20161165 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 - Phone
704-527-1133 - Fax
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St
9th Floor, Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27604
20 1 6 1 1 65
Date: 11/28/2016
CWS Project #: 2016-4134
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
2016 I
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items:
® Prints ❑ Plans ❑ JD Package ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Wetland Survey ® Other
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
1 11/28/2016 4 Application for WQC 3883
2 1 11/28/2016 1 I Application Fee ($240)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
®For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution
❑As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints
❑For review and comment ❑For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Ms. Higgins please find attached four copies of the Preconstruction Notification and application for
WQC 3883 for the Karenstone Drive project. A check for the application fee of $240 is also attached.
Copy to
File
Thank you,
ZT—�F C. A;'—�
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORMFI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: 6416 Karenstone Drive
2. Work Type: Private Fl Institutional 11 Government R Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 63d and 133e]:
The purpose of the project is to realign the stormwater pipe system and to upgrade the stormwater
system to meet current City of Charlotte's design standards.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
CMSWS; POC: Ms. Erin Turner (Shanaberger)
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS Inc. POC: Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: N/A
7. Project Location -Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
6416 Karenstone Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina
Decimal Degrees: 35.251834°, -80.7405220
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 10706237, 10706238, 01706239, 10706240, and 10707106 (partial parcels)
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Briar Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 62c]: Catawba (HUC 03050103)
Authorization: Section 10 F1 Section 404 V Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 3
Regional General Permit #
0✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
9lOZ8Z4ON
0�79�7LI�
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
November 28, 2016
Ms. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -Construction
Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3
6416 Karenstone Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins,
The 6416 Karenstone Drive site (Mecklenburg Tax Parcel Nos. 10706237, 10706238, 01706239,
10706240, and 10707106 [partial parcels]) is approximately 0.5 acre in extent and is located at 6416
Karenstone Drive, southeast of The Plaza and Karenstone Drive intersection in Charlotte, North Carolina
(Figures 1 and 2, attached). Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) has contracted
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to delineate the extent of jurisdictional features within the project
area and to provide Section 404/401 permitting services.
Applicant Name: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS); POC: Ms. Erin Turner
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-336-3927
Street Address of Project: 6416 Karenstone Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina
Waterway: UT to Briar Creek
Basin: Catawba (HUC' 03050103)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Tax Parcel No(s): 10706237, 10706238, 01706239, 10706240, and 10707106 (partial parcels)
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.251834°, -80.740522°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Harrisburg, NC (1996)
Current Land Use
The project area consists of maintained residential areas (Figure 3, attached). Typical on-site vegetation
consists of American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), slippery elm (Ulmus rubra), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), willow oak (Quercus phellos), Russian
' "HUC' is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
W W W.0 W S-INC.NET
Page l of 7

6416 Karenstone Drive November 28, 2016
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 3 CWS Project No. 2016-4134
olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia),
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and various grasses
(Festuca spp.).
According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (Figures 4 and 5, attached), on-site soils consist of
Helena sandy loam (2-8 percent slopes [HeB]) and Helena -Urban land complex (2-8 percent slopes
[HuB]). Both Helena sandy loam and Helena -Urban land complex are listed on the North Carolina
Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County3 and the National Hydric Soils List4 as containing hydric
inclusions.
National Wetlands Inventory
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services. The
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a program which
provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer does not depict any
potential wetland features within the project limits (Figure 6, attached).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On November 14, 2016, Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) scientists Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland
Professional In Training (WPIT), and Caleb Sullivan, Staff Scientist I, delineated on-site jurisdictional
waters of the U.S., including wetlands. Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field),
classified, and mapped with a sub -foot Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Delineation Manual,' the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Form Instructional Guidebook,' with
further technical guidance from the 2012 Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.'
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) guidance. These classifications include sampling with a D -shaped dip
net, photograph documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which stream channel
changes classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms
representative of jurisdictional stream channels are attached (SCP1 and SCP2). A Wetland Determination
Data Form representative of on-site non jurisdictional upland areas is attached as DPI. Locations of
stream classification points and the Wetland Determination Data Form are depicted on Figure 7
(attached). Photographs 1-4 (attached) are representative of the on-site jurisdictional feature and current
site conditions.
United States Department of Agriculture, 2013. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
' United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA-NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh.
" United States Department of Agriculture —Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015. 2015 National Hydric Soils List by State.
s Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
e USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating Procedures for
conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD. USACE Headquarters,
Washington, DC.
US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Page 2 of 7

6416 Karenstone Drive November 28, 2016
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 3 CWS Project No. 2016-4134
Results
Based on the results of this field investigation, there is one jurisdictional water of the U.S. located within
the project boundary (Figure 7, attached). This water consists of one jurisdictional stream channel
(Stream A). The on-site jurisdictional water of the U.S. drains to Briar Creek. Briar Creek is part of the
Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050103) and is classified as "Class C Waters" by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). According to the NCDEQ, Class C Waters are defined
as: "Waters protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic
life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture."'
The on-site jurisdictional water of the U.S. totals approximately 0.006 acre, including 135 linear feet of
jurisdictional stream channel. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of an on-site.jurisdictional stream channel of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Stream
Jurisdiction
NCDEQ Stream
Classification
Score
Photograph Approximate Approximate
Linear Feet (If) Acreage (ac.)
USACE/EPA Rapanos
Classification'
Stream A
Seasonal RPW
20.5
1 135 0.006
Stream Total: 1351f 0.006 ac.
Seasonal Relatively Permanent Waters
Seasonal Relatively Permanent Waters10 (RPWs) are those that exhibit continuous flow for at least three
consecutive months per year on a seasonal basis. This flow regime is the result of a lowering of the water
table during dry periods that prevents ground water discharge to the stream channel. Seasonal streams do
not typically support aquatic life requiring year-round flow necessary for reproductive and maturation
stages. The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there is one Seasonal
RPW (Stream A) located within the project area (Figures 7 and 8, attached)
Seasonal RPW Stream A (Photograph 1, attached) originates on site in the northern portion of the project
limits from a non jurisdictional linear conveyance (Photograph 2, attached) and flows south-southwest for
approximately 9 linear feet before entering a pipe beneath Karenstone Drive. Seasonal RPW Stream A
exits the pipe and flows approximately 66 linear feet before entering a pipe (Photograph 3, attached) that
continues beneath a private residence. Seasonal RPW Stream A exits the pipe and flows approximately
60 linear feet before continuing off site at the southernmost project boundary. Total on-site flow for
Seasonal RPW Stream A is 135 linear feet (Figures 7 and 8, attached). Seasonal RPW Stream A (R4SB4)
1' exhibits strong particle size of stream substrate, strong leaf litter, moderate continuity of channel bed
and bank, and moderate grade control. Biological sampling revealed an absence of aquatic fauna.
Seasonal RPW Stream A scored 20.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDEQ Stream Classification
Form (SCP2, attached).
NCDEQ. "Surface Water Classifications." http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifiications.
v Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non -Relatively
Permanent Waters (Non-RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year-round flow, and seasonal streams
that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications ofjurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to
TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in
close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a
TNW.
10 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. May 5, 2007. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
the Environmental Protection Agency.
http://www.usace.army.miUPortals/2/docs/civilworks/regulatory/cwa_guide/jd guidebook_ 051207final.pdf.
" R4S134 = Intermittent stream with sand bottom, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979.
Page 3 of 7

6416 Karenstone Drive November 28, 2016
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 3 CWS Project No. 20164134
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 17,
2016 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. As of the date of submittal, no response has been received from SHPO.
CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service,'' the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks
Commission online database,13 and the Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G historical mapping program14 and
found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits.
Protected Species
CWS scientists performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data
Explorer15 on November 17, 2016 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate
endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP
review, there are no records of federally -protected species within the project limits or within a mile of the
project site. A copy of the data review report is attached. However, the recent listing of the Northern
long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) now requires consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) per the Final 4(d) Rule,16 which became effective on February 16, 2016, and recent
guidance from the USACE.
The Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the white -nose
syndrome disease. Habitat for the NLEB includes forested areas of any age, rocky areas with boulders,
and culverts greater than four feet wide. Due to recent population declines of almost 89% caused by
white -nose syndrome and continued spread of the disease, the NLEB now receives protection as a
Threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. A Threatened species is defined as a taxon likely
to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Per USFWS published GIS data," there are no known mature roosting trees or hibernacula recorded in
Mecklenburg County. Therefore, this project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the NLEB
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of the project is to realign the stormwater pipe system and to upgrade the stormwater system
to meet current City of Charlotte's design standards. A portion of the stormwater pipe system is located
beneath a private residence (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel No. 10706238; Figure 8, attached). This
alignment prevents adequate access to the stormwater system for necessary maintenance and is a safety
concern for the residence. Additionally, the current stormwater system is in poor condition, undersized,
and contributes to erosion downstream of the stormwater outfall.
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed November 16, 2016.
" Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, http://www.cmhpforg/homehistoricproperties.htm. Accessed November 16, 2016.
'" Mecklenburg County Polaris3G. http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/##mat=220833&pid=05509109
5 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https:Hnenhde.natureserve.org/. Accessed November 17, 2016.
6 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Key to the NLEB 4 (d) Rule for Non -Federal Activities
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdfiKeyFina[4dNLEB 12Jan2O l6.pdf
" The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1973. Endangered Species Act. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/laws-policies/.
a The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Northern Long -Eared Bat.
http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB_in_WNC.html
Page 4 of 7

6416 Karenstone Drive
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 3
November 28, 2016
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
This project is necessary to relocate the current stormwater infrastructure from beneath a private
residence, to upgrade the failing and undersized stormwater system, and to stabilize the stream channel
downstream of the stormwater outfall by installing a riprap apron to prevent future erosion.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters. Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with
all conditions of Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality Certificate No. 3883. All work will be
constructed in the dry.
The existing stormwater pipe system and outfall will be relocated and replaced. During the pipe
relocation, the stormwater pipes will be upsized from 30 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) to 38 -inch
by 60 -inch and 43 -inch by 68 -inch elliptical RCP. However, there is a 66 -linear foot section of
jurisdictional stream channel between stormwater pipe sections that will be piped with a 66 -linear foot
RCP (Figure 8, attached). This 66 -linear foot stream impact is necessary to properly realign the
stormwater pipes once the pipes have been relocated from beneath the private residence. Therefore,
permanent stream impacts resulting from the stormwater pipe system realignment and upgrade are limited
to 66 linear feet.
The upsized stormwater system is necessary to conform to the current City of Charlotte design standards
to properly handle baseflow and peak flow conditions. A 28 -linear foot riprap apron placed downstream
of the stormwater outfall is necessary to dissipate flow, stabilize the banks, and prevent erosional forces
from undermining the outfall. After construction is complete, the stream channel bed and banks will
regain stability, and future erosion will be minimized. Therefore, permanent stream impacts resulting
from the riprap apron installation are limited to 28 linear feet.
Total permanent impacts associated with this project are 94 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel
and are the result of stormwater system relocation and pipe upgrade. The project has been thoughtfully
designed to avoid all other impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. wherever possible. We believe that
the current site plan is the best possible plan that meets the project goals while avoiding impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. associated with this project are limited to a total of 94 linear feet (0.004 acre) of jurisdictional stream
channel (Figure 8, attached). Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A are the result of the
replacement of an existing stormwater pipe requiring the piping of 66 linear feet of jurisdictional stream
channel (S 1) and a 28 -linear foot riprap apron (S2) installation. Temporary impacts result from the pump
around system associated with this project. Figure 8 (attached) depicts the overall site plan with proposed
realignment and associated stream impacts. Table 2 (next page) summarizes the unavoidable permanent
impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Page 5 of 7

6416 Karenstone Drive
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 3
November 28, 2016
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
Table 2. Proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Feature
Impact No. Impact Type
Temporary/ Approximate Approximate
Permanent Length (If) Acreage (ac.)
Seasonal RPW
S1 RCP
Permanent 66 0.003
Stream A
S2 Riprap Apron
Permanent 28 0.001
Permanent Impact Total: I 941f 1 0.004 ac.
Stream Impact 1(S 1)
CMSWS proposes to realign the current stormwater pipe system as the current stormwater infrastructure
is located beneath a private residence (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel No. 10706238). The current pipe
system location is a safety concern and prevents system maintenance. Additionally, the stormwater
system is in poor condition and undersized and must be upgraded to meet current City of Charlotte's
design standards. The proposed stormwater system upgrade consists of 170 linear feet of 38 -inch by
60 -inch elliptical reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and 57 linear feet of 43 -inch by 68 -inch elliptical RCP.
As portions of Seasonal RPW Stream A are already piped, the piped sections will be replaced during the
stormwater system realignment. The 66 -linear foot section of jurisdictional stream channel between
stormwater RCP sections will be piped to properly realign the stormwater pipe from beneath the private
residence. Therefore, permanent stream impacts associated with S 1 total 66 linear feet. As the remaining
161 linear feet of the total 227 -linear foot RCP installation is being replaced during the realignment, there
are no additional permanent impacts associated with upsizing the existing RCP.
Stream Impact 2 (S2)
The proposed 28 linear foot riprap apron (S2) will be installed downstream of the pipe system outlet
(Figure 8, attached). The proposed riprap apron will permanently impact 28 linear feet of Seasonal RPW
Stream A, but is necessary to dissipate flows exiting the pipe per the City of Charlotte's design standards.
The riprap apron will also prevent erosional forces from undermining the pipe outlet.
On behalf of Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No.
31 (attached) and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3.
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. associated with this project are limited to a total of 94 linear feet (0.004 acre) of jurisdictional stream
channel. Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A are the result of the replacement of an existing
stormwater pipe requiring the piping of 66 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (S 1) and a 28 -linear
foot riprap apron (S2) installation. Temporary impacts result from the pump around system associated
with this project. The area of disturbance and impacts are illustrated in Figure 8 (attached) and the
construction plan set (attached).
Compensatory Mitigation
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been limited to 94 linear feet (0.004 acre) of
jurisdictional seasonal stream channel. We believe that the proposed pipe system and riprap apron design
meets the project goals while avoiding and minimizing impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the
greatest extent possible. Therefore, no mitigation is proposed for these impacts.
Page 6 of 7

6416 Karenstone Drive
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 3
November 28, 2016
CWS Project No. 20164134
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not hesitate
to contact Gregg Antemann at 704-408-1683 or [e-mail] should you have any questions or
comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
?4 r NOW z
Michelle LaForge
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Site Location
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Figure 4: USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 5: USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 6: National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figure 8: Site Plan with Proposed Realignment and Impacts
Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1 and SCP2)
USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP 1)
Photopage (Photographs 1-4)
White Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone Map
Construction Plan Set
Page 7 of 7

y
CL
Vance, Ngh �, n
V Jame3 s
e
M1wbrtin
�e td rid _Y \
1,
Ittr:!1 r- :r is
nIV or -m
CFR} {
C
Nur t h sde
Christian 1-85 run,
or
4y Rrvar �r,-1
�a
to
o,a r-°"
<<`�
a
%edy
r (ttpM Creek Nature
Bt r¢ F-'rF, ee rve
Karenstone Drive s`
All
Drive church Rd
Barrin on
aoCP
o �
sy
C harb tie o
Country
Club Pon ceq
Nickv
y Grove Ad C T Ayers
U� Golf course
c"hal Avo a
c
q � ¢
a , b cEmtery a Eastland Legend
Amu -
1 '
F� M.h -,; , Rd - `= Project Limits (0.5 ac.)
Album a66
V
@0' 5,000 2,500 0 5,000 Feet
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY LAYER PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 20111
' 0
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet 11/16/2016 Vicinity Map FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY
2016-4134 CPS tL 6416 Karenstone Drive
APPLICANT NO: CHECKEDBY: GCA C A R 11 L I N A Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
U:\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\2016-0134 Karenstone DriveWcGIS\Figuml Vicinity.m of

\\SERVER4\Public\Server4\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\20164134 Kwenstone Drwe\A.GIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

\\SERVER4\Public\Server4\2016\C W S\2016 Projects\2016-4134 Karenstone Drive\ArcGIS\Figum3_Aerial.mxd

\\SERVER4\Public\Ser er4\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\2016-4134 Kwenstone DriveWrcGIS\Pigure4_Currentsoils.—d

\\SERVER4\Public\Server4\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\2016A 134 Kmenstone DriveWrcGIS\Figure5_historicsoils.mxd

JVJeadowland Dr
C �,crOft
o�ecteekDC Ph n
llllll.....M.....������ayri ge Dr Ne ell Ce D
oli19
s Dr
G.
9 Yk �� galla Ct St Jo s Church d P6n
G
Eastbr k Rd
o�
P14
�0A
a, p �l
q{
d
0 l�
Rockmoor Rid a Rd
0
IPe4
�sf
A: D e1
ero Ln
0
� L ake ,or Psi
er 1 Jlet
emill Ln
O Du roit n o
°a�� ro� Coo1 Water Ct C`°
odd
�1° mac,
>
loype Di
t° Linda Lake Dr
F .
��
�,naayakegr
Perth Ct
Vie3
Way Dr
W
$
Legend
Plaine
Project Limits (0.5 ac.)
Belle
Mar ay Dr
I, o�
'
J5
Roads
National Wetland Inventory
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
I
Delivau Dr Pi�Ih
Freshwater Pond
O�
Ses�,
°
Rand Dr p
REFERENCE: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROVIDED BY UNITED STATES FISH
AND WII. )LIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, DATED 2015.
U
c�a
Z
1,000 500 0
1,000 Feet
BACKGROUND LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY NIECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT; DATED 2016.
U
fi 4`
P h
SCALE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE:
11/21/2016
National Wetland Inventory
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2016-4134
DRAWN BY
CPS
6416 Karenstone Drive
APPLICANPNO:
CHECKED BY: GCA
CAROLINA Charlotte,
North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
\\SERVER4\Public\Server4\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\2016-4134 Kwenstone Drive\ArcGIS\Figure6_NWl.mxd

\\SERVER4\Public\Server4\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\2016-4134 Karenstone Dnve\ArcGIS\Figure7_JDmap_l l_ 18.16.mxd

Stream Impact 1 (Sl)
66 -linear foot RCP
Permanent Impact
Seasonal RPW Stream A
11
Stream Impact 2 (S2)
28 -linear foot Riprap Apron Installation
Permanent Impact
Seasonal RPW Stream A
Seasonal RPW Stream A
- 135 linear feet
Private residence located above
existing stormwater infrastructue
(Mecklenburg County PID: 10706238)
Legend
Project Limits (0.5 ac.)
Seasonal RPW
a•aaaaaa Non -JD Linear Conveyance
Existing RCP
Headwall
- Proposed RCP
Proposed Riprap Apron
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016.
EXISITING AND PROPOSED STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDED BY CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED AND CLASSIFIED BY CWS, INC., ON NOVEMBER 14, 2016. 50 25 0 50 Feet
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.
SCALE:
1 inch = 50 feet
DATE:
11/18/2016
Site Plan with Proposed
P
FIGURE NO.
! Proposed Stream Impact
Jurisdctional
T —mI—q/
Ahprurimate
Apra:imale
CWS PROJECT NO:
2016-4134
Feature
Ln,mct Nu. trn,k¢I Tc,c
Pcnnwlent
I—gth (10
Acreage (aca
'�
CHECKED BY:
® Private Residence
GCA
R
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
/
Seasonal RPW
SI RCP Pemwtent
66
0.003
Roads
Z—A
S2 Riprap Apron Pcrmancm
28
OOUI
Permment Lnpxct Total:
941f
0.004 ac.
Parcels
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016.
EXISITING AND PROPOSED STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDED BY CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED AND CLASSIFIED BY CWS, INC., ON NOVEMBER 14, 2016. 50 25 0 50 Feet
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.
SCALE:
1 inch = 50 feet
DATE:
11/18/2016
Site Plan with Proposed
P
FIGURE NO.
Realignment & Impacts
CWS PROJECT NO:
2016-4134
DRAWN BY
MML
CAROLINA
8
6416 Karenstone Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
GCA
R
CWS Project No. 2016-4134
/
\\SERVER4\Public\Semer4\2016\CWS\2016 Projects\2016-0134 Kwemtone DriveWreGIS\Figure8_SitePlan&Impacts.mxd

O�p� W A TFROG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
0 Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0 Yes ® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular 0 Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express 0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
0 Yes ® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
6416 Karenstone Drive
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Khosrow Behrovzjou, Ebrahim Safaie Mowlavi, and Eugene Hoover
(City of Charlotte, Storm Water Drainage Easement)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
4292-744, 06648-382, and 06791-867; 07338-601, and 25250-353 (in order as above)
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (Storm Water Drainage Easement)
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
P. Agent iq Other, specify: Local Government
4b.
Name:
Ms. Erin Turner (Shanaberger)
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d.
Street address:
600 E. Fourth Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-408-1683
5f.
Fax no.:
704-527-1133
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
10706237, 10706238, 01706239, 10706240, and
10707106 (partial parcels)
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.251834° Longitude: -80.740522°
1 c.
Property size:
0.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Briar Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba (HUC# 03050103)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of maintained residential areas. Typical on site vegetation consists of American
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), slippery elm (Ulmus rubra), sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), willow oak (Quercus phellos), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), and various grasses (Festuca spp.).
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 ac.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 135 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to realign the stormwater pipe system and to upgrade the stormwater system to meet current
City of Charlotte's design standards. A portion of the stormwater pipe system is located beneath a private residence
(Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel No. 10706238; Figure 8, attached). This alignment prevents adequate access to the
stormwater system for necessary maintenance and is a safety concern for the residence. Additionally, the current
stormwater system is in poor condition, undersized, and contributes to erosion downstream of the stormwater outfall.
This project is necessary to relocate the current stormwater infrastructure from beneath a private residence, to upgrade the
failing and undersized stormwater system, and to stabilize the stream channel downstream of the stormwater outfall by
installing a riprap apron to prevent future erosion.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with
this project are limited to a total of 94 linear feet (0.004 acre) of jurisdictional stream channel (Figure 8, attached).
Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A are the result of the replacement of an existing stormwater pipe requiring
the piping of 66 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (S1) and a 28 -linear foot riprap apron (S2) installation.
Temporary impacts result from the pump around system associated with this project.
Stream Impact 1 (S1)
CMSWS proposes to realign the current stormwater pipe system as the current stormwater infrastructure is located beneath
a private residence (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel No. 10706238). The current pipe system location is a safety concern
and prevents system maintenance. Additionally, the stormwater system is in poor condition and undersized and must be
upgraded to meet current City of Charlotte's design standards. The proposed stormwater system upgrade consists of 170
linear feet of 38 -inch by 60 -inch elliptical reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and 57 linear feet of 43 -inch by 68 -inch elliptical
RCP.
As portions of Seasonal RPW Stream A are already piped, the piped sections will be replaced during the stormwater
system realignment. The 66 -linear foot section of jurisdictional stream channel between stormwater RCP sections will be
piped to properly realign the stormwater pipe from beneath the private residence. Therefore, permanent stream impacts
associated with S1 total 66 linear feet. As the remaining 161 linear feet of the total 227 -linear foot RCP installation is being
replaced during the realignment, there are no additional permanent impacts associated with upsizing the existing RCP.
Stream Impact 2 (S2)
The proposed 28 linear foot riprap apron (S2) will be installed downstream of the pipe system outlet (Figure 8, attached).
The proposed riprap apron will permanently impact 28 linear feet of Seasonal RPW Stream A, but is necessary to dissipate
flows exiting the pipe per the City of Charlotte's design standards. The riprap apron will also prevent erosional forces from
undermining the pipe outlet.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Yes No Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary W Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
:. Yes No W Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
P1 Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tempora T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f. Area
of
impact
(acres)
W1
-
Choose One
Choose One
Yes/No
-
W2
_
Choose One
Choose One
Yes/No
-
W3
-
Choose One
Choose One
Yes/No
-
W4
-
Choose One
Choose One
Yes/No
-
W5
-
Choose One
Choose One
Yes/No
-
W6
-
Choose One
Choose One
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
p
RCP Installation
Stream A
INT
Corps
2
66
S2
p
Riprap Apron
Stream A
INT
Corps
2
28
S3
-
Choose One
-
-
S4
-
Choose One
-
-
S5
-
Choose One
-
-
S6
-
Choose One
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
94 If
3i. Comments:
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with
this project are limited to a total of 94 linear feet (0.004 acre) of jurisdictional stream channel. Permanent impacts to
Seasonal RPW Stream A are the result of a 66-foot RCP installation (S1) and a 28-linear foot riprap apron (S2).
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tempora (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose One
Choose
02
-
Choose One
Choose
03
Choose One
Choose
04
-
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes El No If yes, permit ID no.-
o:5i.
5i.Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres).-
acres):5k.
5k.Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Tempora (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
-
Yes/No
B2
-
Yes/No
B3
-
Yes/No
B4
-
Yes/No
B5
_
Yes/No
B6
-
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and
impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality
Certificate No. 3883. All work will be constructed in the dry.
There is an immediate need to realign and upgrade the existing stormwater pipe system as the current system is located
underneath a private residence, is in poor condition, and is undersized to meet current City of Charlotte design standards.
Additionally, the stream channel downstream of the current stormwater outfall is eroding, and is in a need of a riprap apron
to prevent erosional forces from further eroding the channel and undermining the stormwater outfall.
The existing stormwater pipe system and outfall will be relocated and replaced. During the pipe relocation, the stormwater
pipes will be upsized from 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) to 38-inch by 60-inch and 43-inch by 68-inch elliptical
RCP. However, there is a 66-linear foot section of jurisdictional stream channel between stormwater pipe sections that will
be piped with a 66-linear foot RCP (Figure 8, attached). This 66-linear foot stream impact is necessary to properly realign
the stormwater pipes once the pipes have been relocated from beneath the private residence. Therefore, permanent
stream impacts resulting from the stormwater pipe system realignment and upgrade are limited to 66 linear feet.
The upsized stormwater system is necessary to conform to the current City of Charlotte design standards to properly
handle baseflow and peak flow conditions. A 28-linear foot riprap apron placed downstream of the stormwater outfall is
necessary to dissipate flow, stabilize the banks, and prevent erosional forces from undermining the outfall. After
construction is complete, the stream will permit the passage of aquatic life, channel bed and banks will regain stability, and
future erosion will be minimized. Therefore, permanent stream impacts resulting from the riprap apron installation are
limited to 28 linear feet.
Total permanent impacts associated with this project are 94 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel and are the result of
stormwater system relocation and pipe upgrade. The project has been thoughtfully designed to avoid all other impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. wherever possible. We believe that the current site plan is the best possible plan that
meets the project goals while avoiding impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and
impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality
Certificate No. 3883. All work will be constructed in the dry.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
L4'Yes L1 No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
ffiDWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes M No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes
No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
This project is associated with a stormwater infrastructure maintenance project and
Yes
O` No
does not require a SMP.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes
No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project is associated with a stormwater infrastructure maintenance project and does not require a SMP.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the
plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
} Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
apply (check all that apply):
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Lff Yes
No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
HOW
ORW
(check all that apply):
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes
No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
N Yes
IT No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
N Yes
Od No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
rM Yes No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
" Yes No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
Yes No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
p Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge)
of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
C7 Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.`
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS scientists performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on
November 17, 2016 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or
critical habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally -protected
species within the project limits or within a mile of the project site. However, the recent listing of the Northern long-eared
bat (Myotis septentrionalis) now requires consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) per the
Final 4(d) Rule, which became effective on February 16, 2016, and recent guidance from the USACE.
Per USFWS published GIS data, there are no known mature roosting trees or hibernacula recorded in Mecklenburg
County. Therefore, by the Final 4d Rule this project is exempt.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
Yes l No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes[ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 17, 2016 to determine
the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. As
of the date of submittal, no response has been received from SHPO. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service,
the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission online database, and the Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G
historical mapping program and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
Yes ; No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Firm No. 3710458500K
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Erin Shanaberger
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Erin Digitally signed by Erin Shanaberger
DN: cn=Erin Shanaberger, o, ou,
emai I=erio.tu m [e-mail],
Shanaberger Date: 2016.11.28 11:03:10 -05'00'
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's
signature is valid only if an authorization letter
from the applicant is provided.)
11/23/2016
Date
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: November 21, 2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
(CMSWS); POC: Ms. Erin Turner, 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District — Asheville Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 6416 Karenstone Drive, Charlotte, North
Carolina
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg County City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.251834° Long.: -80.740522°
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Briar Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): November 14, 2016
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
Seasonal
RPW
Stream A
35.2519310
-80.7405220
135 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404, non -Section 10

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-7
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Harrisburg, NC (1996). 24K
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County (1976 & 20131
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 6: USF WS NWI for NC (2015)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): ESRI (2013)
or ®Other (Name & Date): Photopage (Photographs 1-4)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Digitally signed by Erin
Erin Shanaberger
DN: cn=Erin Shanaberger, o, ou,
em ail=eri n.tu me [e-mail] otte.n
Shanaberger c.U5,c=DS
Date: 2016.11.28 11:02:53 -05'00'
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: , - �' _ �'
Project/Site: Ot 16- rGl�>a� 0f
Latitude: 3 _
Evaluator. 4
County:
Longitude: Longitude: - ( 0,�
Total Points:5
F"
Stream isatleast intermittent j�j
�eaxn�etermination (circle ono)
C N©" -SD
Other i°I
lfz 19 or perennial ifs 30*
p hemera Intermittent Perennial
e. Quad Name:�''nEar
9'
C
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ( }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Condnulty of channel bed and bank
0
1.5 1 0.5
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
l
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1'
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 `-`
Yes = 3
Sketch: G j j f t , .I - y
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal= it )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
U0
15, Sediment on plants or debris
0 0 r` 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
_)
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = ---
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
fi }
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0'
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 2
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: G j j f t , .I - y

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: l I r r 6'
ProjectlSite: i�
Latitude: �� Q1 j (C.s
Evaluator: 4 8 /[S
County:
Longitude: 7qo
Total Points:rr
Stream is at least intermittent w
Stream Det aatie circle one}
Other $CP a;. t' r, nq
if 2: 19 orperennial if >_ 30' ort' :.� I
EphemeralkLa!EET!!Snp Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = lU'-5 )
Absent
Weak
Mod ate
Strong
I` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
0
es = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0'
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
00
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
l�fo = p-'
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q-
12.
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
CV 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
COD
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0. 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 6 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
(' Q
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennlal streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

WE' TLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: Gf�nb� / K �(nS��e- Drl�e City/County: CAGI10tr-C Sampling Date: I IS�I
Applicant/Owner: ^t- INh R A0V � W kA2,rcv. WaAe.- '2ymu 3 p
�rl�1A�S� State: �G Sampling Point: Q J
Investigator(s): A / C Section, Township, Range: C AG ,4orte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): nFl oe al lq r n Local relief (concave, convex, none): /YO /I t Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): /r�I-I`4- I3 Lat: S / I Long: `O0, 7'tO "f;8' Datum: 1Vt[)-6J
Soil Map Unit Name: H e I,? ( 14r /rr+ G -i�;n6- /o a,, NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes )(,_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No�
Q a tai POl%1 y— 1S I -Pp ✓e P11 7rr, ti(ltd.. d'r Q r5©,-,
(J�1fGr1Qf c'r�? r' torte t -,r* f�' 'di'1�i .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary ndicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2)
^_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B76)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No -7 Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No n
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No JA Ur �G td
o wl t /u?
by%/ a
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
501
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. r rQ f- ,1 t/$ OCC% !n 1ti /iS
% Cover
�_
Species? Status
i I%f�fy
2._ (/lWLIs' rvh rg
a8
Y F�
3. 1-r, v)' Gmt--4r S]' r<<�r. U<
IS
rj}G
4.i rip fn Wro/I t/ h' i e rei
I o
F*V
5, a, f rrvS p A e ll s
1.0
r -f C
7.
= Total Cover
50% of tojal cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 6
1. �- / vSr(v r✓1 ,/ •n P nS t- S•D
2. f eC1i !t VS --eq V-,rti f� Ar, 10 Fifff.
7.
—= Total Cover
S , 50% of total cover: 1K 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Pl�o/t size: ) Y
1. I ©x, G o cf a to rr ! qG rC� /rS" ► j
3
4
7
9
11.
'a = Total Cover
50% o[f�to�al cover: 7. � 20% of total cover: -i
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �^' )
1. j S e ©ii fCC, ?S �I�i9yG
2.Stn,1'/tix fOtVOdf t'q IS
Sampling Point: 0 P/ - VPL
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species `d-7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: O (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
ZC 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3,28 ft in
Hydrophytic
5 Vegetation X
Total Cover Present? Yes ' ` No
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: S
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
,:330 o f rhe c�on,!>7��tr are a� f�r�~t'l
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DPI- v PL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc exture Remarks
0-1 a /0Yg /od
L
12 -Q0 Ips/Ts/©o
s4L a
-'Type: C=Concentration, D=De lesion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
— Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) I(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
/Uo ,'nol!'rov s' ro(
X/ Pt r -.S-o"/I PrP
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

i
- i 1 •v�; 'f; 1r, c - s4 �` ,cam_.
�
— -,.r
� �''•�r �f
�_ _ tl Cyt., *r',, �_.
i
- i 1 •v�; 'f; 1r, c - s4 �` ,cam_.

FIFID 8R'II.DLtPEU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
a, 4 Northern Long -Eared Bat Final 4 d Rule
g �)
White -Nose Syndrome Zone Around WNS/Pd Positive Counties/Districts
1
Miles
Map Created August 31, 2016
Counties/Districts with WNS/Pd
Infected Hibernacula
White -Nose Syndrome Zone
Per Final 4(d) Rule
U.S. counties within 150 miles of positive
counties/districts (Data as of 08/31/16;
additional updates expected)
Northern Long -Eared Bat Range
(Revised 07/25/2016)
Northern Long -Eared Bat range and WNS Zone
subject to change as new data are collected.
WNS = White -Nose Syndrome
Pd = Pseudogymnoascus destructans; the
fungus that causes WNS
Coordinate System: WNS Counties/Districts Data Provided By:
North America Equidistant Conic Pennsylvania Game Commission
Datum: North American 1983 Basemap Data: USGS

INDEX OF SHEETS
CoverSheet ..»_ ...... .....__.......__...._._.._...._...... »»........... _.......... I
General Notes ..». ..... ............._...._.............»...».»..»..._.__...._.......
2
Erosion Control Plan.._......._.......___...____.......__.._..._.._..._....... 3
Storm Drainage Plan and Profile ................... ......_.._..._._............ 4
Water and Sewer Relocation Plan .......... ......... ....... ..................
. UC -I
Traffic Control Notes_ ...... _...................... __....... ...._......_..».....__.
TC -1
Traffic Control Plan .... ........ ........................... ........._.........»....». TC -2
TOTAL SHEETS 7
Vi(`iNTTV MAP
IN15
PLANS PREPARED BY:
w
223 N Graham Street Charlotte, NC 28202
V: 704.333.0325 F. 704.332.3246
www.LandDesign.com
NC Engineering Firm License #0.0658
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Construction Plans of Proposed
6416 Karenstone Drive
Munis Code: 807020 0004
Emerald Request: 3892788
Project Features:
Storm Drainage Improvements
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Driveway Repair
End Project Pavement Repair
Landscaping
Chalett
KM
SeMces
2012 NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
GRAPHIC SCALES
20
40
60
Plan Vim ..............
Proposed Property Line_......................._....._��—
20
40
60
Herz. Profile ..__.....MEMW
i. ssu 5
Existing Structures ......................... .........
4
8
12
Vert. Profile ............
Proposed Edge of Pavemmt .... ...................
Fence...... ...... ............... ............ _....... ....... x _x
5
10
15
Cross Section ..........
Temporary Construction Easement ............ — a e —
PE SEAL
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Proposed Property Line_......................._....._��—
Existing Property Lint ............. ........... _....» — —
S`��'S.syt\II
;•2:tit
Maintained as R/W Line. .............. .... ...... _
i. ssu 5
Existing Structures ......................... .........
= warm
i e
zi`•.
-3�S`••f,Malw}4�:r`yo �r
Railroad Tracks ............... ....... _..............
Proposed Edge of Pavemmt .... ...................
Fence...... ...... ............... ............ _....... ....... x _x
Slope Stake Line ......... ._ .... _....................... _..
Temporary Construction Easement ............ — a e —
Sidrwalk/Utility Easement._____.... — sue sue—
Storm Drainage Easement ........ ............... .. — sce sm—
Existing Gas Line ............... .»..»........»...... o o —
Existing Water Line ... .......... _.»....»...»».._. w w
Existing Sanitary Sewer ».._...»»._..»..»...._.. sa as —
Existing Underground Telecommunications—
Existing Underground Electric ... .......... _.._. — ue ue —
Existing Stores Drainage ....... ............ ----~ ----
Proposed Storm Drainage _.... _................. ..
Existing Tree ... ................ ..............._.....»_...»..................................0
Existing Water Meter ... ........................... _...... ......... _........ ......... _ ❑
Existing Wafer Valve ................. ..................... ............................ >a
Gv
Existing Gas Valve..__.... . ......... . ............................ oa
s
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole ..............».... .....................................
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole ........ ....................... ....... ............ 0
°
Existing Storm Drain Manhole ............................
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ... ............................................ _.0
Existing Telephone Manhole ._........ ... _...............»..». T
Proposed Pump Around Operation ... .................. ...... ..... P
Existing Electric Manhole _.»....._.__.........» ..................... _..._..»._».Q
Proposed Stilling Ruin _... ....... ............ ............ ..................... »..❑�
Existing Catch Basin ..... ».......... .........._».......» .............».._».»...»..»B
Proposed Catch Bum ................ ...................... .............. .......... _�
ExistingLight Pole ........ ....... ......................... .r .................. _............. �
Proposed Light Pole .»... .......... ........................ .... ._........... ... ...........
Existing Utility Pole .....» ........................... »................ »_......... _............ TX
Guy Wire ... _..................................................... »............................. . —<
Proposed Utility Pole ............ .................................... »....._..... ............. V,
IronPin ..... »»»...... __...................... _............. _................... _..... _....... _. 0
Existing Fire Hydrant»»».............._.._......_..._.._.........................._......
Proposed Fire Hydrant._._..»...............................................................
ExistingDrop Inlet ....................................... _...... _........... _.................... E:1
Proposed Drop Inlet .............. .._.......................... _..... _.._.................. _. W
Accessible Ramp .................................... ....... .... _....... ... ... ... ........ ®
Tree Protection .............. .»................... ..... ............ _...............
Proposed Guardrail_.......................»..»....................._.....»..».
9
Silt Fence ...................................
Proposed Curb & Gutter ....................... ... ... ._...... _.._....._.
Proposed Conc. Drive. Sidewalk...._ ................ 3«$
Proposed Rip Rap _. ............ ..... .»._..... .......................... _.........
Proposed Gravel ..... ............................. ....................... _....
Proposed Pavement Removal _ ......................_._......»»_._...._.._
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots _._...._............
RECOMMENDED
Proposed Asphalt Mill and
FOR CONSTRUCTION
Contract Administration
•
Bid Set No.
Storm Water Construction
Utility Coordinator
r.
ITE
ENGINEERING 8 PROPERTY
Landscape Management
CDOT - Design
MANAGEMENT
APPROVED
CITY ENGINEER DATE
COOT - Implementation
Charlotte Water
Storm Water Project Manager

GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS STANDARDS
ARANO ............................ ABANDONED NTS .......................... NOT TO SCALE THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPUCABLE
PROPOSED CURB ELE\-A TIONS: TOLERAN(_ E: AD.................................ALGEBRAIC 0/H ........................... OVER HEAD TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS. I
DIFFERENCE ASPH..............................ASPHALT OC ............................ ON CENTER NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO STRUCTURES INCLUDING STORM DRAIN PIPE, STORM STRUCTURES, SEWER PIPE. AND RETAINING APPROX. ......................... APPROXIMATELY PAVT. ....................... PAVEMENT MAY BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPLICABLE NCDOT STANDARD.
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN WALLS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF *0.10 FEET. STRUCTURES INCLUDING RISERS, WEIRS, B/C.................................BACK OF CURB PC, .......................... .POINT OF CURVATURE
EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND ORIFICES, SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF *0.05 FEET. BIT...................................BITUMINOUS PERM........................ PERMANENT
BM...................................BENCH MARK PG............................ PACE NI : nr'
DRIVEWAYS AND, SIDEWALKS: STREAM IMPROVEMENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF *0.10 FEET. BRG.................................BEARING PI............................. POINT OF INT
AND A PLANIMETRIC TOLERANCE OF *0.50 FEET, CB...................................CATCH BASIN PK ............................ PK NAIL SET
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION - C&G................................CURB AND GUTTER PP............................ POWER POLE STD. NO.: TEFL
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY: '-IDE LOPES: CL...................................CLEARANCE CA PROP --.......•••••••••••.••PROPOSED
300.01..........................................METHOD OF PIPE INSTALLATION
° CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI). FENCE.............................CHAIN LINK FENCE PSE ......................... SW ESMT 838.11.......................................... BRICK ENOWALL FOR SINGLE PIPE n
° ASPHALT - COMMERCIAL TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119.08 LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD CMP................................CORRUGATED NTL PT............................POINT OF TANGENCY 840.01................................ ..........BRICK CATCH BASIN (12" THRU 54" PIPE) m
(COMMERCIAL) PIPE CONC .....................CONCRETE PVI...........................POINT OF VERT INT 840.03..........................................FRAMES, GRATES. AND HOOD
INTERMEDIATE COURSE. UNLESS D THE MAXBY T SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 1HORIZONTAL LL VERTICAL) CONST.........................CONSTRUCTION PUE .......................... PERM UTILITY ESMT 840.38..........................................BRICK DROP INLET (NO APRON) U
(RESIDENTIAL) TWO INCH SF9.58 COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY r...............................RADIUS 840.71............ -............................. CONCRETE AND BRICK PIPE PLUG • Z X
BASE (ABC) COURSE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. DOBEI .................................DEED BOOK
o GRAVEL -SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE DCB................................DOUBLE CB RT.............................. RIGHT 840..02 ........................................PIPE COLLAR r"K 9!
FRrI snN CCINTn 0....................................DROP INLET RCP..........................REINFORCED CONC 1110.02............................... ..........PORTABLE WORK ZONE SIGNS
SIDEWALK SHALL BE FOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS, DIA..................................DIAMETER PIPE R0.0C............. RELOCATE 1135.01......................................... CONES
PER CITY STD. NO. 10.22. DW...................................DRIVEWAY R/W.......................... RIGHT OF WAY 1145.01................................. ........BARRICADES - TYPE III U 3 :�
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DIM..................................DIMENSION S............................... SOUTH 1150.01............. ............................ FLAGGING DEVICE G,E €
DRAINAGE STRI IC TURES: APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCES. THE E......................................EAST/EASING SD.....,.-••.....-••••••••••STORM DRAIN 1630.06........................................ SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS 1633.01.........................................MATTING INSTALLATION +p•' F
SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR EA...................................EACH SF FOOT CE
GRADES. ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE EDEV................................ELEVATION FE...E......................SANI RAIL FENCE ,
ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS, SHALL FOLLOW THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON SHEET 3 OF 4. EDP.................................EDGE OF PAVEMENT 55............................SANITARY SEWER
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION ESMT...............................EASEMENT STA ......................... STATION Z 3 .5
BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS EXIST...............................EXISTING STD................... .......STANDARD U
III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEERE-SSED C 1_1^.S: F/C.................................FACE OUCURB SSW ............................ C. HAKLIJ I IL; �> Z
WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, A MINIMUM OF 1 FES.................................FLARED END SECTION TAN ......................... ,TANGENT
WEEPHOLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6-INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT FH...' ................................FIRE HYDRANT TCF.......................... TEMP CONST ESMT STD. Na, TILE:
STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS, FOC.................................FIBER OPTIC CABLE TEMP ......... •.............. TEMPORARY 10.17A.......................................... STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER
FABRIC AND FILLED W/g78 STONE. THERE WALL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK. CONSTRUCTION PLANS 8: NCOOT STANDARD DRAWINGS. GV...................................CAS VALVE TP ............................ TRAVERSE PONT 10.178.......................................... VALLEY CURB AND GUTTER
HOBZ..............................HORIZONTAL T/W.......................... TEST WIRE 10.27A................................,....,....RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY (TYPE 1)
CITIES: _ - INT..................................INTERSECTION TYP..........................TYPICAL 20.DOA.B.C...................................NCOOT STANDARDS
r.
_"-�''�c'- -. 20.23............................................RIP RAP APRON AT PIPE OUTFALLS
INV..................................INVERT U/G..........................UNDER GROUND 'o
UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD IP....................................IRON PIN SET VC..........................-VERTICAL CURVE �-OSI•�•�-�-•-�-�•�•�--�----••-�--•-•�••�•••-•�-.HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION _
R CITIES c FOR THEACCURACY IOFUTILITY PURPOSES
SIZES- DEPTHS, OR L N THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR L................ LENGTH VERT.........................VERTICAL 30,10........,.......,...,„,....................TEMPRARY ROCK CHECK DAM a
TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE LF-...................................UNEAR FOOTAGE W............................. WEST 30.11 A..........................................STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
COMP N cc OF
UTILITY INFORMATION. 1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE 30.1!1...........................................CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION �+
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE LT..,.."-"-"...............,,,,,."LEFT W/••"""""""""""""WITH 30.17A.8.......................................TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITIES AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TE-IN TO FACE OF Ib....................................POUND VIM ...........................WATER METER W
LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER. 30.18............................................CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CREEK BANK
LP................................LIGHT POLE VAULT...,....,............WATER VAULT 40.02............................................ TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS
MAX%.................................MAXIMUM WV .......................... VALVE
FOR ANY THIRD-PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF - MIN..................................MINIMUM 60P..........................SIXTY PENNY NAIL SET
HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE: MONO ..............................MONOLITHIC-•,-•„-•...................... FOOT
RESPONSIBILITY. mph................................MILES PER HOUR INCH '
AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER COOT HAS DETERMINED THAT MO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE IS TO BE ASSESSED. MIL................................METAL ..............................
LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS N.....................................NORTH/NORTHING „
UTILITY OWNERS. VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR a
DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRAFFIC . l_?NTR('.IE:
STAY A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET AWAY FROM ALL UTILITY POLES. '•�— °n _ 1,na,�,W +.rr �KKY_
° Ra f' ,r� ;. ' :3•':F `o7b:aa,. `HYs'iiae.nK,
FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE-CALL O 1-800-632-4949. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE "WORK AREA
° TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK” (WATCH) AND THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ON SHEET TCT AND • 8• p„ ;� ,•,y;law +.ypo� •r*Srx ca+"a,w
FOR LOCATES OF UTILITIES NOT MEMBERS OF NORTH CAROUNA ONE-CALL CONTACT TC2. F' wnw.o.rox w.asu.�r.uerrx.+Rwxx.mx.a:ws
PROJECT MANAGER h UTILITY COORDINATOR. '°x."•
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER
VAULTS TO FINISHED GRADE. WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS r
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES. • ` W+"•�,i'+',a
BASE SURVEY DATAx .'awx^�::.�.....m.u,,.,x. <..•w.,,..��Pi —
GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. VIA THE ®r. w.,..:.,w:m «+. n....r..a.mi......a •... wn. m+m. x+a„m•.
CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT wwaox er r+r aNH•+m,.:x.n.wxa.w■nxaw u..
NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. +>:3 i", '��'
EXISTING CONDITIONS TAKEN FROM A COMPILATION DATED "ENTER DATE" OF GROUND r :I ®:"'"_,,.�`,
SURVEYS BY "ENTER CONSULTANTS NAME" DATED "ENTER DATE' __ r NI"i�O'-'' ^''�
EXItiTING SANITARY SEWER APHID `$NATER LINE: w
AND BY "ENTER CONSULTANTS NAME" DATED MAY 7, 2008. ALL COORDINATES •IRIM
y C
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER BASED ON NAD 83 AND NAVD 88. 'i ! _ _R+xf.)r.m.+.'.•y+rte nw vnm onw..nw>a.ro+,+.sw S
LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL 'I4 '+r'm,.`+<'`s'"N"�s•+•'.'u.'+w r'.n'n'^"""""N- B
IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR Ownw.i:." X19
SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER LINE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION'SCn'S.xrm
Drainage Structure Table
OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID LINES, am uwr Na .•'"'Par n.,e* ,r e..., " w°6+I
VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY. n+c .r 4,�+.,r,
W
AN Of TOP SLAB
,IHRS1RFACE PLANS
a r1 ,„ ■ k
HISSUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE U THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE yy A
HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. � � N � � � � � � � � tl •L .� � M : � c`
MAIL BOXES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REWIRED BY SECRON 107-12 OF THE
1)R �NA.4w�R
NCOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH x+n■ W a rnm rn amor Pn unP•O '^.,”; '�
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. a.
FENCES' a NmF .a. �N r.o l 6 uN�1�N eti. s
■ �•••• •••'rn• �'4eF'i`w"' SILL OF WATEWUL ,
.ra,. w rnr■ ,«.:, ,,.■ N I sm w■ as xxnA I' _ e o
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS SOW ,x■ ""� • s
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:=xara,�
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LANEREMOVET BEEP, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE _ i—
UNlE55 SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE THAT FALL WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION
BARRIERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT/FILL UNES INQ@�
ADDITION TO THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES/SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING ISN-" BiA TOES a 3a �V�•
NECESSARY• CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD IN ACCORDANCEFe i= ,�j I•�
WITH IS
01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING xNrx ron >r i,lmr ',-- 44 ;£
SHO
ALL BE PER THE LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL (TYP.) W
PL41d OF BOT$ '.A! G Ap - - Q w
USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB k GUTTER OR SIDEWALK. -
USE CLD STD. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT W d
CURBING MUST USE CLD STD. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLD STD. 40.02 Her' orriau •.■nw•i.Frl Immoqr (- - z xZx
AND NTH SECTION 1001) OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS.
. WHEN THE ,ki ]
TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA TREE PROTECTION CLD S. 40.12 SHALL BE USED. W
G
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY TREES. IN ADDITION. z0
. -
ALL TREES LOCATED WITHIN THE LOD THAT ARE TO REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INSPECTED PROPCB-4
a
BE THE CITY TO VERIFY THEY ARE SUITABLE TO REMAIN. 0
FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION STAKING THE PROJECT TEAM (CONTRACTOR, CITY INSPECTOR, CITY ARBORIST NTS , _ I
AND CONSULTANT. IF APPUCABLE) WILL HOLD AN ON-SITE MEETING TO ENSURE THE UMITS OF 'x•°�a'rxnx I FRAME AND GRATE EN LIEU OF MANHOLE RING AND COVER) .ASH GARP" A :; W
DISTURBANCE AND THAT TREES PROPOSED FOR PROTECTION ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 111E TEAM WILL ?: '$ii- �•
WALK THE PROJECT AREA AND AGREE ON THE TREES TO D PROTECTED AND THOSE C REMOVE, RECUTS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. AND IDENTIFY ANY OVENNAP TREES TO PROTECT THAT WERE NOT 3 =
ORIGINALLY MARKED AS SUCH. THE CONTRACTOR GULL GIVIDN APPROVAL FOR TREE REMOVAL• IN
WRITING. AFTER APPROPRIATE TREE PROTECTION HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR PAVLIRf6NT A6PAIA y '
REMOVAL CAN BEGIN. ,�/�(�
Not© ^1q,WT_ ll.�y�,�.•
THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR TREE PROTECTION INSTALLED AROUND ADDITIONAL TREES » DETAIL (\J `L" TIL OPQ„J -
EN FOR PROTECTION.
T CONT = N c
THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES ION OR NOT M FOR 7N-KIND" REPLACEMENT OF TREES DAMAGED THAT HAVE
BEEN MARKED FOR PROTECTION OR NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL
N
TSI
N
W

\ \ m9FERVlOW aKE OETAIt
♦ R/
1
T vrmm�
PLAN VIEW
e FaapE m an. neer, m cf++,E r."N9aTMTalFoIaRRTIw aw4PEn6. )HE un rf OMa1DRE m mRa,.lcf: N R nEr,:, r�1.MR rrn d +rt�re.-.x
TNr.w.mE,R>K:*uF.N+To wPFrsex.sr..numbcexwr.*raoFon.wR).w of+eo..or,rowuuzr LF,rEo ra a.<• NOT TO SCALE
fIi1l:iA iTF.-MECKI}'\IlCKG EXAMPLE PUMP AROUND FLOW DIVERSION -- 7G -
s rOK1l LATER SLWCFS AND DEWATERING CONFIGURATION mr �,6 ♦ �,,
CE%Epr 6ETAIL MIlfVt%M -10
A AMNERT MMOVAL DE-E.e«r.....=„rs.-
1
ti r
if NRORLARY lTA8N12E0OLRLET-l�CTON A•A'
•r N04Pr roar RMAKr ronLoae r.a rNANM iKt4aunoN maugLnM. r.aur. a wewona rou agw6o.,A u�,:, r un nim ,.Ts a .Lo W o,6
H•rFnRamrorEr ro.ewEmo+araFc+pEanlaETwoFaa.•.e..searEa.RanrAroewm Norm c-4n+e sx,. NOT TO SCALE
rurcm
CHARLOTTE-MECKLES6t'llI EXAMPLE PUMP AROUND FLOW DIVERSION
sto@M MATRR smicus I AND DEWATERING CONFIGURATION x,wx : PLf F
GTTLTCT V11 RY.CLI7JILNT+
` L
-. � NC INC VIETNAMESE 6UDDE3IST SOCIETY Of / / Q \\ � t _ � ., � CLAUDrDB ]8615)PG iQ69GR� /
TAX ttID)-06)-03
os o64)s. Pc zsz9 / KHOS0.0WWBFEN/ l61OWA\ \
O
6332
ROvJO620 T-101-030 /60
\ "- ---- --
- - - TAX alol-m3 ' DS 1338. PG
EMRANCE (CLOS 3D.11A) \ \
A/ N651112.71
/ 6526
\ \ ELEv=)ez.n (Moose)
FEE -761.50
9
/ 4' CAST
ON AEAL
. 55 LATERAL
Oq,_e'+� _
/ PoPCLDSRA & 762.1 - 4g MICHAEL o . WJET n
EIR
M (IRON SET)/ ® -- R -� •" � / /'� F //yy , ]56.6 \ / 't` T .1i 53-1. 0
O51172)) eh /l 0 DS -M-
N
E% SSMH ELEv=)SB.t3(MVOeB)-E% �m • WF y \ / ".� ` 8333
- -_ RIM -753.31 '; FFE=758.03 KHOSROW-ROV)OU / 3
d
. 6 pL61G E6A&Nr/ TAXa10)A63.39 --_ _ V / )60.16
1.0._74518 - , 3 l DB 6610. PG 363 )58.-
(NCDDT1800.08) -
SSE \ _\ SSE \PROP. ROCK CHECK DAM / '-•ae. _ • 6400 FFE_]60.72 y <.a. p TC 15.61 SSE-
6
�E �S
Sc C 10 - .OS IMRO'NARE CLOTH AFD GRAVEL �5 / 19 ,ih SS � -
\ Ky ` SSE ✓ ` y I / - - _ IW.ET PROTECOON (CLD6i xos)
SSE 0
\. -... �DS46,. G3•.� OS • _���/ TC 71� -- Sem
,P �� 305 35305 SSE
1 SSE
e s$ `�=' SSE
GARAGE \ \ 0
FFE-753.03 el 6406
,iT \ FFE=758.33 11.q.'
FPR �4
4
\ - �� /• "55.4
gy DECK \ 1
\ \ 6416 WF
\ \ \ \ EUGENE 0. HOOVER
FFE_738.28 \ TAX a10)-063-38 I
'- \ , DIS zssso. Pc 3s3
L. OZ-
mzX ,4rb15
D6394ee. w z3z /
KHOSROW BEHROVKKI EIR
TAX
1I1)]-063-3]
�\ DB 661a PG 3D
Ex. PROPERrr ura=mPe /
\ \ \ PROP. SSMSH6
k
_- 55E POP SSMH74 SSE
_g5 Tc nfi.e4 '
]57.83 / -- .. �F• �; -
LSI,, I�AN /� 1 PRDPDBED IMPERVIOUS DIKE
�IDONED - J.�t y- / O ®; "- ,Q, �- _ y _. _ _.© DTH BYPIISa PUMP. (TYP.)
' pAAINJ //'
(/D
F 6 3U' STORM DRAMAGE,
O. S EA6EMFM.TYP. aa
. N TEMPORARY CONSTRLFTION
EASEMENT, TVP.
t96O1� CRTCHMWNIFAET Q
PROTECnoN (cLDss so.16) t _
SMF
/ KFNTYW B@10.W740U
1-
6413 8417
WF \
TAMM VEAL
6412 /
i
EROSION CONTROL STANDARDS
THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPUCABLE
TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS.
NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MAY BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPUCABLE NCDOT STANDARD.
STD. NO.: TITLE:
1630.06.. .. ............... STILUNG BASIN
H 1,PL-IT I L'
20.23 .........................
.... .RIP RAP APRON AT PIPE OUTFALLS
30.09 ..........................................
.HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
30.10 .......... ......................
.. .. TEMPRARY ROCK CHECK DAM
30.11A ....................................
STABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
3015 ..... ...................
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
3OA7A,B...................................TEMPORARY
SEEDING SCHEDULE
3018...............................CONSTRUCTION
WITHIN CREEK BANK
- -7]e-
MST.IDCONTDURS
D NG OVERHEAD F1EC7RIC
MST. z CONTOURS
FXISn-(i SAHITARY sms
TEMP. CONSIRIFTDN
MTINGrL WATER MAIN
EMPANCEIEXIT (CLOS t30,11A)
EXISTING CAME LINE
TEAP.ROOKCHECN DTVI
E%6TING STORM DRA64AGE
ICLO6a ]0.1%
O
MARDWARECLOTH AFDGMVEL
MET PROTECTION
TEMFORAAY CONSTRUCTION FFSEMIWT
6-LD6 W.09)
STORMDMINAGEEA%MENT
IMPERVIOUS OIKE WRH8YPASs
OP
PLIMPIGLDSR So,l6)
EXISTING POWER POLE
SFECIAL STILLING SASIN
0
RecorsTO.imos)
EX. RIGHT OF WAY NNE
F3p5TMG TREE
CATCH SAS IN INLET PROTECTION
(C1D5.9 ")
NOTES:
1. CONTMCTORTOCOORDINAM WRHWSPECTORONROUONGLOCATK)HPATHOF
PUMP AROUND NNE FROM IMPERVRJU6 DIX TO S ML STILLING BASIN,
EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELECOM
EXISTING GAS MAIM
.
-
D NG OVERHEAD F1EC7RIC
- _ _
FXISn-(i SAHITARY sms
-•• +•
MTINGrL WATER MAIN
-
EXISTING CAME LINE
E%6TING STORM DRA64AGE
_ __ _ _
PROPOSED STORM DPAiNAGE
TEMFORAAY CONSTRUCTION FFSEMIWT
- • - • -
STORMDMINAGEEA%MENT
EXISTING STORM TO BE REFTOVED
- - -'- -'
EXISTING POWER POLE
PROPERTY
EX. RIGHT OF WAY NNE
F3p5TMG TREE
EXISTING ABPHALTAND BASE MATERIAL
TO ISE REMOVED AND R -ED
moFosm wlvcRETE
PROPOSED 311• CURB AND GUTTER
-
ASPHALT TO SE MILLED AND OVERLAYED (I- DEPTH) -
3 wr
z
H.NC r y a
�r' > a
z�� U
Woz z
° C
± 20 4o 60 LT]
�P9RYYblM�' PLAN SCALE: 1'-20'
I�OBImY•K ,
2012 NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
N
N

765
7w
755
750
745
0+00 1
/
...NC INC WLTNAFIFSE RIpDl65T SOCrfY Of /
TAX#107-0f2-02
DR 0647s. fc ssr
WF
KHOMOW 9E-IROV)OU
6526
_4' CAST
S5 LATERAL / TW OF WALL 756.58
INV. IN: 746.05 (DL2)
/ PROPOSED .
/ RIPClD5i2D38� / OP.66.54 LF OF 4YX68'RCP�
® e
Nns117z.n e
E=I14B -LT2 41 LF OF FJL 38' /
EX 541H ELEV=156.13INAv0ae) • �� CMP TO BE READIED
:.- RI11=783.31 / PROP 6PECILL �E 7903 /
STIWNG Bh41N /
1.0 -745.1*
ssE INc0:1 To.te.YDBe) /
- SEE FROP: RODK CI£CK MM
\ \OL08f WAS) -
se
r w ss6 8t
BEE _ y
? F.
Bim\PNtOP. SSE
GMAGE
FFE=753.08 6 WOOD DRNACY FENCE TO P / /
REMOVED AND REPLACED IS 215 LF)
NR PROP. PIPE 0.UG, TTP. ,ly
LD HIO.07IVC LLC 1 ) NC470T1#MD.T1
DB 211 M 132
\
+00 2+00 3+00
Sti
\ ELEWL50N ENRK7UE RANIW
ADO TAX#1077.1
WF
f6MHM 5 HOW1AVl \ `_ 63]2 / SlWS-FOFA.PHA TCLIRBTO
TA 73311, 601 \ \ -- - - / �/ WTH 2 EDAVALLEY REPLACED
06 ),WFG601 6 \ \ - J/`J'If/ W R2'A-VALLEY REPLACED
QD �
Q \ \
CONTRACTOR TO TIE INTO M(WVL IN )
2 \ \ EXISTING DRNEWAY GRADE Nn llnTT
WF r CONCRETE DRNEWAY E•14Bp356.T2
KHOSROw BEHROv)pU / �� TO BE REMDVED AND �� ESEY-m71 NAVDBB
TAX NI67-062-19 \
REPLACED (1, 37 SYS
DB 6648. PG )02 \` OLDS 1DWA
/
PRW
ryrpFCP DF2 MOOT STD. #84026 0
pIO APRON)
W W
/PROP.
°a
51.96 LF OF W
BC RCP®1.0
\ \
�-
PROP. SS CO��
a\
6100
OVERLAY (t-pEPTN)
♦
` 6333
/
`
FFE=760.72
SOF EXISTING 38'RCP
oSE REMWED \ SSE �-
0
SSE
nt ss
4'S 5s SSE
/
/`//
0
x43 LF OF EX 36'CMP TO BE 0 -�
REMOVED A
PROP.T6.%LFOF WXW-RCP®1.00%
PROP. OLd NCD04 ST0.464028
(ND APRON) -
1 ss
�S
HARDWARE CLOTH ANO GRAVEL 0 f
16AET PROTECTION(CL08 M09)� 756
mn
SERVICES. m. _
DESCRIPTI-D
Ae
)0566 q
T
SS
5408
FFE-75833
0
1 EX. w CMP RPE TO W CLEAFEDAFD FILLED WTSH AL
' FLOWABLEFILLFROMAPEPWOLOCAIIONTO \ CONTRACTORTOTIEIWO
MPEPLUGLOGTIONANDABVpOFEDINPLXCE. WCY)`` E%ISTING DRA'EWAYGRAOE\P.
RFMDVEDARDCONCRETERERACED lYTOSE-1
\ \ CLDS SO-
\ \\ 6416 PROP. PIPE RW. ttP. \ WF
\ \ EUGENE R HIOOVBI I
\\ \ 1 FFE=736.28 NCDOTs 640.Ti \ Dess#zso PC 35!/
4T
KHOSROW EBIROv)(XI EW
TAX#10]-062-37
EX
PROPERTY LME (TYP)
AISS RIRf6 bfibEt
\ C8�04fa16166ML
M PUCE (TTP)
FYf \
TM1KA
TAX.I.?
06 7e2ss. FG 6RB /
6412
n _ \
4+00
765
760
755
750
,�vacaa<':oao,�Ji�
��N�
���Yp�Hq �uaeN��1
PIPE JOINT
WRAPPING DETAIL
4 6 8
745
Verl- Profile
20 40 60
Hor2. Profile
FOUNDATION PROTECTION NOTE: FPR
INSTALL FWI4OAlRX4 PROTECTION PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AT THE FOLLOVANG LOCATIONS:
1. 640p MRE STONE DRIVE
2. SLOB KARENSTOWNE DRIVE
SEE PROJECT MANJAL FOR SPECIAL PROVISIONS
NOTES:
1. ALLRIPETOBECUSSIVRCAU WOTIERVASENOTED.
2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL SAHTAW SEINER IATERALS PRIOR TO CONSTRLICTION,
3. COFTRACTOR TO COORDNATE INITH CHARLOTTE WATER REGARDING TEMPORARY
OR PERHMfENT WATER METER RELOCATIONS.
4. VERTICKLOCATONOF MTINOWATERMNM)DGASWASSHOV.NONTHE
PUN WERE PERFORMED VA VACIAIM EXCAVATION W ON TARGET UTILITY LOCALE
SERVICES, INC., ON APRIL 24.2014.
5. CONTRACTOR TO SEED AND STRAW ALL DSTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT
UWTS (5 2541 SY)
S. PIPE DRAENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE MEASURED TO UNTEF6JNE OF STRUCTURES.
T. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN 5 SEPARATION FROM UTKRY POLES WITH ALL
EXCAVATION.
S. CONTRACTOR TO RWWNNACCEWTOALLORIVEWAYSFORRESME ATAU
TIMES DU RING COHETRUCTION.
9. DRNEVAY SPOT ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY PROVIDED DATA CONTRACTOR TO
FELDVERIFT.
SANITARY SEWER NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO
RM SHEET 1X:-1 OF I I FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER
MPR WEWENTS PREPARED BY HINDE ENDNEERMO.
ASPHILLT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH
FUl DEPTH SECTpI
ASPHALT TO BE W LLEDAM OJERLAYED
(1 -DEPTH)
EXIsnHx: sTo9nro9E RET4ovEp -
IX TING FENCE TO BE RD -LOVED -
it
.p<H 2-A
W W
°a
.�
Zzzon
\ \
�-
TAX #15)-051-10
ASPHALT LL AND 066084. PG 313 -
-
\
OVERLAY (t-pEPTN)
�
` 6333
� f
`
.16SOU
SOF EXISTING 38'RCP
oSE REMWED \ SSE �-
-...
SSE
nt ss
4'S 5s SSE
TO All
SSE
1 ss
08E� ON TARGET UTILITY LOCATE
SERVICES. m. _
DESCRIPTI-D
Ae
)0566 q
\ =TY De -(TOP)
44 UTIl1TY DEPTH,(BOT)w
OR MOST RECENT VERSION
NOTE r. SLACK STEEL
-
- M. OUT: 751.%) (Co.)
-1 838__1_
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS DKE
WITH BYPASS PIAAP. (TYP.J
/ 3G8
®S(ORMDRAMiADE-
B
EASBAENT. TYP.
TEAPORARY C6N6TRL0%N
- '
EASEAEW. TYP.
-
ate
ON TARGET LITIITY LOCATE
i PROP. 31.,6 LF6 WXSO`RCP®1.11%_-----RVICES. MC.
PROP. CB STV TBJB((3RATE F)
-SE
- DESCRPIION:WATER
- (REFERTODETARONSNEET2)
ITX3ttDEPDHITOPIJI-
CATCHBASINIFLET
Q UTILDYDEPM IWTY.
NOTE. r. BLACK STEEL -
PROTECTION (CLD663O.,5)
T
TRANSITION 10 LF EACN
SIM (CLOS61000)
SS,
KHASYOU EHROU7JW
TA%#161-071-06
\
\ END OF ROAD SIGN TO
DB "I., PG 96)
TEMPORARILY REMOVED
6413 _
\ ANDRESET -
\ASPHMT MILL AND
OVERS -AY (I- DEPTH)
FYf \
TM1KA
TAX.I.?
06 7e2ss. FG 6RB /
6412
n _ \
4+00
765
760
755
750
,�vacaa<':oao,�Ji�
��N�
���Yp�Hq �uaeN��1
PIPE JOINT
WRAPPING DETAIL
4 6 8
745
Verl- Profile
20 40 60
Hor2. Profile
FOUNDATION PROTECTION NOTE: FPR
INSTALL FWI4OAlRX4 PROTECTION PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AT THE FOLLOVANG LOCATIONS:
1. 640p MRE STONE DRIVE
2. SLOB KARENSTOWNE DRIVE
SEE PROJECT MANJAL FOR SPECIAL PROVISIONS
NOTES:
1. ALLRIPETOBECUSSIVRCAU WOTIERVASENOTED.
2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL SAHTAW SEINER IATERALS PRIOR TO CONSTRLICTION,
3. COFTRACTOR TO COORDNATE INITH CHARLOTTE WATER REGARDING TEMPORARY
OR PERHMfENT WATER METER RELOCATIONS.
4. VERTICKLOCATONOF MTINOWATERMNM)DGASWASSHOV.NONTHE
PUN WERE PERFORMED VA VACIAIM EXCAVATION W ON TARGET UTILITY LOCALE
SERVICES, INC., ON APRIL 24.2014.
5. CONTRACTOR TO SEED AND STRAW ALL DSTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT
UWTS (5 2541 SY)
S. PIPE DRAENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE MEASURED TO UNTEF6JNE OF STRUCTURES.
T. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN 5 SEPARATION FROM UTKRY POLES WITH ALL
EXCAVATION.
S. CONTRACTOR TO RWWNNACCEWTOALLORIVEWAYSFORRESME ATAU
TIMES DU RING COHETRUCTION.
9. DRNEVAY SPOT ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY PROVIDED DATA CONTRACTOR TO
FELDVERIFT.
SANITARY SEWER NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO
RM SHEET 1X:-1 OF I I FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER
MPR WEWENTS PREPARED BY HINDE ENDNEERMO.
ASPHILLT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH
FUl DEPTH SECTpI
ASPHALT TO BE W LLEDAM OJERLAYED
(1 -DEPTH)
EXIsnHx: sTo9nro9E RET4ovEp -
IX TING FENCE TO BE RD -LOVED -
it
.p<H 2-A
W W
°a
.�
Zzzon
Z Q O
IG Q
aDa
Cz
it
?0 40 60
b
PLAN SCALE: 1"=20'
2012 NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OR MOST RECENT VERSION
W

H I N D E KFIODW
EHROVJOU
ENGINEERING BP07-.2
TAI Po7-D6z-D, PROPOSED
24 LF 6'
_ - OB 6648. PG 362 STEEL SLEEVE t S
Tam c EI..-.... w•.�il�e.i.` a�.+Na N.w o.w seE 06
INSTALLED UNDER 38'X60'RCP
/ -S1- STA 0+59
PROPOSED 4 DIA MANHOLE 42
\ \Re-wc VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST / SOLID LID ft SEALED (WATERTIGHT)
TAX/10=-02` - - - z _ _
OB 06475. PG '1529 / \ C CASTWON
55 uiERAERIAL
AL
lkM1 HIkGN PROPOSED 59 LF 8' DI CP, 56X LF OF 1., ;L Pf' Ft,P l4-
PROPOSC£OWEUT
LEANSEWER PIPE, PC 350 e
E :a6 3
FLEV TSG
PROPOSED 25 LF 4' Dl
/RESTRAINED jolySEWER
PIPE, T PC 350SHED
a snE 7 REMOVE & REPLACE -75&03
k- PROPOSED 22 LF 6'
°' SSE ss STEEL SLEEVE T
17
r•�yLT R) PCV. OM+ / /y 9W
\ f: 30 T, HOPSF'MSIN
SnWNr, BA6IN e p / \
/ / � / IvcOOT sm iRTD.k) v � I fi9W
Oow�rIW9
PROPOSED 4' DM MANHOLE i1
Rt
SOLID LID SEALED (WAITERTIGHT)
K\�
B678FN)<UCIIC:43F 1 REMO It REPLACE \ \
, VIN 5 H v'' REMOVE APPROX. 20 LF OF \
e 25/16 ', \ ABANDONED 8' SEWER PIPE '
nLL APPROX. 45 LF OF \
DETAIL #1ABANDONED 8' SEWER PIPE
PROPOSED \\i (PORTION UNDER HOUSE) 0
�MHp REMOVE APPROX. 20 LF OF '
4• DIA PRECAST \ ABANDONED 8' SEWER PIPE N/P
MANHOLE / \ KHOSROW
' \ TAX
1107-062-37
08 6648, PC 382
I v
LO HOMES NC LLC I -52-
TAX z -,s \ PROPOSED 4' DIA AU
DB 29.4.. 88, PG 232 I�/\ REMOVE N!
[t. PROPS R'Y TINE. LiYP,-�
( \ I
NOT TO SCALE /I I
i
ELENILSO ENT\f�llE
Y IIJOI I TGNINNLIN 1 I RAMIREZ
{tn6t ti rT \ CIAUDIA IRIS SAN
9
CRESPO
F>'JBO115:
YF\I=rt.^ +:N47RF` \
DTAx �7o7-061-07
-_B 286t 5, PG 169
PROPOSED 4f D!A MANHOLE /4
/ W/ 8- OUTSIDE DROP ASSEMBLY
SOLID LID SEALED (WATERTIGHT)
,pO REMOVE It REPLACE
REMOVE APPROX. 30 LF OF
T Rs ABANDONED 8' SEWER PIPE
six
\. • - F - MICHAEL D. k
\ S JANET A.
\ CDIE NSHAW
WITH -
RSEL .::;'L+4` TAx /153-0511x10
WITH BYRASS P, -MP ;7;P.'
f CLDSk 30.18- J/�
JUSCR2�91 C- --
LAE f T,T' --
„-m
/ - PROPOSED 18 LF 2' COPPER
3 -3 WATER TUBING, TYPE K
/F INSTALLED OVER 38'X60'RCP
TFFf - Rb
2• '�,�/ LtTI E 6O
4 - PROPOSED 10 LF 4' STEEL SLEEVE
INSTALLED OVER 38'X60' RCP
DI RESTRAINED JOINT PIPE REMOVE APPROX. 18 LF OF
-Sl- STA 1+94 TO 2+24 ABANDONED 2' WATER PIPE
PROPOSED 78 LF 8' Dl
SEWER PIPE, PC 350 -
S1- STA 1+57= KHASYOU
BEHROUZJOU
+ TAX 1107-071-06
OM6DS 6791, PC 867 -
PROPOSED 4' DIA MANHOLE /3 _
SOLID LID 8 SEALED (WATERTIGHT)
SEE DETAIL /1
FILL APPROX. 100 LF OF
ABANDONED 8' SETTER PIPE
PROPOSED 98 LF 8' Dl \
SEWER PIPE, PC 350
/ REMOVE APPROX. 45 LF OF AM+RVEAL \
EG: TAX RIOT -071-07
ABANDONED 8' SEWER PIPES DB 26255, PG 688
I / < /
APPLICATION FOR NDN -DISCHARGE PERMIT
GNAATY SEWER MAIN EXTENSION
CIWPIOTTE WATER
PROWCT MAME er DM DRiW QFFR MLN
Iw.wrRaE NG.: 324 -14 -SQ
Ma Fx wPF: 0-CabTRUCTK
IH ®RESouTox pMDOKI4TIW a.EMWr Ho.
ra Tm[er TxG NwI[n: cAuaNs.ER DAY eAfL
ON Em WI/WY/SINGLL MMLLYxWS HOLD WR N016fkdOf al
1MGAL/DAY/MUUn. ILYUNrtXUNm OR1MH,ON:
WASTEWATER TN MENTPUNTNNm WASTWAT :
p MwnKKFx HNcmisaml p -CR. IN[ODRA ) 0Mmow1-IwEn,G,11t
®sur.M G.IxaDRA93TI 0 MALI k-NEEIDSDx10K
NATIMEawALEwATER .�-xoD.tmTN-_xwamRw
EDNAM[RwL _xDTfIER
oRNwawASTFwATR �su4DNWIDN �LT,MAS[RML
T{,IOa onNII
APMTNMyaND07
�Y rAMMfTR AXOITS CONEFMMTCN TMT www CNATERTW W NORWL pORBSTK LIVELf:
F wASTewATeR B xox.aMg3TTE, OFftpu Levey rReTRMTMExr:
NArRFTR----RMETNMOUNED.HAOrEREN19UEOR 13- DHO
IMS mf EF11 OFlERMwFDTIMT OOWNS11fRM SEWEMME WRRIF TO NRtpETH6 ilOWi ®Y6 0.
PFgM. rp sEwFRs IMMEOMTEEf DaYNfTROW
rNf auwEMM.Wwm.o9wN1TTMAM •Ma
1115 NDKK RMINm MC DF ANO CLTWHw MMNAUM aSNW STAIOMDSME MET w1145
DLT ®TARED RDDRESO FNGM TNG a51GN M
TCMrNONF T w
`ROP[SLONALffIDNGwfwR C[RINXATION ATTESTTMTTN6ArIL 1001- R'SAMIMYJ�>n
.V. weNfNNN EYT NA ueNREVRweD E. AWArmNAURRURif Ax9c9rLertTo rKK
RFfTp MY FNOWUEDGE TMfKKRAT16T TfMTTOM aFTTa MT RNDWMP¢1NF rRDPOEFD DFLEN wSwfM
AnurARM Reewnow. ATNaaN NIIITANN PwTwMa Twsal9Mmr
rACRRa wYA`iuvf uEN lYviLorFD noTxfR r�f �I�Lx INeuslw a 'NSE MATEMNs woER Mr
TSIGMTUEE RNDSULSIGNIMSTIMT MVE R[M iFRMLANDHAVFMDGEDrtip EF COMNTFM WENNTHEaSIGM.
xM1HfMOUM rROfESNgMt ENGINEERS SFAI.fGMTUR[, ANDDATF. ,••'•••• •••
DocuSipnWNl b7:
B678FIOBBC9G13E..
aTwMW rFRMITNo. EsswD '•��/ S
nANr Rav ALLoaTIDEI METImED eT:
rFRMrt AnRovm n:
m5fm c mLsoN. r.e., aKF EMOINEER
768 - - 768 176811
I
-SI-STA + � -53- -SA 0+
W /< - PROPOSED ! DU MANHOLE /S
.54
764 - -- -__-_ PSROPOSED <+DU MAN...._ - -52-
PIOS' STA 0+00
MANHM
5 _.
W1 8MOVE & - OED (WATan LY_. PLACE 7641 i_.---.. - fl _ PROP.
UREPLACE
.. -- _--- -- _ SOLD LID.i. SEALED. PROPOSED D _ _ R/w-758.4!. ..764 - - + = _.. -.--, _-- 764.:1 _.
SOLID LID
SrA
PROP. 3/NY.I OUT -746.66 _ -_...- -- -_l-_-- _1_ PROP RASF.ILEO (WATERTIGHT) PROP. INV. INV /N(�`) �54&jVjV1 ---.. PROPOSED <' DU MANHOLE iS ___..__ IIS!
RIM=2.00 SI- STA 1+57
_. _..:. i PROP. /NV. l EXIST. INV. IN 716.71
N-7<6.DE '
A 0+00 ! PROP. INV. 1N=71L67 PROP. /NV. OL/T=716.11 SOLD LD A SEALED (WATERTIGHT)
- _-_
PROPOSED I DU MANHOLE 1 j, PROP. INV OUT=747.47 R/M=755.51
760 LUD..LLQ� _ _ __- _ _ _ -__ _- _ -_ 760 760 ROP. /NV W=747.97 760
REMOVE 3 REPLACE N=717.RAMq
__7
INV. IN - TARN PROP. INV. OUT=747.q'
L
x
aDST.j INV. pUT_7/8.13
7561 '` , r 756 756 1756
O O--- - -- ---� --- - - ---- r
' 2 ` ---- -- ---'"
752 _ ---� I - I � -_
-_�- -_ -, - 1 - - K
--- -- - 7521
I -- -- -- -'�--� PROP. X6 RC now what's bB�OW.
-- "-?' RCP P P. 3 'X60 RCP POP. 8"X6 ' RC ----r --- 752. 752 - 1
Call before you dig.
748
748_ -748 � � 7481' cHA
---I - - - _i r W
744 °°�y19 A +� aW� �°/��EO/"�/ AW{ 744 744 744
I!f !C .W '.i j S1- Sp liM 7D ND/ 32 14 -
Job N
I
-
T- 1 a6WWIF - -- 740�
�-
S2 -- �L-740 S1 �
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 0+00 1+00
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ASI
CHARLOTTE WATER STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
Na f)aV By RWNMDT SNVWIWfi
GENERAL NOTES
1. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CHARLOTTE WATER (CLTWATER) STANDARDS AND
S'ECIMATIONS.
2. ALL CONTRACTORS WORKING ON CLTWATER PROJECTS ARE
REWIRED TO OWN A COPY OF THE DESIGN MANUAL AND SHALL
KEEP A COPY ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES.
3. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AL
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSUMING THAT UTILITIES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. CALL
NC 811 (PREVIOUSLY NC WE CALL) AT 811 OR 1-OOG-632-4949
FOR UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY
LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
4. IF THE PROPOSED WATER ANO/OR SANITARY SEWER MAN IS
INSTALLED WITHIN 12' IN ANY DIRECTION (VERTICALLY OR
HDRIZWTAIlY) MOM GAS MAINS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY AT 704-525-5365 AND
INFORM THEM.
5. DUCTILE IRON APE (RED BRASS FOR 2 -INCH WATER PIPE)
REWIRED FOR WATER k SANITARY SEWER LINE IF THE
FOLLOWING
CLEARANCES ARE NOT MET:
-16' VERTICAL FOR WATER LINES INSTALLED ABOVE
SEWER LINES, OIP 80TH APES.
-WATER LINE CROSSING UNDER SEWER LINE (FOR
ANY CLEARANCE). DIP BOTH PIPES.
-10' HORIZONTAL SEPARAIION FOR WATER UNE
PARALLEL TO SEWER LINE (OR 18' VERTICAL SEPARATION
IN SEPARATE DITCHES, DIP BOTH PIPES.
-FOR WATER LINES 12' CLEARANCE VITH STORM DRAINS.
CAS MANS, TELEPHONE DUCT BANKS AND UNDERGROUND
CABLES.
e CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SAMPLE OF THE 2'
GALVANIZED WATER LINE TO BE REMOVED TO BILL DEAL. PE OF
CLTWAIER FOR DETERYINATO/ OF FUTURE REPLACEMENT BY
CLTWATER OF THE WATER LRE.
A crry of cwu+LOTTE DEPARTMFJNr
LEGEND
SWIM
PROPOSED CONTOUR
DETAIL
-/-
t�
- PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR
-/-
EXISTING CONTOUR
-/-
- 790 `
,- EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR
-/-
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
-/-
PROPOSED IBLE
CATCH BASINN
-tel I
PROPOSED GRATE
INLET
PROPOSED HEADWALL
-/-
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
-/
RCB: REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
- •
EASEMENT
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CLOS 040.02
SILT FENCE
CLDS /30.06A
� ---
'
SILT FENCE STOMP INLET
OLDS /30.09
SEDIMENT TRAP
- �-
PERM. UTILITY EASEMENT
-/-
PROP. WATER
-/-
PROP. $EVER
-/-
CLEANOUT
-/-
•
MANHOLE
-/-
A crry of cwu+LOTTE DEPARTMFJNr

GENERAL NOTES
A) ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST CURRENT EDITIONS
OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION(CDOT) WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK(W.A.T.C.H.),
THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(M.U.T.C.D.), THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION(NCDOT) SUPPLEMENT TO THE M.U.T.C.D., THE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS AND
THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NC00T STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES.
B)THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY COOT IN WRITING 10 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY ROAD CLOSURE
OR 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING ONE OR MORE TRAVEL LANES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3 OF
THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK.
C) ALL SIGNAL REVISIONS OR SHIFTS OF SIGNAL HEADS WALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CDOT; PRIOR TO
REVISING TRAFFIC LANES WHICH REQUIRE SIGNAL REVISIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE COOT
IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (GUS JORDI / 336-7066) A MINIMUM OF 30 CALENDAR DAYS IN
ADVANCE. TRAFFIC LANES SHALL NOT BE SHIFTED UNTIL THE REQUIRED SIGNAL REVISION / SHIFT IS
COMPLETE AND READY FOR ACTIVATION. FOR NOTICES RELATED TO SIGNAL WORK REQUIRING NEW UTIUTIES,
REFER TO PROJECT NOTES.
D) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH, INSTALL, RELOCATE, AND MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES, SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES FOR WORK SITES AND
DETOUR ROUTES AS SHOWN IN TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER.
E) CONSTRUCTION PHASING MAY DICTATE THAT TWO OR MORE TYPICAL W.A.T.C.H. DIAGRAMS OR STANDARDS
BE USED IN ONE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. CHANNELIZING DEVICES ASSOCIATED PATH THESE TYPICALS SHALL
BE MOVED. SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED. OR REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
PHASING OF THE PLANS, THE LOCATION AND POSITIONING OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE MOTORIST DOES NOT RECEIVE FALSE INFORMATION WHEN TWO OR MORE
TYPICALS AND/OR ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS OVERLAP.
F) CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE THAT WHEN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA IS IN OR NEAR
A VERTICAL CREST OR HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE EXTENDED SO THAT LANE CLOSURE
BEGINS IN ADVANCE OF THE CURVE AND MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET.
G) OFF-DUTY POUCE OFFICERS MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE PRESENT FOR
CONTROLLING TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION HOURS.
H) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL HAZARDS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT WITH WELL-MAINTAINED
SIGNS. BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES. ON CONNECTING ROADS. ALL BARRICADES,
SIGNS, WARNING, AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES SHALL BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED
AS REQUIRED DURING THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
I) WORK ON THE PROJECT OR ANY SEPARATE ACTIVITY THEREIN SHALL NOT START UNTIL ALL OF THE
REQUIRED SIGNS, BARRICADES. WARNING, AND/OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES ARE INSTALLED AND APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER.
J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GUS JORDI, IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (704-335-7066) WITH
THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY
WORK THAT WILL REWIRE THE RELOCATION OR PLACEMENT OF SIGNS OR OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
BY THE CITY.
K) THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DURING ALL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE ABILITY TO FLAG
TRAFFIC USING QUALIFIED FLAGGERS WHEN NECESSARY OR REQUIRED
L) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND ADDRESS CONFLICTING PAVEMENT
MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 17 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
M) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TWO WAY TRAFFIC ON ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT UNLESS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, PROJECT NOTES, OR BY THE ENGINEER,
N) CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TENANTS ACCESS TO THEIR
PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNITS, INCLUDING REASONABLE INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR
BUSINESSES, SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO FIRE HYDRANTS.
0) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY (BY MAIL) ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WHO HAVE DIRECT
ACCESS TO THE ROADWAY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS A MINIMUM OF 5 AND A MAXIMUM OF 10 WORKING
DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN FRONT OF THOSE PROPERTIES. NOTIFICATIONS
SHOULD INCLUDE CONTACT PERSONS NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER. EMAIL ADDRESS, AND MAILING ADDRESS.
P) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATROL THE WORK SITE AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF EACH WORK DAY (AT A
MINIMUM) TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING AT ALL
TIMES DURING PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY.
0) DURING PERIODS OF INACTIVITY OR AT NIGHT, EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN SUCH A MANNER AS
TO BLOCK SIDEWALKS, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR THE MOTORISTS' NEW OF TRAFFIC. EQUIPMENT SHALL
BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE TRAVEL LANE.
R) WHENEVER TRAFFIC MUST BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERUNE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE TWO
OPPOSING DIRECTIONS MUST BE PHYSICALLY SEPARATED, TRAFFIC CONES CAN BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE
DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS; REFLECTORIZED CONES OR DRUMS MUST BE USED AT NIGHT. TRAFFIC SHALL NOT
BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY UNLESS PAVEMENT MARKING
CONFLICTS ARE APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED AND AGREEMENT ON REMOVAL OR NOT IS WORKED OUT WITH
THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK. IF THE ENGINEER APPROVES
TRAFFIC TO CROSS THE CENTER LINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY, ONLY REFLECTORIZED DRUMS MUST
BE USED.
S) THE CITY ENGINEER OR DIRECTOR OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR THEIR
APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE AUTHORIZED TO STOP ANY WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT
DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE W.A.T.C.H. AND THE M.U.T.C.O.
UNTIL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
T) ADJACENT TRAVEL LANE DE EQUIPMENTTO TIS EQUALCTION TOEOR GREATER THAN EN Flu( CLUON6 DTH OF DRUM).RANCE BETWEEN mIF A
DROPOFF EXISTS WITHIN THE WORK ZONE, CONTRACTOR SHOULD FOLLOW SECTION 10 OF THE W.A.T.C.H.
HANDBOOK PERTAINING TO ADJACENT LME CLOSURES DUE TO DROPOFTS.
U) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE PHASING AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN SEQUENCE. WHEN A CONSTRUCTION PHASE
IS DIMOED INTO STEPS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH STEP IN SEQUENCE.
(EXAMPLE: THE REQUIREMENTS OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO PHASE 11; THE
REQUIREMENTS OF STEP 1 OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO STEP 2 OF PHASE 1).
ALL WORK IS
IN THE PROJECT PHASING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EXCEPT WHERE
ITIS SPECIFIED FOR CERTAIN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
V) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO STOP TRAFFIC FOR MORE THAN 5 MINUTES AT A TIME IN
ANY ONE DIRECTION.
W) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO WORK ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD SIMULTANEOUSLY WITHIN
THE SAME AREA EXCEPT WHERE THE ROADWAY IS DIVIDED BY A RAISED MEDIAN. IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO
CONSTRUCT BORE PITS ON EACH SIDE OF A ROADWAY FOR BORING UTILITIES UNDER THE ROADWAY UNLESS
SUPERCEDED BY ENGINEER TO COMPLY WITH PEDESTRIAN REQUIREMENTS OR LATERAL CLEARANCE FROM
TRAVEL LANES.
SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SECTION VII (PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS) OF THE
PROJECT NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL FINAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS. COOT SHALL PROVIDE AND
INSTALL ALL FINAL SIGNAGE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY WORK ON ONE CORNER OF AN INTERSECTION AT A TIME.
3. DURING THE HOURS OF 7:DO AM -9:00 AM AND 4:30 PM -6:30 PM MONDAY THRU FRIDAY CONSTRUCTION
OR MAINTENANCE WORK WHICH INVOLVES CLOSURE OF A TRAVEL LANE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ON
THOROUGHFARE STREETS EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR WITH APPROVAL FROM COOT.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIT CONSTRUCTION TO ONE STREET AT A TIME, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIT CONSTRUCTION TO ONE BLOCK EACH DAY IN
ORDER TO DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF BACKFILL..
S. FLAGGERS ATTIRE SHALL INCLUDE A FLUORESCENT ORANGE VEST, SHIRT, OR JACKET WORN AS THE
OUTER LAYER OF CLOTHING. THE FLAGGER SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A STOP/SOW PADDLE (SEE MUTCD,
PMT IV, SECTION 6F-2, PACE 6F-1). RED FLAGS WILL BE ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF PADDLE IN EMERGENCY
SITUATIONS ONLY. FLAGGERS, PROPERLY EQUIPPED AND INSTRUCTED, WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE
CONTRACTORS AND STATIONED AT THE LOCATIONS SPECIFIED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. A
FLUORESCENT ORANGE CAP MAY BE REQUIRED.
6. THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO FLAGMEN PRESENT DURING DURING ALL PERIODS OF
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO ASSIST IN THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC THROUGH THE WORK AREA. ADDITIONAL
FLAGMEN MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR COOT.
7. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN 5 FT. TO TRENCH AT EXISTING GRADE,
MEASURED FROM THE SIDE FACING TRAFFIC.
S. MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN CHANNELIZING DEVICES SHALL BE 20 FT. IN TANGENT AREAS, 20 FT. IN
TAPERS, AND 10 FT. IN RADII. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
9. OFF-DUTY POLICE OFFICERS MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE PRESENT FOR
CONTROLLING TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION HOURS.
10. IF A TRENCH OR A DIFFERENCE IN GRADE GREATER THAN 1 INCH NEEDS TO REMAIN OPEN OVERNIGHT,
AREA SHALL BE BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL W OR TRAFFIC BEARING STEEL PLATES SHALL
BE USED.
11. INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE NAINTAINED TO ALL BUSINESSES AND DWELLINGS AFFECTED BY THE
PROJECT. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO FIRE HYDRANTS
12. ALL TRAVEL LANES SHALL REMAIN OPEN DURING PERIODS OF INACTIVITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER.;
CONSTRUCTION PHASING
1. BEGIN INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER. PROPOSED SEWER TO CROSS BELOW EXISTING
STORM DRAINAGE IN TWO (2) LOCATIONS. EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE TO REMAIN IN OPERATION DURING
SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR TO ESTABLISH PHASE 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL ONE WEEK PRIOR TO STARTING SANITARY SEWER
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN KARENSTONE DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY.
3. UPON COMPLETION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PHASE 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL AREA,
CONTRACTOR TO SET UP PHASE II TRAFFIC CONTROL
4. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PHASE 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL
BOUNDARY.
5. ACTIVATE NEW SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS.
6. UPON COMPLETION AND ACTIVATION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMP AROUND OPERATION ON PARCEL 1 AND SPECIAL STILLING BASIN DOWNSTREAM
AS DEPICTED IN THESE PLANS AND DETAILS.
7. CONTRACTOR IS TO REESTMUSH PHASE I TRAFFIC CONTROL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL
CONSTRUCTION WARNING SIGNS ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF WORK. THE APPROACH WARNING
SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON KARENSTONE DRIVE AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS
COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DEPICTED IN THE PLANS USING
DIAGRAM 9 OF THE W.A.T.C.H.
S. UPON COMPLETION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOUSH AND CONSTRUCT
STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED IN THE PLANS USING DIAGRAM 9 OF THE W.A.T.C.H.
9. UPON COMPLETION OF STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE I TRAFFIC CONTROL, CONTRACTOR IS
TO SET UP PHASE II OF
CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL CONSTRUCTION WARNING SIGNS
ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF WORK. THE APPROACH WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON
KARENSTONE DRIVE AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION 15 COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR IS
TO DEMOLISH AND CONSTRUCT STORM IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED IN THE PLANS USING DIAGRAM 9 OF THE
W.A.T.C.H.
10. DURING GRADING OPERATIONS CONTRACTOR IS TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
TRAVELWAY 1 WON( ZONE
rI INCH
61 SLOE
MAX
DETAIL A
N.T.S.
DIAGRAM 9
TWO-WAY, ONE LANE TRAFFIC
(FLAGGER CONTROL)
(SEE NOTE 3)
NOTES:
1. SPACING - 35 M.P.H. OR LESS
LEGEND
(SPACING) - ABOVE 35 M.P.N.
*2. BUFFER SHALL EXTEND BACK TO THE
COMES / DRUMS
BEGINNING OF THE CURVE OR HILL TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE
T SIGN
FOR THE APPROACHING TRAFFIC.
® WORK AREA
3. ON LOW VOLUME. RESIDENTIAL STREETS
WHERE THERE IS ADEQUATE VISIBILITY.
A SINGLE FLAGGER POSITIONED AS SHOWN
n FLAGGM
MAY BE ACCEPTABLE
4. IF WORK IS WITHIN 50' OF AN INTERSECTION
SEE DIAGRAM 10 OR DIAGRAM 11.
• Z
i�
3a
E c
W21 -a ^��
Z�
RK
'W a n > 3 U Z
W
A
3

\ FLA GER e
\
a
TAAX010o)ImW
• \ % / 6337 /
W 0 /
O /
CONTRACTOR / REFERTO
S / / £ DIAGRAM 9 FOR SIGN AND BARREL
./ SPACING.
WORK AREA
WF
KFKM0.0W BEH
TAX RIO) -0i
DB bblB PG
6526
1\
r�TRAFFIC CONTROL (PHASE 1)
)(REFER TO WATCH DIAGRAM 9 FOR SIGN PLACEMENT)
\ WF
OTH
Y CHWT
'
50TH R PIIAY
\ TAXIIIO)-0)106
\ D621196 PG 5H
6412
0
{tial �iP FLAGGER
WBDMOIIZIW
pyo y i 0
T—fl,
KT
�� •I' 6737733 /
/ a /
/ CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO WATCH
DIAGRAM 9 FOR SIGN AND BARREL /
SPACING.
� ss�
WORK AREA TAHMWF
FAL
d 2 �
\NR y
KIDSROW BEH0.pVfOU
TAX p106 -062J9 OF.
N DB 66aB PD 382 .q j W \
o Jtif °
Doll"
g'
4 /
I \
1(111/ 4
aO /\ F r EUGENE 0. HOOTER _— –
'
O I DR n210) -06D36 DR 65250. FL l53 \
8405
A
/ \ FLAGGER
e A $�
o
KHOS0.0w BEH0.0`6 Q A �
TAX pID)E
D8661B M PG 3R 3B2 / 0
6526 / KHOSROW BEHROVfpu V
TAX p10)-062-3> '�.
664 5382 �.
0 6 6418 p0.\JE; pY R
�1TRAFFIC CONTROL (PHASE 2)
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: (REFER TO SHEET TCI FOR GENERAL TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES)
1.ODNIRACTOR IS TO UR E COOT WA,T.CH p,EBNG OONSTRI3C)1ON WI NTM RIGHT OF WAV.
2. CON3RAC70R TO PHMSE TRAFFIC CONTROL BASED ON C06GTRUCTION PROGRESS. ENTIRE WORK AREA AS
SHID'NN ON RAN SHALL NOT SECLOSED FOR EMRLETY OF PROJECT.
3. WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVMY IS IN FRONT OF BOO, 6006, AND 6016 KARENSTONE DRIVE, ROAD TO R "N
OPEN IN FROM a 60X1, 8113, AND 6112 KAREN6TONE DRVE.
/. WHEN CONSTRUCTK7r1 A64MN IS IN 6 KARE F W33.6013. AFD 80121URENSTpE ORNE, ROAp TO REMAIN
OPEN IN FROM OF BCW. SOB AND NEE ED TO TOlE ONVE.
S.
COMRIICTOR TORACE6TONE AS NEEDED D ENSURE RESIDENTS OEACCES6OFSVEWSW
fi.INS THE STFTOWORKNiTH COM TIONIAND RIOPERTT OWNERfi TO ENSURE THERE 16 SVFFlGEM PARKING
ON THE STREET DURING CONSTRUCTKIN IF NEEDED,
TAX p10) -0)I -O)
DB 28255. PG 668
1 5413
WF
CHHAY CHHR
SOTHY R PRAY
TAX pl01-01106
DB 21268, PG 5le
6412
1
Ym