20160942 Ver 1_401 Application_20160916

September 28, 2016
Mr. David L. Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
201 60 942
D
�! P 3 0 2016
DEO-WATER RE OURCES
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP#29 for the Chateau Residential
Development (AID: 2016-00107), Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Ms. Higgins and Messrs. Shaeffer, Johnson, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit #29 associated with the proposed Chateau
Residential Development (formerly known as the Elisha Site) in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
NC. Proposed permanent impacts associated with the project total approximately 147 linear feet
of a perennial tributary (Perennial RPW Tributary AA) and approximately 0. 175 acres of onsite
wetlands (Wetlands Z, VV, TT, and ZZ). Permanent impacts are associated with the construction
of three residential lots and the installation of two road crossings. Temporary impacts associated
with sewer line installation total 0.013 acre of wetlands and 51 linear feet of stream channels.
Due to the locations of the onsite jurisdictional surface water features, complete avoidance of
impacts was not practicable. Impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed
development were limited through site selection location and design location/orientation of the
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 1 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
proposed lots and access routes. No compensatory mitigation is being proposed for the
permanent stream channel impacts due to the minimal impacts being proposed. Wetland
mitigation is being proposed to compensate for the 0.175 acre of permanent wetland impact at a
2:1 ratio through payment to NCDMS. All mitigation provided by NCDMS will be for riparian
wetlands even though a portion of the impacts are to non -riparian wetlands (see attached
acceptance letter).
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site in which
no listed species were identified within the project area. The site is wooded which may be
considered summer roosting habitat for the listed Northern Long Eared Bat. However, we have
consulted with the latest guidance associated with the Final 4(d) ruling and there are no known
hibernation and/or roosts sites within a 45 -mile radius of the project area. Based on this
information we believe that the project meets the exemption criteria for the 4(d) rule and formal
USFWS concurrence is not required.
Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you have any questions, (828) 708-
7059 or email at amanda.jones(iiwetlands-epg com.
Sincerely,
Amanda Jones Heath Caldwell
Regulatory Specialist Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 2 [e-mail]

2
Permit Application

>_ Cm
0Niii�-t
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Chateau
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Thomas Johnson
3d.
Street address:
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd.
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28226
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-309-3288
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Amanda Jones
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c. Street address:
1070 Tunnel Road, Building 1, Suite 10, PMB 283
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28805
5e. Telephone no.:
828-708-7059
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple parcels - see attached map
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I
Latitude: 35.0958 Longitude: -80.9794
1c. Property size:
387.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Walker Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
j 03050103 Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the site Is composed of fallow fields and pasture with some forested areas. General land use in the vicinity consists of residential, and
spares commercial development. Currently, construction of Phase 1 development is on-going.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.674
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 8,809
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Fill and grading for construction of residential lots and installation of culverts for access.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: sAw-tots-oo1o7
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary ® Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): N. Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: wEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Corp Notification of Jurisdictional Determination provided on 4/18/2016.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
OYes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temwrary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.055
1N2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.025
VV3 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.092
YV4 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.003
W5 t
Excavation
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.01
VV6 T
Excavation
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corte
0.003
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.188
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream AA
PER
Corps
6
147
S2 T
Excavation
Stream AA
PER
Corps
6
26
S3 T
Excavation
Stream GG
PER
Corps
6
25
S4
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributaryimpacts
198
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
O4 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
58.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, an you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 -
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The site plan was designed to avoid onsite surface water features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site
development and viable access. Due to the location/extent of jurisdictional surface water features on the site, complete avoidance was not practicable.
Impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site location, plan design and location/orientation of
lots, access routes and stormwater treatment facilities.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In4leu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.095 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.08 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:al wetland impacts will be mitigated using riparian wetlands at a 2:1 ratio per DMS acceptance letter.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
35%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater on the site will be handled/treated by eleven BMPs as shown on the attached exhibits. The stormwater pian has not been approved yet
since Mecklenburg County requires a copy of the 401 certification before they will approve the stormwater plan. However, the plan as proposed meets
their current guidelines and is expected to be approved once the 404/401 permits are received.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Mecklenburg County
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):USMP
HWater Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
[]Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
X❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑Yes
® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
[]Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases are proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater on the site will be carried to nearest WWTP for treatment via proposed and existing utility line infrastructure.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes © No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes OX No
impacts?
-T 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threstenedlendangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but is exempt as noted in cover letter. Report is included.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdc r.govthpmmb/
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No Impact areas are proposed within the designated floodplain as part of this project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polarls3g.mecMenburgcoun"c.gov/
9=80===
�teu=Heath Caldwell W,MIHY-fNC.�Wl�MNdYdi-
Heath Caldwell
. CM. C -Us
09-23-2016
Do: 2018.00.2312:18:60 -04W
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Agent Authorization Letter
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Elisha Property
Property Address: 12420 Hamilton Road, Charlotte, NC 28273
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 21932394, 21926112, 21904102, 21904113
Select one: I am the current property owner
Name: Thomas Johnson
Company: Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Mailing Address: 11230 Carmel Commons Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number: 704-309-3288
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
ZIP I )r'
Property OvAer / Interested Buyer* / Other*
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.coni Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB S50 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
len.rindner9wetlands-epg.com 2 amanda.ionesCa wetlands-epg.com

N
c
as
N
Q.
0�
Maps/Plans

FIGURE NO. CHATEAU Drawn By: Reviewed By:
1 Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
DATE:
VICINITY MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 4/24/15
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR
�w-
Road
Eif
_
°
rr
r
v
�P
SITE
.'E
441"
H--ow
wtx��k�
yU
f
n�
Une Pr O
'WO-1�
a9
o
, 1
t'y Nat �"" to-ean
MS's :ba tT
Oic04
Nwp'�irm�o
a°
�r B
... -.
rrd,
.. C-0ydn'
4 a taaar
" i
V•" PraR 41
bG"•k o¢
.fC
a
Walser A. ant
N=r
YorkMtro
cnw+"
V'.tra n tease
AahwlarBWaoM1a Ln
.'� t
Y
°15+ e
41
/rNrat❑t
a
r:
..gr N
mite
ahq Uac.'nd'x ..
'
�"+ta wu ••eratn
"a+^y n. a
p4
N
It,
da ,na�b
41u,
�trM * tIta b.
to G.
c
Pte_.
8
i
oarnc t^ Q
4
,�
0eacd`t'
res``
y'
� i*w4aae
� rxa Nn
ayn4 latan Wa.
* O` j
wary Furr. r.r ` r�tf 4a,
Nana CtWwt..c
.a
W i
c
C'
9°
4uacxsCt
�
aFS
w. PaNr Pt
rj� `
.X f.W4 Ru.t`(: -
6at.wy�
�y p°knr Wl4 ..
A
4` 9t
c
sett"'*
o
�%
t'a
t
ti, nynaa�
I�
Phase 1 Project Boundary
Miles
eta
0 0.25 0.5
1
Pt � +P
Phase 2 Project Boundary
�^
R
iburces: Esn: FERE. UeLorme, USGS. Intermap, increment P Corp NRCAN. Esn Japan. METI Esn
FIGURE NO. CHATEAU Drawn By: Reviewed By:
1 Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
DATE:
VICINITY MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 4/24/15
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR

0,`r:'alkFr Bracer.
0
4/ AT 17
sanding Dr
a.
Wbing
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
(704) 9G4-2277
www.wetlands-epg.com
Nd
0 , RKS; , AIRVE-
Misty
-810
9,4
lc�
'el
36. V)
NIP,,
J.,
LAUREL -
FAIR OAKS MEADOW

xbmi � i
PID:21926112
i
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Parcels Owned by: Lennar
Carolinas, LLC
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd.,
Charlotte, NC 28226

.�
- --►F "�. f nom= ter'''` _. � `.`- '` _ _ I ..>
SITE
Ile lip.
,
X
fi
-, iis-y/f
. e • q
I• f
-- d
+` •fin.
LOCATION c► ' _ .,
Lat: 35.0958 9N USGS QUAD •.1
Long: -80.9794 91N,
FORT MILL -
HUC: 03050103
FIGURE NO. Chateau
4 Union Co., NC
GroupWetlands and Environmental Planning
USGS MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
12 , i SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
LRG I LSR
DATE:
03/04/2014

IR
-141 r Bim" _ ., �,1w rol E'
fat
IA B
r
tat r E• � 6
M
mow' r tat
B.
" .We C ■
N
IF
14 e D IIA
R
•
Pal = .�•c�r-...� y1 t7 � d,�,r �,� ``'-'��•, d
',-
F"'a E - �` • �ta1 � C
,
IA D
,
rA
Pal ,
me
:��. FiF INH.E fa1E
C�IC� ,.:
�': � r moi• - , .:. �4
Al H. CHB �
, , L 4a� •�, E,.. • �^� rat � B 2 �-W u.�Et
FSE CIrB1Er •;'-- f `'
DAll
B2 !�
- I'i"r LI1i Wyr2 roleB2 f.
Pal
' r - j C � tat r C' j ti� y I: 2 C w 4 a f ,"
• a • � � -�.. _ ,,� ; , r ! .,..y-. t... : tib, 1, � , :.�,
,. ..`-^'�" % =rte• - ..f » • � 1=.'��
I , D
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC-
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com

Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
19.7
0.8%
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
181.3
7.8%
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded75.1
3.2%
DaB
Davidson sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
20.2
0.9%
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
31.4
1.3%
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
3.3
0.1%
IrA
Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
111.7
4.8%
IrB
Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes
408.9
17.6%
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
705.0
30.3%
MeD
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
49.7
2.1%
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
235.2
10.1%
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
59.3
2.5%
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
11.4
0.5%
W
Water
16.4
0.7%
WkB
Wilkes loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes
34.9
1.5%
WkD
Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
26.9
1.2%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
1,990.4 85.50/0
FIGURE NO. Chateau Drawn By: Reviewed By:
6 LAIEDt" I Mecklenburg Co., NC I LRG I LSR
SOILS MAP 2 - WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
DATE:
03/04/2014

EXIST. PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
WETLAND M 1 �I"ALkEl�CREEK
SU DIVISION
WETLAND UN
SEASONAL r \ WETLj
TRIBUTARY H \
•SEASONAL RPW \
TRIBUTARY J
WETLAND G =-
WETLAND K
WETLAND F
WETLAND B
WETLAND A
7
POND 2
WETLAND EE
l WETLAND Z
POND W /
L WETLAND Y
WETLAND ZZZ c'
PERENNIAL RPW
�, TRIBUTARY X
;J' -ss WETLAND S--\ ND U�
EXIST. SOUTHBRIDGE FOREST
SUBDIVISION
0 �—
�SEASONAL RPW
TRIBUTARY C
T
PERENNIAL RPW
TRIBUTARY AA
1
WETLAND BB
EXIST. SOUTHBRIDGE
pGr� FOREST SUBDIVISION
WETLAND Q
WETLAND R _
T PERENNIAL RPW
WETLAND T WETLAND W '
iL TRIBUTARY GG
WETLAND V WETLAND W
POND 1 WETLAND ZZ
PERENNIAL RPW
EXIST. HAMILTON �.
WETLAND TT TRIBUTARY II
LAKES SUBDIVISI r"- Q� j1\ /
EXIST. PROPERTY WETLAND UU
BOUNDARY (TYP.) POND 3 �� WETLAND RR
�J WETLAND QQ i
.� WETLAND MM
/ WETLAND CC POND NN—,/WETLAND JJ
WETLAND SS
`J -'� EXIST. PROPERTY
WETLAND PP BOUNDARY (TYP.)
IHAMILTO ROAD WETLAND 00
WETLAND YY WETLAND XX \
BAR SCALE 1"=800' FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY
PERENNIAL RPW \ DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
TRIBUTARY WW PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
o aoo' soo' ieoo'
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
m
x
Lu Q
W W
c/i Q
Z V
WETLAND HH
~
WETLAND LL
V)
-WETLAND KK
�\
W
\W
J
zZ
J
Q'
U
Z \
C
z
J
H
a
Lu
N
0
ZO
��
r
LLw
a
M
w
V
mrZo
r
J '
Lu
Z
U
as
�Lij�wZw
Q U)
c=.)C3a0c=n

ON
ISBN
,� ����1/1111►����-�� ������•.
_ � �\III � ♦ t I
110421
�,, � �. , ,,``��� � :Il. III X11►�� � ., � ,;
�;��VIP
♦ Wr•
11►���� ♦ �.�-�
�� ��II111111111�= �
�_ _ � 1/1111►� -. .
X111/—���j111 1�►� _
� 11\11►;��� � I\� III
►1111111\�
kin : , , •

J
I o
— >m
V
�\ av
1
0
N
O
0
oim0
D<LM
-1 Z co
0
G)c�m
>m
x
Jaz
am0
zoo
a�
NORTH ORIENTED TO
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER NCGRID (NADW)
SAW -
CHECKED BY: APG
DRAWN BY: ECB PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT #1 B.� ""
PROJECT NUMBER: CN13.400 CMWft"`�"
���
ORIGINAL DATE: 09/02/2016 Fat Mi SCxmae
SHEET: 3 OF 19 CHATEAU#)ESP '°'w"
_M
LENNAR CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NCS

APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER
SAW- - -
CHECKED BY: APG latm
DRAWN BY: ECB PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT #2 0.P."
PROJECT NUMBER: CN13.400 awktRNC2MI
MM 8�
ORIGINAL DATE: 09/0212016 Fat M14 SC 73!08
SHEET: CHATEAU '°�'
4 OF 19ILENNAR
�a�
CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NCS

EXIST. NON—JURISDICTIONAL
CHANNEL TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
r \ PROP. HEADWALL14Z
::. •::• :„...
(DESIGN BYOTHERS)
\\� I INV. OUT = _�
Z I v v vv� �1619 40
INV OU
621.3
21 30
PROP. PUMP i
DISCHARGE — J
LOCATION — — —
—
/ PROP. 30' CLASS '1' – — —
RIPRAP APRON -
- / T=2.25''
/ _ WETLAND ZZ-
/ _ _ / (0.092 AC IMPACT)
(EBOVN) OWD ON
Ol O31NMIO H -WON
Y
/
�v Or
Ncr
\ \\ \ \
\\
\\
m
PROP. 74 LF 54” RCP
\ (2 PIPES BURIED 1')_
PROP. 30' CLASS'V `
RIPRAP APRON
\ T=2.25'
INV. IN = //
1621.10
� � � �I��III I •�
PROP. COFFER DAM
�I (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)
(NO 10 PACT)
' PROP. PUMP INLET
LOCATION
PROP. PUMP LINE
i INV.
IN= �(�
1623.00 I
PROP. 71 LF 36" RCP
(2 PIPES)
/
BAR SCALE 1"=60' FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
0 30' 60' 120' LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY

EXIST. STREAMS �g
\ _ TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
6 ' / WETLAND EE v f
(NO IMPACT) A �� ��� PROP. 36' CLASS '1'
RIPRAP APRON
T=3.825'
SSS _ - PROP. PUMP
S� DISCHARGE
LOCATION
6
y, PERENNIAL RPW
TRIBUTARY AA
ZO
INV. OUT (147 LF IMPACT) ti a z
± 586.95
/ INV. OUT = r
t 583.80 °y i
Z 0
PROP. 75 LF 96" RCP _
WETLAND Z PROP. HEADWALL
(0. 003 AC IMPACT) j (DESIGN BY OTHERS) CL
6
o �- W
PROP. 75 LF 120" RCP Q H
(BURIED 1')
SOUTHBRIDGE FOREST DRIVE V
INV IN (PROP 65' PUBLIC R/W)
INV. IN= ` ± 584. \ \ _ -
80Lu
_ 588.95 j
0
PROP. COFFER DAM PROP. PUMP LINE �� ` �� W
r (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) \ PROP. 20' CLASS '1' m a
RIPRAP APRON
PROP. PUMP INLET T=2.25' \ o
LOCATION ��\\�
WETLAND BB \ ti J % Z z
(NO IMPACT) V ��� /
PON�W/ ����, V ��\\ C9CC) go
WETLAND Y cj
\ \ V H ac>m¢ Lu Ci
(NO IMPACT) �� Z 0
ILL
LLI
mw0
BAR SCALE1"=60' FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. V } }
m
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON J ' w m J
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND a v "' Z5 w
0 30' 60' 120' LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY a Q m _
Q 00 a 0 v�

..
L 0+00
584.6
■■■r'!!■■■■■7■■■■■■■■S■■■��■ ■■
■i■■■■ 11
585.71
■■■■■■til\�1�■■■■■■■■1■l�■■�'�■■■■■
co 585.9
ct
585.87
ma om
■■■�■■■■111\1/li■■■■■■■1/1/■■/1■■■■■■
■■■■�■■1■�`;,'''� ■■■■■■■■■■I■■■■■■■■
■■■■■fit■■C�t/■■■■■■■■■I�■■■■■■■■
■Mal ■■■■■■■■■I■■■■■■■■
_•
APPLICATION00 z
SAW
D
PROPOSED • SHEET: 11 '
OF • LENW CAROLINAS, LLC CHATEAU CHARLOTTE, NC

..
585.64 F2 ffv 0+00
586.8
■■ a �■��'■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ • ■
586.84
■■� ■■■■■1!111\■ ■■■■1�■■nl ■ : ■
■■■■■■■li' l I I 1+00
587.57
■■■■■■tJ■■■■■►�■■■■■■■1�a■'I■■■■■
■■■■■■■��■ ■��';�;�'; li■■■■■� IIS■■■■■■■■
::■■■■■■■■■�''�''■■■■■■�l[■■■■■■■■
. ■■■■■■■'\�i■■■\J■■■■■■SIE'■■■■■■■■
::. ■■■■■■■�■■■■/I■■■■■■�Icc
■■■■■■■■
cma So 588.58
o cccn•
.
.-
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER
SAW -
CHECKED BY:
P.A-
PROPOSED IMPACT #4 EMBANKMENT PROFILE
ESP F-masc"F' 70+,a3A90CK0
SHEET: CHATEAU 803402-2440 W
12
OF '

L C I `3 PCCO/ r
BUFFER 3
\ WETLAND I 1 Z
/ \ (NO IMPACT) / /�A J
WETLAND F / L�FZ /
/ (NO IMPACT)
\` X100 -YR STORMWATER \ w
\ — 1 I ELEVATION LINE (TYP.) J
211/
PROP. HEADWALLA\
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)
co—)
ROAD CROSSING WILL OCCUR QLd
610 APPOVED WETLAND _j
CL
BOUNIDARIESTHERE ORE NO IMPACT
em"
ooN���oQ \8 I_ 81 (J\\ O)
PROP. PUMP LINE W
\ I EXIST. NON -JURISDICTIONAL
/it�i
�I �I�I POND
W z
�101
II D
� m W �
a
�I ISI i o 0
II N/F LENNAR CAROLINAS LLC
\ II \ PARCEL ID# 21932394CL z
\ �DB 29476 PG 925 I / - w y�ll �
a U ri N di
z ¢w�o r
O
LjL
w
O
Q
m
w
BAR SCALE 1"=100' FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. 0
m
a
M
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON -1 '
o
Z
Q
r
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND av
w
?
iR
w
0 50' 100' Zoo' LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY a Q
Q(/i
w
UC3N
a
0
w

NOTES: I - / .....• ...... ::•::" ............ ::):..............:..
•.. .. ...•
.............. d� b3
...... .......
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT ALL I 14 a s
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO WATERS OF / )
THE STATE TO LESS THAN 90 DAYS. I 1 236 / I
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE
WETLAND/STREAM CHANNELS TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS
�IWETLAND I J / O v
I (TEMP. IMPACT: / 237 o m t
\ \ I I 0.010 AC)
\ I PROP. PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION
\ (NO IMPACTS TO STREAM CHANNEL) c D in z
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TY\.) / / �I _ � o
J
WETLAND F /
(TEMP. IMPACT: \ 238 / Vas
0.003 AC.) 100+1 STORMWATER m Z
ELEVATION LINE (TYP.) / a
/ I
PROP. 15' SAN. SWR. ESMT. �W Q=
/239 Luy
PROP. COFFER DAMS
(OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) I
/ / :::::::: . .:: ....... U
...:..:..
PROP. PUMP``
a
I II I INLET LOCATION::t:::t:t•:•::;•:•:a ::•:•.; .,;,.;.;;t;;:::•:•:• ::t:•:::•:::::::•::•:::::•:::: _ H
l/ i , j l ( 240
�I Lu
7 / \ BUFF RTS D / / / / / / 1 PROP. SAN. SWR. (TY _ I m W a
Fy z
Z p z
_ a
w z
�41 I Y
�mgN
Lu
L O
BAR SCALE V.=60' FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. V m a
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON } z o
J uj !�
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND IL �? Y z w z F
0 30' 60' 120' LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY a Quj
Q (/� U in, a 0 cn

s �a
S�
msCD
:moi 0 0
CDo
4
Tr—
d $
N M
ReMENOMONEE
w
BAR SCALE 1"=40'
600
0 20' 40' 80'
MENOMONEE
U
z
NONE
MMZME3M3M0M
1
��■%iii■rii�fi�Giil��'
ii■
O
Q
U
on
loom
MEMEWEEMEMEEME
Men
Z
W
CL
O
1MM1=M'_MMM
Wloom O
La
F-
�
�W
a
MEN
IMMEMEMMORMENIME
av
v
590
ONE
ME
No
0
EMEME
MEMEMEMOMMEMINE
MEN
aL)
CO)
ON
No
MEMEMIN
MEN
Lu
0
J
M
E�MWAMI
O
0
z
J
Z
a
MEMMIUR
WAL Z
U
a
25" Y
z
Lq
PROP.
CONCRETE
15 CH PIPE JOINT V
J
ANTI
-SEEP
COLLAR (TYP.)ING
METHOD)
l�
r
9 �PROP-
Q
m
w
2
N
0
V/
MENNEN
CONCRETE Z
NE
U
$
r
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR ) O '
580
►�
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
J '
0°
w°°c~,a
>..
z
Q
o
t
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON IL ?�
x
z
w
z
LO
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND d Q
w
0
3
9
w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY Q (/�
L)
a
o
ti
1
��■%iii■rii�fi�Giil��'
ii■

80 /EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
C-5
7�3S, pCCO
B&Fij
R'j
PERENNIAL RPW \l
TRIBUTARY AA
(TEMP. IMPACT: 26 LF) 411
PROP. PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION
(NO IMPACTS TO STREAM CHANNEL)
8
cn
PROP.
/pt�PROP. SAN.\ PROP. COFFER DAMS
77 SWR. w: P.) (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) INLET LOCATION
1 hl
/76
1 �� 1 I �\ j I I I \ ll�; + I lie
NOTES: 016
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT ALL \ 1 I I ISI, III \
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO WATERS OF IN Ilr v I I I
THE STATE TO LESS THAN 90 DAYS. BAR SCALE 1 "=60' FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
WETLAND/STREAM CHANNELS TO PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS 0 30' 60' 120' LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
0
0
z
o" 4.
Ld
so')
OZ
ci
1
Z
LLI
CL
01
w
=3
Lu
<
3:
Lu
Lu
U
Lu
co)
C3
LLI
C6
<
cf)
z
-i
z
0
0
0
CL
0
Z
0
a�
<
CL
Z
Lq
0
aY
a-
<
ca
5
Lu
Cn
Ocr)
Z
U
T—
o
LL
LLJ
Co
w0
C)
<
Lou
Z
IL
Nc
L)
3::
LL,
3
z
—
L,
LL
IL
LLI
=
9
c
w
L,
m
N
000-01co

O :m
♦ _
5901
w W�. w
TRIBUTARY TO
WALKER BRANCH
CHANNELCL
580
I
PROP. CONCRETE
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR (TYP.) 349
I V R1
I I D 7
r7-
- T
570
565
r.-
Ln �
CO co
0
1� N M
�t�OMM N
= ui II
O H
II
Q
eI) o
0
acn�z z
$1_100 YR WSE 584.87
EXIST.
GRADE (TYP.)
PROP. 76 LF 18" STEEL
Z
a
U
a
ENCASEMENT PIPE; T=0.25"
Z
Q■�
a
3 SPIDERS REQ'D AT EACH PIPE JOINT
w
BAR SCALE 1"=40'
Z
(INSTALLED BY TRENCHING METHOD)
Y
V
O
Q
0 20' 40' 80'
H
U
Z
co
m
_ 1.52%
H
a
Q
0
w
Y
N
J
s
a
x
a
z
r
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND n, Q
w
U
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY Q (/�
c=i
Z
a
0
W
IL
o
W O
_a
H
W
N W
=N
v
0
Z
Q U
N
W
C
N
J
IL
z
l
o
PROP. 76 LF 18" STEEL
Z
a
U
a
ENCASEMENT PIPE; T=0.25"
Z
a
3 SPIDERS REQ'D AT EACH PIPE JOINT
LL
Z
(INSTALLED BY TRENCHING METHOD)
Y
V
O
Q
R.35 SAN. SWR.
H
8
co
m
_ 1.52%
H
a
Q
m
0 cn
w
Y
N
07
Z
U
r�
o
LL
x
Lu
O
Q
H
O FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. �=
M
co
m
Z
~
J
0o DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON d
w
Y
z
0
Lu
a
z
r
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND n, Q
w
w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY Q (/�
c=i
0
a
0
co

NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT ALL ` II
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO WATERS OF
THE STATE TO LESS THAN 90 DAYS. ) /
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE
WETLAND/STREAM CHANNELS TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS
CANTERBURY
CASTLE DRIVE
(PROP. 65' PUBLIC R1W)
i— I , ___>
EXIST. PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
I \
l�1 11 I II NII
f I PROP. PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION
(NO IMPACTS TO STREAM CHANNEL)
f I II
I (VIII i� lf
'I
/ II PROP. PUMP
/ 1 / INLET LOCATION -
1/La 11 1 fl
EXIST. WETLAND HH
/(NO IMPACTS)
IT FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
�n LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
m
w Om
LL
W O
� H
m z o Go
m v T
Lu
LU
U C3 0a 0 w
Z
�
0
U
Z
m
0
LLA
a
�
~
a
�
Q
co
J
QJ
y
0
CL
0
a
Lu
m
w Om
LL
W O
� H
m z o Go
m v T
Lu
LU
U C3 0a 0 w

D
z
m
m'v
9;a
00
0.0
r 0
r0
D
�z
n 01
0) 0%1 00 to
576.7 O :. m OO O
I ___r - - __ - -__- - 0+00
ilke.0 ME 0 w w a w 91 a a m 0 1
owbillommsmom moommomom
MEN klq 'mms"NoMmommlibigAmm
v cnO PROP. SSMH
0+72
D p N STA:0+72.43
@ F � rn @ RIM=579.70
CD ca M cn rn r INV. IN=570.70
oz �
a, D v m z m INV. OUT=570.50
���
-+o:5cn
rnDrnm
0M 11
n IJ
pxm0 -4
D�N� =0 0
Af�2d� V z D
r C n N
GCia�m o
am
�m�A m
<0z DZ o
amG'
viz
z_<
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER A
SAW- - - o
CHECKED BY: APG PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER OPEN CUT #3
FISP Aswclate5. P.A.
DRAWN BY: ECB
PROJECTNUMBER: CN13.400 CROSS-SECTION PQ�7�
ORIGINAL DATE: 09/02/2016 -MdL SC WN
SHEET: CHATEAU W
19 OF 19 LENNARCAROLINAS. LLC CHARLOTTE,NC

LA
4-J
GJ
E
V
O
0
O
.4-J
rz
Mitigation
Documents

Mitigation Services
ENVIRON MENTAL QUALITY
Robert Price
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd,
Charlotte, NC 28226
Project: Chateau
NAT MCCRORY
(: orrrnur
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
September 13, 2016
Expiration of Acceptance: March 13, 2017
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.G. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require
compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned
to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
CLI Location I Stream (feet)
(8 -digit HLIC)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non -Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact I Catawba 1 03050103*' 1 0 0 170 0.095 0.08' 0 1 0 1 0
*'The Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area will be utilized for this impact. In accordance with the directive from
the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the mountains and piedmont areas of
North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian wetland mitigation credits and
invoiced using the riparian wetland fee schedule. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for
providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee
Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in
the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
James. B tanfill
Asset agement Supervisor
cc: Len Rindner/Amanda Jones -agent
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 217 W. ]ones Street, Suite 30W
919 707 8976 T

C
O
4-+
M
.E
L-
w w
a--►
w
5w
N
i
jurisdictional
Determination Information

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-00107 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: SC -FORT MILL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Thomas Johnson
Address: 11230 Carmel Commons Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina. 28277
Telephone Number: 704-309-3288
Size (acres) 387.2 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Walker Branch River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 3050103 Coordinates Latitude: 35.08507
Longitude: .98494
Location description: The subiect property Is located at 12420 Hamilton Road. PINS: 21932394.21926112.21904102.21904113
and 21932392.
Indicate Which of the Following ADW -y:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S., including wetlands on the above described project
area/property. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination
is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you
wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also,
you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S., including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely
manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be
verified by the Corps.
® The waters of the U.S., including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. The approximate boundaries of waters of the U.S. are depicted on the enclosed map dated 1/15/2016. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,
provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Plat Date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
Page 1 of 2

❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination
and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or David.L.ShaefferQusace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the aonlicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the proiect area exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S. as defined in 33 CFR
328, Regplatory Guidance Letter 05-05, the JD Guidebook (i.e. Rauanos Guidance), the 1987 Wetland
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 6/17/2016.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
uw�wVVLW 2075Wn
Corps Regulatory Official: �" 1°"�1:594WW °�"
DRc lOMA/.1� 1Y3739-0tVC
Date: 4/18/2016 Expiration Date: 4/18/2021

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.artny.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Amanda Jones
Leonard S Rindner. PLLC, WEPG
Address: 1070 Tunnel Road, Bids! 1
Asheville. North Carolina. 28805
Telephone Number: 828-708-7059

rw
to
Threatened & Endangered Species ~
Report

Wedands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For CHATEAU PROPERTY
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
G7rrloft office:
10611-D Protildence lid.
PIM1.5150
15150
Charlotte. NC 28277
(7" 904-2277
len. eom
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
April 17, 2015
Updated September 26, 2016
www.wedonde-e grown
AWwAlle Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., BW I
Sulee 10. PMB 283
Aaherllle. NC IM
(84 708.7059
nnendLja "wedundi}eP&Mn

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Chateau Property (formerly called Elisha Property) is located just north of
Hamilton Road, east of Steele Creek Road, and just west of the South Carolina
state line in Charlotte, North Carolina. It can be found on the Fort Mill USGS
Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.0925 N, longitude is 80.9760 W. The
topography consists of upland flats grading into gentle to moderate slopes, with
the elevation ranging from 590 to 650 ft. (Figure 1).
Figure 1:
ELISHA PROPERTY
Charlotte, NC
I 1 u
Figure No. LEDNARD S. RIND14ER PLIC
Weiaads & E mfivronm l Hemming Gavp
3714 S pokes have Lane
M9fl(704) 04-2277 05
[phone]
LEN.RINDNER.P[A &mailcom
ELISHAPROPERTY AW: fop:
CHARLOTTE , N C
Rtam RAWAd
Ey:IRG by: ISR
U SGS MAP /
*APpr-te B 9 wmm
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC.
+w
nay
West Fork
Tvdvemile Creek
�,..
`r
�N�•l .y '}.
._.. �_��-
• SITE
�S
tl
Ji
LOCATION
Lat 35.0925'N
USGSQUAD
Lmg 80.9760'W
FORT MILL
HUC:03050103
1:24,000
Figure No. LEDNARD S. RIND14ER PLIC
Weiaads & E mfivronm l Hemming Gavp
3714 S pokes have Lane
M9fl(704) 04-2277 05
[phone]
LEN.RINDNER.P[A &mailcom
ELISHAPROPERTY AW: fop:
CHARLOTTE , N C
Rtam RAWAd
Ey:IRG by: ISR
U SGS MAP /
*APpr-te B 9 wmm
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened and Endangered species
for Mecklenburg County North Carolina (Table 1). Table 1 summarizes
listed/protected species recognized in Mecklenburg County as of April 30, 2015
(Updated September 26, 2016). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled
and the site was investigated on April 14, 17, and 22, 2015
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Database search performed on April 28, 2015 (Updated September 26, 2016)
Group Name
Clams Carolina heelsplitter
(Lasmi_gona decorata)
Flowering Smooth coneflower (Echinacea
Plants laevi ata
Flowering Schweinitz's sunflower
Plants (Helianthus schweinitz@
Flowering Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Plants michauxii
Mammals Northern Long -Eared Bat
(Mvotis septentrionalis)
Birds Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocenhalus)
Status
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
Protected
under the Bald
and Golden
Eagle
Protection Act
Lead Office
Asheville Ecological
Services Field Office
Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office
Asheville Ecological
Services Field Office
Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office
Twin Cities Ecological
Services Field Office
Great Lakes -Big Rivers
Region (Region 3)
Wedands and Environrnenal Planning Group Leonard $. Rlndner, PLLC.

Chateau —Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Three plant species with federal protection were included in the survey efforts:
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzit), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights-of-way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clear cuts, dry limestone bluffs and power line rights-of-way, requiring
abundant sunlight and little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered,
requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species
requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology.
A total of three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially
occurring in Mecklenburg County:
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large
bodies of open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers,
where there are suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and
roosting.
• Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable,
silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas
occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Wndan& and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
RESULTS:
Habitat Descriptions
(Species lists reflect the seasonality of the survey)
The majority of this site is covered with a mosaic of upland old fields and
pastures planted in a monoculture of young Loblolly Pines (Pinus taeda), and
the remainder is a fragmented mix of old fencerows, dirt roads, sewer line rights-
of-way, ponds, timbered woodlots, and disturbed woodlands and scrub/shrub
thickets. There are mixed hardwood buffers along the drainages and creeks.
Roadside habitat borders the property edges along Hamilton Road and Smith
Road.
The disturbed woodland habitat on site is composed of a mixed pine and
hardwood forest with pines dominating the uplands and grading into the
hardwood dominated slopes. Canopy trees present include Shortleaf Pine
(Pinus echinata), Loblolly Pine (P. taeda), Virginia Pine (P. virginiana), White Oak
(Quercus alba), Black Oak (Q. velutina), Red Oak (Q. rubra), Bitternut Hickory
(Carya cordiformis), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), Tulip Poplar (Lidodendron tulipifera), Hackberry (Celtis laevigata),
and Green Ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica), with the average dbh (diameter at
breast height) at 10 inches. Subcanopy trees include Red Maple (Acer rubrum),
Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica), Ironwood
(Carpinus caroliniana), Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Redbud (Cercis canadensis),
Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida), and Black Cherry (Prunus serotina). The
shrub layer includes Strawberry Bush (Euonymus americanus), Blueberry
(Vaccinium sp.), Russian Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) and Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum sinense). Vines present are Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia), Crossvine (Bignonia capreolata), and Muscadine (Vitis
rotundifolia). The herb layer includes Christmas Fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), Spotted Wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata), Bedstraw (Galium
sp.), and Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum).
The roadsides have Fescue (Festuca sp.) shoulders and ditches that are
periodically mowed. The narrow ecotone at the woods and fencerow edges are
made up of Fescue Serecia (Lespedeza cuneata), Broomsedge (Andropogon
virginicus), Dog fennel (Eupatorium spp.), Goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Blackberry
(Rubus spp.), and Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora).
Wetlands and EnvironmenW Planning Group Leonard S. Pindner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Endangered/Protected Species Results
• Although potential habitat exists for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's
Sumac and Smooth Coneflower along the roadside corridor, and woods
edges, examination of these areas revealed no occurrences on-site.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
The on-site streams are either degraded or do not appear to have the
habitat characteristics required to support populations of the Carolina
Heelsplitter. Based on existing documentation, Carolina Heelsplitter
populations have not been previously identified in this basin. No
individuals were observed during the survey nor would any be expected
on-site.
Comparing our site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the northern
long eared bat.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
We recommend further consultation with you and your project planners and
engineers regarding coordination with USFWS and other federal and state
agencies.
Respectfully submitted,
i
K
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
April 30, 2015
Updated September 26, 2016
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained Botanist and has conducted field work and
investigative studies covering thousands of cumulative acres in both North and South
Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997-1998. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, collecting field data and writing reports.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000-2001. Organized, directed,
and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program, collecting field data and writing reports.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 20,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 - present.
• Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of Federally
Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzit).
• Located and identified four previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's
Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This discovery led (in part) to
the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant Conservation
Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has become a Recovery
Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in Mecklenburg,
Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Plamiq Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2: VICINTIY MAP
ELISHA PROPERTY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
�' Mr
4
Pone H—,,,
a
yo
PlneviU
C
cola Hen as
Choate Park ul;
Or Tega Cay
,�!kr•�6+en +• 1`.Hbif11 E V�,�. Sid"3 Neku
Chat, Irl
Q
U
a
a4907 22
PLEASANT GLEN
CATAW BA
VILLAGE BEJ eON KNOLL
FAIR OAKS
u
CAROLAND ACRES 55 GRINIGLEY ON THE HILL
C
Rapt01 Ct HEMINGEORn GREY
2
HAMILTON PLACE
MEL601-r4+c
C 2014 Mcroioh rr rr 1
FIGURE NO. LEO(gARD S. Rl"XER PLLC
Wetlands & Envirmmental Planting 6rot41
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
1704) 904 -2277
LEN.RINONER.PW5*gmdLcw
)LEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
ELISHA SfTE
MECKLEN13URG COUNTY, NC
VICINITY MAP
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
SIFT:
DRAWN
6YLRG IRE MEwEDY L%' B
DATE PAGE
03 74A4.00
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 3: USGS MAP
ELISHA PROPERTY
Charlotte, NC
_ { i•(•Y{ t:Nn�M!47 .nC1�'
i
r. •1...f •'may
rto:
Wet;ands & E whmmr>ial P1amm% Gmup
3714 Spokes have Lane
M&h8 101
(704) ,04 —2 27
(704) 904 —2277
Ra'iewed
by: ISR
LEN.RINDNER.PWS @gn0,com
USGS MAP
*App ute Boundary
affi �l1 /
ju
1�
f �
West Fork
LOCATION
°N
T,tid,.emile Creek
a
t
—
4
_ { i•(•Y{ t:Nn�M!47 .nC1�'
i
r. •1...f •'may
rto:
Wet;ands & E whmmr>ial P1amm% Gmup
3714 Spokes have Lane
M&h8 101
(704) ,04 —2 27
(704) 904 —2277
Ra'iewed
by: ISR
LEN.RINDNER.PWS @gn0,com
USGS MAP
*App ute Boundary
affi �l1 /
LOCATION
°N
USGS QUAD
Lat 35.0925
Long 80.9760 *W
FOkT I''IILL
Scale
HUC: 03050103
1:24,000
w
Fkure No.
LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
rto:
Wet;ands & E whmmr>ial P1amm% Gmup
3714 Spokes have Lane
M&h8 101
(704) ,04 —2 27
(704) 904 —2277
Ra'iewed
by: ISR
LEN.RINDNER.PWS @gn0,com
ELISHAPROPERTY
sem:
rto:
CHARL OTTE, NC
RMS
by:IRG
Ra'iewed
by: ISR
USGS MAP
*App ute Boundary
affi �l1 /
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

.•/, � 6 iii � r
IiA
Ire MEG T1° IiA
W k.G
IAS, F.�....fMz � ?,,,� ,: •.MaG �r'' _
M
vv 't Me
r6[ F F
FA B
c.eG2 ,�AW4► 1
y
ChA`
I t " t L•, IAYEi2 WwE2
F,b6
✓� yVvC Meet '
ail:
y/ 4:

Chateau - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 5: USDA SOIL MAP LEGEND
ELISHA PROPERTY - MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
acldenbury County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit
Map Unit Name
Acres in
Percent of
Symbol
AOI
AOI
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
19.7
0.8%
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
181.3
7.8%
moderately eroded
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
75.1
3.2%
moderately eroded
DaB
Davidson sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
20.2
0.9%
En8
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
31.4
1.3%
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
3.3
0.1%
IrA
Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
111.7
4.8%
IrB
Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes
408.9
17.6%
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
705.0
30.3%
MeD
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
49.7
2.1%
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
235.2
10.1%
flooded
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
59.3
2.5%
Pal'
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
11.4
0.5%
W
Water
16.4
0.7%
WkB
Wilkes loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes
34.9
1.5%
WkD
Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
26.9
1.2%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
1,990.4
85.5%
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC ELISHA PROPERTY- MECKLENBURG I'll 20F 2
Wedurids & Envirsta tental Plstw l 9 Corwo COUNTY, NC caaww tRa kF�Fwrn LSR
BY e'
3714 Spokeshave Imine
Matthews, NC 28105 NRCS SOIL MAP °ATF
\ (704) 904 - 2277 03A)4/74
LEN.RINDNER.PW 409mNl.cwn APPROXIMATE LOCATION
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC.

Chateau — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 6: AERIAL MAP
ELISHA PROPERTY
MECKLEN13URG COUNTY, NC
FIGURE N0 LEONARD S, RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands &Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Mattheva, NC 28105
\ (704 9)4-2277
LENP14Xh [e-mail]
ELISHA PROPERTY sHEEF
IN
sy
MECKLENBURGCOUNTY, NC uPLRG �t®L5R
047E I PAGE
AERIAL MAP I Qp474
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.