20161079 Ver 1_More Info Received_20161128

Homewood, Sue
From:Joey Lawler <[e-mail]>
Sent:Monday, November 28, 2016 7:59 AM
To:Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc:Homewood, Sue
Subject:RE: Request for Additional Information: PNG Southern Alamance System Enhancement;
SAW-2016-02226
Attachments:Figure 5-REV.pdf; WETLAND STREAM AND BUFFER IMPACT TABLES - REVISED.pdf
Good morning David and Sue - please see attached revised drawing and impact sheet for Stream Crossing 4. Temp impacts
reduced from 103 to 56.

Also, with respect to the riprap at stream crossings, the E&SC Plan has been approved, and specifically states that none shall be
used, so they don't plan on doing so. Let me know if you need a copy of the approved plan.

Thanks! j

Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager

ENGINEERING INTEGRITY
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273 Map
Ph: 704.523.4726
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]

[e-mail]
www.smeinc.com
____________________________________________
S&ME, Inc. moves up seven spots in 2016 ENR Top 500 to 82.

This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com/email. If you received this message in error
please advise the sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please consider the environment
before printing this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:08 AM
To: Joey Lawler <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: PNG Southern Alamance System Enhancement; SAW-2016-02226

Sounds good, Joey. Thanks.
-Dave Bailey

---
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
1

3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do
so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joey Lawler \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:42 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: Request for Additional Information: PNG Southern Alamance System Enhancement; SAW-2016-02226

I believe it can David. I'll update s drawing for you and get it out - likely right after the holiday - j

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Joey,
>
> Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated 11/3/2016 (received 11/4/2016), for the above referenced project. I
have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 12
Blockedhttp://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/NWP2012/NWP12_3-23.pdf. Please submit the
requested information below (via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification
of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
>
> Stream Crossing 4 has proposed Temporary Impacts of 103 linear feet, which is several times larger than the other stream
crossings proposed. I did see that there is temporary lay down space in this area that probably won't be used. However,
permitting temporary work space in and around a stream is difficult to justify given the large areas of uplands in the project area.
Can this proposed impact be minimized to similar magnitudes as the other stream crossings? If so, please update the Stream
Impact Table and Figure 5. If not, please explain why this is not practicable.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dave Bailey
>
> ---
> David E. Bailey, PWS
> Regulatory Project Manager
> US Army Corps of Engineers
> CE-SAW-RG-R
> 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
> Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
> Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
> Fax: [phone]
> Email: [e-mail]
>
2

NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME ON
SEPTEMBER 7, 2016. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE LOCATED USING GPS UNITS
CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL
SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
a-vt
F, 4t hT ►�/
%#
s -
d`.
a y
T
!!,
IMPACT NAME
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE NAME
Stream S4
LF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
56
STREAM WIDTH
3 ft.
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
i
111
0 30 60
(IN FEET)
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT N/A LEGEND
WAM CLASSIFICATION / FLOW REGIME Intermittent PIPE CENTERLINE
NOTES Streams will be restored to original
contours- all impacts are temporary. > - - STREAM CENTERLINES
Stream is not on soil survey or USGS map STREAM BANKS
and thus not subiect to Buffer Rules.
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS (FTZ) TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
PERMANENT IMPACTS TEMPORARY IMPACTS PARCEL LINES
ZONE 1 0 0 — - PERMANENT EASEMENT
ZONE 2 0 0 TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
SCALE: 1 30' JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS FIGURE NO.
DATE: 11-28-16S&ME PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
DRAWN BY: JoL SOUTHERN ALAMANCE SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT 5rev
PROJECT NO: GAS PIPELINE PROJECT
7435-16-053 ALAMANCE & GUILFORD COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

STREAM IMPACT TABLE - REV
PNG Southern Alamance System Enhancement
Stream
Strea
No.
I
verag
"gqpFe
=
We!pendicu Ra
Crossing ID
IDIFigure
lAppendixact
Classificatioln
,
Crossing Type*
Notes
RPW with
Adjacent to existing waterline
1
S7
2
7
25
Yes
Conventional
Perennial Flow
easement
RPW with
2
S6
3
Intermittent
8
25
Yes
Conventional
Flows out of culvert under I-40
Flow
RPW with
3
S5
4
Intermittent
4
29
Yes
Conventional
Abuts Wetland WB
Flow
RPW with
Stream is jurisdictional, but not
4
S4
5
Intermittent
3
56
No
Conventional
subject to buffer rules.
Flow
_
Pipe will be installed by bore -
RPW with
5
S3
6
33
0
Yes
Trenchless
Perennial Flow
stream impacts avoidede.
RPW with
6
S2
7
Intermittent
7
31
No
Conventional
1st crossing of Stream S2
Flow
RPW with
7
S2
8
Intermittent
7
38
No
Conventional
Second crossing of Stream S2
Flow
Total:
204
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the stream.