20161170 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc.
PO Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Phone/Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]
23 November 2016
NC DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Reference: PCN for Tyde Village Subdivision (96 Lots)
Willow Springs, Wake County, North Carolina
USACE Action ID SAW -2016-02125
Dear NC DWR,
Enclosed please find the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) that has been prepared for
the above referenced property, located on northern side of Mt. Pleasant Road near the
intersection of North Creek Road, in Willow Springs, Wake County, North Carolina. The
proposed plan will impact 0.27 acre of riparian wetland for construction of a subdivision road. It
appears the project meets the conditions of and can be authorized by Nationwide Permits 29 and
18. (WQC 3890).
I trust that this provides all the information that you require to authorize the proposed impacts.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
3.
Krissina B. Newcomb

E3 0� VJA �<G
o � -r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit Section 10 ❑ rmit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bankX❑
or in -lieu fee program.
Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Tyde Village
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Willow Spring
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Tyde Village
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Bk016343 PGO 1773
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Freddie Stancil
3d.
Street address:
466 Stancil Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Angier, NC 27501
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-639-2073
3g.
Fax no.:
919-639-8841
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Mike Eaker
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 9321
5d.
City, state, zip:
Fayetteville, NC 28311
5e.
Telephone no.:
910-822-4540
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1606229024 and part of 1606348201
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.569356 Longitude: -78.652215
1 c.
Property size:
24 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Middle Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently wooded/ undeveloped. Land use in the vicinity is residential and agricultural
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 6
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
construct a single family residential subdivision
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
At impact W1 & W2, a 36LF-30"RCP@1.39% culvert will be used under road. Roadway will be filled, shoulders graded&vegetated.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NC DWR Stream Buffer Determination issued 2 Nov 2015, NBRRO#15-421
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
A total of 96 lots are proposed
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands StreaE3 — tributaries Buffers Open \❑ters P❑d Construction ❑
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.19
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.05
W3 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.03
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.27
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
O4 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico Dawba C]ndleman Other
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed road was designed to follow an existing farm road/path to minimize wetland impacts.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
yes, stormwater to be treated in basins
❑X Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
16%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
F] Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
F1 Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑X Yes ❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
individual
on-site septic systems
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/nhp/) lists Alasmidonta heterodon, Picoides borealis, Rhus michauxii, and Myotis
septentrionalis as occuring in Wake County
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service, EFH Mapper (http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Flood Risk Information System (http://fris.nc.gov/fris/)
Mike Eaker
10-18-2016
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

Overview of Tyde Village
Figure 1. Overview of proposed Tyde Village Subdivision (96 Lots), within the property
boundaries. Jurisdictional features within the subdivision boundary are shown.
VICINITY MAP NTS
-� Jurisdictional Waters
�„ ux:cx PNY
Impacts to the jurisdictional wetlands in the southern portion of the property are necessary to construct
the subdivision road. In the northern part of the property, jurisdictional wetlands and waters can be
avoided and no additional impacts are necessary.
23 November 2016

Overview of Tyde Village
Figure 2. Southern portion of Tyde Village subdivision.
SO' INGRESS k
Z -MM
FASEMM
o.e. zos3 rc. ue
t
-4. I'rm a�F. JIu
N 5-'941Y
IOV.b4'
23 November 2016

Overview of Tyde Village
Figure 3. Northern portion ofTyde Village subdivision.
xm�,t
PROPfr}iM nx�a'e
.crtwc
Subdivision
')T
Boundary
rx�ee�1'xE— xu,
Y
xVME �1YwE
MIDDLE CREEK
JURE" N&
PROPERLY w„Lms
I CORNEA 11W
$°I
�I
i
�I
4,
hhal
6°
—XW
I
�I
I°
Ee
JURISOlCfIDS
0-10] ANCRM
Oxm 'wt s se'iVs
Zumu sae WE �ie,
im.av
- J IL
LJ
L -----J ! /rr/ �. ,/"/"�'' 3r�\moi '•'���j �= Y�
0.013 ACRES., -.0I �
L --� JuwsolclleNu r=—
I �\� I •+ / i ill �' 1/\\ ``�������
NOS CORNER 121
II II II 11 r Y
� 11 II IY yt J� S �Y
II II II r'�4—'
li II f
JURISOI DWL
wEL AN85
8,112 PORES
23 November 2016
Indian Branch runs
' along the property line
and SD boundary.
i
r
�m�ti r
I
I
V
l
An unnamed tributary,
and adjacent wetlands
are located in the
common area.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 7505 Mt Pleasant Road
City, State: Willow Spring, NC
County: Wake County
Directions: From 1-40 take Hwy 42 west. Turn right (south) on Mt.Pleasant Rd. Go 1.5 miles,
site is on the left just past North Creek Road
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1606229024
1606348201
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Mike Eaker, Southeastern Soil and Environmental
Mailing Address: PO Box 9321, Fayetteville NC 28311
Telephone Number: 910-822-4540
Electronic Mail Address 1: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Tyde Village
466 Stancil Road
Angier, NC 27501
Telephone Number: 919-639-2073
Electronic Mail Address 3:
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION`
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Tyde Village, LLC -Freddie S
Prope2V Owner (please print)
Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary_ JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein,
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS' and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
❑✓
❑✓
Iv I
G.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 24
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
F-1Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
1-01
■
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
Wf Project Coordinates: 35.569356 Latitude -78.652215 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
W-1 USGS Topographic Map
�✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http:/Iwww.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.armV.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
7 Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
PILandscape Photos, if taken
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
aApproved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc.
P.O. E30X 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Phone/Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regulatory field Office Central Office
69 Darlington Avenue 'Nihil Service Center 1650
Wilmington, NC 28403 Raleigh, NC 27699
Tq NYhom it May concern:
By signing below, the current property owner gives representatives of Southeastern Soil & Environmental
Associates, Incorporated permission to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and isolated waters
and riparian buffer determinations, delineation and pertnittingy for the subject project.
This authori7ation
includes permission to enter the site to conduct site meetings with US Army Corps of Engineers and NC
Division of Water Quality personnel, as necessary.
Project Name: T_yde Village
SSE -A Project P
Current Property Owner or Easement Holder
Name: Tyde Village, LLC
(inch,ide contact person if a corporation, purineri•hip fir government)
Mailing Address. 466 SLancil Road ,
NC 27501
Telephone- 919-639-2073
V S
ii -nature
Date
Fax: [phone]
r -yo i . akrc 9
Print Name
,50ILiSfTE EVALUATION - SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - LAND USEiSU BDIV !SION PLANNING - WETLANDS
GROUNDWATER D RAINAG E/MOUN DING , SURi:ACEISUBSURFACE YJAST5: TRrtATm8NT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION & DESIGN

BKO16343PGO1773
WAKE COUNTY, NC 124
LAURA M RIDDICK
REGISTER OF DEEDS
PRESENTED & RECORDED ON
64/0612016 15:39:30
STATE OF MC REAL ESTATE
EXCISE TAX: $2,250.00
BOOK:016343 PAGE:01773 — 01776
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: $2,250.00
Parcel Identifier No. 0000994 and 0165073 Verified by County on the day of 120
By:
Mail/Box to: GRANTEE
This instrument was prepared by: Currie Tee Howell, Attorney, Adams, Howell, Sizemore & Lenfeste
Brief description for the Index: Two Tracts, Panther Branch Township
THIS DEED made this 1 st day of April, 2016, by and between
GRANTOR
Akins LLC (a North Carolina limited
liability company)
316 Gablewood Lane
Holly Springs, NC 27540
GRANTEE
Tyde Village, LLC (a North Carolina
limited liability company)
466 Stancil Road
Angier, NC 27501
Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g.
corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has
and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated
in Panther Branch Township, Wake County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
If checked, this property is the principal residence of the Grantor.
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

BKO16343PGO1774
Th%property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 8547 Page 1302.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Book of Maps 1977, Page 32 and Book of Maps 1987, Page 787.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee
in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey
the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
This conveyance is expressly made subject to the lien created by all the Grantors' real 2016 Wake County ad valorem
taxes on said tract of land which the Grantee(s) agree to assume and pay in full when due.
Subject to all easements, rights-of-way, covenants and other restrictions as shown on the public record or as would be
disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the land.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
Grantor(s):
Akins1.4,C—+e-North Carolina limited liability company)
(SEAL)
B kins, M16eing Member
State of NC - County or City of
1, the undersigned Notary Public of the County or City of.&MQt and State aforesaid, certify that John'W. Akins
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged that he is the Managing Member of Akins LLC (a North Carolina limited
liability company), and that by authority duly given and as the act of such entity, _he signed the foregoing instrument in its name
on its behalf as its act and deed. Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this _bE"j day of April, 2016.
My Commission Expires:
(Affix Seal)
10,4,%%%, t4--
T,
y NpTAq Y
MY
COM ISSIO 'EXPIRES
M
z PUBL%G q§
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association
RT,�j10
,&Q..:1L.ty off, P, �&#
51,
a 11%
• '• • •-•

BKO16343PGO1775
Exhibit A
Tract One (REID 0000994)
BEING in Panther Branch Township, Wake County, North Carolina and having account number
0000994 and being described as follows:
(a) LYING and being in Panther Branch Township, Wake County, North Carolina, containing
87.955 acres according to a survey entitled "Property of J. Herbert Akins Estate: prepared by C.
W. Russum, R. L. S., dated November, December 1974, a map of which survey is recorded in
Book of Maps 1977, page 32 of the 'Sake County Registry, reference to which trap is hereby
made for a more particular description of said property.
(b) BEGINNING at a stake ,in the Mandy Parrish line, William T. Parrish corner; thence with
said William T. Parrish North 75d East 17 chains to a stake; thence North 570 East 18, 18 chains
to a stake on Middle Creek; thence up said creek 2 ch. 5.60 ch. and 2 ch. to a stake; thcnce South
57° West 21.0 ch. to a stake; thence South 75' West 15.0 ch. to a stake in the eastern line of
Mandy Parrish lot; thence South 3° West 8.0 ch. to the point of BEGINNING, and being the
"Judd Parrish" lot on Partition of D. Parrish land surveyed for Division by W. J. Lambert, Sur.,
Nov. 1937, containing 25.5 acres, and being the property conveyed to C. P. Johnson by deed
from Judd Parrish dated 27 October 1945, recorded November 1, 1945 in Book 929, page 66,
Wake County. Register of Deeds' Office.
Tract Two (REID 0165073)
BEING in Panther Branch Township, Wake County, North Carolina and having account number
0165073 and being described as follows:
This tract is located on the North side of S. R. 2740 approximately I mile East of Mt. Pleasant
Church and is described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron nail near the center of the intersection of S. R. 2740 and S. R. 2741
(South Creek Road); thence North 060 53' 19" Fast 201.30 feetto an existing iron pipe; thence
South 890 3T 54" East 1,448.50 feet to an iron stake comer with Glenn Dupree; thence South
00° 50,17" West 808.15 feet to an existing iron stake with L. M. Dupree I•leirs; thence along the
L. M. Dupree Heirs' line South 75° 04' 52" West 535.33 feet to an iron stake in the center of S. R.
2740; thence down the center of S. R. 2740 North 61" 48'491, West 267.40 feet to an iron stake;
thence along center of said road North Sl* 10' 10" West 934.67 feet. to an iron stake at the.
intersection of S. R. 2740 and S. R. 2741; thence North 52° 17' 20" West 6.44 feet to the point of
BEIGINNNiNG and containing 22.967 acres of the, Annie Mae Adams Akins Estate as surveyed
by Harry M. Williams, T11, R. L. S. dated November 26, 1956.
Also see Tract A as shown in Book of Maps 1987, Page 787, Wake County Registry for further reference.

BKO16343PGO1776
BOOK:616343 PAGE:e1773 - e1776
WAKE
COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Please retain yellow trailer page
It is part of the recorded document and must be submitted with the original for re-
recording.
Laura M. Riddick
Register of Deeds
Wake County Justice Center
300 South Salisbury Street, Suite 1700
Raleigh, NC 27601
❑ New Time Stamp
❑ Additional Document Fee
This Customer Group
# of Excessive Entities
# of Time Stamps Needed
❑ $25 Non -Standard Fee
❑ Additional Reference Fee
This D current
# of Pages S

Vicinity Map
IR1
r ' Nw Hopse
WorltlUnitetl States -NO Wake Co.- Garner /RerrGrave K hdl- auek
ridrs
upclah Cary
Iigh
Wpstnm
- nruaNcx PalNri r-- caossiuc asNCEv r�ius
P
Apex
pF IEY ING
HEIGk15 Shvlwel Emit"
sea Cp Eme[Ad'
11 Yliage
...... ... .. ...... Garner -
N- IIill
t ,.MeCollers
Hally Suring, aNxou ceuNc
-; Da '>..
nlae� wnlage
Fuquay-Vsrina s,romFr.� Paax c
Po rc �
2 miles 5 km
+l'ideTwood {t
u..� Fimuen:
Clayton
'j - PrnNhatan
'off
Wilma
3piings
m2015 HERE 62f;MB Merosott�ary anon
1 West 5mlthT.ld
I ^ d
I^T
CA
r
�r
6
w
DE LTi
Pala DT
[..$Ut 'mow
%
AT f%r-de Hills Co
r' E

A
A�
lY -� �
f� ': LL
�O
Z � �� �; 1. +2
7'
SUNS N asaht Ra
ti
Title N Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
0 205 410 820 Feet
the most current and accurate information possible.
I I i i I i i i I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
1 inch = 400 feet and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

USGS Topographic Map
ANGIER QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.6 -MINUTE SERIES (2013)
SCALE 1:24 000
1 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 0 METERS lel: 20QD
0 1
Viol 11J' I 311(166 A(lil(d=Ir7JtJil
S I K 71 10 11
FEET
CONTOUR 114TERVAL 10 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

3 Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
S
m
712900 713000 713100 713200 713300
35° 34 23" N
S
712900 713000 713100 713200 713300
3
9/30/2015
Page 1 of 3
35° 3355" N
712100 712200 712300 712400 712500
712600 712700 712800
35° 34'23" N o
0
m
M
m
M
M
i ! y�
B
.�.y�►,
aB
'
T
} 1R
FA
(rel
M
,� mti' �, •,'rye
Y r
�y
w
O
M
OJ
y h
i
.V
35° 3355" N M
712100 712200 712300 712400 712500
712600 712700 712800
3
A
Map Scale: 1:6,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
N 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 250 500 1000
1500
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA
Natural Resources
Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service
National Cooperative Soil Survey
S
m
712900 713000 713100 713200 713300
35° 34 23" N
S
712900 713000 713100 713200 713300
3
9/30/2015
Page 1 of 3
35° 3355" N

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
A Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Stony Spot
Blowout
0
Borrow Pit
Very Stony Spot
Clay Spot
i
Closed Depression
Wet Spot
Gravel Pit
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
Lava Flow
Other
Marsh or swamp
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Mine or Quarry
Special Line Features
Miscellaneous Water
I
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
:.
Slide or Slip
0o
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
MAP INFORMATION
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/30/2015
lilm Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800.
Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Very Stony Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
C
Wet Spot
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
Other
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
+a
Special Line Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Water Features
measurements.
Streams and Canals
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Transportation
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
r-++
Rails
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
r,rr
Interstate Highways
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
US Routes
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Major Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
Local Roads
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
Background
the version date(s) listed below.
®
Aerial Photography
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 10, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 14, 2011—Mar 3,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/30/2015
lilm Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map -Wake County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Wake County, North Carolina (NC183)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ApC2
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10
12.5
14.1%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
FaB
Faceville sandy loam, 2 to 6
4.8
5.4%
percent slopes
FaB2
Faceville sandy loam, 2 to 6
0.7
0.8%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
FaC2
Faceville sandy loam, 6 to 10
4.7
5.3%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
LyA
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
0.8
0.9%
percent slopes
MeA
Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2
0.5
0.6%
percent slopes, rarely flooded
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
10.5
11.9%
percent slopes
NoC
Norfolk loamy sand, 6 to 10
2.5
2.8%
percent slopes
OrB
Orangeburg loamy sand, 2 to 6
2.5
2.8%
percent slopes
PsA
Plummer and Osier soils, 0 to 2
2.7
3.0%
percent slopes
RaA
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
6.2
7.1%
percent slopes
W
Water
0.9
1.0%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 2 to 6
26.0
29.4%
percent slopes
WaC
Wagram loamy sand, 6 to 10
1.2
1.3%
percent slopes
WgA
Wagram-Troup sands, 0 to 4
8.3
9.3%
percent slopes
WoA
Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to
3.6
4.1%
2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
88.5
100.0%
us[ -)n Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/30/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Akins Property
„
ALNational
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
Wetlands Inventory
Sep 29, 2015
Wetlands
t
-j Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater ForestedJShrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine ana Marine
e
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
`t,
� c]lkher
i
t
Y
300 m
trn
1000 ft
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not
responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All
wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on
User Remarks:
the Wetlands Mapper web site.

Northing: = 664,253, Easting = 2,101,711 Northing: = 664,253, Easting = 2,105,179
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
With BFE or Depth
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
a
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance
Flood Hazard
i+e Areas Determined to be Outside the
E
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Jurisdiction Boundary
• � ti
r:• FIRM Panel Boundary
ti I North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
ti Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
L 1 inch = 500 feet 16000
„ 0 125 250 500
Feet
0 25 50 100
T” •!h�� OMeters
r -
�; r'Ilk
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
r.
-
CC FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
r O Panel(s):9864
b
J a CONTAINS:
CU COMMUNITY CID
., *! WAKE COUNTY 370368
` rs CO JOHNSTON COUNTY 370138
i
I N Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown
c -below should be used when placing map
orders; the Community Number(s) shown
4 ' :r � � � above should be used on insurance
applications for the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
i
+ _Y 3710986400) 2/2/2007
y.i C6
- iee
W S
Northing: = 660,785, Easting = 2,101,711 Page 1 of 2 Northing: = 660,785, Easting = 2,105,179 -
UDI
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest
product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov.

Title N Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
0 100 200 400 Feet
the most current and accurate information possible.
I i i i I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
1 inch = 200 feet and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope I%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NW classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that apply)
Surface Soul Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (131 r0)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines ($16)
Water Marks (81) —
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) ,
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
— FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ills frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
-% Cover, Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
1
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
2.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope I%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NW classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that apply)
Surface Soul Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (131 r0)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines ($16)
Water Marks (81) —
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) ,
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
— FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ills frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
-% Cover, Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
1
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
2.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
SEE DETAIL SHEET
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SEE DETAIL SHEET
PERMANENT OUTLET PROTECTION
-------
SEE DETAIL SHEET
DIVERSION DITCH /BERM
SEE DETAIL SHEET
TEMPORARY SILT FENCING
- - -
SEE DETAIL SHEET
*~our* STONE CHECK DAM
SEE DETAIL SHEET
STANDARD PIPE INLET PROTECTION
w �
SEE DETAIL SHEET
REINFORCED SILT FENCE OUTLET
SEE DETAIL SHEET
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ DISTURBED LIMIT LINE
------------ DRAINAGE AREA LINE
FINAL CONTOUR
EXISTING CONTOUR
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
�/
�|
� U
STABILIZATION TIME
DESCRIPTION
TIME FRAME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
/
� A
SWALES, DITCHES
7 DAYS
NONE
AND SLOPES
Lu
WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
NONE
.�/DITCH
#27
SLOPES STEEPER
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10'OR LESS IN
|�
|
THAN 2:1,14 DAYS ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER
FLATTER
(ol
THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH
ANY OTHER AREAS
' �--�
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS
- - ---- - -
AND HQW ZONES)
FLATTER THAN 4:1
* "EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY BASED ON WEATHER OR OTHER SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
THAT MAKE COMPLIANCE IMPRACTICABLE." (SECTION II.B(2)(B)
\ \ )\\Y<
1 SCHEDULE CONFERENCE WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEER, JENNIFER MITCHELL ATo1n-8oa-641n.T0OBTAIN A LAND DISTURBING
Psnm|r.
o. INSTALL GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, PERIMETER SILT FENCES,
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASINS, DIVERSION BERMS AND CHECK DAMS AND
OTHER MEASURES *SSHOWN OwTHE APPROVED PLAN. CLEAR ONLY xS
NECESSARY ToINSTALL THESE DEVICES. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS
IMMEDIATELY AFTER MEASURE INSTALLATION.
a. CALL JENNIFER MITCHELL ATo1n'osa's410FOR AwONSITE INSPECTION evTHE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER TOOBTAIN * CERTIFICATE 0FCOMPLIANCE.
4 BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING. MAINTAIN DEVICES AaNEEDED. ROUGH GRADE
SITE.
n. INSTALL STORM SEWER, |FSHOWN, AND PROTECT INLETS WITH BLOCK AND
GRAVEL INLET CONTROLS, SEDIMENT TRAPS onOTHER APPROVED MEASURES
*SSHOWN 0wTHE PLAN.
a STABILIZE SITE xSAREAS ARE BROUGHT uPT0FINISH GRADE WITH
VEGETATION, PAVING, DITCH LININGS, ETC. SEED AND MULCH DENUDED AREAS
WITHIN FIFTEEN (1n)DAYS orCOMPLETION orANY PHASE oFCONSTRUCTION.
7. WHEN CONSTRUCTION |SCOMPLETE AND ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED
COMPLETELY, CALL JENNIFER MITCHELL ATn19-usa-641nFOR AN INSPECTION.
n. WAKE COUNTY onJURISDICTIONAL MUNICIPALITY MUST GRANT PERMISSION To
CONVERT THE SEDIMENT BASIN OVER TOSTOnMvvATERUSE PRIOR T0
COMPLETING ANY RELATED WORK.
o |FSITE mAPPROVED, COVERT RISER/SKIMMER BASIN ToPERMANENT POND.
WHEN DRAINING SEDIMENT BASIN TOCONVERT T0WET POND, THE BASIN MUST
eEoEvvATEREoFROM THE SURFACE THROUGH ASILT BAG.
10REMOVE PERIMETER SILT FENCES AND INLET PROTECTION, AND SEED OUT oR
STABILIZE ANY RESULTING BARE AREAS. ALL REMAINING PERMANENT EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES, SUCH ASVELOCITY o|SS|pArOnS.SHOULD NOW eE
|waTAuEo
11. WHEN VEGETATION HAS BECOME ESTABLISHED, CALL FOR * FINAL SITE
INSPECTION ovTHE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, JENNIFER MITCHELL ^T �
o1o'oso's41o.TVOBTAIN ACERTIFICATE oFCOMPLETION.
�
'
EXISTING POND ``�
| |
|
|
| | ` 4="���=.^�-- --,-
------ \_
(00
|
2911 96. ' \
.���""°"`
| |DIVERSION(TYPICAL 29'
- \_
~ `` ' | '--��m
'46
c�����
' -r--- -- --DiTCH #20
| ' \
| ' \ Y+Y \
/
/ \
l /
/��
�'� \+cY
�/ / [��)
=° GEE DETAIL SHEET FOR DITCH/CHANNEL SCHEDULE| | `-~ /
DITCH #18
Co-
PHYLLIS DUPREE
COIR LOG W.B. 0024983 -00 -E -
/Co| ~ B.M. 1993 ~G.`'"
/ ��� | -284
\
ALBERT GREEN 0 _~^~^
o.�o^mPG. ,�9 - � | MATTHEW HUFF
| p^r»'�mws» ' |
e���mnpa�w, | w� | oa�,e�,�po�um� / | oo^wnPG. om
�Cd d-2
25'TREEAND VEGETATION ZONE
\--_ _-- - '-_ AND VEGETATION
' , \ EMPORARY
SILT FENCE
\ � \ « (TvpICxu---,/
� \ \�� /�\ ^^� ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
276 274STANDARD
DONALD PARRI��7,' /� � ��1 / \ \ \��\ \ \ � \\ �~ov \ � �� \ w/'^ /| / �U��X ~~ '� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ���w��~ \���� '�
\
<\ ^
= '°"^PCULVER
/ \ � ~` '° ���r� ~ ^ - - ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ ^ a�����'PERMANENT
-
`��d� `/ / \ � � \ \ ~ \ � \ / 18" FES/ // ��!���|` OUTLET PROTECTION GEhJERAhJOTE«%
~'~ ^'^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ����^�'
PROTECTION
�"` no��oo ` �\ .'r-,/' �msrn~��Ep/n~ 5 ��/ 'C`A~
`
^ ~ ^ ~ ~
^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~
1 7�1 PORARY kNENT, f
RSION OUTLET PROTECTION
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
\ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
�
TEMPORARY
\ - - - - - -
Lu
��
/' �� �� �� �. � \ �
\
319 ITC
CLASS B HIPKAP (T
ES
8.50, 316
41
(TYPICAL Lu
DIVERSION _E MERGENCY SPILLWAY TEMPORARY
(TYPICAL LENGTH=20', DEPTH=0.5' DIVERSION
316 00, ln (TYPICAL)
`
40X25- SIGN NV=318.90' 0,00
STAN RD
DITCH
PIPE N
UPROTECTION SILT FENCE
4 PAFFLE
TEMPORARY (TYPICAC)
DIVERSION
18 'FES
/ `� " RCP SHALL BE 3
----_ ----_ ----_
EXTENDED
18' ANDFESADDED ` 40 GNCOIR
wsw/wv~ 1.5 y ' ���-- \ /
\
--_ -_~``
PERMANENT V=31305'
-- --'` �y ' / /' `` «* \ �` \ �
GROUND STABILIZATION *
/ |LQ
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME
DESCRIPTION
TIME FRAME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
/
SWALES, DITCHES
7 DAYS
NONE
AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY
WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
NONE
ZONES
|
SLOPES STEEPER
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10'OR LESS IN
THAN 3:1
|
THAN 2:1,14 DAYS ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER
FLATTER
(ol
THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH
ANY OTHER AREAS
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS
WITH SLOPES
AND HQW ZONES)
FLATTER THAN 4:1
* "EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY BASED ON WEATHER OR OTHER SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
THAT MAKE COMPLIANCE IMPRACTICABLE." (SECTION II.B(2)(B)
LL
1��-- -
- -----
-
|
| |
/
|
o
o
309
x
| |
. /
' |---------
DITCH #2304/
/
/ /COIR
«PIPE
INILIET ETC:
|
LOG
PROTECTION
/
"`
/
�-------------���
'
EXISTING POND ``�
| |
|
|
| | ` 4="���=.^�-- --,-
------ \_
(00
|
2911 96. ' \
.���""°"`
| |DIVERSION(TYPICAL 29'
- \_
~ `` ' | '--��m
'46
c�����
' -r--- -- --DiTCH #20
| ' \
| ' \ Y+Y \
/
/ \
l /
/��
�'� \+cY
�/ / [��)
=° GEE DETAIL SHEET FOR DITCH/CHANNEL SCHEDULE| | `-~ /
DITCH #18
Co-
PHYLLIS DUPREE
COIR LOG W.B. 0024983 -00 -E -
/Co| ~ B.M. 1993 ~G.`'"
/ ��� | -284
\
ALBERT GREEN 0 _~^~^
o.�o^mPG. ,�9 - � | MATTHEW HUFF
| p^r»'�mws» ' |
e���mnpa�w, | w� | oa�,e�,�po�um� / | oo^wnPG. om
�Cd d-2
25'TREEAND VEGETATION ZONE
\--_ _-- - '-_ AND VEGETATION
' , \ EMPORARY
SILT FENCE
\ � \ « (TvpICxu---,/
� \ \�� /�\ ^^� ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
276 274STANDARD
DONALD PARRI��7,' /� � ��1 / \ \ \��\ \ \ � \\ �~ov \ � �� \ w/'^ /| / �U��X ~~ '� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ���w��~ \���� '�
\
<\ ^
= '°"^PCULVER
/ \ � ~` '° ���r� ~ ^ - - ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ ^ a�����'PERMANENT
-
`��d� `/ / \ � � \ \ ~ \ � \ / 18" FES/ // ��!���|` OUTLET PROTECTION GEhJERAhJOTE«%
~'~ ^'^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ����^�'
PROTECTION
�"` no��oo ` �\ .'r-,/' �msrn~��Ep/n~ 5 ��/ 'C`A~
`
^ ~ ^ ~ ~
^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~
1 7�1 PORARY kNENT, f
RSION OUTLET PROTECTION
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
\ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
�
TEMPORARY
\ - - - - - -
Lu
��
/' �� �� �� �. � \ �
\
319 ITC
CLASS B HIPKAP (T
ES
8.50, 316
41
(TYPICAL Lu
DIVERSION _E MERGENCY SPILLWAY TEMPORARY
(TYPICAL LENGTH=20', DEPTH=0.5' DIVERSION
316 00, ln (TYPICAL)
`
40X25- SIGN NV=318.90' 0,00
STAN RD
DITCH
PIPE N
UPROTECTION SILT FENCE
4 PAFFLE
TEMPORARY (TYPICAC)
DIVERSION
18 'FES
/ `� " RCP SHALL BE 3
----_ ----_ ----_
EXTENDED
18' ANDFESADDED ` 40 GNCOIR
wsw/wv~ 1.5 y ' ���-- \ /
\
--_ -_~``
PERMANENT V=31305'
-- --'` �y ' / /' `` «* \ �` \ �
GROUND STABILIZATION *
SITE AREA
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME
DESCRIPTION
TIME FRAME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITCHES
7 DAYS
NONE
AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY
WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
NONE
ZONES
SLOPES STEEPER
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10'OR LESS IN
THAN 3:1
LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1,14 DAYS ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER
FLATTER
THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH
ANY OTHER AREAS
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS
WITH SLOPES
AND HQW ZONES)
FLATTER THAN 4:1
* "EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY BASED ON WEATHER OR OTHER SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
THAT MAKE COMPLIANCE IMPRACTICABLE." (SECTION II.B(2)(B)
� ` ' .~ �
-''--- CLA
�` � D����� / |
.EM,"=R, ', ` ~- -'
CONSTRUCTION
|
swrnAwos 56 LF ' `` ^ ^ | ^
@,.m* // /�� /
`` // ~ ~''° ~^- |
orxwoAno ` �� �. � @ 1�y% - - - -
pp�s��r �OTECTION`� ````` � / '� � // ^«� ~ ,� ^ ~ ~ ^ | ^
/
STANDARD
PIpEAwLET~
�pnoTscrow
�7) / `� �-i
DITCH`.� / �
NCDENR SELF -INSPECTION PROGRAM
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED |N2O00TO
REQUIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
_.j
INSPECT APROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE nFTHE PROJECT TnMAKE SURE `.
THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN |S
BEING FOLLOWED.
\ �DIVERSION
RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OFTHESE INSPECTIONS TAKE
EFFECT OCTOBER 1. 2010 -~- \
�
THE SELF -INSPECTION PROGRAM |SSEPARATE FROM THE VVEEKLY _.. -^^
SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM OFTHE NPDESSTORMVVATERPERMIT FOR
~,-
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FOCUS orTHE SELF'|waPEnT|0mnEPonT
|STHE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OFEROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
oOmTRoLmEAouRseAonoRo|woTnTHE APPROVED PLAN. THE
INSPECTIONS SHOULD BECONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OFTHE
�
PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND COVER |a o*w/sLoopnss
ESTABLISHED_ 1481
D ' -
THE SELF -INSPECTION REPORT FORM IS AVAILABLE ASANEXCEL
SPREADSHEET FROM nHsLAwoQuALITvvvEaa|TE.
MARIE CRUMP
o�.po1PG. 630
HATCH -G-JD
EXISTING WETLANDS ASDELINEATED
8YSOIL SCIENTIST
B.M. 1993 PG. 1705
EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER A8DETERMINED
8YSOIL SCIENTIST
1. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND
LOCAL CODES |wOBSERVING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BOTH
nNAND OFF'S|TE.
o.THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT ORASDIRECTED BYLOCAL
AUTHORITIES oRTHE ENGINEER.
3. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL 8ERESPONSIBLE FOR OFF-SITE
DISPOSAL 0FALL CLEARING AND GRADING WASTE MATERIALS
GENERATED DURING HIS PHASE OFWORK AND FOR OBTAINING
ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS FOR OFF-SITE STOCKPILES AND/OR
WASTE AREAS.
4. ULTIMATE DISTURBED AREA: 22.0 ACRES
n. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 8ERESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING ANY TRACKED
SOIL FROM ALL ADJACENT ROADWAYS THAT ARE IMPACTED BY
|
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. |
yN�|hJT��J�����PLAN
'.'^^''"'^-'"^"~��^-
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT |NNOCASE LESS THAN ONCE
EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL oE MADE IMMEDIATELY
ToMAINTAIN ALL MEASURES AaDESIGNED.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM SEDIMENT SKIMMER BASINS WHEN
STORAGE CAPACITY HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY nOY6FILLED.
CLEAN ORREPLACE GRAVEL FILTER WHEN THE SEDIMENT POOL
NOLONGER DRAINS PROPERLY.
o. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM BEHIND SILT FENCE WHEN DEPTH REACHES
s'|wCHsaATTHE FENCE. REPAIR SILT FENCE AaNECESSARY Tn
MAINTAIN ABARRIER.
4. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL osFERTILIZED, RE -SEEDED AS
NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TnPROJECT SPECS
TOMAINTAIN AVIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE GROWTH.
o. MAINTAIN a|LTITnEsPROTECTION FENCING THROUGHOUT DURATION nF
| oomaTRonTmw. |
�TM�����U|����|�T�����`��|��
^� ' ����'~' "^-^- MAINTENANCE ^-'"""'~~�^- ' �^^'`
1 . SEEDING OR COVERING STOCKPILES WITH TARPS OR MULCH IS REQUIRED AND
REDUCE EROSION PROBLEMS. TARPS SHOULD BE KEYED IN AT THE TOP OF
THE SLOPE TO KEEP WATER FROM RUNNING UNDERNEATH THE PLASTIC.
2. IF A STOCKPILE IS TO REMAIN FOR FUTURE USE AFTER THE PROJECT IS
COMPLETE (BUILDERS, ETC.), THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBLE PARTY MUST
NOTIFY WAKE COUNTY OF A NEW RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR THE STOCKPILE.
3. THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF STAGED SEEDING
AND MULCHING ON A CONTINUAL BASIS WHILE THE STOCKPILE IS IN USE.
4. ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A VEGETATIVE BUFFER AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE
(WHERE PRACTICAL).
��T���l�T� ���T�
GRAPHIC ^,°=��"�
oo o 40 80 160
( IN FEET )
09/10/16
CHECKED BY
1. CHANDLER
SCALE
1^=80'
�
=
s
�
'
C:
m
�
Q)
�
�
0
=
�
�
C:
Co
Co
=
�
�
=

C
is
-wood Lane
•ings, NC 27540
Division of hater Resources
November 2, 2015
Donald R. van der tlaart
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRO915-421
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or ElP Call
Z Neuse (i 5A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (I 5A NCAC 213
❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
0259)
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Project Name:
Location/Directi
ons:
Subject Stream:
Akins Property 7505 Mt. Pleasant Rd
Property is located at 7505 Mt. Pleasant Rd in Wake County,
NC
Middle Creek
Determination Date: October 16, 2015 Staff: James Grabam
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh .Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http:/!portal.ncdenr.orw" ebg'Wq,"aps
162811(1ail Service Center.. Raleigh, NC 27639-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive. Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity'+Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Akins Property
Wake County
November 2, 2015
Feature
Not
Subject
To
Buffers
Subject
To
Buffers
E/I/PX
Start@
Stop*
Sail
Survey
USGS
Topa
A
X
E
X
B
X
E
I
X
C
X
E
X
D
X
P
X
X
E
X
,@DWR flag
X
P
X
E
X
G
X
E
X
H
X
P
X
X
I
X
E
X
3
Not Evaluated
Off site
X
K
X
P
X
X
L
X
E
X
Pond 1
X
X
X
Pond 2
X
*E/I/P - Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of
Wake County, North Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at
a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined not to
be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked "Subject" have
been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream.
There may be other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps
referenced above but, still may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army
Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources (DWR).
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may
request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days
of date of this letter or from the date the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent
owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing; or appeal
within sixty (60) days.

Akins Property
Wake County
November 2, 2015
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any
other Local, State, and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future
correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This project may require a
Section 404/401 Permit -for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of
Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact
James Graham at [phone].
°Resp tfully,
l
Danny Smith, Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO/SWP File Copy
Mike Eaker
Southeastern Soil and Environmental
POB 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311.

USES Topographic Map
A.I'�TGIER QUADRANGLE
N01011 CAROLINA
7.5 -MINUTE SERIES (2013)
5CALE 1;24 000
v>,JIL
'HT
CONTOUR 114TERVAL IQ FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 99$$

3I1
PATSY MAINES
D.B. 4987 PG. 310
O.M. 1991 PG. 813
✓/ 286
/ 284
a 1,sti �
a a
ryso —
S89°06'55"E 226.70'
TOTAL WETLAND AREA
TOPE DISTURBED
8,294 SF
zBe,
276
274
rlaaaaa�rrrrrraara�_ _�_raa�r �\
2js
OALWETLANDAREA
TO BE \ DISTURBED 1,981 SF
I o
3p0
02
304
316 �\ 9\�� �0 3pA
T�TAe'WETLAND AREA.
TO BE DISTURBED
1,340 SF r
a - MARIE CRUMP
D.B. 6331 PG. 630
a a a r a a a a a B.M. 1994 PG. 1074
458.09'
M
M
Q
Z
SCALE 1"=100'
I NEER
0 100' 200'
u E
r 3
O ma
ry m
O � F
z
z
O
w
NF s
z
0
t7
O
r
>O
W H
Q O
u1 DATE
09/19116
o
DRAWN BY
B. INGE
• DESIGNED BY
• J. CHANDLER
• CHECKED BY
J. CHANDLER
• • SCALE
• 1„_IOD'
•
•
•
IL
z
O 3
O NI�
LnI'D U N E
LL
U i O
O Q
C)
z MM
Lu W Q
�z
w u
Lu a 3
z <
J
62 J p
Q J z
” �\ a
CL / J E
O LuLu
Oz �
E
E
a
JOB NO. 5
37501
SHEET N0.
C1.0

i
r
286 w
/ co
N �
284 E
E
O
V c V R% a O� OJ a
o m
oo
p o
1 810
10N
TOTAL WETLAND AREAS
TO BE DISTURBED � cv
8,294 SF
ENDWALL - 276 - rn� 1 09119116
�/ o
INV=274.50' — - � �`, DRAWN BY
B. INGE
ENDWALL
DESIGNED
BY
INV=274.00' /.. '..' �.. ,i • J
CHANDLER LEE
R
2> / > I • CHECKED BY
CULVERT #5 4 2°' " `y TOTAL WETLAND AREA 1. CHANDLER
36 LF - 30" RCP (2) o �� o °N' TO BE DISTURBED • SCALE
@ 1.39% "' M �' 1,340 SF •=60
1 2) 1`8" FES o
e INV=295.90, do CULVERT #4 •
42 LF - 18" RCP
2) - @ 1:19%
8 18" FES
moo INV=296.40'
0(Ln
U N E
TOTAL WETLAND AREA oo / MARI '-' p
TO BE DISTURBED 3°CO �h D.B.6 WC5 C5 � `"
�g z Q a
�1,981 SF
N B.M. 19 m Q
ULU
C. N \
IW Q
N a
a3
zC7 =
J H
Q
L<
coN U J
�'lp g
>
N OLu
0W �E
W Z Q41v
00
z
-- -- a
I � I
N aiW. yL. aJa ylc yla � E
SCALE 1"=50'
' ,,MIR
JOB NC.5
0 50' 100' 37501
SHEET ci i

fires
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability October 18, 2016
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Tyde Village
This document confirms that Tyde Village, LLC (Applicant) for the Tyde Village (Project) has
expressed an interest to utilize 0.27 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from the EBX-Neuse
sponsored Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically the Howell Woods Site in
the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, attests to the fact that mitigation
is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1052.
Best Regards,
Cara S. Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

SITE DATA
SUBDIVISION #:
ENGINEER:
OWNER:
PROPERTY LOCATION:
REFERENCES:
ZONING:
TOWNSHIP:
EXISTING USE:
PROPOSED USE:
TOTAL SITE AREA:
PROPOSED R/W DEDICATION:
MAXIMUM # OF LOTS:
PROPOSED # OF LOTS:
AVERAGE LOT SIZE:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH ALLOWED:
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH PROVIDED
MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS
LENGTH OF STREETS:
AREA IN STREETS
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED:
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED:
DISTURBED AREA:
Tyde Village
[+`1SIYZOl:
JIM CHANDLER, PE
TIMMONS GROUP
5410 TRINITY ROAD; SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27607
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
STANCIL BUILDERS, INC.
466 STANCIL ROAD
ANGIER, NC 27501
MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD
1606-22-9024
PORTION OF 1606-34-8201
DEED BOOK 8547 PAGE 1302
DEED BOOK 8547 PAGE 1302
Mill
PANTHER BRANCH
AGRICULTURE & WOODED
CLUSTER SUBDIVISION
92.39 ACRES (AFTER SUBDIVISION)
0.30 ACRES
135 (1.45 DU/AC)
96
26,981 SQFT.
20,997 SQFT.
60'
90'
FRONT - 15'
SIDE - 7.5'
REAR - 15'
CORNER SIDE - 15'
PERIMETER - 30'
7,968 LF
9.45 ACRES
9.32 ACRES (10%)
23.18 ACRES (25.1%)
22 ACRES
;911,1,01
Stancil Builders, Inc.
Panther Branch Township
Wake County, North Carolina
VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE
STORMWATER MANANGEMENT NOTES
1. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE ON EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT WILL BE STRINGENTLY
ENFORCED WITH NO EXCEPTIONS INTO PERPETUITY. A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE FINAL
PLAT LIMITING THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TO 5,000 SQUARE FEET PER LOT.
2. PARCEL NOT LOCATED WITHIN FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA PANEL #0640 MAP #3720064000 J,
EFFECTIVE DATE OCTOBER 3, 2006.
0
0
Ivision
SHEET INDEX
C0.01 - COVER SHEET
C1.01 - EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN (1 OF 3)
C1.02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN (2 OF 3)
C1.03 - EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN (3 OF 3)
C2.01 - LAYOUT PLAN (1 OF 3)
C2.02 - LAYOUT PLAN (2 OF 3)
C2.03 - LAYOUT PLAN (3 OF 3)
C3.01 - UTILITY PLAN (1 OF 3)
C3.02 - UTILITY PLAN (2 OF 3)
C3.03 - UTILITY PLAN (3 OF 3)
C4.01 - GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN (1 OF 3)
C4.02 - GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN (2 OF 3)
C4.03 - GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN (3 OF 3)
C5.01 - CALCUTTA DRIVE & WATER FRONT STREET(West) PLAN/PROFILE
C5.02 - WATER FRONT STREET(East) PLAN/PROFILE
C5.03 - WATER FRONT STREET(East) PLAN/PROFILE (Cont'd)
C5.04 - WATER FRONT STREET(East) PLAN/PROFILE (Cont'd)
C5.05 - CHARTERS END STREET & JARRETT BAY ROAD (West) PLAN/PROFILE
C5.06 - JARRETT BAY ROAD (East) PLAN/PROFILE
C5.07 - DOLPHIN TURN STREET PLAN/PROFILE
C6.01 - MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD WIDENING PLAN/PROFILE
C7.01 - UTILITY DETAILS
C7.02 - SITE AND EROSION DETAILS
C7.03 - EROSION DETAILS
C7.04 - STORMWATER DETAILS
pawwwo'"ortn
aro nam
F-
0
v
n
C) =
k.0 o
N
w U +
= z
Uj 0 LJ of N
Q 00
m
LJ Lt_ N M
0 C
w LnO1
J X
� LL.
0 0
Lr)
01
L �
O
ri 01
In al
J
W
0 Ln
N
U
O
z
W
U)
W
U
J
Q
z
O
Q
U
Z=
I—
O
02:
z
O
d
ry
U
W
z
O
H
Wy
11
W
Q
0
DATE
06/24/16
DRAWN BY
1. CHANDLER
DESIGNED BY
1. CHANDLER
CHECKED BY
1. CHANDLER
SCALE
NTS
z
O
H
Vl
H
I -I
r)
W
UD
Vl
LU
C�
Q
J
i
LU
0
LU
LU
ry
LU
O
U
JOB NO.
37501
SHEET NO
Co. 01