20061334 Ver 2_Mitigation Evaluation_20080319

Zool.e 1334 v.2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: `; - ci-2t-Y-)8 Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: 'a- Kai - 200h
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: From US 64 in Rocky Mount, go north on US 301 Bypass for 7.5 mi. to E. Battleboro Ave ., which becomes
Battle boro-Leggett Rd. Left on Morningstar C
o....--- r...... .-I
n...;....s ;..........w? h. Rd. to Benson Farm Rd. Turn left onto d irt road across from
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20061334 Project Histor y
Project Name: Harrell Site
Event
Event Date
County(ies): Edgecombe
j Re
ort Recei
t: Miti
ation Pl
n
4/4/2007
Basin & subbasin: Tar-Pamlico 03020101 p
p
g
a
Application Review -Wetlands 4/10/2007
Nearest Stream: Swift Creek Application Review - Streams 4/10/2007
Evaluator's Name(s)s_. W ? -Ot- LkA-Z)T%J }6A-L,
s
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; NSW
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 15 acres
Stream: 6987 linear feet
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and Ill.
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20061334-1 1265 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration
20061334-2 5722 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 2
I
20061334-3 15 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration
1C? k t. kx1--c-Lif Y"e. VA -2u0lJ? 4,0 c a-_? C ?k
?c>J c. F? c u-1 uJ ?,. _ C? u? ?v? o? Q -nC1 -R NCO . l
(moo. a. 3 I?ZAO"J -?- C ,i1
`Version 1. 0?(August n2?2 2 7) Page 1 ?1 cle f 1S ??C P 7 C 0 x (V C ? / A-3 90- -- (,_ orA,C_AcV,,k_
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 15 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration Component ID: 20061334-3
Description: Coastal Plan Small Stream Swamp
Location within project: North of stream
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
(R LOGY --Approved Success Criteria: i Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Inundated ?r..
? Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? es No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
I
Dominant Plant Species
Species Sto?y TPAI'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report): rt X+ f'Y1L?1Z r P
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No N
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No 1
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 1 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM -Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techni s: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates suc es Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis result this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCW issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful artially succes ful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): ?--Qr cep
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 2 of 2