20161127 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

o`'oF wA7-f;9
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page I of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacement
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Town of Cary
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
02983/0871
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Paul Kuhn - Town of Cary
3d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 8005
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27512-8005
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page I of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0753197293
Latitude: 35.775756 Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
78.823487
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
286.45 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Crabtree Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Project Area is located within a maintained 90 -foot Duke overhead utility line easement. Crabtree Creek within the
utility easement is a riprap-lined channel. The general vicinity consists of Bond Lake and park to the west and residential
subdivisions to the north, east and south.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands within Project Area A wetland fringe is present around the beaver pond east of the Project Area, but site
work is limited to the western portion of the utility easement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
110 feet (within project area/utility easement).
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project involves replacement of an existing footbridge (already removed), which was situated over a sanitary sewer
line, with culverts. The crossing will be shifted upstream slightly to a new location away from sanitary sewer line.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Culverts are going to be used to replace the bridge. Duke Energy requires the crossing to be 20 feet wide and able to
support 80,000 pounds of weight (Duke utility maintainance/repair equipment). Therefore, a crossing utilizing one 72 -inch
and two 48 -inch reinforced concrete culverts are being proposed to replace the bridge, to the east and upstream of the
original bridge location. Standard construction equipment (trackhoe) will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Town of Cary
Name (if known): Eric Kulz
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
NOTE: Two wetland forms done in Project Area (attached)
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
El Yes El No ®Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Unlikely due to construction dates of the surrounding subdivisions. Bridge and sewer line were constructed in the late
80s.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts are associated with this project
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert Installation
Crabtree Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
12
95
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Impacts are associated with the installation of three concrete culverts to allow a crossing for pedestrians and
utility maintenance equipment to cross the stream.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 [:]POT
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ®P ❑ T
Greenway
Crabtree Creek
® Nos
4,277
938
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Table of Uses indicates greenways/hiking trails are Allowable.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The minimal amount of culvert replacement necessary to provide the crossing width required to accommodate Duke vehicles
and equipment was used. Disturbed areas will be graded, seeded and strawed.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Pump-around will be used during construction, and silt fence will be placed to avoid sediment in Crabtree Creek.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
Comments: Work area will be graded and seeded to maintain diffuse flow.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
1 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No additional impervious space added
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments: Local funds only.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project involves replacing a bridged greenway crossing with a culverted crossing. Greenway infrastructure already in
place.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
[I Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See Attachment 5.5d.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The site is not located in one of the 20 coastal counties.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB Service (accessed 8/19/16). No elements on or near the project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Map No. 3720077200J Firm Panel: 0772. date: 5/2/06
Paul Kuhn
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page I 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

FIGURE 1 Bridge Replacement
=� 2013 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Bond Lake Greenway

D 200
tUS &Hmy fm
r�
FIGURE 2
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Bridge Replacement
Bond Lake Greenway

• _rJ,C v 1 'M Vii. '�"�`°• -
-i+
1- _ }, •r�lia fa�t.c tpit
4 :��,n iSti ,YJ cL► J0,-�`SdiLl�ll'
lLp_.1 71C. r 503 1
rC- 7 14 ❑ 0
I —.j� 1. "■. J. •.. dc Y L •l jam. ) •^ _1¢���T• .J ➢ _ 1 u u
d -+C1 RI^a _ti1J 1 ' _Y• L � R 1w`w�L
J7 i • tr _ s. 1 rl J� .. J -L u 1 L _._ r
- _ °'S r . °` ■ a: 148 -�jt l t Ll : J ° J � ;4 P Y� , ' V� �• �.. 505 d 1
�� p I'�tl ', Ojr .1R,J Jr-�. r '-i l� 'd :C-tI - •
'j t54 • • y
■,ra�if-
fi�r■�. r - - r - I tit ■" O q r I,�¢L R+
`•1. ° ^➢.. r.,7 e • y CL n -• i�R • n - 1 Lti n 4 .r t i -L Ir" _•1107
• + , _ ■ - [1J•- \_.J,7 .. 1 C rLN
V ., + u 1725 _ t l7. $ + r r C '. • 17 -.i
7� ����••��ii r,l r u b
'•� - l- 1104n ur^. ��. L•
u_ lw h•, ❑.. �^ •. i--�,i fr�� �l. f 9_. ,`-rr (119r�r�. -..�: ❑ Lf ..--1 S�_ �.�'�'J 11 r.: L�c,2_7 i'.
1 •`' _
mj� J r�5 y•. �zu ti li
_ ., _ 1
I T� 1
' Sr
i r 4 1708 ly J ''i-ImY tf'' Cts L 21 15
C
r R' _
■ _ L � ZJI '� i I t � ..
Jx
6
.°AI1, e�•J� I
d'_u .- 5 '� � _•�u.�-•-� ° v.a .77 L' I :�._ � L
- W ❑
• I �j W ••'r 220 O r 1 l
jrp �•� IiI- `'L �.13�J ,r � .�I_p11t �r J ", �11•_a„ [ 5
{L �•:il, ■L r --Pro ed Aree°�� e�lii��.A _. 1[J �' I • •_ J
t � - :: oo::"FF a °
�1 '-1 • •L p ■
s •n -Y - J s - L n� J'fir c °-'aril■�qC z77 1
213 - 602 ■�
_>. d � `701 !4 �1- � d li �'L a■. r�4��u.`'�, � d e
11fu 16
1200 ' �O-,Lf t.
_li �t C xl -1 _ 71. Y- ■ 1 ..0 O. •J•i"
- .- r. C . • r.111 - _ .Lr -`L mf1 •'ir 2
(I y .0 r Lam:-.r.l tt,,tl •. "'1LL1 - °� Vin, rr -'t 208.E
R -1f
• ' ^ Y 1.1 UJ L ._ I_ (L ❑ [� t
���} J" � - ^ I _f 740. I_ :L.' - Sl: ] *�
■�_ -t=❑flu°-rte■ RUIN �_o-u r-.- ❑ 1 r yl 'a C �. n, Il nu .r '_'•r 1 • °
L N
a
L ■, l'� ��- • -!T 1J. r J.. a. 1. -C- t. : L, r'u ..
_ ❑ L tot rG ��t� I �i-In _uAeil a X,r r°�.lLo•o Ra
c_ '_' D' u
_�j��, ❑ t- -Y-r- t �'1 rr-11a�__C° -9 r L°
x=120•1 L V 198 y.. _ 04, °. �'t���J1-r)
-r fRl�+,ul. uCT�. 1
0 702
T ■R 7 ■
-�Jy ,ci � t � L �� L °-' 72'p-
1 J u
isr' u ■_n n - y -t24 i
�py� q l• t 1 u ❑ r.
_f - a ° - ■ "rKill���L136- °
FIGURE 3
NRCS SOILS MAP
Bridge Replacement
Bond Lake Greenway

V,\
i
\ IO
BEGIN -PROJECT`
STATIOlORN=10+00.00 -L--
EASTINIG-2052308.34 • c s� �)p� �'eP ✓ \/ ��
ONs
I
\\ N39' 31' 2834•E\ .. �= IIII _ I I v , . ,
40� ID STA 10,77.08 -L-
\ 72• RCP AND TRAM_
\ \ Ch
\ 1 EXISTING TOP OF BANK
vg
RvA
q �
LIM
X�gTING ANN
END �/ I `STAPON=J11CT9L30 -E-
..1}"� NORTHING=73737
NORTI ING=7 738.44
I L� IIII Y �f,
A.v ISV�-
T l
u>m cao
v _
'.qGl
C _ vvv v EXISTING TOP OF BANK -
?.v' -
(li'� T �y PROPOSED YANG WALLS. ENONALLS. AND FOOTINGS
/--SEE SHEET 5, M.)
00L-'
HYDRAULIC DATA
v v v
�SEWER.
4'SANITARY
�
IMPACT DATA
STREAM IMPACTS = 95.0 LF
X�gTING ANN
END �/ I `STAPON=J11CT9L30 -E-
..1}"� NORTHING=73737
NORTI ING=7 738.44
I L� IIII Y �f,
A.v ISV�-
T l
u>m cao
v _
'.qGl
C _ vvv v EXISTING TOP OF BANK -
?.v' -
(li'� T �y PROPOSED YANG WALLS. ENONALLS. AND FOOTINGS
/--SEE SHEET 5, M.)
00L-'
PVI STA: 10+36.14 PN STA:10+71.42 PVI STA11+01.79 PVI STA: 11+49.56
INV.=}41.995
HYDRAULIC DATA
v v v
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
IMPACT DATA
STREAM IMPACTS = 95.0 LF
100 -YEAR ELEV. =
352.24
BUFFER ZONE I IMPACTS = 4,277 SF
������
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
BUFFET ZONE 2 IMPACTS = 938 SF
PVI STA: 10+36.14 PN STA:10+71.42 PVI STA11+01.79 PVI STA: 11+49.56
INV.=}41.995
155
350 0 10 TD 90
315 SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1' - 10'
SCALE: VERTICAL 1• - 10'
340
00 PLANS PID:PARLD 0Y:
VA
ALPHA & OMEGA GROUP
CIVIL I STRUCTURAL I wAT1R R15OVlCIS
M Lrfr B.... r—of Saire JC F."i{!. NCIi607
/bene➢/➢➢// Bl/p £..➢ p// III/
Firm L:rra.e Na. C-/I/r
AAA PROJECT NO. 2016.041
By:
SHEET NO.
1131 OF 1
HYDRAULIC DATA
25-YEARE ELCV. =
351.19
50 YEAR ELEV. =
351.93
100 -YEAR ELEV. =
352.24
25 -YEAR DISCHARGE =
510 CSS
50 -YEAR DISCHARGE =
590 CFS
IOD -YEAR DISCHARGE =
672 CFS
155
350 0 10 TD 90
315 SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1' - 10'
SCALE: VERTICAL 1• - 10'
340
00 PLANS PID:PARLD 0Y:
VA
ALPHA & OMEGA GROUP
CIVIL I STRUCTURAL I wAT1R R15OVlCIS
M Lrfr B.... r—of Saire JC F."i{!. NCIi607
/bene➢/➢➢// Bl/p £..➢ p// III/
Firm L:rra.e Na. C-/I/r
AAA PROJECT NO. 2016.041
By:
SHEET NO.
1131 OF 1

2013 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
WETLAND DATA SHEET LOCATIONS
Bridge Replacement
Bond Lake Greenway

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Bond Lake Greenway Bridge
Applicant/Owner: Town of Cary
E' K I
City/County: Cary/Wake Sampling Date: 8/23/16
State: NC Sampling Point: 001
Investigator(s): rlc u z Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): lLQoncave Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 35;7758 Long: 78.8235 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes G No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No Q
Are Vegetation �, Soil or Hydrology _JL naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No a within a Wetland? Yes In No no
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) ® Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (81) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry-Season
Water Table.(C2)
El Sediment Deposits (82) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (B3) ® Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
®
®Drift
Algal Mat or Crust (84) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)®
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): <14
Saturation Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): `14
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Soils moderately compacted, with rocks/debris. Site is within a maintained utility easement.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 001
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 NA
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
3
Total Number of Dominant
1
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
_.
Percent of Dominant Species
100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 = 1
8
=
0Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5m x 5m
)
FACW species x2= 1
1 Platanus occidentalis
3
FSC►U
FAC species x 3= 1
2.
FACU species x4= 1
3.
UPL species x 5 = 1
Column Totals: 0 (A) 5 (B)
4.
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
g
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5m x 5m )
3
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
1 Lonicera japonica
20
v/
F- Q �I
(Explain)
2 Solidago arguta
5�J�
PL�
3 Solanum viarum
5
N�
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Boehmeria cylindricum
5
ATCU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
IRAN!
5 Toxicodendron radicans
5
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
-All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11 '_Herb
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
40 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Sm x 5m
)
height.
1 Vitis rotundifolia
80
FI
2 Pueraria montane 10 = �
U
�m
3 Rubus argutus 10 TAW
4.
5
JIM
Hydrophytic
6.
Vegetation
Present? Yes no No
100 =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirr
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
0-2
10 YR 3/6
1008
0%
® �
2-10
10 YR 4/6
1008
0%
cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
10=10
10 YR 4/3
1006
0%
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
0%
0%
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
0%
0%
-
0%
0%
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
0%
0%
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
0%
0%
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
0%
0%
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
0%
0%
Sampling Point: 001
Texture Remarks
SiL
SiCL
SiCL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
82
cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No G
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Bond Lake Greenway Bridge Repair
Applicant/Owner: Town of Cary
Investigator(s): Eric Kulz
City/County: Cary/Wake
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC
Sampling Date: 8/23/16
- Sampling Point: 002
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Ini Qf112 Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 35.7758 Long: 78.8235 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil _ 0 , or Hydrology -0- significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation �, Soil E, or Hydrology -0- naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No •
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No • within a Wetland? Yes n No on
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
®Surface
Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
® Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)®
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
a Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (87)
Shallow Aquilard (D3)
-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
®Water
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes Q No r1 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): <12
Saturation Present?
Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): `12
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
or on a
El
0 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: 002
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
1. NA
x 1 = 1
2.
x 2 = 1
3.
x 3 = 1
4.
x4= 1
UPL species
x 5 = 1
6.
i
7.
8.
-
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
NA
)
1.
2.
3-
4.
5.
._
6.
_
7.
8.
_
9.
10.
._
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5m x 5m )
0 = Total Cover
1 Schedonorus arundinaceous (tall fescue)
100 ✓ _
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
_
10.
11.
12.
100 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
or on a
El
0 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: 002
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 = 1
FACW species
x 2 = 1
FAC species
x 3 = 1
FACU species
x4= 1
UPL species
x 5 = 1
Column Totals: 0
(A) 5 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes a No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-2 10 YR 5/6 1008
2-12 10 YR 4/6 1008
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
or
Redox Features
Color (moist) %
Type' Loc
0%
MM
0%
0%
_
00/0
0%
0%
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
0%
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
0%
Black Histic (A3)
0%
0%
(MLRA 147, 148)
Sampling Point: 002
Texture Remarks
SiL Very compacted
SiCL Very compacted
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No Q
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacement
ATTACHMENT 5.5d.
5d. What data source did you use to determine whether your site would
impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database search was conducted for the USGS
Cary Quadrangle (www.ncnhp.orq/web/nhp/database-search) on 10/27/16.
The NHP database identified one occurrence of a federally -protected species. The Bald
Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was identified has having current occurrences within
the Green Level quadrangle. The bald eagle is not listed as a federally endangered or
threatened species; however, it is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (BGPA).
Bald eagles live near rivers, large lakes and marshes where they can find fish and other
prey animals. Bald eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites.
Bond Lake is located adjacent to the project site. However, work proposed for this
project is short-term and minimal in nature. No trees will be removed or disturbed.
Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to have No Effect on this
species.
An IPac Trust Resources Report and an official threatened and endangered species list
was requested from the USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)
(http://ecos.fws.-gov/ipac; see following reports). Five federally -listed species were listed
as having recorded occurrences in Wake County.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), while was not identified by the NHP as having
documented occurrences in Wake County. Michaux's sumac is a woody shrub found in
open woods in rocky or sandy soils.. The project area consists of a maintained
greenway/utility easement. A visual survey for specimens of Michaux's sumac was
conducted by Eric Kulz with the Town of Cary on August 23, 2016. The survey included
both edges of the power easement and the scubby areas along the creek bank.
Specimens of winged sumac (Rhus copallinum) were observed along the western
margin of the easement, but no occurrences of Michaux's sumac were documented.
Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to have No Effect on this
species.
The endangered red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) has historical
occurrences in southern Wake County. According to the ECOS species profile, this
species inhabits mature pine forests. Forested areas around Bond Lake are mixed
pine/hardwood forests with fairly dense understory. Project Area is located within a 90 -
foot cleared and maintained utility easement. No cutting of trees will occur in this area.

Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to have No Effect on this
species.
The endangered dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterdon) is found in creeks and
rivers in stable habitat with substrates ranging from mixed sand, pebble, and gravel, to
clay and silty sand. Crabtree Creek within the project area is a flashy, unstable, rip -
rapped channel, with no suitable habitat for this species. Based upon this
information, the project is anticipated to have No Effect on this species.
The endangered Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana) is found in fast -flowing,
well -oxygenated streams with substrates composed of uncompacted gravel and/or
coarse sand. In Wake County the species has only been documented in the Little River
in eastern Wake County. As described above, no suitable habitat is present for this
species. Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to have No Effect
on this species.
The Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is proposed as endangered.
According to the USFWS Endangered Species Fact Sheet on the northern long-eared
bat, this species spends winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
They typically use large caves or mines with large passages and entrances; constant
temperatures; and high humidity with no air currents. No caves or mines are located in
the vicinity of the project site.
During the summer northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -reproductive
females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat seems
opportunistic in selecting roosts, using tree species based on suitability to retain bark or
provide cavities or crevices. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like
barns and sheds. Project work will occur within the maintained greenway/utility
easement and no trees will be cut. Based upon this information, the project is
anticipated to have No Effect on this species.

Bond Park Greenway
Bridge Replacement
IPaC Trust Resources Report
Generated August 19, 2016 01:21 PM MDT, IPaC v3.0.8
This report is for informational purposes only and should not be used for planning or
analyzing project level impacts. For project reviews that require U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service review or concurrence, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list from the Regulatory Documents page.
IPaC - Information for Planning and Conservation (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipacl): A project planning tool to help
streamline the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service environmental review process.

Table of Contents
IPaC Trust Resources Report ......................................................... 1
ProjectDescription............................................................... 1
Endangered Species.............................................................. 2
MigratoryBirds.................................................................. 4
Refuges & Hatcheries............................................................. 6
Wetlands....................................................................... 7

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC Trust Resources Report
NAME
Bond Park Greenway Bridge
Replacement
LOCATION
Wake County, North Carolina
DESCRIPTION
Replace a wooden pedestrian bridge
with a culverted crossing within a
maintained utility easement
IPAC LINK
httos7//ecos.fws,aov/"pac/` romect/
XU HJQ-M FQDZ-H PRH3-M KH RY-BZ6GOE
pLvll e<x•Iwuvv.
�llf1'inR
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Contact Information
Trust resources in this location are managed by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Endangered Species
Endangered Species
Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species are managed by the
Endangered Species Program of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
This USFWS trust resource report is for informational purposes only and should
not be used for planning or analyzing project level impacts.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the
IPaC website and request an official species list from the Regulatory Documents
section.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may
be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency.
A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list either from the Regulatory
Documents section in IPaC or from the local field office directly.
The list of species below are those that may occur or could potentially be affected by
activities in this location:
Birds
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
....- - . 04 M. ....: ¢111
�
yT11,
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http:Uecos.fws. ovg /tess p ubli /profile/speciesProfile.action75pcode=F029
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
hftp://ecos.fws.aov/tess public/12rofile/speciesProfile.action7spcoda=F015
8/19/2016 1:21 PM IPaC v3.0.8 Page 2

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Endangered Species
Flowering Plants
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws aov/tesspublic/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=Q2HH
Mammals
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
htlp://ecos.fws.gov/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=AOJE
Critical Habitats
There are no critical habitats in this location
8/19/2016 1:21 PM IPaC v3.0.8 Page 3

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Migratory Birds
Migratory Birds
Birds are protected by the Migrato[y Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act.
Any activity that results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless
authorized by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.111 There are no provisions for allowing
the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in the take
of migratory birds is responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations and
implementing appropriate conservation measures.
1. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern
http:/Iwww.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds -of -conservation -concern. pho
• Conservation measures for birds
hftpoHwww.fws.goy/birds/management/prowect-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.pho
• Year-round bird occurrence data
The following species of migratory birds could potentially be affected by activities in this
location:
American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus
Season: Wintering
htto://ecos.fws.aov/tess p ubli /profile/speciesprofile.action?spcode=BOF3
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Season: Year-round
htto://ecos.tws.gov/tens public/12rofile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BO08
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
Season: Year-round
Chuck -will's -widow Caprimulgus carolinensis
Season: Breeding
Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca
Season: Wintering
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
8/19/2016 1:21 PM IPaC v3.0.8 Page 4

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Migratory Birds
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Least Bittem Ixobrychus exilis
Season: Breeding
htto://ecos.fws.goy/tess public/profile/speciesProfile.action1spcode=B092
Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Year-round
hfp:/Iecos.fws.aov/tess public/protile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOFY
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Year-round
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
Short -eared Owl Asio flammeus
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
htto://ecos.fws.aov/tess public rofile/speciesProfile.action?socode=BOND
Swainson's Warbler Limnothlypis swainsonii Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
8/19/2016 1:21 PM IPaC v3.0.8 Page 5

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Refuges & Hatcheries
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
There are no refuges or fish hatcheries in this location
8/19/2016 1:21 PM IPaC v3.0.8 Page 6

IPaC Trust Resources Report
Wetlands
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Armv
Corns of Enaineers District.
DATA LIMITATIONS
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use
of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata
should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the
actual conditions on site.
DATA EXCLUSIONS
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
DATA PRECAUTIONS
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.
This location overlaps all or part of the following wetlands:
Freshwater Forested/shrub Wetland
PF01Ch
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands
Inventory website: http://107.20.228.18/decoders/wetlands.aspx
8/19/2016 1:21 PM IPaC v3.0.8 Page 7

SA�Io'�F . United States Department of the Interior L41y,,
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
551 PYLON DRIVE, SUITE F
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0052 October 27, 2016
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-00140
Project Name: Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacements
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of
the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can
be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed
list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the
proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on
federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless
an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete
record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified
personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related
articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seg.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www. fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
http://www fws aQv/mieratorvbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.htm 1.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National
Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems
you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
Attachment
2

Ow
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
/ Project name: Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacements
Official Species gist
Provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
POST OFFICE BOX 33726
RALEIGH, NC 27636
(919) 8564520
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0052
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-00140
Project Type: ** OTHER **
Project Name: Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacements
Project Description: Replacement of two damaged pedestrian bridges with culverts, and relocation
to move crossing off sanitary sewer lines. One crossing is over a jurisdictional stream (Crabtree
Creek) in a maintained sewer easement, and the other is an ephemeral feature draining to Bond
Lake. Project construction is expected before the end of 2016.
Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it
may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code
matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the'Provided by'
section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/27/2016 07:57 AM
1

t *a�
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacements
Project Location Map:
11
Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((-78.82512599229811 35.7763389947926 1, -
78.82382243871689 35.77634117088301,-78.82385194301605 35.77562958614753,-
78.82513135671616 35.77561435337716,-78.82512599229811 35.77633899479261)))
Project Counties: Wake, NC
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/27/2016 07:57 AM
2

United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacements
Endangered Species Act Species List
There are a total of 5 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in
an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain
fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the
Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your
project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FW S
office if you have questions.
Birds
Status
Has Critical Habitat
Condition(s)
Red -Cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
Endangered
borealis)
Population: Wherever found
Clams
Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
Endangered
heterodon)
Population: Wherever found
Tar River spinymussel (Elliptio
Endangered
steinstansana)
Population: Wherever found
'
Flowering Plants
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Endangered
Population: Wherever found
Mammals
Northern long-eared Bat (Myotis
Threatened
.septenirionalis)
Population: Wherever found
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/27/2016 07:57 AM
3

Rin os ��
V
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bond Park Greenway Bridge Replacements
Critical habitats that lie within your project area
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/27/2016 07:57 AM