20161073 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC.
Land Development Consulting
November 4, 2016
NC DWQ, WBSCP Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
20161073
Riverside Subdivision
CPT Project No. 1280-13
Sir or madame:
Please find an enclosed PCN application, $240.00 fee, supporting documentation, and 4 sets of
site/roadway/utility/grading plans for Riverside Subdivision in Guilford County, NC.
Plans have been electronically submitted concurrently to the City of Winston-Salem and Mr. David Bailey at USACE.
Thanks for your help on this project and please do not hesitate to call me or email me directly with any questions or
comments. (johnb(a cptengineering com)
336-812-8800 x 321
336-816-4438 mobile
Sincerely,
CPT Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
John A. Butler, EIT
Enclosures
Phone: [phone] ext. 321
4400 Tyning Street,
High Point, NC 27265
Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

V
0F \N TF�90
O N;i� -
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes © No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes © No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes © No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ YesX❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Riverside Subdivision - Phase 3
2b. County:
Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Oak Ridge, N.C.
2d. Subdivision name:
Riverside Subdivision
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
BRC Riverside, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
db 7579 pg 44
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
6 1 � n
3d. Street address:
5826 Samet Drive
3e. City, state, zip:
High Point, N.C. 27265
3f. Telephone no.:
336-889-1512
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Chuck Truby, P.E.
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
CPT Engineering and Surveying
5c. Street address:
4400 Tyning Street
5d. City, state, zip:
High Point, NC 27265
5e. Telephone no.:
336-812-8800 ext 321
5f. Fax no.:
336-812-8780
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
6898966360
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.18088 Longitude: 80.02104
1c. Property size:
124.72 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT of Haw River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Vacant and heavily wooded. Hydrologic Group B soils. No evidence of prior development within current phase area of construction.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.015
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 584
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Third Phase of Single Family Residential Neighborhood
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
22 single family lots, 1950 LF of new ribbon pavement roadway, wells/septic on individual lots. Equipment to be used includes track hoes, dozers, pans
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
© Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ®Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Huysman, Sue Homewood
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other. Wetland&Natural ResourceCo
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
7/1/14
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Q Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
4th phase of construction likely to follow within 2 years.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
VV3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT of Haw River
PER
Corps
2
92
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
92
31. Comments.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba []Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
134 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Roadways and widths of stream crossings kept to a minimum.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion control measures shall be installed per the approved plan as approved by Guilford County. The permanent culvert shall be installed and
stabilized early in the construction sequence in order to minimized construction traffic impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes © No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in4ieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
X
E] Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Q Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Q Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes © No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project is not located within an area that requires a storm water management plan.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of oak Ridge, Guilford County
❑x Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs applyHSession
ORW
(check all that apply):
Law 2006-246
[]Other
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Welland Standards,
❑Yes
Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
© No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual lots will be developed with corresponding individual septic fields and wells. No shared common septic fields are planned. No shared
common wells are planned.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

0
If
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ YesX❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
https://ecos.fws.gov
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Fish and Wildlife Service
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/forsyth.html with verification by USACE. Site is not near salt marsh, oyster reef, or sea grass beds.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Office
http://www.hpo-dcr.state.nc.us/.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes 0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 3710689800K, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 16, 22009, 3710780800J, EFFECTIVE DATE JUNE 18, 2007
3 A
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
ApplicanVAgunr§ ignature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Cpr
ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC.
Land Development Consulting
November 41 2016
David Bailey
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone] x35
PCN Submittal for Riverside Subdivision -Phase 2
Mr. Bailey:
BRC Riverside, LLC is the developer of an approximately 124 Acre Tract in Oak Ridge, Guilford County County, NC. They
propose to develop this acreage into 22 large single family tracts with open space that preserves natural drainage ways to the
greatest extent practical. One roadway culvert is required that will impact a limited jurisdictional area. CPT Engineering and
Surveying, Inc. is submitting the PCN for your review.
The site was designed to limit impacts to the streams and stream buffers. A roadway is required to access the interior areas of the
development. We provided a minimum street width in order to minimize impacts. Riparian buffers are preserved around the
existing jurisdictional waters as much as feasible and allowable except for the areas of impacts at the roadway crossing. The
stream impacts on site area total 82 LF of stream impact (stream centerline length).
All of the disturbances shown are necessary and there are no practical alternatives to the impacts.
Sincerely,
CPT Engineering and Surveying, Inc.,
John A. Butler, EIT
Phone: [phone] ext. 321
4400 Tyning Street,
High Point, NC 27265
Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For
more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http //
offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres usda gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call [phone]
(voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
SoilMap..................................................................................................................5
SoilMap................................................................................................................6
Legend..................................................................................................................7
MapUnit Legend..................................................................................................8
MapUnit Descriptions..........................................................................................8
Guilford County, North Carolina......................................................................11
CaB—Casville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes......................................11
CaC--Casville sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes....................................11
CkB--Clifford sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes........................................12
CI132—Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................13
CIC2—Clifford sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................14
CnA—Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded.................16
HdA—Hatboro loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded..................17
NaC—Nathalie sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes....................................19
PoB—Poplar Forest sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes..............................20
PoC—Poplar Forest sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes ...........................21
PoE—Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes ..........................22
PpC2—Poplar Forest clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................23
PpE2—Poplar Forest clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded..............24
References............................................................................................................25
4

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5

36 11 6' N
36" 10 33' N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
587400 587500 587500 587700 5878W 587900 568000 588100 588200 588300 588400 SM500 588600 58
3
y Map Scale: 1:7,290 if
pr0ad on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sfieeG
�
N Meters
N 0 100 200 400 600
�\ 0 350 700 1400 2100
/� Map proiscticn: Web Maoatix Cartescomdrates: WCfi94 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WCSB4
0

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
J
Soil Map Unit Polygons
...0
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
#
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
_
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
J.
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
o,
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
.+. Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
._ Aerial Photography
7
MAP INFORh
The soil surveys that comprise your A,
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid a•
Enlargement of maps beyond the sca
misunderstanding of the detail of map
placement. The maps do not show the
soils that could have been shown at a
Please rely on the bar scale on each i
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources
Web Soil Survey URL: http://webso
Coordinate System: Web Mercator
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are b
projection, which preserves direction <
distance and area. A projection that p
Albers equal-area conic projection, sh
calculations of distance or area are re
This product is generated from the US
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Guilford County,
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Dec
Soil map units are labeled (as space all
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photograp
30, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on
compiled and digitized probably differ
imagery displayed on these maps. As

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Guilford County, North Carolina (NC081)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres In AOI
Percent of AOI
CaB
Casville sandy loam, 2 to 6
22.2
15.0%
percent slopes
CaC
Casville sandy loam, 6 to 10
26.2
17.8%
percent slopes
CkB
Clifford sandy loam, 2 to 6
8.0
5.4%
percent slopes
CIB2
Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 6
1.8
1.2%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CIC2
Clifford sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
1.3
0.9%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CnA
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent
6.6
4.4%
slopes, frequently flooded
HdA
Hatboro loam, 0 to 2 percent
27.8
18.8%
slopes, frequently flooded
NaC
Nathalie sandy loam, 6 to 10
0.0
0.0%
percent slopes
PoB
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 2 to 6
5.6
3.8%
percent slopes
PoC
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 6 to
27.2
18.4%
10 percent slopes
PoE
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15 to
14.8
10.0%
35 percent slopes
PpC2
Poplar Forest clay loam, 6 to 10
6.2
4.2%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PpE2
Poplar Forest clay loam, 15 to 25
0.0
0.0%
percent slopes, eroded
Totals for Area of Interest
147.7
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
N

Custom Soil Resource Report
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
N

Custom Soil Resource Report
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Guilford County, North Carolina
CaB—Casville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 300 to 600 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Casville and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Casville
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Sandy loam
8 to 30 inches: Clay
30 to 39 inches: Sandy clay
39 to 72 inches. Sandy clay loam
72 to 80 inches. Sandy loam
CaC—Casville sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Casville and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Casville
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam
6 to 36 inches: Clay
36 to 50 inches: Sandy loam
50 to 80 inches. Clay loam
CkB—Clifford sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period: 160 to 200 days
Map Unit Composition
Clifford and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Clifford
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam
6 to 10 inches. Sandy loam
10 to 47 inches: Clay
47 to 57 inches: Clay loam
57 to 80 inches: Loam
Minor Components
Westfield
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
C1132—Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period. 160 to 200 days
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Clifford, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 88 percent
Minor components: 4 percent
Description of Clifford, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy clay loam
6 to 52 inches: Clay
52 to 80 inches: Clay loam
Minor Components
Westfield, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
CM—Clifford sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period: 160 to 200 days
Map Unit Composition
Clifford, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Clifford, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy clay loam
6 to 52 inches. Clay
52 to 80 inches: Clay loam
Minor Components
Westfield, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Woolwine, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit. 1 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
CnA—Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period. 160 to 200 days
Map Unit Composition
Codorus and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Description of Codorus
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding
or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loam
8 to 18 inches: Silty clay loam
18 to 30 inches. Loam
30 to 38 inches: Silt loam
38 to 50 inches: Silt loam
50 to 80 inches: Silt loam
Minor Components
Hatboro, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Dan river
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Comus
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ronda
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Natural levees on flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Banister
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flats on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Pfafftown
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
HdA—Hatboro loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period: 160 to 190 days
Map Unit Composition
Hatboro, undrained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Hatboro, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Hatboro, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loam
8 to 43 inches: Sandy clay loam
43 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
Description of Hatboro, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loam
8 to 43 inches: Sandy clay loam
43 to 80 inches: Sandy loam

Custom Soil Resource Report
NaC—Nathalie sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period. 160 to 190 days
Map Unit Composition
Nathalie and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Nathalie
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam
6 to 9 inches: Sandy loam
9 to 12 inches: Sandy clay loam
12 to 48 inches: Clay
48 to 53 inches: Sandy clay loam
53 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
PoB—Poplar Forest sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Poplar forest and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Poplar Forest
Setting
Landform: I nterfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farland class cation: All areas are prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches: Sandy loam
5 to 29 inches: Clay
29 to 34 inches: Clay loam
34 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
PoC—Poplar Forest sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Poplar forest and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Poplar Forest
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches: Sandy loam
5 to 29 inches: Clay
29 to 34 inches. Clay loam
34 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
PoE—Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period. 160 to 200 days
Map Unit Composition
Poplar forest and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Poplar Forest
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 35 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 3 inches: Sandy loam
3 to 8 inches: Sandy loam
8 to 25 inches: Clay
25 to 31 inches: Clay loam
31 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
PpC2—Poplar Forest clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Poplar forest, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Poplar Forest, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy clay loam
6 to 26 inches: Clay
26 to 34 inches. Sandy clay loam
34 to 80 inches. Loam
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
PpE2—Poplar Forest clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost -free period: 160 to 200 days
Map Unit Composition
Poplar forest, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Poplar Forest, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy clay loam
6 to 26 inches: Clay
26 to 37 inches: Clay loam
37 to 80 inches. Loam
24

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http //www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http //www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_„053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www nres usda gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 43041. http.//www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid= n res 142 p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
26

i
\ \\ \ \ \ \ ti\N �► ► --A17113
1 \ \\ \
�Im I 167
I ► \
\ \��
�TREAM BUFF R I 1
\0 1 rISIEE SHEET 3
I
\\` i
TEMPORARY SAND BA6. \ -1 �\, I��? END JURISDIGTIONAL
\ GOFF, R. D M \ \ `` I WATER (F I ELD LOGATED)�
D 15GHARGE PUMP THROUGH
-51LT BAG ATOP GRAVEL PAD. I\ 'FE5t" ► I •I I \ \ /�
\ 1 1 t I ► � \ /�
-' \ \66 150 ► p
\ 66 " , I
\\ �\
ool
/ I \ n
\ 1 �
FE
5
I i
j PROVIDE PUMP TO PUMP
i I 5TORMWATER RUNOFF AROUND.'
in
VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1'=500'
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PRESERVE NORMAL BASE STREAM FLOW.
000 2. IMPACT LENGTHS SHALL NOT EXCEED 82 LF (STREAM LENGTH)
INCLUDING TEMPORARY IMPACTS AT THIS ROAD CROSSING
LOCATION.
GENERAL SEQUENCE:
1. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED "IN THE DRY" IF POSSIBLE. THE
X ( CONTRACTOR SHALL TRY TO SCHEDULE THE WORK AROUND A
PERIOD OF DRY WEATHER LONG ENOUGH TO COMPLETE THE
/; I WORK WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE STREAM BUFFER.
1 �/ 1 1 I
\ / �1 y\ � ► II I ►
I
TEMPORARY 5AND BA& \
\ GOFF�R DRAM `\
Lill",
T\ Il \
/►/ \ `\ \ WORK AREA DURING WET
I WEATHER EVENT \\ \ P \\�'4�
Q� 1\\ , \ \
2. IF REQUIRED DUE TO SOIL CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCT A
TEMPORARY SURGE STONEJGEOTEXTILE FABRIC EQUIPMENT
CROSSING AT CULVERT LOCATION AS REQUIRED FOR
EQUIPMENT MOVEMENT. CONSULT A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
FOR FABRIC RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SAND BAG COFFER DAMS
UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE WORK AREA AS SHOWN.
PROVIDE A PUMP TO PUMP STORMWATER RUNOFF AROUND THE
WORK AREA DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER EVENTS.
4. INSTALL THE CULVERT PIPE WITH REQUIRED OUTLET
PROTECTION, AND DROP INLETS WITH INLET PROTECTION.
5. INSTALL COMPACTED BACKFILL. TEST BACKFILL LIFTS FOR
PROPER COMPACTION AS IT IS PLACED.
6. REINFORCE DITCHES PER SPECIFICATIONS AS THEY ARE
CONSTRUCTED.
7. REMOVE TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS AND ANY BARE AREAS
\\ \\ \\40\ \\\\\ 0 20 40
\
\(SCA IN FEE )
\ \ \ 1 \4nch 40 ft
\831
\\N, CA+Ro
�• �� SEAL`
n 14984
��9'• • FNG I N E�� •,�
11/4/16
SCALE: II
DAIS 11/4/16
PROJECT* 1260-13
DRAWN BY: JAB

Mev K 2010 A%PMjmb\128D-13VM\129D-17 UK 9-4-IU" Ti None PCMW
�
CII
m
Ql
O
mp
m
m
mEEC)
D
Z
Z
ms
g
m
m
�N
G
�
1
1
A
z
ro
�''!
R�oSf o
�E
Z
J
x�+
m m m
rJ N N
G
N
$
'
0
v
Q
+
C7
CYco
-m
+w�
W�
Z
I
10
1
Z
?
1
O
O
I
I
l
``11{{{{,1111,►,,,,,,,
. ....Allo
A '.•rf i
'02FPm CO N:D�
1pO
•
,,�,�✓R
.. . ��x`,,,.ca
co
41
29Ope22
FS
r+
n
O
"3
� �
N
O
O
Arn�,rlON WW �IG�
ENdNEFRING AND SURVEYING. INC.
BLUE RIDGE GONPI WIC
OAKM 61,11VCAROLINA
IT
uoo n�.o anar
u
a
K � O Dllm
W
fll
�
CII
m
Ql
O
Z
D
Z
Z
ms
g
m
m
�N
G
�
1
1
A
z
ro
�''!
R�oSf o
�E
Z
J
x�+
m m m
rJ N N
G
N
$
'
0
v
Q
+
-m
+w�
W�
Z
I
10
1
Z
?
1
O
O
I
I
l
W
fll
�
CII
m
Ql
O
Z
ms
t\e4
m
�N
G
�

INSTALL THE PERMANENT CULVERT 6R0551N65:
The culverts are to be installed in the dry within a 2 to 3 day period of forecasted
dry weather if possible. Sediment fencing shall be installed below disturbed areas and
adjusted if necessary to prevent silt migration into the stream. Gare will be taken to
keep clearing and excavation of the stream banks and bed to a minimum. Upon
completion of crossing, fill, compact, and stabilize the slopes properly. Any disturbed
stream bank areas not stabilized by riparian mix seeding.
IF NOT ABLE TO INSTALL GROSSING IN THE DRY:
Then they must be installed with the use of Goffer/Sand bag Dams. The dams will be
installed around the culvert installations to facilitate pipe construction.
Pumos shall be used to keen the work area as dru as oossib
After the pipe are installed, properly compacted select fill can be brought up to
subgrade. Erosion control shall be maintained throughout the culvert installation
process. Check silt fencing and outlets on a regular basis during construction.
Relocate, reinstall, and/or repair erosion control measures as needed to prevent silt
migration.
Install permanent rip-rap/filter fabric toe protection as shown. All other disturbed
areas shall be stabilized by seeding with rolled erosion control matting. Seed and mat
the slopes above the top of bank with erosion control matting as soon as permanent
grade has been established. Follow the seeding timeframe regvirements stated on the
erosion control plan.
The culvert construction should be completed within two weeks. Any material that need
to be stockpiled near the stream banks will be protected by silt fencing.
Sand bag dams shall be removed within 2 days after the culvert has been stabilized.
BANK
ZONE 2
A VEGETATED AREA BEGINNING
AT THE OUTER EDGE OF ZONE 1
AND EXTENDING LANDWARD A
MINIMUM OF 20 FEET.
ZONE 1
AN UNDISTURBED AREA OF
VEGETATION EXTENDING A
MINIMUM OF 30 FEET FROM THE
TOP OF BANK OR MEAN HIGH
WATER LEVEL OF OTHER WATER
BODIES.
57REAM BfflFER
ILLUSTRATION
Not to Scale
0FESS/0 ..
SEAL
n' 14984
fit
N MoN \
11/4/16
REVISIONS
is
Z
SOME 1'=40'
DATE 11/4/16
PROSECT: 12OD-13
DRAMN or All