The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160965 Ver 1_Additonal Information 111016_20161110N Som SITES cay � q a �0RPo A92 OARS RaAd (not to scale) SETBACKS FRONT- 25' SIDE- 10' REAR- 25' HOUSE COMPLIES LEGEND EIP- EXISTING IRON PIPE CP- INACCESSIBLE POINT IN POND R/W- RIGHT OF WAY NSF- NOW OR FORMERLY BOUNDARY LINES OTHER LINES LABLED AS SHOWN N/F SKINNER Raw • • 30 •• •• GRAPHIC N 42D50'00'IE 36..15'-- . g EIP 4 c F O io to 0) d - n N/F SKINNER (TOTAL) Ox N W — Z Z W Q PLL N 10 n LL In Z d' deck IlA„'. COV w coo ea envyy I EK, TPA, gravel 1 drlvewaY I `. EIP I -- a/w S 35000'005 w 97.27' `Y� ACREAGE 0 HARBOR DRIVE 12269 SOUARE FEETpyu� (COORDINATE METHOD) ` R�� 601 R®�Y NOTE: AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ACREAGE �Cn �� INSIDE PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY, (HARBOR DRIVE) �`• (PAVED, PRIVA7Ej PUBLIC WATER 5 SEWER t`Q' _ _ — aiW - --_- �P------ - R W — SOUTHWESTERN MOST CORNER OF BRIGHT LOT DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 1037, PAGE 944 REFERENCE DEED BOOK 1658, PAGE 801 DEED BOOK 1280, PAGE 910 DEED BOOK 811, PAGE 777 SURVEY FOR Ir UONILa R. HELM. A PpqFE9910RAL LAMP SURVEYOR. CERTIFY RICHARD MADAMS ,NAT T'13 PLAT tWIFOUR ,O THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE PCA LANG PRECISION AC IN NORTH ISCAROLINT AND THAT THE RATIO a A n C' E E IE ' 1I� A A r% A R A e% LAND AS PURVEYING IN NORTH IS INA R D THAT u m— O O �\ 1 ' {� ESI /� 1 ,, E ONE TORY -0" FRAM DWELLING 12y.�}�- ON ILINGS _ woo deck 13.5' 5r N _ Ox N W — Z Z W Q PLL N 10 n LL In Z d' deck IlA„'. COV w coo ea envyy I EK, TPA, gravel 1 drlvewaY I `. EIP I -- a/w S 35000'005 w 97.27' `Y� ACREAGE 0 HARBOR DRIVE 12269 SOUARE FEETpyu� (COORDINATE METHOD) ` R�� 601 R®�Y NOTE: AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ACREAGE �Cn �� INSIDE PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY, (HARBOR DRIVE) �`• (PAVED, PRIVA7Ej PUBLIC WATER 5 SEWER t`Q' _ _ — aiW - --_- �P------ - R W — SOUTHWESTERN MOST CORNER OF BRIGHT LOT DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 1037, PAGE 944 REFERENCE DEED BOOK 1658, PAGE 801 DEED BOOK 1280, PAGE 910 DEED BOOK 811, PAGE 777 SURVEY FOR Ir UONILa R. HELM. A PpqFE9910RAL LAMP SURVEYOR. CERTIFY RICHARD MADAMS ,NAT T'13 PLAT tWIFOUR ,O THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE PCA LANG PRECISION AC IN NORTH ISCAROLINT AND THAT THE RATIO a A n C' E E IE ' 1I� A A r% A R A e% LAND AS PURVEYING IN NORTH IS INA R D THAT u m— O O �\ 1 ' {� ESI /� 1 ,, C. Proposed Impacts Inventory Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. 1. Buffer Impacts 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Proposed impacts are the min. needed to utilize the intent of the designed use 1a. Project is in which protected basin? X❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek 1b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. Buffer impact Reason for Type of impact number— impact (exempt, allowable, Permanent (P) allowable w/ mitigation) or Tem ora T Stream name Buffer mitigation required? Zone 1 Zone 2 impact impact (sq ft) (sq ft) B1 X❑ P ❑ T Home Addition Allowable Neuse ❑ Yes X❑No '$ 986 B2 ❑P ❑T 2c. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed? El Yes El No 2d. B3 ❑ P ❑ T 2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 64 El ❑T ❑Yes No B5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No Total buffer impacts 1c. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Proposed impacts are the min. needed to utilize the intent of the designed use 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Structure will elevated 8 ft. with slat wood construction with vegetation under structure 2. Buffer Mitigation 2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes X❑ No 2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet (square feet Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 Total buffer mitigation required: 2c. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed? ❑Yes ❑ No 2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP. 2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed. 2f. Comments: FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 3 of 8