20161079 Ver 1_More Info Received_20161123

Homewood, Sue
From:Joey Lawler <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:59 PM
To:Homewood, Sue
Cc:Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Subject:Re: Request for Additional Information: PNG Southern Alamance System Enhancement;
SAW-2016-02226
Sue,
That little parallel portion is where the steam flows into a channelized DOT ditch, and into the pipe under the interstate. I believe
that part has been rip wrapped as well. There is also DOT fence between the edge of the proposed easement and that portion of
the stream. So it should not be impacted or effected.

FYI David Bailey called and asked if the impacts at stream 4 " I think" could be reduced. That is where the stream flows through an
area they had identified for a lay down area. I did not think they would impact that part of the stream anyways, but I included it in
the impact totals just to be safe. I confirmed that they would not, so I will send you and David a revised drawing/impact table on
Monday.

Hope you have a good Thanksgiving.
And I'll be in touch next week.
Thank you,
Joey

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 23, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> To add to David's questions:
>
> At stream S6, the impacts show being parallel to the channel and from the impact drawing it looks like the ROW will be
practically on the top of bank. Is this an accurate presentation and if so, is it feasible for them to install the line and not disturb
the portion of S6 that is running parallel to the installation? This has been problematic in other utility installations when trenching
is done so close to the top of the bank of a parallel channel.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sue Homewood
> Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department
> of Environmental Quality
>
> 336 776 9693 office
> 336 813 1863 mobile
> [e-mail]
>
> 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
> Winston Salem NC 27105
>
>
>
> Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North
1