20161204 Ver 1_401 Application_20161216

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2016 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]: 2 1 & 2 0 4
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name (PCN Form A2a]: Mauney Cove Road Convenience Center Project
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government Fv—(] Commercial ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 63d and 133e]:
The purpose of the project is to expand and upgrade the Mauney Cove Convenience Center.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Haywood County
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]: John VllaS, McGill Associates, P.A.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 61b]:
30 Mauney Cove Road, Waynesville, NC 28786
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 8616-39-4152
9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]: Haywood
10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Waynesville
11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Mauney Cove Branch
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 62c]: French Broad, 06010105
uthorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 18
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Section 10 & 404
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

O�OF W A T FROG
h
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a INC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Mauney Cove Road Convenience Center
2b. County:
Haywood
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Waynesville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Haywood County
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
891/1941
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
215 N Main Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Ira Dove, County Manager
4b. Name:
Ira Dove, County Manager
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Haywood County
4d. Street address:
215 N Main Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
[phone]
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
John Vilas
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
McGill Associates, P.A.
5c. Street address:
468 New Market Blvd. Ste. B
5d. City, state, zip:
Boone, NC 28607
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
[phone]
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 15

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8616-39-4152
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.523 Longitude: -82.989
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
1.3 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Mauney Cove Branch
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B
2c.
River basin: map is available at
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
French Broad
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Project is located in the Town of Waynesville Haywood County NC The project site consists of the existing
Maunev Cove Road Convenience Center, adjoining vacant area to the west, and two drainage easement areas to the
south of Maunev Cove Road. The project site is located near the intersection of Maunev Cove Road and Highway 276
(Russ Avenue). See Location Map. The Project site is an active, county run, solid waste transfer station that consists
of a 1/3 -acre fenced -in concrete pad and gravel lot with recycling and solid waste collection containers and a solid
waste compactor unit. The remaining portion of the Project parcel to the west is sparsely wooded.
Two small wetland areas were found on the Proiect site:
1). Wetland Unit 'WA' is an herbaceous dominated seep located southwest of the transfer station near the ditchline
along Maunev Cove Road. Wetland Unit 'WA' drains to the northeast through a 12" CMP under the convenience
center's southern access road and continues within the ditchline as a linear feature before ending at the northern
access road.
2). Wetland Unit 'WB' is a riparian wetland along Maunev Cove Branch located at the outlet end of an existing
stormwater 18"RCP which drains the ditchline between the transfer station facility and Maunev Cove Road
Maunev Cove Branch. a Derennial stream system that drains northeast into Lake Junaluska is located on the
southeastern side of Maunev Cove Road opposite of the convenience center (see Delineation and Impacts Map)
Surrounding areas to the project site include agricultural, residential, commercial and recreational land -uses
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
WL -A: 0.019 -acres (833 M. WL -B: 0.003 -acres (133 M.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Maunev Cove Branch runs Darallel and to the south of Maunev Cove Road within the Maunev Cove Road Baht -of -way for
approximately 400 If.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the Droiect is to expand and upgrade the Maunev Cove Convenience Center. ExDansion will allow for
the center to collect and process more waste benefiting the local community. Upgrades to the on-site drainage system
will improve stormwater management, treatment and detention reducing the amount of sediment currently leaving the
site and entering Maunev Cove Branch.
Page 4 of 15

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Maunev Cove Convenience Center project includes clearina and re-aradina approximately 1.29 -acres on the
Project parcel for expansion of the facility's paved operations area, installation of concrete curb and gutter, two access
roads, and new permanent stormwater BMPs. The two existing 18" CMPs under the access roads, existing fencing,
existina solid waste containers, and existina asphalt and concrete pads will be removed (see Sheet C-101 Existing
Conditions and Demolition Plan).
Proposed project actions would add approximately 0.3 -acres of new paved operations area to the western portion of
the facility and would also include widening and improving the tum radius of the two existing facility access roads.
Proposed new on-site stormwater BMPs would include installation of an 85' x 30' sediment basin in the southwest
comer of the proiect area which would transition into a permanent 70' x 20' bioretention cell. A yard inlet in the eastern
end of the basin/cell will outfall into a proposed approx. 61 If 18" HDPE under the western entrance drive. Stormwater
would then outfall to Maunev Cove Branch via a proposed approx. 37 If 18" HDPE crossing under Maunev Cove
Road. An approx. 140 If vegetated ditch line between the facility and Maunev Cove Road will outfall via an awrox. 53
If 18" HDPE under the eastern access road. Stormwater will then enter an existing 18" RCP storm drain running under
Maunev Cove Road and discharain-g into a rip -rap pad and eventually into Maunev Cove Branch. Concrete headwalls
will be constructed at all proposed pipe inlets and outlets for protection. A concrete headwall is proposed for the inlet
of the existing 18" RCP crossing under Maunev Cove Road. The existing sediment at the outlet end of this Dim will be
removed and restored with rip -rap Dad (see Sheets C-103 Grading and Erosion Control Plan, C-104 Stormwater Plan,
C-502, C-504 Miscellaneous Details). The rip -rap pad will be embedded and underlain with filter cloth to avoid erosion
and to maintain outlet stability.
Once final grading is complete, a veaetative buffer will be established to the north and west of the project area, and
landscaped areas installed between the convenience center property and Maunev Cove Road (see Sheet C-102 Site
Plan .
Proposed project actions would permanently impact Wetland Unit 'WA'. Wetland impact W-1 (see Delineation &
Impact Map) would result from excavation and filling 0.019 -acres of Wetland Unit 'WA' to accommodate the widening
of the facility access roads and installation of the bioretention cell BMP and ditch D2 (see Sheet C-104. Detail C-502).
The construction of the bioretention cell will allow for stormwater to be detained and treated before being discharged
off-site. The project site has a high water table and must be filled to achieve elevations necessary for proper
stormwater BMP function. Final -grade was designed to ensure that the proposed bioretention cell and ditch D2 could
efficiently drain stormwater off-site without bonding and saturation which could dearade proposed infrastructure.
Proposed actions will also permanently impact Wetland Unit 'WB'. Wetland impact W-2 (see Delineation & Impact
Map) would result from removina the sediment from the outlet area of the existing 18" RCP along Maunev Cove
Branch and installing permanent rip -rap protection. The existing 18" RCP is completely blocked at the outlet end with
the accumulated sediment and does not function properly during storm events. The proposed work - and Impact W-2 -
will restore proper function.
Access road widenina and construction of the BMPs would be completed by excavator, bull dozer and dump truck.
Proposed Project actions would permanently impact Maunev Cove Branch. Stream impact S-1 would result from filling
6 linear feet along the left bank of Maunev Cove Branch with the installation of a concrete headwall (see Sheets C -
C104 Stormwater Plan and C-504 Miscellaneous Details). Temporary stream impacts S-2 and S-3 would result from
using approx. 2 -foot high sandbag coffer dams to isolate the areas of stream bank work durina installation of new
headwall and rib -rap pad, and will allow work to be performed in the dry. Disturbed areas of the stream bank will be
stabilized following proposed work with coir mattin-g, and temporary erosion control and native seed mix. Outfall
protection work will be completed by trackhoe and dump truck.
Page 5 of 15

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
El Yes ®No El Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): John Vilas. 10-21-15
Agency/Consultant Company: McGill Associates, P.A.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
6. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 6 of 15

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Excavation and
Fill
Seep
El Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.019
W2 ®P ❑ T
Excavation and
Fill/Rip-rap
Riparian
® Yes
[J No
® Corps
E] DWQ
0.003
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 [:]PMT
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.022
2h. Comments: 0.022 -acres of wetland impacts associated with 21 cubic yards of fill material.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Mauney Cove
Branch
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
8
8
S2 ❑ P ®T
Fill/Coffer Dam
Mauney Cove
Branch
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
g
12
S3 ❑ P ® T
Fill/Coffer Dam
Mauney Cove
Branch
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
g
12
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
32
3i. Comments: Stream impact S-1 is for permanent fill as a concrete headwall. Stream impacts S-2 and S-3 are for temporary
fill as sand bag coffer dams.
Page 7 of 15

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
6f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
61 ❑P❑T
-required?
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 15

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Disturbance is limited to proposed areas for convenience center expansion, erosion control and stormwater measures.
Surface stabilization will be accomplished with vegetation, slope matting, and mulch as specified in the seeding
specifications. Coffer dam or other temporary diversion will be utilized during stream work to ensure all work is performed
in the dry.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Protective drainage structures will be installed at all storm drainage and pipe inlets. Slopes will be graded toward
stormwater control structures. Seed/grass for stabilization on all new cut and fill slopes within 14 days after completion of
any phase of grading. Seed/grass for stabilization on perimeter once finished grade is reached or within 7 calendar days
after final grade is achieved. Place permanent groundcover for all other disturbed areas within 14 working days of finished
grade. Maintain erosion control measures during the entire length of the project and until site is stabilized. No sediment
and erosion control measures in stream channel.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 15

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
El Yes El No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
50%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Proposed new on-site stormwater BMPs would include installation of a permanent 70' x 20' bioretention cell. A yard inlet
in the eastern end of the basin/cell will outfall into a proposed approx. 61 If 18" HDPE under the western entrance drive.
Stormwater would then outfall to Maunev Cove Branch via a proposed approx. 37 If 18" HDPE crossing under Maunev
Cove Road.
An approx. 140 If vegetated ditch line between the facility and Maunev Cove Road will outfall via an approx. 53 If 18"
HDPE under the eastern access road. Stormwater will then enter an existing 18" RCP storm drain running under Maunev
Cove Road and discharging into a rip -rap pad and eventually into Maunev Cove Branch.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Haywood County
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other: None
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other: None
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? I ® Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 15

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Y
® es ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Page 13 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is limited to improvements of the Maunev Cove Road Convenience Center property. No future expansion or
improvements are anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater generated from the proposed project.
Page 14 of 15

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
hftr)s://www.fws.gov/raleigh/sr)ecies/cntylist/haywood.html.• North Carolina Natural Heritage Prooram database auery
found no listed occurrences for Federal or State species in the Project Site Northern Iona -eared bat is federally listed
as Endangered in Haywood County but according to https://www.fws.ciov/asheville/pdfs/NLEB-4DRule Haywood pdf
the project area is not within a mapped consultation area Suitable habitat was not discovered on the project site for
the remainina listed species for Haywood County.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0: http://www.habitat.noaa.ciov/protecUon/efh/haUitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office: http•//gis nedcr aov/hpoweb/
The nearest listed historical structure HPO Site ID: HW--, is 700 -feet southeast from the Project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Flood Risk Information System:
http://fris.nc.gov/fris/Home.aspx
John C. Vilas
4
J66A C. V'ji
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
ApplicanUA fit's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 15 of 15

PROJECT
SITE
Nttl i
t
N
WAYNESVILLE
v 4t
1 -
1 '
Sources Esri HERE, DeLorme, USGS Intermap. increment P Corp -
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esr{ China tHong Kong). Esri (Thailand)
TomTom.. Ntapmylndla, 'OpenStreetMap contributors. and the GIS User
Community
MAUNEY COVE ROAD CONVENIENCE CENTER
LOCATION MAP
MAY 11, 2016 HAYWOOD COUNTY McGI'll
A S S O C I A T E S
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • FINANCE
468 NEW MARKET BLVD- STE, B BOONE, NC 28607 [phone]

c j
.r ,r'I. '�. `- 7n •q. •i
sai
2'30' �.: j r y �• A a• �. i'� r L\ ; ;�`
n34 if f Kribb
pawy
PROJECT i1 r r.,r. �"•
I Cho 11. SITE •t �1. "s gra.
q'gs .a'> :'•,!
"33
�3
000 / '°� _ • , eVq eeertts{ BM .1i am «` sCe
t
EET • ° v 8� . PM ItOj� ii�� 'ill
�'�'�j •.a--15� • • . a��p� rQ EI,Ey QST .0 - •��. 4 ,;
Tta V'
•Sit
• u•j14 e' tChur + Sxm'Jk
G t.
Golf
cOurs• civ
• ,
.�' � r �
/
N 1. � i ; y Fair
r
•
' yiw�f Top47,
« • '
A.
♦�'
� moi` i �q
�_�
Yt
lob
-'
� w` P
t _ -
+ � '•�,.
�
� � Hca
di
T
h d9
a9tt
�
Source: USGS Clyde, NC 1:24,000 topographic quadrangle - 1967
N • �� to �_� .
moo, •
� � v. s a� • i' �y 0
jt', J\ «
•l5 - t 1 � czYk�y:
./
♦�'
� moi` i �q
�_�
-'
� w` P
t _ -
+ � '•�,.
�
� � Hca
i
a9tt
�
2,000
1,000 0
2,000 Feet
i
•
TOPOGRAPHIC MAUNEY COVE ROAD CONVENIENCE CENTER
MAP
MAY 11, 2016 HAYWOOD COUNTY McG111
A S S O C I A T E S
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • FINANCE
468 NEW MARKET BLVD. STE. B BOONE, NC 28607 [phone]

•
MAUNEY COVE ROAD CONVENIENCE CENTER
2015 AERIAL IMAGE HAYWOOD COUNTY
McGill
A S S O C I A T E S
MAY 11, 2016 HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL •PLANNING •FINANCE
468 NEWMARKET BLVD. STE. B BOONE, NC 2907 [phone]

N
W E
S PROPERTY LINE
O�
C�
PAVEMENT EX. 18' RCP
PO _
Q
12' CMP
WETLAND-WB
�P RIP RAP PAD
IMPACT W2
PROPOSED SAND BAG
COFFER DAM
IMPACT S3
PAVEMENT J� J�
FENCE
TREE LINE\
EX. 12' CMP �
i`
WETLAND-WA PROPOSED 18'HDPE
IMPACT W1 AND CONCRETE HEADWALL
IMPACT S1
PROPOSED SAND BAG
�p
COFFER DAM
IMPACT S2
qLF
0 40 80 120
F
DELINEATION AND
IMPACTS MAP
PROJECT #
MAUNEY COVE ROAD CONVENIENCE CENTER
McGill
NOVEMBER 16, 2016
15.00709
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL • FINANCE
468 NEW MARKET BLVD. STE B BOONE. NC 28607 PH. (828) 3861920

I. All omo vad=mtDomdppbw,hRllbechRexedbroWb1ft4md glsRlioe
M-PedudRi l+lo60. etambd mnbofo rework Any
2 Bedhood a l bo Lemoved ha o behimi Idl /®oc Rpm rerbNs R depW do t 6e
dkrmR The dhfoo thafibelapall 'nonam lomdiabal IN.
3. All rdedrs aallbe pNtliiawl, moMW on m omyre1ldnal mmM 1, logo
BeadRHa SpemfiWNmlo reoM®O rlpom d dem vapEtw com
1. 7beCmf alorH1mfi TaSlot®tiaHbq@WmRgeoanNpI 'by NCDBQddo
NP=Comatim Stour $WPwmh. Far doq-mugmd9df-Irpeako npNle
d N)DESSdf-Moo- t;Repma,DWQdD1PJ U&.doped400abimdfum
ME Soflapmgon ropim it upeft Sem M waft mK4me f '-prow..f&.
NPDES SDMMWN Pewit fN Cambwd. A.&4W r. lie 6Ls dWe Bdf-Irpeegm
rpo"isThe kw Wm dorinu mm demdmd soMmaidm mmolmmH
soconlinglodmapprovaniplan. Tbo bwa Tom W O be mdaod RMrmob phae of
dm pmjoM and Domkowd mol peWrem cod corer it IwMimed. 7Ie form er 6e
Neemd at
Obtain the mammy mono-akr d wmalm n0o1L ' Pamit BUR Haywood Ctmy.
MolWia and keep rouS I m Akdby Shot wmEEnd NCDEQ far da i odMm d
comma ofdw BIRO taxa NOt1o'r specified.
ply work limits 6e6ae 0000mdm moth* boom.
Add fin as aealmy d maahaN Wnpamy I abnoed emmaoim a ftm
howU dh ROw an Simon m 410.7, Slowing Body what in rummy to W" the ala
)DWSNamdmbWp4ftapmt- :Welrock WapoMafa4dpnpomW
pafte oo, and =me.m�o.b.alo1.
w.,�
]aS�aBtonpGSay rN-e Up-wpv.*b�eak9ig rd, i
hckL
Been moan polg apaaio- mopepdelowtd awo-yd -
Install Alt Gra an Shown on 4104 prior to Waft the bent.
chap pito dpSlSy.
11. Sabilisal I, 'upboblotwi&stowbammwai v ®Natepaie.
12. S-d*omfarsmbOiadmon Imster ooefipidwdpi&is i 'wwiddn7
asiadt dayE alEer Rad Olde iaaeideveNL
13. PYrp®Samppadrmafaalo&wdkhabedmeawM&fpmlea(14) waking
drys dfimhedpde.
14. MtlWlo motimp-sol arena&xft the aeka Eaphddw pmjmd and oleo
aab0ime&
13. Upon doe vMbMadm conwAc0r dol no* the County for me impFGIim. NOmerte
Ball be nmwW wimoat PdW REpawt.
I& AAerdw al e i Eabilhed vemove aedimen from the a01RmW twin, able Bimew tim
Cogs aov* to orlon[ doFip 1ptla
17. Eonnbd dme to oahilissdo aim is taw(4)nwrDi
I
Major ElemefKs of DWQ Construction General Permit
TYi d.MraHI ISNaa. tr a1R)eF01paCRb dr nmeNlyrevbed /Eorlh CaHoFHw DLvsion d WaMrQrky (DWQ) Clrlodian
2OI I ]L l t.. d(N00Dt) Trfh bdo ms pored m de il.ore ry chow
wham Ae previor pmh leapkrion m AopNl2,
ml1). Sioc dN mWImY Sw 6eiwNsw.Pl caSoio Ik1ads de•ay drupe. the omgkle ParniM ahaam he HII.E lo aaawe f1D
ipl.mmnim Sw ARP://p rtaL cd"r.wE/rwb/Nq/ws/w/cordu-1lm
. ... - .."-. -...Tiaywd•1pei N. RnwhR-Sepsrie•es bas M.s
n EiardtlslRWIY.a• dbMrppy�R.R/dpisua rbr reR.Ysrw+..w
I - TYewe i•. r r lawiUy Y.e Ears Aa.;.be.
I Was IFYan I,vwdmlmmFim •MiZI&YL IoNw-deww
EPA swAY =df-AW-&wKsPawkwMFwDlPmP
CTAO,IYe DIWimr EPAdere"p &ow -W
wplhmW.m 4p.reew rNi A. r i FmW pbas.78P.
SNF Orr
lRaUalrlaa
BIaYWEWEUw 7IINr
PERIMETER CRIES. MIA ES
T1s oras
Pros
• nrimladaan.
sWliv, dHdsu
7dsy.
Naw
Wad Woom
•
7 DAYS
i LOPES ARE 1F OR LEN N HD ARE
LENGTH A
wwar(Ha7w)
Zoom
74YF
Has
uwpm m Ie• w
•
ld'T"
THAN 00 FEET N LENGTH
a.walpw
amY.I
14 YS
malNPwlhr 2:1,
PEOT
M41
11 sdl-.d
• Sbpm3:1
Mays
7- for W"
Powerdm, 50 AN
DOW,
I. iFPh
• AR.A. r.
Nor
With dopm RrN
l/mys
PNEWWor
Sml:1
7sn
'Eseis d lbs APL N.Fp.wd y as PnwiAlla sm►a1W
it m..ew w dr FYFpwMa eN1MHi... r .N W m�pN ma
Yro W eale.` gaabo IIJN3NbT
2) owmipw.""..M"
T4epa4magdWlHwmmiwNvermmddr
• D.dsestHdaRrtrd®Ih6N,Irrrgar
wamm>• d.imHd>P SEsmHW ado
m
air al1a0r1Ym awiM..
EWFlormidiNNgBrs b.lmodl0 *mm-
41ala.rrasaalmrmmom.alddm.
• Omamaa da noboamlldloavow lwkk
aR9w wads w.gadA wbolim.
3) Obdo FF..Pdmmy4kr Wilms
• ltepi.�HYstraasripwYirpwmY. -_
M pmlYaa.a.ta6alrSmD.mas>darr9
d.Dh..w dDWQ Maim d.6. BIRO prr W
Major Elements of DWQCorstrTm Ion General Permtt- Cmdnged
Q hM di.N
• aswaNayipswiaawEd�eb
• SsmapMpeltapeMimdlw03'wa 4es
• Ram, sewyatpiNEAalylMamstamYem
• YrlsMmrisaiH..p.Fi6elwayNiai
• L..rdsam MtrR Nr3ym.raalibk spm
Igemisay -11 i ma .andseq b..Hbrlhrd
• aera.saedrEW
SI fmlim.sOm dNnr PwamGa8Y1mP
• lwjN.MpYYlrtr9.1.w1 P Okm
smlarNSA- mWImA
• C•PI.ma H"mmmWWVdWaAWd3.m11
mdsrw4rad-.f
• APpamler.Nd/dar Aym2,m1)WAN .qb
wl9wwpdtawdYrA
41 L'yNHmYsaGasl.M •tiMim.awW.aOss•1am•
Uwipall.a rryl.awhestr 7 r INNry PeWId
aIEBIaaIYe dtrIRDO
m �Yw¢mmd1he140�pmsis
1ePlrt
71 aRmap Wham •aSHey
• NppoSrtlgddwa-SiwrrwmMW
• DWI." rmpwddMsa seaaarMr rwhar
war i.rd BD' BUR m Mi. r =sem 1.Ir
r HwMmbb alHstlm s naBMi.
• ltwarmstmal abo4aWIlmadlF imNEW
oris nom r rassaii alradHr auAla
• CaaNsaaarYmsrarrYaloarmamMsl
wYbaaramwme, wSOrds, rbldal
8) 6amNsa•ada.
• Ostlw ue.0aar mslweim Bsbma asdaa
T.tr wwitws9m I1H4Ha.
• llraay OUR)MI mwdSrYr1E
• rwMrae SrC rnwrsHY7YoaWanwdsf�aaa Hrslp•i.Yiw• M••Ilya •4•e Mp,�IrrVMesY•sgimemmrbaFae
Y•s4 wr bar •Ase 4.a so••YwY n4•Mans,11A'�
NPDES STORMWATER PHASE II
REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES
REVISION DATE -NOVEMBER 3, 2008
FEDERAL NOES SIOMWA70 RUSE S NORMAN SIAL E MET BY M CONTRACTOR FOR ALL
CONSTRUCTION 91E9 LARGER THAN 1 ACE, TEE REOUREMD(IS ARE SUNMAN= AS FOLLOW&
1. - IMPLEMENT M APPROVED EROSON AND SEDUORAYM CONIIOL PW/ AND NEP A COW Or
M RAN ON SITE. DEMAIM FROM M APPROVED EROSION AND SEDUENTAIM CO ARIL
PLA/ BULL E CONSOOM A "NATION OF M IDEAL NPDES GENERAL PEIIMR.
2. - PREVENT 9 9UM DE FUELS. LUBRICANTS, COOLANTS, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, AND ANY OTHER
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ONTO M GROUND OR N70 SURFACE WATERS, DWOE OF SPENT FUELS
APPROPRIATELY.
3. - USE H OOMM PEYNOES, AND FERTIUM N A MANNER CMWM NTH M FEDERAL
NECT M FUND= AD RmR11fDE ACT AND N ACCORDANCE NTH LAR ESINellORS
4. - CONTROL MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF IFFIER AND SANITARY WASTE FROM M SITE 80 THAT
NO ADVERSE IMPACTS ro WA70 QUALITY OCCUR.
B - ASPECT ALL MOSS AD Mao A7M CONTROL FANNIES EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS
(TNM N BENIN CACDAR DAYS FOR SMMMIR DIBMA 70 S111EAIO GR M LATEST
ETM-APwOVED 3o3( AND WITS 24 HODS w ANY CrOM EVEMF w YORE THAN G.a
NCH w RAN N A 1�� P DW. YMRTAN A IRAN DAZE ONSITE AND HYD A RECORD
OF M AND RAINFALL AMOUNTS ADATES.
L - OBSERVE 8TCO M7R RUNOFF DISCHARGES AND LOOK FOR OLMIiY, FLDA1NG SOLES
SUMPODED OIL OL RISEN AND OTHER mMois NDDAT-B o POWTON AD EVALUATE M
ETFECTIVEMI IS OF M EROSION AND 9EDSENTAIM CONTROL MEASURES. IF $DUENFAIM R
LEANED M CMMMM MFA, TARE WMATE ACTION! TO CONTROL M DO AIML
7. - IED A RECORD OF INSPECTIONS. KOM ANY VOW KDOMIAIDM FORD OUTSIDE M
MTWM WT AND RECORD MEASURES TATA TO DEAN UPM SEDUMT. MME THEE
RECORDS AVAILABLE IOM &VBON OF WATER QUALITY OR ITS AUDW42ED AGENT RIPON
REQUEST.
a - MAINTAIN MINCH AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO KED THEY OPERAAD AT OPTIMUM
6f1ORLY`
CONTACT M DIGNM FOR A COPY OF M
UNDER M MIMAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM.
VIOLATIONS OF M WOES STOftM70 RILES CONSTIUIE A VIOLATION OF M FEDERAL CLEAN
WATER ACT AND ARE SIRJECT TO CIVIL PENALTIES OF UP TO $27.000 PER DAY. UNDER STATE
UW, A DALY OVAL PENALTY O - 310.0PER VIOLATION CAN K AESES9S FOR VIOLATION OF
TERMS O M PERMIT.
NORTH CAROLINA LAND QUALITY SECTION
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
REVISED FOR THIS PROJECT
GENERA: ALL OMM7N CONTROL MEASURES ME TO E PERFORM N SNOT ACCORDANCE NTN KWWEN73 OF THE
NORTH CARCOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT ARE NATURAL RESOURCES. DIVISION OF LAD RESOURCES. LAND QUALITY
SM71M INE FOLLOWED CONSTRUCTION SEOUD= SMALL E COMPLIED NTH FOR ALL WORK
1. -PRION TO BEON16 WIRE ON THE PROJECT M AOS
CONTRACTOR SIL MAIN FROM E NIDI A COPY OF THE
bM9ON AD "SOFT CONiR0. APPROVAL' FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF E MCNMD+F AND
MIUA. RE3MW4M WINDOW OF LAD QUALITY. OR SHE LOCAL Al/MMM PROGRAM. THE APPROVAL NORM
MUSE E AVAILABLE ON -911E MMM ALL GRM N AND mMSRMICOON ACTIVISM
2. - SMALL AL MOSM CONIROL MEASURES AS REQUNED BY M NORTH CARONA DEPARTMENT DE ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL REBOURCEB, DIVISION OF LAD ESOURMS, LAD GUAM SECTION.
I - NO ROD( SMALL E PDIFO N D N 57MM FROM OCTOBER 15 TO APRIL 13 (TO ACCOMMODATE COE AND DWO
IIEOMOMIONR CONCERNED WORK N MIT WAIERL)
4. - CONTRACTOR IS 70 PLACE PERMANENT STAKES MAPWM CLEARLY INE 2i BUFFER FOR STREAMS *ERE SOWN
ON M PIANS AND THE MANM ME TO E MSW AT ALL IBES MMM C061RUCTON.
S. - PROCEED NTN GMORM CLEARED AND DRmS/K NOTE NO OFF SITE DISPOSAL OF MAW44 IS NLOED
INUM M DISPOSAL SITE HAS AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PIM.
8. - S® AND PLACE 00901 CONTROL MATTED ON AL LOM MNMIMV
UPON COURIEIM OF LOPE STABILIZATION.
stm QUAD Ley ..,, . m1HHn T DAYS AslFll M7(yp�T4E ARE F5T4NNSEe_ SEED AND SOL
AYErNENR SWL E PLA® 0 A 41ft B®=D Ai THE rR OwM RATES Psn AGE. SIMM MULCH
SIAL E TACKED NTH TACKED AGENT APPLIED BY NIDROSEEDM
FERTILIZER (10-10-10) 1000000 LL
FERM
KY -71 FCSOUE (POA PRAMeM IOD LBS
STRAW MULCH SO -00 BALES
FOR SAO" SEMM ACO TOM ABOVE:
ODWM MILLET (SETMIA R&")40 IBS
STEA
DIAL -MED SWM GRASS (YOMMUN NCOLOR) ED LBS
FOR WNM SQOIIC Am TDM HOVE•
RVE OW (ECAK WEAVE) 120 Les
r NIpNSEmRD, WOW C[WLOSE MAY E USED N MOTION ro STRAW MLL04 ATM MME OF 4,00 LBS
PER ARE
ALL EEOLNG SEAL EMANTAI ED, WATERED ETC... URL A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER MS
10E
ESTAKD OVER ALL DISTL M AREAS.
FOR AWN "OhNNUM M THE {LM
SON= LESPEDEZA SROMaW OR PEAL MILLET OMMKI N CLAUCW) ! LADS
GRAN SCREW (BOOM BROOM (L) MOENCN SSP. @ COLOR) 2 LBS
NATIVE SEEDING:
M CORRECT S[EDBED PH R as TO a.&
APPLY ZERO NITROGEN AT PLANING
INCORPORATE SL AMENDMENTS Nro TCSOL/RODT ZONE INEISE EmRA'
FNM EMBED BUM MUM (TRAVEL WITH DOZEN CLEATS).
SEEMID DEPTH FOR AL NAIVE SSP. DWI ECMAORASS (TRIPSAOUM DACTYMM) NEED TO E 1/4- - 1/Y.
OREAIER DEPTHS CARE HIGH MM MORTALITY.
SPE MM UMM IMPLEMENTS ARE PFAMM END NOES AND MMES TO MATCH S®E/t USED. A NO-ELL
CROP SEEDER OR BROADCASTER WITH MOSS MEIMM 70 CONTROL SMALL SED FLOW AND PCER Nm
AGITATORS ro MAIDLE FLUFFY SEED ARE BEST SUITED FOR NATIVE END.
NATIVE PLANT SEEDING MIX FOR STREAM OR RIVERBANK STABILIZATION
SEEDING FOR SWARM OR OV WM STABILIZATION SEAL K A MOND Of NATIVE ORAMM PUNTS AND
NQS NARK PLANT m SMALL INCLUDE M FOLLOWED:
OM WO - SIG SL ESIEY (ANDROPOOM CEIWMR NOM GRASS (MCASMM NIUTAMS). UTNE m1E5EM
AUmST THRUM MM
MAY - O UKIM (KC" COE") OAMOIM KDATA} 15 UBS/ACRE EACH
25 LW/ACE EACH
MAY 1 TMU AUGUST -WET ODKOETIM GLLAUNM) 25 Las/ACE EACH
TEES - SLKY DOGW W (CMM "MAO. NNY "UM (SWR SERICEAL HAZEL ATEA (MAJUS MMTA)
. AND ODOMOM (SAMKVA CMADENSS)
MAW& PLANT NK VANA706 SIAL K APPROVED BY ROLEL
NOTE NO fRMLLEA SHALL K USED NTN IV OF TOP DE STEM OR NVQ BANK.
NPDES PERMITS - NOTE -FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING NPDES PERMITS. THE
FOLLOWING STABLIZATION SCHEDULE SHALL APPLY:
p
DYEEBEME
nmgamffm
PERIMETER CRIES. MIA ES
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES AND MAPES
MGM QUALITY WATER
7 DAYS
am
(MG" ZONES
SLOPES STEEPER THAN &1
7 DAYS
i LOPES ARE 1F OR LEN N HD ARE
LENGTH A
NOT SIFEPIRAN 1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOM
ER 2
7 -DAYS FOR LOPES NEATER
SLOPES x/ OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
THAN 00 FEET N LENGTH
A9LLOTRMMA
NANTH
14 YS
OR PERUE1E115
PEOT
M41
DNMCD6
S, - MAINTAIN SOL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UIIL PERMANENT GROUND COVER R ESTABLISHED.
9. - REMOVE SOL U MIN CONTROL MEASURES AND STABILIZE THEM AREAS.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
REVISED FOR TMS PROJECT
1. MSN GRADE TOLERANCES 94AL E AS NOTED N THE SPEOi1CAIOM THE ENGINEER MAY MAKE GRACE
CHANES AS MMN N THE FELE WITHOUT EFFECIM THE UNIT BD PWM FON UNC ASSM EXCAVATION.
2 NIM Wim man ORA
RSOL �CON011101E0 10 11E OPTIMUM MOISTURE SMALL K MS. NOOMIENT AS DEIE111NED SY MOS
ENONEDI AND COPACIED WIN A SLEEPS FOOT ROLLER ro A COMPACTION EQUAL ro OR GREATER THAN
=1000 1l9t (100: N M IOP Y 6 M 9! GRADE ELOM ROADWAYS AID PARKNG LA75I a THE MONTY
RY COHPMRNG A SPATHE w TME MA7ERAL N ACAIIDANCE N7M 711E AIOMO PROCTOR
METHOD OF MOMIM-EIISIIY RDANGANO IM. ASTM ONS OR AANTO-SE UNLESS SPECIFIED N OTHER
SPEf11CAINONS
3. Dan AREA To E GRADED 94AlL E CLEARED AND GROM. NO RLL SMALL E PLA® ON ANY AREA
NOT CLEARED AND OMBBEO.
4. ALL SOIL MICRON COM MIL MEASURES KOUNM BY M MAOM PLM SMALL E PERFORMED PRIOR TO
ORAOIM.. CLEAll1NG OR GI6MN0. All EROSION COfIR0. DEVICES INCH AS SILT FENCES, ETC.. SIAL E
YANTABED N WOIICASLE 001On1OM FOR TIE LEE w M PROJECT AND SMALL E REMOVED AT M
CO P1E71M OF M PROJECT ONLY ON THE ERODRS APPROVAL i DLNM 71E LEE OF 71E PROJECT. A
$TOO CAUSES SOL M tMM NOW JAMES FEW GRADES OR OfATES 'GULLIES' AND 'SASHIED MEALY.
THESE SMALL E EARED AT NO VrIRA COT, ECAD ALL AMtp T WAS OFF OF THE PROJECTON
SME TO
ADJACENT Andiew !WL E ElAO"D AS a*D n THE ami m AT NO FOIA COST . we
CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE To AP APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PIANS WHETHER NOCAIM N THE
COKTWCSI011 PLANS OR IOW SRAMIE COKE
B DRPOSABLE MAYEN&
A CLEWED AND ORMW WASTES 94ALL E REMOVED FROM M 97E AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY
THE CONTRACTOR AT 115 EXPENSE UNLESS SPECIFIED OI ERWISL
B. SOLD WASTES TO E REMOVED. SUCH AS SMWALRS. ONES PAVEMENT, ETC.. SMALL E REMOVED
PROM M SITE AS TOUTED BY M SPECIFICATIONS. Ir MATERIAL SMALL HAVE A W mI COVER OF
Y. M CONTRACTOR SAL MAMAS SKOFM COMPACTION EOUNCO S N THEE AREAS OEM
"OSAL a= ARE NOT PROVIDED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE MS WASTE FROM M RE AND
PROPERLY DISPOK Or E AT HIS OPOM
C. ABANDOIm ZlLr= 9101 AS CULVERTS, WATER PPE. MYDRANY% CASIMM PPE APPURTENANCES,
UIIIIY POIaEMO. SUET E M PROPERTY O' M ?ECIC UTILITY AGENCY. OR COMPANY MANN
JINSOICIIOs EFUE M
CONTRACTOR CAN 0010 , DESTROY, SALVAGE. MM EHL OR STORE FOR
HIS O- USE ANY ABANDONED UIILAY. E LEST RESENT 70 M M" Mr D4 PE M931ON FROM
M UTILITY INVOLVED.
a. N M EVENT EXCESSIVE GROUNDWATER GR WOO M ARE D#MMTERND 07M M LIMITS OF
CMWMCMK M RM*M AML WON 9A11 PE � BEAM ALL WO�T MIKE, ULE SPECAE$ AND IFIED OTHAS ERWISE.
BY
7. M COI1RACTOR IM E WONME FOR M MMMT GR OF ADJUSTMENT OF ALL UWUTY SURFACE
ACCESSES SHEMOR HE PEW005 M WON( OR A UTILITY COMPANY PERFORMS M WORN.
S. M CONTRACTOR ANAL CONTROL AL *DUMY BY PEW= WADING AND !ALL PROVIDE MON AT AL
MMES FOR PROPERTY URATIC EDO M PROJECT AREA AND FOR DAUtOEICY VEHICLES. ALL OPER DITCHES
AND HAZARDOUS MEAS SMALL E CLEARLY MAO= N ACCORDANCE %M M !SPECIFICATIONS.
I. ALL AKMI SPECIFICATIONS. WE F�M9m �WFALL BE N AFIFULIZED AO SMOWK QEOOFF AALL NRRSR �ro M
TAR 3- MMIIEMT 1RACK3, OMT CLODS, BURPS MM AND OWU PUOR TO SMOM M SURFACE
WALL E WDEEm TO A DEPTH OF 34'-0' ro ACCEPT UM GR SOD. M CONTRACTOR SIAL NOT
PROCEED NTH EMM OPERATOR WITHOUT POST OOTMM M DM=n APPROVAL DE M GRADED
RWACE ALL SUPW MULL E PERFORMED BY A MECHANICAL NVORO-SEEDEP. HND SMM SAIL E
AUMORZED ON AN AREA BY AREA APPROVAL BY M DMMQR. WILD WAS *MU THEN K
MATTED WN OWT-TERM POTODEDRADAEf OMON CONTROL MATMrQ *EAE 94M ON PLA14
10. THEE SPECIFIED. ALL STORE DRAIN PPE SMALL E INN DENSITY POLIEINYIENE (HDPE} 9100TH WALL
BIIMM " MIR TONT JONTC BAOO4ED WITH Bd 7 IED stOE UP ro MOL a' OVER M TOP
OF M PPE. HOPE PIPE USB FOR $TM DRAINAGE DElEN71011 M7FYM MNALL E MS R2 WT
OR APPROVED EQUAL.
EPEE POP R SPECIFIED STORM DRAW PPE SIAL E EMORMD CMCRM PPE (RCP) CWCRNG TO
AAw1TO M-1706 AS CORANED N REDDY STAMM SPECIFICATION 1032-I MR WALL 'r TYPE
HERE CP R SPEOPED, MWWIM METAL STORM DRAM PIE (OLP) SAL E ALU MMM TYPE 2
CONWAIM STEEL MANLFACRRIED N ACCORDANCE NN M R[OUMmm OF AASIro M-34. M PPE
SIAL E MANUFACTURED FROM ALUkOlM STEEL TYPE 2 NATURAL COfORRNO TO M AEQ EMMM OF
AA91I0 M-274. ALL PPE SAL K FtOMMM NN NOtM= ENDS AND SAL K "M WIN MOM
BADS M USE OF DUNE BADS WILL NOT E ALLOWED. PPE *MM 24' DIAME7R SMALL K 18
GME. PPE TMdAON 4Y DIAMETER SIAL K 14 GAUGE. Psi THROUGH a4• DIAMETER SW K 12
GAME.
11. CONTRACTOR SIAL VERIFY ALL ELEVATIONS BEFORE N6TALAIMN OF FACLFEM
11 CATCH BASIS GMT -N -PLACE SMALL COBVN ro M KaNKMIS OF NODDY STANDARD SPECT ATIOIS
OR OMOADS 10
0ALATEST EMM) ARTICLES 440-1 TROUGH 840-3, DROP IN ETS SAL
roNs
STAD(
44074.
11 NOP NLET PALE AND DRAW SAL K RERAN R -3334A OR EQUAL
14. CONCRETE AND MASONRY SIAL MEET M FA)Mt MU M OF APPmPRA1E SECTION OF NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND STRUCTURES OLATEST EDITION). MMM SMALL E MASS A OR B, 4000
PSI M OOM MEETING M KOaOdA OF SECTION TOM CONSTRICTED N ACCORDANCE NTH SECTION
481 MASONRY 94AL MEET M REORIENO115 O SECTION IBM CONSTRUCTED N ACCORDANCE NTH
ECTON 830 AD/OR 434.
15. TORS OF PROPOSED RAZES AND ORATES SMALL E RUSH NTH MIND GRADE
N. PIE GST CONCRETE BOLES ARE ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVES FOR PROPOSED CATCH MSNM
U�W�
wz'
� d
Hz�
aw
"zn
z�
UOuz
z
O<
a�
tea#
z
z
Q nc
W
W1z
z
9 W:
w
LU
W Z
U J
Z0
LU
Z U
W
Z F=-
Z Z
O Q
U
0O Z
Q D
w O U
U> O o
Z Oct <�
T
0
Z
Q
V)
W (n
OZ
ZW
J (9
SHEET
G-002

QK.--hlt
's bB�OW.
Call aetora you alg.
N.C. One Call Center
DI., 811 or 1.800.632.4949
NOTE:
SURVEY PROVIDED BY RICHARD M. OWENS JR. DATED 1/9/16
i
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
WATER UNE. (TYP.)
GIEED AKWR1
As woPOL Tyr
orroy 1 / / / / _' \ _ - � � a.. 0 -do w
Astawy V 1011ow-PE too
illow
REMOVE EXISTING
� � 1
EXISTING WATER UNE. (TYP.) -
1 EXISTING 12" SEWER UNE
REMOVE EXISTING 18" CMP _ y
Eoywlr M. Firpxa
EXISTING 8" SEWER EXISTING e" SEWER LINE ' � / P' syJ
MA40CY COW W MAUNEY COVE BRANCHST 1204
�
R/W /I' OV OPER WE OF 1HE
CEN1ERLAW
elt�rrM'—
T'it.r aw'
rr wr
09 7J1
R=J5 Lorry
/ PD dT1
NOTE:
REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE. CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE RELOCATION/NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER.
DATE
PLAN
0 m as w
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 INCH = 20 FEET
REVISION DESCRIPTION
�u
W4 1:9
• Qy
Hz
�w
►-+ z 4
..a
V�zm
Oz€
Q
a�
Qac
w
z�
z°
qt4v
tY
w Z
U Z J
O
LLI
Z U
W
2
ZVo
O Q
U }
p O Z
O =)
w O O
U
U O
}
Z act Q
T 2
06
og
Z Z
O�
U�
z0
c/)0
X
W
SHEET
C-101
I I
I
ROW It" roy
of
{�J
RWtW ft" Toy ` W 2011E / Py "V
1
X*wf Toy
_
AV AOD / Hf m
EXISTING PROPERTY
--
LINE. (TYP.)
�_ I \ `
I
'G
-_- _
^\`--
J
` —
aow,c.Ka
.b Lowy
'✓ /�'��
--�— \���
'�
---
— —--------
REMOVE EIfISnNG
-------
- ------------- �: ��
---_-__-_—_—__—__—_ — — �� \
FENCING
' ------ --------_-- \ ���
PontAWtdaLLC
--- ---- ---- -= �� \
AV eee/Pb I"$
REMOVE EXISTING
CONCRETE_
- - - - _ _ \\\ \
DO NOT DISTURB EASEMENT
EXISTING
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
i
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
WATER UNE. (TYP.)
GIEED AKWR1
As woPOL Tyr
orroy 1 / / / / _' \ _ - � � a.. 0 -do w
Astawy V 1011ow-PE too
illow
REMOVE EXISTING
� � 1
EXISTING WATER UNE. (TYP.) -
1 EXISTING 12" SEWER UNE
REMOVE EXISTING 18" CMP _ y
Eoywlr M. Firpxa
EXISTING 8" SEWER EXISTING e" SEWER LINE ' � / P' syJ
MA40CY COW W MAUNEY COVE BRANCHST 1204
�
R/W /I' OV OPER WE OF 1HE
CEN1ERLAW
elt�rrM'—
T'it.r aw'
rr wr
09 7J1
R=J5 Lorry
/ PD dT1
NOTE:
REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE. CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE RELOCATION/NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER.
DATE
PLAN
0 m as w
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 INCH = 20 FEET
REVISION DESCRIPTION
�u
W4 1:9
• Qy
Hz
�w
►-+ z 4
..a
V�zm
Oz€
Q
a�
Qac
w
z�
z°
qt4v
tY
w Z
U Z J
O
LLI
Z U
W
2
ZVo
O Q
U }
p O Z
O =)
w O O
U
U O
}
Z act Q
T 2
06
og
Z Z
O�
U�
z0
c/)0
X
W
SHEET
C-101

4Know what's belOW.
Call before you dig.
N.C. One -Call Center
Dial 811 or 1.800.632.4949
Robert Vm Toy
Robert N» Toy OB ?OIIE / P4 109
not roy
Ott WV Py 775
_.
I EXIS C
PROPERTY
_ _ _ _ _
PROPOSED TYPE "A" LANDSCAPE BUFFER i� \` - ` _ I -� _ _ - - _ _ _ __ _ �_ , _ _ - - _ - _ LINE _(-TYP )
parrnos K. SMery
.b Low i _ --------_ �_ ---__ --- --- -- --------z '�!
De 482 Pq 101
PROPOSED 8" BOLLARD, i _ _------- ----------
- - SEE DETAIL ON C-501 ---��------ - - - - _--
-
(TYP. OF 8 PER PAD) _ / PROPOSED 8" COMPACTOR --
CONCRETE PADS W/ TURNED
DOWN EDGES(TYP)
PROPOSED 24" CURB AN
~i`� PROPOSED 30' DOUBLE
SWING GATEJew
deW
/ r
/� moi' ice, / / / - •O• L29'JA
PROPOSED B" CONCRETE PAD(30'
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
PROPOSED
WO OGATE 0' DOUBLE /� PAVEMENT (2"S9.58 AND 2"119.OB)
/
$tow y Owen roy
AB 2011E/P9109
PROPOSED SIORETENTION CELL
M`RUNEY CD
- EXISTING 8" SEWER 5-"�+�+"��
� -� -
�5� EXISTING WATER LINE
5� M AUACr COW RD.
SR 1204
R1W 14' QV 17 MR SPE" OF 1M
CEN7ERUVE
Nlt aVr "lwter
WETLAND -W -A PROPOSED STOP BAR -Gs
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ALONG R/W
EXISTING 12" SEWER
Robert Lawry
DB 7J5 / Py 522
- % iki:awr-r
w ar" aw1s - r
EXISTING 8" SEWER Eggers M. Feyuaon
OIB .7fi0 / Py 57J
MAUNEY COVE
BRANCH
PROPOSED 8' CHAIN LINK w/ PVC SLATS
D_
LU
PROPOSED 8" CONCRETE PAD 20' X 30'
(ATTENDANT HUT AND OIL DROP OFF NOT IN CONTRACT,
Z
Z
OWNER PROVIDED)
W
U
J
8
Pd,* Rmtols UC
OBOE &W / Pg tJN
LLJ
U
m 0
0
O w U Q oo LL
W
O
U
> V
of
PROPOSED YARD HYDRANT
O
O
Z
U Q
WETLAND -WB
SM�`r
5(
Z
.oe..*..r
a
4rsm I
J"
Q O
Z
er•7Nw.�.1
/�hN•/
IY O
D
O
P 1�
Uj
0
0
((
_J� L7/ V
LU}
20
DEED PIF
A&&VPy.
Q
_
IINM= 20=
SHEET
C-102
m
8
/
m 0
0
O w U Q oo LL
o
r. a.A
�-e aMer
•:
WETLAND -WB
SM�`r
5(
Z
.oe..*..r
a
4rsm I
J"
J
a
G �(�
W
RIP RAP
P 1�
((
_J� L7/ V
20
PLAN
1. R 40
CRAM117 SCAU
IINM= 20=
SHEET
C-102

8�1
PROPOSED SILT FENCE. (TYP.)
srawy o.., roy /
MB 2011E/P, 10D /
PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN /1
I} PROPOSED 61 LF 18- HDPE O 0.5x SLOPE
r/// PROPOSED ROCK INLET
/ PROTECTION. '
PROPOSED
Lim
LEGEND ===mold c u
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE W z R
¢.2;
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR • F z
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
1
Rb6w7 Wrr Toy
I
I
Rawl Hn roy
a9 201IE / P9 10
PROPOSED ROCK INLET PR07ECMN
mad Toy
SILT FENCE
z
-- i) --
as MR / P)7 >78 1 • �.
_ ` U z U
—
zE
PROPOSED BAFFLE
V 0Q
o--
PROPOSED SKIMMER
.a
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
EXIG PROPERTY
v)
LINE, (
---—_—_--_�_——_=_
1
cra...ro.tc rMA"y
.6 LOW
ZW 402 Pp IM
-----------
2600
_---
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE__-----
.-
---- ---�\� � �
__ —
1.3 ACRES
_----
_— _ \
PROPOSED SILT FENCE. (TYP.)
srawy o.., roy /
MB 2011E/P, 10D /
PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN /1
I} PROPOSED 61 LF 18- HDPE O 0.5x SLOPE
r/// PROPOSED ROCK INLET
/ PROTECTION. '
PROPOSED
Lim
LEGEND ===mold c u
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE W z R
¢.2;
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR • F z
Par* RMta v [[C
PROPOSED DITCH DI. SEE DETAIL C-502
V99W
_ .•.-a.Pt -
�i i
#�,-i����-��
`P'
z�
Qom,
w'
w�
z�
�o
zR
IW s:
astam 1n
az T . .
Z � S2 9V 2 ZwZpp wWC8n
EXISTING STORM DRAIN TO REMAIN
PROPOSED BAFFLE. (TYP.) 2 i —r / Z
I PROPOSED 37 LF 18' CMP O 2 OX SLOPE — — O
. � � �r
PROPOSED 1.5- SKIMMER W/ 0.75. ORIFICE _ i = ; —+�" "'` i ��� ��s�—�� \ �q i/)
p y \ PROPOSED HEADWALL Q QZ
INV OUT: 2583.37 /, i r iissx.r J
`r PROPOSED YARD INLET
w a
RIM:2585.67 PROPOSED RIP RAP —` y wr -
-- UNDER DRAIN INVERT. OUTLET CONTROL 1- r — /SM Q
INV OUT:2583.67 \ 1 5
I PROPOSED SAND BAG Fu�poN M. Fiyvaon � r' �•
_ arr ' COFFER DAM. AB JSO/Py 37J AWWAV r �{,�
M PROPOSED HEADWALL CONTRACTOR TO DEWATER t7 Z Z
OR INV IN: 2583.27 AS NECESSARY TO WORK MALONEY COVE REMOVE EXISTING SEDIMENT yyy
MMAIFY ADZE RA IN DRY CONDITIONS. BRANCH AT PIPE OUTLET AND /
_ yp 1204 RESTORE IWTH RIP—RAP / (�
t� R/W W AV E11hm mf a� 11+E PROPOSED HEADWALL PROPOSED SAND BAG TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY Q
MYEW INV OUT:2582.53 COFFER DAM. ENGINEERof
wr. wm.r CONTACTOR TO DEWATER PLAN of
rrir ii w Ro6rt Lorry AS NECESSARY TO WORK
AB 7JJ
/1v 6 IN DRY CONDITIONS w o Wa IF .o w
`IR"mcs`",m 1 INCH= 20 FEEr SHEET
C-1 04
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
r
6s5Kf.
PROPOSED ROCK INLET PR07ECMN
----------
SILT FENCE
z
-- i) --
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
_ ` U z U
—
zE
PROPOSED BAFFLE
V 0Q
o--
PROPOSED SKIMMER
.a
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
° v
Z.
v)
Par* RMta v [[C
PROPOSED DITCH DI. SEE DETAIL C-502
V99W
_ .•.-a.Pt -
�i i
#�,-i����-��
`P'
z�
Qom,
w'
w�
z�
�o
zR
IW s:
astam 1n
az T . .
Z � S2 9V 2 ZwZpp wWC8n
EXISTING STORM DRAIN TO REMAIN
PROPOSED BAFFLE. (TYP.) 2 i —r / Z
I PROPOSED 37 LF 18' CMP O 2 OX SLOPE — — O
. � � �r
PROPOSED 1.5- SKIMMER W/ 0.75. ORIFICE _ i = ; —+�" "'` i ��� ��s�—�� \ �q i/)
p y \ PROPOSED HEADWALL Q QZ
INV OUT: 2583.37 /, i r iissx.r J
`r PROPOSED YARD INLET
w a
RIM:2585.67 PROPOSED RIP RAP —` y wr -
-- UNDER DRAIN INVERT. OUTLET CONTROL 1- r — /SM Q
INV OUT:2583.67 \ 1 5
I PROPOSED SAND BAG Fu�poN M. Fiyvaon � r' �•
_ arr ' COFFER DAM. AB JSO/Py 37J AWWAV r �{,�
M PROPOSED HEADWALL CONTRACTOR TO DEWATER t7 Z Z
OR INV IN: 2583.27 AS NECESSARY TO WORK MALONEY COVE REMOVE EXISTING SEDIMENT yyy
MMAIFY ADZE RA IN DRY CONDITIONS. BRANCH AT PIPE OUTLET AND /
_ yp 1204 RESTORE IWTH RIP—RAP / (�
t� R/W W AV E11hm mf a� 11+E PROPOSED HEADWALL PROPOSED SAND BAG TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY Q
MYEW INV OUT:2582.53 COFFER DAM. ENGINEERof
wr. wm.r CONTACTOR TO DEWATER PLAN of
rrir ii w Ro6rt Lorry AS NECESSARY TO WORK
AB 7JJ
/1v 6 IN DRY CONDITIONS w o Wa IF .o w
`IR"mcs`",m 1 INCH= 20 FEEr SHEET
C-1 04

1 I
I
Rabat Ion roy Robed Har Toy
YLtai roy LIB 201IE / P8 108
DO eros / P8 775 1
PROPOSED 4' SCH 40 PVC SEWER SERVICE -
W/ CLEANOUTS (TYP.) i PROPOSED PLUG W/ MARKER
_EXISTING PROPERTY
I-- - - --_ ----- -
\ \ \. PROPOSED CLEANOUT - — —_— ——__-_ _—_ — —_ —zeio= — LINE. (TYP.)
70P: 2603.25
IN 2599.75--
A'aw•uvX tl/wry-
-----------
,b e
Low ✓ ��i /.-_- -- - _------�\ G:+f►•
AB 482 Pg 101--I!-!- {`
- ---- --
—2600—
PROPOSED
2600—PROPOSED CLEANOUT - ' -- - - - ' 2D.,
TOP: 2599.3 --- --'r ------- '---- ��
INV: 2595.8
PROPOSED 8' COMPACTOR
PROPOSED 24' CURB AND CUTTER - — 11 �, - _ i ' CONCRETE PADS
:,�-
SAW
EE y
PROPOSED 3/4' TYPE 'K' COPPER
WATER SERVICE, MAINTAIN 3'
MINIMUM COVER (TYP.) 1 /
stall 0— roy
D 2011E/P8108 I/ 1� ..........-.
PROPOSED BIORETENTION CELLSEE DETAIL SHEET C-505.
INSTALL ONCE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. 1 .``.'
REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM SEDIMENT BASIN, AND
RESTORE 70 ORIGINAL DESIGN GRADES
PROPOSED WATER METER (TYP.) �� PROPOSED YARD INLET PROPOSED HEADWALL
RIM:2585.67 INV OUT: 2583.37
_ UNDERDRAIN INVERT:2583.67
PROPOSED CLEANOUT INV OUT: 2583.67
700.2588 �, PROPOSED HEADWALL
INV:2583.5 ��� INV IN: 2583.27
NK N. a.e
NK a1. soe
MRAl COW RD.
510 1204
R1W 14' OM ODlR WE OF IME
CDVIl
sr. arse
a:.war PROPOSED NCDOT Rabat Low
ASPHALT TRENCH REPAIR OB 7J5 / PS
PROPOSED 30' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PROPOSED 61 LF 18' HDPE O 0.5X SLOPE
PROPOSED DITCH D2
Park Randa LLC
OF SW / P8 IJ54
(PROPOSED YARD HYDRANT(
PROPOSED DITCH D1, SEE DETAIL C-502
PROPOSED 37 LF 18- CMP O 2. OX SLOPE
1 _ '�►N„ x
�.
/7 —� - NI(N . syse
a. _.wrs
sw \` � PROPOSED 30' TEMPORARY h0
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
Nr N. w0wa•- I
Nr arr _sone- r � M
Cull Al Fal Bvaa+� 4%DO MO
PROPOSED MILL 2' AND OVERLAY / P8 37J
Will 2' S9.58 ASPHALT PAVEMENT\
MAUNEY COVE
BRANCH REMOVE EXISTING SEDIMENT
A7 PIPE OUTLET AND
PROPOSED 20' PERMANENT PROPOSED 20' PERMANENT RESTORE WITH RIP -RAP
DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PROPOSED SAND BAG
PROPOSED HEADWALL COFFER DAM.
INV OUT. 2582.53 CONTRACTOR 70 DEWATEF
AS NECESSARY TO WORK
PROPOSED SAND BAG IN DRY CONDITIONS.
COFFER DAM. PLAN
CONTRACTOR TO DEWATER m 1. m o
AS NECESSARY 70 WORK
IN DRY CONDITIONS.
GRAPHIC SCALL: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
AT PIPE OUTLET AND
RESTORE WITH RIP -RAP.
TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY
ENGINEER.
it -
9
J_
H
Z)
06
()� Z
W Q
f_ J
Q a
0
F_
U)
SHEET
C-1 05
W awl
PROPOSED HEADWALL GEED MUPDI-
D.B. ero8 P8. 777 1-E INV OUT: 2581.20
2 ii I
- - ,; _ INV IN: 2581.12 - - - -�
,r -aur
PROPOSED 53 LF 18' HDPE O 2.8X SLOPE -M \
PROPOSED HEADWALL
INV IN: 2582.70
-'
EXISTING STORM DRAIN TO REMAIN \
't>Z
PROPOSED 37 LF 18- CMP O 2. OX SLOPE
1 _ '�►N„ x
�.
/7 —� - NI(N . syse
a. _.wrs
sw \` � PROPOSED 30' TEMPORARY h0
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
Nr N. w0wa•- I
Nr arr _sone- r � M
Cull Al Fal Bvaa+� 4%DO MO
PROPOSED MILL 2' AND OVERLAY / P8 37J
Will 2' S9.58 ASPHALT PAVEMENT\
MAUNEY COVE
BRANCH REMOVE EXISTING SEDIMENT
A7 PIPE OUTLET AND
PROPOSED 20' PERMANENT PROPOSED 20' PERMANENT RESTORE WITH RIP -RAP
DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PROPOSED SAND BAG
PROPOSED HEADWALL COFFER DAM.
INV OUT. 2582.53 CONTRACTOR 70 DEWATEF
AS NECESSARY TO WORK
PROPOSED SAND BAG IN DRY CONDITIONS.
COFFER DAM. PLAN
CONTRACTOR TO DEWATER m 1. m o
AS NECESSARY 70 WORK
IN DRY CONDITIONS.
GRAPHIC SCALL: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
AT PIPE OUTLET AND
RESTORE WITH RIP -RAP.
TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY
ENGINEER.
it -
9
J_
H
Z)
06
()� Z
W Q
f_ J
Q a
0
F_
U)
SHEET
C-1 05

EXISTING ROAD � � 10' !' ]6' MN.
FROM EXISTING ROAD
x'-3' COARSE
(RAILROAD BH
NOIFR.
1. A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SMALL BE LOCATED WHERE MAFFIC WILL,
BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRlIOM1N SITE N OR FROM AN OOSTNG ROAD.
2. STONE TO BE 2 - 3 NCH WASHED STONE RAILROAD BALLAST,
3. THE ENTRANCE SMALL BE MAINTAINED N A CONDITION MACH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING
PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH AOpll(RNAL STONE
AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AHD/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES
USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.
4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED. WASHED OR WAMEO ONTO PUBLIC STREETS
MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
5. MEN NECESSARY MHE15 MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO
ENTERING A PUBLIC STREET. MEN WASHING S REQUIRED. IT SMALL BE DONE ON
AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STORE WHICH DRAWS INTO AN APPROVED
SEDIMENT BASIN,
6. REFERENCE NCDENR LAND OUM TY SECTION DESIGN MMUAL 6.06.
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
POROUS BAFFLES
NWZS
1. NFT NNE (A) SIQAD NAW Z. 6
SLMACE AREA, FIRST CELL (0) SMPAD NAW
PACE ME 0 SA SIRFAEE AS<D"D GAL (CI
S1,U D HAVE m 0, —AGE MEA IJUI THE
OUTLET NNE (D) 111dILD HAVE riX 0,
SMAS MEA.
]. .— THE BASH tb THAT THE ODIUM IS
LEVEL WONT TO llx AND SDE N SOC
5. STEEL POSTS SIPAD BE DRVEN M A DEPTH
M
W 24 RIES WAGED A MANNYY W 4 FEET
MMT.
4. DO NOT SRULE FABRIC. USE ONE NNTWVO E
PEC[ ACROSS BMS".
5. "SPECT BAITTES AT I.EAST INGE A LIEF[ MD
AFTER EACH RAMAL MALAR MY REPARIS
MMEBA I REMOVE SnROIr DEPOSITS WHEN
R ORACLES ITE F1AL
6. REFERENCE M(.DENR l.VlO PINKY SC1NN
x9CH MANUAL: X06
AL MATTING PRODUCTS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION
/ \//\��
!'MIN. \ UPS
STRBE, ARE
SUNG GROUND
E- HUN" TO DIVERT RUNOFF
IIIH�
DEPTTH FOR 6
ORDI
FROM EMSTWC ROAD
Y/
1 \� `%•
SUPPORT PW
24• INTO BOTTOM OR SDE
INSTALL EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IN DITCHES
IN BELOW. FABRIC TYPE PER
M "WE T R, SAGGING OR
TO PORTIO ORW
w' MAX FOR SM. STRENGTH FABRIC
1M MRC YCSH REMORLiIFNT
BERM
EDULE
TATUE M
SSUPPER
2. FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY
FOR RIPRAP DITCHES:
SLOPE SLOPE LENGTM(FT) MAXMUM AREA(SOM E FOUND TO BE IN DISREPAIR.
WRE
/
PERMANENT SYNTHETIC LINING
�YARDYARD
INLET
B.�.e:
I� s
.2
FROM EXISTING ROAD
x'-3' COARSE
(RAILROAD BH
NOIFR.
1. A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SMALL BE LOCATED WHERE MAFFIC WILL,
BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRlIOM1N SITE N OR FROM AN OOSTNG ROAD.
2. STONE TO BE 2 - 3 NCH WASHED STONE RAILROAD BALLAST,
3. THE ENTRANCE SMALL BE MAINTAINED N A CONDITION MACH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING
PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH AOpll(RNAL STONE
AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AHD/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES
USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.
4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED. WASHED OR WAMEO ONTO PUBLIC STREETS
MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
5. MEN NECESSARY MHE15 MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO
ENTERING A PUBLIC STREET. MEN WASHING S REQUIRED. IT SMALL BE DONE ON
AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STORE WHICH DRAWS INTO AN APPROVED
SEDIMENT BASIN,
6. REFERENCE NCDENR LAND OUM TY SECTION DESIGN MMUAL 6.06.
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
POROUS BAFFLES
NWZS
1. NFT NNE (A) SIQAD NAW Z. 6
SLMACE AREA, FIRST CELL (0) SMPAD NAW
PACE ME 0 SA SIRFAEE AS<D"D GAL (CI
S1,U D HAVE m 0, —AGE MEA IJUI THE
OUTLET NNE (D) 111dILD HAVE riX 0,
SMAS MEA.
]. .— THE BASH tb THAT THE ODIUM IS
LEVEL WONT TO llx AND SDE N SOC
5. STEEL POSTS SIPAD BE DRVEN M A DEPTH
M
W 24 RIES WAGED A MANNYY W 4 FEET
MMT.
4. DO NOT SRULE FABRIC. USE ONE NNTWVO E
PEC[ ACROSS BMS".
5. "SPECT BAITTES AT I.EAST INGE A LIEF[ MD
AFTER EACH RAMAL MALAR MY REPARIS
MMEBA I REMOVE SnROIr DEPOSITS WHEN
R ORACLES ITE F1AL
6. REFERENCE M(.DENR l.VlO PINKY SC1NN
x9CH MANUAL: X06
AL MATTING PRODUCTS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION
/ \//\��
!'MIN. \ UPS
STRBE, ARE
SUNG GROUND
IIIH�
DEPTTH FOR 6
ORDI
"/i\�i ,
,\\/,/'
Y/
1 \� `%•
QIES�
INSTALL EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IN DITCHES
IN BELOW. FABRIC TYPE PER
WINIM TELY AFTER EACH RAWFA AND
BERM
EDULE
AVG.
2. FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY
FOR RIPRAP DITCHES:
SLOPE SLOPE LENGTM(FT) MAXMUM AREA(SOM E FOUND TO BE IN DISREPAIR.
BOTTOM
PERMANENT SYNTHETIC LINING
�YARDYARD
INLET
Z TO SIE 75 T 6OR DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 1/3
S TO 104 50
WIDTH
OVERLAP EDGES 12' MIN. WITH
DITCH b
D • MATTING TWE
ANCHOR PNS EVERY 3' ALONG
OVERLAP. BURY FIDS 12' MIN.
I 0'
1' Z N.A.G. S.C.150
RIM
NOT TO SCALE
2 0'
Z' 2 N.A.G. SC.150
(FT)
SIZE
TYPICAL DITCH DETAIL
TDP Q FABRIC
MOIIL B, I'
SP NM
SALLAER}.
OF
TOROF BF
SNPNrID BE 2•
LGPMM
TH TOP
a THE san
OR SM. -AR. STAPLED OR
INTO BOTTM OR —
5-
(M
6' MAX STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WIN WIRE FENCE
SIN 1!A 6' I' MIR
6EXTRA-189—
XTR
MAX EA Si8FNGTIM FABRIC WITNWT
FARE FENCE
' TMIE TRENCH -
SECTION VIEW
FILTER
FABRIC EXISTING
'I GROUND
BASIN NO. BAST MI. A BAFFLL SPMSIG D
/ \//\��
!'MIN. \ UPS
STRBE, ARE
2j"
BASIN
Y/
BERM
BASIN
11. FILTER BARRIERS SMALL BE INSPECTED
WINIM TELY AFTER EACH RAWFA AND
BERM
DAILY DARING PROLONGED RAINFALL.
REPAIR SMALL BE MADE AS HECESSMV.
AVG.
2. FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY
BASI6M
SLOPE SLOPE LENGTM(FT) MAXMUM AREA(SOM E FOUND TO BE IN DISREPAIR.
BOTTOM
QE 100 10.000 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SMALL BE REMOVED
AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND WHEN
�YARDYARD
INLET
Z TO SIE 75 T 6OR DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 1/3
S TO 104 50
WIDTH
5.000
;0 TO 204 Z5 p,SOR HEIpHT Qi BARRIER.
WIDTH
x04 13 1.500 !. REFERENCE NCDENR LAND QUALITY
SECTION DESIGN MMUAL 6.61
SEDIMENTATION/SILT FENCE
RIM
NOT TO SCALE
!x4 Y
WSTAI1 SIMMER AN
TO YARD WLET I FT.
BOTTOM OR BASIN
WIMMEF
(SEE DETAIL)
CLASS S STONE BED
(411',1' MIN.)
GROUT YARD INLET
BOTTOM TO ELEV%VU
C'
ENCLOSURE
END CA PVC ELBOW
WATER
ENTRY UNIT
r� rau
PVC TEE
SEDIMENT BASIN WITH RISER
WATER SIMAQ
PW TWO OA S(AWEP MM
SCHEDULE b
PW PIPE )S- HOLES PVC PPE
FLERBL
MTLET Pu
END VIEW
UQM5
1. REFERENCE NCDEHR LAND WALITY
SECTION DESIGN MMU,: 6.64
SKIMMER DETAIL
PAI: WMT PPE SOMWUIE b
PVC PPc
'D EaW¢
OPENRIG
DIMINLE —YE
PW TEF
Y'
IDE
FRONT VIEW
LC
Lu
w Z
UJ
Lu Zw
Z U
w
Z Z
O Q
U
C O Z
Q
w O O
> 0
OU O
w
w
Q � _
5
PLAN o
yp V, U
a
Z W pmS2 z
I�13`Ul
p< a< W O J g W.
O O U O U LL
_J
Q
I—
LU
0
'
V/
Z)
O
LII
Z
Q
J
J
LLI
U
2
SHEET
C-502
TOP
BASIN
BASIN
BERM
BASIN
BARREL
BERM
AVG.
AVG.
SKIMMER 8
BASI6M
ELEV.
BOTTOM
INVERT
�YARDYARD
INLET
INLET
WIDTH
LENGTH
WIDTH
ORIFICE
(R)
RIM
BOTTOM
(FT)
(FT)
(FT)
SIZE
ARAE
L5" SKIMMER
1
2587.5
2584.0
2583.67
2585.67
2582.00
t5
72'
20'
0.75' ORIFICE
C'
ENCLOSURE
END CA PVC ELBOW
WATER
ENTRY UNIT
r� rau
PVC TEE
SEDIMENT BASIN WITH RISER
WATER SIMAQ
PW TWO OA S(AWEP MM
SCHEDULE b
PW PIPE )S- HOLES PVC PPE
FLERBL
MTLET Pu
END VIEW
UQM5
1. REFERENCE NCDEHR LAND WALITY
SECTION DESIGN MMU,: 6.64
SKIMMER DETAIL
PAI: WMT PPE SOMWUIE b
PVC PPc
'D EaW¢
OPENRIG
DIMINLE —YE
PW TEF
Y'
IDE
FRONT VIEW
LC
Lu
w Z
UJ
Lu Zw
Z U
w
Z Z
O Q
U
C O Z
Q
w O O
> 0
OU O
w
w
Q � _
5
PLAN o
yp V, U
a
Z W pmS2 z
I�13`Ul
p< a< W O J g W.
O O U O U LL
_J
Q
I—
LU
0
'
V/
Z)
O
LII
Z
Q
J
J
LLI
U
2
SHEET
C-502

III
1. 40m P51 CONCRETE ST__
RES. (_)�
l--4B•�`SW
..APAPROI ELEVATION
FEB. I—)
t2'
t
J" qA ORNN$ B'
ABDK RDN WE
N2
LD.
H1
12'
1
W2
ELEVATION R®,yl (Tp_)
I
6'
D 6'
BDA ELM
1. COIOEIE NEMNALL RDNFORQl1ENT PEA N.GO.O.T.
REINFORCED CONCRETE ENDWALL
NOT TO SCALE
2' S9.5B SURFACE COURSE
2" 119.08 NTERMEDIATE COURSE
B" AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO
1001E STANDARD PROCTOR
2'-0" SUBGRADE
(COMPACTED +00% N 5" LFTS)
A.J
PLAN
1/2'
/4.
+ +n•
+2'
ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
POLTPROPYLE/'
PLASTIC
rZ ROD S
SECTION A -A
CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL STEP $ SHALL PROTRUDE A MINIMUM OF 5• AND A
MAXIMUM OF 7• FROM INSIDE FACE OF STRUCTURE WALL. 2. STEPS DIFFERING IN
DIMENSIONS, CONFIGURATION, OR MATERIALS FROM THOSE SHOWN MAY ALSO BE USED
PROVIDED THE CONTRACTOR HAS FURNISHED THE ENGINEER WITH DETAILS OF THE
PROPOSED STEPS AND HAS RECEIVED PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER
FOR THE USE OF SAID STEPS.
MANHOLE STEPS
NOT TO SCALE
HEADWALL DIMENSIONS (HDPE PIPE)
NOTL USE NUI, LAROM 512E FGH COO IF PIPE.
YARD NLET SHALL RECEIVE
PE
MI R N2
D E AFX"T
BASE
AREA
3•-2' 4•-+0• r -r r -r
z -r r-9• %550
z]4
E42*�4r
7-r B'-1' tN' r -e•
1'-6' r -r 2.1
9.90
4'-2' r -r 2'-0• 4'-r
II r -V ZXD
t1504'
NOTED OTHERWSE
-r 111 7-P t_C
z -Y r -r ].TDO
1T.95S'-B'
1tl-10' ]'-r 5•-r
z-tl' 4'-r 5.9W
20.90
III
1. 40m P51 CONCRETE ST__
RES. (_)�
l--4B•�`SW
..APAPROI ELEVATION
FEB. I—)
t2'
t
J" qA ORNN$ B'
ABDK RDN WE
N2
LD.
H1
12'
1
W2
ELEVATION R®,yl (Tp_)
I
6'
D 6'
BDA ELM
1. COIOEIE NEMNALL RDNFORQl1ENT PEA N.GO.O.T.
REINFORCED CONCRETE ENDWALL
NOT TO SCALE
2' S9.5B SURFACE COURSE
2" 119.08 NTERMEDIATE COURSE
B" AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO
1001E STANDARD PROCTOR
2'-0" SUBGRADE
(COMPACTED +00% N 5" LFTS)
A.J
PLAN
1/2'
/4.
+ +n•
+2'
ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
POLTPROPYLE/'
PLASTIC
rZ ROD S
SECTION A -A
CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL STEP $ SHALL PROTRUDE A MINIMUM OF 5• AND A
MAXIMUM OF 7• FROM INSIDE FACE OF STRUCTURE WALL. 2. STEPS DIFFERING IN
DIMENSIONS, CONFIGURATION, OR MATERIALS FROM THOSE SHOWN MAY ALSO BE USED
PROVIDED THE CONTRACTOR HAS FURNISHED THE ENGINEER WITH DETAILS OF THE
PROPOSED STEPS AND HAS RECEIVED PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER
FOR THE USE OF SAID STEPS.
MANHOLE STEPS
NOT TO SCALE
CATCH BASIN TOP DETAILS
REVISED FOR THIS PROJECT
YARD NLET SHALL RECEIVE
FLAT TOP WTH MANHOLE RING
AND COVER CAST N FLUSH
CLEARING AND GRUBBING WITH ABC STONE COMPACTED
USE PRE CAST BOX, 4' AND
r CONCRETE 91
95% IN S' LIFTS RLL DEPTH VANES
TO E TOPTO ACHIEVE
THE DESIRED "OAT OPENING
(COMPACTED)
6'-S' THROAT OPENING
GEOTEX 250 ST DY PROPE%
ALL FOUR SIDES INLE55
-
NOTED OTHERWSE
YARD INLET TOP
ORIGINAL GROUND AFTER
CLEARING AND MUNI
CATCH BASIN SCHEDULE SriBGL-(YI)
RIM -BOTTOM OF THROAT OPENING
CATCH BASIN TOP DETAILS
REVISED FOR THIS PROJECT
HEAVY-DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
CROSS-SECTION
r9 GAUGE
MESH &A
PVC COATED
PRIVACY SLA
(TYP.)
MIN. 3000 PSI CONCRETE
REQUIRED THROUGHOUT.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
TOP VARIES WITH
APPLICATION, SEE
CATCH BASIN SCHEDULE
(VERIFY TRAFFIC LOAD
REQUIREMENT FOR EACH
CONCRETE CATCH BASIN
EXTENSION RISER; LENGTH
AND WIDTH TO MATCH
BASIN, HEIGHT VARIES
WITH PROPOSED GRADE
(SEE CATCH BASIN
SCHEDULE)
PRE -CAST CONCRETE CATCH
BASIN; LENGTH. WIDTH AND
HEIGHT VARIES BY
MANUFACTURER AND
APPLICATION; SEE CATCH
BASIN SCHEDULE AND VERIFY
WITH SUPPLIER
5--8" WALL
THICKNESS WITH
KNOCKOUT PANEL
NO PORTION OF STRUCTURE
SHALL BE REMOVED, DAMAGED
OR OTHERWISE ALTERED
EXCEPT THOSE AREAS
DESIGNATED AS KNOCKOUT
PANELS
INLET
(3) No. 4 REE
KNOCKOL
PANEL ('
EACH SIC
"LET
CONCRETE INV
INSTALLED AT
CONSTANT SL(
FROM INLET TI
OUTLET
OUTLET
SECTION A (PLAN)
KNOCKOUT
PANEL (TYP.
EACH SIDE)
A
PIPE TO BE FLUSH
WITH INSIDE WALL NUET
OF BASIN AND
GROUTED SMOOTH
PROPOSED PIPE
INVERT -
BOTTOM OF PIPE
AT FLOW UNE
PRE -CAST CATCH BASIN
CATCH BASIN TOP
(SEE SCHEDULE FOR
RISER
VARIES
(2) No. 4 REBAR
A
CATCH B
APPROVED STEPS VARIES BY
REQUIRED FOR AND MANUi
STRUCTURESOVER
�q-B4 REBAR O' 6�•
.C. EACH
300 PSI CONCRETE TO FORM
INVERT; PROVIDE CONSTANT
SLOPE FROM ALL INLETS TO
SECTION B OUTLET.
FOR POOR SOIL AND/OR WET
CONDITIONS, 12. OF /57 STONE
MAY BE REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR
MUST VERIFY WITH ENGINEER
BEFORE PLACING BOX.
I—) CHAIN LINK FENCE AND DOUBLE SWING GATE
DESCRIPTION
w
W
W Z
U 0
O
Z U
W
Z �
>V0
O
Z
U D
0 O Q ZD
w O O
LLI L)
> 0
UU O
Lu}
Q
CQ
G
gyIn
� W m � � I✓jj�
Z (0 p H M
0 w 4 HD 0 J8r
O O U w U LL_
J_
Q
W
0
U)
Z)
O
W
Z
Q
J
J
W
U
2
SHEET
C-504
EXISTING GROUND AFTER DEPTH OF UDERCUT WALL VARY AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. REPLACE
CLEARING AND GRUBBING WITH ABC STONE COMPACTED
TO 100.5 STANDARD PROCTOR
95% IN S' LIFTS RLL DEPTH VANES
(COMPACTED)
GEOTEX 250 ST DY PROPE%
OR APPROVED EQUAL
UNDERCUT DETAIL
ORIGINAL GROUND AFTER
CLEARING AND MUNI
HEAVY-DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
CROSS-SECTION
r9 GAUGE
MESH &A
PVC COATED
PRIVACY SLA
(TYP.)
MIN. 3000 PSI CONCRETE
REQUIRED THROUGHOUT.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
TOP VARIES WITH
APPLICATION, SEE
CATCH BASIN SCHEDULE
(VERIFY TRAFFIC LOAD
REQUIREMENT FOR EACH
CONCRETE CATCH BASIN
EXTENSION RISER; LENGTH
AND WIDTH TO MATCH
BASIN, HEIGHT VARIES
WITH PROPOSED GRADE
(SEE CATCH BASIN
SCHEDULE)
PRE -CAST CONCRETE CATCH
BASIN; LENGTH. WIDTH AND
HEIGHT VARIES BY
MANUFACTURER AND
APPLICATION; SEE CATCH
BASIN SCHEDULE AND VERIFY
WITH SUPPLIER
5--8" WALL
THICKNESS WITH
KNOCKOUT PANEL
NO PORTION OF STRUCTURE
SHALL BE REMOVED, DAMAGED
OR OTHERWISE ALTERED
EXCEPT THOSE AREAS
DESIGNATED AS KNOCKOUT
PANELS
INLET
(3) No. 4 REE
KNOCKOL
PANEL ('
EACH SIC
"LET
CONCRETE INV
INSTALLED AT
CONSTANT SL(
FROM INLET TI
OUTLET
OUTLET
SECTION A (PLAN)
KNOCKOUT
PANEL (TYP.
EACH SIDE)
A
PIPE TO BE FLUSH
WITH INSIDE WALL NUET
OF BASIN AND
GROUTED SMOOTH
PROPOSED PIPE
INVERT -
BOTTOM OF PIPE
AT FLOW UNE
PRE -CAST CATCH BASIN
CATCH BASIN TOP
(SEE SCHEDULE FOR
RISER
VARIES
(2) No. 4 REBAR
A
CATCH B
APPROVED STEPS VARIES BY
REQUIRED FOR AND MANUi
STRUCTURESOVER
�q-B4 REBAR O' 6�•
.C. EACH
300 PSI CONCRETE TO FORM
INVERT; PROVIDE CONSTANT
SLOPE FROM ALL INLETS TO
SECTION B OUTLET.
FOR POOR SOIL AND/OR WET
CONDITIONS, 12. OF /57 STONE
MAY BE REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR
MUST VERIFY WITH ENGINEER
BEFORE PLACING BOX.
I—) CHAIN LINK FENCE AND DOUBLE SWING GATE
DESCRIPTION
w
W
W Z
U 0
O
Z U
W
Z �
>V0
O
Z
U D
0 O Q ZD
w O O
LLI L)
> 0
UU O
Lu}
Q
CQ
G
gyIn
� W m � � I✓jj�
Z (0 p H M
0 w 4 HD 0 J8r
O O U w U LL_
J_
Q
W
0
U)
Z)
O
W
Z
Q
J
J
W
U
2
SHEET
C-504

PROPOSED 10'
STORMWATER EASEMENT PROPOSED LIMITS S .
8IORElEN110N MEDIA
.
PROPOSED CLEANOUT,
PROPOSED S.
PVC UNDERDRAIN, (TYP.) —
PROPOSED YARD INLET
NOT TO SCALE
PROVIDE FlITER FABRIC
BETWEEN SOIL MEDIA
AND STONE
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC, MIRAFI
_ 140N OR APPROVED EQUAL,
1' TO 2BEYOND
UNDERDRAINPIPE ALONG
70P OF GRAVEL BED
18' OUTLET PIPE
W
SIDE SLOPES 6� CLEANOUT z
CAP AT MIN. 8' ABOVE
SOD U)
n
GRASS SOD >k
TOP LAYER
{
EXISTING
SUBGRADE
RISER DETAIL lar CW CUW PIPE
R:
W. O 2367.67'
BIORETENTION FACILITY DETAIL
NO SCALE
NOTES:
1. TOP LAYER OF BIORETEN"ON CELL SHALL BE GRASSED
USING SOD (NSEEDED). THE SOD SHALL NOT BE
OT
GROWN FROM SOIL THAT HAS AN IMPERMEABLE LAYER
(CLAY).
2. RANTING MEDIUM FOR BIORETENTION FACILITY SHALL
CONSIST OF A HOMOGENEOUS SOIL MIX OF 85-88
PERCENT SAND; 8 TO 12 PERCENT FINES AND 3 TO 5
PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER. THE DEPTH OF THE FILL
SqL SHALL BE 2'.
3. SEE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF BIORETENTION AREA.
4. CONTINUE TO USE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN FOR
EROSION CONTROL UNTIL THE ENTIRE AREA IS STABILIZED.
THE TRAP SHALL BE COMPLETELY CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO
CHANGING OVER TO THE SIORETENTION CELL.
5, CONTRACTOR SHALL POST A CONSPICUOUS SIGN
I F THE REQUIRED
T TING
S WHO I BLE OR
A 0 S RESPONSIBLE
INSPECTION OF THE
N SPE
MAINTENANCE TE CE AN D ANNUAL
BIORETENTION FACILITY.
5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILTS OF THE
SIORETENTION FACILITY TO THE ENGINEER. THE
AS -GUILTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED
SURVEYOR.
7. THE BIORETENTION CELL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
SURFACEAREA OF 1352 SOFT. (SEE PLAN FOR
LAYOUT). THE VOLUME SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 1352
CU.FT. THE PONDING DEPTH SHALL BE NO GREATER
THAN 12".
& PLANTS, MATERIALS, & INSTALLATION ARE TO MEET
NCDEQ, DIV. OF WATER QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS.
SHEET
C-506
8' OPENING ON ALL 4 SIDES
6' CLEANOUT
TOP OF RISER____________
TOP ELEV. 2585.67'
MEDIA__r____
__BIORE7ENII_ON_
TOP ELEV..2584.88
_
/
6 CLEANOUT
GGRASS SOD
WV ELEV. - 2583.87
-------
(SOLID PIPE.
Op LAO
TOP LAYER
2582'______________
8' PERFORATED
TYP) CAP AT
PVC W/ UPTURNED ELBOW (TYP)
VE
MIN. 8' ABOVE
L
2' FILL SOIL MEDIA
GRA Or
x��l7i��GdG�✓i��%i"!/��!/����LC%�%i�i�%�I��\!1"�1��A��%i�li��!/�%i�//��j�A�!%/1���/�?\'��//v//��//��/1��/1�1�11Jj1���1J�/y�/OJ�
�`�`�J\�7��0�11�1j�'A�7/\j�%1`/
RISER DETAIL lar CW CUW PIPE
R:
W. O 2367.67'
BIORETENTION FACILITY DETAIL
NO SCALE
NOTES:
1. TOP LAYER OF BIORETEN"ON CELL SHALL BE GRASSED
USING SOD (NSEEDED). THE SOD SHALL NOT BE
OT
GROWN FROM SOIL THAT HAS AN IMPERMEABLE LAYER
(CLAY).
2. RANTING MEDIUM FOR BIORETENTION FACILITY SHALL
CONSIST OF A HOMOGENEOUS SOIL MIX OF 85-88
PERCENT SAND; 8 TO 12 PERCENT FINES AND 3 TO 5
PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER. THE DEPTH OF THE FILL
SqL SHALL BE 2'.
3. SEE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF BIORETENTION AREA.
4. CONTINUE TO USE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN FOR
EROSION CONTROL UNTIL THE ENTIRE AREA IS STABILIZED.
THE TRAP SHALL BE COMPLETELY CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO
CHANGING OVER TO THE SIORETENTION CELL.
5, CONTRACTOR SHALL POST A CONSPICUOUS SIGN
I F THE REQUIRED
T TING
S WHO I BLE OR
A 0 S RESPONSIBLE
INSPECTION OF THE
N SPE
MAINTENANCE TE CE AN D ANNUAL
BIORETENTION FACILITY.
5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILTS OF THE
SIORETENTION FACILITY TO THE ENGINEER. THE
AS -GUILTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED
SURVEYOR.
7. THE BIORETENTION CELL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
SURFACEAREA OF 1352 SOFT. (SEE PLAN FOR
LAYOUT). THE VOLUME SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 1352
CU.FT. THE PONDING DEPTH SHALL BE NO GREATER
THAN 12".
& PLANTS, MATERIALS, & INSTALLATION ARE TO MEET
NCDEQ, DIV. OF WATER QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS.
SHEET
C-506
8' OPENING ON ALL 4 SIDES
6' CLEANOUT
TOP OF RISER____________
TOP ELEV. 2585.67'
MEDIA__r____
__BIORE7ENII_ON_
TOP ELEV..2584.88
_
/
8� UNDERDRAIN
�5eE N AO 2r
_ Y. Y'. 1_.
WV ELEV. - 2583.87
-------
-- --
2582'______________
8' PERFORATED
OIGUT BOTTOM 6 YND
4ET TO 266167
PVC W/ UPTURNED ELBOW (TYP)
RISER DETAIL lar CW CUW PIPE
R:
W. O 2367.67'
BIORETENTION FACILITY DETAIL
NO SCALE
NOTES:
1. TOP LAYER OF BIORETEN"ON CELL SHALL BE GRASSED
USING SOD (NSEEDED). THE SOD SHALL NOT BE
OT
GROWN FROM SOIL THAT HAS AN IMPERMEABLE LAYER
(CLAY).
2. RANTING MEDIUM FOR BIORETENTION FACILITY SHALL
CONSIST OF A HOMOGENEOUS SOIL MIX OF 85-88
PERCENT SAND; 8 TO 12 PERCENT FINES AND 3 TO 5
PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER. THE DEPTH OF THE FILL
SqL SHALL BE 2'.
3. SEE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF BIORETENTION AREA.
4. CONTINUE TO USE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN FOR
EROSION CONTROL UNTIL THE ENTIRE AREA IS STABILIZED.
THE TRAP SHALL BE COMPLETELY CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO
CHANGING OVER TO THE SIORETENTION CELL.
5, CONTRACTOR SHALL POST A CONSPICUOUS SIGN
I F THE REQUIRED
T TING
S WHO I BLE OR
A 0 S RESPONSIBLE
INSPECTION OF THE
N SPE
MAINTENANCE TE CE AN D ANNUAL
BIORETENTION FACILITY.
5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILTS OF THE
SIORETENTION FACILITY TO THE ENGINEER. THE
AS -GUILTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED
SURVEYOR.
7. THE BIORETENTION CELL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
SURFACEAREA OF 1352 SOFT. (SEE PLAN FOR
LAYOUT). THE VOLUME SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 1352
CU.FT. THE PONDING DEPTH SHALL BE NO GREATER
THAN 12".
& PLANTS, MATERIALS, & INSTALLATION ARE TO MEET
NCDEQ, DIV. OF WATER QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS.
SHEET
C-506
6' CLEANOUT
4'x4' PRECAST CONC.
SOLID PVC (TYP)
OPEN THROAT INLET
12" MAX. PONDW
DEPTH
-------
-- --
3
RISER DETAIL lar CW CUW PIPE
R:
W. O 2367.67'
BIORETENTION FACILITY DETAIL
NO SCALE
NOTES:
1. TOP LAYER OF BIORETEN"ON CELL SHALL BE GRASSED
USING SOD (NSEEDED). THE SOD SHALL NOT BE
OT
GROWN FROM SOIL THAT HAS AN IMPERMEABLE LAYER
(CLAY).
2. RANTING MEDIUM FOR BIORETENTION FACILITY SHALL
CONSIST OF A HOMOGENEOUS SOIL MIX OF 85-88
PERCENT SAND; 8 TO 12 PERCENT FINES AND 3 TO 5
PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER. THE DEPTH OF THE FILL
SqL SHALL BE 2'.
3. SEE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF BIORETENTION AREA.
4. CONTINUE TO USE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN FOR
EROSION CONTROL UNTIL THE ENTIRE AREA IS STABILIZED.
THE TRAP SHALL BE COMPLETELY CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO
CHANGING OVER TO THE SIORETENTION CELL.
5, CONTRACTOR SHALL POST A CONSPICUOUS SIGN
I F THE REQUIRED
T TING
S WHO I BLE OR
A 0 S RESPONSIBLE
INSPECTION OF THE
N SPE
MAINTENANCE TE CE AN D ANNUAL
BIORETENTION FACILITY.
5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILTS OF THE
SIORETENTION FACILITY TO THE ENGINEER. THE
AS -GUILTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED
SURVEYOR.
7. THE BIORETENTION CELL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
SURFACEAREA OF 1352 SOFT. (SEE PLAN FOR
LAYOUT). THE VOLUME SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 1352
CU.FT. THE PONDING DEPTH SHALL BE NO GREATER
THAN 12".
& PLANTS, MATERIALS, & INSTALLATION ARE TO MEET
NCDEQ, DIV. OF WATER QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS.
SHEET
C-506

Photo One: View looking west at existing
convenience center paved area and trash collection
containers.
Photo Three: View looking southeast at inlet of
existing 18" RCP and Mauney Cove Road. 18" RCP
to remain in place and outlet to Mauney Cove
Branch.
Photo Two: View looking east along Mauney
Cove Road at eastern entrance drive, and wetland
WA entering existing 18" CMP.
Photo Four: View looking Southwest along
Mauney Cove Road and wetland WA in ditchline.
Grassed Swale, new access drives, and new 18"
HDPE pipes proposed in this area.
MAUNEY COVE ROAD McGifl
PHOTO SHEET I PROJECT # CONVENIENCE CENTER
NOVEMBER 21, 2016 15.00709 A S S O C I A T E S
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL • FINANCE
468 NEW MARKET BLVD. STE B BOONE, NC 28607 PN. (828) 3861920

3
h(,p
� 5
Photo Five: View looking west at wetland WA and
Photo Six: View looking east along Mauney
vacant area to the west of the convenience center.
Cove Road at wetland WA and open area to the
west of convenience center. Permanent detention
basin proposed in this area.
,k• )
.y
L
�k
Yy�r S�Y }
r i Z.
d }
tiJ' -
h
Photo Seven: View looking southwest upstream at
Photo Eight: View looking north at wetland WB
Mauney Cove Branch at approximate location of
and existing 18" RCP outlet. Outlet and flow path
proposed 18" HDPE outlet and headwall protection.
to Mauney Cove Branch has silted in causing
poor function. Sediment removal and rip -rap
outlet protection proposed for this area.
MAUNEY COVE ROAD
PHOTO SHEET 2
PROJECT #
CONVENIENCE CENTER
McGill
NOVEMBER 21, 2016
15.00709
A S S O C I A T E S
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL • FINANCE
468 NEW MARKET BLVD. STE B BOON.'E, NC'_5607 PH. (828) 3861920

35° 31'25" N
35° 31'29'N
3 Soil Map—Haywood County Area, North Carolina 3
Il; I
319610 319620 319630 319640 319650 319660 319670 319680
3
Map Scale: 1:748 if printed on A portrait (8.5'x 11") sheet
Meters
nN 0 10 20 40 60
,\ 0 35 70 140 210
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WCS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
319690 319700 319710
35° 31'25"N
qra
St!
rri
0
M
Q�
N
M
M
I�
M
O
p�
QM
N
pM�
poM�
N
pM
M
35° 31' 20" N
319720
3
h
a�
3/28/2016
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
. s
Soil Map Unit Lines
+
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
(O
Blowout
Ar
Borrow Pit
X
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
X
Gravel Pit
Gravely Spot
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
Landfill
�}
Lava Flow
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Marsh or swamp
Special Line Features
Mine or Quarry
�p
Miscellaneous Water
Q
Perennial Water
1w'
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Stony Spot
Sandy Spot
,pe.
Severely Eroded Spot
Ar
Sinkhole
'a-
Slide or Slip
Wet Spot
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Haywood County Area, North Carolina
MAP INFORMATION
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2016
21111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Very Stony Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
�7
Wet Spot
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
A
Other
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
•�
Special Line Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Water Features
measurements.
Streams and Canals
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Transportation
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
+-tom
Rails
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
..r
Interstate Highways
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
US Routes
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Major Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
Local Roads
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
Background
the version date(s) listed below.
Aerial Photography
Soil Survey Area: Haywood County Area, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 16, 2015
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 15, 2011—Dec 9,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2016
21111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Haywood County Area, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Haywood County Area, North Carolina (NC606)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BoD2
Braddock clay loam, 15 to 30
percent slopes, eroded, stony
0.3
32.2%
DhA
Dellwood-Urban land complex,
0 to 3 percent slopes,
occasionally flooded
0.7
67.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
1.0
100.0%
I�SDn Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: J ✓
County: goo -X>
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Is at least Intenniffent ?j �'
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other AAVAMY avlw
Ha 19 or rennial ifa 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent nn
e.g. Quad Name: 4weg
A. Geomorphology Subtotal 17J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
2
3
3. in -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
37
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Hvelmlaav (Subtotal= CD • S-)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 lu
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 1 0.5
No V2Yes
1.5
= 3
C_ Rininav (Subtntal = I I 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 CD
2
3
22. Fish
0 6P
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 Other
'Perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
C& fee,

LVETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro)ecUSite._��Ciilf rl0n" 6A;V* 0041ClConty&'y'Joar Cowry Sampling Dale.
Applicant/Owner �i /G !
�✓
iiWOVP V,ITy State. NG Sampling Point
Investigator(;) 1) V section Township. Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc-,) C Nt Local relief (concave convex, none) Slope ( /A
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lal, Long: Datum:
Soil Nlap Unit Name: - -NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes %� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes. No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check
all that aooPd
_ Surface Soil Cracks (Bb)
_ Surface Water (A 1) _
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
Drainage Patterns (Bio)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (B1 b)
Water Marks (B1) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solts (Co) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (rv)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (Bd) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_ Iron Deposits (BS)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_g Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
i FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes r No
Depth (inches) 3�'
Saturalion Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): !`
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
CjrJV.
got
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: I
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species �j
1 nfbwl� That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: J (A)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8
= Total Cover
50°% of total cover, 20% of total cover:
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. � (AM)
Total °% Cover of:
MUMMY by:
OBI- species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total ewer:
Herb 61raturn (Plot size.)
f;�o �j
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed
1 UC Is
present, unless or problematic.
2. S►AP iV A0 IJ 4 05
JID '4C
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3• $ T0'
_
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8•
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9
of size, and woody plants less then 3.28 it tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
50°% of total cover: 20% of total cover: present? yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

ProfBe Description. (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirr
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist)_ % Color moist % Type' Loc
0-'S ro Q yj
I -7o- s7yie_
S -t2 leo (RY[Z "D tY its 8 30
Sampling Point: l
i the absence of Indicators.)
CAN
Remarks
CAN sc
�r
T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RHI=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators;
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A I)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
r Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
_
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
is Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A1 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Shipped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0

p Z uolslan - luowpald pup. su!eluno!A1 uaalse 3
sJaau!6u3 to sdaoO Awiy sn
A0010W]AH
ON ,A saA ijuasajd 46oloapAH puepalA
ON �y saA iPu21lam a u!41IM ON sad, UuasaJd 1!os 3!IpAH
esjy paldweS ay s! —ON ^ SeA Iuasa�d uo!12iaBBA 3!l/4dOJPfH
•ole'samjeaj >luetlodwl `spasueq'suollecool julod 6ulldwes 6uiMoys dew ails UoelIV - SJNlONH 3o A2i'dWWRS
('sliewaa ul siamsue Aue uleldxa 'papeau 10 �3!lewalgojd AlleinlPu A6o101pAH jo ' Ilos uopela6eA a iy
ON saA 4luasajd „sa3ue1swn3j10 IewJON, any 4paganlslp AHuvy!u6ls 46010JpAH ao ' HOS uo!lel96@A any
( s>{aewey ul uleldxa ou 11) ON saA UeaA to aw!l s!4l fol le:)OA1 ells a41 uo suolHpuo3 31BoloipA4 1311ew113 ajV
:u011P3!}IsS1213 IMN :awelV 1!un delN I!os
—:wnle0 :61131 'lel (vellN ao 8?jl) uo!6ajgns
('io) adols (auou 'xaAUO3 0Ae31.103) lal16.112301 N 1.7 -H jj (T ('-o aae»al 'adolslll4) wjolpuel
:96ued 'd!4suMol u01138S (s).10101ISaAu1
lulod BugdweS
:area BuHdwp.s
d44 1auM0/lue3Hddv
lunol/Al!o -90 f •A/10-7 `M40 JAM w1A.� e'1!S/1=afoad
u016e8 )uowpald pue suleaunotiy Wa)se3 - VY803 VIVO NUIVNIVY83130 C)Nt IAM
3 Q1 IV96ANab atvV
d$og (�►M.1.i2 .J,JCT
%M S) Z,
:s�l�ewa�l
:alge!!ene 11 (suollaadsu! snolnaid 'sologd lepae 'Ilam buuol!uow 'a6ne6 weeds) ele0 papioDed aglnsaQ
a u!lj fuejgdeo s3pnl3ul
ON A sah Zluasald f6oloapAH puepa/N
, :(5043111) 4080
ON SeA �AuasWd uo!leinles
�'.
Ir0 :(s943ul) 4ldaa—ON
Sall Zluasald algel jaleM
7,�(sa43up y1dap
014 saA cluasajd jaleM aoepng
:suolleAJasgp plalj
(SO) Isal 113411 N-O'dj —
(El8) euned 31(enby —
(h(3) )a!!ad 3!4dejBodolaj3ltN
(69) saneal pau!elS-jaleM —
(E0) pjellnby Mo11e4S —
(La) A.ie6ewt leliay un elq!s!A uogepunul —
(ZO) uoplsOd 314d1owo90X
(58) si!soda0 uoil •'—
(LO) WPM PasMIS jo palunlS —
(sNiewaa 11ki u!eldx3) ja410 ` (t q) !sn o jo IeIN 1e61y —
(60) Aja6ewl lepay uo alq!sIA uolleinles —
(LO) a3F}jns X3n!N u141 —
(ES) sllsod90 upci _
(8O) smouna 4s'J.4eJO —
(aO) sHoS pa1111 ul uofl3npa8 uoil luaaaa
(Z9) sllsodaO luaw!pas —
(ZO) algel jaleM uoseaS-Ai(j
(to) uoij pa3npaa la MasaJd —
(l8) sNielN jalum —
(9l8) sau11 ul(J1• sso1N (Ea) S100d 6uin11 uo saja4dsoz148 paz!p(x0
(Ey) uolleinles y
(O19) swayed a6eu!el(l
(lO) JOPO e -PUPS u86QJPAH —
(Zy) amel JaIPM 461HA,
(99) o:lppnS 9ne3UOo pale1956A AlasiedS
(tLG) slueld 3penby anil
(ly) aa!2M a3Plins ;Rr
(98) sloai011oS a32VnS —
VO a 1241 Ile 13a43 :peals ej sl euo to n iu w sjole3lPul AJeLUPd
{palls as oml to wnwlu!w) sjole3lpul .tepuo3aS
:si01e31pul AbO1OJpAH Pue110M
A0010W]AH
ON ,A saA ijuasajd 46oloapAH puepalA
ON �y saA iPu21lam a u!41IM ON sad, UuasaJd 1!os 3!IpAH
esjy paldweS ay s! —ON ^ SeA Iuasa�d uo!12iaBBA 3!l/4dOJPfH
•ole'samjeaj >luetlodwl `spasueq'suollecool julod 6ulldwes 6uiMoys dew ails UoelIV - SJNlONH 3o A2i'dWWRS
('sliewaa ul siamsue Aue uleldxa 'papeau 10 �3!lewalgojd AlleinlPu A6o101pAH jo ' Ilos uopela6eA a iy
ON saA 4luasajd „sa3ue1swn3j10 IewJON, any 4paganlslp AHuvy!u6ls 46010JpAH ao ' HOS uo!lel96@A any
( s>{aewey ul uleldxa ou 11) ON saA UeaA to aw!l s!4l fol le:)OA1 ells a41 uo suolHpuo3 31BoloipA4 1311ew113 ajV
:u011P3!}IsS1213 IMN :awelV 1!un delN I!os
—:wnle0 :61131 'lel (vellN ao 8?jl) uo!6ajgns
('io) adols (auou 'xaAUO3 0Ae31.103) lal16.112301 N 1.7 -H jj (T ('-o aae»al 'adolslll4) wjolpuel
:96ued 'd!4suMol u01138S (s).10101ISaAu1
lulod BugdweS
:area BuHdwp.s
d44 1auM0/lue3Hddv
lunol/Al!o -90 f •A/10-7 `M40 JAM w1A.� e'1!S/1=afoad
u016e8 )uowpald pue suleaunotiy Wa)se3 - VY803 VIVO NUIVNIVY83130 C)Nt IAM

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5- Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation , /�
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: Present? Yes " No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size
)
%Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: _ (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant cies
-
5.
That Are BL, FACWoe FAC: t (A!B)
B.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Carer of: Multiply by:
B.
0131- species x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
Saolina/Shrub. Stratum- (Plot size: )
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
1.
UPL species x 3 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2
3.
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyfic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. '' C
)
tj
V�' L
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. '
V $
f4 e,�
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3. �tT ► 6A _�_ .I�
4,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.26 ft (1 m) tall.
?
8•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
9
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5- Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation , /�
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: Present? Yes " No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: I—
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to dorument the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inchesI Color moist) % Color (moist) _ % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
D -t2
10 y
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (Mi LRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
` Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A 12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRP. N.
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes N/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site 14AV L6% Ga!jr 12ftP 60• &4T City/County. �T'+i.:l6Q12PR !*AfrY Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner /Aw Kieyy C-ftAr y State. 4C Sampling Point _
Investigator(s) rI %/ Seclion Township. Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, elf:.)- ii %PJ Local relief (concave convex, nape). Slope 00—
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat: Long: Datura:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no. explain in Remarks,'
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes I✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic.? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _U No within a Wetland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes V_ No
Remarks:
!#'` �� rtto� G
/✓1 owoe%( 6avc c .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two repaired)
Primar,r Indicators (minimum of one is required! check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A21
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_✓Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_, OxIdized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
,_ Bloss Trim Lines (B 16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (Cfi)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microlopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
tt
Surface Water Present? Yes
✓ No Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes
✓ No Depth (inches). D"`
Saturation Present? Yes
V/ No No Depth (inches) �%
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well aerial photos, previous inspections) Ir available:
Remarks:
f` '
0
,c
LI
wt
,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
1 A
er Species? �+ Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2.
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, orecies FAC, (AB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Saphnu/Shrub
1
2
50% of total cover:
Stratum (Plol size: )
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A=
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7-
— 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
>)•
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plat size: )
1 C ~)t
2. $L(/b*r
off L
�',r�-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
3
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (I m) tall.
7
8•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
y
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
11,
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover:
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation /
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes V No
Remarks: (It observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth _ Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist /o ' Color (moist) % Types Lo Taxture Remarks
p -t2 to a l �yfn.Y �. j��
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RI41=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Linina, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils1:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (.S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
^ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (89) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ VeryShallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A1 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F6)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
T Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section N of the JD Form instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish/borough: Haywood City: Waynesville
Center coordinates of site (IatAong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.523° N, Long. -82.9890 W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Nance of nearest waterbody: Mauney Cove Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Pigeon River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 06010105 - Upper French Broad
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination Date:
Field Determination, Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There *0 "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water.Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U.S.
A. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
[j
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly.into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 320 linear feet: 8 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.02 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on Ig6'1� IineatiowMannal
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
El Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section Ill below.
' For purposes of this form, an RP W is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year-round or has continuous clow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
'Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HI.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; If the aquatic resource is a wetiand adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section I11.8 below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjaoent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY ("THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rnponos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), I.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW Is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that Is not perennial (and Its adjacent wetlands If any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine If the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and aft of its adjacent wetlands Is used whether the review area identified In the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section 13I11.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HI.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined In Section III.0 below.
L Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 6.1 es
Drainage area: 1.7 ANI. lri ie
Average annual rainfall: 47 inches
Average annual snowfall. 14 inches
(il) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
J@ Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 2-5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 14 10W river miles from RPW.
Project waters are �4 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick hi t aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW3: Mauney Cove Branch, Richland Creek, Pigeon River.
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Plow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributaty Characteristics ( check all that apply):.
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 8 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes V:grX of 1;* less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
Silts Sands ❑ Concrete
Cobbles Gravel ❑ Muck
Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/lo cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stream system has areas of eroding banks
and steep sloughing banks.
Presence of run/riffle/pooi complexes. Explain: Strong riffle and pool development.
Tributary geometry: Oftii�efy�r�{�t
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 6-8 %
Tributary provides for.. ,sone qiv
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 24
Describe flow regime: Strong baseflow conditions; evidence of annual high flow events; development of bankful
benches within the stream channel,
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Msct (`te n lft,44tii6d. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: K6. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OHWlvib (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
® shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf fitter disturbed or washed away
❑
0 sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
El High Tide Line indicated by: p Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along share objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(fit) Chemical Characteristics;
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water appears clear and free of contaminants.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
"A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (cg., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
9 Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): narrow strip along Mauney Cove Road; borders residential
yards and road mostly.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
Aquatic/wildiife diversity. Explain findings: Macro-benthics, amphibians, fish.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wedand Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.42 -acres
Wetland type. Explain: seep.
Wetland quality. Explain: Moderate - mowing from property landuse, trash and debris; portion of wetland serves as a
ditch drained by stotmwater culvert.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flaw isa%liten%1loiY. Explain: Flow out wetlands is dominated by time of year baseflow, conditions.
Surface flow is: 0401e>re nd � t iced
Characteristics: Wetland boundaries are defined by ditchline.
Subsurface flow! . Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
[7 Directly abutting
0 Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Surface flow is conveyed through ditches to Non-TNW.
® Ecological connection. Explain: Nutrients from wetlands contribute to aquatic nutrient conditions in Non-TNW.
Separated byberm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Z4� aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:WtlJ90 , Wgipk V s•
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500jyesr. pr,gh! afer floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):.
0 Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: Herbaceous dominated/ 100%.
Habitat for:
❑ federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:.
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 1
Approximately ( 0.02 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following-
Directly
ollowing
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size lin acres)
'AW' N 0.02
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Wetland Unit 'AW'provides herbaceous
plant material foodsource for wildlife, groundwater recharge, nutrient and organic carbon for downstream foodwebs, and pollutant
trapping mechanism.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, In combination with all of Its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the Flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It Is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified In the Rgpanos Guidance and
discussed In the Instructional Guidebook, Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or food waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other,relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not Inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWL Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section fil.D: .
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IIi.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Wetland Unit 'AW' is located adjacent to Mauney Cove Branch (RPW), but this wetland provides a hydrological and
chemical connective nexus with the RPW. Wetland'AW is connected by drainage pipes to Mauney Cove Branch. Wedand'AW'
provides baseflow to Mauncy Cove Branch and nutrient and organic carbon for in -stream foodwcbs.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
0 TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
0 Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Continued bed and bank morphology, presence of OHWM, rack -lines, aquatic wildlife. macro-bentbic
population, well developed riffle pool sequencing, strong sorting of material and evidence of periodic high flow events.

El Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section lli.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 320 linear feet 8 width (fl).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or Indirectly into TNWs.
0 Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
D Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
j� Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identifytype(s) of waters:
4. Wedandsdirectly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW&
0 Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section iiI.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
0 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section I11.B and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW arejurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 111. C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.02 acres.
Wetlandsadjitcent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
E] Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres,
impoundments of jurisdictional wateM9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.:' or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATEI WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):'®
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
"See Footnote 9 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section iIi.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
1" Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this categom. Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA 11Q for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CIVA Art Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

0 from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
C] which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
(] Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
f ] Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Q Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft),
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Q If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Carps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
0 Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Prior to the :Ian 2,001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC." the review area would have been regulated basedos !& on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
j] Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus' standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction, Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MSR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, .use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that -apply):
® Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
d Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus' standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
El Non-wetand waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
0 Lakes/ponds: acres.
d Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Q: Wetlands acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
D Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Q Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
0 Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Clyde, NC USGS topo quad,
Q USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
(] National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
0 FEMA/FIRM maps:
F-1 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC ONEMAP DATA EXPLORER -2015.
or ® Other (Name & Date): Field assessment photos- October 21. 2015 and February 4, 2016.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
�] Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):

Attachment A
Stormwater Design, Calculations and Associated Information

(3S)
Bioretention Cel
I Basin
44P
Bioretention Cell
Subcat Reach on Link

bio cell 2
Prepared by McGill Associates Yrintea i vz-5izuio
HydroCADS 10.00-16 s/n 04263 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paw 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(acres) (subcatchment-numbers)
0.370
61
(3S)
0.450
98
(3S)
0.820
81
TOTAL AREA

bio cell 2
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD010 00-16 s/n 04263 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Soil Listing (all nodes)
Area Soil Subcatchment
(acres) Group Numbers
0.000
HSG A
0.000
HSG B
0.000
HSG C
0.000
HSG D
0.820
Other 3S
0.820
TOTAL AREA

bio cell 2
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCADOD10.00-16 s/n 04263 02015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 4
Ground Covers (all nodes)
HSG -A
HSG -B
HSG -C
HSG -D
Other
Total Ground
Subcatchment
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres) Cover
Numbers
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.820
0.820
3S
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.820 0.820 TOTAL
AREA

bio cell 2
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/20116
HydroCAD810.00-16 s/n 042x63 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pam
Pipe Listing (all nodes)
Line# Node
In4nvert
Out -Invert
Length
Slope
n DiamMidth
Height
Inside -Fill
Number
(feet)
(feet)
(feet)
(ft/ft)
(inches)
(inches)
(inches)
1 4P
2,583.67
2,583.37
61.0
0.0049
0.012 18.0
0.0
0.0

bio cell 2 Type 1124 -hr 1" storm Rainfa11=1.00"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD®10 00-16 s/n 04263 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pagel
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment3S; Bioretention Cell Basin Runoff Area=0:820 ac 54.88% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.09"
Flow Length=641' Slope=0.1900 'P Tc=4.9 min CN=81 Runoff --0.10 cfs 0.006 of
Pond 4P: Bioretention Cell Peak 'Eley=2,584.68' Storage=0.000 of Inflow --0.10 cfs 0.006 of
Outflow=0.07 cfs 0.006 of
Total Runoff Area = 0.820 ac Runoff Volume = 0.006 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.09"
45.12% Pervious = 0.370 ac 54.88% Impervious = 0.450 ac

bio cell 2 Type 1124 -hr 1" storm Rainfall=1.00"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD® 10.00-16 s/n 04263 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Bioretention Cell Basin
[491 Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth> 0.09"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 1" storm Rainfall=1.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
0.370 61
0.450 98
0.820 81 Weighted Average
0.370 61 45.12% Pervious Area
0.450 98 54.88% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.9 641 0.1900 2.18 Lag/CN Method,
Subcatchment 3S: Bioretention Cell Basin
Hydrograph
0.11
0.105.
0.10 cfs
Type II 24 -hr
0.095=
0.09_
1" storm Rainfall=1.00"
0.085
0.08.
Runoff Area=0.820 ac
0.075
0.07
Runoff Volume=0.006 of
70.065
0.06.
Runoff Depth>0.09"
; 0.055 .
LL 0.057
Flow Length=641'
°004:=
Slope=0.1900 '/'
°.035
Tc=4.9 m i n
0.03
°.°25-
C N =81
0.02
0.015-
0.01
0.005
0
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
■ Runoff

bio cell 2 Type H 24 -hr 1" storm Rainfall= 1. 00"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD®90 00-16 stn 04263 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC _ Psoe 8
Summary for Pond 4P: Bioretention Cell
Inflow Area = 0.820 ac, 54.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.09" for 1" storm event
Inflow = 0.10 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of
Outflow = 0.07 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 32%, Lag= 3.6 min
Primary = 0.07 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5,00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,584.68' @ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 0.032 ac Storage= 0.000 of
Plug -Flow detention time= 4.8 min calculated for 0.006 of (99% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 3.4 min ( 865.3 - 861.8 )
Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description
#1 2,584.67' 0.091 of 20.00 W x 70.001 x 2.00'H P.rismatoid Z=3.0
Device
Routing
Invert
Outlet Devices
#1
Primary
2,583.67'
18.0" Round Culvert
L= 61.0' CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900
Inlet / Outlet Invert= 2,583.67'/ 2,583.37' S= 0.0049'1' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.012, Flow Area= 1.77 sf
#2
Device 1
2,584.67'
3.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 2,580.00'
#3
Device 1
2,585.87'
36.0"W x 7.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate X 4.00 C= 0.600
Primary OutFlow Max=0.10 cfs @ 1.2.06 hrs HW=2,584.68' (Free Discharge)
tt3=00fice/Grate
Culvert (Passes 0.10 cfs of 3.18 cfs potential flow)
2=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.10 cfs)
( Controls 0.00 cfs)

bio cell 2 Type 1124 -hr 1"storm Rainfall=1.00"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD810.00-16 s/n 04263 @2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9
Pond 4P: Bioretention Cell
Hydrograph
3
0
LL
■ Inflow
■ Primary
0.11
0 10
0.105.
Inflow Area=0.820 ac
0.1
°o09:
Peak Elev=2,584.68'
°.065:
0.08
Storage=0.000 of
0.075
0.07 cfs
0.07 -
0.04-
0.035
0.03
0.025-
0.02-
0.015
.0250.020.015
0.01
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

bio cell 2 Type// 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.09"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HvdroCAD@ 10.00-16 s?n 04263 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 10
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment3S: Bioretention Cell Basin Runoff Area=0:820 ac 54.88% Imperious Runoff Depth>2.87"
Flow Length=641' Slope=0.1900 Y Tc=4.9 min CN=81 Runoff=4.51 cfs 0.196 of
Pond 4P: Bioretention Cell Peak Elev=2,585.89' Storage=0.049 of Inflow=4.51 cfs 0.196 of
Outflow=4.25 cfs 0.187 of
Total Runoff Area= 0.820 ac Runoff Volume= 0.196 of Average Runoff Depth= 2.87"
45.12% Pervious = 0.370 ac 54.88% Impervious= 0.450 ac

bio cell 2 Type 11 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.09"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD® 10.00-16 s/n 04263 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 11
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Bioretention Cell Basin
[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt
Runoff = 4.51 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.196 af, Depth> 2.87"
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.09"
Area (ac) CN Description
0.370
61
' 0.450
98
0.820
81 Weighted Average
0.370
61 45.12% Pervious Area
0.450
98 54.88% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.9 641 0.1900 2.18 Lag/CN Method,
Subcatchment 3S: Bioretention Cell Basin
Hydrograph
5 4.51 cfs
Type II 24 -hr
4 25 -Year Rainfall=5.09"
Runoff Area=0.820 ac
3 Runoff Volume=0.196 of
JT
Runoff Depth>2.87"
LL Flow Length=641'
2 1 1 ESlope=0.1900 '/'
Tc=4.9 m i n
1 CN=81
0
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
® RunoH

bio cell 2 Type 11 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.09"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HvdroCAD010.00-16 s/n 04263 62015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 12
Summary for Pond 4P: Bloretention Cell
Inflow Area = 0.820 ac, 54.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.87" for 25 -Year event
Inflow = 4.51 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.196 of
Outflow = 4.25 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.187 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 2.0 min
Primary = 4.25 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.187 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,585.89'@ 11.99 hrs Surf.Area= 0.049 ac Storage= 0.049 of
Plug -Flow detention time= 74.5 min calculated for 0.187 of (95% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 56.7 min ( 831.4 - 774.7 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 2,584.67' 0.091 of 20.00'W x 70.00'L x 2.00'H Prismatoid Z=3.0
Device
Routing
Invert
Outlet Devices
#1
Primary
2,583.67'
18.0" Round Culvert
L= 61.0' CMP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900
Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 2,583.67'/2,583.37' S= 0.0049'P Cc= 0.900
n= 0.012, Flow Area= 1.77 sf
#2
Device 1
2,584.67'
3.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 2,580.00'
#3
Device 1
2,585.67'
36.0" W x 7.0" H Vert. Orifice/Grate X 4.00 C= 0.600
rimary OutFlow Max=4.09 cfs @ 11.99 hrs HW=2,585.89' (Free Discharge)
Culvert (Passes 4.09 cfs of 8.14 cfs potential flow)
2=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.18 cfs)
3=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 3.91 cfs @ 1.50 fps)

bio cell 2 Type 11 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.09"
Prepared by McGill Associates Printed 11/23/2016
HydroCAD®10.00-16 s/n 04263 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13
u
3
0
LL
Pond 4P: Bioretention Cell
Hydrograph
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
■ Inflow
■ Primary

x " etifi6iiMiiht i�f77
Important operation and maintenance procedures:
Immediately after the bioretention cell is established, the plants will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants
become established (commonly six weeks).
Snow, mulch or any other material will NEVER be piled on the surface of the bioretention cell.
Wheeled or tracked equipment will NEVER be driven over the bioretention planting surface.
Special care will be taken to prevent sediment from entering the bioretention cell.
If standing water is present 2 days after rainfall, conduct an infiltration test of the soil media.
After the bioretention cell is established, inspect it quarterly. Inspection activities shall be performed as follows and maintenance
activites shall commence immediately to remediate any problems observed per the table below.
BMP element:
Potential problem:
How to remediate the problem:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the BMP
Areas of bare soil and/or
erosive gullies have formed.
Regrade the soil to remove the gully, and plant a ground cover and
water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Vegetation is too short or too
Maintain vegetation at a height of approximately six inches.
long.
The inlet device
The pipe is clogged.
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The pipe is cracked or
Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged.
Erosion is occurring in the
Regrade the swale to smooth it over and provide erosion control
swale.
devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future
problems.
Stone verge is clogged or
Remove sediment and replace with clean stone.
covered in sediment (if
applicable).
The pretreatment area
Flow is bypassing
pretreatment area and/or
Regrade if necessary to route all flow to the pretreatment area.
Restabilize the area after grading.
gullies have formed.
Sediment has accumulated to
Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if
a depth greater than three
possible. Remove the sediment and restabilize the pretreatment area.
inches.
Erosion has occurred.
Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or
riprap if needed to prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by hand.
The bioretention cell:
Best professional practices
Prune according to best professional practices.
vegetation
show that pruning is needed
to maintain optimal plant
health.
Plants are dead, diseased or
Determine the source of the problem: soils, hydrology, disease, etc.
dying.
Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide a one-time fertilizer
application to establish the ground cover if a soil test indicates it is
necessary.
Tree stakes/wires are present
Remove tree staketwires (which can kill the tree if not removed).
six months after planting.
rORM-EZ 11/22/2016
Version 1.4 O&M Manual Page 15 of 16

Bioretention Maintenance Requirements (continued)
BMP element:
Potential problem:
How to remediate the problem:
The bioretention cell:
Mulch is breaking down or
Spot mulch if there are only random void areas. Replace whole mulch
soils and mulch
has floated away.
layer if necessary. Remove the remaining much and replace with
triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches.
Soils and/or mulch are
Determine the extent of the clogging - remove and replace either just
clogged with sediment.
the top layers or the entire media as needed. Dispose of the spoil in
an appropriate off-site location. Use triple shredded hard wood mulch
at a maximum depth of three inches. Search for the source of the
sediment and remedy the problem if possible.
An annual soil test shows that
Dolomitic lime shall be applied as recommended per the soil test and
pH has dropped or heavy
toxic soils shall be removed, disposed of properly and replaced with
metals have accumulated in
new planting media.
the soil media.
The underdrain system
Clogging has occurred.
Wash out the underdrain system.
(if applicable)
The drop inlet
Clogging has occurred.
Clean out the drop inlet. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The drop inlet is damaged
Repair or replace the drop inlet.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the local NC Department of Environment and Natural
damage have occurred at the
Resources Regional Office.
outlet.
IORM-EZ 11/22/2016
Version 1.4 O&M Manual Page 16 of 16

Yard Inlet Report
Label Discharge Headwater Elevation Crest Elevation
(ft'Is) (ft) (ft)
4'x4' Yard Inlet 7.20 2586.67 2585.67
Taihvater Elevation
2584.66
Weir Coefficient Crest Length Headwater Height Above
(US) (ft) Crest
0.60 12.00 1.00
Flow Area Velocity Top Width
(it2) (itis) ( )
12.00 0.60 12.00
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Shclilts%NdWaster V81(SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03)
1112312016 9:55:41 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Sults 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203.755.1666 Page 1 of 1

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWO)
Q�of
W AT ,,,
NCDENR
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
BIORETENTION CELL SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part lll) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name
Mauney Cove Road Concenience Center
Contact name
David Francis, Solid Waste Administrator
Phone number
828.452.6625
Date
11.22.16
Drainage area number
1
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
56,526 ft'
Impervious area
30,039 ft'
Percent impervious
53.1% %
Design rainfall depth
1.0 inch
Peak Flow Calculations
Is pre/post control of the 1 -yr, 24 -hr peak flow required?
n (Y or N)
1 -yr, 24 -hr runoff depth
in
1 -yr, 24 -hr intensity
in/hr
Pre -development 1 -yr, 24 -hr peak flow
ft3lsec
Post -development 1 -yr, 24 -hr peak flow
ft3lsec
Pre/Post 1 -yr, 24 -hr peak control
ft3lsec
Storage Volume: Non -SA Waters
Minimum volume required
910.0 ft3
Volume provided
1,400.0 ft'
OK
Storage Volume: SA Waters
1.5" runoff volume
ft3
Pre -development 1 -yr, 24 -hr runoff
ft3
Post -development 1 -yr, 24 -hr runoff
ft
Minimum volume required
0 ft3
Volume provided
ft3
Cell Dimensions
Ponding depth of water
12 inches
OK
Ponding depth of water
1.00 ft
Surface area of the top of the bioretention cell
1,400.0 ft'
OK
Length:
72 ft
OK
Width:
20 ft
OK
-or- Radius
n/a ft
OK
Media and Soils Summary
Drawdown time, ponded volume
2.59 hr
OK
Drawdown time, to 24 inches below surface
2.33 hr
OK
Drawdown time, total:
4.92 hr
in-situ soil:
Soil permeability
3.00 irVhr
OK
Planting media soil:
Soil permeability
3.00 in/hr
OK
Soil composition
% Sand (by volume)
85-88%
Sand should be -85-88%
Fines (by volume)
8-12%
Fines should be -8-12%
% Organic (by volume)
3.5%
Organic should be 45%
Total: 0%
Phosphorus Index (P -Index) of media
20 (unitiess)
OK
Form SW401-Bioretention Rev.8
June 25, 2010
Parts I and II. Design Summary. Page 1 of 2

Basin Elevations
Temporary pool elevation
Type of bioretention cell (answer'Y' to only one of the two
following questions)
Is this a grassed cell?
Is this a cell with trees/shrubs?
Planting elevation (top of the mulch or grass sod layer)
Depth of mulch
Bottom of the planting media soil
Planting media depth
Depth of washed sand below planting media soil
Are underdrains being installed?
How many clean out pipes are being installed?
What factor of safety is used for sizing the underdrains? (See
BMP Manual Section 12.3.6)
Additional distance between the bottom of the planting media and
the bottom of the cell to account for underdrains
Bottom of the cell required
SHWT elevation
Distance from bottom to SHWT
Internal Water Storage Zone (IWS)
Does the design include IWS
Elevation of the top of the upturned elbow
Separation of IWS and Surface
Planting Plan
Number of tree species
Number of shrub species
Number of herbaceous groundcover species
Additional Information
Does volume in excess of the design volume bypass the
bioretention cell?
Does volume in excess of the design volume flow evenly distributed
through a vegetated filter?
What is the length of the vegetated filter?
Does the design use a level spreader to evenly distribute flow?
Is the BMP located at least 30 feet from surface waters (50 feet if
SA waters)?
Is the BMP located at least 100 feet from water supply wells?
Are the vegetated side slopes equal to or less than 3:1?
Is the BMP located in a proposed drainage easement with access
to a public Right of Way (ROW)?
Inlet velocity (from treatment system)
is the area surrounding the cell likely to undergo development in
the future?
Are the slopes draining to the bioretention cell greater than 20%?
Is the drainage area permanently stabilized?
Pretreatment Used
(Indicate Type Used with an 'X* in the shaded cell)
Gravel and grass
(81inches gravel followed by 3-5 it of grass)
Grassed Swale
Forebay
Other
Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev.8
June 25, 2010
Permit Number:
(to be provided by D WO)
2585.67 fmsl
Y (Y or N) OK
n (Y or N)
2584 66 fmsl
0 inches insufficient mulch depth, unless installing grassed cell.
2582.66 fmsl
2 ft
0 ft
`• (Y or N)
8 OK
3 OK
a P 5 ;k :.7 .7 fmsi
2580 fmsi
a' R
y (Y or N)
2583.66 fmsi
1 ft
0
0
0
OK
Recommend more species.
y (Y or N) OK
Y (Y or N) OK
12 R
n (Y or N) Show how flow is evenly distributed.
Y (Y or N)
OK
y (Y or N)
OK
Y (Y or N)
OK
Y (Y or N)
OK
15 fusec
Insufficient inlet velocity unless energy dissipating devices are
being used.
n (Y or N)
OK
n (Y or N) OK
y (Y or N) OK
X
#VALUE!
Parts I and II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2

Permit No.
(to bo sasoW by D*V)
- " ' '; '�q, I �-i 5 '"• w.. i L.K �yi7 r . -::' g c)S +s.� a? it Yom. �c Ot " '�1 `� �J,a,i k�,.. � : X
y �:� , 'ry4:� . *`? �.� .t T.�r„ � -"7.r ., o+ fix's• � •>. d . �!-1*,` �;i�..i:Sxa�� ;-'• ,-
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the suppodng documentation can be found, An incomplete submittal package
will resufl In a request for additional Information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the spaos provided
to Indicate the following design requirements have been met, If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Side slopes, 3:9 or lower
Initials shoot No.
tinderdraln system (11 applicable), and
1. Plane (1' - UY or larger) of the entire site showing:
/4AIjA/ 6-10!5'
-Design all ultimate build -out,
- Off-site drainage (If applicable),
Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
L— Slid
- C8ti dimensions,
- Pretreatment system,
elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (h*. Resulie of soils tests of both the planting soil and the In
situ &oil must include:
- High flow bypass system,
Sol permeability.
Maintenance ==a,
04;
- Recorded &*age easement and public right of way (ROW),
-Goan out pipe locations,
- Overflow device, and
. 8oundaries of drainage easement.
2 Plan details (1' = 30' or larger) for the bloretention cell showing:
fQN Vt/ Sod Cell dimensions
- Pretreatment system,
- Wgh low bypass system,
Maintenance access,
Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Design at ultimate buildout,
..Off-slte drainage (fl applicable),
• Clean out pipe locations,
- Overllcwdevlce, and
Boundaries of drainage easement
- Indicate the P -Index between 10 and 30
3. Section view of the bioretenfion cell (1' = XY or larger) showing:
fJ,,v w G X506
Side slopes, 3:9 or lower
tinderdraln system (11 applicable), and
Bioretention cell layers jground level and slope, pre-treatment, ponding depth, mulch depth, fill media
depth, washed send, filler fabric (or chddng stone ff applicable), #57 sone, undardrains (If applicable),
SHWT level(s), and overflow structure)
4. A sols report that Is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
�„ a
results of the sols report must be verified in Iia fold by DWl3, by oompteting & submitting the sols
investigation request form. County son maps are not an acceptable source of soils Information. Al
elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (h*. Resulie of soils tests of both the planting soil and the In
situ &oil must include:
e/, rxkian 6y
Sol permeability.
1,,iiell l.4~1 Sot composition (% send, % fines, % organic), and
-Wit S-,'9 "'
04;
.P-lnden.
5, A detailed planting plan (1' = 20' or larger) prepared by a qualified indiuldual showing:
- A variety of suitable species,
- Saes, spedrmg and locations of plantings,
- Total quantity of each type of plant specified,
- A planting detail,
- The source nursery for the plants, and
- Fertilizer and watering requirements to establish vegetation.
6. A construction sequence that shows how the bioretention cell will be protected from sediment until the
14*41 (j ooa
entire drainage area is stabilized.
7, The supporting calculations (including underdrain calculations, d applicable).
8. A copy and the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (10) agreement,
W� 9. A copy of the deed restriction.
Form SWOI-Bbratenbon-Rev.7 Part III, Page 1 of 1

Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
Mauney Cove Convience Center
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
Scott Burwell, P.E., McGill Associates, P.A. NCDENR
Application
Type of application:1 New Permit
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed. A complete package includes all of the items in the checklist
below. Add any comments, and indicate the page or plan sheet number where the following information can be found. Please
Indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided next to each item.
Part 1: Submittal Checklist
Item
Notes / Comments Initials
1 Original and one copy of this application form (all worksheets) and the permit
ANW
application fee. For applications submitted to the DEMLR regular permitting
program, the fee is $505 payable to NCDENR. For Express Review, click on the
link below for information and fee schedule. Contact the appropriate regional
office Express Review Coordinator to schedule the required pre -application
meetinq.
Click here for Express Permitting info
2 A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as
Attached in appendix
ANW
class SA or the receiving stream drains to and is within 1/2 mile of SA waters,
then include the 1/2 mile radius on the map.
3 A copy of the most current property deed.
Attached in appendix
ANW
4 Two copies of additional calculations (as needed). Sealed, signed and dated.
ANW
5 Two sets of sealed, signed, & dated full-sized plans of the entire site at a
ANW
readable scale, including:
a. Project name, engineer and firm, revision number and dates.
ANW
G-001
ANW
b. Location map with street names and SR numbers, legend, north arrow,
scale.
c. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
C-101
ANW
d. The boundaries of all surface waters, regulatory flood zones, and protected
C-101
ANW
riparian buffers or a note on the plans that none exist.
e. The boundaries of all vegetated or protected riparian buffers.
NIA
WA
f. Site layout showing all built -upon areas, drainage features, stormwater
C-105
ANW
collection systems (inlets, outlets, swales, pipe elevations, slopes and
diameters), and SCMs at ultimate build -out.
g. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, and finished floor
C-105
ANW
elevations.
h. Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes,
C-105, calculations attached
ANW
runoff calculations.
i. Drainage area boundaries (included in the main set of plans, not as a
Exhibit 1
ANW
separate document).
j. Existing and proposed maintenance access routes, utility easements,
C-105
ANW
drainage easements, public rights-of-way etc.
k. A construction sequence that shows how the SCMs will be protected from
G-002 & C-506
ANW
sediment until the entire drainage area is stabilized.
6 Two sets of sealed, signed, & dated full-sized plan details of each SCM (or
C-105 & C-506
ANW
typical if appropriate) in both plan view and cross-section at a scale of 1" = 30'
or larger, including:
a. Dimensions, side slopes, length to width ratios and elevations with a
C-105 & C-506
ANW
benchmark for clean-out if appropriate.
b. All applicable conveyance devices, including: bypass structure,
C-105 & C-506
ANW
pretreatment area, flow distribution device, underdrains, outlet device, outlet
dissipater and level spreader.
c. A table of elevations, incremental volumes and accumulated volumes (if
C-506
ANW
applicable).
d. Specifications for applicable materials, such as planting media, aggregate,
C-506
ANW
sod, underdrains, outlet devices, etc.
STORM -EZ 11/22/2016
Version 1.4 Application Page 1 of 16

Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
7 Two sealed, signed, & dated planting plans for each SCM (or typical) at a scale
of 1" = 29 or larger, as applicable, including:
ANW
a. The locations of each species and a planting detail.
n/a
WA
b. A table summarizing the size, spacing and total quantity of each plant
Na
WA
species that should be used.
c. The source nursery for the plants.
n/a
WA
d. A one-time fertilizer specification to establish plants If necessary.
n/a
WA
8 A soils report based on field evaluation indicating the SHWT elevations within
the footprints of the proposed SCM(s). Provide a map of the boring locations
Attached in appendix
ANW
with the existing elevations and boring logs. For infiltration SCW the report
shall include the soil type, infiltration rate and method for determining the
Infiltration rate. Soils Information shall be signed and sealed by a licensed soil
Rejentist
9 A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (O & M)
Attached in appendix
ANW
agreement.
10 A copy of the proposed deed restrictions protecting the SCMs and limiting the
built -upon area so that it does not exceed the capacity of the SCM(s) or the hig
We
ANW
density threshold (as applicable).
NCDENR Deed Restriction Fom►s
11 For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Documentation from
the NC Secretary of State or other official documentation. which supports the
titles and positions held by the persons listed in the Contact information section.
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing
with the NC Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
n/a
WA
NC Deol of the Secretary of State
12 A copy of the lease agreement or pending sales agreement if applicable.
n/a
N/A
STORM -EZ 11/22/2016
Version 1.4 Application Page 2 of 16

Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
Part If: General Project and Applicant Information
Project Name: Mauney Cove Convience Center Date: 11.22.16
Project Street Address: 30 Mauney Cove Road Let: 35°31'22.86"N
City: Waynesville Zip -.F28786 Long: 82"59'18.90"W
Directions to Project: From the intersection of U.S. 276 and Mauney Cove Rd travel 200 feel on County: HAYWOOD
(from nearest intersection) Mauney Cove Road. The project site is located on the right. NON -COASTAL
Project Applicant: I Haywood County
(identify the corporation, organization, property owner, designated
government official, etc. which owns the groiect.)
Owner t Signing Offical's Name:
Title:
Address:
City
State:
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
David Francis
Solid Waste Administrator
215 N. Main St
Waynesville
NC
28786
828452-6625
828452-6715
dbfrancis ha oodnc.net
Status of applicant:1 Owner
River Basin: French Broad
Receiving Stream(s): Mauney Cove Branch
Stream Class(es): B
Surface Water Area (ac): 0 Coastal wetland area (ac): 0
Total property area (ac): 1.3 Total project area (ac): 1.3
Goa lstcharacteristics: YES Volume Matching (LID) NO Drains to an offsite stormwater system
NO Low Density NO Within 575' of Saltwater ORW
NO High Density NO Within 5 miles of a public airport
Briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated:
Stormwater will be conveyed across the asphalt pad into a bioretention cell. The water will drain through infiltration,
underdrains, and a yard inlet to be conveyed through an 18" pipe across Mauney Cove Rd. and into Mauney Cove Branch
Status of constructiod Not Started
Other permits needed: YES Sedimentation & erosion control YES 404 Permit 1401 Certification
NO CAMA Major Permit I NO Ilsolated Wetlands Permit
NO Threatened & Endangered Species I NO NPDES Industrial Stormwater Permit
If an application for this project has been previously returned, provide the original project number and previous name of the project:
n/a
Provide the permit type, number and issue date for any permits that have already been obtained for this
If claiming vested rights, then identify (and attach) the supporting documents and approval dates:
MNOApproval of a site-specific development plan or PUD Approval date:
Valid building permit Issue date:
Other Date:
Not Started
Point of Contact:
STORM -EZ
Version 1.4 Application
Phone number:
11/22/2016
Page 3 of 16

(Optional) Additional Contact
Person f Orginization:
Signing Official & Title:
Street address:
City, State, Zip:
Phone number(s):
Email:
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
Part IV: Additional Contact Information
Haywood County
David Francis, Solid Waste Administrator
215 N. Main St.
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-452-6625
dbfrancis(cilhavwoodnc. net
(Note: PersonlOrganization noted above may be contacted for additional project information if applicant
cannot be reached.)
Part V: Consultant Information
Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf for this project (such as addressing requests for additional information).
Consultant: Scott Burwell, P.E.
Firm: McGill Associates, P.A.
Street address: 55 Broad Street
City, State, Zip: Asheville, NC 28801
Phone number(s): 828-252-0575
Email: iscott.burwell.mcoillencli

Mauney Cove Convience Center
©X►A
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
NCDENR
French Broad River Basin
2.22
RAINFALL & CALCULATION DATA
2.66
Project County: HAYWOOD
3.79
Project City: Waynesville
4.48
Rainfall Source: Asheville -A
5.03
Loaded Rainfall: Asheville
Design Storm: First Flush / WQV
Calculation Method Discrete SCS Method,
Pre - Post
(Minimum Design Storm = P90 for non -SA, 1 -yr, 24 -hr for SA)
Storm Event
P90
Depth
(inches)
1.00
1.39
P95
1.88
1- r, 24 -hr
2.22
2 -yr, 24 -hr
2.66
10 -yr, 24 -hr
3.79
25 -yr, 24 -hr
4.48
50 -yr, 24 -hr
5.03
10D- r, 24 -hr
5.58
NOTE Please use the Storm -EZ calculation sheets to document the stormwater design
and create the O&M Agreement Highlighted Storm is Design Storm
PROJECT INFORMATION
Total Property Area 1.30 acress
Total Coastal Wetlands Area 0.00 acre
Total Surface Water Area 0.00 1 acres
Complete the breakdown of impervious area for the project
Basin Information
Entire Site
Receiving Stream name
Mauney Cove Branch
Stream Class
B
Stream Index Number
Total Drainage Area
56,526
On -Site Drainage Area (sf)
56,526
Offsite Drainage Area (sf)
0
Pro sed Im rvious Area si
30,039
Impervious Area total
53%
Impervious Surface Area
Entire Site
On -Site Buildings/Lots (sf)
0
On -Site Streets (sf)
0
On -Site Parking (sf)
16,279
Onsite Sidewalks (sf)
0
Other On -Site (sf)
0
Future (sf)
13,760
Off-site s
0
6cisti BUA (sf)
0
Total
30,0t39
Total Impervious Area 0.69 acres
Project % impervious area 1 53%
ALL AREAS ARE IN SQUARE FEET
Use Worksheet Data? I Yes
Data in italics is derived from application
forms and land use data worksheets and
cannot be changed by user.
STORM -EZ 11/22/2016
Version 1.4 Project Data Page 5 of 16

Pre -Development Land Use:
Note. Eraer BUA Orarro,g to
Per,%41RW Parer m SeRrn
User Defined Drainage Areas:
Mauney Cove Convience Center ,��
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County ©�
French B�I ' road River Basin � NCDENR
Drainage Area #= ' � Of 1
PRE -DEVELOPMENT LAND USE CALCULATIONS
Pasture
Existing Permeable Pavement Infiltration)
SCM N Description
100
SCM N
150
HSG
Area
BUA % Has Synthetic
Liner?
CN
ISO
acres %
98
16,279
0.37 28.80 %
61
40.247
0.92 71.20,%
rbtotal:
56.526
1.30
Existing Permeable Pavement Infiltration)
SCM N Description
100
SCM N
150
HSG
Soil Gravel Vold Total Orifice Orifice
Pavement Area Additional BUA Infiltrallo Space Gravel Die. Height
n Rate Depth
BUA % Has Synthetic
Liner?
D.S.
BMP
Rainfall Volume =
(at) (sf) (Inlhr) I%) (in) (in) (in)
4,711
cf
Runoff Reduction Components:
Existing Green Roofs:
DSD I PAW D, Area DS SCM N Notes'
Land Use Summa :Area sf.
From Lend Use Tables' 56.526 1.30 1 acres
Permeable Pavement +Additional BUA: 0 0.00 I acres
Green Roofs: 0 1 0, 1 acres
Preserved Surface Waters & Norm -Coastal Wetlantls : 0.00 acres
Preserved C stalWetiands:l 1 0.00 acres
Total Site Area: 56,526 1 1.30 1 acres
Design Storm Runoff Fate Summary:
Rainfall Volume =
1.30 acre -inches =
4,711
cf
Runoff Reduction Components:
Natural Int9tration & ET =
-1.00 ane -inches =
-3.638
of
Disconnected Impervious Surfaces =
0.00 acre -aches =
0
Cf
SCM Inflltratton =
0.00 acre -inches =
0
Of
Permeable Pavement Infiltration =
0.00 acre -inches =
0
G
Green Roof ET =
0.00 acre -inches =
0
G
Post Filtration Discharge =
0.00 ace -inches =
0
G
Total Runoff Reduction =
-1.00 acre -Inches
-3,638
cf
SCM Treatment:
Treated SCM Outflow =
0.00 acre -inches =
0
cf
Untreated Surface Runoff =
0.30 acre -Inches =
1,073
cf
The Pre -Development project area contains 16279 at of built upon area, resulting In an overall density of 28.8%.
STORE' -EZ 1122/2016
Ve-o- 1.a Pre -Development Page 6 of 16

SCM0
500
Mauney Cove Convience CenterAA
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County AN/=
French Broad River Basin NCDENR
Drainage Area M 1 of 1
POST -DEVELOPMENT LAND USE CALCULATIONS
hle Pavement:
IMihnlion ta
HBe onfi.Odfic.
D—
Natural Infiltration & ET =
. Area Addilionel BUA Void SPBce G..1
RBt.
01.
6ynllwhc Dia, H.IQM
Mr.—cMck
Disconnected Impervious Surfaces =
D.tBMion
HSG
HSG P-1 Typ. D.P11
Limr7
SCM
•0.10 .rse A . _
chick
1811 lerfe6l Iefl Iecre6l (�rvfi) (°e) (�nl
(N) Int
0 00 000
No
rr
Green Roof ET =
000 a rChee =
Area IM,.., Retro0tl I D cN
sM m I Commerda
L&W Excluded or Perae! E-lud d, bom Vorum. C.IcWedons: 1d 1 Ix
Surface Waters& Non-C—IN WBUeMS 0 0.00
CoaafBl WB6Anda 0 0.00
Total Slle Ar -1 56,526 1.00
Rainfall Volume= 130 .Lf—h., = 4,711 Cf
Runoff Reduction Components:
Natural Infiltration & ET =
.0.75 eveKrrcnea -
-2.731
d
Disconnected Impervious Surfaces =
000 acre -intoes -
o
cr
SCM Infiltration a
•0.10 .rse A . _
.044
cl
Permeable Pavement 1riNtralion =
0.00 --chew
c
rr
Green Roof ET =
000 a rChee =
0
d
Post Filtration Dischar e =
-0. 3 es -
-126
dota
Runoff =t.os
m.—h-
.cra-Inch.. _
1
c
STORM -E2 11122/2016
Verson 1 Pox D—bp— Pati. 7 d 16

Mauney Cove Convience Center lrap�A
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County ©'' %A
French Broad River Basin NC©ENR
Drainage Area # 1 of 1
POST -DEVELOPMENT LAND USE CALCULATIONS
Cr`M Troalmnnr
Treated SCM OulAow = 0.00 .--mches =
Untreated Surface Runoff * 9.25 ....4r h.. - 910 cf
Pre-Develo rnent Runoff = 0 30 aoo-rc e. = 1.073 Cf
DNference = -a.00 ecn--rres - -163 C/
Th. Post-D.v.lopm.M proj.ct.r.. -nuina 70039 .101 built upon .r.., r ... ldng in-oWtall o.nsity of 53.105L
STORM -EZ 11;2212016
Ve— 1 4 Post D—topmem page 8 d 16

Mauney Cove CMvlence Center ,04A
Weynnvills, NC HAVWOOO County �NyJ
F—h Broad Ri— S.W. NCDENR
Drainage Area a 1 of t
PROPOSED 8W. 3, STRUCTURAL RUNOFF VOLUME CONTROLS
Enter only runoff volume below that will be Infiltrated or drawn down over 2 to 5 days. Additional volume provided In devices should not be entered in this worksheet.
Drawdown time requirement applies to all storm events.
OHaiU Impervious 0 sf
Ana TnaNd
STORMWATER COWMOL MEABURES
ConoI.IN Alen
0
c7
Drailay
ieW fbat
4.711
►.V—
%arrow %at Td✓
Bterpe
Dewe Ana Inger
kmar 1n111Vaep0a Fl mNm Tnded %o1 BCM
Nsf rW kA&.bon a ET •
-0.73 rwlura
NO•�q P-1..
Vol—
amain BCM Vaaelr
vok ET OUMow Outram Volume
w
BOM
s Nama l Lacaapn T o/OMw -0
a
.70.039 ZBJ67
Af� Area
(e0
B
Imam
fZe 0 IT.1
700 B,natenlon OtlA BCnlaMalwllWB B
ta337 19.e9t
Sf1i 74%
Ia00
1070
1070 91a
o
19591✓apnl W.n er W
sa%✓fad 7a%-(W-
-003 avawdwJ
• IM
d
16Z]I✓wpw.+aw �e.lvsd
aalw.16aB7 ✓ 9Y.r
nn rb0 p.+dlJ
at
tml .. 3".f kfd �.gwwws
- W
aPml Acaae
sTa.
Sform Runoff FW. Summary:
am OewwtwJ
0
c7
RdnfWl Volume.
1]0 auantlrs '
4.711
d
Runoff Reduction Compon.nt.:
0.30 an—ft.
1.073
d
Nsf rW kA&.bon a ET •
-0.73 rwlura
-2.731
d
GUcameded Impervious Area=
caro o.rlcfloa
o
d
SCMh1A Nifloa
-026 a—.N"
as.
d
Pwm.eble Paysln.W k4wf 09n •
am a•a vldrJ •
0
d
Green Roo(ET •
ow --f- =
o
d
Post Fitlr.0on IXachtses =
-003 avawdwJ
• IM
d
ToW Runoff R.duetlon •
-tai sera -eases •
'7.401
at
SCM Tf.alm.nt:
Intow SCM Outflow •
am OewwtwJ
0
c7
UntnWd Sual c. Runoff •
0.e6 ear.-. IM •
910
of
P1 D.vWopmna Runoff =
0.30 an—ft.
1.073
d
Dlflarance=
oar ava*W— =
-163
of
'VOLUME MATCHWG ACHIEVED"
TIr pnrAwbNpewat prgad.r« oer.alna 30079 sr er aur wore tree, raall.eq ti an owns sal.lq a a.n%.
11n7770fe
BTON.I.EZ S—W caw vary 9 d 10
yuan 14

STORWEZ 1R2;2o16
Vaam 14 RaedaA Faa GrapO vaep TO a t6
Mauney Cove Convience Center
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
© ��
French Broad River Basin
NCDENR
Drainage Ares# 1 of 1
FATE OF RAINFALL
Selocl Storm:
First Flush
BASIC TREATMENT SCALE
Compliance Storm = First Flush Storm • Rainf II Depth a 1 Inch
PO
lark TtaattMnt ThrnhOld
VOLUME MATCHING SCALE
First Flush Storm - Rainfall DGE1111 - t Ineh
Volume Matching Th—Mid
FATE OF RAINFALL GRAPHS
Pre Development Fates Post Development Fates
IVDM
100'
von
wx
as
aol.
w.
ror.
3
�
9
% rOM1
X b%
too
IO%
7011
fell
1M/[u[oa endR yRLd T,nd.04n b-11 , Od Vethaed Aafxe llunea loll IMataan Mdrf M75d Te OWlaarrameNN.Od
WrWad Sudece RtMl-vldd
oaa FLnen Oudbw-Oa •aMi eVou FW, 0l05OM-126d
SOL'.by
•ttN1tllen aMh-Oc1 •oeitnutlt iawmea lMiRruiOn Od alantaun W aMh - 9u cl
•On[onnhWlmpervurs�nliRtalan Od e6emaool[rnoa10f0--OA aRnmeaMe V>rMlml pd0[tati0n-Od
aDecOnnMed lmpml0uf helRri[Cn Id
•rManra rndR lexA aWten Roof Evanrtaesp:nion Od
Th7w a KM' cna'tt dapay ne hyd,aoaa pOaasala b 1Nnph raNM rOAtmn n sugealed Woad on ae s a rnd uee, aal Ilya. aM abm+Nw cOnada etre+ae Oy ea wn TM cnaas re devpiW ro Onplay sl. tmmiwaet
pan N a s- salol a as drurpec 11 dw hydrtlapc Jc wan t W tram aNava0wl SW lernrvs uwmv -IWAWn WWW9 n.
STORWEZ 1R2;2o16
Vaam 14 RaedaA Faa GrapO vaep TO a t6

Mauney Cove Convience Center
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
French Broad River Basin
Drainage Area # 1 of 1
ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS
E OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS:
Pre -Development
Sheet Flow
Sheet Flow
Shallow Flow
Shallow Flow
Length (ft)
Slope (ft/ft)
Surface Cover
T, (hrs)
300
015
Grass
0.28
50 -Yr
100 -Yr
all in = 1.00
1.39
1.88 2.22 2.66 3.79 4.48
5.03
558
= 0.23
0.34
0.51 0.66 0.87 1.53 1.98
2.37
I
Flow Area
Length (ft) Slope (ftlft) n -value (fl') Wetted Perimeter (ft) T, (hrs)
Channel Flow:
Channel Flow:
Pre -development T, = 16.84 min (Minh 5 mrowes)
Post Development
Sheet Flow
Sheet Flow
Shallow Flow
Shallow Flow
Length (ft)
Slope (ftlft)
Surface Cover
T, (hrs)
300
0.15
Grass
0.28
50 -Yr
100 -Yr
all in = 1.00
1.39
1.88 2.22 2.66 3.79 4.48
5.03
558
= 0.23
0.34
0.51 0.66 0.87 1.53 1.98
2.37
I
Flow Area
Length (ft) Slope (ft/ft) n -value (ft') Wetted Perimeter (ft) T, (hrs) j
Channel Flow: 300 0.1 0.03 5.0 10.0 0.01
Channel Flow:
Post -development T, = 17.34 min (Minimum 5 mutes)
ED CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS
A
NCDENK
pment
F.F.
Analysis Area = 1.3 Acres (0.002 sq. miles)
Analysis Area = 1.3 Acres (0.002 sq. miles)
P95 1 -Yr 2 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr
50 -Yr
F.F.
P90
P95 1 -Yr 2 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr
50 -Yr
100 -Yr
all in = 1.00
1.39
1.88 2.22 2.66 3.79 4.48
5.03
558
= 0.23
0.34
0.51 0.66 0.87 1.53 1.98
2.37
2.77
87
84
81 79 78 75 74
74
73
Post Development
TIONS:
Pre -Development
F.F.
P90
Analysis Area = 1.3 Acres (0.002 sq. miles)
P95 1 -Yr 2 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr
50 -Yr
100 -Yr
O' (in)
1 0.23
0.34
0.51
0.66
0.87
1.53
1.98
2.37
2.77
q, (csmlin)
1 483.30
483.30
483.30
483.30
586.43
586.43
586.43
586.43
586.43
a (cfs)
Post Development
0.22
0.33
0.50
0.65
1.04
1.82
2.36
2.82
3.29
O' (in)
q„ (csmlin)
a (cfs)
0.19
0.29
0.41
0.61
0.90
1.72
2.25
2.69
3.14
423.69
475.76
475.76
475.76
475.76
576.96
578.96
578.96
576.96
0.17
0.28
0.40
0.59
0.87
2.01
2.63
3.15
3.68
-22.7%
-15.2%
-20.0%
g.2%11.8%
1 11.7%
"Note: To decrease Post -development peak flows - increase storage volume being drawdown or infiltrated or lengthen post -
STORM -117 1112212016
Version 1.4 Peak Flow Calcs Page 11 of 16

IdsysiopmeM flme of eonceniYsfion. See UD HELP for more W maflon I
STORM -EZ 11/22/2016
Version 1.4 Peak Flow Calcs Pege 12 of 16

Operation & Maintenance Agreement
Mauney Cove Convience Center
Waynesville, NC HAYWOOD County
Prepared By: Scott Burwell, P.E., McGill Associates, P.A.
Cover Page
Maintenance records shall be kept on the following BMP(s). This maintenance recora snail be Kept in a ivy in a known act
Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired, or replaced immediately, These deficiencies can
affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the pollutant removal efficiency of the BMP(s).
The BMP(s) on this project include (check all that apply &
Bioretention Cell Quantity:
Dry Detention Basin
Grassed Swale
Green Roof
Infiltration Basin
Infiltration Trench
Level SpreaderNFS
Permeable Pavement
Proprietary System
Rainwater Harvesting
Sand Filter
Stormwater Wetland
Wet Detention Basin
Disconnected Impervious Area
Soil Amendments
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Present:
Present:
g O&M tables will
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
Location(s)
be added
I–Maunev Cove Convenience Center J
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed for
each BMP above, and attached O&M tables. I agree to notify NCDENR of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to
the system or responsible party.
" Responsible Party
Title & Organization
Street address
City, state, zip
Phone number(s)
Email
Signature:
County of
personally appeared before me this
David Francis
Solid Waste Administrator
215 N. Main St.
Wa nesville, NC 28786
828-452-6625
dbfrancis{a_haywoodnc.net
Date:
a Notary Public for the State of 61 vtiC
do hearby certify that (r C 1—i►'zt Ul��;
�S day of and
acknowledge the due execution of the Oper tions and r
intepzgnce Aareement .
r
Witness m� hand Cyd official seal,
STORM -EZ
Version 1.4
My commission expires
O&M Manual
11/2312016
Page 1 of 1

MAUNEY COVE CONVIENENCE CENTER
Job No. 15.00709
Nov.14,2016
BIORETENTION CELL
BIORETENTION CALCULATIONS — DRAWDOWN RATES
BIORETENTION DEPTH AND SOIL TYPE
Use 2' minimum planting soil depth
Soil Type will be Loamy Sand with a conductivity rate of 3 in/hr
Drawdown Rate using Darcy's Equation:
Q= (2.3e-5) x K x A x 0H/AL
Where Q = Flow (rate of draw) through bioretention soils (cfs)
K = Hydraulic Conductivity of soil (in/hr)
A = Surface Area of Bioretention Area (sq.ft.)
AH = Height of water above gravel envelope (drainage pipe zone)
AL = Thickness of soil
Q= (2.3e-5) x 3 x 1400 x (3/2)
Q = 0.15 cfs
Drawdown time from Inundation to saturation:
Volume
V 1-s = 1400 x 1.0
Vi -s = 1400 cu.ft.
Time
Ti -s = V 1-s -: Q
T1 -s = 1400 _ 0.15
Ti -s = 9334 seconds
Ti -s = 2.59 hours

MAUNEY COVE CONVIENENCE CENTER
Job No. 15.00709
Nov. 14, 201 b
Drawdown time from Saturation at Surface to 2.0' below Surface:
Use soil porosity 45% n = 0.45
Volume
Vs 2.o = 2.0 ft. x 1400 x 0.45
Vs -2.0 = 1,260 cuA
Time
Ts -2.o = Vs -2.o _ Q
Ts -2,o = 1,260 0.15
Ts -2.o = 8,400 seconds
Ts -2.o = 2.33 hours
Total Drawdown Time:
TTOTAL = Ti -s + Ts -2.o
TTOTAL = 2.59 hours + 2.33 hours 2,
TTOTAL = 4.92 hours
Size Underdrain Pipes:
NxD = 16x(Qxnls"o.5)^318
Where: N = number of pipes
D = diameter of pipes (inches)
Q = flow to be carried (cfs)
n = manning coefficient
s = slope of pipe
Known Q = 0.52 cfs
SizeforlOxQ = 0.15x10 = 1.5cfs
n = 0.011
D = 16 x (1.5 cfs x.01 I _ .005^0.5)^3/8
D = 9.27" inches
Use 4 — 6" perforated PVC pipe

�strumentll 2015007003 Book 891 Page 1941
PENDING REVIEW FOR TAX LISTING
2015007003
�
DA Y
HAYVVWO CO. NC FEE $26.00
STATE OF NC REAL ESTATE EXTX
$300.00
HAYWOOD COUNTY TAX CERTIFICATION
oREMTFO s aeCOMED
08-25-201512:12:29 PM
There are no delinquent taxes due that are a lien
SHERRI C. ROGERS
016"M OF DEEDS
BY�M OWGUMMEZ
0BE
against parcel numbers) � /4 -31. ul TO
K: RB 891
Mike Matthews, Haywood County Tax Collector
PG: 1941-1943
r
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise tax: $ 300.00 ($150,000.00)
Parcel Identifier No. 8616-39.4150 (split)
Mail after recording to: Leon M. Milian III
This instrument was prepared by: Frank G. Queen, Attorney, Waynesville NC 28786
THIS DEED is trade this'day of August, 2015, between
GRANTOR
Bruce Lowe Toy, single
Address: 762 Jacqueline Lane, Palm Harbor
FL 34683
If checked, this WAS a Grantor's Principal
Residence (otherwise ignore): [ ]
GRANTEE
Haywood County, a body politic and
corporate
Address: - XI
The designtions Grantor and Grantee shall include the parties, their respective heirs, successors, and assigns, and
shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSES that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all Of that certain lot or parcel of
land situated in the Waynesville Township, Haywood County, North Carolina, more particularly described as
follows:
See attached Exhibit A.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to
convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will

astrument# 2015007003 Book 891 Page 1942
warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions
hereinafter stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
Easements, restrictions, rights of way of record, and 2015 ad valorem taxes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in :its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereunto affixed by
authority of its Hoard of Directors, the day and year first above writte .
ce Lowe toy, sing e
PINSIPH County, State: fiv12•i24
I certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before
me this day, each acknowledging to me that he or she voluntarily
signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein and
in the capacity indicated: B na Toy, single.
SEAL -STAMP
9�atrr
Date ficial Signature of Not
JOSM&MAM Notary Public
•i
s
WCOAMIONOEESM194 Not �B printed o�rr typed name:
f EXPIRES:Apt820,2017 JtlSval� /�1�D1"l
..�, , r �n0ed TAN MoinrY DuEYc UndenxitW
My commission expires: a

istrument# 2015007003 Book 991 Page 1943
EXHIBIT A
BEING a 1.410 acre parcel as shown on the survey of Richard M. Owens, Jr., PLS, dated
August 18, 2015, entitled "Bruce Lowe Toy," recorded in Plat Cabinet C, Slot &f -70,
Haywood County Registry.
TOGETHER WITH and SUBJECT TO an easement for access and utility purposes over
the 0.039 acre strip on the southwestern side of the subject property, which easement is
shared with the properties of Lowe (Deed Book 482, page 101), Robert Van Toy (Deed
Book Sog, page 775 and estate file 11 E log, Haywood County Clerk's office) and Stanley
Owen Toy (estate file 11 E log) for the benefit of those referenced tracts.
BEING a portion of the property conveyed to Bruce Lowe Toy by Robert Van Toy et ux.,
by deed dated June 16, 2011, recorded in Book 809, page 777 and inherited by Bruce
Lowe Toy from the will of Mildred Lowe Toy (11 E log, Haywood County Clerk's office).
1
1

11/15/2016 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Waynesville, North Carolina, USA*
Latitude: 35.5229°, Longitude: -82.9887°
j Elevation: 2585.63 ft"
``+: • source ESRI Maps y,r
•• source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parrybok, M.Yekta, and 0. Riley
NOAH, National Weather Service. Sliver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
11
1
-,�
( J
10 1
25
50
100 �
200 J
500 j
1000 I
4.07
4.81
5��76 '
6.54
7.62
8.28
9.04 f
9.78
10.7 ;
11.6
(3.67-4.52) ;
(4,34.5.35)
(5.20-6.41)
(5.89.7.27) ;
(6.73-8.34)
(7.37.9.18)
(7.99.10.1)
(8.58-1U.9) I
(9.30.12.0)
(9.881 3.0)
-5-mtn
3.26
F -3 -.85-7F
4.61
5.23
6.99
6.69
7.18 1
7.75
9.06
10 -min
(293.3.61)
(3.47-4,28)
(4.16.5.13)
(4`72-5.81) I
(5.36.6.65)
I (5.87-7.31)
(6.35.7.99) !
(6.808.65)
[�(7,369.53)
(7_77-10.2)
2.71
3.22
3.89
41.16.06
6.66
6.05
6.52
7.12
7 68
15 -min ,
(2.44-3.01)
(2.91.3.58)
(3.51.4.33)
(3.98-4.90) i
(4.53.5.62)
(4.95-6.18) 1
(5.35-6.73)
(5.72.7.28)
1 (6.17-8.00) !(6.50-8.57)
.
1.86
2.23
2.77
3.20
3.76
4.19
4.63
5.08
5.67
6.14
30 -rein ;
(1.88-2.06) ;
(2.01-2.48)
(2.49-3.07)
1 2.88-3.55)j
(3.36.4.16)
(3.73-4.65)
(4.10.5.15) ',
(4.45-5.66)
(4.91-6.36) i
(5.27-6.94)
1.16
1 40
1.77
2.08
2.50
2.84
3.19
3.b6
4.07
4A8
60-rT1in
(1.04-1.29) ±
(1.26-1.55)
(1.60-1.97)
(1.88-2.31) '
(2.23.2.77)
(2.53-3.15)
(2.82-3.55)
(3.12.3.87)
(3.52-4'56)
(3.84-5.06)
0.674
0.810
1.02
1.20
1.44
1.64
1.85
2.07
I 2.37
2.61
2 -hr 1
(0.611.0.746)
(0.735-0.896)
(0.924-1.13) !
(1.08.1.33)
(1.29-1.59)
1 (1.46-1.81) ;
(1.63-2.05) ?
1 (2.04-2.64)
1 (2.23-2.93)
OA77 j
0.568
0.712
0.836
17017F
1.16 77
1.31
`(1.81-2.29)
1A7
1.71
1.89 r
3 -hr
(0.434.0.529);
(0.518.0.629)
(0.847.0.787)
(0.757-0.921)1
(0.906.1.11)
(1.03-1.27) I
(1.16-1.45)
(1.29-1.63)]
(1_47-1.90)
(1.6112.13) i
0.294
0.346
OA -24
OA95
0.596
0.681 7,
F 0.772 i
0.869
1.12 i
6 -hr ,
(0.269-0.322)
(0.316.0.379)
(0.388.0.465)
(0.451-0.541)
(0.539-0.650)
(0.612-0.743)
(0.687.0.845)1(0.765-0.953)1
(0.871-1.11)
(0.954-1.24)
0.182
0.214
0.261 ,
0.301
0.356
0.398
--O-A-43-70.487
0.546
0.588 1
12 -hr
(0.168.0.199)
(0.198.0.234)
(0.240-0.284)
(0.277.0.328)
(0.325-0.386)
(0.363-0.433)
(0.401-0.482)1
(0.439.0.531)
(0.487.0.598)
(0.521-0.649);
0.107
F 0.129 70.167
0.181 71
0.212
0.238
0.263
0.289
0.324
0.350
24 -hr i
(0.101-0.115)
(0.120-0.138)
(0.147-0.169)1
(0.169-0.193)1(0.198-0.226)
(0.221-0.253)
(0.244-0.280)
(0.267-0.308)
(0.298-0.344)
(0.320-0.371).
2 -day
0.064
(0.060.0.068)1
0.076
(0.072 0.081)
0.092
(0.087.0.098]
0.106
(0.099 0.112))
0.123
(0.115.0.131)
0.137
(0.128-0.146)
0.161
(0.141-0.161)1
0.166
(0.154.0.176)
0.184
(0.170 0.196)1
0.199
(0.183-0.210)4
3 -day
0.046
(0.043 0.049)+
0.054
0.05100
0.065
(0.082 0.069)
0.074
(0.070-0.079)1
0.086
(0.081-0.091)
0.095
(0.0890.101)(0.088-0.111){(0.10
O 1-0-5-1
0.114
)
0.126
35
0401 4
F4 -day
0.037
0.043F
(0.041-0.046)1(0.049-0.055)11(0.055-0.082)I(0,063-0.071)
-05-62-7,F-05-59-70.067
!F-0-07-4-7F-0.0-81--7;F-O.-08-8-7! .0.097
(0.070.0.079);
(0.076_0.086)
(0.082.0.093)
(0.090-0.10
0.103 I
(0.085-0'109)
_1(0.035-0.039)
IF
0.026
0.028
0.036
0.040
0.046
0.051
0.055
0.060
0.066
0.071
[�7-da7y'
(0.023.0.026)
(0.028 0.031)
(0.033-0.037)
(0.037.0.042)
(0.043-0.048)
(0.047.0.053):
(0.052 0.059)
{0.056 0.064)
(0.062-0.070)1(0.066.0.075)
10 -da y
0.020 1
0.024
0.028
0.031 I
0.036
(0.034-0.038)
0.040
(0.037 0.042)1[(0.!0Z
0043 i
0.046)
0.047
(0,044-0.050)
-0-0-117--',705.0-55--7,
(0.048.0.055
(0,051-0.058)
(0.019-0.021��
0.014
(0.022.0,025)
0.016
(0.026.0.030)
0.019
(0.029-0.033)'
0 -.021F
-O-.0-23-7-0.025
-0-0-2-7-7,-0.0-29-7--0.-_0
3-1
0.033
20day
(0.013-0.014)a
(0.015-0.017)
(0.018-0.020)
(0.020.0.022)
(0.022-0.024)4
(0.024-0.027)!
(0.025-0.029)
(0.027.0.030)
(0.029-0_033)
(0.031.0.035)
30
0.011
012) (0.011.0.012)1
0.013
(0.013 0.014)
OA1 b
(0.014.0.016)
0.016
(0.016-0:017);
0.018
(0.017 0.019)]
0.020
(0.019-0.020)
0.021
(0.020 0.022)!
0.022
(0.021.0.023)
0.023
(0.022 0.024)
0.024
(0.023 0.025)
0.010
0.011
0.013
0.014
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.017
0.018
0.018
[475-d
2)
(0.012 0.013);
(0.013-0.014);
(0.014-0.015)1
(0.015-0.016)
(0.016.0_017)1
(0.016 0.018)
(0.017-0.019)
(0.017-0.019)
60 -day 1
0.009 J
0.010
0.011
0.012
0.013
OA14
0-014F---0--.-0--1--5
0.015
0.016
(0.008-0.009).
(0_010 0.011)
(0.011_0.012).
(0.012-0.013)1
(0.013-0.014)4
(0.013-0.014)
(0.014-0:015)
(0.014 0.015)
(0.015.0.016)1(0.015
0.016)
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence intervaq w8 be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Bads to Too
http lhdsc.rtws.rioaa.govft&c/pfds/pfdsjrintpage.html?lat=35.5229&Ion=-82.9887&data=intensity&traits=english8series=pds 1/4

' 11/15/2016 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
PF graphical
tPDS -based intensity -duration -frequency (IDF) curves
Latitude: 35.52291, Longitude: -82.98870
1 2 5 10 40 W LUV zuv Jw •v00
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Tue Nov 15 21.45:56 2016
Baric to Too
' Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
htvJftxisc,rl s.Maa,9 A)ftCJpids/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=35.5229&on=-82.9887&data=irtensity&units=er4ish&series=pds
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
2
5
10
-- 25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
'
100.000
100.000
-- 3 -day
t
10.000
IC
'
— 60 -mut
— 10 -day
— 2 -hr
— 20 -day
_c
— 30 -day
E
— 45 -day
— 12 -hi
— 60 -day
N A
4)
1.000
-Y -0 -0
'
ar
-Y -Y
'
Ln
c
in
1-1
c
°
M
0.100
rl
N
N r11
h O
ri
in
C s
C
a`
0.010
'
Duration
0.010
0 001
1 2 5 10 40 W LUV zuv Jw •v00
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Tue Nov 15 21.45:56 2016
Baric to Too
' Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
htvJftxisc,rl s.Maa,9 A)ftCJpids/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=35.5229&on=-82.9887&data=irtensity&units=er4ish&series=pds
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
2
5
10
-- 25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
— 5 -mm T
100.000
— 10 -min
-- 3 -day
15 im
— 4 -day
IC
10.000
— 60 -mut
— 10 -day
— 2 -hr
— 20 -day
— 3 -hr
— 30 -day
E
— 45 -day
— 12 -hi
— 60 -day
N A
'6 N
a
-Y -0 -0
'0 -0
'C 'Q
-Y -Y
'
Ln
O
rr
in
1-1
$
'
rl
N
N r11
h O
6 A
in
C s
C
Duration
0.010
0 001
1 2 5 10 40 W LUV zuv Jw •v00
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Tue Nov 15 21.45:56 2016
Baric to Too
' Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
htvJftxisc,rl s.Maa,9 A)ftCJpids/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=35.5229&on=-82.9887&data=irtensity&units=er4ish&series=pds
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
2
5
10
-- 25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
— 5 -mm T
100.000
— 10 -min
-- 3 -day
15 im
— 4 -day
IC
10.000
— 60 -mut
— 10 -day
— 2 -hr
— 20 -day
— 3 -hr
— 30 -day
— 6 -hr
— 45 -day
— 12 -hi
— 60 -day
— 24 -hr
iA
1.000
.E
'
°
u
0.100
ro
C
0.010
0 001
1 2 5 10 40 W LUV zuv Jw •v00
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Tue Nov 15 21.45:56 2016
Baric to Too
' Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
htvJftxisc,rl s.Maa,9 A)ftCJpids/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=35.5229&on=-82.9887&data=irtensity&units=er4ish&series=pds
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
2
5
10
-- 25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
— 5 -mm T
— 2 -day
— 10 -min
-- 3 -day
15 im
— 4 -day
30 -mm
— 7 -day
— 60 -mut
— 10 -day
— 2 -hr
— 20 -day
— 3 -hr
— 30 -day
— 6 -hr
— 45 -day
— 12 -hi
— 60 -day
— 24 -hr
214

'
Data Server
11/1512016
Precipitation Frequency
t
r, Aft -W TAIL
7tl
MO
4
r
tx d
'A` .Lake JUnaluska
23?
c ;
ILI
ry
5
a(
l
2111 /
Large scale terrain
Kingsport' &istd
.SEE
Johnson City •
+. Winsu
Knoxville
} t: 3�+�.•1.. • Ashevilie N 0
'
�hattanooga —
•Greenville
100km
SOUTH C,
'
L 60mi
w
Large scale map
'
f Kin>aspert EYt�lca
Johnson
Q% ;city
1
1
Knoxville
100km
60mi
AmhiMe
_ Ijw
v
GrewAle i
v
Large scale aerial
&W ids=et4isWeries=Pdl
314

11/15/2016
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Back to Ton
r
Nanonar vveamer service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: HDSC.QuestionsiMnoaa.aov
http:l/hdsc.rwos.noaa.govRxdsclpfds/pfds jrintpage.t>tml?Iat=35.52298don=-82.9887&data=irtensity&uryts=english&series=pds 4/4