20051680 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20080509

200 5 1 tpgo

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: `-?-I(o- oa Evaluator's Name(s): - i
Date of Report: - 2 ? Report for Monitoring Year: ?4, IP Ci._r".-
Date of Field Review: 1 1 - (D t"S Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: located in western Bertie Co. on east side of NC Hwy 11 just north of NCSR 1108 south of Lewiston-Woodville
adjacent to Roquist Pocosin, Roquist Creek, Jack's Creek, and Indian Creek
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20051680 Project History
Project Name: Roquist Wetland Restoration ??ttr, ?(rl rCC_'C?
County(ies): Bertie t, t ??-
Basin & subbasin: Roanoke 3010107, rte
Nearest Stream: Jack's Branch
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: ?5,,?
Mitigator Type: EEP/WRP
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 3M -ate acres
Stream:
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20051680-1 -acres Wetland Restoration( 2 3'l? lFCLC
U3 t?eS? c • ( pmX -.e Z
re-.gin mck-, LaA._ cCA C'c ?1? e ` ?\t?x - \k-(A c c`mmur\ ,, . ?
?i-i i? tit. 5?.? • ??5?
0-C
-. ? cvc???11" (>C1 5 c?.c, ? t\Lc?r12tV FU-• +Ck3c'? ?"?J
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
< uLrf- tkj } , 1 c., "J-- L" l k t- «,nS
d_ -CLUB G`` Lkn `ae-c#?CY1
i? ?-rt-e ok I cC_C? hen u? ???Lln -
c 4he-__1 /1 (Ee? ?_ (_? ? ter
ct -C,
fn c
' 40
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 3926 acres Wetland Restoration Component ID: 20051680-1
Description: mostly Nonriverine Swamp Forest & Wet Hardwood Forest with some Mixed Mesic Hardwood F
Location within project: entire project
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
when sat. soil occurs within 12" of ground's surface for minimum ?Inundated
of 12.5% of GS, or if the hydroperiod in rest. areas is within 20% ?Saturated in upper 12 inches
of reference wetlands hvdrooeriod durina dro conditions
Monitoring report indicates success Ye No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? a No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? a No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: na Sc V ?rC? ?1C??? CC?tY1 ?k? l?t?'v?
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No mCi'1=l Q-cb c.i-i Cs J
List indicators of hydric soils: ?pJD C - `F, 0 V'Vl t)
'
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
min. mean dens. of 320 stems/acre of approved target sp. Species Story TPp c ver
surviving for 1 st 3 years, to decrease by 10% yearly after 3rd t r, ,??,? ?` . - ?.h1(?t .Su ; rCS? a 1?,Cc ((?1c!?j?
`
`?
year to 290 stems/acre year 4 and 260 stems/acre for year 5 1
CIS?I
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No +U-n t Cam- ?? ?u ?

y- , Average TPA for entire site (per report):

c ,
grCC_nkoriCIr Arcs ( C tru+?, v?
ii
("C>_C' JR-M +i'1CACJ C I'lo-ifl?e?
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
?
r3 ,ec?!
tJLNyXQ.Iv. Lcet I ?? ?t s? ?;rn,t?-?c? (rug c??{hQ?r
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
0
Sir J
C C
.
c Vegetation planted on site? Yes No 7
'?
Date of last planting: ?E c? n? + C de r CU c, rte. a?
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes. No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
4
'lC
Estimated a
=age
or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):

List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
f
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Na WAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques:
? NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? esf No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this rep Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to addres (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful p t succe ful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
i
I
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
I '
J
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
J'V cap ?!7 v? ill
r?.. - S Cv' 0 CA_
-? 1z=Le S {? ?3?5 LA C_
tae 12m
rt C-) Cf J
G r vd . X4;11 ?dti &C-t au r rC-1 P?Akd
. yl_- C_s wee' cic)G) LU-0
?
y
set-
iM
uo
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) C'V lk? ? Page 2 of 2
S M -0 U ?wCvdZA c p- 4t v I V4\_CLC l V-d f