20061804 Ver 3_Individual_20080501

oto - 180 v3
soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, Notch Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
' May 1, 2008
S&EC Project # 6658.W4
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Thomas Brown Attn: Cyndi Karoly
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Ste. 105 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 AtH PAID
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Bob Zarzecki & Debbie Edwards
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road U LE7 (� Do Raleigh, NC 27614 t`
Re: The Village at Flowers Plantation, Clayton, NC MAY 1 2008
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION
AID No. 200320491 & 200320493; DWQ Project #2006-1804v2 LA1D8gNWSTORR�WAUTY
WETBRANCH
Please find attached a complete application and supplemental information from Rebecca Flowers
of River Dell Company, Inc. requesting an Individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) and an Individual Certification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). Please contact Bob or Debbie at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PRn IGrT ci innneeDV
Project Name
The Village at Flowers Plantation
Project Type
Residential & Commercial Development
Owner / Applicant
River Dell Company, Inc. Attn: Rebecca Flowers
County
Johnston
Nearest Town
Clayton, NC
Waterbody Name
Mill Creek, UT to Mill Creek & UT to Buffalo Creek
River Basin /USGS Cataloging Unit
Neuse / 03020201
Index Number
03-04-02, 27-39; 03-04-02, 27-57-16- 3
Class
WS4V, NSW; C, NSW
mnpArT ci 1&AhAADV
Stream Impact (acres):
0.265 (Permanent)
0.042 (Temporary)
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.122 (Permanent)
0.005 (Temporary)
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.387 (Permanent)
0.047 (Temporary)
1,439 (Permanent)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
220 (Temporary)
(Total Permanent Impacts -Important =
1,023; Unim ortant =416
r ttGu1 u 1 ivi ua.
Individual Permit Application Form, Block Sheets & Supplemental Information
$570 Application Fee to DWQ
CC: Lauren Witherspoon, NCDENR DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION
Individual Permit Application
S&EC, PA Project No. 6658.W4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................. 3
2. INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION.........................................................................
4
3. BLOCK SHEETS..........................................................................................................
6
4. MITIGATION PLAN & NCEEP ACCEPTANCE.........................................................
27
5. PUBLIC INTEREST FACTORS.................................................................................
31
6. VICINITY MAPS.........................................................................................................
36
7. OVERALL SITE PLAN & IMPACT MAPS.................................................................
41
8. PHOTOGRAPHS OF IMPACT AREAS.....................................................................
74
9. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & DIFFUSE FLOW CALCULATION..................90
Attachements
1) Johnston County letter .
2) NCDWQ Neuse River Buffer letters (NBRRO 03-057 & NBRRO 03-058)
3) NCDWQ Intermittent/Perennial letter (IPPRO 08-013)
4) Engineering Justification and Exhibit
5) Johnston County Subdivision Ordinance
6) NHP & OSA Search Report
Page 2 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION May 2008
Individual Permit Application S&EC, PA Project No. 6658.W4
Executive Summary
The proposed project, The Village at Flowers Plantation, entails the infrastructure (i.e.
roads) that will support the residential and commercial development of property currently
owned by the applicant, River Dell Company, Inc. totaling ± 1200 acres. However, this
1200 acre project area excludes the existing developed areas as identified and depicted
on the overall site plan. The project is located within the northwest, northeast, southwest
and southeast quadrants of the NC -42 and Buffalo Road (SR 1003) intersection,
Johnston County, NC, approximately 2 miles east of Clayton, INC.
Specifically, The Village at Flowers Plantation is intended to be the completion of the
Flowers Plantation development located in Johnston County, NC. This Master Planned
development is intended to have a range of residential housing, commercial
development, two (2) schools and amenities in addition to a farmers market.
' The preliminary planning of this project precedes 1997. The Master Plan for this
development was approved by Johnston County in 1997 and again in 1998. Beginning
in 2001, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) began evaluations such as a
' detailed wetland delineation, Neuse River Buffer evaluation, a Threatened &
Endangered Species review, a Office of State Archaeology (OSA) review and a State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) search request. Additionally, in August &
September 2002, Ms. Deborah Edwards, formally of the North Carolina Department of
' Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh Regional Office, conducted a Neuse River
Basin Buffer confirmation of the buffer determinations made by S&EC onsite (NBRRO
03-057 & NBRRO 03-058), and in August 2003, Mrs. Amanda Jones of the USACE
' confirmed jurisdictional wetlands onsite (Action ID# 200320492 & 200320493).
Furthermore, in January 2008, Mr. Thomas Brown of the USACE confirmed importance
stream calls and mitigation ratios onsite; we have not received written confirmation of
this as of the submittal of this application. And finally, in February 2008, Mrs. Lauren
Witherspoon conducted an intermittent/perennial stream determination onsite (IPPRO
08-013).
' Total permanent impacts proposed equal 0.122 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and
1,439 linear feet of stream. However, these impacts account for less than 2% of the
total stream length and less than 1 % of the total wetland area, resulting in the avoidance
' of over 13 miles of streams and over 107 acres of wetlands.
The Village at Flowers Plantation project consists of seventeen (17) stream or wetland
crossings. These proposed road crossing intend to cross eight (8) important streams,
' three (3) unimportant streams, five (5) linear wetlands and one (1) forested headwater
wetland area.
' All proposed stream and wetland impacts are proposed to be mitigated for through the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP).
IPage 3 of 193

O lv --18 o L} v3
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public reporting burden for this collection of Information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications
should require 5 hours or less. This Includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of Information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directories of
Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of Information if it does not display a currently valid OMB.
control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer
having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
' Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used In evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, If information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a
permit be issued.
' One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed In full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
River Dell Company, Inc. (Attn: Rebecca Flowers)
N/A
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
4880 NC 42 East, Clayton, NC 27527
N/A
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE (919)-846-5900
a. Residence N/A
a. Residence N/A
b. Business 919-553-3084
b. Business N/A
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, N/A to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental
' information in support of this permit application. P A I D
' APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
The Village at Flowers Plantation
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (irappiicabie) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (itappticabie)
Mill Creek, UT to Mill Creek & UT to Buffalo Creek
15. LOCATION OF THE PROJECT
Johnston North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
kffl/��R
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (see instructions) lyli I x (..000
35.65990 N, -78.3569° W (NAD83/WGS84)
UErild WAfE.RUU LITY"
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE Vft-"iP-A- AW MROATER BRA
From Raleigh NC, take Hwy 70 south, just south of Clayton, NC, take Hwy 42 east, continue on Hwy 42 east for approximately 5
miles, Flowers Plantation is within the NW, NE, SW and SE quadrangles of Hwy 42 and Buffalo Road.
ENG. FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 OBSOLETE
Page 4 of'S93 (Proponent: CECW-OR)

18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
See block sheet 18.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
See block sheet 19.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
See block sheet 20.
21. Type(s) of material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
See block sheet 21.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
See block sheet 22.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See block sheet 24.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
-------------------------
------------------------ See block sheet 25. ---—--------------—
-----------------—-- -------------------------
* Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits.
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
�� y 0(616
GNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if
the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and
willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be
fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Page 5 of 193

Block Sheets
Page 6 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 18 — Nature of Activity
The proposed project, The Village at Flowers Plantation, involves the development of
property currently owned and inherited by the applicant, Rebecca Flowers of River Dell
Company, Inc. This property totals ± 1200 acres and is depicted on the attached overall
site plan map and impact maps. The Village at Flowers Plantation is a master planned
community consisting of seventeen (17) proposed road crossings necessary to construct
the road infrastructure to support the residential and commercial development. (Note:
The crossings were labeled consistent with past agency coordination and as such they
range from #1 to #19, however there is no road crossing #4 and #15 , these crossings
have either been avoided or placed in areas that do not include jurisdictional wetlands.)
The project is located within the northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast
quadrants of the NC -42 and Buffalo Road (SR 1003) intersection, Johnston County, NC;
approximately 2 miles east of Clayton, NC (see attached vicinity maps).
Offsite Alternatives Analysis:
The property identified within the project boundaries was inherited by the owner
Rebecca Flowers. To identify and purchase property other than what has been inherited
would not be practical. The proposed development is consistent with current Johnston
County zoning. Additionally, most likely other property of comparable size would include
similar amounts of jurisdictional features and density of streams.
Onsite Alternatives Analvsis:
The proposed road crossings are located on the stream features that separate upland
areas within the project boundaries and therefore are necessary to access high ground.
According to the project engineer, to utilize bridges on the proposed road crossings
would not be economically feasible; bridges are typically 4 to 5 times higher than the
' cost of pipe crossings. Additionally, crossing #'s 1, 2, 5, 18 & 19 are crossings that are
needed for the Neuse River Parkway, a collector road approved by Johnston County on
May 20, 1997 as a part of the Flowers Plantation Master Plan. Furthermore, crossing
#'s 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 & 17 are proposed to be in compliance with the Johnston
' County Subdivision Ordinance Sec. 14-226(6), requiring a paved second entrance for
subdivisions proposing 201 lots or more. See attached Stocks Engineering
memorandum and justification exhibit.
Alternatively, when Johnston County approved the Master Plan in 1997, proposed
impacts were considerably greater. Specifically, impacts proposed for roads alone were
1.09 acres of wetlands, 2,450 linear feet of streams and 4.68 acres of riparian buffers.
' Because this approved Master Plan included residential and commercial development,
in addition to a golf course, the total proposed impacts for the entire development were
5.28 acres of wetlands, 19,800 linear feet of streams and 41.01 acres of riparian buffers.
' (Note: The quality of the Master Plan map with overlay of quantified impacts is rather
poor and has not been included within this submittal. However a copy of this map can
be provided if requested.)
IPage 7 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 18 — Nature of Activity (Continued)
1
Individual Impact Analysis:
' Impact #1 (Road Crossing) -proposes 155 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.036 acres and 0.005 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
' segment of the Neuse River Parkway, a collector road that extends through The Village
at Flowers Plantation and connects to the existing Flowers Plantation development.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-01 A & C-01 B.
Impact #2 (Road Crossing) proposes 115 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.016 acres and 0.003 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
segment of the Neuse River Parkway, a collector road that extends through The Village
at Flowers Plantation and connects to the existing Flowers Plantation development.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C -02A & C-026.
' Impact #3 (Road Crossing) -proposes 174 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.032 acres and 0.004 acres,
' consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
local residential road necessary to access high ground. Additionally, please refer to
impact exhibit C 03A & C-0313.
Impact #4 (Road Crossing) -this impact area has been avoided in this site plan
Impact #5 (Road Crossing) -proposes 144 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.053 acres and 0.007 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
segment of the Neuse River Parkway, a collector road that extends through The Village
at Flowers Plantation and connects to the existing Flowers Plantation development.
' Additionally, this road was previously approved by Johnston County in the Flowers
Plantation Master Plan, please see Johnston County letter dated May 26, 2006 in
addition to engineering justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for
' additional justification. Furthermore, please refer to impact exhibit C -05A & C-056.
Impact #6 (Road Crossing) -*proposes 17 linear feet of permanent impacts and 10 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.004 acres and 0.002 acres,
consecutively) and 88 linear feet of permanent impacts and 10 linear feet of temporary
impacts to an unimportant stream (0.020 acres and 0.002 acres, consecutively) for the
purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a local residential road
' necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering justification memorandum
provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification. Additionally, please refer to
impact exhibit C -06A & C-0613. *It is important to note that the USACE determined the
' importance origin 50 feet downstream from the center stake of the proposed road
crossing.
Impact #7 (Road Crossings -proposes 130 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
' feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.030 acres and 0.005 acres,
Page 8 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 18 — Nature of Activity (Continued)
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
local residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering
justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C -07A & C-076.
' Impact #8 (Road Crossing) proposes 148 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.014 acres and 0.002 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
' local residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering
justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C -08A & C-0813.
Impact #9 (Road Crossing) proposes 4026 ft2 (0.092 acres) of permanent wetland
impacts for the purpose of a road widening. This road widening will serve as a local
residential road necessary to access high ground. Additionally, please refer to impact
' exhibit C -09A & C-0913.
Impact #10 (Road Crossing) -proposes 156 ft2 (0.004 acres) of permanent wetland
impacts and 40 ft2 (0.001 acres) of temporary wetland impacts for the purpose of a road
crossing. This road crossing will serve as a local residential road necessary to access
high ground. Please see engineering justification memorandum provided by Stocks
Engineering for additional justification. Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-1 OA
& C-1013.
Impact #11 (Road Crossing) -proposes 140 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20
' linear feet of temporary impacts to an important stream (0.019 acres and 0.003 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
local residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering
justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification.
' Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-11 A & C-11 B.
Impact #12 (Road Crossing_) -proposes 280 ft2 (0.006 acres) of permanent wetland
' impacts for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a local
residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering justification
memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification. Additionally,
' please refer to impact exhibit C-1 2A & C-1213.
Impact #13 (Road Crossing) -proposes 98 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an unimportant stream (0.018 acres and 0.004 acres,
' consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
local residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering
justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-1 3A & C-1 3B.
Impact #14 (Road Crossing) -proposes 135 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20
linear feet of temporary impacts to an unimportant stream (0.019 acres and 0.003 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
local residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering
Page 9 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 18 — Nature of Activity (Continued)
justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C -14A & C-146.
Impact #15 (Road Crossing) -this impact area is currently located in an area that does
not include jurisdictional wetlands.
Impact #16 (Road Crossing) -proposes 95 linear feet of permanent impacts and 20 linear
feet of temporary impacts to an unimportant stream (0.004 acres and 0.001 acres,
consecutively) for the purpose of a road crossing. This road crossing will serve as a
local residential road necessary to access high ground. Please see engineering
justification memorandum provided by Stocks Engineering for additional justification.
Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-1 6A & C-1 6B.
Impact #17 (Road Crossing) -proposes 312 ft2 (0.007 acres) of permanent wetland
impacts and 40 ft2 (0.001 acres) of temporary wetland impacts for the purpose of a road
crossing. This road crossing will serve as a local residential road necessary to access
high ground. Please see engineering justification memorandum provided by Stocks
Engineering for additional justification. Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-1 7A
& C-1713.
Impact #18 (Road CrossingJ-proposes 210 ft2 (0.005 acres) of permanent wetland
impacts and 40 ft2 (0.001 acres) of temporary wetland impacts for the purpose of a road
crossing. This road crossing will serve as a segment of the Neuse River Parkway, a
collector road that extends through The Village at Flowers Plantation and connects to
the existing Flowers Plantation development. Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit
C-1 8A & C-1813.
Impact #19 (Road Crossingl-proposes 340 ft2 (0.008 acres) of permanent wetland
impacts and 80 ft2 (0.002 acres) of temporary wetland impacts for the purpose of a road
crossing. This road crossing will serve as a local residential road necessary to access
high ground. Please see engineering justification memorandum provided by Stocks
Engineering for additional justification. Additionally, please refer to impact exhibit C-1 9A
& C-1913.
Materials:
The materials to be used include earthen fill to construct the base for the roads and
pavement materials such as asphalt, concrete and paver blocks. The roads would be
paved and a number of which will use curb and gutter to manage stormwater runoff.
The proposed road crossings will utilize a variety of pipe sizes and rip -rap dissipaters
depending on final design of each road crossing, the preliminary design of these pipes
are intended meet the aquatic life passage requirement.
Page 10 of 193

u
Page 11 of 193
THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
'
BLOCK SHEETS
'
BLOCK 18 — Nature of Activity (Continued)
Waters of the US:
t
There are approximately 73,800 linear feet of streams and approximately 107.4 acres of
wetlands within the project boundaries. These waters are located within the Mill Creek
and Buffalo Creek watershed. Both Mill Creek and Buffalo Creek are depicted as a
tributary streams within the Neuse River Basin, USGS Cataloging Unit No. 03020201.
'
The N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has classified this section of Mill Creek as
"WS -IV; NSW"; ("WS -IV"- water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing
purposes where a WS -I, II or III classification is not feasible; "NSW" -Nutrient Sensitive
'
Waters) and Buffalo Creek as "C; NSW"; ("C" -Secondary Recreation, fishing, wildlife,
fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of
biological integrity, and agriculture; "NSW" -Nutrient Sensitive Waters).
'
The wetlands onsite are primarily forested headwater wetlands dominated by sweet
gum, American elm, willow oak, swamp chestnut oak, black willow, southern arrowwood,
roundleaf greenbrier and Japanese honeysuckle.
u
Page 11 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
I BLOCK 19 — Project Purpose
' The basic project purpose is to construct the infrastructure (i.e. roads) that will support
the residential and commercial development of The Village at Flowers Plantation. The
Village at Flowers Plantation is a Master Planned community located within Johnston
County, North Carolina. This community will feature a range of residential housing,
' commercial development, two (2) schools, and amenities in addition to a farmers market.
The overall project purpose is to complete the Master Planned community owned by
' River Dell Company, Inc. and initially approved by Johnston County in 1997. Impacts to
waters of the U.S. associated with the community include only the construction of roads
at this time. While the applicant agrees that these activities are not water dependent,
similar impacts are constructed within waters of the US as required to access high
' ground.
11
1
Page 12 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 20 — Reasons for Discharge
' Road Crossings — There are seventeen (17) permanent road crossings proposed at the
Village at Flowers Plantation project. The proposed road crossings are located on the
stream features that separate upland areas within the project boundaries and therefore
are necessary to access high ground. Additionally, crossing #'s 1, 2, 5, 18 & 19 are
' crossings that are needed for the Neuse River Parkway, a collector road approved by
Johnston County as a part of the Flowers Plantation Master Plan, see attached letter
from Johnston County. Furthermore, crossing #'s 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 & 17 are
' proposed to be in compliance with the Johnston County Subdivision Ordinance Sec. 14-
226(6), requiring a paved second entrance for subdivisions proposing 201 lots or more.
1
i
1
1
See attached Stocks Engineering memorandum and justification exhibit
Page 13 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
' BLOCK 21 — Type of Material Being Discharged and the
Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland Impact
Stream
Type of Wetland
Type of
Area of
Impact
Volume of
Discharge
Site Number
Type of Impact
,Material
(e.g., forested, marsh
Impact
(square
(cubic
(indicate on map)
(cubic
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Being
Discharged
Yards)
k
yards)
**
Crossing #9
C -09A
Road Crossing
Permanent -
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
dissipater
446
149
Crossing #10
Road Crossing
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
20
7
C-1 OA
Permanent -
Dissipater
dissipater
Crossing #10
Road Crossing-
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
5
2
C -10A
Temporary
dissipater
Crossing #12
Road Crossing-
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
30
10
C -12A
Permanent
dissipater
Crossing #17
Road Crossing-
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
34
12
C -17A
Permanent
dissipater
Crossing #17
Road Crossing
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
5
2
C -17A
Temporary -
dissipater
Crossing #18
Road Crossing
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
25
9
C-1 8A
Permanent -
dissipater
Crossing #18
Road Crossing-
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
5
2
C-1 8A
Temporary
dissipater
Crossing #19
Road Crossing-
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
39
13
C -19A
Permanent
dissipater
Crossing #19
Road Crossing
Non -Riparian
Culvert and
10
4
C-1 9A
Temporary
p rY -
dissipater
Total Discharge Volume (cubic yards)
210
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
** Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume wetlands to be 0.333 yards deep and
do not account for discharge materials above this 0.333 -yard assumed depth.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Impact
Stream
Type of
Perennial or
Type of
Material
Area of
Impact
Volume of
Discharge
Site Number
indicate on ma
( p)
Name
Impact
Intermittent?
Being
(square
(cubic
Discharged
yards)
yards)
Crossing #1
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
175
59
C -01A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Page 14 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 21 — Type of Material Being Discharged and the
Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards (continued)
STREAM IMPACT TABLE (CONTINUED)
Page 15 of 193
Type of
Area of
Volume of
Stream Impact
Site Number
Stream
Type of
Perennial or
Material
Impact
(square
Discharge
(cubic
(indicate on map)
Name
Impact
Intermittent?
Being
yards)
yards)
Discharged
Crossing #1
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
25
9
C -01A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #2
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
78
26
C -02A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #2
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
15
5
C -02A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #3
UT to Mill
Road
IntermittentCrossing- (DWQ)
Culvert &
155
52
C -03A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #3
UT to Mill
Road
IntermittentCrossing-
Culvert &
C -03A
Creek
(DWQ)
Dissipater
20
7
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Crossing #5
Mill Creek
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
257
86
C -05A
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #5
Mill Creek
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
34
12
C -05A
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Road
Perennial/Intermittent
Crossing #6
UT to Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)***
Culvert &
117
39
C -06A
Creek
Permanent
Important/Unimportant
Dissipater
(USACE)***
Road
Perennial/Intermittent
Crossing #6
UT to Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)***
Culvert &
25
9
C -06A
Creek
Temporary
Important/Unimportant
Dissipater
(USACE)***
Crossing #7
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
146
32
C -07A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Page 15 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
Stream Impact
Type of
Area of
Impact
Volume of
Discharge
Site Number
Stream
Type of
Perennial or
Material
(square
(cubic
(indicate on map)
Name
Impact
Intermittent?
Being
yards)
yards)
Discharged
Crossing #7
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
25
9
C -07A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #8
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
68
23
C -08A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #8
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
10
4
C -08A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #11
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
92
31
C -11A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #11
UT to Mill
Road
Perennial (DWQ)
Culvert &
15
5
C -11A
CreekCrossing-
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #13
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Intermittent
(DWQ)
Culvert &
88
30
C -13A
Creek
Permanent
Unimportant (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #13
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Intermittent
(DWQ)
Culvert &
20
7
C-1 3A
Creek
Temporary
Unimportant (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #14
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Intermittent
(DWQ)
Culvert &
92
31
C -14A
Creek
Permanent
Unimportant (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #14
UT to Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Intermittent
(DWQ)
Culvert &
15
5
C -14A
Creek
Temporary
Unimportant (USACE)
Dissipater
Crossing #16
UT to Mill
Road
Intermittent
Culvert &
C -16A
Creek
Crossing-
(DWQ)
Dissipater
20
7
Permanent
Unimportant (USACE)
Crossing #16
UT to Mill
Road
Intermittent
Culvert &
C -16A
Creek
Crossing-
Temporary
(DWQ)
Unimportant (USACE)
Dissipater
5
2
Total Discharge Volume (cubic yards)
490
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
** Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume wetlands to be 0.333 yards deep and
do not account for discharge materials above this 0.333 -yard assumed depth.
*** USACE determined Perennial/Important 50' downstream from center stake of crossing, the
remainder of impacts within crossing determined to be Intermittent/Unimportant (no mitigation)
Page 16 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 22 — Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
Waters Filled
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland Impact
Type of Wetland
Located within
Distance to
Area of
Site Number
(indicate on
Type of Impact
(e.g., forested, marsh,
100 -year
Nearest
Impact
Impact
Length
Area of
Impact
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Floodplain
Stream
(acres)
ma
(linear
(acres)`
es/no
linear feet
Crossing #9
Road Crossing-
feet)
Crossing #1
UT to Mill
C -09A
Permanent
Non -riparian
No
> 1500'
0.092
Crossing #10
C -10A
Road Crossing-
Permanent
Non -riparian
No
> 300'
0.004
Crossing #10
C -10A
Road Crossing-
Temporary
Non -riparian
No
> 300'
0.001**
Crossing #12
C -12A
Road Crossing-
Permanent
Non -riparian
No
> 600'
0.006
Crossing #17
C -17A
Road Crossing-
Permanent
Non -riparian
No
> 200'
0.007
Crossing #17
C -17A
Road Crossing-
Temporary
Non -riparian
No
> 200'
0.001**
Crossing #18
C-1 8A
Road Crossing-
Permanent
Non -riparian
No
> 200'
0.005
Crossing #18
Road Crossing-
C -18A
Temporary
Non -riparian
No
> 200'
0.001**
Crossing #19
C -19A
Road Crossing-
Permanent
Non -riparian
No
> 300'
0.008
Crossing #19
C-1 9A
Road Crossing-
Temporary
Non -riparian
No
> 300'
0.002**
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
0.122
0.005**
* All impacts have been rounded up to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre.
** Proposed temporary impacts for construction of road crossings
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Page 17 of 193
Average
Stream Impact Number
Stream
Type of
Perennial or Intermittent
Stream
Width
Impact
Length
Area of
Impact
(indicate on map)
Name
Impact
Before
(linear
(acres)`
Impact
feet)
Crossing #1
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
10'
155
0.036
C -01A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing #1
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
10'
20**
0.005**
C -01A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Page 17 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
' BLOCK 22 — Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
Waters Filled (continued)
1
STREAM IMPACT TABLE (CONTINUED)
Page 18 of 193
Average
Impact
Stream Impact Number
Stream
Type of
Stream
Length
Area of
(indicate on map)
Name
Impact
Perennial or Intermittent
Width
(linear
Impact
Before
feet)
(acres)*
Impact
Crossing #2
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)115
6
0.016
C -02A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing #2
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
6'
20**
0.003**
C -02A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Crossing #3
UT to Mill
Road
Intermittent
174
C -03A
Creek
Crossing-
(DWQ)
8'
0.032
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing #3
UT to Mill
Road
Intermittent
C -03A
Creek
Crossing-
(DWQ)
8'
20**
0.004**
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Crossing#5
Mill Creek
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
16,
144
0.053
C -OSA
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing#5
C
Mill Creek
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
16'
20**
0.007**
-05A
Temporary
Important (USACE)
UT to
Road
Perennial/Intermittent
Crossing #6
C -06A
Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)**'
Important/Unimportant
10'
105
0.024
Creek
Permanent
(USACE)***
UT to
Road
Perennial/Intermittent
Crossing #6DWQ
C -06A
Buffalo
Crossing-
Import nt/Unimportant
10'
20**
0.005**
Creek
Temporary
(USACE)*
Crossing #7
UT to
Buffalo
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
10,
130
0.030
C -07A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing #7
LIT g fft oRoad
dPerennial
(DWQ)
10'
20**
0.005**
C-07ACrossing-Important
Creek
Temporary
(USACE)
Crossing #8
UT g ff o
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
4,
148
0.014
C -08A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing #8
LIT to
Buffalo
Roa
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
4'
20**
0.002**
C -08A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Crossing #11
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
6'
140
0.019
C-1 1A
Creek
Permanent
Important (USACE)
Crossing #11
UT to Mill
Road
Crossing-
Perennial (DWQ)
6'
20**
0.003**
C -11A
Creek
Temporary
Important (USACE)
Page 18 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 22 — Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
' Waters Filled (continued)
fl
0
L
t
STREAM IMPACT TABLE (CONTINUED)
* All impacts have been rounded up to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre.
** Proposed temporary impacts for construction of road crossings
*** USACE determined Perennial/Important 50' downstream from center stake of crossing, the
remainder of impacts within crossing determined to be Intermittent/Unimportant
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.265 (Permanent)
0.042 (Temporary)
Average
0.122 (Permanent)
Stream Impact Number
Stream
Type of
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Stream
Impact
Area of
(indicate on map)
Name
Impact
Perennial or Intermittent
Width
Length
Impact
Important = 1,023;
Unimportant =416
Before
(linear feet)
(acres)*
Impact
Crossing #13
UT to
Road
Intermittent
98
C-1 3A
Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)
8'
0.018
Creek
Permanent
Unimportant (USACE)
Crossing #13
UT to
Road
Intermittent
C-1 3A
Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)
8'
20**
0.004**
Creek
Temporary
Unimportant (USACE)
Crossing #14
UT to
Road
Intermittent
6'
135
0.019
C -14A
Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)
Creek
Permanent
Unimportant (USACE)
Crossing #14
UT to
Road
Intermittent
C -14A
Buffalo
Crossing-
(DWQ)
6'
20**
0.003**
Creek
Temporary
Unimportant (USACE)
Crossing #16
UT to Mill
Road
IntermittentCrossing-
2'
95
0.004
C-1 6A
Creek
(DWQ)
Permanent
Unimportant (USACE)
Crossing #16
UT to Mill
Road
Intermittent
C -16A
Creek
Crossing-
(DWQ)
2'
20**
0.001**
Temporary
Unimportant (USACE)
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
1,439
0.265220**
0.042
* All impacts have been rounded up to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre.
** Proposed temporary impacts for construction of road crossings
*** USACE determined Perennial/Important 50' downstream from center stake of crossing, the
remainder of impacts within crossing determined to be Intermittent/Unimportant
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.265 (Permanent)
0.042 (Temporary)
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.122 (Permanent)
0.005 (Temporary)
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.387 (Permanent)
0.047 (Temporary)
1,439 (Permanent)
220 (Temporary)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
(Total Permanent Impacts -
Important = 1,023;
Unimportant =416
Page 19 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS
IMPACT #1 -ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1
9187
3
n/a
2
4192
1.5
n/a
Total
13379
1 n/a
IMPACT #2 -ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1
7391
3
n/a
2
4020
1.5
n/a
Total
11411
n/a
IMPACT #3- ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1
9387
3
n/a
2
3699
1.5
n/a
Total
13086
n/a
IMPACT #5 -ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1
8956
3
n/a
2
5341
1.5
n/a
Total
14297
n/a
IMPACT #6- ROAD CROSSING
Zone* Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1 6976
3
n/a
2 3316
1.5
n/a
Total 10292
1.5
n/a
IMPACT #7 -ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
s uare feet
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1
7828
3
n/a
2
4276
1.5
n/a
Total
12104
n/a
Page 20 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS (CONTINUED)
IMPACT #8 -ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1
7731
3
n/a
2
3473
1.5
n/a
Total
11204
n/a
n/a
IMPACT #11- ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1
8743
3
n/a
2
4398
1.5
n/a
Total
13141
n/a
n/a
IMPACT #12- ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1
8469
3
n/a
2
4569
1.5
n/a
Total
13038
n/a
n/a
IMPACT #13- ROAD CROSSING
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1
6212
3
n/a
2
2833
1.5
n/a
Total
9045
n/a
n/a
IMPACT #14- ROAD CROSSING
Total Ri arian Buffer Impacts
Zone*
Impact
(square feet
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
Multiplier
1
7592
3
n/a
3
2
3601
1.5
n/a
1.5
Total
11193
n/a
Total Ri arian Buffer Impacts
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)Mitigation
Multiplier
Required
1
88,472
3
n/a
2
43,718
1.5
n/a
Total 132,190 n/a
*Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel;
Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 21 of 193

' THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
' BLOCK 24 — Names & Addresses of Adjoining Property
Owners, Lessees, et., Whose Property Adjoins the
Project Site.
Note: The addresses of property owners whose property adjoins the project site
' The Village at Flowers Plantation listed below were taken from the Johnston
County, NC GIS website last updated on April 8, 2008.
11
n
1689-42-3899
1689-89-8558
16980-39-7827
42 EAST LLC
Atkins, Brande Harold
Bagwell, Jason M
508 Southmead Drive
PO BOX 20012
291 Kentucky Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Raleigh, NC 27619
Clayton, NC 27520
169900-28-2900
1699-86-3000
1699-50-6768
Bancroft, Todd M.
Barber, Timothy Earl
Blackmon, Marshall G
110 Cottsworth Court
2431 Government Road
10570 Buffalo Road
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-59-0278
1699-30-2655
1699-39-1063
Brame, William W III
Brantley, James W
Brown, Robert J
180 Homestead Way
532 S Mead Drive
106 Regent Court
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1689-98-2017
1699-85-8466
1699-61-1334
Carolynn Real Estate LLC
Carter, Stuart V
Carter, Tempi Sue Blake
407 N. Smithfield Road
240 Talley Ho Drive
532 Northfort Drive
Knightdale, NC 27545
Selma, NC 27576
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-18-0753
169-86-1149
1698-49-5826
Carver, Lewis C
Catlett, William H
Chandler, Cary
419 Triple Crown Circle
28 Buffalo Creek Drive
320 Southwick Avenue
Clayton, NC 27527
Selma, NC 27576
Clayton, NC 27527
1698-39-9775
1699-49-5282
1699-30-4319
Cody, Stephen R
Cole, Michael J
Consiglio, James Joseph
400 Southwick Avenue
110 Homestead Way
524 South Mead Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-29-5073
1699-61-8619
1699-59-4432
Constantino, Antonio Jr
Cook, Craig S. Sr
Cooper, Humphrey J
212 South Mead Drive
113 Apache Drive
250 Homestead Way
Clayton, NC 27520
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-79-4456
1699-03-0031
1699-28-6989
Creech, Darlene C
David Milton Flowers Amended
Decker, Paul Michael
109 Deer Ridge Drive
445 Motorcycle Road
216 Norwood Drive
Selma, NC 27576
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
Page 22 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
1689-89-8773
1689-89-8433
1699-61-55695
Deleruyelle, Helen M
Deloatch, Stacy E
Duszynski, Daniel
297 Kentucky Drive
287 Kentucky Drive
105 Athol Court
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
2609-05-4939
1699-39-4056
1699-39-5402
Earp, Raymond E Jr
Eckhardt, Bernard William
Edenton Group LLC
7230 NC 42 E
114 Regent Court
11431 Hwy 70 West, Ste 308
Selma, NC 27576
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
1698-49-6858
1699-01-8910
1689-91-9784
Fincher, Ronnie
Flowers, Brandi Dean
Flowers, Jimmy Rogers
300 Southwick Avenue
4300 NC Hwy 42 East
1270 B North Brightleaf Blvd
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
Smithfield, NC 27577
1689-92-9593
1699-61-4552
1689-69-5208
Flowers, Jimmy Rogers
Frick, Charles D Jr
Gidco Inc
4116 NC Hwy 42 East
263 Benning Circle
216 S. Fourth Street
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Smithfield, NC 27577
1689-89-8132
1699-30-7056
1699-59-5576
Henson, Kelly C
Hogue, David C
Homecraft Properties Inc
281 Kentucky Drive
512 Southmead Drive
115 Jasmine Drive
Clayton, NC 27520
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-49-2198
1699-95-0312
1699-49-7263
Hudock, David P Sr
Johnson, David Eugene
Johnson, Gregory W
94 Homestead Way
251 Tally Ho Drive
134 Homestead Way
Clayton, NC 27527
Selma, NC 27576
Clayton, NC 27529
1689-75-2638
1699-18-7883
1699-94-1322
Johnson, Rose -Marie J
Jones, Amanda
King, Hinton Douglas Jr
268 Windham Way
12151 Buffalo Road
6019 NC 42 East
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
Selma, NC 27576
1699-79-2650
1689-75-5686
1699-08-7668
Kipp, Earl
Kirkwood Builders Inc
Lancaster, Roger D
113 Deer Ridge Drive
258 Christenbury Lane
425 Triple Crown Circle
Selma, NC 27576
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-39-8129
1689-94-0501
1699-59-1392
Lane, Heather Renay Lewis
Lauraleen LLC
Lee, Jewel L
105 Athol Court
3515 Queen Anne Drive
204 Homestead Way
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1689-69-4521
2609-03-3877
169802-59-1878
Lewis Building Corp
Lynch Penny, Margaret
Martin, Christopher S
PO Box 1836
6827 Rock Quarry Road
200 Southwick Avenue
Wendell, NC 27591
Raleigh, NC 27610
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-39-2097
1699-50-0362
1689-57-0045
Maviki, Mitchell
McDonald, William Norman Jr
Mill Creek West Community Assoc.
110 Regent Court
226 Southwick Avenue
c/o Kohn -Ell Association Mgt
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
4515 Falls of Neuse Road S-145
Raleigh, NC 27609
Page 23 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
1698-49-2608
1780-60-1800
1689-48-6661
Monce, Donald J
Murphy, Charles Jerry
North Farm Community Assoc. Inc
380 Southwick Avenue
1124 South Murphrey Road
c/o Kohn -Ell Association Mgt
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
4515 Falls of Neuse Road S-145
Raleigh, NC 27609
1689-69-6328
North Farm Cottages Comm Assoc
1699-50-9666
1699-40-9204
c/o Pat Benson
North Fort Homeowners
Oliver, Richard
4880 Hwy 42 East
263 Benning Circle
250 Southwick Avenue
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1780-70-9735
1699-39-4282
1699-39-0179
Pace, Jerry G Jr
Phaby, Christopher A
Prestage, Robert S
13388 Buffalo Road
13082 Buffalo Road
230 Norwood Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
1689-93-7149
1689-65-9698
1699-76-9299
Ragland, Russell B
RH Construction Inc
Rowe, Timothy Franklin
132 Torrey Pines Drive
225 Muirfield Lane
115 Chase Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Selma, NC 27576
1780-50-6159
S & S Land Development LLC
1699-40-7146
1698-49-2795
A NC Limited Liability Co
Schumacher, Wayne Earl
Scott, Marc A
104 Amberly Court
276 Southwick Avenue
360 Southwick Avenue
Garner, NC 27529
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1689-88-7986
1689-75-1618
1698-49-4800
Sharpe, Christopher Tad
Shearer, Jeffrey A
Shearin, Jeffrey P
302 Shelby Court
294 Windham Way
340 Southwick Avenue
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-08-5636
1699-18-2779
1699-76-8550
Shelton, Karen A
Simmons, Elizabeth
Stauber, William P
433 Triple Crown Circle
413 Triple Crown Circle
116 Chase Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27520
Selma, NC 27576
1699-49-9235
1699-29-9023
1699-18-4827
Strother, Beth R
Sullivan, Joey L
Teel, Scott
158 Homestead Way
220 Norwood Drive
3220 La Costa Way
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Raleigh, NC 27610
1689-46-9288
Walker Woods Development LLC
1689-88-8820
1699-39-9280
c/o Kohn -Ell Association Mgt
Ward, Thomas R
Watkins, Margaret B
2005 W. Millbrook Road
305 Shelby Court
99 Athol Court
Raleigh, NC 27609
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-30-6104
1689-75-4608
1689-89-8228
Wellman, Kathryn
Wheeler, David M
Wilder, Forrest
516 South Mead Street
240 Windham Way
283 Kentucky Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Page 24 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
1699-59-3308
1699-30-5207
1699-30-3530
Witherell, Kenneth Garrett
Wood, George A
Wood, Johanna Del
230 Homestead Way
520 Southmead Drive
528 Southmead Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-28-3952
Zens, Mark
105 Cottsworth Court
Clayton, NC 27520
1699-72-3200, 1699-82-0603, 1699-83-8027, 1699-51-8175,
1699-72-4373, 1699-72-8546, 1699-72-6424, 1699-72-7429,
1699-62-9081, 1699-82-1627
Dreamland Builders Inc
1592 Osborn Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
1689-92-8114, 1699-12-7874, 1699-12-7874
Flowers, Peggy Ann
4400 NC Hwy 42 East
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-85-5826, 1699-85-7682
Jensen, Arthur F
329 Swanns Point Circle
Hampton, VA 23699
1689-75-8629, 1689-65-8648, 1689-65-7657
Neuse Park Development Co LLC
3515 Queen Ann Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
1699-69-2689, 1699-49-1336
Odom, K Ruffin
115 Jasmin Drive
Clayton, NC 27527
Page 25 of 193

THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 25 — Information about Approvals or Denials by
other Agencies.
Local Approvals:
Local approvals will be necessary for the Village at Flowers Plantation project. A
Master Plan was approved by Johnston County in 1997 and in 1998, consecutively.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR),
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section:
An Erosion & Sediment Control Permit will be needed from NCDENR. The
NCDENR Land Quality Section enforces the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act of 1973 on a statewide basis.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ):
In addition to an Erosion & Sediment Control Permit that will be issued by
NCDENR-Land Quality Section, the NPDES General Stormwater Permit
(NCG010000) administered by the NCDWQ will automatically be issued.
Additionally, an Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Protection Rules
was issued for Impact Area #1 on December 13, 2006, authorizing an open
bottom culvert crossing (DWQ # 2006-1804). And on October 26, 2007, an
additional Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Protection Rules was
issued for Impact Area #1 authorizing a bridge crossing (DWQ # 2006-1804v2)
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):
' The USACE issued a jurisdictional determination confirming jurisdictional waters
of the US on August 13, 2008 (Action ID# 200320492 & 200320493).
Page 26 of 193

Mitigation Plan
NCEEP Acceptance
Page 27 of 193

1
1
1
1
0
THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
Mitigation Plan
At this time, the applicant proposes payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) to mitigate for proposed impacts to important streams,
unimportant streams and jurisdictional wetlands as determined in the January 29, 2008
site meeting with Thomas Brown of the USACE. On site mitigation beyond the proposed
avoidance to streams, wetlands and riparian buffers does not exist. Specifically,
mitigation at a 2:1 ratio for proposed stream and jurisdictional wetland impacts within
Impact Area #'s 1, 2, 5, 7, 9 & 11 and mitigation at a 1:1 ratio for proposed stream and
jurisdictional wetland impacts within Impact Area #'s 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 17, 18 & 19.
Proposed Impact Area #'s 13, 14 & 16 will not require mitigation. Attached to this
application are two (2) letters from the NCEEP dated February 5, 2008 indicating that
they are willing to accept mitigation payment for the impacts proposed for this project.
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 1,707
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.22
Furthermore, the applicant requests a conditional approval that phases the mitigation
payments as the impacts occur; this option has been discussed with both the USACE
and the NCEEP.
Page 28 of 193

oem
E arment
PROGRAM
February 5, 2008
' Rebecca D. Flowers
Flowers Plantation
4881 NE 42 East
Clayton, NC 27527 Expiration of Acceptance: August 5, 2008
' Project: Flowers Plantation East Section County: JOHNSTON
We have received your request to access the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program's (NCEEP) In -Lieu Fee
' mitigation program for the above referenced project. We regret that we are unable to accept the full amount of credit
requested at this time. This letter constitutes an acceptance of a portion of the mitigation you have requested.
r
r
n
EEP recently proposed a revision to the fee schedule for wetland and stream mitigation as a means of allowing the program
to collect fees commensurate with our project implementation costs. The revision was passed by the Environmental
Management Commission and Rules Review Commission but has been delayed due to administrative rules regarding
comment submittals. Per established protocols for rule-making, the fee revision will now be considered during the next
legislative session beginning in May 2008. Until that time, EEP has developed a strategy that considers the financial
implications to the program for new requests to access the In -Lieu Fee Program and has determined that we are only able to
accept a portion of your mitigation request at this time. If you want to resubmit your request form at a later time, EEP will
reconsider the request in the future. We anticipate updating our strategy as new data and opportunities become available.
EEP will consider all requests on a case -by- case basis.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require'compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Neuse
03020201
Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres)
Bufferf-
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm Riparian
Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impacts Requested
0
0
1,198 0.01
0.13
0
0
0
Impacts Accepted
0
0
0 0.01
0.13
0
0
0
Credits
0
0
0 0.02
0.26
0
0
0
EEP is willing to accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table above.
Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP
will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
' Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998. AA
A
Pro", Oar Sta& t�C�DEM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

� .Fcos stem .:
PROGRAM
' February 5, 2008
' Rebecca D. Flowers
Flowers Plantation
4881 NE 42 East
' Clayton, NC 27527 Expiration of Acceptance: August 5, 2008
Project: Flowers Plantation East Section (Streams)- REVISED REQUEST County: JOHNSTON
' The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. 1f we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to. NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
NEUSE Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer II
03020202 (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm Riparian
Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0
0
1,198 0
0
0 0 0
Credits 0
0
2,396 0
0
0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
'0"
Willia D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Thomas Brown, USACE- Raleigh
Lauren Witherspoon, NCDWQ-Raleigh
Debbie Edwards, agent
File
RP.StDY"19... 'E ... PYDt�C.tl,GC9 0" stmt", M
NCD -ETR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mai "�6tCggter, Raleigh, NC 27699-16521919-715-04761 www.nceep.net

Public Interest Factors
Page 31 of 193

0
u
THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION May 2008
Individual Permit Application S&EC, PA Project No. 6658.W4
PUBLIC INTEREST FACTORS
In a document provided by the U.S. Corps of Engineers titled "Wetlands & Corps
Wetland Regulations" and dated August 13, 2001, the Corps of Engineers lists 21
specific factors that will be reviewed related to Public Interest. These factors are similar
to the "Evaluation Factors" listed on Page 8 of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Regulatory Program Application Information document dated May 1985. These items
are as follows:
Conservation
Economics Water Quality
Aesthetics
General Environmental Concerns
Wetlands
Historic and Cultural Resources
Fish & Wildlife Values
1. Conservation:
Flood Hazard Recreation
Floodplain Value Safety
Land Use
Navigation
Shore Erosion and Accretion
Recreation
Water Supply
Water Quality
Energy Needs
Safety
Food & Fiber Production
Mineral Needs
Property Ownership
Needs and Welfare of the People
In conducting the planned development, the applicant would continue to practice
sound land and water conservation by providing sedimentation and erosion control
as required under their Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Land
Resources, Land Quality Section administers the erosion control program within
Johnston County. The NCDENR Land Quality Section enforces the requirements of
the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 on a statewide basis. Properly
designed and located sediment control structures would be utilized to prevent
sedimentation of undisturbed waters. The project would avoid approximately 72,361
feet (13.7 miles) of streams and 107.27 acres of on-site wetlands or otherwise, 98%
of total streams and greater than 99% of the total wetlands onsite will be avoided.
Furthermore, the implementation of the proposed mitigation plan would restore
approximately 0.22 acres of wetlands and 1,707 feet of streams within the Neuse
Fear River Basin.
2. Economics (33CFR320.4(q)):
The applicant would be the primary beneficiary of the sale of residential lots and
commercial retail space. The project would help meet regional demand for housing
and commercial space. The project would also provide an overall benefit to the local
economy and would result in increases in local, state and federal tax revenues. It
would also result in additional job opportunities during construction and upon
occupation of retail facilities.
3. Aesthetics:
The project would be designed to maintain the rural and farm atmosphere that the
original farm possessed. Additionally, there are 100 ft buffers planned along the
proposed Neuse River Parkway, which would hide the communities and would
provide a natural, wooded environment. Furthermore, with the number of wetlands
and riparian corridors throughout the property that are to be avoided, additional open
space is available for homeowners. The project would not diminish the aesthetics of
the surrounding community.
Page 32 of 193

The Village at Flowers Plantation
Individual Permit Application
May 2008
S&EC, PA Project No. 6658.W4
4. General Environmental Concerns (33CFR320.4(p)):
The overall impact to the environment as a result of the construction of the project
would be minimal. Temporary increases in sediment, construction noise, traffic
levels, etc., would be expected during construction of the project. Any potential long-
term impacts to wetlands, streams, and fish and wildlife would be somewhat offset by
the mitigation offered by the applicant. Consideration was also given to the
environmental justice of the proposed project. The project would not result in
negative impacts to persons living or owning land with the floodplain downstream of
the project. Accordingly, the proposed activity would not unjustly impact any
surrounding property owner or particular minority group (ethnic, socioeconomic, or
otherwise).
5. Wetlands (33CFR320.4(b)):
The project would result in the permanent loss of 0.122 acres of wetlands and 1,439
feet of streams that currently provide some nutrient filtering, sediment removal, and
aquatic habitat. The applicant would mitigate for these unavoidable impacts through
payment into the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (see attached "Mitigation
Plan" for further detail) to offset the impacts associated with this project. The project
would avoid 107.27 acres of on-site wetlands and 13.7 miles feet of streams.
6. Historic and Cultural Resources (33CRF320.4(e)):
The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) was sent a letter requesting comments and/or concerns on April 1, 2008.
Additionally, see attached Office of State Archaeology (OSA) report prepared by
S&EC dated April 17, 2008.
7. Fish & Wildlife Values (33CFR320.4(c)):
The project would not be expected to result in permanent adverse effects to the
overall fish or wildlife value of the site. During construction, it is likely that some
aquatic and terrestrial animals within the project boundaries might be lost or
displaced, along with their habitat. Following construction, the remaining natural
areas, riparian corridors and wetlands would continue to provide habitat for fish and
migratory bird species. S&EC, PA has performed a review of National Heritage
Program files and have confirmed that there are no significant natural heritage areas
or natural heritage elements of occurrences of rare plants or animals located within
the proposed project boundaries. Additionally, this review revealed that there are
significant natural heritage areas and natural heritage rare plants and animals
species that are listed within a five -mile radius of the property boundaries. However,
it is not anticipated that this development will impact any of these species given their
location in relation to the project boundaries. See attached Natural Heritage
Program File Search Report prepared by S&EC dated April 17, 2008.
8. Flood Hazard:
The project would not be expected to have an impact on the overall hazard of
flooding downstream of the project site. The development would result in increases
to impervious surface within the watershed, but some of this increase would be offset
by the retention of storm water runoff by the remaining natural wetlands and riparian
corridors. The development of the upland areas will comply with all applicable
stormwater management requirements.
Page 33 of 193

The Village at Flowers Plantation
Individual Permit Application
May 2008
S&EC, PA Project No. 6658.W4
9. Floodplain Value (33CFR320.4(I)):
Pursuant to Executive Order 11988, consideration is also given here to the effect that
the proposed project may have in reducing the risk of flood loss, minimizing the
impact of floods on human safety, health and welfare, and restoring and preserving
the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains. There are two designated
floodplain areas within the project boundaries; the 100 -year floodplains of Buffalo
Creek and Mill Creek. No impacts are proposed to the floodplain areas other than
the fill required for a proposed road crossing. The crossing will be designed so as
not to dam floodwaters after a significant storm event. The wetlands that are to
remain within the project area would assist in the retention of stormwater runoff and
downstream flooding.
10. Land Use:
As proposed, the development would result in the conversion of farm and forested
area to residential/commercial use. While this is a major shift in land use, the project
would remain consistent with local zoning requirements. Additionally, the project is
located adjacent to existing development with a similar land use.
11. Navigation (33CFR320.4(o)):
The project is located on a non -navigable waterway. Accordingly, consideration of
the project's effect on navigation is not applicable.
12. Shore Erosion & Accretion:
This public interest issue is not applicable to this application as the project is not
located in an area where shoreline erosion or accretion is problematic. Terrestrial
erosion and potential sedimentation to surface waters would be addressed through
the Division of Land Resources — Land Quality Section's required Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan.
13. Recreation:
The project site will retain four (4) ponds in addition to over 13 miles of natural
riparian corridors and more than 107 acres of wetlands. Homeowners will have
access to these areas via walking trails throughout the communities. Any potential
turbidity that is generated during construction would likely be carried into Mill Creek
(Class "WS -IV" by N.C. DWQ) or Buffalo Creek (Class "C" by N.C. DWQ), but would
be minimized due to an approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Class "WS -
IV" waters are protected for water supply needed drinking, culinary, or food
processing purposes where a WS -I, II or III classification is not feasible and class "C"
waters are protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life
propagation and survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C.
14. Water Supply (33CFR320.4(m)):
The project is not expected to result in measurable increases in water consumption.
Increases to impervious surfaces on site may result in changes to the extent of water
infiltration; however any impacts are expected to be negligible.
15. Water Quality (33CFR320.4(d)):
A North Carolina Division of Water Quality certification has been applied for in
association with this permit application. Special conditions are anticipated, and a
copy of these conditions will be provided to the USACE. No major impacts to water
quality are expected. However, increases in turbidity during construction, loss of
Page 34 of 193

' The Village at Flowers Plantation May 2008
Individual Permit Application S&EC, PA Project No. 6658.W4
' nutrient removal capacity of the filled wetland, and some discharge of pollutants and
nutrients in the runoff could result. The devices required under the Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan would assist in the protection of water quality. It is likely that
portions of the development would require a DWQ approved stormwater
' management plan, these portions of the project would consist of areas that include a
post -construction impervious percentage of 24% or greater. In the areas that will
ultimately require a DWQ approved storm water management plan, these approved
' devises along with the remaining wetlands and riparian corridors would provide both
stormwater retention and treatment of any runoff associated with the project to
prevent any cumulative affects to Mill Creek and Buffalo Creek in addition to other
downstream waters.
16. Energy Needs (33CFR320.4(n)):
The proposed project would not be used for the generation of power. The proposed
' project will increase the current rate of power consumption required for this area.
However, energy demands are not anticipated to increase beyond previous
development expectations for this area. Accordingly, consideration of the project's
' effect on energy needs is not applicable.
17. Safety:
The project would be designed in accordance with local traffic safety regulations and
should not result in additional safety concerns.
18. Food & Fiber Production:
' The project is entirely residential and commercial in nature and consideration of its
effect on food and fiber production is not applicable.
19. Mineral Needs:
' The project is entirely residential and commercial in nature and consideration of its
effect on mineral needs is not applicable.
20. Considerations of Property Ownership
Adjacent landowners may be affected as a result of the proximity of their property to
the project, and the possibility of an increase in their property value and resulting tax
rate. However, the use of the land would be consistent with the designated zoning,
' and issuance of the permit would be consistent with the owner's right to reasonable,
private use of their land, and in keeping with the public's interest in economic
investment.
21. Needs and Welfare of the People
The economic value resulting from the project would benefit the public. Specifically,
' the local, state, and federal tax base would benefit from the value added to the
property and the temporary and permanent jobs that would be created.
Page 35 of 193

Vicinity Maps
Page 36 of 193

IfL 1 Co ro7 wng' rt IS '
asbure p E 51m
S Q N� G F
158' 1
• Roxboro+ t
4
Fro sb.r;
,I SmoKsdale f
Rmevil'e
7}, PIcW 1 sy�l5ar B,
RI $villa 7 If,
' R ��
49 ForhkY
Hurd
Timberlake \
1 7 Gordontdn MITI
e r
1Aonah j
01 ' Prc
R E N
•1
5 ♦•r Jac�l
031 fol 126 ?,:.. +
i
p7 � ouittemant
1�
Caldwell
G� 83ha a'WT�.='r stem
li
Schley'
I La@w
Tai
F171 N G E
s
Eflandrj Hillsbooug
,1T,a, lt• iBut.e
, Ipt ji
---. "r—.a:..-e D: I2,H1A�M:
3 r,CPI
WBllamaboro
[i[��j, ] /1 NorRrnl
lawn 5 ,
� !07 a
Littleton Rneasville
"'rl y• arysbuq
1; Q R T
•
r J RI" U ewe
,� 1 158
mon s
+. Vaum/n
r. 1`
1 f 7 2 FWe don 10
L E 4.r•^
- Wa«onto.
,� ', iddleburg
Sunnyside
vL�'
5 7
.was
f
,?91 W A R'
R E N
r 4 !
5 ♦•r Jac�l
031 fol 126 ?,:.. +
S�.
ashen,
,j ' , reyftone' 7 Creek
2 43
4
/' Airlis
' +Heli}a
��,.'..�"Rode •-•
He48
ndersoj� Elberon
'
i ' ,",=a`
fsl
7 `•- --
1 1 1°8 a 161 Glllburg,
1
B Arcoll I
j l Awa rinkiayvllla
5
It y
`
=
1
1 �,_
Inez
L f sit
1 Tillery
1
•P '.• .
toll •`Alert
1 i7
Holl f HuNsv4lle
l
ssex Rin ood •;
•
561
o S
, Kltb•II
�
S
1 1
t7{�r• , If
woo$ '
H A 4 1- '
r 1F 5 A X SPrin
'-�
a• ;
Ingleside Centerville
i
�."1��
f 1
5
s l
"j", ! (W 481. Enlfeld Nill
99718
-s Glenview]
Wilton r
B
3 It 1
A
nton
4, v
�.- -.`
..
F' R
A L I N.
�R
1
1-
s
-
5
} Loaisbu
' 1 581 S 56
� 6 1t.--.,
• C•edl�e
98 33, 4
d't r.,an a 6
' _ 1
Whitaker$ 17 ' •`oseneattn
arrboro 5 2 oI h w ` / ' Ii2Wake " �> Pond„ ] vK r ashvlll , 7 c q I a s.w v "XII
s
,� ] t / I Fore ] Rlky f s gg r ] " ' { , ] i : 1 64A
i 4 1 Rotesvnl'. t ` Peer 3 rt V l 1 1 / ] 2 MaNsease 1 . 114 \B f baro 19
r _ _ ` AncevII e
U merrrla, r -f` v: Itnwe: \ JS� I -}
Lakft
r , - - �f ltlf. GroveNl'I do'3.�1{ 1 1 \ d7 .Raleigh 9_ + .I/., 271 5 St6 P y� �� arpabugl' 43 .3 l ] 7
azar 4 t 91 6gl `4f . Ifz 33 f.
Fearnn to .. j t ��il F 7.,$ , nr 31cN ' a f e f C `' f Comtoe
Wit 1 WP r I ] A b,K E 0 9,' r EIm Ci 10 n2 258 e `
vmorrlsvllle,t __ ,s �,I 'L Eab to a ow ; Pinot <' r
,g r` 4` _l' , Zc' 1 58 Creek ] ,4 1� 64A
.d - IBI / � - ~,* ' • - q � Eagle � 64 B ' M ddPosex 84 7 ° , 1 rs
S I s -ask z O ] —1 -- r Belle - Wilbanks 1122
' ] 4f ,,' p 1 �:� �_. y 7 , IdMghid810r'°r,., ,Roc �Wenuet7l Il 2]17Ht Y
2 N,v , , 0 ,� 1 Slms atcleslield p '
1 , d F I g�jv ° L -
c „-�31, r° '�n r'Yij, Apex.° I lug Garnecz C, f E n 1 •� BOI Ridge I t, t yyrLS`QII+ - 'Falkland '
[�itlsb ZJc to*' f s' .ie 11 y 2
AuburjKJ
rr+ Archer u Bockhorn 4 ] 1 1� r 22 1 33
� \H A�ArZSiM•r 1 'y��L,C Ledge 9 Crossroads s t.�•. p ., s \
` v-' ( H { 9 ) `/, R 6i ten 2 ] ! Fountain Bruce t.
0onsai New n 5 �"" 0II i� , , Luum
G1 aks 3 HIlyr Springs (; McCullet ! s gY 2 , f i L S , O N. roeay 3 m 43
Moncure -- �$J O//S Saratoga `f 1 91 ,
i t/A. 5 J - ♦ �` `� ~r.Fq 9 - S , 3D1 " l Black •r 1 'k _I ! Farmvll1� �t.2
?/ Haywood '�' "� Ns �: wmow s do SITE E �.m m f Creek
fugue Varma `` ] e S �j,
�- Stanton l
II - , 'Walstonburg ]� I II Arthur
rl khevrYn �,, _ �- 65 ♦ - Micro S 4 22 r 1+ DB a' Selma2 ti 64A
Lo m
3 ] Smithfield ��� y 4 f Eureka t IS P
Col_ n 4" ♦ Y• ® 4 Pinkney
W 0W
Springs An{ler Il° ii 2_ Pine Level i Y "^ , Lizzie, 1 1
i i„ . + " 2 0 !' ��, wn, <',� = I OA l 1 Plkewille w t G R E E jN ] Roun`_dtree '
Sanford r- K1pnn t ]
� - ;� : yr 1 m 1
II Yh eroa;way ° Ax ,w f I° a Hefq GLs._ ® �'s�7w7 ♦4 6n PatelI (I r ] Maur ] 1°3 �` 1°2
. 3 ' • C! 'L , 4 J' 1 to Four Oa L'.� 2 `� 1 c r 17A y
/ ` 1 Boles '`� ,.�_ Princeton a' 3 3 Saulstont ,c 1]Z 7 SHI°w"* 1 Ormondsvill$ j
rE ' 4 t If LII Ingto Creek / Co ! S ;® 3 j f Hool•rfoni
smona amen p
ring: ' H A R N r s 1e tt YejAr �ttonwood .6ubd$bure Jason
Swann , ensoP t 96 ] EYMOLU
ouvia ❑ 21 4-5 f,. I �_ {,, �f iOHNsON v
4 � $ 1 InsOtoh Daws n 1 Graingars
8 , t 11 E wt ° 8' l 50 Is t.a o e° _�4F .
Pineview 219 Bunnlevel `t n ,�Y 242 • i° Grantham 1 _f t Veined: O Grange 3 2 1
Du _ C 6 r
11 SCnek ,t fit* LIN
hnsonvllle ] Spout 5p`Inga + 4 fl1 I r , A 4 1 N E , : -
� f t 6 HewtoBl`rove : 111
oubuty
l to,
+Linden A" 8 fD 1 2 Dobbenville 2 l7 ar °E / ,
_ ] - eP°' !1 sf� Tis Nev,r RlveT. „>� ~vG fz— ♦ Do
.` klynchrs4r God G 1 2 11 i t". i. 3 4 r
fp (. t snvert Wyse
r � � O1 ��. suuorliosm I I]
Falcon or f SPrInAa ! Fork
, e i/� Spivey$ i' _ _ Mnum ` -.. ,R �� L E 0 1 R
• f V Wa 9 rt. /� a ornv C`t 7a , 6B r, f aK• -`Dnp Run a'
i Spring LIM t10 f t Calypso
242 11
` 58
! a ..m Pine Green 4 -L Keener ' , Feinn Albertso ' ,
Fayetteville; 9 4= ] r y „'1 'D U P L r' N``_ sa'
t 1 Pleasant Hill
S A M! P L7 O N, B0 ad°'" Korne{aY 1 11 r Pink HIII I n
r F z.:!.. I 407 « 007
I 59 * O 1 r ♦ ,�<e.
ti Vander °'^T } Hc'" 11 .•
umbetland fie , 2 V A —If la Selemburg CII D 1 Warsaw 1i1 2p ' Comte
_ _ _ s. - - 41
f si s Stedman ,:.
ord Lq,FItH r , ] It ' 12 i i •Ir 2 Turkey, ] 24B 1 * Kenansvl to 3 -� •� - - ' - _
R Arablf '.Noe ' 2 su 2 1 " ' 3
D • , . . Po ter:
Cedar 210 meboro 6a S 1rr� 11 ,
1 HIII
n _ .•� . «- MIA 2 8 / creek Petersbur
N
Lena M \ 4 4 1 )jRulavlile t'
I C U M(` 13 E R L A N D 411 a 1101 iJ Magnoli a , u ° i Richlands
r u �, , u �_ 11 60 tl4 Lyman Q N 31
7 , - - - _ - - 11 111 111 l Cat er(n
Veo.rlr Gitlr 7
W E 4 9 k '�' aCkrn tlnJlzYry Parker turg f Fountain ,
k. L�aJJ CJ 242 1 4 , Del Rose Hill Grcenever 11 hinquapin 2
Catherine
2B N ,r be Ammon a wla I . 1 t 1/ 4- If
Lake i
rke
.S �s 53 2 4 `� 2 Teache >
{ ` W it Oak LAD 1 ,4 Cypress '..
IS} r y ta�sc. 2 411 10 41 we in 1.1 f T i Cl�' Creek
Sola u © \�• Tor
n'ri Li LAKES`* 3 1 E , Hamlls - ,
L
PML
No. Scale:
665L NTs VICINITY MAP - REGIONAL SOURCE: • 11010Raven F2idgeRd.
Project MJOHNSTON COUNTY, t�Ce Mgr. Drawn ST. FLOWERS SITE NC STATE Raleigh, NC 27614
P
g 37 of 19 TRANSMAP TRANSPORTATION 919-846-5900
Date: 04/03/08

4M
W E,r lit' �' � ��-, - ) �) P — jl l
`t``/tj`��..,.� `''
teq
'K:
Pro'sct No. Scale:
664 W4 1•=2000' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SOURCE:
Project Mgr. Drawn By. FLOWERS SITE FLOWERS
BZ/DE MM JOHNSTON COUNTY, I�'�i a 39 of 193 USGDATEDQUADRANGLE
Date: 04/03/08
�1
11010 Raven Rd
Raleigh, NC 276 4
919.846-5900

� Overall Site Plan &
' Impact Maps
IPage 41 of 193
11

Ci
5
cp
T

u
t
1
FLOWERS PLANTATION
PROPOSED BUFFER
CROSSINGS
Civil Engineering:
Stocks Engineering, P.A.
3344 Hillsborough Street, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.821.2440 (v)
919.821.2210 (f)
email: [e-mail]
Contact: Paul Smith, PE
Owner:
The Riverdell Company
4880 NC 42 East
Clayton, NC 27520
919.553.3084 (v)
ContaOMA"f lowers
Environmental:
S&EC
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
919.846.5900 (v)
919.846.9467 (f)
Contact: Kevin Martin
.PERMITAPPLICATION
Johnston County,
North Carolina
INDEX
C-01
OVERALL SITE PLAN
C-02
JUSTIFICATION EXHIBIT
C -01A
CROSSING #1 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
C-01 B
CROSSING #1 -DETAILS
C -02A
CROSSING #2 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
INDEX (CONT.)
C -02B
CROSSING #2 - DETAILS
C -02C
CROSSING #2 - PHOTOS
CALCS DRAINAGE AREAS AND DISCHARGES
C -03A
CROSSING #3 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
CULVERT CALCULATIONS
C -03B
CROSSING #3 - DETAILS
LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS
C -03C
CROSSING #3 - PHOTOS
DITCH CALCULATIONS
C -05A
CROSSING #5 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
C -05B
CROSSING #5 - DETAILS
C -05C
CROSSING #5 - PHOTOS
t4
C -06A
CROSSING #6 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
0- o
C -06B
CROSSING #6 - DTAILSoo
y
C -06C
CROSSING #6 - PHOTOS
SITE Z
C -07A
CROSSING #7 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
t,
C -07B
CROSSING #7 - DETAILS
C -07C
CROSSING #7 - PHOTOS
C -08A
CROSSING #8 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
C -08B
CROSSING #8 - DETAILS
C -08C
CROSSING #8 - PHOTOS
tGl�
C -09A
CROSSING #9 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
C-098
CROSSING #9 -DETAILS
C -09C
CROSSING #9 - PHOTOS
C -10A
CROSSING #10 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
C -10B
CROSSING #10 - DETAILS
CLAYTON
C -10C
CROSSING #10 - PHOTOS
LA
C -11A
C-11 B
CROSSING #11 -DETAILED SITE PLAN
=c
C41 C
CROSSING #11 -DETAILS
CROSSING #11 -PHOTOS
N
C42A
CROSSING #12 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
VICINITY MAP
C42B
CROSSING #12 - DETAILS
TS
C42C
CROSSING #12 -PHOTOS
C -13A
C
CROSSING #13 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
CROSSING
-13B
C -13C
#13 -DETAILS
CROSSING#13-PHOTOS
CARO
O•� �N ��•' A
C -14A
CROSSING #14 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
����.•'���
O�QQ�F ES ���
C -14B
CROSSING #14 - DETAILS
• 9
C44C
CROSSING #14 - PHOTOS
AL
C46A
CROSSING #16 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
C -16B
CROSSING #16 - DETAILS
026970
C -17A
C -17B
CROSSING #17 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
CROSSING #17 - DETAILS
• . • `�
��i �y •••FNC
I NE�'�
�'
, ��� 010
X41
SITE PLAN
C6�
C-1813
CROSSINGS #18 & 19 - D TAILSD
�,�..
Civil Engineering:
Stocks Engineering, P.A.
3344 Hillsborough Street, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.821.2440 (v)
919.821.2210 (f)
email: [e-mail]
Contact: Paul Smith, PE
Owner:
The Riverdell Company
4880 NC 42 East
Clayton, NC 27520
919.553.3084 (v)
ContaOMA"f lowers
Environmental:
S&EC
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
919.846.5900 (v)
919.846.9467 (f)
Contact: Kevin Martin

IMPACT
.,-TEM-P.,-;- CANNIEL-\
IMPACT
ZONE, 1
........ . . -BUFFER
LS -D \ " " "
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE: [phone] ItOO EASTERN AVENUE PHONE-. [phone]
SUITE 250 FAX: [phone] NISMILLE, N.C. 271156 FAX" (252) 459-11127
RALEIGH. N.C. 27607
FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC IC -01A I
CROSSING #1- DETAILED SITE PLAN
44 of 193 APRIL 2008

280
270
260
250
240
rr
��Ir�rli��ii" �ri�lir��>•► �rll�
w�Ilr■rlwnlMwrr�Ir�wrr�r�Il. ii�»■wrlwli�ii�iii
�wwl■rw►.��rur rwr�w�r�wrlw��rrrrrww
26+00
28+00 30+00
1 CROSSING #1 PROFILE
tCO 1 B SCALE: HRT.: 1"=100'
VERT.; 1"=10'
Q RD.
280
i
270
i
260
i
250
i
240
PIPE BURIED 1' BELOW 1 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM
�01
SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, INC C -01B
SUITE 250 FAX (BIB) 821-2210 NASHVRT.E. N.C. 27858 FAX' [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 age 45 of 193 CROSSING #1- DETAILS
I
APRIL 2008 1

k ZONE 1- 13 �F RLIMIT'
�ry�
-ZONE 2 BUFFER LIMIT CREEK
Fs
1 CENTERLINE
n
LS -A „ N
Sp. /
00
All
TOB BEGIN
36NEIA
`P RM. 'CLIA ;BUFFER
%IMA T /
72` LF
DOUKE i
<y� 60" C P's
LS -B•
MP .4- 4 --ANNE \ \
1' 73
00
ZONE 116UFFER LIMIT
ZONE- 2 "BUFFER LIMIT
1
' :'CREEK
CENTERLINE 1
fMl'ORTAN ERENNIAL STREAM
® ZONE 1 IMPACT 7391 SF SCALE: 1" = 50'
ZONE 2 IMPACT 4020 SF o 5o too i25 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 H MOROUGH ST. PHONE: [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY NV n-Of1 A
SUITE 250
FAX..
(919) E21-2410 NASHNLIE, N.C. 27656 FAX [phone] CROSSING #2 - DETAILED SITE PLAN 4 (,p
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607
Page 46 of 193 APRIL 2008

240
230
220
210,
AAwA�AA�A��wAAAAAAA�AAAANAAAAA�AAiAA `�AAA�AA�A� �, �•
� �' �c: � AAI IIAII�������������' • �?
�I�ii�'ii.:o ��AAAA�i�AA �''�I��A��iiii�iA��A���ili�iw�w•A'
���AAIAAAA11At AAAA.wAAA•IA■IAAA� IAAII/.�
�� � �� ALr AIAArAIIA•AUAIAAAAA�A
ArAAAAAAAA�AwA�AA�AA�AAwA��AAAIArIAIAAAcwAAI���..�.�•�MA,�.,�, ���u.�rAA�AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA�AAAAAAA�AA��
�AAAAIAAA�>AwAAA�AAAA �AwAAA��.� �.� �. rAAAANAiA
I�i�i�iAAAAAAA��r�ArAAAAwwr<ii�iii�AAwA■AA��AiAA� - �,���Aw�AAAA�Ai�AAI
�A�AA�AA�AAA��N�AAAArA►.� �A��wwA��iAAAAA€ArA�AA�A■A�AAAAA�AAAAAAAIrwAwAAAAr
ArAA.nAIAAAA■AAA��AAArrrAAwwrArA��AAnAAi�A^�AA�rI ,��A�rA■A� SAA
�AAA�MAA�iA•w�rIAA����i ��AAAAAAAAAIAwAAAIAMAAAAAAAA�AIAAIAAAAt�IA�
� w z� •. +� I��AA�AAAAAAAIAA�AAIA
14+00 16+00 18+00
1 CROSSING #2 PROFILE
C -02B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: V=10'
• 240
230
-220
210
PIPE BURIED 1' BELOW 1 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM
C—O2B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
5544 HILLSBOROUGH Si. PHONE: [phone] EA -N A Nul PHONE [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C-028
S187E 250 FAX: [phone] NASHHLLE, N.0. 27856 FAX (..2) 459-8197
RALEIGH, N.O. 27807 age 47 of 193 CROSSING #2 - DETAILS
APRIL 2008
- -1

ZONE 1 BUFFER LIMIT
ZONE 2 BUFFER LIMIT
CREE
LINE
CENT R
6 1� 11p
Y 0
tj
1v
1t V
U)
B'33EGIN\,
V'.. ONtA)
LS -A 11 LF GONE
1 ' 1 11 !
42" RCR UFFER
- 2
__ ... PERM.�'iAi�fEL- �� "� ' j i �
12
. .. .......... ............ . .
09
-W-AbT
_TEMP CRANN`EL--o�- rLS-D
IMPACT
cu
v)
...........
Og 1 BUFFER LIMIT
"SONE 2 �BUFffR LIMIT
CREEK REE
CENTERLINE
... .........
IMPORTAW/NTERMWTENT Sf E- 'AM
ZONE 1 IMPACT 9387 SF SCALE: 1 50'
ZONE 2 IMPACT 3699 SF
0 50 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 HUMOROUGH St PHONE: 1(9)19 -2+4D 1101 "1-11 -- P—E; 2)52 - JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC -03A
9 5�821 1 (2 )5459 a196
$UITE 250 FAX: (9 1-2210 NASHMLLE, N.C. 27856 FAY-' (25 4 C
RALaGH. N.C. 27607 9-8197 CROSSING #3 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
11age 48 of 193 APRIL 2008

290 �Fr>_nn' I�� z1 -290
Ml
280 -280
270 -270
260 260
250vkj 250
20+00 22+00 24+00
CROSSING #3 PROFILE
tC-03B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1"=10'
RD.
10' 10'
2" ACSC S9.56 GRADE POINT 4'
4'
2% 25
pM cm
v Mlo
COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
r
w{yyYiYijy
PIPE BURIED 8.5" BELOW r2 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM tO SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -03B
7044 HILLS90Rd1GH 5f. PHONE [phone] EASTERN N.C.A1£NUE PHONE. [phone]
SUITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHNLLE, N. 27856 FAX: [phone] g
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 :,age 49 of 193 CROSSING #3 - DETAILS
APRIL 2008
•
CIS
���
■Ilw�lwlrr Ir■■r■rrwl�
r�ww��
�
��i���rl��
��r�■I�rlmul■I�r���lr�

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F
I
I
I
I
TOB BEGIN
ZONE A
BUFFER
..... ......
ZONE 2 BUFFER -LIMIT
ONE t, BUFFER LIMIT
CRE 906-
CENTEFkINE,- '2
2,
1 110
DOU
191RCP's
A-
----------
�LS-M
------- ----
g `.
00+ -.L
q)
op PERM. CHANNEL
cNj IMPACT((:;
LS -BI, I
ZONE 1 "BUFFER LIMIT
ZONE 2 BUFFER LIMIT,
TEMP.\ CHANNEL
IMPACT
00�TANT/PERENNIAL STREAM
ZONE 1 IMPACT 8956 SF SCALE: 1" = 50'_
ZONE 2 IMPACT 5341 SF 0 5 i 0 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3 44 HILLSOOROUGH ST. PHONE' 9) 621-2440 1100 EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -05A
SUITE 250 FAX [phone] HASHIAUE. N.C. 271156 FAX.- [phone]
RALEICH. N.C. 27607 CROSSING #5 — DETAILED SITE PLAN
Page 50 of 193 APRIL 2008 _j

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
230
1 220
1 210
1 200
1 190
14+00 16+00 18+00 20+00
1 CROSSING #5 PROFILE
C-058 SCALE: HORIZ.: 1 "=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
7/f
l
RD.
2' ACSC S9.58 LGRADE POINT
4'
8X _ 2X_ 2X _
PIPE BURIED 1' BELOW1/0" 2 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM C -OSB SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -05B
M44 HILLS80ROUGH ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone]
SUITE 250 FAN; [phone] NASHNLLE, N.C. 27056 FAN: [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 age 51 of 193 CROSSING #5 - DETAILS
APRIL 2008 1

X
CREEK
L CENTERLINE '
SONE `1 BUFFER LIMIT
C
ZONE 2 BUFFER. LIMIT ,[[
\ O
\ ` ULSIA 74- LF' — /
148"\RCP
\
=f
I -
PERM. CHANNEL'`
IMPACT O
x0
'ZONE `1 BUFFER LIMIT
1 FS=D_
\ .
TEMP.. CHANNEL,
IMPACT
Y`�,
`\ \
TOB
-,Z NEB1GIN
BUFFER
Ojp
ZONE 2 BUFFER LIMITS .
IMPOaTANT' PERENNIAL STREAM
CREEK
CENTERLINE
,- /
® ZONE 1 IMPACT 6976 SF SCALE: 1" = 50'
ZONE 2 IMPACT 3316 SF o 50 goo 125 iso
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -06A
3344 HIELSBOROUGH ST. PHONE 9) 0 B21-2440 NAS EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: (252) -519796
SUITE 250 FAX: (91 9)
821-1210 NASHVILLE, N.C. 27856 FAX [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 CROSSING #6 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
Page 52 of 193 APRIL 2008

300
• IC
1 280
1 270
1260
20+00
22+00 24+00
1 CROSSING #6 PROFILE
C -06B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
26+00
3001
2901
R
2701
2601
BED OF STREAM I I• ' ' ' � � ` " `" I 1"1 •
tO6B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS. CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 H51S90ROUSH St PHONE [phone] EASTERN AV£M,E PHONE [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C-068
SUITE 255 FAX: [phone] NASMNLLEN.C. 27858 FAX -c252> 459-5,97 s CROSSING #6 — DETAILS
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 a, e 53 Of 193
APRIL 2008

I
ZONE 1'26UFEER—LIMIT__
i
\� ZONE 1 BUFFER LIMIT
00
X
PERM 6HANNEL
IMPACT
CREEK
CENT�RLINE:!�-,
\\
• DOUBLE
54" RCE',s
JAB' BEGIN / TEMP., CHANNEL
ZONE 1 IMPACT
' - BUFFER '
IMPORTANT PERENNIAL 'STREAM
® ZONE 1 IMPACT 7828 SF SCALE: 1" = 50'
ZONE 2 IMPACT 4276 SF o 50 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -07A
SUIT HILLSBOROUGH SL PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone]
RALEIGH,
250 FAX; [phone] NASHVILLE, N.C. 27858 FA%: (262) t69-6187 CROSSING #7 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607
Page 54 of 193 APRIL 2008

L 200.00'
o K 27.59
0
00 R 3.63
....__........._.............._..._.__....._
1-...�n..._..
_
..... _....... _._._... __... _...........
_ _ _....._.....__._
....._.....
._.._...__....._......._.......
............. _ .._...�._.__._..__..._........_.._..._...._..__............ ..........._... ..__........_._..._.-... _......._..........._...._...
.__ ... _. 4...Q.O._._...._..._.._..._...._.._...._....._...................._..._...._.._.......-_._........._......I.._....._..._.......
_._.... o.
...._...._.....,� ..N..._........_.._
_,� ..__......__.............
_ ._..._...._._........_.._
.._._._.__..._.._..._....._.... ......_._.._..._.....
........._._............._
------ _._ ....
_..-...._._.__ ....._f :3...: �Offi:':.::::=:_::M..:"::=::::.:::::::�.::w:::::�::::::..:
:::::::
250----._...._.____.._.
.:::::
..__...._..._.
......... _-.__...__..._.._..... __........_..._.._.
oo
.....
........... ....._.
50
2v...._.._......_...._......._..._._......_........_...._.
o::--....__....- --------- -__:_:
__
.__..._...._..Q
_.......... _:o,_._.__
�__o._.._-_-.._-___.a.
--_--:---�
=__
-----._.--.
:_io.
_
.. __._...........__.._ ._._..__ .._..._....rM._._........ .......
.
....... -_._.........
__..._..._._:ry
04
240
__._.._..._._...
......... _. _......_>._-___.._.
_.__._..
_._ ...._....
�.._..._.___...___. _______._ .____._._._..._........_._..__-.-.-
-
-
240
._.._.......__.........._
..._..._._ . .._._..._.___.._...__
Nd
rr2--%
230
230
_.---._._..._.
_.._.__..__......__.._..__._..
_-.__.._.__._
._._........... _
.._....> _ ____ _ ... jww ____. _._.._.._....__ .._____..__ _____.__._ .__.____._
._..__..._..._.
.___.._
____._
___.___..__.______._
.._._____._.
_a . 1 �I.._. ____._....__._..___....__._ _..___.._.....__._ ____.__.._._ __.._._.
220
_._.._.._.
_._.__.._.._.__.
____..-____.._...._....__._
.__...__..__._........._._...___._._
_._............__._.---__-__.__ __.._...._.__ __._.__...._.._. __.__.._..__._ ...__......._.___
._._._..___.__....
0
10+00 12+00 14+00 16+00
CROSSING #7 PROFILE
C_O%B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
"=10'
VERT.: 1
- RD.
10' 10,
2' ACSC S9.513 GRADE POINT 4-
4-
8%_ 2% 2X _ g
., B" CAB
SUBGRAAADE �Yc
5 0�
sr S �t'$
2 TYPICAL SECTION
PIPE BURIED 1BELOW
BED of STREAM tO7B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
3344 NR1,58CROUCH ST.
SUITE 250
RAlE1GH, N.C. 27807
PHONE: (9,9) 821-2440 1100 FASIERN AVENUE PHONE [phone]
FAX- (919) 921-22,0 NASHVILLE. N.C. 27858 FA%: (252) 159-9,97
a e 55 of 193
9 CROSSING #7 - DETAILS
C-078
I
APRIL 2008
i
i

ONE 1 BUFFER LIMIT
-ZONE 9.1�IBUFFER LIMIT 00 . ............
PERM. CHANNEL
CCR REEK IMPACT V,
CENTERLINE
TEMP.. CHANNEL
IMPACT
ti TN
E15 ZONE 1
.,LFOB BEGI
Ck
54 R
/* BUFFER
CREEK
CENTERLINE
FH
ab / sr'
ZONE 1 BUFFER "LIMIT
ZONE 2 BUFFER__LIMIT
�IMPORTANT /PER NNIAL-STREAM
ZONE 1 IMPACT 7731 SF SCALE: 1 50'
ZONE 2 IMPACT 3473 SF
0 S0 160 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
.3344 HUWOROUGH ST. PHONE: (SIQ) B21-2440 1100 EASTERN AVENUE JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC_
SUIS 9 PHONE. [phone] C -08A
Ul. 250 FAX [phone] NASKM[14 N.C. 27856 FAx: (2m) 4ss-aw
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 CROSSING #8 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
Page 56 of 193 APRIL 2008

250 250
1 240
1 230
1 220
12104-
12+00
BED OF STREAM
14+00 16+00
1 CROSSING #8 PROFILE
C-088SCALE: VOR 1"=100'
VERT.:.: 1 "=10'
TVnl^ A I c-rnTin►i
SCALE: N.T.S.
18+00
2401
2301
2201
2101
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -08B
SO H81580ROUCH 5T. PHONE [phone] EAS"N A%ENUE PHONE [phone]
SUITE 250 FAX- [phone] NASHVILLE. N.C. 27858 FAX: [phone] s CROSSING #8 — DETAILS
RALEIGH, N.C. 27eo7 'age 57 of 193
APRILI MR

w m w m w w w ,e, m w w m w w w m m•/
I N
• 2c m. s .at ax es. w ,a nr, sr. w ac a m a r � / �`
I• w m m m� m m m m r rp �. �k •./
EDGE
m M PONDm m / .. �9
m ..
86 LF
48" RCP
EDGE
WETLAND
fee
1
=JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACT 4026 SF SCALE: 1" = iR
0 50 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COMP, NC C -09A
J544 HIUSBOROUCH ST. PHONE: [phone]M0 1100 EASTERN AVENUE PHONE (252) SSB-BIB6
RITE 25C FAX [phone] NASHNLLE N.
27856 FAX: (252) X59-8197 s 10ROSSING #9 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
�
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 a e 58 of
APRIL 2nns

300
290
280
10+00
12+00
CROSSING #9 PROFILE
C - 09B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1"=10'
PIPE BURIED 9.5" BELOW
FLOW LINE
TYPICAL SECTION
SCALE: N.T.S.
300
290
-1.280
13+50
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
]344 MILL%ORWGH ST. PHONE [phone]N0 1100 EASTERN A1iNUE PHONE [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -09B
SUITE 250C. 27807 FAX: [phone] NASHVILLE. N.C. 27856 FAX: [phone]
RAUDGH. N. 8 ge 59 of 193 CROSSING #S -DETAILS

:_'"_---\ EDGE
WETLAND
l I ,/ / 0 / j.,,j
—TEMP
• IMPACT
60 LF —p0 j
54" RCP
oe
ERM.
IMPACT
/
TEMP.
;IMPACT
. . . .. ..........
j .
LINEAR WETLAND SCALE: 1 = 50'
0 50 160 15 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE. [phone] EA -11 AVENUE PHONE: [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -10A
SUITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHVIJJJ, N.C. 27556 FAX[phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 CROSSING #10 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
Page 60 of 193 APRIL 2008

t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
............................. ...........................
290- 290
280 280
270 270
260 260
10+00 12+00 14+00
1 CROSSING #10 PROFILE
C-1 OB SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1"=10'
RD.
10' 10'
2' ACSC S9.58 GRADE POINT 4'
4'
x _ 2X_ 2fiL,� 8x
8 CABG LA
j
COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
5
a
PIPE BURIED V BELOW 2 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM
tLO B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERM17TING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -10B
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE: (019) —221040 1100 EASTERN 2706 PHONE [phone]
SUITE 250 FAX. [phone] NASNL7LLE, N.C, 27958 FAx [phone] CROSSING #10 - DETAILS
RALEIGH, N.C. M07 age 61 of 193
APRIc 2000
I.��
i��r�iw�
�
IlrwNl Ir:�'��!"
�wwlalrallwr

ZONE 1� BUFFER LIMIT
.\ZONE 2i BUFFER LIMIT—
FEE]
x
4-10�
sl
ZONE 1 BUFFER LIMIT
ONE 2 BUFFER LIMIT
90 LF,"�'
)r
DOUBLE
60 RCP's
PERM. CHANNEL
IMPACT
TEMP.. CHANNEL,\
lmpkyFFER
CR�
CENTERLINE
0
IMPORTANT PERENNIAL STREAM
ZONE 1 IMPACT 8743 SF SCALE: 1" 50'
ZONE 2 IMPACT 4398 SF
6 50 160 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3 44 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE- 1(919) 821-2440 1100 EASTERN AVENUE PHONE-. [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC -11A
SUITE 250 FAY_. (9 9) 821-22tO NASHVILLE. N.C. MSG FAY- [phone] C
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 CROSSING #11- DETAILED SITE PLAN
Page 62 of 193 APRIL 2008

270 270
260 rm 260
250- 250
240-2 240
230- -11230
12+00 14+00 16+00 18+00
1 CROSSING #11 PROFILE
C-1
�1B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1 "=100'
RD.
VERT.: 1 "=10'
10' 10'
2" ACSC S9.5B GRADE POINT 4'
4'
_
_ 2%. 2X
ax
8 CAB la 1.0
"51 COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
PIPE BURIED V BELOW 2 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM C-1 1 B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS. PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C-11 B
SUITE 28501.SBOROUGH FAY- (919)1821 �22�0 a NASVILLE. N.C. 27858 FAX'. (25) 450-8197252) 98
RALEIGH. N.C. 27807 age 63 of 193 CROSSING #'11— DETAILS
APRIL 20OB I 1
�■I■�A lr�'RI����I�A•■■II.
�
��►�
■A�
111w��
r�r�Irrrrl�IwlwrNwlnlr ��r�wlr�l����■�rl�wlw�w�llwlr��l�rii�

I V IVV ILJ IJV
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
33 JOHNSTON COUNTY NC C 12A
SUIT HILLSBOROUGH SL PHONE: [phone] NAS EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: (252) -819796 /f { q i
SLATE 250 FAX: (B18) 821-2210 NASHVILLE, N.C. 27856 FAX (252) 459-BI97 CROSSING #/L _ DETAILED SITE PLAN
RAlE10H, N.C. 27607 CROSSING {7/
Page 64 of 193 APRIL 2008

i 1 Rn.nn'
260
250
240
230
220
12+00
14+00 16+00
1 CROSSING #12 PROFILE
C-120 SCALE: HOR1Z.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
260 1
250 1
240 1
230 1
220 I
18+00
LPIPE BURIED 7" BELOW 1 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM
C-120 SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C-128
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE: [phone] EASTERN AVENUE 27856 PHONE: [phone]
SURE 250 FAX [phone] NASHNLLE, N.C. 27851 FAX [phone] CROSSING #12 - DETAILS
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 age 65 of 193
APRIL 2008

C
RE0
F�l
CENTERLINE
q 0
. . ..........
......... .....
.... ... ...
... .. .....
TEM CHA14NIEL-,
IMPACT
....... ....
T08 BEGIN
/l/6
5 LF' ZONE -------
36" RCP
1
BUFFER
------ -- ------ ......
... --------
...... ..... ...
PER . �IMPAC CHANNEL
/
it
J a. .. . .......
ZONE 1 BUFFER LIMIT
ONE 2. -BUFFER LIMIT
CREEK"
CENTERLINE ,
UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT STREAM
KZONE 1 IMPACT 6212 SF SCALE: 1 50'
ONE 2 IMPACT 2833 SF 0 do 160 125 160
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
44 HI LS8--GH ST. PHONE: EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone] JOHNSTON COUNff, INC
SUITE 250 FAX: VILLF• NX, 27856 FAX. [phone] C -13A
M
RALEIGH, N.C. 27507 CROSSING #13 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
Page 66 of 193 APRIL 2008

260
250
240
230-
-260
250
240
230
10+00 12+00 13+50
rl�
CROSSING #13 PROFILE
C -13B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1"=10'
4'.
8.
LPIPE BURIED 7" BELOW Z TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM
C -13B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -13H
53M HILLSBOROUGH ST. PRONE: 6) 1 2210 1100 EASTERN"N. AVENUE PMONE (252) 1-5197 8
SURE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHNILE. N.C. 27851 FAX: [phone] CROSSING #13 - DETAILS
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 age 67 of 193
APRIL 2008

1- —�E-2M —,GHAN
f ___IMPACT'
I /r N
QIV
1 r' • ) 1 t
/ LSI$' i (
i JAI c j
/ZONE' (1 BUFFER LIMIT
ZONE 2 BUFFER; LIMIT�� f
�• BG � I�
UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT STREAM
wzONE
ONE 1 IMPACT 7592 SF SCALE: 1" = 50'
2 IMPACT 3. 601 SF o 50 100 125
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
3344 H(LISBOROUGH SL PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone]
SUITE 250 FAX [phone] NASHVILLE, N.C. 27656 FAX [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607
150
FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, INC C -14A
CROSSING #14 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
68 of 193 APRIL 2008

290 340-,0'X--290
f
TO --7
._a-7
' T
280 — ® 280
�.cr
270 T Q' 270
260 260
250 250
10+00 12+00 14+00
1 CROSSING #14 PROFILE
C -14B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
RD.
10' 10'
2- ACSC S9.5B GRADE POINT 4*
4� r
_ 2%- . 8X
--a
w 8- CAB
6' COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
Ai'
PIPE BURIED V BELOW 2 TYPICAL SECTION
BED OF STREAM
C - 14B SCALE: N.T.S.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -14B
SUITE H5LSBOROUGX ST. PHONE: 0) 8 82t-2440 1100 EASE. N. AWNUE PHONE (252) E52147
SUITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHNLLf, N.C. 27958 FAX [phone] CROSSING #14 - DETAILS
RALEIGH, N.C. 27507 age 69 of 193
A pit gnna

2,14
54" RCP
CREEK
CENTERL NE
ZONE 1 )QUFFER LINT
ONE 2 BUI`;�ER LIMIT
UNIMPORTANT/INTERMITTENT STREAM SCALE: 1" = 50' iiiiii
0 50 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -16A
SU NLLSeORWGH Si. FAXO (919)10 822210 C EASTERN
N.0^2fi56 FA%: (252)2{58-E197B8
AGN, N.C. 27607 aye 70 of MOSSIN6 #16 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
APRIL 2005

290
280
270
10+00
12+00
14+00
CROSSING #16 PROFILE
C -16B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1 "=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
PIPE BURIED V BELOW
BED OF STREAM
TYPICAL SECTION
SCALE: N.T.S.
290
280
270
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC �_ is8
SUITE 250 FAX; [phone] NASHVILLE. N.C. 27856 FAX [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27607 age 71 of 193 CROSSING #16 - DETAILS
APRIL 2008

• /� C�OSSIN6 #1 .
TEMK
IMP CT 1
M MP.
A(J \
PERK
PACT • • 1
REP
TEMP.
E IMPACT
I ACCT \
t3"RCf
1 /
�E�P.
LINEAR WETLAND — CROSSING #18 SCALE: 1" = 50'
LINEAR WETLAND — CROSSING 19 0 50 100 125 Iso
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C-18A
3314 f9IL580R0UCJ1 ST. PHONE: (919) 82f-2N0 1100 EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone]
RALEIGH,
250 FAX: (018) B2f-2210 NASHNLLE, N.C. 27858 FAIL• [phone] age CUMNGS #18 & #19 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
RAIERp1, N.C. 27607
Avail 9nna

240
230-
220-
210-
200-
1
30220210200'1
• IIM1�!Y • 1�
MI�I��II��IM1M1111�I�M�IIM1�1111A1I��AlI�."�li� ..a��IN�11�' i11�1�M�1
CROSSINGS24+00 26+00 28'00
30+00
• PROFILE
10, •
GRADEPOINT
�IIIII';�IILI�II�III' ��� •
-11=II-�11=11.=11.
PIPE
0
• •©BED OF STREAM TYPICAL SECTION
��8
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
3344 IRLIMOIN)LIGH ST, PHONE. (019) 621 Jt440 110D EASTERN AVENUE
SUITE 250 FAk (910) a2l-2210 NASHVILLE N.C. 27M FAX 2_8197
RALEIGH, KC, 27601
240
i
230
220
210
200
C-18BI

I Photographs of Impact Areas
J
Page 74 of 193

A�
9 pw 0-l'
MWERS CRUSSINUS PES
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA JOHNSTON COUNTY, N!
11010 Ravin Ridge Road • Raleigh, Notth Cmhm 27614 , Phone: [phone] • Fu (919) 846-946 age 75 of 193
—.S.deC..om nenVVIun U4 nunrnn

� rt
ra
ar
s ♦ � y
�yy
ek yy
}
� tV
.. � , ate. ,. r';•(, � 4
i �'r {-K i?�� �� \`�4•�� Awn w a
v
` M{i
e
DWERS
CROSSINGS
r *
PH
rAj
JOHNSTON
COUNTY,
M
of 193
CROSSING
Annu
#3
nnnn
- PHOTOS
YA^
p
Y yM
P
�' Yo- .=< .rte. ' •; t f'44
. r
� rt
ra
ar
s ♦ � y
�yy
ek yy
}
� tV
.. � , ate. ,. r';•(, � 4
i �'r {-K i?�� �� \`�4•�� Awn w a
v
` M{i
e
DWERS
CROSSINGS
PH
JOHNSTON
COUNTY,
M
of 193
CROSSING
Annu
#3
nnnn
- PHOTOS

' i p 777
d M
t
:�4�,��a •'sem _ ?.«� ,, �� i�* - F� Y �,•'�"'
s
it c s
�' . r�'t � ., s .,.� -''r► - s � may,;, the
xr .a
v
UWERS CROtiSINUN PEH

Ii ri 7.1"RII .'IIXXYII'rHM;i I.

LOOKING EAST
LOOKING NORTH
LOOKING WEST
LOOKING SOUTH
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
3344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone] JOHNSTON COUNTY, INC C -12C
RUALEIGH. N.C. 27607 ITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHVILLE. N.C. 27856 FAS: [phone] Page 85 of 193 CROSSING #12 - PHOTOS
APRIL 2008

1 k4
� r
��
. d:� A x� i� ♦" .,� - � ./y. ��[+fA,_ !�� � �� T Til
PLYAW
a
'
. P Y
d �S,
e4
v
�t f
e
,
At
•-r.`�i�' ��'�� �J �' . ,fir � _✓`, "'qs*�_
r
y Y
4
4
z �3
MRS
GRUSSINUS
1
JOHNSTON
1 k4
� r
��
. d:� A x� i� ♦" .,� - � ./y. ��[+fA,_ !�� � �� T Til
PLYAW
a
'
. P Y
d �S,
e4
v
�t f
e
,
At
•-r.`�i�' ��'�� �J �' . ,fir � _✓`, "'qs*�_
r
y Y
4
4
z �3
MRS
GRUSSINUS
PEN
JOHNSTON
COUNTY,
Ni
of 193
CROSSING
even
#14
-
12nno
PHOTOS

LOOKING EAST
CROSSING LOCATION
FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC C -18C
11010 Ravin Ridge Rand • RdeigL• Nwh C—Ii.. 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fu: (919) U&9461age 88 of 193
CROSSING #18 - PHOTOS
APRIL 2008

LOOKING EAST
LOOKING WEST
FLOWERS CROSSINGS PERMITTING
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
11010 Rs— Ridge Road • Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27614 • Ph.[phone] • Fu: (919) 646-946 age 89 of 193 C-19
—.SaadEC.wm CROSSING #19 - PHOTOS
APRIL 2008

I Stormwater Management
Diffuse Flow Calculations
Page 90 of 193

1 THE VILLAGE AT FLOWERS PLANTATION -MAY 2008
Stormwater Management & Diffuse Flow Calculations
The proposed project, The Village at Flowers Plantation, entails the infrastructure (i.e.
roads) that will support the future residential and commercial development of property
and excludes the existing developed areas as identified and depicted on the overall site
plan. Because only the roads can be designed at this time and the project is located
within the Neuse River Basin, the project engineer has provided and we have included
level spreaders on the impact exhibits and diffuse flow calculations to meet the diffuse
' flow requirements. Additionally, the percent impervious for some portions of the
residential and/or commercial phases of this Master Planned community is expected to
be greater than 24% and would therefore require a stormwater management plan to
' meet the NCDWQ stormwater management requirements. However, at this time the
specific development plans for the residential and commercial phases that are to be
designed are unknown. As such, we would like to request a conditional approval from
the NCDWQ that would allow the review and approval of the stormwater management
plans to be submitted on a phase by phase basis to either the 401/Express Permitting
Unit or to Johnston County, an NCDWQ delegated municipality with a local stormwater
management program.
Page 91 of 193

Page 92 of 193
q°
�
u
�
'O
•;
El
�C �a
d
p y�aj
v�u
^
y Q
M
O
�c
� 7
E
•a�
�
�,°wo
a
.9
ip�0099
l��,lf6
���
' �
��
—°�
��
8
b
>��3�
A ••.
°app
� o�
>�
V
M
•� O
Y G
�
F 27
•a
m
m C o
4°�i
'.3 ?3 v
31
�
B
� •`�
ai
vi ^ �
:� • 3
� o 'g �y
o
N
N
d
N b O
N O� H
h h h a
N
h b h
V' Q Oo 00
00 Ot Vt O
M Ci vi
C f`1 v�� N1
00 O V'
[: 00 0
W M OG
7 O O� p
O r r O
O� Q\ 00
.r. .�-. O
16
R M V1 b
N N N
b h W Ot
l� 0 0
h p N
M MV
S N
h .L tit
N
G n e.1 p
r D` ,..
a .^+
b ,00. N N
N W .�•. CNO
ti
M O. ti
ti
j�j h
N N
^ N
.h+
Q
r O vt
h hl N
N 00 O �D
Vl O� O Vt
T M o0
OR 00
N
O.
O
O
p
C
G
CD
O
O
O
O
p
C
ww
v
o
e
e��•.
W
p
p
C
O
O
C!
p
O
fop
O
N
M
N
N
N
Q
n
N
b
N
Q -
T
N
N
N
i
Ivry
Q
r+
O
O
p
O
O
Wl
O
O
O
O
O
tri
c
r
N
o,
00
N
7
oMo
1161
Dnp
tp
O�0
N
Oh
�••� u
N
M
r
b
10
N
p
N
N
N
r
N
r
tn
�p
Q x
N
N
M
{l��
T
QQ
N
en
a
r1
O
M
Q
N
w
N h
H VOi
N N Itn
N N
N N N ppy
N N 1011 ppj
N N Vpi ppy
N h N
N N „py
N N N
N N h N
N N VI ppy
N Bey
N ppy
ppy
�Oy
QI
h
N a
O V
U Q
Y � to
d
-
•vx
0�0 Wy O
O
x
t
�
�.;
Page 92 of 193

Page 93 of 193
Y
y
F]
Lj
Rj
C� Lj
tj
t]
S bQ,
ttgog�� bRR
�-a^---aha--o------^"_gf;---
bRR iiss gggg
gp�j b
b b !�$
Q, -9@ bg
b bQ
$g b o
0 qgo bR
p�
g
B
j
c
d R
6
m
v n
---------4
«4
-
o ��a
R°•dry
m
$N.�ie
ey
* a�.J
$$ «
n
N.�1• a1
.S xtl•,
nNx-1n
xJNvNNvNn
3ppyU
$,------2
v'2
.mxni
mi ni
2�i
w�j�o
o
�
22
i
-ia
Qx ps{$�g"q'g'e�9'
QQ qq
S S
gq gg
�_ NN
qq q gg
iJ _N iJ
Q 44 QQ
25 SS
gg qQ gg
Ni•1 i_J
5��5y p45�R���9i
gg 44
iJ � N
4
•
4 0 4
4 0
0
4 0 9
4 0 4?
o?
R a 4
4 e R
e e 4
e e e
e e R
g o 0
Si
3
BNS
�w
n
n
e
aaEffis<ad�aE`12
9arya<
Q
ti�iixi
�.m
^
^iapm8t
a 6a
a mei$.ne,
e
�je �
a a
m«_no
rin
e�4
Ra
O
� a
�88m�a��ryN$s���mN�=ag�M1
��rymN$eRm��
v
2
9�
OE�8�88N
:d N
.t .:
.i N
$..Re
"wSe��e
9
a
cpt
«°�rHr�S���HR�«
�3
z�
W
g"aap
m$
0ARA62A°
a"aa���«"a«�
eQ���eeeee
��
Qg4g
aen�ha=�ryh%rennn
is
ry_m
p
r H
x N r
0
a
C
'y
�
9'38R'X28,8918R''78��'A'�i8A8S,03i��8�817fn�''78�RSZR3l9P„
O
Y
o
Q.
i0
#
Page 93 of 193

f
y
�•
d N m d }
d OI Ot
y
m d d Ol A
N d dbC
d d}
d d d d
O, C OE
d d d m
dl O> CE
C C C C
d d d d
�1 Oi C
C C C
'N!A t4 V!�
}3, d d d d�
C 01 OE
C C C gg
-NNRA N.3
d d d d
Oi O� -
C C C C •r-
V1 NN VJ}
d N N d,-..
O�
C y m G i,
V7NNR�
(l1 d d ✓��
3.
�j C C dry
NVl tp tq
� d m
d
d N m C
Nt/1 V1 N
(0/)N Q)U)
U) (n coM
fANNN
(j) en Cf) 3"
f41hN
�
�.
'�
- 0 0 0 0 f
Vi eC U
b n m
O O O O g
V1 '+ h M
O N h N
O O O O
tri � M ...
N ^
O 0 0
�G ti R'1 � �.
^ b N 3.,.
0 0 0 0.
P O� •� Ni
m N l� �•
O O O
� r .m. M :.
Ge�l COR• O C
.. N h � N
0 0 0 0
ri h-
- ^ N Q Q
-• O 0 0,
O r �+I N
� � Q '. m -
0 0 0 0
y Ni b
O O O O
MI ^M' b N
0 0 0 0
^ K N w
3
-
�}�,dddd.-ddod'ddd^�odo'E��ddd'dcdd•,ddod
doad:oddd�dd6d
oddd�-dood
<o : A'�
U��
�`e X•
aF��o•
F�,�,
q:e p ��
a gm
'^Q�v,
�R�R
m Q
}
O n h h
h
` O h h h�
O h
'g• Vol h
.Y(x h v01 v01 O.
•
O„ N O
•�yy
N�
Q
< O O
h h h
h h h VOi
O h O�
h
h
h O N h
VOi vCl O
•
l h°�
N N h Voj
t
�
W �
-�Q nomo-
�o=o.n-
oo�om
o ryrn
0 '4666
6666
C C O O
- C O66
Sp R Vj N
^ Q ^
G
t O < '+
O lV V) O
VI V1 C O
K
•`
-
3
p pp
O S
S S S S
ppb
S O S O
-6
S S O O�
S S o
R' S O O��
O O S
O S S
M``• O^ S S
-' SSSS
O S S O
� p pp
4� S S O O
B O
�-
$�.�
E.'•
_
^
�
v**
Y
imaoom
°O
R=-
OSTM
�l
v
1
O O •
x O O C
h0 0 0
0
C 0 0 0
O C G C
0 0 0
6 0
O
O
Nk
a
n
Y�
m .. h
N O•
r b b
O .-• m r
-. t` � .nn m
.V 1. � V O
.'�. '» R r
v
Q
O
6144
O m h m
0 0 0 0
� oo h .-.
- 0 0
N
-` h 0^ O
h
•^>� O O
O O
O O
O ^ G -•
G O O C
- O G O
0 0 0
•+ h M
.: � P N �
- 10 n O� O
.- yOj � P- W
tom_ t� h
0 0 0
N m �
O O OO O
w�.t
S 8
$ O O N
O O O O
S S S O
: p Op S O g
�
O O
D O S S
O S O O
� G
Gi
- � M-
I
I
�'4
•E
Ldi .�
:
�
FF
�
•Y:
+��WA
t�
dNWq
v
_ ao5ygl.
ao5t�dee4vderLyd�9ao;tjd:�aalud�ac8yb�
9e 94
93
d
m

F Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:...
' Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = MO ,; , sf
281.87 acres
'
Qio --CxIxA
C = Pf-
ho = Whr
A= 281.87 acres
Qio = 528.32 cfs
' Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Mannings Equation: V=1.49/n * 1F*Sly , Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n = b�i1:��� 4-6" stone
Base Width (B) = x . M . _ ft -ft 0
M:=
M:1
' Ditch Slope (S)
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)EM fps
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area (A) = B*d + M*d2 e 46.86
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S - 18.65
R= A/P= 2.51
VPR = V Permiss * R = 15.07
V = Flow Velocity = 11.28 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
' Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 6.00 fps
Vactual = 11.28 fps
Page 95 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
g P p��BEV=
�Station Ran e/Descri tion: i 1tin :_ 3
Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = 568Ct7 W sf
40.33 acres
' Q10=Cx I x A
C = Oft
Iio = in/hr
A = 40.33 acres
Q10 = 114.72 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * e3*S" , Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n 4" stone
Base Width (B) _ ftFdJ
M—
MA
Ditch Slope (S)_ �-- , 3"+ sr
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)" fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*dZ- 18.82
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)'S = 16.18
R = A/P = 1.16
VpR = V Permiss * R = 6.98
V = Flow Velocity = 6.10 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
' Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 6.00 fps
Vactual = 6.10 fps
Page 96 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:i +ems 9alr1
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = w Opp. " sf
1300.00 acres
Qlo=CxIxA
I10 = t�.i "a; in/hr
A = 1300.00 acres
Q10 = 1378.65 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * IF*S1/2, Q=AN
Ditch Characteristics:
n=�
''"� 18" stone
Base Width (B) = ft —Zil0
M=
Ditch Slope (S) _ I� -►1
Permissible Max Velocity 9,Rm ft fps
Fil
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
R
Area (A) =
B*d + M*dz `
119.22
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(M2+l)'S'
33.59
R=
A/P =
3.55
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
37.97
V =
Flow Velocity =
11.56 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
10.70
fps
Vactual =
11.56
fps
A.
Page 97 of 193

11
Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
r *.
Ditch # -
Station Range/Description:
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area sf
46.75 acres
Qio=CxIxA
C =� »w
Ilo = in/hr
A= 46.75 acres
Qio = 125.34 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Rv3*SIS , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
grass
Base Width (B) N R M:1
M= F
Ditch Slope (S) _ o f�
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)
,, i X-0-1 9 WE fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
ft
Area (A)=
B*d+M*d2-
13.62
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S -
11.71
R =
AN =
1.16
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
5.82
V =
Flow Velocity =
9.20 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
9.20
fps
Page 98 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description: dans. i�?itIo t~yrtassing
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = W�"09��_„ sf
183.87 acres
QIo=CxIxA
flow depth =
C= -0s
Area (A) =
IIo = N in/hr
38.73
A = 183.87 acres
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S -
Q10 = 390.68 cfs
R =
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition: _
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * le'*S" , Q=A/V
VPR =
Ditch Characteristics:
13.19
n = 9 4" stone
Flow Velocity =
Base Width (B) ft
Q =
design flow =
M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _MOWN=
N— ►�
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
VP =
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
ft
Area (A) =
B*d + M*& -
38.73
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S -
17.61
R =
A/P =
2.20
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
13.19
V =
Flow Velocity =
10.09 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
10.09
fps
Page 99 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description: E1�rstngi)i , itl'orCrs�ltg#$
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area =11-10 -83;,, , „ 8
56.52 acres
' Qio=CxIxA
110 — m " in/hr
'A= 56.52 acres
Qio = 148.78 cfs
' Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Re3*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
grass
Base Width (B) — ft®
r r
Ditch Slope (S) _g.�f
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) � A,�fts
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d= flow depth = ft
Area (A) = B*d+M*d2- 18.17
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)'S ` 11.66
' R = A/P = 1.56
VpR = V Permiss * R = 7.79
V = Flow Velocity = 8.19 fps
' Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 8.19 fps
Page 100 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
' Project Name: Flowers Permit Cossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = x8823 .' sf
66.17 acres
Q10=CxIxA
C=
Ito =_.
µ in/hr
' A = 66.17 acres
Qio = 149.04 cfs
' Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Rv3*Su2, Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = �, .. -F brushy channel
Base Width (B) _ ftd❑
M M:1
' Ditch Slope (S) _ M "f0o w;. .„ N --►I
Permissible Mix Velocity (Vp)0 fpsFBI
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*d2` 37.72
' Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)'S ` 16.61
R = A/P = 2.27
VPR= V Permiss * R= 11.35
' V = Flow Velocity = 3.95 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
' Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
Vp = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 3.95 fps
11
11
11
n
Page 101 of 193
11

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
' Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #: x _
Station Range/Description:
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area =t13" sf
88.22 acres
Qio=CxIxA
C=
110 = in/hr
A = 88.22 acres
Q10 = 174.17 cfs
1 Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Rv3*Sjl', Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n = - brushy channel
Base Width (B) _ ft
M=M MEMO, M:1
' Ditch Slope (S)_ 10.°`'0= �►I
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) w ,.N.�.:. fps
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area (A) = B*d+M*d2- 75.76
' Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S - 55.32
R= A/P= 1.37
VpR = V Permiss * R = 6.85
V = Flow Velocity = 2.30 fps
' Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 2.30 fps
Page 102 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet 1
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
09
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description: lxn��n
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area =.a sf
186.96 acres
Qio=CxIxA
C
lio = � _ i� ° in/hr
A = 186.96 acres
Q 1 = 395.76 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S112 , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n =tOZ8 . 4" stone
Base Width (B) ft a
M = xt� M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _A
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)0..: �R� fps B
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual
"d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
:.a ft
Area (A) =
B*d+ M*d2=
35.82
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)" -
16.45
R =
A/P =
2.18
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
10.89
V =
Flow Velocity =
11.05 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
Vp =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
11.05
fps
Page 103 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:uDc,6
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = IN sf
22.61 acres
Q10=CxIxA
C =iggs-S:IJ rn
A = 22.61 acres
Qlo = 65.00 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*Sly , Q=AN
Ditch Characteristics:
n =grass
Base Width (B) _" ft M:1 ❑
M=�
Ditch Slope (S) _
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp).'(F fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual
"d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
a} j'`d , ft
Area (A)=
B*d+M*d2-
12.69
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S `
16.25
R =
AIT =
0.78
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
3.91
V =
Flow Velocity =
5.12 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
5.12
fps
Page 104 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = �' ' IIM S M .- ` sf
23.61 acres
QIo=CxIxA
C =pra
.
I 1 = � in/hr
A = 23.61 acres
QIo = 70.24 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = -I= 4" stone
Base Width (B) _ ft�
Ditch Slope (S)_noWN,,
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
Apply the Following Analysis to
Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth = ft
Area (A)=
B*d+M*&= 7.62
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(Nf2+1)" 7.81
R=
A/P= 0.98
VPR =
V Permiss * R = 4.88
V =
Flow Velocity = 9.22 fps
Q =
design flow = cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00 fps
Vactual =
9.22 fps
Page 105 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings��.. MK
Ditch #: 1�
Station Range/Description: r�titiCrslugL4
Peak Discharge Calculation:
...............
Drainage Area = O • - t sf
70.77 acres
Qio=CxIxA
_=-OUNNi,
1104 ­
lo = _ _
in/hr
A = 70.77 acres
Qio = 165.91 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n 6" stone
Base Width (B) _ ft®
M = M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) -1� fps B
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
ft
Area(A)=
B*d+M*d2-
16.12
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S `
11.31
R =
A/P =
1.43
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
8.55
V =
Flow Velocity =
10.29 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
10.29
fps
Page 106 of 193

tDitch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
' Ditch #: IM, ' '
Station Range/Description: N, s >1a i..;, off' . 0—T-
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area =WE
�- _. n sf
5.91 acres
Qio=CxIxA
C=
110 =w in/hrg.�ft>
A = 5.91 acres
Qio = 53.00 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O -S", Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = (ii grass
Base Width (B) _ WE= ft 0
M= A M:1
Ditch Slope (S)
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)fps BI
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
Page 107 of 193
d = flow depth =
° ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*&-
5.41
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'5 -
9.27
'
R = A/P =
0.58
VpR = V Permiss * R =
2.92
V = Flow Velocity =
9.80 fps
' Q = design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 5.00
fps
'
Vactual = 9.80
fps
aqui( ova cLEerm ntn xN
' Find Permanent Lining
Recalculate with Liner:
Liner Material =
' n=� �"11A X21"
Stone
Base Width (B) = 4
ft
M= 3
Ditch Slope (S) = 8.00%
T allow Td r $Q
21" Stone
Page 107 of 193

Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d= flow depth =
Area (A) = B*d + M*d2 _
9.99
IIPerimeter
(P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)" -
12.07
R= A/P =
0.83
V = Flow Velocity =
5.30 fps
('
Q = design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Tshear stress= i'*d*s
y = 62.4
1b/ft3
d= 1.28
ft
S 8.00%
I'
_
Tshear stress 6.37
Compare Tshear stress to Td,
T allow (Tp) 7.80
Tshear stress — 6.37
Iti
Page 108 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:
staGrssin
Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area =278428 - sf
281.87 acres
Q25 = C x I x A
' Izs = _ � s
in/hr
A= 281.87 acres
Q25 = 586.84 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * IF*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics: —
n = W -141,301-M-4-6" stone
d
Base Width (B) $ M:1
M
Ditch Slope (S) =t}°
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area (A) = B*d + M*dz = 50.65
' Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(Mz+1)'s = 19.36
R= AT= 2.62
VpR = V Permiss * R = 15.70
' V = Flow Velocity = 11.59 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 6.00 fps
Vactual = 11.59 fps
u
u
n
n
11
Page 109 of 193

F Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet I
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:tiritg D)<fc�Ce3'ttFg
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = s68 sf
40.33 acres
Q25=CxIxA
C =51?
;mm in/hr
IZs =- __
A = 40.33 acres
Q25 = 126.09 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = 'Z0fi A 4" stone
Base Width (B) _
M =
Ditch Slope S a ' .
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)�t�iH�ll! fps [3
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
`?'$ 3 }) ,:. ft
Area (A) =
B*d + M*d2 a
20.18
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S -
16.72
R =
A/P =
1.21
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
7.24
V =
Flow Velocity =
6.25 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
6.25
fps
Page 110 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
' Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #
Station Range/Description:stu�i . z toxo;ssii5
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = h
'6i8if0U: ~ sf
1300.00 acres
Qts=CxIXA
125 in/hr
A = 1300.00 acres
Qzs = 1567.35 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * 03*Sl/2, Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = ROM r 18" stone
Base Width (B) _� ft M:1
M=� �`.. II
Ditch Slope (S) _�wr M N- ►I
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) ._.. fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V" _
d = flow depth =
ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*d2_
130.33
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'s=
34.64
R = AT =
3.76
VpR = V Permiss * R =
40.26
V = Flow Velocity =
12.03 fps
Q = design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
'
VP =
Vactual =
u
n
n
n
11
10.70 fps
12.03 fps
Page 111 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet 1
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description: ats�€iagl�cl%ot►s�in
Peak Discharge Calculation•
Drainage Area = „ 1)?$4 sf
46.75 acres
Qu=CxIxA
C=
Its = in/hr
A= 46.75 acres
Q25 = 137.94 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Rv3*SIT2, Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = o grass
Base Width (B) _'��l�� ft
M _ r M:1
Ditch Slope (S)
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)fps B
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =,
:.. ft
Area (A) =
B*d+ M*dz-
14.63
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'s -
12.12
R=
A/P=
1.21
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
6.04
V =
Flow Velocity =
9.43 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
9.43
fps
Page 112 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet J
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #: ������� .
Station Range/Description: NOR WI
NO -11 s� .
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Area
Drainage =
g h4C9� sf
183.87 acres
Qts=CxIxA
C=
a
>,..�:^.. -gym
in/hr
A = 183.87 acres
Q25 = 432.39 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * R''*Sri , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = f -T� 4" stone
Base Width (B)=
M=
Ki
Ditch Slope (S) =_,f,
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual
"d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
ft
Area(A)=
B*d+M*d2=
41.67
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'s =
18.17
R =
A/P =
2.29
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
13.76
V =
Flow Velocity =
10.38 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
10.38
fps
Page 113 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Pernit Crossings
Ditch #
Station Range/Description:s11tt�DiYc"o.Glrrss�ng$
_Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = $30 ..r sf
' 56.52 acres
Q2s=CxIxA
C =511
Al12s = $ in/hr
A= 56.52 acres
Q25= 163.80 cfs
' Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n =.,; ,�,,� grass
Base Width (B) _-ft
=� M:1
M
Ditch Slope (S) _ MAI
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) v fps B
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth =. ft
Area (A)= B*d+M*d2= 19.51
' Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)•s 12.06
R = A/P = 1.62
VpR = V Permiss * R = 8.09
V = Flow Velocity = 8.40 fps
Q = design flow = ;; : cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 8.40 fps
11
11
11
Page 114 of 193

Dutch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet I
Project Name: Flowers PermitCrossings
Ditch #:
�•
Station Range/Description: I�stin c���C�o
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = $83Q sf
Q25=CxIxA
66.17 acres
C WMIR Sr
in/hr
A = 66.17 acres
Q25 = 164.70 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * R *Si7 , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = � ��,�u� T� brushy channel
Base Width (B) _ ft
M:1
M=
Ditch Slope (S) 4N 5i1"!o
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp). fps FBI
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d=
flow depth =
z << yi ft
Area (A) =
B*d + M*dz=
40.65
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d* (M2+1).5 -
17.24
R=
A/P=
2.36
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
11.79
V =
Flow Velocity =
4.05 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
4.05
fps
Page 115 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossin_gS
Ditch #: MEMO
Station Range/Description:
�man
Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = �3�3b03 sf
88.22 acres
Q25=CxIxA
C =MR � Qx�0._
A = 88.22 acres
Q25 = 193.16 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * k13*S112, Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n brushy channel
Base Width (B)=ft JFAI
Ditch Slope (S) _Qt
Permissible Max Velocity (VP) fps B
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth= ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*d2- 81.86
' Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)s` 57.51
R = A/P = 1.42
VPR = V Permiss * R = 7.12
' V = Flow Velocity = 2.36 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
' Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
Vp = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 2.36 fps
11
11
u
Page 116 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet I
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #: l
Station Range/Description: ��, tlitl?Ciiiro�sslnn#1X
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = $4854 sf
186.96 acres
Q25=CxIxA
ON
inn
125 — _....'s• -.i m » cry
A = 186.96 acres
Q25 = 438.05 cfs
_Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * e *S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n= (1� Y 4" stone
Base Width (B)..ft ft
M=� M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _�� I�- ►I
Permissible Max Velocity (VP) fps B
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual 'T and "V"
d =
flow depth=
_)°,);lir ' ft
Area(A)=
B*d+M*d2-
38.59
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(M2+1)'S =
17.03
R =
A/P =
2.27
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
11.33
V =
Flow Velocity =
11.35 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
11.35
fps
Page 117 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
' Ditch #1.7
Station Range/Description: �CitudntcL �tsin"�12
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = 113MAXOMMsf
22.61 acres
' Q25=CxIxA
C =HiQ �,�.a
Izs = in/hr
' A = 22.61 µ acres
Q25 = 71.43 cfs
' Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Rv3*S" , Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n =tF grass
Base Width (B) _TO
r ft
M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _=�,���.�*o► u„ � 1` I'
f:
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) �' �� ,_ fps B
11
11
u
11
Page 118 of 193
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual
"d" and "V"
d = flow depth =
ft
Area (A)= B*d+M*dz-
13.62
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(Mz+1)'s =
16.83
'
R = A/P =
0.81
VpR = V Permiss * R =
4.05
V = Flow Velocity =
5.24 fps
Q = design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
Vp = 5.00
fps
'
Vactual = 5.24
fps
11
11
u
11
Page 118 of 193

f— Ditch "Q" and "Y" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #
Station Range/Description:xY' ng iitc IRR #
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = ��} sf
23.61 acres
. Q25=CxIxA
C =r
125 = w . in/hr
A= 23.61 acres
Q25 = 77.13 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics: —
n = IM }is 4" stone
Base Width (B) —O ft
M
Ditch Slope (S) _.�4 f�- ►f
' Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)' -W fps
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = _; ft
Area (A) = B*d + M*d2" 8.17
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)" = 8.09
R = A/P = 1.01
VPR = V Permiss * R = 5.05
V = Flow Velocity = 9.44 fps
Q = design flow = _ cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
' Vp = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 9.44 fps
11
D
11
11
Page 119 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #
Station Range/Description: 'Ex�stu►k'►tcii ciossin4
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area sf
70.77 acres
Q25=CxIxA
C=
X00
I25 =
in/hr
A =
70.77 acres
Q25 =
183.16 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S' , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = Imo - 0U, � 6" stone
Base Width (B) _ �` ft 0
M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _ " �i
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) - B
'0 ���-� .�� fps ❑
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
ft
Area (A) =
B*d + M*d2
17.32
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(M2+1)'5-
11.66
R =
A/P =
1.49
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
8.91
V =
Flow Velocity =
10.58 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
10.58
fps
Page 120 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
' �6
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:sin[�I�(�
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = P__Z2 = sf
281.87 acres
' Q50=CxIxA
C=am
150 = Rte., in/hr
A= 281.87 acres
Q50 = 715.26 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
stone
Base Width (B) _ ��� " - ft
M =.'� M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _ ao�=x�"
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) Qin fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual 'Wand "V"
d =
flow depth =
T tx ft
Area (A) =
B*d+ M*&Z
58.66
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S -
20.78
R =
A/P =
2.82
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
16.94
V =
Flow Velocity =
12.19 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
12.19
fps
Page 121 of 193
check Q: OK

F— Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch # : IM �I
Station Range/Description: I�htchpfs�#
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area 1mg0m sf
40.33 acres
Qsa=CxIxA
150
5 'in/hr
A= 40.33 acres
Q50 = 152.19 cfs
_Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
4" stone
Base Width (B)
M=� M:1
Ditch Slope (S)
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
` �(: , ft
Area(A)=
B*d+M*d2-
23.20
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(M41)'s -
17.87
R =
A/P =
1.30
VpR =
V P ermiss * R =
7.79
V =
Flow Velocity =
6.56 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
6.56
fps
Page 122 of 193
check Q: OK

I— Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name:
Ditch #: w
Station Range/Description: Exisin�Dich�Ar (�xss7g�#`
Peak Discharge Calculation: _
Drainage Area sf
1300.00 acres
Q50=CxIxA
C_
150 = _ 1n/hr
A = 1300.00 acres
Q50 = 1950.85 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*Sv2 , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n =�3 18" stone
Base Width (B) _� X,�_' ft 0
M= �� M:1
Ditch Slope (S)
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) &Q��-Qfps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*d2= 151.91
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S - 36.61
R = A/P = 4.15
VpR = V Permiss * R = 44.40
V = Flow Velocity = 12.84 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 10.70 fps
Vactual = 12.84 fps
Page 123 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
' Project Name: Flowers P r it rossings
Ditch #: �-
Station Range/Description: WU �Dit`�h # � M
Peak Discharge Calculation _
Drainage Area = 'i147 sf
46.75 acres
'
Qso =CxIxA
m/hr
A= 46.75 acres
Qso = 166.68 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * k'*S" , Q=A/V
' Ditch Characteristics:
n =r grass
Base Width (B) _ ft M:1 ❑
M
' Ditch Slope (S) N -►I
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth =, ++ ft
Area (A) = B*d + M*d2 - 16.84
Perimeter (P) = b + 20(MZ+1)s - 12.98
R= A/P= 1.30
VpR = V Permiss * R = 6.49
V = Flow Velocity = 9.90 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
' Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
Vp = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 9.90 fps
n
n
11
11
Page 124 of 153
11

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
jeer
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:kls4ng Dil%af3#r w tt�
' Peak Discharge Calculation _
Drainage Area = x 192i'r' sf
183.87 acres
' Q50 = C x I x A
z
150 =a..i in/hr
A = 183.87 . acres
Q50 = 525.25 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * Re3*SITZ , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n 4" stone
Base Width (B) _!� ft d❑
M=
Ditch Slope (S) _ a f�—►I
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps nB
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual
"d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
i i ft
Area (A) =
B*d + M*dZ `
47.98
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(h,I2+1)'S -
19.31
R =
A/P =
2.48
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
14.91
V =
Flow Velocity =
10.95 fps
Q =
design flow =
�, ;''.tu cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
6.00
fps
Vactual =
10.95
fps
Page 125 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name:
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:
Flowers Permit Crossings
__. gI?ch�fgr R9ssin `,1
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area sf
56.52 acres
Q50=CxIxA
C =ag
-
I50- ��`� � 1,�- �� < in/hr
A= 56.52 acres
Q50 = 198.01 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S"' , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = r13 grass
Base Width (B) ft d❑
M= I'
M:1
Ditch Slope (S)=�c5i1°� I� ►i
Permissible Max Velocity gyp) �..
Fil
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =''
�g ft
Area(A)=
B*d+M*d2-
22.45
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)'S `
12.89
R =
A/P =
1.74
VPR =
V Permiss * R =
8.71
V =
Flow Velocity =
8.82 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
8.82
fps
Page 126 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
Ditch #: ,
Station Range/Description:14�tcltC��`►ssucg#9=
Peak Discharge Calculation: _
Drainage Area =2.882) sf
66.17 acres
Q5o=CxIxA
C =�,OWN
I50 = in/hr
_H..
A= 66.17 acres
Q50 = 199.79 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=AlV
Ditch Characteristics:
n = a F " '` brushy channel
Base Width (B) = ft d0
M:1
Ditch Slope (S)_ t'.�
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)1' "fps nB
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
�; ; ft
Area (A) =
B*d + M*dZ `
46.98
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S-
18.54
R =
A/P =
2.53
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
12.67
V =
Flow Velocity =
4.25 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
4.25
fps
Page 127 of 193
check Q: OK

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet J
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
o
Ditch # : �vWin
"
Station Range/Description: d tF�cissing�0
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area ON_� :. sf
88.22 acres
Q50=CxIxA
C
150=� in/hr
A= 88.22 __. acres
Q50 = 235.10 cfs
iDetermine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S' , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n=— brushy channel
Base Width (B)_1__1�� ft
M=� M:1
Ditch Slope (S)
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) K, NMENN� fps Fil
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d = flow depth = ft
Area(A)= B*d+M*d2- 94.84
' Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)" 61.90
R = A/P = 1.53
VpR = V Permiss * R = 7.66
' V = Flow Velocity = 2.48 fps
Q = design flow = cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 5.00 fps
Vactual = 2.48 fps
Page 128 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Permit Crossings
®
Ditch 4:Station Range/Description:
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = FFa$ sf
186.96 acres
Qso=CxIxA
C
1S0 — a �s in/hr
A = 186.96 acres
Q50 = 532.18 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O -S", Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n = sou ..' 4" stone
Base Width (B)_ �� ft
.�" M:1
M
Ditch Slope (S) _IM
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
ft
Area (A) =
B*d+M*d2-
44.55
Perimeter (P) =
b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S -
18.21
R=
A/P=
2.45
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
12.23
V =
Flow Velocity =
11.95 fps
Q =
design flow =
Mom,cfs
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
11.95
fps
Page 129 of 193
check Q: OK

' Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
' Project Name: Flowers Permit CrossingsDitch #
Station Range/Description. xis „ iC>C�1 „12
Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = 8`1" ' sf
22.61 acres
Qso = C x I x A
01
150 =
A = 22.61 acres
Qso = 86.20 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (y) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S' , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n= Qom' grass
Base Width (B) .W ft TFAI
M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _''
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp) fps
11
11
Page 130 of 193
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual
"d" and "V"
d = flow depth =
ft
Area (A)= B*d+M*d2=
15.68
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'S =
18.06
'
R = A/P =
0.87
VPR = V Permiss * R =
4.34
V = Flow Velocity =
5.50 fps
Q = design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
'
VP = 5.00
fps
Vactual = 5.50
fps
11
11
Page 130 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Flowers Pernit Craui=
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description:OWN
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area =i sf
23.61 acres
Qso=CxIxA
C
Iso = in/hr
A= 23.61 acres
Qso = 93.02 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth (d) and Velocity (v) Check for Permanent Condition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*S" , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics:
n= `.�02 4" stone 71
Base Width (B) _ �`'� ft M' d
M= II
Ditch Slope (S) _ f�- ►I
Permissible Max Velocity (Vp)i q fps
Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V"
d =
flow depth =
: ft
Area(A)=
B*d+M*d2=
9.40
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(MZ+1)'s =
8.67
R=
AT =
1.08
VpR =
V Permiss * R =
5.42
V =
Flow Velocity =
9.89 fps
Q =
design flow =
cfs check Q: OK
Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP =
5.00
fps
Vactual =
9.89
fps
Page 131 of 193

Ditch "Q" and "V" Calculation Worksheet
II' Project Name: Fl_r permit rossings
2400, =�
Ditch #:
Station Range/Description: saw
' Peak Discharge Calculation
Drainage Area = �.���� sf
70.77 acres
Q50=CxIxA
C =��
150=
A= 70.77 acres
Q50 = 221.97 cfs
Determine Ditch Flow Depth d and Veloci(vent Check for PermanCondition:
Apply Manning's Equation: V=1.49/n * O*Sin , Q=A/V
Ditch Characteristics: T
n = ON3 ? 6„ stone
�ft
Base Width (B) _
M— M:1
Ditch Slope (S) _9
Permissible Max Velocity (VP),.s
' Apply the Following Analysis to Determine Actual "d" and "V" ft
d = flow depth =
Area (A) = B*d+M*&- 19.91
Perimeter (P) = b + 2d*(M2+1)'5 - 12.40
R = A/P = 1.61
VpR = V Permiss * R = 9.64
V = Flow Velocity = 11.15 fps
Q = design flow = cfs
' Check Ditch Velocity for Lining:
VP = 6.00 fps
Vactual = 11.15 fps
Page 132 of 193
check Q: OK

I Attachments
1.
JOHNSTON COUNTY LETTER..........................................134
2.
NCDWQ NEUSE RIVER BUFFER LETTERS &
INTERMITTENT/PERENNIAL STREAM LETTER...................136
3.
ENGINEERING JUSTIFICATION LETTER & EXHIBIT ............
146
' 4.
JOHNSTON COUNTY SUBDIVISON ORDINANCE.................149
5.
NHP & OSA SEARH REPORT............................................152
Page 133 of 193

� Johnston County Letter
' Note: The Master Plan map was originally
approved on May 20, 1997
Page 134 of 193

yahmion eountq
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
"Here To Serve... "
May 25, 2006
Mr. Andrew Hodge, PE
PO Box 1401
Smithfield, NC 27577
Re: Neuse River Parkway
Dear Andrew:
A Master Plan dated September 23, 1998 for Flowers Plantation was approved by
Johnston County. This approval included an extension of Neuse River Parkway with a
crossing over Mill Creek and eventually connecting into SR 1003. The County will
require that any development of Flowers Plantation be based on this Master Plan since it
is still valid today. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Berry ray
Senior Planner
Cc: Steven Finn, Planning & Zoning Director
309 East Market SEE-,%inq ifleld, NC 27577
Telephone [phone] • (Fax) 919) 989-5426
www.johnstonnc.com

NCDWQ Neuse River Basin
Buffer Letters &
Intermittent/Perennial Letter
Page 136 of 193

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
I fflC.K;W'J
NCDENP*
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
March 7, 2003
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 03-057
Flowers Tract 1
S&EC #01-6658
Clayton, Johnston County, NC
Dear Mr. Clark:
This letter will serve as confirmation of the buffer determination made by S&EC at the
' subject property referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 03-057.
On August 7, 2002, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above
' referenced project as identified on the attached maps. It was determined that the features shown
on the Johnston County Soil Survey and on the USGS Flowers, NC Quad map could potentially
be subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
' Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:
02B.0233 (NCAC .0233).
feature
starting point
1
flag BG 135 (previously determined, SM)
2
flag T 200
3
not subject
4
starts off property (north of northern property line)
5
subject throughout property (buffalo creek)
6
flag BC 43B
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-16&ge 137 of 193 Telephone [phone] FAX(919)57i-4718
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

feature
starting point
7
flag W 36
8
flag SC 162
9
flag JL 80.8
10
flag T 102.1
11
not subject until greater than 50' off property
12
starts at culvert south of Hwy 42
13
flag LC 141
14
flag S 07
15
flag LC 374
16
flag BC 122.1
18P
not subject
19P
not subject
20P
subject
21P
subject
22P
not subject
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information
relevant to wetlands and other impacts, please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank yo u
for your attention to this matter and if this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
lab-
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist I
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Johnston County
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1628
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Page 138 of 193
Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

250'
NI
a s IU,1JL
O
U
Fri1
01IkS.M.

C�
y r sUry H A
a K �< tC 4 to t y`' l 7 t Y �7 CPB f( Io -F♦ ?M
•M,aH t �'� Fa6,
Mab\t".
.� u� l.F'B `ii .aE. ( Co m .F �:'r �K �v'�"7x"�� � � � �iL+D,�,t. �• � ,�� ,
La"_�
Ma.4 r S 4 .. ,�� 3�;.•m�z z - Y �'Ge� / v . -, 'r
, iNorex �!.a
�/ ` P_ 4 y .y z e• _ + 'v .w . 3' 1 F �y� "ear�_i` \` FaA `' oA
y
, MaH'
-� '� `'> re •. � r r rar G'�sfa Z � tvcH
,j ` U 4 K�'A:ti t . �• {nary S � 'Ryrhy tri 4y ` a { ,� Y �4F :"�-•� ]� k�a �� { [\
���� r .. O i <.'�"•'! � i� •ry d � r A . j4� �,c.[ i ': ?!�'.,'�`d',%S'"-s 'v.-i�' F � � r 2 � . F f x i . .
� -r• 7t ' . r .. .,,2 ti f Z- - � .. +R.� i�"� 3 �t � .rt a 7 'c'i a. ?a•^ 14 `�,c �*, r�
Ce8V1,
Ce6
w� e�PY i" ; �''Yrr•- /�� ' ,t i' �
r �• �,,;... � idaCt CeD .+lr:.m.,�, i r,— �/ t i . Y sa #fs�,; '3}. � ti ° 'i'V
�.• + ;... (' H ' •� 4 rs"�'� `.' �> tib' � � •--:�?a ^re : �
GVB.., GcA t 1•)t} J Ge6 vel 3iel\l ;A F av R y �2fs ;" E :. tr
a6 r B Ma$a .. r AaA 7 a MaA
NraB
GerrH
Mbf3\�1��'�"S.
!Pi jam, 'rt.,n .�• P t '\ 4.x,�2tr3 .,�< � a < '•r_ � ^,.�� �� 4 � � � +,r ,�_
;w� .. ':� s,�} �,y ,����^.,�*''.'� �% i• ^v �.yT��. �. x, ` y y''� _, J.H '•yam �s
iY Y 4�' .ti .� 7 s z i }a as 4 r rH .,,.�,•,+' Cee •r ' ' �
"`d'' ! ..•K +�' ,� ayti Baal: r i' �..
.4'. ..� 'K! � .t.fJi'�.:• ... � „ � Lp$. 1 _ . �� S.�l�. `�y,�.Y `k...,�rt �'/ , 4 '� .� Ct!(; � �� Ma B '
r�
_
r bBrPa�' •{r • ,. � r�(p�•+ �� a� y a-• k r w..` ,/ r °r>t ��
l.-" t ' P+Q fps -�.` "x /i- •f'Z ktc}Y ��� s} `day .J�,p�r'fir F MaA Bit r1 4 ,,�� fit- '��-+rf-
tiR f +
n
s,¢.
`�, { � � �` 3t . *.. n .4,y' •. \ � ��„ '� ,+1 „ � ; Ey1a8 , 3i, MaY1.:�"�°�•
.'r t ; . � '' ,,/.yyy r, Y,,. ` n \ Ce6 , �� � ,� � tvlc3 �. •, 'S":"k.:. _ �,v
•. ')'a�Y r+,.. /�' 'w'' . C66 e y ll r_ r� •i Y �,ye ��^t „' t Tt''Y �, r ??:,,'��v.7
a%� a `S,: K <rE '�., �A. ! tai. a y: , ^. T Sr .. ! � p Xt.2•.�r`'iai+
'1c3
%) t i �� < �� "s�q � �izg t - (� -u 15� 8H _•'�„. } :&r A _ A'tr�fr"^�' r3�u. � rte^ '�'� 1;,
✓r '.ar� \7 Ngs a `I .# -.�ax� �)..C1'�3k'�'� 2
•.3 Ce.A {� ,,.. _fin 'C• "Jp. 'j . F;i. � , � 7 T .. �`
}. 1+-.• _r CeB °: t ,•a ;_ __ 1..a ,� � ti T�n`"+'t. _ _ .•itry.' �-
'
:4a} .., " MaH;' ./ � r ` - 4 tda8 '"` � �"- A➢'- '''�", r K r _,M 9 �
a <;� GeH f aG PaD rr�ti x ri . ' a ti4�� a ilk CeB
�,'� J•~£sx'�i„��)a Amb `S� �.'LPB ''7 Ft• 'tE6 a i :, C� >vv ��. 4�. a �..` *'. •tt`'r� �. _•,� n
f � t. O ._ r � .�� €`' ',, ��1� �_ ?. y� j ,t_. 'A.. �, 4•�� ��• J,C C. �� t � ". iT Ftp
/ _ ,` + �, { '' - 4. �5 ` �_.,` �' !\, � � ' .v- �`�--�A"�'^s. _ 7 r Ee8', *ary��.; - ^'�,+,�- y F„�.•. "`s - 1. �'�/..,'
1 � t,v '�'p•P.,�D ? ��' � � �r i`�X . , t.^�- - bt1Ga � \� ..e * 4 s
..j,•�y�,,6
��`1'f r ;�>, >�' �, 's <r + 7 �'•' `^^tt P if E J /T r n �eD '' ( Asx R
+ v I
%'r'�! rf r.r F� 4y,7�^'i� " r,, �, � �� � °u �. 2 E Ll ?u!.i �' �� ,��l ♦ MSG r � �y: 4� ' �aT•^
NMI
F u _ �b' f' +err ,. .. r L ��•.t e� F-- - a c
NUS!
rJ S• -k' /' - �\ ..<�-" , J .R3fa t:]++' '� •1 4tfd .R ..F �C - `.. A
n
`.`F.>�BI,�"I'
r.
Mtl� t l j,' }.y'�` -rrc ,,�,'',`

State of North Carolina
Department of -Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
March 1.0, 2003
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 03-058
Flowers Tract 2
S&EC #01-6658
Clayton, Johnston County, NC
Dear Mr. Clark:
This letter will serve as confirmation of the buffer determination made by S&EC at the
subject property referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 03-058.
On September 4, 2002, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above
referenced project as identified on the attached maps. It was determined that the features shown
on the Johnston County Soil Survey and on the USGS Flowers, NC Quad map could potentially
be subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
' Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:
02B.0233 (NCAC .0233).
r
r',
feature
starthig point
A
subject throughout property
B
flag SC 01
C
flag CGC 200
D
flag WWC 34
E
flag WWC 28
F
subject, starts off property through to confluence of A
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-162Vge 141 of 193 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

feature
starting point
G
flag TPL 103
H
flag BSMF 122
I
flag JLG 77
J
flag JLG 50
K
flag FCC 181
L
flag LG 21 (also recorded as flag #17)
M
flag WWC 05
N
not subject (not present in field)
O
flag WWC 01
P
flag D 01
Q
not subject within property boundaries
R
skip -no feature to represent
S
flag CGC 239
T
flag D 02
U
flag FCC 141
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information
relevant to wetlands and other impacts, please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
&LC4C_L_ &�" C�t"a4z_
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist I
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Johnston County
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Page 142 of 193
Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

d�0,� W A r�9QG
0``ty'<i=� C
S&EC
Attn: Kevin Martin
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.February 25, 2008
INTERMITTENT/PERENNIAL (UP) STREAM DETERMINATION
Project Name:
Flowers Tract
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
IPRRO 08-013
County: Johnston
' Location/Directions: in all four quadrants of the intersection of Buffalo Road (SR 1003) and NC 42
I
Subject Stream(s): UTs to Mill Creek and Buffalo Creek
Date of UP Determination(s): 2/5/2008
Feature
IIP call*
Location of UP Point Notes/Basis for Call
(GPS Points and/or Flag) (Stream Form Rating,
Biol.:[ndicators, etc.).
BC #1
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
BC #2
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
IBC #3
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
BC #5 (Mill Creels)
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
BC #6
I
At proposed crossing
BC #7
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
BC #8
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
BC #11
P (not contested)
At proposed crossing
BC #12
I
At proposed crossing
BC 41.3
I
At proposed crossing
13C #14
I
At proposed crossing
*Irate rmitten t/Perennial
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local may request a
determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the
Director in writing c% Cyndi Karoly, , DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC
27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereb,rthcazolina
notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start until the affectedparty (including Naturally
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% RecycIV/1�0% fatoC# %Veer Paper

2/25/08
' Page 2 of 2
applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely
manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within
60 days.
The (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local,
State, and.Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the
subject property (stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed
activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-
733-178 6,
919)-
733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
' Lauren C. Witherspoon
Environmental Senior Specialist
I CC:
DWQ-RRO Files
Central Files
DWQ 401Unit
NPAhCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet; h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50%Recycl?Vge*NP4'9toCf lFer Paper

n
11
u
Engineering Justification
Memorandum &Exhibit
Page 146 of 193

Stocks Engineering, P.A.
' DeSE'gv % the t~uture, TodAt�.
' Date: April 16, 2008
To: Ms. Rebecca D. Flowers
River Dell Company
' From: Paul D. Smith, P.E �S
Stocks Engineerin i
Subject: The Village C Flowers Plantation
IP for Wetland and Buffer Impacts at Proposed Roadway Crossings
Engineering Justification Memo
' Crossing #5
This crossing is not perpendicular to the creek because the alignment of the roadway is controlled by
existing development in the southwest quadrant of the crossing and by the development located on
' the adjacent property to the west.
Crossing #6
' Attempts were made to avoid impacts to the perennial section of the stream. However, impacts to
this section could not be avoided because it would require the proposed roadway to be moved to the
north approximately 400 feet, but this is not possible because the property to the northeast of the
' crossing is not owned by River Dell Company. Furthermore, the land in question was developed as
River Dell Elementary School by Johnston County.
Crossings#7, #10. #11, 412, #13, #14. #16, #17
While these crossings require that the same tributary be crossed at two locations, both impacts are
required in order for the development to meet Johnston County Subdivision Ordinance Section 14-
226(6) which requires two (2) paved entrances into subdivisions that have 201 or more lots (copy of
ordinance is attached).
As illustrated on the attached Justification Exhibit:
• Crossing #7 is necessary to provide a second paved entrance (B2) into subdivision area B.
• Crossing #10 is necessary to provide a second paved entrance (112) into subdivision area H.
• Crossings # I I and # 16 are necessary to provide two entrances (F I and F2) into subdivision
area F.
• Crossing #12 is necessary to provide a second paved entrance (G2) into subdivision area G.
• Crossing #13 is necessary to provide a second paved entrance (D2) into subdivision area D.
• Crossing #14 is necessary to provide a second paved entrance (A2) into subdivision area A
and a second paved entrance (C2) into subdivision area C.
• Crossing #17 is necessary to provide a second paved entrance (E2) into subdivision area E.
J. Michael Stocks, PE
Paul D. Smith, PE
1100 Eastern Avenue
3344 Hillsborough Street
PO Box 1108
Suite 250
Nashville, NC 27856
Raleigh, NC 27607
252.459.8196 (voice)
919.821.2440 (voice)
252.459.8197 (fax)
919.821.2210 (fax)
252.903.6891 (mobile)
919.880.5886 (mobile)
mstocks0stocksenaineering.corn
Page 147 of 193 psmithAstocksengineering.com

1
1
1
1
1
11
1
-
O
W
N
M
CO
M
N
N�
N
V
�
Q

11
r
1
1
[7
Johnston County Subdivision
Ordinance
Chapter 14 Article III, Division 5,
Section 14-226(6)
Page 149 of 193

tARTICLE III. SUBDIVISIONS*
Page 9 of 18
(3) The minimum separation between the flagpole portion of the lot and that of another
flag lot shall be 100 feet;
' (4) Where public water is available, the occupied building on the flag lot shall be within
500 feet of a fire hydrant. This distance shall be measured along the street, then along
the flagpole, then in a straight line to the building thereon;
' (5) Where public sewer is available, the occupied building on the lot shall have a gravity
service line, or the sewer pump requirements shall be noted on the recorded plat;
(6) Use of a single driveway to serve the flag lot and an adjoining lot is permitted and
' encouraged. In the case of a shared driveway, the location of the driveway shall be on
the flagpole portion of the flag lot, with the conventional lot granted an access easement
over the flagpole; and
(7) Designate the building footprint and orientation of the house on the preliminary plat.
(e) The flagpole portion of a lot shall not be used to calculate the area, width, or setbacks of
' the lot for the zoning district in which the lot is located.
(Ord. of 7-10-2000, § 5.10.4.1; Amend. of 12-12-2005(2))
1
1
u
1
1
n
1
Sec. 14-226. Access and circulation.
The type and arrangement of streets within a development under this article shall be in
compliance with and coordinate to the county's thoroughfare plan. Principal vehicular access points to
the subdivision shall be designed to encourage smooth traffic flow and minimize hazard to vehicular
traffic, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Accommodation for controlled turning movements into and out of
the subdivision and improvement of the approach street should be considered where existing or
anticipated heavy traffic flows indicate need. Safe and convenient vehicular access shall be provided
for emergency, service and school bus vehicles. Subdivisions located on an arterial or collector road
shall be so designed so that no new subdivided lot shall have a direct driveway connection onto an
arterial or collector road, unless it can be demonstrated that the proposed subdivision cannot be
feasibly designed, or that no reasonable alternative exists, to prohibit driveway access onto an arterial
or collector street.
(1) Roads. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade, and location of all roads
should be designed in relation to existing and proposed transportation patterns,
topographical and other natural features, public convenience and safety, and proposed
uses of lands to be served by such roads and existing and potential land uses in
adjoining areas. Private roads not within a minor subdivision or planned unit
development shall:
a. Be limited to a nonthrough road;
b. Be paved;
c. Meet the road construction standards for a private road as set out in the
county design manual; and
d. Be ensured proper maintenance through the establishment of a homeowners'
association or a road maintenance agreement.
All public and private roads shall meet the design and construction standards as
specified in the JJ
(2) Relationship to adjoining properties. New streets or roads shall be appropriately
related to, and coordinated with, adjoining properties, and existing and proposed
roadways. Roadways within a proposed subdivision may connect with adjoining
Page 150 of 193
Ihq://Iibrmy3.municode.com/default/DocView/13494/1/31/34 3/12/2008

1 ARTICLE III. SUBDIVISIONS*
Page 10 of 18
' properties where necessary to permit the convenient, efficient and safe movement of
traffic. All roads that extend to adjacent properties shall be designated as public roads.
(3) Access to streets. Every subdivided lot shall front on, or have direct driveway
' access or dedicated easement to, a public or private street meeting the standards of the
county design manual.
(4) [Direct residential driveway connections.] Major subdivisions to be located on a
local road shall be so designed that there shall be no more than one direct residential
driveway connection per 500 feet along the same side of the local road, unless it can be
demonstrated that the proposed subdivision cannot be physically designed, that no
' reasonable alternative exists, or it would create an unreasonable hardship without a
corresponding public benefit to prohibit individual driveway access onto a local road.
(5) Reserved.
(6) Subdivision entrances. Second entrances or emergency access easements will be
required when meeting or exceeding the following thresholds:
For subdivisions proposing between 100 and 200 lots, the developer has the option of
providing a second paved entrance or a dedicated "emergency vehicle access." This
access is to be constructed of any all-weather surface and kept cleared at all times in
case the main entrance is blocked and emergency vehicles need to get into the
development.
For subdivisions proposing 201 lots or more, a paved second entrance will be required.
Note: For determining when a second entrance is required, the count will be cumulative.
(7) Subdivision road standards.
a. Once a subdivision has a minimum of four occupied homes and an average
of two occupied homes per tenth of a mile, no more land use permits will be
issued for lots on that street until the developer or related agent petitions the
North Carolina Department of Transportation for maintenance and acceptance of
the subject street into the state maintained road network.
b. Land use permits will be issued until 75 percent of the lots along a subject
road have been permitted. Once this threshold has been met, no more land use
permits will be issued for lots on that street until the North Carolina Department
of Transportation district engineer has accepted the subject road into the state
maintained road network.
(Ord. of 7-10-2000, § 5.10.5; Ord. of 7-9-2001; Ord. of 11-12-2001, § 5.10.5; Amend. of 5-12-2003(2);
Amend. of 7-7-2003; Amend. of 11-8-2004)
Sec. 14-227. Lot dimensions.
Every subdivided lot shall comply with the minimum lot size, lot width, and street frontage
standard as stipulated in this chapter, as well as other standards of the county health department for
lots not served by a public water and/or sanitary sewer system.
(Ord. of 7-10-2000, § 5.10.6)
Sec. 14-228. Partial tract subdivision.
Where the gross land area of a remaining lot in the proposed subdivision is greater than or
equal to twice the minimum lot size allowed in the zoning district, the planning director, to ensure future
Page 151 of 193
I I
http://Iibrary3.municode.com/default/DocView/13494/1/31/34 3/12/2008

1
[I
n
L
1
1
Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
& Office of -State Archaeology
(OSA) File Search Report
Page 152 of 193

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
April 17, 2008
S&EC Project # 6658.W4
River Dell Company
' Attn: Rebecca Flowers
4880 NC 42 East
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Re: Office of State Archaeology/
Natural Heritage Program File Search
Flowers. Site (+/-1200 acres)
Johnston County, North Carolina
Rebecca Flowers,
In April 2008, S&EC conducted a review of state records at North Carolina Office of
Archaeology (OSA). The in depth review included sites and structures of historical, cultural,
and archaeological significance on the subject property. In April 2008, S&EC conducted a file
search for state or federally protected species and significant natural communities was
performed through the Natural Heritage Program (NHP) office located in Raleigh, North
Carolina. These records were updated utilizing the NHP Virtual Workroom (NHP 2008) and by
requesting element occurrence identifications from NHP staff. The USGS map and location of
the project site with respect to these occurrences accompanies this report.
Findings — NC Natural Heritage Program
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program records occurrences of rare plant and animal
species, exemplary natural communities, and special animal habitats known to occur in North
Carolina. These records include Federal, State and Natural Heritage Program listed species.
The record check was performed in April 2008. The subject property is located on the Flowers
USGS quadrangle. Several significant natural heritage areas and element occurrences of rare
plants and animals are located within five miles of the boundary of the subject property. These
areas and occurrences are listed below. No significant natural heritage areas or natural heritage
element occurrences of rare plants or animals are located within the Flowers Site. Due to the
sensitivity of the locations of rare species, the element occurrences for plants and animals
within five miles of the Flowers site are listed solely by their category on the attached map.
Significant Natural Heritage Areas within 5 -mile radius of Property Boundary
Neuse River Forests (Clayton)
Little Devine Road Powerline Savanna
Camp Atkinson Hardwood Forest
Wendell Lake
Page 153 of 193

April 17, 2008
S&EC Project #6658.W4
Page 2 of 6
Page 154 of 193
Scientific Name
Common Name State Status
Federal status
Plants (within 5 -mile radius of Property Boundary)
Scutellaria australis
Southern Skullcap SR -P
t
Hexalectris spicata
Crested Coralroot SR -P
Carex reniformis
Kidney Sedge SR -P
Dichanthelium sp.
A Witch Grass SR -L
Animals (within 5 -mile radius of Property Boundary)
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper T
T
'
Alasmidonta undulata
Triangle Floater E
T
Carex reniformis
Kidney Sedge SR -P
'
Elliptio roanokensis
Lampsilis radiata radiata
Roanoke Slabshell E
Eastern Lampmussel E
T
T
Lanius ludovicianus
Loggerhead Shrike E
SC
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded E
E
'
Woodpecker
RECORDS REVIEW
'
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) records occurrences of rare plant
and animal species, exemplary natural communities, and special animal habitats known to
occur in North Carolina.
An updated record check of all species listed in Johnston County, NC
'
was performed in April 2008.
Johnston County Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened species:
'
Scientific Name
Common Name State Status
Federal status
Alasmidonta heterodon
Dwarf Wedgemussel E
E
Elliptio steinstansana
Tar River E
E
Spinymussel
'
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded E
E
woodpecker
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's Sumac E -SC
E
Page 154 of 193

April 17, 2008
S&EC Project #6658.W4
Page 3 of 6
Johnston County; State Listed.Species, Federal Species of Concern, and NCNH13 listed .
Significantly Rare and Special Concern species:
Scientific Name
Fusconaia masoni
Lampsilis carlosa
Lasmigona subviddis
Elliptio lanceolata
Lasmigona subviridis
Matrioptila jeanae
Orconectes carolinensis
Strophitus undulatus
' Villosa constricta
Weissia ludoviciana
Baptisia alba
Carex bushii
Carex reniformis
Dichanthelium sp. 9
Didiplis diandra
Hexalectris spicata
Hottonia inflata
Lindera subcoriacea
Ludwigia brevipes
Ludwigia sphaerocarpa
Macbridea caroliniana
Quercus austrina
Schoenoplectus
etuberculatus
Scutellaria australis
Solidago verna
Trillium pusillum
var. virginlanum
Ambloplites cavifrons
Dendroica cerulea
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Hyla andersonii
Lanius ludovicianus
Necturus lewisi
Noturus furiosus
Common Name State Status Federal status
Atlantic Pigtoe
E
FSC
Yellow Lampmussel
E
FSC
Green Floater
E
FSC
Yellow Lance
E
FSC
Green Floater
E
FSC
A Caddisfly
SR
None
North Carolina
SC
None
Spiny Crayfish
Creeper
T
None
Notched Rainbow
SC
None
A Moss
SR -T
None
Thick -pod White
SR -P
None
Wild Indigo
Bush's Sedge
SR -P
None
Kidney Sedge
SR -P
None
A Witch Grass
SR -L
None
Water Purslane
SR -P
None
Crested Coralroot
SR -P
None
Featherfoil
SR -O
None
Bog Spicebush
T
FSC
Long Beach
SR -T
None
Seedbox
Globe -fruit Seedbox
SR -P
None
Carolina Bogmint
T
FSC
Bluff Oak
SR -P
None
Canby's Bulrush
SR -P
None
Southern Skullcap
SR -P
None
Spring -flowering
T
FSC
Goldenrod
Virginia Least
E
FSC
Trillium
Roanoke Bass
SR
FSC
Cerulean Warbler
SR
FSC
Bald Eagle
T
None
Pine Barrens
SR
None
Treefrog
Loggerhead Shrike
SC
None
Neuse River
SC
None
Waterdog
Carolina Madtom
SC (PT)
FSC
Page 155 of 193

I
Sciurus niger
Eastern Fox SR None
Squirrel
April 17, 2008
S&EC Project 96658.W4
Page 4 of 6
US -E: Federally Endangered
US -T: Federally Threatened
US -FSC: Federal Species of Concern
NC -E: North Carolina Endangered
NC -T: North Carolina Threatened
NC -SC: North Carolina Special concern
NCNHP-SR: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program designated Significantly Rare
-P: Peripheral, -T: Throughout Range, -L: Local
"Endangered Species" (E) means any native species documented by biological research and
inventory to be in danger of extirpation throughout all or a significant portion of its range within
the state and to have no more than five occurrences in the state, and any species determined
to be an "endangered species" pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act.
"Threatened Species" (T) means any native species documented by biological research and
inventory to be likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the sate and to have no more than nine
occurrences in the state, and any species determined to be a "threatened species" pursuant to
the federal Endangered Species Act, except for such species determined to be endangered by
the Commissioner in accordance with section 4 of this act.
"Species of Special Concern" (SC) means any native plant species or any native nonharvested
wildlife species documented by scientific research and inventory to have a naturally restricted
range or habitat in the state, to be at a low population level, to be in such high demand by man
that its unregulated taking would be detrimental to the conservation of its population or has
been extirpated from the state.
"Significantly Rare" (SR) Species which are very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20
populations in the state, generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction (and
sometimes also by direct exploitation or disease). These species are generally more common
somewhere else in their ranges, occurring in North Carolina peripherally to their main ranges,
mostly in habitats which are unusual in North Carolina. Also included are some species with 20-
100 populations in North Carolina, if they also have only 50-100 populations rangewide and are
declining.
Findings — NC Office of State Archaeology
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) records archaeological sites and
excavations. The record check was performed in April 2008. Archaeological sites on-site and
surrounding the project area have been examined. Artifacts have been recorded within the site
boundaries, but there are no significant or Nationally Registered historic archaeological
locations recorded on-site or within a 3 -mile radius of the site boundary. The following sites
(within the property boundary) contain widely scattered quartz and metavolcanic debitage and
sherds (SOA: JT350, JT351, JT352, JT353, JT354, JT355, JT356, JT357). These sites were
acknowledged solely on surface scatter or artifacts, no subsurface testing was conducted. The
Page 156 of 193

April 17, 2008
S&EC Project #6658.W4
Page 5 of 6
research potential for these sites has not been evaluated. However, because the soils in the
area are conducive to preservation of artifacts and large amount of artifacts found on the
surface within the property boundaries, Delores Hall of OSA verbally recommended the Flowers
site for subsurface shovel testing by an Archaeological Surveying Firm. Office of State
Archaeology Site # 01-7183 within the proposed project boundaries is also recommended for
shovel testing. Due to the sensitivity of the locations of archaeological sites, the sites in the
surrounding area are not included on the attached map.
North Carolina Archaeological Site form 8.0 Report for OSA for all above listed sites
were analyzed by S&EC staff along with Delores Hall of OSA (See Attached forms). These
forms represent data collected and recommendations from soil surface surveys conducted
within the proposed project boundary. Original site work was conducted through Brockington
Cultural Resources Consulting, Dawn Reid of Archaeological Consulting Carolinas conducted
the field work for Brockington. All of these sites are within or adjacent to the proposed project
boundary. Site Forms suggest that site boundaries were established based on the extent of
surface artifacts and that the "subsurface contexts should be explored".
Summary
The records search at the Natural Heritage Program revealed that the above -listed
species have been recorded within five -miles of the project boundaries. No significant natural
heritage areas or natural heritage element occurrences of rare plants or animals are located
within the proposed project boundaries of the Flowers Site. There are no significant or
Nationally Registered archaeological locations recorded on-site or within a 3 -mile radius of the
site boundary. However, Office of State Archaeology verbally recommends the entire Flowers
site for subsurface shovel testing by an Archaeological Surveying Firm. All sites within
proposed project boundaries have not been evaluated. If the project is subject to Section 106
of National Historic Preservation Act, these sites are recommended by OSA to be evaluated for
the National Register for Historic Places.
If you have any questions or need additional services, feel free to contact S&EC.
Sincerely,
David G
�NUU
aine
EnvironmentLSpeciaIis /Project Manager
Jes R. GrahamDavid G. Cooper
Bib logist/Environmental Scientist Staff Biologist
Page 157 of 193

April 17, 2008
S&EC Project #6658.W4
Page 6 of 6
Attachments:
1) Natural Heritage and Cultural Resource Map
2) OSA Site Forms
References
[NHP] North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2008. N.C. NHP internet-based search.
Natural Heritage Program Virtual Workroom <http://www.ncnhp.org> Accessed 16 April
2008.
----- 2008. N.C. NHP internet-based search.
<http://www.nconemap.com/GetData/DownloadFTP/tabid/286/Default.aspx> Accessed 12
April 2008.
Page 158 of 193

Tracking #. ER 01-7183 Other #'s ER 01-7183
County: Johnston
Applicant: Edenton Group, The Status: A
Project. Road access for development,1 mile N of SR 10031NC
42
Initial W: CurrentIN. 7/25/2000 Client: DUE: 8/812000 OUT: 8/4/2000
Program: ACOE To: A/S/H
Info. Req.: By: Info Type., Received:
FLA GIWO Archaeoloey SurveoWest.
Survey Req: By: Report: Report.
Testing Req: By: Report: Report.
Mitigation: By: Report. Report:
❑ DoE
UNK Effect
Bib #. Sites: 0 Forms IN.•
Quads: Flowers Acres: 196 Miles: 0
Notes: To OSA/JWC 7/27.
❑ Project Area Map ❑ DoE NR Map Cleared Archaeology:
❑ Survey Area Map ❑ Microfiched Cleared Survey.
Reviewer(s): JWC
Comments
Arch Comments: 814100: letter brook to Hellberg - survey - JWC
Survey Comments: HPO Comments:
Page 160 of 193

0
Tracking #. ER 06-2416 . Other #'s boti,40'rt t05
County: Johnston
Applicant: Ralph Whitehead Associates Status: A
Project: Develop 550 acres, N & S of NC 42, East of Clayton
Initial W: 9/7/2006 CurrentlN. 9/7/2006 Client: 9/8/2006 DUE: 9/27/2006 OUT: 10/4/2006
Program: MISC To: A/S
Info. Req.: By., Info Type:
Received.
FLAG INFO Archaeology Survey/Rest.
Survey Req: 9/27/2006. By: A Report: Report:
Testing Req: By: Report: Report:
Mitigation: By: Report: Report.
❑ DoE
UNK Effect
Bib #. Sites: 0 Forms IN.
Quads: Flowers, Clayton Acres: 550 Miles:
Notes: NC 42 East, LLC.
* Project Area Map ❑ DoE NR Map Cleared Archaeology: 6/12/2007
❑ Survey Area Map ❑ Microfiched Cleared Survey: 9/29/2006
Reviewer(s): SGM JGH
Comments
Arch Comments: 9/27/06: Nothing recorded w/in tract boundaries. Sites 31JT350 - 31JT357 recorded to
E by ACC. Maybe for subdivision; not through compliance review. All unassessed. Projects CT 01-0928
(cleared 4/4/01) and ER 06-0914 (cleared 4/5/06). Latter is wood waste facility reviewed for Richardson
& Associates. 15 acres on area that appeared cleared and with building already on tract. Soils include
Cecil and Chewacla loams and Gilead and Wedowee sandy loams. Consider sites likely. Survey
recommended, Sandbeck to lagnocco. SGM
5/21/07: RGE rec'd e-mail from James Shern, AOE, defining permit area. They decided that area of
potential effect should include two proposed creek crossings (just south of NC 42 --see map) as well as
the corridor before and between the crossings. Area amounts to about four acres. Applicant has reduced
creek crossings by five to these two. Have also eliminated the lot fill impacts that had been proposed
near the river. Shern requests our input to determine potential effects resulting from remaining impacts.
SGM
6/4/07: Talked over w/ DAH/SRC, then e-mailed Renee to effect that while we still expect potentially
eligible sites within the overall boundaries, permit area is now so small as to not warrant survey request.
Asked that she transfer record to OSA for updating and letter drafting. SGM
6112/07: Drafted letter Sandbeck to lagnocco (or Shern?) withdrawing survey request and clearing
project. SGM Survey Comments: HPO Comments:
Page 161 of 193

STATE SITE #: JT350
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER:
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington & Associates, Inc. PROJECT SITE NUMBER:
SITE COMPONENT: Prehistoric SITE REMAINS: No Above -Ground Remains
SITE LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Hill or Ridgetop ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 162 of 193
310
No
Page i of 4
LOCATION INFORMATION
COU14TYJOHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 740500
MAP DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 3949100
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Hill or Ridgetop ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 162 of 193
310
No
Page i of 4

STATE SITE #: JT350
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0 SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (%) 5
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: East
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam NRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Row Crop/Cultivated SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 50 TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse WATER: Pond _
SITE SIZE: 25,001-50,000 sq. m. / 29,901-59,800 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 95 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 95
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 30,000
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Cultivated
Light Erosion
CULTURAL AFFILIATIONS: SITE FUNCTION
Late Archaic Unknown
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Primary Debitage
Cores
Hafted Bifaces/Projectile Pts.
TOOL TYPE: TOOL FREQUENCY:
SMALL SAVANNAH RIVER STEMMED I
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
Page 163 of 193
Page 2of4

STATE SITE #: IT350 .
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END
REFINED DATE FROM REFINED DATE TO
i.'T.rWil ar-1.1yVYJIM zq
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRNP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Accurate
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 164 of 193
Page 3 of 4

STATE SITE #: JT350
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
COMMENTS
RESEARCH
This site contains abundant quartz debitage and several tool fragments - also a small amount of
POTENTIAL:
metavolcanic and chert debitage. It was identified based solely on the surface scatter of artifacts; no
subsurface testing was conducted so the research potential for the site has not been evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site is currently fallow, but could be impacted by cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
EXPLANATION OF
M this site was Identified during an informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS
solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, subsurface contextsshould be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a fallow field immediately south of SR 1735 (Jordan-Narron Road); it is
bounded by the road, woods, and a pond.
COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy. 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 165 of 193

STATE SITE #: JT351
1\ORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER:
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brocldngton & Associates, Inc. PROJECT SITE NUMBER.,
SITE COMPONENT: Both SITE REMAINS: Above -Ground Remains
CrrF 1 ACATMN TNFARMATTON
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
LOCATION INFORMATION
COUNTY]OHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
RECORDED BY:
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 740380
MAP DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 3949320
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM
GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM
GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE
GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED:
6/15/2002
RECORDED BY:
Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME:
n/a
CODING DATE:
CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
DESTRUCTION CAUSES
Other
PERCENT DESTROYED 76-100% DESTRUCTION DATE
No
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION. Hill or Ridgetop - _- ELEVATION (FEET): 310
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 1 of 4
Page 166 of 193

STATE SITE #: JT351
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORINT 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0 SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (%) 5
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: Northeast
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam MRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Row Crop/Cultivated SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 100 TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse _ WATER: River, Creek, or Stream
SITE SIZE: 25,001-50,000 sq. m. / 29,901-59,800 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (a/o) 95 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 95
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 30,000
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Cultivated
Light Erosion
CULTURAL AFFILIATIONS: SITE FUNCTION
Middle Woodland
Early Woodland
Late Archaic
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Unknown
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Primary Debitage
Cores
Hafted Bifaces/Projectile Pts.
TOOL TYPE: TOOL FREQUENCY:
PROJECTILE POINT (STEMMED)
CLARKSVILLE SMALL TRIANGULAR
SMALL SAVANNAH RIVER STEMMED
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 167 of 193
Page 2 of 4

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
STATE SITE #: IT351
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
TEMPER SURFACE PROPOSED_TYPE
Coarse Sand Fabric Impressed
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN Unknown _ _ PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END 20th Centum
REFINED DATE FROM REFINED DATE TO
HIST CULTURAL AFFILIATION
Unknown
DEFINITION
STRUCTURE TYPE/FEATURE
Domestic
Home/Residence
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
ARCHITECTURE
Other
Window Glass
CLOTHING
Ceramics
DATEABLE CERAMICS: Yes
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRNP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Accurate
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 168 of 193
Page 3 of 4

LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 169 of 193
Page 4 of 4
STATE SITE #: JT351
' l�TORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
COMMENTS
RESEARCH
This site contains abundant quartz debitage and several tool fragments - also a small amount of
POTENTIAL,
metavolcanic and chert debitage and 2 fabric Impressed sherds were observed. In the southern
portion of the site, historic architectural debris is scattered - two of the structures that appear on
the topo. Map have been razed; the third has been demolished but the chimney remains standing.
The site was identified based solely on the surface scatter of artifacts, no subsurface testing was
t
conducted so the research potential for the site has not been evaluated.
—
EXPLANATION
Site area is currently fallow, but could be impacted by cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
'
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS
solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
—
TESTING RESULTS:
'
FEATURE
Structure reflected on topo. map have been destroyed; brick chimney remains standing.
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
'
INFORMATION:
—
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a fallow field immediately north of SR 1735 (Jordan-Narron Road); it is
bounded by the road, and woods.
' COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy. 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
' TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 169 of 193
Page 4 of 4

STATE SITE #. JT352
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER,
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington &•Associates, Inc. PROJECT SITE NUMBER: Site 2
SITE COMPONENT: Prehistoric SITE REMAINS: Not Recorded
SITE LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
J
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT: No
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY: .
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET): 320
-- --- -- — ---
. --_....... ._._... ----
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 1 of 4
Page 170 of 193
LOCATION INFORMATION
COUNTYJOHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 740235
MAP. DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 3949200
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
J
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT: No
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY: .
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET): 320
-- --- -- — ---
. --_....... ._._... ----
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 1 of 4
Page 170 of 193

STATE SITE #: JT352
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0 SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (°/a) 5
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: North
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam NRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Row Crop/Cultivated SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 150 TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse WATER: River, Creek, or Stream
SITE SIZE: 10,001-25,000 sq. m. / 11,961-29,900 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 95 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 95
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 25,000
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Cultivated
Light Erosion
Lithic (Unknown Component) Unknown
Woodland (Unknown Subpenod)
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Primary Debitage
TEMPER
Coarse Sand
Coarse Sand
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN
REFINED DATE FROM
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
SURFACE PROPOSED_TYPE
Other
Plain
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END
REFINED DATE TO
Page 171 of 193
Page 2 of 4

STATE SITE #: IT352
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
DATEABLE CERAMICS:
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRHP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Accurate
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
' LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 3 of 4
Page 172 of 193

STATE SITE #: IT352
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
EXPLANATION OF
COMMENTS
-RESEARCH
This site contains widely scattered quartz and metavolcanic debitage and sherds; quartz is relatively
POTENTIAL:
abundant, metavolcanic is sparse, sherds were plain with sand temper. The site was identified
based solely on the surface scatter or artifacts; no subsurface testing was conducted so the
research potential for the site has not been evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site area is currently under cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
DESCRIPTION
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE
n/a
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a cultivated field adjacent to Buffalo Road, approximately 200 m northwest of
the intersection of Buffalo Road and Jordan-Narron Rd.
COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an Informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy. 42 and Buffalo road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 173 of 193
Page 4 of 4

STATE SITE #: JT353
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): T_ OTHER SITE NUMBER:
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington & Associates, Inc. PROJECT SITE NUMBER: Site 3
SITE COMPONENT:- Prehistoric SITE REMAINS: No Above -Ground Remains
SITE LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PR03ECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland or Talus Slope ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 174 of 193
310
No
Page 1 of 4
LOCATION INFORMATION
COUNTYJOHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 739700
MAP DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 3949980
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PR03ECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland or Talus Slope ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 174 of 193
310
No
Page 1 of 4

STATE SITE #: ]T353
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0
SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (%) 5
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: West
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam
MRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Row Crop/Cultivated
SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 100
TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse
WATER: River, Creek, or Stream _
SITE SIZE: > 50,000 sq. m. / > 59,800 sq.yds.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 95
GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 95
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 80,000.
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
SITE CONDITION:
Cultivated
Light Erosion
Middle Woodland
Early Woodland
Late Archaic
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
Unknown
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Primary Debitage
Cores
Hafted Bifaces/Projectile Pts.
TOOL TYPE: TOOL FREQUENCY:
PROJECTILE POINT (STEMMED)
SMALL SAVANNAH RIVER STEMMED
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
TEMPER SURFACE PROPOSED_TYPE
Coarse Sand other
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END
Page 175 of 193
Page 2 of 4

STATE SITE #: JT353
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
REFINED DATE FROM REFINED DATE TO
DATEABLE CERAMICS:
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRNP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Accurate
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 176 of 193
Page 3 of 4

LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 177 of 193
Page 4 of 4
STATE SITE #: IT353
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
COMMENTS
RESEARCH
This site contains abundant quartz debitage and several tool fragments - also a small amount of
POTENTIAL:
metavolcanic and chert debitage and I fabric impressed sherd was observed. The site was identified
based solely on the surface scatter of artifacts, no subsurface testing was conducted so the research
potential for the site has not been evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site area is currently fallow, but could be impacted by cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE
n/a
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a cultivated field approximately 400 m west of Buffalo Road and 400 m north
of Hwy 42.
COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 177 of 193
Page 4 of 4

STATE SITE #: IT354
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER:
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington 8L Associates, Inc. PROJECT SITE NUMBER: Site 4
SITE COMPONENT: Prehistoric SITE REMAINS: No Above -Ground Remains ,
CTTP t nCATTON TNPORMATION
COUNTY)OHNSTON
MAP - COORDINATE
SYSTEM UTM
MAP ZONE 17
MAP DATUM NAD 27
LOCATION INFORMATION
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP UNITS
MAP EASTING 739805
MAP NORTHING 3949058
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: KraULI yr 1-M 91-1-
PR03ECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland or Talus Slope ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 178 of 193
320
No
Page i of 4

STATE SITE #: IT355
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER: _
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington & Associates Inc. PR03ECT SITE NUMBER: Site 5
SITE COMPONENT: Both SITE REMAINS: No Above -Ground Remains r
SITE LOCATION INFORMATION
i
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM
GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 182 of 193
320
No
Page i of 4
LOCATION INFORMATION
COUNTY)OHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
I
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 739980
MAP DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 39490150
i
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM
GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF COMPLIANCE
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 182 of 193
320
No
Page i of 4

STATE SITE #: JT355
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0 SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (%) 5
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION, Northwest
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam NRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Fallow SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS)., 150 TYPE OF NEAREST
----- PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse WATER: River, Creek, or Stream
SITE SIZE: 10,001-25,000 sq. m. / 11,961-29,900 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 100 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 100
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 15,000
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Fallow
Light Erosion
CULTURAL AFFILIATIONS:
Lithic (Unknown Component)
SITE FUNCTION
Unknown
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Hafted Bifaces/Projectile Pts.
TOOL TYPE: TOOL FREQUENCY:
SAVANNAH RIVER STEMMED
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN Unknown
REFINED DATE FROM
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END 20th Century
REFINED DATE TO
Page 183 of 193
Page 2 of 4

STATE SITE #: JT355
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 :REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
HIST CULTURAL AFFILIATION
Unknown
ARCHITECTURE
Brick
CLOTHING
Other
Ceramics
DATEABLE CERAMICS: Yes
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRHP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Within 100m Rad
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 184 of 193
Page 3 of 4

LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 185 of 193
STATE SITE #: IT355
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
COMMENTS
RESEARCH
This site is a light scatter of metavolcanic debitage and tools, and a relatively dense scatter of brick
POTENTIAL:
and historic ceramics and glass (presumably related to the nearby house) in a fallow field. The site
was identified based solely on the surface scatter of artifacts; no subsurface testing was conducted
so the research potential for the site has not been evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site area is currently fallow but would be impacted by cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS
solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE
n/a
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a cultivated field immediately northwest of a historic house adjacent to
Buffalo Road; site begins approximately 15 m west of Buffalo Road and is approximately 200 m
northwest of the intersection of Buffalo Road and Jordan-Narron Road.
COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 185 of 193

STATE SITE #: JT356
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER:
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington & Associates, Inc. PROJECT SITE NUMBER: Site 6
SITE COMPONENT: Prehistoric SITE REMAINS: No Above -Ground Remains
SITE LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: KrbULI Ur W.UMMIA111.c
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET):
._-----___.._-----_...--
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 186 of 193
300
No
Page 1 of 4
LOCATION INFORMATION
COUNTYJOHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 740680
MAP DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 394800
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM
GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM
GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE
GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: KrbULI Ur W.UMMIA111.c
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED: 6/15/2002
RECORDED BY: Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME: n/a
CODING DATE: CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET):
._-----___.._-----_...--
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 186 of 193
300
No
Page 1 of 4

STATE SITE #: IT356
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0 . SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (%) 5
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: Northeast
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam NRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Fallow SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 200 TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse WATER: River, Creek, or Stream
SITE SIZE: 25,001-50,000 sq. m. / 29,901-59,800 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 100 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 100
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 30,000
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Fallow
Light Erosion
CULTURAL AFFILIATIONS: SITE FUNCTION
Lithic (Unknown Component) Unknown
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Bifaces
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END
REFINED DATE FROM REFINED DATE TO
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 187 of 193
Page 2 of 4

STATE SITE #: JT356
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT.
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
DATEABLE CERAMICS:
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
REGISTER CRITERION
DATE ON NRNP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: , Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Within 100m Rad
FORM OATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 188 of 193
Page 3 of 4

LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 189 of 193
STATE SITE #: JT356
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
COMMENTS.
RESEARCH
This site is a moderate. scatter of quartz debitage and bifaces in a currently fallow field separated
POTENTIAL:
from the highway by a tree buffer. The site was identified based solely on the surface scatter of
artifacts; no subsurface testing was conducted so the research potential for the site has not been
evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site area is currently fallow but would be impacted by cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an informal walkover and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS
solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, -subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE
n/a
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
_
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a cultivated field north of Hwy 42, approximately 400 m east/northeast of the
intersection of Buffalo Road and Hwy 42.
COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an informal walk-over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 189 of 193

STATE SITE ##: JT357
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SITE NAME(S): OTHER SITE NUMBER:
INSTITUTION ASSIGNING: Brockington & Associates, Inc. PROTECT SITE NUMBER: Site 7
SITE COMPONENT: Prehistoric SITE REMAINS: No Above -Ground Remains
SITE LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF LUMNLIARLt
LOCATION INFORMATION
COUNTYJOHNSTON
QUAD MAP FLOWERS 1964 (73PR)
MAP - COORDINATE
RECORDED BY:
SYSTEM UTM
MAP UNITS
MAP ZONE 17
MAP EASTING 740500
MAP DATUM NAD 27
MAP NORTHING 3948865
GPS LOCATION INFORMATION
GPS -COORDINATE
SYSTEM GPS UNITS
GPS DATUM GPS EASTING
GPS ZONE GPS NORTHING
GPS DATA POST -PROCESSED?: RESULT OF LUMNLIARLt
PROJECT:
DATE RECORDED:
6/15/2002
RECORDED BY:
Dawn Reid
PROJECT NAME:
n/a
CODING DATE:
CODED BY:
ARTIFACT INVENTORY ATTACHED? No
RECOMMENDATION
Test Excavations
Surface Collection
PERCENT DESTROYED Unknown
DESTRUCTION DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
TOPOGRAPHIC SITUATION: Upland Flats ELEVATION (FEET):
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/7/2007
Page 190 of 193
300
No
Page I of 4

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
STATE SITE #• JT357
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 0 SLOPE PERCENT HIGH
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: Northeast _
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam NRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Fallow SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 10 TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse WATER, Lake
SITE SIZE: 10,001-25,000 sq. m. / 11,961-29,900 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 100 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%)- 100
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 17,500 _•_
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Fallow
Light Erosion
rill T11RAL AFFILIATIONS: SITE FUNCTION
Lithic (Unknown Component)
Late Archaic
MIDDEN:
LTTHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
Bifaces
Unknown
Hafted Bifaces/Projectile Pts.
TOOL TYPE: TOOL FREQUENCY:
OTHER
PROJECTILE POINT (STEMMED)
SAVANNAH RIVER STEMMED
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN
REFINED DATE FROM
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/7/2007
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END
REFINED DATE TO
Page 191 of 193
Page 2 of 4

STATE SITE #: JT357
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
DATEABLE CERAMICS:
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRHP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Within 100m Rad
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/7/2007
Page 192 of 193
-Page 3 of 4

LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/7/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 193 of 193
STATE SITE #: JT357
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
COMMENTS
RESEARCH
This slteis a densescatter of quartz debitage and tools in a currently fallow field situated at the
POTENTIAL:
edge. of -asma3lWake and. a wWand. The site was ldentified based solely on the surface scatter of
,artifacts; no subsurface testing was conducted so the research potential for the site has not been
evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site are is currently fallow but would be impacted, by cultivation.
OF IMPACTS:
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS
solely on the extent of the surface scatter ofartifacts, subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE
n/a
DESCRIPTION
OWNER/TENANT
River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a cultivated field north of Hwy 42, approximately 400 m northeast of the
intersection of Buffalo Road and Hwy 42.
COMMENTS:
This site was identified during an informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/7/2007 Page 4 of 4
Page 193 of 193

STATE SITE #: JT354
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
SLOPE PERCENT LOW(%) 5 SLOPE PERCENT HIGH (%) 10
SLOPE FACE DIRECTION: North
SOIL COMPOSITION: Clay Loam NRCS SOIL TYPE CODE:
MODERN VEGETATION: Fallow SERIES NAME:
DISTANCE TO WATER (METERS): 100 TYPE OF NEAREST
PERMANENT
DRAINAGE BASIN: Neuse WATER: River, Creek, or Stream
SITE SIZE: 10,001-25,000 sq. M. / 11,961-29,900 sq.
GROUND VISIBILITY LOW (%) 100 GROUND VISIBILITY HIGH (%) 100
INVESTIGATIONS
AREA COVERED IN CONTROLLED COLLECTION (SQ.M.): 15,000
SUBSURFACE TEST MADE:
No
COLLECTION MADE:
No
NATIVE AMERICAN SITE INFORMATION
SITE CONDITION:
Fallow
Heavy Erosion
CULTURAL AFFILIATIONS: SITE FUNCTION
Lithic (Unknown Component) Unknown
MIDDEN:
LITHICS:
Tertiary Debitage
Secondary Debitage
NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS
PERIOD OF OCCUPATION BEGIN PERIOD OF OCCUPATION END
REFINED DATE FROM REFINED DATE TO
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 179 of 193
Page 2 of 4

STATE SITE #: 3T354
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
DATEABLE CERAMICS:
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY USE ONLY
DATE ON NRHP: REGISTER STATUS: Unassessed
TYPE OF FORM: Archaeological Site Form VI RECORDER STATUS: NCAC Member or Professional
FORM RELIABILITY: Coding Complete LOCATIONAL RELIABILITY: Accurate
FORM DATA CHECKED BY: FORM DATE:
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE n/a
DESCRIPTION
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED i 6/6/2007
Page 180 of 193
Page 3 of 4
COMMENTS
RESEARCH
This site is a light scatter of quartz debitage on a upland/upland slope in a currently fallow field. The
POTENTIAL:
site was identified based solely on the surface scatter of artifacts; no subsurface testing was
conducted so the research potential for the site has not been evaluated.
EXPLANATION
Site area is currently fallow but would be impacted by cultivation; due to slope, erosion is a factor.
OF IMPACTS:
EXPLANATION OF
As this site was identified during an Informal walk -over and boundaries were established based
RECOMMENDATIONS solely on the extent of the surface scatter of artifacts, subsurface contexts should be explored.
EXCAVATION
RESULTS:
SUBSURFACE
TESTING RESULTS:
FEATURE n/a
DESCRIPTION
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED i 6/6/2007
Page 180 of 193
Page 3 of 4

1
1
1
1
1
1
STATE SITE #: JT354
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM 8.0 REPORT
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY
OWNER/TENANT River Dell Company, Selma NC.
INFORMATION:
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: This site is situated in a cultivated field adjacent to a dirt road, approximately 250 m west of Buffalo
Road and 300 m northwest of the intersection of Buffalo Road and Jordan-Narron Rd.
COMMENTS: This site was identified during an informal walk -over of fields in the vicinity of the intersection of
Hwy 42 and Buffalo Road; surface only known.
HISTORIC CERAMIC
TYPES:
FORM COMMENTS:
OTHER IMPORTANT
ARTIFACT TYPES:
LAST DATE RECORD SAVED 6/6/2007
Page 181 of 193
Page 4 of 4

P<
8�
INA
N
Z Tl—
qt