The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20161132 Ver 1_B-4771 Nationwide Johnston November 15 2016_20161116Tr�r�.s�taort�ti�n November 15, 2016 N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 ATTN: Rob Ridings NCDOT Coordinator PAi l�1cCR[3RY Ca�nar �icxc��,�s �. rEtar��sa�v �� Subject: Application for Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and Neuse Buffer Authorization for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 11 over Mill Creek on SR 1201 (Richardson Bridge Rd.) in Johnston County, North Carolina; TIP No. B-4771; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1200(6); Debit $240 from WBS No. 38543.1.1 Dear Sir, The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 161-foot bridge no. 16 with a 175-foot bridge, on the existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained on an offsite detour during constnxction. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings, stormwater management plan, utility narrative, and design plans for the above referenced project. This project calls for a letting date of May 16, 2017 and a review date of March 28, 2017. The project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: The project's environmental documentation was processed as a Categorical Exclusion. However, we anticipate that the bridge replacement, including all approach work will be authorized under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit (N WP) 3(Maintenance) in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). We are not requesting written approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, but are providing this application to them as a notice of use of NWP 3. Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3883 will apply to this project. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources. �'"'Nothing �mp�re�� State of North Carolina � Department of Transportation � PDEA-Natural Environment Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 � 1598 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F Neuse River Buffer Rule Authorization: NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under the Neuse River Buffer rules. Authorization to debit the $240 Permit Application Fee from WBS Element 38543.1.1 is hereby given. A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project in May 2016. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Gordon Cashin at either gcashin@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6107. Sincerely, � _�,.�,5,,�►-__ _ - _ = - � Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M, Manager Natural Environment Section cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List o�� W A r�qQ� � � � � a � � , , , � o -c Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 11 over Mill Creek on SR 1201 2b. County: Johnston 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Four Oaks 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g�77� project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6107 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: gcashin@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.341866 Longitude: - 78.216246 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 7.1 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Mill Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The study area includes the existing roadway and bridge and adjacent rural land. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.9 acres (from Table 6 in NRTR) 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 434 feet (from Table 5 in the NRTR) 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a deteriorated bridge 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 161-foot bridge with a 175-foot bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No � Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Tem ora T Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: There will be <0.01 ac of hand clearing. See Wetland Permit Impact Summary sheet for details 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Mill Creek, Interior bents impact <0.01 acre 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. � Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? B1 � P❑ T Bridge Mill Creek � Nas 3,766 1,021 B1 � P❑ T Roadway Construction Mill Creek � No 292 U1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No U2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 3,766 1,313 6i. Comments: "See Buffer Impact Summary sheet D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Wetland impacts were reduced through design refinements. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be followed during construction. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be used. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Types of impacts proposed do not require com ensato miti ation. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: See attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS website, field surveys. All species No Effect. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation � 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps �,C Philip S. Harris III. P.E. ''' —� �_ , %I ' j s.- L�' I� Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 11 = ,��. Hi�1lw�V North Carolina Department of Transportation �� Stort��vater ' 1 �,.,,,.,<.., Highway Stormwater Program ''�f�;.� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ''�"' �•<<�:y``'� (Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 38543.1.1 TIP No.: B-4771 County(ies): Johnston Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 38543.1.1 TIP Number: B-4771 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 9/20/2016 NCDOT Contact: Paul Atkinson, PE Contractor / Designer: TGS Engineers (David B. Petty, PE) Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 706 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27603 Phone: 919-707-6707 Phone: 919-773-8887 (Ext. 104) Email: patkinson@ncdot.gov Email: dpetty@tgsengineers.com City/Town: Four Oaks County(ies): Johnston River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Description Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 500 ft. Surrounding Land Use: Forest, Cropland, Rural Residential Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.3 ac. 0.3 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 12' wide paved travel lanes w/ shoulders paved to face of guardrails (varies 0' to 5') Two 12' wide paved travel lanes with 2' to 4' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side and 3' wide grassed shoulders behind guardrail. Outside of guardrails are 3' wide slopes ranging from about 4(H):1(V) to 3(H):1(V). grassed shoulders and 3(H):1(V) to 12.5(H):1(V) grassed side slopes. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 618 Year: 2037 Existing: 441 Year: 2017 General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge No. 500011 on SR 1201 (Richardson Bridge Road) over Mill Creek (Moorewood Pond) in Johnston County southeast of Four Oaks, NC. Proposed 175' (Description of Minimization of Water long by 33' wide triple-span bridge to replace existing 161' long by 25' wide quadruple-span bridge. The proposed grade is about 0.5' above existing ground in the vicinity of the Quality Impacts) bridge. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water or buffers. Stormwater runoff on the existing bridge discharges directly into the water for the full length of the bridge. Stormwater runoff from the proposed bridge is to flow to two (2) proposed drop inlets at the north approach and to two (2) proposed drop inlets at the south approach. Discharge from the pipe outlets will be attenuated on riprap pads outside of the buffer zones and be fully diffused by the existing topographic conditions before sheet flowing toward the buffer zones. Deck drains will not be installed. Stormwater runoff will be discharged at minimum practicable slopes, yielding minimum velocities. Hand clearing in wetlands within proposed right of way due to bridge replacement. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Mill Creek (Moorewood Pond) NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-52-(1) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: N/A Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) �A a ` � �a � V W 0 � � � h � � � V f � � V � � 0 V B-4771 Hvd prm wet tsh.d�n 10/14/2016 11:54:50 AM TGS See Sl�et PA For Index af Si�ets Sae Si�et 9B fa' Conve�lonal Symbols �� JoH�sTo�r cov�r� LOCATl011t: REPLACE BRIDGE #11 OYER MILL CREEK 011t SR 1201 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GRADIII�G, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE AND PAYIKG PERMIT DRAWINGS STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS DUE TD ROADWAY/BRIDGE 4CTQBER 14, zo� b WETLAN DS r� -_ _ " BEGIN BRIDGE ►�t,4R� _ _ _ _ -L- POT STA. 15 + 95 +/- (SR o� ��►S� R 8J �. � _ __; _ M -- - _ _ ---_ _ _-_ ��' - 5R 12D1 , � . -v--- -�, _ - -- --- ---- - w � , -L- POC STA. 14 + 2 �.00 � WEf IANDS WETLANDS END -L- I 5�1TE 1 �; BRIDGE GOCYYEMT NOT CON8IOEREO FINAL YNLiSS ALL 81GNATURis GOMPLkTip � �o�� Pp B � � 3 �D �gR 1200) RICHARDSON BRIDGE _R�._._�__- _ TO W1L1.1FORD � -- I � -L- POC STA.19+25.00 �I END TIP PRQJECT B-4771 � ,'? ,� WETLANDS CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMIT5 E5TABLISHE� BY METHOD III . THIS PROJEGT 15 NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOl1NDARIES. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 5 INCOMPLETE PLANS UO NOT II96 AOR ROW ACQUI�'CDDN GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PRO,JECT LENGTH P�red For: HYDR4ULICS ENGII�TEER DIYISIOK OF HIGHWAYS ADT 2017 = 441 lOBO Birc�i Rid�r Dr., R�lei�k NG, 276l0 �� 25 O $O ,� ADT �037 = 618 T S iL�li6EN�INFFRS � PH(9'19}T/3BBB7 } 130� q K = " p� _ 7p6 HILLSBpROUGH $T �� .ENSE NO.: P�S LEKGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-11771 0.062 mile +� suire zao ��5 D= 55 % ygxGTH STRUCTT/RES TIP PROJECT B-J1771 =� p,33 �� +,� �EIOH, NC 2780:t r.g o � `�4 25 4 ?� �Qa T= 13 96 "` awa sraa�xn sr�c�►rarraavs gURKE EVANS PE � o TiDT.9L LEHGTIi TIP PROJECT 8-4771 = 0.095 mile +� � RQADWAY D&SIGX V= 60 MPH RIGHT OF WAY DL4TS ��' �'� PROFILE (FIORIZONTALj . OCT08ER 21, 201b �� (TTST 49b + DUAL 9%} TRAVIS COOK. EI � 1D 5 0 10 20 FUNCT CLASS= pA�' �""'�" � Te�w MINOR COLLECTDR �TT'�G �TB� GARY LOVERING� PE PROFILE (VERTICALj SU�REGIONAL TIER DESIGN �Y ��+� 201 Mcno°�aaww.��ar p$ 37GYA7T188: 5g 5 •� WETLAND IMPACTS Hand Clearing in Wellonds � EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS lbl' X 25' C�UADRUPLE�PAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PROPQSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 776' X 3'(TRIPLE-SPANj, 90 dEG. SKEW TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 500' � � `"_ .--�-_� - -�,_ �__� ---__ ____ .� _---- -�, � ` � --��'-�-� ��R —� � �� ` � � -�-�,� �� -�----�� ` I � J �_� � 9D n �� G7 'y�D �p - O � O NORMAN C. �ENNINGS W00�5 CLASS B RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PAD � �` F -- F--------�--___� e� TB � PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR B-4771 �oHNSTON couN�r STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS BRI DGE #500011 — CLA55 II RIP RAP I x w U � I - - - - -� �� —� r�r�.� �� .a. .s. ►'�l3.`�"'..^r�.7�l�' B–d771 –L– STA. 14+25.00 JOHNSTON COUNTY PUB�ic uTi�iTY NOTES: 1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. 2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. 3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. 4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT METHOD III. GRAPHIC SCALE 7�5 D 25 50 E3-4771_liyd�rm_wet�sh4.dgn 10/14/2016 4:26:50 PM TGS CLASS B RIP RAP � D15SIPATOR PAD APPROX. LOCATION OF VISIBLE 12" DIA. ABANDONED PIERS T4 BE REMOVED APPROX. LOCATION OF PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R (EX. BRG 4@30'j (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VI511] TO BE REMOVED W00�5 O NORMAN C. DENNINGS PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 5 � ��, � � APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. CRUTCH BENTS TO BE REMOVED WOOQS CLASS B RIP ftAP DISSIPATOR PAD �� 1 ��i�� - i� ��R .�� ,. . �,.-- - �r � � � N CULTIVATEQ O LANE FARMS INC. –L– 5TA. 19+25.pp EXISTING R/W . : �.� �, „ . -, -, — — — _— �T�= _ = _ = = — = � � �� — = T = � `- ____ ---�— �- F- - - - 6 4N9 PVC �� ~ � ~ � F �^ �xisYtiNc Riw � �-^1 ,�. PU E ' � � - -- -- - -� �- -- -- �-.� -- -- -- -- m� CLASS B RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PAD W00�5 O DANIEL F. KORNEGAY & PAIJLA S. KORNEGAY CULTIVATEQ 5g 5 •� EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS lbl' X 25' C�UADRUPLE�PAN), 90 DEG. SKEW WETLAND IMPACTS PROPQSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 776' X 3'(TRIPLE—SPANj, 90 dEG. SKEW TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH — 500' Hand Clearing in Wellonds � � 9D n �� G7 'y�D �p - PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR B-4771 �oHNSTON couN�r STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS BRI DGE #500011 CLA55 II RIP RAP — ... ,_. f ",..., /` . . (p � . �` . . . . V � � G . �� PH !3/9J7T3-8887 � � �g -� /I I � N � i„ � �. � � � DQWMENT NQT CQNEIDERED FINAL �`� % � . UNLESS ALL S16NATURES COMPLETED � -- � � 0, W % � CP � � � l�1 � � ' - �.,_ � cb � �� 4 � � `� �� O _ � � � � � � �, � � � i � _ r �, �� + 8 � �p ' �_ � O � I , � �PROX. LOCATION OF EX. GI��JTCH 0 ca3 � —, c^' Zg I �F' � � � BENT5�0 BE REMOVED � � N c� �`�_ � NORMAN C. DENNINGS � '�. 66 �0° �; + c�-� __ � o� � ,� � °� ` � CULTIVATEQ ,� � � �� ;, � c� � �'� l� cs� ti8 2 woo�s � ' woo�5 LANE FARMS INC. p � � �� c,� �� i ! � +� � � � � � � � 8 '�, CLASS B RIP RAP 1 �} ' � r� � 7 DISSIPATOR PAD � 81 �'�' �g 0'� c� C° � ��N• , f 1 � ��a �� B-477PROJECT G� �8 � � l � ; �' � � , ClA5� B�iP ftAP m , -L- 5TA.19+25.QQ � 4 � � 1 @� � y DISSIPATOR PAD -� . :;``t_; � _ . i , : � �� W � %. � I � � � ![�� 1 � � tp � _-: .._ __ � c� �� - � - , ��— � � � � tS� ` _� � _ � •--; . � . . "`_--- __- 'A �8 �-------,- --�`:==� E � � � F E �� ` � � ' ' �--• - • . � � �� EXISTING R/W `�- .�__,.� � __ _ �_ : ; . � I - - - -� - — -- - =---�- � � � - - ----_._ . � � � i ~ � �� _ - - F F ..,- ��-� - : ��, ��__ — �-��a� . �� ` -� • � �� -- ---._. L � � r ^ _ ^ � r ""�-,'�t, ` �� L� x� �,=-n , -- -------- -- �. r ,f--'`�ii�'�-i.�-'�+ ,-� v;�-�,.'�-,.,,�� F _ _� -_� __... -- . -T� -----�-- _ �_ �-- � T��-�—� TB 2GI � l � i i i �f �� TB 2 ro s� �`E� —� ,�_� l � � � � ° �' �� _i�� 1 -- w `_' S — r�—hl� —� � � Y----. � �- �.a��-� � `��-�- =� � ON BRIDGE RD. 25' BST TB 2GI 1 � � � �o i i i _ �`___ 1 0� GI - � s - - - � � _ _ __ � �_- � � � - �� - - . �.� � � _. - � -� �,3�� T`_`-- �--��.� w � _E � ^ .- =�� _- - �-�- � i sl ��lo-�.,�'''� ° ^ - _ _ _ _ _ _ � -. �r� - �� _ - � � � � � - - •� .. � � � � �� - �,� � � � $� F` F � 6 4N9 '��'�.. {] � --g-�r 1, �- �_.�—� — _ I r ^` , ` _ � �� _ � — F � \ g � .L i_ U (�9 �ii . . ` W . .� � �� .�,.�,. ,.__ � .._...e . =-:_.� ' ^ .. . '�� .�� ~ . . .. . �. e . . �....a �� U . _ _ .r�_�_ .._�" . :�xisYtiNc Riw 1 � � ''--, F g �' — --8 � - =._r�'Z. -ta rs� � �'C �` � 3 � r A � +k � ��--�.,"�.� �5 � .:n��'-�� E � �o_ _ " PUE � �� °� , \� � � - ��_.�!":"Lr^ ^�"�_ . .--t-'t,'�' �� '�►°' � _ R � � t a � .. �. .. ._ . � � .. �. , . �� - � `�" � , rw, ,� �.,..��. . - - - - - �� ` �' � � CLASS B RIP RAP � �4� ,;. ��g � � � � � - - - - - • - - G�- -'�i�-'� N � BE I PR E T �' � � .�`. - _ ` �1 L L � B-d771 D15�'PATOR PAD 8� � e � � � � 1 E � �� ', � �r CLASS B R�P � . � � � -L- STA.14+25.00 � �� g� ° r � � � ; / � - "- , � � DISSIPATOR P/� � � "� cp � � � � APPROX. LpCATION OF VIS�LE 82 � °`- �� 1 '�`�, � 1 � � � 1 ', `\ `, JOHNSTON COUN��' 12 DIA. ABANDO PIERS �`'`� � G� � I � � g �`��~ � P lJ B L I C U T I L I T Y�`� �2 T4 BE REMOVED � � � � � � :9 �J � � 6`�, 'w �, �.� � `s � � �' � � . � �� ' & � � � �-. � 6�� , � , � g � �. 1 ,, � � , . � � � �` ti, ° � '' 1 h' ,�", \ `,, APPROX. LOCATION O�PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R � � M1_ 1�� , 1 � � Y � 4 W00�5 � cb Lg . CULTIVATEa � s `��_`� _ (EX. BRG �30 j (NOT �ISIBLE DURING SITE VI511] , � �, �� .�;, �L � - 8,� ' � � t � ,.`i �co , `��. �� T� BE ItE1�AOVED '1 cp 0�5 � � °°� � � _� � � � � � ` � x � � 1 � �.� 1 � � NOTES: �`� tS� ci� 1.•., � �. 1 � S� '`� ° � R 1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. � �j N `] � �� rr' � � � . � 2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. � D �� '� �' `� � a� � € NORMAN C. DENNINGS �� '� _.�� ` � ,; �,� � �, '� = 3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. � / � co '1� � � � � �ANIEL F. I��RNEGAY & � d, ,.�1 0� �,..,'� ,,, � PAIJLA S. KORNEGA�Yo � � �% ,; _ - `n' 4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT 1 � � � , � � � � � �1 � e METHOD IIL ��,. _ '��1 � / ' � � � � � J ' �f 'i � . � �� r 8 E GRAPHIC SCALE PERMIT D RAWI N G � � �� ; / � � c � \ �o cA \ � 5 D 25 5o SHEET 3 OF 5 '��' �� :` �i6 � g � � � � � = �l � � m� ; � � � . E3-4771_liyd�rm_wet�sh4.dgn 10/14/2016 4:2720 PM TGS € m d � 100 �`� :i 70 BEGIN GRADE -L- STA. 14 + 25.00 EL. 88.15' �-}U.3700% i � � � � � � � � PI = 15+25.00 EL = 87.78' VC = 140' K = 129 V = 55 mph 10� YR. W.S- ELEV. = 85.0' GL -L- STA. ib+sz.00 PROP. 1@55', 1@G5',1@55` 24" CSU W/4'-0" DEEP CAPS PROP. GRADE = 88.59' SKEW = 90° � �� P�i � •'� ^� ^ . �- _�.—,�.— � CL4SS I I RI P RAP KEY-IN 3.5' (TYP.j PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 81.0' APPROX. LOCATION OF VISIBLE 12" DIA. ABANDONED PIERS 14+00 15+00 ST RUCT URE HYDRAULIC DAT A DESIGN DISCHARGE = 5.600 CFS DESIGN FREG?UENCY = 25 YRS DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 83.9 FT BASE DISCHARGE = 8J00 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = 100 YRS BASE HW ELEVATIQN = 85A FT OVERTOPPING DISCHAfiGE = 8,000 CFS OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 50t YRS OVERTQPPING ELEVATION = 84.8= FT =OVERTOPPING ELEVATION REPRESENTS LOWEST TOPO ELEV,THAT ALLOWS WATER TO GET TO LOWER WOODS LINE ELEVATIONS 12000' NORTH �F BRIDGEJ. 16+00 »+ao 1'' 1'� (�) I�� I I. 1: EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED - LOW SIDE LOW CHORD PI = 16 + 95.00 EL = 89.00' VC = 200' K = 119 V = 55 mph PROP. GRADE ____ �_ (-}0.9696� -� ---------• I EX. GR,4DE END GRADE -L- STA. 19 + 25.00 EL. 86.77' EXISTING TIMBER ABUTMENTS TO BE REMOVED (TYP.j � 1.5:1 NORMAL SLOPE W/CL4SS II RIP RAP (TYP.) � PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 81.0` NORMAL WATER SURFACE = 72' APPR4X. LOCATI4N OF EX. CRUTCH BENTS T4 BE REMOVED. APPROX. LOCATION OF PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G BSR (EX. BRG 4@30') (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VISITj. TO BE REM4VED. �s+oo 19+00 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 5 '�� ll�t��.�. DI V ISION OF HIGHW AYS JOHNSTON COUNTY PROJECT:385�3.1.1 iB-�771) PERMIT DRAWINGS REPLt�CEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.500011 F�R B�77� ON SR 1241 (RICH�RDSON BRIDGE RD) JOHNSTON COUNTY �VER MILL CREEg BRIDGE #500011 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 17+12 LT to 17+25 LT Roadway/Bridge < 0.01 TOTALS*: < 0.01 0 0 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: <0.01 acres of Permanent SW impacts for both interior bents at 16+50 & 17+15. 2013 10 24 �A a ` � �a � V W 0 � � � h O � � V f � � V � � 0 V B-4771 Hvd prm buf tsh.den 10/14/2016 11:55:49 AM TGS See Sl�et PA For Index af Si�ets Sae Si�et 9B fa' Conve�lonal Symbols �� JoH�sTo�r cov�r� LOCATl011t: REPLACE BRIDGE #11 OYER MILL CREEK 011t SR 1201 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GRADIII�G, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE AND PAYIKG PERMIT DRAWINGS BUFFER IMPACTS DUE TD ROADWAY/BRIDGE 4CTQBER 14, zo� b WETLAN DS r� -_ _ " BEGIN BRIDGE ►�t,4R� _ _ _ _ -L- POT STA. 15 + 95 +/- (SR o� ��►S� R 8J �. � _ __; _ M -- - _ _ ---_ _ _-_ ��' - 5R 12D1 , � . -v--- -�, _ - -- --- ---- - w � , —L— POC STA. 14 + 2 �.00 � �� i .• WETLANDS � � END r � I' -L- I T I�''*a �, ,�� ', ; , I�w 51TE 1 �\ �. P �w�r�awos ,' � � r �, ' BRIDGE GOCYYEMT NOT CON8IOEREO FINAL YNLiSS ALL 81GNATURis GOMPLkTip � �o�� Pp B � � 3 �D �gR 1200) RICHARDSON BRIDGE _R�._._�__- _ TO W1L1.1FORD �«� -- I � —L— POC STA.19+25.00 �I END TIP PRQJECT B-4771 ; q %� � WETLANDS � CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMIT5 E5TABLISHE� BY METHOD III . THIS PROJEGT 15 NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOl1NDARIES. BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 5 INCOMPLETE PLANS UO NOT II96 AOR ROW ACQUI�'CDDN GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PRO,JECT LENGTH P�red For: HYDR4ULICS ENGII�TEER DIYISIOK OF HIGHWAYS ADT 2017 = 441 lOBO Birc�i Rid�r Dr., R�lei�k NG, 276l0 �� 25 O $O ,� ADT �037 = 618 T S iL�li6EN�INFFRS � PH(9'19}T/3BBB7 } 130� q K = " p� _ 7p6 HILLSBpROUGH $T �� .ENSE NO.: P�S LEKGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-11771 0.062 mile +� suire zao ��5 D= 55 % ygxGTH STRUCTT/RES TIP PROJECT B-J1771 =� p,33 �� +,� �EIOH, NC 2780:t r.g o � `�4 25 4 ?� �Qa T= 13 96 "` awa sraa�xn sr�c�►rarraavs gURKE EVANS PE � o TiDT.9L LEHGTIi TIP PROJECT 8-4771 = 0.095 mile +� � RQADWAY D&SIGX V= 60 MPH RIGHT OF WAY DL4TS ��' �'� PROFILE (FIORIZONTALj . OCT08ER 21, 201b �� (TTST 49b + DUAL 9%} TRAVIS COOK. EI � 1D 5 0 10 20 FUNCT CLASS= pA�' �""'�" � Te�w MINOR COLLECTDR �TT'�G �TB� GARY LOVERING� PE PROFILE (VERTICALj SU�REGIONAL TIER DESIGN �Y ��+� 201 Mcno°�aaww.��ar p$ 37GYA7T188: 5g 5 •� BufFer Zone (BZj ImpacFs Area of Allowable Area of Allowable Impacfs Impacfs Within BZl Within BZ2 LEGEND T�`X x'�,�'S� � � � � ,,,,, IXISTING BRIDGE DIMEN510NS lbl' X 25' QUADRUPLE�PAN], 90 DEG. SKEW PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 175' X 3�' {TRIPLE-SPAN], 90 DEG. SKEW TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 500' � 9D n �� G7 'y�D �p O � � O NORMAN C. �ENNINGS W00�5 CLASS B RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PAD �, � r,�� D(15TING TRANSPORTATION FACILfTY 90UNDARY {iYP•J �. ____� �- --__ .� --^-�_ - � �-�- F F �--�-• �-- --------�--___� ` � --��'-�-� ��R �� a�� F�-�-- � �- -�"'�-�,� �� -~---�� ` I � J �_� -L- 76 W�-E�—= '��---------�, r � ~� �P E � B-d771 -L- STA. 14+25.00 JOHNSTON COUNTY PUB�ic uTi�iTY NOTES: 1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. 2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. 3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. 4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT METHOD III. GRAPHIC SCALE 7�5 D 25 50 E3-4771_liyd�rm_buf�sh4.dgn 10/14/20164:03:57 PM TUS CLASS B RIP RAP � D15SIPATOR PAD APPROX. LOCATION OF VISIBLE 12" DIA. ABANDONED PIERS T4 BE REMOVED APPROX. LOCATION OF PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R (EX. BRG 4@30'j (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VI511] TO BE REMOVED W00�5 O NORMAN C. DENNINGS BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 5 � ��, BUFFER IMPACTS CLA55 II RIP RAP x w w U � I � � � PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR B-4771 �oHNSTON couN�r BRI DGE #500011 APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. CRUTCH BENTS TO BE REMOVED �r � WOOQS CLASS B RIP ftAP DISSIPATOR PAD _ --- E F _ � . ~�r � ' � F. '�� F � � N CULTIVATEQ O LANE FARMS INC. -L- 5TA. 19+25.pp EXISTING R/W . : �.� ,� n . -, -, - — — _— �T�= _=_= =— =»=� � — = T = � `- ____ ---�— �- F- - - - 6 4N9 PVC �� ~ � --�F - ,, -- � ~ �^ �xisYtiNc Riw � �-^1 ,�. PU E ' � � - -- -- - -� �- -- -- �-.� -- -- -- -- m� CLASS B RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PAD W00�5 O DANIEL F. KORNEGAY & PAIJLA S. KORNEGAY CULTIVATEQ 5g 5 •� BufFer Zone (BZj ImpacFs �STING BRIDGE DIMEN510NS lbl' X 25'�QUADRUPLE�PAN], 90 DEG. SKEW PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 175 X 3 {TRIPLE-SPAN], 90 DEG. SKEW Area of Allowable Area of Allowable TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 500' Impacfs Impacfs Within BZl Within BZ2 LEGEND „hX x�,�ti ,�. ;'; , 9 BUFFER IMPACTS D y �� 'yD �p - CLA55 II RIP RAP — PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR B-4771 �oHNSTON couN�r BRI DGE #500011 ... ,_. f ",,L.., /` . . (X? � . �`. . . . . V � � G . �� PH !3/9J7T3-8887 � � �g -� /I I � N � i � �. � � � DQWMENT NQT CQNEIDERED FINAL �`� % � . UNLESS ALL S16NATURES COMPLETED � -- � � /, ; �� , � � � w .� � . — �.,_ � � � CD� � � �1 (� `� I �� O � � � , � � �� . f � r8 �p � � O �'� � � � ' � �PROX. LOCATION OF EX. GI��JTCH � 0 ca3 � -�_ c,,, Z8 '' � �� BENT O BE REMOVED � . �� NORMAN C. DENNINGS I �'�. 6 �0° �; �-' � N r�� ' 6 � t ' °� +`, o� CULTIVATEQ � � � s� �' � � � �'s � � � tiB 2 � `�� woo�s l � � p ��, j ,�_ � l � � � . . � �� i ..� ��, �, � �� N �g woo�5 LANE FARMS INC. '�, CLASS B RIP RAP 1 �} � r� � 7 DISSIPATOR PAD � 81 �'�' �g 0 � � C° � � ��• , f 1 � ��a �� B-477PROJECT G Z8 cp � l � ;�' �� +. ClA5� B�iP ftAP m , -L- 5TA. 19+25.QQ ,-� 4 c� � ' DISSIPATOR PAD -� • r�,a cp oa�c r PORTATION J rn r . - � . � _ m,Pi� rr�x eou��' � `� � `'`' R�� 1 � , 3 �-'�-'„�,�,.�-�-A-, �-� , `'� w � `�' 2' � --- E � � � . ``_.---`�_.�_� �Cg t.`sac'`--=-� ==� �,s�,�� —�E i, � �kx�'�� _ --- _�, XY� ' F `�—� �� —' EXISTING R/W ��— — -- : � � .... .. ., � — ----.-- . _ _ - --- . ri i � �� /� — — �g =� . � ' __�—_� --- ---._. L _ E_ _ � _ _ � _ � `�-, r; Y Y � - - - . - � F . ------ .� F F �_ `� • �, '' ac.. � '��'� f -- - ��'`41's'�.�-'�:,-� v,.;�..�-+---o�� F � �. ^—�--�----- ' Y . � — --� — . -- — _ �� -- � T��-�—� TB 2GI � i ' i �f � TB 2 ro s� �`E� —� ,�_� l � � � � � �' �� _i�� 1 -- w `_' S — r�—hl� —� � � "----. � �- -.�.d;;��-� � ``�o$-- =� � ON BRIDGE RD. 25' BST TB 2GI � � ~. � � � i i i � 1 0� GI - � s - - - � � _ _ __ � �_- � � � - �� - - . �.� � � _. - � '� __" _- ` _` � - - - - - - - � � � � � � � . ��3�� ' - � ��S`---- �� w � _E � .- - :�� _- - -- � �u� ��,�'�, � ^ — - _ - ' -_ � '� -� - - � �r - � - - � _ __ -- _ �-�- - ,'"�,�' �� ., �_ --g-� , � �_,_-� _ . _ I ^ � L k x � -� v Y � 4��- � - � � � � = F � F F 6 4 N 9 � q � g �� ~ � ; _ r- r �- _ � __ . ' �- s� -�, x u u �_ �� `�-� �.. -{P �xisYtiNc Riw � � � - =...r�„�...• -ta cp � �"` ^ y �, , i ,,,r- g� � r _ p� ��..�.. �5 c� . ��_p1�F � � �' _ __ % � 1k �y� �.r� ��''-��f-r':�r� � : .�- _ . �`s m r K — ., ,�,.. PUE ' y � � °� . . . . . �- � g � � �' � �� e � � BE I PR E T � � �� >, �: � - - - - - . . :�''�i�-� tp � �' � CLASS B RI P RAP � � co�� , . '8��9 � � � ' +Yf ` 1 - - - - - - . ' L L ` � D15�'PATOR PAD �p , g ,1 � � `ti �' � 1 N t�� -BL STA.14+25.00 co cp� �� `' 4 ', r � � �r CLASS B R�P � � � � � � DISSIPATOR P/� � � � �, i � � � APPROX. LpCATION OF VIS�LE 82 �``- �`�'' 1 r^�� ,• � Z� � �� , �' g `\ JOHNSTON COUN��' 12" DIA. ABANDOI�D PIERS �� `'� I � � , . � � I � & `�� ` PIJBLIC UTILITY�'� �2 T4 BE REMOVED ru � � l � 9 ��, �677 11�'� � �'g � cs� y � �� "1 , �,.. —� � � e ;'�---� �� ! �� 1''',, �' ,.. �1� / 1 :. ;i@ I c' I 4 W00�5 � ;�f , Cb ,L8 . CULTIVATEQ � � APPROX. LOCATION O� PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R � � � �. � i � `~ �'� ` (EX. BRG �30'j (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VI511] ` � � � Y� U� 8,, t � ,.� � �co ',\ �., ~_' �, ` � T� BE REI�AOVED ,,°` cp � g � � �`,1 � ..� �L � �, � � W0�5 � ,,.._ ;•. o� R� � a� � ` � � � � �� NOTES: `� tS� c5� � ,•., � �� 1 �� a � R 1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. � �j � N `] � �� .rr'� � � � . � 2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. � D �� '� ��' `� � a� � € NORMAN C. DENNINGS �� '� _.�� ` � ,; �;� � �, '� = 3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. � / � co '1� � � � � �ANIEL F. I��RNEGAY & � d, ,.�1 0� �,..,'� ,,, � PAIJLA S. KORNEGA�Yo � � �% ,; _ - `n' 4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT 1 � � � , � � � � � �1 � e METHOD IIL ��,. _ '��1 � / ' � � � � � J ' �f 'i � . � �� r 8 i c�rxre sc� BUFFER DRAWING � � � �� ° � � / � � � � � �� ca � 5 D 25 5o SHEET 3 OF 5 '��' �� .� �i6 �° � g ,� � � � � = �l � � m� ; � � � . F3-4771_liyd�rm_buf�sh4.dgi 10/14/2016423:53 PM TUS � � � 1 1 � � � � � � � � • � � � � � � � � � �� • • • ' • • • • • • • ' • • ' � :' � �' : •�- • • / -�- •• � � • __- .... . : . ., a�� • � - .. �� • � � � � � �, NOTES: Rev. May 2006 Rev.Jan 2009 •� See Sh�eet 9 A For I ndex of Sheets See Sheet � 8 f or Conventl onal Symbols Tp y�RPF R y0 �SR �o �s� R osj o. � " 1 ' . �� " 1 ' I �: C�� i �� \ (�� 1'� " i � 1-< < � . �� 1'� C�} 1.1 \ . •� I1�1�"I�IC�)\ C��1�` I-Il�ll-1��.��"� L UCA T1411 t: REPLA CE BRIDGE #11 � T�ER 1 V[ILL CREEK 411� SR 1241 (RICHARDS411t BRIDGE RD.� TYPE 4F WORK: GRADI11tG, DRAI11tAGE, STR UCTURE A11tD PA T�I11tG BEGIN BRIDGE —L— POT STA. 15 + 95 +/— �--- SR �201 —L— POC STA. 14 + 25.�� BEGIN TIP PRQJECT B-4771 � _ r � n � rn � END BRIDGE —L— POT STA. 17 + 70 +/— RICHARDSON BRIDGE RD. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURE$ C�MPLETED � ■ .-J � TO wtiLl.1F4RD CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERF4RMED T4 THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III . THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. f0 771 RD tsR ��oo� GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGII� DATA PRQJECT LENGTH Pre�ared For: HYDRAULICS EKGINEER DIVISl011t OF HIGHWAYS ADT 2417 = 441 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 5� 25 � 50 lO0 ADT 2037 = 618 TGS ENGINEERS �� , �� t° TGS 706 HILLSBOROUGH 5T pH (919) 773-8887 ��`C `�� PLANS K= 11 % LE1I�GTH RQA.DWAY TIP PR4JECT B�771 = O.U62 mile +/— su�TE Zoa CORP. C CO2 �5E NO.: � �� D= 55 % � RALEIGH, NC 27603 P.�. � � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 13 %* ��GTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4771 = 0.033 m:le +/— 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS sjG�TT'�' � � TUTAL LE11tGTH TIP PRO ECT B-4771 = 0.095 mile +/— BURKE EVANS, PE ROADWAY DESIG11t � � V= 6� MPH '� RIGHT OF WAY DATE: pRUJECT ENGINEER E11�GI11tEER �� PROFILE �HORIZONTAL) *��ST 4% + DUAL 9%� OCTOBER 2G, 2Q16 TRAVIS COOK EI �`�'� ��' 1 O 5 O 1 O 2 O F U N CT C LASS - rRQJECT D�SIGN �rGrx� �� A�� MINOR COLLECTOR LETI'ING DATE: GARY LOVERING, PE PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB-REGIONAL TIER DESIGN MAY 16, 2017 r[�OT ROADWAY DESIGX p� SIGNAT'URE: BDUND�4RIES 14ND PROPEI�TY.• State Line Cou nty Li ne --- ---- Township Line -- -- City Line - - Reservation Line - - Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Corner � Property Monument � Parcel/Sequence Number i23 Existing Fence Line -x x x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -w�B- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary w�B Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB Existing Endangered Plant Boundary �g Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB Known Contamination Area; Soil -�--�-- Potential Contamination Area: Soil -�--�-- Known Contamination Area: Water -�--�-- Potential Contamination Area: Water -�--�-- Contaminated Site: Known or Potential '■' � BUILDINGS �4ND DTHElZ CULTURE: Gas Pump Vent or l� Tank Cap O Sign � We I I ° Small Mine 'SZ' Foundation 0 Area Outline Cemetery fi Building School � Church � Dam H�'DROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water --- --- Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � � Jurisdictional Stream �S ... — Buffer Zone 1 az � BufFer Zone 2 Bz � Flow Arrow �--- --- Disappearing Stream �--- --- Spri ng c�'� -�_.--� Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � Fiow False Sump �� 1'�I �q J.L.1�� V`V' �� Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Suhsurface Utility Eraga�aeerang R14ILR014DS: Sta nda rd Ga uge CSX TRANSPORTATION RR Signal Milepost M�r�� 35 $WItCi1 � SWlTCH RR Abandoned � � � � RR Dismantled -------- RrGHT oF u��y Baseline Control Point ♦ Existing Right of Way Marker 0 Existing Right of Way Line - Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite R1W Marker Propased Control of Access Line with Concrete C/A Marker Existing Control of Access ' � t / Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line E Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - E Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement TDE Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement PDE Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement ouE Proposed Permanent Utility Easement PUE Proposed Temporary Utility Easement TUE Proposed Aerial Utility Easement AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with Iron Pin and Cap Marker R0�4DS �4ND REL�4TED FEI4TURES: Existing Edge of Pavement — Existing Curb — � I Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fi I I --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp cR Existing Metal Guardrail T T T Proposed Guardrail T T T T Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n Equality Symbol � Pavement Removal T�'GET�ITION.• Single Tree Single Shrub � � Hedge Woods Line -- -- -- -- -- 4rchard Vi neya rd EXISTING STRUCTURES: MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES: P4WER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WiG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole IYiG Power Line LOS B�S. U. E.*} LV�G Power Line LOS C�S.U,E.*� W�G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Pedestal Telephone Cell Tower l,V� Telephone Cable Hand Hole l,V� Telephone Cable LOS B�S.U.E.*] - lY� Telephone Cable LOS C[S.U.E.*� - lY� Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*j - lY� Telephone Conduit L4S B(S.U.E.*j lY� Telephone Conduit L4S C�S.U.E.*� IYC� Telephone Conduit L4S D�S.U.E.*) U/� Fiber Optics Cable L4S B(S.U.E.*j U/� Fiber Optics Cable L4S C�S.U.E.*) U/� Fiber Optics Cable L4S D�S.U.E.*) � � � � Vlneyard CQNG ) coNc ww C coNc Hw ❑ CB 0 5 • • 0 ►-� n �� P — —P— — � � O ❑T � HH -- — —T---- — —T— — T ----TC---- --TC--- TC ----TFo--- --T FO--- T FO WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant LViG Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*) LVC� Water Line LOS C�S. U. E*} LViG Water Line LOS D�S. U. E*} Above Ground Water Line TV: N Pedestal N Tower U/fGG N Cable Hand Hole u U/fGG N Cable LOS B{S.U.E.*) U/fGG N Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*j U/fGG N Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*j U/fGG Fiber Optic Cable LOS B�S.U.E.*) U/fGG Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*} U/fGG Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*} GAS: Gas Valve Gas Meter LI�G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.�`) LI�G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) LV�G Gas Line LOS D�S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout LV� Sanitary Sewer Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer SS Forced Main Line LOS B�S.U.E.*� SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*� MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located 4bject Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown LI�G Line LOS B�S.U.E.*� IY�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. - A� Tank; Water, Gas, 4il Geoenvironmental Boring l�G Test Hole L4S A(S.U.E.*j Abandoned According to Utility Records - End of Information O 0 � � --w---- — —N— — w A/G Water — ---TY--- — — —TY— — Tv ----TV FD--- — —TY FO— TV FO � � ----�---- - —G— — —G A/G Gas � • SS A/G Sanitary Sewer ----F55---- - -�5 FSS � 0 � ❑s —7UTL 0 U5T 0 � m AATU R E.O.I. o, a� � N \ � PAVEIIAENT SCH EDU LE FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN: OCTOBER 2, 2015 Cl PROP. APPROX. 2.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.b Lbs PER SQUARE YAR� IN EACH OF TW4 LAYERS. PROP. VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT AN C� AVEftAGE ftATE OF 11Q Lbs PER SQUARE YARD PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LE55 THAN 1.Os OR GREATER THAN 1.5" IN DEPTH. El PROP. APPROX. 4.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD. PROP. VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN EZ AVEftAGE ftATE OF 114 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LE55 THAN 4.0" OR GREATER THAN 5.5" IN DEPTH. R CONCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER T EARTH MATERIAL U EXISTING PAVEMENT W WEbGING (VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEETj PAVEMENT EDGE SL4PES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN 4THERWISE. C1 E2 � 4.0"' MIN. � -L- , ; POI f Jlti�� ~�~ � u c2 ( C1 E2 DETAIL SHOWING METHQD �F WEDGING Ow 1' 1" VERTICAL CONCRET� BARRIER ,_5,► DETAIL F�R SHOULDER BERM GUTTER SEE CORRESPONDING TYPICAL SECTION FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN. 5EE TYPICAL SECTION5 AND PL4NS FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS. 3' VARIABLE WIDTH W FULL DEPTH g PAVED SHOULDER � � W � 0.025 � _ w 3.1 � �lf — ORIGINAL GROUND LINE -L- -L- -L- -L- E1 � GRADE TQ THIS LINE STATIONS 15 + 65.00 to 15 + 82.38 LT 15 + 65.00 to 15 + 82.38 RT 17 + 81.63 to 17 + 99.00 LT 17 + 81.63 to 17 + 99.00 RT C� —L— SR 1201 �RICHARDSON BRIDGE ROAD) L I 34'-10" CLEAR R4ADWAY . . 12•�0•` �1� �� +��i�//I// 00 00 00 00�00 12•�0•• ,_5., . ' GRADE I POI NT : �.� � , . �00000000000 . . � 1' 1" VERTICAL �CONCRETE BARRIER TYPI CAL S ECTI 4 N 0 N STRU CTU RE FROM -L- STA. 15 + 95 +/- TO STA. 17 + 7� +/- �SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL AND DIMENSIONING AS WELL AS DETAILS OF BRIDGE RAIL AND ASPHALT OVERLAY.j � �—�l� — ORIGINAL cRourvo ORIGINAL GROUND � _ �� 1-�l� — ORIGINAL GROUND ;1 3:� �e � -L- SR 12D1 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE ROADj VARI ES, VARI ES 11.5' � 12 .0' VARI ES, 0.08 � TO 12.1` 0.�25 FT/FT � W GRADE POI NT 0.025 FTiFT � �: TYPICAL SECTI4N NO. 1 F ROM -L- STA. 14 + 2 5. �0 TO STA. 14 + 75 . 04 FROM -L- STA. 18 + 75.00 TO STA. 19 + 25.04 8' 3' �i� . 0.08 � 4'� �! T 12' TYP. 0.025 FVFT E1 GRADE TO THIS LINE � —L— SR 1201 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE ROAD) � 12' TYP. , 3' , GRADE POI NT 0.025 FT/FT C� 7` T TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 FROM -L- STA. 14 + 75.00 TO STA. 15 + 95 +/- �BEGIN BRIDGE) FROM -L- STA. 17 + 70 +/- �END BRIDGE� TO STA. 18 + 75.�0 NOTE: PAVE TO THE FACE OF GUARDRAIL 3•� PR4JECT REFERENCE N4. B—�%%� RNV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. �n_� PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER TGS ENGINEERS TGS 706 HILLSBOROUGH ST. SUITE 200 0 RALEIGH, NC 27603 � PH {919) 773-8887 CORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED L ` � ORIGINAL cRouNo ��— ORIGINAL GR4UND � na+wn c. oE��s D6 T95 PC 516 x� y ^ � 11CtQ5 1 � `�� M 579T�E W�342E 1.-_ �� BL S ELEY.� 82�g2L piiS BRI�GE SPIKE IN POrER POLE � yt1 rv� K � r. � � � ""r y� � s� tt � K �i',� � � � BEGIN TIP � PdC Sf eaons ! -t- Pl sto r3fsT..3s PI Sta 2c1�2.44 p= 125i1' 2�3`lLTJ p= 3' 54' 35�9' fLTJ o - 3�11'4T.4 0 - ror3o.� L - .34731" L - .�753.�' r - n�� r - ��r��r R - f55U1XJ' R - 3�OOi7CT' SE - SEE 7't1UYS SE - 5EE PLAAfa � �wcnas�rtuy �f'R Cu� a wr xAr � `�U01 �.ceoi m"u er. s rr �5' LT PROP. SBG —� � STA 15+66.00 YO 15+82.38 LT 6 RT � - r -�--�� - - ikT� � �� F�=ma .�- � y � -- � F ..�. ---s��~ '��ta-,-� ~ ts�c - � ~� Y_ � ; _''_�� _ Ei1k = Fq lt 5Y ,` , . `-"__ : YE 1 r - �p �t \ �tiU'!h .�'w . T x� * C3:Y31_� � -� E7[ M1w k �� Gi{Al1 950 !r B-4T71 O NOR�+N C.OEMMIGS us r55 re se5 xoaos I A ,�c � C:' � � � ,� � cu�s � u� uv c r.eoio iu 6T.5 SY / � �� '"' is�: �0005 TL 3 � W � � LME FARM5 NC. OB 999 PC �6 OB 17 PC 205 �- SiA. 17+81.G9 TO 17+99.00 LT & 1[T END APPAOACH � PROJEGT IIEFEIIENCE NO. e-4n� RM' SXEEf NO. iav�nw,�r oesic,H ENGINEE0. � �� sM[f7 N6. 9VGINEER �OWMENT NOT CpM$I�ERED FINAL UNLESE ALL i16NATYREs COM�LEP�G cu�nvar¢o � TGS ENGINEERS 706 HILLSBOROUGH 3T, Sl11TE 200 RALEIGH, NC 2id�S7 PH {8181779-8887 �_-��t _ --'"��'� R.. �� —�—��, �� F �� ` � i� 53.,. SR �'A,CN� H�[�IJd61' .r�: � �[.�- s '�= —r = — ' � _ � � f �p' � I�+I.PVE —' �' _ � — -- E� NS� UNTY �UBLI�T f — '� 1 5g 7T$Mg �,� 1� l 4 �` HL65TA= I5+5�3£32Z 44,52' d 1 BRIOGE SPVKE� 1N �OWER POLE II � II � V {0° END TlP PROJECT B-4771 "'.0° �` 3 U POC St�.19+25.00 ��-��L � �-`�� R� kBANO@NE9r.� - �' � � o,u�� F.ICORMECAY a PAULA 5. KflRIiECAY 09 �OT PG 7= PB 77 PC 2�0 � � 1 ` N't3005 q1LTIYRTEO � • oouiiui�iii'i�i 'ii Q •� CriiiiiiiiiiiinuAi��d� imiili�i� , ,, ou� u�u�� a na��u�� ■ ��onm f�oa m�f • r aa�iu��:��iii� ■ ��u�um �uo ■ ��a�� ' � � � �� '�l�C�� ' � ■ �� !!p� � 1 D�is� �� - i • • - • i�i � �.i�.a'i� . . ' ' • • • • , ��■■....W`��N��■.N��N� �. �i7�iii��x�m��s�ui M 0�o ni�iiiii■ ��iiii�iii ��iiiioi�iu��i i Y, +�=��a�iL��iiii i�wGG7 iii �i�u7iiiiiiiiiii��n�iiiiiii�iiiii �uu�iiiiiiii� �. : ' �� • �r �.-,� . �. � + �-. � + � '�■ �� i�iii�� iiiiiiiiiiiriuiuiiiiiiiiiii ua�o�� ii �i o�;�r�� x�r�� ' � :: .. � . ... • i� �iiiiiiiii� � im��iiGiii�ii m�iiiiiiii f � ::� :::::::�:?:;_��:��0.'2�:�:::�:::� ��C�:'. �::,� ++ � � "�::::'��Il��i��'.a:�::: ':��:: C:�� :;;;;::: :e:e:: e�=��e e::::: ::�.; ;:; :: ; ::; :e: � � � �, � � ee�e ��e �e�6IIIIUIIIIII�Ii?!�?E?e�ee:eee�eeeeeeee�Eeee� . ' • .. .....:::: :: �:e • ::•:::: :::::::: :� � . ., ; ., . � • , . � - i _ • r i �' � l� '� 4� � I : 1 �o��.�u ■ ■ oouoo��o�i�� ■ �uoor I'*�w�� . ��i`, I 1 m� u�o ■ m��o�o�� o�o�� a� .... ......... � �.0 .C. ... ......�..... ...6... � n ��u�� mn■ �� o • � • • 0o n�u�� ■ a �� ■ �o�n��nuu �� ` .k � ui �� ■ ao��o�u �� .� . ��. � � �on��o��oo�� ' . „s� �i ii�m �a�iu� ��oo�� io � _ "� �' i � ir i f �C 11 12 13 Z �_� ��-� =�o� ��m �� .... , .' '� � ..�.�...... ....� . ......u........ rn�� u�Rno�en iu� iiuiu�ii��i�uu ■rr ■ �� ■ �� o��or�� ;;: �� e..E :. .......... ...... ..... .... ........E�::'��'•,.y;;"W �:E� �� ' _��:�:: '�:� :�: :: � �?:::�:� � _ �: ::: ��:�:' ::::�: �:::::: :: .■...��fil�III�9d�..�....��...��W.�..E...�.■..■��a�.��flnIIIII��.�...��....�::..W.....�: EE�:: "� e� �eee eee?�:eee:eee�� e::'E : e'�e �?eee B: Eee :eEeee :E . %{� �L 54 �o .... .... ........ .... ......... ... . . ........ .... .... .. .... .... ......... .. 14 15 1G 17 16 14 20 �1 22 23