20070834 Ver 1_Fisher River Mitigation Bank (5)_20080313

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s) 0i J?
Date of Report: JO--r) Report for Monitoring Year: 572?07-77)
Date of Field Review: 5 - I Cc - C )A Evaluator's Name(s):-TJ I L,u/ LID
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: Lr1 J (-1 u 1 C= (---:: )
Weather Conditions (today & recent): JA )rt r nnTy? j Y (? ?? b( ?C C t ,?« cti
Directions to Site: site located on east side of SR1338 (Fisher Valley Rd) adjacent to the west side of the Fisher River in Bryan
and Franklin Townships, approx. 5-6m NW of Dobson in Surry Co, NC
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20070834
Project Name: Fisher River Mitigation Bank
County(ies): Surry
- Project History
Event Event Date
Basin & subbasin: Yadkin 03040101
Nearest Stream:.
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery
DOT Status: DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 34.5 acres
Stream: 4752 linear feet
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? 0 No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site:
Report Review - Wetlands
Report Review - Streams
3/22/2007
3/22/2007
to/o2
ii
*Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): -OT- _NIAC C d r, ceived -construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and a aluate each co ponent based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
11. Summary of Results:
ry -?: X4.7 5 2 = 10 : I s?df_- cb ?tl era ??z ? ??d?r
Monitorin Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) Resolved
20070834-1 4752 linear feet Stream (Perennial) ??.,(it0n 6
20070834-2 34.5 acres Wetland 'I G _T 4C
ULt'L?L O .'?_ ? C.1" e 0 •? J !?-C .._ ?? ? . Off? Cl
cc-.
6D 28 xol_:?
L,A ),JJj c? CAN Wit. 0.31 cLL
Cb _J i _e,4 c -r• 0,9 G C,- C. cA-U-o r' , cdnUt
?a< ,» _ Li.U'J?W- ia-i r-iJ ? I I
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 4752 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Component ID: 20070834-1
Description:
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
STREAMBANK STABILITY - Approved Success Criteria:
Are streambanks stable? Yes No
If no, provide description and notes regarding stability issues:
STRUCTURES - Approved Success Criteria:
List all types of structures present on site:
Are the structures installed correctly? Yes No
Are the structures made of acceptable material? Yes No
(Unacceptable materials include: railroad ties, concrete with rebar, etc.
Are the structures located approximately where shown on the plan? Yes No
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes No
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
FEATURES - Approved Success Criteria:
Are riffles and pools in approximately the correct locations Yes No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? Yes No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the thalweg Yes No
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel bars,
downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
AQUATIC BIOTA - Approved Success Criteria:
Is aquatic life present in the channel? Yes No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of biota. Include a brief
description of the sampling methodology.
List any remaining aquatic biota issues to address (e.g. erosion, discharges or toxicants, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of vegetation,
etc.):
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
'Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
i
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Use the definitions in the joint state/federal stream mitigation guidelines to determine the correct type of
mitigation used for this component.
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important stream features.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 34.5 acres Wetland Component ID: 20070834-2
Description: t?4LQ t + 6L-kA " "Shrvb L> ( ?,c?S2>?
Location within project:
Ill. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
saturation to within 12" ofsuuggce for 5-12.5% of GS Inundated
OJA U_XXLS ` ADUY " ` CA AL ? Saturated in upper 12 inches
, cJUCr? `?? *ju L,1 Z (-p ?]
Monitoring report indicates success 'L>" No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
to kow ". %-(w -A{) U 2CDU + -2,00'7
ObJt" ? ? an SAS w 9O-LfdLo 3 +- 0 (1%-t0- 5°/o ix 20LrJ) c 5% u'V '0(,x) LOC S ?t ?rOL'q ?cx ?f?Cl
l xLpU-crk ?o c,,.4LQ_J_{ z dam-- dto -Ott t j C? 7S. G ?¢ Cz ^? C 5( 1 r?WLC a(tl rt?r?
CALU x_
SOILS -Approved Success Criteria: ?f?? ?"
S 1 tU?Le 1?en ?n r-e SF air ?? use U?? h.Cw?
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? a No r, u.YW 3 ra_dtiat mn- tea)
1
List indicators of hydric soils: , - - re _2
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland a eas, etc.):
J
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
survival of 260spa after 5yrs with no single species Species Story TPA/'/ cover
comprising more than 20/0 of surviving stems 7j°XD 61?C
Monitoring report indicates success? Q No
Average TPA for entire site ;up ? , l
(per report): 1, w ol., 0,_0_A-t?D0_PJZ0CIL
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site?
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully?
Yes No
Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
c v e a?.? o.? nd? pU* 2 ( loin A'-e-c c-1-) -4 -) , -1 +- 9 C l c?g?? 8l c¢ U--3
CphoA-os s1-ouo dt qe-A b' r'tj
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) -Page 1 of 2l

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
-
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

f
V
(7
C \
N t
C??J
C
r

-13 „Z
v?o
? v rn
N N
< (D
< 0
N ~'
ct ?
ct
73 =1
n
N ?
S ?
3
S
`s o
Ln r-f-
v ZS
?LZ
zs
c
TT
\V

® O
0 F- v'
C v
O L
C r
O ? r
0 3 n z

> x
m
o Vj
rn
° o o o
G) ?° -fp z

rn

r
r- 3 N
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Caroline 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fu: [phone]
-.EC...
F- f
F- f-
0>0
00
7
FTI
-? J)
-{ P'
CO
O
0 O
0
Z
° 00
m 0
D
r
u
1
W
0
0

FISHER RIVER
WETLAND MITIGATION BANK
SURRY COUNTY, NC I AMERICAN WETLANDS
Sheet Title:
AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 1/29/03 PKS MONITORING WELLS
DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED PLANT SURVIVABILITY PLOT-9
REVISIONS
Project No.:
6169
Designed: Drawn:
JMO MM, PK5,
LGT
Scale:
1 "=300'
Sheet No.:
I of