NC0021873_Renewal (Application)_20161201

SUEZ
Gesue2 PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
November 1, 2016
Mr. Michael Brandt
Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W. Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
Dear Mr. Brandt:
Enclosed is the NPDES Permit Renewal Application for the Town of Mayodan Wastewater
Treatment Plant. Please sign and date the Application and mail (certified return receipt
requested), the original and two (2) copies and a letter requesting renewal to:
NCDENR/DWQ
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
The Application should be submitted to DEHNR by November 30, 2016 to avoid penalties.
Please send SUEZ a copy of the signed application for our files.
Sincerely,
CT TR 7
GS/lm
Town of ;lia.yod n

�_m_n_n.m_�r_neueh=
�7
u
u u
i MAYODAI�
Town ofMayodan. 210 W. Main Street. Mayodan. NC. 27027. [phone]. www.townofniayodan.com
James A. Collins Municipal Building
November 17, 2016
NCDENR/DWQ
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Weaver,
Enclosed is the permit renewal application for the Town of Mayodan WWTP.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Town of Mayodan
/'��14401Z:t��
Michael Brandt
Town Manager

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP,NC0021873
Renewal
Ronoake
FORM
IRWIN
2A
NPDES r
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions 13.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL'AP�PLICANTS'MUST COMPLETE=.PART C.'(CERTIFI,CAT(ON,)' ,-
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. $ASIC-,APPLICATfON'INFQRMATION FOR AL_''APPLIOANTSs
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Mavodan WWTP
Mailing Address 293 Cardwell Rd
Mavodan, NC 27027
Contact Person Michael Brandt
Title Town Manager
Telephone Number ( 336) 427-0241
Facility Address 293 Cardwell Road
(not P.O. Box) Mavodan, NC 27027
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Town of Mavodan
Mailing Address 210 W Main Street
Mavodan, NC 27027
Contact Person Michael Brandt
Title Town Manager
Telephone Number ( 336 ) 427-0241
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ❑ operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO021873 PSD
UIC Other Land Application WQ0002672
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Mavodan 2,468 Sanitary Town of Mavodan
Stoneville 1,042 Sanitary Town of Mavodan
Madison 2.205 Sanitary Town of Mavodan
Total population served _6,046
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873 Renewal Ronoake
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.B. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12 -month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 4.5 mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 0.987 1.104 1.080
C. Maximum daily flow rate 1.384 1.104 1.718
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.B. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
I. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
d
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
1
® No
mgd
❑ Yes ® No
mgd
❑ Yes ® No

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g.', tank truck, pipe).
NA
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( 1
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): ❑ Yes
® No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873 . Renewal Ronoake
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Ouffall number
b. Location Mayodan
27027
(City or town, if applicable)
(Zip Code)
Rockingham
NC
(County)
(State)
36024'25"
79057'56"
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable)
ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 1.080
mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes
® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information.
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Mayo River
❑ Yes ® No
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14 -digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): Ronoake
United States Geological Survey 8 -digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute
cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable):
1
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
chronic
cfs
mg/I of CaCO3

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
❑ Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 91.1 %
Design SS removal 88.0 %
Design P removal
Design N removal %
Other
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ❑ Yes ® No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number. 001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value ,-'
'Unit's
Value .'
"' Unffs
Number of'Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.6
s.u.
pH (Maximum)
7.0
S.U.
Flow Rate
1.191
MGD
1.104
MGD
365
Temperature (Winter)
16.9
°C
11.8
°C
82
Temperature (Summer)
22.9
°C
19.8
°C
148
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
'!DISCHARGE,
AVERAGE DAILY DI§CHARGE • `
POLLUTANT
:.
_ _ __ - - •
_ _ ___ _ _ _
Numtie�of
ANALYTICAL
`'METHOD,-•
ML/MDL
Conc. Units .
Conc. Units Sam les
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
14.9
M /I
7.4
Mg/I
116
EPA405.1
2.0
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
598.4
#1100m1
8.2
#/100ml
173
SM9222D
1.0
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
21.4
Mg/1
8.7
M /I
118
EPA160.2
1.0
_END OF'PART-A.
REFER.TOTHE APPLI'CR'Ir OVERVI,EIN,(PAGE 1)•TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
- OF FORM 2A YOU 'MUST COMPLETE=
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
BASIGAPPLIQ-AT,10 I"OR-MAT-110-14
'PART B. kbOhTIONAL,APPLItATidN,INFORMATION' FOR APPLICANTS WITH A m -�QWWGR -Ek'THAN OR-
.-,5IGWF1: FA
All applicants with a design flow rate 2! 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.I. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
NA gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.) SEE ATTACHMENT I
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within '/< mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram. SEE ATTACHMENT 11
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? 0 Yes I—] No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractors responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name: SUEZ
Mailing Address: PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
Telephone Number: 336 ) 766-0270
Responsibilities of Contractor: Operation and maintenance of the Mayodan WWTP
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A 9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
NA
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies
E] Yes [] No
NPIDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
NA
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational Level
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on-half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
=
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
..._
ANALYTICAL''•
MLIMDL,
_;
Cone..
"Units
Cone:
_h'
Number of
_
- METHOD
,•,'
'Samples°
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
1.75
Mg/I
0.91
Mg/I
90
350.1
0.02
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
41.7
Ug/I
27.2
Ug/I
216
4500CLG
0.470
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
8.5
Mg/I
7.4
Mg/I
216
550A
0
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
7.68
Mg/I
3.83
Mg/I
12
351.2
0.25
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
N
NITROGEN
A
OIL and GREASE
<5.0
Mg/I
<5.0
Mg/I
1
1664A
5.0
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
3.91
Mg/I
2.12
Mg/I
12
365.4
0.05
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
108
Mg/I
108
Mg/I
1
160.1
10.0
(TDS)
OTHER
END-OF PART B:,
REFER. TO THE _APPLICATIOR OVERVIEW- (,PAGE 1 )TO' DETERMINE WHICH. `OTHER .KARTS
OF _PORN! 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G:. 'CERTIFICATION' `
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
74LL,APPLICANTS;ffUStdOMPLETE-THE,FOLLQWIN6 CERTIFICAJION:,
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Michaell Bra dt Town Manager
Signature �A
Telephone number ( 336 1 427-0241
Date signed
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Ronoake
-SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION,
PART' D.. 'EXPANDED ,EFFLUENT'TESTING -DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 SEE ATTACHMENT III (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANTS
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHAliblEj
DAILYDISCHARGE.'
ANALYTICAL
METHOD'
-
"
:ML/M6'L '
bon'b.,'
. -
Units
Mass
'Units-
_
..Conc.
-
Units
Mass
-Units
Number
of
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Ronoake
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT..'
-
MAXIMUM'DAILY DISCHARGE •,
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE , '
_.
METHOD
MUMDL
Conic.
Units
Mass
Units
`Cont':
Units
Mass .,
Units
Number','QNALYTICAL
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Ronoake
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
=
MAXIMUMDAILY DISCHARGE
=
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE"
- -
ANALYTICdL
METHOD
-
` \MLIMDL `:
Conc.
UHits
_
Mass
lJriits
Corid.
Units
Mass
, 'Units °
" Number
of -' I
Samples
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID-EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DIN ITRO-O-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid-extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE-NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Ronoake
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
''.MAXIMUM
DAILY DISCHARGE
'
AVERAGE'DAILY,DISC,HARGE
- -
'ANALYTICAL -
METHOD
ML/MDL
-
Cond.
Units '
Mass
Urfits
' Conc.
` Units''
Mass•'
`. '
,Unit`s -,
'Number `'
_' of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2 -CHLORO -
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
DI -N -BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2 -DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3 -DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4 -DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-D IC H LORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2 -DIPHENYL -
HYDRAZINE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Outfall number: (Complete once for each ouffall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTTAIN
ML/MDL,
z
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
PROPYLAMINE
METHYLAMINE
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
NPOESFORM 2AAdditional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
-SUPP-LEMENTALAPPLICATION.IN- MAll 0N
RART,E.;jOXICITYTESTING DATA -
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12 -month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests. SEE ATTACHMENT IV
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. Test number: Test number:
a. Test information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24 -Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Ronoake
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow-through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LC5o
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Ronoake
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
ICzs
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results- (see instructions)
-END OF ,PART 8, - -
REFER TO_THE AP,PL1CATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINEWHICH'OTHER PART'
OF FORM 2AY0;U MUST,COMPLI=TE:
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non-categorical SIUs. 3
b. Number of CIUs. 0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Sans Tech
Mailing Address: PO Box 1437
Reidsville, NC 27323
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Melting and extruding nylon chip into fiber
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Spun nylon fiber
Raw material(s): NVlon 6, 6 chip, 10-12% mineral oil, heat transfer mediums
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
0.0256 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ® No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END•OF PART �F.-
REFER TO T48 --APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE.1) TO DETERMINE,WHICH OTHER.PARTS
OP FORM 2AYO.0 MU$T'C'OMPiLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
$U PP f 'Airlio
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved Pretreatment program?
C9 Yes [I No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
C. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 3
d. Number of ClUs. 0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Unifi 105
Mailing Address: PO Box 1437
Reidsville, NC 27323
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SI U's discharge.
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
Principal product(s): Textured and covered nylon fiber
Raw material(s): Nylon fiber, coning oil, light mineral oil
F.6. Flow Rate.
C. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
0.0885 gpd x continuous or intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Z Yes [I No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes Z No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDESFORM 2AAdditional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED -BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
FA 0. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
FA 1. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
C. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ® No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
d. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
iEND OFi�RART��F;� - -
REFER.;TO:'THE-AP,PL'ICATI'ON`OUERVIEW';'PAGE==1' TO,'•DETERMINE'WHI'CH'OTH'E'R;PARTS'
O:F PL'ETE'COM2A OU_._UM_s
. , M
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
SUPPLEMENTAL.APPLIGATION*,INFORMATION.
PART-F:INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES ANDJWkA/CERCLA WASTES.
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
E Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
e. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 3
f. Number of Cl Us. 0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Strum. Ruoer & Co
Mailing Address: 271 Cardwell Road
Mayodan, NC 27027
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacturing of fabrication of firearms from purchased steel.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Firearms
Raw material(s): Steel, aluminum, and synthetic parts.
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
0.0061 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Mayodan WWTP , NCO021873
Renewal
Ronoake
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
FA 0. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER: Mi
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to originate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
e. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ® No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
f. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
_ --
REFER, TO -THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE, 1) TO OETERMINE WHICH. OTH-ER PARTS
OF FORM •2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

Town of Mayodan
NPDES Permit NCO021873
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Town of Mayodan WWTP thickens sludge in one of two gravity thickeners and then it is
digested in an aerobic digester with the capacity of 0.4 MGD. The stabilized sludge is then land
applied either as a liquid directly from the digester or it may be dewatered on one of the 10 sand
drying beds and then land applied. The Land Application Permit (WQ0002672), permits a total of
197.6 acres.

ATTACHMENT I
TOPOGRAGPHIC MAP

ATTACHMENT II
SCHEMATIC AND BRIEF NARRITIVE

TOWN OF MAYODAN WWTP
Influent--------
InfluentInfluent Bar�uent
Splitt r from Unifi
Plant I
Pump
C!4-4.:--
Aeratio Basin Aeration Basin
1.25 M D Total 1.75 MGD ,
- Control �
Building �
Waste Sludge _ . _ .. _ _
Return Sludge-----------------------------------
Sludge loifge
Clarifier Pumping I 9adi-
0.143 M ding Clarifier Digestor
0.143 MG
--- 0 400 MG
Aeration Basin
1.5 MGD
CL
0
-----------•---------,-------------�
CD
-k - - - ui d n Clarifier Y0.40O
0.400 MG
_ Sludge Cl2 --------------------
Cl Thickener SO2
Chlorine
SO2 Waste Sludge Bldg '�------- __ •-------- -- ---•--•--•--•--•----- ------
Contact
#1
Chlorine
Chlorine Contact # 2
Contact # 3
Effluent Meter

The Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant is a 4.5 MGD design capacity facility. The
facility treats a combination of domestic, industrial, and commercial wastewaters. The current
treatment scheme includes a mechanical bar screen, grit removal system, activated sludge and
secondary clarification. The treated effluent is disinfected by chlorination followed by
dechlorination through the use of sulfur dioxide.

ATTACHMENT III
EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING

UNITED WATER
PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
November 19, 2014
ATTN: Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Sirs,
Enclosed is an amended PPA report for the Town of Mayodan WWTP (NPDES Permit No.
NC0021873) for September, 2014. The month and year were changed to September, 2014 instead
of June, 2013.
We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
T T__'i_1 tT T_1_ _
Director of Operations
GS/lm
cc: Mr. Michael Brandt
Mr. Jamie Whitten

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO021873 n '"
Outfall 001 ��;" a •. ;)>:�- 5�Y' +�
Facility Name Mayodan WWTP ORC Jamie Whitten
Date of sampling 09/09/14 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Environment One
Month September-
Year�12014:^•
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
350.1
0.02
0.17
mg/l
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
360.1
0
6.21
mg/l
1
Nitrate/ Nitrite
Composite
353.2
0.02
9
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.25
1.95
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
365.4
0.05
3.71
mg/1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
2540C
10
319
mg/l
1
Hardness
Composite
2340C
N/A
69
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
4500clg
0.012
<10
mg/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5
<5
mg/1
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
200.8
0.003
mg/l
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.001
mg/1
1
Cadmium
Composite
3113B
0.001
<0.001
mg/l
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.01
0.038
mg/l
1
Lead
Composite
3113B
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.2
0.0000325
mg/1
1
Nickel
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Selenium
Composite
3113B
0.002
<0.010
mg/1
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.001
mg/1
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.001
mg/l
1
Zinc
Composite
3113B
0.01
0.08
mg/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
4500 CNE
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
51OA/B
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
100
<100.00
ug/1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
50
<50
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
5
51.6
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
5
15.2
ug/1
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 1

Permit No. NCO021873
Outfall 001
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant SC
�� Month September
Year 2014
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Toluene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,2 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2 -chlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
2,4 -dimethylphenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/l
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Phenol
Grab
625
10
<2
ug/1
1
2,4,6 -trichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
100
<100
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
20
<20
ug/1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 2

Permit No. NC0021873
Outfall 001
. ,Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Spa
Month September
Year 2014
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Di -n -butyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,2 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,4 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Isophorone
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for ki
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 3

UNITED WATER
PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
November 19, 2014
ATTN: Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Sirs,
Enclosed is a PPA report for the Town of Mayodan WWTP (NPDES Permit No. NC0021873) for
September, 2014. This was not included with the DMR for September due to the sample results
not being received until November.
We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
United Water
Gary
GS/lm
cc: Mr. Michael Brandt
Mr. Jamie Whitten

`nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Ser-)
Permit No. NCO021873
Outfall 001
Facility Name Mayodan WWTP
Date of sampling 09/09/ 14
Analytical Laboratory Environment One
ORC Jamie Whitten
Phone [phone]
Month June
Year 2009
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
350.1
0.02
0.17
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
360.1
0
6.21
mg/l
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
353.2
0.02
9
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.25
1.95
mg/l
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
365.4
0.05
3.71
mg/1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
2540C
10
319
mg/l
1
Hardness
Composite
2340C
N/A
69
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
4500c1g
0.012
<10
mg/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5
<5
mg/1
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
200.8
0.003
mg/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.001
mg/1
1
Cadmium
Composite
3113B
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.01
0.038
mg/1
1
Lead
Composite
3113B
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.2
0.0000325
mg/1
1
Nickel
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/l
1
Selenium
Composite
3113B
0.002
<0.010
mg/l
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.001
mg/1
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.001
mg/1
1
Zinc
Composite
3113B
0.01
0.08
mg/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
4500 CN E
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
51OA/B
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
100
<100.00
ug/1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
50
<50
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
5
51.6
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
5
15.2
ug/1
1
1, 1 -dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 1

--Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Sc;m_ 1
Permit No. NC0021873
Outfall 001
Month June
Year 2009
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,2 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2 -chlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4 -dimethylphenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Phenol
Grab
625
10
<2
ug/1
1
2,4,6 -trichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
100
<100
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
20
<20
ug/1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 2

—�nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Sc, --
Permit No. NC0021873
Outfall 001
Month June
Year 2009
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Di -n -butyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,4 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Isophorone
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene I
Grab
625 1
10
<10
ug/l
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 3

nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Scr—)
Permit No. NCO021873
Outfall 001
Facility Name Mayodan WWTP
Date of sampling 09/10/14
Analytical Laboratory Environment One
ORC Jamie Whitten
Phone [phone]
Month June
Year 2009
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
350.1
0.02
mg/l
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
360.1
0
mg/l
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
353.2
0.02
mg/l
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.25
mg/l
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
365.4
0.05
mg/l
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
2540C
10
mg/l
1
Hardness
Composite
2340C
N/A
mg/l
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
4500c1g
0.012
mg/l
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5
mg/l
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
200.8
0.003
<0.003
mg/l
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
0.005
mg/l
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.001
<0.001
mg/l
1
Cadmium
Composite
3113B
0.001
mg/l
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.005
mg/l
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.01
mg/l
1
Lead
Composite
3113B
0.005
mg/l
1
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.2
mg/l
1
Nickel
Composite
200.7
0.01
mg/l
1
Selenium
Composite
3113B
0.002
mg/l
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.005
mg/l
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.001
<0.001
mg/l
1
Zinc
Composite
3113B
0.01
mg/l
1
Cyanide
Grab
4500 CN E
0.005
mg/l
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
51OA/B
0.005
mg/l
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
100
ug/1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
50
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
10
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 1

- %nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Sc,—)
Permit No. NC0021873
Outfall 001
Month June
Year 2009
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
ug/l
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
5
ug/l
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
10
ug/1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
5
ug/l
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
10
ug/1
1
1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
5
ug/l
1
Toluene
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
ug/l
1
1,1,2 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
ug/l
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
10
ug/l
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
2 -chlorophenol
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
2,4 -dimethylphenol
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
50
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
50
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
50
ug/1
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
625
50
ug/l
1
Phenol
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
2,4,6 -trichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
100
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
20
ug/l
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 2

—Nnnual Monitoring and Pollutant Sc'—)
Permit No. NC0021873
Outfall 001
Month June
Year 2009
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Di -n -butyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
1,2 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
1,4 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Isophorone
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
10
ug/1
1
Pyrene
Grab
625
10
ug/l
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene I
Grab 1
625 1
10
ug/l
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 3

�p�or�pppc��� T, be ppQaW
UNITED WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS ,NC 27012
ID#: 991
DATE COLLECTED: 09/09/14
DATE REPORTED : 10/28/14
VZZMlWN13 i�3'44F
Effluent
Analysis
Method
PARAMETERS
Date Analyst
Code
Ammonia Nitrogen as N, mg/l
0.17
09/11/14
ANO
350.1 R2-93
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N,mg/l
1.95
09/15/14
AKS
351.2 R2-93
Nitrate -Nitrite as N, mg/l
9.00
09/12/14
AKS
353.2 R2-93
Total Phosphorus as P, mg/l
3.71
09/15/14
ALB
365.4-74
Oil & Grease (HEM), mg/l
<5.0
09/11/14
SEJ
1664B
Phenol, ug/l
<5
09/26/14
SEJ
420.1-78
Total Cyanide, mg/l
<0.005
09/19/00
SEJ
450OCNE-99
Total Hardness, mg/l
69
09/11/14
TRB
2340C-97
Total Dissolved Residue, mg/l
319
09/11/14
KKF
2540C-97
ID#: 991
DATE COLLECTED: 09/09/14
DATE REPORTED : 10/28/14
VZZMlWN13 i�3'44F

C ��oQo� c��� % ��c��u ooQ��c�d
CLIENT: UNITED WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP) CLIENT ID: 991
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279 ANALYST: MAO
CLEMMONS, NC 27012 DATE COLLECTED: 09/09/14
DATE ANALYZED: 09/20/14
DATE REPORTED: 10/28/14
REVIEWED BY:
VOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 624
PARAMETERS, ug/l
Effluent
1.
Chloromethane
<10.00
2.
Vinyl Chloride
<10.00
3.
Bromomethane
< 10.00
4.
Chloroethane
< 10.00
5.
Trichlorofluoromethane
<5.00
6.
1,1-Dichloroethane
<5.00
7.
Methylene Chloride
< 10.00
8.
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
<5.00
9.
1,1-Dichloroethene
<5.00
10.
Chloroform
<5.00
11.
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
<5.00
12.
Carbon Tetrachloride
<5.00
13.
Benzene
<5.00
14.
1,2-Dichloroethane
<5.00
15.
Trichloroethene
<5.00
16.
1,2-Dichloropropane
<5.00
17.
Bromodichloromethane
<5.00
18.
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
<5.00
19.
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<5.00
20.
Toluene
<5.00
21.
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<5.00
22.
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
<5.00
23.
Tetrachloroethene
< 5.00
24.
Dibromochloromethane
15.20
25.
Chlorobenzene
<5.00
26.
Ethylbenzene
<5.00
27.
Bromoform
51.60
28.
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
<5.00
29.
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
30.
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
31.
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
32.
Acrolein
< 100.00
33.
Acrylonitrile
<50.00

Po�a��d
- �! .-Z---77_ ._ .. •;to ms's; "Sa h^,� r ."i.'rd... .. 3.
w r
RO. BOX 7085, 114+OAKMONT DRIVE
CLIENT: UNITED WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
REVIEWED BY:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
CLIENT ID: 991
756-6208
ANALYST: CHS
DATE COLLECTED: 09/09/14 Page: 1
DATE EXTRACTED: 09/16/14
DATE ANALYZED: 09/24/14
DATE REPORTED: 10/28/14
PARAMETERS, ug/I
Effluent
1.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10.00
2.
Phenol
< 10.00
3.
Bis (2 -Chloro ethyl) Ether
<10.00
4.
2 -Chlorophenol
< 10.00
S.
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
6.
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
7.
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
8.
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
<10.00
9.
Hexachloroethane
< 10.00
10.
N-Nitrosodi-N-Propylamine
<10.00
11.
Nitrobenzene
< 10.00
12.
Isophorone
< 10.00
13.
2-Nitrophenol
< 10.00
14.
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
< 10.00
15.
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane
<10.00
16.
2,4-Dichlorophenol
<10.00
17.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
< 10.00
18.
Naphthalene
< 10.00
19.
Hexachlorobutadiene
< 10.00
20.
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
<20.00
21.
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<10.00
22.
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
< 10.00
23.
2-Chloronaphthalene
< 10.00
24.
Acenaphthylene
< 10.00
25.
Dimethylphthalate
< 10.00
26.
2,6-Dinitrrotoulene
< 10.00
27.
Acenaphthene
< 10.00
28.
2,4-Dinitrophenol
< 50.00
29.
4-Nitrophenol
< 50.00
30.
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
< 10.00
31.
Fludrene
< 10.00
32.
DiethyIphthalate
< 10.00
33.
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
<10.00
34.
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
< 50.00
35.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10.00
36.
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
<10.00
37.
Hexachlorobenzene
< 10.00
38.
Pentachlorophenol
<50.00
39.
Phenanthrene
< 10.00
40.
Anthracene
< 10.00
41.
Di-N-Butylphthalate
< 10.00
42.
Fluoranthene
<10.00
43.
Benzidine
< 100.00
44.
Pyrene
<10.00
45.
Butylbenzylphthlate
<10.00
46.
Benzo[a]anthracene
<10.00
47.
3,3-Dichlorobenzadine
< 10.00
48.
Chrysene
<10.00

p
CLIENT: UNITED WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
REVIEWED BY:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
CLIENT ID: 991
ANALYST: CHS
DATE COLLECTED: 09/09/14
DATE EXTRACTED: 09/16/14
DATE ANALYZED: 09/24/14
DATE REPORTED: 10/28/14
Page: 2
PARAMETERS, ug/1
Effluent
49.
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
<20.00
50.
Di-N-Octylphthalate
<10.00
51.
Benzo[b]Ruoranthene
< 10.00
52.
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
<10.00
53.
Benzo[a]pyrene
<10.00
54.
Indeno(1,2,3-C,d)pyrene
< 10.00
55.
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
< 10.00
56.
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
<10.00
57.
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
< 10.00
Page: 2

Flooh[OH&M Flo kvo-)u I'mmUd
1
UNITED WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-LTM)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS ,NC 27012
Pt
ID#: 989
DATE COLLECTED: 09/10/14
DATE REPORTED : 10/08/14
REVIEWED BY:
Orr
2014
Effluent
Analysis
Method
PARAMETERS
Date
Analyst
Code
Total Cyanide, mg/1
<0.005
09/19/00
SEJ
450OCNE-99
Antimony, ug/l
<3.0
10/03/14
LFJ
EPA200.8
Arsenic, ug/l
<5.0
09/15/14
MEL
311313-04
Beryllium, ug/l
<1.0
09/17/14
LFJ
EPA200.7
Cadmium, ug/l
< 1.0
09/18/14
MEL
311313-04
Copper, ug/l
11
09/17/14
LFJ
EPA200.7
Total Chromium, ug/l
<5.0
09/17/14
LFJ
EPA200.7
Lead, ug/l
<5.0
09/17/14
MEL
311313-04
Molybdenum, ug/l
<10
09/17/14
LFJ
EPA200.7
Nickel, ug/l
<10
09/17/14
LFJ
EPA200.7
Selenium, ug/l
<10
09/16/14
MEL
311313-04
Silver, ug/l
< 1.0
09/17/14
LFJ
EPA200.7
Thallium, ug/l
< 1.0
10/03/14
LFJ
EPA200.8
Zinc, ug/l
72
09/17/14
MTM
311113-99
Pt
ID#: 989
DATE COLLECTED: 09/10/14
DATE REPORTED : 10/08/14
REVIEWED BY:
Orr
2014

--A� nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Sc--,,
Permit No. NCO021873
Outfall 001
Facility Name Mayodan WWTP ORC Jamie Whitten
12/8/2015 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Environment One
Month December
Year 2015
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
350.1
0.02
<0.04
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
360.1
0
8.06
mg/l
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
353.2
0.02
5.8
mg/l
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.25
0.93
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
365.4
0.05
0.59
mg/l
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
2540C
- 10
177
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
2340C
N/A
44
mg/l
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
4500c1g
0.012
34
mg/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5
<5
mg/l
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
200.8
0.003
<0.003
mg/l
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.001
<0.001
mg/l
1
Cadmium
Composite
3113B
0.001
0.002
mg/1
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Lead
Composite
3113B
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Mercury
Composite
1631
0.001
0.0023
mg/l
1
Nickel
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Selenium
Composite
3113B
0.002
<0.010
mg/1
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Zinc
Composite
3113B
0.01
0.046
mg/l
1
Cyanide
Grab
4500 CN E
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
51OA/B
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
100
<100.00
ug/1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
50
<50
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
5
5.8
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
5
15.2
ug/1
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 1

-` 4,nnual Monitoring and Pollutant Se--�
Permit No. NC0021873 Month December
Outfall 001 Year 2015
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,2 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2 -chlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4 -dimethylphenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Phenol
Grab
625
10
<2
ug/1
1
2,4,6 -trichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
100
<100
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
20
<20
ug/1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Sc - !Nn
Permit No. NC0021873 } Month December
Outfall 001 Year 2015
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Di -n -butyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ugll
1
1,4 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Isophorone
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1 1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 3

' x 4' � Y. n r T. •^ _ '� , a p3t,�.,�.aiy"I�� - + `
r �' •� '
'i.. � i "
4.%0.�'� � ' oil �
yi `!y�h H ,
h.
. 2f'! in.' . „j" a .. �
"� •,""j«?' ^, ,i»� , p< ''S'y •� -
_ __ '
2'f<
_
=� • ., �l�SY4. _
de � F+
!'m,'..
PARAMETERS
y:. 'e+')
,
"F?.O BOX 7,095 'i 14,OAkM_ ONT�DRIVE
_
_•`TraM41£
:P
GREEN'V1LL`E. N.C: 27835-7085
AKS
350.1 R2-93
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N,mg/1
0.93
12/14/15
RAJ
351.2 R2-93
SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS ,NC 27012
ID#: 991
DATE COLLECTED: 12/08/15
DATE REPORTED : 01/04/16
REVIEWED BY:
Effluent
Analysis
Method
PARAMETERS
Date
Analyst
Code
Ammonia Nitrogen as N, mg/1
<0.04
12/10/15
AKS
350.1 R2-93
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N,mg/1
0.93
12/14/15
RAJ
351.2 R2-93
Nitrate -Nitrite as N, mg/l
5.80
12/11/15
RAJ
353.2 R2-93
Total Phosphorus as P, mg/l
0.59
12/14/15
RND
365.4-74
Oil & Grease (HE", mg/l
<5
12/11/15
SEJ
1664B
Phenol, ug/l
<5
12/18/15
SEJ
420.1-78
Total Cyanide, mg/1
<0.005
12/11/15
SEJ
450OCNE-99
Total Hardness, mg/l
44
12/14/15
KKF
2340C-97
Total Dissolved Residue, mg/l
177
12/10/15
MLH
2540C-97
Antimony, ug/l
<3.0
12/22/15
LFJ
EPA200.8
Arsenic, ug/l
<5.0
12/22/15
MTM
3113B-04
Beryllium, ug/l
< 1.0
12/21/15
LFJ
EPA200.7
Cadmium, ug/l
2
12/21/15
MTM
3113B-04
Total Chromium, ug/l
<5.0
12/17/15
LFJ
EPA200.7
Copper, ug/l
<10
12/17/15
LFJ
EPA200.7
Lead, ug/1
<5.0
12/17/15
MTM
3113B-04
Nickel, ug/l
<10
12/17/15
LFJ
EPA200.7
Selenium, ug/1
<10
12/23/15
MTM
3113B-04
Silver, ug/l
<5.0
12/17/15
LFJ
EPA200.7
Thallium, ug/l
< 1.0
12/22/15
LFJ
EPA200.8
Zinc, ug/l
46
12/17/15
LFJ
EPA200.7
ID#: 991
DATE COLLECTED: 12/08/15
DATE REPORTED : 01/04/16
REVIEWED BY:

rawoblimW %
1• :+. +_ #Yf 1 ; h.�''j"'„, +i'` Y :#:� sa -,. .,: ,-y,:'t t..�o �` "N°'` :i ,f(•,r .� �rr^.e;T',`Y�r q
<��.� •S- arz• ��`*Niyu�x``e'.''W,�;e � � 54�t�T•.:an'� Y, '�`>'LF� . -. _ � ��4� `fr w:,r� c s. ..
P'0. BOX 7085, 1'14'OAKMONT DRIVE
[ GREEN IL 1_EEN.0. 2;, 5-7085
CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
REVIEWED BY:
VOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 624
CLIENT ID: 991
(252) 756-62a8, .I
ANALYST: MAO
DATE COLLECTED: 12/08/15
DATE ANALYZED: 12/11/15
DATE REPORTED: 01/04/16
PARAMETERS, ug/1
Effluent
1.
Chloromethane
< 10.00
2.
Vinyl Chloride
< 10.00
3.
Bromomethane
< 10.00
4.
Chloroethane
< 10.00
5.
Trichlorofluoromethane
<5.00
6.
1,1-Dichloroethane
<5.00
7.
Methylene Chloride
< 10.00
S.
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
<5.00
9.
1,1-Dichloroethene
<5.00
10.
Chloroform
<5.00
11.
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
<5.00
12.
Carbon Tetrachloride
<5.00
13.
Benzene
<5.00
14.
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 5.00
15.
Trichloroethene
<5.00
16.
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 5.00
17.
Bromodichloromethane
<5.00
18.
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
<5.00
19.
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<5.00
20.
Toluene
<5.00
21.
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
< 5.00
22.
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
<5.00
23.
Tetrachloroethene
< 5.00
24.
Dibromochloromethane
<5.00
25.
Chlorobenzene
< 5.00
26.
Ethylbenzene
<5.00
27.
Bromoform
5.80
28.
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
<5.00
29.
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
<5.00
30.
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
31.
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
32.
Acrolein
< 100.00
33.
Acrylonitrile
<50.00

'dpoT&
..;r°�. f� >'4''.�- r a'�?�` s;.i � -- �.�«��,�,�,_.ai�>i�`;: .�=�,'��. T��ts�'�`4- `"i .n „��.v'� -i��;. •cE i-�'` 'tom
��_' `+'�_"+d- _ }n- 6�.s '7_� --� 3•xzi „�3. `y't. .. t' -5 ,G _•i- ^_ - ��. -�R�f. exp v�1•LX
-
-
�'�
CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP) CLIENT ID: 991
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279 ANALYST: CHS
CLEMMONS, NC 27012 DATE COLLECTED: 12/08/15
DATE EXTRACTED: 12/14/15
DATE ANALYZED: 12/22/15
REVIEWED BY: DATE REPORTED: 01/04/16
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
Page: 1
PARAMETERS, ug/1
Effluent
1.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
< 10.00
2.
Phenol
< 10.00
3.
Bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
<10.00
4.
2 -Chlorophenol
< 10.00
5.
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
6.
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
7.
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
8.
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
<10.00
9.
Hexachloroethane
< 10.00
10.
N-Nitrosodi-N-Propylamine
< 10.00
11.
Nitrobenzene
< 10.00
12.
Isophorone
< 10.00
13.
2-Nitrophenol
< 10.00
14.
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
< 10.00
15.
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane
<10.00
16.
2,4-Dichlorophenol
< 10.00
17.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
< 10.00
18.
Naphthalene
<10.00
19.
Hexachlorobutadiene
< 10.00
20.
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
< 20.00
21.
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
< 10.00
22.
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
< 10.00
23.
2-Chloronaphthalene
< 10.00
24.
Acenaphthylene
<10.00
25.
Dimethylphthalate
< 10.00
26.
2,6-Dinitrotoulene
< 10.00
27.
Acenaphthene
< 10.00
28.
2,4-Dinitrophenol
< 50.00
29.
4-Nitrophenol
< 50.00
30.
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
< 10.00
31.
Fluorene
< 10.00
32.
Diethylphthalate
< 10.00
33.
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
< 10.00
34.
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
< 50.00
35-
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
< 10.00
36.
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
< 10.00
37.
Hexachlorobenzene
< 10.00
38.
Pentachlorophenol
<50.00
39.
Phenanthrene
< 10.00
40.
Anthracene
< 10.00
41.
Di-N-Butylphthalate
< 10.00
42.
Fluoranthene
< 10.00
43.
Benzidine
< 100.00
44.
Pyrene
< 10.00
45.
ButylbenzylphtWate
< 10.00
46.
Benzo[a]anthracene
<10.00
47.
3,3-Dichlorobenzadine
< 10.00
48.
Chrysene
< 10.00
Page: 1

% hgDpwaNd
CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
REVIEWED BY:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
CLIENT ID: 991
ANALYST: CHS
DATE COLLECTED: 12/08/15 Page: 2
DATE EXTRACTED: 12/14/15
DATE ANALYZED: 12/22/15
DATE REPORTED: 01/04/16
PARAMETERS, ug/l
Effluent
49.
D-iakfng Aet�s SD: 3'/71'S�
Gr':4
'a'',.=
a'*.'{ "r.. ^'�`•s 'i"'. _ i" _y-�€„�4!" :�° �; .�"y .I�,-
_ _.��� r:=� - ;�. ��,,., ''mss, .y�'.'uk,f c •_F- e. ±{.
{` �„, �`';�,f..i=,: -f,...
_r.>�; ;., ;: „., ,u:.: _s���`
a"5-, �_ ; ,.r _ rt-..
' '�3
��:5�='. `�..�_
��
.�' - - ."'ria - - D7
':�._'�..�y _ --;x•', ���'4 ;�>,•.. `,vr,� MaB tevht„e=�s�'Z X20 • '�
''-t`�' t4:; <a.i-.���-..�'�";'�C�:�,., `�Y
� Yx.,� N 3F' . _ �,. . _ - � �, P',: ,•^.�
-t
�.,�.• _
- � _
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
1.14 <-
35, OAKNtONTDRIVE
53.
Benzo[a]pyrene
�...
'PH2
LMENVBOX'70
ILLE,&C. 27835=7085' r _'; �
� �__
_'
__. FA-X_(252j"_756=063 ==.
CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
REVIEWED BY:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
CLIENT ID: 991
ANALYST: CHS
DATE COLLECTED: 12/08/15 Page: 2
DATE EXTRACTED: 12/14/15
DATE ANALYZED: 12/22/15
DATE REPORTED: 01/04/16
PARAMETERS, ug/l
Effluent
49.
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
<20.00
50.
Di-N-Octylphthalate
< 10.00
51.
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
< 10.00
52.
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
< 10.00
53.
Benzo[a]pyrene
<10.00
54.
Indeno(1,2,3-C,d)pyrene
< 10.00
55.
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
< 10.00
56.
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
<10.00
57.
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
< 10.00

P
s U v 2 PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
June 28, 2016
ATTN: Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Sirs,
Enclosed is an amended Monthly Monitoring Report for the Town of Mayodan WWTP (NPDES
Permit No. NC0021873) for March 2016. The report is being amended to include the Priority
Pollutant Analysis. This data was not received when the report was mailed.
We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
GS/lm
cc: Mr. Michael Brandt
Mr. Jamie Whitten

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. NCO021873 `Ij
Outfall 001
Facility Name Mayodan WWTP ORC Jamie Whitten
3/15/2016 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Environment One
Month March
Year 2016
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
350.1
0.02
0.32
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
360.1
0
7.08
mg/l
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
353.2
0.02
0.1
mg/l
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.25
1.8
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
365.4
0.05
2.56
mg/l
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
2540C
10
206
mg/l
1
Hardness
Composite
2340C
N/A
57
mg/l
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
4500c1g
0.012
41
mg/l
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5
<5
mg/1
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
200.8
0.003
<0.003
mg/l
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.001
<0.001
mg/l
1
Cadmium
Composite
3113B
0.001
<0.001
mg/l
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Lead
Composite
3113B
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Mercury
Composite
1631
0.001
0.0035
mg/l
1
Nickel
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/l
1
Selenium
Composite
3113B
0.002
<0.010
mg/l
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Zinc
Composite
3113B
0.01
0.065
mg/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
4500 CN E
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
51OA/B
0.005
<0.005
mg/l
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
100
<100.00
ug/1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
50
<50
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
5
5.8
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
10
<10
Ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
5
5.1
ug/1
1
1, 1 -dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
j 624 j
5 j
<5
1 ug/1 I1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 1

.—Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Sca_ 1
Permit No. NC0021873
Outfall 001
Month March
Year 2016
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1, 1 -dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/l
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,2 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624 J
5
<5
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2 -chlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4 -dimethylphenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Phenol
Grab
625
10
<2
ug/1
1
2,4,6 -trichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
100
<100
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
20
<20
ug/1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 2

-,.Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Sce-n
Permit No. NCO021873 i
Outfall 001
Month March
Year 2016
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Di -n -butyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,4 -dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Isophorone
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA -1 Page 3

rwcIT00 DI R(W- T, halU
SUEZ WATER (KAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS ,NC 27012
ID#: 991
DATE COLLECTED: 03/15/16
DATE REPORTED : 04/28/16
REVIEWED BY:
Effluent
Analysis
Method
PARAMETERS
Date
Analyst
Code
Ammonia Nitrogen as N, mg/l
0.32
03/17/16
RAJ
350.1 R2-93
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N,mg/1
1.80
03/21/16
MF
351.2 R2-93
Nitrate -Nitrite as N, mg/l
0.10
03/18/16
AKS
353.2 R2-93
Total Phosphorus as P, mg/1
2.56
03/21/16
RAJ
365.4-74
Oil & Grease (BE", mg/1
<5
03/19/16
SEJ
1664B
Phenol, ug/l
<5
03/28/16
SEJ
420.1-78
Total Cyanide, mg/1
<0.005
03/22/16
SEJ
4500CNE-99
Total Hardness, mg/1
57
03/21/16
CMC
2340C-97
Total Dissolved Residue, mg/1
206
03/17/16
MCS
2540C-97
Antimony, ug/l
<3.0
04/05/16
LFJ
EPA200.8
Arsenic, ug/l
<5.0
04/07/16
MTM
311313-04
Beryllium, ug/1
< 1.0
04/01/16
LFJ
EPA200.7
Cadmium, ug/l
<1.0
04/06/16
MTM
311313-04
Total Chromium, ug/1
< 5.0
04/01/16
LFJ
EPA200.7
Copper, ug/l
<10
04/01/16
LFJ
EPA200.7
Lead, ug/l
<5.0
03/28/16
MTM
311313-04
Nickel, ug/1
<10
04/01/16
LFJ
EPA200.7
Selenium, ug/l
<10
03/31/16
MTiVI
311313-04
Suver, ug/l
<5.0
04/01/16
LFJ
EPA200.7
Thallium, ug/1
< 1.0
04/05/16
LFJ
EPA200.8
Zinc, ug/l
65
04/01/16
LFJ
EPA200.7
ID#: 991
DATE COLLECTED: 03/15/16
DATE REPORTED : 04/28/16
REVIEWED BY:

J;
ERwFT(1Rm0 11, hcco)�Ned
31UE` _ 'PF
CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP) CLIENT ID: 991
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279 ANALYST: MAO
CLEMMONS, NC 27012 DATE COLLECTED: 03/15/16
DATE ANALYZED: 03/29/16
DATE REPORTED: 04/28/16
REVIEWED BY:
00, VOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 624
PARAMETERS, ug/1
Effluent
1.
Chloromethane
< 10.00
2.
Vinyl Chloride
< 10.00
3.
Bromomethane
< 10.00
4.
Chloroethane
< 10.00
5.
Trichlorofluoromethane
<5.00
6.
1,1-Dichloroethene
< 5.00
7.
Methylene Chloride
< 10.00
S.
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
<5.00
9.
1,1-Dichloroethene
< 5.00
10.
Chloroform
<5.00
11.
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
<5.00
12.
Carbon Tetrachloride
<5.00
13.
Benzene
<5.00
14.
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 5.00
15.
Trichloroethene
<5.00
16.
1,2-Dichloropropane
<5.00
17.
Bromodichloromethane
<5.00
18.
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
<5.00
19.
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<5.00
20.
Toluene
<5.00
21.
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
< 5.00
22.
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
<5.00
23.
Tetrachloroethene
< 5.00
24.
Dibromochloromethane
5.10
25.
Chlorobenzene
<5.00
26.
Ethylbenzene
< 5.00
27.
Bromoform
7.40
28.
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
<5.00
29.
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
30.
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
31.
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
< 5.00
32.
Acrolein
< 100.00
33.
Acrylonitrile
<50.00

`1
CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
i
REVIEWED BY:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
CLIENT ID: 991
ANALYST: CHS
DATE COLLECTED: 03/15/16 Page: 1
DATE EXTRACTED: 03/17/16
DATE ANALYZED: 04/24/16
DATE REPORTED: 04/28/16
PARAMETERS, ug/l
Effluent
1.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
< 10.00
2.
Phenol
< 10.00
3.
Bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether
<10.00
4.
2 -Chlorophenol
< 10.00
5.
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
6.
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
7.
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
< 10.00
8.
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
< 10.00
9.
Hexachloroethane
< 10.00
10.
N-Nitrosodi-N-Propylamine
< 10.00
11.
Nitrobenzene
< 10.00
12.
Isophorone
< 10.00
13.
2-Nitrophenol
< 10.00
14.
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
< 10.00
15.
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane
< 10.00
16.
2,4-DicWorophenol
< 10.00
17.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
< 10.00
18.
Naphthalene
< 10.00
19.
Hexachlorobutadiene
< 10.00
20.
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
<20.00
21.
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
< 10.00
22.
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
< 10.00
23.
2-Chloronaphthalene
< 10.00
24.
Acenaphthylene
<10.00
25.
Dimethylphthalate
<10.00
26.
2,6-Dinitrotoulene
< 10.00
27.
Acenaphthene
<: 0.00
28.
2,4-Dinitrophenol
<50.00
29.
4-Nitrophenol
< 50.00
30.
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
< 10.00
31.
Fluorene
< 10.00
32.
Diethylphthalate
< 10.00
33.
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
< 10.00
34.
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
< 50.00
35.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
< 10.00
36.
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
< 10.00
37.
Hexachlorobenzene
< 10.00
38.
Pentachlorophenol
<50.00
39.
Phenanthrene
<10.00
40.
Anthracene
< 10.00
41.
Di-N-Butylphthalate
< 10.00
42.
Fluoranthene
< 10.00
43.
Benzidine
< 100.00
44.
Pyrene
< 10.00
45.
Butylbenzylphthlate
< 10.00
46.
Benzo(a]anthracene
< 10.00
47.
3,3-Dichlorobenzadine
< 10.00
48.
Chrysene
< 10.00

CLIENT: SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-PP)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
REVIEWED BY:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 625
CLIENT ID: 991
ANALYST: CHS
DATE COLLECTED: 03/15/16 Page: 2
DATE EXTRACTED: 03/17/16
DATE ANALYZED: 04/24/16
DATE REPORTED: 04/28/16
PARAMETERS, ug/l
Effluent
49.
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
<20.00
50.
Di-N-Octylphthalate
< 10.00
51.
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
< 10.00
52.
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
< 10.00
53.
Benzo[a]pyrene
< 10.00
54.
Indeno(1,2,3-C,d)pyrene
< 10.00
55.
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
< 10.00
56.
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
<10.00
57.
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
< 10.00

ATTACHMENT IV
TOXICITY TESTING

�t� - :f,
''
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicitv Resort Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: March 30, 2012
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing of -ons, ni Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 7785
Samples- 120314.10, 120316.09
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 1 03-14-12 1 03-21-12 1 1324 0820
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg(L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (eC):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
03-12-12
03-14-12 =n"'
Ro,c l2
5.0%
5.0%
24-h
24-h
Control
Control
33
-
Z14
40
352
341
154.154, 159
2.000
1.09
7.53
5.7
5.8
{
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg(L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
R-0
R.,c,,.l2
Start
Reneaal l
Ro,c l2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.50
7.57
7.64
753
7.62
7.71
7.64
7.65
7.63
7.53
7.64
7.57
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.6
7.8
25.2
24.9
24.9
24.7
24.6
E24.624.9
24.9
24.8
25.1
24.9
.7
Organism Number
2 d S F 7 R 9 10 11 12 m,eaa
Number of Young Produced 128127
10
32 35
128127
130
29
128
129 131
29
31
27
28 7
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Effluent Percentage a.o°/
- -.---- --_°-- 1 1) 2 n r r, 7 R 9 10 11 17
Number of Young Produced 129
10
32 35
29
32
36
29
29 29
32 29
1 29.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead I L
D
L L
LI
L
L
L
L L
L L
a -2.0
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 3 Organisms 1 Z 3 4 J 6 i a Y 1l1 11 1a Mean
(umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 S 4 5 o i a 7 1v 11
lumber of Young Produced
tdult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 1c mean
[umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Reductic
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 b / u 9 1U L1 1L Mean
dumber of Young Produced
idult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Reductic
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
nwn fnrr„ AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV.
5.0
48 Hour Mortality
No
Control:
0 of
12
IWC:
0 of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No cont.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Wilcoxon Two
Normal Distribution:
No
Method:
Shapiro-Wtlk's
Statistic:
0.637
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
No
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
20.835
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Wilcoxon Two Sample
Effluent % Rank Stun Critical Sum
5.0%
183.0 109.0

' PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
f, Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
„r Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: June 29, 2012
' Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
W` Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Test S lution In . ' Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: r �r9At. Project: 8074
Samples: 120613.04, 120615.04
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date. End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 06-13-12 1 06-20-12 1437 0744
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
WE =11
Rme l
Renmal2
Start
Rc-1I
Reneml2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.68
7.67
7.79
7.69
7.74
7.66
r I
I r
7.55
7.62
7.78
7.31
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L),
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
Rme l
Renmal2
Start
Rc-1I
Reneml2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.68
7.67
7.79
7.69
7.74
7.66
7.68
7.80
7.55
7.62
7.78
7.31
7.9
8.1
8.0
7.8
8.0
7.8
8.1
7.8
8.1
8.0
78
8.0
25.2
25.0
25.0
24.8
24.8
24.7
25.1
25.0
1 24.9
25.1
24.9
24.8
Organism Number
7 z d 5 F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
_..
. 11 ---
NumberofYoun Produced 33
Number
-
31
30
29
33
28
30
30
29
30
31
30
30.3
Adult Survival: Wive, (D)ead L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage s.o%
'2 n c 4 7 9. Q 10 11 12 mean
Number of Young Produced
134
31 F29 136
36
134
37
33 37
35
31 33 33.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
L I L I L
L
L
L
L L
L
L L1 -11.5
RM --
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 o r a 7 r v Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 b / a 9 iv it
lumber of YounE Produced
Ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reductio
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 o / a Y lv
lumber of Young'
kdult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Reductit
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 o i a 7 1v 1L r� aacaa
lumber of Young Produced
Ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reductit
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.9
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control: 1 0 of
12
IWC: 0 of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wilks
Statistic:
0.959
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic.
2.905
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

'W Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: September 24, 2012
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 09-12-12 09-19-12 1442 0746
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg(L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/I.):
Final DO (mg(L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
�QR,
1 Rencwal2
Start
RenevalIr7.84
al
��
5.0%
to �•:r
Control
Control
k
7.49
7.46
7.71
7.81
7.837.67
L
LI
7.71
7.67
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/I.):
Final DO (mg(L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
Renavall
1 Rencwal2
Start
RenevalIr7.84
al
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
30
7.49
7.46
7.71
7.81
7.837.67
L
LI
7.71
7.67
7.60
7.69
I L
7.9
8.0
7.7
7.8
8.0
78
7.9
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.7U7.824.9
25.0
25.1
24.9
24.824.9
249
25.0
24.9
24.9
Organism Number
t r z d S h 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
1 [1Number of YoungProduced
30
26
28
27
26
29
28
30 28
26
29
30
28 j
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D}ead
L
L
L
L
LI
L
L
L I L
I L
I L
I L
Effluent Percentage a.o%
, 11 1 n c 4 '7 u o 1 n 11 17 Min
Number ofYoun Produced
36
31
34
30
35
32 1 30
35
32
135
136 134
1 33.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
I L
I L
I L
L I L
I L
I L
I L
L L
-18.7
R.ir,nn
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment Organisms 1 2 3 4 --) b / a V iv 11 11- Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 G 5 4 D o i o 7 IV 11
Number of Youn Produced
Adult Survival: Rive, (D)ead
% Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
„ ,"
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 D o / a 7 iv 11 iL Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
„ ,n
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4j o / a y iv 11 iL Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Rrducean
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.6
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control: 0
°f
12
IWC: 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.928
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
2.031
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

7L�
° Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: December 28, 2012
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing of tions, I c. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 8586
Samples: 121205.19, 121207.18
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: I End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 12-05-12 12-12-12 1458 0900
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3).
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample
Sample2
Control
12-03-12
12-05-12 1_i_ �s7
Rm-sl2
5.0%
5.0%
24-h
24-h
?3
�.'- , t
Control
7.54
31,34
`r�.- 4•",
42,40
413
401
154,151,148
0.299
0.210
7.44
5.4
4.031
- 1
n sib
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
R. -I 1
Renmaal2
Stan
Re -1I
Rm-sl2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.54
7.37
7.71
7.76
7.71
7.77
7.58
7.69
7.63
7.44
7.67
7.63
7.8
8.3
8.1
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.9
8.2
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.8
24.9
24.8
24.8
24.7
24.8
25.0
24.8
25.0
25.1
24.8
24.8
24.9
Organism Number
A- 5 F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced 130 132
134
130
31130
131
29
130
129 130 131
30.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead L I L
I L
I L
L I L
I L
Lj
L
I L I L I L
No
Effluent Percentage 5.0%
t 7 z A S F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
34
37
30 33
30
33 33
132 32 30 33 29
32.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L L
L
L L
I L I L I L I L I L
o -5.2
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 J b 7 d y 1v 11 1/- Mean
lumber of Young Produced
ldult Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
Reducnc
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / S 9 1u 11 1c Mean
[umber of Young Produced
,dult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Rexiucnc
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / b 9 IV ii 1/- Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Raduc4c
Percentage=
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 7 b / a y 1v ii 1L Mean
lumber of Young Produced
ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead EffluentFFFFI 1 1 1
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEL: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV.
4.5
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control: 0
of
12
IWC: 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cont.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastict
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wilks
Statistic:
0 945
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
2.566
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

j
! =.,mss. �.�. ".�S�,-rlt
l•� -
PO Box 7565
fl -D-3- Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: April 01, 2013
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testi o ution , Ill . Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 8836
Samples: 130320.01, 130322.01
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 03-20-13 03-27-13 1004 T 0810
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L. CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/Q:
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Test Information
Treatment*
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
I Renewal)
1 R.-al2 1
start
R=mval l
I R.-al2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.74
7.71
7.85
7.70
7.80
7.86
7.79
7.87
7.66
7.79
7.95
7.66
8.2
7.8
8.0
8 1
7.7
7.8
8.1
80
7.9
7.7
7.8
7.7
25.0
24.7
25.1
24.8
25.0
24.8
25.1
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.8
24.8
Organism Number
c -, Q o 1f) 11 17 Mean
Uontroi organisms
Number of Young Produced
31
32
29
34
30
-
33
31
31
31 30
30
30
31.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
Effluent Percentage s.o
il c � Q a in 11 17 nrPn�
Treatment) Vr amsms
Number of Young ProducedHL
1
I
28 30
- -
27 28
-
30
29
-
31
29
27
28
31
29.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
12
IWC:
0
'of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cont.
Critical Value:
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
t 1 i A 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
reatment a vrgau,surs -
lumber of Youn Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead I % Redacn<
Effluent Percentage
to 11 12 Mtn
reatment 4 Organisms 1 j 4 --
lumber of Youn Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
=R4-
% Raluc[it
Effluent Percentage
1n 11 t7 Mc,n
Treatments Vr antsms
3
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.6
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
Number of Young Produced
of
12
IWC:
0
'of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cont.
Critical Value:
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%
% Reducuon
Effluent Percentage
10 11 t 2 Mc,n
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 L ' ' --
lumber of YounE Produced
idult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead % Reduce(
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5•0% NOEC:'
5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.6
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
'of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cont.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
HomoscedasticI
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Willes
Statistic:
0.929
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances.
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.000
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

j
AV
J Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aauatic Toxicitv Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: June 28, 2013
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC -.0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing 564ions, tn4 Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: tProject: 9059
Samples: 130619.22, 130621.02
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time -
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 06-19-13 06-26-13 1014 0741
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1 Sample 2
Control
06-17-13 06-19-13
Start
c
� ^r
24-h 24-h.
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
1005
40,40
323
152,151,157
E;
0.411
7.74
5.7
= ""
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (Sin:
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
Control nrQanisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcv
Start
RenewalI
Renewal2
Start
Rmne 11
Rene 12
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.73
7.72
7.74
7.65
7.63
7.85
7.74
7.83
7.79
7.67
7.81
7.57
8.0
7.9
7.7
8.0
7.8
7.7
8.1
7.7
7.9
8.0
7.8
7.8
25.2
25.3
25.2
24.6
24.8
24.7
24.9
24.9
24.9
24.7
24.7
24.9
Number of Young Produced
129
131133
35
131
1 30
130
130
133
129
131130
I L
132130.8
L
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Critical Stun
Effluent Percentage 5.0
*7 n. -..-k- 1 7 3 4 5 F 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
135
32
35
35 130
34
35
33 36
30
35 34 33.7
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
L
L
L' L
L
L
L L
L
L L -9.5
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
dumber of Young Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive (D)ead _
%ReLaic
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 4 Or anisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1U 11 U Mean
dumber of Young Produced
ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 S 6 / zs y lU 11 IL M=
[umber of Young Produced
,dult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Redmuc
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 6 Or anisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / 1S V 1u 11 IL M_
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
ReducGc
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEL: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.4
48 Hour Mortality
Yes
Control:
0 of
12
IWC:
0 of
12
Sigmficant7:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
ReproductionLOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEL:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shap'vo-Witk's
Statistic:
0.924
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
2.206
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Stun
5.0%

v
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicitv Report Form - Phase II Chronic CeriodaphKia dubia
1;
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC, --28802
Phone: (82--g),3,50-0364
Fax: [phone]
Date: October 09, 2013
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing of s, c Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Project: 9281
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: yR
Samples. 130925.01, 130927.01
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center IStart date:E0-02-1: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 69-25-13 l0-02-13 Io25 o7zo
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample)
Sample2
Control
09-23-13
09-25-13
Renewal2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
24-h
24-h
'1
7.51
33,32
7.58
40,42
T
380
160,157,152
7.76
1.236
8.3
8.2
5.3
t:
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L)•
Final DO (mg(L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (eC):
Start
RenewalI
Renewal
Start
RenewalI
Renewal2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.48
7.49
7.63
7.51
7.56
7.58
7.59
7.73
7.66
7.53
7.76
7.66
8.3
8.2
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.1
7.9
8.2
24.9
25.2
25.2
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.7
EEI
24.7
organism Number
I A 5 6 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced 131
29
30
33
33 132
132
131133
134
32
31
1 34
31.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive,(D)eadl L
L
L
L
L L
L
I L
I L
L
L
I L
1 0.3
Effluent Percentage 5.0%
1 7 1 d. S r 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
31
1 28
133
1 34
30
134
134
130 32
30 31133
Control:
1 31.7
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I L I L
L L
I L
1 0.3
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 3 Organisms 1 G S 4 5 o i o 7 l v 11 .�
(umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive Mead
Re4uctl(
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 o a 7 1v 11 1� Nina
lumber of YoungProduced
Ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
%Reductio
Effluent Percentage=
-
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 s 4 o r o 3, 1v 11 lc
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)iv,, (D)ead
% Rrd.ak
Effluent Percentage=
_ n n In 11 17
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 o i o 7 1v 11 .�
[umber of YoungProduced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reductio
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.5
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
1 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.945
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.918
Critical Value:
5 320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method -
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
f'
{ Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
( PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: December 27, 2013
Facility: United Water Hydromanagement NPDES #: NC- 0029572 Pipe #: 001 County: Pitt
Farmville WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testin t tions, Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 9457
Samples: 131204.12, I31206.18
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Starttime: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 12-04-13 12-11-13 1515 0857
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaC%):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt CC):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. CC):
Final Temp. CC):
S.,
R=ulI
Rencwal2
Stan
11--lI
R-1
30 31
9o%
90%
Control
Control
Control
L
7.40
7.45
7.71
7.71
7.58
L
7.38
7.52
7.53
7.62
7.58
L24.6
8.3
8.3
8.0
8.0
7.9
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.1
8.2
25.1
25.0
2418
24.7
25.0
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.9
25.2
Organism Number
2 d S A 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of YounE Produced
3029
37
31
31
30 30 31
30 31
28129132130.2
38
E34
136
Adult Survival: (L ive, (D ead
L
L
L
L
L L L
L L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage 90
----n n -.-.._a., r 7 Z d 5 A 7 R 9 10 11 12 duan
Number of Youni
ReproductionLOEC:
37
34 33
31
37
31
35
38
E34
136
1331
34.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
L
L L
.L
L
L
L
L
I L
I L
1 L
1O p13.5 ^
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 j 4 o 0 / is Y IV 11 ra mm
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D ead
Rcduclion
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mran
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
R iuctic¢
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcan
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Roduaion
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mea
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: L ive, Dead
Rcducti¢n
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV: >90%
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev.11195
Chronic Test Results
ReproductionLOEC:
Final Control Mortality No):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
3.7
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No concentration
Reproduction Analyses
ReproductionLOEC:
>90%
Reproduction NOEC:
90%
Overall Method:
HomosmdastioT
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wink's
Statistic:
0.970
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
4.555
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent% Rank Sum
Critical Sum
90%

I �
GE
Environmental Testing Solutlons,Inc.
Efi'^-^+ "^••.+o.. T.,vipifw 12annrt lPnrm _ Phace ii Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
t
4 PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: January 06, 2014
Facility: United WaterHydroManagement NPDES #: NC -0021873 Pipe#: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testin o tions Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 9491
Samples: 131211.07,131213.06
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date; Starttime: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 12-11-13 12-18-13 1305 0744
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grob:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg1L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L C8CO3):
Conductivity (µmhoslem):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
S.,t
30
R...12
Start
Rcnml lr
31 30 30
5.0%
28
5.0%
Control
Control
Adult Survival: (L)ive, D)ead
7.61
r7.62
7.80
7.45
7.557.66
L
L
L
7.66
7.67
7.808.0
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
..
8.1
7.6
7.6
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
24.9
25.0P24.8
24.7
25.0
25.0
9
24.8
24.9
24.9
24.8
Organism Number
n a 'A a F 7 R 9 If) 11 12 M-
Number of Young Produced
30
35
135130
%Control with 3rd Broods:
31 30 30
29
28
29
32 28
30.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, D)ead
L
L
L
L
L L L
L
L
L
L L
Critical Value:
Effluent Percentage S.o%
e 4 7 u o In 11 17 Mean
Number of Youn Produced
33
32 33
3133
%Control with 3rd Broods:
-
33 31
34 30 29 28
33 31.7
Adult Survival: ive, D ead
I L
I L L
L
I L
I L I L
L L L L
I L -3.5
%RM.dmn
Effluent Percentage=
„ ,n
'reatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 D 0 i a 7 ry IL ,- m
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: Wive (D)md L-LEEE
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / 8 y l u r a 14 m -
[umber of YoungProduced
Ault Survival: Wive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
reatment 5 Or anisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 nt as
[umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: L ive, D jad
% Red°°tip
Effluent Percentage
'reatment 6 Or anisms -1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 m=
lumber of YoungProduced
adult Survival: ive, D ead
Raluca
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQformA?-3 (8191) Rev.11195
Chronic Test Results
ReproductionLOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Repmduction'CV:
7.7
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0 of
12
IWC:
o of
12
Significant7:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: Noconc.
Reproduction Analyses
ReproductionLOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shap'vo-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.949
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.575
Critical Value:
5320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc_
-jn
-Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Renort Form - Phase H Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: June 27, 2014
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Test' So tion , Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 9903
Samples. 140611.04, 140613.05
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 06-11-14 1 06-18-14 1330 0830
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration -
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
06-09-14
06-11-14 P,
R..I 2
5.0%
5.0%
24-h
24-h
_
' +
*` , _
34
40
387
398
152, 155, 160
0.627
1.000
!
0.5
1.3
7.65
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp (°C):
Start
R. -al I
R..e al
Start
R=wal I
R..I 2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.61
7.79
7.59
7.70
7.66
7.47
7.76
7.58
7.58
7.65
7.61
7.53
7.9
8.2
8.0
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.8
8.0
8.1
7.7
7.7
7.6
24.9
25.2
25.0
24.7
25.1
24.8
25.0
25.0
25.0
24.8
25.0
25.1
Organism Number
R d S F 7 R 9 10 11 12
Number of Young Produced
31
32
32
33
32
31
31 32
30
29
29
33
31.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
L
L
L
L
I L
I L I L
LL
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage 5.0%
t z a S F 7 R 9 10 11 12 m -
Number of Young Produced
130 31
30
35
29
30
30
L134
32
33
3331.6
of
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L L
L
L
I L
I L
I L
L
I L L
L
L
o -1 1^
Effluent Percentage
_ - ,n 11 11
reatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 0 0 / o 7 ,v I,
(umber of Young Produced
dult Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
"/o Keauctic
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 L 3 4 0 0 / a 7 IV 11 r� Mia
lumber of Young Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 J 0 / 0 7 iv It is mcm
(umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reducdc
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 G 3 4 0 0 / 0 7 ry r r ,I illi-
lumber of Young Produced I I +
ldult Survival: (L)ive, (Wead I I I f±
Reductio
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQformAT--3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.3
48 Hour Mortality
Yes
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastict
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Will's
Statistic:
0.963
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances.
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.922
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

7F10-'
lip
'' Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase I1 Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
FU tsox /DOD
Asheville, NC 28802
>, Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: September 24, 2014
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC -0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing do, c: Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 10105
Samples: 140910.06, 140912.06
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 09-10-14 09-17-14 1350 0827
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3)*
Hardness (mg/I. CaCO3).
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (OC):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
09-08-14
09-10-14
R-al2
5.0%
5.0%
•
24-h
24-h
&W-
7.52
7.63
34,34
7.46
jjjM
38,40
440
414
155, 157, 156
1.146
2.212
7.54
1.7
1 05
1 7.9
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU),
Initial DO (mg(L):
Final DO (mg(L):
Initial Temp. (nC):
Final Temp. (nC):
Start
RennralI
Ren -12
Start
ReaewnlI
R-al2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.52
7.63
7.63
7.46
7.57
7.62
7.65
7.66
7.58
7.86
7.66
7.54
7.9
80
1 7.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
8.0
7.9
7.6
80
8.0
7.6
25.1
25.0
24.8
24.7
24.8
24.8
25.2
25.]
25.1
25.1
24.8
25.2
Organism Number
7 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Your Produced 31
28
29 130
129130
100
27 28130
4.4
129
127
130
29 0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead I L
L
L I L
I L
I L
L L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
Effluent Percentage s.o
t o 1 I q A 5 F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
34
134
135130
100
136134
4.4
131134
Yes
135
1311
34
281
33.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
L
1 -13.8
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 L 3 4 0 / 8 Y 1V 11 1L Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 L S 4 D b / 8 7 1V 11 1L Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2. 3 4 D O / 25 7 IV 11 1G Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 b 7 8 9 1V 11 1L Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (V)ive, Mead
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5•0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%): 1
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.4
48 Hour Mortality
Yes
Control:
0
of
12
IWC.
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEL:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedwtict
Normal Distribution.
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wilks
Statistic:
0.908
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
3.556
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

C 'FTS
4 Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: December 22, 2014
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testi Solut' ns, In . Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: '
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 10289
Samples: 141203.13, 141205.12
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date- Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 12-03-14 12-10-14 1354 1 0822
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg(L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
12-01-14
12-03-14
Renewal2
5.0%
5.0%
Ow
24-h
24-h
Control
7.20
7.23
30
7.05
7.15
40
310
317
152, 151, 158
<0.10
<0.10
7.13
1.0
0.5
FAMN
Test Information
Treatment
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg(L):
Final DO (mg/1.):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
RenewalI
R. -I2
Stan I
RenewalI
Renewal2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.20
7.23
7.49
7.05
7.15
7.34
7.17
7.48
7.25
7.13
7.35
7.13
7.9
8.0
7.9
7.7
7.7
7.8
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
LE
25.1
25.1
25.0
24.8
24.8
24.9
25.0
253
25.0
25.1
24.9
24.9
Organism Number
A S A 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Youn Produced
29
31
28 30
30
30
30 32 30
283129
38 39
31
29 8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead-I
L
I L
I L I L
I L
I L
I L I L I L
ILI
L
I L
L a 017.3 '--
Effluent Percentage 5.0
1 1) a A 5 F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mran
Number of YoungProduced
34
31
36 37
31
33
38
35
38 39
31
37 35.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L a 017.3 '--
Effluent
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 3 Organisms 1 L 3 4 D 0 1 a 7 lv 11 1L. Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ldult Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
i ttcaucuc
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / a 9 tv ii 1L. Mean
lumber of Young Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Reducu<
Effluent Percentage=
n ,n tt tit
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 o i a 7 lv 11 ,� Mean
lumber of Young Produced
l.dult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
+7H�±i I I I % Rcducdc
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 6 Organisms 1 L 3 4 D 0 r a y IV 11 1L. Mean
lumber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
%Rduc[i<
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
in Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.0
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0 1 of
12
IWC:
0 of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Heterosmdastict
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Willes
Statistic-
0.957
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
No
Method:
F -Test
Statistic-
6.128
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
50%
LE

r
-rEnvironmental Testing Solutions, Inc
t Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
I ,r.
tk=
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: March 16, 2015
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Tes Solu ons, J -Jo Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 10483
Samples: 150304.10, 150306.09
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: I Start time: End time.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 03-04-15 1 03-11-15 1 1327 0830
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab.
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/Q:
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
Renewal l
Rmmal2
Start
Renewal i
Reneaal2
5.0%
5.0%
7
®®
Control
Control
7.59
7.57
7.71
7.58
7.80
7.81
7.63
7.81
7.63
7.62
7.83
7.57
7.8
7.9
8.0
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/Q:
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
Renewal l
Rmmal2
Start
Renewal i
Reneaal2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.59
7.57
7.71
7.58
7.80
7.81
7.63
7.81
7.63
7.62
7.83
7.57
7.8
7.9
8.0
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.1
7.9
7.9
7.8
24.9
24.9
25.1
24.8
24.9
24.8
25.2
25.2
1 25.1
25.0
24.9
24.8
Organism Number
A S C, 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
33
129128128130
30
-
30
- -
34 31
28 30 29
27 30
30
29
29 3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L I L L
L L
L
L
o% --no
Effluent Percentage 5.0°/
n I A c A 7 u Q in ii i? M-
• 1 cauucu
Number of Young; Produced
32
30
30
-
30
- -
34 31
31
33 35 35
31
32
32.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L L I L
I L
I L
o% --no
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 o / 0 7 1v 11 14 mean
[umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
RA__
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 o / a y 1v 11 1c M -
dumber of Young Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% ReducRt
Effluent Percentage=
n ,n tt 77
reatment 5 Or anisms 1 2 3 4 D o / 0 7 1„ .
dumber of Young Produced
adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reducti,
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 6 Or anisms 1 2 3 4 0 b / 8 7 1u 11 1c mean
lumber of Youn Produced
ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Relnctic
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC-
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.3
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
1 of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?'
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC-
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedasuct
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Will's
Statistic:
0.925
Critical Value.
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.448
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method -
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

t,
-
._ � _ x•3.1"
PO Box 7.565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: June 22, 2015
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
i
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testi So do Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: �adib
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 10670
Samples: 150603.11, 150605.11
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date:End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 06-03-15 06 -10 -IS 1347 0927
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg(L CaCO3):
Conductivity (pathos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg(L.):
Final DO (mg/L.):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
start
Renewal
Renewa12
stat[
Rene.vall
Renen-alt
5.0%
50%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.66
7.75
7.68
7.66
7.72
7.57
7.73
7.69
7.68
7.70
7.67
7.69
8.0
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.6
7.9
8.0
7.9
7.7
7.8
7.7
25.0
25.1
24.8
24.8
24.9
24.8
25.1
24.8
24.8
25.1
25.1
248
Organism Number
r n 5 A 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
a.,v.u.. v■ v. Sa,
Number of Young Produced
31
-
32
-
26 27
31
30
27 27
28 29 28 28
28 7
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L L
L
L
L L
L L L L
I L
Effluent Percentage 5.0°/u
A c 4 7 St Q 10 11 17 Mran
1I-CaLUICIlL f, Vl au■a■uo
Number of Young Produced
32
29 130130
-
- -
31 28
32
27
31
28
29
27
29.5
Adult Survival: (L)ive, Dead
I L
L
I L I L
I L I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
-2.9
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%
% Reduction
Effluent Percentage
i n o n to 11 17
reatment 3 Organisms 1 L 3 4 j v
Lumber of Young Produced
Ldult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Reducti<
Effluent Percentage
�� u q t n t t t 2 Mann
1 reatiucuL -t v■ a�
Reproduction LOEC:
-
-
-
-
Adult Survival: (I )ive, (D)ead
6.7
Number of Youn Produced
Method:
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
of
12
IWC:
0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
12
Significant?:
Reduction
Final Mortality Significant at: I No cone.
Critical Value:
5.320
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
c R o 10 11 17. Minn
1 reatment o yr alublua
Number of Young Produced
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
-
-
Adult Survival: (I )ive, (D)ead
6.7
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
Reduction
Effluent Percentage
tiz a In 11 17 Mran
i reatment o yr aulau■a
Number of Youn Produced
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
-
100
Adult Survival: (I )ive, (D)ead
6.7
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: '5.0%
DWQ form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 17/95
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
6.7
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: I No cone.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method,
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Willes
Statistic:
0.937
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.162
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphuia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: September 25, 2015
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1623 Mail Service Center I Start date: J End date: Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 1 09-02-15 1 09-09-15 1223 1 0813
S I I f t. n Sam lei Sam le 2 Control
amp a norma to
p
P
Collection start date:
08-31-15 09-02-15
Test Information
Grab:
5.0%
Treatment
Composite duration:
24-h
24-h Initial pH (SU):
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
6.83
31
Final pH (SU):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
7.47
40
Initial DO (mg/L):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
420
457 167, I54, I50
Final DO (mg(L):
Total residual chlorine (mg/I.):
<0.10 <0.10
1 8.1
Initial Temp. (°C):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
1.4
2.0
Final Temp. (°C):
swt
RenewalI
Renmal2
sunt
Rennvwll
Renewal
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.27
6.83
7.13
7.29
7.18
7.47
7.02
7.19
7.01
7.15
7.38
7.19
7.9
8.0
1 8.1
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.2
7.8
7.9
8.0
25.0
25.1
24.9
24.8
J7725.0
25.2
24.9
24.8
25.0
25.1
Organism Number
n.._.._..i n_,.....:....,� t 7 'A d S F 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
128
28
27
27
30
27 30 28
27
27
30
29
28 2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)eadj_
L
L
L
L
L
L L L
L
L
L
L
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Effluent Percentages.o%
e n S 4 7 R 0 10 11 12 M -
Number of Youn Produced
30 30
28
31
29
29
32 33
28 3:0=30
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
29.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L L
L
L
L
L
L L
L L
L
L
e 05.6
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 .3 4 0 / a y lv 11 1/- Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
i % Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 L S 4 5 o i a 7 iv 11 1Z Mean
Number of Yot Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 j 4 0 o 1 a 7 lv 11 r/- Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 o / 6 y IV 11 l/- Mean
Number of Youna Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWQformAT-3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (°/n)'
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.5
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0 of
12
IWC:
0 °f
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cont.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wilks
Statistic:
0.964
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1.825
Critical Value.
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent % Rank Stun
Critical Stam
5.0%

l; r
E=1
ntal Testing Solutions, Inc
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: December 28, 2015
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing of do Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 11099
Samples- 151209.12, 151211 13
flail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1623 Mail Service Center Start date: End date Start time: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 12-09-15 1 12-16-15 1 1437 0918
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity(mg(L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg(L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
12-07-15
12-09-12
Ren -l2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
24-h
24-h
Control
7.82
V
34,33,33
7.87
7.71
40, 40, 40
271
292
vo, 1;2, ls4
<0.10
0.648
7.63
10
0.9
1 82
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU)'
Final pH (SU).
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg(I.):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start
Renewal l
Rm ..12
Start
R. -i I
Ren -l2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.82
7.67
7.70
7.87
7.71
7.74
7.75
7.77
771
7.69
7.73
7.63
8.4
1 8.2
1 82
7.8
7.7
77
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.8
24.8
25.1
25.1
249
247
249
24.9
24.9
252
24.9
24.9
24.7
Organism Number
t d 5 r, 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
1 29
126127
1 32
126 1 28
25pM32
1 31.8
29
26
29Adult
I L
Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L L
LL
No
L
L
L
Critical Value:
Effluent Percentage s.0
, z n c 4 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mcaa
1 a �4aaaac,aa v va Su
Number of Young Produced 33
Effluent Percentage=
- - - -
29 27 30 35 132
129 133
1 32
136
132 133
1 31.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead LI
L L L L I L
I L IL
I L
I L
I L I L
1 -12.4
---
.---
EffluentPercentage=
n to tt 17
Treatment 3 Organisms i 2 s 4 D o i o 7 ,v ..
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 S 4 5 b i a 7 1v !I r/- mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: Wive, (D)ead
Rcduumn
Effluent Percentage=
_
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 s 4 3 o i u iv ,. a
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reduction
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 s 4 5 o i a 7 iv r i ra mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
^/.. RMlueuon
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWO form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Result!8.
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality (%):
% Control with 3rd Broods.
Control Reproduction CV:
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control: 0
of
12
IWC: 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cone.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5 0%
Reproduction NOEL:
5.0%
Overall Method:
Hotnoscedastic t
Normal Distribution.
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wilds
Statistic:
0.966
Critical Value:
0 884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1 275
Critical Value:
5.320
Non-Parametnc Analysis (if applicable)
Method
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

i V
r v �
2.!il1 mT •r
l Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
i, rr
- PO,.B0 7565
Ashevi116; NC- 28802•
Phone: (828)•350 -0364 -
Fax: [phone]
Date: March 25, 2016
Facility: United Water EIydro Management NPDES #: NC -0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: EnvironmenATesti-Solns, c Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible CharSignature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Project: 11300
\ Samples. 160309 06, 160311.07
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-16231
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,)'
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhoslcm).
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
03-07-16
03-09-16
Rw ml2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
24-h
24-h
Control
7.32
7.28
30, 31, 32
- _
45, 42, 37
239
290
142152.156
<0.10
0 905
its - x°' ,
0.4
0.4
8.0
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg1L):
Initial Temp- CC):
Final Temp. CC):
Startdate: End date: Starttime- End time.
03-09-16 03-16-16 1407 0654 I
dart
Re -I I
Rcncnal 2
start
Rcnewal I
Rw ml2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.32
7.28
7.13
751
731
7.08
7.12
7.16
7.25
7.10
7.11
7.10
7.8
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.9
3.1
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.8
3
25.1
24.9
24.9
25.0
24.7
U24.9
24.7
25.1
24.8
24.7
25.1
Organism Number
F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mwn
I---
Number of Young Produced
127
28
27
1 29
2627
29
2627
33
27
30 27
28
27.4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
-14.6
%. RrinM1nn
Effluent Percentage s.o/
I - I A S 4 7 R o 10 11 1'2 uen
Number of Young Produced
33
32
30
31
28
29
34
33
34
30 31
32
31.4
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
-14.6
%. RrinM1nn
Effluent Percentage=
d 5 F 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
• 'b»
Reproduction LOEC-
Final Control Mortality (%).
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods'
-
Control Reproduction CV.
4.2
43 Hour Mortality
Method
Control 0
Number of Young Produced
Number of Young Produced
IWC: 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Statistic:
2.743
Critical Value-
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Stun
5.0%
R �ncnnn
Effluent Percentage=
reatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 b i a 7 1 i t L Mean
cumber of Young Produced
.dult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
%. Rcductii
Effluent Percentage=
n to tt 17 _
reatment 5 Organisms 1 L 3 4
[umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Reductii
Effluent Percentage=
n c 7 R Q 1(1 1 1 li Mn
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWO form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC-
Final Control Mortality (%).
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods'
-
Control Reproduction CV.
4.2
43 Hour Mortality
Method
Control 0
of
Number of Young Produced
IWC: 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Statistic:
2.743
Critical Value-
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Stun
5.0%
%. Reducnan
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWO form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC-
Final Control Mortality (%).
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods'
100
Control Reproduction CV.
4.2
43 Hour Mortality
Method
Control 0
of
12
IWC: 0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No conc.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC-
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC:
5.00
Overall Method:
Homoscedasne t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method
Shapiro -Wilks
Statistic:
0 944
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
2.743
Critical Value-
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method,
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Stun
5.0%

XV
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: June 24, 2016
Facility: United Nater Hydro Management NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe 9: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental TeX.- S ut1 ns, Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project- 11519
Samples. 160608.15, 160610.15
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Startdate: I Enddate- Starttime.End time -
Raleigh, NC 27699-16231 1 06-08-16 06-15-16 151: 1 Oslo
Sample Information
Collection start date'
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg1L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
06-06-16
06-08-16
R-al2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
24.5-h
24.75-h
`
7.60
- _
30, 30, 33
7.67
38, 36, 40
402
411
153. 149, 155
<0.10
<0.10
7.77
0.5
0.3
4 {`
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mglL):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. CC):
Start
Renmval l
Ren -12
Start
R -at l
R-al2
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.60
7.62
764
7.67
7.72
7.76
7.73
7.61
765
7.72
7.77
7.64
7.9
7.9
3.0
7.9
7.8
7.3
8.2
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.9
A7.9
25 2
24.9
25.1
24.8
24.6
24.3
24.9
25 2
1 24.7
24.9
24.8
25.2
Organism Number
t 7 _ A S (. 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Youn,, Produced
27
26
25
27
25
26125129
29
30
26 28 2628
30
26 5
Adult Survival: (L)ie, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
LLL
L L
L
L
L .L L
L
-14.5
Effluent PercentageEE]
n c r 7 R Q In 11 12
Number of Young Produced
1 32
130
135
129131
26
29 33
29
30
30
30
30.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L L
L
L L
L
L
L
L
-14.5
Effluent Percentage
reatment 3 Organisms 1 i 4 o / 0 7 iv r 1 4
[umber of Young Produced
.dult Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
- -- % Reduelii
Effluent Percentage=
t, 1,
reatment 4 Organisms 1 L 5 4 J 0 / b 7 1l/ Lk rG
[umber of Young Produced
.dolt Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
[umber of Young Produced
Ault Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
o n in 11 17
reatment 6 Organisms 1 2 .5 4 j o / o 7 v r
lumber of Young Produced ITI��
Ault Survival: (L)ive Mead
i. Rcducni
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >J-0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWO form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Reproduction LOEC:
Final Control Mortality N:
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.0
48 Hour Mortality
Method:
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at: No cont.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC.
5.0%
Overall Method.
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution.
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Willes
Statistic:
0.936
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
2.982
Critical Value-
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method -
Effluent °/ Rank Sum
Critical Sum
50%

a
:1
PO Bos 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
j Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Date: June 24, 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Mayodan WWTP NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing of ' ns, n . .. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: f Project: 11493
Samples: 160607.04, 160609 04, 160611.05
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date. End date: Start time I End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 06-07-16 06-14-16 1242 1 1150
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
High Concent
PH (SU).
DO (mg/LY
Temp (°C):
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
In-house Culture
Begin hatch: 06-06-16 1600
End hatch: 06-07-16 0620
7.74 7.57 7.67 7 50 7.76 1 7.56 1 7.72 1 7 28 1 7.71 737 1 7.73 7.55 7.76 7.61
7.7 7.8 79 7.7 7.3 7.6 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 1 7.7 7.8 7.8 80
24.8 24 6 24.8 24.5 24.8 1 24.2 1 24.7 1 24.4 1 24.7 24.6 1 24.8 24.4 24.7 24.3
47.62 7.56 7.63 1 7.58 1 7.52 7.50 1 7.69 7.35 7.36 7.32 7.70 751 7.66 7.52
8.1 80 8.0 76.0 1 8.0 7.7 1 8.0 1 79 8.0 79 1 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.3
24.8 24.6 25.0 24.6
24.7 24.6 1 249 1 24.5 24.3 1 24.4 1 250 24.2 24.9 24.5
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration.
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)-
Conductivity (gmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample l
Sample 2
Sample 3 1
Replicate number
06-05-16
06-07-16
06-09-16
>20%
>20%
1
2
3
4
25-h
25-h
Control
Surviving number of larvae
10
10 1
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Organisms
Original number oflarvae
10
10
10
10 1
Average wt (mg)
0.50$
Werghtlonginal (mg/larvae)
0.498
0.505
0.544 1
0.474 1
Average wt/
0.505
surviving (mg)
%Effluent
Survivingnumber oflarvae
10
10 1
10 1
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.487
1 0.520
0.499
0.518
Average wt (mg)
0.506
%Effluent
ISurviving number of larvae
1 10
10
10 1
10
2.5 /
Original number of larvae
10
10
10 1
10
Survival (%)
F 100.0
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.423
0.513
0.504 1
0.534
Average wt (mg)
0.494
%Effluent
I Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10 1
10
5.0 %
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival
Weight(original (mgllarvae)
0.469
0.464
1 0.482 1
0.499
Average wt (mg)
0.479
% Effluent
ISurviving number of larvae
10
1 10
1 10 11
10
DKI
I Original number of larvae
10
1 10
10
10
Survival
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.534
1 0.504
0.530
0.587
Average wt (mg)
0.539
%Effluent
ISurviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
20 %
Original number of larvae
10
1010
10
Survival
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
0.480
0 540
0.516
0.556
Average wt (mg)
0.523
Water Quality Data
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
High Concent
PH (SU).
DO (mg/LY
Temp (°C):
Test Organisms
Outside supplier:
In-house Culture
Begin hatch: 06-06-16 1600
End hatch: 06-07-16 0620
7.74 7.57 7.67 7 50 7.76 1 7.56 1 7.72 1 7 28 1 7.71 737 1 7.73 7.55 7.76 7.61
7.7 7.8 79 7.7 7.3 7.6 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 1 7.7 7.8 7.8 80
24.8 24 6 24.8 24.5 24.8 1 24.2 1 24.7 1 24.4 1 24.7 24.6 1 24.8 24.4 24.7 24.3
47.62 7.56 7.63 1 7.58 1 7.52 7.50 1 7.69 7.35 7.36 7.32 7.70 751 7.66 7.52
8.1 80 8.0 76.0 1 8.0 7.7 1 8.0 1 79 8.0 79 1 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.3
24.8 24.6 25.0 24.6
24.7 24.6 1 249 1 24.5 24.3 1 24.4 1 250 24.2 24.9 24.5
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration.
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)-
Conductivity (gmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample l
Sample 2
Sample 3 1
Control
06-05-16
06-07-16
06-09-16
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Vrsuallnsp.
24-h
25-h
25-h
NgNM
89
67
69
30-33
I00
im
150
36-40
420
464
439
149-155
<010
<010
<o.10
0.3
0.4
2 1
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Method:
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >20% NOEC: 20% ChV: >20%
Survival Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Vrsuallnsp.
Dunnetfs
Survival Growth
% Effluent Critical Calculated
Critical
Calculated
1.25%
2.410
-0.034
25%
2 410
0.525
5.0%
2.410
1.195
10%
2 410
-1.497
2p%
2.410
-0.793
DWQ form AT -5 (8103)

` PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Date: August 05, 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicitv Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Mayodan WWTP NPDES 4: NC- 0021873 Pipe 9. 001 County: Rockingham
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing of 'ons, , Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: r Project. 11617
Samples: 160719 02, 160721 02, 160723.02
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date: I Start time: I End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 07-19-16 1 07-26-16 1 1240 1 1210
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp (°C):
High Concent
PH (SU),
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Sample 2
1
Replicate number
2 3
4
Control
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Organisms
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
110
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.598
0.617 1
0.711 1
0.606
Average wt (mg)
F 0.701
494339
148-155
< 0 10
%Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
10
10
10 1
10
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
1 0.696
1 0.735
0.703
0.670
%Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
1 10
10
10 I10
EEOriginal
number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.757
1 0.753 1
0.770 1
0.741
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
1 10 1
10 I10
EEIOriginal
number of larvae
10
10
10 1
10
Weightionginal (mg/larvae)
0.702
0.697
0.681 1
0.697
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
10%
Ottginal number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.681
0.679
0.707
0.668
% Effluent
Surviving number oflarvae
10
10
1 10
10
20 %
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
1 0.683
1 0.730
0.629
0.623
Water Quality Data
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp (°C):
High Concent
PH (SU),
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.757
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.694
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.684
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.666
7 61 1 7.55 1 7.63 1 7 56 7.59 7.58 7.75 1 7.28 1 7 77 1 7.37 1 7.76 1 7.57 1 7.70 1 7.55
7.8 1 7.9 7.9 1 7.6 1 8.0 1 7.8 7.9 1 6.17.8 6.7 7.3 7.8 8.2 7 8
24 7 1 24.4 24.7
24.7 24.6 24.6 24.7 24.6 24.6 1 24.4 1 24.7 1 24.6 1 24.7 1 24.4
aL1U11
7.57 7 59 1 7.73 1 7 61 1 7 58 1 7 61 1 7.81 1 7.33 1 7.57 1 7.26 17 72 7.51 7 71 7.52
8.0 7.9 3.1 7.7 1 8.1 1 7.78 1 6.1 3.1 6.6 80 79 1 8.2 7.9
24.3 24.6 1 24.8 24.7 1 24 3 1 244-243 24.4 24.3 24.6 24.9 1 24.5 1 24.6 1 242
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab -
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)'
Conductivity (Irmhos/cm).
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp at Receipt (°C):
Sample I
Sample 2
Test Organisms
Survival (%)
F100.0
Outside supplier:
Average wt (mg)
0.633
In-house Culture
Average wt /
0.633
Visual hasp
surviving (mg)
25-h
Begin hatch
07-18-16 1515
77
110
End hatch:
1 07-19-16 0545
Survival (%)
F _10-0.0
58
Average wt (mg)
F 0.701
494339
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.757
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 0.694
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.684
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.666
7 61 1 7.55 1 7.63 1 7 56 7.59 7.58 7.75 1 7.28 1 7 77 1 7.37 1 7.76 1 7.57 1 7.70 1 7.55
7.8 1 7.9 7.9 1 7.6 1 8.0 1 7.8 7.9 1 6.17.8 6.7 7.3 7.8 8.2 7 8
24 7 1 24.4 24.7
24.7 24.6 24.6 24.7 24.6 24.6 1 24.4 1 24.7 1 24.6 1 24.7 1 24.4
aL1U11
7.57 7 59 1 7.73 1 7 61 1 7 58 1 7 61 1 7.81 1 7.33 1 7.57 1 7.26 17 72 7.51 7 71 7.52
8.0 7.9 3.1 7.7 1 8.1 1 7.78 1 6.1 3.1 6.6 80 79 1 8.2 7.9
24.3 24.6 1 24.8 24.7 1 24 3 1 244-243 24.4 24.3 24.6 24.9 1 24.5 1 24.6 1 242
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab -
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)'
Conductivity (Irmhos/cm).
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp at Receipt (°C):
Sample I
Sample 2
Sample 3 1
Control
07-17-16
07-19-16
07-21-16
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visual hasp
24-h
25-h
24-h
-2.178
77
110
65
32,33
60
60
58
40,40
449
494339
148-155
< 0 10
< 0.10
< 0.10
5.3
0.9
5.5
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEC•
LOEC-
ChV:
Method:
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >20% NOEC: 20% ChV: >20%
DWO farm AT -5 (8/03)
Survival Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visual hasp
Dunnett's
Survival Growth
% Effluent
Critical Calculated Critical
Calculated
1.25%
2.410
-2.919
2.5%
2.410
-5301
5.0%
2.4 L0
-2.629
10%
2.410
-2.178
20%
2 410
-1.427

PO Box 7565
man Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing solutions, Inc. Date: September 30, 2016
Effl,tent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Mayodan WWTP NPDES 9: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: /-/�
Comments:
Project: 11739
Samples. 160913E�1�160917.03
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Surviving number of larvae
10
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
10
10
7.47
100.0
1621 Mail Service Center
Original number of larvae10
7.52
Start date: End date: Start time: End time -
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
10
Survival (%)
09-13-16 09-2046 1 1210 1123
Replicate number
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
0.553
0.433 1
0.512
1 2 3
4
0.496
7.9
Test Organisms
Control
Surviving number of larvae 10 10 10
10 1
Survival (%)
100.0
Outside supplier:
Organisms
Original number of larvae 10 10 10
1
10
Average wt (mg)
1 0.511 1
In-house Culture
Original number of larvae
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae) 0.501 0.443 0.559
0.534
Average wt/
surviving (trig)
0.511
Begin hatch: 09-12-16 1450
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
10 10 1 10 11 10
0.510 I
0.502
End hatch: 09-I3-16 0610
% Effluent
E1.25 %
Surviving number of larvae
Original number of larvae 10 10 10
10
Survival
Weight/onginal (mg/larvae) 0.539 0.570 0.593
0.561
Average wt (mg)
0.566
---T-
10
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
7.47
100.0
7.75
Original number of larvae10
7.52
10
10
10
Survival (%)
1150
79
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
0.553
0.433 1
0.512
0.487
Average wt (mg)
0.496
7.9
7.6
7.9
7.9
24.
%Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10 1
10
10
24.4
100.0
S.0 %
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.500
0.510 I
0.502
0.519
Average wt (mg)
0.508
% Effluent
Surviving number oflarvae
10
10
---T-
10
10
100.0
(0 %
E
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.$31
0.$29
1 0.502
0.498 1
Average wt (mg)
0315
% Effluent
100.0
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
F20%
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae)
0.566
0.497
0.527
0.534
Average wt (mg)
0.531
Water Quality Data
_
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg/L)-
Temp. (°C):
High Concent
pH (SU):
DO (in
Temp. (°C):
7.6M124.6
Sample 2
7.61
739
7.60
7.35
7.47
7.25
7.75
7.15
7.52
7.42
7.44
7.36
7 9
1150
79
77
7.9
7.5
7.9
72
7.6
7.5
7.9
7.6
7.9
7.9
24.
< 0 10<
247
242
24.7
24.6
24 3
24.4
1 24.8
1 24.7
24.8
244 1
24.3 1
24.6
-auun
7.45 7.51 7.64 7 43 7.35 7.35 749 7 17 7.54 7.03 7.40 7.35 7.53 7.31
8.0 7.7 7.8 7.7 8.1, 7.7 1 7.9 7.3 7.8 6.9 80 1 7.6 1 7.8 8 l
24.3 24.5 24.8 1 24.4 24.6 24.4
24.7 246 25.0 24.4 1 24.9 1 24.7 1 25.0 1 24 3
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab.
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3).
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (pmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3 1
Control -
09 -11-16
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visuallnsp.
24-h
P427424
1150
60
2p%
2.410
2-34
71
0-42
411
-160
<0.10
< 0 10<
0.10
12
1 2.0
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC-
ChV:
Ylethc d -
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >20% NOEC: 20% ChV: >20%
DWO form AT -5 (8/03)
Survival Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnetts
Survival Growth
Effluent
Critical Calculated Critical
Calculated
1 25%
2 410
-2.374
2.5%
2.410
0.612
5.0%
2.410
0.118
10%
2.410
-0.193
2p%
2.410
-0831

F`7
r�
z'
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase R Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Far: [phone]
Date: September 30, 2016
Facility: SUEZ NPDES 9: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testi So tion In Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project- 11758
Samples: 160914.09, 160916.09
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start date: End date- Start time: End time -
Raleigh, NC 27699-16231 09-14-16 09-21-16 1228 0743
Sample Information
Collection start date.
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)-
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (aC):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
09-12-16
09-14-16
Renewal
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
24-h
24-h
Control
' ;..
755
32,34
7.61
7.47
41,40
434
432
158. 160, 156
<0.10
<0 10
'
04
1.1
7.7
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
CnntrnlOraanisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Start
Renewal t
Renewal
Start
Renewal I
Renewal
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.52
755
7.48
7.61
7.47
7.44
759
7.52
7.50
7.61
7.57
7.42
8.0
8.0
7.7
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.9
24.7
24.9
248
24.7
24.7
1
24.8
24.9
252
25.1
25.0
25.0
25.1
Number of Young Produced
1 32
131127
129
131130
128
130
28
31126
33
3029
29.1
29.5
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent PercentageEE]
T-fmant 2 Ol aaniemc 1 7 4 5 6 7 R 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
130
126
128
128 28
128
128
32
30 28
33
30
29.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
I L
I L
I L
I L L
I L
I L
L
L L
L
L
1.4
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 V IU 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / S y lU 11 ld Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 / s Y IU Ll 1 Z Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: Wive, (D)ead
Red -inn
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 y IU 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >5.0% NOEC: 5.0% ChV: >5.0%
DWO form AT -3 (8/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
% Control with 3rd Broods.
100
Control Reproduction CV:
6.0
48 Hour Mortality
Yes
Control-
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No cont.
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC'
>5.0%
Reproduction NOEC.
5.0%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method
Shapiro-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.971
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F -Test
Statistic:
1 226
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysts (if applicable)
Method
Effluent % Rank Sum
Critical Sum
5.0%

{.• �'Jfluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute" C50 Date: 09/29/16
,3cility: RAMSEUR WWTP NPDES#: NC0026565 Pipe#: 001 County: RAIVDOLPH
�fLaboratory Performing es ME ITE H�LABS, INC.
� � Comments
X
Signature of Ope a i poyisible Cilarge
X
Signature of La ra ory ervisor * PASSED: -10.17% Reduction
Work order: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
forth Carolina Ceriod.apnnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
:ONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced II20I20I18I20I19I20I21I15I20I20I22I21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead IIL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL
affluent %: 6%
'REATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
9.027%
## Young Produced 15 24 22 22122121 22 25 22 22 22 21 % control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
Adult (L) ive (D) ead L IL L L L L L L IL L L L 100%
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = -10.17
% Mortality
Avg.keprod.
0.00
19.67
Control
Control
0.00
21.67
Treatment 2
Treatment 2
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 09/21/16
Control 8.04 8.14 7.91 8.24 8.11 8.05 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/19/16 Sample 2: 09/21/16
Treatment 2 8.03 8.18 8.02 8.11 7.92 8.03 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st PIF
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24.0 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24.0 hrs T P P
lst sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness (mg / 1 ) 48
Control 7.37 7.74 7.40 7.48 7.50 7.52
Spec. Cond.(gmhos) 171 499 509
Treatment 2 7.45 7.72 6.70 7.39 7.40 7.54
Chlorine (mg/1) ........ <0 .1 <0 .1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) ........ 1.4 1.3
(Mortality expressed as combining replicates)
N tePlease
o .
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
IC50 = % Method of Determination
95% Con i ence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
-- % Spearman Karber _ Other
9i
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
Control
High
f''nn n
9i
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

s
PO Box 7565
" 1 Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
iii ,r 1 Fax: [phone]
E-mail: Jimlc�r�etsnclab.com
_J Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Date: October 21, 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Mayodan WWTP NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testi- Sol ions, `" Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 11783
Samples- 161004.04, 161006.04, 161008.02
i4Iai1 Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
10
ZO Y.
Original number of larvae
10 I0 10
Original number of larvae
10
1621 Mail Service Center
10
10
Survival (4'0)100.0
0.518 0.553 0S96
Start
date: End
date: Start time: End time:
0.569 1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
0.614
Average ,vt (mg)
0.587
375 1
10-04-16 10-H-16 1210 1126
Day l
Day 2
Replicate
number
Surviving numberoflarvae
10
10
10
10
1
2
3
4
10
10 1
Test Organisms
Control
ISurviving number of larvae 10
F10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Outside supplier
Organisms
Original number of larvae 10
1 0 1
0
10
Average wt (mg)
0.534
In-house Culture
% EffluentSurviving
WeighVoriginal (mgAarvae) 0.595
1 0.571 1
0.489
0.479
Average m /
0.534
Y.
10riginal number of larvae
10
10 1
10
surviving (tug)
Survival (%)
Begin hatch:
10 -03 -IG 1703
%Effluent
SurvivingnuinberoFlarvae IO
10
10
10
Average,vt (mg)
0.530
End hatch:
10-04-16 0600
1.25 %
Original number of larvae 10
1 10 1
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Weightforiginal (tngllarvae) 1 0.677
10.575 1
0.560 1
0.646
Average wt (mg)
0.615
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
ZO Y.
Original number of larvae
10 I0 10
Original number of larvae
10
10 1
10
10
Survival (4'0)100.0
0.518 0.553 0S96
0.629
Weight/ariginal (mg/larvae)
0.523
0.569 1
0.641
0.614
Average ,vt (mg)
0.587
375 1
Day 0
Day l
Day 2
Day 3
% Effluent
Surviving numberoflarvae
10
10
10
10
I Initial I Final
Initial I Final
5.0 Y.
Original number of lanae
10
10 1
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.493
0.477 1
0.544 1
0.549
Average,vt (mg)
0.516
% EffluentSurviving
number oflarvae
10
10
IO
10
Y.
10riginal number of larvae
10
10 1
10
10 1
Survival (%)
100.0
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.519 1
0.302 1
0.523 1
0-575 1
Average,vt (mg)
0.530
% Effluent
Surviving number of larvae
10 10 10
10
10-02-16
10-04-16
ZO Y.
Original number of larvae
10 I0 10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
24-h
24.25 -It
Weight(originel (mgAavae)
0.518 0.553 0S96
0.629
Average wt (mg)
0.574
30-32
Water Quality Data
56
68
4044
375 1
Day 0
Day l
Day 2
Day 3
Dav 4
Dav 5
Day 6
2.4
Initial I Final
Initial I Final
I Initial I Final
Initial I Final
Initial I
Final
Initial I Final
Initial I Final
Control
PH
DO
Temp. (°C):
7.32 1 7.24 7.34 7.24 7.85 7 33 7.55 7.06 1 7.49 1 7.19 7.65 7.27 7.44 7.23
7.9 1 7.6 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.4 7.9 7.1 8.0 6.9 7.9 7.6 7.9 7.3
74_6 1 24.3 24.6 24.4 24.7 24.5 24.7 24.4 24.7 245 24.7 24.3 24.8 1 24.9
High Concentration
PH (SU): 7.76 7.29 7.47 7.36 7.76 7.19 7.52 1 7.02 1 7.41 1 7.07 7.40 7.2" 733 7.21
DO (mglL): 8.0 7.7 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.2 3.2 7.1 7.9 1 7.0 7.9 7.7 8.0 8.0
Temp. (°C): 24.7 24.4 24.7 24.6 24.9 24.5 24.9 24.5 24.6 1 24.6 24.9 24.4 25.0 24.6
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO,):
Conductivity (ginhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C)'
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
10-02-16
10-04-16
10-06-16
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visuallnsp.
24-h
24.25 -It
24.75-h
O.I10
72
56
32
30-32
55
56
68
4044
375 1
369
401
152-166
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
MUM
2.4
0.8
4.0
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
ChV:
Nlethod:
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >20% NOEC: 20% ChV: >20%
Survival Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnett's
Survival Growth
Effluent
Critical Calculated Critical
Calculated
125%
2.410
-2.382
2.5%
2.410
-1.566
5.0%
2.410
0.522
10%
2.410
O.I10
20%
2.410
-1.191
DWOforni AT -5 (8/03)

AdUaNb
7
a 7�1
,..of
L-
Environmental Testin Solutions Inc
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
9 Date: October 21, 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Mayodan WWTP NPDES #: NC- 0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental TV n Solus; au , F Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Project: 11783
Samples. 161004.04, 161006 04, 161008 02
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
10-04-16
10-06-16
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
1621 Mail Service Center
24.25-h
24 75-h
2.410
72
Start
date- End
date- Start time- End time
55
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
68
40-44
375
369
10-04-16 10-11-16 1210 1 1126
152466
<0.10
Replicate number
<0.10
2.4
0.8
4.0
1
2
3
4
Test Organisms
Control
Surviving number of larvae 10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Outside supplier
Organisms
I Original number of larvae 10
10
10
10
Average wt (mg)
0.534
In-house Culture
Weightloriginal (mgAarvae) 0.595
0.571
0.489
0.479
Average wt /
1 0.534
surviving (mg)
Begin hatch:
10-03-16 1703
ado Effluent
Surviving number of larvae 10
10
10
10
End hatch:
10-04-16 0600
1.25 %
E100.0
Original number of larvae 10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
Weight/original (mg/larvae) 0.677
0.575
0.560
0.646
Average wt (mg)
1 0.615
% Efflue ISurviving number of larvae 10 10 10 10
% Original number of larvae 10 10 1 10 10 1 Survival (%) 100.0
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae) 0 523 1 0 569 1 0.641 0.614 1 Average wt (mg) 1 0.587
% Efflue ISurviving number oflarvae 10 10 1 10 10
5.0'% Original number of larvae 10 10 1 10 10 Survival (%) 100.0
Weight/original (mgAarvae) 0.493 1 0.477 1 0.544 0.549 Average wt (mg) 1 0.516
%Effluent Surviving number of larvae 10 10 10 10
10 % Original number of larvae 1 10 10 1 10 10 Survival (%) 100.0
Weightloriginal (mg/larvae) 1 0.519 1 0.502 1 0.523 0.575 Average wt (mg) O.J30
% Efflue ISurviving number of larvae 10 10 10 10
20'% Original number of larvae 1 10 10 10 10 Survival
Weightloriginal (ing/larvae) 0.518 0.553 0.596 0.629 Average wt (mg) 1 0.574
Water Quality Data
Day 0 Day I Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial I Final Initial I Final
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L)
Temp. (°C):
7.82 724 7.34 7.24 7 85 733 1 7.55 7.06 7.49 7 19 7.65 7.17 744 728
79 7.6 78 77 7.3 1 74 1 79 7.1 8.0 6.9 7.9 7.6 7.9 7.8
24.6 24.3 24.6 24.4 24.7 1 24.5 1 24.7 24.4 24.7 24.5 24.7 24.3 24.8 24.9
High Concentration
pH (SU): 7.76 7.29 7.47 7.36 776 7.19 752 7.02 741 7.07 740 7.22 7.33 721
DO (mg/L): 3.0 7.7 30 80 8.0 7.2 8.2 7.1 79 70 79 77 8.0 8.0
Temp (°C): 24.7 24.4 24.7 24.6 24.9 24.5 24.9 24 5 24.6 24.6 24.9 24 4 25 0 24.6
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration.
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3)-
Hardness (mg(L CaCO3).
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)-
Total residual chlonne (mg/L):
Sample Temp, at Receipt (°C):
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Control
10-02-16
10-04-16
10-06-16
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
24-h
24.25-h
24 75-h
2.410
72
56
32
30-32
55
56
68
40-44
375
369
401 1
152466
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
2.4
0.8
4.0
Analyses
Normal:
Horn Var
NOEL:
LOEC:
ChV.
Method.
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >20% NOEC: 20% ChV: >20%
Survival Growth
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnetts
Survival Growth
% Effluent
Critical Calculated Critical
Calculated
125%
2 410
-2.382
2.5%
2410
-1.566
5 0%
2.410
0.522
10%
2.410
0 110
20%
2 410
1.191
DWO form AT -5 (8/03)

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secrelaq
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Direcror
December 1, 2016
Mr. Michael Brandt, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W. Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
Subject: Additional Information for
Current Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO021873
Town of Mayodan
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting documentation received on December 1, 2016. The primary reviewer for this renewal
application is Trupti Desai.
The primary reviewer will review your application, and she will contact you if additional
information is required to complete your permit renewal. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit
does not expire until permit decision on the application is made. Continuation of the current permit
is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit.
Please respond in a timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to
complete the permit application. If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the
subject permit, please contact Trupti Desai at 919-807-6351 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
?Am %Cies 01d
Wren Thedford
Wastewater Branch
cc: Central Files
NPDES
Winston-Salem Regional Office
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-807-6300