20161044 Ver 1_Tech Proposal_2016_20160601

WILDLANDS
January 21,2016
Ms. Kathy Dale
NC DEQ-Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street,Suite 3409-G
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Proposal-Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin Cataloging Unit 03040101;Yadkin County,NC
In response to RFP 16-006706-Full Delivery Project
Dear Ms.Dale,
As an authorized representative of Wildlands Engineering, Inc.(Wildlands), I am pleased to present to
the NC Division of Mitigation Services(DMS)the following proposal to provide stream mitigation units in
the Yadkin River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03040101)in response to RFP 16.006706.This proposal is a firm
offer from Wildlands and shall remain open for acceptance by the NC Department of Environmental
Quality(DEQ)until January 21,2017,which is one year from the closing date of the above-referenced
RFP.
As a fully licensed engineering firm,Wildlands will serve as the contracting entity and lead designer with
Kee Mapping&Surveying providing professional surveying services.The key individuals on the
Wildlands Team have worked together on numerous projects over multiple years and will operate
smoothly as a cohesive unit.
Wildlands is committed to creating an excellent ecological restoration project at the Lone Hickory
Mitigation Site(Site)and proposes to provide up to 12,901 Stream Mitigation Units(SM Us).
The Site contains seven unnamed tributaries to South Deep Creek(UTI,UTIA,UT18,UT2,UT2A, UT2C,
and UT3),which have been impacted by agricultural ditching and runoff. This project will improve water
quality and ecology through stream and habitat restoration,resulting in a decrease in nutrient and
sediment loads from the project site and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat onsite.
The Wildlands'Lane Hickory Mitigation Site submittal includes two signed,original Technical Proposals,
five photocopies of the Technical Proposal,one CD-R of the Technical Proposal,one CD-R of the Project
Site boundaries in ArcG IS format,two signed,original Cost Proposals,and two photocopies of the Cost
Proposal. All paper contained within this proposal is 100%recycled, 30%post-consumer content.
With our diverse,yet unified team we offer the expertise, understanding,and commitment to ensure
this project's success.
V' � VYr✓lam
Shawn Wilkerson,President
W Wildlands Engineering,Inc. (P)70K.332.1154 • (F)704.332.3306 . 14M South Mint St,Suite IN - Charlotte;NC 28203

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Request for Proposal#
16-006706
For Internal State agency processing, including tabulation of proposals in the Interactive Purchasing System (IPS),
please provide yourcompany's Federal Employer Iden5ficstion Numberoraltemate identification number(e.g.Social
Secunty Number). Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 132-1.10(b) this identification number shall not be
released to the public. This page will be removed and shredded, or otherwise kept confidential, before the
procurement file Is made available for public inspection.
This page is to be filled out and returned with your proposal.
Failure to do so may subject your proposal to rejection.
ID Number.
56-0651376
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Vendor Name

RFP Number: RFP 76-006706 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
EXECUTION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
Refer ALL Inquiries regarding this RFP Request for Proposal At 16-006706
to: Kathy Dale Proposals will be publicly opened:January 21, 2016
ContractType: Open Market
E-MAIL: [e-mail] Commodity No.and Description: 962.73
Restoration/Reclamation Services of Land and Other Properties
PHONE: [phone] Using Agency: Division of Mitigation Services
Requisition Na:
In compliance with this Request for Proposals,and Subject to all the conditions herein,the undersigned Vendor offers and
agrees to furnish and deliver any or all Items upon which prices are bid,at Me prices set opposite each item within Me time
specified herein.By executing this proposal,the undersigned Vendor certifies that this proposal is submitted competitively
and without collusion(G.S. 143-5a),that none of its oRca rs, directors,or miners Of an unincoryomted business entry has
Wen convicted of any violations of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes, the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934(G.S.143.59.2),and that it is net an Ineligible Vendor as set forth in G.S.143.59.1.False cerdfication
Is a Class I felony.Furthermore by executing this proposal,the undersigned car08es to the best of Vendor's knowledge and
belief, that it and its principals are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared Ineligible or
voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal or State department or agency.As required by G.S.§143-
48.5,Me undersigned Vendor certifies that it,antl each of its sub-Contractors for any Contract awarded as a result of this
RFP,complies with the requirements of Article 2 of Chapter 64 of the NC General Statutes,Including the requirement for
each employer with more than 25 employees in North Carolina to very the work authorization of its employees through Me
federal E-Verify system. G S. 133-32 and Executive Order 24(2009) prohibit the offer to, or acceptance by, any State
Employee associated with the preparing plans,specifications,estimates for public Contract;or awaiting or administering
public Contracts;or inspecting or supervising delivery of the public Contract of any gift from anyone with a Contract with
Me State,or tram any person seeking Is do business with the State. By execution of any response in this procurement,you
attest,for your entire organization and Its employees or agents,that you are not aware that any such gift has been offered,
accepted,or promised by any employees of your organization.
Failure to executelsign proposal prior to submittal shall render proposal Invalid and It WILL BE REJECTED. Late
proposals cannot be accepted,
VENDOR:
Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
STREETADDRESS: P.O.BOX: LP:
1430 S. Mint Street,Suite 104 28203
CITY a STATE a ZIP; TELEPHONENVMBEft IULLFREETELNO:
Charlotte,NC 28203 [phone] Na
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE(SEE INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS ITEM#toy.
n/a
PRIM NAME a TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING ON BEHALF OFVENDOR'. FAx NUMBER;
Sh n D.Wilkerson,President 1 [phone]
VEND SAU IZEO NATURE: DATE: EMAIL:
01/20/2016 [e-mail]
Offer vigNor at least W days from date of proposal opening,unless otherwise stated here: 365 days. After this time,any
withdrawal of offer shall be made In wrong,effective upon receipt by the agency Issuing this RFP.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
If any or all pads of this Proposal are accepted by the State of North Carolina,an authorized representative of the Department 07
Environment and Natural Resources shall affix fluffs signature hereto and this document and all pmvislans"is Request For
Propasal along with the Vendor proposal response and the wriften results of any negotiations shall Men constitute the written
agreement between the parties.A copy of his acceptance will be forwarded Is Me successful Vendogs).
FORSTATEUSEONLY:Offer accepted and Oanimd awarded Mls_dayof ,20_,as indicated an the
ettarJrad caNAcetlon,by .(Authorized!Representative of DEO).
Ver 711115 Page 1 or 35

FP
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Pal McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
November 19, 2015
THIS ADDENDUM DOES NOT HAVE TO BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
RFP NO. 16-006706 RFP TITLE: Full Delivery Projects To Provide Stream Mitigation Within
Cataloging Unit 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin
ADDENDUM NO. 01 USING Division of Mitigation Services
AGENCY:
PURCHASER KATHY DALE OPENING January 21,2016@2:00 P.M.
DATE/TIME:
This correspondence serves as an addendum to the subject RFP. Your response to this RFP should be
governed by the content of the original RFP and the Information provided in this addendum notice.
SECTION 1. A. GENERAL INFORMATION & CHANGES
1-Section 2.4, item g)Current Ownership and Long Tema Protection
A signed option agreement valid fora period of one(1)year from the closing date of this RFP or ether suitable
documentation of real property interest must be provided for each parcel.
2-13ection 2.6 Required Templates
Delete FEMA Floodplain Requirements Checklist
3-Unk to GIS Online Map:
the J/ncdenrmaps.arcgis.cam/apps'webappmewerlindex.himi7id=efl bd476571 d4ccb92de37c596cbe7cc
4-Unk to GIS layers: hao'.l/portal.ncdenr.omlwebleeo/research-anddata
5-Section 3.2,Task 4
Delete TEMA floodplain eradication'
6-Section 3.2,Task 6
Delete item C.
7-Attachment H. Technical Evaluation Scuresheel
Question e2 in Section 5.0 is not applicable
8-Templates Unit(for this RFP):
htt¢Nportal.ncdonr.orgiddocument library/pet fle7o I id=60409&folderid=26588895&name=DLFE-119283.xisx
RFP 16-008706
Addendum No.1 Page 1 of 5

SECTION 1- B. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1) Can you provide more information on what counts and what does not mount towards page limits. Specifically,do
the following items count towards the page limit?
Cover sheet,Table of Contents Sheet. Dividers and Section Tab Sheets, Execution Sheet(Page 1 in RFP),
Accordions, Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Financial Statement,Quality Control Section, Option Contacts,
Steam Forms,Stream Data(XS's, etc.), Mock Scoring Sheet Corporate Background and Experience Info(Org
Charts, Pmject Descriptions,etc.), Project Organizamin Info(Resuni etc.),Attachment D,Attachment E,
Attachment F
Everything above will count toward the 100 pages except Execution Sheet, Addendums. Financial
Statement(Attachment EL Option Contracts, Stream Forms. Mock Scoring Sheet, Attachment D and
Attachment F.
2) Page 7—Project Development;Second bullet refers to a scaring advantage for bridges or solvents with fencing
but the scoring sheet does not seem to provide a way for the review team to reward extra points for these types of
crossings. Please explain.
Section 5.0,quest R3 discusses crossings and utility barriers and constraints.
3) Page 7-Regarding Option Agreements,can a provider provide a one-page,retarded memorandum that
references a contact as opposed to providing the entire contract in the RFP? This will save pages and still be
legally binding.
No, if the vendor is using options to secure the property, the entire option agreement must be included.
4) Page 13 Section 3.1 Special Conditions; If the vendor provides a price for riparian wetlands,will they be
responsible for developing those credits(at risk)from the start of the stream project or will DMS contract with the
provider at a later data to develop the credits at the provided price?
DMS may approach the vendor at any time during the contract period to request amending the contract
for wetland credit delivery. Keep in mind that this Is only optional for the vendor.
5) Attachment O; DMS is soliciting for 45,000 warm stream credits. Is the thermal regime the only reason that the
majority of the Ararat River and Upper Yadkin LW P has been excluded from the search area7 If so, would DMS
consider out-of-kind(cool for warm)credits in all of the other UWP 14 digit HUC5 that comprise the AR&UY LW P7
There hes been precedent for the IRT accepting thermal out-of-kind mitigation in certain mass. This would
Increase inventory significantly.
No,the request Is for'Warm stream credits.
6) The 4-29-15 Version of the CE Template does not appear to be posted on the DMS website yet.
See the Templates hyperlink in this addendum.
7) May a Vendor submit a proposal in the name of a whollyowned,specific purpose entity versus the parent
operating company if the vendor signed Into the mandatory pre-proposal meeting under the name of the parent
company? If me answer is yes, would the submitting entity still get the qualifications of the parent operating
company,le experience,financial vitality,etc...?
The Vendor must subm It a a y proposal uad or the entity name signed in at tha Pre-Proposal meeting
8) Section 2.3; Page 5; Under Item N2,the RFP states, "Submit your technical proposal in a sealed package. Clearly
mark each package with the following information:(1)Sealed Cost Proposal..'Should this read'(1)Sealed
Technical Proposal?
hould be marked as Sealed Technical Proposal'
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No.1 Page 2 of 5

9) Section 2.3: Page 5; Under item 44,the RFP states, 'Submit one(1)electronic copy of your proposal on a
separate readronly CD's, DVD's or gash drive."Please clarify if this includes both the technical proposal and cast
proposal,or just the technical proposal.
Only the technical proposal
10) Section 2.6; Page 9:The provided"DMS Full Delivery Landowner Authorization Form"on the DMS website
references the"NCEEP"in the header.Please confirm that this the latest and greatest"DMS"file or whether you
would prefer the vendor to change that Header to DMS. We understand that this form is not to be signed until
after contract.
Use the form pro vid ad until DMS publishes a new one.
11) Section 2.4; Page 8;Since the proposals are required to be submitted in a 3-ring binder,would you considering
allowing the"Title Page to be presented as the first item(inserted into the clear binder cover),rather than under
Its own tab after the"Cover LetterT
No, it needs to be in the document as stated.
12) Section 3.3; Page 16; Is there a specific project tyle where DMS would like five years of monitoring to be
proposed? Can you give more information on the five versus seven years of monitoring that is new for this RFP?
No, "Vendors will determine the appropriate Payment Schedule based on their mitigation types,
regulatory rules and guidance"
13) Section 2.4: Page 8; Please clarify whether or not the Execution Page and Attachments count towards the max
page limit for the Technical Proposal.
They do not count toward the page limit.
14) Section 2]; Page 12;Specifically locking at the definition of-Site,"do multiple,contiguous parcels automatically
qualify as they have in the Past or could DMS still reject it as a site if DMS, in its sole discretion does not agree
with the hydrologic or ecologic connectivity? For example,If a provider had an option on four contiguous parcels
but the creeks did not all flow together within the project area,would this automatically be considered a site or do
we need to submit them as separate sites or options to be sure? Our suggestion would be to continue to utilize
the old definition of a site(contiguous parcels) but that a site could also be considered with non-contiguous
parcels if the resources have hydrologic or swings:continuity in DMS's sole discretion.
As the definition states, they must have functional connectivity, it is up to the Vendor to determine that.
15) Section 3.1;Page 13;The RFP states,'On the Cost Proposal form(Attachment C), there Is a line for an optional
riparian wetland credit cost." In additional to the cost,does DMS prefer us to list the amount of credits?
OMS is only asking far the credit cost if an amend in ant would be considered In the future. DMS does not
want anything further.
16)Section 3.3:Page 1617; If successful credit delivery occurs years 1-6,will the final 100A payment be released at
year 7 of monitoring or after successful closeout and final credit release?
If the site has delivered all contracted credits up to this paint and the final monitoring report meets all of
the success criteria, payment will be released. Keep in mind that If credits are reduced before or during
closeout.the contracted vendor will need to reimburse the State for the contracted cost of the lost
credits.
17) Section 5.1; Page 19;Please confirm that the Vendors submitting proposals can communicate about their sites
with members of DMS during the site visit phase of the evaluation period.
Communication is open during the site visits but only involving information submitted in the technical
proposal and only with the project review team.
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No.1 Page 3 of 5

18) Section 6.1; Page 22/Attachment E; Page 34;The RFP states that Attachment E'must be signed by an
individual authorized to speak for the Vendor.'Could this be the Vendor's CPA, Bonding Company,or Company
President?
It must be the Vendor's President or CEO that signs this document.
19)Attachment H;Page 4; Item#6 seams to be Incomplete.It reads,'For reaches proposed for
restoration/enhancement,what is the percent of project length actively subject to...7 Please clarity-subject to
what?
No, "Vendors will determine the appropriate Payment Schedule based on their mitigation types,
regulatory rules and guidance'
20) Widrm the proposal,the terns"Vendor"and°Contractor"are used interchangeably. Please offer any clarification
that needs to be made.
For the purpose of this RFP, the terms are Interchangeable.
SECTION 2
PLEASE NOTE-THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Check ONLY ONE of the following categories and if required,return one properly executed copy of this
addendum prior to bid opening time and date.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. Changes resulting from this addendum are attached.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. NO CHANGES resulted from this addendum.
® aid has NOT been mailed and ANY CHANGES resulting from this addendum are included in our offer.
SECTION 3
Execute Addendum:
BIDDER: Wildlands Engineering,Inc
ADDRESS(CITY&STATE): 143$S. Mint Street,Suite 11004 Charlotte,
NG 28203
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: cV " 'u 'l/ " DATE: 01202010
NAME 8 TITLE(TYPED): Shawn D.Wilkerson, President
Notes it Is the oftener's responsibility to choose the appropriate delivery method to guarantee that the offer is
received by the Issuing Agency by the Opening Datefiime noted in the RFP.
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No.1 Page 4 of 5

DELIVERED BY US POSTAL SERVICE DELIVERED BY ANY OTHER MEANS(UPS I FEDEXI
(Mail at least 7 business days prior to Bid ETC.)
Closing Data) ((Suggestion Request Signature Receipt)
SEALED BID SEALED BID
RFP 16406706 RFP 16-006706
NC DEPT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY NC DEPT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
ATTN: KATHY DALE ATTN: KATHY DALE
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 217 W.JONES STREET,SUITE 3409-G
RALEIGH NC 27699-1652 RALEIGH NC 27603
IT IS THE OFFER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTINUOUSLY CHECK FOR ADDENDA UP TO THE LAST POSTED
OPENING DATEITIME AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL ADDENDA HAVE BEEN REVIEWED,SIGNED AND RETURNED
IF REQUIRED.
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No.1 Page 5 of 5

KC
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
November 24, 2015
THIS ADDENDUM DOES NOT HAVE TO BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
RFP NO. 16-006708 RFP TITLE: Full Delivery Projects To Provide Stream Mitigation Within
Cataloging Unit 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin
ADDENDUM NO. 02 USING Division of Mitigation Services
AGENCY:
PURCHASER KATHY DALE OPENING January 21,2016®2:00 P.M.
DATE(TIME:
This coresponderi serves as an addendum to the subject RFP. Your response to this RFP should be
governed by the content of the original RFP and the Information provided in this addendum notice.
SECTION 1- QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
t) Question 19 of Addendum#1 does not seem to address the posed question. Please provide the missing
Information for Section 2.0,question#6 of Attachment H.
The qu astion should read, 'For reaches proposed for restorationlenhancement,what is the percent of
project length actively subject to onsite water quality or habitat stressors that the design proposes to
address?(Onsite means within or immediately adjacent to(within 30 it of) the proposed easement
boundary. Example stressors Include pasture with direct livestock access, livestock exclusion but with
poorly managed crossings, hydrologic bypass of buffers (e,g. the drains,discharge curtails, hydrologic
connections to livestock wallows or CAFO ponds),stormwater outfalls,adjacent row crops. Maintained
vegetation, or Impervious surfaces.('
2) We understand that we need to submit the entire option agreement,however,are we permitted to redact the
financial Information to protect the landowners privacy?
No
3) Will DMS please share the sign-in sheet from the DMS Pre-Proposal meeting?
No, all Information pertaining to a bid is considered confidential until after an award Is made. Vendors
have the option to review these at the pre-bid conference.
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No.2 Page 1 of 2

SECTION 2
F
PLEASE NOTE—THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Check ONLY ONE of the following categories and if required,return one propedy executed copy of this
addendum prior to bid opening time and data.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. Changes resulting from this addendum are attached.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. NO CHANGES resulted from this addendum.
® Bid has NOT been mailed and ANY CHANGES resulting from this addendum are included in our offer.
SECTION 3
Execute Addendum:
BIDDER: WIdla ds Engineering, Inc
ADDRESS(CRY S STATE): 1430 S.Mint Stre\et�1^Suite 104 Charlotte NC 28203
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: h,P
1f V' DATE: 01=016
NAME 8 TITLE(TYPED): Shawn D.Wilkerson President
Note: It is the offeror's responsibility to choose the appropriate delivery method to guarantee that the offer is
received by the Issuing Agency by the Opening DateRim r noted in the RFP,
DELIVERED BY US POSTAL SERVICE DELIVERED BY ANY OTHER MEANS (UPS I FEDE%/
(Mall at least 7 business days prior to Bid ETC.)
ClosingDate Su estiow Request Si nature Recei 1
SEALED BID SEALED BID
RFP 16-006706 RFP 16-006706
NC DEPT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY NC DEPT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DWISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
ATTN: KATHY DALE ATTN:KATHY DALE
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 217 W.JONES STREET,SUITE 36 g9-G
RALEIGH NC 27699­1652 RALEIGH NC 27603
IT IS THE OFFER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTINUOUSLY CHECK FOR ADDENDA UP TO THE LAST POSTED
OPENING DATE/TIME AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL ADDENDA HAVE BEEN REVIEWED,SIGNED AND RETURNED
IF REQUIRED.
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No. 2 Page 2 of 2

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaad
Governor Secretary
January 5, 2016
THIS ADDENDUM DOES NOT HAVE TO BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
RFP NO. 16-006706 RFP TITLE: Full Delivery Projects To Provide Steam Mitigation Within
Cataloging Unit 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin
ADDENDUM NO. 03 USING Division of Mitigation Services
AGENCY:
PURCHASER KATHY DALE OPENING January 21,2016 @ 2:00 P.M.
DATE/TIME:
This correspondence serves as an addendum to the subject RFP. Your response to this RFP should be
governed by the content of the original RFP and the Information provided in this addendum notice.
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATIONS REQUESTED
REQUEST61:
Addendum 1 —Item 18. This says that only a president or CEO can sign Exhibit E? Can you explain why that
is? Does that apply to all other signature documents(cost proposal, execution page,addendums etc.)? This
requirement provides unnecessary burden to the Providers-especially to larger firms that have internal signature
authority policies in place for these types of commitments. For example at KCI, Vice Presidents and Discipline
Heads are given signature authority to sign all commitments under$5 million,the President would be required to
sign commitments above that level. Please clarify.
ANSWER: Addendum 1. Item 18-We are asking for the Financial state or the entire company. It must be signed
by President or CEO,
REQUESTIl2:
Addendum 2-Item 2. The answer to this questions says that financial information cannot be redacted from the
option contract to protect the landowner. Leaving financial information In the technical proposal appears to be in
direct conflict with Section 5.2 (Proposal Opening)which states that"No Cost information shall be contained in
the technical proposal and no technical information should be contained in the cost proposal". It goes on to say
that if you do this shall constitute sufficient grounds to reject the Vendors proposal:' Please clarify.
ANSWER: Addendum J. item L-We v.n: ;mow the financial information to be redacted but still need the terns
and dates on the option as well as bung recorded in the respective county.
RFP 16-006706
Addendum No.3 Page 1 of 2

SECTION 2
PLEASE NOTE—THIS ADDENDUM MUST 8E RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Check ONLY ONE of me following categories and if required,return one properly executed copy of this
addendum prior to bid opening time and date.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. Changes resulting from this addendum are attached.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. NO CHANGES resulted from this addendum.
® Bid has NOT been mailed and ANY CHANGES resulting from this addendum are Included in our offer.
SECTION 3
Execute Addendum:
BIDDER: Wildlands Engineering, I
ADDRESS(CITY 8 STATE): 1430 S.
Mint Street. Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: /b' L ubtr ' yv� DATE: 01202016 y
NAME B TITLE(TYPED): ShawnD Wilkerson President
Note: It is the offeror's responsibility to choose the appropriate delivery method to guarantee that the offer is
received by the Issuing Agency by the Opening DatefTime noted in the RFP.
DELIVERED BY US POSTAL SERVICE tDELIVEREDBYANYfTHER R MEANS(UPS I FEDEX(Mail at least 7 business days prior to Bid Closin Date stion. ature Recei tSEALED BID D BID
RFP 18-006706 -00670NC DEPT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY T ENVL QUALITYDIVISION OF MRIGATION SERVICES N OF MERVICESATTN: KATHY DALE KATHY1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER JONESUITE 3409-GRALEIGH NC 27899.1652 H NC
IT IS THE OFFER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTINUOUSLY CHECK FORADDENDA UP TO THE LAST POSTED
OPENING DATEITIME AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL ADDENDA HAVE BEEN REVIEWED, SIGNED AND RETURNED
IF REQUIRED.
RFP 16.006706
Addendum No.3 Page 2 of 2

PART D- Executive Summary
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) proposes 12,901 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs),for the Yadkin
River Basin Cataloging Unit 03040101 at the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site (Site) in Yadkin County, NC.
Wildlands has recorded options to acquire fee simple title to 224 acres and will place a conservation
easement on 80.9 acres on the Site.The project will involve the restoration and preservation of seven
unnamed tributaries to South Deep Creek (UT1, UT1A, UT113, UT2, UT2A, UT2C, and UT3).
As detailed in Part G of this proposal,the proposed project
will not only result in the creation of mitigation units, but will
also provide ecological improvement to the project streams
through the restoration of aquatic and terrestrial (riparian)
habitats, and re-establishment of natural stream bedform. _
The project will also decrease nutrient and sediment loadst
from the watershed by restoring native riparian buffers. �.
Approximately 10.9 acres of wetlands can also be restored as
part of this project. The specific evaluation criteria outlined
in the Division of Mitigation's (DMS's) Request for Proposals
will be met as summarized in the following section. '
The following is a summary of the enclosed proposal contents
in the context of the Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria presented in the RFP.The location of the
supporting material within the Technical Proposal is also provided below. Our overall self-score is 160
points.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. For stream mitigation projects,does the Technical Proposal adequately document the historical
presence of stream(s)on the project site,and provide the drainage areas(acres)and provide
accurate, process-based descriptions of all project stream reaches and tributaries?
Yes,the historical presence of streams on the project site is documented by inclusion of historic
aerial imagery in the Appendix, which shows these features.The drainage area for each stream
reach is shown on Figure 4, Watershed Map and provided in Table G.2. Stream reach and tributary
descriptions are provided in Part G, Section 2.2.
SCORE: YES
2. Does the proposal adequately document the physical,chemical and/or biological impairments
that currently exist on the project site?
Yes,the impairments on the Site are documented in Part G, Section 2.2.
SCORE: YES
3. Does DMS agree with the overall mitigation approach (proposed levels of intervention)
presented?
Yes, Wildlands has proposed Restoration in areas where the stream is incised and degrading from
obvious historic agricultural manipulation or preservation where streams are in good condition.A
short length of UT1 is intermittent and proposed for restoration in order to reconnect the stream to
its valley bottom without use of Priority 2 restoration. UT2A and UT2C,which are also intermittent
streams, are proposed for full restoration due to the level of agricultural manipulation through
ditching and the complete lack of available habitat or bedform in the existing stream channels.
SCORE: YES
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.1

4. Does DMS agree with the proposed credit structure(s)described in the proposal?
Wildlands has used conservative estimates for credit ratios. Please see Part G,Table G.S.
SCORE: YES
5. Does the proposed project avoid significant adverse impacts to existing wetlands and/or streams?
Yes, Wildlands has identified a project approach and corridor that will allow the project to be
designed without significant adverse impacts to streams and floodplain wetlands. Small, adjacent
wetlands that were noted in the field along UT1 are subject to improved hydrologic connections due
to the restoration of UTI
SCORE: YES
6. Does the proposal adequately describe how the project will advance DMS watershed planning
goals?
Yes,the project goals listed in Part G,Table G.1 directly correlate to goals set forth in DMS
watershed planning documentation such as the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP).
SCORE: YES
7. For any proposed Priority II restoration,are all the following elements included in the proposal OR
is Priority II stream restoration limited to"tie-ins" (designed tributary confluences)?
Yes, Priority II restoration is limited to upstream and downstream tie in points on UT1 and UT3 to
South Deep Creek. No other Priority II is proposed on the Site.
SCORE: YES
Section 1: Watershed Module
1.1 For proposed projects located outside of an LWP—but within another targeted HUC(TLW)--to
what extent does the project support the restoration goals?
The proposed project addresses five of the seven CU-wide functional improvement objectives:
1) The proposed project will reduce sediment inputs.
2) The project will reduce nutrient inputs.
3) The project will restore degraded riparian buffers.
4) The project protects waters in a Water Supply Watershed.
5) The project will implement four agricultural BMPS at point sources for runoff from adjacent
farm fields.
SCORE: 10
1.2 For projects located within the Ararat LWP, does proposed project address stressors and sources
as identified in Findings and Recommendations Summary?
N/A.
SCORE: 0
1.3 BONUS: Does the project design include one or more structural BMPS within or immediately
upstream of the project easement such that nutrient and/or sediment inputs or hydraulic
stresses from outside the project easement are more effectively addressed?
Yes,the project includes four structural BMPS within the easement that will be designed to reduce
nutrient and sediment inputs from outside of the project easement.
SCORE: 15
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.2

Section 2: Existing Conditions and Functional Uplift Module
2.1 BONUS: Project reach(es) are on or confluent to(directly discharge to) a 303d listed stream or
waterbody?
N/A.
SCORE: 0
2.2 BONUS: Is the proposed project on WS-classified reach(es) upstream of a water supply intake or
reservoir?
Yes,the streams drain to South Deep Creek, which is classified as WS-III waters. The intake for the
Town of Yadkinville water supply is less than one mile downstream from the Site.
SCORE: 6
2.3 What is the proportion of significant, obvious incision (BHR >—1.5)for reaches identified for
some level of channel modification?
71%of the streams proposed for some level of channel modification exhibit significant, obvious
incision. Please see Figure 2.
SCORE: 10
2.4 What is the proportion of active bank erosion for the existing condition of reaches proposed for
channel modification?
42%of the streams proposed for channel modification exhibit active bank erosion. Please see
Figure 2.
SCORE: 10
2.5 For reaches proposed for restoration/enhancement,what is the dominant buffer vegetation
condition?
The dominant buffer vegetation is row crops. Please see Figure 2.
SCORE: 20
2.6 For reaches proposed for restoration/enhancement,what is the percent of project length
actively subject to onsite water quality or habitat stressors that the design proposes to address?
>70%of the reaches proposed for channel modification are directly affected by agricultural
ditching and row cropping to the top of stream bank. Please see Figure 2.
SCORE: 12
2.7 BONUS: Comparing nutrient concentrations of influent to effluent demonstrates the nutrient
removal function of a project site. Using a widely accepted computer model (including simple
spreadsheet tools),to what extent is the project predicted to reduce on-site nutrient inputs
(total dissolved nitrogen and/or phosphorus)from runoff flowing laterally into the proposed
project easement—with effluent measured/predicted at the immediate downstream project
boundary?
The model estimates that the proposed restoration efforts will reduce total nitrogen by 56% and
total phosphorus by 70%. Please refer to Part G, Section 3.3 and the spreadsheet outputs
provided in the Appendix.
SCORE: 6
k4l" Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.3

Habitat and Conservation Connectivity Module
3.1 BONUS: Ability to connect adjacent(having a common boundary with) natural habitats and
extend wildlife corridors.
Yes,the stream will connect the upstream, forested buffer on UT2 and UT3 with the forested
buffer on South Deep Creek.This will extend existing wildlife corridors. Please refer to Part G,
Section 3.1, for more information.
SCORE: 6
3.2 BONUS: Proposed project boundaries are directly contiguous to(have a common boundary
with) another protected property.
N/A.
SCORE:0
3.3 BONUS:Ability to provide habitat improvement for identified Threatened and Endangered
Species (federal or state listed).
Yes, during Site investigations, Wildlands determined that the Site could provide potential habitat
for the Northern long-eared bat.
SCORE: 2
Section 4: Design Module
4.1 To what extent does the proposal (and project design) address sediment supply and transport?
The proposal qualitatively describes sediment supply and dynamics in a restoration context.
Additionally, preliminary sediment transport analysis was performed to determine existing shear
stress and the maximum entrained particle range for project reaches. Preliminary sediment
transport analysis and proposed methods are described in Part G, Section 3.2.
4.2 BONUS: For stream or buffer mitigation projects on first order streams (headwater drainages),
do project easements extend upstream toward drainage divides on all tributaries/reaches such
that flow(whether perennial, intermittent or ephemeral) in >90%of all upstream channels is
captured within the project easement(s)?
N/A.
SCORE: 0
Section 5: Implementation and Risk Module
5.1 The proposed project provides:
The proposed project provides 12,901 SMUs, which is 29% of the 45,000 SMU request.
SCORE: 5
5.2 Physical constraints or barriers (i.e. utilities, property lines, easements, managed areas, etc.)
that affect project design and effectiveness.
There are no crossings, roadways, or utility right of ways in the proposed project area.
SCORE: 15
14.1, Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page DA

5.3 What is the predominant land use/land cover within the watershed (contributing drainage area)
upstream of the proposed project site?
The predominant land use/land cover in within the watersheds of the two main Site drainages
(UT1 and UT3) is forest. UT1's watershed is 51%forest, and UT3's watershed is 68%forest. See
Figure 4 and Part G,Table G.2.
SCORE: 15
Section 6: Quality Control Module
6.1 Similar mitigation projects completed by the Offeror(through at least 3 years of monitoring).
Completed more than 5 mitigation projects.
SCORE: 5
6.2 Experience of Project Team (people actually completing work).
The Wildlands Team proposed for the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site consists of 13 professionals
with specialties specific to project evaluation, acquisition, design, construction, and monitoring.
Each of these 13 professionals has relevant technical background and experience in mitigation.
SCORE: 2
6.3 Quality Control Program.
Wildlands' Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program is outlined in Part 6 of the
proposal. Wildlands QA/QC Plan for each project includes checks and balances that cross
examines engineering and design methods, document preparation and delivery, and project
implementation.
SCORE: 5
TOTAL SCORE: 160 POINTS
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.5

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. is a leader in mitigation banking and ecosystem restoration. As a fully
licensed engineering firm,Wildlands will serve as the contracting entity and lead designer on a team
consisting of Wildlands and Kee Mapping&Surveying, PA(Kee) as professional surveyor.The Wildlands
Team has worked together on numerous projects over multiple years and is positioned to create a
timely and quality mitigation project.
W-11 L1 I
M t.
a
r k e
w �
In summary,the restoration plan for the site will include the following:
• Generation of 12,901 stream mitigation units;
• Protection for stream channels from further channel manipulation and vegetation management
for agricultural purposes;
• Reduction of sediment and nutrient loadings by filtering overland runoff and providing
treatment through four agricultural BMPs and wider than require buffer widths;
• Enhancement of habitat functions through channel restoration and enhancement, and riparian
buffer re-establishment;
• Removal of two old pond embankments and restoration of channel-floodplain connectivity;
• Conservation of approximately 80.9 acres of restored land in perpetuity.
k!6.1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.6

PART E-Corporate Background and Experience
1.0 Corporate Background
The Wildlands Team is a multidisciplinary group of professionals that brings together the expertise
necessary to create outstanding ecological restoration projects in a timely and cost effective manner.
Wildlands, the primary offeror, is headquartered in Charlotte, NC.Wildlands has offices in Charlotte, NC;
Raleigh, NC; Asheville, NC; Charleston, SC; and Fairfax,VA. Our 36 employees dedicated to
environmental restoration have positioned Wildlands as a leader in ecosystem restoration in the
southeastern United States.
Wildlands has teamed with Kee Mapping&Surveying(Kee) for survey and easement services for the
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site. Kee is a well-established professional land surveying firm based out of
Asheville, NC. Kee has worked on a variety of projects with Wildlands staff and their experience includes
geomorphic assessment surveys, Global Positioning System (GPS) control for NC State Plane survey
work, boundary surveys for property net verification, easement platting, legal descriptions, and
easement monumentation. Early coordination and frequent communication ensures that everyone
understands their role in the project and can complete tasks in a timely and efficient manner.
Wildlands will use one of the following five contractors specializing in
stream work:
• Backwater Environmental, based in Pittsboro, NC
• Fluvial Solutions, Inc., based in Garner, NC
• Land Mechanic Designs, Inc., based in Willow Spring, NC
• North State Environmental, Inc., based in Winston Salem, NC
• River Works, Inc., based in Cary, NC tine
2.0 Ability to Complete all Phases of the Proposal
Wildlands' success is owed to the skills and abilities of its diverse and talented staff. Wildlands' staff
expertise includes planning, ecology, biology, economics, civil engineering, real estate, AutoCAD,
Geographic Information System (GIS), land management, environmental consulting, and habitat
construction. Our collection of professionals allows for a seamless approach to planning, permitting,
design, construction, and management of restoration projects. We fully understand the permitting
process at the federal, state, and local level. Wildlands has not been found to be out-of-compliance with
any required project permits. Wildlands has five NC Certified Floodplain Managers (CFMs) on staff to
address local, state, and FEMA floodplain permitting requirements. We have extensive experience with
categorical exclusions, 401/404 permitting, and sediment and erosion control plans.
3.0 Similar Projects
Wildlands has completed numerous projects involving stream restoration,wetland restoration, and
mitigation banking. Several of these projects are summarized below.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site,Johnston County, NC-Wildlands is
r currently performing ecological restoration work at a site in Johnston
County, east of the Town of Four Oaks.The full-delivery project will
j
' - provide 18,527 SMUs and 67 Riparian WMUs on several unnamed
tributaries to the Neuse River for DMS.The project includes categorical
0 Q
1 exclusion documentation,existing conditions assessment, landowner
coordination, conservation easement acquisition, stream and wetland
restoration design, permitting, construction, and seven years of post-
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.1

construction monitoring. Wildlands has completed the categorical
exclusion documentation, design, permitting, and easement acquisition
for this site. Construction of the project was completed in early 2014
and the project is currently in the third year of post-construction
monitoring.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, Person County, NC-Wildlands is currently
performing ecological restoration work at a site in Person County, south
of the Town of Hurdle Mills.The full-delivery project will provide 5,387
SMUs on Byrds Creek and five of its tributaries in the Falls Lake portion
of the Neuse River Basin for DMS.The project includes categorical
exclusion documentation, existing conditions assessment, landowner
coordination, conservation easement acquisition, stream restoration
design, permitting, construction, and five years of post-construction
monitoring. Wildlands has completed the categorical exclusion
documentation, permits, easement acquisition, and design for the site.
This project is currently in the third year of post-construction
monitoring.
Hopewell Stream Mitigation Site, Randolph County, NC-Wildlands is
developing a full-delivery project in Randolph County on unnamed
tributaries to Little River.The project will provide 7,463 SMUs for DMS
in the Yadkin River Basin. Stream restoration, enhancement, and
preservation will occur on 12,519 LF of perennial and intermittent
streams that are currently accessed by over 250 head of cattle.The
project includes existing site assessment, conservation easement
acquisition, permitting, stream restoration design, construction, and
seven years of post-construction monitoring of geomorphic stability and
vegetation. Construction was completed in November 2014 and the
second year of post-construction monitoring is underway.
Agony Acres Stream and Buffer Mitigation Site, Guilford County, NC-
Wildlands is currently performing ecological restoration work for DMS
at a full-delivery site in Guilford County, north of the Town of
_-_ Gibsonville.The project will provide 6,488 SMUs and 3.0 BMUs on four
unnamed tributaries to Reedy Fork in the Cape Fear River Basin.The
- project includes categorical exclusion documentation, existing
conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation easement
acquisition, stream restoration design,
qpermitting, construction, and
seven years of post-construction monitoring. Construction was
completed in summer 2014 and the second year of post-construction
monitoring is underway.
` Bear Creek(Phillips Site)Stream Restoration, Chatham County, NC-
Wildlands finalized design and construction documents for a stream
restoration site near Siler City for DMS.The project includes restoration
work on 4,075 LF of Bear Creek and one unnamed tributary in the Cape
Fear River basin.The project includes design, permitting, bid assistance,
and construction administration. Bear Creek is located in a mapped
floodplain; Wildlands obtained the published hydraulic modeling from
the NC Division of Emergency Management and performed detailed
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.2

hydraulic modeling of the proposed restoration design to satisfy FEMA
requirements for a no-rise condition. Construction was completed in
August 2013 in accordance with State Construction Office (SCO)
procedures.
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site, Union County, NC-Wildlands is
developing a full-delivery project in rural Union County on Norkett
Branch and four tributaries.The project will provide 10,098 SMUs for
DMS in the Yadkin River Basin.The project includes existing site
f At assessment, conservation easement acquisition, permitting, stream
' restoration design, construction, and seven years of post-construction
monitoring of geomorphic stability and vegetation. Detailed hydraulic
modeling was completed for CLOMR and LOMR approvals.Two storm
water Best Management Practices (BMPs) were constructed to treat
headwater agricultural runoff and will provide SMU credits.This project
is currently in the third year of post-construction monitoring.
Owl's Den Mitigation Site, Lincoln County, NC-Wildlands is developing
a full-delivery project in Lincoln County on two unnamed tributaries to
Howards Creek.The project will provide 2,400 SMUs on two tributaries
to Howards Creek in the Catawba River basin and 8.0 WMUs via wetland
re-establishment and rehabilitation. The project includes categorical
r exclusion documentation,existing conditions assessment, landowner
coordination, conservation easement acquisition, stream and wetland
restoration design, permitting, construction, and seven years of post-
construction monitoring. Detailed hydrologic modeling was completed
to study wetland-groundwater connections. Construction of this project
was completed in the summer of 2015.
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site,Rockingham County, NC-
i ' Jc�'i t^ Wildlands is currently performing ecological restoration work at a site in
Reidsville, NC.The full-delivery project will provide 4,900 SMUs and 12.7
WMUs on Little Troublesome Creek, Irvin Creek, and one of its unnamed
` tributaries in the Cape Fear River basin for DMJ
S.The project includes
categorical exclusion documentation, existing conditions assessment,
landowner coordination, conservation easement acquisition, stream
and wetland restoration design, permitting, construction, and five years
of post-construction monitoring. Wildlands also performed detailed
hydraulic modeling of the proposed restoration design for CLOMR and
Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) submittals to satisfy FEMA
requirements. Fifth year monitoring of the project is currently
underway.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.3

Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site, Stanly County, NC-Wildlands is
currently performing ecological restoration work at a site near
Albemarle, NC.The full-delivery project will provide 6,415 SMUs on
Scaly Bark Creek and six unnamed tributaries in the Yadkin River basin
for DMS.The project includes categorical exclusion documentation,
existing conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation
easement acquisition, restoration design, permitting, construction, and
five years of post-construction monitoring. Wildlands successfully
- completed CLOMR and LOMR packages for this project.This project is in
the final year of post-construction monitoring and approaching close-
out.
Underwood Mitigation Site, Chatham County, NC-Wildlands is
currently performing ecological restoration work at a site northeast of
Siler City, NC.The full-delivery project will provide 6,192 SMUs, 10.1
WMUs, and 1.9 Non-Riparian WMUs on South Fork Cane Creek and its
seven unnamed tributaries in the Cape Fear River basin for DMS.The
A. project includes categorical exclusion documentation, existing
conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation easement
acquisition, stream and wetland restoration design, permitting,
construction, and seven years of post-construction monitoring. Because
South Fork Cane Creek is located in a mapped floodplain, Wildlands
performed detailed hydraulic modeling of the proposed restoration
design to satisfy FEMA requirements. Wildlands has completed the
categorical exclusion documentation, easement acquisition, restoration
design, and construction. This project is currently in the fourth year of
monitoring.
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project, Union County, NC-Wildlands
completed ecological restoration work at a site in Union County,
southeast of the City of Charlotte.The project will provide 5,672 SMUs
and 11.5 WMUs on Crooked Creek and three unnamed tributaries in the
Yadkin River Basin.The project includes categorical exclusion
documentation, existing conditions assessment, Environmental
Resources Technical Report (ERTR), stream and wetland restoration
design, and construction oversight in accordance with State
Construction Office (SCO) requirements. Wildlands has completed the
categorical exclusion documentation, ERTR, design, and permitting for
the site. Construction was completed in 2015.
Little Pine Creek III Stream &Wetland Restoration Project,Alleghany
County, NC-Wildlands is currently performing ecological restoration
work located in the DMS Little River& Brush Creek Local Watershed
planning area.The design-bid-build project will provide approximately
7,017 SMUs and 1.4 WMUs on three unnamed tributaries to Little Pine
Creek. Site challenges include a wide variety of onsite stream types and
valley transitions, from Rosgen A-and B-type streams in the headwaters
of the project to Rosgen C-and E-type streams.The project involves a
variety of approaches including full restoration of stream dimension,
pattern, and profile; stream enhancement; stream preservation;
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page EA

wetland enhancement; and wetland preservation. Construction was
completed in December 2015.
- - - - Lyle Creek Mitigation Site, Catawba County, NC-Wildlands is currently
performing ecological restoration work at a site northwest of Lake
Norman in Catawba County, NC.The project will provide 5,779 SMUs
and 7.0 WMUs on unnamed tributaries to Lyle Creek in the Catawba
River basin.The project includes categorical exclusion documentation,
existing conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation
easement acquisition, stream and wetland restoration design,
permitting, construction, and five years of post-construction
monitoring. Construction was completed in 2012 and fifth year
monitoring of the project is currently underway.
Malbone Wetland Mitigation, City of Virginia Beach, VA -This
Wildlands-designed wetland mitigation project was constructed by
North State Environmental during the summer of 2010 for the Virginia
Department of Transportation in Virginia Beach, Virginia.The site was
selected for enhancement and creation of three wetland types
(emergent, scrub-shrub, and forested)to mitigate for wetland impacts
resulting from the proposed widening of Princess Anne Road and the
construction of Nimmo Parkway.Approximately 24 acres of wetlands
were created or enhanced as a result of the project.This includes 16
acres of palustrine forested wetland creation,three acres of palustrine
emergent wetland creation, 0.1 acres of scrub-shrub wetland creation
and five acres of palustrine emergent wetlands enhancement. Key
elements of the project included soil classification and analysis,
groundwater monitoring well installation and monitoring, wetland
hydrologic modeling, grading design, permitting, construction document
development, construction oversight, as-built plan development,
baseline monitoring, and 10 years of post-construction monitoring.
�. West Fork Linville River Restoration,Avery County, NC-Wildlands
completed design and permitting for the restoration and enhancement
of a high elevation riparian system. Construction was completed in 2009
g p Y p
on approximately 5,200 LF of native trout channels in the Upper Linville
River Watershed. Several sections of the stream design focused on total
.} restoration of degraded stream corridors while other stream reaches
have been enhanced for trout habitat.The project design also included
elements of off-channel habitat enhancement and pond rehabilitation.
401/404 permits, conservation easements, and floodplain permits were
obtained for this project.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.5

Lone Oak Mitigation Bank,Albemarle County, VA -Wildlands completed
the construction phase of the Lone Oak Stream Mitigation Bank near
Charlottesville,VA, in early 2011.The bank resulted in the restoration
and enhancement of approximately 38,000 LF of Ballinger Creek and
several tributary streams. Restoration of the site and removal of the
existing cattle operation is expected to aid in the removal of Ballinger
Creek from the state 303(d) list.The project included development of a
Banking Instrument and plans for permit submittals, development of
final design plans and specifications, construction observation, as-built
survey and the baseline monitoring report.
4.0 Lead Consultant and Team Members
Wildlands is a licensed engineering firm in NC and will act as prime consultant for this contract. Staff
from our Charlotte, NC office will complete this project. Wildlands has teamed with Kee to offer the best
possible team to DMS. As indicated above in Section 1.0,Wildlands will select a specialty stream
contractor from our provided list of qualified firms.
LEAD CONSULTANT
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. - Headquarters
Charlotte, NC Office Location
_O 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
A����►�' Charlotte, NC 28203
W I LILA N D (P) 704.332.7754 (F) 704.332.3306
Cr GI hJC L RI'd:_
Firm Contact:
Shawn Wilkerson, President,[e-mail]
North Carolina S-Corporation
Federal Identification Number: 56-0651376
TEAM MEMBERS
Kee Mapping and Survey, PA
P.O. Box 2566
-� Asheville, NC 28802
Keel
(P) 828-645-8275
01 11,11LIJAIJ Firm Contact
Phillip Brad Kee, PLS
[e-mail]
Services to be Provided: Professional surveying services
5.0 Project Manager Experience
Ms. Emily Reinicker currently serves as a senior water resources engineer for Wildlands' Charlotte, NC,
office. Her duties include technical review and project management for ecological restoration projects.
She has 16 years of professional experience in water resources and civil engineering, including
hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, natural channel design, regulatory research,watershed analysis, and
stormwater management. She has been involved in the design of more than 123,000 LF of stream
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.6

restoration and enhancement work in NC.Additional information on Ms. Reinicker's experience is
provided below in Section 7.0.
6.0 Project Approach
The Wildlands Team takes a holistic, integrated approach to site restoration.The following text outlines
some key aspects of our multi-disciplinary project approach. Site-specific project plans are further
described in Part G of this proposal.
6.1 Site Selection _...,..:. --. .
The Wildlands Team carefully selects project sites where ecological
restoration can be maximized. Our sites are reviewed by our
environmental scientists and engineers during the selection process
to ensure that ecological uplift can be achieved within regulatory
parameters related to floodplain management, protected species,
and existing wetland resources. We consult with the existing
landowners to explain the restoration process and the conservation t `
easement conditions. We review the site with our contractor to
identify potential construction challenges and opportunities.
6.2 Property Owner Coordination
Property owner coordination begins during the site selection stage and continues throughout the
project. We meet with families to understand the existing and future land use plans for the site. We
work to fully explain the restoration process and review site plans at the conceptual design stage and
final design stage with the property owners to make sure that their concerns are addressed. Our project
manager is the point of contact throughout the project so that the property owners always know who
can answer any questions that may arise.
6.3 Contractor Coordination
Wildlands draws on our contractor's construction expertise early in the project planning phase. We
consult with our contractor so that the project can be designed and constructed in an efficient and cost-
effective manner. We work to identify on-site materials that are native to the existing ecosystem and
that should be incorporated into the restoration project to best mimic natural systems for the site
locale. For example, cobble material embedded in excavated material on mountain stream sites can be
sorted and used for riffle construction. We also know that coordination and flexibility during
construction is the key to a successful restoration site.
6.4 Site Assessment
Numerous methods of assessment are used to quantify and qualify
the site and upstream watershed's stability, nutrient loads, }
sediment transport, hydrologic and hydraulic properties, plant and
animal habitat, ecology, soil conditions and functional uplift
potential. Our assessment is carried out by surveyors trained in
natural channel assessment and by field scientists and engineers
trained in stream and wetland assessment and design who know
what characteristics to look for that will aid in design. Wildlands
looks for predictors of future stability problems, such as upstream
development and concentrated overland flow paths.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.7

6.5 Permitting
A project's schedule can be completely disrupted if the permitting for the project is not performed
correctly.The Wildlands Team understands the critical steps necessary for acquiring these permits in a
timely and efficient manner. Methods used to ensure a rapid permitting process include on-site
meetings with the various permitting agency representatives prior to design, as well as staying up-to-
date on the regulations associated with ecosystem restoration.These steps allow for the submittal of a
thorough and accurate permitting application for our projects.
6.6 Site Design
Once the existing conditions are documented and evaluated,the preferred alternative selected, and
base-mapping developed, a design discharge range is selected based on the project goals. Natural
channel design parameters will be developed based on reference reach data, hydraulic modeling, and
sediment transport assessment. Wildlands has five CFMs on staff who can evaluate design options to
optimize floodplain function and minimize off-site adverse flood elevation impacts. During the
preliminary design the plan view channel location is set, cross-sections for riffles and pools are designed,
and in-stream habitat and grade control structures are located. General grading limits, details, and
easement locations are included at this stage. Property owner input and contractor coordination help to
assure that the proposed design meets the multi-faceted
design goals.
6.7 Construction .•a �� f":�
The Wildlands Team is familiar with the policies, procedures,
and practices necessary to construct natural channel design P
and wetland restoration projects. Wildlands has provided
construction administration and observation services for over
28 miles of stream work and 152 acres of wetland work.
6.8 Monitoring
Monitoring is an important component to any stream restoration or enhancement work.The Wildlands
Team has experience in both developing monitoring plans for restoration projects and in implementing
those plans. Our monitoring plan experience includes as-built surveys and determining whether the
project has met its success criteria after the required time period.
7.0 Key Personnel Resumes (Prime and Sub)
This section provides resumes for the Wildlands project manager and the managing staff for our survey
subcontractor on this project.An additional description of the Wildlands project manager's abilities is
provided in Section 5.0. Resumes for remaining personnel on the team are provided in Part F.
Emily Reinicker, PE, CFM—Wildlands Project Manager
Ms. Reinicker has over 16 years of experience in managing and executing a wide variety of water
resources planning and engineering projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Project Manager
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer(NC); Certified Floodplain Manger(NC)
TOTAL YEARS EXPERIENCE: 16 years
EDUCATION: BS, Biosystems Engineering with a Minor in Environmental Engineering,
Clemson University, 1999
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.8

ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Hydraulic Modeling for Stream Restoration and Sediment Transport
(Kris Bass, PE, NC State University Department of Biological &
Agricultural Engineering), 2011
Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for Engineers (Rosgen & Hey,
Wildland Hydrology), 2006
Project Manager Boot Camp (PSMJ Resources), 2004& 2014
Stormwater BMP Academy (NC State Cooperative Extension), 2004
Advanced HEC-RAS Training (David Ford Consulting Engineers), 2002
Floodplain Map Revision Workshop (FEMA), 2001
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Construction Practices Workshop
(US Army Corps of Engineers), 2000
Using Best Management Practices to Improve Water Quality and
Reduce Flood Damages in Urban Watersheds (Northeastern
Illinois Planning Commission), 2000
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SMUs;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 WMUs Project Manager
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site
10,098 SMUs Project Manager
Union County, NC
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SM US; Assistant Project
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs Manager
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
6,415 SMUs Lead Designer
Stanly County, NC
Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project
28,000 SMUs Project Manager
Charlotte, NC
Lone Oak Mitigation Bank
Albemarle County, VA 38,000 LF Design
Phillip Brad Kee, PLS—Surveyor Subconsultant
With over 15 years of experience in Land Surveying, Mr. Kee has been a leader in providing high quality
site surveys for clients ranging from land developers to conservation agencies. Mr. Kee is experienced in
geomorphic assessment surveys, conservation easement surveys, boundary surveys for property net
verification, GPS control for NC State Plane survey work, easement platting, legal descriptions, and
easement monumentation. For projects large and small, Kee Mapping & Surveying uses the same care
and integrity to achieve accurate documentation.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION/TRAINING: Professional Land Surveyor NC L-4647
PROJECT EXPERIENCE(WILDLANDS PROJECTS) PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SMUs;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 WMUs Project Surveyor
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site
10,098 SMUs Project Surveyor
Union County, NC
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.9

PROJECT EXPERIENCE(WILDLANDS PROJECTS) PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Agony Acres Stream and Buffer Mitigation Site 6,488 SM Us;
Guilford County, NC 3.0 BMUs Project Surveyor
Little Pine Creek III Stream &Wetland Restoration 7,546 SMUs;
Project—Alleghany County, NC 1.2 WMUs Project Surveyor
8.0 DBE/HUB Participation
Two of our potential contractors are woman-owned businesses: Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. and North
State Environmental, Inc.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.10

PART F- Project Organization
1.0 Organizational Chart
The following illustrates the organization of personnel that will be assigned to this project.
ZI. -
Environmental
Qualify
Shawn Wilkerson 7F-ilyeinicker,PE,CFM Aaron Earley,PE,CFM
Categorical Exclusions Existing Conditions Survey
Andrea Eckardt Ian Eckardt Andrea Eckardt Eric Neuhaus,PE
Ian Eckardt Alea Tuttle,PWS Robert Bugg,ALC Christine Blackwelder
Ruby Danis Brad Kee, PLS Jesse Kelley
Brad Kee,PLS
Construction
Ian Eckardt Christine Blackwelder Kirsten Glmbert
Eric Neuhaus,PE Erie Neuhaus,PE Alea Tuttle,Pws
Ruby dais
■ MLouaMos Charlotte,NC Offices
Engnrenng aeawees roll 6n
N&r
KEE MAPPING&SURVEY Ash evil le,NC Office k...°d by amplava�ol
licenard caepueaee an�tie
2.0 Qualifications and Experience
Brief resumes presenting the qualifications, experience, and assigned project responsibilities of each
project team member are presented on the following pages. Resumes for the Wildlands project
manager, Ms. Emily Reinicker, and for the project manager for Kee were presented in Part E, Section 7.0.
t:6V Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page FA

Shawn Wilkerson
Mr. Wilkerson has 17 years of professional experience in water resources,focusing on surface water
hydrology and restoration. He has managed and designed a diverse range of projects, including
wetland/BMP construction and monitoring, stream restoration and enhancement, and watershed
planning for flood control and water quality improvements. Mr. Wilkerson plays a key role in initial site
evaluation for mitigation and conservation easement acquisition. In the roles of principal-in-charge or
project manager, Mr. Wilkerson has overseen and managed design and construction for more than 34
miles of stream restoration projects. Several of his key projects have involved mitigation banking and
turn-key mitigation solutions. In his role at Wildlands, he also serves as the leader of a 36-person team
of scientists and engineers that focuses on ecological restoration and assessments. Mr. Wilkerson
focuses on integrating ecologically responsible projects within the constraints of impacted landscapes
while using his experience and education to manage and create innovative and successful projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: President
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Principal-in-Charge
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: NC Real Estate Broker, 2000
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 17 years
EDUCATION: MS, Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
1998
BA, English Literature, Appalachian State University, 1993
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rosgen Levels I through IV, 1998- 2003
PSMJ Project Manager Boot Camp, 2004, 2014
Mecklenburg Habitat Assessment Protocol Training, 2000
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site 4,500 SM Us;
Catawba County, NC 4.0 WMUs Principal-in-Charge
Candy Creek Stream Mitigation Site
15,456 SMUs Principal-in-Charge
Guilford County, NC
7-
Bear Creek(Phillips Site)Stream Restoration
4,075 LF Principal-in-Charge
Chatham County, NC
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site 10,098 SMUs Principal-in-Charge
Union County, NC
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site Principal-in-Charge; Project
Stanly County, NC 6,415 SMUs Manager; Conservation
Easement Acquisition
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site 4,900 SMUs; Principal-in-Charge; Project
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 WMUs Manager
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs; Principal-in-Charge;
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs i Conservation Easement
Acquisition
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.2

Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
Mr. Earley has 15 years of experience in ecological restoration, stormwater management design and
modeling, floodplain delineation, and hydrologic/hydraulic analysis. At Wildlands, he is responsible for
managing stream restoration and stormwater quality Best Management Practice (BMP) projects,
performing hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to support natural channel design, and final preparation
of construction documents. Mr. Earley has experience with municipal and state environmental
restoration projects, school and university improvement projects, and private development projects. He
has completed numerous Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) flood studies of stream
restoration projects throughout NC.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: QA/QC Manager
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer; Certified Floodplain Manager
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 15 years
EDUCATION: MS, Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, 1999
BS,Textile Engineering, North Carolina State University, 1996
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Hydraulic Modeling for Stream Restoration and Sediment
Transport, NC State University Dept of Biological &
Agricultural Engineering, 2011
Low Impact Development Certification, NC Cooperative
Extension, 2010
River Morphology&Applications, Wildland Hydrology, 2008
Fluvial Geomorphology for Engineers,Wildland Hydrology, 2007
Project Manager Boot Camp, PSMJ Resources, 2004, 2014
HEC-RAS for Stream Restoration, Pennsylvania State University,
2002
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Candy Creek Stream Mitigation Site
15,456 SMUs Project Manager
Guilford County, NC
Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project Assistant Project
Charlotte, NC 28,000 SMUs Manager; Lead
Designer
Glassy Creek Stream Restoration Project
3,505 LF Project Manager
Charlotte, NC
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 5,672 LF; 12.4 acres of Project Manager;
Union County, NC wetland Lead Engineer
Briar Creek/Edwards Branch Stream Restoration
3,560 LF Project Manager
Charlotte, NC
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.3

Andrea Eckardt
Ms. Eckardt has 17 years of experience in watershed management, environmental planning, permitting,
and geographic information systems (GIS). She currently serves as the Senior Environmental Planner for
Wildlands. She specializes in environmental permitting, watershed management, project development
and implementation, citizen/agency facilitation, grant writing, conservation easement coordination, and
GIS mapping. Ms. Eckardt has experience with municipal and state improvement projects, school and
university improvement projects, non-profit improvement projects, and private development projects.
Ms. Eckardt has facilitated State Property Office coordination of easements for 484.23 acres of
conservation easements in NC.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Planner
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Categorical Exclusions; Conservation Easement Acquisition
Lead; GIS Coordinator
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 17 years
EDUCATION: MS, Environmental Science, Applied Ecology, Indiana
University, 1996
BS, Biology, Wake Forest University, 1994
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Consultant Regulatory Workshop, 2007
Financial Benefits of Conservation Easements: Conservation
Programs and Tax Incentives for NC Landowners, 2006
Project Manager Boot Camp, 2005, 2014
Natural Resource Leadership Institute, 2001
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Various Full-Delivery Projects 15 full-delivery Categorical Exclusion;
Multiple Counties in NC projects Conservation
Easement Acquisition
Box Creek Wilderness Area Stream Mitigation Bank
158,400 LF (30 miles) Project Manager
Rutherford County, NC
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site 4,900 SM Us; Project Manager
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 WMUs (existing condition &
design phase)
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 5,672 SMUs; Project Manager
Union County, NC 11.5 WMUs (conceptual phase)
Burnetts Chapel Buffer Mitigation Site
9.2 BMUs Project Manager
Guilford County, NC
West Fork Linville River Stream Restoration
5,200 LF Permitting
Avery County, NC
Lone Oak Mitigation Bank Permitting; Banking
Albemarle County, VA 38,000 LF Instrument
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page FA

Robert Bugg,ALC
Mr. Bugg is a seasoned real estate broker and land acquisition professional with a 12-year history as a
Realtor°focusing primarily on land acquisition and entitlement for development and mitigation. In his
career he has purchased, sold, or brokered over$50M in real estate. He is one of only 36 brokers in the
state of North Carolina to hold the esteemed Accredited Land Consultant(ALC) designation which
required over 90 hours of class time and over$10M in land sales.
Mr. Bugg has been responsible for identification, land owner negotiation, and closure of conservation
easements and land use agreements on over 1,000 acres representing 94,000 feet of stream mitigation,
25 acres of buffer mitigation, 92 acres of wetlands mitigation, and over$37M in full delivery awards. In
addition to helping identify and close easements for Wildlands, Mr. Bugg is also responsible for our
mitigation credit sales to local developers from our existing mitigation banks.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Director of Land Acquisition
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Conservation Easement Acquisitions
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: NC & SC Realtor® Broker,Accredited Land Consultant, Unlimited
NC General Contractor's License
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 12 years
EDUCATION: BA,The University of the South, Sewanee,TN, 1990
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project 28,000 SMUs Conservation Easement
Charlotte, NC Acquisition
Agony Acres Stream and Buffer Mitigation Site 6,488 SMUs; Conservation Easement
Guilford County, NC 3.0 BMUs Acquisition; Realtor
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site 10,098 SMUs Conservation Easement
Union County, NC Acquisition; Realtor
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SMUs; Conservation Easement
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 WMUs Acquisition; Realtor
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site 18,527 SMUs; Conservation Easement
Johnston County, NC 67 WMUs Acquisition; Realtor
Burnetts Chapel Buffer Mitigation Site 9.2 BMUs Conservation Easement
Guilford County, NC Acquisition
Cannon Creek Mitigation Site 16,000 SMUs Conservation Easement
Berkeley County, SC Acquisition
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.5

Ian Eckardt
Mr. Eckardt has 11 years of experience in stream geomorphic assessments, stream classification,
wetland delineation, protected species surveys, sediment sampling and analysis,water quality
monitoring, groundwater monitoring, surveying, and vegetation assessment. He currently serves as
Environmental Scientist for Wildlands Engineering and is responsible for regulatory permitting, agency
correspondence, wetland delineations, geomorphic surveys and assessments, protected species surveys,
and post-construction monitoring.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Categorical Exclusions; Existing Conditions Survey; Permitting
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 11 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
2007
BA, Geology, North Carolina State University, 2001
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, 2013
Advanced Problems in Hydric Soil Evaluation, 2013
Rosgen Level I, 2013
Surface Water Identification Training and Certification, 2013
NC WAM Certificate Training, 2010
Management of Invasives and Exotic Vegetation in Riparian
Areas, 2009
North Carolina Rare Plant Identification Workshops, 2007 &
2011
Delineation of Piedmont and Coastal Plain Jurisdiction
Wetlands, 2007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Agony Acres Stream and Buffer Mitigation Site 6,488 SM Us; Existing Conditions;
Guilford County, NC 3.0 BMUs
Categorical Exclusions;
Permitting; Monitoring
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site Existing Conditions;
Union County, NC 10,098 SM Us Categorical Exclusions;
Permitting; Monitoring
Existing Conditions;
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SMUs; Categorical Exclusions;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 WMUs
Permitting; Monitoring
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
6,415 SM Us Monitoring
Stanly County, NC
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs
Burnetts Chapel Buffer Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 9.2 BMUs Monitoring
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.6

Eric Neuhaus, PE
Mr. Neuhaus serves as a water resources engineer in the Wildlands' Charlotte office. He has five years of
experience working on a variety of projects including stream and wetland restoration, stormwater
management, erosion and sediment control, hydrologic modeling, and groundwater modeling. Mr.
Neuhaus' duties include field data collection, site analysis, design development, preparation of
construction plans, earthwork estimation, construction administration, and post-construction
monitoring of mitigation sites. He also provides hydrologic modeling and water budget analysis including
groundwater modeling for wetland restoration projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Design; Permitting; Construction Administration/Observation
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 5 years
EDUCATION: MS, Biological Systems Engineering,Virginia Tech, 2013
BS, Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, 2010
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rogen Level I -Applied Fluvial Geomorphology, 2015
River Course 101 -Stream Morphology and Assessment, 2013
River Course 201 - Natural Channel Design Principles, 2013
HEC-RAS (ASCE), 2013
Stream Restoration Design Techniques, 2012
Sediment Transport Fundamentals, 2012
Stormwater Design and Erosion and Sediment Control
Techniques, 2009
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SMUs; Design; Modeling; Construction
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 WMUs Administration
Candy Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 SMUs Design
Henry Fork Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site 4,500 SMUs; Design; Hydrologic Modeling
Catawba County, NC 4.0 WMUs
Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project
28,000 SMUs Design
Charlotte, NC
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site 10,098 SMUs CADD; Plan & Construction
Union County, NC Document Production
East Providence Stream Repair Geomorphic Assessment;
Charlotte, NC 300 LF Design
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.7

Christine Blackwelder
Ms. Blackwelder currently serves as a senior environmental scientist for Wildlands' Charlotte, NC office.
Her duties include assessment, design, and project management for ecological restoration projects. She
has 13 years of professional experience in environmental planning and restoration. Ms. Blackwelder is
skilled in watershed assessment methodology,geomorphic assessments, natural channel design,
stormwater design, bid document development, construction management, and monitoring techniques.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Design; Construction Administration/Observation
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 12 years
EDUCATION: Graduate level classes in Earth Science, University of North
Carolina, Charlotte, NC
BA, Environmental Science, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, VA, 2002
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Sediment Transport in Stream Assessment and Design (Dr. Peter
Wilcock, Utah State), 2014
Rosgen Level I - IV, 2006-2008
Project Manager Boot Camp, 2008, 2014
Aquatic Insect Collection Protocols for Stream Mitigation
Projects, 2006
Stream Restoration Construction Training, 2005
Erosion and Sediment Control Inspector, 2003
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Reviewer, 2003
OSHA 10 Hour Safety Training, 2009
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Holman Mill Stream Mitigation Site 3,656 SMUs Assistant Project Manager;
Alamance County, NC Lead Designer
Little Pine Creek III Stream &Wetland Project Manager; Lead
Restoration Project—Alleghany County, NC 7,546 SMUs; 1.2 WMUs Designer
Little Pine Creek II Stream &Wetland 4,156 LF of streams; Project Manager; Lead
Restoration Project: Redesign—Alleghany
5.4 acres of wetlands Designer
County, NC
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs; Assistant Project Manager;
Design; Construction
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs
Administration
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site Construction Document
Stanly County, NC 6,415 SMUs Preparation; Construction
Administration
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.8

Kirsten Gimbert
Ms. Gimbert has over 11 years of professional experience in success monitoring for ecological
restoration projects. Ms. Gimbert's responsibilities include monitoring/assessments, design,
construction oversight, and project management for ecological restoration projects. She has been
involved with more than 23 monitoring projects for stream restoration and enhancement work in both
urban and rural settings across North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Monitoring Lead
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 11 years
EDUCATION: MS, Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, 2004
BA, Earth Sciences, State University of New York at Fredonia,
2000
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rosgen Level 1 - III, 2007-2014
River Course 131—Assessment and Identification of Riparian
Vegetation, 2012
Stream Restoration Construction Training, 2006 and 2009
AutoCAD for Stream Monitoring and Restoration, 2006
NC WAM Certificate Training, 2010
Developments in Sediment and Erosion Control for
Mountainous Regions, 2004
Taxonomy and Pollution Ecology of Aquatic Insects, 2004
OSHA 10 Hour Safety Training (Jacobs), 2010
First Aid/CPR Certified (Jacobs), 2010
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site 18,527 SM Us; Existing Conditions
Johnston County, NC 67 WMUs Survey; Monitoring
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
6,415 SM Us Monitoring
Stonly County, NC
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Existing Conditions
Person County, NC 5,387 SM Us Survey; Monitoring
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site +4,900 SMUs;
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 WMUs Monitoring
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs;
Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs
Malbone Wetland Mitigation Site
24 acres of wetland Monitoring
City of Virginia Beach, VA
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.9

Jesse Kelley
Mr. Kelley has over 13 years of experience dealing with AutoCAD/Civil 3D in civil design, surveying, and
mechanical design. His survey experience has involved collecting data in the field,transferring it to
AutoCAD, preparing surfaces, creating project base files, project design, construction staking, and
construction management. His stream and restoration design experience has included existing
conditions survey and base map preparation, existing and proposed stream alignments, erosion control
structures and BMPs, earthwork balancing, as-built plans, and habitat and planting design. Infrastructure
design involved preparation of proposed grading, erosion control and water quality design, stormwater
drainage, potable water and sewer design, roadway design, and project coordination with clients,
designers, and multiple jurisdictions and utilities.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Designer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: CADD Design
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 13 years
EDUCATION: BA, English, New Mexico State University, 1996
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: ArcGIS 1: Introduction to GIS, 2014
River Course 131 -Assessment and Identification of Riparian
Vegetation, 2012
River Course 201 - Natural Channel Design, 2011
River Course 101 -Stream Morphology Assessment, 2009
Introduction to AutoCAD Civil 3D, 2006
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SM Us;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 WMUs CADD; Plan Production
Bear Creek(Phillips Site)Stream Restoration
4,075 LF CADD; Plan Production
Chatham County, NC
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site 10,098 SM Us Existing Conditions Survey;
Union County, NC CADD; Plan Production
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site 6,415 SM Us CADD; Plan Production;
Stanly County, NC Monitoring
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site 4,900 SM Us; Existing Conditions Survey;
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 WMUs CADD; Plan Production
Glassy Creek Stream Restoration Project Existing Conditions Survey;
Charlotte, NC 3,505 LF CADD; Plan Production
Lone Oak Mitigation Bank 38,000 LF CADD; Plan Production
Albemarle County, VA
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.10

Alea Tuttle, Pws
Ms. Tuttle has over five years of experience in various aspects of stream and wetland monitoring,
including geomorphic assessment, biological assessment, water quality monitoring, and sediment
sampling and analysis. She is also experienced with vegetation monitoring and invasive species control.
Ms. Tuttle currently serves as environmental scientist for Wildlands and is responsible for geomorphic
stream assessment, post-construction monitoring, GIS analysis and mapping, and assisting with stream
and wetland delineations.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Existing Conditions Survey; Permitting; Monitoring
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Wetland Scientist
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 5 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth Science, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, 2012
BS, Environmental Science, University of Vermont, 2008
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Surface Water Identification Training and Certification Class,
North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 2014
Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, North Carolina State University,
2014
Advanced Problems in Hydric Soil Evaluation, North Carolina
State University, 2014
Natural Communities and Rare Plants of the Uwharrie National
Forest, North Carolina National Heritage Program, 2014
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Agony Acres Stream and Buffer Mitigation Site 6,488 SMUs; Existing Conditions
Guilford County, NC 3.0 BMUs Survey
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site 18,527 SMUs; Existing Conditions
Johnston County, NC 67 WMUs Survey; Monitoring
Little Pine Creek III Stream &Wetland Restoration 7,546 SMUs; Existing Conditions
Project—Alleghany County, NC 1Us Survey
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site 4,900 SMUs; ~
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 WMUs Monitoring
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs
Burnetts Chapel Buffer Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 9.2 BMUs Monitoring
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
5,387 SMUs Monitoring
Person County, NC
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site- PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.11

Ruby Davis
Ms. Davis currently serves as an Environmental Scientist with a background in real estate and wildlife
biology. At Wildlands, she assists with various aspects of stream and wetland monitoring, including
geomorphic assessment, biological assessment,vegetation assessment, water quality monitoring, and
sediment sampling and analysis. She is responsible for macroinvertebrate and herpetology collection
and identification, agency correspondence and surveys for protected species, post-construction
monitoring, and real estate title work.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Existing Conditions Survey; Monitoring
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: N.C. Licensed Wildlife Rehabilitator
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 1.5 years
EDUCATION: BS, Wildlife Biology, Lees-McRae College, 2014
BS, Business Administration, UNC-Wilmington, 1995
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Stream Morphology Assessment, 2015
Assessment and Identification of Riparian Vegetation, 2015
Member of Animal Rehabilitators of the Carolinas
PROJECT EXPERINCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Candy Creek Stream Mitigation Site 15,456 SMUs Existing Conditions
Guilford County, NC Survey
Henry Fork Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site 4,500 SMUs; Existing Conditions
Catawba County, NC 4.0 WMUs Survey
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
6,415 SMUs Monitoring
Stanly County, NC
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs;
Catawba County, NC 7.0 WMUs Monitoring
Norkett Branch Stream Mitigation Site
10,098 SMUs Monitoring
Union County, NC
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.12

Part G -Technical Approach
The Lone Hickory Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Yadkin County approximately 3.5 miles south of the
town of Yadkinville and approximately 24 miles west of the city of Winston-Salem, NC(Figure 1).The
project involves the restoration and preservation of project streams, optional wetland development,
and the creation of best management practices(BMPs)to treat adjacent agricultural runoff.The project
is located within the DMS targeted watershed for the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03040101130020 and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-07-02 and is being submitted
for mitigation credit in the Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101.
The proposed Site contains tributaries to South Deep Creek. South Deep Creek classifies as supporting
for aquatic life near the Site; however, the 2008 DWR Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Plan noted that
approximately 3.3 miles downstream from the Site, South Deep Creek was impaired for aquatic life due
to turbidity. This section of South Deep Creek was included on the 2014 North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment-for 305(b) lists as exceeding criteria for fish tissue mercury and turbidity.The 2008 DWR
Report noted the importance of stream restoration and best management practices in the watershed to
address the observed stressors.The 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities
(RBRP) also outlined general goals of restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat on impaired
streams in the watershed, and implementation of agricultural BMPs to limit sediment and nutrient input
from active farming operations.
Less than a mile downstream from the Site,where
of South Deep Creek crosses underneath SR 601, the
Town of Yadkinville has a water plant with a water
NOintake on South Deep Creek. NC DWR classifies South
w Deep Creek as a critical area here.The Site is within
the water supply watershed to this facility.
Jy The Upper Yadkin River basin is also discussed in the
2005 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission's
K, (NCWRC) Wildlife Action Plan (WAP). In the report,
this watershed was noted as a priority watershed for
freshwater conservation.
Restoration of the Site will directly and indirectly
address stressors identified in the RBRP,the DWR
Basinwide Plan and the NCWRC WAP by creating stable stream banks, reconnecting incised streams to
floodplains, restoring a forest to agriculturally maintained buffer areas, installing BMPs to treat areas of
concentrated agricultural inputs, and restoring and preserving existing forested buffers in amounts
twice of that required.These actions will reduce nutrient and sediment inputs to project streams, and
ultimately to South Deep Creek. Approximately 80.9 acres of land will be placed under permanent
conservation easement to protect the Site in perpetuity.
Sources:
NC Division of Mitigation Services.2009. Upper Yadkin River Pee-Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities.
NC Division of Water Resources.2008.Yadkin—Pee Dee River Basin Plan.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission.2005.North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan.Raleigh,NC.
NCDWR.2012. North Carolina Integrated Report 305(b)and 303(d).
1.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The major goals of the proposed stream mitigation project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Yadkin River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level
including redevelopment of historic wetlands. Floodplain habitat and ecological function will be re-
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.1

established and enhanced on-site,with the goal of restoring Piedmont Alluvial Forest, Piedmont
Headwater Stream Forest, Piedmont Bottomland Forest, and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
communities as described by Schafale (2012).
Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below in Table G.1.
Table G.1 Ecological and Water Quality Goals of the Mitigation Project
Goal Objective CU-Wide and RBRP Objectives Supported
Reconstruct stream channels slated for
Restoration with stable dimensions. Create
Stabilize eroding stable tie-ins for tributaries joining restored Reduce sediment inputs; Improve
stream banks. channels.Add bank revetments and in- freshwater habitat.
stream structures to reaches to protect
restored/enhanced streams.
Construct stream channels that will maintain
Improve the a stable pattern and profile considering the
stability of stream hydrologic and sediment inputs to the Reduce sediment inputs; Improve
freshwater habitat.
channels. system,the landscape setting,and the
watershed conditions.
Install habitat features such as constructed
Improve instream
riffles, cover logs,and brush toes into
restored/enhanced streams.Add woody Improve freshwater habitat.
habitat. materials to channel beds. Construct pools
of varying depth.
Reconnect Reconstruct stream channels with
channels with appropriate bankfull dimensions and depth Reduce sediment inputs; Reduce nutrient
floodplains. relative to the existing floodplain. inputs; Improve freshwater habitat.
Reduce sediment Construct three(3)step pool stormwater Reduce agricultural and sediment inputs;
and nutrient input conveyance and one dry detention BMP to Reduce nutrient inputs; Improve
from adjacent farm slow and treat runoff from farm fields freshwater habitat; Implement
fields before entering Site streams. agricultural BMPs.
Restore and Reduce and control sediment inputs;
enhance native Plant native tree and understory species in Improve freshwater habitat; Restore
floodplain riparian zone where currently insufficient. degraded riparian buffers.
vegetation.
Permanently Reduce and control sediment inputs;
protect the project Establish a conservation easement on the Reduce and manage nutrient inputs;
site from harmful Site. Improve freshwater habitat; Protect
uses. Water Supply waters.
2.0 Project Description
The following section describes the existing conditions at the Site in terms of geomorphic condition,
watershed, soils, geology, cultural resources, species of concern, regulated floodplain zones, and site
constraints.
2.1 Existing Site Conditions
The Site is located on the Reavico Farm,which is under option for purchase fee simple by Wildlands
Engineering. Seven unnamed tributaries to South Deep Creek(UTI, UT1A, UT1B, UT2, UT2A, UT2C, and
UT3) are present on the Site. On January 7, 2016, UT1, UT1A, UT113, UT2, and UT3 were identified as
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.2

perennial streams while UT2A and UT2C were identified as intermittent.A north to south oriented ridge
divides the Site; however, the Site is ecologically and hydrologically connected and will be contained on
a single parcel owned by Wildlands Engineering.
For discussion purposes,the eastern half of the Site is referred to as the East Side and the western half is
referred to as the West Side. UT1, UT1A, and UT113 drain the East Side, while UT2, UT2A, UT2C, and UT3
drain the West Side (Figure 2). All Site tributaries drain to a 1,000-foot section of South Deep Creek.
Details about the existing streams and associated reaches are provided in Section 2.2 below.
East Side Site Conditions and Historic Presence of
y Streams
Near the southern project boundary, UT1 originates
" and becomes jurisdictional at a headcut in an
ephemeral stream within a narrow valley.The
stream runs through two sediment-filled ponds with
breaching dams before entering the lower valley.
The valley bottom gradually widens downstream as
it approaches South Deep Creek, where the valley
bottom is a broad, alluvial floodplain. Land use on
• ' the East Side is characterized by mix of active row
crops on the upper valley slopes and in the broad
valley bottom, with woodlands on the moderate to
steep valley hillslopes, in the narrower valley bottoms, and near the confluence with South Deep Creek.
UT1 features a series of former inline impoundments in the upper reaches of the valley, which contain
old pond bed sediments and are depicted on Figure 2. Based on a review of historical surveys and aerials
(presented in the Appendix),the onsite streams have been manipulated through ditching,
impoundments, and land use changes since 1963. In 1963 one large inline impoundment (Pond 1) is
visible on UTI and one impoundment is visible in drainage to UT1 (Pond 2). By 1982, an additional inline
impoundment (Pond 3) appears immediately upstream from Pond 1 and farm roads are visible over the
impoundment dams. Evidence of clearing within the UT1 valley is apparent in this aerial. In the 1993
aerial, Pond 1 appears drained with a large downstream headcut progressing through a field. Also at this
time, Pond 3 appears greatly reduced in size, and a fourth impoundment (Pond 4) is visible upstream
from Pond 2. No evidence of Pond 4 remained during a field walk on Jan 6, 2016, and this pond is not
visible in 2006 in aerial imagery. Legacy sediments remain in place at the site of Ponds 1, 2, and 3.
UT1 had a forested buffer surrounded by cultivated fields prior to 1982. In the 1982 aerial,the
floodplain of UT1 is cleared for cultivation, and the headwaters of UT1 are completely deforested above
Pond 1. In 2007,the eastern farm field and hillslopes surrounding Pond 3 were converted to loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda) plantation.An active dairy farm operated on the southernmost farm field above UT1 from
1950 until 1994. Buildings associated with the dairy were demolished a few years after the dairy closed
and are not visible on the 2005 aerial.
Throughout the East Side,the floodplains include native hardwood species such as red maple (Acer
rubrum), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera). The slopes
surrounding a collapsed boulder dam contains several species of oak trees including swamp chestnut
oak(Quercus michauxii), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Quercus alba), and water oak
(Quercus nigra). Other mature hardwoods along UT1 include black willow(Salix nigra),American beech
(Fagus grandifolia), and umbrella magnolia (Magnolia tripetala).The understory has little shrubby
growth but does include species such as mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), American hop-hornbeam
(Ostrya virginiana), and young sassafras (Sassafras albidum).The ground cover contains several
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.3

herbaceous species, including various ferns and moss populations on rock crops and stream banks, along
with a small patch of horsetail (Equisetum sp.)further downstream.
There are areas of invasive species present throughout, which include a population of the princess tree
(Paulownia tomentosa), Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense),thick Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium
vimineum), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
A large, steeply sloping farm field along the lower ridge that divides the East and West Sides was
deforested at some point between 1963 and the mid-1980s.
West Side Site Conditions and Historic Presence of
Streams
The West Side is characterized by the broad, gently
sloping floodplain of South Deep Creek. The South
Deep Creek floodplain here is actively row cropped,
and the valley walls around the West Side are
primarily forested. Several species of pine are seen in
these wooded areas, such as loblolly and pitch (Pinus
rigia), along with the same hardwood species
observed along UT1.The streams on this side of the
West Side—Streams ditched through broad Site are ditched through the South Deep Creek
floodplain Creek floodplain.The herbaceous plants along the ditches
are typical wildflowers and weeds seen in open
pastures and fields such as goldenrod (Salidago sp.), ironweed (Vernonia sp.), henbit deadnettle
(Lamium amplexicaule), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens).
UT2, UT2A, and UT2C are have been ditched and re-routed several times, as evidenced by the series of
aerial images presented in the Appendix. UT2C in particular followed a flow path parallel to UT2 in 1963,
but was re-routed and shortened in length by the 1982 aerial. Between 1982 and 1993, the series of
hillside ditches that carries UT2C to its current location along the hillside ditch appear to be installed.
Ditching and re-routing of UT3, a primary drainage feature on the West Side, began prior to 1957
according to a historical survey, provided in the Appendix.The historical survey shows UT3 connecting
straight out to South Deep Creek; however, at least three parallel farm ditches connected the UT3
hydrology through UT2 in the 1963 aerial.The main connection between UT3 and UT2 flowed through
what is now Ditch 1.This connection was removed sometime between 1998 and 2005. Currently, all
surface water flow to UT3 is routed along the western parcel boundary where it drains directly to South
Deep Creek.John Kessler, a landowner along UT3, indicated that his wife's family has owned the land
adjacent to this field for generations, and that UT3 once ran across the open floodplain of South Deep
Creek. Mr. Kessler said that the farmer excavated a ditch long the property boundary and routed UT3
into it as part of the agricultural management of the parcel (J. Kessler, personal communication,
December 29, 2015).
t!6,1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page GA

2.2 Existing Conditions-Streams
UT1 to South Deep Creek—Reach 1
The origin of UT1 flow occurs on the southeastern
} corner of the project area and flows roughly south
,i to north from a headcut above Pond 3.A 20 to 50
foot wide forested buffer exists on both stream
banks, with row crops and pine plantation beyond.
For the first 130 feet within the proposed
conservation easement the stream is classified as
_ intermittent. UT1 here is steep, narrow and deeply
,.• may[ `' 4, incised into clay subsoil with very little pattern
-
' development and several small active headcuts.
==: UTI transitions to a perennial channel upstream of
Pond 3. Here, the stream slope is greatly reduced
Incised,eroding UT1 Reach 1 as UTI flows through wetlands which have
developed in the sediment deposition behind the
old pond embankment.The bed and banks are weakly defined here as the stream meanders throughold
pond bed.A deeply incsied, ephemeral drainage ditch carrying a heavy sediment load from the farm
fields enters from the left bank.The weakly defined bed and banks continue until the stream drops over
an active headcut.
Below this headcut, UTI is deeply incised, with steep banks, mass wasting, and moderate bank erosion
on alternating banks. UT1 is characterized here by moderate pattern and coarse gravels. A cross section
(XS1)was collected along this reach of UTI to
classify the channel and is presented in the
Appendix. Here, UT1 most closely classifies as an y -_
incised unstable Rosgen G-type stream with a
width-to-depth ratio of 8.6, an entrenchment ratio _
1.3, and a bank height ratio of 4.5.A pavement `
pebble count was also conducted to classify the
riffle material of UTI in this location, and a
subpavement sample was collected for laboratory
analysis.The median particle size of the riffle
pavement is coarse gravel.This reach continues for fir.
approximately 300 feet until reaching an
approximately 30-foot tall embankment
undergoing active breaching through mass wasting
with series of small headcuts leading to a steep
boulder cascade.This embankment is clearly visible on the 1993 historical aerial as an old farm road.
Beyond the boulder cascade, the stream enters the another wetland within a pond bed from an old
impoundment (Pond 1).
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.5

Within the old pond bed, UT1 has weakly defined
i� bed and banks, and at the time of evaluation was
braided with several concurrent flowpaths. Flow
continues for 250 feet through the old pond bed
before the weakly defined channel begins to follow a
ditch. Several headcuts occur along this ditch and
the stream becomes incised.This slightly
meandering, incised section continues for 150 feet
until reaching another breaching dam with a massive
active headcut of about an eight-foot drop. Banks
around the base of this headcut are 10-20 feet
above the streambed, and are mass-wasting with
several visible root masses undermined by erosion.
The area of mass wasting subsides within 60 feet, as the stream takes a sharp turn to the east, and the
hillslope gradually comes down to meet the new elevation of the streambed.The breaching dams and
active headcuts are creating a large sediment input and threaten to erode through the old pond
sediments.
UT1 to South Deep Creek—Reach 2
µ.
UT1 Reach 2 begins where UTI takes a sharp turn 4
back to the north approximately 100 feet below the
headcut at Pond 1, and is confined against the right
valley wall.At this point the stream reaches a �.�,_
confluence with a small linear wetland in a narrow
valley.A drainage pipe emanating from Pond 1
contributes to the hydrology of this wetland which
could likely be a remnant channel of UT1 prior to its
impoundment. A series of bedrock outrcops alsoconfined
begin at this point, and continues to influence the cleared for row cropsop of bank
streambed throughout the rest of the project.
Approximately 100 feet donwstream from the sharp turn, the valley bottom is cleared for row crops
from the left valley toe all the way up to the left top of bank at the right valley toe. Moderate to mild
bank erosion occurs throughout this length of UTI due to the confinement of the channel and the lack
of stabilizing vegetation.The reach is predomoinately incised, but regains connection through one low
bank in areas where bedrock outcrops are present in the channel or in isolated areas where bankfull
benches have developed within the incised channel. Due to confinement against the right valley wall,
the stream has very little pattern. Long riffles and short, shallow pools dominate the streambed as a
result of the lack of pattern. Due to the steepess of the right valley wall, mass wasting is present in areas
where the stream has eroded into it.According to family members,their grandfather had this channel
ditched along the valley wall to open up the field for farming.
Two perennial tributaries (UT1A and UT1B)join UT1 along Reach 2. A cross section (XS2)was collected
along UTI Reach 2 to classify the channel, and is presented in the Appendix. Here, UT1 most closely
classifies as an incised, unstable Rosgen F-type stream, with a width-to-depth ratio of 14.5, an
entrenchment ratio of 1.1, and a bank height ratio of 1.8.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.6

!�
4.
.70
10
P
erodingUT1 Reach 3—confined and
cropsvalley wall,cleared for row of bank confluence
UT1 to South Deep Creek—Reach 3
UT1 takes a slight turn to the north west at a ford crossing, at which point the left bank of the channel is
confined against the left valley wall.The left bank has a variable width forested buffer of at least 100
feet, beyond which is cultivated fields.The right bank of the channel is at the edge of a field cleared for
cultivation. Active bank erosion and incision dominate this reach with occasional areas of mass wasting.
A cross section (XS3) was collected along this reach of UT1 to classify the channel, and is presented in
the Appendix. Here, UTI most closely classifies as an incised, unstable Rosgen F-type stream,with a
width-to-depth ratio of 12.1 and entrenchment ratio 1.3, and a bank height ratio of 3.9.A pavement
pebble count was also conducted to classify the riffle material of UT1.The median particle size of the
riffle pavement is very coarse gravel. Downstream from XS3 an incised and eroding ditch draining
enters UT1 from the east, accompanied by a tile drain pipe.This reach continues until a large bedrock
outcrop, where the stream regains stability.
UT1 to South Deep Creek—Reach 4
UT1 to South Deep Creek Reach 4 begins where large bedrock outcrops begin to dominate the stream
bed.This reach has a stable meander pattern with little active erosion. A narrow, approximately 10-foot
wide forested buffer begins on the right bank until the channel turns further north-west into a mature
bottomland forest.
UT1A and UT113 to South Deep Creek
UT1A and UTIB both originate outside the project
limits, and enter the Site from the east. Both streams
have well-established forested buffer on both banks
and have stable riffle-pool morphology with low bank
heights.The vegetation community is similar to the
wooded community along UT1 Reach 2. A substantial
portion of the UT1A watershed adjacent to the Site
was clear-cut in 2009. z ,
UT2 to South Deep Creek ••• W.-
UT2 to South Deep Creek originates outside the
project limits flowing through a moderately mature forest.The stream enters the project along a farm
road on the West Side of the site. UT2 flows north for approximately 500 feet along the farm road until
entering a metal culvert as the road turns to the west. Upstream of the culvert, UT2 is incised with
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.7

active bank erosion, and is pinched between the
- valley wall on the left bank and the road on the right
F` bank. Here,vegetation consisted of mature
hardwood canopy species on the left bank including
beech (Fagus grandifolia). Beyond the culvert, UT2
enters a broad flat floodplain and is ditched, deeply
incised, and straightened until a confluence with
_QW UT2A and a network of farm field ditches. UT2
continues straight before curving gradually to the
northeast where it receives drainage from UT2C.
UT2C carries a high fine sediment load, and there is
UT2—upstream of culvert and large sediment input from UT2C.The channel
continues along the straightened northeast
trajectory until its confluence with South Deep Creek. UT2 drains a steeply sloping mostly forested
watershed dominated by hardwoods, as well as gently sloping floodplain valley bottom farmland.
Natural vegetation along the ditched portion of UT2 consists of rice cut grass (Leersia oryzoides), soft
rush (Juncus effuses),various sedges (Carex spp.) and asters (Aster spp.), and occasional saplings of
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) along the streambank, with row crop cultivation beyond the top of
bank on both sides.
Two cross sections were collected on UT2 to classify the channel: one upstream of the culvert (XS8) and
one downstream of the culvert (XS6).These sections
are presented in the Appendix. A sediment sample
was also collected at XS8 to classify the riffle
material of UT2 in this location.Above the culvert,
UT2 most closesly classifies as an incised, unstable
Rosgen G-type stream, with a width-to-depth ratio
of 9.9, an entrenchment ratio 1.5, and a bank height
ratio of 3.4.The median particle size of the riffle
_, pavement is very coarse gravel. Below the culvert,
M UT2 is maintained as a V-ditch and has awidth-to-
depth ratio of 0.4 (XS6). Sediment composition in
ditched below culvert in South Deep's" this section of the stream consisted of fine silts from
floodplainadjacent agricultural runoff.
UT2A to South Deep Creek
UT2A to South Deep Creek originates from a
_ headcut below a failing concrete culvert. Above the
• ,e , ` , ,, '' F xli r= culvert is an ephemeral channel draining a steeply
sloping forested watershed dominated by
= hardwoods. UT2A is ditched, deeply incised, and
straightened.The channel takes a sharp right turn
r
as it reaches a confluence with Ditch 1, and enters a
' farm-ditch network. UT2A flows straight through
the ditch network until its confluence with UT2.
.. Natural vegetation along UT2A is similar to the
ditched portion of UT2.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.8

UT2C to South Deep Creek
UT2C—ditched into hillside,carrying
UT2C to South Deep Creek originates from a headcut below a agricultural sediment runoff
series of incised hillslope ditches as depicted on Figure 2.
These ditches carry flow across a hillslope and into UT2C in its
current location, despite the fact that the natural fall of the
valley leads directly down into the South Deep Creek
floodplain.
UT2C begins as a deeply incised channel with a series of
active headcuts eroding down to saprolite.The stream has
actively eroding bed and banks. UT2C loses bed and bank °F
definition where the agricultural ditching ends and UT2C's
flow is emptied out into the South Deep Creek floodplain just
upstream of UT2. UT2C carries a tremendous volume of fine
sediment generated from row crop runoff, and the majority
of this sediment deposits here at UT2C's outlet.
UT3 to South Deep Creek
UT3 to South Deep Creek, a perennial stream, originates
outside the project limits, enters the project at the
southwestern corner of the Site, and runs directly UT3—maintained as a ditch
along the property boundary in a manmade and
maintained ditch to its confluence with South
S
Deep Creek. UT3 has riffle-pool morphology for
the first several hundred feet within the project
limits, but is incised with eroded stream banks. :.•:.'
Approximately 500 feet into the project, UT3
becomes ditched and flows in a perfectly straight
line before turning east to join South Deep Creek. -
UT3 appears regularly maintained and lacks
bedform. Row cropping is present up to the top of
the right bank, and the left bank is actively mowed
and maintained. A cross section (XS7)was
collected along UT3 to classify the channel, and is
presented in the Appendix. UT3 most closely classifies as an incised, unstable Rosgen G-type stream,
with a width-to-depth ratio of 6.8, an entrenchment ratio of 1.3, and a bank height ratio of 1.5.
2.3 Existing Conditions—Potential Wetland Restoration Areas
The Site includes up to 10.9 acres in the flat floodplain of South Deep Creek around UT2, UT2A, and UT3
where wetlands could potentially be developed, as shown in Figure 6.This area of the project has been
farmed since at least 1963 according to aerial photographs (see Appendix) and consists of row crops
with extensive ditching and channelized streams.This area has also been altered by field crowning and
tillage. No existing wetlands were identified by Wildlands personnel within these lower fields during Site
visits; however, no formal jurisdictional determination has been made. Based on soil borings performed
by Wildlands, hydric soils were generally encountered between 12 to 24 inches in the potential wetland
restoration areas.Small pockets of shallow hydric soils were observed within low areas of the fields that
collect surface water. Soils in this area are mapped primarily as Codorus loam (see Figure 5), which is
listed on the National Hydric Soil list.
t!6,1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.9

2.4 Watershed Characterization
The Site is located within the Targeted Local Watershed 03040101130020 and DWR Subbasin 03-07-02.
All onsite tributaries drain to South Deep Creek, which is classified as Water Supply III (WS-III), and
immediately downstream from the Site South Deep Creek is classified as a Critical Area (CA) by DWR.
WS-III waters are in moderately developed areas and are used as sources of water supply for drinking,
culinary, or food processing purposes.These waters are also protected for Class C uses including
secondary recreation,wildlife,fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival, and
maintenance of biological integrity. CAs within one-half mile upstream and draining to a river intake or
within one-half mile and draining to the normal pool elevation of water supply reservoirs are where risk
associated with pollution is greater than from remaining portions of the watershed.
The Site topography, as indicated on the Lone Hickory, NC USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle,
shows slightly sloped areas in the western portion of the Site with some moderate and steep contours
along UTI (Figure 3). Drainage areas for the project reaches were delineated using 2-foot contour
intervals derived from the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program's 2007 Light Detection and
Ranging(LiDAR) data (Figure 4). Land uses draining to the project reaches are primarily managed row
crops and forest with some residential area.The watershed areas and current land use are summarized
in Table G.2, below.The impervious area within the project catchment at the downstream end was
calculated to be 64 acres, or approximately 0.82%of the project catchment using USGS North Carolina
StreamStats Version 3.0.
Table G.2 Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
NCDWR Intermittent/ Watershed
Reach Name Stream Perennial Watershed Area(sq. Land Use
Identification Status Area(acres) mi.)
Form Scores
Perennial/
51%forested;42%managed herbaceous
UT1 30.5/(23.5) (Intermittent) 287 0.45 cover/row crops;8%Residential
Development
66%forested;23%managed herbaceous
UT1A 36.5 Perennial 97 0.15 cover/row crops; 10%Residential
Development
58%forested; 19%managed herbaceous
UT1B 33.5 Perennial 32 0.05 cover/row crops; 23%Residential
Development
UT2 43.5 Perennial 166 0.26 40%forested;60%managed herbaceous
cover/row crops
UT2A 21 Intermittent 27 0.04 18%forested;82%managed herbaceous
cover/row crops
UT2C 25.5 Intermittent 32 0.05 7%forested;93%managed herbaceous
cover/row crops
68%forested;29%managed herbaceous
UT3 41.5 Perennial 426 0.67 cover/row crops; 3%Residential
Development
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.10

2.5 Soils
The proposed project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Yadkin County. Project area soils are
described below in Table G.3. Figure 5 is a soil map of the Site.
Table G.3 Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Description
Clifford Series: These soils on gently sloping uplands with a slope of 2-6%. Clifford soils are very deep and
Fine Sandy well drained.They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Includes a moderately
Loam eroded component of sandy clay loam with a gravelly loamy surface layer.The parent material
consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist.
This series consists of poorly drained soils,on nearly level floodplains and valleys with a slope
Codorus loam of 0-2%.These soils are subject to occasional flooding of brief duration,and they have a
loamy surface layer and subsoil.The parent material consists of loamy alluvium derived from
igneous and metamorphic rock.This soil meets hydric criteria.
This series consists of 50%Dan River and 40%Codorus soil on nearly level valleys and
floodplains with a slope of 0-2%. Dan River soils are very deep and well drained or moderately
Dan river and well drained.They have a loamy surface layer and loamy subsoil. Codorus soils are very deep
Codorus soils and somewhat poorly drained.They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil.These soils are
subject to occasional flooding.The parent material consists of loamy alluvium derived from
igneous and metamorphic rock.
This series consists of 50%Dan River and 40%Comus soils on nearly level to gently sloping
valleys and floodplains with a slope of 0-4%. Dan River soils are very deep and well drained or
Dan River and moderately well drained.They have a loamy surface layer and loamy subsoil.Codorus soils are
Comus soils very deep and somewhat poorly drained.They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil.These
soils are subject to occasional flooding.The parent material consists of loamy and sandy
alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock.
This series consists of nearly level to gently sloping soils along drainageways and in slight
Delila Fine depressions on uplands with 0-6%slopes. Delila soils are very deep and poorly drained.They
Sandy Loam have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.The parent material consists of alluvium
and/or colluvium over saprolite derived from granite and gneiss.This soil meets hydric criteria.
This series consists of strongly sloping soils on uplands, ridges and hills,with slopes from 10-
Fairview 15%. Fairview soils are very deep and well drained.They have a thin loamy surface layer and a
Sandy Clay clayey subsoil. Includes a moderately eroded and severely eroded component. Rills,gullies,
Loam and soils with thin surface layers are indicative of past or present severe erosion.The parent
material consists of saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or schist.
This series consists of 60%Fairview and 28%Stott Knob soils,on steep hillslopes, ridges, and
uplands,with 25-45%slopes. Fairview soils are very deep and well drained.They have a
Fairview-Stott cobbly, loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.Stott Knob soils are well drained and have
Knob complex soft bedrock within a depth of 20 to 40 inches.They have a cobbly, loamy surface layer and
subsoil.Stones are widely scattered on the soil surface.The parent material consists of
saprolite derived from schist and/or gneiss.
Nathalie This series consists of gently sloping soils on uplands with 2-6%slopes. Nathalie soils are very
sandy clay deep and well drained.They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.This map unit is
loam moderately eroded.The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
and/or schist.
� Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.11

Soil Name Description
This series consists of 75%Rhodhiss and 20%Stott Knob soils on strongly sloping hillslopes,
Rhodhiss- ridges and uplands of 8-25%slopes.The compositions changes to 40%Rhodhiss and 20%Stott
Stott Knob Knob from 25-45%slopes. Rhodhiss soils are very deep and well drained.Stott Knob soils are
complex, well drained and have soft(rippable) bedrock within a depth of 20 to 40 inches. Both soils
stony have a loamy surface layer and subsoil.There are widely scattered stones on the soil surface
The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or schist.
This series consists of strongly sloping to steep soils on hillslopes, ridges, and uplands from 25-
Siloam sandy 50%slopes.Siloam soils are well drained and have soft(rippable) bedrock within a depth of 10
loam to 20 inches.They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil.The parent material consists of
residuum weathered from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or gneiss.
This series consists of nearly level soils in upland drainageways and depressions with a slope of
0-6%.Starr soils are very deep and well drained.They have a loamy surface layer and a loamy
Starr loam subsoil.Thes soils are subject to occasional flooding from surrounding uplands, mainly by
overland flow.The parent material consists of loamy alluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock.
Toast fine This series consists of soils on moderately steep hillslopes, ridges and uplands with a slope of
sandy loam 15-25%.Toast soils are very deep and well drained.They have a loamy surface layer and a
and sandy clay clayey subsoil.The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or
loam schist.Also includes a moderately eroded component(sandy clay loam)
This series consists of 47%Woolwine, 24%Fairview and 10%Westfield components on steep
Woolwine- uplands with slopes ranging from 25-45%and include a stony component.Woolwine soils
Fairview- have soft(rippable) bedrock within a depth of 20 to 40 inches.They have a gravelly, loamy
Westfield surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Fairview soils are very deep.They have a gravelly, loamy
Complex surface layer and a clayey subsoil.Westfield soils have soft(rippable) bedrock within a depth
of 40 to 60 inches.They have a gravelly, loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Parent
material consists of saprolinte derived from schist and/or gneiss.
Source: Web Soil Survey of Yadkin County,North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/
2.6 Geology
The Site is located in the Inner Piedmont Belt of the Piedmont physiographic province.The Piedmont is
characterized by gently rolling, well-rounded hills with long low ridges, with elevations ranging
anywhere from 300 to 1500 feet above sea level.The Inner Piedmont Belt consists of deformed and
metamorphosed rocks ranging from 500-750 million years in age (NCGS, 2013).The underlying geology
of the proposed mitigation site is mapped as late Proterozoic to Cambrian (1 billion to 500 million years
in age) metamorphic rocks biotite gneiss and schist (CZbg) and Cambrian to Ordovician (455-540 million
years in age) intrusive metamorphosed granitic rock(OCg) (NCGS, 1985).The Proterozoic to Cambrian
biotite gneiss and schist is described as "inequigranular, locally abundant potassic feldspar and garnet;
interlayered and gradational with calc-silicate rock, sillimantite-mica schist, mica schist, and amphibolite.
Contains small masses of granitic rock."The Cambrian to Ordovician metamorphosed granitic rock
intrusion is described as "equigranular to megacrystic,foliated to massive. Includes Toluca Granite."
Instances of exposed bedrock along project channels are mapped on Figure 2.
Source:North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS),2013. Mineral Resources.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral%20resources/mineralresources.htmlNorth Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS),
1985.Geologic map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale.
2.7 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
The Site is not located near any sites listed on the National Register with the State Historic Preservation
Office.The archaeological site files at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) have not
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.12

3s=
been reviewed at this time. All appropriate cultural
resource agencies will be contacted for their review a y
and comment prior to any land disturbing activity. ,
Two habitats are considered Significant Natural
Heritage Areas within five miles of the project .
location.These habitats include the North Deep
Creek Bluffs and Cedar Creek Forest (Figure 1).
r
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands searched the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
databases for federally listed threatened and s
endangered plant and animal species in Yadkin
County, NC. Currently,there are two federal
species registered for this specific county,which
include the bald eagle (Hailaeetus leucocephalus)
and the northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) (Table G.4).A pedestrian survey +
conducted on December 29, 2015, indicated that -
the Site could provide potential habitat for the
federally protected species, but none were located .
at the time. USFWS is not aware of the northern
long-eared bat occurring in Yadkin County, NC. ' ��;
Wildlands will conduct a review of the Site for
protected species upon award of contract.
Table GA Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species in Yadkin County,NC
Species Federal Status Habitat
Vertebrate
Bald eagle BGPA Near large open water bodies:lakes,marshes,seacoasts,and rivers
(Holiaeetus leucocephalus)
Northern long-eared bat T Roost in 3"dbh dead and alive trees with exfoliating bark,crevices or
(Myotis septentrionalis) hollows during summer months.Caves or mines during winter months.
T=Threatened,BGPA=Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
2.9 Floodplain Compliance
The Site is represented on the Yadkin and Davie County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 5804. On the
eastern side of the project,the downstream most 200 LF of UT1 lies within the Zone AE Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA) mapped floodplain of South Deep Creek. On the western side of the project, the
entire flat bottomland lies within the Zone AE SFHA mapped floodplain of South Deep Creek. Streams
within the mapped bottomland include approximately 2,000 LF of UT2 and the full project length of the
following streams: UT2A, UT2C, and UT3.
Zone AE are areas defined by FEMA as, "subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-change flood
event determined by detailed methods." Base Flood Elevations are established and a floodway has been
delineated for South Deep Creek. Effective hydraulic modeling for South Deep Creek will be obtained
from the NC Floodplain Mapping Program. A no-rise condition should be able to be accomplished and
will be pursued. If a no-rise condition is not attainable,then a CLOMR will be prepared. Wildlands'
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.13

engineers have successfully navigated the CLOMR process for several similar full-delivery project sites. A
LOMR will be completed if required after construction using as-built survey data.
2.10 Site Constraints and Access
No crossings are proposed on the Site. No known utilities are present within the proposed conservation
easement.All streams proposed for mitigation credit provide the required 50-foot minimum riparian
buffer for Piedmont streams.The easement area will be marked per DMS Guidelines for Full Delivery
Requirement for Completion of Survey for Conservation Easements (version 13,August 2013).
The entire easement area can be accessed for construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship
from the Reavico Farms Road off Lone Hickory Road (Figure 2).Wildlands has executed option
agreements to purchase the properties fee simple and will be recombined into one parcel before the
easement is granted to the State, and will ensure the right of entry abilities of Wildlands, its contractors,
and the future easement holder in any future land transactions. Wildlands has also secured option
agreements for a temporary construction permit on John and Allison Kessler, Ruth Myers, and Danny
and Sherrie Williams parcels along UT3, which will allow us to fill the ditch that UT3 currently flows
through and reroute UT3 through the center of the valley within the proposed conservation easement.
The proposed conservation easement leaves an approximate 6-acre landlocked area on the northeast
portion of the Site, adjacent to UT1 Reach 3 and UTI Reach 4. Wildlands is in discussions with the
adjacent landowner, who intends to purchase this area from Wildlands through a property line
adjustment upon award of the contract. Otherwise, this area will be placed in the easement.
There are five small air transport facilities known to exist within five miles of the Site: Lone Hickory
Airport, Piney Ridge Airport, Unifi Heliport, Boonville Airport, and Welborn Farm Airport. Lone Hickory is
a public, turf runway airport that averages 46 flights per month. Piney Ridge Airport is a private,turf
runway airport with three aircraft based on the field.The Unifi Heliport is a private heliport with one
helicopter based on the field.The Boonville Airport is a private,turf runway airport that averages 29
flights per week.Welborn Farm Airport is s private,turf runway airport that has two aircraft based on
the field.
3.0 Project Development
The Wildlands Team proposes to restore a high quality of ecological function to the streams and riparian
corridors on the Site.The project design will be developed to avoid
�V
significant adverse impacts to existing wetlands, streams, or riparian
buffers. Different management objectives are proposed for different
portions of the project area.These activities are discussed below
and summarized in Table G.6. conceptual
Fi ure 6 illustrates the + I '
design for the Site. g
3.1 Stream Mitigation Approach }
Currently,the streams throughout the Site are heavily impacted by
agricultural activities.
East Side
The primary stressors to UT1 are sediment-laden impoundments,
concentrated agricultural runoff inputs, confinement against the
valley wall, active stream incision and head cutting, and lack of
stabilizing streamside vegetation due to agriculture practices. Priority I stream restoration
Wildlands' approach to restoring UT1 will focus on treating through existing trees
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.14

concentrated inputs of agricultural runoff, removing breaching dams and sediments behind them,
reconnecting the stream to its floodplain and stabilizing active headcuts, returning the stream to the
center of its valley, and replacing sinuosity that was likely removed during agricultural ditching. At the
very upstream end of UT1,Wildlands plans to install a step pool stormwater conveyance (SPSC) BMP to
treat concentrated agricultural runoff from the neighboring farm. Below this, at the headcut where UT1
becomes intermittent and begins to incise, UTI will be reconnected to the valley bottom using Priority I
restoration. Full restoration is proposed instead of enhancement on this intermittent section to allow
for reconnection of the system to the valley bottom without the use of Priority 2 restoration. UTI
transitions to a perennial channel within 130 feet of its inception. UTI will be designed here as a Rosgen
B-type stream, with energy dissipated vertically over steps. Another SPSC will be installed where
concentrated agricultural inputs enter UT1 from the left floodplain. Moving downstream, as the valley
widens, the stream will gain sinuosity and transition to a Rosgen C-type stream, with energy dissipated
laterally through meander geometry. Small, adjacent wetlands identified in the field will be subject to
improved hydrologic connections due to the raised streambed.At a concentrated flow point of an
ephemeral ditch entering from the right floodplain, a SPSC BMP will be installed to treat the runoff and
arrest the ditch erosion before entering UT1.The conservation easement on the East Side will protect
39.4 acres in perpetuity.The existing and planted buffer that will be protected in a conservation
easement will average 246 feet in total width or approximately 100 feet from top of bank on either side
of the stream, which is much wider than the required 50-foot buffer width from top of bank.
The remnant embankments and impounded sediments of Ponds 1 and 3 will be removed and the drop
through the embankments will be spread out and stabilized to prevent further incision. During design,
Wildlands will most likely(based on consultation with DMS and the IRT) remove the sediments stored
behind these embankments and will restore the natural valley bottom.Throughout the length of UTI,
there are isolated areas of stability. During the design process, Wildlands will work to incorporate these
existing stable stretches into the overall restoration design.
Where UT1 becomes stable near its confluence with South Deep Creek,the approach will transition to
preservation.A short length of Priority 11 restoration may be needed to transition the stream to the
elevation of the existing channel. Where Priority II restoration is used, the floodplain bench grading will
extend a minimum of 1.5 bankfull widths beyond the stream belt-width.The floodplain bench will be
excavated to create a straight valley;the floodplain will not meander with the channel. Construction
management techniques will be implemented during bench excavation to ensure that"A" horizon
topsoil is harvested and stockpiled separately from the "B" horizon soil.The floodplain will be over-
excavated and the "A" horizon topsoil will be replaced on the new floodplain. Additionally,the slopes
between the outer edge of the floodplain grading up to the existing ground elevation will be a minimum
of 5:1. UT1A and UT1B,which are stable,will be preserved in their current condition and connected to
the newly constructed UT1.
West Side
The primary stressors to streams on the West Side are the extensive agricultural manipulation through
ditching, deep incision, and the lack of bedform diversity. Wildlands' focus on this side of the Site is to
create a holistic restoration of the bottomland that removes drainage ditches, restores the streams to
their natural drainage patterns, and restores wetlands to the South Deep Creek floodplain. UT3's ditch
will be completely filled in and the drainage will be restored using Priority I restoration through a broad
floodplain to connect with UT2. UT2A will also be restored using Priority I restoration to connect with
UT3 at a location upstream of the UT2 confluence.The series of farm ditches that currently divert
UT2C's flow to the hillside ditch will be filled in, and UT2C will be restored to the center of its valley and
meandered downstream using Priority I restoration to join UT2. Full restoration was selected instead of
t!6,1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.15

enhancement on intermittent streams UT2A and UT2C due to the ditched condition of the existing
streams and their complete lack of bedform diversity. In order to address the heavy fine sediment
contribution coming from the agricultural drainage upstream of UT2C, a dry detention basin BMP will be
installed upstream from UT2C's inception point. Additional buffer will be planted at the upper end of
UT2C to stabilize ephemeral ditches and dissipate agricultural runoff.
Below the UT2, UT2A, UT2C, and UT3 confluence,the proposed channel will be meandered through the
right floodplain of South Deep Creek near the stream's approximate existing alignment in order to take
advantage of the shading provided by the steep southern forested valley wall. Deep pools with woody
structures protected from the afternoon sun will provide excellent refuge habitat for fish from South
Deep Creek. A short length of Priority II restoration may be needed to transition UT3 down to the invert
of South Deep Creek. Where Priority II restoration is used,the floodplain bench grading will extend a
minimum of 1.5 bankfull widths beyond the stream belt-width.The floodplain bench will be excavated
to create a straight valley;the floodplain will not meander with the channel. Construction management
techniques will be implemented during bench excavation to ensure that"A" horizon topsoil is harvested
and stockpiled separately from the "B" horizon soil.The floodplain will be over-excavated and the "A"
horizon topsoil will be replaced on the new floodplain.Additionally,the slopes between the outer edge
of the floodplain grading up to the existing ground elevation will be a minimum of 5:1.
Restoration on both the East and West Side will not only improve Site streams, but will restore the
habitat fragmentation caused by the current agricultural land use practices.The narrow, single sided
buffer along UT1 will be expanded significantly, and the upstream, forested buffer on UT2 and UT3 will
be reconnected with the forested buffer on South Deep Creek.The entire bottomland on the West Side
of the Site, including the approximately 1,200 feet of riparian buffer along South Deep Creek,will be
restored to the appropriate vegetative community.This improvement will not only expand the existing,
actively used wildlife corridors, but also establish a riparian connector that will provide improved
opportunities for shelter,food, breeding grounds, and nesting sites for multiple species. Overall,the
easement on the West Side will protect 41.5 acres with buffers averaging over 267 feet in total width or
approximately 100 feet from top of bank on either side of the stream, which is much wider than the
required 50-foot buffer width from top of stream bank.
The adjacent landowner described the Site as teaming with wildlife but noted that the flathead catfish
(Pylodictis olivaris) population in South Deep Creek decreased over recent years, and he now more
frequently caught bullhead catfish (Ameiurus nebulosus).The bullhead catfish is more tolerate of muddy
waters and low oxygen levels than the flathead catfish. Site activities will reduce fine sediment
contributions to South Deep Creek.The native canopy along the restored streams will shade the
streams, enabling cooler water temperatures that can support high dissolved oxygen levels and allow
better spawning conditions. Furthermore,the riparian corridor that will be established throughout the
Site will be utilized by the existing wildlife. Multiple animal tracks were observed throughout the project,
including raccoon, opossum, coyote, rabbit, and deer, while red-tail hawks, killdeer birds, flycatchers,
and waterfowl were observed.Amphibians present along South Deep Creek that need to seek upland
habitats after breeding season will also make use of the riparian corridor. The native floodplain
communities should provide increased insect habitat, and more insects will invite bats to forage and will
provide food for migratory birds. Planted river birches and planted wildflowers and shrubs will welcome
butterflies. Lastly,the continuous riparian corridor will be key in allowing individuals from separate
populations to exchange genetics, such as the eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina). The
wildlife diversity and richness will strongly progress on the Site due to the restoration.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.16

All restored reaches on the project will be designed to In-stream log structures
create stable, functional stream channels. Design will be
based on reference reach and sediment transport
analyses. Dimension, pattern, and profile will be
designed to allow for frequent overbank flooding,
provide stable bank slopes, and enable biological lift.
This approach will provide hydrologic connectivity `..
between creeks and floodplains and will also create
vertical and lateral stability.Treating invasive vegetation
and establishing stable bank slopes will allow for a
native and diverse riparian zone to grow which will
improve nutrient removal.A diverse bedform will
provide habitat for an increased number of species of insects, fish, and amphibians.This diverse
bedform will be established using instream structures appropriate for the geomorphic setting such as
log weirs, log vanes, and constructed riffles. Hardwood trees may be able to be harvested from upland
areas around the property for log and wood structures.
Wildlands will begin the project by identifying the best design approach to meet the stated project
objectives and implement the appropriate degree of intervention.A combination of analog, empirical,
and analytical design approaches will potentially be used. Reference streams will be identified and will
serve as one of the primary sources of information on which restoration designs are based. Modeling
and other detailed analyses will be used as appropriate to develop or verify designs. Wildlands has
developed a general approach to be used as the basis for stream restoration design.The design
approach, which is tailored to each site, continues to develop as additional projects are implemented.
Some of the key elements of the methods are described below.
Generally, stream designs will be based on a design discharge range that, in most cases,will
approximate the bankfull discharge but will be selected to meet the objectives of the design.The
discharge will be determined through detailed hydrologic analyses using the best available information
such as local or regional stream gage records, empirical regional stream flow estimates, hydrologic
modeling results, and reference stream flows. Other discharges (such as baseflow or flows to support
instream habitat features)will also be considered during the design process based on the specific
project objectives.The design will be refined or validated with sediment transport analysis that is
further described in Section 3.2 below.
Conservation easement areas will be marked per DMS guidelines. Native riparian buffers a minimum of
50 feet from the proposed top of bank will be planted along all restored streams on the Site but as
stated above the average buffer will be 100 feet from top of bank.
3.2 Sediment Transport
Sediment transport is an extremely complicated process and the appropriate level of analysis must be
determined for each specific design.This determination is based on watershed assessment, local stream
observations, reference conditions, and other sources of information. Generally,these assessments will
lead to one of two levels of sediment transport analysis and a corresponding design approach. For
streams that are gravel or cobble bed sites and have a low bed load,threshold channels can be designed
based on discharge and sediment transport competence analysis.These channels are not expected to be
prone to excessive morphologic change and the project objectives will include that channel slope,
geometry, and bedforms do not change significantly over time. Other streams, including those with sand
or silt bed material and those that have a moderate to high bedload will require more detailed sediment
transport studies.These conditions must be considered when establishing design objectives as alluvial
t!6.1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.17

channels are expected to adjust their slope, geometry, and bedforms over time. In these cases, a
capacity analysis with data collection and/or detailed modeling is an important component of the
design. However, alluvial channels will most often be designed with controls at key locations to prevent
rapid, significant change.
At the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site,the fine sediment loading rate is expected to be substantially
reduced by eliminating cattle access and stabilizing eroding banks within the project site. For preliminary
site analysis, a pavement and subpavement sample were collected on UT1 at XS1.This preliminary
analysis indicates that UTI is degradational at this location. XS1 has a low width-to-depth ratio of 8.6,
which may contribute to the degradational nature of the section. Shear stress was also evaluated at
several locations within the project area. Surveyed cross sections were used to determine an existing
condition shear stress associated with the reaches proposed for restoration: UTI XS1,XS2, and XS3; UT2
XS6 and XSB; UT2C XS4; and UT3 XS7. Results from the analysis showed that existing shear stress values
for UTI were between 0.80 lbs./ft2 and 1.07 lbs./ft2, which can entrain a maximum particle size between
130 and 160 mm. On UT2,the existing shear stress values were between 0.15 lbs/ft' in the flat, ditched
section, which can entrain a particle size of 38 mm, up to 1.30 Ibs/ft2 in the higher sloped section above
the culvert,which can entrain a particle size of 185 mm. On UT2C, in the current hillside ditch, the
existing shear stress is 1.63 Ibs/ft2 (capable of entraining a 218 mm particle), and on UT3 in the ditched
section, the existing shear stress is 0.36 Ibs/ft2(capable of entraining a 71 mm particle). Wildlands will
analyze the restoration reaches during the project design and compare the proposed boundary shear
stress of designed cross sections and proposed slopes to ensure boundary shear stress within the
proposed system is appropriate for the sediment distribution at the site.
3.3 Nutrient Reduction
On-site nutrient reduction will be achieved by converting current agricultural fields to a restored stream
complex, establishing riparian buffers which average over 250-feet wide across the Site, and installing
four BMPs to treat drainage from agricultural runoff.The project area currently consists of a mix of
forested canopy and row crops.An estimate of the percent reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus was
made using a simplified version of the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Calculation Sheet that estimates typical
nutrient loading. Pre-project conditions reflected agricultural and maintained field conditions within the
project area while post-project conditions modeled the project area as wooded. It was assumed that
riparian areas within the project easement which are currently row crops will become wooded pervious
areas.Additionally, reductions from the proposed BMPs were calculated based on estimated nutrient
loads for the proposed BMPs catchments pre and post installation.The proposed BMPs include one dry
detention basin and three step pool stormwater conveyances (SPSCs).The removal rate for the dry
detention basin was 10%for total nitrogen and 10%for total phosphorus based on standard removal
rates listed in the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Calculation Sheet. The current version of the Tar-Pamlico
Nutrient Calculation Sheet does not have estimated nutrient reduction rates for SPSCs. Based on
literature research, it was determined that median reduction rates for SPSCs were estimated between
30 and 40%for total nitrogen and 25 and 35%for total phosphorus.The reduction rates depend on
factors such as retention time, storm event,vegetation, etc. For this preliminary estimate it was
assumed that the reduction rates for the proposed SPSCs were 30%for total nitrogen and 25%for total
phosphorus. Based on these reduction values,the worksheet estimated that total nitrogen would be
reduced by 56% and total phosphorus (TP) would be reduced by 70%after the proposed site changes. A
copy of the spreadsheet results is provided in the Appendix.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.18

3.4 Vegetation Plan
r ,
The Site will be planted following construction of the project.
The planting plan will be based on an appropriate nearby
reference community and will be developed to restore
appropriate strata (canopy, understory, shrub, and
herbaceous layers). Based on initial observation of the Site,
four specific vegetation communities defined by Shafale
(2012)will likely be targeted:
• Hillslopes outside of the floodprone area will be
planted to target a Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest Planted riparian
(Piedmont subtype).
• The upstream reaches of UTI, UT1A, and UT1B will be planted to target a Piedmont Headwater
Stream Forest (typic subtype).
• The downstream reach of UT1 and UT2 along the old farm road will be planted to target a
Piedmont Alluvial Forest.
• The flat floodplain of South Deep Creek on the West Side, which contains UT2, UT2A, UT2C, and
UT3, will be planted to target a Piedmont Bottomland Forest.
The canopy will be restored through planting of bare root trees.The understory and shrub layers will be
restored through a combination of planting bare root, low growth species and installing live stake shrub
species.The herbaceous layer will be restored by seeding the disturbed area with a native seed mix with
an emphasis placed on creating good soil contact to encourage germination.
4.0 Proposed Mitigation
Given the existing conditions of the stream channels,the disturbance factors, and the constraints,
management objectives for each reach have been established.The Site will be a combination of stream
restoration, stream preservation, agricultural BMPs, and optional wetland restoration for a total of
12,901 SM Us.
Figure 6 represents the proposed management objectives.The mitigation credit calculation was derived
using the US Army Corps of Engineers' Stream Mitigation Guidance and was based on Wildlands'
conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift.The management objectives,the mitigation types, and
proposed amounts of stream mitigation are presented below.
Table G.5 Mitigation Units proposed for the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
Stream Mitigation
Type of Length Mitigation Units
Reach Management Objectives Ratio
Mitigation (feet) (SMUs)
Remove remnant impoundments,restore dimension,pattern,
UTI and floodplain connectivity with Priority 1 restoration
Reaches 1, approach. Improve bedform and habitat by installing instream Restoration 6,060 1:1 6,060
2,&3 structures.Treat invasive vegetation as needed and establish
a native riparian buffer where lacking.Treat concentrated
agricultural inputs with three SPSCs at point source inputs.
UTI Supplement the existing riparian buffer with additional
Reach 4 vegetation as needed. Protect stream with conservation Preservation* 390 10:1 39
easement.
Supplement the existing riparian buffer with additional
UT1A vegetation as needed. Protect stream with conservation Preservation* 260 10:1 26
easement.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.19

Stream Mitigation
Type of Length Mitigation Units
Reach Management Objectives Ratio
Mitigation (feet) (SMUs)
Supplement the existing riparian buffer with additional
UT16 vegetation as needed. Protect stream with conservation Preservation* 250 10:1 25
easement.
Restore dimension,pattern,and profile with Priority 1
restoration approach. Improve bedform and habitat by
UT2 fencing out livestock and installing instream structures. Restoration 1,762 1:1 1,762
Establish native riparian vegetation.
Restore dimension,pattern,and profile with Priority 1
restoration approach. Develop a wetland-stream complex in
UT2A bottomland by connecting stream to restored wetlands. Restoration 982 1:1 982
Improve bedform and habitat by fencing out livestock and
installing instream structures.Establish native riparian
vegetation.
Restore dimension,pattern,and profile with Priority 1
restoration approach. Improve bedform and habitat by
UT2C Restoration 864 1:1 864
fencing out livestock and installing instream structures.
Establish native riparian vegetation.
Restore dimension,pattern,and profile with Priority 1
restoration approach. Develop a wetland-stream complex in
UT3 bottomland by connecting stream to restored wetlands. Restoration 3,133 1:1 3,133
Improve bedform and habitat by fencing out livestock and
installing instream structures.Establish native riparian
vegetation.
Stream Mitigation Total 13,710 --- 12,901 SMUs
*900 feet,or 6.6%of the total linear footage offered for mitigation is proposed for stream preservation.
5.0 Current Ownership
The Site is located on five parcels owned by members of the Reavico family: Reavico Farms, Inc.,Ann R.
Steelman, Howard F. Steelman, Nancy R. Shore, Michael S. Shore, Hughes M. Reavis, Cynthia H. Reavis,
Joel D. Reavis,Jennifer B. Reavis,Janet R. Wall, and Charles M. Wall. Option agreements for the general
project area shown on Figure 6 have been signed by the property owners and a Memorandum of Option
for each property owner is recorded for parcels at the Yadkin County Register of Deeds.The option
agreements allow Wildlands to acquire the property fee simple.These properties will be recombined
into one large parcel upon the purchase by Wildlands Engineering before placing the conservation
easement for the State.The Memoranda of Option are valid for a minimum of one year from the closing
date of RFP 16-00676. Wildlands will convey the conservation easement to the State to provide long
term protection of the mitigation site.
In addition, a Temporary Access and Construction Easement has been signed by five property owners:
Danny W. Williams, Sherrie Williams,John J. Kessler,Allison Kessler, and Ruth H. Myers.The Temporary
Access and Construction Easement allows Wildlands to relocate the UT3 stream channel off the property
boundary and onto the Site.The old UT3 channel will be filled in.The agreement has been recorded in
the Yadkin County Register of Deeds and the area is reflected on Figure 6. Copies of the Memoranda of
Options and Temporary Access and Construction Easement are included in the Appendix.The
landowner, parcel identification numbers, and deed book and page number for the Memoranda of
Options and Temporary Access and Construction Easement are summarized in Table G.6.
� Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.20

Table G.6 Property Owners for the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
Property Owner Parcel ID Number Memorandum of Option Deed Book(DB)and Page Number(PG)
580500888433
Reavico Farms, Inc. 580500847703 DB: 1173 PG:0001
580500677286
Ann R.Steelman
Howard F.Steelman 580500785291 DB: 1173 PG:0019
Nancy R.Shore
Michael S.Shore
Hughes M.Reavis
Cynthis H.Reavis
Joel D. Reavis 580500778441 DB: 1173 PG:0008
Jennifer B. Reavis
Janet R.Wall
Charles M.Wall
Danny W.Williams* 580500672235 DB: 01174 PG:384-395
Sherrie Williams*
John J. Kessler*
Allison Kessler* 580500681228 DB: 01174 PG:384 395
Ruth H.Myers* 5805586073 DB: 01174 PG:384-395
*Agreement for temporary construction easement
6.0 Scope of Work and Project Phasing
Table G.7 describes the tasks and deliverables required by the Scope of Work outlined in RFP 16-006706.
Table G.8, provides the proposed schedule for accomplishing each Scope of Work task. Wildlands Team
has experience handling tightly scheduled projects with a number of stakeholders. We understand the
importance of clear communication and adherence to deadlines. We will establish additional internal
deadlines to keep the project milestones on track. Each task will be staffed with the appropriate
technical and management staff to ensure quality and timely completion.
t!6.1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.21

Table G.7 Summary Scope of Work for the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
ask# Task Name Task Summary DMS Deliverable
• Secure DMS Full Delivery Landowner
Authorization Forms.
• On-site meeting with the IRT and DMS to
Categorical discuss concepts of the mitigation plan • DMS Full Delivery Landowner
1 Exclusion and identify concerns. Authorization Form.
Documentation
• Conduct an environmental screening to • 2 hard copies, 1 electronic copy
identify threatened/endangered species, Categorical Exclusion document.
environmental,or cultural issues on the
Site.
• 5 preliminary review items outlined
Conservation
• Create conservation easement documents in the RFP,submitted
and plats. electronically.
2 Easement
Recordation • Close and record the conservation • 7 final deliverables outlined in the
easement. RFP,submitted electronically and 1
hard copy.
• 3 hard copies and 1 electronic
"Draft" Mitigation Plan.
Mitigation Plan • Develop asite-specific mitigation plan,
• 5 hard copies and 1 electronic
3 and Financial appropriate for the Site. "Final Draft" Mitigation Plan.
• 4 Completed PCN forms,8 hard
Assurance • Revise per DMS and IRT review comments. copies and 3 electronic copies of
the"Final" Mitigation Plan.
• Initial Performance Bond
• Secure all necessary permits and/or
• 1 hard copy of approved permits
Permitting& prior to beginning earthwork.
4 Earthwork certifications for Site construction. . Written notification of earthwork
• Construct the Site. completion.
Mitigation Site
Planting& • Complete planting of Site. • Written notification of planting and
5 Installation of • Install monitoring devices. monitoring device installation
Monitoring • Install easement markers and signage. completion.
Devices
• 3 hard copies of"Draft" Baseline
Monitoring Document and As-Built
Baseline • Conduct baseline monitoring. drawings.
Monitoring Report • perform as-built survey. • 3 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
6 (Including As-Built
Drawings) • Prepare baseline monitoring document. of"Final" Baseline Monitoring
Approved by DMS ' Prepare as-built survey drawings. Document and As-Built drawings.
• Monitoring Phase Performance
Bond
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
7 Monitoring Year 1 • prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
8 Monitoring Year 2 . Prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
9 Monitoring Year 3 9 Prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.22

ask# Task Name Task Summary DMS Deliverable
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
10 Monitoring Year 4 . prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
11 Monitoring Year 5 . prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
12 Monitoring Year 6 • prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
Monitoring Year 7 • prepare the monitoring report. of the annual monitoring report.
13 and Close-Out
Process . Prepare closeout report. • 5 hard copies and 1 electronic copy
• Attend closeout meetings. of the closeout report.
Table G.8 Project Schedule for the Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
Proposed Time to Proposed Completion
Project Milestone Completion Date(assuming NTP on
(from date of NTP) May 1, 2016)
Task 1. CE Document 3 months August 1,2016
Task 2.Submit Recorded Conservation Easement on the Site 1 year,6 months November 1, 2017
Task 3. Mitigation Plan Approved by DMS and Financial 1 year,6 months November 1, 2017
Assurance
Task 4. Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed 2 years,5 months October 1, 2018
Task 5. Mitigation Site Planting& Installation of Monitoring 2 years,8 months January 1,2019
Devices
Task 6. Baseline Monitoring Report(Including As-Built
Drawings)Approved by DMS 3 years May 1, 2019
Task 7.Submit Monitoring Report#1 to DMS* 3 years 7 months November 30,2019
Task 8.Submit Monitoring Report#2 to DMS* 4 years 7 months November 30,2020
Task 9.Submit Monitoring Report#3 to DMS* 5 years 7 months November 30,2021
Task 10.Submit Monitoring Report#4 to DMS* 6 years 7 months November 30,2022
Task 11.Submit Monitoring Report#5 to DMS* 7 years 7 months November 30,2023
Task 12.Submit Monitoring Report#6 to DMS* 8 years 7 months November 30,2024
Task 13.Submit Monitoring Report#7 to DMS*and 9 years 7 months November 30,2025
complete Close-Out Process
*Meets success criteria (schedule progression has been developed assuming that the site meets success
criteria each monitoring year)
7.0 Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan
The stream restoration performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria
presented in the DMS Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance (October 2015)the
DMS Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines (February 2014), and the Stream Mitigation
Guidelines issued in April 2003 by the USACE and DWR. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits
will be conducted to assess the condition of the completed project.The stream restoration sections of
the project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for hydrology, vegetation, and
geomorphology. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the (up-to) seven years of post-
construction monitoring. If all performance criteria have been successfully met and at least two bankfull
events and at least two other geomorphically significant events have occurred during separate years,
Wildlands may propose to terminate stream and/or vegetation monitoring after five years pending little
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.23

to no prevalent invasive species issues are occurring.An outline of the performance criteria components
follows.
7.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width-to-depth ratio. Per DMS guidance, bank height ratios
shall not exceed 1.2 and entrenchment ratios shall be at least 2.2 for restored channels to be considered
stable.All riffle cross sections should fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate
stream type. If any changes do occur,these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream
channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability
or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width-to-depth ratio in meandering channels or an
increase in pool depth. Remedial action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement
toward stability.
In order to assess channel dimension performance,
permanent cross sections will be installed per DMS
Stream and Wetland Monitoring Guidelines (February
2014). Each cross section will be permanently marked
with pins to establish its location. Cross section surveys
will include points measured at all breaks in slope,
including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and
thalweg. Cross section and bank pin surveys (if
applicable) will be conducted in monitoring years one,
three,five, and seven.
Example of a cross section survey
In addition to the above geomorphic surveys, at least two
sets of hydraulic geometry measurements will be
conducted within each distinct design reach following a flow event that corresponds with a geomorphic
significant discharge (Ogs) event as described in the DMS Stream and Wetland Monitoring Guidelines
(February 2014). Within each reach, a representative wavelength will be assessed using hydraulic
measurements within riffle and pool cross sections and along water surface slopes. Measurements can
occur at any time during the seven-year monitoring period.
Profile and Pattern
Longitudinal profile surveys will not be conducted during the seven-year monitoring period unless other
indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a
longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will follow standards as described in the DMS
Annual Monitoring and Closeout Reporting Template (February 2014) and the 2003 USACE and DWR
Stream Mitigation Guidance for the necessary reaches.
Substrate
Substrate materials in the restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the maintenance
of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features.
A reach-wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach each year for classification
purposes. A pebble count will be performed at each surveyed riffle to characterize the pavement.
t!6,1 Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.24

7.2 Hydrology
Stream
Two bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years,
must be documented on the restoration reaches
within the seven-year monitoring period. In addition, + a
two other geomorphically significant events must be =
documented. For these purposes, a geomorphically
significant event is a flow event that is at least 66%of 'ifft * x.
the 2-year recurrence interval flow.The 2-year
recurrence interval flow will be estimated using USGS * '
{ ti.
regression equations that are appropriate for the Site
location in the NC Piedmont.The confirmation that J ^!
such an event has occurred will be based on
measurements of stage converted to discharge with a
stage-discharge relation developed with a hydraulic
model. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the form of two bankfull events in
separate years and two additional geomorphically significant events have been documented.
Bankfull events will be documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer,
as appropriate for site conditions.The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream
within a surveyed riffle cross section.The device will be checked at each site visit to determine if a
bankfull event has occurred. Photographs will also be used to document the occurrence of debris lines
and sediment deposition.
7.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 native species stems per acre in the
riparian corridor at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven).The interim measure of
vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 native species stems per acre at the end
of the third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. If
this performance standard is met by year five and stem density is trending towards success (i.e.,vigor),
and invasive species are not threatening ecological success, monitoring of vegetation on the site may be
terminated with written approval by the USACE in consultation with the NC Interagency Review Team.
The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout
the required monitoring period (year five or seven).
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the restoration site to measure the survival of
the planted trees.The number of monitoring quadrants required and frequency of monitoring will be
based on the DMS monitoring guidance documents. Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall and will
follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008) or another DMS approved protocol.
7.4 Other Parameters
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs should illustrate the site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent bars within the channel or vertical incision. Grade
control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is
preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for seven years following
construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment so that the same
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.25

locations and view directions on the site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor
restoration, enhancement, and preservation stream reaches as well as vegetation plots.
Longitudinal reference photos will be established at regular intervals along the channel by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream (usually at tail of riffle feature). Cross sectional photos will be
taken of each permanent cross section looking upstream and downstream. Reference photos will also
be taken for each of the vegetation plots. Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point,
cross section, and vegetation plot will be taken on the same day of the stream and vegetation
assessments are conducted.The photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same
area in each photo overtime.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above.
Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the seven-
year monitoring period. Problem areas will be noted such as channel instability(e.g. lateral and/or
vertical instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts),vegetation health (e.g.
low stem density,vegetation mortality, invasive species, or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock
access.Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed accompanied by a written description in the
annual report. Problem areas with be re-evaluated during each subsequent visual assessment. Should
remedial actions be required, recommendations will be provided in the annual monitoring report.
Benthic Macroin vertebrates
If required by DWR as part of the project's permitting process, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will
be performed on the restored site.Any required sampling will be performed using DWR Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates, October 2012.
7.5 Reporting Performance Criteria
Using the DMS As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Template (February 2014), a baseline monitoring
document and as-built record drawings of the project will be developed on the restored site. Complete
monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of monitoring year one,three,five, and seven and
submitted to DMS. In monitoring years two, four, and six, a brief summary of the site along with photos,
current condition plan view (CCPV) map, and applicable hydrology data will be prepared and submitted
to DMS.These annual monitoring reports will be based on the DMS Annual Monitoring Report Template
(April 2015).The monitoring period will extend seven years beyond completion of construction or until
performance criteria have been met per the criteria stated in the DMS Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines(February 2014).
7.6 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
The Wildlands Team will develop necessary adaptive measures or implement appropriate remedial
actions in the event that the site or a specific component of the site fails to achieve the success criteria
outlined above.The project—specific monitoring plan developed during the design phase will identify an
appropriate threshold for maintenance intervention based on the monitored items. Any actions
implemented will be designed to achieve the success criteria specified previously, and will include a
work schedule and updated monitoring criteria.
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.26

8.0 Quality Control
The Wildlands Team takes pride in the quality of services that we deliver to our clients. We strive to
exceed our clients' expectations. In order to maintain the highest level of quality, Wildlands has an
established Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol that every member of our staff follows.
At the beginning of a project, the necessary level of QA/QC is determined based on the size and
complexity of the project.At a minimum,the project manager and an assigned QA/QC manager will
function to control the quality of the project.The project
manager provides day-to-day QA/QC and may assign task
leaders to provide task-specific quality control (QC)functions.
The QA/QC manager is a knowledgeable senior staff member
who is not assigned to function in a lead capacity on other
areas of the project.This allows the QA/QC manager clear,
objective views of the quality of work.
Our QC program includes established procedures for processes
performed from project inception through implementation and
success monitoring of the project. For example,Wildlands has
developed standardized checklists and pre-defined procedures
for activities such as field surveys of stream cross-sections and
Pfp=ftt�'
profiles, pebble counts, benthic surveys, bank stability
p , p Y Y
t assessments, natural channel design, permitting, contract
document preparation, post-construction baseline survey, and
Wse w•an Pa -
P•� -_ post construction monitoring.The checklists are largely based
on the most current DMS guidelines to ensure that all required
information is included in the correct format.Task leaders
assigned for each activity train project team members in the
. application of these procedures.The task leaders assist the
project manager by providing day-to-day QC functions, such as
establishing clear decisions and directions to team members in
the field, checking the completeness and accuracy of checklists,
constant supervision, and documentation of all decisions,
assumptions, and recommendations.The role of the project manager in QC is to monitor and maintain
project schedule and budget, address any concerns the client may have, constantly assess company
resources, and review all of the checklists.
During the conceptual and preliminary design stages,the project manager and the task leader will
perform a review of the design data, plans,technical specifications, and construction estimate for
accuracy, correct approach, and general overall quality of the product before submission to the client.
The project manager will perform a similar review at final design as will the QA/QC manager. During the
construction phase,the project manager and the construction task manager will regularly meet to
provide updates and discuss any issues.The goal of the QC process is to provide the highest quality
product to our client by completing tasks correctly the first time. By only completing procedural
processes once, it helps ensure that we deliver the best products at a minimum cost to our clients.
QA is performed to confirm that the QC program is effectively enforced, and to provide feedback on
further developments needed in the QC program.The QA/QC manager leads the QA program; however,
the project manager,task leaders, and project team staff also play large roles. It is each person's
responsibility to notify the QA/QC manager whenever discrepancies and inefficiencies are found in the
set of procedural activities that make up the QC process.The objective of QA is the continual
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.27

improvement of the total delivery process to enhance quality, productivity, and customer satisfaction.
We are continually improving the QC process so that our latest products and services are better than the
previous ones.
8.1 Deliverables
Schedule is established during the scoping phases of a project and it is the project manager's
responsibility to maintain the schedule. A work plan is developed at the outset of a project and shared
internally with team members so that milestone deadlines and work requirements are clearly outlined.
Review time is built into this internal schedule to ensure that adequate review takes place.
The QA form, which is maintained by the QA/QC manager, is established at the beginning of the project
and is maintained throughout the life of the project. Reviews of technical data, design parameters,
reports, plan sheets, hydraulic models, and supporting calculations are tracked on the form. Included on
this form are requirements that a professional staff member, who is not involved in the project on a
day-to-day basis review the design calculations, hydraulic models, reports, plans, and all other types of
project deliverables. Conformance with DMS report templates are also integrated into the QA review
process.
8.2 Construction
Wildlands team members are familiar with the policies, procedures, and practices necessary to
construct natural channel design and wetland restoration projects.Wildlands has provided construction
administration and observation services of over 28 miles of stream work and 152 acres of wetland work.
We believe that project implementation is the ultimate key to a successful project and,to achieve this, it
is extremely important to have our most experienced staff members involved on all construction
projects. Our team knows how to oversee construction so that the project is completed on time and in
compliance with all federal, state, and local permits. Several members of the team have assisted with
construction services for the DMS restoration sites, many of which have performed successfully for
three years or more:
v
Table G.9 Wildlands Team Member Construction Oversight Experience a', 0 3
z
Y
J 3
W Gl V
3 d z m
Project Details v; Li
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site 10,098 SMUs x
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 SMUs;8.0 WMUs x
Scaly Bark Mitigation Site 6,415 SMUs x x
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 5,672 SMUs; 11.5 WMUs x
Little Pine Creek III Mitigation Site 7,017 SMUs; 1.4 WMUs x
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,779 SMUs;7.0 WMUs x
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,808 SMUs;4.22 WMUs x
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.28

RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor: RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor:
ATTACHMENT A: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS 10.RECIPROCAL PREFERENCE:G.S.§143-59 establishes a reciprocal preference requirement to discourage
other states from favoring their own resident Vendors by applying percentage increases to any proposal by a
North Carolina resident Vendor.The"Principal Place of Business"is defined as the principal place from which
1. READ,REVIEW AND COMPLY:It shall be the Vendors responsibiltty to read this entire document,review all the trade or business of the Vendor is directed or managed.
enclosures and attachments,and any addenda thereto,and comply with all requirements specified herein, 11.CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION:To the extent permitted by applicable statutes and rules,the State will maintain
regardless of whether appearing in these Instructions to Vendors or elsewhere in this RFP document. confidential trade secrets that the Vendor does not wish disclosed.As a condition to confidential treatment,each
page containing trade secret information shall be identified in boldface at the top and bottom as"CONFIDENTIAL"
2. LATE PROPOSALS: Late proposals, regardless of cause,will not be opened or considered,and will by the Vendor,with specific trade secret information enclosed in boxes or similar indication.Cost information
automatically be disqualified from further consideration.It shall be the Vendor's sole responsibility to ensure shall not be deemed confidential under any circumstances.Regardless of what a Vendor may label as a trade
delivery at the designated office by the designated time. secret,the determination whether it is or is not entitled to protection will be determined in accordance with G.S.
§132-1.2.Any material labeled as confidential constitutes a representation by the Vendor that it has made a
3. ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION:The State reserves the right to reject any and all proposals,to waive any reasonable effort in good faith to determine that such material is,in fact,a trade secret under G.S.§132-1.2.
informality in proposals and,unless otherwise specified by the Vendor,to accept any item in the proposal.If Vendors are urged and cautioned to limit the marking of information as a trade secret or as confidential so far as
either a unit price or an extended price is obviously in error and the other is obviously correct,the incorrect price is possible.
will be disregarded. 12.PROTEST PROCEDURES:When a Vendor wishes to protest a Contract resulting from this solicitation that is
4. BASIS FOR REJECTION:Pursuant to 01 NCAC 05B.0501,the State reserves the right to reject any and all awarded by the Division of Purchase and Contract,or awarded by an agency in an awarded amount of at least
$25,000,a Vendor shall submit a written request addressed to the State Purchasing Officer at Purchase and
offers,In whole or In part,by deeming the offer unsatisfactory as to quality or quantity,delivery,price or service
Contract,1305 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1305.A protest request related to an award amount of
offered,non-compliance with the requirements or intent of this solicitation,lack of competitiveness,error(s)in less than$25,000 shall be sent to the purchasing officer of the agency that issued the award.The protest request
specifications or indications that revision would be advantageous to the State,cancellation or other changes in must be received in the proper office within thirty(30)consecutive calendar days from the date of the Contract
the intended project or any other determination that the proposed requirement is no longer needed,limitation or award.Protest letters shall contain specific grounds and reasons for the protest,how the protesting party was
lack of available funds,circumstances that prevent determination of the best offer,or any other determination harmed by the award made and any documentation providing support for the protesting party's claims.Note:
that rejection would be in the best interest of the State. Contract award notices are sent only to the Vendor actually awarded the Contract,and not to every person or
firm responding to a solicitation. Proposal status and Award notices are posted on the Internet at
5. EXECUTION:Failure to sign EXECUTION PAGE in the indicated space will render proposal non-responsive, haps://www.ios.state.nc.us/ios/.All protests will be handled pursuant to the North Carolina Administrative Code,
and it shall be rejected. 01 NCAC 05B.1519.
6. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE:In cases of conflict between specific provisions in this solicitation or in any contract 13. MISCELLANEOUS:Masculine pronouns shall be read to include feminine pronouns,and the singular of any
arising from it,the order of precedence shall be(high to low)(1)any special terms and conditions specific to this word or phrase shall be read to include the plural and vice versa.
RFP,including any negotiated terms;(2)requirements and specifications in Sections 4,5 and 6 of this RFP;(3) 14. COMMUNICATIONS BY VENDORS:In submitting its proposal,the Vendor agrees not to discuss or otherwise
North Carolina General Contract Terms and Conditions in ATTACHMENT B:NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL reveal the contents of its proposal to any source,government or private,outside of the using or issuing agency
CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS;(4)Instructions in ATTACHMENT A:INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS; until after the award of the Contract or cancellation of this RFP.All Vendors are forbidden from having any
and(5)Vendors Proposal. communications with the using or issuing agency,or any other representative of the State concerning the
solicitation,during the evaluation of the proposals(i.e.,after the public opening of the proposals and before the
7. INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE:Vendor shall furnish all information requested and in the award of the Contract),unless the State directly contacts the Vendors)for purposes of seeking clarification or
spaces provided in this document.Further,if required elsewhere in this proposal,each Vendor must submit with another reason permitted by the solicitation.A Vendor shall not:(a)transmit to the issuing and/or using agency
their proposal sketches,descriptive literature and/or complete specifications covering the products offered. any information commenting on the ability or qualifications of any other Vendor to provide the advertised good,
Reference to literature submitted with a previous proposal or available elsewhere will not satisfy this provision. equipment,commodity;(b)identify defects,errors and/or omissions in any other Vendor's proposal and/or prices
Proposals that do not comply with these requirements shall be subject to rejection. at any time during the procurement process;and/or(c)engage in or attempt any other communication or conduct
that could influence the evaluation and/or award of the Contractthat is the subject of this RFP.Vendors not in
8. SUSTAINABILITY:To support the sustainability efforts of the State of North Carolina we solicit your cooperation compliance with this provision may be disqualified,at the option ofthe State,from the Contmct award.Only those
in this effort.Pursuant to Executive Order 156(1999),it is desirable that all responses meet the following: communications with the using agency or issuing agency authorized by this RFP are permitted.
15. TABULATIONS:Proposal tabulations can be electronically retrieved at the Interactive Purchasing System(IPS),
• All copies of the proposal are printed double sided. httos://www.ios.state.nc.us/ios/BIdNumberSearch.Click on the IPS BIDS icon,click on Search for Bid,enter the
• All submittals and copies are printed on recycled paper with a minimum post-consumer content of 30%. proposal number,and then search.Tabulations will normally be available at this web she not later than one
• Unless absolutely necessary,all proposals and copies should minimize or eliminate use of non-recyclable or working day after the proposal opening.Lengthy or complex tabulations may be summarized,with other details
non-reusable materials such as plastic report covers,plastic dividers,vinyl sleeves,and GBC binding.Three- not made available on IPS,and requests for additional details or information concerning such tabulations cannot
ringed binders,glued materials,paper clips,and staples are acceptable. be honored.
• Materials should be submitted in a format which allows for easy removal,filing and/or recycling of paper and 16. VENDOR REGISTRATION AND SOLICITATION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM:Vendor Link NC allows Vendors to
binder materials.Use of oversized paper is strongly discouraged unless necessary for clarity or legibility. electronically register free with the State to receive electronic notification of current procurement opportunities for
goods and services of potential interests to them available on the Interactive Purchasing System,as well as
9. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES:Pursuant to General Statute§143-48 and Executive Order notifications of status changes to those solicitations.Online registration and other purchasing information is
#150(1999),the State invites and encourages participation In this procurement process by businesses owned available at the following website http://www.Dandc.nc.gov/.
by minorities,women,disabled,disabled business enterprises and non-profit work centers for the blind and
severely disabled. 17.WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL:a Proposal may be withdrawn only in writing and actually received by the office
issuing the RFP prior to the time for the opening of Proposals identified on the cover page of this RFP(or such
Ver:7/1/15 Page 25 of 35 Ver.7/1/15 Page 26 of 35
RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor: RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor:
later date included in an Addendum to the RFP). A withdrawal request must be on Vendor's letterhead and ATTACHMENT El: NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
signed by an official of the Vendor authorized to make such request. Any withdrawal request made after the
opening of Proposals shall be allowed only for good cause shown and in the sole discretion of the Division of
Purchase and Contract. 1. PERFORMANCE AND DEFAULT:If,through any cause,Vendor shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner
the obligations under this contract,the State shall have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice
18.INFORMAL COMMENTS:The State shall not be bound by informal explanations,instructions or information to the Vendor and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event and subject to all other provisions of this
given at any time by anyone on behalf of the State during the competitive process or after award.The State is contract„all finished or unfinished deliverable items under this contract prepared by the Vendor shall,at the
bound only by information provided in this RFP and in formal Addenda issued through IPS. option of the State,become its property,and the Vendor shall be entitled to receive compensation for units
actually produced,if any,in an amount determined by reducing the total amount due had the full number of
19.COST FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION:Any costs incurred by Vendor in preparing or submitting offers are Units been produced pro rata,such that the ratio of the final compensation actually paid to the original total
the Vendors sale responsibility;the State of North Carolina will not reimburse any Vendor for any casts amount due in accordance with Attachment C(as amended,if applicable)is equal to the ratio of the Units
incurred prior to awi actually generated to the total Units identified in Attachment C.
20.VENDOR'S REPRESENTATIVE:Each Vendor shall submit with its proposal the name,address,and telephone Notwithstanding any other provision in this agreement,Vendor shall not be relieved of liability to the State for
number of the pemon(s)with authority to bind the firm and answer questions or provide clarification concerning
the firm's proposal. damages sustained by the State by virtue of any breach of this contract,and the State may withhold any payment
due the Vendor for the purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the State from such
21.SUBCONTRACTING: Unless expressly prohibited,a Vendor may propose to subcontract portions of the work breach can be determined.The State reserves the right to require at any time a performance bond or other
to identified subcontractor(s),provided that its proposal clearly describe what work it plans to subcontract and acceptable alternative guarantees from a successful Vendor without expense to the State.
that Vendor includes in its proposal all information regarding employees,business experience,etc.for each
proposed subcontractor that is required to be provided for Vendor itself. In case of default by the Vendor,the State may procure the services necessary to complete performance
hereunder from other sources and hold the Vendor responsible for any excess cost occasioned thereby. In
22.INSPECTION AT VENDOR'S SITE:The State reserves the right to inspect,at a reasonable time,the addition,in the event of default by the Contractor under this contract,or upon the Contractor filing a petition for
equipment/item,plant or other facilities of a prospective Vendor prior to Contract award,and during the Contract bankruptcy or the entering of a judgment of bankruptcy by or against the Contractor,the State may immediately
term as necessary forthe State determination that such equipment item,plant or other facilities conform with the cease doing business with the Contractor,immediately terminate this contract for cause,and may act to debar
specifications/requirements and are adequate and suitable for the proper and effective performance of the the Contractor from doing future business with the State
Contract.
2. GOVERNMENTAL RESTRICTIONS:In the event any Governmental restrictions are imposed which necessitate
alteration of the material,quality,workmanship or performance of the items offered prior to their delivery,it shall
be the responsibility of the Vendor to notify,in writing,the issuing purchasing office at once,indicating the specific
regulation which required such alterations.The State reserves the right to accept any such alterations,including
any price adjustments occasioned thereby,or to cancel the Contract.
3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS:Any and all payments to the Vendor are dependent upon and subject to the
availability of funds to the agency forme purpose set forth in this contract.
4. TAXES:Any applicable taxes shall be invoiced as a separate item.
a. G.S.§143-59.1 bars the Secretary of Administration from entering into Contracts with Vendors if the
Vendor or its affiliates meet one of the conditions of G.S.§105-164.8(b)and refuses to collect use tax
on sales of tangible personal property to purchasers in North Carolina.Conditions under G.S.§105-
This Space is Intentionally Left Blank 164.8(b)include:(1)Maintenance of a retail establishment or office,(2)Presence of representatives in
the State that solicit sales or transact business on behalf of the Vendor and(3)Systematic exploitation
of the market by media-assisted,media-facilitated,or media-solicited means.By execution of the
proposal document the Vendor certifies that it and all of Its affiliates,(if it has affiliates),collect(s)the
appropriate taxes.
b. All agencies participating in this Contract are exempt from Federal Taxes,such as excise and
transportation.Exemption forms submitted by the Vendor will be executed and returned by the using
agency.
c. Prices offered are not to include any personal property taxes,nor any sales or use tax(or fees)unless
required by the North Carolina Department of Revenue.
5. SITUS:The place of this Contact,its situs and forum,shall be North Carolina,where all matters,whether
sounding in Contract or tort,relating to its validity,construction,interpretation and enforcement shall be
determined.
Ver.711,15 Page 27 of 35 Ver:7/1/15 Page 28 of 35

RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor: RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor:
6. GOVERNING LAWS:This Contract is made under and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the b. Commercial General Liability-General Liability Coverage on a Comprehensive Broad Form on an
laws of the State of North Carolina,without regard to is conflict of laws rules. occurrence,basis in the minimum amount of$1,000,000.00 Combined Single Limit.(Defense cost shall be in
excess of the limit of liability.)
7. PAYMENT TERMS:Payment terms are Net not later than 30 days after receipt of correct invoice or acceptance
of goods,whichever is later.The using agency is responsible for all payments to the Vendor under the Contract. G. Automobile-Automobile Liability Insurance,to include liability coverage,covering all owned,hired and
Payment by some agencies may be made by procurement card,if the Vendor accepts that card(Visa, non-owned vehicles,used in connection with the Contract.The minimum combined single limit shall be
MasterCard,etc.)from other customers,and it shall be accepted by the Vendor for payment under the same $250,000.00 bodily injury and property damage;$250,000.00 uninsured/under insured motorist:and$2,500.00
terms and conditions as any other method of payment accepted by the Vendor.If payment is made by medical payment.
procurement card,then payment may be processed immediately by the Vendor.
REQUIREMENTS-Providing and maintaining adequate insurance coverage is a material obligation of the
8. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION:The Vendor will take affirmative action in complying with all Federal and State Vendor and is ofthe essence of this Contract.All such insurance shall meet all laws ofthe State of North Carolina.
requirements concerning fair employment and employment of people with disabilities,and concerning the Such insurance coverage shall be obtained from companies that are authorized to provide such coverage and
treatment of all employees without regard to discrimination by reason of race,color,religion,sex,national origin that are authorized by the Commissioner of Insurance to do business in North Carolina.The Vendor shall at all
or disability. times comply with the terms of such insurance policies,and all requirements of the insurer under any such
insurance policies,except as they may conflict with existing North Carolina laws or this Contract.The limits of
9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY: Vendor shall hold and save the State,its officers,agents and coverage under each insurance policy maintained by the Vendor shall not be interpreted as limiting the Vendor's
employees,harmless from liability of any kind,including costs and expenses,resulting from infringement of the liability and obligations under the Contract.
rights of any third party in any copyrighted material,patented or unpatented invention,articles,device or
appliance delivered in connection with this contract. 14.GENERAL INDEMNITY:The Vendor shall hold and save the State,its officers,agents,and employees,harmless
from liability of any kind,including all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any other person,firm,or
10.ADVERTISING:Vendor agrees not to use the existence of this Contract or the name of the State of North corporation furnishing or supplying work,services,materials,or supplies in connection with the performance of
Carolina as part of any commercial advertising or marketing of products or services. A Vendor may inquire this Contract,and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person,firm,or corporation that
whether the State is willing to act as a reference by providing factual information directly to other prospective may be injured or damaged by the Vendor in the performance of this Contract and that are attributable to the
customers. negligence or intentionally tortious acts of the Vendor provided that the Vendor is notified in writing within 30 days
that the State has knowledge of such claims.The Vendor represents and warrants that it shall make no claim of
11.ACCESS TO PERSONS AND RECORDS:During and after the term hereof,the State Auditor and any using any kind or nature against the State's agents who are involved in the delivery or processing of Vendor goods to
agency's internal auditors shall have access to persons and records related to this Contract to verify accounts the State.The representation and warranty in the preceding sentence shall survive the termination or expiration
and data affecting fees or performance under the Contract,as provided in G.S.§143-49(9). of this Contract.
12.ASSIGNMENT:No assignment of the Vendor's obligations nor the Vendor's right to receive payment hereunder 15.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR:Vendor shall be considered to be an independent contractor and as such shall
shall be permitted. be wholly responsible for the work to be performed and for the supervision of its employees.Vendor represents
that it has,or will secure at its own expense,all personnel required in performing the services under this contract.
However,upon written request approved by the issuing purchasing authority and solely as a convenience to the Such employees shall not be employees of,or have any individual contractual relationship with the Agency.
Vendor,the State may:
a.Forward the Vendors payment check directly to any person or entity designated by the Vendor,and 16.KEY PERSONNEL: Vendor shall not substitute key personnel assigned to the performance of this contract
without prior written approval by the State's assigned Contract Lead. The individuals designated as key
b.Include any person or entity designated by Vendor as a joint payee on the Vendor's payment check. personnel for purposes of this contract are those specified in the RFP or Vendors proposal.
In no event shall such approval and action obligate the State to anyone other than the Vendor and the Vendor 17.SUBCONTRACTING:Work proposed to be performed under this contract by the Vendor or its employees shall
shall remain responsible for fulfillment of all Contract obligations.Upon advance written request,the State may, not be subcontracted without prior written approval of the State's assigned Contract Administrator.Acceptance
in its unfettered discretion,approve an assignment to the surviving entity of a merger,acquisition or corporate of a Vendor's proposal shall include approval to use the subcontractor(s)specified therein in accordance with
reorganization,if made as part of the transfer of all or substantially all of the Vendor's assets.Any purported paragraph 21 of Attachment A:Instructions to Vendor.
assignment made in violation of this provision shall be void and a material breach of this Contract. 18.TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE:The State may terminate this contract at anytime by 30 days'notice
13.INSURANCE: in writing from the State to the Vendor.In that event,all finished or unfinished deliverable items prepared by the
Vendor under this contract shall,at the option of the State,become its property.If the contract is terminated by
COVERAGE-During the term of the Contract,the Vendor at its sole cost and expense shall provide commercial the State as provided in this section,the State shall pay for services satisfactorily completed by the Vendor,less
insurance of such type and with such terms and limits as may be reasonably associated with the Contract.As a payment or compensation previously made.
minimum,the Vendor shall provide and maintain the following coverage and limits:
19.CONFIDENTIALITY: Any State information,data,instruments,documents,studies or reports given to or
a. Worker's Compensation-The Vendor shall provide and maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance,as prepared or assembled by or provided to the Vendor under this contract shall be kept as confidential,used only
required by the laws of North Carolina,as well as employer's liability coverage with minimum limits of for the purpose(s)required to perform this contract and not divulged or made available to any individual or
$500,000.00,covering all of Vendor's employees who are engaged in any work under the Contract.If any work organization without the prior written approval of the State.
is sub-contracted,the Vendor shall require the sub-Contractor to provide the same coverage for any of his
employees engaged in any work under the Contract. 20.CARE OF PROPERTY:The Vendor agrees that it shall be responsible for the proper custody and care of any
property furnished it by the State for use in connection with the performance of this contract or purchased by or
Ver:7/1/15 Page 29 of 35 Ver:7/1/15 Page 30 of 35
RFP Number:16-006706 Vendor:
for the State for this contract,and Vendor will reimburse the State for loss or damage of such property while In
Vendor's custody.
21.PROPERTY RIGHTS:All deliverable items produced for or as a result of this contract shall be an become the
property of the State,and Vendor hereby assigns all ownership rights in such deliverables,including all
intellectual property rights,to the Stale;provided,however,that as to any preexisting works imbedded in such
deliverables,Vendor hereby grants the State a fully-paid,perpetual license to copy,distribute and adapt the
preexisting works.
22.OUTSOURCING: Any Vendor or subcontractor providing call or contact center services to the State of North
Carolina shall disclose to inbound callers the location from which the call or contact center services are being
provided.
If,after award of a contract,the contractor wishes to relocate or outsource any portion of the work to a location
outside the United States,or to contract with a subcontractor for the performance of any work,which
subcontractor and nature of the work has not previously been disclosed to the State in writing,prior written
approval must be obtained from the State agency responsible for the contract.
Vendor shall give notice to the using agency of any relocation of the Vendor,employees of the Vendor,
subcontractors of the Vendor,or other persons performing services under a state contract to a location outside
of the United States.
23.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: Vendor shall comply with all laws,ordinances,codes,rules,regulations,and
licensing requirements that are applicable to the conduct of its business,including those of federal,state,and
local agencies having jurisdiction and/or authority.
24.ENTIRE AGREEMENT:This contract and any documents incorporated specifically by reference represent the
entire agreement between the parties and supersede all prior oral or written statements or agreements. This
RFP,any addenda thereto,and the Vendor's proposal are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth
verbatim.
All promises,requirements,terms,conditions,provisions,representations,guarantees,and warranties contained
herein shall survive the contract expiration or termination date unless specifically provided otherwise herein,or
unless superseded by applicable Federal or State statutes of limitation.
25.AMENDMENTS:This contract may be amended only by written amendments duly executed by the State and
the Vendor.The NC Division of Purchase and Contract shall give prior approval to any amendment to a contract
awarded through that office.
26.WAIVER:The failure to enforce or the waiver by the State of any right or of breach or default on one occasion or
instance shall not constitute the waiver of such right,breach or default on any subsequent occasion or instance.
27.FORCE MAJEURE:Neither party shall be deemed to be in default of its obligations hereunder it and so long as
it is prevented from perforning such obligations as a result of events beyond its reasonable control,including
without limitation,fire,power failures,any act of war,hostile foreign action,nuclear explosion,riot,strikes or
failures or refusals to perform under subcontracts,civil insurrection,earthquake,hurricane,tornado,or other
catastrophic natural event or act of God.
This Space is Intentionally Left Blank
Ver:7/1/15 Page 31 of 35

RFP Number. 16-006706 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT D: LOCATION OF WORKERS UTILIZED BY VENDOR
In accordance with NC General Statute§143-59.4, the Vendor shall detail the location(s)at which performance will
occur, as well as the manner in which it intends to utilize resources or workers outside of the United States In the
performance of this Contract. The State will evaluate the additional risks, costs, and other factors associated with
such utilization prior to making an award. Please complete Items a, b,and c below.
a) Will any work under this Contract be performed outside the United States? ❑ YES ®NO
If the Vendor answered"YES"above,Vendor must complete items land 2 below:
t. List the location(s) outside the United States where work under this Contract will be performed by the
Vendor,any sub-Contractors,employees, or other persons performing work under the Contract:
n/a
2. Describe the corporate structure and location of corporate employees and activities of the Vendor, Its
affiliates or any other sub-Contractors that will perform work outside the U.S.:
n/a
b) The Vendor agrees to provide notice,in writing to the State,of the relocation of the
Vendor,employees of the Vendor,sub-Contractors of the Vender,or ether persons ® YES ❑ NO
performing services under the Contract outside of the United States
NOTE:All Vendor or sub-Contractor personnel providing call or contact center services to
the State of North Carolina under the Contract shall disclose to inbound callers the
location from which the call or contact center services are being provided.
c) Identify all U.S. locations at which performance will occur:
Design:Charlotte, NC; Survey:
Asheville,NC
PRINTED NAME:Shawn D.Wilkerson, President DATE:01/202016
This Space is Intentionally Left Blank
Ver:71115 Page 33 of 35

RFP Number: 1"06706 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT E: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Name of Vendor. Wildlands Engineering Inc.
The undersigned hereby certifies that: [check all applicable boxes]
® The Vendor is in sound financial condition and received an unqualified audit opinion for the latest audit of its
financial statements.
Date of latest audit: 12/3112014
® The Vendor has no outstanding liabilities to the Internal Revenue Service or other government entities.
® The Vendor is not the subject of any current litigation or findings of noncompliance under federal or state law.
® The Vendor has not been the subject of any past litigation or finings of any past litigation or findings of
noncompliance under federal or state law that may impact in any way its ability to fulfill the requirements Of
this Contract.
® He or she is authorized to make the foregoing statements on behalf of the Vendor.
If any one or more of the foregoing boxes is NOT checked,explain the reason in the space below:
D'v r"'✓ �--�� 01/20/2016
Sign t Date
Shawn D.Wilkerson President
Printed Name Title
[This Certification must be signed by an individual authorized W speak for the Vendor]
This Space is Intentionally Left Blank
Ver.711115 Page 34 of 35

RFP Number 16-006706 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc
ATTACHMENT F: ADDITIONAL VENDOR INFORMATION
VENDOR'S INFORMATION
Vendors Primary Contact(or Project Manager)
Name: Shawn D. Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: President
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104
City: Charlotte Statel Zip: NC/28203
Telephone: ]04 332-7754 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Vendors Execution Address(Where the contract should be mailed for signature)
Name: Shawn D.Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Title: President
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104
City: Charlotte State/Lp: NC/28203
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Vendors Payment(RemitTO)Address(Where the checks should be mailed)
(This address sheuldagree with the"Remit-To"address associated with the Contractor's Tax lD. Thisinlormarbon
must be verified with the Contractor's Corporate Accounting Dice)
Name: Shawn D.Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Tile: President
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104
City: Charlotte State/Zip: NC/28203
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Ver:711115 Pape 35 of 35

A { North Carolina Counties
J ,* Project Site
# NC municipalities
03040101090050
' ''• "Boonvifle
1 14 Digit HUC NC
Targeted Local Watershed
01•, a°i � Water Supply Watershed
BOONVILLE
�. �
J � Significant Natural Heritage Areas
-�WELBORN
J= FARM j NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas
NC Historic Preservation Areas
- - - - - 2014 Final 303(d)List
\ Water Features
\\\
Airports
\` 03040101130010
3040101140010
UNIFIL 1� 03040101140020 ,
Yadkinville Forb [
North Deep Creek
eek
W1 '
\ \ \ %\N\
0T ` �\ '♦ ~�`�North Deer Creek Bluffs�itflqal6l, e
IX�
�adkino�inty QpeR S c
\ \\ \ ie mont L nd oA e7vanb se ent
\\ \
` "�\ \ ♦ ` f�C lea V17ater a gecne t \\
ie o L d \ ervanc Ease n \ \..r \ Tr t n♦d�a m nt\�
\ \ '♦ \ n \ \ \, \ \ ♦ \ \
\\.\ \ \ ♦ H se F \ ♦ \ \ • \ \
0411 -
1
� \• \ \ \ ,, \,
\ \` D \♦` i ` �`` \\ \\ \\ \ \\� �
ONE HICKORY
AIRFIELD
1,0
I.
© 4�.10116Q0 �I
-04 Lone Hickory
1 i
Historic District /Cedar Creek \\\dv io f
o
10 Forest n i \
L +� 03040101200010
X03040102020040] �f yti� �\\♦`
# \\3040101200020 \\\
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
0 2 4 Miles Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
i I i I Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
WIL1]LANDS
Yadkin County, NC

4
Project Site
! Proposed Conservation Easement 1
Former Impoundment
cam' Row Crops
Site of Former Dairy Farm
Offsite Streams
f = + Topography 4'Contour Interval
0
- •, � ', Project Streams
s.> w
0:;. . . {' Intermittent
�, -�•J�e Perennial
Ditch
O Cross Section
Reach Breaks
If = Mass Wasting
1 ,� 1 Bank Scour
1 _ Incision
i �'`- - r f r.� i� \. �` �� • Bedrock
�-
• Pipe or Culvert
R.
s
a 0 O Active Headcut
L1 V
Sediment Sample
j .
0East Sid
!f p
� '��,fir✓, _i Y � !i �r e ry f�i•'
( 1,
i
n
a i r
Y — .PI.
� I �
I If
f
A
" — 1VIC
- --
r
Streams Proposed for Modification
Former Inline Ditching/ Total + I r
Reach Bank Scour Incision Mass Wasting Row Crops Impoundments Straightening Length
UTI 62% 0 0 0 0 o
50/ 12/ 78/ 21/ 0/ 5,952
UT2 27% 96% 0 79/0 0% 79% 2,401 V
UT2A 0% 100% 0% 97% 0% 100% 1,142
UT2C 51% 51% 0% 100% 0% 100% 510 rf h
UT3 24% 94% 0% 100% 0% 100% 1,842
Total 42% 71% 6% 84% 10% 46% 11,847
,P
Figure 2 Site Map and Channel Stability Map
0 500 1,000 1,500 Feet Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
W I L 13 LA N D S I i I i I i I Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
F.It C.I N h F R I RI(:
Yadkin County, NC

rdo
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
L.ry aCe ,
ad
0
go
go
00
oy g
S
., °.
1 ,
i
-ire
to ■.: _
+ • r- -
&
47nut&4bP-QgFwPhfC q a ran
Figure 3 Topographic Map
0 1,200 2,400 Feet Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
W I LID LA. 1) I i I i I Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
thr;iraFrui ra r:
Yadkin County, NC

IF
1
Project Site
Projectcams
ea
Offsite StreamsWatershed
L
#7
eP
GteeK
�ilV f-j
0.45 sgmi
0.04 sgmi 0.05
F� �p�'her;Rd". wad
r
UT2' ,I f 0.95 sgmi
0.26,,Isq mi
0.67 sgmi 'd UT1A A
4 Rd , 0.15 sqmi
4,
w -
pe
IV
2014 Aerial agery
1 11 X11

Project Site DhA-Dan River and Codorus soils,0 to Fd E2-Fairview sandy clay loam,15 to SmF-Siloam sandy loam,25 to 50
2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded 25 percent slopes,moderately eroded percent slopes
Proposed Conservation Easement
DmA-Dan River and Comus soils,0 to Fe D3-Fairview clay loam,10 to 15 St6-Starr loam,0 to 6 percent slopes,
Project Streams 4 percent slopes,occasionally flooded percent slopes,severely eroded rarely flooded
Offsite Streams Dob-Delila fine sandy loam,0 to 6 Fs F-Fairview-Stott Knob complex,25 Ta E-Toast fine sandy loam,15 to 25
percent slopes to 45 percent slopes percent slopes
Ditch
Fa D-Fairview fine sandy loam,10 to FtF-Fairview-Stott Knob complex,25 TeE2-Toast sandy clay loam,15 to 25
Soils 15 percent slopes to 45 percent slopes,stony percent slopes,moderately eroded
Cab-Clifford fine sandy loam,2 to 6 Fa E-Fairview fine sandy loam,15 to Ne62-Nathalie sandy clay loam,2 to 6 WoF-Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield
percent slopes 25 percent slopes percent slopes,moderately eroded complex,25 to 45 percent slopes
CrA-Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent Fd D2-Fairview sandy clay loam,10 to Rd E-Rhodhiss-Stott Knob complex,15 WwF-Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield
slopes,occasionally flooded 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded to 25 percent slopes,stony complex,25 to 45 percent slopes,
stony
,
,Lo�NeB2 t WoF
WoF h ',
Do�
- �' � vIC ICIC ICIC IIlk
CIC.
DmA
DoB
4111
u �,` , ♦ `*�" y
StB
u CrA Rd�'� "
;# ' FaE
r v'u FeD3
v FsF >•,-® dE2 �'� �����• ` FaE a
f
FtF
i ♦ :
■ t CaB nam
■ A
c ♦ Ci
II.I.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1./■ ' l-a�!
A ♦ FaD
j 1
■ ,� WwF A
■ . Cil
i Z FI, av x ;�! y 1 FaEr'-'
41
4 y
44.
FaE
l n
•�i ' \tom ' �` V � - � �� S .�y t � � e9f. .i �f��
.1 1
• .J +".k � �� �� Ili �� r
r
c I �
Fit,
F '�
t
1�i-I■ Il rrr. S r _16 ,a
�N
Figure 5 Soils Map
Oft 0 500 1,000 1,500 Feet Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
IiV I L ll LA 1`I I7 I i I iI I III Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
F.1t GI FdF FRI N(:
Yadkin County, NC

'Ilk- _,_,_,_
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement, L,_,_,_! p
Temporary Construction Easement
y }
'fir`r� � � �.-• 4 ��� Easement Access Road
Offsite Streams
Topography 4'Contour Interval
Wetland Restoration
Ditch to be Filled
Reach Breaks
Proposed BMP
p # Estimated Proposed Alignments
°; - •-._•
Stream Restoration
Stream Preservation
WiT
t'
PNI
"(DI
-----------------
,
R
1i
I
-`•1��� �, �• �� �` iii'{
Y�. -•�.0 � rrr � "_`+ - �' '�r!'v. R�^��r� .,.:'4. � �. 5.��..��--r+"r.�
�! 1'.•5^1`! f` l�fit-tea � ��VP'�� A°,�'� �� ,� ��d ���'K 4
' ln9` 55,, ) � �r /p _._�� �' °yo- Ptfv 6J" f t t ,��°.. H.'� � � '•meg ',
P f r• � � q1q .a3 v �i- °'" -
/J7AV
-
�� q,� i r fr"` F 4�` +�f t.� '� r� ..�. �� ,q�pif �,J� �,..�,� ..I q� j" �qh'�,4 k��� pr
dr° ah } �� IIH f, r f tl Kra ova {{# /J' 1 9 �.�. 1} d 1t
t�fJ/ 4�IiI
1 I
.,, f+ � {�r„h '���\ ��s�, rM 11 i�1�J11�{,d�l � ,�. � Ili � Pdje//'` ~'�^. �'a ..�•.'�,�t.
r
s
tt'' Y
�qY:
i
lO
Pk
44/
M Figure 6 Concept Map
0 500 1,000 1,500 Feet Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
1V I L iJ LA N ll S I i I i I i I Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
EKGIKEERItic�
Yadkin County, NC

t � moo Z
o v
.. o
L mo
t 1 1
_
,+ Sw
t L
i w A Ff
d
Gin
�a 2 LL
r e
0
�K
1�
iiw Illi:JI A` •...dye' .3'ASf' _..�r
a° I
7
u
0
O N m m U
O
IS
��row osu•y^t+' LL
• 1 11 ¢
r
Y a Y
1
� d
tt 1
i r -T �• o
4 I 9t
i` Aze
e rt. -

S _
i
rid
r
j-4
F•` + c�0 O
�. II
• , 5 Q
cr
i r3ti�
• r t j..
,t �Al, f.T

f r .�
,. �' ,,`
f .d
s
.�. w t.
f
���� � �, '
+��,� �
e
�.
�� „
S��Y � �f
'� t, ' t� 4 -ti � ,r 4 �
�.
!I ''�
a -
I� .k^
(�
- ,��.{rl�.. -
� �
i �
� � ;P..
,��
� +�" f
� - �,
:�9�
��,,,
�-- �."�
-,�.�,

r y; er
Of
- tF �•� -� ��.-:f k I
0
N
V M
m
}
5
CY
Z }
Of
M
� o
cn o
O N
N I I
O
N
� N
OJ
#
}
a
Z w

s
i ..
MM
' N r
p I I
N
I �
r4 CY
Z }
81
Al
p O

�.: �..
`�.� �'
�� �`
.�
i' J
�'_
� A��e _
\ + 4�} �
C'
� � -'
� �
�� ` `
1s
-.,
�. `�"�
�A ti
' � w
y ���
i
r, .��
.. �� ��
f
�� � /
T
P �.f ter' �."
'.# '�.,
�- � ti
. _
__ .�, �
.� '-L
w
. r ��
fij \ -� —
rj ` _ � `�
4

�JR
J.
t �
a
� o
O N
N I I
O
N
V O
O
O
� N
}
o a
p
r �
�l
R
p I I
N
V O
O
O
# N
� a
Z W

,fir,=:.
1 �
r.
,t
,,
/f -if
,�
B
��
h `rte
-r,:r"` c.^; ,�' h _A.�,5 t .r -`� � -� �/ '.... gra- �"���� � '�F
- 2 .. -- ... --'Aria,} ..+�� .. - � '_
•.1�
., ���
-� � �--
„ � `
- d� } �
�. . _ -
� _� - - -
; � .� �
_.
,.
.�

'`C�`f�� �C ^�7��t�'A (, ��r+Y 7���,�,�Y( �-F�, � / J.v. * P P�♦i�«�• - _
F J•��� a}y.�� ill;�^� /FSC ii r$����i 1f'i« i;.
Ape
� o
m o
co �
N I I
O
V m
O
O
# N
}
o a
Z W
Z �
d
co 0
� o
O N
N I I
O
O
7 m
O
O
7t N
}
Q
Z W

k
l
r�
r
Y 44 I
k
y
X ,
r

a
y, ffi u t
tn
•o N N N N n N s^ N N�� A N N�^ �N x
S 5 t �! Y
45
J -
a
ec g Do Q 0000. a o 0 o Q j dra `y
g a a a =3s
L i
o
1 E In 44 s
15 15 y a o It
w 9133 r
en rots -t
3 a
Im
..
� .cnte8 =�xan = 11%
!7 W F i 'P to IP A sc qi rd 67 r r U°/ai
N n n ry r fA t
® •"m��, N N N N h N N h� N N.C� �N N � u] � �!
_ m '
�e d
• � u C y � �'11 A O O
€ 0 LL
ea
i
(yip }... �}$m�$L � �m y�� � Il �•�� � � � � � �
m rr• Edi U dF

: a-
n
m.0
N rn II
rz
aC
1€ z A z lit
e
c � �€ 00
o a
+� a
u7
h i
fA
La
o y f +�
AY!- rbc ❑ '�a�a � ® ` -- � 8 �9gs � � �® � � ID�� £ � ¢� �
�s o E m m
mwoo m �oaa
avi+s+..:tri aid � m N ne mm z ,w 0- N m4"i 6
z.
`s
3 410 60
3 0 2 f
m o
21
6 m H �tY N N p
° 'n EE ao a oao o ao
c $ a
CL
U a °
v ww
c g
a
c
coa
7R L
o £E¢g m
n i o 'm L7 Cj.y`'°a¢0¢=Cry x m.�_, a m P chi m ii ¢ u.v d C 8 0
m
C ul Fya QMH.ri ovi ro rtm Gi9 ai V ••i•r�.4� U rnci cv ea LQ

yy�a In m o o ea
i
b
J
C - N
m�
I� it LL
_
G O o 4 P p a O 0 a s a s eri cc.b g a.a a .
0
ri
qf
E
.fi m
a .1E
�maG 11 C
L p C c
c14
m
c �
dw rGfq Q��NY
G± a,� A NNS'e �A tQA t6 tlirNV NN C9w�'i�G n ap
M
001
N
Q
S n o
Is
M1•1 ro z ,w
q N N N NSO N N N[V r N N p - N N+--- w�
J
uq E � Lh
y C
V � YO ItlN? LLa 4l1 4lY
'E3 � aa a vaaooa�a oo •ao oc ¢ �
a
4 dl J
7 b i.1 CJ ru f/J
r1^
� s
m
Sb
b.
2 ogre. �N -�n. vivui�nari airivN� x
� rn

{gyp O n t+'f] N1 0� n in eri n o1 61
�'•`• Iii iogaF
3C t f II
m _Y a
II
.A r � y •-- �Ci O r r-Q o N N�� O O O C]U
It 11
ll��w
c
• � CI �r �
-FF
ava o oa a a ao 4..
° = a
La
o ti
E
J L
2r EE
ti
R
3 (r ° is ag
x
49 •C 4 O fG, 'yO
r d d m N n 4 n N ry N Z N
L4 2L
r
y V
m � � N fil N N N N N N S s'� �N N� '•
em
J � N 117 4[1I IA V N 11
N N •-�Y 4
i
LL
cv
go I
11 11
prr w 4 a a O 8 b b b b 6 4 0 O d t^w a
a r
m
'� �yp C1r � 11 �,q L333 ��E � � x` •�TY w
g
d- +f I[i w0

Lone Hickory Farms XS1 Riffle
Pavement& Subpavement Particle Distribution
Silt/Clay. . ..... Sand. .....
Gravel
a obble I r
30
y rb
a
E 50
y A
y to
U '
d
a
;o
30
sar—
sb
�P
0.01 0.1 1 to loo lobo loom
Particle Class Size(mm)
'--E—Pavaman[Sumnury � SuCpaveme�R sunmary
a+
D T c
t A '
9
sits (14)--7¢.13

d
I
s E
o a
- � o
(g)uogena13

Rnne,u
���� IIIIIII
IIIIII
^'k

a
N
C
O
mm
pp o
N y:tLn v
x C E
CuCf n
t L
= N
J
o
(g)um;enal3
aO•
N
C o
u. O s
S � a
� 3
N m
X �CC S2
V L I
N
~ LL o x
O o
V Lei -
H 2
C _
J
E
O E
x
- c

1
0
m
00
cY_
N C
X VE1
Mm
i-; LL
o_
Y
u �
2
a
C o
O
J
0 0
o m m m m m
(11)--R-13
G1
Y
N
C
O -
++
ra
pq o
a+
N E
X n
N £ a
H m ID LL
i c
H
2
v
C o
J I
Ll
o m m m m m
(u)U.II.Aa13

Lone Hickory Farms XS$ Riffle
Pavement Particle Distribution
too - -•----'-i.1_._r,-Y ...—..-_�---rrrrr -. .-_.-_„_.._-----n. .. ■'- t*..- -# - ft- ---
40 Silt/Clay. . ..... Sand. .....
Gravel
ok6le I r
so
a
E ;o
y
U
d
a
3i1
10
0.01 U.1 l I,, 100 1000 loom
Particle Class Size(mm)
--.s---Pavement Summary
N
Ol
a.+
,{ N
C
X
LL
h 4
bil C o
(W-14...13

Preliminary Nutrient Reduction Model for Lone Hickory Mitigation Site
Estimated Nutrient Reduction from the Establishment of the Riparian Buffer
Pre-Project Nutrient Loading Estimate
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Easement S.M.Formula Average EMC of TN Column Average EMC of TP Column
Acreae 0.46+831 m /L 234) (m /L) (2 * 36
Transportation impervious 0.46 2.60 0.00 0.19 0.00
Roof impervious 0.46 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
Managed pervious
0.46 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00
(lawn/landscape)
Managed pervious
47.80 0.46 4.25 93.45 1.23 27.05
(cropland)
Managed pervious
0.18 0.46 2.04 0.17 0.62 0.05
(pasture)
Wooded pervious 33.00 0.46 0.94 14.27 0.14 2.13
Area taken up by BMP 0.46 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
Fraction Impervious(1)= 0.00 TN Load(Ib/yr)= 107.89 TP Load(Ib/yr)= 29.22
TN Export TP Export
Total Project Area= 80.98 (Ib/ac/yr)= 1.33 (Ib/ac/yr)= 036
Post-Project Nutrient Loading Estimate
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Easement S.M.Formula Average EMC of TN Column Average EMC of TP Column
Acreage (0.46+8.31) (m /L) (2 * 3 * 4) (m /L) (2 * 3 * 6
Transportation impervious 0.46 2.60 0.00 0.19 0.00
Roof impervious 0.46 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
Managed pervious
0.46 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00
(lawn/landscape)
Managed pervious
0.46 4.25 0.00 1.23 0.00
(cropland)
Managed pervious
0.46 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00
(pasture)
Wooded pervious 80.80 0.46 0.94 34.94 0.14 5.20
Area taken up by BMP 0.18 0.46 1.95 0.16 0.11 0.01
Fraction Impervious(1)= 0.00 TN Load(Ib/yr)= 35.10 TP Load(Ib/yr)= 5.21
Total Project Area= 80,98 TN Export 0.43 TP Export 0.06
(Ib/ac/yr)_ (Ib/ac/yr)_
Estimated Nutrient Reduction from the Potential BMP(Dry Catchment Basin)
Catchment 1:
Total acreage of catchment 1= 20.57 ac
First BMP's TN removal rate= 10 % First BMP's TP removal rate= 10
Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TP removal rate=
Third BMP's TN removal rate= % Third BMP's TP removal rate=
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 10 % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= 10
(1)1 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Catchment S.M.Formula Average EMC of TN Column Average EMC of TP Column
Acreage (0.46+8.31) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(4) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(6)
Transportation impervious 0.46 2.60 0.00 0.19 0.00
Roof impervious 0.46 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
Managed pervious 20.39 0.46 1.42 13.32 0.28 2.63
Wooded pervious 0.46 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00
Area taken up by BMP 0.18 0.46 1.95 0.16 0.11 0.01
Pre-BMP TN Pre-BMP TP Load
Fraction Impervious(I)= 0.00 Load(Ib/yr)= 13.48 (Ib/yr)= 2.64
Post-BMP TN Load Post-BMP TP Load
Ib/ r = 12.13 Ib/ r = 2.37

Estimated Nutrient Reduction from the Potential BMP(RSC#1)
Catchment 2:
Total acreage of catchment 2= ac
First BMP's TN removal rate= % First BMP's TP removal rate= 25 %
Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TP removal rate= %
Third BMP's TN removal rate= % Third BMP's TP removal rate= %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 30 % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= 25 %
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Catchment S.M.Formula Average EMC of TN Column Average EMC of TP Column
Acreage (0.46+8.31) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(4) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(6)
Transportation impervious 1.15 0.46 2.60 1.38 0.19 0.10
Roof impervious 0.47 0.46 1.95 0.42 0.11 0.02
Managed pervious 7.00 0.46 1.42 4.57 0.28 0.90
Wooded pervious 4.01 0.46 0.94 1.73 0.14 0.26
Area taken up by BMP 0.25 0.46 1.95 0.22 0.11 0.01
Pre-BMP TN Pre-BMP TP Load
Fraction Impervious(I)= 0.13 Load(Ib/yr)= 8.32 (Ib/yr)= 1.30
Post-BMP TN Load Post-BMP TP Load
(lb/r = 5.83 Ib/ r _ 0.97
Estimated Nutrient Reduction from the Potential BMP(RSC#2)
Catchment 3:
Total acreage of catchment 2= ac
First BMP's TN removal rate= % First BMP's TP removal rate= 5 %
Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TP removal rate= %
Third BMP's TN removal rate=M% Third BMP's TP removal rate= %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 30 % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= 25 %
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Catchment S.M.Formula Average EMC of TN Column Average EMC of TP Column
Acreage (0.46+8.31) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(4) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(6)
Transportation impervious 0.60 0.46 2.60 0.72 0.19 0.05
Roof impervious 0.42 0.46 1.95 0.38 0.11 0.02
Managed pervious 13.31 0.46 1.42 8.69 0.28 1.71
Wooded pervious 0.46 0.94 0.00 0.14 0.00
Area taken up by BMP 0.15 0.46 1.95 0.13 0.11 0.01
Pre-BMP TN Pre-BMP TP Load
Fraction Impervious(1)= 0.07 Load(Ib/yr)= 9.92 (Ib/yr)= 1.80
Post-BMP TN Load Post-BMP TP Load
(lb/r = 6.95 Ib/ r
Estimated Nutrient Reduction from the Potential BMP(RSC#3)
Catchment 4:
Total acreage of catchment 2= ac
First BMP's TN removal rate= % First BMP's TP removal rate= 25 %
Second BMP's TN removal rate= % Second BMP's TP removal rate= %
Third BMP's TN removal rate= % Third BMP's TP removal rate= %
TOTAL TN REMOVAL RATE= 30 % TOTAL TP REMOVAL RATE= 25 %
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Catchment S.M.Formula Average EMC of TN Column Average EMC of TP Column
Acreage (0.46+8.31) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(4) (mg/L) (2)*(3)*(6)
Transportation impervious 0.23 0.46 2.60 0.27 0.19 0.02
Roof impervious 0.47 0.46 1.95 0.42 0.11 0.02
Managed pervious 7.18 0.46 1.42 4.69 0.28 0.92
Wooded pervious 0.57 0.46 0.94 0.25 0.14 0.04
Area taken up by BMP 0.033 0.46 1.95 0.03 0.11 0.00
Pre-BMP TN Pre-BMP TP Load
Fraction Impervious(I)= 0.08 Load(Ib/yr)= 5.66 (Ib/yr)= 1.01
Post-BMP TN Load Post-BMP TP Load
(lb/r = 3.96 (lb/yr)
b/ r
Nutrient Loading Reduction Summary
TN(Ib/yr) TP(Ib/yr)
Pre-Project 145.28 35.96
Post-Project 63.97 10.66
1%Reduction 56% 70%

1173 FILED 1173
09411 0002
YADKIN COUNTY,NC
ARIC WILHELM
REGISTER OF DEEDS The pprrovisismi sel forth In an Option Agreement between the parties with an effective date of
f-1+rrL•st,Ser a73 1015 are hereW Incarpmrated In thismemprandwn.
FILED Dec 28,2015
. Each pony Is aligning ng this memorandum onthdate slated below that partyssigna[ur
AT 10 t0.08 am e.
BOOK 01173
START PAGE 0061
END PAGE 0007
INSTRUMENT 0 04742 DONEE'
WILDLANDS ENGINEMNG,INC,a North Carolina
wrpor on
ill D.Wilkerson,President
Dau: Ia 73-rs
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
W ikdtands Engineering,Inc,
3430 South Mint$tree[,Suile 104
Charlotte,NC 28203 (]JEEy'r"IrA lore_county,North CafoliM
Attention; fery J Lee Knight Caf
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE I eerily that the}rowing person personally appeared before me this day,acknowledging to me that he
w she signed the foregoing document:
MEMORANDUM OF OPTION
,Sf7k•wr L� W�`/1 red on
TMs Memorandum of Optbn(this'MemorwWurrr l Is belween Reavlco Famu,Inc,Icolletttvely, Npmr o/prMefpW
'Optlnnor'),and TMLDLANOS ENGINEERING,INC.,a North Carolina cwpomtion(-Optk e').
This memorandum wsll became effective when all panics have signed It. The date of this Date.
Memorandum will be the date this Memorandum is signed by the last party to sips it.
Optionor does herebygive and grant to bptklnee the right and option to purchase fee simple title (OtOcial seal
to a portion of real properly comprised of three parcels lotating approximately 201.5 acres:11 OffKrof Srpdprurc ofNptay
approximately 14.1 acres located oft Reavico Farm Road in Yadkirnille,Yadkin County,North Carolina, /�jpsf.�s��,
recorded in that county's it"Ister of Deeds at Book 108,Page 5g flht'proparty'},The property Is also ^ L—?-a '
=FROBERT4O Ndtors Primed dr Cled dome
Identfsed as Parcel Identihca[bn Number 580500888433,and 2)appoaimately 117 eves laa[ed oaf 3CReawko Farm Road In Yadkirnille,Yadkin County,North Carolina,recorded In that county's Register of n'P)r Mytommhslon expires:Deeds at Baal,117,Page 209 4he'Propertyr).The Property is also iderva*d as Parcel Identification
Number 58g50084M3,and 31 approximately 713.5 acres located off Reav co Farm Road In Yadklmdee,
Yadkin County,North Carolina,re orded In[hat countYs Register of Deeds at Book 117,Page 209(the
"Properelr').The Property is also identified as Parcel Identification Number 58050)677286.The Property
N also shown on Exhibit A.
This option expires an Dewmter 31,2017.
2
1173 1173
01003 0064
OPTIONOR: 01,710NOR:
Reavlto Farms,Inc- ReavIco Farms,Inc.,,fY�� f�J7 {"y
By. ev !! .A.:e�+'1'6 fk4t...n• 7`/2CaufwJx
a R. ,Tee surer f,
Date_ rough s M.Reavis,President
Dale:
County.North Carolina
I certify that the folkiail person personally appeared before me this day,ackrww9edging to me that he
or she signed the Foregoing docunenu.
/7ervr� /•{, S6ra-t
nJ.k+:t County,North Carolina
Nome of P�WIN
I penny that the fWkwing person personally appeared before me this day,achnowkdging To me that he
Dale: /.2-A 2-a or she signed the foregoing document.
IOtRciai Sealy' - /-/ 7ley ?7. {�[,arr'a
+Cion Sipno No[ory N oforirxlpaJ
j3461r+ w. f3�
ROBERT W.BUG{3 xotorYspr+nredwrmednome Date: / +22 AS
NOTARY PUBLIC g-�-3'✓6
R,AOCWenb,urp County M,I commission expires:
NOrtT1 Carollnp (OPfidal Seal) 1 �
,/]LOffnhl SiQ++vtlue%faprwr
ROBERT W.BUC3G Nptmy's printed ar typed nvme
NOTARY PUBLIC
Mecklenburg County MY commission expires: 8'r7-Try'$
North Carolina
3
4

1173 1173
0005 0006
OPTIONOR: OPTIONOR:
Renim fame:,tnc. Raavlop parnns,rnr.
ey: ✓ UrccFr•�*n� gy�Jr�f-fc��-i
❑.Reavis.Vice President ^']an R.Wa0,.Secretary
Date: 1' a-15
EPA✓AC]'+ eotmtY.North cerolkw
r.}'wdApPi county,North CIINWa
I cMlfylhat tit fohovAng person pet aRy appeared before me this day,acknowledgkg to me that he
Or she sgned the f0teong document:
I certify that the following penam persona4y appeared before me tNf day,acknowledging to me that he
or she signed the foregoing dowmem:
arc f li. Wa1A
(]0'e/ cD� 13��P, Name�Pr rcfpo
Nome gpNrnlpm
Date:
Date: /2.73-IS
laffib.l se.Q
[Official seal)
OfIK+�d+vnarurr o nary
011rciaf�.vpnorvrc oao�ir Dry /�flL7Pr--� W. �.y�,�
�+ � � M ROBERT W.BUOO Notmy'spnntedwryperinomr
ROBERT W.BUCiO Notorys pNnttd or Hume NOTARY PUBLIC c?:�,�J6
ry8ed Mecklenburg County Mycommissbn e.prefi
NOTARY PUBLIC g-�j-46 North Carelrna
Mecklenburg County Mycommissbn expires:
Noah CarKAIna
s 5
1173
00
Parwra
QTho Prnpeny
Prly}IG
ral.aY rwM�
ra+�'wte wx
rM V� Aarrtl
earcn.xr. \Aarer o
Aw.u e
Tlea map la Hol a oorbsed purvey and
has not been revMwad by a kcal
rl
gaVarNrgnlagmtcy ttlw compl on with
My appUmble lard development repufarwns
_ uar lixwry'm
bNba A
W I L D L A N D 5 vaaun w,er easm dosoMttotf
Iran... i ry n 9 350 700 Fast YpdAm Courtly,NC
1 I
araearR

1173 1173
0019 FILED 0020
Ynm COUNTY.NC
AR1C WILHELM
REGISTER OF DEEDS
OPTIOPPM:
FILED Dec 26,2015
AT 10:16'59 am VADIANDS ENGINEEM N6,NYE,a North Carolina
BOOK 01173 mrporatic .f�
START PAGE 0019 gy: d/ .
END PAGE 0023 SIsW D.weke+um.President
iNSTRUMENTN 04744 /;-R3-/S
Daae:
RECORDING REQUESTED BY r•.�si RC�fn�xarw County,Noah Carolina
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL 70:
Wildlands Engineering,I- I urtl that the ronowim nai a aged before me this day,acknowledging to me that he
i430 South Mint Street,Suite 104 N g penton entP N Pa gin$
Chadolle,NC 7820? or she signed the foregoing document
Attention:Lee Knight Caffery
SPACE ABOVE THIS UN'E FOR RECORDER'S USE SOJA wt !J,
Nome of P—Poi
MEMORANDUM DF OPTION
Dau: /2^z3-411"
This Memorandum of Optwn Ithli-MemorarMum'I is between Ann R.Sti earn and Howard F.
Steelman[tallMlivlly,"OpNonar"],and WILOIANDS ENGINEERING,tPIC,a North Carolina corporation
(-Opllonee-I. (Official Seal) es
�P�p tfNotmy
This memorandum will become efleneve when all parties have signed it. The date of this
Memorandum will be the date this Memorandum is signed by the last party to sign ll.
ROBER7 W.BU13G xnrPryspri4tMatyprd none ca
Optionordoes hereby eve arM grant to BPtbnee the right and option to pwthase feesimple lick �TA M to a portion of real property comprlsed of appeowm ltery 20.9 ares scaled PH Reavim Farm Road in y cpmmissiam expires:YadkiroaRk,Yadkin County,North Carolina,moorded In that county's Register of Deeds a1 Rook 241,Page
102 Ithe-Property)The Property is also IdentiRed at Parcel Identification Number 580598785291 and
is shown on Exfdblt A.
This option expkes on December 32,2017.
The provisWns set Forth In an Option Agreement between Che parties with an effective date of
A..>041 ass- 2V�2015 are hereby Immorporaled In this memorandum.
E40 party IS signing this memorandum Im the date stated below that party%slgeat".
2
1173 1173
0021 0022
OPTIONOR:
Ann.R.St"Imas, OPTIONOR:
�J Howard F.Steelman
Ann.R.St"llmars 'f
Date,^J:2
Howard F.Steelman
Date:/a- J-?r/Jr
[Pvnry,NPnh Carolina
I certify that the fplbwing person personalty appeared before me this day,acknowledging to me that he a,{
or she signed the foregoing document: J aJk�%t
yt
/� County,Noah Carolina
A n'l A, S�rOAMCro
Name��� I unity that the faliawlrg person personally appeared before me this day,.ackmowledging to me that he
or she signed the foregoing document:
Date - -'
NOW arrrl F, 6 4,c!.ry aT..
Wowse P7PN+niAol
401(kial Seall
%IitiaNSrprmtunr.1Notary Date:-
Z'txr+
ate:obnrt W, Gamy R
ROBERT W.BUf3G "Dra,'ys Printed w ryprd home �_
NOTARY 2Ba.LIC - 3-1�7 {Official Sewl
maknklenaurg Cao my MY commission e.:pares: - 0&its fsona[ my
NOI'th CarglirlB
ROBERT W..BUGC3 Mvtwyta pririuM P.r typed nom[ �7
NOTARY PUBLIC
fs4wkienburq Cauniy NEy commlssiort expires: $- .3-�`(
Ngrth Cara11DB.
} 4

1173
PercNe
Qr e Pax�m
A—E--1
Pr[r h
Rr+Jan
c4Nbc•.!'.^` ,Parch
et4�v r.e• \
CA gW:•ti-- Par[N6
—.1C
Perces 9
TN.lrsap is wt d"MMerd suray m4
t9 not bM a v*6 dby 8 bmi
puwmment P..y W CGi1*fal With
anyeppfir.".IaM deneAopmerM1 mgdito M1.
LangN /m
UhM A
�IPM W 1 L D LA ry ENPD o %&j. .er e_{d3wmetl
lam/ o asa IW Peet roakur cwft w
tazt.rza+s
.eeuru

1173 FIND 1173
0098 YADKIN COUNTY,NC 0009
ARIC WILHELM
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Dec 28,2015
AT 10'14;20 aftl OPTiONEE:
BOOK 01173 WILDIAiNDS ENGINEERING,INC,a Norlh Carolina
START PAGE 0006 corporate n
END PAGE 0018
INSTRUMENT* 04743
Shawn D.Wilkerson,President
Date:
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO'
Wildlands Engineers ng,Inc Me� cmunty.North Carotana
1430 South Mint Street,Swte 104
Charlotte,NC 28203
Attention.Le!Knight Caffery I eertliy that the following person personally,appeared before me this day,acknowledging to me shat he
SPACE ABOVE THIS ONE FOR RECORDER'S USE or she signed the foregoing document:
MS MORANDO M OF OPTION 'f iD'T
Nome of prindyw!
This Memorandum of Option(this'MZmoramlum'I is between Nancy R.5hore,Michael S.Shue, /2� 3
Hughes M.Reavis,Cynthia N.IEfavls,1"0.Reavis,lenelfer Is.Rravl4,land R.Wall and Charles M. Date:
wag(SdiKtNety,"DAtlorwr"I,and WILDLANDS ENGINEERING,INC,a North Carolina corporation
I'Op6mme'1-
This memorandum will Recons ef*"K*when all partles have Aped it The date of this (DNicial Seal)
Memorandum will be the date this Memorandum is signed by the last party to sign it. ,[_,offxiot S wfrrre Notary
Optionor does hemW give and grant to Opteoner the right and option to purchase fee simple title A01W-4
to a portion of real property pprox'imaEely 19.1 acres loWted oft Reawicn farm Road in =FtC)E,-IZTa¢ NotWs printed or typal none
po P perty eampriwd of a
Yadadnalk,Yadkin County,North Carollna,recorded in that county s Reghterof Deeds at gook 760.Page IC Mycammissionexpires, g:73_/49
319(h!'Property')The Property Is also Identified at Parcel Identification plumber 586500778441 and rsty
Is shown on Eahibii A.
Thisoption eapirei on DeW.ber 33,2017.
The pmvionrss set forth in an Option Agreement between the parties with an effective dale of
A;1er"6W _J_3 2015 are hereby Incorporated in this memorarelum.
Each party 4 signing this memorandum on the date stated below that party's signature.
1173 1173
0010 0011
OPTIDftOR.: OFTIONOR;
Nancy R.Shote / Michael S Sheri
Byi w+�
Date: r11 Michas
Wil:
4a,i`k/1 County,North Carolina
I cMITy that the following person personaliy appeared before me this day,acknowkdgltg to me that he r.i alfa/�l
or she signed the foregoarg document V County,Horth Carollrra
/thing A Shtni'e I can if,that the following person p twnally appeared before me this day,ackrwwledgang to me that he
Npme o)prfndpof or she signed the foregoing document:
Date: 1,r7-!7] s /3'Itihaal S. SSare_
Norm of princfpaf
[Official Seale
O SQneirum Atatory Cam. .7'Ax'!S
W, iQ
f1C]BERT W.BUGG Norary"s printedor typed come (Official Seat)
INOTAfaY PV6LIC g_�?_f` &pnmurt afAlotory
Mecklenburg County Mycommkslam caparcs: �v
North Carolina ROBERT'Y1i.f3Ud34 og
Nota
ry's printed or typed Home
NUTARY'UBLIC
Meckferiburg County MY commission expires:
North Carolhrre
3 4

1173 1173
Wal 0013
OPTNX gt OPTIONOR:
pslghegl rM.R"yd ,��ss Cynthia H,Rr-1.
By: , !1� r�..f..-e•,. 4:�e¢r'i7Trlt.w, A.
flusisdim
faate: 1,-3p�e.,a+rs CynmFa H,Reav[s _
2-zs: Date: I�-off-/y
County,Naafi cwoum
dia*A1 County,North Camlim
1 tensity that the followlssj person personally appeared before the this day,aeknowledgrng.to me that he
or she slpsed the"Oft document=
!certify that the fodWwlrrg penan personalty appeared before,me this day,acknowledging to me that he
or she s4grwd the foregoing document:
MOA s{! Ift
Nz,ne Oforsappf
Norse of principd
Date: J�-A3.r5
Date:
Eoffkial Sea@
S]fJ.."p&pirN Signature oJNorary' ��+/
,Q✓Uq a�, (ONksat Scall —
t P�dof urn
RU9fRT W.BUGG Ncxa yap redatyprd name /3a Lkr� W. ( ✓
NOTARY g CBou My cormmisslon expires: g-'7�"'r6 ROBERT W. BUGG NaWy%p—ledw rWpednome
MioNk burp Gpunty NOTARY PUBLIC
Nartft Cararinp mycommissioneapires:
I- klen'bur{l Gaunty
North Carolina
5 6
1173 1173
0014 0015
OPTIONOR: OPT111N001:
loot O.lt—ls lannffhr&genets
Xt 43y
O.Re is I
Datc. ILIA -ar — denrdfer$.Rga"ls
Orta: I1J.
fdoulkA, County,Main Carolrm
�Qdk+%y County.Noah Carolina
I certify that the following person per idly appeared before me this day,acknowledging to me than he
or she signed the foregoing document: Icenify that the following person personally appeared before me this day,acknowledging to me that he
r^7 or she ogrwd the foregoing dntument:
ydE1 Q l�esr+rs
�H,rme of pr+n[rpal _
Date: r.t-A17"S
Qni—i Seal)
0&.1-5mresoy�nna�s[ory $eaq
/gvLwtw. _ ygDJfirtialSig
S0eERT W.BUGG NattNlPaprintedwtypedname P'p�'r`r' W, 4?
Ri]BERT yy,6UCiQ Norory'sprinredorryPedrm'me
NOTARY PUBLIC
Mecklenburg County •.�.3-,J(
Myxommisslonexplres: NOTARY
North Caroline Meoklenaurg Couuntnt y nay commisslon expkes:
North Carolina
F g

1173 1173
0018 0017
OIPTION01k: 1WNONOR:
lane[R.Wall Charles M.wall
R: �- ��
larel R.Wall Charles M.WaR
V. e1'- 1-115 Date: /Z LA 1///
!J'
county,North Carollm
County,North Carob w I eeruiry that the rollawtng person penoeally appeared befae me this day,acknowledging tome that he
or she skned the foregoing doNmenL
I certify that the following penin personally appeared before me this day,acknowledging la me that he
or she signed the foregoing document: G 44,
�} Nmrre of Pri-Ow
Y f�1 t'+
Nome O pri-ripw Date: 1.x
Date. /2-.2..-/S (Offmw Seat) _.
- OJ,(kna rrarwe q Norm
�y / oberf w. w
(Official Sea3) j ,e��� FROXIEFIT Numr's PrintM ar typed name--- Mq wmmisstort esplres:f3Li
Notary's prrnredw typedrtome
Nf7TARY PUBLIC j 33—/S
lNaGklsrtburq County My Eommission expires: u
North Cartxl
9 10
7973
W B
PercNa
7ne PwpPn'r
`� AccPaa€.t
Par,_ri H
• �P rc�•
Pa•ce�11
ue.ar e
1'Itia map is not a ca,t&.ed survey and
has oat been reviewed by P J r Al
poramment ap rey forty Pllanca with
eny opVklbra lark developmonl rapulalms
t.a+Illraary Aa
Gh,ba A
ON W 1 L D L A N Q S ndkm avec lam.,,3040101)
fr+nrr.Ee armr a. 0 350 700 Feet V",cedarK 19c1 1
r xumr s
aeaars

FILED
YADKIN COUNTY,NC
ARIC WILH ELM
REGISTER OF DEEDS Grantors and Gran tee therefore agree as follows.
FILED Jan 15.2015 1. Grant of Temporary Access and Construction Easement In consideration of the sum of
01 35 1fi Pit01174t to be prorated to the owner of record of each parcel that comprises the Property by the
A7
AT 016 Ptotal number of acres In the easement,Eche-Purchase Prlce"j Grantors grant Ib Grantee,a temporary
access and construction easement in,upon,over,under and across the Property as generally shown In
START PAGE 0394 exhibit A(the"Easement`).Grantee will pay 51 zf the Purchase price within five days after the last
ENO PAGE 0995 party signs this temporary auess and construction easement.if Grantee ezerclses its option to purchase
INSTRUMENT# 04199 a conservation easement on the Adjacent Parcel,Grantee will pay Grantors the remaining 5
prior to the commencement of the Construction Activities and temporary access and construction
easement will become effective. If Grantee does not exarcist Its option to purchase a conservation
RECORDING REgUESTEO BY AND WHEN easement no Elie Adjacent Parcel,then this temporary access and construction easement is void and
RECORDED MAIL TO: Grantee Is not obligated to pay Grantors the remaining ft
Wild'land5 Engineering,Inc. 2. Construction Activities.Grantee and Its contractors,agents and assigns have the right
1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104 to utilize the Easement for the purpose of grading and filling a ditch stream located approximately on
Charlotte.NC 28203 the property line between the Property and the Adjacent Parcel,redirecting Row to a newly restored
Attention:Lea Knight Caffery stream Channel on the Adjacent Parcel.Grantee and its contractors,agents and assigns shall subdue,
seed and straw all disturbed areas or the easement,and plant new native vegetation during the Stream
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Restoration Project.Grantee shall solicit Grantor's Input Into species of trees to be planted with In the
easement and shall provide best faith effort to imbrporage Grantor's input within the guidelines
TEMPORARY ACCESS AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT outlined by the Division bf Mitigation Services.Grantee has the right to deposit tophi,implements,and
ether material on the Easement,to utilize construction,automotive and other equipment in the
Easement,transport fill dirt to be used in the Stream Restoration Project,and to Install and maintain
Thistemporary access and construction easement Is between Danny R.Williams,Sherrie sedl went and erosion oonlrol measures as necessary[the"Comtrwtlen AetlWtles"j.
W1111ams,Jahn J.Kessler,and Allison Kessler,individuals[collectively-Grantors`[,and Wildlands 3. Easement Access.Grantee may only access the Easement through the Adjacent Parcel
Engineering,Inc.,a North Carolina corporation["Grantee'). This temporary access and construction and does not have the right of access through the Property from Roland's Trail.
easement will become effective on the date the Grantee pays Grantor' as set forth in
paragraph 1 below(the"Effective Date). 4. Boundary Survey.Grantee will survey the Adjacent.Parcel, Identify the common
property line and turners between the Adjacent Parcel and Grantors'Property and will install neer Uen
A.Grantors are the owners of three parcels of real property comprised of approximately 1.3. pins to mark.the common property comers between the Adjacent Parcel and the Property.
29.9,and 1.9 acres touted off of Robend's.Trail Road In Yadkinville,Yadkin County,North Carolina,
recorded in.the Yadkin County Register of Deeds at Book 0650 Page 494,Book 1016 Page 369,and Book S. Grantee's Representations. Grantee represents that Granite,its contractors,agents
9 Page 213 (the-Property`). The Property Is also idemkHM as Taw Idenilliuten Numbers and assigns are qualified to perform the Construction Activities and win perform all Construction
580500672235,58055$6073,and 560500681228. Activities under in accordance with alt applicable laws.
S.Grantee has an option to purchase,the adjacent parcel comprised of approximately 70.5 6. Indemni fkatlon. Grantee shalt Inde.nNy Grantors item any and all damages,claims,
acres located off Reavico Farms Road In the Vadkinvdle,Yadkin County.North Ca-rolloa,recorded in the Iiabi lities expenses(including reasonable attorneys'fees}ansing out of or as a result of the Construction
Yadkin County Register of Deeds at Book 117 Page 209(the-Adjacent Parcell)•The Adjacent Parcel is Aetivitm,performed and entry,onto the Property by Grantee,Its contractors,agents and assigns.
also Identified as Tax IdentifIcatlon Number 580500677286.
7. Termination,The Easement terminates upon the earlier of{a)the completion of the
C. if Grantee exercises its option to purchase the Adjacent Grantee plans to relocate,restore, Construction Activities and the removal of sediment and erosion control measures or(b}March 31,
enhance,plant,and protect the streams and wetlands on the Adjacent Parcel as part of a Stream 2019-Grantee agrees that the Construction Activities shall be pursued as diligently and as expeditiously
reiteration project(the"Stream Restoration Project"j. as reasonably possible and that upon completion of the Construction Activities,the Easement shall be
evenly graded,stabilized and seeded and all construction debris,will be remaved. Once the site is
D.Granton have agreed to grant Grantee a temporary access and construction easement on the stabilized,sediment and erosion control measures will also be removed. Upon the termination of the
approximate 0.88 acre area shown on Exhibit A. Easement,the Grantee shall have no further obligation or liability In connection with the Property.
•1•
8. A islgnentnc Grantee may assign Grantee 5 rights in the Easement. Each Party Is signing this temporary access and construction agreement on the date stated
below that party's signature.
9. Covenants Running with the land. This Easement and covenants created by this
Easement3hall he deemed to be covenants running with the land and shall be binding upon andinure to
the benefit of the respective heirs,suuessors and assigns of the parties. Ggp2JTEE: GRANTORS;
10. Right to Coney.Grantors covenant that they have the right to convey this temporary VALC ANDS ENGINEEfdNG,INC, Danny R-W dams,Sherrie Williams,John J.
access and construction easement.
a Northrdsna corpora Kessler,end Alison
BY By:
$hDiyh b.Wilkerson,President Danny 'illiams
Dale: `ft 4y i(y+ Wte: ♦r3•�3j'
[SIGNATURE PAGE FQLLt1W51
Sllerde YWlEatrrs
Jofl
By: G
n J.Kelssler��Jt {J�
Date: f� f-�9 A
Allison Kesfi.r
Data= I•,IL1^ Lp
A,.fk H. Mori bb her
4Ocv`u X,: 3A eFr ra w:ruo,
,0 a4e
a.
a.

117esklt-r5 County,North Carolina
List of Exhibits I Certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day,ackrwwladging to me that be
or she signed the foregoing document:
Exhibit - Map of the Property and the Easement
Nome of principal
Date:
(OfhclaI Sealy
Q}IWI of ko-Y
R.'7' W-BUG � 6 4 L.!
NOTARY PUBL7G Noferv's panted atypednrrrne
Me�cklanburg County Mycommission expires:
North Carollna
Jamil County,North Casulina County,North Carolina
I Certify that the folfowing person personally appeared before me this day,acl0awledging to me that he I certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day,acknowledging to me that he
or she signed the foregoing document. or she signed the foregoing doCUm¢rlt:
4�carr y�i. w,')IruatS 53 errie La,y/06 its
vme oJprincipal Nome ofjo-upo
Date: Date:
(Official Seal) :+^`�� (Official Seall
ffOff,C,U�i�gnv�of Notary ofcivf,g>rvrure of Notory
RCtBBRT W. BUGG Nvtveyraprinredortypednv.me ` ftO=VIIIUGG
Nwory'sprintedortypednttmeNGTARY PUE3LIC My[emmlrinte Cpirete -�+'/ NMy commission expires:Mecklenburg Gounty Ma
.l. Y-

J.dkry County,North Carolina
94 o!/r.^+ County,North Carolina
I certify that the fallowing person personally appeared before me Phis day,acknowledging tame that he r
at she signed the foregoing document:
I certify that the falPowing person personalty appeared before me this day,acknowledging tome that he
at she signed the faregoing document:
N/4 � kasalrr
Name of prncipa! r4 f/i507 gess lR-
Nome of principal
gate:
date:
lofficlal seall —/fir!lr�
CIff'OriFsgv -tie amatory -
{Offclal
/50be^4 Ly, av:j 2vd Flgnv[urr ofNoPpry
ROBERT W.. aVGG AiNary'S printed or typed rune
NOTARY PUBLIC
hRectento. County My commission expires: $" - ".'d RUaERT W.BUC;G Adomry's pryntrd or Pyprdvvme
M4rtCaral lna
NaTARY
h7aoklgnbung County My commission expires:
f^lorih Carolina
V•
An-
PargNi
,d roti property
County,North Carotloa Temporary Construct4on Easement
�•�
Danny d Shama Wasans-0.ii Acres
4
.bort d Allison Kessler-8.t7 Acres
certify that the following.person personally appearedy,acknowledging to me that he before me this da �...K Y•""t
:
or she signed the Farrgaingdocument: Rech Myars.Oaft Area
Ruth M,y 0.12 Acme E.aistyy Traes Remain
POA �rr s3.+•g
Home of prinripa!
Date:
t'
s i
(Official Seal J��� _- `.
Of RR[v+e ISEs5LF�l a a;$ 11ki5Qv
of Mo[oty
7o�h
W.BUGG Nvrveys printed or typed oorae AMTERSAUr"K4LEI
PUBLIC
rg County My commission expires:
arolina - t
1
Y
r
1
i
This map is rut a ceniged survey and
has not poen r W towed by a lora?
gwemment agency tar compliance"
tiny apphcab[a land development reguteLons
! CrhiNt A
River Haan i0'Jdtololl
0 200 400 Feat I,fdpt, metrn C-",,MC
I
II ,+IYNtB
Moser.

4 o N F c ' •'•'
cp a u'm
9
a y p 3 Cc a
E p `c w m v`
c m c A
m av w Ea w o p o
T is 0 c$ v
c
3- c a E
'o p f
d
c ro w c . m E.0 d N x O a�« ,ca c n m ?i d oro u
r
c
©cm _ g W a nw c oo. "�o•p v p a Mm
n y1 eE
w O�C
Qsa
o „di C
°'r. EY e5 ow e.0 3 4 v d �`a
- x o - `-'
- ate y0.&
w ;ar on
m'N mro os « --
E
,�
p w o y cc.n '-� m m mci a`+ w r'«u-. o u as = a o a w Q m m
o o i.o m m lo
pO maan'.°TaE ymt� P- EcE °i wu0am
Q r iT 6p. - C d C A m o w W a u 4 C c 3 n V p t yci
OLpi 8
c Z w o c.T N „ E p e a w ..; o �a m .2~ ro a + c
Lm
w O
a m w m o'p c e.Q
u�f m p 'mv c. o 'c°m " a' m Y a „°« " ❑U ut y
,A p w m mace v N 2 w ry g n �' « v,
-.2 a
.a oa `our aL 3- c-
uo, Y uo
0 �s
w �
rws u m 0 aci o 2' t ww. n.Dw O rw.
ci E m c o a w ry ma
n o'a
o n
m ro m C a C a. c w o o w o M a d w c
m v F
a m n d 4 � c � c ? a ca'- n� °•' .E a as a c W
m a mon d E 4 0 y tE O
i d v•w'96^ o y wa.« �amua°'. oro;� a aawi
o W w c - w a w E
oeo c w Omew c bmo
® cr' a W E Sao
- .,. E n 4 o w ~ o m on a
c w 0,'c a c n c o x w E m
u c aw w 4war
pF KC b 6 o r;, N E .0 m d o D. d m o
w.o
❑� e
ca `rte c o
a r o Ao = p 0,-!
'a
w w m oKa urs
C =y O 9 w ro O O C C U'C tla�•"p tl A La Q w `�E
C P p P 0 ro o �, C N m b O W C ewi
c °u tFe a`qp is 2 o Rizla
a' � n n n
p u wa
ee F N u e m p :;`p v -a o € o o I e © mar+`A
to ro - C p q � � C L ? w C .. t. 6 r co C
o z o.�a e a w lL°7 a O d c m $ u`"O ,; reO�c v "� a
o •C w�c a o - c w �u Y
N p
O c ['7 .a} f a ronia.Em
p a c w w e
TC'
O W 5 d O ri m 30 3

Q o d tl
'•' d � N ro D ,_j 2 D u i 2D
is s o e ar w $tl o m c
O s.. `v$❑ m a x a n q m v�'n m:a x a 3 m m .'% c c- vi fir. a-e v
a
spd.a�'i �•. Q g ® r d•�a s ,5 ;a E a w :: e a m`a. m E € °:v ry
y
E n`a
D
Lo z i v Ya e S m.
'v w'4 L 3 u VI y t 4 T] °� a O p v E A D Cc x ro a ' m
6 C 4 ro G L yD„ D W d 0 T a V V! U m U L Q'D a s n n'� •p Y j L G Cn•
v A c E.� m A A+� L L a ro aU a%, D m C T v .v.: vs a C O
a m v �• v w m S u-p .� W N L se 3 R C d ry H a A °� m g c 0 N G g �1 N ro
L A p e N O` � — a q Z W y € C E 3 '� a V'�• a 4 ,�,a P B.�
o3 m m ro c a m m a t9 as a e u c
o �, o v a` 6 o w m s o c `9 3 •E ro 47-
t p Y G "' a op i•.. a p fL d e :� C n n N• G+
� ' rosu' c m pn arc $ o Es. B-
m ro
c A o a c e•,E L m a N °'z i m o 3 a D c c'g E o rar m 7 0 c v
m +'
a ❑ a�"o a e.m c s
c `o n ' "
'P au
0- m m H n c°i mra. °' a d 3 a a c H. Ero Q c
zt m o, ,oma.° D C•W o c,ea, 'c'n :num `''u E
w a R u o o D = c _ ro c +` ro n E 1 u s a m.� o m w
e d " p g v ti °'a a a o V
3 a 'a c `w m *'
o n« �+ E L °1 o aro N
l 0
o
m. n Da E ra o�`o n O F t ro y 9._ o u a ? D``�' ami ae w ro g a
D a m a R 3 a.iy s m°� E' a E.a D T E o
•�au a s w ro ,n a
m
0.2 a a `g w V p c' •c m fi r% a "'.. c ro v s c. m a D c f D m "' °¢' m m_
a D a°' L m E "' m d L 5 N a 0 Hie 3 � M a m T.
Y„❑m O mp m .. v`o w e 22:5 4 E TES ;9 ni p c 6 v a,o V"'x a, P:a�+
c a 0.2 U
c "z a ©a g.a•£ c o c
� 3 - is «_❑ E ' c Er, oiYn :;ay m o� amm--%' maw-�r.izW 'o
ro °' v ate.R D w =M E A 3 m`Ds v m uF`- ro �c rov
V
G r O m ... C a W N ❑ w
4 « L° •p Y -Cc yy D
Cm
V m Q« }-D O € y ❑N N p it u j O 0
G 6
c '° D0�
m m❑ acs o'� N °',R �o� m - w :�
Z vm o a,4.0 w © e o a•d
d D a
y a o
E w y n gm - �-c a t D a E m c c Y a
0
o ., c ro w o a ., y y y g a . 3 a- w :� a m q E a = a a
a N O n M p C q'c a c as oul
m .. m•a ro a 0 a a r a r 0 3
a d N a M x 00 u ©.o o a C ? e E c
75
n m � s E '« m E e � �y w L c� � c m c m a g c:' a 3 •`� N°a� .�
ro 6 y dE n a Q' W .. L a❑ E ro Q M D S O a C L [i
G .c o a= m '��° c ` t �
y o v `o roa `e c �.'
e a 'ei. y m D ,a, m « iE A e ❑ C ro
s �� vi N T
c ❑ m e C c a ar., E « c d 'c E v D a E o a E
a E3 ❑ mo a•r.ao m m o x
a s o c a D 'y Lo D m a❑ e c c m r -a o a v �' eas
a is m@.£”° E a o n,a •� y
of o_ O v u m W o
p G e Ma yi H p r e O 1 v a x a L a ❑ ,�n N o y % v
[] u A y w, t ' .0' 6N 'z Q
T G E u a :3 L Ls n m D CC a o mB p
c 9 aY C m
.'a a a V. —is v
= u s C urs m F y p a m n O .ys mm L D w V ro a
a Cw a y L0•W O ro L ,o c a 'C-.m e e m
E n v
y
E m y c a m¢ m r m
3;
c
UE c
a c °tr
aa

" y x E V n `a d E a "F.
P ro v 9
L a g d ry 4 p,Va L C N C a E N W
p c O •� m d O Y H Q n
Y a Y E -5
c a
a w Z o c c1 ov m_mmb n
a y az m o .ten
,co 3 w c
a a '
y y°' E d v m ,c �o y 3•m$ w au C 3 'c
aa „Y c T. a as µ« c a �«
v0 E v y d o E 3 3 m is c@ mea. ro
s a d u o E E ' a s E
o AL
c a 2 d m « m a
s�p� w o�Z mr a,a a'a .c
E _ a c u a a D a y
v a d a^' N Q 3 e m a°ni E .T $w °`' w u.�a E $ o c'�m
.vg ad e c v .2p
a s x a c .. r 3 g ci
yvi in
z
A- -E
c c` oto a' of u¢ m' i.y r z 'Q c
a m `oE c
o = Cya Oaa , c '� m cm
Q E a
> aEa'
r e O
E .p
p O O'Y m
ti���•a r L C Z N w C M a Q ® C a
ro m a is v ©
o E a E m
e.... C
E a C C L n ea qa a c _. T y 4= u
o y a s # O O d N A c`n a
m
u m a s a
My t p a m m m s a M
.w a o g E m a E m O m a ` c I
« .2 Q c � � m � � ar o c� ._ o a
E '" ao a
w a na c n o c Ftp ys._T f 'r a
� ® u x a• •ncr? o '°
.o o c y of m °Tm°.n m v E 3 :: �« � � •a w w �u w��� o ro•ca,s
�y ¢N a N T Q N Y C a•G a « N�� ��� .' U e a Q ® v `r L
c m
W n
ani m
'"
c ° m.n a
s". _ u m.. a c a N 'R= g
o re s•£ o i d t w M c °e' 3 c m o n a c m e
n .� i°d $ 3= +c o c aci © m w m
aoi'a o 3 Y s c=« 3 m a
ar o i y gq r .Z ;; n a c c Y a m ca.N m
6 n a a 6 a ip ai a :
ro g
Q 10 a cx v 0 5 - m o ¢p
a' v« c a a e m D o o«:Q o f a w o o E
a=«a m 3 c ou t is b y m .man a �_ a v w a rn o b - E a n
o a a E a c a gy a
sSE`s amm ,o�°'
s m e m n« Q = Q
o o O L o E a r,'c c o a a c a a a� '
m n:E V Y o y LL m o m b c - c a o
ZA
u v v ZA
c
a © u e ? 3 O c m m e m r M o a o
4 ro c q "° a V� c fl T'µ° a s a�`am •o -In Cc
p n d a y u a
1° E En `o�p m
ao •n .n M S 'c a s v E ', E rt m m m a s 3
E m
:, eac o a^
n"n d«.e
o ;
N L 9 5 n C c w ..« d'N
a O ti O fi Y fl.u £ ,� c r aha Q u n +fin v
3E

U
9
C
46
n
s
3
m
s
v
a �
a
c
n Q
a u
s r
c �
❑ ❑
z
c
a
c
y a
n
u�
c Z y a
a
a o �
� W
a
ti ❑ 3 � m
G
N ❑o
C C a E ❑
m e m C a v E
a S
er� E -p'�
a
`� ❑ m y � k " u o�
0
m a
Q m
m Z
a�
'•� i E a t � d 'eo u °'
5 c 2
v a m a m m a c' ui
aE m' o� z°aa°� mo zv mvo a r
� as c a 3 ❑ ❑
M E
s c s m C.a Ec co dV y u
❑ E ='"
EL ❑ �- a 3 m— a
i
❑ a o r '
a O
mom' d `mom ❑ � _ � un
u c o0
z 3 x 3 na 1 0�'N

)
� �
� y.
: 6
.\ ���
§j � f
g � .� l ;.
kk a k
4
��y )k�
/ � � §
§2 a 3

N
1
Vt'ID
d
F!
C�
D S
F T v
D d m o
.a
R
om z' a
a 3 «
O m o

K
C
�y
N
} p 15
� � 5
m.d
h L �
d t
d
a � o
z —
0 0
� v

4u

� E
C LL
v
4
F L _
4 L
w v �
J c o
o m
m
¢ m
:a n

ui � � w 5 r a u ❑ �
= � �� p ` � n u v� T �C❑ d 4'rCy q y d
a u r Z
$C A p c o n o a•o u w a a C H m c'� p p "
aE "u na sµ a
y m m v y c q a m i rt q ; i '' �' �. ._« ©sa, w za u
s w o n`
'O E m c m
o r �.m c�.y Y� � a c• .� E nc a s� „.� y a a a�� � ._ c
.ate vm a nqc woo � :'90 � y on ©
❑ o Z.c o m •- € a E s °' roc d E $ c y o
© a r q m C
r y y
a c E a o � ui�3 a i
s � a m 7"a m y a a c m D cri
a
C a h s E ra= -
oV m m Ti a ` �' $ y a m s m O R N m w cc ''' m a-c
q'~ w a © m r y r a m i R `. g, n a O
d a c n $
o
G o o .c°°.. o s c`E J z o 6 u I a LL rE7r T u Q „
.a u �':.n E v n `� U ~ '$ a v ab w a w e o sa, a v ru
_« o a L= O q a s c c - o w E
ei a a G r YO L Of IQ :4 0 _fO'
aae o.$ " +❑nn t 2 0 '_q�� mQm m u � mv
a m `o s a eu..� m G' c o �" m n .,~o.,r d r a•^.r n
-a Vr-
o � �a.o ��a�` = c= m +n u r s m � Y sur E� u c
q ; o« ei ++ °a'z r n c u y o 'c° v t m W m
4 v
o n m sn m m w E E m F a?O m i 91 - o- - w
Y
q n a V, c a v m s p X a m u c s• m r y „'
Oa a c c y o c '° y "' m a ur y; •- _ ® a o c �.
cg a c ro c 'c m
o m w a N c.a p a ti '^ m Y a m a y •- p ao y U ~ m o c
� dt-^W C d t i O d 0 C C C n i
u �r E-� a S e o '`'
W o rc m m c A p Q F n a a n a s ro m o m c_o E a y 0,60 u
a
�+ E 4 o s y o c c
r15 O �4 L E «•- �4 C 0 N O N N 0
o y,o._. a u a c ❑ n 3
E �
o `o a 9 BE 0 -0 ,n w ru 3 m 3 coa c Ut) we
sr
•❑ a s a u CE O N C dG 0 O
� (L M � ✓ T �' ® O R O w
n N r F 0. C a B ✓ c❑ `E..
E D �
a OY O d C
N m U a e.6 a K ~ u a© ur d a
t E., a O q. c
A OT T r ® y y a o, a y w Q c w c
n o'aN ndc aoc•ca yccgys
E 9+Qm ate.. m mq fl Q >vg�L-'�
d O B o m W y
H.� aN� a � a. o mm cp.� o o ur a a•N....is
0
$ E t A �' C a O G u O'r' N m 2-5 v d 0 v a 0
cc- R a w ca ae 'm
a o p•"a-`
w a m o o m w c W a
a a
U = 2 m e n= x a M'Q o ar o o a `q m a E .
z E o N c 3 o O Y r
N o Ecia 4 u Q
QF,2 eye
Ern
ca d un a m 3; o' Qyp� a9 n mp N
w n'�r` on ,p m o cuE « � Oavi o_m cru
`ru aavc mm m a Eu arca« cw
d cy y
m
.. q 'a
d�0 w v+� an 3 e y ' o� o�' o•ca,v a
O a a c a 3
3: wo o m ro c 4 a« o a
m
CO w E C ro iC.q d'
Y O d d © ❑ .N C Q 0
4
e30 3 �

a-E
;m`o c o ❑•a w a m c © °' m a ^' :: m e p a p n "n m a E c
m
c E n r a c 4 z❑aac E
❑ ❑ m .a d 4* m m N E m c ro s L N ❑ m m c c 9 y c c w.�°,N E
no— u'o max c d 3.mN Y c cTO ovi E- p ma
m m d s y 7 r E o E E 2,o r m ro
'Tac om a s•" m y Y £ n o Y .y s a g m u
so o $, ❑ y-.a 3 o 1— zn o p ��o � 05 ai�a .di w� 9'
o re m a °' w °.c'� ri, ❑ - w V ? 'e`eo m G •`�-� ❑ ' c
Ea i:M5 E p a s te a. `E° n>
C W y O OdB^. d u G W L p°8 d '6n rn } lS L�tl s�c�!!.0 3 C `R d
O E OaD C ?,V N T ro a ❑. OD N « p ro C p T m G.0 ro C p � d�=� Q '+] 3 A
o;� e`_n.° T m c moi.'u H . u
a d L `a , T ro a A a o cg c > m c
c f
`y d E a a s p c r `—�-
e o e=� 3°'m e �' ,, c m a ro o f ❑
10 ® dy.
'-�m o p o o d u a "ro' v'' • 'tl a w ¢ .v m m d a�" m,rvo. '" N e t
m o 5-8 m a _
❑ p ❑m p y c' U r $ m m c o-E u c o u »'°
=° p c � s G z c p.o _ ---u u ro= - m
ry m ani
c M E roc p•a❑ .. 3 �c "' p c re o a p p v a s4 e E o w 3 y °'u V[] V v Q E
�p C.ti ❑ a
a a o o a v' ,y ur p ro ❑ ,ET a o 3 3 �. 3
zaw W. '�E� n.cEj ;? '' 'am " � w, � aca `3oa� m � ro`—�❑J �
u m c m m c c Eat m p ; o � � a`3a mcfrc m '� �
•. C IW p T G ro 0 d N w ❑ a m :C �' C m -p W d a`f
E a e "`_ E u p a n 2 N c= N c ro a. a E a Ci5 e u 0
s `❑ a .c 3 c o e n s a` a a c Q :o a.
`o -12s a n m m " L m y C E c
c ❑ ._ c d ¢ w u a+ c
��sa� s � �.a
w Q1 u > "— eEa:+ �'',ca, E-po
c
2 •� 4 �F •q �� �-o � Q
tj
o u C'C.. © = d C =a.t m Q p R L C m II'i a o'U T m
'❑°� 'a C =E o mm 5 ou ".�-3 . .4'.�r� 3 N e ni
-E
O a O O m o a e p.n m E + v v E c rota. v ` o e c _o
me yo co %'' © vTir y=_-n c o - M " co dav16ro 0co
rc � ❑ uoa� q sdoaomradr303= m
,c o a rir 2-
m
m `p o c an o � ❑ ro ❑.'" 0a E ro # m o.� °_' e ti Y u � � �� Ga� m tir
T C '
lw
❑ �m a� a...�. C� E a �
°' _ '� # a 4 a ro �� n ❑ $ 3 � � 3 � E a m u o
` " ❑ ❑ ,E s ` `p cam x c o v c a 9 m 'n w �°o a
a s a = d d d E Q a' ro t❑- a N p a ' o o a w m E m a t .❑
aw 2
'c•. w O.c w G C w ❑ ❑
m
vs a s d m Orx
fl =
s o. na c .a �' f o o a v z c m ❑ v °°O o
m n a'a m =fl W u �asn� ro m.w � ❑ � d.� � = E .4
C N W a }. ❑13 r a u U u O Q 4•R.Y Nm y N X 'p
V v o N u w p
Y o i.ti i w o •= c m �i m o s
z m E au Y o c ro W W a�r .. u u c
a N�Da w oci a„—.'`m �t c a 00 ~ mo 3
m 3 0
a o a 3 a a u c3 v c d E° p 0•❑ c? a
a„ w'� c y y �° o p v o
L E m ddme' -, aT •tl w.a� .n
7 d v fU
C.
d r op }.
w ¢O b p C o 1 w❑ � m �p N Ys y u C � � 0 2� 'meq p �0 6 b � u'G C U 3
a a
O ❑.Q w
d a Z y c 3 a c 5
d d d c c
n =
o T Y. T o a'co m m m E "—' ❑ y 0 u a ❑
E a ”' m ' "'3 n :° y p a � v❑ u '� 4 u
d a ❑ O.6 d 0 u C Q T ro
L 8 l3'a 'p r0 w C b 4 n n N ❑ d 4 D A✓ a Q
B „ d H Q -2 N.O c `. .Cro. p C L C F p 4'0 Q' d Tf a
w c Ca O a E m d T n c = E s 3 `o m rE E A a c as
s`ro c.. c p;E n B a N 'a ro a o 0 4 m =2 Z" _� a© .a c a c a a t ,�
-a c u d o m w'a o y '^.« n '- ❑` O ® a d L7 e' a N w r rs.
m C u c d 0 w X o `" a re a m fl i" m'ro c m a a oco o c.o
= p ❑Y °' o a � 3_ ,m os"a � v�my
3 u u ❑ w E e ~ _`a _ m © e o"° = ❑ d = m '-E d
m M m y i .ro c
m e q o.— c n v m-�a 0a q ❑ a n d s « c o a
;� ry a un r n p T m s. ry ri C a m W w
�° £ q_ ' u m a a` u o c d o a. c n°' m a o
u d c `m_c q a o o a.,ce a.'o D sa c a `❑ p m s
d - - .❑ v 0 m au

d
- •y- Q p D
� Q'.w u y .man 4 0 y w � o p ❑ �' a s a s
a � 5 o•a c � of a m �9 nro o «. � c
m
`�'
m m cr a s
Q a
E '« oc
o N ae c a D Y ca ? h� arm
m o a d
u o a 1 � �m c m"d m E Q� � Q
n
ma vY c a r � 3 n i .^n© ,•.� � maa c n e Q.c y } E c
E x m o w m •40 « m r„
fc
10O C y a y ^`_+ C c z E c
« a
ia9L m g m0 = m o "' c = � r 3 Dv 3
a« c o o Q a n•3 0 m :_
c n
v
£ O0c
c a*+
7 P C C m o m
Iv
aol
a m ,
m m
m
NE m .4 Q c a a` - a a.. v m
o m nNp a o v au. avv ,��5 w o OrL ci E r� a
yu t m
v °« m U E a
S.is a E
ti.
m µ ai N o v e m m v E M +Ea m
m a m m a
m a y1. o c a cp fi 3 c u am m Q E G a a m Q E c *? a d
c d d m a A. Y, m o o m £ y m s a 4 °o o', �.m a ti m m M.m R
m •�r a��+ v o c
a rs o4 ch a° of na'a. a cm _- °'
r F m u m "'s 0 o f«c g E 3 °' iJ r.` a m .a• £ °c = o om
O^- o a v e •E Q= ��? a w °' a N m d E« N p��+ c1p}i .c ® m
— c N - c a. m Q '^ Jct.
o ' a o p m E '°°° 4'" s me $ A `o 6 m a`e a E•_
� � � n« � �« a d °'
n
rs� Q d m:..t Q ` ss.mt c c,r Qu. a e c $ 4_.
.°"-'t m o .. �' = E ar"- E O m ai ,ca m« ova a °_° �_°�_' 3 o
.t2
v a o 9 p A m p u r =
•� '�' m o o d y .?. a a o m E c E
W 0 2 0 351 �' w e o f c t m o rva.a y ..ra. _ ? c@ n
a w c o x• d Q' 'w' m `p '}^ m �' a u 5 5 3 u c w
d V T v d r+ m y _^Y w. C ;;r a«R t 4 C c C
mast Ep° � c
c
.e s a « '.n. '.n c C c �'O v rn w w c
`p o ac« nu 535 i �n3 m W $:o nmaii e w mC E
m a a'ry T _ m
E w ra« c ro m u 3 E c

U
s
a
e �
R w
E °1
N
Z � � 471
h e �
[]Q m d
.� —
N N N ]
c
m
m ma v a°'i mr u mE a
m
pr f c v c
�a C
t', W '9
N v. o c z E w ^^ E o n
m y � 00°'° s
c
a� O= u �r E d¢ L
r E o e u � b dE � q
d d c is ° o E
a L c
IS c
t�1({ o a
c cp i �" .:e m y o z s
ff LL C1 N tlm
L O d e t µ y E a E W r h L N 2 d
d �, o 3; cm
d c $
= moo Ham cm3 ad c� � Y}} rd
Cr Y O O d L O w 4 }
n w d
'�° •- m w E e E `t l7 m S o•,�Y 'c w z c
M ,,,;s mo wi n' o 0 O u m' o

� �
�. LL
e s
a` �
w w
� �
o .�
* ca a
� � d
O � y _'
r .� 3
� o
� �
0
m a
a m
n a
k
c
3.
�n
`� c S�
c - E �{
E m 'k
d
w ti i
� �
Q u� ,a
� -a 3
O �
� 3 = d
`o s g' o

a d
O _
T© W c a'1..N a d
E
d a E « p
a•
9 u
4 u _n w ro v m Z .A E
- a:.c z c o '^ o 2- c a w
3 m E
4 © w m¢ E 6 c •' �'q c 4 E r, E
_ y C u
u n* °i o nmC7aa c P- aO a o c o c ca
anc = a O w o L p �m�,m E au €« .n
y o 'E '-° u�if
FL o m m gc'�
'o
t
ofoavc �'c 5Eva m oca m� � v a o sZi «
m% m w o 3 m m,� u a p n
o v
E c a y w e 'a' o f© T W ,� @ E a Y w Oa w L. c
v 7 o c '� m E o o p r+ o y=
n C v c w v v it n +s g E U ~ a a u r+
=2 0 '�' c c c «Lv. E« a.A F °' F- O 'C7 v X v c
cam $ o0 3 QYL"�:.s�n
w t c °' 61 0_ «s a en . v E A E« u o ©„a .. 5 7c o
ti u " ry-_..n y W m L C d •C LwX
V u m T
E u ro o « u;o�:.. v$ c o �
O a c m o w «o ro c k
oa V a « m 'g N d - v . w �o m n 9y �
3'v o M c ^;' - E o z
c
E va ' sa
k= o."c p o y a c c ts m cm o m a
3 "u a v a W w a c._ w c o
o, Y`p u ©
`N _m w a a u G w r .a, ¢m
a c V© o c " �O '£ o 19 $ > a N a 23 o c �' ®o e m a no`.
m
E CJ a O
c p p E 5 m a y
W ... c.i S 9 O.°�j Q O .O y O.� ,n 'p S�9
aau � + y ?A
E
y. ro « u R mm
-� o
i q n a v ¢ y c m r a e E 29
Y u
ej 6 m 4i m L in y Q
•��: _�� '> © y r u m e�`ip m y `ate o
c a E y❑ O o 0Y C'
c
z E s a1O Ya a a .m V E GE OC7 a.E
w c u a.� m..•i _ � n m `m a m y v.4
z a o $ «g n E s v a ri
a
c Emia•- o
c o d p du v m r d L'a v a _ w
c
a o
e' `w n v m
in v
=o o m cv
c a o
z 'E n d 2 M « r p w Y Sc
o v 2 nu -1
a '• p c M E o c m a a ..J t7 o © c c c
a c mu m 3 N y m U z n 3 S v o o a
N u
c^'
`s ..y'^ -•y'^ m d ro ts
E c c
m ¢ m r w v m p p c
E v 'F d as E . � aYy
g, a �. z a 2 }. �o y c a u E_ o.a9
v
in
u N. .A Q v Vp py G
N a O n0 06 u C � a L p d 9 a C C m
c O c y£c V'w_. Y A m n°'i O1 0 = £ n c..-o ` m
E c ¢ v o `o v o
o z z z e o.b € a Y o a s m u
m y _ O N airy dA-F o W
m m r u u u u u a u a a s y i
c
C 6 `co
G O Yr L° d Y y c V'O F
•Q� 4v ;a a u m 'av m v o tiryQ 09 Ex
• • • 1•- D a a « o m O 0
V ti m
Z C7] O u �3Ca7 3 O Da

a
14"❑ O G O ❑ C O z+ +�+ � v b
a g 20 v ❑ o
a a o f P c w d ru o u =m
C L m N N d ry d z N
_8 y d YO A ¢D 3 0.N •�-❑ C d.Q d
3a ,C r r w mk o a a w m E E
V , fl x � I
E -
wc
3 0-
E v m 2 R n m m B °L o `p ami n cm a t T r •y w m u. @—m
'E m `a T° a m r 3 o a s ;° n.'c s ❑ o D a a m 3 v m
E a 6 3 m v w o m « y ° y E A5
P w v o m w "a. ?,fl�. ^° D p °"
v b £ nQ10 R $ ` @_ a.m m a +^ x c?
C Y D 'a q W u o E O cc s 3 o b .'�. 0J z. u en E y E d
ffi w O.O d .. © «L y ` ❑ x n J� � w R'[3 O = 23 ° w Y W C m - d U rm L
R c n O n u ❑ w�i ue e•
o E
o y o c Q» E N
❑_m.` e c " o o e ° ,o m �' vv�i c P u d rx p a €
o N '�a c m m m g v °d a•Q 5' n o© u o c m
`
'
n m ..
C u`m o ❑ �;` 3 s
v o•cs c w " .. m ;y T ' O w o o m c -+ o@ c - o m o.r«w m
� ❑ Y Q A•Pi •�•• C •�}�- T 2.� C A N V o� E
d
m ,° E m
z m a "". c - ai°' °��'+ m L n co o f `a T c 3= o '° c v L o
c o c 'n © 3
o "� ° m d c 3 m'n o n �" u° 4 o v B E `P « g m `m «r —"n a y c S' c
w z n d m m n
a e
D = T o o E w � ° $� maa_ '�rocs ' u .. as
E A c ¢.a w Y O r m ¢p. 0.2 E =Q r,L 4 R 9 Q Z E .T+d].A 9 L m y m.�G v m
ece S P Y q n D O T v ® aC .n ] a of E r.c D u r'ne P y
m Lw d m 2 q a ODE O a ©O ucu ❑ o w o c a A
at r -^ `m �•a o a E w e q w m N a o "'p "'
u -zr
o o ti 4 p n a � �
c w © a p :8 E m E
a C V mT� 0 [7 a o m c Pa c ac o PN ��_ �9,r E g
h aPi �' y q a m e E 3 m ?' v $
As
c m r n c `o d. rn o u a` a a 2 u m c'G= N 16 3 ea n
0 c n 3 v
c�
a v a " ^a
0 o Y O aw Z) 4 m'p Y?_ ` n @ N y—. n ❑ Y] E rc'� C m
c ° o a
arm cU ❑° wmnT�p «� Ew 6q w ` pm ❑ 3 `° Pa
c?,.,m � E �'
n© a .' w E
a w6 21 d e n m m y w D'ji
u N d a n "' '+ d w c a o c ='-t may 7;u o >
c �'w a s ❑ wo.~ P-3 0 �—
m w a$ o v b m~° ©
w a N u W m y C d d dv Q u C 7 d O N f P N m
0 4 C m p m'y'v C ro w O ate.. d d 86 -E �'.+° ❑v 9i fl� d m a E
b wP y w0 ,.. ]• m N LJ O G d
= n E o •c w — m N E y v ?r O R ro m❑ = m,c m e
N A v c a E c;,+ g m n y e c
c moo- m " wE u cm.. �� w ;3 d w
v P r c ., �' m O a a.c c c N o v tr a a. w
a F- m
v w e
c
f]
LL aT E w u O w m e c�i r;° y n x « c c o o '�" 3 aci:c 5 c c
n g,' e' u a _� a rod Q c•� y a
ccd L v ,«m m a- y ❑ e a L. o f u a
❑ G c c w w R.o a uP. c G n w m pG P 4r w t C7 v P.� m'm 4 4. o
y U v ro N C r R u ti.G O • `�m 1V « L .. t +.I] .w. D l;
v d C 6 1 w C s w ry P rA. y'O L
� $ L e+ a, q 6 g w� m -? my
ai w :: c a O D a y +nn m ai0+n w Q _Ty m
:�a c a-c-m q q.—P w c 3 a c
co «_ 5 v a c— re c c c
a Pd d ;F pm a m eco _oScsa m E2�5 Y cameo €ye $ Y �
+u m y m H n 3 « y o w s a 0
Tg wc� w � d 3n� Uu n `w
'�.+ n�n� oo a c:`c �❑ c N "
O F C L.i» d — N n A a n p w— rp y m G o d,., C ❑ o Ery P
yE_a 2] p 6 Q w +' C D O a tJ t y O_ N d O d c. O En p O G 6 P
e❑i'p O C Q Q » O c A^ u N £ Q b ro C O O L
Qi H m o y Lci �' u 3 c C d,d N °�2'2
o b w
d © m m m N•13 C m w Q© C
E v m = o S c m o c v
T re a o o a r a6 w
u Y
0
p C p ma = N o E Y o
ry D ~ d.❑.. ❑ u wm n N o O
a+
E E 01 of µC m u N O u Q G N b C p c 6 d C H d n N m
C E r s= y Y C d C a R e d P•a. 4 a.x n a b .P.L W m P a.
6❑7 ° 30 w'ao m e u 0°� wm 0 u a o m i 0

E m E 2
i a T
01
d d m•`a' as m m ` m n. m s c
d api p � � q� C v g' o u u, � n ❑fl�,. w � '^ o o E E a
m a m=
a � 9
-a
c R 4 5 �a_ m
u- A v� n a E E m n o ca
a c s m ti a y C c mn c ; ; c si wl
E
c Q c
o m% wo. a "� es u c m c a •C
a E 4ti, m 'm'g'�m N= ` °' w .a m a w a ? a$ o x
❑ m E r c c d E " H o o D
a n. `O E L R D d v y 'W u'S'Q 9 u G +L,wc O.A N Q T a
a m c a a y �^G a a m L c ?; m ° _ a a o u p t
o p O p ¢R€
ump
p LL a .Q V C W N Q 'N W F Z ? w
-b
u m r
a , w Z m p $�' E
e mN a a E c w p= =o a r
p a d S N D U G = = a y R E m ay d d w tl0
a,L° m m a �, a�• o �. o y' -
'�3L' OI N d q .� D Bao w re Q u p U 3 m D
_ c c c v © 2 q
x v� b a a a m w
a 3 Q O c u ry .i z 2 9 O z w w w °' " 's.
_ M
` am u " "•m c �c-� a m u u a a r e v Eµ � �
E
Q C tO d O m as C a �•
a
- m Q L A m u .-•} C 4 f O
.0 Q� 1- m Q w R
O a
u i a a uO1, a a d a u
°" � q c - v m� a s a c � = R y °' E m � a m +v a a,❑
a• L? ,� °-�'*a., ae m?-.w 3 d n m E m h m a m b a uT
m E N] a.0❑ a a d y y a D Q u -- � yt„ R 3 C U a C q c• n a a
E m i. o... E m u _ « Y Q E
g u° a v ^❑T m � m m v ¢ 2 t a y c a a a p D
p W Q 9 m n4 ti a w
a O 6J C _ n eu a L m .. ,Q N .'" '3 o mg
p.a m Z,]
.5
m a ❑ a Q "' �. u'g o a s mecc
L° o ° A
N s
o
t o"m �? a aQ.w cps c p Tw.i o f �° `m y L u m
m
`o m o a a w'2 .1 -1 1 n v w 3 a E c
a s C A C w L c m 6 p a E 6 C G O N a w p a
E m w o v m.a a A a c w o -'E 6 o y o n u E m 4? E
'p^ E o LL" c a a.E °�m' c 0 i t m a mop a c m c R a Q a
m vi C.7 '^ '' L Lt Q a a "O 9 N aa+ r O,D k Fi d T n r n., ["! ❑ y 6. ER p
U`a in z a °' E o a p ai _ 5 `' d L m•n q a y e$.p E
c 3 ¢ y g$ a oY' arS a-'= cc 8 s c L O Y 6 a $ y m U o �.
Q z -g=oro a roc o;` " o y c c d' w d E u w w
v u Q Al � E a p v N m c a o ©� o m E mm Q 3 ai
° in
a° c .`-,, c.'$r U m z` a r w -'^ Q b .Y y« rS E= a m m m r
E
m c m N�t°1-' E Y 3 0• �`z z `�'s E ❑ a w c c
w € c n u °� � c°a w «u z >.m `Q Q �e m 3 c m$ c o .y a c © y s "
m p d '+� •o m µ a'a i s w 3'_ m a =a a L a `c_ c ? m•n c c'g • E a i
-a Ere ~or - mw = - 2 : c ^' `o.M m eo `�v � '�
aro o a L o -d R oom gem o c +6 c c o c •E i s y y E ro E•c
a ¢ n a c C v 'D °° `a m :a j r .gym-. a e p' E aei m n E L �' O Y o
cr'°'y, m s C. c p Q o 4 L u o '�" a a
�^ z o `° u^, v m s sr n a m z a m.� . u.v E w = a 2 u Q m
m v y m m m ncc q ass« v`Q v m a w o
mn
%u c «�
m o o m vn
m`� Eovci��o � c d@o ° Cm � oo o� acv cam
• n cn a cs vi w w m a y N c x. v c r S a u `° c c Y
C aF L 7 w N _ « C }a y 3 s y
E
t w N a C m'O� ml a ¢v G� O p v y ❑ v
o f `o a o o f L.. C C d h R u m U L q
E'Q N

m
r
a
{
a
ro
a �
n
v
a �
_c
c o
o x
c
a
wx;,
a n v1 «
a.m ro
n. E s �? m� � 3 u �• n°i � Q u
d
c m � a
.ac .. q �,a a �' a 3; cc
3 c a m o m a
o m e a v a d
y "roa Q
'e �O So a m E ro a r c w « W
° d a n
o ur 3 2- ma c n -„rP a p
D c cc a m
oE a :e p ro oye o m aci Y 5 m g
G B S C c d u Q m .M £ � B £ rte w 2t
d c o_" t p �, w m r. s m
£N R o - y 6 y S — C C
C D a Q
0 3cl
£
u rii
2 '� 'a a •� at,. 'C.0 'tl0 a
`� m
m °�r

w
0
4
�!�
n`i
u
��
ii � -'?
.�
c m
4 'i �
� B M
(� Y a
�„� � W
a •,
[� c m o
d
f
c
ci
w
is m
6 LL
� Q
�� Z
H d
0 G tD Q

4
h
r��
a�
�.
+.�
w�
U `,r/S
cY � � (C°4
O
� � d
4. _
� `° ci
� �
a
D eC m
V
m
a`
'A
' � a
c
a
w
E � `
o+� o
z a —
o.a
p� m Q