20080612 Ver 1_Emails_20080505

[Fwd: Pinehurst No. 7 - Corps]
Subject: [Fwd: Pinehurst No. 7 - Corps]
From: Ken Averitte <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 08:26:51 -0400
To: Lia Myott <[e-mail]>
Lia,
FYI.
Like she says, this is not really a typical stream "restoration". In my mind, it
should be more of a NW13 with some deviations, but the corps wants to do a NW39.
Anyway, I'll do comments on BIMS whenever it gets back to working.
thanks
Ken
Subject: Pinehurst No. 7 - Corps
From: "Jennifer Freeman" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:57:39 -0400
To: "Ken Averitte" <[e-mail]>
Ken,
I spoke with Emily today about the Pinehurst No. 7 project. She feels it will be best covered under a
NWP 39 for the Corps' purposes, citing the likelihood that we will have to remove more than 25 cu. ft. of
sediment from the pond and that NWP 27 would generally cover traditional restoration projects. (We
discussed that this is a bit of a'band-aid' or repair, rather than something that would increase the overall
aquatic resource).
I just wanted to let you know if the NWP change on the Corps' part in case that affects the DWQ review
in any way. Can you please pass this on to central office personnel? Lia Myott? I've never seen her
signature on a letter before, so she's new to me...never worked with her.
Also, I put my letter response to the DWQ letter in the mail today .... it should arrive Monday or so.
I'll be local until next Thursday, off Friday, then I'm out of state working for a month.
Jennifer M. Archambault **Please note the name change.**
Wildlife Biologist
Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc.
Environmental Consultants
515 - F Midland Road
Southern Pines, NC 28387
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (mobile)
Pinehurst No. 7 - Corps.eml Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Encoding: 7bit
I of 2 5/5/2008 9:09 AM
[Fwd: Pinehurst No. 7 - Corps]
2 of 2 5/5/2008 9:09 AM