20080645 Ver 1_Application_20080407

•
Apri13, 2008
Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Re: PCN Barnet Park
Lenoir County
08 0 645
Please find enclosed 7 copies of the PCN application and supporting documentation and a
check for $200 dollars for the application fee. A copy of this information has also been
provided to Tracey Wheeler at the US Army Corp of Engineers, Washington Regional
Office.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Michelle S. Clements, PE
The East Group, PA
cc: Mike Hill -Barnet
Rhonda Barwick -City of Kinston
Enclosures
o ~~~aaC p
APR 7 2008
DENR - WATER (lUAi1TY
1NETLANDS ANO STORMWATER BRANCH
THE
GROUP
Corporate Office
PO Box 7305
324 S Evans St
Greenville
NC 27835
www.eastgroup.com
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
ENGINEERING
ARCFIITECTURE
SURVEYING
TECHNOLOGY
Since 1975, servicing clients worldwide

+l
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ 8 X 6 4 5
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Not Requested
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^ Buffer Rules variance only
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^ No payment proposed
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^ Project
located in Lenoir County ~, , 4
II. Applicant Information D ~~~ ~ ,~~
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR ~ 2008
Name: Scott Stevens, City Mana eg r, Cit~ofKinston ,~~~rt .,
Mailing Address: 207 E. King Street ~F~~S10RMW
Kinston, NC 28502 `~
Telephone Number: 252-939-3110 Fax Number: 252-939-3388
E-mail Address: Scott. stevensna,ci. knston. nc. us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Michelle Clements
Company Affiliation: The East Group, PA
Mailing Address: 324 Evans Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Telephone Number: 252-758-3746 Fax Number: 252-830-3954
E-mail Address: mchelle. clements(a~eastgroup. com
Page 5 of 15

III. Project Information
5
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Barnet/Park Drainage
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NONE
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 450502598020 Record No. 1570
4. Location
County: Lenoir Nearest Town: Kinston
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): None
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take NC 11 South from
Greenville to US 258. Take a right onto Vernon Avenue. Continue west on Vernon Avenue to
Hull Roa~ust past the Caswell Center. Turn right onto Hull Road. Continue north on Hull
Road to Hillcrest Road. Turn left on Hillcrest Road and continue south to Sand Clay Road.
Turn right onto Sand Clay Road. Project area is on the right side of Sand Clay Road at the
east edge of Barnett Park.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.2764 °N 77.6400
6. Property size (acres)
31.91 AC
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Neuse River
8. River Basin:
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site area for this project is abortion of Barnett Park off
a sheet that
oW
Page 6 of 15

of Sand Clay Road in the northwest portion of Kinston. The drainage area for this parcel is
approximately 410 AC and is a mix of_park land, residential, woods, and commercial
development. (See Attachment 1) The drainage follows a stream to an existing 84-inch
culvert beneath Sand Clay Road. Duringperiods of heavy rain, the downstream commercial
and residential developments are,flooded.
Soils within this area are defined as Johnston in the Soils survey_for Lenoir County. These
soils are nearly level, verypoorly drained soils on.flood~lains. Infiltration is moderate, the
seasonal high water table is at the surface and runoff is very slow, and the surface is ponded
in places.
The Flood Insurance Rate Map for this area does not indicate any of the drainage area to be
in a flood hazard area. It is shown as Zone X which is an area determined to be outside of
the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. (See Attachment 2~
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed solution involves placing a precast concrete structure in the stream to retain water
and to slow the discharge through the existing 84-inch culvert beneath Sand Clay Road. (See
Drawings Cl. l , C2.1 and C3.1) Approximately 16 LF of 84-inch CMP would be added to
the existing 84-inch culvert beneath Sand Clay Road. A 12.foot diameter drainage structure
would then be installed in the center of the stream.
This structure would be custom-made and would be 14 feet tall and would have two 2' x 6'
openings and a 4' x 7 'opening to allow water to pass through at different storm events and
a gated top to allow. or overflow water to discharge icy blockage occurs . The bottom of
the structure would be submerged with the lower opening extending below grade to allow
normal.flow of the stream to continue unobstructed. The area around the proposed structure
will be cleared of the existing vegetation and will be backfilled and slope to match natural
grade. The stream banks and the outlet of the stream will be stabilized with riprap and.fabric
to help control erosion and minimize scour effects. Side ditches that are currently
dischar~g into the stream will be graded to discharge prior to the proposed structure. The
areas around the structure will have topsoil placed and seeded to establish permanent
vegetation. The City of Kinston will monitor and maintain the structure as a part of the
maintenance of Barnett Park and make necessary repairs and remove any accumulated
debris from the openings of the structure.
Typical construction equipment will be used. The ollowing equipment will likely be used:
excavator, rubber tine backhoe, dump truck, service truck, and miscellaneous hand tools.
1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the installation of the concrete
structure is to slow the rate of runoff on the north side o Sand Clay Road and create
temporar~ponding on the upstream side. The area to be used or the temporary_ponding is a
portion of the Barnet/ Park which is used for frisbee golf or is undeveloped. Currently, the
drainage passes beneath Sand Clay Road through an existing 84-inch culvert. During
periods o heavy rainfall, the rate and volume of runof' is so great that ooding occurs
Page 7 of 15

downstream in both commercial, industrial and residential developments due to restrictions
in flow downstream and the concentration of the entire drainage area. The 410 acres above
Sand Clay Road combines with an additional 600 acres at a point in a downstream
subdivision prior to dischargiLng to the Neuse River. (See Attachment 3) The intent is to slow
down and temporarily detain this drainage on the north side of Sand Clay Road to prevent
„ ooding on the south side. The stream has been surveyed to verify that it can store the
retained water.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. NCDENR-DWQ has made an On-site Determination for the portion of
the stream of ected by the project (see attached letter dated February 22, 2007). Meetings have
been held to discuss various solutions to the existing drainage issue. Attendees of the meeting
included representatives om the ollowing a eg ncies/firms: NCDENR-DWQ, NC Wildlife
Resource Commission, US Army Corp o~Engineers, City of Kinston, William Barnett Companx
LLC, and The East Group, PA.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated or this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 8 of 15

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The stream will be impacted and the
riparian buffer will be impacted. Approximately SS LF of stream will be impacted and
approximately 0.10 AC of bu„~fer will be impacted. The stream will be impacted where the 16
LF of additional 84-inch pipe will be added and where the concrete structure will sit. The
riparian buffer will be impacted where the all will be placed and the stream banks will be re-
graded along the area of the pipe and the structure. Wetlands will not be impacted.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
None

Total Wetland Impact (acres) `
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.64 AC
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres
1 Unnamed Permanent Perennial 14 55 0.02

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) SS 0.02
Page 9 of 15

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
None

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.02
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): SS
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation None
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Page 10 of 15

were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Several alternatives were developed and considered. However, each of these alternatives were
eliminated as possibilities due to various reasons. The alternatives were as follows:
1) Provide a off channel area, for temporary detention. A dry detention basin would be created
and during rain events water would be diverted to it after the water reached a certain level. The
water would then discharge back into the channel once the storm event passed. This alternative
was not selected due to the requirement to acquire land for the dry detention basin and the him
cost ofland in this area. This alternative will still include riparian buf er impacts.
2) Place permanent rock/silt check dams within the channel. This would slow the water in the
channel until it reached a certain level and then spilled over. However this would require
maintenance of the check dams to remove sediment and a larger portion of the stream would be
impacted. Stabilization of these structures would require structural reinforcement and impact
both the stream and the riparian bu„ ffer. This would also require additional easements from
adiacent landowners for maintenance and installation.
3) Provide stilling basins at ditch tie-in points and at pipe inlets and outlets. This would require
that the areas at these points be excavated and lined with rip rap. This also would required that
a larger portion of the stream be impacted.
4) Clean out the existing channel to its natural grade, shape the channel banks to a manageable
slope, and install slope stabilization fabric. This would require the acquisition of additional
easements,from adiacent landowner so that the necessary bank slopes could be achieved. This
would also require bringing in,fill to repair areas that have previously eroded.
5)Replace the existing 84" culvert pipe with a smaller culvert pipe to create the temporary
ponding on the upstream side of Sand Clay Road. The alternative would reduce the cross
sectional area o the,flow channel and therefore impact the aquatic life within the stream. This
alternative would also not provide any freeboard or overflow options for large rain events.
6~~no improvements are made to this stream, the downstream developments will continue to be
.flooded during periodic storm events. Loss of product and lose of production time at the
industrial facilities would have an economic impact to the Industry and to the City of Kinston.
The alternative chosen appears to have the least amount of impact to the stream and the riparian
buffers in this area. It also appears to be the most structurally sound and maintainable
alternative. Also this impact would be on one property owned by the City of Kinston so no other
property owner would need to be involved in the process.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
Page 11 of 15

including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is planned.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
Page 12 of 15

City of Kinston is the Owner
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ®Not Required
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone , ~„~_~ ~ ~~~ Multiplier
T .T:4:....~:..«
1 1, 650 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 1,100 1.5 0
Total 2, 750 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Not Required
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 13 of 15

the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The project is design to correct existing
stormwater issues.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will not be generated.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Work will onl ty ake place in stream to correct existing stormwater issues on currently developed
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The impact to the downstream industrial and residential developments are a significant concern
to the Cit~of Kinston. This solution will provide needed relie,~for these downstream individuals
Page 14 of 15

who deal with the e ects o~ the temporary, frequent _ ooding that occurs during storm events.
This proposed solution will also provide some relief to the entire drainage basin by slowing
down the rate o runoff from this portion of the basin.
/v~GlloSt /
' Applicant/Agent's Signature "" Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15

approximate and
absolute.
Map Soixce: No~!!t CsroNna Atlas i Oazetber. P~ 64.2003
SCALE 1" = 1 Mfle
Ths East Group. PA
MIc~eNe Cierr~ents
F+wy zse North Trams LM G ~ ~,. ~ F~~ure 1
~erpk ~ ~ NC fnvlion,n~nfe! CenfulfenN N~Cinity Map
40-0~~7^-3~1s1 Juno 2007

TopoZone -USGS Falling Creek (NC) Topo Map
Page 1 of 1
~ ~,
1
~ "` - y
~~
,'
~.1
11

. •. ~~ ~

t ~~
.~
~F19~IYVfl '~
C`.AI'f'1 l_
~-^__-y
"_-~~ '~
-. t1 Y ~ 1
rt. ~~~•
r ~ ~ .~
~~ y,_..
i '.`.~.__..~
~ ~ ~ ,/~ ,,
r.~
ti ~~x 1
~~ , I
M*
0 0.3 0.6 4.9 1.2 1.5 km
0 0.2 0.4 4.6 0.8 1 mi
35.2764°N, 77.6401°W (NAD83/WGS84)
USGS Falling Creek (NC) Quadrangle M=-9,367
Projection is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum G=-1.526
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?lat=3 5.27643&lon=-77.64013&size=l&u=5&layer=D... 3/12/2008

a ~
•~~
~ ••
. ~ •
~ ~ •
•~
_~asr -~,
s e '' ~+__. w.uwa
_.. , .
ti{)i 3'tt~~ili ll? x.71; ~I~SUIUIG-
Map Source: Falling Creek Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990. SCALE 1" = 1000'
The East Group, PA
Michelle Clements 9
258 North T LMG F~ ure 2
Hwy ract LANDMANAGWlMGIIOUPs>ic USGS To ra hic Ma
Lenoir County, NC fnrbonmrnfol Coniulronts PA P P
40-07-311 June 2007

Pa: Pocaila
Js: Johnston
Nc: Norfolk
Map Source: NRGS Sosl Survwy
fi
^~re ~;
e~~
.~t;hl ! i' _~f rt
11ir k d'•t ~it~,r1{~, f'(1 {`
h1~Gh~ pt~ C,h:ni~;iit~. ~ ~ s~l~ ~IC~Ure ~
J
Hwy 2~~ Nurih Tract ~~,.`. • ' •°~a.,, , , SOifs IUSap
,,i~~~~i C~;~fr~tY NC.; ~~~~~
,!i ~! 1 !itr :'Illil

STATE OF NOATH CAROLINA FIRM PANEL LOCATOR DIRGRAM
ptar ~ rrvCs
DATUM INFORMATION
me prolecup. peed b me pmpamdnr pf role Tan was mr. Npnn c~mFna
szro Plane IFIFSIONf 32001. The AOrlxanGl Qatar Has Ina Nprh Anerican
Dan.m pf r9a3. GR580 ellpspd. DXleranpes In tlap.m. elgpspid. projection, or
Urlve.elT¢nwerse Mersatprzwas umd In ma pmtluatpr of FINMS for adlecam
tudsdkdpns may 'esuh In slight poshionpl tliNCrpnccs it mob Icpturcs aprons
jmuabnpnal tropntladea. rneae elxaanpea ap ram dte:t ma aca,mpr m mis
Flaw. anpoptanataa pp role map era In us. sonar Paal. wham
IUS-su-ray Fpot• IMIg'393) Meters.
FlDptl elevations pn mis map are rele~enpetl m fM1e Na?n ATOdcen Vertical
DaNm M 1988 INAVD BB), Resa Xpnd elwetlwrs mast be mmparai tp sinrecre
erd g~pand elevatluns ralerenced m me same rertlprl Ortur. An average
pHsat banvesn NAVD Ha antl me Natlonal GeotleSC Vertical Oalum pl I9}9
1N6Vn 291 has beer computed fo~epch NoM Carvllrm cpunry. Tris pXSa vas
'lien aoplletl m me NGVD 2911oop eleuabprrs mz: Hare notrMsatl AwnA dre
-m of Ih'w slatexltln format FLAN. The pfhms br mch cpunN sAm.r on
tM1ls ~T{HM panel ere sM1pvrin the venipa]dewm pHsettable below. Wdue a
cunry bwntlary and a flppCng sparse wdn unmised NGVD A9 iboe pleva:Nns
are pdnplaept aq mprda,eloXaet M1ea bean pmaphtap ape apa~ep epnng me
' n bt Mis s¢txmin fOrmM FlFM. See SecApn 6i ptma acmmpaMing
Flpptl Insurance s[udy report tp obtain funrar frdommedun cn
of Aevadons vetween NAVD 88 end NGVD 29. To pdrain currant elevation,
aeeprt=flan. ana/or Ibpadpn h9ormatlorm- began mrta ahown pr rols map.
FAeree contam9ra NoeM1 Ca~idlna Geotlnlc Survry at rM1e atldrns sku,n hnlnw_
also nine Iplorrratlun Sere na Brann of the Nallnnal Geo]dric
Surveyaat laps l rt9-a2a2, o~ eisll heir weake at rruw.nps no
N h G I'. ~ God ' s C ry A Wage Van cal Jatum Ottset ladle
12. N6 S pry fhmlh'
R le'gn NC g) 3
1891 ]]}J83fi
All summs Ib1etl 'n the Fleod Xexard Data irble below were stutllpd by
e¢Iletl melhotls using field su ev. Othe, Ilopd M1aaartl pate shown or 'his
Irap may haae been desired nsiny ehter a coastal aralysls 0, Ilmbu detaled
pair+;a. More Ipmrmason on ma fmpmng avu~eaa .mumaA br mane
araMaea ~a cpnrPmep In me nand F.wrance svtly reppr_
FLOOC HA2ARC DATA TAB LE ana.a,we~r.c

FAIJNG L ACCF

Ot3
]
NEIIS~aIVEF
E69 <X9

9,556' 40590
39fi,939' 90500 JI B 3669/2$90
]080
fi~ 2030 /?'90
9103 m0,33
a0 1,900/3,615
v EP. TFIeuiA XV

495a uE 0' 15
O
FMON T iAB TPA Y
31.5° 99
31.9' 99

06a 6.950

c 3 am Wo IEFi 136a ""'
City of Kinston F.xtraterrimrial Jurisdiction
370145
lolNB PANEL 4516
LEGEND
I ~;'"~n' SPECIAL FLOOD HAURO ARFAS (SFHAJ SUBIECT TO
i~ INIiNDATION 8Y THE IM ANNUM. CHANCE FLOOD
annuil rbana Mad 11n1-year AooAr abo h.+..n . tm Fm hnd, t. rM1e Ar.,d
S rhos a I % dvwe of NInA Ntiagd or uai.d in any yv.o veer. The sAkiil
F ao1 H rU es is dv aixo w a m Awdirry fiY rM1e 1% n ual dnnrr Aapd. ,es
iaaerdd uaeam Indpar~ipn.. qAf. nl l.AO, na. 899. v. and vE. Tn. e..a
ilm~a it nn,a rnana Rrv,d.
.,na~Arrerm~eA~
,aRFwpe Elrwlun, a.rom,bw.
lout AN Blood d.prhr of r feu morally areaM pnnAingr; brats FInM
Fl.vaavnr 0e¢rmlwf.
xOrvx AO Fuod ~Ndu OeteWni~redelor aye euf a9uvul fen Arwd nXRVell~atrla~
average dap
w JNermiuv9.
xE a al rood H ~a rrv~~ry praouvul I,em me tw nn
m ~Ie nmf e aom ~nnpl n m mat wv a~~enw
rrrrdr d. m r w mairner mm Ile m~rMr enpa ,nar„I sync
btlng rrlwrG m pralde pmt«tlon M1onr me IX annual d,an c or
Yearei Ants
SON! A» m be proktled firm 1 M annual d,ma MM M o federd
XrJ pmlaz,lon slssem unhr anxmnion. no Oue NrM Elevaunns
Jere mineA.
ZONF VF meal AmA n.v wA v i,y hzrad marw aNpnr, pax FImA iWUlm,
AekrminM.
FLOODWAY gRFA1 fN ZONE Af
The Mwdwav o Ifie rAannd ,J a,unrir plur any adjaam AouAP'ao, uem Nu rnrnrb:
4ep ireeau' envoarMrml w tlw Ae 1yn moral cAance Aood an be rz,Aed Mtlwr
u n, v aus pi Awd heirhu.
OTHER FLOOD gRFAs
ZgaF n a of b.tYS annpel ~fiapac M1,nd; er m of 1M .nnud rfiance AwrJ
wlm avery{e depllu d [ea tlun t loot prwlm dmtn.ye arw les Nen
t yuarc mX~ aril um 4rokwl hY brcu iro,ri 1G mnual,)aue
Awl.
DrHFR alas
w><drwnirod m a oumd<t~ nzx ,lnpal N,na tlcadpwn.
acs to xfilrh AmA fiaxa~r6 am uMnraminrd, butposslhlc
COASTAL FARRIER RESOURCES FYSTEM fCFR51 ARFA(
~~ ~ Dnmewlm PRONCmD AREAS tuvnal
BF error o~ as arc ~ axWl Foal HoreN aw
- a ,ual dace Aranlp4 n F.unA+ry
O~i Mdonnual vhan« Amdphin boundary
- - - - fladrwy h,uodvy
]one onMry
nn
.................... lBRS aM t)pA MwMarv
"" "~~ 0oundary AMJnR SpMi FIOM fWVd Aiw. ardiihrenr
L"::-"'":1 ase FIwA Fwanpn°. Hord dePN: o, Mocd valcciaee
-^---619---- a-Hord F ,. end velac~ c><valbo '.n
w Nr.rA FI va,n Ilrmbe ntirre ~~drmm .AAln,pnr.
IES ae>I nbvadnn In lar•
nerenwl m tk NunX Mreriran awul Oarum or I/de
~~ oas <mw nnr
-_____O tram.n rnr.
raadl~ar~ mrrem~r In Nr Np„„ Amwlr~
9r td .,E 3a_6 D;r~P~
49ux• I rW r 6d tr
il h ml' I
an wo EEi ~
BM55gx 4 1 ~. ykA 41 I
h la m tl n o N~c i RM p eY,m
8M5510 Na Cn erb survey LemA ,nrk lee esplanalimr Ire
® Il,e D um ulnhxmabnp anon nllFla IAN panA1
r Nl> 0.n., fn}
~~
cFID uoarH
AuP scale I• toao~ rt 1z,oaol
Rp fEEr
aaa o xp 5aaIETERS
III AI II ~IIIII JIII PANEL 4504) I
City of Kinston
FIRM
fE00D INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
14
uscr,.yrtew lore, wr
"0e
TM1b dig!¢I Flopp Insprarce Pate Map InFM was mpouced mrpuyh a unique
pre partnership between the State of NOFM1 Csrpllna antl the Fatleal
F~eryency Management Agency lFEMA. The State pf Ndrin CarDlira has
mplementntl a brag rum approach pt MDOApleln managn'nnrt tp decrease.
d b dl
I This A d sp
g M
A tll h l II I. A" th' X N
p P
o I' S ' g T 19e¢ egree~
wRiN FEMA pdpco arp aomr P dBnaIFIPM.
www.nc(loodmaps.com
Thh crap ,s tar use In adminive,ing me Natlonal Flood Inw,rance Pmgrem. X does rot
sadly Itlentlty ell aeas supiett to Ilootling. Darticdady Faro lo<aldraaage sources
DlsmaA slzc. The connunltY naD repealtolry sAOUb be wrsuhN )a ppsslak updated
pradd I M A r e '. mrmanpn
Tc pb ' d I ' lormation n areas whore eue Flood Elrv tl 9 E'
na/ it h y on detemi natl. uses are enww~ed ro pp F, h FI tl
Prpl'ea, FlpadwevD to /or summer of sti wm E bl davit 'n
M1e FI d I. 5 d FIS reppF .hat eccpm '. FIRM U ud be
e That Fr[s sown on [M1e FIflM -ep eventr d tl wnola-Spot eleratons, iM1esa
BFCS s¢ intentletl tar Mead insurance rz4ng ppryoses only antl shovltl nol to used
as tie sde source pf Ilopd eleverien Infornadpn. Awpkingy.flppd elevation date
ut~ In Ne f15 re on shouts oa uvlgetl in conluncaon wM the fIFM fa purposes
of ppnatma~,n and/nr pnnpdplam managamem,
Bond' (h }I dry d' glrad b'
T 11 ad G p d I llr
ss ~
Y
' tNN ~R tll. Pg .Flo y~din d
yeMne Xuodway rah rc pr 7m' Ne FbpA Ins n Srrdy repprtiD [ a labsd'cdp s.
City Of
Kinston
370145
NOTES TO USERS
Certain areas or In Sgalel Flood HazaN Areas roar be protepmd by flood rpnirel ibis map reAecs mare datnleo and ap-toda¢ rtreae <haenel ronflgurrtlonr man
niructuree. R to sttuon e.a ~lootl Pro¢glon Measures" of the flood Irsurerpe

e Nose sM1wrn on fM1e pr»eus FWM for [tin' pn. The Ibotlpleids erd ilood.+ays
ur~ctl
intamatior. on tlopo control sbu<wes In the wdsdlNpns.
Study ¢ppA for Thal were trenslertod from [he previous FlFM may have been atlissted :D ppriorm to
h M1 I f le RN FI Pfil dR
9 Y
~
rp' Po' Itl d d d FIRM b' d hd
A I tl. g ''- g b I ty d fed D bl
h loaf I s dy p Ili h a W h A Ib
tl I y M Ids tldfe h bt ap.
d/ N Th d b f FlFM' "I d
A of (re Np'ond Ogrtpl OrrT~ophcm Prpgrom the lore pe po al cpllecfo fort Please relarro t rarely p~ ~ted Yap Ilydex for „n ova p of t e county
g
~
magaiy la ly?R-1898. I la a artl geo,pata daa .upp6ei by the Ioaal wmmunhN eel sAOVdng Ibe layolrt of n
antl a Lst ag of
ap Danels', commuorry ma4 repromry addmsse
met FEMA bas specificatlp s pHs duetl he p'derred sp u to CpmmublYos labia coMan rag Na4onalRmd Inwrarpe PoAam dads for each mrmlurry
alppment of rM1e base crap. See Aeospetial mebdad ta!Ae asspcatetl tlip;al RAM
V as wall es a Ilsling of fM1e panels on whiph eaoh Is located.
fa
additionallnNmanpr abpp[base map pepaaapr.

pvemions conce
Xrop ha.e guertbns .boat <nla nap. pr more me motional ROOtl
Base map lemwss sM1pwn an mis map. nuts as prrprrate linlta. era basetl on dte Insurance Pmpmm In gereral. pieaae ve111-XZI-FFYA WFSe]]d3F18D1 or NsR;ne
:od I bl - f bl' to 9 Sn Me corporate FEMA at w«wtema.oov
lleit y A d L tA1 W p bli A d. Map users should
A Ty m I tc m mfr car prat wntlRans of
A FI tl I 51 L f AI R ILOM L
isd"ptlopel bpu.We p base map feayras, l tMs
f
M'p 0. d
a
d
y
M
F
fl
9 F g e
al bl V
tM1 X M1 L 11 it dpleln
l
ppl
1
rvwwmcmptl~eco_,o ao taco FEXA sap seraipe Lrnterm Fepoara9fife
ta-molmaron on ii i ed p od ~ s e ' h Ps nFM. The FEMn map sera
Cepmr may aha ba reaphad by Fm at FXOF35?-&]i g and ihoirvmai's atvn^.+v.lrmp.3o
Adala DAre 4:n FsosnaMS n[waXNd or.ish.vwr+.nrnmdr,u

nuY P
h d M M
nay P I pPP
_ ry table I and b Fl d l dy po i h "af
I tl . M1 IA h aReMNe
rN GoFo D d g r R rear We A'aonNFbui m>'rance kogmn uNe
ri 'tph I w..
n r ~ ~ . a~NmH hrera~ Pn~am
aNKK1 fp Hm rnR 100-61 xwlema.pMifiP
PANEL 4504
,orATD9 9N6F~a tln MA I.Rr, F6A A5M
cpvlnlXS.
LOMMXIaFt NJMBFA ANn SIIfAY

EffECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
IUEY 2,1004 J7204SO40E1
~,~
a"0~"'
Stan of Nan h Carulib~a
FederalEmergency Mepegcmenl Agenry'

500' 250' 0 500'
1 "=500'-0"
WATERSHED
CITY OF KINSTON
DRAINAGE STUDY
APRIL, 2007
THE
EAST
GROUP, P.A.
^Enginee~ring ^Architecture ^ S~urueying ^Technology
Box 7305, 324 S. Evans St., Greenville, NC 27834 252-758-3746, 252-830-3954 (Fax)

>K
y
PR y
P(~
~~&l~~~ ~~~~~\~
Q
~ Q
~
~ ~

8/27/08 ISSUE FOR CONSIRUC110N BVB
~ wrz k'AWl n
THE
EAST
GROUP, P,A,
'~*N+~*Y'ImA1fM~n•SNvW+W'lY
Y A{ 91 f B~~ ~~M k L!1 R-1iJM, iO~1Mpd
M106Y 1111[
City of Kinston
Drainage Study
rz~
DRAINAGE AREA 1
,,s NmEO as
eve +/eim
~~
C~
1
e
20070057

. ~ •
o`'o~ tiW a r~RpG
~ ~
~' -i
~ ~
_---- - -_
February ?~. 2f)07
~4ieharl I I:a+lcr. t;u.rox,r
VFdhasn (i Koss Ir , secrctxrv
Nt~rlh C'aa~ltn;t I k partntnnl nl I.m ironrncltt :utd \aturxl Krsuurie~
Alan LV Klimri.. P.t:- ihetaaor
[)icisurn of water t?uaht}
1)W(1 I'rdjcct # WaRO-(?7-O26~
l.enc}ir C'out~ty
Vlrs. Michelle Clements
The East Group PA
a2~ Evans Street
Greenville, NC 278~8
Subject Property: Sand Glare Road (NCSR 1553)
I_;T to Veirsl River
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Veuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A VC'AC
2B .0233)
Dear ylrs. Clements:
()n Febru~rry 2U, 20U7, at your request f canclucted an do-site deterrninatian td review drainage features located
on the suhject propcrtr~` for applicability to the 'Meuse Quffer Rubs (I5!1 NC=AC' 2R .Q23;~ }. Thhe property is
located just off'of'~CCSR I ~~ ~ Sand Clay Read. '1'hc features are labeled as'`1J~'aKU-U?-017 a & b" on the
attached map initiated b~' me ott l~ebruary ?(3. 2[)()7.
The Division of ~'4'ater Qualih' (DW'Q) has determined that the portion of the features that is highlighted
in blue and labeled as "VIWaR0-07-0017 a & b" starting at the Pipe stream crossing of tiCSR 1553 and
continuing upstream to cans°ergence of tw~a unnamed tributary' and continuing upstream of each of the
unnamed tributaries 250 feet as shown on the attached. map is Subiect to the Meuse Buffer Rules.
'[~hesc; features should be identified on any future plans f'or this property. The o~vrler (or f'uturc owners) should
notify the D~l'(,1(and other relevant agencies) df this decision in any future correspondences czmcerninb this
prdperky. This determination pertains td the. subject property c}ttly. This cin-site dctertnination shall expire five
~ ~ }years frt~m the date of thin letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the I)~~'Q car Delegated Local Authority
that a surface water exists and chat it is subject td the buffer rule rnn}~' request a determination by the Director. A
request fr~r a determination by the Diretor shall be referred to the Director in wriiing c~`a C'yndi hardly, DWQ
l~~`etl<rnds.'=t{)1 t snit, ? ~? I Crabtree 1~Slvd_, Raleigh. yC' 27G0~1-226(}. Individuals that dispute a determination by
the C?V4'Q or [)elegated Local ~~~uthority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask fi}r an
adjudicatory hearing. You must act v<Tithin 60 days df the date that you receive this letter. ,~~pplieants are
hereby notified that the 6O-day statutdr}' appeal time do}es not start until the affected party (including;
dd~~~nstrcatn and adjacent landowners) is notified of`this decision. DWt1 recommends that the applicant
conduct this notification in order td hN certain that third party appeals arc made in a timely manner.
\ortkt t'ztrolina [)is icon of"4vatcr (jualit} anterr,~t- h2a.etttstate.r~.us
g-!; 4vashin~;G~n "iquare'titall I'honc 242 `,7_#t,-tialil
~l'ahmpton. \iC 2'lSR9 F,1?i .5' ~?~(±•~2t
An Equal Opport;~^:mf~A`firrnat+~e NCtian Ertp~ayer- ~C~~ Reaycied'10°~s Post uansumes Pa;~+
No ~ hCarOlina
~atura!!

a ~ ~
'I~o ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of !administrative Hearings, 6714 4iai1 Service Center, Raleigh, N.G. 27699-671=1. Phis
determination is final and binding unless you ask ft~r a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicabilit~• to the buffer rtiles and does not approve an} activity within the
buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within V4'aters ol` the United Staies or ~4`aters of the State. If
you Dave an_y additional questions or r~°quire additional infvrmatian please call nee at (?~') 94~-3y40.
Sincerely,
A
~~
Roberto l.. Scheller.~l~nvironmcntal Spec. lI!
C_)1~V(~.~ aa~ aRO
4Vctlancis ~ 401 I:xpress unit
l~nelosures: [ SCiS tap, Falling Creek
cc: I»4'Q WaRC) file
~lOl Central Office ale
Filename: w'aRC:l-07-0264

077 ` 38'3000"W 077' 38'0 00" W 077° 37' 30.00" W
• j .?d •' • ' - -
I• _
Y . j No R'4G&cling Envirenmer;ii
•.+
Man44M. eorn rn isfion
� Divfs'" •
cew
�Q • r 7 ♦^ \ ¢ r + Date 2,(^ 44
• { Reviewed l' •
r
b • • • Z
i
LO
Bethel
Ch VOW
• + ♦ +
• f ♦ ,• •U,,
f •
i • • .29Aha4 R i 3
• :;. aR0-07-001 0'
,'
4 . •
4• • /
© • •ted. ''� Z
a WaRO-'P7
Sewage dd s r "
a Church of thL-
•r Y _j
M
exempt poly __._;:tet 4NL) Q
`"�• ttltdCJ+E; doth .z. 43T C_44ROZZ
- * -06 .
• • ••iir •.•■...'
. .
• • ' • • Westvi ew ` . `s =` got
4
z • • a/age • • • ! ••� •
D • it ••i+Cem '• + • O
O • • • • • ♦ • P • o
ti 1w,
O • • • p
Q 9' W boo + ' • I T of yqr p
077° 98' 30.00" W 077' 38'0.00" W 077° 37' 30.00" W
Name: FALLING CREEK Location: 035'16'40.19" N 077038'11-89" W
Date: 2/23/2007 Caption: Lenoir County, SR 1553, Sand Clay Road.
j Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
98, Maptech Inc

~ k
Stormwater Calculations
Project William Barnett Drainage Study
Kinston, NC
Date 04/02/08
DRAINAGE AREA 1
Existing Conditions - 2
Type Year Event
Area(ac)
C factor
CA
Residential 51.00 0.40 20.40
Woods 232.00 0.20 46.40
Farm 97.00 0.10 9.70
Park 30.00 0.40 12.00
Total 410.00 88.50
Composite C factor 0.22
Overland sheet flow use manning's kinematic solution
Tc = .007*(nL)^.8/(P2^.5 S^.4)
Mannings n
Flow length
2-Year 6 Hr Rainfall
Land Slope, S, ft/ft
Tc, h r =
Tc, min =
O=CiA
1.10 From IDF Curve
Existing Conditions - 5 Year Event
Type Area(ac) C factor CA
Residential 51.00 0.40 20.40
Woods 232.00 0.20 46.40
Farm 97.00 0.10 9.70
Park 30.00 0.40 12.00
Total 410.00 88.50
Composite C factor 0.22
Overland sheet flow use manning's kinematic solution
Tc = .007*(nL)^.8/(P2^.5 S^.4)
Mannings n 0.030
Flow length 7000.00
5-Year 6 Hr Rainfall 3.90
Land Slope, S, ft/ft 0.008
Tc, h r = 1.81
Tc, min = 108.51 thus i = 1.50 From IDF Curve
O=CiA
0 8 0 6 4 5

I ~
Tc, min = 102.16 thus i = 1.80 From IDF Curve
Q=CiA
Type Area(ac) C factor CA
Residential 51.00 0.40 20.40
Woods 232.00 0.20 46.40
Farm 97.00 0.10 9.70
Park 30.00 0.40 12.00
Total 410.00 88.50
Composite C factor 0.22
Overland sheet flow use manning's ki nematic solution
Tc = .007*(nL)^.8/(P2^.5 S^.4)
Mannings n 0.030
Flow length 7000.00
10-Year 6 Hr Rainfall 4.40
Land Slope, S, ft/ft 0.008
Tc, hr = 1.70
Type Area(ac) C factor CA
Residential 51.00 0.40 20.40
Woods 232.00 0.20 46.40
Farm 97.00 0.10 9.70
Park 30.00 0.60 18.00
Total 410.00 94.50
Composite C factor 0.23
Overland sheet flow use manning's kinematic solution
Tc = .007`(nL)^.8/(P2^.5 S^.4)
Mannings n 0.030
Flow length 7000.00 FT.
25-Year 6 Hr Rainfall 5.20 IN.
Land Slope, S, ft/ft 0.008
Tc, hr = 1.57
Tc, min = 93.97 thus i =
Q=CiA
2.50 From IDF Curve

Type Area(ac) C factor CA
Residential 51.00 0.40 20.40
Woods 232.00 0.20 46.40
Farm 97.00 0.10 9.70
Park 30.00 0.40 12.00
Total 410.00 88.50
Composite C factor 0.22
Overland sheet flow use manning's kinematic solution
Tc = .007'(nL)".8/(P2^.5 S^.4)
Mannings n
Flow length
50-Year 6 Hr Rainfall
Land Slope, S, ft/ft
Tc, h r =
Tc, min =
Q=CiA
0.030
7000.00 FT.
5.90 IN.
0.008
1.47
88.22 thus i =
3.00 From IDF Curve

Existing Conditio
Type ns -100 Year Event
Area(ac) C factor
CA
Residential 51.00 0.40 20.40
Woods 232.00 0.20 46.40
Farm 97.00 0.10 9.70
Park 30.00 0.40 12.00
Total 410.00 88.50
Composite C factor 0.22
Overland sheet flow use manning's kinematic solution
Tc = .007'"(nL)^.8/(P2^.5 S^.4)
Mannings n 0.030
Flow length 7000.00 FT.
100-Year 6 Hr Rainfall 6.50 IN.
Land Slope, S, ft/ft 0.008
Tc, hr = 1.40
Tc, min = 84.05 thus i = 4.80 From IDF Curve
Q=CiA

2-YEAR EVENT
Worksheet for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 97.35 cfs
Results
Depth 1.84 ft
Flow Area 11.0 ft=
Wetted Perimi 9.68 ft
Top Width 6.00 ft
Critical Depth 2.02 ft
Critical Slope 0.003868 ft/ft
Velocity 8.82 ft/s
Velocity Head 1.21 ft
Specific Enerc 3.05 ft
Froude Numb 1.15
Flow Type supercritical
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 (614e]
04/03/08 03:37:37 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

Cross Section 2-YR EVENT
Cross Section for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Depth 1.84 ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 97.35 cfs
1.84 ft
V:1
H:1
NTS
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:37:59 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] -Page 1 of 1

Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 132.75 cfs
Results
Depth 2.30 ft
Flow Area 13.8 ft2
Wetted Perim 10.59 ft
Top Width 6.00 ft
Critical Depth 2.48 ft
Critical Slope 0.004062 ft/ft
Velocity 9.63 ft!s
Velocity Head 1.44 ft
Specific Enerc 3.74 ft
Froude Numb 1.12
Flow Type >upercritical
5-YR EVENT
Worksheet for Rectangular Channel
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:39:12 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

CROSS SECTION 5-YR EVENT
Cross Section for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Depth 2.30 ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 132.75 cfs
2.30 ft
V:1
H:1
NTS
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:39:57 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

/ ~
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 159.30 cfs
Results
Depth 2.62 ft
Flow Area 15.7 ftZ
Wetted Perim 11.25 ft
Top Width 6.00 ft
Critical Depth 2.80 ft
Critical Slope 0.004207 ft/ft
Velocity 10.11 ft/s
Velocity Head 1.59 ft
Specific Enerc 4.21 ft
Froude Numb 1.10
Flow Type supercritical
10-YR EVENT
Worksheet for Rectangular Channel
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614ej
04/03/08 03:40:39 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

CROSS SECTION 10-YR EVENT
Cross Section for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Depth 2.62 ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 159.30 cfs
2.62 ft
V:1
H:1
NTS
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:40:52 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

a
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 236.25 cfs
Results
Depth 3.53 ft
Flow Area 21.2 ftZ
Wetted Perim 13.06 ft
Top Width 6.00 ft
Critical Depth 3.64 ft
Critical Slope 0.004617 ft/ft
Velocity 11.16 ft/s
Velocity Head 1.93 ft
Specific Enerc 5.46 ft
Froude Numb 1.05
Flow Type supercritical
25-YR EVENT
Worksheet for Rectangular Channel
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 (614e]
04/03/08 03:41:46 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

CROSS SECTION 25-YR EVENT
Cross Section for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Depth 3.53 ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 236.25 cfs
3.53 ft
V:1
H:1
NTS
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:42:02 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 265.50 cfs
Results
Depth 3.86 ft
Flow Area 23.2 ft2
Wetted Perim 13.72 ft
Top Width 6.00 ft
Critical Depth 3.93 ft
Critical Slope 0.004767 ft/ft
Velocity 11.46 ft/s
Velocity Head 2.04 ft
Specific Enerc 5.90 ft
Froude Numb 1.03
Flow Type supercritical
50-YR EVENT
Worksheet for Rectangular Channel
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:42:32 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

CROSS SECTION 50-YR EVENT
Cross Section for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Depth 3.86 ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 265.50 cfs
3.86 ft
V:1
H:1
NTS
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 [614e)
04/03/08 03:42:47 PM m Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

~ ~ f ~
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coeftic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 424.80 cfs
Results
Depth 5.60 ft
Flow Area 33.6 ft2
Wetted Perim 17.21 ft
Top Width 6.00 ft
Critical Depth 5.38 ft
Critical Slope 0.005529 ft/ft
Velocity 12.63 ft/s
Velocity Head 2.48 ft
Specific Enerc 8.08 ft
Froude Numb 0.94
Flow Type 3ubcritical
100-YR EVENT
Worksheet for Rectangular Channel
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster vs.0 [614e]
04/03/08 03:43:13 PM m Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

s ~
CROSS SECTION 100-YR EVENT
Cross Section for Rectangular Channel
Project Description
Worksheet Rectangular Chann
Flow Element Rectangular Chann
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coeffic 0.013
Slope 005000 ft/ft
Depth 5.60 ft
Bottom Width 6.00 ft
Discharge 424.80 cfs
5.60 ft
V:1
H:1
NTS
Project Engineer: Michelle Clements
c:\haestad\fmw\barnet park.fm2 The East Group FlowMaster v6.0 (614e]
04/03/08 03:43:29 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1