20080884 Ver 1_More Info Received_20080529

CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS, INC.
May 29, 2008
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Ovesight/Express Review Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: GRP Inc. Site Grading
DWQ Project # 08-0884
Dear Ms. Karoly;
8208 Brian Ct.; Garner, NC 27529
P:919-606-1065 - F:919-341-4474
The purpose of this letter is to respond to your May 28, 2008 Request for More Information for
the above referenced project. Thank you for your prompt response. Enclosed is the information
you requested including:
Revised PCN form with Table 8 showing the isolated wetland impacts
Figure 5 showing the impact areas that are detailed in the plan set attached to the
application.
If you have any questions regarding the information or responses provided please contact me at
your earliest convenience at [phone].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Philip Senior nviro Scientist JV?k@g?VIAI
Cc: Monte Matthews, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Office mm 2 9 2008
Lauren Witherspoon, NCDWQ Raleigh Regional Office CENR vivo,"'VA0
Alan Manness, P.E., BBM Associates, Inc. fps ANo
Office Use Only: Form Version March 08
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0'a - C) $ $ q
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: IWGP100000
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ? D
II. Applicant Information U ct @ L5
MAY 2 9 2008
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: George R. Perkins, Jr. oENR wArEROUaeRw+G?
Mailing Address: GRP Inc. & Medallion Partners LLC w?tos ° ?0h
P.O. Box 525
Sanford NC 27331
Telephone Number: 919-776-9940 Fax Number: 919-718-5495
E-mail Address: george.perkinsAfrontierspinning.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Phil May
Company Affiliation: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Mailing Address: 8208 Brian Court
Garner NC 27529
Telephone Number: 919-606-1065 Fax Number: 919-341-4474
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: GRP Inc. Site Grading
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): not applicable (n/aj
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9643-13-0710-00 & 9643-03-6347-00
4. Location
County: Lee Nearest Town: Sanford
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): not applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, take US 1 south to
Sanford. Take the Spring Lane exit and take the first right onto Douglas Drive. The site is
on the left after passing the entrance to the car dealership and movie theater.
5. Site coordinates (Lat/Long or decimal degrees): 35.4904 N; -79.1979 W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 23.2
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Big Buffalo Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear; HUC 03030003; DWQ Basin 03-06-11
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The northern portion of the parcel currently contains an
existing industrial building (Cargill plant). The southern portion is undeveloped, consisting
of forested areas and maintained sewer and power line right-of-ways. The surrounding area
Page 6 of 13
is primarily industrial and commercial including movie theater, car dealership, and other
uses.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project includes grading of a portion of the southern portion of the parcel to dispose of fill
material generated from another site owned by GRP, Inc. Standard construction equipment
will be used potentially including bulldozers, graders, and pans. The area will be g[aded to
the contour elevations shown in the attached plans and re-vegetated according to current
erosion control requirements.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to dispose
of fill material from another facility and re-grade the steep slopes directly behind the existing
plant. There are no current plans to develop the site further.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous permits have been applied or granted for this property. A delineation verification
package was sent to the USACE - Raleigh Regulatory Office in December 2007. There has
been no written response to date, although the project has been discussed via phone. Lauren
Cobb of NCDWO verified the status of the isolated wetlands on December 19, 2007.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are currently no plans for the development of the propg!y or expansion of the plant.
Future development potential is limited due to the presence of the sewer and power line
easements on the southern portion of the site. Any future development of the project would
likely require a driveway entrance across the 404-jurisdictional stream south of the property and
therefore require an additional permit application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
Page 7 of 13
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No impacts to Waters of the
US are proposed for this proiect.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Fill Isolated No 116 0.03
2 Fill Isolated No 227 0.22

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.25
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.26 (inc. isolated)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
Page 8 of 13
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

I Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resultine from the nroiect:
Stream Imp act acres): 0
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact (acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The isolated waters on site are two small man-made depressions formed alone the maintained
right-of-way(ROW) of the power line crossing the site. These herbaceous wetland areas are
dominated by typical invasive species such as cattails. Due to the location of these wetland
areas in the center of the site, it is difficult to re-grade without impacting the areas. Total
impacts will be 0.25 acres of fill.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Page 9 of 13
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed impacts are unavoidable as the are located in the center of the southern portion of
the site. GRP Inc. cannot dispose of their excess fill material without purchasing another
property, which is an unreasonable expense given that they already own the subject property.
The fill material must be removed from the other project rontier Spinning to comply with
their sediment and erosion control permit. The grading will also allow for a safer slope behind
the plant.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htm 1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 10 of 13
No compensatory mitigation is required as the only impacts are to a small amount of isolated
wetlands.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within I5A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
Page 11 of 13
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* I (--'mpact .? I Multiplier I Required
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total 0 0
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. n/a
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The existing impervious areas consist of the
Cargill plant on the northern portion of the site. There will be no increase in impervious surface
as a result of this gmding_project. The area will be re-vegetated according to standard NC
erosion control requirements. No new stormwater discharges will be created
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No additional wastewater will be generated by this project
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Page 12 of 13
The purpose of the project is to dispose of fill material and re-grade the slopes behind the plant
This activity is not expected to generate additional development in the area The development
potential of the site is limited by the presence of power line and sewer easements on the property
Adjacent parcels are already as commercial or industrial facilities
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

N
l17
N
\ o I \ I (0 LL
1 L1?
y U co
t5 C: CD
CL ca (7)
06
\ \? N
az
F-
L ?
a
fu d l
LL C? to;
U)
i
CD
N (fl ) \\ A?i
N O ?? \\\
1
LL
m
/i \ )\ \\
?caa)
i
a
(D Co CC
N? \ ?oN
O
a) IX
t?
coo , ?- -- ? o
0 U)
w. Q cY)
cc In (1)
L m /- z
0
o ?
LL 0 i