HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160438 Ver 1_Bridge Nos 207 and 270 Alamance_20160525 (2)
Strickland, Bev
From:Thomson, Nicole J
Sent:Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:59 AM
To:Wrenn, Brian L; David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil
Cc:Parker, Jerry A
Subject:FW: Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 Alamance
Hey Brian!
Below is the answer to the question you had about the sewer line. It’s outside the ROW and definitely outside the
culvert and wing walls, so it won’t be in conflict with the culvert installation.
I hope this answers your questions. Let me know if you need anything else.
Nik
From: "Tracy Parrott" <tracy.parrott@summitde.net>
Date: May 24, 2016 at 19:09:46 EDT
To: "'Brandon Johnson'" <brandon.johnson@summitde.net>, "'Nancy Scott'" <nancy.scott@threeoaksengineering.com>
Cc: "'Michael Wood'" <michael.wood@threeoaksengineering.com>
Subject: RE: Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 Alamance
N,
Brandon is correct. We are not relocating the sewer line, it is outside of the proposed culvert.
Did you need any input on the BR 270 questions? The proposed DI and outlet pipe are connecting to an
existing pipe system and outletting it around the proposed wing wall. It is not a new conveyance.
Thanks, TNP
From: Brandon Johnson \[mailto:brandon.johnson@summitde.net\]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:41 PM
To: 'Nancy Scott' <nancy.scott@threeoaksengineering.com>; tracy.parrott@summitde.net
Cc: 'Michael Wood' <michael.wood@threeoaksengineering.com>
Subject: RE: Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 Alamance
Nancy,
And Tracy correct me if I am wrong, but the sewer is outside the existing ROW and away from the
end of the culvert, it is also outside our proposed wing walls by a few feet. So it should be fine to
remain in place. Thanks.
1
Brandon W. Johnson, PE
Project Engineer
Infrastructure Engineering
100 E. Six Forks Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: 919.322.0115
Cell: 919.422.7446
Fax: 919.322.0116
From: Nancy Scott \[mailto:nancy.scott@threeoaksengineering.com\]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:23 PM
To: 'tracy.parrott@summitde.net'; 'Brandon Johnson'
Cc: Michael Wood
Subject: FW: Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 Alamance
Tracy/Brandon, can you help answer the question below about Bridge 207?
Thanks,
Nancy
From: Thomson, Nicole J \[mailto:njthomson2@ncdot.gov\]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 12:33 PM
To: Nancy Scott <nancy.scott@threeoaksengineering.com>
Subject: FW: Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 Alamance
Hi Nancy!
2
I highlighted a section of Brian’s email (he’s our new DWR agent) with a question about Bridge 207 in
Alamance County.
Can you help me out and shed some light on this?
Thanks!
Nik
From: Wrenn, Brian L
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 8:56 AM
To: Nicole Thomson <nthomson@sepiengineering.com>
Cc: Patton, Vance H <vhpatton@ncdot.gov>; Cail, William G <gcail@ncdot.gov>;
David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil
Subject: Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 Alamance
Nikki,
I visited Bridge Nos. 207 and 270 in Alamance yesterday. I have a couple of questions:
207
-On the upstream side, there is a large sewer line. It looks like it is about where the new culvert
inlet will be located. I assume this will be relocated but I didn’t see anything on the plans. If it is
to be relocated, will any impacts (perm or temp) occur as part of the relocation?
270
-In the NW quadrant of the crossing, a drop inlet with a conveyance and rip rap pad at the
stream bank is proposed. It doesn’t appear that there is any stormwater treatment prior to
entering the drop inlet. Unless I’m misreading what’s proposed, this would be considered a new
stormwater conveyance through the buffer without treatment which is allowable with
mitigation. The application doesn’t propose any buffer mitigation. Can you give me some more
details on this?
-I’m okay with the proposed ditch improvements in the SW quadrant of the crossing.
Thanks!
Brian L. Wrenn
Transportation Permitting Unit
Division of Water Resources
919-707-8792
Brian.wrenn@ncdenr.gov
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
3
�;�'_• ���— � .������
- _e: � ��i■
;;1: �• � �{%..�"-i%f.-ji�
;;�;; , . -,.. - ���'%/�s�'1
�. .
_.�.; � ,
�.n;: �L��auss:r-w�w��