20160858 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
November 4, 2016
TO: Mr. Kyle Barnes
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Retreat at Greenville; Pitt County, NC
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
NWP 29 Application
Dear Kyle:
2 0 1 6 1 0 9 7
C(:)P)sy
Enclosed is a NWP 29 Application for your review. It is submitted on behalf of LCD Acquisitions, LLC
to construct the Retreat at Greenville, a multi -family development located off of S. Charles
Boulevard in Greenville, NC (Pitt County). Impacts to 0.031 acre of Waters of the US are needed
for the construction of a stormwater pond and to provide access to an adjacent site. Initial
conversations with City of Greenville officials instructed the applicant to plan for this access way.
However, the crossing would only be constructed if it becomes a requirement of the City of
Greenville. Because impacts are so small and are to Waters of the US, no mitigation is proposed.
Enclosed are the PCN form, site maps and the site plan. Please let me know if you have any
questions or need additional information in order to issue the NWP 29. Thank you for your
assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
cc: Mr. Andrew Young, LCD Acquisitions, LLC
Mr. Jim Bob McElroy, Williams and Associates
Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh, NC DWR
Ms. Jennifer Burdette, NC DWR
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

o� F wAT6R9
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) For
A.
1.
Applicant Information
Processing
�j
�/
NII �
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
�NSection Permit ❑ Section 10 P r
R
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number.
R P
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Retreat at Greenville
2b.
County:
Pitt County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Greenville
2d.
Subdivision name:
Retreat at Greenville
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John Marvin Taft & Patricia Sheller Bowen
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 30924
3e.
City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27833
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) N/A
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Applicant has project area under contract.
4b. Name:
Mr. Andrew Young
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
4d. Street address:
455 Epps Bridge Parkway
4e. City, state, zip:
Athens, GA 30606
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kim Williams
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
5d. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
[phone]
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Portion of 09010
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.5725 Longitude: -77.3499
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
28.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT of Meeting House Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is mostly in agricultural use. There are some forested areas along the stream to the south. Adjacent land use is
agricultural, commercial development, or residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
-y 2,100 LF along southern border.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop multi-family residential housing within the site that will serve a growing
Greenville population.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes the development of 188 multi-family units, clubhouse, parking, stormwater facilities, and access
ways. A total of 0.031 acre of Waters of the US impact is needed. One impact is needed for the construction of a
stormwater pond. The other impact is needed to provide access to an adjacent site and would only be constructed if
required by the City of Greenville. Initial conversations with City officials requested the access easement and the
developers would like to prepare for this crossing, if it becomes a requirement of the City. Site will be cleared and graded.
Stormwater facilities will be installed and roads/utilities will be constructed. Then building construction will occur. Track
hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Land Management Group, Inc.
Name (if known): Paul Farley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Kyle Barnes of the USACE verbally approved the line on site on September 20, 2016. No JD has been issued yet.
Anthony Scarbraugh with NC DWR confirmed the limits of riparian buffers within the site on that same date.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts N/A
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
El Yes
❑Corps
W1 F1P ElT
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts N/A
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INS?
other)
(feet)
feet
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b_
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ®P ❑ T
N/A
Excavation for stormwater pond;
some fill near edge of pond
RPW
0.019
02 ®P ❑ T
N/A
Road Crossings/Culvert
RPW
0.012
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
05 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0.031
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction N/A
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Stormwater
_ 2 ac
P2
5f. Total
2 ac
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) N/A
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ®Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
El Yes
131 ❑P❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B2 ❑P❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts were minimized by careful site design. No stream or riparian buffer impacts will occur. The only impacts needed
are to jurisdictional Waters of the US. One impact is needed for the construction of a stormwater pond. This ditch extends
up into the site and cannot be avoided. A section of the ditch will be excavated and will become a part of the stormwater
pond. The other impact is needed to provide access to an adjacent site and would only be constructed if required by the
City of Greenville. Initial conversations with City officials requested the access easement and the developers would like to
prepare for this crossing, if it becomes a requirement of the City.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing will be used during construction to reduce sediment from eroding into the jurisdictional areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
Impacts are small (0.031 ac) and the channels are of low
quality.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank NIA
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program N/A
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan N/A
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan N/A
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
—51%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Project engineer will obtain a stormwater permit prior to construction.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Greenville
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review N/A
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
EI Yes [:1 No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review N/A
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
El Yes El No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The applicant may be required by the City of Greenville to provide access to the adjacent tract to the south and has
accounted for the RPW impact in the application.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into the local sanitary sewer system.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program GIS layer was used to determine the presence of federally listed species. No rare
species are known to occur within the site. One rare animal species, the coppery emerald dragonfly, has been observed
within a one -mile radius of the site but has not been observed since 2004 and this occurrence has a low accuracy. No
impacts to federally -protected species are anticipated from this project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH). No EFH or Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at or near the site.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC SHPO HPOWEB GIS service website was used to determine the presence of historic resources. No historic or
cultural resources are known to occur on or adjacent to the property.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Kim Williams
11/4/2016
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Uwe, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for the Retreat at Greenville project. All questions in regards to this project should be directed to
Land Management Group, Inc.
Applicant
Print Name: Andrew Young
Date: October 18, 2016

wi ntervlIle
r
t
a,.
Greenville
a
f+
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI.. Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
TomTom, Mapmylndia. (7 OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
I`Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map SCALE 1" = 1 mile
Retreat at Greenville LMG
x.1'.1 MANA(4-NIEYT GROUP r:
Pitt County, NC _ °°°° °° °°, Figure 1
www.lmgroup.net Vicinity Map
November 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
c
r
i
s
t 1!'
wi ntervlIle
r
t
a,.
Greenville
a
f+
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI.. Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
TomTom, Mapmylndia. (7 OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
I`Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map SCALE 1" = 1 mile
Retreat at Greenville LMG
x.1'.1 MANA(4-NIEYT GROUP r:
Pitt County, NC _ °°°° °° °°, Figure 1
www.lmgroup.net Vicinity Map
November 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

"Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Pitt County GIS Mosaic
SCALE 1" = 1.000'
Retreat at Greenville LMG
;vU MAN.AMENT GROUP.r<
Pitt County, NC4 o,m_01-11
Figure 2
www.lmgrour).net USGS Topographic Map
November 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

x
R
R
c
f
yq Y
T}}"
d} ��
—S
V d
41
.. alp aM
Legend
Cc: Coxville fine sandy loam
CA Craven fine sandy loam, 0-1 % slopes
ExA: Exum fine sandy loam, 0-1 % slopes
Ly: Lynchburg fine sandy loam
NrA: Norfolk sandy loam, 0-1 % slopes
OcB: Ocilla loamy fine sand, 0-4% slopes
Ra: Rains fine sandy loam
I*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey
SCALE 1" = 400'
Retreat at Greenville LMG
1:%ND %I?SAI,I np V l GNl1!'p
Pitt County, NC ,,:,,,,,,,,. �.:,�.,�.,�:,.� g
Fi ure 3
www.Imerour).net Soils Map
November 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: 910.4S2.0060

�` w1
w
FRED,
RE , + o
Irk
YL
iL
EL I
IBoundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2012 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
Ti a�4
R
paF �
HERE Dr-,`
SCALE 1" = 400'
Retreat at Greenville LMG
Pitt County, NC4.1- 1- 11� Figure 4
www.lmgroup.net Aerial Photograph
November 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate.
This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated
areas and review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior
to specific site planning. Delineation approved by Kyle Barnes of the USACE on 9/20/16.
Buffer determination confirmed by Anthony Scarbaraugh of NC DWR on 9/20/16
M
r
jata
C�
Project area - 28.4 acres _ Waters of the US - 722
Potential uplands - 28.3 ac or 99%
linear feet or 0.05 ac
Tar River Buffer area
Potential stream - 2085 linear feet
16.
� - f - m 7�J I f IllCiii
L\wetlands\2016\01-16-244\maps\approvedwetlandsketch.cdr
`Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" - 300'
Map Source: 1998 NAPP Aerial photography
South Charles Blvd. Tract 4—LMG A `'
Pitt County, NC ANDMAN`A4EMENIUROUP Appro Yed
,, a �.�„t, i'�
Upland/Wetland Sketch
WWW.Imgroup.net
September 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

R
NC WY 43 — CHARLES BWLEVNW
(too' n/w es' B/a —C)
TAM COURT
VARES 4W WO MJRX)
R
NC HWY 43/S. CHARLE BLVD
$6�
ENGINEERING SURVEYING RETREAT at GREENVILLE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
S. CHARLES AVE. -GREENVILLE, NC
L W 2470 Daniells Bridge Road, Suite 161 26.9 ACRES
Athens, Georgia 30606
P. 706.310.0400
F. 706.310.0411 PLAN TYPE: PROJECT NO:
Williams CONCEPT? G00024
associates www•gaplanning.com SCALE: DATE:
1 "= 150' 10/6/2016
v 77 7Z -i- —" r....,.ois
0
J
U
r
O
n
�m
$6�
ENGINEERING SURVEYING RETREAT at GREENVILLE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
S. CHARLES AVE. -GREENVILLE, NC
L W 2470 Daniells Bridge Road, Suite 161 26.9 ACRES
Athens, Georgia 30606
P. 706.310.0400
F. 706.310.0411 PLAN TYPE: PROJECT NO:
Williams CONCEPT? G00024
associates www•gaplanning.com SCALE: DATE:
1 "= 150' 10/6/2016
v 77 7Z -i- —" r....,.ois

O O O
O
T y
O
O He RCP FLARED END SECTION
STA:O+ 12.8
CD O C o
MI cn
N r o
< n
rn o
O il
p y
RCP FLARED END SECTION
--k62.00STA:0+91.4 e
O
s
+
Iv
O O � O O
U
� 6S
66 c
Cb
M a
N 6,
w 1N3W3SV3
SS30OV,00
68
66
Cn
v 0
Fr -1 m O rn e�
o z o
~ rn m
Iv C7
c
C-3 p
M
O O
O M
�
o N
m
Z A
rF
O -1
x a
N
�^ v A
Z
x o '*
C7 ..
Irl
rri
r
C'n
4F
61.17
ENGINEERING SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
2470 Daniells Bridge Road, Suite 161
Athens, Georgia 30606
P. 706.310.0400
F. 706.310.0411
�'�'vwv.gaptanning.com
RETREAT at GREENVILLE
S. CHARLES AVE. - GREENVILLE, NC
+/- 26.9 ACRES
INV IN: 61.00 (Culvert)
PROJECT NO:
16130
X R
DATE:
11/03/2016
z
�
1 �
� I
a
i
�
M
I
INV OUT: 62.00 (Culvert)
62.00
O.OD
a
\-V
Williams
&-Associates
ENGINEERING SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
2470 Daniells Bridge Road, Suite 161
Athens, Georgia 30606
P. 706.310.0400
F. 706.310.0411
�'�'vwv.gaptanning.com
RETREAT at GREENVILLE
S. CHARLES AVE. - GREENVILLE, NC
+/- 26.9 ACRES
PLAN TYPE:
PROPOSED CULVERT' EXHIBIT
PROJECT NO:
16130
SCALE:
1 "= 30'
DATE:
11/03/2016

Environmental
Quality
September 28, 2016
John Taft
PO Box 30337
Greenville, NC 27858
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
JAY ZIMMERMAN
DWR Director
DWR #16-0858
PITT County
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to Tat -Pamlico River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 029 .0259)
Subject Property/ Project Name: Charles Blvd. Tract
Address/Location: Due East of Intersection of Turnbury Drive and Charles Boulevard, Greenville
Stream(s) Evaluated: Uts to Meeting House Branch
Determination Date: 09/27/16 Staff; Anthony Scarbraugh
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination
® Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B.0259)
16-0858 A I X 16-0811 A E/I
❑ Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
X
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 02B.0267) (governmental
16-0811 B End
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
❑ Randleman (15A NCAC 026.0250)
❑ Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
Stream E/1/P* Not Subject Subject Start@
Stop@
Soil USGS
Survey Topo
16-0858 A E X 16-0811 A Begin
16-0811 A E/I
X
16-0858 A I X 16-0811 A E/I
16-0811 A End
X
16-0858 B E X 16-0811 B Begin
16-0811 B End
X
*E/1/P= Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed above and included on the attached map
have been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of PITT County, North Carolina and/or the most
recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale and evaluated for applicability to the Tar -Pamlico River
Riparian Buffer Rule. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent
or not present on the property. Streams that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. There may be other streams or features located
on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according
to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An appeal request
must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter to the Director in writing.
<_"-"Nothing Coirnpares_--
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources-RJater Quality Regional Oferations Section -Washington Regional office
943 Washington Square Mali, Washington, North Carolina 27889
252-946-6481

v � 4
if sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR-401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
CHARLES BLVD. TRACT
PITT County
09/28/2016
Page 2 of 2
if sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
clo Karen Higgins
DWR - 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding
applicability to the Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory
Field Office at (910)-251-4584.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Anthony Scarbraugh at (252) 948-
3924.
Sincerely,
)�" -
Robert Tankard, Assistant Re ional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: WaRO DWR File Copy
LASERFICHE
Paul Farley, Land Management Group (email: [e-mail])

f(N cio 1) �
Lr�1
GOA
L IWETLANDS12016WETLANDSFILES101-16-2441dwrbuffer reviexAmapset,wr
'Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute. NOT TO SCALE
Map SourcePitt County Soil Survey
Charles BoulevardLMGW
Pitt County, NC -- °° Figure 3
www.lmerouD.net NRCS Soil Survey Map
September 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01.16-244 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: 910.4S2.0001 Fax: [phone]