20060830 Ver 1_Emails_20061004

Ze: 06-0830 Glendalough SD
Subject: Re: 06-0830 Glendalough SD
From: Alan Johnson <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:17:09 -0400
To: Laurie Dennison <laurie [e-mail]>
The actual number is 3078 (if you add up the impact). somehow I added (probably a
mistroke) 5 additional feet. and I don't know where they got the 2988. Between
the correct value of 3078 and 2988 is 90 ft. could be a change in design and the
numbers got cross. So make it easy, change BIMS to 3083. The additional 5 feet can
be riprap. impacts are to mostly unimportant stream/ditches. If not I can send out
a corrected letter for the 5 ft.
Laurie Dennison wrote:
Please explain the written approval letter dated 9/26/06 for stream impacts of
3,083 if vs what was shown in the PCN of 2,988 lf?
Thanks!
Laurie
Alan Johnson - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
of 1 10/4/2006 2:22 PM
RE: 06-0830 Glendalough SD
Subject: RE: 06-0830 Glendalough SD
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:48:49 -0400
To: Alan Johnson <[e-mail]>
Please explain the written approval letter dated 9/26/06 for stream impacts of 3,083
if vs what was shown in the PCN of 2,988 lf?
Thanks!
Laurie
1 of 1 10/3/2006 2:49 PM