Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071431 Ver 2_WRC Comments_20080421RE: 071431 E-31 Elementary School Subject: RE: 071431 E-31 Elementary School From: "Shari Bryant" <bryants 5 @earthlink. net> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:42:24 -0400 To: <lia.myott@ncmail.net> CC: "'Suiter, Dale"' <Dale_Suiter@fws.gov>, <James.F.Shern@usace.army. mil>, "'Nichols, Rob"' <rob. nichols@ncwildlife. org> Lia, As I mentioned on your voicemail, our staff did not find suitable habitat for dwarf wedgemussel at or near the site. Therefore, we do not feel an aquatic survey is needed. I don't know the status of the permit, but if it has not been issued yet, attached are our revised (and final) comments. Basically, I removed only the aquatic survey paragraph and recommendation (#1) from our comments. Since dwarf wedgemussels have been found downstream of the project, we still feel protecting wide riparian buffers and managing stormwater and sediment is important to protect their habitat downstream. If you have any questions, please contact me. Shari L. Bryant N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission P.O. Box 129 Sedalia, NC 27342-0129 336.449.7625 bryantsS(a)-earthlink. net -----Original Message----- From: Shari Bryant [ ma ilto: brya nts5@earth link. net] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:54 PM To: 'lia.myott@ncmail.net' Cc: 'Suiter, Dale'; 'James.F.Shern@usace.army.mil'; 'Nichols, Rob' Subject: 071431 E-31 Elementary School Lia, Thank you for discussing this project with me earlier today. As we discussed, I am submitting our comments to you now to ensure we meet the commenting deadline for this permit. I have attached a signed copy (pdf) and a word document for your convenience. Also, as we discussed, based on the information available and the time constraints of the express permit, I have requested an aquatic survey. Once our staff has the opportunity to determine whether suitable habitat for dwarf wedgemussel is found within the site boundaries, either I or one of our staff will contact you to let you know whether or not we still feel an aquatic survey is needed. I have copied Jamie Shern (USACE) and Dale Suiter (USFWS) so they are aware of our comments on this project. Also, for clarification, our staff will not be conducting an aquatic survey. Basically our staff will determine whether suitable habitat exists for dwarf wedgemussel at the site. If suitable habitat exists, then we will request the applicant conduct an aquatic survey. If suitable habitat does not exist, then no aquatic survey will be necessary. Should an aquatic survey be conducted and dwarf wedgemussel are found within the site boundaries, then this will require coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop measures to avoid impact to the species. In the past, this has included use of directional bore or relocation of mussels, but may include other measures. Thanks again for your help. Please contact me if you have any questions. 1 of2 4/21/2008 1:48 PM RE: 071431 E-31 Elementary School Shari L. Bryant N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission P.O. Box 129 Sedalia, NC 27342-0129 336.449.7625 bryants5@earthlink.net WRC_071431 E31 Elem_final.pdf Content-Type: application/pdf Content-Encoding: base64 2 of 2 4/21/2008 1:48 PM ® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission MEMORANDUM TO: Lia Myott, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit Division of Water Quality FROM: Shari L. Bryant, Piedmont Region Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program DATE: 21 April 2008 SUBJECT: Pre-construction Notification Application for Wake County Public School System, E-31 Elementary School, Wake County, North Carolina. DWQ ID: 07-1431. Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.), and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 101.0102. The applicant proposes to impact 0.15 acre of wetlands and 90 linear feet of perennial stream channel for utility installation for a proposed elementary school. Proposed construction of the elementary school and associated facilities will result in approximately 18% impervious surface. The applicant proposes a bioretention pond for stormwater management. Based on information provided in the application, it appears a 50-foot riparian buffer will be maintained. The proposed project will impact an unnamed tributary to Mahlers Creek. Mahlers Creek is a tributary to Swift Creek in the Neuse River basin. There are records for the federal and state endangered dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon); the federal species of concern and state endangered yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolata) and Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni); and the state threatened triangle floater (Alasmidonta undulata), Roanoke slabshell (Elliptio roanokensis), creeper (Strophitus undulatus), and eastern lampmussel (Lampsilis radiata radiata) in Swift Creek. The area is experiencing rapid urban growth and we are concerned about the cumulative impacts of development on dwarf wedgemussel downstream of the project. Changes in land use from a primarily forested area to an urban landscape may exacerbate channel degradation and sediment impacts to stream ecosystems due to increased stormwater runoff and elevated flooding. In addition, pollutants (e.g., sediment, heavy metals, pesticides, and fertilizers) washed from roads and urban landscapes can adversely affect and extirpate species downstream of developed areas. Due to the presence of dwarf wedgemussel downstream of the project site, we recommend the following conditions be incorporated into the permit to further minimize impacts to this species and to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources in general. Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 TilPnhnne- (919) 707-0??0 9 FnX- (919)7(17-00?R Page 2 21 April 2008 E-31 Elementary School DWQ ID: 07-1431 Maintain a 200-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a 100-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area. In addition, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with stormwater runoff. Whereas, a grassed buffer, particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer but will not provide the necessary and highly valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers. 2. All remaining wetlands and streams on the site should be protected from additional impacts by placing them in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling, draining, flooding, and excavation. 3. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands to eliminate the need to fill and culvert, where practicable. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be designed to allow passage of aquatic organisms. 4. New developments exceeding 6% imperviousness should include stormwater controls designed to replicate and maintain the hydrographic condition at the site prior to the change in landscape. 5. Locate sewers and other utilities as far away from streams as functionally possible and minimize stream crossings. It is preferable that sewers be located outside the riparian buffers as detailed in # 1. 6. Use landscaping that consists of non-invasive native species and Low Impact Development (LID) technology. Using native species instead of ornamentals should provide benefits by reducing the need for water, fertilizers, and pesticides. Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain the predevelopment hydrologic regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of the site. 7. Sediment and erosion controls measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can provide further assistance, please contact our office at (336) 449-7625. cc: Jamie Shern, USACE ec: Dale Suiter, USFWS Rob Nichols, WRC