20161091 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

Montalvo, Sheri A
From: Montalvo, Sheri A
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:41 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: In -stream Bioreactor
Attachments: Agent Authorization Form.pdf
Importance: High
Charles,
We received the PCN for the above project. We will require an actual agent authorization form to be filled out to go along
with your signature from page 10 of 10. I have attached one for your use. Please email it back to me once completed at
sheri.montalvo(.&ncdenr.gov so that I can take the project off hold and forward through the review process.
Thanks
Sheri Mov�,tnWo
Administrative Assistant
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6303 (office)
919 807-6494 (fax)
sheri.montalvo(&ncdenr.gov
Physical: 512 N. Salisbury St., Ste 942-D, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

rTTJ East Carolina University
Department of
Health Education
and Promotion
College of Health and
Human Performance
2201 Carol Belk Building
East Carolina University
Greenville, NC 27858-4353
252-328-6000 office
252-328-1285 fax
www.ecu.edu/hith/
East C.'anrlinn ilnirvrsih• is a ronstitnew
nirritrrtion of tlx unhrnih of Norrh
Carolina. An rlunl opprrtunity unirrrsin•.
November 3, 2016
AI
20161091
Dear Environmental Regulatory Agency Personnel,
East Carolina University received funding via an NC DEQ 319 Program grant to improve
water quality in the Lick Creek Watershed by implementing various best management
practices. Lick Creek is an impaired stream, and is on the 303(d) list. The project we are
working on includes monitoring the flow and water quality (nutrients, fecal indicator bacteria,
turbidity, pH, etc) along the main stem of Lick Creek and several of Lick Creek's tributaries
before and after implementation of best management practices. We began monitoring in
January of 2015 and have installed some best management practices related to residential
septic systems. Our monitoring data has shown that there are elevated concentrations of
nutrients and fecal indicator bacteria discharging from a stream that drains a residential
neighborhood. We believe that the quality of water in the stream (and discharging to Lick
Creek) can be improved by implementing a bioreactor along a segment of the stream. The
stream bed is small (< 2.5 ft across) and the stream does not flow continuously throughout the
year. Property owners along this segment have given us permission to install the bioreactor,
and their signatures and contact information is provided in this application. We hope you will
consider and approve our request to improve water quality by implementing this stream
bioreactor. Prior research has shown that practices such as bioreactors can greatly reduce
nutrient transport. We have over 1.5 years of monitoring data and would like to be able to
compare flow and water quality upstream and downstream of the reactor and before and after
the bioreactor is implemented.
If there are any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Sincerely,
� J,J, k�--6
Charles Humphrey, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Environmental Health Sciences
East Carolina University
3408 Carol Belk Building
Greenville, NC 27858
Email:
Phone: [phone]

O_IQIJATER
h v
(r;—
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no. Form
Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
Yes No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
In -stream Bioreactor for Nitrogen Removal in the Lick Creek Watershed
2b. County:
Durham
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2d. Subdivision name:
Phaw Hills
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Emily Draughon Frederick Garrett I James Hatley William Riggins I John Hamlett
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
006938-000251 000382-000734 1000394-000182 004206-000183 1007247-
000197
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
312, 316, 320 Olive Branch Road (respectively); 319, 323 Bandock Dr. (respectively)
3e. City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27703
3f. Telephone no.:
See attached
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
See attached
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
Agent Other, specify: Researcher
4b. Name:
Charles Humphrey, Jr.
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
East Carolina University
4d. Street address:
Carol Belk Building
4e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC, 27858
4f. Telephone no.:
252-737-1479
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
193502 —19504 1193516 -193517
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.968852 Longitude: -78.785331
1 c. Property size:
2.68 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Lick Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
WS -IV, NSW, Impaired: Fair Bioclassification (79 water
quality index in 2014)
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:The proposed site is a small, intermittent unnamed tributary to Lick Creek. The surrounding land use is
residential development. The current site conditions consist of grassed stream banks with no forested buffer
present. No wetlands are present at the site. The landowners mow the grass up to the bank of the creek. The
creek is mostly dry in summer. The stream is eroding, and contains elevated concentrations of nutrients.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 300 ft.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Stream sampling data indicate excess nutrient concentrations in the proposed stream site compared to other nearby streams.
There is also significant erosion of the stream bank and bed due to upstream development. The goal of this project is to
enhance the nutrient removal capacity of the stream and stabilize the stream to reduce erosion and sediment transport.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A backhoe/excavator will be used to excavate approximately 3-4 ft of the stream channel bed and wood chips will be installed
to facilitate nitrogen removal via denitrification. The wood chip bioreactor will be capped with 6-12 inches of stone. The
bioreactor will extend approximately 210 ft in length and will be approximately 3 ft wide (channel width) and installed at the
current stream channel elevation. A series of stone check dams will be installed to facilitate infiltration into the bioreactor and to
mitigate channel erosion. An outlet pipe will be installed at the end of the bioreactor to allow water to exit the bioreactor and
discharge to the existing channel downstream of the bioreactor. This project should improve water quality by reducing erosion
and sediment transport, and reducing nitrogen loading.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Yes No Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments: Classified as intermittent stream
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
Yes No Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams — tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f. Area
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T
Sediments
UTI to Lick Creek
INT
Corps
2-4 ft
210 ft
S2 P
Excavation and
UT1 to Lick Creek
INT
Corps
2-4 ft
210 ft
Media Fill
S3 P
Stabilization (check
UTI to Lick Creek
INT
Corps
2-4 ft
210 ft
ams and re -seeding)
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3
3i. Comments: The major negative impact will occur during construction. The total sediment load may increase during the bank
stabilization and media installation practices. However, this impact is temporary and should be outweighed by the positive, long-
term influences including enhanced nitrogen removal and reduction in sediment transport.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 (P)
Bank stabilization
Unnamed tributary of lick creek
1600
0
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
1600
6i. Comments: Banks will be tapered and lined with stones for stabilization
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Sedimentation control measures such as silt fencing, and covering spoil, will be installed until the site is stabilized. The stream
channel will be lined with stone check dams to stabilize channel, slow velocities, and minimize erosion. Banks will be tapered
and also lined with stone for stabilzation.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sedimentation control measures such as silt fencing and covering spoil, will be installed until site is stabilized. Construction
will occur during a period when rainfall projections are minimal. Areas of exposed soil outside of the channel will be reseeded
and straw will be applied for stabilization.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
poop
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This
project is designed to reduce impervious cover by planting herbaceous plants.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is thisproject?
County of Durham
Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Yes No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes
No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Yes
No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Yes
No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
Yes
No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
Yes
No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not generate any wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS endangered species list does not list any species that are found on site. The stream flows intermittently and
the stream banks are grassed without any shrubs or trees.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation. The tributary is not large enough to provide essential fish habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC National Register of Historical Places (http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/NR-PDFs.html#D) does not list any historical cultural
resources in the vicinity of the proposed study area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Flood Risk Information System shows the site and upstream areas not within the 100 -year flood plain.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Age nature (Agents
Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Pre -Existing Site Conditions
Site Information
The proposed location for the bioreactor and stream enhancement will occur within
a section of a small [approximately 300 ft. (100 m)] stream running through a
residential subdivision that was developed approximately 50 years ago (Fig. 1-4).
Based on the USGS topographic map and the 1976 Durham County Soil Survey, the
selected stream is classified as an intermittent stream (Fig.1 and 2). A satellite
image of the general vicinity of the proposed stream bioreactor and the volunteered
homeowners is shown in Fig. 3. A detailed topographic map superimposed over a
satellite image detailing the watershed and stream bioreactor boundaries is shown
in Figure 4. The stream bioreactor is a bed of woodchips installed beneath the
stream with a series of stone check dams to facilitate infiltration into the bioreactor
and to mitigate erosion of the capstone overlaying the woodchip bed (Fig. 5). A
photograph of the stream segment is shown in Figure 6.
pPoposed Site.
Area
nut It
N
Figure 1. USGS Topographic map illustrating the stream (blue line) and the
approximate property boundaries of homeowners volunteered for stream
bioreactor project.

W•�.i
GrB T
WC/ Ch PfC � 1
. ./ , CrB1 PfE
f r B 4 / 1 r
Figure 2. Durham County soil survey map (USDA 1976) illustrating the approximate
boundaries of the residences volunteering for the stream enhancements. The area of
disturbance will be localized to the stream.

Figure 3. Vicinity map detailing the bounds of the volunteered residences (black
box), the stream (blue line), and the approximate project area (red box).

322.0
321.0 Top of Bank
320.0 - Profile
319.0 Channel Thalwag
Profile Check Dams (9" Depth, No. 57 Stone
J1°° Upstream Slope: 3:1
317.0 --/ Downstream Slope: 5:1)
318.0 Bioreactor Cap
3150 (6'r Depth, Silt Soil)
314.0 Bioreactor Entrance Y Y I
313.0 (6' Depth, No. 2 Stone)' �- Y
312.0
311.0 Bioreactor Media
310.0 (Wood Chips, 3' Depth)
309.0
Outlet
- - (2" PVC) I.
308.0
_ I
307,0_. _..
O+DO 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+75 2+00 2+25 2+50 2+76 3+00 3+26 3+00 3175 4+00
Station (ft.)
Figure S. Design plan for stream bioreactor.
o.n.�l Nora.
Profile view of
Proposed
Bloreactor
Bloreactor width
equal to width of
top of bank (-3').
Bloreactor length
Is 182' (Station:
1+64 — 3+46)
Outlet will consist
of horizontal
slotted 2" PVC
pipe extending
width of
bioreactor
connecting via
T—connection to
solid 2" PVC pipe.
Drawn By
Eban Baan. PE. PhD
Aalatant Proof—
Dapdrtmant of
En9haa My
Et Cardin Uniwralty
bwrlabeaau.adu
PMj— N— 8 AddreN
Uck Croak Bloraaator
B•t— 319 and 327
Burdock Dr. and 316 and
320 Oil- 13 h Rd..
Durham. NC 27703
Project Deb
Uck Crank 6/24/16
Bkraaoldr
Bogle —et
VMical: 1
1• — 1'
Noriz
,2s• 2.15'
r -

t
4
.'•` �.+�_�; .y Vie; .L. 1
Figure 6. Proposed location of the bioreactor and stream enhancement.

Current Nutrient Trends
The selected stream is an unnamed tributary that drains to Lick Creek, and
ultimately into Falls Lake. Data was collected on a monthly basis from this stream
between January 2015 and June 2016. Preliminary results indicate that this stream
contains elevated nutrient concentrations capable of stimulating primary
production in nutrient -sensitive waters (Table 1). Total dissolved phosphorus was
not analyzed for every sampling event but PO4-P accounted for a mean 70.5%
(n=54) of total dissolved phosphorus. These data suggest that this unnamed
tributary is capable of inputting significant concentrations to nutrient -sensitive
receiving waters (e.g., Falls Lake).
Table 1. Median concentrations (mg/L) of parameters during each season and
annual.
Parameter
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Annual
NH4-N
0.64
0.35
0.33
0.16
0.39
NO3-N
2.00
1.64
4.53
3.28
2.05
TDN
2.86
2.40
5.20
4.42
2.93
PO4-P
0.08
0.08
0.58
0.15
0.10
CI
46.54
39.67
30.76
41.28
41.28
DOC
7.96
11.80
10.61
12.83
10.61
Preliminary data indicate that these streams export significant masses of nutrients
(Table 2). Winter and fall months reported the highest exports of total dissolved
nitrogen. Despite having the greatest concentration of total dissolved nitrogen,
summer months did not export as much. This is likely a component of the low flows
that were observed since this stream is an intermittent stream. During summer
months, the stream often dries out and the flow is more likely driven by storm
events. Phosphate loads remained relatively similar across all seasons, except spring
months when masses were lowest.
Table 2. Median normalized masses (kg/yr/ha) of parameters during each season
and annual.
Parameter
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Annual
NH4-N
2.45
0.33
0.16
0.08
0.55
NO3-N
7.62
1.57
2.15
1.56
2.95
TDN
10.90
2.29
2.47
1.89
4.11
PO4-P
0.30
0.07
0.28
0.07
0.14

R
Image showing the stream where the reactor is planned. Near this fence was the X1 cross section. Cross
sections X2 -X4 are up -gradient, and extend to near the trees in the background.

97
96
95
94
93
ON
e
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Longitudinal Station (ft.)

93
XS4
92
RTOB
Im
85
64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
X -section Station (ft.)
-♦-1+00
91
TW
- 1+86
2+66
90
XS3
3+68
};
LTOB
4-.
0
89
RTOB
>
a
; TOB
LU
LTOB TW
88'
T w
�=
LTOB -T-�
87
RTOB
Im
85
64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
X -section Station (ft.)

Owners) Name: Frederick and Mellonie Garrett
316 Olive Branch Road
Durham, NC 27703 c� l
,3
Phone Number:
a
Signature:

Owner(s) Name: Emily and Tim Draughon
312 Olive Branch Road
Durham, NC 27703
Phone Number:—q 1 q -JoI " -7d
Signature: v

Owner(s) Name: James and Betty Hatley
320 Olive Branch Road
Durham, NC 27703
Phone Number: --
Signature: a -Z.

Owner(s) Name: William and Judith Riggins
319 Bandock Dr
Durham, NC 27703
Phone Number: a I q, 5."W -
C)
. "W-
C) /q - 9 L/3- a -I )g- (� Fll�
Signature:

Owner(s) Name: John and Lindsey Hamlett
323 Bandock Drive
Durham, NC 27703
Phone Number:
Signature: ( LICA `���. }'

Montalvo, Sheri A
From: Humphrey, Charles Pittman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Montalvo, Sheri A
Subject: Re: In -stream Bioreactor
Attachments: Permissions.pdf
Hey Sheri,
We just received the final signed permission form in the mail. The last person was on vacation and just got back.
Attached are the signed forms. I can send hard copies if needed. If there are any questions let me know.
Thanks,
Charlie.
From: Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 2:24 PM
To: Humphrey, Charles Pittman
Subject: RE: In -stream Bioreactor
Perfect. I was just checking in.
From: Humphrey, Charles Pittman [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 2:22 PM
To: Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: In -stream Bioreactor
Hey Sheri,
We are working on getting the signatures on the forms. Some people were out of town when we visited. We
left envelopes with the forms and a description, but will touch base with them again. We will be sure to send
them to you when they are completed.
Thanks,
Charlie.
From: Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:55 PM
To: Humphrey, Charles Pittman
Subject: FW: In -stream Bioreactor
From: Montalvo, Sheri A
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:41 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: In -stream Bioreactor
Importance: High
1

Charles,
We received the PCN for the above project. We will require an actual agent authorization form to be filled out to go along
with your signature from page 10 of 10. 1 have attached one for your use. Please email it back to me once completed at
[e-mail] so that I can take the project off hold and forward through the review process.
III1IV
shed MOV'OLvo
Administrative Assistant
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6303 (office)
919 807-6494 (fax)
[e-mail]
Physical: 512 N. Salisbury St., Ste 942-D, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
�v
PROPERLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: 320 Olive Branch Road, Durham, NC 27703
Please print:
Property Owner: James Hatley
Property Owner: Betty Hatley
193504
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Charles Humphrey , of East Carolina University
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
qAutrized Signatu
Date:
Authorized S' nature
Date: ��

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. __ PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 193502
STREET ADDRESS: 312 Olive Branch Road, Durham, NC, 27703
Please print:
Property Owner: Emily Draughton
Property Owner: Timothy Draughton
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Charles Humphrey of . East Carolina University
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO.
STREET ADDRESS:
Please print:
Property Owner:
PARCELID: 193503
316 Olive Branch Rd, Durham, NC 27703
Frederick Garrett
Property Owner: Mellonie Garrett
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Charles Humphrey , of East Carolina University
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
919-302-2446
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date:�D7i 2't e, f4
Authorized Signature
Date:

\ N�y \'�A
Illy
/<�)
SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO.
PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 193516
STREET ADDRESS: 323 Bandock Drive, Durham, NC 27703
Please print:
Property Owner: Lindsey Hamlett
Property Owner:
John Hamlett
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Charles Humphrey of East Carolina University
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
919-819-2634
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
V
orized Signat re t rized SI nat : L l Z-� 1 It Date �� �%

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 193517
STREET ADDRESS: 319 Bandock Drive, Durham, NC 27703
Please print:
Property Owner: William Riggins
Property Owner: _ ,Judith Riggins
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Charles Humphrey of East Carolina Universi
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application Is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date: %! Z
orized Signature
Date: