20080774 Ver 1_Application_20080505

su_ ??i ST
ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 29, 2008
if,
N' ?14
W. LYNDO TIPPETI-L./Y
SECRETARY
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 UA7 7
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer ®°'
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit # 14 (Linear Transportation Project)
NCDENR DWQ 401 WQC 3704
SR 1404 (Morganton Road) From Sycamore Dairy road to SR 1596 (Glensford
Drive), Cumberland County, Division 6, STIP-4756
State Project No. 8.2473 Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-2116(1)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct roadway
improvements along SR 1404 (Morganton Road) and replace Bridge No. 228 over All-American
Freeway in Fayetteville, Cumberland County. Roadway improvements will include adding an
additional lane to Morganton Road in each direction from Sycamore Dairy Road to SR 1596
(Glensford Drive). The proposed project is approximately 0.4 mile long and is scheduled for
letting in September 2008.
This permit application consists of the cover letter, Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) form, a
project vicinity map (Figure 1), topographic map (Figure 2), site photographs, permit drawings
and the Categorical Exclusion document approval signature page. A bridge/culvert hydraulic
design report and Federal Emergency Management Agency compliance letter are not applicable
for Bridge No. 228 because it is located over the All-American Freeway.
Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to the need to extend an existing
95"x67" CMPA 24 linear feet. The installation of the culvert extension will impact an unnamed
tributary to Buckhead Creek (aka Buckland Creek). Originally, the project was designed with a
wall to reduce the length of the slope along Morganton Road. Due to the skew of the 95'x67'
CMPA, the wall was not feasible and it was determined that the culvert needed to be lengthened
to accommodate the slope. Mitigation is not proposed for this minor impact.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 - Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]
A Nationwide Permit #7 was issued for an outfall culvert August 15, 2007 under Corps of
Engineers Action ID: SAW 2007-02145-026. Rapanos Forms were submitted in the PCN for the
original authorization.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this project, please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS, NCDOT Division 6 Environmental Officer at [phone].
Sincerely,
James J' Rerko, PWS
l Division 6 Environmental Officer
CC: Brian Wrenn (7 copies)
Ken Averitte (1 copy)
Greg Burns
Office Use Only:
Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. 2 DWQ NO. 0 8 0 7 7 4
.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14, MC 3704
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NC Department of Transportation. Hi hwa Division 6
Mailing Address: Attn: Gres Burns P E
P.O. Box 1150
Fa Ateville NC 28302
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
_(910) 437-2577
E-mail Address:jzburns(a dot state nc us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Cind Simpson Carr
Company Affiliation: Mulkey Engineers & Consultants Inc
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 33127
Raleigh. NC 27636-3127
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:-[phone]
E-mail Address: ccan(a?mulkevinc com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SR 1404 (Morganton Road From Sycamore Dairy Road To SR 1596
f lensford Drive) Fayetteville Cumberland County NCDOT Division 6
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): STIP U-4756
State Project No 8.2473501
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town:Fayetteville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Business (Bus .1
I-95MS 301 south of Fayetteville, exit to Owen Drive n rthbound ecomes All American
Freeway at Bus US 401 intersection approx. 3.5 miles Continue nort hward on All
American Freeway to the Morganton Road exit approximately 2 miles north of Bus US 401
intersection.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.066718° °N 78.9551580 °W
6. Property size (acres): Project acreage: 23.33
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Buckhead Creek (aka Buckland Creek)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River subbasin 03-06-15 USGS HUC 03030004
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project is located at the Morganton Road interchange
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9
with the All American Freeway. At this location, the Morganton Road bridge (No 228) and
roadway are multi-lane urban facilities with extensive commercial development along both
sides of the road The bridge spans a roadway and not jurisdictional resources Land
adjacent to the facilities have numerous commercial buildings and extensive areas of paved
narking lots and driveways
The closest named stream is identified as Buckhead Creek on the USGS 7.5-minute
topographic man for Fayetteville but NCDWQ GIS stream data shows the channel as
Buckland Creek. An unnamed tributM UI) to Buckhead Creek originates in the southeast
quadrant of the Morganton Road and All American Freeway interchange where an existing
pipe crosses under Morganton Road The UT flows downstream for approximately 460
stream feet to a double box culvertthat crosses under the All American Freeway. A
stormwater pipe located approximately 50 feet upstream of the box culvert drains from an
adjacent shopping center parking lot into the UT A narrow riparian buffer of loblolly pine,
red maple, sweet gum, and tulip poplar grows along the slope above the stream channel In
this location, the UT Buckhead Creek is severely degraded and filled with trash
Photos are attached.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Bridge
replacement and roadway construction will use typical equipment such as track hoes dump
trucks cranes paving machines and rollers The project will build an extra roadway lane in
each direction along Morganton Road and will replace the existing Bridge No 228 with a
new structure. All roadway work will be constructed within the existing right-of-way
boundaries.
Consideration was given to using a retaining wall at the existing 95"x67' corrugated metal
pipe arched paved pipe (CMPA) but due to the severe skew angle created between the
CMPA and the proposed retaining wall and an abnormally long span of over the existing
culvert, it was not feasible. The existing CMPA will be extended 24 linear feet b addin a
special junction box and pipe CMPA extension (Site 2) However, 2.1 slopes have been used
to minimize the impacts to the stream
As part of the stormwater control system for the new bridge, an 18 inch diameter
corrugated steel pipe (CSP) will be installed in the southeast Quadrant of the interchange,
located east of the exit ramp roadway. This pipe will carry stormwater flows from the new
bridge and will drain to UT Buckhead Creek approximately 28 feet downstream of the
CMPA. To prevent erosion of the channel at the pipe outlet approximately 6 linear feet of
rip-rap will be placed in the channel Site 1 This part of the project was permitted
previously under NWP7 (Action ID# SAW-2007-02145-026) with notification to the NC
Division of Water Quality.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The roadway widening and new bridge
construction will provide additional traffic capacity at a heavily congested interchange The
special junction box and CMPA extension Site 21 is needed for the roadway lane and
shoulder widening. The 18-inch CSP (Site 1) will provide stormwater drainage control for
the new Bridge No 228 structure The rip-Lap placed in the UT will prevent erosion of the
channel at the pipe outlet
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A NWP 7 was issued under Action ID SAW-2007-02145-026 on August
15, 2007 for impacts related to construction of the 18-inch CSP Site 1) for stormwater drainage
It is unknown if any previous permits were issued for this project
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: _ The existing 95"x67" CWA
will be extended 24 linear feet b adding a s ecial 'unction box and CMPA paved -pi -Re
extension in the channel (Site 21 Approximately 6 linear feet of rim rap will be placed in the
channel to prevent erosion from an 18-inch diameter CSP (Site 1): this impact was previously
permitted under Action IDSAW-2007-02145 026
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Dis
tance
to Area of
Site
Number
Type of Impact
(e.g•, forested, marsh,
100-year :
earest
Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Floodplun trea
in
(acres)
es/no) ear feet)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Wetland Impact (acres) N/A
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream
Average Stream
Impact
Number
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Width Before
Impact Impact
Length Area of

I
(indicate on Intermittent? (linear mpact
) feet) (acres)
1:7 Site 1 was previously permitted and is not included with this application.

2 UT Buckhead
Creek Junction Box and
Pipe Extension Perennial Less than 3 feet 24 Less than
0.001 ac.

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 24
<0.001
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
3iteVNumb?er Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
(if applicab le Type of Impact
(indicate on maul ) (lake, pond, estuary' sound, bay, p
Im act
.
N/A N/A I N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the IT c
.. -M111
am Impact (acres): Ll E%A
< 0.001
PWetand
lIm act (acres : N/A
n Water Im act acr N/A
al Impact to Waters of the U. S. (acres) < 0.001
Total Stream Impact linear feet): 24
N/A
N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.- Impacts can not be avoided
because use of a retaining wall above the existing_CMPA paved pipe would cross at an
abnormally long skew. The fill material for the exit ramp creates a steep slope adjacent to the
highway and to UT Buckhead Creek thereby restricting the area available for discharge of
stormwater drainage Minimization measures include using 2:1 slopes and a segment of
retaining wall along Morganton Road to reduce the slope angle
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed because the channel is severely degraded and filled with trash
and impacts are minimal (241inear feet)
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
IX.
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
X.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or .0260. N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.. Existing impervious surface acreage 9 43 acres
New impervious surface acreage: 11.70. Total project acreage: 23.33 acres All stormwater
controls are per approved NCDOT and NCDENR design standards
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9
XI. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes [] No
XH. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This
project is a roadway improvement and bridge replacement project High-density commercial and
urban development currently surrounds the project area This project will not contribute to or
cause future development.
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Natural resource field investintions were conducted in compliance with SEPA and NEPA
requirements. There are no protected species located in the project area

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

W ETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUM MARY
D IMP AC S 0
AC W 11
1 I S

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) an
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
Impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1 Previouslype rm itted under Action ID #
2 -L- 49+88 RT Culvert Extension
<0.01
24

TOTALS :
<0.01 24.000
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 1404 (MORGANTON ROAD) AND
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 22B
OVER SR 1 007 ALL AMERICAN FREEWAY
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT No. STP-1 404(9)
WBS No. 39750.1.1
T.I.P. PROJECT No. U-4756
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

SUBMITTED BY
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
For further information contact:
Michael Summers, Project Manager
Bridge Maintenance Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1565 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1565
[phone]
/ 3 ?Da
Date of Approval illichael Summers, Project Manager
North Carolina Department of Transportation
/Xo
Date of Approval John F. Sullivan III, P.E., Division Administrator
/ Federal Highway Administration
DENOTES FILL
NAD 83-x- ?9?•5? ® IN SURFACE WATERS
Ex ?? 10.00 7
Ri , 103.63 i DETaLA•
' MON - ILF RNMor N CAU)
A TRI-PLAYER INVESTENENTS, L.L.C. ?? ro
DB 4453 PG 600 / `;" ?;F<,? F s Fr.
? `, ? J 9h. I i Fr.?.
I Z \3 ME OF U11 - cuss r RW-W
EY. R/W ue n+?sa:am
l i F >., 110.00
BEGIN RETAR
-L- 50+60
SPECIAL JB
/ Z i SEE DETAIL SHEET 2 i E
-H
65 -BL- ST
9s?x \?-' SITE 2 - 6)n ELEV
66
RIP RAP IN CHANNEL m
f R X. ; SEE DETAIL `A'
R MoN EST• 3 TONS RIP RAP> ?'
i ?q/N r EST. 3 SY FIL. FAB.- /
OS??? ?P - SITE 1
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
RPA- POT Sta.10*00.00
CB ?? CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
EST.3 TONS
q? EST. 10 SY FIL. FAB. STATE BANK 9
\ DB 3255 PG 397
R,
RETAIN EXIS
TIE TO \ DITCH
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
'ENGLISH
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PLAN VIEW PROJECT: 32782.1.1 (U-4756)
J BRIDGE NO.228 OVER
SCALE: 1": 50' ALL-AMERICAN FREEWAY
ON SR 1404 (MORGANTON RD.)
SHEET OF 04/ 21/ 2008
II-475b
The CMP will be retained and a retaining wall built along Morganton Road to avoid impacts to this
part of the channel.
1. Unnamed tributary to Buckhead Creek (UT1) located on south side of Morganton Road in SE
quadrant of bridge. View is looking upstream at CMP under road.
2. About 50 feet downstream of the CMP shown in Photo 1. View looking upstream at trash and
debris in channel.

3. About 100 feet downstream of the CMP shown in Photo 1. This is the approximate area where

4. View is looking upstream (northward) from double-barrel culverts shown in next photo. Parking
lot stormwater pipe is shown along right edge of photo. New 18" storrwater pipe will be
located upstream of tree line shown in this photo.

} wA
'?wK
q-P
kit'
.u?.tf. f W
5. Culvert inlet for UT1 which flows under the All American Freeway, just south of Morganton
Road and Bridge No. 228. View is looking downstream. Photo taken approximately 50 feet
south of previous Photo 2.
ppllcelloll JUl J

In Santc •0 '? LJUirgton -r2alr gn
RDSpring Lake
C
f
? t
T ? AMDtEWS
?
S NER `-r^"
0U ft }D r ..lip ¦ ?\ O. \?__
¢0
13
NONF rcup? 6
?c
401
` ?
G¢ Aa
It <C¢ r C`,, OAyfA //l/1Mw•Mil:n ¢O" w
+ A. ! CaJfwge }
NA ti F
O !
:
-
¦
x P
Rf rr
•ATA.`f!
RD
.
3
?
?
^
.aa
)I o )
R ?RD
97 rar, straw
, 6ea' /•
v w it J
ye
Arh a
E
p
?
?• D lake 4°Rnxr = ? ?
11 n €
J
Sw
R
Horn6aa ursOR I T
?y
1? ?l 0¢
s" ?i \.iI.I
LrtRa
l? 4
?` " ?. ?'"
f r
te Donne v d„
Bonn
"> : i
?

o ,J-
p

a
Il +
Project Location
D. i
`
etteville
;
?
S
?
~
AO - _
RR_Fi U11? D. ' J inA
j !
l c

a R C r iiafn f F y? \
\

- }LA
`l
i .le C UM¢C
pll.li AS
,4b
\
``
? C
R J ? i s
S
? v Vy f°\ j j s a ? tf +,9 l
¢° ?
AD.
81 ¢D ?,
V
R
d
C
b
TC
um
e
3
o z y
f .72
6
210
?
??
/
r7 of .. RD
Rb. }D" 0 1P.
fCf
11 \Cy
p
y ?
n 0
1
t/ MpEM ADCRFJIM t ope Mil 1a "rr t ®
F?r sk \Rrs°s "1
r°, ???
,_
l ¢? C // __ R G,3V'S Po'
O
a
+a
\
?
.
r.,tp¦
Creep 53
z
T? r akr ?'2
r
•
_
A,?,/?y R
Q 1. t }(hu NJA ! v ° a -- TOM a_ aA HEN
S
' m
? ? t a 4o I ; /
r.rtet
t

` 0 v.
Fso
ti
Faye iN
Tnlr-rw-a; .?f Iraf?thUrv.'?
yetteville
t`
`C
Ofw
`\
,
dH
Ir
4r

Map Not To Scale
A
"
B
'
? o
C U M
R L A N D
',_E
- . i
- ?Nr or n?µ9o?`?
Cumberland County
TIP PROJECT NO. U-4756
I
IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 1404 (MORGANTON RD.)
AND REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 228
OVER SR 1007 (ALL AMERICAN FREEWAY)
f Figure No. 1

(rive -in Q
T hea ter
f
_j .

`atn Ground
}

r i \ 1
? :j? CAN ?
J
....._. s

i
, W `• I
t

,Y
Nil
k

y7cFHn
-
ii
t) ? ?, yr• ?1
. ?! ?_1??6
F

.4 •

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet
124,000 Figure No.
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Quadrangle: Fayetteville PROJECT TOPOGRAPHY
Created 1957 (Photorevised 1987) Contour Interval 10 Feet
U-4756 Morganton Road, Fayetteville
? Replace Bridge No. 228 over All American Freeway
Cumberland County, North Carolina