HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130517 All Versions_Design Plans_20160718 (3)
Wrenn, Brian L
From:Wrenn, Brian L
Sent:Monday, July 18, 2016 2:45 PM
To:Lovinggood, Ray D; david.e.bailey2@usace.army.mil; Eason, Patty P; Lorenz, Kris;
'gary_jordan@fws.gov'; Wilson, Travis W.; Riffey, Deanna
Cc:Morgan, Stephen R; Shumsky, Michael J
Subject:RE: R-2413A
With a slope that steep, I don’t see the need to bury it. In the past, DWR hasn’t required pipe burial on stream crossings
of this slope. However, others may have information to warrant it.
Thanks,
Brian Wrenn
919-707-8792
From: Lovinggood, Ray D
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 2:27 PM
To: Wrenn, Brian L <brian.wrenn@ncdenr.gov>; david.e.bailey2@usace.army.mil; Eason, Patty P <peason@ncdot.gov>;
Lorenz, Kris <klorenz@ncdot.gov>; 'gary_jordan@fws.gov' <gary_jordan@fws.gov>; Wilson, Travis W.
<travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org>; Riffey, Deanna <driffey@ncdot.gov>
Cc: Morgan, Stephen R <smorgan@ncdot.gov>; Shumsky, Michael J <mshumsky@ncdot.gov>
Subject: R-2413A
All,
I am reviewing a construction change for the subject project and have three questions which are listed below the plan view
image.
1
•
n
2SFD
HP
-Y1C- STA 23-+7d- 6
NS C. B RIPRAP
ll1 FILL TRA,NSLT1014--
f-��_-- = e -
TOE --FRO TEGTIQ
rx SEE .DETAIL E:.
fJ
.43
, _ of .9 NV--diBil ID
2 TONS GAL. 0 'RIPRAP
17 AY GE;O FAB
1NV 88$_0
deb
Proposed 48' CSP
TECTION.l
TAli F
876_1
ON
& ttE tat r.-
FOR -
PLANS PR,
RUMMEL, KLEPI
900 RIDGEFIELD
RALEIGH, NORTH Cd
NC LICENSE NO. F-
The 48" CSP cross pipe near —YC1- Sta 25+50 is shown as a 48" CSP, 16 Gage.
This pipe should be RCP -IV, not corrugated steel.
My questions are:
2
1. Was there a commitment to use a metal pipe at this location? Why?
2. With a slope of 7.74% and a stream slope of 5% downstream of the pipe, do we bury the pipe 20% of its diameter
and try to keep material in it? The plans call for it be buried 0.8’, but on a slope that steep, I doubt material would
stay in the pipe. To possibly keep material in the pipe, sills on both ends will be required. Also, the pipe would
need to be upsized to either a 54” or 60” to compensate for the area lost to burial of the pipe.
3. Plans show outlet protection as Cl I Riprap on the channel banks. I recommend Class I riprap also in the channel
bed, but without geotextile fabric.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Ray
Ray D. Lovinggood, P.E.
Engineer - Advanced
Hydraulics Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6736 office
rlovinggood@ncdot.gov
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit
1590 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
_____________________________________________________________
Facebook Twitter YouTube
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
3