20021215 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20080414

Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Project No. 72
2007 Monitoring Report (Final): Year 3 of 5

' g
a

J

4
?

March 2008
Prepared for: NCDENR-EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by: Jordan, Jones, and Goulding, Inc.
9101 Southern Pine Blvd., Suite 160
Charlotte, NC 28273
Design Firm: CH2MHill, Inc.
4824 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28217
rY
COs stelll
I•Ri)1. M AM
?[M@fflow_ IMP
APR 1 4 2008
DENR - WATER QUAUTY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
JONES &
? GOULDING
J Jordan
Jones s
Goulding
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SECTION 1- PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting ........................
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
1.3 Project History and Background......
1.4 Monitoring Plan View ......................
1-1
..............................................................
.............................................................. 1-1
..............................................................1-2
..............................................................1-4
SECTION 2 - PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .............................................................................................. 2-1
2.1.1 Soil Data ......................................................................................................2-1
2.1.2 Vegetative Current Conditions ................................................................... 2-2
2.1.3 Vegetative Current Condition Plan View ................................................... 2-3
2.1.4 Stem Counts ................................................................................................ 2-3
2.1.5 Vegetation Plot Photos ................................................................................ 2-5
2.2. Stream Assessment ................................................................................................... 2-5
2.2.1 Stream Current Condition Plan View ......................................................... 2-5
2.2.2 Stream Current Condition Table ................................................................. 2-5
2.2.3 Numbered Issues Photo Section .................................................................. 2-5
2.2.4 Fixed Photo Station Photos ......................................................................... 2-5
2.2.5 Stability Assessment ................................................................................... 2-6
2.2.6 Quantitative Measures Tables .....................................................................2-8
2.2.7 Hydrologic Criteria ...................................................................................2-11
SECTION 3 - METHODOLOGY
3.1 Methodology ..............................................................................................................3-1
SECTION 4 - REFERENCES
SECTION 5 - FIGURES
SECTION 6 - APPENDICES
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page ii
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives ........................................................ 1-2
Table 1.2 Project Activity and Reporting History ............................................................... 1-2
Table 1.3 Project Contacts ................................................................................................... 1-3
Table 1.4 Project Background .............................................................................................. 1-3
Table 2.1 Preliminary Soil Data ........................................................................................... 2-2
Table 2.2 Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot ............................................. 2-4
Table 2.3 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment . ................................... 2-8
Table 2.4 Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic As-Built Summary . ................................... 2-9
Table 2.5 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ............................................ 2-10
Table 2.6 Verification of Bankfull Events ......................................................................... 2-11
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Project Location and Watershed Map
Figure 1.2 Monitoring Plan View Map
Figure 2.1 Soils Map
List of Appendices
Appendix 1 Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix 2 Geomorphic and Stream Stability Data
Appendix 3 Integrated Problem Areas Plan View
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
J Jordan
Janos a
Goulding
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary
The Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project is located in Mecklenburg County. The stream
restoration project consisted of restoring 2,500 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Clark
Creek, restoring 2.9 acres of associated riparian zone, providing one cattle crossing, and fencing
the riparian corridor to exclude cattle grazing. The following goals for the Cato Farms Stream
Restoration Project were established through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP).
1. Restore the stream to a stable form.
2. Restore the riparian zone adjacent to the stream.
3. Provide a crossing for cattle at one location along the project reach.
4. Provide fencing to prevent cattle from entering the riparian area.
The Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project was restored by relocating approximately 2,000
linear feet (Reach 1) of the existing channel to establish an E-type channel (Priority 1). In
addition, approximately 500 linear feet (Reach 2) of stream was restored in-place to create a 13-
type channel (Priority 3) to transition the channel to the confluence elevation with Clark Creek.
Cato Farm's riparian areas were planted to improve habitat and stabilize streambanks. The entire
site was fenced in to exclude cattle access to the UT and a cattle crossing was established at the
lower end of the project. This report serves as the 3`d year of the 5 year monitoring plan for the
Cato Farms Stream and Wetland Restoration Site.
Results from the 2007 stream monitoring effort indicate that Cato Farms is maintaining vertical
and lateral stability. Current drought conditions during the 2007 monitoring year have severely
lowered the normal baseflow levels, creating minimal flow. These conditions created high silt
deposition throughout Reach 1 and 2 and stagnant pools with algal blooms in Reach 2. The
pattern, profile, and dimension of the restored UT appear stable. A few problem areas were
observed, such as moderate bank erosion, moderate to poor streambank cover, loose matting, and
aggradation. It is recommended that sections with poor streambank cover should be stabilized
with matting and vegetation as soon as possible to prevent future problems.
The 2007 vegetation plot monitoring results indicate that the Cato Farms Site appears to be
meeting vegetation success criteria. Planted and naturally recruited vegetation is doing well at
the site. Some minor vegetation problems were noted. There are several small barren areas and
a high live stake mortality observed along the streambanks. The high live stake mortality
observed could be from being planted in compacted soil, planted too high on the banks, or
planted too late in the growing season. In the limited areas where vegetation has not established,
addition of temporary and permanent seeding is recommended. On the banks with high live
stake mortality, replacement of live stakes will help provide long-term stability.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 2
Executive Summary
The survival rate for the woody vegetation monitored is 74%. The monitoring data indicates an
average of 15 stems per plot. Using the monitoring plot's size of IOm x l Om (0.025 ac), the site
density is approximately 600 planted stems per acre. The success goal for planted woody
vegetation requires 320 stems per acre for year 3. Overall, the Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Project appears to be stable and has met stream and vegetation goals for monitoring year 3.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
J Jordan
Jones a
Goulding
SECTION 1
PROJECT BACKGROUND
SECTION 1
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The background information provided in this report is referenced from previous monitoring
reports.
1.1 Location and Setting
The Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project is located at the Cato Farms Property in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina immediately south of Huntersville-Concord Road just east
of Huntersville (Figure 1.1). The stream restoration project consisted of restoring 2,500 linear
feet of an UT to Clark Creek, restoring 2.9 acres of associated riparian zone, providing one cattle
crossing, and fencing the riparian corridor to exclude cattle access.
To access the site from Charlotte, take Interstate 77 North to Exit 25 (Gilead Road) and turn right
off the exit heading east. Gilead Road will turn into Huntersville-Concord Road. Take
Huntersville-Concord Road from this point for approximately 2 miles. Huntersville-Concord
Road will cross the UT at a low point in the road. The tributary is located approximately 1,000
feet downstream from where Huntersville-Concord Road crosses the UT to Clark Creek.
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
The UT to Clark Creek is located within the Southern Outer Piedmont Physiographic Region.
The UT site drains approximately 0.41 square miles to Clark Creek, within the Yadkin-Pee Dee
River Basin (HUC 3040105). The UT runs through the agricultural property of William Cato
and family. Prior to restoration, the site was predominantly utilized for cattle grazing.
Historically, the land was cleared to provide pasture land, with access to the stream for cattle
watering. The UT appears to previously have been channelized/straightened, and ditches were
created to drain adjacent wetlands. These activities are thought to have inhibited stream channel
stability; therefore, producing an incised, eroded stream. Furthermore, the channel incision may
have caused adjacent hydric soils to become less saturated. The following goals were
established for the Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project.
1. Restore the stream to a stable form.
2. Restore the riparian zone adjacent to the stream.
3. Provide a crossing for cattle at one location along the project reach.
4. Provide fencing to exclude cattle access to the UT and the riparian areas.
The Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project was restored by relocating approximately 2,000
linear feet (Reach 1) of the existing channel to establish an E-type channel (Priority 1) and
restoring in-place approximately 500 linear feet (Reach 2) to create a B-type channel (Priority 3)
to transition the channel to the confluence elevation with Clark Creek. Cato Farm's riparian
areas were planted to improve habitat and stabilize streambanks.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 1-2
Project Background
A sinuous, stable pattern, with riffle-pool bed features was constructed. Cross-vanes and
constructed riffles were installed to provide bank stabilization and maintain grade control.
Approximately 2.9 acres of wetlands were preserved by fencing in the entire site to exclude
cattle access to the UT and establishing a cattle crossing at the lower end of the project (Table
1.1). Riparian areas along Reach 1 were planted with native grasses and woody stem vegetation.
Streambanks were stabilized with geotextile matting, native grasses, and live stakes. Reach 2
was soil bioengineered (live staked) with shrubs.
Table 1.1
Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Cato Farms Stream Restoration/Project No. 72
Segment/Reach Mitigation Type Approach Linear Feet or Stationing (ft) Comments
Acreage
Channel restoration, relocation
Reach 1 Restoration/Relocation 111 2,000 linear feet 0+00-20+00 with use of grade control and
bank rotection structures.
Channel restoration, in-place
Reach 2 Restoration in-place P3 500 linear feet 20+00-25+00 with use of grade control and
bank rotection structures.
Cato Farms Preservation - 2.9 acres - Buffer Restoration/Replanting
1.3 Project History and Background
The stream restoration was designed by CH2MHill, Inc. Monitoring has been conducted
annually from 2005 to present. This report serves as the 3rd year of the 5 year monitoring plan
for the Cato Farms Stream Restoration Site. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide detailed project activity,
history and contact information for this project. Table 1.4 provides more in-depth watershed/site
background for the UT to Clark Creek
Table 1.2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Cato Farms Stream Restoration/Project No. 72
Activity or Report Data Collection Completed Actual Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan N/A July 2002
Final Design-90% N/A November 2002
Construction N/A N/A
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area* N/A N/A
Permanent seed mix applied to reach N/A N/A
Mitigation Plan/ As-Built (Year 0 Monitoring) N/A Summer 2004
Year 1 Monitoring June 2005 January 2005
Year 2 Monitoring September 2006 November 2006
Year 3 Monitoring August 2007 November 2007
Year 4 Monitoring TBD TBD
Year 5 Monitoring TBD TBD
*Seed and mulch are added as each section of construction is completed.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 1-3
Project Background
Table 1.3
Project Contacts
Cato Farms Stream Restoration/Project No. 72

Designer CH2MHill, Inc.
4824 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28217
Contractor's Name Unknown
Planting Contractor Unknown
Seeding Contractor Unknown

Monitoring Performers Jordan, Jones, and Goulding, Inc.
9101 Southern Pine Blvd., Suite 160
Charlotte, NC 28273
Stream Monitoring, POC Kirsten Youn , 704-527-4106 ext.246
Vegetation Monitoring, POC Kirsten Young, 704-527-4106 ext.246
Table 1.4
Project Background
Cato Farms Stream Restoration/Project No. 72
Project County Mecklenburg, North Carolina
Drainage Area 0.41 s q. mi
Drainage impervious cover estimate < 5%
Stream Order 1 st
Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont
Ecore ion Southern Outer Piedmont
Rosgen Classification of As-built E (2,000 ft)
B --500 ft
Cowardin Classification N/A
Dominant soil types Monacan, Cecil, Enon, Iredell, Helena,
and Wilkes
Reference site ID Coffey Creek
UT to Little Sugar Creek
USGS RUC for Project and Reference 3040105
NCDW Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-07-11
NCDW classification for Project and Reference C
An onion of an project segment 303d list? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment? No
Reason for 303d listing or stressor? N/A
% of project easement fenced? 100%
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 1-4
Project Background
1.4 Monitoring Plan View
The monitoring plan view map (Figure 1.2) illustrates the location of the longitudinal profile
stations, cross-section stations, vegetation plots, and photo points. A total of six cross-sections
were previously established within Reach 1 and 2. Approximately 2,500 linear feet of
longitudinal profile was monitored. Eight previously established vegetation plots were
monitored in 2007. Photographs were taken upstream and downstream at each cross-section and
at existing photo points.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Jordan
Jones e
Goulding
SECTION 2
PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
SECTION 2
PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS
The following monitoring results are from the 2007 (year 3 of 5) survey completed in August
2007.
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Eight previously established vegetation monitoring plots were monitored within the riparian
buffer of the Cato Farm Stream Restoration Project. Vegetation assessments were conducted
following the NCEEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol which consists of counting woody stems
within the established vegetation plots. Planted zones related to the stream restoration consist of
the streambank and the buffer area adjacent to the stream. The riparian zone begins at the top of
bank and proceeds perpendicular to the stream. The planted streambank initiates at base flow
elevation and extends to the top of bank. The overall success of these two particular planted
zones is good. Live stakes (Salix nigra and Cornus amomum) and herbaceous species (Carex
spp., Juncus spp., and Panicum spp.) along the streambank are healthy and abundant. The
riparian buffer is dominated by a thick herbaceous layer with numerous shrubs and saplings
throughout. Natural recruitment vegetation appears to be dominant. This is likely due to the
native seed bank.
Overall, planted and naturally recruited vegetation is doing well at the site. Some minor
vegetation problems were noted. There are several small barren areas and a high live stake
mortality observed along the streambanks. The high live stake mortality observed could from
being planted in compacted soil, planted too high on the banks, or planted too late in the growing
season. The majority of the live stakes throughout the project area are thriving.
The areas of compacted soil and live stake mortality could lead to an erosion problem over time
depending on the extent of natural recruitment in these areas. Coir matting is still holding the
majority of the banks together, but it will decompose eventually leaving these areas barren.
In the limited areas where vegetation has not established, addition of temporary and permanent
seeding is recommended. On the banks with high live stake mortality, replacement of live stakes
is recommended to provide long-term stability.
2.1.1 Soil Data
The Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project is situated between a narrow ridge and valley within
the Outer Piedmont Belt of the North Carolina Piedmont Physiographic Province. Researchable
data indicates that the soils within the project area are those found in alluvial landforms in this
physiographic region; however, grading and filling activities during construction likely have
disturbed the parent soil material.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 2-2
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
Review of the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina indicates that four soil series
are found within or adjacent to the project limits (Figure 2.1). These soil series consist of Enon,
Helena, Monacan, and Wilkes. Enon soils are very deep, well-drained soils on ridges and side
slopes of the Piedmont uplands. The soils are formed in clayey residuum weathered from mafic
or intermediate igneous and metamorphic rocks such as diorite, gabbro, gneiss, and schist of the
Piedmont uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 45 percent for the Enon series. Helena soils are very
deep, well-drained soils on broad ridges and toe slopes of the Piedmont uplands. The soils are
formed in residuum weathered from a mixture of felsic, intermediate, or mafic igneous, or
metamorphic rocks such as granite, or granite gneiss that may be cut by dykes of gabbro and
diorite, or mixed with hornblende schist or hornblende gneiss. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent
for the Helena series; however, these soils are generally found on slopes that range from 0 to 10
percent. Monacan soils are very deep, well-drained to somewhat poorly-drained soils found
along stream corridors. These soils are formed in recent alluvium sediments of the Piedmont and
Coastal Plain. Slopes are generally less than 2 percent. Wilkes soils are shallow, well-drained
soils adjacent to drainageways. They are formed in residuum weathered from intermediate and
mafic crystalline rocks on the Piedmont uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 25 percent for the
Wilkes series. Please refer to Table 2.1 for the preliminary soil data of the soil series within the
project area.
Table 2.1
Preliminary Soil Data
Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project No. 72
Series Depth (in) on Surface Factor Factor
OM %
Enon 60 5-20 0.34 4 0.0-3.0
Helena 64 5-20 0.37 3 0.0-2.0
Monacan 65 7-27 0.28 4 0.0-3.0
Wilkes 45 5-20 0.28 2 6.o-2.0
2.1.2 Vegetative Current Conditions
During the initial assessment survey conducted in April 2007, it was noted that some minor areas
of streambank have suffered localized loss of vegetative cover. In these areas, it is apparent that
flood events likely caused the bank erosion resulting in a loss of vegetation. Furthermore, the
compaction of soil and nutrient poor conditions may also be contributing to the mortality of live
stakes and herbaceous cover in these limited areas. During the vegetative survey completed in
August, it was observed that many of the problem areas noted during the initial vegetation
assessment (March 2007) have improved throughout the growing season. It should be noted that
much of the sites herbaceous cover in the riparian area is dog-fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium).
This species seems to be invasive on site; however, it is not listed as an invasive species for
North Carolina. Control of this species may need to be done in order to allow for preferred
riparian species to establish. Please refer to Appendix 1.1 for the vegetative problem areas table.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 2-3
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
2.1.3 Vegetative Current Condition Plan View
Please refer to Appendix 3 for location of vegetative current condition areas onsite and Appendix
1.2 for representative vegetation current condition photos.
2.1.4 Stem Counts
JJG conducted the vegetative assessment and vegetative plot analysis in March and August 2007.
The eight previously established vegetative plots represent the riparian buffer zone and
streambank vegetation.
Trees planted within the plots monitored includes white oak (Quercus alba), swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus michauxii), river birch (Betula nigra), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), willow species (Salix sp.), silky dogwood (Corpus
amomum), box-elder (Acer negundo), and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica). In addition, natural
recruitment vegetation was also monitored within these plots. Species encountered were tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer
rubrum), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virgiana), oak species
(Quercus spp.), and species that were originally planted. Refer to Table 2.2 for a summary of
stem counts for planted species.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
N
N ?y
O
O
.O
cd
O
'C
S"r
O
U
U
N
O
a?
? C
?z
eu
d
L a
d p
N •? ?
H ?a
a ?
CC ?
a?
it
W
y
a ?
O (?
U A 0
R
?? U
O ti 00 V1 V) 00
ti
M
tn
.?
N
1

e4 z
0
N 'O

C

++

M

M

ma
y

N

00

O

O

k n

O

.?

N

kn

•?y
r
II
N (~ en „ z b0
d
M l-
C
O
N
?
M
M
M
0?0
O
O
tn
N
W?
.mow
O
N ?
00
p O O O O N O O O O O O N N N
N
eq
a
?
o r
O
O
M
O
M
O
d'
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
r
? e
N
r. Qw
? ?
O
O
o ?O
y N
>? _p 0 0 0 co 0 O O N O O •-+ M 'M,y N
r
a
? Ar r

f" p N - O,__, O O N O O O O O r-+ O O „may
Q p
C
y o
q ? ? O N ? M O O N co co O O O ? Cl M kn 00

rpi p O --? N O S •-+ N O O O O O O O O 00 C
Ar 00

a >
N
y10 p O N O O --? N N O O --? O O O --? N N e
v a 00
a
O

? r.
a+
G
O
O
M
c)
"t
O
-+
0
0
0
0
^-?
0
0
-+

? e

r
py r

v

a?
0
o ?
N 3

`e t3 y rn N
;z: z
0
z
O
fi
CS
+U
O
U
y
O
i.
?,?
>
'Zi

v a ^o ayi R ti ra i i i
°' ° obi O O
3 s°, v O O ? ? O Z3 ;3 O > d
Z
rA V) U U v? 12 rz O, O1 F d A. v?
04 O
O O
O
O U
vi
a?
Q
b
w
O
ti
d
z
w
0
0
rx
O
C
O
O
oz
wM?
O
0
U?ci
Page 2-5
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
The survival rate for the woody vegetation monitored for 2007 is 74%. The monitoring data
indicates an average of 15 stems per plot. Using the monitoring plots size of 10m x 10m (0.025
ac), the site density is approximately 600 planted stems per acre. The success goal for planted
woody vegetation is 320 stems per acre. Furthermore, many natural recruitment stems were
observed within all eight plots. If these volunteers were also included in the stem average and
site density calculation, then the number would increase dramatically. The site has satisfied this
goal for monitoring year 3.
In conclusion, the vegetation within the Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project meets the
success criteria for year 3. Although some loss of streambank vegetation has occurred, the
overall growth of the riparian buffer is good.
2.1.5 Vegetation Plot Photos
Please refer to Appendix 1.3 for photographs of the monitoring plots.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Stream dimension, pattern, profile and substrate were evaluated within 2,500 linear feet of the
stream restoration site. The stream assessment included walking the entire stream reach and
monitoring 2,500 linear feet of longitudinal profile and six pre-established cross-sections. Please
refer to Table 2.3 and Appendix 2 for the stability assessment, stream photographs, and raw data,
Table 2.4 for the baseline morphology and hydraulic as-built summary, Table 2.5 for monitoring
years 2003-2007 morphology and hydraulic summary, and Appendix 3 for the current condition
plan view map.
2.2.1 Stream Current Condition Plan View
Please refer to Appendix 3 for location of stream current condition areas onsite.
2.2.2 Stream Current Condition Table
Please refer to Appendix 2.1 for the stream current condition table.
2.2.3 Numbered Issues Photo Section
Please refer to Appendix 2.2 for representative stream current condition photos.
2.2.4 Fixed Photo Station Photos
Please refer to Appendix 2.3 for stream photo station photos and Appendix 2.4 for stream cross-
section photos.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 2-6
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
2.2.5 Stability Assessment
The pattern, profile, and dimensions of Reach I and 2 appear stable with some isolated signs of
moderate erosion and heavy sediment deposition. These areas of moderate and severe bank
erosion are primarily due to lack of vegetative cover. There are also numerous areas that are not
actively eroding but are susceptible to bank erosion due to poor vegetative cover. Current
drought conditions during the 2007 monitoring year have severely lowered the normal baseflow
levels, creating minimal flow. These conditions most likely attributed to high silt deposition
throughout Reach 1 and 2 and stagnant pools with algal blooms in Reach 2. It is assumed that a
few high flow events would decrease and flush out some of the fine sediment depositions and
algal blooms observed in the 2007 monitoring year.
Due to the nature of the previous monitoring years data provided by and to JJG, the longitudinal
profile plot provided for the 2007 monitoring year overlays monitoring years 2005 (year 1 of 5)
and 2007 (year 3 of 5). The 2005 monitoring survey was the only data provided that could be
used in AutoCAD/LDD to accurately represent the changes in streambed morphology within the
Cato Farms Stream Restoration Site. A general overview of Reach 1 and 2 is provided below.
Reach I
In several outer bends, there are areas of moderate to severe bank erosion under the matting due
to the lack of vegetative cover (Approximate stationing 9+15 and 17+00). Upstream of the
bridge crossing from stationing 12+25 through 13+00, vegetation is growing in the middle of the
channel, creating a mid channel bar. Within Reach 1, Cross-sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 are located.
Cross-sections 3, 4 and 5, which are all pools, have moderate streambank erosion and have
shown an increase in width to depth ratio (W/D). Cross-section 6 is a riffle that was previously a
pool in monitoring years 2005-2006. Per NCEEP request, Cross-Section 6 was relocated in the
2007 monitoring year from a pool to a riffle stream feature. No significant changes in channel
dimension were observed that indicate lateral instability is occurring.
In Reach 1, the average water surface slope and the average bankfull slope were very similar for
the surveyed reach, 0.0062 ft/ft and 0.0068 ft/ft respectively. The surveyed water surface slope
was slightly lower than the proposed 0.0100 ft/ft, but similar to the 2005 and 2006 surveyed
slopes. The profile appears stable and is not showing significant vertical incision; however, fine
silt deposition has impacted the streambed morphology. Upstream sources from construction
development and abnormal rainfall conditions are most likely attributing to the increase in
sediment deposition. As a result, compound pools have developed throughout the reach,
increasing pool to pool spacing. For the 2007 monitoring year, the pool furthest downstream
within the compound pool was counted for pool to pool spacing measurements.
Overall, pattern measurements did not illustrate any significant shifts in values when comparing
the 2007 results to the 2005 and 2006 results. There are no indicators that Reach 1 is illustrating
trends towards lateral migration.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 2-7
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
Reach 2
Overall, the structures within the transition zone appear to be in good condition; however, the
outer arm of some structures are lacking in vegetative cover; therefore, moderate to severe
scouring is occurring (Stationing 21+00, 21+50, 22+50, 22+90, 23+90, 23+25, and 24+30). The
cross-vane at stationing 24+25 has vegetation growing on the invert and lateral bars are forming
on the downstream side of a few cross-vanes below stationing 22+25.
Cross-sections 1 and 2 are located within Reach 2. Both cross-section 1 and 2 are riffles and
appear to be stable with minimal erosion occurring. The average water surface slope and the
average bankfull slope were very similar for the surveyed reach, 0.0090 ft/ft and 0.0080 ft/ft
respectively. The surveyed water surface slope was slightly lower than the proposed 0.010 ft/ft
and steeper than the previous surveyed slopes in 2006 (0.0080 ft/ft and 0.0070 ft/ft, respectively).
The profile appears stable and is not showing significant shifting in the bed features; however,
results indicate there is a slight change. This change could be due to the minimal to absent
baseflow conditions observed during the 2007 longitudinal survey. Pattern measurements also
showed a shift in values when comparing the 2007 results to 2006 results. Riffle features that
were previously noted in 2006 have transitioned into runs and pool to pool spacing increased.
These changes could be due to the lower baseflow levels and sediment deposition due to drought
conditions and sediment deposition from upstream sources.
In summary, both Reach 1 and 2 appear to be stable with some minor areas of moderate to severe
bank erosion due to lack of vegetative cover. Some minor bank repair work was completed after
construction, but no specific information was provided. It is recommended that the sections with
poor streambank cover should be stabilized with matting and vegetation as soon as possible to
prevent future problems. Please refer to Table 2.3 for a summary of the visual stability
assessment, Table 2.4 for the morphology and hydraulic as-built summary, Table 2.5 for
monitoring years 2005-2007 morphology and hydraulic summary, Table 2.6 for hydrologic
criteria, and Appendix 2 for more detailed stream data tables and plots.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Page 2-8
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
Table 2.3
Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project No. 72
R each 1
Feature As-Built MYl 2005 MY2 2006 MY3 2007
A. Riffles - - 100% 75%
B. Pools - 100% 100%
C. Thalwe - 98% 98%
D. Meanders - 98% 99%
E. Bed General - - 100% 99%
F. Bank Performance* - - N/A 96%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc - - N/A N/A
F. Wads/Boulders - - 96% 100%
R each 2
Feature As-Built MYl 2005 MY2 2006 MY3 2007
A. Riffles - N/A N/A
B. Pools - 90% 100%
C. Thalwe - 100% 100%
D. Meanders - 91.67% 100%
E. Bed General - 100% 100%
F. Bank Performance* - 100% 91%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc - - N/A 73%
F. Wads/Boulders - 99% N/A
(Cells noted with a (-), data was not provided, *Although bank erosion is occurring within the reach,
it is not actively eroding.)
2.2.6 Quantitative Measures Tables
Tables 2.4 and 2.5 display morphological summary data from all monitoring years. Raw survey
data can be found in Appendix 2.
Cato Fanns Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
0
0
b
,O
O
U
U
.O
it
?r
W
o
?z
d
O
? L L
N b O
FQa
OU ??+
O ?
aE
'U
K b b b b b

a a rs. a o.

+' 0
C 0
C 0
C 0
C 0
C
C
3
? ? 3 3 3 p? 3
q GC R3 ?' CC
A A A A A
? as ca ? a o

N
s
d ?

y
v'i
C`
r
p
i ?
M
i M
'?
N
p
i
N
O

.
y
C
V
F
000 b
D
A
.r
'? ?
A
s

a
yam, [? O? 00
O NO Z M r- N O N t\ O • i i M OO M
M
o
W
a r-? M oo vi 4 c c 00
c
0
0
`
o
q
a
V] .? O? ? r v'? N O? pMp ?O N `O O N ? ? p N ?
rA vi ' ' M ? • • o °O ' ? M o ? W
co
p" c
C
V C
?
w ?
a a
N

Y
?
?
?
00
Vl
pp
Vl
M
?
?
?
?
.N,
M
N u
•?
N
U
Q. V U M W) N o A. o w
r`
M
ay
a ?D
[? [?
? M O? N 00 O O • • M N O? • h
C M
?+ M ? O
•p .0
0

V
O

?

?

n

?
vi
?

N

M

M

?

?
O?

?

p

p
v1
O

?

•

? rn
'?
N

C

? U

•

?

O
N
C

?

v`?i
? N C t7
r
? ?
M ? C

W W
a ? [? ?p r ? O? C ^' ? ? O? 00 O ? O • ? i M ? O ? ? ? O O ? ?
[? V1 O N V1 O W
[? C

C p

w y

as
c ?

c
0 c
a a
c_

4

°
< o
A M A
d

to
G7
`n
A ? A
A
ado
c C7

Con
A
a

ro

o a cd y
0 0 0 IN O
0
.

d u o a
A w w w w w 3 w 3 x w a
, u 04 ? ? a
, i? ii 9z °. 2 Z Q Q d > u ?;i 3 w ? t
J
to o
:D o
N
0
ti
b
O
W
¢
w
0
0
a¢i
a;
c
0
c
0
W) o
oz
o
0
Ufa
0
N
y
F+ti
Q
O
0
c?
C
O
b
0
U
U
N
.O
Lr
a
£z
0
? V
CA O
C O
L L
w
C. C7
O
N u O
L
H ? d
L
R ?
o L
a°
?U
'O
E z z M
a

O C O N 01 N OMi r- O ol
Q
Q

d o6 O N rn N
A O O O O ,? ,z M O

q N

L
W) ?c
z z
M
r
p Q n
n O Q C W) O
-• 00
V '?
` ^O
V N o0
'
' M O . l
C N ,
.
? ?-. 01 O N Z O O O --'
O
a
C O Q O rn ?c Q' N ON O ?D 7 Y!
O Q1
'o
O
M
00
N

V
d

q
L
C
O
O
O
00
c
C
O _
vl
O

M
U p O O . . . . r M 00 ? 00 O 00 v

N r ? N O O . - ? ? O
.-. i
?
C Q' t-- N N Q' 00 O M

N
7 O
oo vi
O ?o
-4
N
Z 4
O O O
O 7
O
O -.
a

O
p Q [? M M 0?0 Q N ? O 7 [? - Y!

u
N
z O
O
O
N
2 Vl
O O 7
O 00
O -
V ,

q
O

N O
o0 o o
00 Q' N 00 N Q' 00 O 00 'O -:T
M
Z t? O?
C 00 O
o
z V
O O O M
O V O? N
O
N O
C N n o oo .-» O
o
a
V1 01 ? 00 Q M -?t O vl It K N N
lo O1 O r-? ^• 00 O M O %Q ?O M O

z
C?
O
O
O 00
N
V O

i
r
a
L
C
O
O
O
.+
O?
C
k

N
?
?
O
p _
N
? O
p O N N N N O O O V N O 00
C N _ (V O 00
C ? C O O? O M
G
a /? / °
N

C
?O
O
O
N
•--?
O
N
Z
K
O
N
O
O N
.L'
O
N
N
O,
000
p O O O ^? N [? ?,j N O ?o O V R N N U N ,.. N O O
N n M O O /? O O N y O N in O O

q N
L O O O O O O O ?o C l- Cl
O
O
.?
O
O

rq

00
U p 7 [- N M i O M l? O d' O U O O O O W

N
p O
N 7 O
O
N
10 N O O O
N
00 O
N O
N O O
O ? O O
r `O N N O kn 'C 000 O O .? p N N 000 t-
p O O O ?o ?o ?
M O? ?D O O ol
O V M O ? N
V1 N O O (?
E N O? /? ?p O /? O? O O N M O
O
`? O O
a o
? p
.
C \O ?p O Q, N M M O .••• .-- i! 000 O O N ,L O O 10 ?
O D, O O N ?j vi O r R O
00
kn C 0 ?D O O
W

w'
N
n
O
00
/?
?O
O
O
,?" 00

O
N o
O
O
y 0 N 0.! O O

O 0 O m
U p N 7 0
? N N a0 O
O O V1 C "" 7 O
O O
O
N N -n O r O O o6 N N
O
C W
O M

H

3
U E s •°-° s E a o o
U
Z ° ?
- a ?+ ..? O
y
? a? a? _ 0 A y 5? y

A o

w p
cd

w b

x CC O

Q

Q

a O

a O

a

>
Ed

3
e3
N
a
ca as oa as 3 3 co o
. z ca
N
U
b .?
G.
.> cd
O
O. ?
C
? cd
b?
3 3
C C
VJ N
UU
ou o0
?Oo
'O N
0 U
yy ?
vi
ti
b
O
ti
w
o0
c
o
O
O
'^ o
?oz
w cn ?
0
Ufa
2-11
Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
7. Hydrologic Criteria
The Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project has a crest gauge located on site, but was installed
following our 2007 survey. Therefore visual assessments are noted for bankfull verification.
Indicators such as wrack lines and vegetation layover were observed at the bankfull and greater
elevations within the restoration site during the 2007 stream survey. A local USGS gauge, Clark
Creek, is located within the area, but the drainage area is larger than 10 square miles and was not
used per NCEEP recommendation. Table 2.6 summarized the visual assessment results below.
Table 2.6
Verification of Bankfull Events
Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project/Project No. 72
Date of Collection Date of Occurrence Method Photo # if available
Summer/Fall 2006 Unknown Visual Assessment N/A
Spring/Summer 2007 Unknown Visual Assessment N/A
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Jordan
Jones a
Goulding
SECTION 3
METHODOLOGY
SECTION 3
3.1 Methodology
METHODOLOGY
Methods employed for the Cato Farms Stream Restoration Project were a combination of those
established by standard regulatory guidance and procedures documents and the North Carolina
State University and Soil and Environmental Consultants monitoring reports. Geomorphic and
stream assessments were performed following guidelines outlined in the Stream Channel
Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the
Stream Restoration a Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al, 2003). Vegetation
assessments were conducted following the NCEEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol which consists
of counting woody stems within the established vegetation plots. JJG used the Manual of the
Vascular Flora of the Carolinas by Albert R. Radford, Harry E. Ahles, and C. Ritchie Bell as the
taxonomic standard for vegetation nomenclature for this report.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
J Jordan
Jones s
Goulding
SECTION 4
REFERENCES
SECTION 4
REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E.,
2003. Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 61 p.
Radford, A.E., H.A. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1964. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas.
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
Rosgen, D L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs,
CO.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
J, Jordan
Jones a
Goulding
SECTION 5
FIGURES
w
0
LEST
WAY
OLD

It
?o
3

Clark Creek

Legend
Project Watershed
Site Location
Reach 1
" Reach 2
Streams
Roads
NtW HAVEN
750 375 0 750
Feet
Figure 1.1 Project Location and Watershed Map
r' JORDAN Cato Farms Stream Restoration
teal JONES &
Eam
GOULDING Mecklenburg County, NC
Year 3 of 5
Project No. 72
November 2007
Wd SZ:LE:b LOOZ/OZ/TT '6Mp'tlMTO05JN\MaIA ueld 9T-I1-900Z\DM(]\T00\090EO\EO\:d
MIN't !+
ti.
t f t t` O
r
0
t
N w o
,? . ` ('`•? } ?? ? '?: .A .?. "P' ' ? + X-` x '' ?+?, •'?+i.= lhl '?. ? "... " ?+a ? ;.? '? :c-. k?'.: ???` ?i11 ??'• ?y ; a ; ?eteSk y.,AN. `i . ~• L ? O O
r
.
LLJ
• `1 :r ," o
p Y 5
is °'r ? ? `'?'l ?l?;z''...? +? ?"'n, • ??! • ?.7?e•- t .i+. kiy? ? ?F:. r?^ „? ? . ? ? ??
. , SRRi'1`
LLJ
f
W zz Q
? ,,r y . $ rR1, f >«< o ks
Alk ^aY a ??
1? t
_J
oll Al)
p O
C a .. -+ •^+ $ °" r Y +"?'w ?'} AYE +v A, , 1 ?s .' # v, `b `k `« r. L ** 0 U) u-
*41
r'
e•v;;`;?' r? ?#<Ttr•. Tn. `y L' 17 `?.t• a ti L, F +'?!t ?C'• ?i `1t".. O Q Q
of <
•
?; . t O,l F •«' !¢ 'was C O
T i t _,!` }..mIF1,y •? fty?t. ?F.y + ..? ?`, T? w w
'?• m? F{.*t 4) w Z
y.
*" i war C w
• ,4.
t ?.
[If
;' r w'' i a 1 t \ # a' O LL_
w •
9
,?!v ? °t Fr o ~` ,? ?` .'= f 06
•
° I ?` K? 4y T ?",+? ? k ? # C r' '? ? ` •vk 31:-..: 1• t? ? '' O O
S
n t
.
• 2 ` s
LUL- a.
C%j
?a 4
CD __j
of C
z W :D Of 0 LL.
Qzo
• f
!Fa Rte ?. P R? U I O PO
J
W
O U z Q
a
O L.Lj
S
' ? ,` r O W
?w W
w'y - W z
?4u r
Q
i W X
_00
_ i 00-
a
<W
:. .? Q a
y
f ?
J
?t T11 J_j
,
c;) W z _j
?. J
?! t a "
t f t R
OZ U cV
t
. Y :.
0 4-
0 _ `• \.
N00? 3(Nny ?1I
0
R 0 x
~
,
8
e
Wd ZZ:OZ:b LOOZ/TE/OT '6+P'TOSJTOOS:)N\-D!A ueld 9T-T T-900Z\9M0\100\090EO\EO\:d
C JO z 38noI3 33S
5L +g 'b1S 3NIIHO1 y
W
1-
\ z 00+8 - \
o \
No ?
V \
a ?\
Q X
\ r
O
O I
I \
~O \
ca
Li - 1
o0
Y, ?
? J
1 /
F-
° I \
\ a
\> - \
\ ? I
\°q% 1}00
I < ? v
J?
L SD
0
O
0
N
W o °
m I
:2 p O
w
o o
z O
o
wZ
LLJ w
Qm
0V) C) D
U

w
o
o
U Go ? a-
U? o
H 0<
W?
C o°
T.
Z
z w Cf)
W
C) w ck? N
0 w : Z
W LLI
J
W D
N
cf) '
^
V
w? LIZ

0 oQ O
C) w F
-
Z

Z O
U
a
V) M:
Of % o
U
LLJ CL
H
J z z Q z
O Q > O
W LL CL > Y H
Q
O 0 O F
m >
z ?
w
\ / J ?o
C9
Zz
O W
Z
OOU
z
°z
o ::1
LO
?of 0
zmQZO0
H Z U of
W J = O
-DYE~af
O UQ? ZQ
G? w0Ow
Cl- :2i z::5 >-
L
w
w
U
Z
?w
m~
Q
:2_
LLJ 00
O a
a Q
Q w
Q
Q
0 V)
LLJ Z
V) Q
J U
O°
w
(n Z J
? U LLI -J
Q
O
Z N
G
EEO
4?
Wd 0£:TZ:b LOOZ/TE/0T '6mP'ZOSJTOOSDN\malA ueld 9T-I1-900Z\9Ma\T00\090EO\EO\:d
2JO2
SL+L L *Vis
/?j
NO
QQ?
Q'
O
.v1
S
ii?Inoij iiis
3NI?HOiVN
I \
I CD
+
?A?2
?j
15+00
? I
<CC
I
\ o
0
+
d'
I
z
O
H
W
V)
/ I
x
12k0
V I
Q4'
H
I
JI
W
U-
L-
m ~
I
O
c?
LLI
>
Nl?y? ?S
? bW
?CD
O
CT

\O
?J

/ M
I (n

CD _ Z
0O C
J
N
I u

x U-
?
m
I

H

L.Li
Lf)
>p /
Ci-
W
_o
m
m
I
c
I
\ I
a?
F-
w0-t
z /
0
U
W /
N
x
O
o-
0
'J
' Lj
\ (L
LL
J-D
m

F4
O
0
U °°
F?--1-1
a
N
0
O
r
O
O
N
Of O
W O O
:2
> II o
O _ rD
z -0
O
w z
LLJ -j
Q 0 0
0 U) ?
+3
w Z
?o
W
U Q
?+ I I O 0
Z a
v F-
W
w
m
w
z Q
Q W
Z
W U)
w (n
}
Q
LL.
LLI
0
Z Q
U
rr)
LL-
0
N
w
0
L?

_W
N >
z
W Q
? J
0
lL Z
w
0
z
Z
Z °6 F-+
C)w?
000
?nV
r
z
OQ
(' J LO
?[if 0
zztYCD L,
m Q z p
? z U E
w J=pry
? Y ? ~
O U 0? Z Q
Q? WOOW
d > z :>: >-
N 2
Of U O
H v W d
H
W Z
Z_
O Q > O
W LL. > Y H
Q
Y F- V) 00 W
Q Z O O 2 0
m
H d U >
v ~
J >
L
W
W
U
z
}w
m~
Q
0 ::>
W X
00
5; [if
00-
0-
<
?aW
?Q
a
LIJ
0
v? Q
J U
Q
O
QY
w
?zJ
F- CLLJ
) Q
O
?
z N
?G
Wd OZZZ:b ZOOZ/IE/01 '6Mp'E09I009N\-@!A ueld 91-11-9002\9M(1\100\090EO\EO\:d
w <,6 OQ P7
D TTx N LL-
0 D o O
w o O
n 0 i m OI r)
LL-
O > II p
O _ ro
o z 0
z
w I \-I o
?J w z w
LLJ I D
_ Q m CD
\ 0 U O
U ? °m w Z
W :2 < Q Q
/
O
O ?+ II OO O
/ z Of
n, s a W L LI
U d+ ° w? N?
LLJ
U
0 C14 ly- a_
j J w D
Qe i / d 00 U?
Q p o wCir) LL- Z_
>
0
ov Q
LL-
r
z
C "O w
O
O\ \ O z 0
O x
Z 061-4
W
> ?\ ?c9
Z
000
>
n '
U /
I OQ
r U Z
I O w Ln
' Z of O
> F Z m Q Z_ w
(n U I ~ Z U -
O
U LLJ -J
N
1 I Yof
x/ OU0!? ZQ
Q? w0Ow
CD / w :2 Z =
0
I +
U ?
O
J
w?
w
\ O
w w > U
Z
>- w
m l-
N Q
1 ? X
0 O? 0 > of
O
O
C)f
V) \
Q
1 \ - p
x \a Q w
Q Q
o cn
> > LLJO
_ N F- ?Q
\CD W U " OJ Q U
d
> H w CL O
a_ 00 Q Z w Z ft? J LLJ
k ?y
Z > Q P ?zJ LLJ
U' d > H <
W li
\ Q O
\ Y F N O j Z N
H M CL U >
Z LLI
Z 18+00 / w ?I > 7jz N/
a- ct
? bl S ??S
H?1 b
WkE
WkD
WkB
EnB
CeB2
l WkD
ILLE-CONCORD
WkD
iect Site
EnB
CeB2
EnD

Legend
Ma Unit M Unit Name Slope
EnB Enon, sandy loam (hydric) 2 to 8%
EnD Enon,sandyloam 9to15N
EnD M O Monacan loam (hydsic)
W kB Wilkes loam (hydric) 2 to 8% NkE
E WkD Rakes loam (hydcic) 8 to 15%
EnB W kE Wilkes loam 15 to 25%
WkB 4" CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, eroded 2 to 8° o
H eB
w Helena sandy loam (liy&ic) 2 to 9%
500 250 0 500 1,000
WkE ee
EnB WkF WkD
EnD HOLBROO

r'
JORDAN Figure 2.1 Soil Map
Pr
j
t N
72
JONES & Cato Farms Stream Restoration o
ec
o.
l1.c? 1s stem
Y
GOULDING
Mecklenburg County, NC February 2008
Year 3 of 5
J Jordan
Jones s
Goulding
SECTION 6
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 - Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix 2 - Geomorphic and Stream Stability Data
Appendix 3 - Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Jordan
Jones e
Goulding
APPENDIX I
VEGETATION RAW DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables*
2. Representative Vegetation Current Condition Photos
3. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
0
o
cc
go

? H

O
O
N
C
M
M
M
N
O
O
kn
O
.•r
N
t"
z
r

?
Q
n
O
M N ?O M M may M
00
0
N
kn
„may
0
F rI

00 0
p O O ? O N O er O O O O O N N N N N
CIO

p
O r
p
O
O
M
O
M
O
?
O
O
N
O
O
O
--?
N
pry o
?°\,i
N a ?

? p O O O O ?t O -? O O N O O •--• ? M ? ? N O
Qw N a r ?
.G ?

e
g
? .0
L
?
N
--?
O
O
--?
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
?
O
O
?y 0
L?L?L? ?

O
'u
d n d \°
0
? ? ? O N 7 M 0 0 N O O O O O -- O M •?y O

a °

w
d fn e

, _O O •••• N O -•• N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
Q Ar 00

0
0
U
N e
O N O O -? N N O O •-+ 0 0 0 •-• N
0. 00
'~
O
O
M
O
?
O
•--?
O
O
O
O
--?
O
O
•-+ e
a ?

0
o ?
o
N ?
y
tl p
N
ar O
N h
O
CS v y N y
O O ? tl ^' CS CS ? a '? N
?
? it ? t C3 V] •
- O
o • o Qj
Vl Vl ?. to U N CS y 5 F`I ?•+ N
Q to rl)
v? r°i » U U U v? ? F C U U ri ,
° ;3 F d Q, r?i? *
? O
Q ?
? O
ti
N
° o
O y M
a?
.? w
.? o
x U
N
a
Q

A
+
a
O
a
as
1
p
0
.
'4
0
a?
a?
E
0
a?

as
U ? a1
a 4. pq
a ?

o
, cd

f?
cx?

fWA

f?0
00
44

GWO

; 0
o
o
W E
E C
E ??y 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L+ 1 Ey
y
°o y
? b
3

m c

? c

? c

.-

ro t
o
C
?

?

? ?q
p i
v
r -
?
?
?
, p (u
b

I
a?
r.
a?
=
CL1
O
n d E E ? :0 U I . X 9 9

' N N N N N N N N 3
0 N N N N O O 0

O O N r.L
U
U
v -v •v •v v -0 v -o = v b o b -C
W G Q C ? Q C Q O A C K+ 1 O C Q
0 1 Q Q C '} k 0 O E E
y y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O • y„ O O .0 O
O v b O
C
?• C.?
'
? 0
it 0
3-i 0
Ir 0
3-, 0
i? 0
it 0
iw 0
f-i 0
7-i 0
Yr 0
U 0 0
Lr 0
in f'
U O
U O
L. O
it a?+
-0 O
i-r
tc O
2 N
0
N
Vl
3.. .
i.. .O N N ,SNP .YN N N ,SNP N ,.lN? N
N v? ??'"! N N
> v? N N (u N N
O
? -
N RS
N
O O i Li Q Q Q Q 1
r L" 0 ? L? C
?? Q > O i
- 7
i 3
r w w
V] v) ?.
/?
[Q ? /?
W M
W ffcCC= CO M W
?./
? m = CO (m ? cd? a?f z tE? cCC? CIS CQ P ?./
?
W ?.
/
?
W CA CIS CIS
0
it
_ In O ?O v'1 v)
?-r O In O O O In N I- N l- In l- M l-
_M (0 O O
In In l'-
O
In l-
W) O_ In O In
In 00 In l-
kr)
[- Cc

y
?

^J ?{- M In M •-- 00 In N II7 l? 0\ + + ?- + ?-
-}- + + + + + + + + + O --I IT r- 00
In ?O " N ao 0
.
O
v
N + + + +
O N M M N +
+ r-
. + + + + +
O In In ?O 00 +
N
to 0

C
. N
0 .-
.-i .--+
I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cl N N N N 0
,
.. .-
-
N

p
p 1 1 1
0 0 In M O In Wn In O N O Vn O Vl O N In In O
In N .? 41 [? O In
In r- 0\ IC M t- N In 1 1 1 1
O O In O
- O M In 1 1
V1 O
In 1 1 1 1 1
In In Vn In In
N N l? N N 1
In
N

N
Q
A +
%
O <'`) N '+
+
+
O+ N O N N M N
+ +
O d
V ? N
V I
0
0
0
0 N N N N 1
0
- 0
0
'
- ?--1 ?- -. O
O
O
N

C
8
8
8 0
0 ?i 0 a
x y
(

O
w (S
a+

a?

cu s.
p

a
O
O
O W
3
O
O >

O O N
Q
b
A bq X
0 o U 0 chi

as

o n

0
W 0

> C
G
Cd
? W A
?
? 0
?
CIS
W to
U
1
Fti
M
I-
W IH
M
W ? cu

M1 Cd
W
?
^
W
ti
H
Q C4
y
N
0 tr)
G O
O y M
Y n
? ? y
.? w
.? o
U
C
N
Rte.
Q
l? N
O
N ()
z odZ
d s ?Y v p cy- Z?
z 000
G
z
N T
N
C-i
N
• a?1 ??? ? ?iy?T•,MMft 1 t'?l?ke??a?,` p5?.+ OO ? O
1
S\? ?! tM:y ? /rte! 'r" ?y:.•' Qr ? ?
A o r i .?Ds 9 ?
° • -? t +r r--r
"4 cq
!1 v?•rC+ r ,w
N
+ t r: Y rate- Lyi rA
Corn a
4 ?rA U a?
w '' d M
?''fj^+` •. ?.r9 •g ? ? .3';? 'e?"r%".l `_ , Z,.. ?4f . in•r . w
v
? I
wc:
tt"
?l r.4 iitn, t;.•? Lrl ;a r ??j. z`k` N ?
KtK;?it?°M " cad Q'
+ ?? G
-in
,s 'Nail
Ns
v'? w f
a.
[-- N
O
N U`
.D z?ti
E? QU1?
? 'k?t s?y^.• z a' z ?
000
1?
O
fl.
O`p O?
7, 00
O 00 aF t" O
O ?
z
LY wl O
O
cl O
c
w ?
O M
U
ry e,ry rry ? rt ?? 'O
}
00
00
k 7?1
y
l? N
O ?
N ?
Z 06 --'
e Q (/1 U
04
dp r«r „ter r a s a s. Z oo(-)
.M 1 ?' ??'4 ?r tic. .».????tlay- r t _, ?, • ?. .?.?'• ? ?i`!i~° Z
K5C ?.. s O y N
20.
s r s ?t+ bOAp Laer r ib'?? bAO
`?„ ? ? o ? :fir ? •.g.« o
00
000 °' .
i ,
00
k - ""ff pta?
a ''y+"?{?,y? rf }yrf? a+ i i- * a it s i
,Y? ? ??. r'4f AYs i r?FHW"? r a'? ^!a. Y ,??Pi a?,..'a? ? S.'
O ?
c
O O
O
E EM C
O
bA
w ?
O M
U
ffiw
?Jv
0 N
r--
000 IVA
Jordan
Jones a
Goulding
APPENDIX 2
GEOMORPHIC AND STREAM STABILITY DATA
1. Stream Current Condition Table
2. Representative Stream Current Condition Photos
3. Stream Photo Station Photos
4. Stream Cross-Section Photos
5. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
6. Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables*
7. Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables*
8. Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables*
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically.
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72

.-. N M 7 • 7 V1 ?D
.C
a

? 0
F
a
10,

w
0 c
O o
O
`? 0
m
7
(? '? '? m
m m
a 4q m
a W P?
a W
a W
a b W LO W W ? ? .b
?3 O
0 'O y
? W ?y ° ° p
y O ? (?7
El
b

V

C

C
LL

C
p

C
a

C
s
p
p

E

N
Fq
m
?
>
°
b
c
N
C

A

A

pa
F4
pa
>

O *

o
W

c

o
V
o
x
?i
y

0 w

0

3 ' K E

? G G

v

a E C

a E

a ai

c y C
s

o
v
a
Gq

y
.?
s
'd
R.
'd
c ?y
„
n?
y E E E E E E E E 3 E E E E .o c b o

°' a

' °
CL
°
-

o

o

FNp
C
'
etl
E C
'Z
cE
E

m v
t3
m v
b
C
b
? v
bp
7
b?
7
'O?
7 v
'Op
7 v
'O
? v
'O
?

? 0

? v
bC
7 v
b?
7
O
V
C

? v
bC
7 d
b
C o
y o
'
E
O
O
N
m
a

"'
° O

P ?
y
.?
o
?' 0
C
? 0
C
.? o
v C
?d
? y

?
d .?

?

? o

N o

N

-3

-3 y

U O
/?
Q
a C
o c
0 C
0 c
0 r
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 O C C C C C ? C E .. k 0
o
o p
c C
v v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 °' o

-' .° s s °'
a

1.,
7
o

o
s
N
' d v v v v

yC? v v

Yom` ?

.1C ? v
a
N c

O v v

>

y? d

y? d ..

'p 0

d v w s y

N ° °o

N
s
' ti

N

N

N
'
'

'00

'00

'O

N

N

Y

v?
v? ?
m
m
m
m
m td
m
m ttl
m ttl
m td
m
m c?
m N
m
? o etl
m eC
m O
z td
m ctl
m
m O y
v? td
m
m
m
L1 N
Ll O
y O
vn O
a. t
d
m t?
m t?
m t?
m O O O N
v? N
v? U
v o
m o
r' l ?

H
^?
Vl
}
p
m
}
V1
V1
}
O
M
}
O

+
O
W
}
Vl

+
` _

h
}

N
N

}
?
r
r,
}
N
D\
} h
t
}
O O

} O
r
} n
M
} v1
r-
?-
00 M_

?-
O O
V1
?-
N O
Vl
i-
M O
r
}
M
Vt
N
} O
r-
}
l?

O O
°,
}
b

O

O

O v1
t-
}
N

1 v1
Vt
}
O O_

}
V'1 ?n
oo
}
V1 O

}
lO ?n

}
00

O

O

O

O

1

O

tom. N
p
O O N N N 7 Vl Vl O ?O l r o0 .--r .-. .-. N N N N 0\ .-• ' + c .
i N •-• •-• •-• •-• O ? } 01
+
+
+ E ^d
0
C 0 O
N y?
7 M O V)
o+
r-
} h
O O
Vi N
} O
h h O
a,
} h
to O
m
} M
-- Vl
l?
N O
h O O
O h
M c h o
h h O N
N N
N y?
N It
N
N
N
r-
}
N
N
N .
.
N N
N
N M
N V
N N '?
p
O N N d' V' V b o r- n r- 0
0 O W O N M M T n N O V
i W 1 1 O`
3J
V.1 N ell b P
.C
w°

N

N

C

O ca
O N
O
(? N
b > O Pr d G
C :? O
7 ,Z.,o m
^ C
° a?
O
N y o y
° O

a a U
N
F
C
O C
0
v ?
U y
w
V]
N °
x a
;d U
C
a
d
1. Bank Erosion: Moderate
3/21/2007
Prepared For:
r?
l.cta,??titr,:i
2. Bank Erosion: Severe
3/21/2007
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Appendix 2.2 Representative Stream Current Condition Photos
Date: November 2007
Project No.: 72
JORDAN
JONES &
GOULDING
He name
x
a - lit q
3. Bank Slump
3/21/2007
7,

' 1 Y 'M1` d ? r.
rat.; If ta-?,
hti4 `:? t
ypPs?. " ?` ?F {
?r6d i?? ,* ?i•? -fie...
' 4q
ma 4
y p ,, ,
4 w? ,
tTn 4 !, r , 0
r k,
tea, -} us • `
6 9 ?

4. In-stream Vegetation/Mid-Channel Bar
3/21/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r' JORDAN
["Cows tcw Appendix 2.2 Representative Stream Current Condition Photos JONES &
GOULDING
ename

5. Vegetation Cover-Poor
3/21/2007
6. Structure-Stressed
3/21/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r? JORDAN
Appendix 2.2 Representative Stream Current Condition Photos JONES &
GOULDING
'ile name

tai
-J?
+'-
.. Y
' 1 I
>r
1 W' . U ?i k ?f 6i
a °Nh'^.
.
n

'
v Fi
f t
y` ?x w

?3
Photo Point 3: Upstream-8/17/2007
l`4 # r 7¢
AOL.
A"Ilk
?Il +?i ? 4 •. ?? y a j? ? al '..
1 P 11 ?} g?
Photo Point 4: Upstream-8/17/200
Prepared For:
r=?
t r rk f
`a a?Tq? ? t f
ov,
dd ? ,fit a ?, t F
Photo Point 3: Downstream-8/17/2007
OL
7
Photo Point 4: Downstream-8/17/2007
Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
JORDAN
Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos JONES &
GOULDING
File name
f q?
r ?
f b yS
r? •'?r? t Pity w ? `*? ?Pti,. ?, ''
lip t ?, ??#1,"???t','?gq?Fe"? y_ ?+.. ?.t
? n
r
A x??eC
Photo Point 5: Upstream-8/17/2007
Photo Point 6: Upstream-8/17/2007
Photo Point 5: Downstream-8/17/2007
Photo Point 6: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r' JORDAN
h criytitcni Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos JONES &
G O U LD I N G
File name
?..\ ? t '1\.i 1? ??s ? -? $b i rt-?a? }i?f??Fy?t, ii?.p[i
q?y?Lir ?r6
T l "? i?5
d y? y
i
?vi
i4 '? ,? .? k 1?,y Vii t? f •'` "•N t
Nwe?,: fr?iy'? ?J i ??i,' a-0?,` .A?VM
Photo Point 7: Upstream-8/17/2007
hAl, w ?`f? fN, P
t T? '?'?' "y f
'Ira
¢. x
f.
i
"
'1.
J > y i
Y
f
?y Z,
T ? ?yqq"
izlk
1 t ?•
?f tp?'yt+f. f ? ?, 7 1 999 /[t, ,? \?a", 'k 4 fw
r i ?" p 1
` e
Photo Point 7: Downstream-8/17/2007
r ?
i
?•
?
v. k
r ?
r
.R r?

n
? r.
?{ r '? ff
?
r
? J
y? . b %,?.
R
? ?y
Ti ecs •
?
?

44

Photo Point 8: Upstream-8/17/2007 Photo Point 8: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r? JORDAN
Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos JONES &
GOULDING
File name
?e 4 ,:C•t
+'t ? ? •f M M SS???44??YYY l ;S
+ n
l ({, 55 Yp{{t'¢" '?' 11yy??jj?
Photo Point 9: Upstream-8/17/2007
J A..
r ?
Photo Point 9: Downstream-8/17/2007

r
9 4 t t
?tk
+
2yj
s r4T, ti ? ? '? \?;; S
I
Photo Point 10: Upstream-8/17/2007 Photo Point 10: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
JORDAN
1,OhyAppendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos JONES
GOULDI
NG
File name
y J
f
AW,
Photo Point 11: Upstream-8/17/2007

-°a

A
.v ??l?ya t5
.
'?
•ei
'i` ?•
" ,'Y

Rj, ?rYy -"'W W t,r•
1t
Photo Point 11: Downstream-8/17/2007
T f cY ,,,,(( ?.y
4
?R
01
' S1 ji' f.j ,^•?p+ua6 2 ? iPG Yr? ?p(??•?ln? Yrt irg,
"'? lt?i(3}?c ab„?°• ??. {a rk? '?? Yat`y
Photo Point 12: Upstream-8/17/2007 Photo Point 12: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
JORDAN
t t>>! ` Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos JONES &
GOULDING
le name

) • R .q
?1
?
+*? s ?

- "
4 J W F
Photo Point 13: Downstream-8/17/2007
,c Fx r WfYhe,"... f -' a
rt i ` h
R,
?4.
,` t ?` 1 rri ? yC n
Photo Point 14: Upstream-8/17/2007 Photo Point 14: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r' JORDAN
Vcrnystenl Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos JONES &
GOULDING
He name
Photo Point 13: Upstream-8/17/2007
Y
a AV J

Photo Point 15: Upstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For:
r?
Lcosysteni
k e ?' 3?Ir:_ r ?r
=O
t r,AS s1
?y [ ? Y 47 Photo Point 15: Downstream-8/17/2007

Photo Point 16: Downstream-8/17/2007
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos
Date: November 2007
Project No.: 72
JORDAN
JONES &
GOULDING
File name
L
Photo Point 16: Upstream-8/17/2007
AaFf+S ..
ytZ
Vt" ?? NA * ?T -TT? f ?•??
Photo Point 17: Upstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For:
r=?
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Photo Point 17: Downstream-8/17/2007
Appendix 2.3 Stream Photo Station Photos
Date: November 2007
Project No.: 72
JORDAN
JONES &
GOULDING
Filename
Photo Point 18: 8/17/2007
w s .
a }:.
A
Cross-Section 1: Upstream-8/17/2007
r
Cross-Section 1: Downstream-8/17/2007
...N

?Lw

w _•
?+
y
0 ?

1 f ?\ ?

f ?''. ?? a .t •t , ? .? ?/ .,?».. 4 '`?: V
e.

Cross-Section 2: Upstream-8/17/2007 Cross-Section 2: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r', JORDAN
Lcny?tc>> Appendix 2.4 Stream Cross-Section Photos JONES &
GOULDING
File name
°5i Y !
v
• ? j! F? ? .ran Yf -l?K f?'
ti r ?t
Or -
ter` 4 '?? 'E,
i, ,. 41 w
Cross-Section 3: Upstream-8/17/2007
G 9
t
i" 1P.
L}?,
sky ',w r A I' '..:qnq :'i5?a v
ak
Cross-Section 3: Downstream-8/17/2007
4
, z
F k
?i8 r''? ? ? t y? ??gt !'? ?r i t k? i e ? ??+'' •,.E. ?a ? ,
d`K i ? r.4 rail. ro,r.µt.
i f 4
At. t
Cross-Section 4: Upstream-8/17/2007 Cross-Section 4: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
JORDAN
?.?'Ihy,t ; Appendix 2.4 Stream Cross-Section Photos 30NES &
GOULDING
le name

r IVV
?
?,

`? f3
j ry.? l y k. >
1 r 1
14 ?in? F ?`
' g

Cross-Section 5: Upstream-8/17/2007
}x
? 4 'sa ? of ? r
4b C' 3 AT
K? tiR::Y q AT I
tit ??a
VIC a w ??R.
Cross-Section 6: Upstream-8/17/2007
Cross-Section 5: Downstream-8/17/2007
n ? t 'rJ?gj
;t AQ
t;
.a' ? r, ;? ? PY J yF
a y kea t R
li. t F `: a 'a..YF Ar. rq ate ` } } n t3 f''
Cross-Section 6: Downstream-8/17/2007
Prepared For: Cato Farms Stream Restoration Date: November 2007
Year 3 of 5 Project No.: 72
r', JORDAN
Lcosystepl Appendix 2.4 Stream Cross-Section Photos J 0 N E S_ &
:name
Reach 1 (2000 linear feet)

eature Category (# Stable)

Number

Performing
as Intended Total
Number

assessed

per 2007

survey Total
Number/

feet in

unstable

state
% Perform

in Stable

Condition Feature

Perform

Mean
Total
l
1. Present? 8 100%
2. Armor Stable? 8 100%
A. Riffles 3. Facet grade appears stable? 8 8 N/A 100% 75%
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining? 0 0%
5. Length appropriate? - -
1. Present? 39 100%
B. Pools 2. Sufficient) deep? 39 39 N/A 100% 100%
3. Length Appropriate? - -

Th
l
C 1. Upstream of meander bend centering? 40
4
/ 95%
weg
.
a 2. Downstream of meander centering? 47 7 N
A 100% 98%
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 46 98%

D
M
d 2. Of those eroding, # w/concomitant point bar formation? 47
47
/ 100%
.
ean
ers
3. A arent Rc within spec?
47 N
A
100% 99%
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief? 47 100%
E
B
d G
l 1. General channel bed a adation areas bar formation)? / 1150 98%
.
e
enera
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down-cutting or head cutting? N
A
0/0
100% 99%
F. Bank Performance* 1. Active) eroding, wasting, or slumping bank N/A 19/176 96% 96%
1. Free of back or arm scour?
V
G
/J
H
k 2. Height appropriate?
.
anes
-
oo
s, etc
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? N/A
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
H
W
d
/ B
ld 1. Free of scour?
.
a
s
ou
ers
2. Footing stable? N/A
*Although bank erosion is occuring along the reach, only 35 feet are actively eroding.
Appendix 2.5 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Reach 2 (500 linear feet)

Feature Categor
Y (# Stable)

y

Performing
as Intended Total
Number

assessed

Per 2006
survey Total
Number/

feet in

unstable
state
% Perform

in Stable

Condition Feature

Perform

Mean or
Total
1. Present?
2. Armor Stable?
A. Riffles 3. Facet rade a ears stable? N/A
4. Minimal evidence of embeddin finin ?
5. Len h a ro riate?
1. Present? 8 100%
B. Pools 2. Sufcientl dee ? 8 8 N/A 100% 100%
3. Len h A ro riate? - -

C
Th
l 1. U stream of meander bend centerin ? 4 100
.
a
weg 2. Downstream of meander centerin ? 4 4 N/A 100 100%
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion? 4 100%

D
M
d 2. Of those erodin # w/concomitant oint bar formation? N/A 100%
.
ean
ers
3. A arent Rc within s ec?
4 4 N/A
100% 100%
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief? 4 100%
E
B
d G
l 1. General channel bed a radation areas bar formation ? 0/5 99%
.
e
enera
2. Channel bed de radation - areas of increasin down-cuttin or head cuttin ? N/A
0/0
100% 100%
F. Bank Performance* 1. Active) erodin , wastin , or slum in bank N/A 4/88 91% 91%
1. Free of back or arm scour? 5 45%
V
G
n
/J
H
k
t 2. Hei t a ro riate? -
.
a
es
-
oo
s, e
c
3. An le and geometry a ear a ro riate?
- 11 N/A
- 73%
4. Free of i in or other structural failures? 11 100%
H
W
d
/ B
ld 1. Free of scour?
.
a
s
ou
ers
2. Footin stable? N/A
`Although bank erosion is occurring along the reach, the banks are not actively eroding
Appendix 2.5 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Stream Name: Cato Farms
Cross-Section: 1
Feature: Riffle
As-Built-2004 2005 2006 2007
Station Elevation Note Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes
0.00 90.36 XSPIN 0000 90.53 -24.02 91.24
4.81 89.90 XS 2.00 90.30 -12.16 91.35
6.73 89.74 XS 4.00 90.13 -7.83 91.25
9.79 88.80 XS 6.00 89.97 -1.40 91.13
12.11 88.66 XS 8.00 8466 0.80 90.73
14.15 88.54 (XS) 1 10.00 88.94 2.75 90.17
15.54 88.42 B 1100 88.59 LBKF 5.15 90.03
16.74 87.79 XS 16.00 88.38 7.25 89.74
17.28 87.24 XS 17.00 87088 8.98 89.23
18.31 86.79 XS 18.00 87029 LEW 9.86 88.87
18.78 86.72 XS 18080 87011 TW 13.24 88.80 BKF
19.05 86.82 XS 19070 87.29 REW 14.83 88.49
19.43 87.04 XS 20.90 87.99 17.23 87.88
19.88 87.57 S 22.60 88.59 RBKF 17.52 87.30 LEW
21.78 88.51 S 24.00 88.91 17.82 87.14 TW
No As-Built Provided 24.90 88.85 S 26.00 89.02 18.51 87.30 REW
27.04 89.17 S 28000 89.38 18.75 87.66
29.97 90.48 XS 30000 90.38 21.38 88.35
32.29 90.84 XSPIN 30.50 90.58 22.32 88.80
31.50 90.78 R HUB 25.72 88.92
27.26 89.26
28.51 89.82
29.21 90.03
33.6 91.22
36.47 91.73
38.88 92.19
42.27 92.62
43.82 92.94
47.24 93.23
51.02 93.49
53.97 93.57
57.75 93.69
Appendix 2,6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Stream Name: Cato Farms
Cross-Section: 2
Features Rifle
As-Built-2004 2005 2006 2007
Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes
0.00 91.44 XSPIN -0.87 91.70 -39.80 93.31
2.45 91.04 S 0.00 91.44 LHUB -29.83 93.00
5.05 90.42 S 2.28 91.15 -21.56 92.93
7.48 89.68 S 4.28 90.62 -16.98 92.88
9.58 89.68 S 6.28 89.98 -12.56 92.50
11.85 89.55 S 7.48 89.68 -8.17 92.20
12.24 89.17 S 9.28 89.69 -5.28 92.09
14.32 88.97 XS 11.28 89.69 LBKF -3.81 91.84
15.12 88.97 XS 12.78 89.29 -2.46 91.61
15.98 89.22 XS 13.28 89.03 LEW 1.53 91.22
17.12 89.34 XS 13.98 88.92 TW 3.58 90.77
19.99 88.87 XS 14.78 89.03 REW 5.28 90.30
21.13 89.18 XS 16.28 89.65 6.28 89.81
22.56 89.67 XS 17.28 89.44 7.61 89.82
24.23 89.49 XS 21.28 89.60 10.44 89.84 LBKF
26.06 89.48 XS 23.28 89.69 RBKF 12.35 89.62
No As-Built Provided 27.25 89.85 XS 26.28 89.71 13.46 89.17
29.85 90.87 XS 27.28 89.97 13.74 89.03 LEW
33.10 91.15 XS 28.78 90.60 13.83 89.04 TW
35.63 91.35 XSPIN 30.78 91.01 14.47 89.03 REW
32.28 91.11 14.82 89.77
35.63 91.32 RHUB 16.77 89.68
19.16 89.56
21.89 89.84 RBKF
23.99 89.67
25.78 89.65
27.58 90.11
28.72 90.63
31.25 91.12
36.93 91.72
39.26 91.87
43.63 92.15
48.39 92.23
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Stream Name: Cato Farms
Cross-Section: 3
Feature: Pool
As-Built-2004 2005 2006 2007
Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes
0.35 9184 SPIN 0.00 94.18 1.21 93.85
2.57 93.64 XS 0.30 93.88 LHUB 4.54 93.48
5.38 93.29 XS 2.30 93.58 9.46 93.35
8.97 9113 XS 5.30 93.42 14.47 93.36
9.05 93.13 XS 7.30 93.26 Start Left Bench 22.50 93.24
13.45 93.22 XS 11.30 93.16 25.46 93.31 BKF
17.98 93.08 XS 16.30 93.21 26.56 93.04
20.90 93.19 XS 20.30 93.19 27.38 92.41
25.33 93.16 XS 25.80 93.22 LBKF/End Left Bench 27.62 92.23 LEW
26.54 92.64 XS 26.30 92.91 29.76 91.45
28.16 91.97 XS 27.30 91.83 LEW 29.98 91.43 TW
28.79 91.91 XS 29.70 91.18 TW 30.77 92.23 REW
29.04 91.30 XS 30.60 91.83 REW 31.71 92.66
No As-Built Provided 29.45 91.26 XS 31.80 92.81 32.81 93.32
30.36 91.52 XS 33050 93.22 R13KF 34.67 94.00
30.98 92.36 XS 35.10 94.22 RHUB 35.69 94.67
31.98 92.96 XS 37.72 95.03
33.61 93.73 S 39.54 96.02
35.02 94.25 XSPIN 42.22 97.15
44.78 98.08 TOB 44.24 97.7
45.4 98.06
47.46 98.26
49.3 98.74
53.72 99.36
57.69 100.02
61.32 100.45
65.19 100.79
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Stream Name: Cato Farms
Cross-Section: 4
Feature: Pool
As-Built-2004 2005 2006 2007
Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes
0.65 96.67 X4 30.19 96.9 -10.28 96.73
11.49 97.05 X4 33.49 96.78 -6.37 96.82
27.45 96.75 X4 35.19 96.7 -1.47 96.8
32.96 96.77 X4 36.19 96.29 2.93 96.97
33.49 96.78 X4LP 37.19 95.34 7.79 96.96
34.53 96.61 X4 38.19 94.71 14.6 97.02
35.33 96.21 X4 38.79 94.23 LBKF 19.36 97.02
38.23 94.1 B 39.59 93.1 LEW 24.9 96.94
39.37 93.25 X4 40.99 92.6 TW 29.54 96.92
39.77 92.98 X4 42.19 93.1 REW 33.13 96.91
39.88 92.95 X4 44.19 93.6 33.95 97.05
40.2 92.76 4 45.19 93.69 34.7 96.82
40.9 92.46 X4 47.19 93.8 35.47 96.4
41.27 92.45 4 49.19 93.89 36.06 95.65
41.85 92.79 4 51.19 93.9 37.9 94.83
42.01 93.1 4 53.19 94.23 RBKF 38 94.28 LBKF
No As-Built Provided 42.23 92097 4 55.99 94.32 38.5 94.12
42.68 93.38 4 57.19 94.45 38.94 93.52
44.27 93.54 4 59.19 94.69 39.62 93.12
47.12 93.72 X4 62.19 94.91 40.64 92.64
52.45 94.03 X4 64.19 95.12 41.28 93 LEW
59.11 94.58 X4 65.19 95.3 41.52 92.61 TW
66.72 95.32 X4RPIN 66.99 95.48 41.73 93 REW
67.18 95.42 X4 69.19 95.66 42.35 93.65
80.53 96.36 X4 72.19 95.79 45.83 93.77
94.52 96.99 X4 75.19 96.01 51.1 94.04
116.45 97.8 4 77.19 96.23 55.79 94.4
30.81 99.22 X4LPOSTTOP 80.19 96.47 60.56 94.94
66.88 97.67 X4RPOSTTOP 82.19 96.72 64.18 95.19
74.66 95.97
77.54 96.26
93.11 97.11
105.55 97.56
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Stream Name: Cato Farms
Cross-Section: 5
Feamre? Pnnl
As-Built-2004 2005 2006 2007
Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes Station Elevation Notes
0.00 97.00 XSPIN 10.01 97.16 5.18 97.15
9.30 97.08 X5 14.01 97.11 11.43 97.11
19.62 97.07 XS 18.01 97.11 17.82 97.09
20.21 97.11 XSLP 20.21 97.10 21.47 97.20
21.08 97.13 5 22.01 97.26 22.80 96.93
22.48 97.20 5 22.51 97.18 24.59 96.09
22.65 97.05 23.01 97.00 24.68 95.51
23.72 96.63 5 24.01 96.34 25.76 94.88
25.30 95.42 XS 25.01 95.71 26.02 94.10 LEW
26.00 94.85 XS 25.51 95.24 LBKF/TOB 27.83 93.98
27.13 93.92 XS 26.01 94.78 28.13 93.05
27.26 93.28 XS 26.51 94.34 28.83 92.96 TW
27.93 93.00 XS 26.81 93.88 LEW 29.77 94.30
28.51 92.73 XS 27.01 9148 30.71 94.32
29.57 93.32 XS 27.51 93.03 31.47 94.56
29.99 94.08 XS 28.01 92.88 TW 32.46 94.88 REW
No As-Built Provided 30.58 94.36 XS 28.41 92.92 33.07 94.90
32.67 94.83 XS 29.01 93.07 37.02 95.26 RBKF
32.95 94.80 29.31 93.88 REW 40.06 95.51
34.62 94.95 5 29.61 94.17 43.71 95.71
39.57 95.42 5 30.51 94.31 45.11 95.91
43.37 95.65 5 31.61 94.64 50.29 96.27
44.01 95.70 XSRP 33.01 94.92 55.87 96.38
51.27 96.07 XS 34.01 94.96 60.12 96.50
68.43 96.79 XS 35.21 95.04 65.64 96.68
84.47 97.77 XS 36.01 95.18 67.99 96.81
37.01 95.24 REW
39.01 95.44
41.01 95.53
43.01 95.66
48.01 96.07
58.01 96.42
62.01 96.56
64.01 96.65
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Stream Name: Cato Farms
Cross-Section: 6
Feah?rr Pool
2007
Station Elevation Notes
8.50 97.74
10.64 97.74
14.81 97.62
16.39 97.22
17.03 96.75
18.38 96.23
19.19 95.41
19.55 95.52
19.83 95.00 LEW
20.75 93.84 TW
21.54 94.31
21.91 94.40
21.97 94.51
22.89 94.71
23.13 95.00 REW
24.34 95.23
25.29 95.65
27.60 96.05 BKF
30.21 96.28
32.53 96.55
36.81 96.91
41.05 97.08
41.06 97.05
45.14 97.14
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Cato Farms
Cross-Section 1-Riffle
92

91

90

89
_
c
0 ?
v
W
88

87

86

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (ft)
2005 2006 - -2007 Bankfull Water Surface
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Cato Farms
Cross-Section 2-Riffle
93

92

0000
0000

91

2
z

c
0
90
cq
ua I? /

89

88

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (ft)
2005 2006 - -2007 Bankfull Water Surface
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Cato Farms
Cross-Section 4-Pool

98
97

96
R

95
o

c
W

94

I
93

92

20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (ft)
2005 2006 -2007 Bankfull Water Surface
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5

Cato Farms
Cross-Section 5-Pool
98

97

96

95
c
0
? I
W
94
I

93 I

92

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
2005 2006 - -2007 Bankfull Water Surface
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Cato Farms
Cross-Section 6-Riffle
99
98
97
D
tC
96
c
0
0010
W
95
ooo
94
93
10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (ft)
-2007 Bankfull Water Surface
r /
J
Appendix 2.6 Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Cem F.-, Cato F.-
MY-2005 Longilndinnl P-M. MY-20071-gitadieel Pro61e
2007
ShOon rW-2007 Shtion WS-2007 sudon BKF-2007 N.D.
0 97.31 0.91 97.66 2.2 100.16 U
5.08 973 4.1 97.62 1072 99.45 U
9066 97.37 8039 97.62 35.31 99.22 P
12419 97.17 22.95 97.58 37.01 99.17 P
1904 96.61 31.25 97.58 6535 98.79 P
24.62 96.65 34.85 97.56 81.44 98.61 MP
27.38 96.62 42.6 97.5 135.21 98.51 P
3136 9762 53.7 97632 143.16 98.48 U
41.09 97.19 56.64 97631 191.45 98.4 R
43472 97.06 61.35 9729 206.22 98.08 R
44.95 96.94 72.03 97,29 219.05 98 U
51.21 96.75 8762 97.25 244.38 97.6 P
55.23 96.62 96.92 97415 273.09 97.23 P
58.38 96.43 114.11 97.03 283627 97.61 w
63013 96681 118.94 97.05 295.82 96.92 U
68071 96983 128626 96086 349996 96675 U
73092 96971 131695 96086 356.09 %.79 U
7995 96.88 152603 96.82 367.01 96.72 U
9493 %.71 156.87 96.71 434.95 96.02 U
90.22 96.61 160.62 %.69 470.52 95959 7-
i00.98 96064 173.77 96.6 472.5 9596 U
105005 96073 174.95 96.6 501.46 95.36 P
105057 9631 176.69 %.58 57022 94.47 W
112011 9607 188.75 96.53 599.64 94.18 U
125.47 96.67 199.31 96.43 629.92 94.21 U
130619 %.4 202.96 96.43 641.58 9434 U
134.65 96049 215.6 %.34 669.65 9195 U
137062 96044 222.8 95.96 698.26 93.81 U
143091 9605 227.78 95.95 728.47 93.93 U
148.18 96.49 230638 95.95 823.08 93.55 P
151.5 96.06 233.75 95.94 887.54 93.15 P
153611 96.06 23625 95.91 91442 93.09 MP
156.78 96927 236659 95.9 933.44 92.76 P
161685 96038 253.19 95.89 986.5 92.69 U
17248 96029 26451 95.8 1069.11 9256 U
17631 96003 282982 95672 1111.29 92923 U
17809 96.27 291.06 95.7 1158.31 92909 R
188015 95053 310.05 95.48 1222.63 9199 U
192.97 9525 324.43 95039 1355.91 91 P
199.67 95A7 342662 95037 137939 90094 P
200.83 95.42 35124 95.37 1451987 90005 P
210.13 95.69 357.88 95.32 1499.48 89.34 U
212.17 96.18 362681 95.32 1619.33 88.72 R
217.41 95037 370.1 95627 1654068 88.26 P
219.36 95.1 379.12 95.19 1673.41 88.62 MP
224.8 95622 384082 95.19 1701.13 88.13 P
228.33 95.65 395.81 94.82 1702619 88.27 P
229 95.64 403.61 94.82 170439 87.96 U
2346637 95.35 417 94.29 1776.09 87.34 P
238689 94083 422.7 94.31 1920.62 86.61 P
24433 94.14 449.01 94.12 2013 86.28 MP
247.37 94.35 460921 93.82 2061.75 85.95 P
252099 95042 484.73 93.81 2109.99 85.65 P
260686 95004 495.35 93.72 220537 84.63 P
267.77 95.36 502.45 93.71 2250612 94 P
270 95639 513001 9307 230453 83.17 U
279.65 95.2 521.95 93638 2394 82.38 P
28605 94.75 522.85 9338 P
294.61 95.02 525.51 9337 p
30746 94.66 536.32 9332 w
320.96 95.1 545.97 9393 P
328.29 94.91 557.69 93925 w
332.76 95611 5672 93.24 U
338.78 94.78 572.75 93.07 U
34319 9498 579699 93.06 U
346976 94.89 592.11 92.95 U
35031 94.85 594994 92.92 U
354.15 94.98 607.55 92.9 U
360.5 94.96 616,07 92.79 U
366.4 94085 62195 9237 U
37633 94.58 635.52 92.77 U
381.02 945 66281 92.75 U
391015 94018 667.79 92675 U
398.66 94.11 673.1 92.68 P
425043 93043 682.3 92.64 1.dP
430.48 93669 694.3 9156 P
433626 93077 702088 92058 P
44147 94005 726004 92052 U
450.46 93.71 740.5 92.52 U
459.8 93.05 748.98 9247 U
471.3 93.13 759.31 92.45 U
481.19 93632 763.15 92.45 U
493675 93.18 768.87 92.45 U
494.47 93.23 774.31 92.45 U
503 93.31 781.53 9204 U
5143 93.05 789.04 9229 U
522095 92.81 796.8 92.29 U
524.53 92.8 804906 92929 U
535.45 92.72 822.5 92.29 U
544992 92.68 841.52 92 29 U
554.61 92.59 842.85 92.29 U
556.9 92.67 947.02 9229 U
571.13 92.67 853.45 92.16 U
57962 92.74 962.31 92.16 U
588.16 92961 87041 92 03 p
CV-2007
Stadon El-d..
2024.93 85
2071.1 84.45
2120.58 84.18
2169.31 83.14
2214.25 82.61
2260.63 81.85
2354095 80.47
2400.58 80.62
Appendix 2.7 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Cab Farms Caro F.-
MY-2005 Loagitadiaal Pmfd, MY-2097 Loagitadiaal ProNe
2007
ShOoa TY-2007 Statloa WS-2007 Sbdoe BKF-2007 Nob.
59235 9153 876632 92001 P
601.45 92068 890.98 91.76 R
612.53 92.45 906.39 91.67 R
61122 914091 910.89 91663 P
618.34 91.9191 915.24 91654 P
627042 9169491 918.67 91.36 MP
635.96 922291 943.34 91.4 P
648078 9263491 952.18 91.36 P
654.78 91.9191 966.68 91.32 MP
659943 92.3791 98064 91.36 U
675.28 91.8691 985.89 91,32 P
683.93 913091 992.18 91.18 P
694.66 91.5491 1005.24 91.23 P
717.22 91.1091 101262 91915 P
723015 903391 102203 91015 MP
744.36 91.93 1054.45 91.14 R
750028 9107291 106144 91014 P
75602 913791 1070071 91013 P
760.01 91.4091 1078.12 91.13 P
766.85 91.2391 1082.38 91.13 P
775.51 91.4591 1085.64 91.13 P
792032 9107691 1088.36 91.13 P
800.65 91.04 1089002 91013 MP
805.98 91.05 1096958 91.11 P
818.11 9193 1109.17 90.95 P
836.89 91951 1117015 91 P
840927 90.88 1117051 90095 P
845.09 90061 1144.88 90.87 MP
850.82 90.81 1145.54 90.73 P
857.92 91.28 1148091 90684 U
865.16 91.33 1159.81 90.72 U
872071 90089 1164.46 90.73 U
887925 90061 1169.11 90.76 U
900979 90059 117169 90974 P
908.46 90.4 1175.05 90.72 P
913063 89.96 1184005 90073 MP
917091 90055 119035 90064 P
930096 9011 1209.86 90.64 P
942.66 89661 1220.32 90.69 KF
949 9056 1221988 90.47 U
963.05 903 1225935 90.64 p
976.06 90.06 1228.91 90.51 P
98048 90.4 1238.25 90.47 P
98803 89942 1251.55 90.22 MP
1000.45 90625 1270.31 90.22 P
1005914 90.6 1286002 90022 P
1018.76 90913 1302049 90.22 P
1025954 89.45 1310076 90007 MP
1035956 90,29 131922 89.87 P
1045497 9006 1328.8 8987 U
1052.71 90.55 1343653 89.87 P
1058023 89048 1349085 89087 MP
1068912 9036 1350.42 89.84 U
1075.17 90.5 1356.6 89.81 P
1077005 90 138172 89462 P
1083.49 90.18 1404.16 89039 P
1090.2 9002 1406911 89026 P
1104 08 89.98 1408909 89035 P
1121.66 89.18 1412.99 89.04 U
114102 90.07 1426.03 88.65 U
1149.95 89.83 1428.68 88.65 U
1158.16 9003 1436.81 88065 P
116434 89085 1445.67 88065 P
117108 8907 1452066 88.42 MP
1179008 89018 147527 88.43 P
1185.08 89.17 1490.74 884 P
1189.01 90.16 1494.05 88.4 P
1192.86 9026 1502.31 883 U
1199.86 8904 1536975 88.24 U
1212.59 90605 1549.73 88024 U
1218683 89.43 1568.35 88.05 U
1225005 89985 1582071 87092 U
1232.69 89902 1598.74 87.16 U
1246.01 89078 160162 87016 U
1257.83 89.53 1608.51 87616 U
1267085 89097 1636025 87616 U
1276007 89013 1637663 8703 P-BRDG
1291.65 8902 1640691 86.85 P-BRDG
1301.31 89.9 1644.96 86.85 U
1309.6 89.37 1649.31 86.85 U
1318.28 89956 1656072 86068 P
133308 89.13 1660.26 86957 P
1351919 88.74 1666.44 86657 P
1370.97 87.71 1673.57 86.57 MP
1389.92 89.25 1684071 86.5 U
1402.04 88.07 1690.73 86.5 U
1408003 89009 1693 22 8605 R
1421.66 88.18 170698 86.5 U
1427.6 88.18 1714.4 86.4 P
1439.59 87.73 1719.1 86.24 P
1452.13 8708 1735.11 8624 MP
1461.34 8625 1739.54 86.24 P
1471.27 87.75 1753.43 86.24 P
1490.07 86.96 1756.86 86.24 P
1491.26 86.75 1761.66 B6624 P
Appendix 2.7 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Caro F.rm, C.ro F.rm.
MY-20051-gitedie.l Prof. MY-2007 L..giledi..l P.M.
2007
S1.0oe TW-2007 SI.Ooe WS-2007 ShO.. BKF-2007 Not.
1495075 8634 1764.15 86.24 MP
1513681 88.31 1768.64 86.12 U
1531.13 87.64 1769.64 86.12 U
1541.68 88.06 1777.02 86012 P
-
1556.03 87.18 1777.46 86.12 77-
1565.66 86.66 177985 85472 MP
1570.06 87.95 1817.37 85.51 R
1583.63 8772 1849.47 85051 R
1587.69 87.15 1855.78 85.47 P
1594.83 96,62 186601 85.41 MP
1601.48 8704 1878651 85.26 U
1612077 86099 1883.03 85.26 U
162033 86073 1890.45 85.26 U
1626.09 86.7 1926.6 85.25 P
16301 85.96 1930.33 85025 MP
1635 01 86.31 194134 85.23 P
1644045 8636 1944.1 8523 P
1651.49 86 1947.58 8523 P
166006 85463 1950.49 85.23 MP
1666.14 86.12 1967.71 85.23 P
167974 85098 1992.09 85,23 P
1690.8 8609 1999.24 85,21 U
1696.45 85698 2012.16 85.21 U
1703.41 86.01 202607 85002 U
1705 23 86.46 2036033 85002 U
1711.94 86653 2036.98 85002 R
1721.74 8586 2045.18 84015 P
1727633 8564 2045.67 84.15 P
1730.93 8437 2048.36 84.13 MP
174707 85.86 2050.37 84013 P
1752.56 85689 2062.08 84.44 P
176016 8522 2069.87 84.44 P
176538 85A 2070.07 84.44 P
177364 8504 2082.12 84.44 P
1779.5 853 2094.24 84.26 MP
1789663 85484 2095.75 84.16 U
1793.57 85.41 2121 84.17 U
1807.58 85064 2122.33 84.16 P
1816.44 85.12 2133,21 83,25 P
1819636 84.43 2156.17 83.08 MP
1826631 85437 2156.72 83.08 P
1828.09 85953 2176.67 82.83 U
1834.87 84.49 2208.14 82.83 U
1839.68 84.43 220836 82083 U
184896 84.55 221109 82081 U
1864626 84.95 2233041 82001 U
1868685 83995 2243.35 82.01 U
188173 83.81 2248957 82001 U
1897.32 8431 2255952 82.04 U
1912.84 83099 2270.39 81.62 U
1923r68 84.4 2279.04 81064 P
193181 83.2 2281995 81064 MP
1940.58 84038 2282.4 81064 P
1944915 8427 2285.58 80.92 U
196019 84914 2291072 80.92 U
1977927 84.09 2292.27 80.92 P
1983.08 8429 2302.81 80092 P
199129 83017 231026 8009 MP
2008069 8437 2318.31 8098 U
2014998 84062 2322.2 8071 U
2018.43 84,61 2327031 80.66 U
2024093 85 2336.9 80.66 CV
1031.89 83.49 2354.33 80.66 P
2036.78 83.24 237462 80 66 P
2039073 8267 2428055 80063 PAP
2049,43 84.16 2436.54 80.5 P
2052.41 84.3 244825 8005 U
2058.97 83.46 2457.66 80.5 U
2067.47 83.42 U
2069056 8419 U
207124 84.63 U
2074.06 84.06 CV
2076.7 82.46 P
2086001 81.99 MP
2092684 83.81 O
2095662 84.42 U
210733 8231 U
211624 83.9 U
2120624 84.46 U
212058 84.18 7
2125.12 81.9 P
212833 81.47 MP
2137973 93.09 P
2140.84 83946 U
2145.99 81958 U
2152.88 81.47 U
2156.62 82043 U
2169931 83.14 CV
2176.18 81.38 P
2181.08 80.78 NT
2188.51 82.5 P
2194639 82.76 U
2202.55 81.32 U
2206.99 82.39 U
220979 82.59 U
Appendix 2.7 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
Caro F.- Caw Farm,
MY-2005 Longiwdianl P.M. MY-2007 Longiwdinal P.f&
2007
Shtlon TW-2007 Swl- WS-2007 ShOon BXF-2007 Noon
2214.25 82061 CV
2219.66 80.37 MP
2223.85 80.42 P
2229.64 81.8 U
2236.84 81.79 7-
2241037 80069 U
2253.4 80.58 U
2255.51 81.69 U
2258.74 81.87 U
2260,63 81.85 CV
2263,28 79.71 MP
2272.79 79.95 P
2292.89 80.75 U
2299.39 79.9 U
2302.12 80,41 U
2305.01 80.98 U
2316.62 79.66 U
2318.36 80.51 U
2327038 79.63 U
2334.77 79.82 U
2345.92 79.83 U
2350.36 8022 U
2352.05 80.68 U
2354.95 80.47 CV
235755 79.34 P
2368065 79008 MP
2378.92 80.65 U
2381,27 8065 U
2388.02 80.43 U
2396076 80.42 U
2400958 80.62 77
2404.22 7903 MP
2412.84 79.49 P
2435.27 79.6 U
2435 27 79.6 U
Appendix 2.7 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
Cato Farms Stream Restoration
Year 3 of 5
CD
0
0

°o
rn
o
U
N

U
°
o

0
0
N

O
O U

CD O
O
N
?O w
x
m

w
0 0
0 c
n n
N
b
3 '
c o0

? o

? 0
N
3 3
o F

td O
M
w
U
_
7) M
G ?

p?
+ p O
N
O
N
? rn F
3
U c +
L N O ¢ s
.n o F
R
0
3
w
10
to ? o v
96 D ro o o
,i, R ? U wo II

U a
on r ? o? v
o
+r a -?4
R
v
c
U ° C3 m3
i

O
O o
U 0 ?
O O V
. Q N
. O
? O O c
, o 0
0
(1f-,Ggaliq.w ) UO!4VA313
0
0
U

_N
.D
A
cC
? c
3 ,o
-d o
c
a N M
C V] ?
N
Y
c w
0
r u
N
k
"O
L.
n.
a

°o
v
N
C
O
U

O p
M
N U
O

O O
N
O
N U
¦
0
o
N
N W

w
O
O

CD CD
O
N O
N
b CO)
3
c
3 ,
N
c
I
U
U
? N N
3 3
CIS
F

V
CIS
_U
'D M
10

E t N N
N Q ? r3
F r F
30 1 +
10
y ? C p V1 m
v
w s 10
I CD L
O

O
a ? ? O
? v
L [i1 y N
V1 ,M U

U
o

Q U
C
44
?
CD r u a; w ,
?,
+?+ O p R ro
c
°O

10
Ua
Na3 w 3
0
0

00
1 00
00
00
ONO
000
I?

10

r N
(11-,Ciea j!gae) UO !IEAal?

c

o
' U

C

U
N

' U
a?
,n
cc
Fi
^3 .o
W Cd
i.
"CS O
rl? U
c? N
? E o
0.. y M
c w
0 0
.a ?
N
X
b
C
N
a.
E ?
w•Da
Y 4
B

?

? <

? '

?

? e

? e

$;
e

o°
e

°o
e

S
e

S
e

8

e
°0

e
8

e
8

e
0°

e
°0

e
8

e
8

e
5

e
8

e
8

e
8

e
°o

e
°o

e
°o
U

N e
g
8
^
N

,,,
e
v
e
o
e
?
e
e
.-
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0

°o
A
O

h

?

V

O

?

^

.-

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O
F

? e°

N e

? a

? e°

;a e

g
e
S
e
0
e
p
0
e
p
0
e
0
e
0
e
S
e
p
0
e
p
0
e
0
e
0
e
8
e
5
e
0
e
0
e
p
0
e
8
e
0
e
0
U

`$ e

S
e
e
P
e
?
e
?
e
N
e
N
e
?
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
°
O
e
N ^ -
E

O
!!
-
2
h
"1
"
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
lo
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
F

B
N
N
O
b

? e°

8 e

O
C e

O
C e

00 e

O
O °

O
O e

O
G a°

00 ep°
O ep
p ep
O e°

O
O e
8 ep
0 ep°
0 e

O
0 a°
S ep
O ep
O a

O
O e°

O
O
U
'i'

N
8
ti e
N-i e
O
,_,? e
? e
N e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0
0
a
?
b
O
T
N
ti
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
F

B O ? N h
O O
^ O
fV O
V n
h O ^ V N
N (V V
? g N W ? b ?
h N
0 ?a
0 0
.? O O C .. h1 N ?
A
•
m S
r ? O y
> v a W ? > a a L F
° ?
a p b
3 9
3 '? q
3
? m ? FF F q y. u u 0

v
0
a
a
0
e
e

e 0
F'
•C j ? U? w a d- a ? °

C
y
? e
U
m
PO

Q?
Cd
Q
? O
u,
b O
y
O ? O
QI
M
O ? O
_N
N O
00 U
N
b
C
N
a
a
e
•a° a
Z `u ..
y u
D ? w
rnU?

°?
°?
?
?
e
a
a e
8 v
s a
8 a
8 e
s e
8 e
8 e
8 e
°0 v
8 e
8 e
8 e
°o e
°0 °
8 e
8 e
°o e
s
U , „
,

s e
e
N
e
?

?
e
m
e
rn
e
.o
v
-.
a
o
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
0
<
0
D
0
e
0
e
0
v
0
e
0
a
0
v
0
e
0
e
0
e
0 e

8
,a, °O a oo a ?o .- o o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o
F

? e

? e

? e

? e

g ?

? e

? e

;
v
8
e
8
e
5

8
e
8
e
8
e
8
e
8
e
8
e
8

8
e
8
e
8
v
S
e
8
e
o
e
8
e
S

y
E e
6
rv
"
g
N
a
d
e
v
a
a
v
a
a
v
e
s
e
e
v
a
v
a
e
°
O
N S ,^ ,.• N ,? - ?D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
it
r
O
?
h
r
0^
N
N
?
.?-.
b
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
S
F

E
o
h
e
?
?
e
?
?
P
^
P
e
g e

O e

O <

S e

0 s

0 e

S e

S v

S e

O a

S v

S a

S v

O e

O a

S e

O e

O e

O
V

S e
E
e
rn
=
e
e
v
e
e
e
"
"
>
" e

O
? - ,_, ?O N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
?
e N M U ? m -+ O - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O N
F

E O N N O S O
fV O
? l?
v? O ? V N N p ?p p. W
N O
? ?p
N N
? N
v N
O p
C T
S
.? 0 0 0 0 - ^, N M 1 N ?

a
s
h
d
ro
-
a
?
? - A
?
?
°
a
o
g
3
q
3
-a
0
9

u
C .-. u o

E
"' C
'? .Q
E '^
$ C
w G
'c
E 9
o U U
E %?
C •?
E `?`
E
'a
`? y
> E u > > E > E
e
Y
a
a
0
e ?

C
j v
?d
U r a> r-
a
0
? ?
•a F
FO
G ".i. ? V m m
CO
I--I
b
G
cd
^O
W
a.+
O
U
a?
a
O
Cd
O
O
y M
ti ?a
w
O
.,
u
X
b
Q?
Qr
a
Q
C
A
W
U en
n a° S
ab?
ti U W

U

h

e

n

° e

s e

s °

s e

s e

s e

s e

s <

s e
S e
S v
g e
s v
s o
g <
s e

?
o e
g e
s e
$ >

?
o <

?
0
a ,_ - _ _

N e
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

0

0

0

0

0
C h ? ? ? ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S
F
'
N e e e e e
S e
S e
O o
O e
S e
O e
O a
S e
S e
O e
O e
O e
S e
O e
O e
O
O
S e
O e
S
U - - _ -

g
fOV e'
e
0?

N
°p\p
_
e
P
N
N

-+
m
'+
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
o
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
O
O
O
F N ? Q N ? ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S
'
e
e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

U
b
r
? O
O
S
S O
0 O
0 O
0
S O
O O
0 O
0
S
S O
O
S
S O
O O
0 O
0 O
0
S O
0 O
0

'§' E °
p o e ? "
o e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e o

N ? , _ _ 0 0
o ^ w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F

E O .N. N h
O 8 N V h O •-• b ?
N N V ?p U N W h b h 0 ? 0

h C C O ^ M ^ N M -
N O
V

> i
e
a

e ?
z A a g+ ? ? F
'C j h V' A i u_ C C 2 0
O h U a0 PC
ti
_N
LLCJC
C?
I--1
3 0
aS
l.n
b
O
a _
Q?
.a
a? o
a ?
0o u
N
X
b
G
w
W
U a
Y O
e8
y u
vi Ufi
? e

N e

r e

? e

g e

q
e
S
e
O
e
O
e
S
e
S
e
O
e
S
e
S
e
O
e
S
e
S
e
O
e
O
e
S
e
S
e
S
e
O
e
O
e
S
U ? b .? r .? r r r r r r r r r r r r .--i r r

p
a e
E
y
e
y
a
r
e
?
..,
e
O?
e
N
e
r
e
O
e
O
a
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
a
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
a
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
a
O
e
O

O
N « ?
Y

O
?
r
r
h
?
N
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F

?

.N.. e

N s

g e

Q a

? s

?
e
S
e
O
s
S
a°
S
e
0
e
0
e
0
e
S
s
S
e
O
e
0
e
0
e
S
e
0
e
0
e
8
e
S
e
O
e
S
U

N E
«y N
,..? ° O? ?°/? N e
al e
b e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 s
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 e
0 0
O0

O
^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
F F

s
o
v
°° e
°o e
°0 e
8 e
8 e
S. e

8 e

8 e

8 e

°O e

8 e

8 e

8 e e

8 e

8 e

8 e e e

8 e e e
o
o
S E o °?o e o i e e e e e e e e 0 e e e e e e e e s o
N ? m m N T 0
, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e
'^
^
'
2
O
I
O
o I
-

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
F
F'
.?

V7 G
O ?
O N
G h
O S
' O
!V O
< 1?
v? O ^ V
^ N
N N
m
O p
?0 O
O? N
^ W
^ ?
N V
m .N.
v? N
O
?
N O
O
?

,?C
N

S
C

C
ttl

9
?
'pC
w
r
>

N

r
'
-
N
r
'
-
>
w
an
w
d
w

L
y
C

^
L
Y

O
..
v

y O
w
.C w C
LLi ? N w ? ? Y A
V
qq c
i
Y ?
A ?
$ L
FF 3 O

O
F

C
C
.C
n
w
j
.J

y

V r w> u-
u
e

p
Y
? rn U Cq of
ft2
cd
F--1
O
F.
p O
N
N
O
n
m
O
U
U
a °
0o u
N
x
.ti
Qn
Q
N
0.
k
N
n 00
M
O o
ITI
0
N ? G
N ?.
W ?
O
N Ly
Q
0
O Q.
P? `JO
f•f
ae w v, °
a a Q - n < r , n ? ? 7.
0
C
< m rv
i ° < < ?
r
? c n E a a ?
T ? °
S ° r
? < ? ? ? d 6 L p
C
e ? 6 ° N m ?p < r ? ? ? G
O N O ? U U y -
N `O T A N W U .•y- W U A N •_• C N

?
?
p
N
N
°?
O
O
O
O
A
U
?
O
W
O
J
O
O
S
p
O N
U °•
N
B
9
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V g U - O ?O ?
S
v O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
v O
a O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e A
e "
\
\
\ N
o O
e
e ??
}
{

e T
1
f
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
g 0
o 0
0 0
0
$ 0
o 0
0 o
0 rn

° oO
^?
°
o ?'
o -
w ? ?
e° e e e e e° a e° e e e e o e e e e e° o e e e° a e° e
i

00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
twit
O+
N
U
rn e
C
Y
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ? U w " '"' '"' "' fi
e e a o e v a e e v e e v o e e e s o a ? ? ? ? ? a
0 0 rl o o
_R 0 0
-I! 0
e 0
e °
0 °
0 °
0 °
0 °
0 °
0 o

S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' N T N U ?p
A
0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U " - fi N
0
e e v a v e s a a e e v a e v a e e e e ? ? ? ? 9 8

O
O
O
S
S
O
O
S
S
O
O
S
S
O
S
S
S
O
O
b
A
N
a
A
?° n
9
e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e
?a
e
S °e
u n

CD
X
N
n 00
O CD
ITI (7
crd
CD
N l I
C N
O
(D
o a
o'
C'

a
e
f1
y
?: 0
?°
'o a ? a
0
O
a 0.
E'
3
O
O G G G 6 N R h 6 ?. 3
0 6 E3. ?+ N . r@
A ?i p
m i

O
O

A
N
~•
Oo
In
A
N O
N 9
? 9
O
b A A N N O? O m O A t
i? O N
W T
O .
tJ O J O O ? ? O ,
N N '3

O
00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N ao A
H
i[
O O
e O
e O
e O
v O
e O
e O
e O
s O
e O
s O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
e O
v O
e "
e "
e to
e
e
3

T° 8

J
s
O s
O s
O s
O -
°o o
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 o
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 s
0 o
o ?
s o
e ?;
e o
e N
e a
s e v e v e e s e e e s e v e v e s e e e
n n?
?a
A Vi
D O
e e n

?a
/
0
06
d
?
2
6r
O,
r/S
2
00 9f

9S
r

0d/
k?
06

I
N L
rf
a
9 I
g ?
94 E
f'
w o
O U
U? ? v

y ( w o
p
N 9/ _

d ¦

g

'
I

g U
f.
/
¦
O
U p
U /
I d

?f
b

r
O ,

C
,
O
S
r0
S
r/O
x
90

e
_

o
U

e
o0

e
1?

o
b
luz-

0
H
d o.v

o
O
7ejn

e
M
=3

e
N

o
..

o
/
OQ
?
$
O
e

P
e

o0
e
0

w
e
o
D
aajad
e
r

ssE13
o

O
junp
e

?n
inipu
o
o
N
I
e
0
o 0
_N
Q
3 0
L
-0 0
N
y? M
Y L
°
N ?
a °
00 U
N
X
'O
C
t1.
L7.
Q

p0,
/

p0/

p/

g
I
u ?
B
e I

8 r

w o
J
?
7 ,i
v
a

I m
U
o
/ g U

1
`o

e°
c
? o°
? a
^ e°
?

juaa e
?

ad - e
?

1.1- o°
m

3 e
N e
o c /O'
p
°o
O
o
P e
? e
0
r
lu o
0
?
aaad e
0

sse[:) e
0
O
lenp e
0

inIpu e

N
l o
0 e
0
i
w
0
U'
96
006
f$
2
6,
O/

9f,
9f
2
N

9 ne
H
P,

/
:d
cd
Q
'6 3 0
cG ?
b O
? N
Q

¦ Q c
C ?
`?
E ? ? a
i
a?
a
8 ? O
ro
?j ¦ ? U
N
P X
.b
C

a
Q
`o
zo
O
?Q

pOo
/ p
co
Oa

O?
6r
O/
r/s
pp f

93
r
O
ff/
?2I
06
G/ d9

? s6

o
o f£
E
o
a 8 I
g a E
ff
"? ¦
m
C
W ,O
iE ? ?
rn
y I ? M
G
LL .O
id ? f .
9 i
?y ^?'
¦
S
U N / 8 U y f? ¦
0 0
U U
I 8

6
r

S
O
S
r0
s
r/O
c$

e

e
O

a
? m

e
1

o
? ?
?uaa

° e
r
?ad an

° e
V
ile?n

e
M
um?

e
N

e
.-

c
.
/
O?
o
°
O
e
a°
e
o°

o n

lu
e e
o
b
awad
e
N

ssri
e
o
V
j jen
o
0

plnipu
o
0
N
l
e
0

0 O
o
N
Cd
cd
Q ?
3 0
cd
w
b O
? y
O z O
in' ro M
O ? N
a O
00 U
N
^c3
N
CL
(1,
Q
°o
0.
w .o
o
U ti
O
U
%11
oo!
o!
8
I
e
a I
I g
I
I
O
o e e e e e e e e e c !00
rn m n ?p h a M N
NOWd -111-3

96
86
6r
O!
S
r9f
9fr
OBI

69
`r6
?f
° E 8
a ¦
r g
? c
cs. o
U
O
v ¦
9/
,y
U
`n
O f` ¦
!
U
8
?S
6
2

Sr0
S
r!O
2y
00
e
OO o
T e
? e
o o
? e
O e
? o
O e
N e
o o
0
w aaiad sselJ lenp impu l
N
.a
H
c?
C?
Q
3 0
ro
c.
b O
c?C y
N ? V'1
? O
G) O
Qr ?
o? U
N
X
:b
G
N
[l,
Q

op
o
!
0
0
6
?d
Or
dr
Ol
S
?
Op 9f

9S
2

Odd
br'
OU
p! d9

g Sd
I
rS
° G
vi
c
°
U n
?, ?n
C c

U n 2

` o
' ! 8 N f! a
0 0 !
U I U
8

d
t
!O /

O
S
eO
S
r/O
2
1l

o
luaai

d a±

_
peln

_
wnj

_

o
!
Op

o
o e
°
e
?
o
0
lu
e
0
aaJad
o
0
sspI
e
0
D Im
e
o
plnipu
e
rv
l
e
o
e
0 0
N
cC
Q
3 0
O c'!
? N
C Y
O y
N
? w
p. O
? U
N
k
b
C
N
CL
f1
4'

96
O
Dd
8d
Or
d?
O!
2!
S
2
y
f
!

9J
2

0?!
?f!
06
p d9
!

Sd

W
fx
p
E

8 W
cL

'
E
fr
Z
C `°
e c
w o
O ?
U
?

` ?

-a
3
I

I ?
`D
e c
u, o
p V
U L N
rn
_
9!
a 8

¦

o f!

U !
U
8

?S
d
2

O /

S
O
Sr
0
Sr!
O
2
90

0
O

0
P

o
e

a
o r

e
?
luaw

o
r
ad w

o
V
jejn

e
M
-3

e
N

e
?

o
!
p'
p
e
00
..
e
O
.
e
?
o
?

lu
e
?

aaiad
e
O

-13
e
Ov

junp
e
O

impu
e
N

l
o
O
0
O 0
3 0
.
Cd
Frr ?
i.
b 0
a ? O
? M
cd
O ? N
N ?
-? w
O
? U
N
k
:b
A
CL
Q
J Jordan
Jones a
Goulding
APPENDIX 3
INTEGRATED PROBLEM AREAS PLAN VIEW
1. Current Condition Plan View Map (Integrated)
Cato Farms Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 3 of 5 March 2008
Project No. 72
Wd 8S85:b 8002/SZ/Z'6.p WSJS00SDN\9MO\100\090EO\EO\:d
Wd gl:":b SOOZ/SZ/Z'6^P IOS]SOOSDN\DMO\100\090£0\£0\:d
2 Jo z 38noiJ 33s
SL+g 'b1S 3NIIHO1bw

I ?
No
a
a
Q
I
\ Z ?0+8
O
I
x
O
?oQQ%
I
I
0 O
0
O re)
CN LL.
o 0
w O
m I T-
? p O
LiJ ?o
0
Zoo
O w
wZ
LLJQm
Q U CD
\ d+ OD + Z
\ U °° 0 w
F O < Q >
pq ,t \ r-i o Q
G w L M
x z U J
w? X z
Z Q o 0
Q w z -
N Z W M
CD cn 0- Z
i /?
++ I LL o
LLJ U)
Q U
c?
cn
°?
w w
1 ?
/ COQ U U
,n
V
06 1 ..4
00 0
a_ (N
c?
w
1
> 1
I
i
i I
? J
I
0
O _
n \}!
V
k ?
\ I
v ?
o_
L+
°
w
H
Of X LLJ
('
w
o w
0 Cl- ? w
H
N
< Of V) N
w
I I LLI m F C > w
O F-
O O W > U N Z
O
LLJ
O O Z Q > w
o
w w LLI ti = af Q ? Q
U H- F- U Q
w ?
I N
o I
m m m ? > V) Q
N F -
(r
v
U O
w ? J
F- LLJ H
d
z_
\ O Q > O
W LL- d > y H
O (n O H
m ? w o > LLJ
<V /
J
r
z
N O Z_
O J Lf)
of O
LL.
Z m Q Z0
?zu0
LU J=On
--D y ? - of
O U Df Z Q
?w00w
a-
w
w
U
z
?w
m~
Q
0:2
LLJ T<
00
>?
Ow
?w
wQ
Q w
HEK
QQ
0V)
H0
J Q
Q U
O
of
w
Z J
LLJ W
P- C'Q
O
Z -? N
G
} r
Wd ZZ:SS:b 8007/SZ/Z'6MP'ZOSDIOOSDN\9M4\100\090£0\EO\:d
rl-
2 30 2 3?i no 13 33S
o o °
SL+L L 'd1S 3NI?HOiVh Of
/ > o
° rl)
:-
z o
o w
LL) z
-i
I / F-am
Q U 0 0
I - o W O Cf) LL
o
W
N? \J `Z LLJ a_
Q \ \ r w
Z :2 LLJ
V) 0 Qw o0
r
\ I z
[If -
z ~ N z
W D
CD O ?L'Cf) 11- Z
+ - :2 0- 0
LLJ V)
+w I cr- ° F-- Q U
Lwi-. N Doe
o LL -
/ % X m LL-
m () /Y
Z
C! U C)
??- F-
U /
15+00 > ? /
/ Z
zod"
awD
LLJ 000
-? \ \ 0
I ? m
0
+ -
i F-
z
Z N U Z
OO % `n
pof O
vwi ''•' I zM<ZO
X ?YF-°?
/ '•'* / °woow
' wO? m12 z:?
12+0? F
m (r 00 p LLJ w w Z d w
O W I N
off/ Ln / m V) <
LLI Of of
/ Z I I m w > F-
R Q O / O O
U ZO ZO d w > U I z d LLJ
to vwi / O O Z < > O U
X W W N = CIf Q H ° Z
JI Y Y Y U V) ~ U a F-
w p of mQ
? Q Q Q ° I W F- 0 p?
W
LA- O m m m z > Ln Q LLJ X
LL 00
m ~ \ > Od
n-
.*
I \ Q
Q W
**+J
I \ Q Q
\ \ f
0 C)
\ v>i = O
00, \-J 0 1-1 ~O v? f=
/ 0I Q w Z a QO
z (IfJ
cn \ O Q > O
/- - W LL. m > Y Q H CLU -J
? Q
I-? Y N O W Uz N
Q Z O O 2 O
/ \ I(W F- M a U >
O
J
G
s ? o ?? Jm
LLJ
> CD r 4-W
W
Wd 8I:9S:4 80OZ/SZ/Z'6mp'EOSJTOOSJN\!)MO\100\090EO\EO\:d
~ 0
O
'2- 0
1r LL
° O
/ xSC' w °O
n m ° I n
:2 0
j
II o
O _ n
° z O
z
w .. p
w z w
. Q U p U
I \ ~ a m p
W 0 Cf)
I ? >
U OD w z
O W
W° Q
CD >
w II 0 0 O Z
CD of <
+ > nx Z ) ~ J
n CY mow! o `-..?"i Z W
U ry a W Q
z W F O
Z W
Cf)
Q? z /O
V)
CD I
U
W N Q 12
P
> N Q
O Z
Ii
U
W
w O a'
Of <
\?Ox
U-) g
O-
?\ C',
Z 0 p
V)
ce zD
000
(Z)
I U
I
r
z
U °a
U ?OZ_
ofJ
, I Z pof 0
> O0 Z m Q Z_ L,
U / O
n? W F- Z U?
U U - LLJ (n J pry
x ?w0Ow
CD I Z
0
w
00 Q w O
U) 1 - Of > ZO V)
of O w F I N
U :2 V) Q ~o Q w w w
m O > cn
U O_ O_ a w > LLJ O I O_ w
W (n (n
\ m z :2 W W O
> 0 0 J zQ Q > CE z
Q
w w V) = W LLJ Q H Q } m ?
\
I) N F a
Z / Q Q Q I w F- 0 °w X
p\ m m m ? > N Q °O
F- 5; U \ 00-
Li
\ \? d
N a
I -
x \ ° :• a w
\ o- ~ Of
o a
U
\U') > > LIJ Z
V) M:
Q
Cif
1-1 O J
> ? Q W Z
\ W
O Q > O wwJ
Z) 0-
\ \ W LL. > Y ~ ~C?a
Q O
N
N ~ ZE
Y F U) 0
Q Z O O S (mj
F
\\ --- m d U >
EU
'G-
O i
S 18+00
NI?,y? bls ?s ?
lb