.5
i.5
T-_....... J
arbriml cKches aro not rated; sit B "ctsspn3 in manual
R HVr1rn1WV (Snahtntal = }
12. Presence of Baseflaw
i 0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
0-�1
1.5
� _ 1 � g
2
0.5
_3 #
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 ,
0.5
0
j 0 '
0.5
0.5
16. Organic debris tales or piles
T.
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? --
No = 0
Yes = 3
C- B10100v (Subtotal= }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20 Macrobenthos (note divq'�« ;dy and abundance)
3
3
t -- 0
2
2
1
�. ;'[ "
?_
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2_
.
.. _.
3
22- Fish
23. Crayfish _
0
j 0 '
0.5
0.5
1
=.1.5
24. Aneph3ai�ts�1.5
25. Arae
0-5 -_
1 _
(
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
f
FACW - 0.75; d8L =
1.5 Other= 0
!,
'pormniai streams may also be *dentsfaed usmo other rnethom Seep 35 of manual.
i
Notes.
i
Sketch' ,-
_
I
r
I
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Mir INWA 4.trz-A rn ldontifir2tian Pnrm Version 4-11
Deft:
Projectisite:
Weak
Evaluator
County:
County:_
Lori" ude:
I' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
-Z,
Other
Total Points:
Stream DetermirMion (circle one
sbasm is at bast i"ftMxdw1
Epherneral intermittent cttrial -
0.9- Quad Nam:
I ff2:19orpenwyWd2:30*
2
A. Geomorphology (SuMLotql
Absent
Weak
0 0.5
1
Strong
I' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
Yes -3
-Nkxierate
20. Macrobenthos. (note diversity and abur4anoe)
3
1
3, In -channel structure: e)L fiffle-pool, step -pool.
ripple-pooi sequence
0
3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
t 0
22. Fish
0.5
3
5. Activelrelid floodplain
0
1
2
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1.5
3
-t, Recont al[uvial deposits
0
1
2
26 ~WW plants in S"ambed
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade Control
10. Naturai valley
U
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
140 = 0
Sketch-,
Yes = 3
'.wfftdzd Wtches are W rated: w dww*cions .,n marwai
B- Hydrolog Subtotal=
12. Presence of Sawflow
L 13. Iron oxidizing bac�tena
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debrts
16. Organic debris lines or Ades
i IT Sod- msed evidence of high water table?
0 1
0
1.5 i
0 0.5
2
2
0.5
1
3
1.3
0 0.5
1
15
No=O
2
Yes -3
0-
20. Macrobenthos. (note diversity and abur4anoe)
'7-6
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
3
19. Rooted up" plants in strearnbed
-3
2
1
0-
20. Macrobenthos. (note diversity and abur4anoe)
'7-6
1
3
21. Aquatic Mokrks
1
--2 I
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
tz. b
0,5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25.
0
0.5
1.5
26 ~WW plants in S"ambed
FACW= 0.75-, QPL - 1
sueams may also te identified using other ff*U%od& See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch-,
41
k