HomeMy WebLinkAbout20161132 Ver 1_B-4771 Nationwide Johnston November 15 2016_20161116Tr�r�.s�taort�ti�n
November 15, 2016
N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATTN: Rob Ridings
NCDOT Coordinator
PAi l�1cCR[3RY
Ca�nar
�icxc��,�s �. rEtar��sa�v
���
Subject: Application for Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and Neuse Buffer
Authorization for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 11 over Mill Creek
on SR 1201 (Richardson Bridge Rd.) in Johnston County, North Carolina; TIP
No. B-4771; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1200(6); Debit $240 from WBS No.
38543.1.1
Dear Sir,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing
161-foot bridge no. 16 with a 175-foot bridge, on the existing alignment. Traffic will be
maintained on an offsite detour during constnxction.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings,
stormwater management plan, utility narrative, and design plans for the above referenced project.
This project calls for a letting date of May 16, 2017 and a review date of March 28, 2017. The
project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: The project's environmental documentation was processed as a Categorical
Exclusion. However, we anticipate that the bridge replacement, including all approach work will
be authorized under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit (N WP) 3(Maintenance) in accordance with
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). We are not requesting written approval
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, but are providing this application to them as a notice of
use of NWP 3.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3883 will apply to this
project. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
�'"'Nothing �mp�re��
State of North Carolina � Department of Transportation � PDEA-Natural Environment Section
1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 � 1598 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F
Neuse River Buffer Rule Authorization: NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized
under the Neuse River Buffer rules. Authorization to debit the $240 Permit Application Fee from
WBS Element 38543.1.1 is hereby given.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx under Quick Links >
Permit Applications. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this
project in May 2016. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under
Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please contact Gordon Cashin at either
gcashin@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6107.
Sincerely,
� _�,.�,5,,�►-__ _ -
_ = -
� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M, Manager
Natural Environment Section
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
o��� W A r�qQ�
� �
� � a �
� , , , � o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 11 over Mill Creek on SR 1201
2b. County: Johnston
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Four Oaks
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g�77�
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6107
3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785
3h. Email address: gcashin@ncdot.gov
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.341866 Longitude: - 78.216246
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 7.1 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Mill Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The study area includes the existing roadway and bridge and adjacent rural land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.9 acres (from Table 6 in NRTR)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
434 feet (from Table 5 in the NRTR)
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a deteriorated bridge
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 161-foot bridge with a 175-foot bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour.
Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No � Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres)
Tem ora T
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: There will be <0.01 ac of hand clearing. See Wetland Permit Impact Summary sheet for details
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width
Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet)
DWQ —
non-404,
other)
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Mill Creek, Interior bents impact <0.01 acre
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Flo
Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
B1 � P❑ T Bridge Mill Creek � Nas 3,766 1,021
B1 � P❑ T Roadway Construction Mill Creek � No 292
U1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
U2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts 3,766 1,313
6i. Comments: "See Buffer Impact Summary sheet
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Wetland impacts were reduced through design refinements. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be followed
during construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Types of impacts proposed do not require
com ensato miti ation.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
Comments: See attached buffer permit drawings.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website, field surveys. All species No Effect.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation �
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
�,C Philip S. Harris III. P.E. ''' —� �_ , %I ' j s.- L�' I�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
11
= ,��.
Hi�1lw�V North Carolina Department of Transportation ��
Stort���vater ' 1
�,.,,,.,<.., Highway Stormwater Program ''�f�;.�
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ''�"' �•<<�:y``'�
(Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 38543.1.1 TIP No.: B-4771 County(ies): Johnston Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 38543.1.1 TIP Number: B-4771 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 9/20/2016
NCDOT Contact: Paul Atkinson, PE Contractor / Designer: TGS Engineers (David B. Petty, PE)
Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 706 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27603
Phone: 919-707-6707 Phone: 919-773-8887 (Ext. 104)
Email: patkinson@ncdot.gov Email: dpetty@tgsengineers.com
City/Town: Four Oaks County(ies): Johnston
River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 500 ft. Surrounding Land Use: Forest, Cropland, Rural Residential
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.3 ac. 0.3 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 12' wide paved travel lanes w/ shoulders paved to face of guardrails (varies 0' to 5') Two 12' wide paved travel lanes with 2' to 4' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side
and 3' wide grassed shoulders behind guardrail. Outside of guardrails are 3' wide slopes ranging from about 4(H):1(V) to 3(H):1(V).
grassed shoulders and 3(H):1(V) to 12.5(H):1(V) grassed side slopes.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 618 Year: 2037 Existing: 441 Year: 2017
General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge No. 500011 on SR 1201 (Richardson Bridge Road) over Mill Creek (Moorewood Pond) in Johnston County southeast of Four Oaks, NC. Proposed 175'
(Description of Minimization of Water long by 33' wide triple-span bridge to replace existing 161' long by 25' wide quadruple-span bridge. The proposed grade is about 0.5' above existing ground in the vicinity of the
Quality Impacts) bridge. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water or buffers. Stormwater runoff on the existing bridge discharges directly into the water for the full length of
the bridge. Stormwater runoff from the proposed bridge is to flow to two (2) proposed drop inlets at the north approach and to two (2) proposed drop inlets at the south approach.
Discharge from the pipe outlets will be attenuated on riprap pads outside of the buffer zones and be fully diffused by the existing topographic conditions before sheet flowing
toward the buffer zones. Deck drains will not be installed. Stormwater runoff will be discharged at minimum practicable slopes, yielding minimum velocities. Hand clearing in
wetlands within proposed right of way due to bridge replacement.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Mill Creek (Moorewood Pond) NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-52-(1)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: N/A Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
�A
a `
�
�a
�
V
W
0
�
�
�
h
�
�
�
V
f �
�
V
�
�
0
V
B-4771 Hvd prm wet tsh.d�n 10/14/2016 11:54:50 AM TGS
See Sl�et PA For Index af Si�ets
Sae Si�et 9B fa' Conve�lonal Symbols
����� �� ����� ��������
�������� �� ��������
JoH�sTo�r cov�r�
LOCATl011t: REPLACE BRIDGE #11 OYER MILL CREEK
011t SR 1201 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE RD.)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADIII�G, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE AND PAYIKG
PERMIT DRAWINGS
STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS
DUE TD ROADWAY/BRIDGE
4CTQBER 14, zo� b
WETLAN DS
r� -_ _ " BEGIN BRIDGE
►�t,4R� _ _ _ _ -L- POT STA. 15 + 95 +/-
(SR o� ��►S� R
8J �. �
_ __; _ M -- - _ _ ---_ _ _-_ ��' - 5R 12D1
, � . -v--- -�, _ - -- --- ---- -
w � ,
-L- POC STA. 14 + 2 �.00 �
WEf IANDS
WETLANDS
END
-L- I
5�1TE 1
�;
BRIDGE
GOCYYEMT NOT CON8IOEREO FINAL
YNLiSS ALL 81GNATURis GOMPLkTip
�
�o��
Pp B
�
� 3 �D �gR 1200)
RICHARDSON BRIDGE _R�._._�__- _ TO W1L1.1FORD
� -- I
� -L- POC STA.19+25.00
�I END TIP PRQJECT B-4771
� ,'?
,� WETLANDS
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMIT5 E5TABLISHE� BY METHOD III .
THIS PROJEGT 15 NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOl1NDARIES.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
INCOMPLETE PLANS
UO NOT II96 AOR ROW ACQUI�'CDDN
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PRO,JECT LENGTH P�red For: HYDR4ULICS ENGII�TEER
DIYISIOK OF HIGHWAYS
ADT 2017 = 441 lOBO Birc�i Rid�r Dr., R�lei�k NG, 276l0
�� 25 O $O ,� ADT �037 = 618 T S iL�li6EN�INFFRS � PH(9'19}T/3BBB7 } 130� q
K = " p� _ 7p6 HILLSBpROUGH $T �� �.ENSE NO.:
P�S LEKGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-11771 0.062 mile +� suire zao ��5
D= 55 % ygxGTH STRUCTT/RES TIP PROJECT B-J1771 =� p,33 �� +,� �EIOH, NC 2780:t r.g o �
`�4 25 4 ?� �Qa T= 13 96 "` awa sraa�xn sr�c�►rarraavs gURKE EVANS PE � o
TiDT.9L LEHGTIi TIP PROJECT 8-4771 = 0.095 mile +� � RQADWAY D&SIGX
V= 60 MPH RIGHT OF WAY DL4TS ��' �'�
PROFILE (FIORIZONTALj . OCT08ER 21, 201b ���
(TTST 49b + DUAL 9%} TRAVIS COOK. EI �
1D 5 0 10 20 FUNCT CLASS= pA�' �""'�" � Te�w
MINOR COLLECTDR �TT'�G �TB� GARY LOVERING� PE
PROFILE (VERTICALj SU�REGIONAL TIER DESIGN �Y ��+� 201 Mcno°�aaww.���ar p$
37GYA7T188:
5g
5 •�
WETLAND IMPACTS
Hand Clearing
in Wellonds
�
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS lbl' X 25' C�UADRUPLE�PAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPQSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 776' X 3'(TRIPLE-SPANj, 90 dEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 500'
� �
`"_ .--�-_� -
-�,_ �__�
---__ ____ .�
_---- -�, �
` � --��'-�-� ��R
—� � ��� �` � �
-�-�,� ����� �-�----�� ` I
�
J
�_�
�
9D
n
��
G7
'y�D
�p
-
O
�
O
NORMAN C. �ENNINGS
W00�5
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD �
�`
F -- F--------�--___�
e�
TB
�
PERMIT DRAWINGS
FOR B-4771
�oHNSTON couN�r
STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS BRI DGE #500011
— CLA55 II RIP RAP
I x
w
U
� I
- - - - -� �����
� —� r�r�.�
���
����
� .a. .s. ►'�l3.`�"'..^r�.7�l�'
B–d771
–L– STA. 14+25.00
JOHNSTON COUNTY
PUB�ic uTi�iTY
NOTES:
1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN.
2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT
METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALE
7�5 D 25 50
E3-4771_liyd�rm_wet�sh4.dgn 10/14/2016 4:26:50 PM TGS
CLASS B RIP RAP �
D15SIPATOR PAD
APPROX. LOCATION OF VISIBLE
12" DIA. ABANDONED PIERS
T4 BE REMOVED
APPROX. LOCATION OF PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R
(EX. BRG 4@30'j (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VI511]
TO BE REMOVED
W00�5
O
NORMAN C. DENNINGS
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 5
�
��,
�
�
APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. CRUTCH
BENTS TO BE REMOVED
WOOQS
CLASS B RIP ftAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
����
1 ���i�� -
i� �����R .�� ,.
. �,.-- -
�r
�
�
�
N
CULTIVATEQ
O
LANE FARMS INC.
–L– 5TA. 19+25.pp
EXISTING R/W
. : �.�
�, „ . -, -,
— — — _— �T�= _ = _ = = — = � � ��
� — = T =
� `- ____ ---�— �- F- - - - 6 4N9 PVC ��� � ~
� ~ � F �^ �xisYtiNc Riw
� �-^1
,�. PU E ' � �
- -- -- - -� �- -- -- �-.� -- -- -- --
m�
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
W00�5
O
DANIEL F. KORNEGAY &
PAIJLA S. KORNEGAY
CULTIVATEQ
5g
5 •�
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS lbl' X 25' C�UADRUPLE�PAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
WETLAND IMPACTS PROPQSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 776' X 3'(TRIPLE—SPANj, 90 dEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH — 500'
Hand Clearing
in Wellonds
�
�
9D
n
��
G7
'y�D
�p
-
PERMIT DRAWINGS
FOR B-4771
�oHNSTON couN�r
STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS BRI DGE #500011
CLA55 II RIP RAP —
... ,_. f ",..., /` . . (p � . �` . . . . V � � G . ��� PH !3/9J7T3-8887
� � �g -� /I I � N � i„ � �. � � � DQWMENT NQT CQNEIDERED FINAL
�`� % � . UNLESS ALL S16NATURES COMPLETED
� -- � � 0, W
% � CP � � � l�1 � � '
- �.,_ � cb � �� �4 � � `� �� O
_ � � � � � � �, � � �
i �
_ r �, ��
� �
+
8
� �p ' �_ � O � I , � �PROX. LOCATION OF EX. GI��JTCH 0
ca3 � —, c^' Zg I �F' � � � BENT5�0 BE REMOVED � � N
c� �`�_ � NORMAN C. DENNINGS � '�. 66 �0° �; + c�-�
__ �
o� � ,� � °� ` � CULTIVATEQ
,� � � ��
�;, � c� � �'� l� cs� ti8 2
woo�s
� ' woo�5 LANE FARMS INC.
p � � �� � c,� �� i ! � +� � � � � � � � 8
'�, CLASS B RIP RAP 1 �} ' � r� �
7 DISSIPATOR PAD � 81 �'�' �g 0'� c� C° � ��N• , f 1 � ���a �� B-477PROJECT
G� �8 � � l � ; �' � � , ClA5� B�iP ftAP m , -L- 5TA.19+25.QQ
� 4 � � 1 @� � y DISSIPATOR PAD -� .
:;``t_; � _ . i , :
� �� � W � %. � I � � � ![�� 1 � � tp
� _-: .._ __ � c� �� � - � - , ��— � � � � tS�
` _�
�
_ � •--; . � . .
"`_--- __- 'A �8 �-------,- --�`:==� E � � � F E ��
� ` � � ' ' �--• - • . � � �� EXISTING R/W
`�- .�__,.� � __ _ �_ : ; . � I - - - -� - — -- - =---�- � � � - -
----_._ . � � � i ~ � ��
� _ - - F F ..,- ��-� - : ��, ���__ — �-��a� . �� ` -� • �
�� �-- ---._. L � � r ^ _ ^ � r ""�-,'�t, ` �� L� x� �,=-n ,
-- -------- -- �.
r ,f--'`�ii�'�-i.�-'�+ ,-� v;�-�,.'�-,.,,�� F
_ _� -_� __... -- . -T� -----�-- _ �_
�-- � T��-�—� TB 2GI � l � i i i �f ��� TB 2 ro s�
�`E� —� ,�_� l � � � � ° �' �� _i�� 1
-- w `_' S — r�—hl�
—� � �
Y----. � �- �.a��-� � `���-�- =� � ON BRIDGE RD. 25' BST TB 2GI 1 � � � �o i i i _ �`___ 1 0� GI - � s - - - � � _ _ __ � �_-
� �
� - �� - -
. �.� � �
_. - �
-� �,3�� � ��T`_`-- �--��.� w � _E � ^ .- =�� _- - �-�- � i sl ���lo-�.,�'''� ° ^ - _ _ _ _ _ _ � -. �r� - �� _ - � � � � � - -
•�
.. � � � � ��� - �,� � � � $� F` F � 6 4N9
'��'�.. {] � --g-�r 1, �- �_.�—� — _ I r ^` , ` _ � �� ��� � � _ � — F
� \ g � .L i_ U (�9 �ii . . ` W . .� � �� � .�,.�,. ,.__ � .._...e . =-:_.� ' ^ .. . '�� .�� ~ . . .. . �.
e . . �....a �� ��U . _ _ .r�_�_ .._�" . :�xisYtiNc Riw
1
� � ''--, F g �' —
--8
� - =._r�'Z. -ta rs� � �'C �` � 3 � r
A
� +k � ��--�.,"�.� �5 � .:n��'-�� E � �o_ _ " PUE � �� °�
, \� � � - ��_.�!":"Lr^ ^�"�_ . .--t-'t,'�' ��� '�►°' �
_ R � � t
a � .. �. .. ._ . � � .. �. , .
�� - � `�" � , rw, ,� �.,..��. . - - - - - ��
� � ` �' � � CLASS B RIP RAP � �4� ,;. ��g � � � � � - - - - - • - - G�- -'�i�-'� N
� BE I PR E T �' � � .�`. - _ ` �1
L L � B-d771 D15�'PATOR PAD 8� � e � � � � 1
E � �� � ', � �r CLASS B R�P � .
� � � -L- STA.14+25.00 � �� g� ° r � � �
; / � - "- , � � DISSIPATOR P/� � �
"� cp � � � � APPROX. LpCATION OF VIS�LE 82 � °`- �� 1 '�`�, � 1 � � � 1
', `\ `, JOHNSTON COUN��' 12 DIA. ABANDO PIERS �`'`� � G� �
I �
� g �`����~ � P lJ B L I C U T I L I T Y�`� �2 T4 BE REMOVED � � � � � � :9 �J � � 6`�, 'w �, �.� � `s � � �' � � . � �� '
& � � � �-. � 6�� , � , � g � �. 1 ,, � � , .
� � � �`
ti,
° � '' 1 h' ,�", \ `,, APPROX. LOCATION O�PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R � � M1_ 1��� , 1 � � Y � 4 W00�5 � cb Lg . CULTIVATEa
� s `���_`� _ (EX. BRG �30 j (NOT �ISIBLE DURING SITE VI511] , � �, �� � � �.�;, �L � - 8,� ' �
�
t � ,.`i �co , `��. �� T� BE ItE1�AOVED '1 cp 0�5 � � °°� � � _� � � �
� � ` � x � � 1 � �.� 1 �
� NOTES: �`� tS� ci� 1.•., � �. 1
� S� '`� ° �
R 1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. � �j N `] � �� � rr' � � �
.
� 2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. � D �� �� '� �' `� � a� �
€ NORMAN C. DENNINGS �� '� _.�� ` � ,; �,� � �, '�
= 3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. � / � co '1� � � � � �ANIEL F. I��RNEGAY &
� d, ,.�1 0� �,..,'� ,,, � PAIJLA S. KORNEGA�Yo
� �
�% ,; _ -
`n' 4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT 1 � � � , � � � � � �1 �
e METHOD IIL ��,. _ '��1 � / ' � � � �
� J ' �f 'i � . � ��
� �r 8
E GRAPHIC SCALE PERMIT D RAWI N G � � �� � � � � �; / � � c � \
�o cA \
� 5 D 25 5o SHEET 3 OF 5 '��' ��� � :` �i6 � g �
� � � �
= �l � � m� ; � �
� .
E3-4771_liyd�rm_wet�sh4.dgn 10/14/2016 4:2720 PM TGS
€
m
d
�
100
�`�
:i
70
BEGIN GRADE
-L- STA. 14 + 25.00
EL. 88.15'
�-}U.3700%
i
� � � � � � � �
PI = 15+25.00
EL = 87.78'
VC = 140'
K = 129
V = 55 mph
10� YR. W.S-
ELEV. = 85.0'
GL -L- STA. ib+sz.00
PROP. 1@55', 1@G5',1@55`
24" CSU W/4'-0" DEEP CAPS
PROP. GRADE = 88.59'
SKEW = 90° �
��
P�i
� •'� ^�
^
.
�-
_�.—,�.—
�
CL4SS I I RI P RAP
KEY-IN 3.5' (TYP.j
PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 81.0'
APPROX. LOCATION OF VISIBLE
12" DIA. ABANDONED PIERS
14+00 15+00
ST RUCT URE HYDRAULIC DAT A
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 5.600 CFS
DESIGN FREG?UENCY = 25 YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 83.9 FT
BASE DISCHARGE = 8J00 CFS
BASE FREQUENCY = 100 YRS
BASE HW ELEVATIQN = 85A FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHAfiGE = 8,000 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 50t YRS
OVERTQPPING ELEVATION = 84.8= FT
=OVERTOPPING ELEVATION REPRESENTS
LOWEST TOPO ELEV,THAT ALLOWS WATER
TO GET TO LOWER WOODS LINE
ELEVATIONS 12000' NORTH �F BRIDGEJ.
16+00
»+ao
1'' 1'� (�) I�� I I. 1:
EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED
- LOW SIDE LOW CHORD
PI = 16 + 95.00
EL = 89.00'
VC = 200'
K = 119
V = 55 mph
PROP. GRADE
____ �_ (-}0.9696�
-� ---------•
I EX. GR,4DE
END GRADE
-L- STA. 19 + 25.00
EL. 86.77'
EXISTING TIMBER ABUTMENTS
TO BE REMOVED (TYP.j
� 1.5:1 NORMAL SLOPE
W/CL4SS II RIP RAP (TYP.)
� PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 81.0`
NORMAL WATER SURFACE = 72'
APPR4X. LOCATI4N OF EX. CRUTCH BENTS T4 BE REMOVED.
APPROX. LOCATION OF PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G BSR
(EX. BRG 4@30') (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VISITj.
TO BE REM4VED.
�s+oo
19+00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 5
'�� ll�t��.�.
DI V ISION OF HIGHW AYS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
PROJECT:385�3.1.1 iB-�771)
PERMIT DRAWINGS REPLt�CEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.500011
F�R B�77� ON SR 1241 (RICH�RDSON BRIDGE RD)
JOHNSTON COUNTY �VER MILL CREEg
BRIDGE #500011
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 17+12 LT to 17+25 LT Roadway/Bridge < 0.01
TOTALS*: < 0.01 0 0 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
<0.01 acres of Permanent SW impacts for both interior bents at 16+50 & 17+15.
2013 10 24
�A
a `
�
�a
�
V
W
0
�
�
�
h
O
�
�
V
f �
�
V
�
�
0
V
B-4771 Hvd prm buf tsh.den 10/14/2016 11:55:49 AM TGS
See Sl�et PA For Index af Si�ets
Sae Si�et 9B fa' Conve�lonal Symbols
����� �� ����� ��������
�������� �� ��������
JoH�sTo�r cov�r�
LOCATl011t: REPLACE BRIDGE #11 OYER MILL CREEK
011t SR 1201 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE RD.)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADIII�G, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE AND PAYIKG
PERMIT DRAWINGS
BUFFER IMPACTS
DUE TD ROADWAY/BRIDGE
4CTQBER 14, zo� b
WETLAN DS
r� -_ _ " BEGIN BRIDGE
►�t,4R� _ _ _ _ -L- POT STA. 15 + 95 +/-
(SR o� ��►S� R
8J �. �
_ __; _ M -- - _ _ ---_ _ _-_ ��' - 5R 12D1
, � . -v--- -�, _ - -- --- ---- -
w � ,
—L— POC STA. 14 + 2 �.00 �
��
� i .• WETLANDS
�
� END
r
� I' -L- I
T I�''*a
�, ,��
', ; ,
I�w
51TE 1 �\ �.
P
�w�r�awos ,'
� �
r �,
'
BRIDGE
GOCYYEMT NOT CON8IOEREO FINAL
YNLiSS ALL 81GNATURis GOMPLkTip
�
�o��
Pp B
�
� 3 �D �gR 1200)
RICHARDSON BRIDGE _R�._._�__- _ TO W1L1.1FORD
�«� -- I
� —L— POC STA.19+25.00
�I END TIP PRQJECT B-4771
; q
%� � WETLANDS
�
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMIT5 E5TABLISHE� BY METHOD III .
THIS PROJEGT 15 NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOl1NDARIES.
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
INCOMPLETE PLANS
UO NOT II96 AOR ROW ACQUI�'CDDN
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PRO,JECT LENGTH P�red For: HYDR4ULICS ENGII�TEER
DIYISIOK OF HIGHWAYS
ADT 2017 = 441 lOBO Birc�i Rid�r Dr., R�lei�k NG, 276l0
�� 25 O $O ,� ADT �037 = 618 T S iL�li6EN�INFFRS � PH(9'19}T/3BBB7 } 130� q
K = " p� _ 7p6 HILLSBpROUGH $T �� �.ENSE NO.:
P�S LEKGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-11771 0.062 mile +� suire zao ��5
D= 55 % ygxGTH STRUCTT/RES TIP PROJECT B-J1771 =� p,33 �� +,� �EIOH, NC 2780:t r.g o �
`�4 25 4 ?� �Qa T= 13 96 "` awa sraa�xn sr�c�►rarraavs gURKE EVANS PE � o
TiDT.9L LEHGTIi TIP PROJECT 8-4771 = 0.095 mile +� � RQADWAY D&SIGX
V= 60 MPH RIGHT OF WAY DL4TS ��' �'�
PROFILE (FIORIZONTALj . OCT08ER 21, 201b ���
(TTST 49b + DUAL 9%} TRAVIS COOK. EI �
1D 5 0 10 20 FUNCT CLASS= pA�' �""'�" � Te�w
MINOR COLLECTDR �TT'�G �TB� GARY LOVERING� PE
PROFILE (VERTICALj SU�REGIONAL TIER DESIGN �Y ��+� 201 Mcno°�aaww.���ar p$
37GYA7T188:
5g
5 •�
BufFer Zone (BZj ImpacFs
Area of Allowable Area of Allowable
Impacfs Impacfs
Within BZl Within BZ2
LEGEND T�`X x'�,�'S� � � � �
,,,,,
IXISTING BRIDGE DIMEN510NS lbl' X 25' QUADRUPLE�PAN], 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 175' X 3�' {TRIPLE-SPAN], 90 DEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 500'
�
9D
n
��
G7
'y�D
�p
O
�
�
O
NORMAN C. �ENNINGS
W00�5
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
�,
�
r,���� D(15TING TRANSPORTATION
FACILfTY 90UNDARY
{iYP•J
�. ____� �-
--__ .�
--^-�_ -
� �-�- F F
�--�-• �-- --------�--___�
` � --��'-�-� ��R
�� � �a�� F�-�-- � �-
-�"'�-�,� ����� �-~---�� ` I
�
J
�_�
-L- 76
W�-E�—= '��---------�, r
� ~�
�P E
�
B-d771
-L- STA. 14+25.00
JOHNSTON COUNTY
PUB�ic uTi�iTY
NOTES:
1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN.
2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT
METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALE
7�5 D 25 50
E3-4771_liyd�rm_buf�sh4.dgn 10/14/20164:03:57 PM TUS
CLASS B RIP RAP �
D15SIPATOR PAD
APPROX. LOCATION OF VISIBLE
12" DIA. ABANDONED PIERS
T4 BE REMOVED
APPROX. LOCATION OF PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R
(EX. BRG 4@30'j (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VI511]
TO BE REMOVED
W00�5
O
NORMAN C. DENNINGS
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 5
�
��,
BUFFER IMPACTS
CLA55 II RIP RAP
x
w
w
U
� I
�
�
�
PERMIT DRAWINGS
FOR B-4771
�oHNSTON couN�r
BRI DGE #500011
APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. CRUTCH
BENTS TO BE REMOVED
�r
�
WOOQS
CLASS B RIP ftAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
_ --- E F _ � .
~�r
�
' � F.
'�� F
�
�
N
CULTIVATEQ
O
LANE FARMS INC.
-L- 5TA. 19+25.pp
EXISTING R/W
. : �.�
,� n . -, -,
- — — _— �T�= _=_= =— =»=�
� — = T =
� `- ____ ---�— �- F- - - - 6 4N9 PVC ��� � ~
� --�F -
,, -- � ~ �^ �xisYtiNc Riw
� �-^1
,�. PU E ' � �
- -- -- - -� �- -- -- �-.� -- -- -- --
m�
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
W00�5
O
DANIEL F. KORNEGAY &
PAIJLA S. KORNEGAY
CULTIVATEQ
5g
5 •�
BufFer Zone (BZj ImpacFs �STING BRIDGE DIMEN510NS lbl' X 25'�QUADRUPLE�PAN], 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 175 X 3 {TRIPLE-SPAN], 90 DEG. SKEW
Area of Allowable Area of Allowable TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 500'
Impacfs Impacfs
Within BZl Within BZ2
LEGEND „hX x�,�ti ,�. ;'; , 9 BUFFER IMPACTS
D y
��
� �
'yD
�p
-
CLA55 II RIP RAP —
PERMIT DRAWINGS
FOR B-4771
�oHNSTON couN�r
BRI DGE #500011
... ,_. f ",,L.., /` . . (X? � . �`. . . . . V � � G . ��� PH !3/9J7T3-8887
� � �g -� /I I � N � i � �. � � � DQWMENT NQT CQNEIDERED FINAL
�`� % � . UNLESS ALL S16NATURES COMPLETED
� --
� �
/, ; �� , � � � w .� � .
— �.,_ � � � CD� � � �1 (� `� I �� O
� � � , � � ��� . f
� r8 �p � � O �'� � � � ' � �PROX. LOCATION OF EX. GI��JTCH � 0
ca3 � -�_ c,,, Z8 '' � �� � BENT O BE REMOVED �
.
�� NORMAN C. DENNINGS I �'�. 6 �0° �; �-' � N
r�� �� � �� � ' 6 � t
' °� +`, o� CULTIVATEQ
� � � s�
�' � � � �'s � � � tiB 2
� `�� woo�s l � �
p ��, j ,�_ � l � � � . .
� �� i ..� ��, �, � �� � �N �g woo�5 LANE FARMS INC.
'�, CLASS B RIP RAP 1 �} � r� �
7 DISSIPATOR PAD � 81 �'�' �g 0 � � C° � � ��• , f 1 � ���a �� B-477PROJECT
G Z8 cp � l � ;�' �� +. ClA5� B�iP ftAP m , -L- 5TA. 19+25.QQ
,-� 4 c� � ' DISSIPATOR PAD -� •
r�,a cp oa�c r PORTATION J rn r
. - � . � _ m,Pi� rr�x eou��' � `� � `'`' R�� � 1 � ,
3 �-'�-'„�,�,.�-�-A-, �-� , `'� w � `�' 2' � --- E � � �
.
``_.---`�_.�_� �Cg t.`sac'`--=-� ==� �,s�,�� —�E i, � �kx�'�� _ --- _�, XY� ' F `�—� ��� —' EXISTING R/W
��— — -- : � � .... .. ., � —
----.-- . _ _ - --- . ri i � �� /�
— — �g =� . � ' __�—_�
--- ---._. L _ E_ _ � _ _ � _ � `�-, r; Y Y � - - - . - � F .
------ .� F F �_ `� • �,
'' ac.. � '��'� f -- - ��'`41's'�.�-'�:,-� v,.;�..�-+---o�� F �
�.
^—�--�----- ' Y . �
— --� — . -- — _ ��
�-- � T��-�—� TB 2GI � i ' i �f � TB 2 ro s�
�`E� —� ,�_� l � � � � � �' �� _i�� 1
-- w `_' S — r�—hl�
—� � �
"----. � �- -.�.d;;��-� � ``�o$-- =� � ON BRIDGE RD. 25' BST TB 2GI � � ~. � � � i i i � 1 0� GI - � s - - - � � _ _ __ � �_-
� �
� - �� - -
. �.� � �
_. - �
'� __" _- ` _` � - - - - - - - � �
� � � �
�
.
��3�� ' - � ��S`---- ��� w � _E � .- - :�� _- - -- � �u� ��,�'�, � ^ — - _ - ' -_ � '� -� - - � �r - � - -
� _
__ -- _ �-�- -
,'"�,�' �� � ., �_ --g-� , � �_,_-� _ . _ I ^ � L k x � -� v Y � 4��- � - � � � � = F � F F 6 4 N 9 �
q � g �� � ~ � ; _ r- r �- _ � __ . ' �- s� -�, x u u �_ �� `�-� �.. -{P �xisYtiNc Riw �
� � - =...r�„�...• -ta cp � �"` ^ y �, , i ,,,r- g� � r _ p�
��..�.. �5 c� . ��_p1�F � � �'
_ __ %
� 1k �y� �.r� ��''-���f-r':�r� � : .�- _ . �`s m r K — ., ,�,.. PUE ' y � � °�
. . . . . �- � g � �
�' � �� e � � BE I PR E T � � �� � >, �: � - - - - - . . :�''�i�-� tp �
�' � CLASS B RI P RAP � � co�� , . '8��9 � � � ' +Yf ` 1 - - - - - - .
' L L ` � D15�'PATOR PAD �p , g ,1 � � `ti �' � 1 N
t�� � � -BL STA.14+25.00 co cp� �� `' 4 ', r � � �r CLASS B R�P � �
� � � � DISSIPATOR P/�
� � �
�, i � � � APPROX. LpCATION OF VIS�LE 82 �``- �`�'' 1 r^�� ,• � Z� � �� ,
�' g `\ JOHNSTON COUN��' 12" DIA. ABANDOI�D PIERS �� �`'� I � � , . � � I �
& `���� ` PIJBLIC UTILITY�'� �2 T4 BE REMOVED ru � � l � 9 ��, �677 11�'� � �'g � cs� y � �� � �"1
, �,..
—�
� �
e ;'�---� �� ! �� 1''',, �' ,.. �1� / 1 :. ;i@ I c' I 4 W00�5 � ;�f , Cb ,L8 . CULTIVATEQ
� � APPROX. LOCATION O� PREVIOUS PIERS PER 197G 65R � � � �. � i �
`~ �'� ` (EX. BRG �30'j (NOT VISIBLE DURING SITE VI511] ` � � � Y� U� 8,,
t � ,.� � �co ',\ �., ~_' �, ` � T� BE REI�AOVED ,,°` cp � g � � �`,1 � ..� �L � �,
� � W0�5 � ,,.._ ;•. o� R� �
a� � ` � � � � �� � � � �
� NOTES: `� tS� c5� � ,•., � �� 1
�� a �
R 1. MILL CREEK IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. � �j � N `] � �� �.rr'� � � �
.
� 2. NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. � D �� �� '� ��' `� � a� �
€ NORMAN C. DENNINGS �� '� _.�� ` � ,; �;� � �, '�
= 3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. � / � co '1� � � � � �ANIEL F. I��RNEGAY &
� d, ,.�1 0� �,..,'� ,,, � PAIJLA S. KORNEGA�Yo
� �
�% ,; _ -
`n' 4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT 1 � � � , � � � � � �1 �
e METHOD IIL ��,. _ '��1 � / ' � � � �
� J ' �f 'i � . � ��
� �r 8
i c�rxre sc� BUFFER DRAWING � � � �� � ��� � � � �° � � / � � � � � �� ��
ca
� 5 D 25 5o SHEET 3 OF 5 '��' ��� � .� �i6 �° � g ,�
� � � �
= �l � � m� ; � �
� .
F3-4771_liyd�rm_buf�sh4.dgi 10/14/2016423:53 PM TUS
� � � 1 1 �
� �
� �
�
� � • � � � � � � �
� � ���� ���� • • • ' • • • • • •
• ' • • ' � :' � �'
: •�- • • / -�- •• � � • __-
.... . : . ., a��������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
���������
• � - .. �� �• � � � � � �,
NOTES:
Rev. May 2006
Rev.Jan 2009
•�
See Sh�eet 9 A For I ndex of Sheets
See Sheet � 8 f or Conventl onal Symbols
Tp
y�RPF
R y0
�SR �o �s� R
osj o.
� " 1 ' . �� " 1 ' I �: C�� i �� \ (�� 1'� " i � 1-< < � . �� 1'� C�} 1.1 \ . •�
I1�1�"I�IC�)\ C��1�` I-Il�ll-1���.���"�
L UCA T1411 t: REPLA CE BRIDGE #11 � T�ER 1 V[ILL CREEK
411� SR 1241 (RICHARDS411t BRIDGE RD.�
TYPE 4F WORK: GRADI11tG, DRAI11tAGE, STR UCTURE A11tD PA T�I11tG
BEGIN BRIDGE
—L— POT STA. 15 + 95 +/—
�--- SR �201
—L— POC STA. 14 + 25.��
BEGIN TIP PRQJECT B-4771
�
_
r
�
n
�
rn
�
END BRIDGE
—L— POT STA. 17 + 70 +/—
RICHARDSON BRIDGE RD.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURE$ C�MPLETED
�
■
.-J
�
TO wtiLl.1F4RD
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERF4RMED T4 THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III .
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
f0
771
RD tsR ��oo�
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGII� DATA PRQJECT LENGTH Pre�ared For: HYDRAULICS EKGINEER
DIVISl011t OF HIGHWAYS
ADT 2417 = 441 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
5� 25 � 50 lO0 ADT 2037 = 618 TGS ENGINEERS �� �, �� ����� t°
TGS 706 HILLSBOROUGH 5T pH (919) 773-8887 ��`C `���
PLANS K= 11 % LE1I�GTH RQA.DWAY TIP PR4JECT B�771 = O.U62 mile +/— su�TE Zoa CORP. C CO2 �5E NO.: � ��
D= 55 % � RALEIGH, NC 27603 P.�. � �
50 25 0 50 100 T= 13 %* ��GTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4771 = 0.033 m:le +/— 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS sjG�TT'�' � �
TUTAL LE11tGTH TIP PRO ECT B-4771 = 0.095 mile +/— BURKE EVANS, PE ROADWAY DESIG11t � �
V= 6� MPH '� RIGHT OF WAY DATE: pRUJECT ENGINEER E11�GI11tEER �� ��
PROFILE �HORIZONTAL) *��ST 4% + DUAL 9%� OCTOBER 2G, 2Q16 TRAVIS COOK EI �`�'� ��'
1 O 5 O 1 O 2 O F U N CT C LASS - rRQJECT D�SIGN �rGrx� �� �� A���
MINOR COLLECTOR LETI'ING DATE: GARY LOVERING, PE
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB-REGIONAL TIER DESIGN MAY 16, 2017 r[�OT ROADWAY DESIGX p�
SIGNAT'URE:
BDUND�4RIES 14ND PROPEI�TY.•
State Line
Cou nty Li ne --- ----
Township Line -- --
City Line - -
Reservation Line - -
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin �
Property Corner �
Property Monument �
Parcel/Sequence Number i23
Existing Fence Line -x x x-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -w�B- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary w�B
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary �g
Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB
Known Contamination Area; Soil -�--�--
Potential Contamination Area: Soil -�--�--
Known Contamination Area: Water -�--�--
Potential Contamination Area: Water -�--�--
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential '■' �
BUILDINGS �4ND DTHElZ CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or l� Tank Cap O
Sign �
We I I °
Small Mine 'SZ'
Foundation 0
Area Outline
Cemetery fi
Building
School �
Church �
Dam
H�'DROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water --- ---
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � �
Jurisdictional Stream �S ... —
Buffer Zone 1 az �
BufFer Zone 2 Bz �
Flow Arrow �--- ---
Disappearing Stream �--- ---
Spri ng c�'� -�_.--�
Wetland �
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
� Fiow
False Sump
����� �� ����� ������1'�I �q J.L.1�������� �� ���� V`V' ���
Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Suhsurface Utility Eraga�aeerang
R14ILR014DS:
Sta nda rd Ga uge CSX TRANSPORTATION
RR Signal Milepost M�r�� 35
$WItCi1 �
SWlTCH
RR Abandoned � � � �
RR Dismantled --------
RrGHT oF u��y
Baseline Control Point ♦
Existing Right of Way Marker 0
Existing Right of Way Line -
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R1W Marker
Propased Control of Access Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
Existing Control of Access ' �
t /
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line E
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - E
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement TDE
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement PDE
Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement ouE
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement PUE
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement TUE
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement AUE
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
R0�4DS �4ND REL�4TED FEI4TURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement —
Existing Curb —
�
I
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �---
Proposed Slope Stakes Fi I I --- F---
Proposed Curb Ramp cR
Existing Metal Guardrail T T T
Proposed Guardrail T T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail n n �
Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n
Equality Symbol �
Pavement Removal
T�'GET�ITION.•
Single Tree
Single Shrub
�
�
Hedge
Woods Line -- -- -- -- --
4rchard
Vi neya rd
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
P4WER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
WiG Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
IYiG Power Line LOS B�S. U. E.*}
LV�G Power Line LOS C�S.U,E.*�
W�G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
l,V� Telephone Cable Hand Hole
l,V� Telephone Cable LOS B�S.U.E.*] -
lY� Telephone Cable LOS C[S.U.E.*� -
lY� Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*j -
lY� Telephone Conduit L4S B(S.U.E.*j
lY� Telephone Conduit L4S C�S.U.E.*�
IYC� Telephone Conduit L4S D�S.U.E.*)
U/� Fiber Optics Cable L4S B(S.U.E.*j
U/� Fiber Optics Cable L4S C�S.U.E.*)
U/� Fiber Optics Cable L4S D�S.U.E.*)
� � � �
Vlneyard
CQNG
) coNc ww C
coNc Hw
❑ CB
0
5
•
•
0
►-�
n
��
P
— —P— —
�
�
O
❑T
�
HH
-- — —T----
— —T— —
T
----TC----
--TC---
TC
----TFo---
--T FO---
T FO
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
LViG Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*)
LVC� Water Line LOS C�S. U. E*}
LViG Water Line LOS D�S. U. E*}
Above Ground Water Line
TV:
N Pedestal
N Tower
U/fGG N Cable Hand Hole
u
U/fGG N Cable LOS B{S.U.E.*)
U/fGG N Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*j
U/fGG N Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*j
U/fGG Fiber Optic Cable LOS B�S.U.E.*)
U/fGG Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*}
U/fGG Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*}
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
LI�G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.�`)
LI�G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
LV�G Gas Line LOS D�S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
LV� Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B�S.U.E.*�
SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*�
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located 4bject
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown LI�G Line LOS B�S.U.E.*�
IY�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. -
A� Tank; Water, Gas, 4il
Geoenvironmental Boring
l�G Test Hole L4S A(S.U.E.*j
Abandoned According to Utility Records -
End of Information
O
0
�
�
--w----
— —N— —
w
A/G Water
— ---TY--- —
— —TY— —
Tv
----TV FD---
— —TY FO—
TV FO
�
�
----�----
- —G— —
—G
A/G Gas
�
•
SS
A/G Sanitary Sewer
----F55----
- -�5
FSS
�
0
�
❑s
—7UTL
0
U5T
0
�
m
AATU R
E.O.I.
o,
a�
�
N
\
�
PAVEIIAENT SCH EDU LE
FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN: OCTOBER 2, 2015
Cl PROP. APPROX. 2.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 137.b Lbs PER SQUARE YAR� IN EACH OF TW4 LAYERS.
PROP. VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT AN
C� AVEftAGE ftATE OF 11Q Lbs PER SQUARE YARD PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN
LAYERS NOT LE55 THAN 1.Os OR GREATER THAN 1.5" IN DEPTH.
El PROP. APPROX. 4.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 456 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD.
PROP. VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN
EZ AVEftAGE ftATE OF 114 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN
LAYERS NOT LE55 THAN 4.0" OR GREATER THAN 5.5" IN DEPTH.
R CONCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
T EARTH MATERIAL
U EXISTING PAVEMENT
W WEbGING (VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEETj
PAVEMENT EDGE SL4PES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN 4THERWISE.
C1
E2
�
4.0"' MIN.
� -L-
,
; POI
f Jlti��
���~�~
�
u c2 (
C1
E2
DETAIL SHOWING METHQD �F WEDGING Ow
1' 1"
VERTICAL
CONCRET�
BARRIER
,_5,►
DETAIL F�R SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
SEE CORRESPONDING TYPICAL SECTION FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.
5EE TYPICAL SECTION5 AND PL4NS FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
3' VARIABLE WIDTH W
FULL DEPTH g
PAVED SHOULDER
�
�
W
�
0.025 �
_ w
3.1
� �lf —
ORIGINAL
GROUND
LINE
-L-
-L-
-L-
-L-
E1 �
GRADE TQ THIS LINE
STATIONS
15 + 65.00 to 15 + 82.38 LT
15 + 65.00 to 15 + 82.38 RT
17 + 81.63 to 17 + 99.00 LT
17 + 81.63 to 17 + 99.00 RT
C� —L— SR 1201 �RICHARDSON BRIDGE ROAD)
L
I
34'-10" CLEAR R4ADWAY
.
.
12•�0•`
�1�
�� �
�+��i�//I//
00 00 00 00�00
12•�0••
,_5.,
.
' GRADE
I POI NT
: �.�
� ,
.
�00000000000
.
.
�
1' 1"
VERTICAL
�CONCRETE
BARRIER
TYPI CAL S ECTI 4 N 0 N STRU CTU RE
FROM -L- STA. 15 + 95 +/- TO STA. 17 + 7� +/-
�SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL AND DIMENSIONING
AS WELL AS DETAILS OF BRIDGE RAIL AND ASPHALT OVERLAY.j
� �—�l� —
ORIGINAL
cRourvo
ORIGINAL
GROUND
� _ ��
� 1-�l� —
ORIGINAL
GROUND
;1
3:�
�e
� -L- SR 12D1 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE ROADj
VARI ES, VARI ES 11.5' � 12 .0' VARI ES,
0.08
�
TO 12.1`
0.�25 FT/FT
�
W
GRADE
POI NT
0.025 FTiFT
� �:
TYPICAL SECTI4N NO. 1
F ROM -L- STA. 14 + 2 5. �0 TO STA. 14 + 75 . 04
FROM -L- STA. 18 + 75.00 TO STA. 19 + 25.04
8' 3'
�i� .
0.08
�
4'� �!
T
12' TYP.
0.025 FVFT
E1
GRADE TO THIS LINE
� —L— SR 1201 (RICHARDSON BRIDGE ROAD)
� 12' TYP. , 3' ,
GRADE
POI NT
0.025 FT/FT
C�
7`
T
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
FROM -L- STA. 14 + 75.00 TO STA. 15 + 95 +/- �BEGIN BRIDGE)
FROM -L- STA. 17 + 70 +/- �END BRIDGE� TO STA. 18 + 75.�0
NOTE: PAVE TO THE FACE OF GUARDRAIL
3•�
PR4JECT REFERENCE N4.
B—�%%�
RNV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
�n_�
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
TGS ENGINEERS
TGS 706 HILLSBOROUGH ST. SUITE 200
0 RALEIGH, NC 27603
� PH {919) 773-8887
CORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
L
` �
ORIGINAL
cRouNo
��—
ORIGINAL
GR4UND
�
na+wn c. oE��s
D6 T95 PC 516
x� y
^ � 11CtQ5
1 �
`�� M 579T�E W�342E 1.-_ ��
BL S ELEY.� 82�g2L piiS
BRI�GE SPIKE IN POrER POLE
�
yt1 rv� K
�
r.
�
� � ""r
y� � s�
tt �
K �i',�
� �
�
BEGIN TIP
� PdC Sf
eaons
!
-t-
Pl sto r3fsT..3s PI Sta 2c1�2.44
p= 125i1' 2�3`lLTJ p= 3' 54' 35�9' fLTJ
o - 3�11'4T.4 0 - ror3o.�
L - .34731" L - .�753.�'
r - n�� r - ��r��r
R - f55U1XJ' R - 3�OOi7CT'
SE - SEE 7't1UYS SE - 5EE PLAAfa �
�wcnas�rtuy
�f'R
Cu� a wr xAr � `�U01
�.ceoi m"u
er. s rr
�5' LT
PROP. SBG —�
� STA 15+66.00
YO 15+82.38 LT 6 RT
� - r -�--�� - -
ikT� � ���� � �
F�=ma .�- � y � -- � F
..�. ---s��~ '���ta-,-� ~ ts�c
- � ~� Y_ � ; _''_��� �� _ Ei1k = Fq
lt 5Y ,` , . `-"__ :
YE 1 r -
�p �t \ �tiU'!h .�'w .
T
x� * C3:Y31_�
� -� E7[ M1w
k �� � Gi{Al1 950
!r
B-4T71
O
NOR�+N C.OEMMIGS
us r55 re se5
xoaos
I
A
,�c
� C:' �
� � ,�
�
cu�s � u� uv
c r.eoio iu
6T.5 SY
/
� ��
�'"'
is�:
�0005
TL 3
�
W
�
�
LME FARM5 NC.
OB 999 PC �6
OB 17 PC 205
�- SiA. 17+81.G9
TO 17+99.00 LT & 1[T
END APPAOACH
�
PROJEGT IIEFEIIENCE NO.
e-4n�
RM' SXEEf NO.
iav�nw,�r oesic,H
ENGINEE0.
�
��
sM[f7 N6.
9VGINEER
�OWMENT NOT CpM$I�ERED FINAL
UNLESE ALL i16NATYREs COM�LEP�G
cu�nvar¢o � TGS ENGINEERS
706 HILLSBOROUGH 3T, Sl11TE 200
RALEIGH, NC 2id�S7
PH {8181779-8887
�_-���t _ --'"��'� R..
�� �� —�—�������, ��
F
�� ` �
i� 53.,. SR �'A,CN� H�[�IJd61' .r�: �
�[.�- s '�= —r = — ' � _ �
� f �p' � I�+I.PVE —' �' _ � — -- E� NS� UNTY �UBLI�T
f — '� 1 5g 7T$Mg �,� 1�
l 4 �` HL65TA= I5+5�3£32Z
44,52' d
1 BRIOGE SPVKE� 1N �OWER POLE
II �
II � V
{0° END TlP PROJECT B-4771
"'.0° �` 3 U POC St�.19+25.00
��-��L � �-`��
�R� kBANO@NE9r.� -
�' �
�
o,u�� F.ICORMECAY a
PAULA 5. KflRIiECAY
09 �OT PG 7=
PB 77 PC 2�0
� �
1 `
N't3005 q1LTIYRTEO �
•
oouiiui�iii'i�i 'ii Q •� CriiiiiiiiiiiinuAi��d� imiili�i� , ,,
ou� u�u����� a
na��u�� ■ ��onm f�oa m�f • r
aa�iu��:��iii� ■ ��������u�um �uo ■ ��a�� ' � �
� ��� � '�l�C��� � � ' � ■ �� �����!!p� � 1
D�is� ������ � � - i • • - • i�i � �.i�.a'i� . . ' ' • • • •
, �����■■....W`����N��■.N������N� �. �i7�iii��x�m�������s�ui M
0�o ni�iiiii■ ��iiii�iii ����iiiioi�iu��i i Y, +�=��a�iL����iiii i�wGG7 iii
�i�u7iiiiiiiiiii�������n�iiiiiii�iiiii �uu�iiiiiiii� �. : ' ��� • �r �.-,� . �. � + �-. � + � '�■ �� ��i�iii�� ��iiiiiiiiiiiriuiuiiiiiiiiiii
ua�o������� ii �i o�;�r��� �x�r����� ����� ' � :: .. � . ... • i� �iiiiiiiii� � im��iiGiii�ii m�iiiiiiii
f � ::� :::::::�:?:;_��:�����0.'2�:�:::�:::� ��C�:'. �::,� ++ � � "�::::'��Il������i��'.a:�::: ':����:: C:��
��
:;;;;::: :e:e:: e�=��e e::::: ::�.; ;:; :: ; ::; :e: � � � �, � � ee�e ��e �e�6IIIIUIIIIII�Ii?!�?E?e�ee:eee�eeeeeeee�Eeee�
. ' • .. .....:::: :: �:e • ::•:::: :::::::: :� �
.
., ; .,
. � • ,
. � - i _
• r i �' � l�
'�
4� � I
: 1 �o��������.�u ■ ■ oouoo��o�i���� ■ �uoor I'*�w�� . ���i`, I 1
m� u�o ■ m���o�o�� �� o�o�� a�
.... ......... � �.0 .C. ... ......�..... ...6... �
n �����u�� �� mn■ ����� �� ��� o • � • •
0o n�u���� ■ a �� ■ �o�n��nuu ������ �` .k � ui ���������� ■
ao��o�u ��
.� . ��. � � �on��o��oo��� �
' . „s� �i ii�m �a�iu�
��oo��
io � _ "� �' i � ir
i f �C
11 12 13
Z �_�
��-�
=�o�
���m
��
.... , .' '� � ..�.�......
....� . ......u........
rn��� �u�Rno�en
iu� iiuiu�ii��i�uu
■rr ■ �� ■ ����� �o��or��������
�;;: ��� e..E :. .......... ...... ..... .... ........E�::'��'•,.y;;"W �:E�
�� �� � ' _��:�:: '�:� :�: :: � �?:::�:� � _ �: ::: ��:�:' ::::�: �:::::: ::
.■...��fil�III�9d�..�....��...��W.�..E...�.■..■��a�.��flnIIIII��.�...��....�::..W.....�:
EE�:: "� e� �eee eee?�:eee:eee�� e::'E : e'�e �?eee B: Eee :eEeee :E
.
%{�
�L
54
�o
.... .... ........ .... ......... ... . . ........ .... .... .. .... .... ......... ..
14 15 1G 17 16 14 20 �1 22 23