20051117 Ver 2_More Info Received_20080414

Lissara Partners, LLC
2631 Reynolda Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
s" j7,
April 10, 2008
Ms. Cindy Karoly
Supervisor - 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit psAN??? ?"cfa
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject Property: Lissara Development, Lewisville, North Carolina - 401 Water Quality Certification
DWQ Project # 05-1117, Ver.2
Via Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Pursuant to your reply to our application for 401 Water Quality Certification, dated March 14,
2008 please find attached our return submittal of additional information requested. We have
numbered each item to match item numbers outlined in your letter. This re-submittal is complete for
your review less Item #3.
1) A) See Master Plan - 24" x 36" Overall Sheet, Scale: 1" = 200'; and 24" x 36" Sheets 2 through
5, Scale: 1" = 50'. Attachment 1. 5 Sheets.
B) See Preservation Plan - 24" x 36" Overall Sheet, Scale: 1" = 200'; and 24" x 36" Sheets 2
through 5, Scale: 1" = 50'. Attachment 2. 5 Sheets.
2) See Forsyth County Soil Survey with project boundaries located. Attachment 3. 1 Page.
3) Sampling - Currently under discussion with NCDENR - Division of Water Quality. Future
Attachment 4.
4) See Impervious Surface Data - Attachment 5. 1 Page.
5) There are no impacts to isolated or non-isolated wetlands or streams due to construction of
residential units. There are no building lots containing wetland areas as shown on our Site
Plan previously submitted. There are six (6) lots whose boundaries potentially overlap center-
lines of streams. In all cases no building envelopes reach within the 50' wide preservation
buffers for those streams.
6) A) See Master Plan - 24" x 36" Overall Sheet, Scale: 1" = 200'; and 24" x 36" Sheets 2 through
5, Scale: 1" = 50'. Attachment 1. 5 Sheets.
B) See Preservation Plan - 24" x 36" Overall Sheet, Scale: 1" = 200'; and 24" x 36" Sheets 2
through 5, Scale: 1" = 50'. Attachment 2. 5 Sheets.
7) All proposed stream crossings for our private roadways will utilize bottomless culverts. As an
allowable alternative recommended by our engineers and consultants; the use of this type
stream crossing results in zero impact to existing streams and therefore incorporated into our
design.

8) No fossil-fueled water-craft will be allowed on our proposed lake except for the water-ski tow-
boat that will be owned and operated by the homeowners association. The ski-boat will be
removed from the lake, taken to the nearest gasoline station, refueled there and returned to
the lake boat-house/lodge.
9) Stream buffers per our proposed mitigation plan and previous negotiations with the USACE
are proposed as 50' wide from center-line of stream, on both sides of the stream, and will be
protected in their natural state during the course of construction of the development
improvements and construction of each of the residential units. In addition the lake will be
protected by the 50' buffer design as outlined in our previous submittal. The buffers are to
remain in their natural state and cannot be disturbed in any manner by the homeowners
association or individual lot owners. The attached Stream Quality Assessment report compiled
for the USACE (with photographic images) documents the quality of the stream buffers that will
be preserved. Attachment 6. Pages 1 - 37.
10) Preliminary design information is attached showing the anticipated dam design section and
plan views. Attachments 7 and 8. 1 Page each.
11)Water Release Plan. We will comply with all the requirements of 15A NCAC 2K - Dam Safety,
including 15 A NCAC 2K.0502 Required Minimum Flow for Dams (Not Small Hydro
Protects ; and 15 A NCAC 2K.0504 Monitoring of Minimum Flow Requirements. This
information is considered and evaluated by the Dam Safety Program personnel within the
Division of Land Resources ( a division within the NC DENR).
12)A) Lissara Lake Maintenance Plan - It is the intent of the Lissara Partners, L.L.C. management
group to procure the services of a consulting firm, specializing in lake maintenance, lake
management and lake and stream water quality regulatory parameters, to ensure that
responsible environmental stewardship of the Lissara fake and associated stream waters is
conducted as an on-going program. It is anticipated that, as a minimum, the overall erosion
control system associated with the lake and surrounding subdivision as well as general lake
appearance and any required water quality analyses, (consistent with other recent 401 Water
Quality Certifications for similar impoundments) are in compliance with North Carolina Division
of Water Quality standards.
B) Dam Maintenance Plan. Attachment. 9. Pages 1 and 2.
If you have further questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Very tr yours,
Lang Wi ox
Lissara Partners, L.L.C.
cc: Mr. Brant Godfrey, Esquire
Mr. Chris Huysman
Mr. Jim Armentrout
Lissara Development
Soils Map
Soils Legend
CcD: Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Ch: Chewacla loam
EnD: Enon fine sand loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
IrB: Iredell fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
PaB: Pacolet fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
PaC: Pacolet fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
PaD: Pacolet fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
PaF: Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
WIC: Wilkes soils, 6 to 10 percent slopes
WID: Wilkes soils, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Attachment 3
LISSARA
Residential Subdivision
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Impervious Surface Data
111 Acres
Residential roof area, patios, sidewalks, parking aprons, driveways
7.8%
Subdivision roadways
3.2%
Total Percentage of Impervious Area
11.0%
Attachment 5
LISSARA Subdivision
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Stream Quality Assessment
Pages 1 - 37
Attachment 6
OOOL-Ml Wawdo?ane0 aessn
5L98Z DX `si+edS
A
' d
-
r
l ooZl ,009 ,o04 ,OOZ 0
punoo tg
wod
eupreO yuoN peo
-
S su
d VOC
d
sL.minsuoD aourroso)l prunLSN pus puspoM
WawdoLanaO --n ?
-
1d NOLLVA213S321d
NV (9?:X-vZ) '00Z - j 3IF/DS

Bo-t-VO aNM ,OoZ=" Llot mm rn rsr+asvau wr
O
Z
m
E5 m¢ m
mo m= o e
It ? z8 Y
?8'^ JN Ni
m

___________1
?r
ti.
t
L
p?
6
eE
t? -
K 3
r ? ? ? c
s °
yslas, 'us;
a
N
_ W
a?E ?F5
y -
p? ? z
L? P
P
N
N t
O E
a` 2
U
m y E
30 T
0 a 65
? L
C 0 O
0 C
y ? N
T
d CO V
?--+
s
• W
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
N
V
Q
W
aC
M
V
Q
W
a
d"
V
Q
W
ac
LO
V
Q
W
iC
-.O
-or
V
Q
cY

sit

A

V
Q
W
DC
00
V
Q
W
a
m
V
Q
W/?/
LJ
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 1 (indicate on attached map)
i i STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 08:32
5. Name of stream: Reach 1 UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.04 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Forsyth
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1022483° N. 80.4499465° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 1 see attached Figure 2 details and location man)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters M Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? DYES ONO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ®YES ?NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ®YES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
90% Forested % Cleared / Logged 5% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Banldull width: 5 It
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: D Flat (0 to 2%) ? Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ®Occasional bends DFrequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 87 Comments: Channel sinuosity is appropriate for the valley type
Evaluator's Signature
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

I -ECOREGI©1VP m' RANGE ? ? ?'"
SCORE
# _ i TERNTICS
CB "coastal on?t ?°' r
1?'?oautain

Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
1 no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max rots)
Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
2 extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max rots)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2 4
6 no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max rots)
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 4
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max rots)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 2
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0; large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition--- 0; little or no sediment = max rots
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate = NA* 0-4 0-5 4
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
-+ 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 4
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 4
(no visible rots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
W 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact --0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pooMpple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 5
no riffles/riles or pools = 0; well-developed = max Points)

t 17 Habitat complexity
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 5
,
I -
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
no shadin vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
0-5
0-5
0-5
5

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max Points)

21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3
'0 no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

"O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max rots)
Total:Points:Ple 100 160. i()0
`TOTAL" SCORE (also enter on first page), 87
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # -Reach 2 (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillipss/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 09:05
5. Name of stream: Reach 2 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.06 8. Stream order: 2
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Forsyth
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1041090° N, 80.4484218° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 2 see attached Figure 2 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic, no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ®NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ?YES ®NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ®YES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 15% Agricultural
60% Forested % Cleared / Logged 15% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 5 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ® Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasional bends ®Frequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 80 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
r,
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
s? ECOREGONQIN T Rt?NGE CORE
A ,:y$ c - F ?a.vaasaa fi'`fr+: fit;. F¢A'IOUntaln -

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max Points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
ts
1-4
0-4
0-2
3
)
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max poin
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3
a+
entrenched ='0; firAuent flooding = max points)
deeply

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max Points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate * 0 -4 0 -5 4
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0 -5
-
3
,a severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 4
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max ints)

16 Presence of riMe poolhipple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
5
no riffleshi les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Habit
lexit
t
o

17 y
a
c
mp
0-6
0
-6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat = 0; firquent, varied habitats = max ints) 1

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness 0-4 0-4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous Pipes = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O, no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Totw PomAossibYe 100 100
400
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 80
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
4
i USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 3 (indicate on attached map)
.AbL
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M "MOAV
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 09:26
5. Name of stream: Reach 3 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.01 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Fors h
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.10576181 N, 80.4471513° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 3 see attached Figure 2 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: No major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ®NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ?YES ®NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ®YES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
45% Forested % Cleared / Logged 50% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1.5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ? Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: [] Straight []Occasional bends ®Frequent meander []Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 70 Comments:
Evaluator's
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREG?ON POINT ??tANGE <? ?? ?. '
SCORE `
# CgAR CTERISTiCS ? pitmont ; MoQi tmn -

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max ints)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; conti
guous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
U no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2
p+ (deepl entrenched = 0; fr went floodin = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2
acent wetlands = max ints
no wetlands = 0; large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate * 0-4 0-5 4
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max ints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points

13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks =Hoax points
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
Cy'
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)

16 Presence of HML poollripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
no riffleshi les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
(little or no habitat = 0; firguent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 2
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
0 no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = max points)
:O 22 Presence of f1sh 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
To- bie > 100. # OU 100

TOTAL SCORE (alsa enter on first page)
F
70
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 4 (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 10:49
5. Name of stream: Reach 4 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.05 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Fors h
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1150243° N. 80.4480832° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 4 see attached Figure 2 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic, no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES NNO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ?YES ®NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ®YES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
90% Forested % Cleared / Logged 10% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 4 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ? Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasional bends ®Frequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 69 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
`?" ? r ECOREGION.?i'OIl?1'I ' RANGE -
SCORE
_
# f (?STICS Coastal ?m
gt
Pl M
dl
ii .
o
t t
O

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3 zone
w 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
e buffer = max points)
id
(no buffer = 0; contiguous,
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max rots
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
U 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched= 0; frequent flooding = max points

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0-6
0-4
0-2
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0• large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
extensive chaanelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
extensive deposition- 0; little or no sediment = max ints)

?
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
'-NA*.
0-4
0-5
4
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max ints)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
s (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
d; severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
E (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max rots)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max points)

16 Presence of rMe-pooMpple-pool complexes
`
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
pools = 0; well-developed = max rots
no riffles/ripples les or

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness #
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3
no evidence = 0; common, numerous rAxs = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 1
no evidence = 0; common
numerous bTies = max points)
23 ,
Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
x
-61
Total Points Poss?le

100

x100 :

r 100
TOTAL SCORE (also'enter on fast page) - 69
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117_- -- - Site # Reach 5 (indicate on attached map)
a] STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
"Mrr
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 11:46
5. Name of stream: Reach 5 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.24 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Forsyth
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1119253° N. 80.4492691° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 5 see attached Figure 2 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic, no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ENO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? EYES ?NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? EYES [:]NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 7% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
90% Forested % Cleared / Logged 10% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 10 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3.5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ? Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasional bends ®Frequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 84 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION=FOIiV RANGE F
# CBARACTERISTTCS
Coastil
wo
t
nt
in
M ;SCORE
F F r. a, :
n a
ep

1 Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation= 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
(no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max ints
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment= max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
4
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
.".,
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
d severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max ints)
14 Root depth' and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 4
Ey':
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
5
0
4
0
5
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max points) - - - 3

16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
5
no riffles/ripples, lor pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 5

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
4
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
no evidence = 0; common, numerous qpes = max points)
..
21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
3
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

O,
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
o
T
inessible
TJ4 100; w300 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 84
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
10
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 6 (indicate on attached map)
1 1
1 ? ? ? 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
"*AV
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lane Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 12:18
5. Name of stream: Reach 6 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.04 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Fors h
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1111333° N, 80.4451607° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 6 see attached Figure 2 details and location maps
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic, no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? DYES ENO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? DYES ®NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ®YES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
90% Forested % Cleared / Logged 10% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ® Gentle (2 to 4%) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasionai bends OFrequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 69 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
Date
11
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION'POIN T RANGE , ten:,
' SCORE`
:. C
HARACTERIST
XCS ;
t
,.
3 Coastal Piedmont' Monntam

1 Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
extensive dischar es - 0; no dischar es = max oints
a" 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
?C no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

-
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
W; no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)

7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
4
? (deeply entrenched = 0; firAuent flooding = max ints)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
?? 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate WA* 0-4 0-5 1
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
a.
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 4
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
rA
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
'
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial
act =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 1
F+ no riffles/riles or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
17 Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) 0-6 0-6 0-6 1
Canopy coverage over streambed
18 no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 5

19 Substrate embeddeduess
'NA*
0-4
0-4
1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
C no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = max points
a
'
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
fToovtix Fossble 100 100 lOp
'-TOTAL SCORE (also enter on°first page) 69
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
12
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 7 (indicate on attached map)
i STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 12:37
5. Name of stream: Reach 7 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.60 8. Stream order: 2
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: ForsyLh
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1125451° N, 80.4491844° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 7 see attached Figure 2 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic, no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed W (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ®NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ®YES ?NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ®YES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
85% Forested % Cleared / Logged 10% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 12 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ? Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ®Occasional bends ?Frequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 72 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
•
•
• 13
•
•
•
•
Date
•
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
19COREGION=P()?IN T RANGE g`
RE
# CHAR?CTERLSTICS - - a py xM.: SC
.

1 Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max ' points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 n zone
i 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
= 0; contiguous
no buffer
, wide buffer = max ints)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
? (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max rots)

7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
dee 1 entrenched = 0; uent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 1
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition--- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 4
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
v 14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
F,r no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max points)

16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes
'
0 - 3
0 - 5
0 - 6
4
no riffles/riles or pools = 0; well-developed = max
points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max rots)
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3
no evidence = 0; common numerous qrpes = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous t3rpes = max points)

b
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
[23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0-5
5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total'`Points?Possible 100 100 I00
a
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on' first page) 72
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
14
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 8 (indicate on attached map)
i i STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET '
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 12:56
5. Name of stream: Reach 8 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.01 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Forsyth
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1129582° N. 80.4499468° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 8 see attached Fieure 2 details and location maps
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Minor ATV traffic, no major recent disturbances, wooded buffers
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ® Water Supply Watershed IV (I-11V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? DYES ENO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? DYES ENO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? DYES ENO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
100% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0.5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ® Flat (0 to 2%) D Gentle (2 to 4%) ® Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight []Occasional bends ®Frequent meander []Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 60 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
Date
15
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
C
R ANF«
-

?"
N
L SCO
E
C
C kR R
STICS Coastal ; > dmo?"t,;;. R

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max rots)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 4
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
"
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
no flood
lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max rots

7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
4
(deeply entrenched = 0; uent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max hits
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 4
extensive deposition--- 0; little or no sediment = max rots
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0-5
1
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max rots)
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 5
a severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
4
Ey no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 - 3
0 - 5
0 - 6
no riffles/ri 1es ois - 0 well-developed = max ints
F Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max ints)
Canopy coverage over streambed
no shadin vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 5

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 - 5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O' no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

22 Presence of fish
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) .

7v .Tom P s possible "'
100
X00; , :- }
100

TOTAL SCORE `(also enter on first page) 60
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
16
USACE AID# 200520968 DWQ # 05-1117 Site # Reach 9 (indicate on attached
i i STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Lissara Partners LLC, c/o Lang Wilcox 2. Evaluator's name: Kelly Phillips/WNR
3. Date of evaluation: 4/1/08 4. Time of evaluation: 13:34
5. Name of stream: Reach 9 - UT to the Yadkin River 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.04 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: ft 10. County: Forsyth
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36.1146798° N. 80.4518105° W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Lissara Lake
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(Reach 9 see attached Figure 2 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream Preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: Wet
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Recent fire damage (minor), no other major disturbances, wooded buffer
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters E Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ENO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ?YES ENO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? EYES ?NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
80% Forested % Cleared / Logged 20% Other (abandoned agricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) E Gentle (2 to 4%) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasional bends ?Frequent meander EVery sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 62 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
17
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
F
COREGI4N
# I
['
G RANGE
E?IST
C.,
°
t c

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
.0-4
0-5
3
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / flood
lain access
p 0-5 0-4 0-2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; fi-equent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max ints

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max ints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max `points)
14 Root depth and density on banks

H-
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-5 4
rA, 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
:
substantial impact ?; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 3

16 Presence of ri®e-pooUripple-pool complexes
no riffles/riles or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6 3

17 Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; fivquent, varied habitats = max ints
0-6
0-6
0-6
2
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 4

19 Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0; common, numerous = maw points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 1
1.
21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
Q no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0,
O, 22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
- r•+ no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points PuasdbTc 100 00 100

TOTAL SCORE (also Enter on first page) 62
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
18
•
•
•
i
•
•
i.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: L; Latitude: 3(, l e) )AI P3
Evaluator: Site: , i2e, Longitude: Fe Ity 99V
I?t((t t'?,?llrfi5 - w? _ cl,
Total Points: ' Other
Stream is at least intermittent 4 County: rG f5 e.g. Quad Name: C t tM of ca S
d> 10 nr namnniaf d 2t 30 It,
A. Geomor hology (Subtotal AbsOent w Zak Moderate rate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank t
1
2. Sinuosi 0 g
ty
3. I6% annel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 -
0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting _ ?..
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 - 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2
0 Natural levees 0 1 ® 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1
xis in .r \
13. Second or greater order channel on existing-
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No - 0 Yes = 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
C
= )
.droloff Subtotal
B. H
- - [
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -for growing season
16. Leallitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)-
; 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
2 3
I ' 1 2 3
5 1 0.5 0
----- 1 1.
I 0.5
0.5 1 r-5)
No = 0 _ Yes- 5
C. Biology (Subtotal = + ` )
20 . Fbrous roots in channel 3 2
21 . -Rooted plants in channel 2
22. Crayfish - 0.5
23. Bivalves 1
24. Fish 0 0.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 &O?
29s. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this Corm for additional notes.)
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aq?
1 -- 0
1. 1 ? 1.5
1.5
1.5
_ 1.5
_3
1.5
i SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
wetland plants.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 1-l
Project: L; S5g, rc, ` cA e?-
Evaluator: el?1`J/ti1i?k Site: k,ti,J, Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent County:
if Z Igor oerennW if >_ 30 _
Latitude:3 /C 'I /e 4A`',
Longitude:
other C 1? m wins
e.g Quad Name: f
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = a h Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 .. 3
0 1 2 3 -
!3. Sinuosity
In--channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2
4. Sail texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 _
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 - 2 t3J
Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 -
037
Recent alluvial deposits _0 2
8. 9 e Natural levees 0 1 2- 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 -
1 L Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 I 0.5 1 _ 1
n I
13. Second or greater order channel on existi
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No 0 Yes = 3
evidence. I.- I
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
r
B. Hydrology Subtotal = • `? )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 1 2 3
Water in channel - dry or growing season lJ _ -
-
16. Leaflitter __ 1.5 _ CIF 0'5
17. Sediment on plants or debris T- 0 0.5 1 1.
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 j 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = _?)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 -?
21'5 . Rooted plants in channel _ 2
22. Crayfish 0 0.5
23. Bivalves 1
24. Fish - 0 0.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus. 0 0.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aqi
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
0
1.5
1 - ? 1.5L
1.5
1 1.5
2 3
1 - 1.5
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
wetland plants.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: j ; SS a ir q LS kti Latitude: 36. /o S 7ae jl
3
Evaluator: Kit T1,11 w4l$- site: Pe.. C 3 Longitude:ff6, ala1-7/ 5'1
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent 1 County: vz (5. C R e.g. Quad Name: rm?Yl 5
S 2 19 oroerertrual if 2 30 r J
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal absent We M eIrate Strong
a Continuous bed and bank 0 1 ? --
0 1 2
2. Sinuosity
13. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 _
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2
-
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 a
------------------
Natural levees 0 1 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
---
1 i. Grade controls 0 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5
13. Second or greater order channel on e)i in
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No 0 I Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 2_?.
14- Groundwater flow/discharge _1 _
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or ® 1
Water in channel - dry or growing season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 JE 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5
1s. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = j LI )
_0?. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 '
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2
22. Crayfish 0 .5
23. Bivalves 1
24. Fish 0.5
25. Amphibians 0 5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL
Ite 02ms amend 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aq
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
--2?.3
2 3
0
1
1 --
Yes 1.5
y 0
1 0
1 1.5
1 1 C1.5
1 1.5
2 I 3-
5) SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
or Welland plants.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: l C Project: L SSa t << ?? Latitude: 36. 0 S6 Al
7
?C,,yy ?n ?'3
?rl ?i Wlv? Site: R etlc Longitude:
Evaluator.
Total Poin Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: e.g. Quad Name: C FVNmet ?,.f
if a 19 or perennial if ;t 30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal 7 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
-7p o
r1a. Continuous bed and bank
0 1 2, -?T
1 g
12. Sinuosity 0 --
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 3 j
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 . 1 2 ---fff
1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 2
6. Depositional bars or benches ?0? 1 2
- ?::4
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 _? -
9 a Natural levees _ 0 1 3 -- -
10. Headcuts 0 2 -
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 - 1 -
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.
13. Second or greater order channel on eAsti
..,. __ .,,... --- - ,,..........e.,.- Nn en Yes = 3
Main-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B.Hydrology (Subtotal= ?s _
1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 2 -
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. or 1 2
Water in channel - dry or growing season _
16. Leaflitter 1.5 11 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 _ 0.5 1
1 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0
Yes f 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ?' S )
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0?
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3. 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 .5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 .5 1 _ 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: L-1 / 116 0
Evaluator:
Project: , S_54 r , Lc ro--
Site: RecA
County:d r S
Latitude: 36. /it 1) 5 3'''-"
Longitude: ?0 i j y y `1t
Other
e.g. Quad Name: C +'lvI rr?c+i S
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if x 19 or oerenniat ifa 30 - _?
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = .3 Absent Weak Moderate I Strong
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 -T-
r2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 }
I: 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 - 1 2 1- -
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting0 1 2 ?-
0 1 2
-5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2
t 01 2 3
7. Braided channel
8 Recent alluvial deposits - 0 1 2
9 0 Natural levees_ 0 1 - 2 -
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.
0 0.5
12_ Natural valley or drainageway 1 1. -__-
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No c Yes = 3
avirtanrp __ --?
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drology(Su(Sbtotal
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2
11 5. Water in channel -and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel -- dryorgrowing season F -
16. Leaflitter 5 1 0.5 0
?17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 _--
^18. Organic debrs lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1 --
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.
C. Biology (Subtotal
T
-
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 2 1 -
215. Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0 --
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1 5
23 Bivalves t - 2 3
0 0.5 Cl) -1.5
. 24. Fish
25. Amphibians 0 , 0.5 1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 _ 2 3 J
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriaMungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1. SAV = 2.0_; Other 0 _
° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form;
Date: i i I ('0'Z Project: L,5Sct rCt Ln4e-
Evaluator:` L??$ Site: ?a •?
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 26 county:
if a 19 or perennial if 2 30
Latitude:
Version 3.1
.?.?3 ° Al
Longitude: ?n , y y 5% 4 C 7
Other
e.g. Quad Name: C t'8t1 N/1 ! nS
A. Geomorphology-.(Subtotal Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1
.?. 0 2 3 1
1'. Continuous bed and bank _ -
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 -
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sort ing 0 3
5. Active/relic floodplain I 0 1 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2
0 1 _
7. Braided channel 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 - -
9' Natural levees 0 2 3 -
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
0 0.5 1
11. Grade controls J 5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing ?j
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No l'/ I Yes = 3
i
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ -
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel --dry or growin season ----- -
g - -
16. Leaffitter 1.5 1 .5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 -0.5 1 1 • _ _
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 ? 0.5 1 1
19. yH dric soils (redoximorphhiic features) present? No = 0 _ Yes 1.
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 : }
2
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish - 0 l 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 _
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. - 0.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed ffFA = 0.5: FACW = 0.75; OBL
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aqi
Sketch:
1 1.5
1 1.5
2 3
1 _ 15
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 9 i Cg Project L?SSc+ra Lk z Latitude:2?, I) 5 IS1 c'?
Evaluator.. r1? Mj '0 t10A/k Site: C? Longitude: 70. 'J'-/? J d??l1
Total Points:' Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: fe 45 f? e.g. Quad Name: L IPM fyl e -'1 S
if 2:19 or Perennial if t 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = d Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 ' 2 3
2. Sinuosity - 0
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 l`? E:D 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2
5. Activelrelic floodplain 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2
_d channel U 1 ? 2 3?
7. Braide
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2( -
-- ? ?
9 aNatural levees 0 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 -
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.f5 1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented I No = 0 I Yes 10
evidence.
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal _
14. Groundwater flow/discharge _T__0 1 2 - 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel - dryor growing season (l?J/
16. Leaflitter 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.
1 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 redox 19. Hydric soils (- - - imorphic features) present? i No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
0
26'. Fibrous roots in channel 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish - 0 1 1.5
25. Amphibians - 0 0.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidiang bacterialfungus. 0.5 1 1.5
[29 . Wetland plants in streambed _ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL .5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 _
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aqua or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version V
Date: Project: o L c+t z- Latitude-- 36,11)15-' Y
y t ?
Evaluator: Situ KAr Longitude:gp, yyq g yee'o
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: (s e.g. Quad Name: C PvYt ?1 l C n 5
ff a 19 or perennial if Z 30 ,
A. Geomor hp ology (Subtotal = L?_ Absent Weak oderate Strong
1 . Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 - ?_?-
2. Sinuosity 0 3
-
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Sal texture or stream substrate sorting 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
1 3
. 6_ Depositional bars or benches 0
Br a?dpd 0 2 3 8. Rnalluviadeposits 0 2 3
9' Natral levees ` 0 1 2 3?
10. Headcuts
7E E
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1-5
.
12. Natural valley or drainageway 00 0.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrolog Subtotal = ? )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 ??
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, Q 1 2 3
Water in channel - dryor growingseason l
16- Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
18. Organic debris tines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 1.5 _
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3 -? )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
2 R1?ooted plants in channel 3 2 0 _
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves _ 1 2 3 _
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5_ 1 1.5
26 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5.
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 _ 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 o.5 1 1.5_
29plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1. SAV = 2.0; Other - 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
•
•
s
•
•
•
•
• North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 31
3?.
• Date: y ! ?? Proiect: L,SSarir, IG,C? Latitude:
• Evaluator: 1 ' s W NQ Site: e. t Longitude:ry s 1/dS o?
Total Points: Other
• Stream is at least intermittent -.),Lf County: c I S , ?? e.g. Quad Name: Cleolm ?S
• if>_ 19 or perennial if a 30 1
• A. Geomorphology_ (Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
• 1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 I ' } 2 30
• 2. Sinuosity 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 3
• . Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3 -
5.4Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2
_ ?1 2
• t 6P7. Depositional bars or benches 0 1
Braided channel. Recent alluvial deposits _ 0 1 2
.<
• 9 ° Natural levees 0 2 - 3
• 10. Headcuts 0 1 2
11. Grade controls s 0 .5 1 1.5
• r2 . Natural valley or drainageway 0 1 1 -
3. Second or greater order channel on existing
• USGS or NRCS map or other documented No Yes = 3
evidencei -
• Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrol Subtotal = _ .
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2
• 115. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Tl 1 2 3
• Water in channel - dry or growing season
16. Leaflitter _ 1.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 %Ye 1 5
• -
Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0 1.5
18.
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 C. Biology (Subtotal
• F20°. Fibrous roots in channel _ 3 2 - . 0
• 216. Rooted plants in channel _ 3 2 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
• 23. Bivalves 0 1_ 2 3
• 24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians S 0 5 1 1.5
• 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
• 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0.5 ! 1 1-5
• -- . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.? SAV = 2.0; Other _0 -
° items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
• Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
•
•
•
•
•

LISSARA Subdivision
Forsyth County, North Carolina
TENSAR BX„00 GEOGRID
2'--0" VERTICAL SPACING
EL = 805_00 (IYP.)
-- SEED & STABILIZE.

NOF,,AAL POOL S00-00
/ 10
IY2
EL. = 790.00
2.5
1?
C33 CONCRETE SAND
CHIMNEY DRAIN TO
RUN LENGTH OF DAM
BOTTOM OF DAM -
FII L ELEVATION
VARIES
SECTION THRU DAM
NO SCALE
THIS DRAWING IS A PRE DESIGN CONCFPIUAL DRAWING. FINAL DESIGN MAY RF DIFFFRFNT DUF TO
ADDITIOt,IAL INLORMA.TION PROVIDLD BY RIL Di_(AILED DLSIGN.
Attachment 7
IADDER DRAIN SPACED
AT 75' ALONG LENGTH
OF DAM

•
•
•
?I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
- --- --- ---- -- -- - -
- LISSARA Subdivision
Forsyth County, North Carolina
--- --- ---- ---------
----- --- '? n ?
I \ < -
-ENfRGI' DISSIP,9TOR
\ 1 + I ) I
1 , I 1 I
I , 1 ) 1
OPEN CHANNEL %5
0?
COfMBINAFION PRINCIPAL &I i
EUERGENCY SPILLWAY-
/
s
/ -
if-_ 26'
71-
?61100
? 1 800 d
00
12 SIPHON TO.???? ?> ?? '? ?_,? 1 ??
DRAIN TO fL. 780.0 - ? `\ / 80? ,\f,? '? ?? \ i
, I
6 DO-
I ?
! i I 16 801 TOM
/' -- \ \ \
lI ; i ) i \ DRAIN / AOPROXIM'ATE TOE
) ' 1 I I
I '
I r i I 1
PLAN VIEW -- LISSARA DAM
SCALE: 1"= 100'
THIS DRAWING IS A PRE-DESIGN CONCEPTUAL DRAWING. FINAL DESIGN MAY BE DIFFLRLNT DUE TO
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE DETAILED DESIGN AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION-
Attachment 8
LISSARA Subdivision
Forsyth County, North Carolina
DAM MAINTENANCE PLAN
A qualified representative will be appointed by the Lissara Homeowners
Association to perform management tasks associated with periodic
inspections to assure the integrity of the dam structure and meet State of
North Carolina Dam Safety inspection and reporting requirements.
Inspection
Inspection is a necessary part of operation since early detection of gradual
changes can reduce maintenance costs. Routine inspections provide a
way to monitor the dam performance.
All inspections should be performed by properly trained persons.
Listed below are the several categories of inspections:
pDaily /Weekly
U River flow observations
UPrecipitation Records
UMonthly
UOperating Equipment
USafety Equipment
pPerformance and Superficial Structure
?Yearly
UStructural
UOperating and Safety Equipment
p 10 year Department of Natural Resources
oAfter High Flow Conditions have Subsided (post storm)
The categories are time based with increasing considerations.
Daily/weekly and monthly inspections require little time to perform.
These inspections provide insight on how the dam is operating under
current weather conditions. They also provide insight if the dam is
mechanically operable for emergencies. Stream flow conditions should
also be regularly monitored. The water depth measuring strip on the
upstream
abutment provides the easiest way to consistently monitor water levels.
Water levels and gate operating positions should be recorded on a "'Daily
/Weekly Inspections Observations".
Attachment 9

Yearly inspections are designed to evaluate how the dam performed
throughout the year and what is the dam's condition. This inspection
evaluates how the dam has changed from its original as-built plan
condition. Detailed photo documentation provides a permanent record of
changing conditions. Cracking conditions can be carefully monitored by
placing a ruler within the photo. Larger scale repair and maintenance
items should be identified for correction. These inspections are best
performed mid-year after the higher spring flows have subsided. State
code requires that copies of a thorough annual inspection report be
submitted to the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
(NCDNR).
A ten-year NCDNR inspection is required by North Carolina State
Statutes. The dam must be inspected by dam safety officials. This
coordinated inspection thoroughly details a minimum of the following:
[]Structures Integrity ( concrete, piling, up I downstream conditions )
[]Dam Equipment Operation (gate operators, winches, etc. )
[]Dam Safety Equipment Operation (fences, signage)
Post storm inspections should be made as soon as flood water conditions
have subsided. This dam is susceptible to damage during high flow
conditions because it is designed for submergence during the 100 year
flood. Listed below are key elements to be inspected after storm flows
have subsided:
[]Vegetation: high flow damage
[] Earthen Fill: slope, riprap, and abutment stability, seepage
[]Tainter Gates: operation
[]Flashboard Bays: board damage Gate Openings: deposited debris
Attachment 9
OOM-Ml uewdo
ene
ejess
l
l
a
ll
5L98Z DN `I"MdS
' d
- ON l .009 '00b 'ON 0
Aunoa Wriod
eullaeO 4WN peo
a
=e+S omd bL9£
sjumMmoo ownosog pxmiaN Pug PuuipM
1uewdolenea eiessll

NVIdNOIlVAH3S3Nd (9?:xbZ) '007 - j 11d:DS
Ab
80-1-60 11NM ,OOZ=.k" Slo 1 ?? ewa srwissiewnsisNasiAMI as
NORTH
00 y m
o f x
,?
LM of
Q?
Z
?
CL- z a
z

,*fj'?r?, b l •w.
? z
,, u b 3
1
X
Jill
r frf
r.
I III Q o v
0
aaU ??a
cV m r-
p n
I ? ? O
f ? G O ?
I
N Q, N
E O p p
'? ?? O N N N
N C C ?
CJ J J J
cn
?? CO 7 CV
Y N
n G
G
O 0
C O O
O C
O N N _
n p
o
p d d
o
c
? n

c
I I
I
l -
\
o
° I
l
N I
U p V) I
N N L
Q

v
E

a
v
E !S v
_ ?
6" m?:,
I C

o
o
C)
No oM
0 m
6 C)
N o
?<
D
?:?
) I o°a
O

L,? m
n
0 ?
L o
`
m I N
cnQ O

U)
-o u) n (
n c)
, J J m d o

C C
_ O
N
1

0M
I N ?
I
-1 l -- L - - - - - - - - - - - i

3: LnIL L
6 v-
N
Q m ? O
O
C Q) _
O L L
U _Q
? it
i O m N E
U C
n m N
O O
L
(D 0
mm ()
44
oom-Ml luouidolanaa ejessll
5L98Z DN `mmdS
-
J8 WSJO
O
AUM eo
donBen
aa ooh ON 00 1 oS o
3
D
IP
3 W
N p
d
S
!d 17L9£
s;uninsaoo oamosag Wmvlq pue pwoipaM
luawdolanea Wessll

NVId NOIIVAH3S32ld
: \
jz (9 ? X t, Z) , o q = „ L ] ? V D S

BO L 40 aNM A .09=.L ,.M S to Z . r.is ?
W.
SNassienns i SNOISIA3a
oN
0o06-Ml luouidolanea eiessll
*MO 5L98Z aH `inndS
d
'A d=A%
RO
an 'ON ON ,00 L oS o
unoa ip
eupoieO 4WN
sio3
:uopwj S
M
P
?d bL9£
- sluminsuoo aamosag lwmBNl Pue PxmIpM
luewdolenea W8991
1
:au
\ F
F
NVIdNOIlVna3S3ad V
A
R (9?XbZ) oq ]?VDS
a.a A
80 640 21NM OS=.6 S!o£ awue
goo
sNassiewns i sNasuA3ti
as
OOM-MI luewdolene0 ejessll
9L98Z 3N `inndS
'A eo
dMM
aut 'OH OW o0 l oS 0
1u000 WsJOd
BUIPOO 4WN P
g
S
d 40£
slunInsuoo aamm-d p mWN Ptru PIIBPaM
luewdoIen80 BJeasII
MAN PgfQW

NVIdNOUVn2MMId (9?XtiZ) ,05 = j I?v3s

90-1-VO IINM 05=.1 s 9101, aw srroissewns i sNasm3a oN
000 VMl luewd 110AGO eJessll
MMI. 5L98Z DN `mmdS
' d
A*
O'
a
l ,00? 'ON .001 .09 0
IUunoo V-.l
euIPJ8O WON Pe
=
,S
d bL9£
d
u
sluinTmoa oamosod j xwN puu PuuIlaM
juewdoleneo elessll ti

NVIdNOIIVAU3S3Ud (9SXbZ) o5 = „l IIdSS
:.au dwn
80 L 40 MNM Og=, L •.e g;o g srwissiewns i swism3m as
NORTH
? O
O ?
O
O -+j
O nl
O
O
O
OU
O
O
--j
o
4-
0
O b
A_ mm
3 [ 9
Q m
W 2
J '
4
.F 1
^ 7. 1
FI
W
T

1
oom-Ml lueuidoleneQ eiessll
5L98Z DH °euedS
eu
ae 'puno
L
Asro eo
dum-
ou? .oN l ,008 '00tb ,OOZ 0
=l
ip
o
p
O 4WN p
g
S
d bL9£
slu nlnsaoo aamosag FjMlRx Pas puleIlaM
juewdolenea eaessll
»w -N P*rwd - \
\ F
I '

Nvidaatsvw

A
2
I

(94
XtiZ) ,OOZ = j Ilv3s

90 l 40 aNM AOZ=.I S!o l swve
aaa
sNassiewnsisNasin3a
oa
Lui 00 -,?Elf

N D

Lu LM
L2,:

Q- o < O
M a o

r a

N
c
c
0
E
0
1 ?
C
N
E
Q.8
J
NORTH
1
I
l
1
i

4-
C)
O
m
U
C) -0
c c
_ O O
c
-c
?0C+
?DE?
0 0 0
uWm1

1

f
f

1?
4 V) rq

I/ c C)

I

Jill
w
Qua
z w
?
U
0 a
3J0
Z J
z zzW (n

O <

, 0 Q w
u U
0 3JJ Q U
U 0
w

O
°
00
r H
w
O

n C7 d W N W

O LLLJ
LL w
.
Q JO J Li
.

> Q
z ~w
z
O Q?W?
W
d Q? - mz
L W J
d 0 Q
U) J?0 JW SLf)

04
zIt
a Q n w h
W J
Z W
O Ch
CL Q
4
oom-MI weuidowea eiessn
5c98z ON `m-dS
eullaeO LO-N Ajunoo Wsroj Peog dmeen$ 0wd ft9£ ooh ON 00 L OS 0

d slulnfnsaoo oamoseg IRMW l PUB PU91PAk
luew
olenea BJessn
NV C

Idi131SVW A
0S = „l IIVDS
wwa awa
-
40 ZINM
W0
910 Z :"-.
apo
sNassrewns i sNOisiAmi -
as
¦
¦

¦

¦
i
¦
1,803

,?

O
¦
¦

r 1 ¦
%

1
t

?i

¦

O ¦

?
r -
- O ¦

?
?E¦f'i¦i
¦wf¦ ¦
"tow¦ _
RAMWjKlg ¦i¦ii¦F
O
O
O
O
O
g
O
O w a -

H
W
NORTH 2
?? v J
OOOL-MI ;usuidolenea eiessrl
5L98Z DN `mndS
-11-8 q
0 LWN 'lyunoo Wslo Peog duru-S 0-d
L ON ooz oo t os o
_ b
9£
s;oinInsuoo omnosod Iw18AI Pug PugIpM
;uewdolened wessil '

NVId2131SVW
F?
:
J2 ?\ (9zXbZ) oq = „l I?VDS
.au dw.n '
80-L-hO UNM p9=.L 910E ., _ I app sNOssiewns/sNosin3ti oa
¦
¦ NORTH
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦

¦
¦
¦
?
r
¦
¦
¦

1 1`rr ¦
¦
¦
1 ¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦

¦
*0000 wommusaw
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
_ _ i Cpl
¦

r

L6
Ll F
¦
M
Q J ¦
W ' ¦
t-
1
¦
¦
¦
oooi-n I wewdopned eiessn
5L98Z jm `mndS
-IPJeJ tU-N 'R{unoo tpAsro? PsoZI dum-S oumd bL9£ oo? ooz oo os o

e
do
e
- sluei[nsaoo ownoso d TwWM Pug PAM
ju
w
l
nep eiessl
I
NVldN31SVW C

& (9?XbZ) ,O
= „L 7?V?S
:.au
4-u
80 -1 40 2lNM
og=,lwos 5104 arwe ` app sNoismannsisNasimm M+
ooot-MI luewdoleneQ euessn
Aml-? W-10 SL98Z am `%mdS
su
as vUuno
L
Asio
- eo
duism
au? ON 00Z ,001 os 0
ip
o
p
3
O 41
N
:uopwl P
g
S
d ft9£
s;uMinsuoo aamosag iuBNi Pug Pupi3aM
tuewdoleneQ eiessn
F 7
NVldN31SVW
A
0q _ „L ]IdDS
(9?7 Xt,
+au aw.w
BO t 40 UNM pg='t.ros 9109 ; Wo sNoissiswnsiswismgu as