The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20161105 Ver 1_280095_Permit_Application_Revised_20161109_20161114Transporta rron November 8, 2016 Mr. John Thomas US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Dr. Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27615 PAT McCRORY Governar NICHOLAS ]. TENNYS�N 5ecretary SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit #14 Bridge No. 95 on Lake Leonard Rd (SR 1838) over Leonard Creek, Class WS-III CA, Davidson County, NC, WBS Project No.: 17BP.9.R.62 Dear Mr. Thomas, We are requesting a Nationwide 14 permit for replacement of Bridge No. 95 with a double barrel box culvert on Lake Leonard Road (SR 1838) over Leonard Creek (Class WS-III CA) in Davidson County. I have attached a pre-construction notification application, a vicinity, soils, and topographical map with the project area called out, a stormwater management plan, a'No Survey Required form for Historic Architecture', and a'No Archaeological sites are present or Affected' for Archeology, and a mitigation acceptance letter from Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Also attached are the construction plans and the culvert survey report. The project will permanently impact 124 linear feet (51'-culvert, 73'-bank stabilization) and temporarily impact 26 linear feet (dewatering) of Leonard Creek. Low stream flow will be isolated into one barrel, with 1' sills, and the culvert will be buried 1' below the stream bed to ensure aquatic passage. The high flow barrel will have 2' sills and floodplain benches constructed at the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The low flow barrel will be backfilled with material that is excavated from the stream or floodplain and may be supplemented with rip rap if needed. The high flow barrel will be backfilled with rip rap or native bed material of appropriate size to the sill elevation in order to expedite the establishment of a natural stream bed. The culvert site will be dewatered during construction in accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices. A 12" waterline is proposed for installation on the north side of the existing bridge and under the proposed culvert. The portion under the culvert will be encased in a 20" pipe and will be installed via trenchless installation. No additional impacts to Waters of the US are proposed as a result of the installation. The USFWS lists Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) as endangered and Northern Long-Eared bat (NLEB-Myotis septentrionalis) as threatened for Davidson County. There is no habitat in the project area for Schweinitz's Sunflower; therefore, it was determined that there will be `no effect' on Schweinitz's Sunflower. There is summer roosting habitat in the existing bridge for the NLEB. Anticipated tree clearing impacts for �Nothing Compares�_ State of North Carolina I Department of Transpoitation I Division 9— CONSTRUCTION 375 Silas Crcck Parkway j Winston-Salcin, NC 27127 (336)747-7800 T I (336)703-6693 F Trunsportatlon PAT Mc�RORY CoveYnor N[C�iQLAS J. TEI�PNYSON secrerary this project are �s#irr�ated to be 0.2 acr�s. INe d�term�ined that the project 'May Affect but ts �lot Likely t� Adversely Affect' the NLEB. A NLEB 5creening check�ist is attached. Thus, for the propased �ction, NCDOT has committed to #he conservation rr�easures listed be0ow: 9) �Jo alterat�ons of a known hibernaculum's entrance ar inter�or envirorrment if it itnpairs ara essential behavioral patter�, including sheltering Northern fa�ng-eared bats (January 1 through Decerraber 31); 2) f�o tre� removaf within a�.25 mile radiu� of a known hibernacula (Jan�rary � through December 31}; �nd 3) No cutting ar destroying a knowr�, occupied m�ternity roost tree, ar any other trE�s within a"f 5(7-foot radius from the known, occupied m�ternity tree during the period from June 1 through and including July 31. NCDOT �ras det�rmined that the pro�osed action daes not req�rire separate consultation on tlae graur�ds that the proposed actian is consis#ent with the final Sectian 4(d) eule, codified at 50 C.F.R. § 17.�Q(a) and effecti�� Fek�ruary 16, 2(}16. Sectian 7 responsi4�ilities are therefore considered fulfilled. Bald Eagfes are pratected ur�der the Mrgratory Bird Tr�aty Act �nd the Bald and Galden Eag1e Protection Act. A field survey c�f the pro}ect study area was conductec! on January 27, 2015. No s�ecies or nests were abserv�ti. Therefare, this species will not be �mpacted as a result oF project �anstructian. By copy of this letter, we alsQ request 401 revi�w and approval from the NG �i�isior� of Water Resaurces with on� copy of the application pacEcage pravided to Amy Chapman, Yransportatia� Rermitting Unit Supervisor, and Da�e Wanucf�a, D�T Praject Coord�nator. Please charge the application fee af $270 to W65 �roject �lo. 7BP.9.R.62. By copy of this letter, we also req�rest Marla Chambers, NC Wildlif� Resau�ces Commisswan, to corriment diree#1y ta the Corps conceming the permit request. If you ha�e any questians, comraie�ts or need additianal information afte� reviewing this ma#erial pfease contact Arr�y �uliss ai {336} 747-78Q0, TE�ank you for your caop�ration in this Tnatter. Sincerefy, / �� l A�rry Euliss Division En�ir�nmental C}fficer, MCi]OT Div�sion 9 Attachments: Application package and plans �Nothing Compares�,� State of �or¢h Carolina I Dcpavm7eni ofTrsuzsportation ��ivision 9— C QNSTRUCT101*f 37S Sila� Creek Parkwey I �+''��szon-S�lem, NC 27127 (336) 747-7606 '1' I (336) 703-6693 F Transporta rion CC PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS ]. TENNYS�N Secretary Amy Chapman, NCDEQ-DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit Supervisor- e- copy Dave Wanucha, NCDEQ-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy Dale Swicegood, P.E. Davidson Resident Engineer —e-copy Phil Suggs, Division 9 Roadside Environmental Engineer- e-copy Marla Chambers, WRC- e-copy Andrew Henderson, USFWS Asheville Field Office, e-copy Beth Harmon, NCDEQ-DMS, e-copy Christy Huff, NCDOT Priority Projects Unit, e-copy �Nothing Compares�_ State of North Carolina I Department of T�anspoitation I Division 9— CONSTRUCTION 375 Silas Crcck Parkway j Winston-Salcm, NC 27127 (336)747-7800 T I (336)703-6693 F Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? 401 Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge to culvert replacement of Bridge No. 95 on Lake Leonard Road. 2b. County: Davidson County 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bethesda 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.9.R.62 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 9 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if pat Ivey, P.E. Division Engineer applicable): 3d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 3e. City, state, zip: Winston - Salem, NC 27127 3f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7800 3g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 3h. Email address: pivey@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: DEO 4b. Name: Amy Euliss 4c. Business name NCDOT Division 9 (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 4e. City, state, zip: Winston- Salem, NC 27127 4f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7802 4g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 4h. Email address: aeuliss@ncdot.gov 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.883 Longitude: - 80.2111 1c. Property size: 0.97 acres, 365 linear feet (within project area) 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Leonard Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III CA 2c. River basin: Yadkin 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The existing site is a bridge. The surrounding land is a mixture of agricultural, rural residential, and forested areas. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 210 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Replacing a structurally deficient single span bridge with (2) 12' X 10' RCBC's on a 63 degree skew. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Traffic will be detoured off-site and erosion and sedimentation control measures will be installed. Water will be diverted around the construction area and the old bridge will be removed. The proposed structure will be replaced on its existing alignment and a new culvert structure (2) 12' x 10' RCBC's will be cast in place. The channel will then be excavated and realigned for low flow shaping, and a floodplain bench with stabilization will be established on each bank. Water will be pumped around the work area during construction by installed impervious dikes upstream and downstream of the existing bridge. Pumped water between dikes will be directed into a special stilling basin. Equipment to be used includes a track hoe, dump truck, paving equipment, pumps, and various hand tools. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � Yes � No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Corps (404, 10) or Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ (401, other) (acres) Tem ora T - Choose One Choose one Yes/No - 0 2g. Total wetland impacts 0 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average stream Impact number (PER) or width length Permanent (P) or intermitte (feet) (linear Temporary (T) nt (INT)? feet) S1 P Culvert Leonard Creek PER Corps 10 51 S2 P Stabilization Leonard Creek PER Corps 10 73 S3 T Dewatering Leonard Creek PER Corps 10 26 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 150 3i. Comments: Of the 150 LF of stream impacts, only 124 LF are associated with permanent impacts to the stream for the purpose of stream alignment and stabilization with respect to the culvert installation. The 26 LF of temporary impacts are associated with the impervious dikes that will be used upstream and downstream of the proposed crossing. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Tem ora T 01 Choose one Choose One Choose 0 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 Choose One P2 Choose One 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a.Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer mitigation required? Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed project will remove and replace a structurally deficient bridge and replace it with a box culvert. Roadway approach work is minimized as much as is practical to reduce the overall project footprint. An off-site detour will be employed to avoid the need for a temporary parallel structure. The culvert slope is 0.39 %, so native bed material shall be placed between the sills in the culvert to provide a continuous low flow channel. Further justification is provided in the stormwater management plan. Bank stabilization will be minimized to those areas where deemed necessary. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Erosion and sedimentation BMPs will be installed prior to construction. Water will be diverted around the work area to prevent sedimentation of downstream aquatic resources. Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surFace waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US and coordination (including a pre-construction meeting) with the Division Environmental Supervisor. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A Type: Choose one 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one 3c. Comments: N/A 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 51 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: N/A 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan Page 6 of 10 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 23 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Stormwater Management Plan is attached. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWR TPU 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes � No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. This project is a bridge to culvert project and will not increase access to nearby properties. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. It is not anticipated that this project will generate any wastewater as it is a roadway project. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endar�gered Species and Designated Critical Habitat �Corps Requirement) 5a. WiN this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Y�s ❑ Na habitat? 5b. Have you checked with ths US�'W5 conceming Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field fJffce you have contacied. Ashevilfe 5d. Whaf da#a sourcas did yau use to determine vrhether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Criticaf Habitat? US Fisfi� and Wifdlife and NC Natural Heritage Pragram data far Schweinitz's sunflower. A nest sutrrey for bafd eagle was conducted ort January 27, 2Q15. No eagles or �agle nests lacated. 6. Essential Fish HabitaE (Cnrps Repuirement} 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essentiaE fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Esse�iial Fish Habitat? This bridge replacement project takes place in Davidson County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat fhat would support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.). 7. Flistoric or Prehistoric Cultural Resources {Corps Requirement) 7a, Will this pro�ect occur in or near an erea thatthe state, #edera! or tribal governments have designated as having histaric ar cultural preservation � yes � No status (e.g., National Nistarlc Trust designatian or properties significant +n North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use ta determine whether your site would impact historic or archeoiogical resources? 5ee attached Historic Architec#ure and Landscapes "No 5urvey Required Form" and Archeological Resaurces "No hlational Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archealogical Sites Present or Affected Form" 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requir�ment} 8a. Will this project oocur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floo�plain? � Yes ❑ Nfl 8b. if yes, expEain how project meeks FEMA requirements: Tha project is in a FEMA Qetailed 5tudy. The Project will be an MOA Type 2B. For more information please refer ta the Culvert Su�vey Report. 8c. What source(s} did yau use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps. Amy Euliss � � ��1� nUAgen s Signature ApplicantlAgent's Printed Name (Agent`s signatur� is �alid only if an authorizatian Date letter from the applicant is pravided.} Page '! 0 af 1 D 1Y�rther� Lon�-Eared Bat 4(,�,1 Rule Streamlined �Q��ultation Form Federal agencies siiould use this form for the optional streamlined consultation framework for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB). This framework allows federal agencies to rely upon the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's {USFWS) 3anuary 5, 2416, int�a-Service Programmatic Biological Opinion (BO) on the final4{d} rule for the NL�B for section 7(a)(2) compliance by: (1) notifying the USFWS that an action agency will use the streamlined framework; {2) describing the project with sufficient detail to support the required determination, and (3} enabting the USFWS to t�ack effects and determine if reinitiation of consultation is required per 50 CFR 402.1b. This form is not necessary if an agency determines that a proposed action will ttave no effect to the NLEB or if the USFWS has concurred in writing with an agency's determination that a proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the NLEB (i.e., the standard informal consultation process). Actions that may cause prohibited incidental take require separate formal consultation. Providing this information does not address section 7(a)(2) compliance for any other listed species. Information to Determine 4(d) Rule Compliance: YES NO 1. Does the project occur wholly outside of the WNS Zonel? ❑ x 2. Have you contacted the appropriate agency2 to determine if your project is near x � known hibernacula or maternity roost t�ees? 3. Could the project disturb hibernating NLEBs in a known hibernaculum? � x �4. Could the project alter the entrance or interior environment of a known � x hibemaculum? 5. Does the pro�ect remove any trees within 0.25 miles of a icnown hibernacult�m at � x any time of year? 5. Would the project cut or destroy known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other trees within a 150-foot radius from the maternity roost tree from June 1 � x throu h Jul 31. You are eligible to use this form if you have answered yes to question # 1�yes to question #�2 g�no to questions 3, 4, 5 and 6. The remainder of tlie form will be used by the USFWS to track our assumptions in the B0. Agency and Applicant3 (Name, Email, P�one No.): NCDOT Division 9, aeuliss@ncdot.gov, 336-747-7802 Proiect Name: Project Location (include coordinates if lcnown): 35.883026, -80.211151 Basic Pro3ect Description (provide narrative below or attach additional information}: Replace existing bridge with a 2 barrel, concrete box culvert 1 http://www.fws.go�/midwest/endangered/mammalslnleb/pdf/WNSZone.pdf ] n__ i_..._.�r-"--"'-r_....�.._.1.._:a'--^-`1_"_�_"__'"..Jl."."'"""_1_I._1..Ll..I.:..:.__ La.__[ General Project Information YES NO A enc Determination: By signing this form, the action agency determines that this project may affect the NLEB, but that any resulting incidental take of the NLEB is not prohibited by the final4(d) rule. If the USFWS does not respond within 30 days from submittal of this form, the action agency may presume that its determination is �nformed by the best available information and that its project responsibilities nnder 7(a)(2) with respect to the NLEB are fulfilled through the USFWS Jant�ary 5, 2�16, Programmatic BO. The action agency wi11 update this determination annualIy for multi-year activities. The action agency understands that the USFWS presumes that all activities are implemented as described herein. The action agency will promptly report any deparlures from the described activities to the appropriate USFWS Field Office. The action agency will provide the appropriate USFWS Field Office with the results of any surveys conducted for the NLEB. involved parties will promptly notify the appropriate USFWS Fietd Ofiice upon finding a dead, injured, or sick NLEB. Signature: Date Submitted: � I � 4 Any acti�ity that temporarily or permanently removes suitable forested habitat, including, but not limited to, tree removal from development, energy production and transmission, mining, agriculture, etc. (see page 48 of the BO). 5 If the project removes less than 10 trees and the acreage is unknown, report the acreage as less than 0.1 acre. 6 If the activity includes tree clearing in June and July, also include those acreage in April to October. #l��a A �L~1 i�� i. . �if��r �i��\� f,w�.r�► ■I/�� i��X r�1��lr.y,x,�� l`�rt+��.'�� s� ��r� ��r W�ns4on- M�r��ervwill� - Lewi�e�Hle 5ale�n - rlemmans ',��\ f104 Project Vicinity �' „i��' � Paint • L�xYn�t;n � �,ix„aaw�i�� aF µoRrk �� 9 h �P ro � � P Q`� � �OF TRAN�'g E�IGINEERIN� & C O N S T R U C Y I❑ N Figure 1 - Project Vicinity REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 280095 OVER LEONARD CREEK ON SR 1838 (LAKE LEONARD RD) DAVIDSON COUNTY JUNE 13, 2016 0 250 500 1,000 Feet � Soil Legend -�.�Cil vdllqJ ILOdl71, � i� :, r;;,,,,,: - Cecil S�ndv ! oam. 8 to 15 percF • :f.. ,. r . . ,�:. �`'-�'e�._ ; '�`_:,� { w" �, ,� . . � t-. �.,� f � , I.,�" . � )�r'f/.� F � � � w - � ' �� / � �. . � � .��J�w�~: . � I � �r�.S � ` .�t . `•.�%�� 1.� /' �"' ��'• /.'�y ,. ,..J� �, A l: � � �� J1� � �/ 0 � �y' i 1 7 / f � � t' %� . r, ` i �/ :� �� v� �d•, i .+ �°�' „� " CF �yj� � � t � '' . � 1 /. �,�- .r r j� r,r• }Y�`� d'9':d1''� ��`a� r �f �'; y "TM��I P , �A'. �� v�f/" � �� f � ! t- �; �,',, �, I•� �.� 1 ' 1 . y Y'f r�'u/li�t � � ��,.�1 � %(t ��:�� f�� , � I r`._ .. -�-r �i�► < < ,,� �� . �`�� / `, f �..� f� , . �fh - � ��', � �,', , x al -� �, �,� y�+' . ��' ,�`� ,. , ; ,,��.� � �`, �, , �'' � , - � � t � ,�/� �.�.�� ' � � .: �' �. � . . � � ��r 1I` �� 7i r: _ �' �t�+�-;�1, ,+ ,,'� �► ��° �` � , i��,� ��`�, � f4,�, �Mr��'�; ,, ., : /� _/ � ,�`/� - ~� �� . � � • � � , � ��, � li � J .� J � / ��% ��. . � . �� /� , � �� #:r/ '�� I� �. � F'� ��k/ �I ♦: p V . �.ir �.. �� ' �%' ;� � jTA '�� _ �yy, � �w � � . � � J�� r _i � � ��r/ 10 w 'AO � 1 + ,� �� ;��e,'t° ' �r''�j'�-� AJ fi r = !�: r,�I� '" , �� ' r�" ' .� d y c � . �; � � �;; . 1�,, �. � , r''� � _ �y�, � � �1� �'- � r. , r :!`�� ( /S -� �, �. f ,� `�- y✓ �'P- t '�'r r, ".`.��'�. !+i� ,, "^'' ; �`c� :,� e ` "� ��J �� w rr., r,'�''��N � • r r `i� � , �', yt ' �' �� %/ 'r' �`� ''�., / � ` � �� .. �•_ i � f �. �• •' !. ��^'�4 �� !� W i`� y ,+, ,�iJ � 1� ,� ,a �'�* � �" y^�f1� ., I,. � � ✓ �.�' i f� w'�A i'« M , � 1 � ., . .,1 'a � �' � � ��,� 'f'�' ' �? '�,,� ��" � �° � _ � � � � � r I�'f-- s�'�� . , r r � l,i: � � �/�i'`'w � . �3�� . � `, . . j�� "� �'. r.r . . . , ",M'f - ' �'� �,�• ,��y ��Ii � ..! !� .}� 1'�� . ►e• '� �. i,�., '�^fi �.� e - i y/+ � . /'f� �'� .. . .�# ' i. � '^� �r�j��r,' 1i� i Y �w 7\ y . �,J�� Y I . � f'W ' ✓b �.. , } � �T . � .-( � Yf�y� . .• + r . r . ;' � '�,. � ��_, �, `I Y 'Fft� �'r � �/� � ��''�� \ ,` � ", . , '• �'�,, �,- _ �•� . •, . .i , Y . ' i.� � � �'' � _,. � � " `�;� i� ., f '� . "� .` �y��, . , ' �Y�. ,y „ ,. � .r.h.�,, �! . �^a % y,h� u� `�1 • ��' .7 , . r�pf . _ ,,i. �.'.�+.`13"' � r. , ,., � �.,�y,' «"- � - �y`�� `J� y��, y �?:� ,�� y y r � � f � �, .,_ � . + � +�,/� " / ti �',. �' 7�: �t � �. �• ��`Y�� .. � �' � �' �' '� ��`�: � ��'+• '�y,'�� {y�.;. � a �. ��`�' � � � �� r r �' �` � i� ,t�► - �a:�i'; �, '� I' '�'"�"�'. \ : �; � �� , �* � ..w , �� :�.�. _ � �". � �:�Y I �_- 'r� � Map Location FORSYTH GUILFORD DAVIDSON • RANDOLPH �- hr[Y �� . ' +�� . � . � 1 � fL' �' ' r � ^:�'j e`�y� , ~ . �.� � -�i rl . . ' � " '"'"y _ �� ' �: �' � '�' ?. �� ' ' � . y, r• � -- .1��i^� ' � ;:y..: .,.0 .A�� . ✓ .'_ � � � . , i Soil Map REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 280095 OVER LEONARD CREEK ON SR 1838 (LAKE LEONARD RD) DAVIDSON COUNTY JUNE 13, 2016 1 inch = 200 feet a Prnjrcl Tr'ncking No. (lxternnf. Use} i�-1 �-aoog HTSTORIC ARCHITE+CTURE AND LANDSCAPES N� SURVEY REQUIRED FURM This form only pertains to Hiskori� Architecture and Lands�apes fvr this project. It is nat �alid for Archaeological Resaurces. Yau must consult separately with the Archaeolagy Graup. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No. Couraty: Da�idSOn N'13S N'o.: 17BP.9. R,fi2 Dacument T e: Fed. Aid 1Vo: Funding: X State Federal Federal X Yes No Permit NWF 3 vr i4 Permit s: T e s} : ProjectDescri�tion: Replace 6ridge No. 9S an SR �838 (Lake l.eonard Road} over Leonard Creek (off-site detour, some R�1N acquisitian planned}. SUMMARY OF HIST{3RIC ARCHITECTURE AND LAl'�USCAPES REVTEW Description of review activiiies, results, and cortclusions: HPDWeb reviewed on 1 ��c�mber 2014 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, �E, or 5S praperties in the Area flf Potential Effects �APEj. Davidson County current GIS mapping, aerial photagraphy, and tax information indicated an APE of cleared residential par�els, se�eral containing resaurces dating to the 197as, and some woadland (viewed 1 December 2014}. Constructed in 1953, Bridge No. 95 is not eligible far the Natianal Register as it is not representative af any distinctive engineering vr aesthetic type. Goagle Maps "Street View" confirmed the absenee of critical historic struckures and landscapes in the APE (viewed 1 December Z014}. Na architeckural survey is required for the projectas currently defined. Whv the availa6le informntion pravides rc reliable basis for reasona6lv predicting tlrat tliere are �a unirlentifred si�nifrcant liistoric architecturtrl or landsc�rpe resources in the nraieet area: APE eyckends 300 feet from either end nf the existing hridge (NW-5E] and 100 feet to either side of the SR 1838 (Lake Leonard Road) centerline (NE-SW) tv encampass praposed construction acti�ities. The comprehensi�e county architectural survey (1981) and later in�estigatio�s recorded na properties in the APE {Paul B. Touart, 6'uilding fhe Backcountry.� The Arch/tectural History afDavidson County, Ndrth Carolina ((Lexington, MC]: The Davidson Caunty Historical Association, 19�7)}. County GIS�#ax materials and other visuals clearly illustrate the absence af significant architectural resources. No Natinnal Register-listed properties are located within the APE. Shauld the design Qf the project change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture as additianal review may be necessary. SUPPURT D�CUIYIENTATIUN X Map(s} ❑Pre�ious Surrrey Info. ❑Phatos ❑Gorrespondenee FINDING BY NCDUT ARCHITECTURAL HIST�RIAN Hist ric Architect e dsr�apes -- ND SURVEY REQUIRED � NCDOT Architectural Historian Date ❑Design Plans � Nislorrc Arrhriec7iirr mid Lan�Lscnpe.s NO S(lHV1sY RluC]ll!!{li1J Jnrix jr»• Adi�iar '!'rnns�x�rralrra� Pro�ecu us thrafrfird �fi d1e 2fN17 Prog+r+nrranfic Agrernrrxl. �ry . i0 � � � ��rOri�� rC��7 0`� aw �' �',� .< -' �( �'�f = g;, �, �: . , • ' : .. [y ''�-r 'o' l�'�-�'� '� � � . Hd ;n �li�. n `.' WelCOPt3e ' @�� ,-.� .,� I'�� e��"E'�, �� ='S'v � 4 � - a� �., - `' �� Z l . . Sf. � g�E _ . i[.S � . . ' . � +�nc%� �4 SicinyRr� ❑ � \ � , �:l.i Ot{r � . l l � ■ �J� � �� R liillflr � . . 5,��5 n . �`�t3tsS5iiikRd a i /M G �,'`r. I f. ry l.anirr Or �, ; , f ��r ��ybr a �, ,'�'' ��J� �r,u lori �'� sp` o ,`"� . ' ^,• . n 'P f �" 'fi �;t !i[1 � 4"�. �. � � y� : - k+� ' � �v � � .I � w,r�cr Ln DAViQSON �,�. "'��• � •,� b , �l k � y iti �ywna� �; � � � �,4 r � � � �.::\, t��i5tt,r�7 ^' �^F� �4 SI��$ 7 � �e,<N�� '. �'$ Lakt� :. � r�+� �. � F ' � "� L�xingtvn `a � �� :3 - r`n 4 �v <i � N n n Cy�, �:r.. m a � .v i�. /� � Mola{7.y i?r �p ,� C3l,�ck,Sa1 . u � . � ..�. ' yC� K'+llilffirl �. - � `� � .. . �� ' 1'�� tia� Gyq€9'b'�' G �i �`,nn l.r1 " - _ �4 :�� r�$S�e""- _ �� x i"� Bridge No, 95 on SR 1838 {Lake Levnard Rvad� oVe�r Levnar� �reek 1NB5 NQ. 17BP.9.R.G2 [�avidsa�, �county 6ase ma p: H P�1Neb, nts NCDOT — Fiistoric Architecture Clecember 2U14 Traeking iVa. 14-11-0a44 T�n�,a�+a� �� L,31s o-� Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES �o� '��' �� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ��.�, �Fp� �`� PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM �� ' � � `¢_4,ti�° �' This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �;�:�....~-..;: � ��-�`�� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the �.�4� Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: WBS No: 17BP.9.R.62 County: Document: Davidson Minimum Criteria Sheet or PCE F.A. No: N/A Funding: � State ❑ Federal Federal Permit Required? � Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3 or NWP 14 Project Description: This project consists of the replacement of Bridge No. 95 on SR 1838 (Lake Leonard Road) over Leonard Creek in Davidson County. Structure will be replaced at its existing location with an off-site detour. As defined by the NCDOT, the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for archaeology measures approximately 300 feet (91.44 m) from either end of Bridge No. 95. The corridor is approximately 1 SO feet (45. 72 m) wide, extending 75 feet (22.86 m) on each side of SR 1838 from its present centerline. SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed the subject project and determined.• � There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area of potential effects. ❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project. ❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. � All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. � There are no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needec� "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 'L.7�K�]�u�J��L�LI An archaeological survey and evaluation of the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 95 on SR 1838 (Lake Leonard Road) over Leonard Creek in Davidson County was conducted on February 5, 2015, by Terri Russ and Laurie Griesmer of Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI). As a result of the investigations, one historic archaeological site (31DV749**) was located within the project's APE. This archaeological site was recommended not eligible for the National Register; no further archaeological investigations are needed for this project. I concur with this recommendation as the proposed bridge replacement project will not impact significant archaeological resources. If the project expands and impacts subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultations will be necessary. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) Other: Signed: ❑ Previous Survey Info � Photos ❑Correspondence Date NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 2of18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: ESI conducted an intensive archaeological survey for the replacement of Bridge No. 95 over Leonard Creek on SR 1838 (Lake Leonard Road) in Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). As defined by the NCDOT, the survey area (Area of Potential Effects [APE]) for archaeology measures approximately 300 feet (91.44 m) from either end of Bridge No. 95. The corridor is approximately 150 feet (45.72 m) wide, extending 75 feet (22.86 m) on each side of SR 1838 from its present centerline. A map review and site file search at the Ofiice of State Archaeology (OSA) revealed that no previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within or adjacent to the APE. A search of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online database (HPOWEB GIS Service) revealed no previously recorded historic architectural resources within the APE that have the potential to yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, aerial photography, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil survey maps, and histaric maps were examined for information on natural or cultural factors that might have affected site locations or preservation. A 1910 map of Davidson County drawn by Calvin Miller included the names of residences, schools, churches, and other landmarks (Figure 3). No homes or landmarks are noted for area surrounding the APE, but a road that roughly follows the current alignment of Lake Leonard Road is shown. The 1915 Soil Survey map for Davidson County does not show a road or crossing in the vicinity of the current bridge (Figure 4). The 1938 Davidson County North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission road map shows a road that roughly follows the current alignment of Lake Leonard Road; however, no structures appear to be within the project area (Figure 5). The APE consists of a mixture of wooded, residential, and pasture areas. Oriented generally northwest to southeast, Bridge No. 95 and Lake Leonard Road cross Leonard Creek, which drains southwest into Abbotts Creek within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. Map units (soil series) are named for the major soil or soils within the unit, but may have minor inclusions of other soils (NRCS 2013). The soil units mapped within the APE are listed in Table 1. Four soil units are present within the APE. The floodplain of the APE is composed of Chewacla loam (ChA), a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained and frequently flooded soil series. The western side slopes and terraces are mapped as Cecil sandy clay loam (CcD; 8-15% slopes). This well drained soil typically consists of up to 20 centimeters of sandy loam over clay subsoil. The eastern quadrants of the APE are mapped as Sedgefield sandy loam (lower terrace adjacent to the floodplain) and Enon fine sandy loam (upper terraces). Sedgefield sandy loam is a moderately well drained soil series, typically consisting of up to 40 centimeters of sandy loam over clay subsoil. Enon fine sandy loam is a well drained soil series. A typical soil proiile for this series consists of less than 20 centimeters of fine sandy loam over less than 10 centimeters of sandy clay loam. Clay is typically encountered around 25 to 30 centimeters below ground surface. Table 1: Project Area Soils Soil Name Code Slope Drainage Chewacla loam, frequently flooded ChA 0-2% Somewhat Poorly Cecil sandy loam Enon fine sandy loam Sedgefield sandy loam CcD 8-15% Well EnB 2-8% Well SfB 2-8% Moderately Well Landform Floodplains Interfluves Interfluves Ridges The current archaeological investigation included pedestrian (visual) inspection and shovel testing within the APE. Photographs of the proj ect area are shown as Figures 6-15. For the purposes of the "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " farm for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 3of18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 investigation, the APE was divided into four quadrants (northeastern, southeastern, southwestern, northwestern), based roughly on the road orientation. Prior to the initiation of shovel testing, a systematic visual inspection of each quadrant of the APE was undertaken to search for surface artifacts, above-ground resources, or other signs of cultural activity. The eastern quadrants of the project area consisted of grassy fields and former pasture. The western quadrants of the APE consisted of pasture areas in the floodplain adj acent to Leonard Creek, with wooded side slopes in the northwest quadrant and a residential yard in the southwest quadrant. Surface visibility in all portions of the APE was generally poor due to grass cover, leaf litter, and general vegetation; however, a general visual inspection of the APE and immediate vicinity revealed no surface artifacts, structural remains, or other signs of historic or prehistoric cultural activity. The portion of Lake Leonard Road in the eastern half and portions of the western half of the APE appears to have been built up above the existing floodplain. The road is elevated, with a moderate to steeply sloping embankment on either side of the road. Shovel testing adjacent to this area revealed disturbed fill and gravel. A total of 20 shovel tests were excavated within and adjacent to the APE (see Figure 2 for shovel test locations). Three shovel tests were excavated within the northeastern quadrant of the APE (STs 19-21). This portion of the APE consisted of a fairly level to gently sloping grassy landform, with standing water visible in portions of the floodplain. ST 19, excavated on the upper terrace of the eastern end of the APE, encountered 15 centimeters of light grayish brown sandy loam over 15 centimeters of disturbed fill (gravel and mottled yellowish brown and reddish brown clay). ST20 encountered similarly disturbed soils, with 50 centimeters of very mottled and disturbed soils (brown and reddish brown sandy loam and sandy clay loam with gravel), likely the result of the construction of the elevated roadbed. Soils in ST21 were very poorly drained, with water encountered at 10 centimeters below ground surface. No cultural materials were encountered in any of these shovel tests. The northwestern quadrant of the APE consisted of a narrow floodplain and eroded side slopes. Three shovel tests were excavated in this portion of the APE (STs 22-24). Soils in ST 22, excavated adjacent to Leonard Creek within the floodplain, consisted of 25 centimeters of light grayish brown sandy loam and rock (recently tilled) over 30 centimeters of light brownish gray silty sandy loam and rock. The shovel test was terminated at 60 centimeters below ground surface when water began percolating into the base of the shovel test. STs 23 and 24 were excavated in a wooded area along a side slope. Soils in these shovel tests consisted of 5 to 10 centimeters of dark grayish brown loam over red clay. No cultural materials were recovered from any of the shovel tests within this portion of the APE. The southwestern quadrant of the APE consisted of a narrow floodplain, residential driveway, and residential yard. Erosion was evident in this area, with reddish brown clay visible in the patchy grass cover of the yard and adjacent pasture. No shovel testing was conducted in the driveway, landscaped yard, or eroded portion of the pasture. One shovel test (ST 25) was excavated in the floodplain adjacent to Leonard Creek. Shovel testing revealed 45 centimeters of brown sandy loam over 30 centimeters of brown sandy clay loam. No artifacts or cultural materials were recovered. The southeastern quadrant of the APE consists of a gently sloping, grassy terrace. STs 26-28 were excavated at 30-meter intervals within the APE. Shovel tests were aligned near the western edge of the APE boundaries to avoid encountering the disturbed soils associated with the construction of the elevated existing road bed. ST 26 was excavated in the floodplain adjacent to Leonard Creek. Shovel testing revealed 15 centimeters of light brown loamy sand over 15 centimeters of brown sandy loam and rock. A light reddish brown sandy clay loam was encountered from 30 centimeters below surface to a depth of one meter below surface, where water was encountered. Areas of surface water were noted, particularly around a cluster of several trees within the field adjacent "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " farm for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 4of18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 to ST 27. ST 27 was excavated adjacent to the clump of trees within the field. Shovel testing encountered 30 centimeters of brown sandy clay loam over brown clay loam. Water was encountered at 45 centimeters below surface and the shovel test was terminated. ST 28, excavated near the southeastern end of the APE, yielded two histaric artifacts. This archaeological site, designated 31DV749**, is discussed below. 31DV749** Site Size: 675 mz TopoQraphv: Base of Ridgetoe Elevation: 725 feet amsl Environmental Settin�: Pasture Soil Tvpe: SfB, Sedgefield sandy loam, 2-8% slopes Nearest Water: Leonard Creek, 75 meters northwest Surface Visibilitv: Poor Field Procedure: Pedestrian inspection and shovel testing (n=12) Cultural Affiliation: Historic (Unknown Subperiod) Site Function: Historic Artifact Scatter Recommendations: Not Eligible, No Further Work Site Description: The excavation of ST 28 near the southeastern edge of the APE yielded two historic artifacts from the uppermost 15 centimeters of the shovel test. The iron object appears to be a piece of agricultural hardware (possibly part of a snaffle or curb bit for a horse harness). Figure 16 shows the artifacts recovered from 31DV749**; a representative photograph of a snaffle bit is shown on Figure 17. The ceramic sherd was a small (20 mm diameter) piece of nondiagnostic utilitarian unglazed coarse earthenware with a brown interior glaze. Delineation shovel testing was conducted at 15-meter intervals oriented parallel to the road within and just outside of the APE. Two adjacent shovel tests (STs 110 and 111) also yielded artifacts. Both positive delineation shovel tests were located outside of the APE. ST 111, excavated 15 meters southwest of ST 28, yielded a tiny (10 mm diameter) brick fragment and a corroded unidentified nail from the plowzone (0-25 centimeters below surface). ST 110, excavated 30 meters southwest of ST 28, yielded a small brick fragment from the plowzone (around 5 centimeters below surface). Table 2 shows the artifacts recovered from 31DV749**. Table 2: Artifacts Recovered from 31DV749**. ST# Strat. Depth Component/ Artifact Description Size N= Comments (cmbs) Category (mm) ST28 I(PZ) 0-15 Historic: Metal (iron) Hardware- 85 1 poss. horse agricultural snaffle/curb bit Historic: Ceramic Unglazed ext./ 20 1 (coarse earthenware) Brown glazed int. ST110* I(PZ) 0-5 Historic: Brick 30 1 ST111* I(PZ) 0-25 Historic: Brick 10 1 tiny frag. Historic: Metal (Ironl Nail-UID corroded 20 1 noss. wire nail *Located outside of APE None of the other excavated shovel tests yielded any additional cultural materials. No additional shovel testing outside of the APE was conducted; however, a visual inspection of the area revealed no surface evidence of a structure or other above ground remains. Soils in the shovel tests in this portion of the project area generally consisted of 25 centimeters of dark yellowish brown loamy sand (plowzone) over 20 centimeters of dark yellowish brown sandy clay loam. "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " farm for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. Sof18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 Yellowish brown clay was encountered at around 40 centimeters below surface. Recommendations: This historic artifact scatter consisted of five non-diagnostic historic artifacts recovered from the uppermost disturbed soils of three consecutive shovel tests (two of which were outside of the APE). An examination of historic maps showed no structures in the vicinity, and no intact subsurface deposits or cultural features suggesting a long-term occupation were recorded. This historic artifact scatter does not have the potential to yield significant information pertaining to our knowledge of local or regional history. The portion of this site within the APE is recommended not eligible for the National Register, and no further work is recommended at this location. Based on the results of the background research and field investigations, no significant archaeological resources are located within the APE for Bridge No. 95 in Davidson County. It is recommended that this project be allowed to proceed without concern for impacts to signifcant cultural resources. Should the boundary of the proposed APE be expanded or moved, additional archaeological investigations may be necessary, as determined in consultation with the NCDOT and/or SHPO per the Programmatic Agreement. ,�i��y�� Lu�� Terri Russ Senior Archaeology Manager Environmental Services, Inc. "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 6of18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 f ;7 �I �i �1:7 �1►[�.Y�J _Y_-1� �17 Miller, Calvin 1910 Map ofDavidson County, Drawn by C.M. Miller C.E., Salisbury. On file, North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/304/rec/14 accessed January 26, 2015. National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 2013 Davidson County Soil Survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture Web Soil Survey. Tabular Data (2014); Spatial Data (2013). http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda. o�v/ accessed January 26, 2015. North Carolina State Highway Commission 1938 North Carolina County Road Sui-vey of Davidson County. On file, North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/2012/rec/18 accessed 29 January 2015. U.S. Bureau of Soils: North Carolina Department of Agriculture 1915 Soil Map, North Carolina, Davidson County Sheet. On file, North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh. "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 7of18 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 , . - ,�. . ,� .•�-. 4 ��+.�y., - � - � ", � . 3 .� �y 1 `/ y' j ' � I� �Vj � +,I/ -K � � ' � / � � r��' 3 1�� !! ,1J7k � �' �'• _ ( ' � 1 j" .t� � � f ; � �j� �„r �� '��,� / 4 + ��j � � �'i* ��. � "'�. � 1 .�:_ � � � � 1., �.'�y� " y/ L� 'a , s w. I v ��i' - �ti I'�� i — T., , . .r - .,� °�., �. i:.. ''J �.. .�.`�,� � i .,t�{� 3..� tt�' m,� °� � • �� . _-�; � � ''' •' .r: � y y. . - � _c--�� .l� � . r r. ' f4tu� �- i /"�-_ � � 5j 1 , ° , ¢ � I .-�-��,I -i�� b.}y�`-�C�� . � �i��l�� v/�I-y� e �,, r � r - 4 _-� ��{ �`'r ,. r� � :� , w . ,� , � � +. -� - ,, � �� : A�fi ! � �i, �y�� +rr r �- -� ` ,. Itt � . �] 1 � �t ��'. t"I i . �r-�lf� ; . . , � f. � � � , � �--'^r'�d � ^ .-->L.iL __ � ... f ..� �p�' �fi� �t�i �y.s1 `5.-b] - �,.� � s4r'�lr�� ..\,f / Y. � � '� I }*� �' �` %" -'P` �� Yr _: . � w`.'� ' ;� '7 J�T t� -� �,� � �, - . ,._ �✓"�'�`" � �, . i . � t �A r �-ri--"+--�'-l�t �- ��-� �,t� 1 '� '3+ + �� '� L _ T � � ��l � I ---, y � � r ` ,, � L 1� '�"i _ ,Gr , J ..,1 .i(-��_ �—i � . 1 �,}Y' � .r '^�v � - '; ,y.- �� ,r�, .^� 15 � -�^ 1 ' \ � J�lf '-}� „� ' T� � �, ay . `•��i,�, �` � /'1` -- --"�� _ Y ,,�.: ,_�� { `� �n ' ��y ��,"� � ,`�� + x + . 4 . . � � _ . �� . A �� r � ' l� _ ' � .: t � r��-. . f . - � • M � � �l •' ' ,,} -� _ -_ -� �- 5 _ , � �' ,. w , , �,,�,i �„ _ J - � � �_ � . . ' ', � J � 'f �Ir ' � / ' , � �`� �, - �Ff �. D�.T�� .. � ` � �- 7' � �:� ,. �� i�� , _ �. '. . .� � . . � �yr - I +[ � . M �� . �- h r� � -, �1. r y {� � (. •�. . i :'� � � \ ;y`"- $ }' . � �ti f�7. , �� Y��i+1: � .,'N F .�I � �,e. � � �' � ! � � A .� aC .�1�11 L��`: �� :�, a1. � •I � � I .�.� '�_� �� °�J�� I�:� �.�.�' ��.r . y.,f'�� p �f1 �J`�''�..�-/ � i '��{,�: � I �' _--��,�•_ 1� 'M1 y _ �� F�'=�`.�r �fJl � �� _ � .'� .. � ..y� �f 1�•�' �� 1 �'� ` '_� y� I , � � I Y y r� � fs�"5 " "�'� - I �� `�I +��-r �'r i � ��"��-R�L�+�IY�- �y }�.i i + --..Y � ;� � '!�, �F� , . u . - �.a.�r-,d- �. 1-'��,�'T�" �� 1 i 49y �-, E �� _ ' , . I L � ( 4 � � �,� ,o �'�� ✓ � "�" ' �i � � I '�Y� . �` 'T l ��` :,,iy '1 � , �'h.ic'R...�-�- '.. 4 _� � arJ I I i . ` �' '4,r`� �'' � � J � . .. � �,�,`1 �� f �� _ �' r • � .� * � 1 F� 4 �-- ��' � ^'��' "` ,` !� ,- `' i' � '��` � "^t + y�. !, '� � �., r' y +. ��;*_ .�'� .�'i �'; � � �� '-✓, BridgP .� � ,��`� r s�"'� '�,1 ' �.w ,,� f�r: .'vt�� I." �.;, "`j �i' No. 95 '� � ;{�' � F � ,; �� J �s`��ro � _ �' � ``,. �� '�"� . ,k�, fi� i � �� ' T� . � t-� � ��, �. rt ' ��; 1� � � �. � � p� �. 0 �'Y' __`� 1 ��1�L `^�� 'r .I'• -� � - ��V.�. .� `� ��+ I �� ,J i ._�. _ �};� � ti Y' � a 4_ "_ -�. J'„�+` ��- . �' .� � ._ ' �� ' � �- I�� _ �ti i ' . ,7� J"'� X ..1 �` ', - %�- '-..� �.! d`�"�. � �..'w � �� f�� I � �a �, ��_ .�- ,,� �� li�� ,.g�" �`y�"�, ._ !- }�'' � �� t .%T � �I �� ` �� ' i�� -'� ' '�a t� � , . �� `?�:.� � _ .. � . �I � k � � �\ � t _ y.'. -_ ' �,�,�/` 1 :�p � .'�..'. �` 4. • �A �' "r` +r',i� . � �� k = - �� . . ' J � r�-'�r� } l . � " 1. _ , ��`.�. � � i Y I . _ �5��. [�'+'.' �.f � �� '� 1 _ I _ � �. T .� �`., _ �. . ` _ Y' _ ti � ' •�,��1 ��p I � � I 16� ��Q� n � }i � r� � . ` �... T `"-,�y � r ..� � � 'b �• �� i 's �. �'. � y ' . � E �#��` .� § - - �� ,� r.1�� _, � �- - _ i �} {• � � �-�� ..� �.�.. � - .i • „�` t?j _ � � ..i '�`ti . i � ,Y �� -��T ! s ` + ' �� - � -��I�. � `�,�—' ! "� � jF� i`f J .�"' f - � �� i `� f �('��; =I �� r (� � - �.�� 1,Y �v / } �, _ � f�C ��L��"�,.'T*'� r• +,%� � k� � i ` r _ny,j / � ' � � , 4,t � -� 'r� � ,f� `� .� _ 7 I� . . ,. ' 14_ �.: � I` � :r, /1 { � ti � f �Y � � � �y, tc, ��. `� �_. �'y � �»� „r' � ci 1 P ir' � � ` � ¢ -. }� � � .� �? ,�^._'�"'h' �li � r � _� � � r� j�'+, w • +--� �=`,1 � : f �. jT r� . , _ 'y� � * , � 's . r R� � � , a+� �t�'" ',i�,,}" r - s -V� ff r-�. � '�j:-s o � 1 ' A �, �=.��' _ ''�{r � r �5 ,. � 3` � ��- - :`a `� {` _ `� _ " i-,;� .il'� �_ � � e.�'•�a'.% � ,`' � �L. ,,�,�� `✓_'��" 1�'' }",• ��y � �+ "�-� �- ��i� _ . �� .� e"'x� jj{`��.� %� �'re+�l � 1 ' �ir a,�4 , �yY ��t :• - ��}} � _ '-� i r t �° ! ' 1.r } �-' . I ` �_,� r' J � - -J - 's`�� V _ � - -+'9�a�,! �1 � �' r� �' jA� - I^� [ � f'4 I � ' . 4,r�}�- � ,. ��••� � _ "» `�� I �.-- . � � � �� V�N � t IL�"�f� �f--yl 1+��^-'t+,�' . . �r f�". � _ -- � � f�r�'P��,, ! 6 . _ � � yy _. 1 irl � �"' ♦ _ '� � 1 �! - i . '� I`-ti � `� . J' ' . : y'3G,�Y ��%�� i � y � _ �-� 1�+'��-� ; '`j . � - � i �. , � :�' :., - ' ' . y - - ;� - I . '. __�� ...�c. 1 I V� � ...� , I � � :, � Proaect Bounciary (APE) � �i i ' . f. � � �~ � } .� .-_ . i. " -. f. �•�' � �� y��] �e 7!� -,, �,Aj - o ior,o za�€r i .�� ' ` �'L�.� i �.�` 1.�`. "''� ij� - � -i"'�''��.. �_ . � I . �v, y� 5';LAy i�- I° I ., + ` V., `' i_ � I +� �F � . I . f Pet � J '� ' - _ �� i ��.��. M �+f ,(„ _' f i � �y, �? -' � T � .!� Source-2071 NamonalGeographic5oeie�ylCSRl.i-ciibed � �� ! � y � seamless 11Si S` quad�anqles [t3enlon, WCI: I�'roJect � {. I �'- � , � BAundn y(fnV dt �i k1y NCC70T. Firl�Jwnrk hy ESI. o_ A 4t�� :�.y+ Ci , , ' - �R,� �h'� � � � 7 �'��'i . � - F+ .r -,° f r � us�ien�_rix�Flsam�ai��,d�nr��ao�msrq�m�sm� '' ; - � 0: {� _ - ' ,. � �1�� r• �� .� �r�� ,�L� � ^� ' Fircnnaona:�i�� }. . . .ry r . � p � ii �, ��n .nm , w. '� �` ��''��! y „-; .JF� sultzm�forlegalo eng'neer�r,�purpoxs �1 ry � .. _ _ _ - 1'; �. !: � . - . � G ; z _Cnovratiht; Figure 1: Project Location (Denton, NC USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangles). NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. sofix "" " `` t�' '� �' ` �� rr �'� �r �� .s � . �r �r`.S _�� ;N „ :� � � � ~.,.��(� , /�''r _ � � � �� . :�� •�pi� .� r,� . �E N� �� - / rT �� y� � •. f�� `_� � � � � �� 3'�'� �;�, "� � •� G��1y' •I �,• " 1 .. '� ,� �'� ��,k✓ 1('�.�. �� ` -i i �� , ,,,, �� i � � . �� Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 �� • ;� !� ,! . ; � _ � N f. ��r ��:� � � � � � � �. �` "�' . �f �, "ST�� ,; `�+ �'� , - �-' r � � : , w � � ��_ :�� ;�" ; - _ � , �µ �, � ;� '', �� ,� . a � = � ta '� ��,,_� ;� i ' '�� ,�y�"�, , , ' r�, , � � ' r +t� ` . `�!' , �•. .+r � � !�. � ;� ` " � ',' '' � • h' - S �' Q� �� + ,� ��" , � ,f� ,� � � ' �'i,.�� , ��r" � '�'`o.�� `�1�541J23�� ' i P � Y . �:� � �� .� - �� ,,s "r; �'�. �' �`�- i� � � �k STQL2� � � . r'' '. . .; ': Yr � � � � �� . • � � � bh a, f �i,, � ; * , , �R� �« .�;�, � �°'�..�- �- - � • X x�� ^ n � i'� ►�., .�"� � ( ` � �r- 1t � . -,.'fi'� � �7' `_ _ . � _ � •� ��~ �1. ' �.:5 I,UZS a R'�M1�l • . ,�.,� -r .H�� . "� ' � ST021 = 4'`'.��','-�� . h'� - :r: } � n ' = �� { . , �/� � � � � f :.,. ` 1+ �� , � • ;� r � �� '�. �' ��,��;r� � �� ,+'�,S SI(11[i ��' y� :. ♦ ;� S�r[720° ^ � r, `�r � � rr � f T , `'� .�' 4. � =�' � �'� .� Y. ic� � ' .. � � �` � � �� ` . , � _ _ ��'A' � ST027 �`.�� i.`'' �,\ ��.' . /':. 1�a� 1� ��a, �► r..• � --:,ST113`� ST112 Sf1D9 STU19` .,, r , , s �+ -?� + _ �� l �� ' � '�� , F � ; .:� S � 4.��T028�, . � _ � T .+` � �. ; l� � r � �� " ''' ' ' ST111 ST107 `" ' ~ � : �# � �� ` �, ��\ � + �°"` �� _ O� � ST7 �0 :� ST116 ST10�� ' ::;� � ., �':J►'ti, •' �n '. �� . $Tll.i .,�� . = L; 31 DV749** �`.�� Projee[ Bound-ary (APEj i� 8hovel Test (Negative) i Shavel Test (PositEve) _e:� Site 8oundary __:� Portion of Site within APE X Not Qug �o ioo ��.: . FPP,1 5aurr.k.r: Hir�h i2esnlutinrr NC 5�atewiAe Dr�thaimagery, ✓'�• GGIA, 2�70; Pro�ecl Bountlary Rrovided 6y NC�OT, FieltlwoEk by E51, � - Discla�imer. f fic information tlepinetl on Ihls fgurc hs. for .. ..rtmalional' �urp�ises oniy anb was noi preparN lrrr, and rs nal �;urtAtile lor ley�l p enginew,rney pinpaho.+. Figure 2: Bridge No. 95 showing APE, Shovel Test Locations, and Archeological Site Boundaries. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 9ofix Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 �f�j ,+�r� , r�'�• � �.�:. � ,,� � �, � 1 " � . 4� 4 IY �%� �',� ! 1'�� %� � �. , � � �A, �• I � X C C�. ��.' +� ��-'' 1 � � } � �� f + � J 1�� r �il �'2:, f �G � c :: f � � . i. Y�` � � � i r � T r� � �� ,� � o rr �. r+� , ' . �, � y�,!� �!1 � +'�"' �' w'�'� q� ; ry�r!� . S �++h' � t�' r �'r�ad ��a`�r- � ��+�� ,� . H !/'r�.!lf:.�-r� � �o w� �' �; . /Y]. y'o � l�� . �� , � � � � � �. �� f`,�'� �" � SR 1835 (Bethesda Rd) � �� +r�ar�L � ,� r�n� s �:��¢tr� �� 1�++"� ��`o�`� � �Y��rr�� '� � � � ` � �. SR 1837 (Bud Sinl< Rd) - '� � �. y�. , �� co �* y� ` d�, /�pProximate Location of APL, ` L� �+ �. P* .J � f%� f� I � � � t,f e� �. r '�'� � � . � S ,� YJ �� • }�� '� � � � �1 . � � �.'� * , �, �r. .. ��' � �' i rl �t �� c�-' � � ,�'f a� c�, I.al<c Lconard Rd (SR 18381 �.� � L,% � - � � �" _ � - �.�r � '� • � � �� . +' n � � � � � 1 ' Rlacic Sawmill Rd ��r-rr �5�l� i � � f,f. 1 � . � } �; , ,,¢ . f rr�1`� � . �st� +�✓ � �.��f � ` .�'t . ,� � lyjrs � I J�` �S � ■ � � �/. +�, v e � , .�. � �f �rk /c � . , .Ess�c Figure 3: 1910 Map of Davidson County showing Approximate Project Area. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 10 Of l8 Project Tracking No.: �14-11-0009 Figure 4: 1915 Soils Map of Davidson County showing Approximate Project Area. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 11 Of l8 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 Figure 5: 1938 Davidson County Map showing Approximate Project Area. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 12 Of l8 . ,�: , ,� . �� a,� �� ,- �� { �� Elevated Roadbed � ' � ""'` t .:�± t�� '�: - a _� <'� "� -�` / ' �' �,_ ! i�,,, `'i . � � �� .f . _ . . . w -- .r,�. � ��_ Project Tracking No.: �14-11-0009 i � .. , t.� (� � � .. I1 ��:�" '{�' [��' � ; t � �';' . �`V � �! j '4f�1 � :[� y � • }�� v� � - t aiitlr,L'.'��s?1.1.� .- i �' . + � � . , , - _ . - . , ., ... .r � ' .'t ' .. - �_ . � � �iJ/ N ! � � � • .. �'. r i��,. M p�. .. � :` g 4� r.i�. F � ' i � .. E . -� � �� i � „ � ;`i v�a .: .r R� A 5i" f�,p �4` Z. -., ti �� 6�y.�`1F ��" .' y' '� .� +°& 3 j.� ` '� � L s Y , �F��,I�f' 7' n � � � � � • �'L ,(�' � Y r'Y.I� 1,4 � �� ,.i�i5' S Y'� yK . � Y N! y � p�,��'� � `�' '�r�'' ^ 'y',� ; � �'il� '�M� �, i 9r, � ty^.�'! �: > �� '�." ..�.; -'F�j: + � ,�i• �' i',�. rr � . t, �..�'�; � �`.�rc �",°�r .1S' '' � J...r° .a-:. �� `� � �T�I y.�;_�. �� ry � � � � 4 , ' i.� � � � ,.,�,.'� �`tp /,?f !S'A yR}y�, �'� �� y� �� t �Y:; �+ fY �� . �1r''��. .'' '"` ��y, ;� is' � � !+�/R '`i1' �*��} � I" fA '�w�►'� �4c y � � � �_ � � 8' y�� ` 1 .Ip+S f+ i t ' �� ✓ 3 �i �y� : k .C. � p, �. fi� a� � ii #+,6� k �fr +r' �A�1 �:' � �!— t" .Yl� /� �p � [s.�,a lY K Figure 6: View of Northeastern Quadrant of APE, facing Northwest. -;� � � ��` � �� `� �- � .+ _�" �.:�� ' � � � ��,� � � �+ "�'� � �:�` '� k _ � � �� ,� � . „- �.- , ,�, �. — �ax- . � —;w�u � i � � .. i�' .s. ..�_z� � ��-. ' �� - - , � } � ,'�, �> ' a� � M s4 � w� '� � ,�� s, r . � �' , � ' �+ ��'�'y �� ,< � � ��9� � � '�r 3= �r � � , , � `� � � r „�� ''t,� b� , ! . `�� :� '� ';� ��a �, � t ��< ♦!'�." � 1�_ e e `� ��: r .p+s.�. - � a _ �a .+' - .�,� . � '�,i �� .. �y � � � a . � i N �" j kC,� ��}f�€� � � �. t�� ` � - j,� !' �Y!V �.-�� . l.�,. .,� 'E �R�^,��E.;��'�.r� �`�,'�r� -. �s-' �,�,. •..,\ � a .��.,.�r �. ,� t�r � . . � . � �, h : / � t. . b . r , � �, ,y`�„ �.. ". �^'�p� - ,; '4y � _ �,ti.'�'e�, �.� .. -, r �$� iiif t`��$ ; �"'.��'. et.�yT�,�� yr. ��5��'}'� y4�,�Jj€.� ,� °'_L'�. .r �,y. ,� ��. ,. �i G tl �. � f � -� !� ��'+"x . S w "c�'��'�Y � � ' Trk'� �S+ .r .. f �,4.. ��h' f�.,�.." a�,ty�9,�� t� N s dk �`' , mr E �i�.P4 �«y '-�'��'3'�inT�. +i� �aAb,r�i.,��"'�'�� r 9��r � � � �� t � ' . � � ' y +� r ��`�� '�" -�� ' �a�„'.� � Cr"�' c' `'�' "� je ,�:�'F "._ -�.,�,�..� �. �� „ �.�� p s, ,. � .� w . . _s -�.'� S� *� �' ,t�=i',4.� � `� � �,+ i � 4 �'= - '� � - �. - __ - <"- - .: : '�a`!,:e'3iFa'''y��" - 1�.� •� `F.�" - ,rs . .� , +�. Figure 7: View of Bridge No. 95 from Northeastern Quadrant of APE, facing Northwest. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 13 of l8 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 ., _ �' `, , � �-_ � A � � , � � � � ' �,. -`� � , � � ,�,r ��' w ,°� � -� ��.< � �, � __.�,� -�-� � �� ° , � � � � , , . � w�,�•+ - ��, k C, ,.. �' f � '� a` y„ : Y' `yW. �' 1 � 6 � `� �� {��, � - M 3 I r � . .�2�ji'� `� � 1 '�.,7 ' ; f'-_ �° �, � y '�i '�'' '�'� � � :�: `� i � � `•�. 1 � -1Ur.4 f�; . . .^. ! ., • � ti i i ��' 'a. .,' " � � f h � �.y, {� .,, . . . F � i ( � � it' . S' y� �j��'' `" :.'� �f �1 �"� � �y °" � y�-� �f � �, �� - ��.'�4 �� i � ,� a r t � � �- J " ^N �� ° �i� ��, . _ _ �_�`. 7 � � r�� .) - �� Sii�� i�� r . � r ,,, : � L� �� ` A f � J �`� -_-' _�-.�� -e-- . / � � r�� 4 •�> �: _� ��-'� .. - ��..w� ��'. �r-"y < _.�- ,�.�- ��, � � .. -�. �� . ^.;,�` ,� � ... ' _ � �: _. �• �_, � � '�-"" " � .�.a►+- �,�,,�. I � , a. � P��..- �' ,.�)rr.i ��.�P=� - '� �� ..�� . Figure 8: View of Northeastern Quadrant of APE, facing North. ,► � � � � � + ' } � �� . � � � � --t� ' i, �� - � fi� --�' � , � � ; J� ,', f�'. .'} ` .x �� \. � \ � �', �� ;�� ., , � � � ` �,.r ` . �y,._- r „ x '�� , f, '� � $� + �� w, � +�` �+!r `� ' �1 � �.i ��' �4 � , �' 4 }r e� � 't `, _ '� ll`��r � ` �� ("7 ^� ', � v� ��' _ I { � �,'. j � � 's -,� �` - , � , ,- } d� , � , � `� i f f o � f r � E � � � � � .� , � ' '�' �-�" I`a; �- , 5 � P?/ ., � � �� 4 r, L_,' � 4 -� ;E ��,`� i�' 1 7..�? �� !�� a� f�� f��, �.. if ; e�4 � �'. �� P .F<�' �4f }�(, r, . �.,� � � - �'��'f�%��i�'»', � �yya.i � it d � � S �'��! � -�-.`, � �! '. ��:�.r �. �.. ��.. �,t ,:�R� a4 � -�� _ - +'��° �. ''��'ti� ��p �' �.. �° �t �".. ..� p _ —_ __ �;.��iiy` p •I �� `� '�{�� ; 'Y��•�� I .� . � . ,. _ _ �.- r .M . .-- _ �- _ � , . � � 1 . . -.. ��6i '� �fy�,"� n,,._ � '�i: A ♦ �✓ . � a } 4�^Ffi�9" .'.� . Lix ... - k.�. _.� �..�, � r,�ra�µ� _ � . ....- . . _ L . _ � fJ ` ,��` �.<�� 7 'y . . � �� s � �. - �:� , � - =�- , � r. �:::: .� i � - . _ . . . {'..' . ��. . %�. '� .. Figure 9: View of Northwestern Quadrant of APE, facing Southeast. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 14 of l8 Figur� Project Tracking No.: �14-11-0009 . \ . b _,'. � � � ,�j Ir1' � ., fJ� �! � :':7 .. ..�� ,� r� � �, ,�.�:.,,.;,� � , � �T w F � .. ��.. � r �1�y ,.5� / I � ' - - k�`� -g•�' . ._. � r� ,k �� 7"F� �/ � �l� � � �'.�' .➢ .{4 ""—�. ,� � �,, r ,,� - . , : � } i, �- � .__ <� � `'.�, � " �Ft � ._ �; .- f— , ... V� r v �^'" ', i t 3 ,- ¢ ,,�r � � _ '� i `, �' � i . � � � � 4 � � � ' '`)�/,�„��'- ' i ,�� . w � � � � � �• Z� u, r . �, '" f !� � 14 . / �/ } �,s , ,� � f % 'k G 'L /'� I � I , 1 -�, �" `� Q{ ,� _ � _ ' I� � � �. : �Y� j' k:��.' ; �I� �f��r,i -.��`��.�1--.`r.�:-_ k � � � � e f I ' rr �' 'ti� " � � � ,� a � " I � � � { �� y Z��°" " � ` _ — > �,# � , a �, y r [ � , � "f � ; ,�i± k' p�`,� � + i: , I � � � �� "• e,.r �I�` � . ,o., � � f�� fe. IIt i� � W � y� `- l,�� e 4 �+ �- .-r-� _y: " I � �'g� � � �J" �� .� � = I '� � �j �b '. 9 � „_ � � - �� N , ii �, r • s" a� ' ' ,� m �r ' _ � t n � 1 � f� � � �,�r � ,..I � d.-��r Y M �µ + � '�y } ��'� f�-�� . � _- ) �. j �� ' � ��->�� .�1_ �� E � � � l,,.yjr Y �y 1 ! ,` � " � * � Y i�y 7d � f . � �1 i!,��/y� � �_ �� a t !`►f 1if � �' ui' ;.L,�.•.!! - � a�4` a� � � �' - _ � ' . � ,� , _ . . . � y � ,�,,;,,� a , �- � ' �.� �. , � �:. , � � � �� , � t { :� ,� � }�� ° -� ;. �-`'' �". ' ' 1a� a ' : �- < ��.;N.� .: -. ,�E � v ,f • � �, � � ,. �, •�.�� . •-� � w ,''��• °` � +'�.. '� c� �-,� 4�,. .� �, � Y i e ,� �� ` .�- - - }, , � � # . , . _ 1� �4 � � ' . �.- - �� Figure 11: View of Southwestern Quadrant of APE, facing Northwest. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 15 Of l8 heast. Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 ,. '�- ,, ,1� y' � i � ,� �,�'�� +h ` , � *� � r �: " / � � l' r-"� 4 ti. .� R M �' �`' � ti � �' �i� X �� °� � r . F�� I_ V'', I �,��'��_� ^� .�„ �'�� :��,�. � � ��'. ' �. ,'-+R: �� r 1.� � ` �� •'. V ;; f . . k � �" . �1��. M ' �� r r ' � `� � � � � 1 :?7 I�_ . q. ,� t � .s 6 I i � , � �2 • � .k��. �, z, .. . . � K � .. a:��_�.' � _ . ' - . . _ _' _. � rs '.. - �` . . e � ` � . k. �;�'� ' � _ : � "-�.. �>�, .�. ,� . — � ��, - _ �s,.•' _• ,.� - . ' k � � �,p �- ' � . ".�_ � ." �.��. ` 'i e� � L'y�s.�'� _�, y__A� "'�,Y�a ' ,: ,��,�'�' '�'�+� a .`�"`n'� " M' ; rn . Mlt ^M, A a'",�4_ �. -- .... �" - � �u°Sa �y_�� • � `rr- :ti: . .3s"�'^ - �..t-'�. ,u'- _ .+i` + - ��. I � rc, r+'" . 5 r :, p � � ,� r; 0 - -. S*�.�. 1!'w " yr � .''i +1„� ° ,'�- vj _ � � � ,-. .�:y ti !. � . A y a . +" - t + w..� w' 1.;'T , y � '" � , �}' ,� � �� # � M � � . . 4 � �� . f 4 . %�� x �. ; ,�� Y �� -�� -#�i �X {r..�� .- , A.?l.��r� < �- ,��,�.,,�„ror ti , .i,° ... �, � y„e ��- ^. +y�3c e ._. .� .. ��$..� a�.�. . � �*i�i.� . � . -�� S,�",.. ,''�. � - a'r' .,�'3,� _" h#-4 Figure l3: View of Eastern Half of APE, facing Southeast. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 16 Of l8 Project Tracicing No.: 14-11-0009 Figure 15: View of Elevated Roadbed in Southeastern Quadrant of APE, facing Southeast. NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 17 Of l8 Project Tracking No.: 14-11-0009 _,,; ,�. ,� `� �-,, , - - ,;�. .h ':� � ST28 ST111 Figure 16: Artifacts Recovered from 31DV749** Figure 17: Example of Snaffle Bit (Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coppermouthedbitjpg#mecliaviewer/File:Copper•mouthedbitjpp� NO NATLONA! RF,GISTFR ELIGIBLF. OR LISTF.D ARCHAF,OLOGICAL SITF,S PRESENT OR AFFF,CTED" �orn2 for Minor Trmis/�ortation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 18 Of l8 k li�;l 1'+t'�tti' North Carolina Department of Transportation .`7� L I 71't 1�1 V�id�f'� . .. Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 19BP.9.R.62 TIP No.: SF-280095 County(ies): Davidson Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 19BP.9.R.62 TIP Number: SF-280095 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 10/29/2015 NCDOT Contact: Contractor I Designer: SEPI Engineering and Construction, Inc. Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 1025 Wade Avenue Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Raleigh, NC 27605 Phone: 919-707-6711 Phone: 919-747-5839 Email: cail ncdot. ov Email: ahowell se ien ineerin .com Cit ITown: Near Lexin ton, NC Count ies): Davidson River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.07 Surrounding Land Use: Agricultural / Rural / Light Residential Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.4 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 10' Travel Lane with 4' Paved Shoulders - Normal Crown 2@-9' Travel Lanes with Minimal Grass Shoulders - Normal Crown Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 600 Year: 2025 Existin : 240 Year: 2013 General Project Narrative: Replace Bridge #95 in Davidson County with 2-Barrel Cast-In-Place Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (RCBC). Minimal roadway improvements required at existing/proposed (Description of Minimization of Water crossing as described in the typical cross section descriptions above. Stream impacts due to culvet and channel improvements are approximately 120 Linear Feet. Quality Impacts) Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Leonard Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 12-119-8-(2.5) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply III (WS-III) Supplemental Classification: CA Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: N/A NRTR Stream ID: N/A Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) I h,iy!]1�'�31' North Carolina Department of Transportation � �3 �kUJ"1]��tii3tf C i Highway Stormwater Program � �.; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN — (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 19BP.9.R.62 TIP No.: SF-280095 County(ies): Davidson Page 2 of 2 Bridge to Culvert Avoidance and Minimization Proposed Structure Summary Sheet No. & Station Sheet No.: 4 Station: 13+37 Number of Culverts: 2 Drainage Area (ac or sq mi): 5.61 Sq. Miles Culvert Width/Diameter (ft): 12 Surface Water Body: 1 Leonard Creek Culvert Height (ft : 8 Culvert T e: Cast-In-Place RCBC 4 Sided Culvert Length (ft 49 Avoidance and Minimization Efforts: Minimal Change to existing footprint and profile / 2:1 fill slopes used / Minimal channel improvements required to tie back to existing (Bridge to Culvert) Stream Slope Fish and/or Aquatic Life Passage Existing Average Stream Slope (°/a): 0.39 % Existing Low Flow Channel Dimensions 10 FT Base - Low Flow Channel (+/-) ; 1.5:1 Proposed Culvert Slope (%): 0.39 % in the Stream: Side Slopes ; 5 FT Depth Culvert Burial Proposed Culvert Burial Depth (ft): 1 FT (RT Barrel) / 2 FT (LT Barrel Existing Streambed Material: Sand / Small to Medium Rocks / Small Boulders Proposed Low Flow Dimensions 12 FT Low Flow Barrel Width Through the Culvert: Proposed Sills/Baffles: 1 FT Sill (RT Barrel - Both Sides) / 2 FT Sill (LT Barrel - Both Sides) Existing Low Flow Velocities in the Stream (ft/s): 8.1 fps (10-yr) ropose ow ow e oci ies roug the Culvert (fUs): 7.5 fps (10-yr) Alternating Low Flow Sills/Baffles: Sills provided as described to the left - no baffles proposed (no meandering low flow channel to retain) Culvert/Stream Alignment Stream Patterns Upstream and Downstream Relatively straight alignment in vicinity of culvert / Some amount of riffle-pool pattern observed in profile / Banks relatively stable / City Lake of the Culvert that Could Affect Fish downstream likely to have greatest impact on fish passage (no anadromous fish) Passage and Bank Stability: Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, culvert outlet falls relatively close to an existing pool that will be impacted by channel improvements. Culvert slope based upon floodplain slope pools, glides, etc.): and slope b/w riffles in stream profile. Low Flow Floodplain Bench Required? Yes Left barrel will function as floodplain barrel - not designed to carry flow during base flow scenarios but necessary for flood flow (provide justification) scenarios to prevent rise in ws profiles upstream Sharp Bends at InIeUOutlet? No Culvert well aligned with existing stream (describe culvert alignment with stream) Stream Realignment Necessary? (provide Yes Minor channel improvements required - see Culvert Survey Report in Plan View justification) Bank Stabilization: Minor Channel improvements required - see Culvert Survey Report in Plan View Outlet Velocities Natural Stream Channel 2-yr Velocity (ft/s): 5.09 Natural Stream Channel 10-yr Velocity (ft/s): 8.1 Proposed Culvert 2-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 5.27 Proposed Culvert 10-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 7.5 Roadway Geometric Considerations Evaluate/Describe Roadway Geometric Constraints: Proposed roadway geometry generally matches existing - Bridge replacement is primary reason for project. •� See Sheet �-A For I ndex of Sheets See Sheet �-B For Conventi onal symbols See Sheet �-C For Survey Control Sheet _ TO JOE SINK RD. (SR 1835) THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO 0 � J� �� J��`�_�� -� ��J�!� ;._1�� LOCA TI01�: REPLA CE BRIDGE 1�0. 280095 O VER LE0I�ARD CREEI� 01� SR 1838 (LAI�E LE0I�ARD RD. ) TYPE OF WORI�: GRADI11tG, DRAI1�lAGE, PA T�I11tG A11tD STR UCTURE BEGIN PROJECT -L- STA. 11 + 65.00 EXISTING WATER LINE � DUKE POWER P42 19 OWER THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 13 + 23.53 � PROPOSED WATER LINE � ,z _W— — —� �x— x � , - _— � x � x x F iXo�Pow�AER \ ✓ / � \ X � END CULVERT -L- STA. 13 + 50.47 IL �Z�, WL _ ,� � _�_ � � � END PROJECT -L- STA. 15 + 30.00 �F �� —�/ 1X ` LAKE LEONARD RD. r (SR 1838) rn X �' , z • D � O c� � rn x rn � X Y X ` PERMIT DRAW NG SHEET OF 6 TO R��c,E RD �SR � 813� ��,�� ,�� ][�� IV�°1C �T�]G ]��lE$ ]E8 % W .s��(��[JI�I°ll°I�N � �� d�� Pre,00red in tne office of: HYDRAULICS E1VGI11tEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH � 1025 Wade Avenue E P I Te1999� 89-99605 ADT 2 013 = 240 E N G I N E E R I N G & Fax 919-789-9591 50 25 0 50 100 LENGTH OF ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.9.R.62 = 0.064 MI � C 0 N S T R U C T I O N License C-2197 0� �o�p�y � 0 DHV = 11 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.9.R.62 = 0.005 MI 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �Q� g`�oQ PLANS TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT 17BP.9.R.62 = 0.069 MI BEN CRAWFORD, PE P.E. � � 2 O � O O 2 O 4O = PROJECT ENGINEER SIGNATURE: w� � T 6 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: a � V= 55 MPH JUNE 2, 2015 ROADWAY DESIG11l �' � * � o HE D sr COPPNE RPE E111GI11tEER �� Q PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) TTST = 3 DUAL 3 J �' o � °� `� G°3 p��'Q l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LETTIIIIG DATE: LOCAL JUNE 2, 2015 VIRGINIA MABRY PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER PRIORITY PROJECTS UNIT P.E. SIGNATURE: PROIECT REFERENCE NO. � SHEET NO. ENGINEER � ENGINEER � � � � � 1025 Wade Avenue Raleigh, NC 2i605 C Te1919-789 9977 ENGINEERING & Fax�.919-789-9591 C 0 N 5 T R U C T I O N Llcense: G2197 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 6 DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � • � �� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ `IV'ETLA�VD P'ERIVIIT �IUIPACT SUMMAF�Y WETLAND IMPACTS SU'RFA�E WATEI� IMPA�TS Hand Existing Existing Perm�nen� Temp. � Excarratian Mechanized Clearir�g Perman�nt Tem�. �hannel +�har�nel Natural Site St�tivr� Struc�ure Fill� In Fill In in Clearir� in �1N S1N Im act� Im acts Str�e�m � � � N�� FromlTv} Size l Typ� W�tla�nds Wetlands 1Netlands ir� VVetlands Wetlands im�acts im��cts Perm�nent Temp�. Qesign �� f�� ft� �� 1 13�+3� -L- � a� ��FX1 �' RCBC U.� � 51 BA�� TABILIZATI�N U.U� � �Q.�� 73 ��6 T�JTALS*: C�.�3 � �.�1 � �4 26 Q *i�Q�r�ded totals are sum of �ctual impacts I� C`iT�ES : Revi�ed 2013 10 �4 --• ..........................•------............----........----•-•----...,..,........,..........................,...........................,..---•-r------.._s__..------------------------------------------------ _.-----------•_........_._......_.._....._.. _...............__........__... -------------,----._.._._....p...............................____,.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AD'�#TIC7hiA�. �h�F�RMATIC)I� AN� �CCJIVIPUTATI+C]NS S1TE DATA �, , �� 5.fa1 SQ.MI. STR�AdvA STA�S REGION 1 QLIA� MAP MI�WAY � �� ' [)rainage Area ., Sourc� ... � � . - , . ..,..._._..� ........................ ...._---.-...---------------------------.__.._....,--------- ; � � �ULVE�tT SURVEY & HYC)R►AUL�C QESIGN REPC)RT Da = 5.61 SQ. Mi. � i��er Basin YA[?KIN�F'EE-DEE Charatter RURAL PiEDM�NT : �� ......................------------___-----------------------------------•--------------------------------------------------------- • -_.._.....................---...._,....... ...---'W�III: WATER +SUP�lY III• CA I�JUEX NO,12-1i9-8-2.5 'N C � ARTMENT 0� TRAN5PC�R�'ATl{31� � : � � , WI; . . ' � f � � , 01�1{510N �F HfGH4VAYS • S#reom Classificatian 5uch as Traut, �-li h Qualr Waier etc. r ...........................................................................................---._......_..._.....__...-------------- � 4 s �► . l -----...._�_---------- ---------------------- ' � � ; HYDRAULICS UNiT . RUF't�L ItCbG�t c�nc� VAtLEY-PIEC?Mf}N� �E�na F�s ; L3ata on Existing 5tructt�re 1@ 26` �N� 8�NT5. TfMBER +CAPS 8� PIL�S �CC]NC_ ENCAS�D ; ,`�j ; RALEIGH, N. C. ......... --------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ .................._------------._._...............--=•----......_.._...._._._........--_--------- SIR 2049-5158 ; . �b� n� ; � Total Waterwcry Upernng 165 ,�.f. Waferrvay Upening Be1av►r �i]Oyr. INS E�.------........s.f. ' ............... ,. ............................................................................... ................................................. . . � fl.b, � . . � Q'o= 398 �DA) - 1,153 CFS (SAY T,204 CFSj QiD = 1,Dqi� CFS ; Debris Patential: Low [] Mc,�erate [gl High C� ; �; �.D. No.__ 5F_28(]095 _ Pr��eci� No. ........ 17BP.9_�y62 ...,.... _. �. STA, 13+37 -L- . Pra' S#atian -------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � , � llPS7REAM - DAVI[35SJ�1 #361, � a��5'-6" TiM�ER p�CK C1N 1-BEAMS; w, °�°°6 Dato on �atrucFures Up and Down Stream C ' �'�' Gt2�= 537 (DA) - 1,527 CFS (SAY 1,5[DQ �FS] ' . ........................... tru, Na.,... .... ..................................•---•-----.._._..-----•----------•-------- � �AV11�S�N LEC3NAR�] CREEK g 495 . u-> ; Cc�un#y 5trearn , � . Q„ --------------------------- ............... .. .....-- --.. -------------------o.s�----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ; TIM6ER CAPS & PiLES. �NL7TE: PRC}P�QSEQ 1@ b�' �� PCC5 NE1N L�QCA1'IQt+� LlrS); DOWNSTREAlVI -��TY LAKE [7f�M Q�o= �61 aA - 1 8fi{? CFS 5AY �,90{} CF5 ' ` '� � B t y . t } Q5� = 1,910 CFS .....................•----•---•------•-----------................_.. ------------------------......__......... --------------------- � • SR 1838 !.AlCE LEC]iVARD RD 5R �8i3 S 1835 -----------------`--------------'....-----......._.........,.._......4.......W.o............_..........._.,�a.'-'...,........._o..... fY.54d �,an` �76 jDl#] = 2,1tS1 CFS �SAY 2,24i} CFS} qi0fl 2,3f�fl +CFS �USE�3) ----------•------------------�.----....�..._....-------------_._..�---------- 0_589 - 8'91 (DA} � �,4bi� CF5 {5AY 2,54Q CFSj _... �?:.,.......... .-----_._----------------_.__-------------------------------------------------------------------------- � 0 5�3 �Q =�,q72 {C�A) = 2,93� CFS (SAY 2,90U CFS} C�500 3 58U CFS -- �P4-------------------...._..._..........�_._..._.._.._-_------_......_..........._._....._ - ..__:..---------._.-•-----•--------- [1Q4% REGI�N 1} FEMI� aISCHARGES FRI7M R:S 237U� i� R5 25dU4.4 NC}TES: F�MA DISCHARGES FR+C)M AVAII�ABLE HEC-2 DAT,A llSEa FOiR hAC►A M�t7Et5� 51R 20fl9-5158 C)1SCWA�tG�S US�D FOR NCDC3T MU�7ELS E}CCEPT F�R Q10+D (�EAAA�. ..............""""""_"" "' _� ___'.""_"'_"".""'."""'.."""""""'.._._,.....�.. _ _... OVERT�PPING DESCHAR�E IS APPfCUXiM►4i�LY Q50D (SIR 2�}Q9-5158j. A RE,DEL NEATED HEC^2 STUDY. THE N11CR£}FICHE PRINTO�T AVAILABLE REPO�TS SQME I.E�NARD CR��K tS I hJEGATIVE SUR�HA32G�5 IN THE �FFECTiVE FLOODWAY RUN. NOT ALL RlVER STATIONS ARE LISTED ]N THE F6S FLO(3I] STUDY 7ABLE5. KNOWN WA7ER SURFACE ��V,AT10N5 FROlN T�dE HEC--2 PRIN�OUT �AOJUSTED FDR THE CF�ANGE IN VERTICAL QATIIMj WERE USEQ AS THE PRt?FILE SP€CIfIC DOWNSTREAM B�UNaAR°Y CONDITIQNS �t]R 7HE CQ�RR�CT�D A�1VD REVIS�D HEC-RAS N1+�D�iS. TH� FACT+aR USED TO C[]NVERT El�EVA7iOMS C��FERENCE�b TC3 NGVC] Z9 TC3 NAVD 88 IN bAYtaSUN CdUNTY IS -0.74 FEEf (S�� DAY�DS�hJ COUNTt' FLt3�D INSUIt�NCE 57UDY, VQLUME 1 QF 4, bATEC] MARCH lb, 2�Y09). b�SICyN F+OLLOWS SUBREGaQNAL TIER GUI�7'�Llhl�S. TH�S PR,�.IEGT COM�PLfES 1NITH LOCAL fLL]Oa PLAIN MANA�,EMENT REGULAT1c3NS. NQ S�RUCTURES W�LC BE AOY�kSELY INIPACTE� BY THlS PROJ�CT. ��S1GIV IhhPROVES EXl5TING L�VEL Q� SERVICE. Ga � Stcs#ion hlv. . ............. ................ P�riod �f Rectirds _� � ------------------------------------------ -yrs. Max. [?ischarge ................. .......... c.f.s I�ate - - Frequency - - Historico# Flavd #nfarrnation: '�+'�4TER ON l.QW STEEL - BRIDGE N�T KN+OWN TQ DV€RTOP __ __ �_ MIKE WI�SOhf, DAVID5t3t� C4�lNTY Peria� of Date_..._.----.. �lev......_...�t.Esf. Fre�. -------.yr. Source BRfpG� MAihtT�NANCE 5�UPERVI50R Knowledge...��...yrs. .......................................... Penad of Uat�...... .._.. Elev�.._... ...3t. Est. �req. .... ._.yr. Source ................... ..................... Knawleclge -- ----Yrs. Allowable HW El�v. _Nl�+WIAII�__ORIMFR�Y�1�vr_L�IE�_OF_SERYJ��....ft. I�orfinal 1Nater Surface Ele�r. .----_746,4----_�. Manning's n: Leff C}.B. __4.055 ... Char�nel _.�_�.��.. Right 0.8. _�_055 _ Jbtained Fram FEMA IFIELD OBSERVAi'IOM Flaod 5#u�y /Status __IN F�MA Df7A,�LE[7..FLQ!Q:C3..�T�dDY--------• F�oodway �sta6lisheti,YES�.MAR._2009 . �., . ... With 1Nithe�ut Flvod S�udy ] q0 y�-. [3ischarge ---�,-�� . c.f,s, � W5 E�ev.: F�aodway _. �:�.gig. _ _...ft. Floociway -- �18,(i #f, @E##ective Ri�er Station `�b20U �i„ []E�aIGh� DATA •��nn FIS PROFiiE, ws�� nsov� �� ssoo9s APPRQ?I. FIAT TO RS 2G200 - GL05ESf RERC3RTED 1N5€L UPSTREA,M {]f LAKE [�L)NARD ROAD Hyc3rolagical Nlet�ad �i,�GS REGJS�NA4.��xBE�t�k�l.�.Q�lA71S?N�.�4R.��1i��.5258.LRU{�44lRE�ai?i�!_7i.+�_fF.�AAA_R�iAIt.STl�f?Y Hydraulic i]esign Method _ HEC-RAS V. 4.1.� /Leonard Creek MO�A.pr� Design Tnilwater � Q,� ---- �=,-----�� '�zs ---r=� ---�-: QSo_-- �=�---�-rC�,00 --- $=�----�-: Gt�,ofl ------'�-�------�. Inlef Contrfl! Dufle! Coniroi Sixe & Type (c.f�.s.j K e HW,�U �{�� dc �� 2� ha }i ES� �� }• Remprks �� Is a Fiaod�nray �te�ision Req�rired2YE5� �(�.50: DECREASE1MUA,2B Total Proposed Waterway �,pening ..... 204.......s,f C3utle# Velc�ci#y (V10} -----------7.5 -------------f.p.s. I�latural Channel Vefacity {V'�o} ..----•----.--8.1-----------f.�.s. Ftequ��-�d C?utlet Prote�tion �LA55 '11' RlP �A,P ir��a�.nna,z�or� Ya sE s�owN oti p��s W5 El. Taken � �iver Stption �5246.5 D�sign: discharge __..145DD..... c.i,s. Frequency.----------�� ------- Yr. ��v. ....-------714:1 ..._------�- Base Flood: Discharge �,3dU_�FEMA), �.f.s. Frequersey,.._..._..��Q yr_ Eteu. 716�.38 �t. C?ver#npping: �isc#�arge ..._?�qL�Q�---• �-f.s, �requencyr.---......5Q4-------- r. Elev. 718.2�� .... �t. Y ..............a.... ---- "` �T ELEVATiZ]N �RC]M �IEC-f�4S MQ�EL co � On Highway-------------- ------•--- ' etw��n ._............._........ and ._..................--------•---------.. N ----- � 'L' P�t�POSED � 12'x]Q` RC�C GAST IN PLACE w/TpP �QGE SEVEL �4[�ID WINGWA�LlS 'v�. Recamm+ended Structure __...._.. ...�----------------- �� ......... .............. -----........-----------_------------------- � -•------------------------------------- F' 1'�4_'_SILL IN, LC3W F#.OW RE�H_` �ARRE�,• 2`-4�" SiLL IN �LC3�?D�IAIN LEF'fj BA�iREL �..............•�---.o.�.o......- ---------------- ' --..._..._... � I; � � Recvmmended Widih of I�vadway_. 2_� _14' TRAYEL LANES Z8' CLEA6t ROADWAY Skew ._.._63_ D�G. �; ...........:..............w..-----.... ------....... . '°°' Recommenc��d i.acafior� is �Upf�Dnwn Stream from Exisfin Crossin N� � � J 9�•------------------------------ � ---... �.�= Statewide Tier ❑ Regtonal Tier ❑ 5ub-R�gi�nal Tier � � � Bench Mark �s ._...._.$�. �..1,741_b7�RT C]F -L� STA. 15-�33.26----------------------------------------------------- . . cv = •o : --------------------------------------------------------------------- E e'v. ...?:1�JQa.�..ft. Clcttum: NAVD $$...,,,_ �. � °' ; Temporary Crossing --- ES N�T ,REqUIR'�DL C3FFShi"E_ pE%OUR AVAII.ABLE c:, ---------- -._...._..._Fy------------------------------------------------- ra°• ; �- , � _ �. ' � F'� ,� ,�� t A` `�ti,, � � 1, ,, � � o •,., � � �j ,- � � :,,. , ,� �'� �' �- = '�• ..t r � �; � ' " . ,. � r-_� � ��' ,r � ��,� t � � ' � ' 'o �� •` " ��,. �� - -�� a ;-.:y � 4�� 4 � ,�� ' _ r, r�� ; ss _ _�� ' t � " � .. ` �.:. ��` '�� '� , . �" r� � . - N. ,r, �;" . "�. N i � <� -� -- _ _ - v � '�.�.��" _ _ _ --�`y'' ` ..= . "_ ^`. ` `. :, � � �_. _ � Y � H �._ , �� '� "� 0 F - V� , � y 1 a' y, `�':• �,'� . � � `� , s, R � . y ��.�� .� . . e�r .r � '� � � u°1 � � . :4 � �--� - ..:er�� ,- : . • � c I Gh . � . �j �+ti'_ v c� ; ;� � _ - - . Z >m�.. � . ^I'• � . � ;�� ._.... , K _ �4�± .� V �� . JF. . , t . : '�. ��. � � ' �!►t . j�::,� — � ; ; . ��y ` .. ' G �� F- _M1� I � ��. �� ,�' �+ , 1 � � � ''� f ~ I � �� , ' �P =�:.� . `�I/,�'✓' � � • ; �:- `a'=i'`� r- • � ,f � �. . _ �....�-+2 . .. _z;�-- _. _��'�=�y_p!�s� �' -_�..�. � ` Desi ned b ��'! �NGIPlE�RING & �C3NSTRUCTlQhIE INC. 9 Y= --- . -- - ------------- �Assis#ed by: PAE3L SHE�ARD Projeet Engineee ; ANDR�W . FiUW�CI� P.E;- -----. �� .._ j� -� --- - - - -- Reviewed by: .......... . ......... . .. ...L��.. _..� o�� io-�s-�� SEP1 Engineering 9� Consfrucfian, trvc. 1Q25 Wad� Avenue Raleigh, hEC 276U5 414-789-4977 i.yr. hJo.: C-3147 ►•+'��..��R��'��i, C7 .• �p�a� �, 5 s �,�� j �' �unc�ssi�: . ; -� Q��{�i ��'�'��``�� ,�� . i��,.�Q �ti�. �Slr.�'� lIV4 � _.�►*�� in,�aslzo�� { �� .�. : - ;. PAT MCCRORY DONALD R. V:�1�w:' DER VAART s��,. _. hi�tigatian S�ervices ENVtRONHENT4L QUALITY November 7, 2016 Ms. Amy Euliss NCDOT Division 9 Environmental Officer North Carolina Department of Transportation 375 Silas Creek Parkway Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27127 Dear Ms. Euliss: Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter: Division 9 Project, Replace Bridge 95 on SR 1838 (Lake Leonard Road), Davidson County; WBS Number 17BP.9.R.62 The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on November 4, 2016, the impacts are located in CU 03040103 of the Yadkin River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Yadkin Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.) 03040103 Non- Coastal Cp Cold Cool Warm Riparian Zone 1 Zone 2 Ri arian Marsh Impacts � p 51.0 0 0 0 0 0 (feedacres) *Some of the stream and/or wetland impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details. This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2016 impact data. DMS will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, Ja�es . Stanfill Cre ' anagement Supervisor cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Mr. Dave Wanucha, NCDWR — Winston-Salem Office Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA File: SR 1838 — Bridge 95 — Division 9 State of Nor[h Carolina Environmental Quality � Mi[igation Se�vices 1652 Mail Service Center � 217 W. 7ones Sh�eet, Suite 3000 � Raleigh, NC 27609-1652 919 707 8976 T