20052254 Ver 1_Site Plan_20050708

Ev7l
FUQUAY-VARINA, NORTH CAROLINA
TOWN OF FUQUAY-VARINA
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
February 20, 2006
Mr. John Dorney
NC DENR - DWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Subject: DWQ #05-2254
Hello Mr. Dorney,
- -71

The Town of Fuquay-Varina received your letter regarding the review of DWQ #05-
2254, Judd Parkway Extension. In response to you letter dated January 6, 2006 with
regards to cumulative impacts, the Town of Fuquay-Varina commits to requiring on-site
stormwater management measures (such as level spreaders, riparian buffers, bioretention,
or constructed wetlands) for any additional development on parcels adjacent to this
extension of the thoroughfare. Please be aware that the Town is also currently in the
process of developing and implementing stormwater management requirements as part of
its NPDES Phase II Permit that will be applied town wide.
If you should have any questions, please fell free to contact me at 567-3911.
Sincerely,
Ja Meyer P.E.
Town Engineer
cc: Elizabeth Workman, RK&K (by facsimile)
Arthur Mouberry, Assistant Town Manager
Michael Sorensen, Planning Director
March 13, 2006
91 North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Rummel, Raleigh, NC 27604
Klepper Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision,
&- Kahl, LLP DWQ #05-2254
William K. Hellmann Dear Mr. Ian McMillian,
Emeritus
David W Wallace In response to your 401 Certification letter dated February 23, 2006 (copy
Robert J. Halbert attached) and per the phone conversation with you on March 13, 2006, we are
Stephen G. zemtz submitting this letter to request revisions to the mitigation of 115 linear feet of
J. Michael Potter stream impacts.
Thomas E. Molder
James A. Tito
According to the Preconstruction Notification, compensatory mitigation is
Charles M. Easter, It: required if perennial stream impacts equal or exceed 150 linear feet. The Judd
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr Parkway Extension project originally had 115 linear feet of stream impacts, but
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill
was increased to 134 linear feet after the addition of a rip rapped area previously
J. Tommy Peacock, Jr: 2006 submittal of additional
believed to be temporary impacts (see January 13
Michael W Myers
Marti„ C. Rodgers ,
information). The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) was
Kenneth A. Goon contacted in December 2005 for approval of compensatory mitigation, if needed.
Richard J. Adams, Jr
' Their January 3, 2006 letter indicated that up to 115 linear feet of stream and
Epagnier
John A. d
Barbara J. Floage
0.114 acre of wetland mitigation will be provided by EEP, if necessary, for the
Christopher F. Wright 401 Water Quality Certification and 404 permit. Mitigation determinations are
Owen L. Peery
Naucv R. Bergeron
typically listed in the 401 and 404 permits, forwarded to EEP, then mitigation
Stuart A. Morngomeny costs are invoiced to the responsible party. We need to forward these permits to
David G. Vn.scoy EEP in order to mitigation for wetland impacts. However, we need the
Henry J. Bamkard, /n:
Peter C. DAdamo correction to the mitigation requirements.
James F Ridenour, Jr.
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr:
Please send us a revised certification showing that the 115 linear feet
B. Keith Skinner (actually 134 linear feet) does not require mitigation due to being below the 150-
Karen Kahl
foot threshold. Thank you for your help.
Seyed A. . Sandat
John C. Moore
Smya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein
_
Sincerely,
900 Ridgefield Olin'
Snit,- 350
Raleigh, North ('awlina
270109-3900
]'It: 919-S7S-9560
l_,,, 919-790-, 'N-" Elizabeth Workman
vnanv.rkken,gimrre.amn Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
F.- I WORDI DOCUMEN71305-0781 CorrIDWQ-003. dor
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
Sent By: RUMMEL KLEPPER & KAHL-RALEIGH; 9197908382; Mar-13-06 2:24PM;
March 13, 2006
N 4 North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Rummel, Raleigh, NC 27604
1<lepper Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision,
&.. Kahl, 1.1 P DWQ #05-2254
Page 1/1
William X. llepoiann Dear Mr. Ian McMillian,
F.meriins
DaridW %illacr In response to your 401 Certification letter dated February 23, 2006 (copy
Ralmrt J Halbert attached) acid per the phone conversation with you on March 13, 2006, we are
Strphen G. Irnts submitting this letter to request revisions to the mitigation of 115 linear feet of
1. Mkhad Potter stream impacts-
rhornac E. Mohler
James A. Zito
Charier M. Faerer, A,,
Joeirh A. Romanowski, Jr.
Mtehaei L. xrureaw
Lure F. Hill
J, Tonrnry Peanak. Jr.
Mtchad W M;.
Martin C. Rodgety
Kenneth A. l Kwrn
RlAatTl 1. Adana, lr:
John A eEyagnwr
Barbrna J. Fleabe
Chrix opherI I fight
Owen L. ftery
Nancy R. Rerkzrun
Swore A. Moatgomny
David G. Wnsck y
Henry J. Rankard, Ir.
Pew C. U'1LJamo
larne. F, Ridenour, A
Rebm J. Andrvszak
Raymond M. Harhew n, Jr.
H. Kelth Skinner
Kann B. Kahl
Seyed A. Raiaint
John C Moore
Sonya Y Blown
Eric M Klrin
According to the Preconstruction Notification, compensatory mitigation is
required if perennial stream impacts equal or exceed 150 linear feet. The Judd
Parkway Extension project originally had 115 linear feet of stream impacts, but
was increased to 134 linear feet after the addition of a rip rapped area previously
believed to be temporary impacts (see January 13, 2006 submittal of additional
information). The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) was
contacted in December 2005 for approval of compensatory mitigation, if needed.
Their January 3, 2006 letter indicated that up to 115 linear feet of stream and
0.114 acre of wetland mitigation will be provided by EEP, if necessary, for the
401 Water Quality Certification and 404 permit. Mitigation determinations are
typically listed in the 401 and 404 permits, forwarded to EEP, then mitigation
costs are invoiced to the responsible party. We need to forward these permits to
EEP in order to mitigation for wetland impacts. However, we need the
correction to the mitigation requirements.
Please send us a revised certification showing that the 115 linear feet
(actually 134 linear feet) does not require mitigation due to being below the 150-
foot threshold. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
900 Rilgefleld r),-ire
5ifiri 330
Ralrigh North Gin-linu
?W9.3960
Pk 419-8711-9560
Far. 919.790-h3N?
www.rkkrnd wo';.toni

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kalil, LLP
Past-It" Fax Note 7671 °a1d3 I c ` pages?' f
Ta ril le, I// From 1.4 0! "n
Co./mPl. -r U 0 CO. 1Q K i
Rona 17 3.3 I1 Phone ti 97,f- 5 G ,ice .? I
Fax N `-1 33 - L j Fax # "'71 o 8
Joe
rrryinia &"/r, VA Riehmand, V^ .Serruwlne, VA
vn, YA Keq.er, WV wnrhindeon, DC
MAR-13-2006 MON 14:17 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
?GF W A rF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O -? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 23, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Meyers:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.158 acres of wetland, 220 linear feet of stream and 0.024 acres of open
waters for the purpose of constructing the thoroughfare road and subdivision at the subject property, as
described within your application dated December 22, 2005, and received by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on December 22, 2005. The DWQ received more information from you on January 9,
2006, January 13, 2006, February 13, 2006 and February 22, 2006. After reviewing your application, we
have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404
(GC3404). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW14 when issued by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with
your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire
upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Noc°OhCaro ina
Awkimlift,
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 2 of 5
February 23, 2006
Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference
40.4 Wetland 0.158 acres PCN page 5 of 10
Stream 220 linear feet PCN page 5 of 10
Open Waters 0.024 acres PCN page 6 of 10
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment AdErosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
C. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor
within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC
2B.0233 and GC 3404;
6. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 3 of 5
February 23, 2006
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed
to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completiol'of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please
send photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion form.
7. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified
as appropriate to suit to this project;
8. Written Stormwater Management Plan (No Further Approval Needed)
The final, written stormwater management plans (including a signed and notarized Operation and
Maintenance Agreement) must be implemented and the stormwater management facilities shall
be constructed and operational before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site. The
structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be
maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without
written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
9. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by
the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 4 of 5
February 23, 2006
been determined by the VWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until
the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into a
restoration fund. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For
accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands
Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Sub-basin Number
Stream 115 linear feet Cape Fear/03030002
10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO 10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents. htm. *1
11. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
12. Cumulative impacts on downstream water quality
In accordance with the February 20, 2006 letter from the Town of Fuquay-Varina, on-site
stormwater management shall be required for stormwater from all parcels that are developed as a
result of this road construction. The Town of Fuquay-Varina has the responsibility to notify
landowners and developers of these tracts with respect to this requirement. These stormwater
management plans shall conform to the latest DWQ design guidelines in effect when the parcels
are developed. The Town of Fuquay-Varina shall maintain copies of these approved plans and
make them available for DWQ inspection and review upon request.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 5 of 5
February 23, 2006
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
AWK/ijm
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
EEP Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquayVarinaluddExtandSouthViewPointeSD(Wake)401
February 13, 20
9@[R0W[
North Carolina Division of Water Quality FEB 1 5 2006
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250 WE11AM M-DSTOR?° QUALITY
Rummel, Raleigh, NC 27604
Klepper Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision,
&- Kahl, LLP DWQ #05-2254
William K. Hellmann Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly

Emeritus ,
David W. Wallace In response to your letter dated February 8, 2006 (letter attached) and per the
Robert J Halbert phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on February 2, 2006, we are
Stephen G. Zentz submitting additional information per DWQ's request to expedite the 401
J Michael Potter permitting process. We have included one copy of the following:
71omas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
• Set of stormwater calculations
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
h e Wet Detention Basin Operation and Maintenance Agreement
signed and
Josep
A. Romanowski, Jr. ,
notarized
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill • DWQ 401 Wet Detention Basin Worksheet
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr
Michael W. Myers
• Set of applicable stormwater sheets C-5, D-1 which includes a [ ( planting
Martin C. Rodgers plan), and D-2]
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr. • CD with copies of all above stormwater documents
John A. d'Epagnier
Barbara J. Hoage
Christo
h
r FW
i
ht This submittal should finalize and complete the stormwater plans requested
p
e
r
g
Owen L. Peery by DWQ.
Nancy R. Bergeron
Stuart A, Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr. Sincerely,
}r,
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond Harbeson, Jr.
B. Keith Skinner

Karen B. Kahl %2 fig r i/
-

Seyed A. Saadat -_
r
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Elizabeth Workman
Eric M. Klein Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ri kK ftehl Drive
suite, 150 cc: Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
Radei,la North Carolina Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
•/7 GUq-3q?? Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO

Ph 90-878-9500 Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Jay Meyers, Town of Fuquay-Varina
Fe.e: 9! 9-790-8382 ES W

ivww rkkengineers.cmn 1TP
JMH
MTM
THS
1WM
F:1 WORDIDOCUMEN71305-0781CorrlDWQ-001.doe
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
Eeosrbt 'N--
Ystem
PROGRAM
January 3, 2006
Elizabeth Workman
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
Project: Judd Parkway Ext. and Southview Pointe
)0052-254
J@@j D
,/Q N .9 - zoos
WfrLq QUALI BRANCH
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/LAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging Unit (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0.114 0 0 0 0 115 0 0
03030004
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely, pp
I.E . ?iGilmore, PEA
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
Rut-or' ... E ... Protect' Our stag © A
CDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
A,4
Project Name: JPW southview Sub
Project No. DWQ 05-2254
Pond No.
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations average depth status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 375
Permanent Pool (ft) 380 5 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 381.9 1.9 ft. depth ok

areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 14506 12403 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 17.26 376: based on avg depth ok
Impervious Area (ac) 9.86 57.1 % -
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 35365
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 35867 35345 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 7075 20.0 % ok
other parameters
SA/DA 1.7 1.65 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 2.25 0.13 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 3.2 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
5 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA fron (Avg. Depth)
Next Lowest 50 1.5 1.736058183
Project Impervious 57.1 165,
Next Highest 60 1 71 1.867372122
3ft

aP y/0 - ro
1.08
1.33
1.43
4
F'
I .
MCKA4&CFEED
200 MacKenan Court Suite 200
Cary, NC_ 2"753.1.
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
I:?? ?;ic; ?;? rr,i:11?I ?:TT?II N r: Saw
FACSTMILE TRANSNITTTAL
FAX No (9'19) 733-6893
(=()\IPAiU')' : NCUENR - DWQ - Raleigh Regiozral. Office DATE: Fobntari 2I, 2006
";H1` Dll'I%': Gareth Avant
TIME'. 4:15
NLj%, lbT,'K OF fIRANSMISSTON PAGES (Including this page): 2
I'ROiI?I.'T N1'NlBFX 4068-0001 PROJECT NAME Judd Parkway I.?xtensior> - - -? ---
[,] THIS IS YOUN ORIGINAL U T IAP.D COPY 1"0 FOLLOW
CO TNIEi`TSI- N IF NOT CURREC'TrN RECEIVED OR PAGES FAULTY, PLF..ASF, CAI.,I_. SENDEr AT QIQJ2:3,3-8091 •`_ al .

I'vc atl-ached our revised 40:1 worksheet. If you, treed anything else, feel free to call. I will get une
t(wj,sed seat of plans rand the aril,u?af worksheet in the mall.
1
14
ATTENIION
11* N'r; lr:M '?IPJ ; ;',rJTgI1JF1:' 4J TIAN FACS1111,E MEiSAGE 13 PRI'VII EGED AND C_ONFD[PITIAL IIJ OPM4TIOF. I'aiEi JC t•?' 00l-'f F(,w rHE V E 1JF 1P L I,`1DIVlt'2tW [tFirr rlA&IFD
F'rvkFANF.. 7 '1',1?.1i;: ;d-_)T.THE U-TENDED PKIF'IEI1T.OR THEEMPLQY?FQF1':1F,'M_Et•ItFESPONS][jI,FTC!C?FUYFQTY,-THE1,,TlMW F'F',.IFIEIJT,Y1:!1AREHU?EEY
•Jr !T FIkC'H?.T /.I I',' n_ ?N.Ir;aTl<; l I„ F'l^!ItION -?F' CC PYIN': <?K THIF IZClMMI,R4IC.AT1014 L >TPICTLY PRi?F1iFfI1ED. I1 , QCi HnVL "fd J T '--.'?Mr4V1a't.. A", JI•I I: -J ER ?iF, '._LA E
?r' , tl) f ^.N , FE'L:hJ '?E ORIGII I.\L 1AE;''Ao c 10 ?:IS AT TH5 ABOVE ADOPES, VIA THE l 5. F(jSTAI :ER'.''.: F. AYE Y.J I =1naa 1 C: fir'("n; FCjR A'd'( a?: 1'. ndc_ l!RP _D,
`,'.A4)0',OGW % 101- ;-;nun Jf Ixt(K0b_C12-?n-DWU.Sorri 401 Workshnet.dOc <'V' _wTv,
FEE; i i r; TUF- 1x;:11 TLL:'?1-?i __,L __ fIHfIE:LIIU- lJE1l-.Nlll=i' f'. 1
-
Ji
1.
DIVISION OFWATER QUALI'T'Y - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN W'0.I7;k;•;HEET•
DWryl Stot7ltwater Man Orr eat Pl! t Review:
A complete storntwater matiagernent plan submittal includes a wet detention basin wojk<<heet for each basin,
damn ,:alculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure detail., and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agrecttient, An incomplete submittal package will result in rcqucst for additional
inforniation and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information)-
Project Nante : __Sc?a ruv-, £.w 1-41> T>: SGkB Dlu,sIa-l _ W -
Contact P -rson: G u "'r c_-tv "4 vo D Phone Number: (J. q) > 6 6
11
Foi picieects, with r:rultiple basin Specify which basin this worksheet applies to
Basin F?ottonl Hevation ft. (average elevation of the floor nfthe burin)
't't. (elevation of the orlCcV Invert out)
}'erntanent Pool EiCVat1U11 !d ?0
" 8 o ft. (elevation of the outlet structUllt iuveri in)
Ten-poraiv Fool Elevation ?-Z
Permanent Pool Surface Area sq, ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Draina(re. A.re,a _1'I• Z. (e ac (on-sitc and off-site drainage to the basin)
hnpervicns Area ac. (can-site and off=site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Fool Volrune Cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
"temporary fool Volume 3 s',8471 eu. ft. (volume detained on top of the pennanew pool)
foreba; Voiame cu. ft.
SA:D.A used (surface area to drainage area ratio)
L)iameb.-r of Orifice. (draw down orifice diameter)
I1. RhQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist out.hrles design requirements per the storntwater Best Managettat.`nt Pn tict.A momial
(N.C. Depar,ment of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. Noven,lXr 1.995) and A.dauni!,trative Code
Section: Ii A NCAC ?H .1008• Initial in the space provided to indic•.atc the following dcs,ign requirements have
b erg nu;t and supporting documentation is attached. Ira requirement has n()t bocn met c7thich OU etplan ation cif
11171.
A1tT?lic, a Its Initials
C+NU- The temporary pool controls nrnoff from the 1 inch stony event.
^C-. " r-. The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
6. ,A t- - The basin side !,lopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A subtnerged and vegetated perimeter shelfat less than 6:1 is provided.
"' Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
_
_ w An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required mini-mini or 3 feet
"` The temporary pool draws down in Z to 5 days.
The fi)rebay ,olunie is approximately equal to 20°.'o of the total basin VDIUnIr'.
G + Sediment ,,totage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
6 Ma A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
&W(_ -- A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plats is provided.
_ rAL _ A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&Al plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the Q&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed aftc•.r eve,y storin e ent.
_ <:•?c.__ A speeitic sediment clean-out benchmark is li?cted (elevation or deptlij iu 08:M ]clan.
- ---6 xt.__ A responsible party is designated in the 06,N1 plan.
FOKNI SWG 100 09/97 NYC 1 of 1
F Ef, "'.1 - THE 1. r;: 1 t TEL_: 9 ±, 7^l___1 R 1 IHME: DWI !-l•JETLAtIll' , P.

WET DETENTION BASIN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Southview Pointe Subdivision
The wet detention basin system is defined as the wet detention basin, pretreatment including forebays and the
vegetated filter or level spreader if one is provided.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the wet detention basin system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash accumulation,
vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary pool occurs within
2 to 5 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative cover, mow
vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.) quarterly to
maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the wet detention basin system semi-annually or when depth is
reduced to 75% of the original design depth (see diagram below). Removed sediment shall be disposed
of in an appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality
(i.e. stockpiling near a wet detention basin or stream, etc.).
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate
depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
When the permanent pool depth reads 1.25 feet in the main pond, the sediment shall be removed.
[For stormwater wetlands: If the elevation of the marsh areas exceeds the permanent pool elevation, the
sediment should be removed to design levels. This shall be performed by removing the upper 6 inches of
soil and stockpiling it. Then the marsh area shall be excavated six inches below design elevations.
Afterwards the stockpiled soil should be spread over the marsh surface. The soil should not be stockpiled
for more than two weeks.]
When the permanent pool depth reads 0.50 feet in the forebay [and micro-pool], the sediment shall be
removed.
BASIN DIAGRAM
(fill in the blanks)
Permanent Pool Elevation: 380.00
Sediment Re oval El. 378.57 /o
0
------- -- Sediment Removal Elevation: 376.25 7510vation:_378.00t Bottom E 5% - -- ---------------------------- A ------ .
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
Page I of 2
r
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of the basin surface. These
plants shall be encouraged to grow along the vegetated shelf and forebay berm.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment
through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
7. All components of the wet detention basin system shall be maintained in good working order.
8. Level spreaders or other structures that provide diffuse flow shall be maintained every six months. All
accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed from the structure, and a level elevation shall be
maintained across the entire flow spreading structure. Any down gradient erosion must be repaired and/or
replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the seven
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
" TI
un
riallyap'p'earefox.?f1'tis."?fi?
iation pit tai"eirgoing weti [itland) dptentlo bisii`°4infenance rpc{ui?ehent,' Witr?as my fend sand
rfficial; ?,

SEAL
'z
My commission expires
Page 2 of 2

February 13, 2 (@ [2 U W
. j
North Carolina Division of Water Quality F FB 1 3 2006
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250 WE AND3MIDDST7.. ER ATEO BWXH
Rummel Raleigh, NC 27604 au?w
IQepper Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision ,
& Kahl, UP DWQ #05-2254
William K Hellmann Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Emeritus
In response to your letter dated February 8
2006 (letter attached) and per the
David W Wallace ,
Robert J. Halbert phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on February 2, 2006, we are
Stephen G. tent= submitting additional information per DWQ's request to expedite the 401
1. Michael Potter permitting process. We have included one copy of the following:
Thomas E. Molder
James A. Zito
• Set of stormwater calculations
Charles M. Easter Jr . Wet Detention Basin Operation and Maintenance Agreement, signed and
Joseph A. Rounanowski, Jr,
notarized
Michael L. Krupsarv
Lars E. Hill . DWQ 401 Wet Detention Basin Worksheet
J. Tomny Peacock, Jr:
Michael WMyrs
• Set of applicable stormwater sheets [C-5, D-1 (which includes a planting
Martin C. Rodgers plan), and D-2]
Keruneth A. Gaon
Kenne
• CD with copies of all above stormwater documents
d J. Adams, Jr:
Richar
John A, d'Epagnier
Barbara J. Hoage This submittal should finalize and complete the stormwater plans requested
Christopher F Wright
DWQ
b
Owen L. Peety .
y
Nancy R. Bergeron
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. utnscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr:
Peter C. D'Adamo
Sincerely,
James F. Ridenow; Jr:
Robert J. Andtyszak
Raymond M. Harbeso n, Jr:
B. Keith Skinner
Karen B. Kahl --------
Syed A. Saadat
John C. Moore Elizabeth Workman
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein Senior Environmental Planner
- Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
Son Rid( rgidd Dnre
Suite 350 cc: Mr. Mike Koran, N('DWQ
Rtdrigh, North Uarulina Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
V7009-P)60 Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO
Mr. Monte Matthesss, USACE
Plc 919-,S7S'-9560 Mr. Jay Meyers. Town ofPuyuay-Varina
Firr: 919-790-R3S. : W
J"f P
wvw. rkkengiWrens. rum J M 11
M-1 M
TI IS
JWM
F; 11VORI r DOC I IMEW J`1?05-0781(oi r l D lVQ-001. don
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
O?0F WA TFgQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Quolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 8, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ received more information from you on
January 5, 2006 and January 13, 2006. However, the DWQ has determined that your application
remains incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will
require this additional information in order to process your application to impact protected
wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required
by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide complete stormwater plans for the Southview Pointe Subdivision.
Additionally, please provide a digital copy of the complete stormwater plans for the
Southview Pointe Subdivision on CD.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.encstate.tic.us/ncwetlands
Noe Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/] 014 Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 2 of 2
February 8, 2006
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
H Icname: 052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSouth V iewPointeSD(Wake)On_Hold3
4
Project No. DWQ C - a1 a11_ L' (to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : SOU-r'HV Ew '?oI .1 -L SUT3yiv45(*-1
Contact Person: G 2 -.uT L%yr-AA &00 4> Phone Number: (°I 11 ) 23 3 -
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: NlA
Basin Bottom Elevation 3 -7 S • oy ft. (average elevation of the floor of the basin)
Permanent Pool Elevation 3 Sa • o o ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation 3 S t . '10 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area 14 , 5"0(p sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area 1-1. 2 (0 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area R. 8(v ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume L3, S a S cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume 3 5, 8G-1 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume 4, a a s cu. ft.
SA/DA used 1 . -7 (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice Z. ?-<- in. (draw down orifice diameter)
U. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
why.
Applicants Initials
G M L The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
GMt- The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
e-ML The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
G M L A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
e. M L Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
&ML An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
6 M L The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
G,h The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
G ?n The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
G ML Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
M L Access is provided for maintenance.
G ML A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
ML A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
aML A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
(AML Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
Gnt4- A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M plan.
Gac A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM SWGI00 09/97 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: Southview Pointe
Project No. DW Q 05-2254
Pond No.
SUBMITTED DESIGN: 1 REQUIRED DESIGN:
2/15/2006

elevations a
average depth
status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 375
Permanent Pool (ft) 380 5 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 381.9 1.9 ft. depth ok

areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 14506 12403 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 17.26 based on avg depth check surfac
Impervious Area (ac) 9.86 57.1 % -
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 23305
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 35867 35345 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 4995 21.4 % ok
other parameters
SA/DA 1.7 1.65 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 2.25 0.13 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 3.2 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA * * *
5 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA fron (Avg. Depth)
Next Lowest 50 1.5 2.085237833 1.08
Project Impervious 57.1 1.65-, 77 1.33
Next Highest 60 1.71 2.100158555 1.43
3ft 4
Project Name: Southview Pointe
Project No. DWQ 05-2254
Pond No.
SUBMITTED DESIGN: 1 REQUIRED DESIGN:
2/15/2006
elevations 2:4 average depth status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 375
Permanent Pool (ft) 380 5 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 381.9 1.9 ft. depth ok

areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 14506 12403 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 17.26 13817 based on avg depth ok
Impervious Area (ac) 9.86 57.1 % -
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 35000
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 35867 35345 cu. ft, ok
Forebay (cu ft) 7000 20.0 % ok
other parameters
SA/DA 1.7 1.65 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 2.25 0.13 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 3.2 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA ***
5 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA fron (Avg. Depth)
Next Lowest 50 1.5 1.746626224 1.08
Project Impervious 57.1 1.65- 1,84' 1.33
Next Highest 60 1.71 1.874417482 1.43
3 ft 4
os zz?/
January 13, 2006
Rummel, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Klepper 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit JA ? // D
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250 N j
& Kahl, LLP Raleigh, NC 27604 DE,?R WAT Z?06
SAND gTQ FRB
William K Hellmann Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision %CH
Emeritus
David W. Wallace Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly,
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz In response to your letter dated January 3, 2006 (letter attached) and per the
1. Michael Potter phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on January 5, 2006 (memo
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
attached), we are submitting additional information per DWQ's request to
expedite the 401 permitting process. We have included five copies of the
Charles M. Easter, Jr. following:
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill • NCEEP letter accepting mitigation payment
J. Tommy Peacock, Jr
Michael W. Myers • Site plan and spreadsheet showing the riprap area as permanent impact
Martin C. Rodgers rather than temporary impact
Kenneth A. Goon • Site plan showing contour lines
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier • Site plan showing the stream feature identified in blue color
Barbara J. Hoage • Zoning Map for Town of Fuquay-Varina
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery USGS topographic map with project footprint
Nancy R. Bergeron • Soil survey map with project footprint
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
' Also included is a full size copy of the construction plans for the Southview
Peter C. D
Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Pointe Subdivision (including the Stormwater Management Plan and Sediment
Robert J. Andryszak and Erosion Control Plan) with drainage computations, a full size copy of the
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr
B
K
ith Ski Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for Judd Parkway Extension with drainage
.
e
nner
Karen B. Kahl
computations, and the Town's draft Stormwater Management Plan.
SeyedA. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Comment #3 on DWQ's January 3, 2006 letter addressed concerns for the
Eric M. Klein downstream water quality impacts resulting from potential development
adjacent to the Judd Parkway Extension.
900 Ri
dgefreld Drive
Suite 350
Raleigh. North Camfin,,
Per conversation with Mr. Mike Soronsen, Town of Fuquay-Varina planner, on
27609-3960 January 11, 2006, there are no impervious surface restrictions for development
Ph: 919-878-9560 in the Cape Fear River basin for the Town at this time.
F v 919-790-8382
nrvw.rkbengincrr,.ro„ Zoning adjacent to the extension is identified as R8 (Conditional) (Multi-family
district), R15 (Single family homes) and R20 (Single family homes). See the
attached zoning map for more details. Additional information is available at
littp://www.fuquay-varina.or www/departure-4.asp?d=10&s=detail.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local Cape Fear River buffer ordinances protecting the 50-foot
buffer of the pond and tributary. Buffer impacts are being coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-
Varina (Jay Meyers- Town Engineer).
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods, the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative downstream impacts. The
residential community will be relatively small, will not involve commercial development, and is
located in a relatively developed landscape (see construction plans attached). The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. Southview Pointe's stormwater will
be collected in catch basins and curb inlets and will gravity flow into two retention ponds. These
ponds have been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will
provide control from the 10-year return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions
per the Town of Fuquay-Varina's stormwater requirements (draft policy is attached).
The Judd Parkway Extension will alleviate construction truck traffic on Sunset Drive, which is
currently being used to access the proposed Southview Pointe Subdivision. The developer has
offered to build this section of the road (and be reimbursed by the town) which provides better
access to the property and avoids neighborhood roads. The majority of the area southward and
eastward is essentially built-out with limited opportunities for infill development. A parcel
located directly west of the extension may provide development opportunities however are
limited by jurisdictional features and buffer restrictions. The Judd Parkway Extension is not
likely to stimulate future development or influence intraregional land development location
decisions. It is not in conflict with local plans, does not have an explicit economic purpose, and
does not contain notable features within the impact area (other than the tributary and wetlands
discussed in the PCN). Adherence to federal, state and local regulations directly protecting
features such as "Waters of the US", floodplains, and riparian buffers ensure that long-term
indirect and cumulative impacts do not occur on a regional basis due to the proposed project.
Within the next twelve months, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is implementing a Stormwater
Management Policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased runoff due to the
development of land. This draft is attached and is available on-line at http://www.fuquay-
varina.or.g/www/departme-4.asp?d=17&s=detail. The proper management of stormwater runoff
will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a functional drainage system, reduce
the effects of development on land and stream channel erosion, assist in the attainment and
maintenance of water quality standards, enhance the local environment associated with the
drainage system, reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic development by
mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts. The town engineer, Mr. Jay Meyers, stated
that any new development as a result of the Judd Parkway Extension of 675 feet, will likely
occur after the policy's approval and will be required to follow this stormwater management
policy. Besides the Southview Pointe Subdivision, which currently follows the Town's
stormwater management policy, there are no other proposed developments adjacent to the
extension at this time. All parcels south of Judd Parkway (i.e. Southern Oaks and Carnage
Heights Subdivision) are approved and under development. Although the Town of Fuquay-
Varina implemented buffer rule protection for Cape Fear River Basin in November 2005, both
the Southern Oaks and Carriage Heights Subdivision have proactively followed these buffer
rules. The Southview Pointe Subdivision is required to follow these buffer rules as well.
We hope that the above and attached information will suffice in answering Comment #3. Please
let me know if you need more information.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc: Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Jay Meyers, Town of Fuquay-Varina
ESW
JTP
JMH
MTM
THS
JWM
305-078-A01
F- -I WORDIDOCUMEN71305-0781 Corrl DWQ-00/. doc
?Qv, c90 Michael F. Easley, Governor
?0 G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>_
p -C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3,'2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review
your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide a copy of the approval letter from NCEEP indicating their willingness to
accept payment for the 0.114 acres of wetland mitigation.
2. Please be advised that riprap is considered a permanent impact by the DWQ. Therefore,
the stream impact at Site 1, currently labeled as "Temporary", should be labeled as
permanent. Please make this correction in your tables and on your map, and re-submit
five copies of this page of the PCN and the map of Site 1.
3. With respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in
additional parcels which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the
case, then please address how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for
these parcels.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: h_Ilp://h2o.enr state nc us/ncwetlands
None Caro na
ataral??y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 2 of 2
January 3, 2006
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
4 ,Ira
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSouthViewPointeSD(Wake)On Hold
INTER
OFFICE
To: file
From: Liz Workman
MEMO
Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision in Fuquay-Varina
Date: January 5, 2006
In response to DWQ's response letter, dated January 3, 2005, 1 sent an email to Ian McMillan, DWQ,
providing additional information on the Cumulative Impacts portion of the PCN dated December 22,
2005. This email was to ensure that our response sufficiently answered DWQ's "Comment 3".
Ian called with his comments and will be sending a letter as well. He stated that any new development,
not only Southview Pointe, around the extension must have stormwater controls in place to protect
cumulative impacts to water quality. The Town of Fuquay-Varina should have zoning ordinances that
limit impervious surfaces in this area. Ian would like to know what the land use is zoned as and who is
responsible for stormwater controls on new development in the area of the extension.
Ian would like to see the Stormwater Management Plan for the Southview Pointe Subdivision,
including calculations for drainages and sediment/erosion control methods and locations (silt fencing,
etc.).
The site map should be resubmitted with topographic lines.
The steam should be clearly defined on the site map.
The soil survey and USGS maps should show the subdivision and roadway footprint, not the project
study area. We can zoom in on the area.
305-078
F:\W ord\Documen t\305-078\Memo\Memo-004.doc
Ecos ,stem
R? 3 r? i ??
MPROGRAM
January 3, 2006
Elizabeth Workman
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
Project: Judd Parkway Ext. and Southview Pointe County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging Unit (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0.114 0 0 0 0 115 0 0
03030004
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
incerely, Q?Iliam D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
kmtDY ... F ... PrMe& 0" .ftu t& IW--Fil
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
I Not to 5wk1
NOtur FIII
Gaune D •S I'/ft. SbpB
d
MIn.D = 1.5 Ft.
Max .O = 1.5 Ft.
o = 2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM
FROM STA. 16.65 RT. TO STA. 11,59 RT.
o O
° NC CAPITAL GROUP

CB
25' 0' 25' 50'
SCALE: /'= 50'
SITE I
I

(2) 2 CB
--------------------
3
E E
" E INTERMITTENT E
STREAM LATERAL V DeCH F
SEE DETAIL
5
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
F °
PROJECT REFERENCE N0. SHEEf NO.
7D PARKWAY EXT.
RW SHEET NO.
OADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER

INCOMPLE E PLANS
OD NOT USE FOR /w -0 ISITION
PRELIMI
N RY PLANS
0 NLSE
FO CONSTRICTION
W
PERENNIAL
STREAM

b -F k? ?- ---- ---------
? ,rte---I<
English

BEAVER POND --
L' -

X- SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC
EXISTING POND
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
NC CAPITAL GROUP
? I<-

111 '1 s.
1
1 I
III
1
><

?Ili I I
I
'- --
I
Illlii 1?II11,
j
I
T
X ? I

1

I _
?II
I
j 1
ti
f I
-_--

I
I
? PLANS PREPARED BY
RUMMEL KLEPPER & KAM, LLP
consu/tfng engineers
'

I 900 RIDGEF ELD DRIVE SL1 TE 350
R ALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 21609 3960
19191818-9560
FOR
THE TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
NORTH CAROLINA
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)

1 16+65 TO 18+96 66" RCP

INTERMITTENT STREAM - - - - - 0.0004 0.008 - 81

BEAVER POND - - - - - 0.017 0.007 - -

PERENNIAL STREAM - - - - 0.021 0.001 134 5

WETLANDS 0.114 0.006 - 0.038 - - - -

TOTALS: 0.114 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.038 0.039 0.017 134 86 0
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'Y' DITCH
IMOr to xabl
FO
OVd r t.°
a
41n.0 = LS Ft.
Max. d = LS Ft.
D = 2.0 Ft.
Type of Lln- PSRM
FROM STA 16+65 tt. TO STA.17+58 RT.
° NC CAPITAL GROUP

OCB
25' 0' 25' 50'
SCALE:r= 50'
SITE I
I
?E F v
C
-- A
EXCAVATION IN
WETLANDS
1
2 CB AR
5
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
Q
PROIEcr REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
DD PARKWAY EXT.
RM' SHEET NO.
tOADWAY DESIGN
ENGNEER HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER

INCOMPLE E PLANS
00 NOT 1158 FOR /M ACOUGSi110N
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
m NOT U98 coNSTAUCnON
W
245 - - - - - - - --------------- -_F F F P
C F O ff H F
------ E--E E
_ E c
SEEEDETAILD CH
-AL V
English
X
O
SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC
x
MKIOWF4

JAN 1 3 2006
I<
EXISTI
NG POND
DENR - WATEkOuHLITr
ANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH X
N
IE o
? I a
X
I? ? L I N
0 ® DENOTES
FILL IN
SURFA E WATER
®
DENOTES FILL IN
NC CAPITAL GROUP

?

® (POND)

DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER

®

DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND I
PLANS PREPARED BY

I RUMMEL RLEPPER & KAH[,LI
consulting enplneei-s

IC'

® DENOTES TEMPORARY

FILL IN SURFACE
WATER

®

DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
I ?. 9ao RIOOEFIE DRIVE SUITE 350
-3
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 560 27609960
FOR
THE TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
? NORTH CAROLINA
Town of Fuquay-Varina Official Zoning Map
5o,,,, Conditional Uses =Corporate Limits
0
-IL
12/13/05
1' = 2,000 ft
Information depicted hereon is for reference purposes
only, compiled from best available sources. Fuquay-Varina
assumes no responsibility for errors arising from misuse of
this map or misuse of the measurement scale.
??zzsy
January 13, 2006
Rummel, North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2R@RflW,0M
Kle er 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit pp 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250 Kahl, LLP Raleigh, NC 27604 JAN 3 1006 DENR WATER
William K Hellmann Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdj ?N SR
Emeritus
TALg7cH
David W. Wallace Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly,
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz In response to your letter dated January 3, 2006 (letter attached) and per the
1. Michael Potter phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on January 5, 2006 (memo
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
attached), we are submitting additional information per DWQ's request to
expedite the 401 permitting process. We have included five copies of the
Charles M. Easter, Jr. following:
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill • NCEEP letter accepting mitigation payment
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr
Michael W. Myers . Site plan and spreadsheet showing the riprap area as permanent impact
Martin C. Rodgers rather than temporary impact
Kenneth A. Goon . Site plan showing contour lines
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier • Site plan showing the stream feature identified in blue color
Barbara J. Hoage . Zoning Map for Town of Fuquay-Varina
Christopher E Wright
Owen L. Peery • USGS topographic map with project footprint
Nancy R. Bergeron . Soil survey map with project footprint
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr Also included is a full size copy of the construction plans for the Southview
Peter C. DAdamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Pointe Subdivision (including the Stormwater Management Plan and Sediment
Robert J. Andryszak and Erosion Control Plan) with drainage computations, a full size copy of the
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr
B
h Ski
K
i Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for Judd Parkway Extension with drainage
.
e
t
nner
Karen B. Kahl
computations, and the Town's draft Stormwater Management Plan.
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Comment #3 on DWQ's January 3, 2006 letter addressed concerns for the
Eric M. Klein downstream water quality impacts resulting from potential development
adjacent to the Judd Parkway Extension.
900 Ridgefield
Drine
Suite 'i50
Raleigh, ;north Carolina
Per conversation with Mr. Mike Soronsen, Town of Fuquay-Varina planner, on
27609-3960 January 11, 2006, there are no impervious surface restrictions for development
Ph: 919-878-9560 in the Cape Fear River basin for the Town at this time.
Fax: [phone]
mvivrkkengineers.eonr Zoning adjacent to the extension is identified as R8 (Conditional) (Multi-family
district), R15 (Single family homes) and R20 (Single family homes). See the
attached zoning map for more details. Additional information is available at
littp://www.fuquay-varina.or www/departine-4 asp?d=10&s=detail.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local Cape Fear River buffer ordinances protecting the 50-foot
buffer of the pond and tributary. Buffer impacts are being coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-
Varina (Jay Meyers- Town Engineer).
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods, the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative downstream impacts. The
residential community will be relatively small, will not involve commercial development, and is
located in a relatively developed landscape (see construction plans attached). The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. Southview Pointe's stormwater will
be collected in catch basins and curb inlets and will gravity flow into two retention ponds. These
ponds have been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will
provide control from the 10-year return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions
per the Town of Fuquay-Varina's stormwater requirements (draft policy is attached).
The Judd Parkway Extension will alleviate construction truck traffic on Sunset Drive, which is
currently being used to access the proposed Southview Pointe Subdivision. The developer has
offered to build this section of the road (and be reimbursed by the town) which provides better
access to the property and avoids neighborhood roads. The majority of the area southward and
eastward is essentially built-out with limited opportunities for infill development. A parcel
located directly west of the extension may provide development opportunities however are
limited by jurisdictional features and buffer restrictions. The Judd Parkway Extension is not
likely to stimulate future development or influence intraregional land development location
decisions. It is not in conflict with local plans, does not have an explicit economic purpose, and
does not contain notable features within the impact area (other than the tributary and wetlands
discussed in the PCN). Adherence to federal, state and local regulations directly protecting
features such as "Waters of the US", floodplains, and riparian buffers ensure that long-term
indirect and cumulative impacts do not occur on a regional basis due to the proposed project.
Within the next twelve months, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is implementing a Stormwater
Management Policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased runoff due to the
development of land. This draft is attached and is available on-line at htlp://www.fuguay-
varina.org/www/dgpartme-4.asp?d=17&s=detail. The proper management of stormwater runoff
will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a functional drainage system, reduce
the effects of development on land and stream channel erosion, assist in the attainment and
maintenance of water quality standards, enhance the local environment associated with the
drainage system, reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic development by
mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts. The town engineer, Mr. Jay Meyers, stated
that any new development as a result of the Judd Parkway Extension of 675 feet, will likely
occur after the policy's approval and will be required to follow this stormwater management
policy. Besides the Southview Pointe Subdivision, which currently follows the Town's
stormwater management policy, there are no other proposed developments adjacent to the
extension at this time. All parcels south of Judd Parkway (i.e. Southern Oaks and Carriage
Heights Subdivision) are approved and under development. Although the Town of Fuquay-
Varina implemented buffer rule protection for Cape Fear River Basin in November 2005, both
the Southern Oaks and Carriage Heights Subdivision have proactively followed these buffer
rules. The Southview Pointe Subdivision is required to follow these buffer rules as well.
We hope that the above and attached information will suffice in answering Comment #3. Please
let me know if you need more information.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc: Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Jay Meyers, Town of Fuquay-Varina
ES W
JTP
JMH
MTM
THS
JWM
305-078-A01
F: I WORDIDOCUMEN71305-0781 Corrl DWQ-001. doc
&I Qr "" ' c9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
?(r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O Y Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3,2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review
your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide a copy of the approval letter from NCEEP indicating their willingness to
accept payment for the 0.114 acres of wetland mitigation.
2. Please be advised that riprap is considered a permanent impact by the DWQ. Therefore,
the stream impact at Site 1, currently labeled as "Temporary", should be labeled as
permanent. Please make this correction in your tables and on your map, and re-submit
five copies of this page of the PCN and the map of Site 1.
3. With respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in
additional parcels which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the
case, then please address how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for
these parcels.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.car.gatc.nc,us/ncwctlands
one
Caro
N na
aa, Am,
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 2 of 2
January 3, 2006
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
,?ra
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSout6ViewPointeSD(Wake)On Hold
INTER
OMOE MEMO
To: file
From: Liz Workman
Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision in Fuquay-Varina
Date: January 5, 2006
In response to DWQ's response letter, dated January 3, 2005,1 sent an email to Ian McMillan, DWQ,
providing additional information on the Cumulative Impacts portion of the PCN dated December 22,
2005. This email was to ensure that our response sufficiently answered DWQ's "Comment 3".
Ian called with his comments and will be sending a letter as well. He stated that any new development,
not only Southview Pointe, around the extension must have stormwater controls in place to protect
cumulative impacts to water quality. The Town of Fuquay-Varina should have zoning ordinances that
limit impervious surfaces in this area. Ian would like to know what the land use is zoned as and who is
responsible for stormwater controls on new development in the area of the extension.
Ian would like to see the Stormwater Management Plan for the Southview Pointe Subdivision,
including calculations for drainages and sediment/erosion control methods and locations (silt fencing,
etc.).
The site map should be resubmitted with topographic lines.
The steam should be clearly defined on the site map.
The soil survey and USGS maps should show the subdivision and roadway footprint, not the project
study area. We can zoom in on the area.
305-078
F:1W ord\Document\305-078\Memo\Memo-004.doc
r 1*0-
-d;Ji
o stem
PROGRAM
January 3, 2006
Elizabeth Workman
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
Project: Judd Parkway Ext. and Southview Pointe County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging Unit (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0.114 0 0 0 0 115 0 0
03030004
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
incerely,
lliam D. Gilmore PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
kutorl;itj... E ... Prot"' Our fta&
FIMA
L,
MUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
1wr to saDW
0 FO
ma p --
a
Yin. D = 1.5 Ft.
Max. all = L5 Ft.
o = 2.0 Ft.
of liner=
SFA. 16.6
° (D
° NC CAPITAL GROUP

SITE I
1
IE E 10
5
)CB
2 CB
3
-------------------------- ---
E E
C F F - - -
E INTERMITTENT E
STREAM LATERAL V D CH F
E F SEE DETAIL
0
L i< L
I?C' IC IC rt- 1C IC
li K,
25' 0' 25' 50'
SCALE:?= 50'
k-
English
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
F ?
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHIM NO.
DD PARKWAY EXT.
RW SHEET 140.
'.OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
ENGINEER ENGINEER

INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR /W ACOL'ISIno",
PRELIMIN
DO "OT 1,5E FO RY PLANS
CO\S-=IO\'
W
PERENNIAL
STREAM F
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -
E E
j K
BEAVER POND
(? ? SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC
ll EXISTING POND
JAN 1 3 2006
DENR- W4TER
I? WETLAND
AWS MD QU k- 'sro,q? BryRq, I? BOUNDARY
1? ? L
IC
O
NC CAPITAL GROUP

N
7
M
X
m
N
Rr' N - >lm
0N
PLANS PREPARED BY :
RUNNEL KLEPPER & KAM- LI
consulting englneers
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960
19191878-9560
FOR
THE TORN OF FUQUAY VARMA
NORTH CAROLINA
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
ac
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)

1 16+65 TO 18+96 66" RCP

INTERMITTENT STREAM - - - - - 0.0004 0.008 - 81 -

BEAVER POND - - - - - 0.017 0.007 - - -

PERENNIAL S TREAM - - - - - 0.021 0.001 134 5 -

WETLANDS 0.114 - 0.006 - 0.038 - - - -

TOTALS: 0.114 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.038 0.039 0.017 134 86 0
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION
HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY
r I
ATN Revise d 3131105
I

DETAIL
A
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
ova o rr t. ?'
Hin0=I.5 F7.
Mpx.O = L5 Fr.
o = 2.0 F7.
Type of Llnx= PSRU
FROM STA. 16+65 RT. TO STA. 17+56 RT.
O 0
° NC CAPITAL GROUP
--E
--------------------
' )CB
SITE 1
1
v 4---
10
C F v
_---
EXCAVATION IN
WETLANDS
2 CB
3
5
25' 0' 25' 50'
SCALE: I'= 50'
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
O
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
9D PARKWAY EXT.
6W SHEET NO.
IOADWAY DESIGN HYDRA ua
ENGIHM ENWNEER

INCOMPLE
DO NOT un mR E PLANS
/9 ACWORION
PRELIMIN
00 NOT V.? RY PLANS
OON4171lCffON
Vl
UJI
le -N
==L== ----
Erb ? ? ? T ? ? ? L ? ? kL
L I< T k-
IF L T
SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC-
T l
EXISTING POND
I
^G I,I< T ?C
nL L I
E, R' ?L I
T K,-
O ® DENOTES FILL ® DENOTES FILL IN I
? SURFACE WATER R WETLAND I
NC CAPITAL GROUP I4 (POND)
DENOTES FILL IN DENOTES EXCAVATION
? SURFACE WATER ® IN WETLAND I
® DENOTES TEMPORARY ® DENOTES HAND I
FILL IN SURFACE CLEARING I
WATER
k?
e
X
M
X
N
io
X
ac" N
P
LANS PREPARED BY :
RUMMEL KLEPPER & BAHL LI
consun/ng engineers
Soo RALEIG NOR H E CAROLINA SUITE 2760953960
[phone]
FOR
THE TOWN OF FUQUAY FARINA
NORTH CAROLINA
Town of Fuquay-Varina Official Zoning Map
?. Conditional Uses Q Corporate Limits

« FR
12/13/05
1" = 2,000 ft
"formation depicted hereon is for reference purposes
only, wmpiled from best available sources. Fuquay-Varina
assumes no responsibility for errors arising from misuse of
this map or misuse of the measurement scale.
M

-14

10 3
Judd Parkway Extension S``JUDD =P ;¦ ???? ' '
?; ; ¦ •
is n 1 ¦ •. ? ( ?' n
JUDD PARK WAY SITE MAP
`? •?a FLIQUAY-VARINA, NC
WAKE COUNTY
•? . ¦ January 2005 Figure 2
500 1,00.0 II 2,00 ¦ 300 X000 - RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
• consulting engineers Town of
eet '
¦ _ ' ? • Al ? RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Fuquay-Varina
1-m e a s 1,Q00 fe 8l o «
L 1 r
tJ ?f • '
,? it •, ?? ? ?
• ; (, A
7
y ?.
¦ y ? !I I
o
+ •. Subdivision
V
source: uses i.?, minute Ivuaurangle, ruguay Marina, NC
Source: NRCS, Wake County Soil Surrey
2oos2ZSy
DRAINAGE COMPUTATIONS FOR
JUDD PARKWAY
0 P? 1 `'a ? aJP?O?
P
s?
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE: 08/25/05 REVISED:
PROJ. NO.: Judd Parkwav I.D. NO.: N/A
DESCRIPTION: Judd Parkway Extension - Fuouay Varina NC
COUNTY: Wake
SHEET 1 OF 1
DESIGNED BY: JWM
CHECKED BY: THS
Shoulder 374.90 Centerline PLAN SUMMARY DATA
PLACE 66" PI PE AND BURY 1' Elev. Elev. 375.20 Drainage Area 49.05 acres
Design Freq. 50 rs
Station -L-17+80 Design Disch. 107.3 cfs
Skew 105° H.W. Design H.W. Elev. 364.09 ft
Size/Type Pipe 54" RCP LSo T.W. Q100 Disch. 124.7 cfs
Type Entrance Headwall ----f- -t Q100 H.W. Elev. 364.59 ft
Direction of Flow SOUTHWEST Inv. Elev. 359.50 So = 0.0441 ft/ft Inv. Elev. 353.50 Overtopping Freq. 500+ yrs
Hydrological Meth. NCDOT charts Bury Elev. 358.50 L = 136.00 ft Bury Elev. 352.50 Overtopping Disch 338.4 cfs
H.W. Control Elev. 372.29 Overto in Elev. 375.95 ft
n Am=
Freq. Q Nat. Allow 3.60 INLET CONT. OUTLET CONTROL H.W. Vo
SIZE (Yrs.) Ids) H.W. H.W. T.W. HW/D H.W. Ke do (dc+DY2 ho H Lso H.W. Elev. (ft/s) COMMENTS

RCP
54" 10 58.0 1.13 12.79 3.60 0.69 3.11 0.2 2.13 3.31 3.60 0.35 6.00 -2.05 362.61 3.65 Inlet Con.
54" 25 78.3 1.36 12.79 3.60 0.86 3.87 0.2 2.52 3.51 3.60 0.63 6.00 -1.77 363.37 4.92 Inlet Con.
54" 50 107.3 1.65 12.79 3.60 1.02 4.59 0.2 3.02 3.76 3.76 1.19 6.00 -1.05 364.09 6.75 Inlet Con.
54" 100 124.7 1.82 12.79 3.60 1.13 5.09 0.2 3.30 3.90 3.90 1.61 6.00 -0.49 364.59 7.84 Inlet Con.

54" OT 338.4 3.36 12.79 3.60 3.66 16.45 0.2 4.05 4.28 4.28 11.85 6.00 1 10.121 1 375.95 21.28 Inlet Con.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: HW CONTROL IS 1.5' BELOW SHLDR AT SAG, PLACE 66" PIPE AND BURY 1'. Overtopping Sta. 16+53.61 at high side of shoulder el. 375.95
STANDARD OUTLET PROTECTION - CLASS I RIPRAP IS REQUIRED
CHART 10
Igo 10,000
166 8,000 EXAMPLE
156 -6.000 0.41 lashes (3.5 fact) g'

144 11,000 On Ito ds a.
4,000 ! M low
h s. b.
13t N
4

3,000
(1) 2.0 E.11
a' .
4.
120 (21 2.1 7.4
2,000 131 2.2 7.7 4.
106
*0 Is fact
3.
ss 1,000
goo
g4
600 2-
500
72 400
= 300 La La
H /
so
? 200 1.5
_ _ W
D t
H ?
W 49 W =
so
J x
v 4t r,
H 60 IL
im 1.0 1.0
MW ENTRANCE
- SCAL 1.0
IC 40 TYPE lC
W e
1W
-
36
30
( square ad 11 < 's
S heodwell 3 .8
33 ?Iw
20 t2) eo" on1 with W
30 dwell x .6 .6
13) Oracve a .g
27 prejesting
10
•7 r
s .
24
6 To use stele (2) or (3) project
21 5 horizontally li wale (1). then
4 *se straight inclined line through
0 sad 0 smelts, or reverse as .6
3
il1*etreted.
is
2
15 S

.s ' .s
r.o
12 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
HEADWATER SCALES 2113 CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS
REVISED MAY 1964 WITH INLET CONTROL
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS JML 043
181

DATE: 08/25/05 COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: JWM
PROJ. NO.: Judd Parkway I.D. NO.: N/A STATION: -L-17+80 CHECKED BY: THS
DESCRIPTION:
TAILWATER CALCULATIONS
D= 4.50 FT.
0.8*D= 3.60
s= 0.0485

No.
cfs B
ft y
ft M
ft/ft S
ft/ft n A
s .ft. P
ft Q
cfs Vc
ft/s Use n= 0.045
TW
Q5 43.50 7.0 0.95 0.5 0.0485 0.045 7.07 9.11 43.50 4.13 3.60
Q10 58.00 7.0 1.13 0.5 0.0485 0.045 8.55 9.53 58.00 4.55 3.60 lope=
7i
/s
Q25 78.30 7.0 1.36 0.5 0.0485 0.045 10.45 10.04 78.30 5.03 3.60 0.5
Q50 107.30 7.0 1.65 0.5 0.0485 0.045 12.95 10.70 107.30 5.56 -
3.60 to 1
Q100 124.70 7.0 1.82 0.5 0.0485 0.045 14.37 11.06 124.70 5.83 3.60 base= 7.0 ft
Q500 212.28 7.0 2.52 0.5 0.0485 0.045 20.85 12.64 212.28 6.83 3.60
QOT 338.40 7.0 3.36 0.5 0.0485 0.045 29.14 14.51 338.40 7.79 3.60
Q CALCULATIONS

No. Tc
min I
in/hr
C A
acres Q
cfs
Q5 0.60 0.0
Q10 0.60 0.0
Q25 0.60 0.0
Q50 0.60 0.0
Q100 0.60 0.0
Q500 0.60 0.0
QOT 0.60 0.0
NOT USED
Discharges determined using NCDOT Urban Charts
See discharge spreadsheet for caculations
Project No.: Judd Parkway Prepared By: JWM Date: 12/22/2005
TIP No : N/A
County: Wake Checked By. THS Date: 12122/2005
Location: Fuquay Vanna
TYPE OF DRAINAGE AREA (R for rural or U for urban): U
URBAN NCDOT CHARTS U WHEN DRAINAGE AREA IS < 100 ac R WHEN DRAINAGE AREA IS < 1.0 Sq Mi
AREA = 49.05 ACRES CF = 1.00 (CORR. FACTOR FOR DEVELOPMENT, C200.3)
NCDOT C200.1, C200.3
UQ5 = Q10XCFX0.75= 43.50 CFS
UQ25 = Q10xCFx1.35= 78.30 CFS
UQ50' = Q10xCFx1.85= 107.30 CFS
UQ100 = Q10xCFx2.15= 124.70 CFS
UQ200 = Q10xCFx2.80= 162.40 CFS
UQ500 = Q10xCFx3.66= 212.28 CFS
010 = 58.00 CFS C200.3
HYDROLOGIC CONTOUR = 6 C200.1
D= 2.5 FT
TAILWATER CALCULATIONS 0.8'D= 2.00 FT
1100
No. B
ft y
ft M
f t t S
fttft n A
.ft. P
ft R Q
cfs Vc
ft/s
Q5 43.50 7.0 0.95 0.5 0.0485 0.045 7.07 9.11 0.78 43.50 4.13
Q10 58.00 7.0 1.13 0.5 0.0485 0.045 8.55 9.53 0.90 58.00 4.55
Q25 78.30 7.0 1.36 0.5 0.0485 0.045 10.45 10.04 1.04 78.30 5.03
050 107.30 7.0 1.65 0.5 0.0485 0.045 12.95 10.70 1.21 107.30 5.56
Q100 124.70 7.0 1.82 0.5 0.0485 0.045 14.37 11.06 1.30 124.70 5.83
Q500 212.28 7.0 2.52 0.5 0.0485 0.045 20.85 12.64 1.65 212.28 6.83
QOT 338.40 7.0 3.36 0.5 0.0485 0.045 29.14 14.51 2.01 338.40 7.79
s= 0.0485
Use n= 0.045
TW
2.00 Depth= 0.00
2.00 slope=
2.00 0.5
2.00 to 1
2.00 base= 7.0 ft
2.52
3.36
r YFrM PL
61 YEN
HYDROL06-1C CONTOUR 5.0
DRRINRGF AREA 35 RC
5MRL L ARER FULL BUNNB 55
ANSWER
010=39 x1.4 = 54.6 CF.S.
8
v ?
v
a 4
Z Op - --
0.5
V ? v
RtY
O l4t-
-.3
?v W?
?
FOR YEDEvALR.oR gil0v
,ORCTORS FOR FREQUENCIES
?Q 5 CURVE R?LUE Z .75
Chi 2 0 ?r n x 1.3.5
Q GO r? X Z•83
2,000
,io00
800
600
400
200
E80°
40

?0 c:;
U
?o
8 a
?o
2
I
APPENDIX C
SHEET 3 OF 8
„
1000 I
6 00
QOo
J..
-6 20o
t
T
goo
50
30
?o
? Q+
ro '?
Z
ct:
O
RUNOFF FROM URBAN RREAS
IVOR771 CRROUIVI? 5rrE' HlGN1NAY COAM115510N
JAN,1?3 C2013
CHART C 200.3
0
D
--I
C7
N
O
O
mD
m T
?m
?z
O0
X
OD 0
NORTH CAROL INR 5TRTE hU6HGYfJy C011MMIIJ5101V
HYDROCRRPHIC DEPT
MAP OF HYOROL O6-IC CONTOUR5 FM USE IN DETERiYlINIA16
PROJECT DE916AI 0l5CHA,C'6E5
DATE: 1222105 REVISED: INLET COMPUTATION SHEET
SHE
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY PROJ. NO.: COUNTY: WAKE SHE
DESIGNED ETI OFD JWm
DESCRIPTION: DD PARKWAY EXT EN I N CHECKED THS
LOCATION ROADWAY RUNOFF INLET
RIM
INLET
No. STATION
RT INLET
TYPE ELEV
ft. GRADE
R/R X-SLOPE
ft/ft DESC BOX DA
ac C Tc
min 10
irvtr p
cfs Q
cfs Q
cfs SPREAD
ft BEARING INTER
cfs BYPASS
cfs
EX2 L- 10+00
6.68
0.67
36.6
3.57
15.97
15.97
15.97 A
EXIST SYSTEM
EXt -L- 12+75
RT CB 380.0 0.028 0.050 F 0.57 0.72 11.9 4.00 1.64 1.64 3.2 1.55 0.09 EXIST CB
1 L- 15+50
RT CB 373.8 0.011 0.040 F 1.19 0.71 16.0
4.00
3.38
0.09
3.47
6.5
2.65
0.82
BYPASS TO 2
Fl L- 20+00
2.45
0.69
30.6
3.83
6.47
8.47
6.47 A
FUTURE SYSTEM
4 -L- 20+12
RT Cg 379.9 0.027 0.020 G 0.27 0.67 13.6 4.00 0.72 0.72 3.5 0.70 0.02 BYPASS TO 3
3 -L- 17+73
RT CB 374.0 0.012 0.040 F 0.43 0.83 10.0 4.00 1.41 0.02 1.44 4.3 1.32 0.12 BYPASS TO 2
2 -L-16+54 CB 373.2 0.000 0.040 E 0.43 0.88 10.0 4.00 1.50 DOU
0.94 B1 2." LE Q 6.1 2.44 0.00 DOUBLE B

Judd Parkway Stomach
TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS
DATE: I REVISED: 0 SHEET 1 OF 2,
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY PROJ. NO.: Q COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION. JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION CHECKED THS
Tc b K inematic, Wa ve E bon Trial Tc calcul ated for Sh allow Concentrated Flo w Trial Tc calwla ted for op en chann els Total
No. L
ft n S
ft/ft Tc
min W
1T
I
iMv L
It Slope
ftlft Paved
Un ved avp
V
Chart V
ft Tc
min No. L
ft 8
ft y
ft m
bit S
ft m n A
s q. ft P
ft R Q
ds VC
ms Tc
I rain Tc
ruin
EX2 300.0 0.24 0.007 31.7 3.75 100 0.007 U 1.35 123 EX2 840 1.0 0.94 4.0 0.026 0.040 4.46 8.74 0.51 17.130 3.84 3.65 36.58
EX1 200.0 024 0.050 11.5 5.90 70 0.020 P 2.87 0.41 EX1 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 1.22 0.05 0.057 0.80 0.00 11.91
1 220.0 0.24 0.030 14.8 5.33 160 0.011 P 2.11 1.26 1 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 1.22 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 16.05
Ft 300.0 0.24 0.009 28.8 3.94 130 0.038 U 3.15 0.69 F1 215 1.0 0.57 4.0 0.037 0.040 1.89 5.73 0.33 6471 3.42 1.05 30.57
4 230.0 0.24 0.042 13.5 5.55 25 0.027 P 3.35 0.12 4 0 0.0 0.79 5.0 0.012 0.040 3.12 8.05 0.39 6.760 2.17 0.00 13.63
3 70.0 0.01 0.040 0.9 7.22 165 0.012 P 2.23 1.23 3 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 00040 0.07 1.22 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 2.13
2 75.0 0.01 0.040 0.9 7.22 265 0.027 P 3.34 1.32 2 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 1.22 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 2.26
DITCH 300.0 0.24 0.043 16.2 5.18 473 0.042 U 3.31 2.38 DITCH 240 0.0 1.68 1.0 0.029 0.040 2.83 4.76 0.60 12.760 4.50 0.89 19.44
DITCH 300.0 0.24 0.043 162 5.18 473 0.042 U 3.31 2.38 DITCH 240 0.0 1.52 1.0 0.029 0.040 2.31 4.30 0.54 9.700 4.20 0.95 19.51

Judd ft&"W Sbrm.xls
TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS
DATE. I REVISED. 0 SHEET-L OF 2,
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY PROD. NO.: Q COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION: JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION CHECKED THS
Tc b Kinematic Wava E lion Trial Tc calculated for Shallow Concentrated Flow Trial Tc calaYated for channels Taal
10 yew avp
No. L n S Tc I L Slope Paved Chart V Tc No. L 8 y m S n A P R Q VC Tc Tc
It ftMt min ihlhr It ftB Un ved ft/s min ft It It Will Mt s g. It ft CIS ftls min min
EX2 300.0 0.24 0.007 31.7 3.75 100 0.007 U 1.35 1.23 EX2 840 1.0 0.94 4.0 0.026 0.040 4.46 8.74 0.51 17.130 3.84 3.65 36.58
EXt 2000 . 0.24 0.050 11.5 5.90 70 0.020 P 2.87 0.41 EX1 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 1.22 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 11.91
1 220.0 0.24 0.030 14.8 5.33 160 0.011 P 2.11 1.26 1 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 122 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 16.05
F1 300.0 0.24 0.009 28.8 3.94 130 0.038 U 3.15 0.69 F1 215 1.0 0.57 4.0 0.037 0.040 1.89 5.73 0.33 6.471 3.42 1.05 30.57
4 230.0 024 0.042 13.5 5.55 25 0.027 P 3.35 0.12 4 0 0.0 0.79 5.0 0.012 0.040 3.12 8.05 0.39 6.760 2.17 0.00 13.63
3 70.0 0.01 0.040 0.9 7.22 165 0.012 P 2.23 123 3 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 122 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 2.13
2 75.0 0.01 0.040 0.9 7.22 265 0.027 P 3.34 1.32 2 0 0.0 0.12 5.0 0.020 0.040 0.07 122 0.06 0.057 0.80 0.00 2.26
DITCH 300.0 0.24 0.043 16.2 5.18 473 0.042 U 3.31 2.38 DITCH 240 0.0 1.68 1.0 0.029 0.040 2.83 4.76 0.60 12.760 4.50 0.89 19.44
DITCH 300.0 0.24 0.043 162 5.18 473 0.042 U 3.31 2.38 DITCH 240 0.0 1.52 1.0 0.029 0.040 2.31 4.30 0.54 9.700 4.20 0.95 19.51

Judd Pwkwy Sbmh.xk
DITCH DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS - Q10 -
DATE: 12/22/05 PROJ. NO.: 0 SHEET 2 OF 2
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION: JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION CHECKED THS
Discharge calcu lations b Rational Method Q
tation
to
Station
Location Freq.
Freq.
r
Tc
min
I
in/hr
A
acres
C
Q
cfs

1665
1758 RT 10 19.4 4.90 4.340 0.60 12.765

1665
1758 RT 2 19.5 3.73 4.340 0.60 9.705

1665
1758 RT 10 19.4 4.90 4.340 0.60 12.765

Judd Parkway Storm.xls
DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS
DATE: 12/22/05 REVISED: 0 PROJ. NO.: 0 SHEET 2 OF2
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION: JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION CHECKED THS
Discharge calculations b Rational Method Q
No. Station Freq.
r Tc
min I
in/hr A
acres C Q
cts
EX2 -L-10+00 10 30.0 3.83 6.68 0.67 17.13
EX1 -L-12+76 10 11.9 5.99 0.57 0.72 2.46
1 -L- 15+50 10 16.0 5.19 1.19 0.71 4.39
F1 -L- 20+00 10 30.0 3.83 2.45 0.69 6.47
4 -L- 20+12 10 13.6 5.64 0.27 0.67 1.02
3 -L-17+73 10 10.0 6.16 0.43 0.83 2.18
2 -L- 16+54 10 10.0 6.16 0.43 0.88 2.32
DITCH -L- 17+50 10 19.4 4.90 4.34 0.60 12.76
DITCH -L- 17+50 2 19.5 3.73 4.34 0.60 9.70

F7
Judd Parkway StormAs
STORM DRAIN DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
DATE: 12/22/05 REVISED: 0 SHEETS OF
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY PROJ. NO.: Q COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION: QQQ PARKWAY EULULKLN CHECKED THS
L
OCATION
-TR
RUNOFF 10 yr.
PIPE D
ESIGN
OM I
TOTAL
acres GA
TOTAL PIPE
LENGTH
ft INLET
TIME
min FLOW
TIME
min DESIGN
TIME
min INTEN
I
in/hr DISCH
Q
cfs INLET
TOP
INV OUTLEI
TOP
INV
SLOPE
ft/ft
DIA
in
CAP
cfs h.g.
VEL
fUs ACt.
flow t
min
REMARKS

EX2
EX1
6
68
4
47 EX
. .
6 0.0 30.00 0.00 30.00 3.83 17.13 0.00
EX1 1 7
25 373.79
. 4.886 272.0 11.91 30.00 30.00 3.83 18.70 376.14 3
70.04
0.0224
25.0
5.95
0.38

1
2 373.79 373.24
8.44 5.731 100.0 16.05 30.38 30.00 3.83 21.94 370.04 369.20 0.0084 24 22.5 6.98 0.20

2
3 373.24 373.98-
8.87 6.107 116.0 2.26 30.59 30.00 3.83 23.38 369.20 368.00 0.0103 24 24.9 7.44 0.21
Fl 4
2.45 1.691 0.0 30.00 30.80 30.00 3.83 6.47 0.00

4
3
2 379.92 373.98
.72 1.871 240.0 13.63 30.80 30.00 3.83 7.16 376.92 368.75 0.0340 15 9.0 5.84 0.37

CULV
3
49
05 373.98
. 28.0 58.00 358.50 357.24 0.0450 160.0 3.65 0.02
3 OUT 60
64 open
. 104.0 90.72 357.24 352.50 0.0456 160.0 5.70 0.08 Ex. D = 18.74

Judd Parkway Storm.xls
HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE
DATE: 12/22/05 REVSED: 0 SHEET-1 OF -1
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY PROJ. NO.: 2 COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION: JUDQ PARKWAY EZIEN§ION CHECKED THS
PIPE DATA HEAD LOSS ES
No.

3 WS EL

•0.8D
356.10 Do
in

54 QO
cfs

90.720 LO
ft

104.00 ANGLE

90 Hf

0.1885 He
ft.

0.1263 He
ft.

0.3010 Hb (bend)
ft.

0.6019 Ht
ft.

1.2176 INLET
WS EL

357.32 RIM
EL

373.98 RIM-W.S.
CLEARANCE

4.38 0.8`DIA
+INV RIM

369.60 REMARKS
2 369.60 24 23.378 116.00 0 1.0553 0.2150 0.2651 0.0000 1.5353 371.14 373.24 2.10 370.80

1
371.14
24
21.939
100.00
0
0.8012
0.1893
0.1927
0.0000
1.1832
372.32
373.79
1.47 EX1
371.64

EX1
372.32
24
18.705
272.00
0
1.5841
0.1376
0.0000
0.0000
1.7218
374.04
380.00
2.26 1 EX1
377.74
4 369.60 15 7.164 240.00 0 2.5068 0.1323 0.0000 0.0000 2.6391 372.24 379.92 2.00 377.92

Judd Parkway Stortnxls
DITCH CAPACITY CALCULATIONS
DATE: 12/22/05
SHEET 1 OF 2
I.D. NO.: JUDD PARKWAY PROJ. NO.: 0 COUNTY: WAKE DESIGNED JWM
DESCRIPTION: JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION CHECKED THS
Med. Sp. Trial
LINE Station

PSH
to
Station
Location L

ft Lateral
Sp. Cut
Tail

TYPE =grass
B=class
1=dass I
B
ft
y
ft
M
ft/ft
S
ft/ft
n
A
s .ft.
P
ft.
R
ft.
Q
ds Vc

ft/s
REMARKS
T V'R

NR
METHOD
4 1758
RT 93 Lateral V G 0.0 1.289 2.0 0.027 0.044 3.32 5.76 0.58 12.76 3.84 2.16 2.22
-L- 1665
4 1758 ax

Use
ynthe RT

tic Mat for 93

Temporary Lateral

Erosion Co V

ntrol Lin G 0.0 0.941 .0 0.027 0.025 -i.-77- -T21- -o--4T- -977o- -5-.4y-
58
1

00-6-r in g
METHOD
-L-
1665
4 1758 RT 93 Lateral V G 0.0 1.116 2.0 0.027 0.030 2.49 4.99 0.50 12.765 5.12 Rein. Matt

CONCLUSION: USE P ERMANE NET REINFORCING SOIL MAT FOR TEM P EROSION CONTR OL AND FINAL DIT H LINER

Judd Parkway Storm.xls

TOWN POLICY
TOWN OF FUQUAY-VARINA
Subject: Number: Effective Date: No. of Pages: 39
Stormwater

Management Supercedes: Prepared By: Recommended By:
All Previous Engineering Dept.
Adopted this day of 2004
Rose John, Town Clerk
TOWN POLICY FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Subject: Implementation of a policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased
runoff due to development of land.
1.0 Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is to protect, maintain, and enhance the public health,
safety, and general welfare by establishing minimum requirements and procedures
to control the adverse effects of increased stormwater runoff associated with land
development within the Town of Fuquay-Varina. Proper management of
stormwater runoff will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a
functional drainage system, reduce the effects of development on land and stream
channel erosion, assist in the attainment and maintenance of water quality
standards, enhance the local environment associated with the drainage system,
reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic
development by mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts.
The application of this policy and the provisions expressed herein shall be the
minimum stormwater discharge control requirements and shall not be deemed a
limitation or repeal of any other obligations imposed by State statute or judicial
A.
decisions. Consequently, if site characteristics indicate that complying with these
minimum requirements will not provide adequate designs or protection for local
property or residents, it is the designer's responsibility to exceed the minimum
requirements as necessary. The Town Engineer or designee shall be responsible
for the coordination and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter.
2.0 Departments Involved:
Administration
Planning Department
Engineering Department
Public Works Department
3.0 Jurisdiction:
This policy shall apply to all areas within the Planning Jurisdiction (Town Limits
and ET J) as defined on official Town maps that may be amended from time to
time.
4.0 Definitions:
As used in this policy, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the
following terms, phrases and words, and their derivatives, shall have the meaning
given herein:
As-built plan. Plans reflecting actual field conditions which may include the
construction plans with any changes identified and shown on the plan.
Designer. A professional who is permitted by the Town of Fuquay-Varina to
prepare and submit plans and studies required by this policy.
Detention structure. A permanent structure for the temporary storage of
stormwater runoff that is designed so as not to create a permanent pool of water.
Develop. The construction, landscaping, clearing projects or any other project
that in any manner alters the natural structure of the landmass.
Development. Any site plan or subdivision.
Developed peak discharge rates. The peak discharge rates, in cubic feet per
second, calculated using Town approved methods and based on developed land
use conditions.
Easement. Right of use over the property of another for a specific purpose or
reservation by the owner of the land for the use of such land by others for a
-a*
specific purpose or purposes, and which must be included in the conveyance of
land affected by such easement.
Existing land use conditions. The land use conditions existing at the time the
design plans are submitted for approval, including previously approved upstream
developments.
Impervious surface. Any material that significantly reduces and prevents natural
infiltration of water into the soil. Impervious surfaces include but are not limited
to roof, patios, balconies, decks, streets, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, and
any concrete, stone, brick, asphalt or compacted gravel surface.
Infiltration. The passage or movement of water into the soil sub-surface.
Maintenance. Any action necessary to preserve drainage and flood control
facilities in proper working condition, so that such facilities shall continue to
comply with the standards of this chapter and to prevent failure of such facilities.
Maintenance shall not include actions taken solely for the purpose of enhancing
the aesthetics aspects associated with the stormwater discharge control facilities.
Off-site stormwater runoff rate. The stormwater runoff resulting from a
designated design storm which flows through the subject site either naturally or
via storm drainage systems from off the subject site. Off-site stormwater runoff
rate shall be calculated assuming contributing offsite properties are fully
developed.
On-site stormwater discharge control facilities. The design and construction of a
facility necessary to control stormwater runoff within and for a single
development.
Opaque Screening. A substance that cannot be seen through when viewed
perpendicularly at the same elevation from the ground to at least a height of six
(6) feet. Composition of the opaque screen may include a wall, fence, landscaped
earthen berm, planted vegetation, existing vegetation, or any appropriate
combination of the elements. At least 75 percent of the planted vegetation shall be
evergreen species locally adapted to the area.
Predevelopment stormwater runoff rate. Stormwater runoff resulting from a
designated design storm with the subject site in its natural condition prior to any
development activity.
Post development stormwater runoff rate. The stormwater runoff resulting from a
designated design storm after the site has been fully developed.

Regional retention detention facilities. The design and construction of a facility
to control stormwater runoff within or outside a development and for one or more
developments.
Retention structures. A permanent structure that provides for the storage of
runoff and is designed to maintain a permanent pool of water.
Storm drainage facilities. The man-made system of inlets, conduits or other such
facilities, and appurtenances which collect, store and convey stormwater.
Stormwater discharge control design plan. The set of drawings and other
documents that comprise all of the information and specifications for the drainage
systems, structures, concepts and techniques that will be used to control
stormwater discharges as required by this chapter. Also included are the
supporting engineering calculations, input data for any computer analysis, and
results of any computer analysis.
Ten-year and one hundred-year design storms. The stormwater runoff resulting
from a rainfall intensity based on statistical data and of a duration that will
produce the maximum peak rate of runoff for the watershed of interest under
average moisture conditions. A ten-year storm has statistically a 10% chance of
occurring in any given year and a 100-year storm has statistically a 1 % chance of
occurring in any given year.
5.0 Scope and Exclusions
5.1 No person shall develop any land without having provided for appropriate
stormwater discharge control measures to control or manage stormwater
runoff, in compliance with this policy, unless exempted under paragraph
5.2.
5.2 The following development activities are exempt from the provisions of
this policy:
5.2.1 Projects grandfathered based on the following criteria:
5.2.1.1 Industrial and commercial projects under construction as of
the effective date of this policy
5.2.1.2 Industrial and commercial projects with approved
construction plans as of the effective date of this policy
5.2.1.3 Industrial and commercial projects within the Town's
review cycle prior to the effective date of this policy
5.2.1.4 Residential single phase projects within the Town's review
cycle, with approved preliminary subdivision plat,
approved construction plans, or under construction as of the
effective date of this policy
5.2.1.5 Residential multi-phase projects within the Town's review
cycle, with approved preliminary subdivision plat,
approved construction plans, or under construction as of the
effective date, with the provision that exempt phases must
be under construction within 5-years of the effective date of
this policy. If changes to the approved preliminary sub-
division plat result in an increase in the number of lots
and/or an increase in the overall impervious surface area by
ten percent or more, this policy would then apply to that
changed phase of the project.
5.3 Additions or modifications to existing detached single-family dwellings.
5.4 Residential site plans consisting of one single family or one duplex
dwelling, or one structure of a two-unit townhouse dwelling.
5.5 Expansion of existing developments that increases stormwater runoff less
than 10 percent.
5.6 Compliance with this policy would result in greater adverse downstream
impact, such as local flooding, as determined by Town approved
engineering studies.
6.0 Minimum Runoff Control Requirements
The minimum stormwater runoff control requirements shall provide:
6.1 Control measures necessary to control velocities of flow from stormwater
discharge control facilities to a level which will comply with the "North
Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973";
6.2 Compliance with any applicable local, state, and/or federal Neuse River
Basin and Cape Fear River Basin rules;
6.3 Reduce post-development runoff rate to pre-development runoff rate for
the 1-year, 24-hour design storm and the 10-year, 24-hour design storm,
by installing stormwater discharge control facilities.
6.4 Provide sufficient storage volume to retain on-site the runoff from the first
inch of rainfall (first flush) for 24 to 72 hours.
6.5 The Town reserves the right to require additional stormwater management
measures for projects complying with this policy if stormwater runoff
from the project will cause adverse effects on other properties including
without limitation public streets, sidewalks, greenways, and utility
easements.
7.0 Stormwater Control Facilities:
7.1 Stormwater discharge control facilities may include both structural and
nonstructural elements. Natural swales and other natural runoff conduits
shall be retained where practicable, but where additional stormwater
discharge control facilities are required to satisfy the minimum control
requirements, the following measures are examples of what may be used:
7.1.1 Stormwater detention structures (dry basins).
7.1.2 Stormwater retention structures (wet ponds).
7.1.3 Detention swales.
7.1.4 Bio-retention areas (requires geotechnical report to establish
suitability of fill material for bioretention area).
7.1.5 Other methods acceptable to the Town Engineer that meets the .
policy requirements and assures no harm to downstream
properties.
7.2 Where detention and retention structures are used, designs that consolidate
these facilities into a limited number of large structures will be preferred
over designs that utilize a large number of small structures.
7.3 Stormwater discharge control design plans can be rejected by the Town
Engineer if they incorporate structures and facilities that will demand
considerable maintenance, will be difficult to maintain, or utilize
numerous small structures if other alternatives are physically possible.
8.0 Design Procedures
All stormwater discharge control facilities shall be designed in accordance with
procedures approved by the Town Engineer. Pre-approved procedures include:
8.1 Peak Runoff Calculation
8. 1.1 For drainage areas less than 100-acres - Rational Method. The
following Intensity-Duration-Frequency chart shall be utilized:
Table 8.1.1- Fu ua -Varina I-D-F Table
Duration
(minutes) 1-year
(in/hr) 10-year
(in/hr) 25-year
(in/hr) 50-year
(in/hr) 100-year
(in/hr)
5 5.10 7.22 8.19 8.96 9.72
10 4.20 6.13 7.01 7.71 8.40
15 3.50 5.25 6.03 6.64 7.24
30 2.38 3.28 4.32 4.80 5.28
60 1.50 2.41 2.84 3.17 3.50
120 0.89 1.37 1.62 1.81 2.00
180 0.65 1.02 1.21 1.35 1.50
360 0.38 0.65 0.77 0.86 0.96
720 0.23 0.39 0.46 0.52 0.57
1440 0.13 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.33
24-hour
rainfall 3.00 inches 5.38 inches 6.41 inches 7.21 inches 8.00 inches
8.1.2 For drainage areas 26-acres to 640-acres - U.S. Geological Survey
Water -Resources Investigations Reports 01-4207 (Table 5 - Rural
Flood-Frequency Coastal equations) and 96-4084 (Table 7 - North
Carolina Flood-Frequency Equations).
8.1.3 For drainage areas greater than 640-acres - United States Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center computer
programs HEC-1 or HEC-MMS, or Haestad Methods "Pondpack".
These programs shall include evaluation of multiple sub-basins and
storage areas.
8.2 Runoff Volume Calculation
8.2.1 The "Simple Method" as described by Schueler (1987) and
referenced in NCDENR's "Stormwater Best Management
Practices" dated April 1999 shall be used for calculating the post
development runoff volume resulting from the first inch of rainfall.
8.2.2 For drainage areas up to 640-acres - Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds, TR-55 (Technical Release 55) published by the
Engineering Division, United States Natural Resource
Conservation Service (formerly known as the Soil Conservation
Service) United States Department of Agriculture, June 1986,
except as noted in 8.2.1.
8.2.3 For drainage areas greater than 640-acres - United States Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center computer
programs HEC-1 or HEC-MMS, or Haestad Methods "Pondpack".
These programs shall include evaluation of multiple sub-basins and
storage areas.
8.3 Hydrograph Development
8.3.1 For drainage areas less than 100-acres - Unit Hydrograph per
"Elements of Urban Stormwater Design" by H. Rooney Malcom,
P.E.
8.3.2 For drainage areas up to 640-acres - Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds, TR-55 (Technical Release 55) published by the
Engineering Division, United States Natural Resource
Conservation Service (formerly known as the Soil Conservation
Service) United States Department of Agriculture, June 1986.
8.3.3 For drainage areas greater than 640-acres - United States Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center computer
programs HEC-1 or HEC-MMS, or Haestad Methods "Pondpack".
These programs shall include evaluation for multiple sub-basins
and storage areas.
8.4 Other hydraulic methods may be used if the designer demonstrates that the
methods are appropriate for the intended use and calibrated to local
conditions.
9.0 Stormwater Discharge Control Design Plan and Report Requirements
9.1 Stormwater discharge control design plans/reports shall include the
following:
9.1.1 Delineation of drainage basins
9.1.2 All project existing and proposed impervious surfaces clearly
delineated and listed in square feet.
9.1.3 All surface waters: FEMA 100-year floodplain and floodway lines;
flood hazard soils areas; wetlands; reserved open spaces; and the
location, dimensions and arrangements of all drainage ways;
watershed, riparian, and other buffers including associated
setbacks.
9.1.4 A determination that the proposed stormwater discharge control
facility will not create flooding or drainage problems for adjacent
structures for the 10- and 100-year flood events.
9.1.5 A designation of all easements needed for inspection and
maintenance of the stormwater discharge control facilities. The
location of all stormwater management facilities shall be specified
prior to recording of easements.
9.1.6 A plan for maintenance of all stormwater discharge control
facilities shall be included as part of the stormwater discharge
control design plan. The maintenance plan should include an
estimated maintenance budget.
9.1.7 Landscaping/screening to enhance the aesthetic qualities of the
stormwater discharge control facilities. Landscaping inside
detention/retention basins side slopes is allowed as long as the
landscaping does not significantly decrease storage volume or
create maintenance problems. Any screening used shall be opaque
in nature.
9.2 The hydrologic criteria to be used for the stormwater discharge control
design plans and calculations included on the plans or in the report shall
be as follows:
9.2.1 Post development discharge shall be at pre-development levels for
the 1-year, 24-hour and 10-year, 24-hour design storms for all
stormwater discharge facilities.
9.2.2 Emergency spillways will be designed at a minimum for 50-year
storms.
9.2.3 All stormwater discharge control designs shall be checked using
the 100-year storm for analysis of local flooding and possible flood
hazards to adjacent structures and/or property.
9.3 Record (as-built) drawings (reproducible mylars and magnetic form in
.dwg or dxf files) for all stormwater management facilities depicting as-
built conditions including, but not limited to, size, depth, field location and
elevations, must be certified by an authorized registered professional as to
the completeness of the as-builts and that the stormwater management
devices and their installation are in compliance with this policy and the
approved plans, and a copy provided to the Town of Fuquay-Varina for
permanent record.
10.0 Professional Registration Requirements
10.1 Stormwater discharge control design plans shall be prepared by a qualified
registered North Carolina Professional Engineer, using acceptable
engineering standards and practices.
11.0 Ownership and Maintenance of Stormwater Discharge Control Facilities
11.1 Any stormwater discharge control facility that serves a single lot or
development other than detached single-family dwellings and their
accessory uses will be privately owned and continuously maintained by
the served property owners. Stormwater discharge control facilities that
serve detached single-family dwelling developments and their accessory
uses will be privately owned and continuously maintained by the
individual homeowner associations.
11.2 The ownership and continuous maintenance of the stormwater discharge
control facility shall also apply to non-exclusive perpetual easements in
favor of the Town for access to the facility. The Town will not be
responsible for the maintenance of the access easements.
11.3 Maintenance requirements identified under paragraph 9.1.6 of this policy
shall be a part of the deed for the affected property and recorded with the
Wake County Register of Deeds.
11.4 The location and description of the stormwater discharge facility along
with access/maintenance easements shall be indicated on subdivision
map(s) and site plats recorded with the Wake County Register of Deeds.
11.5 Stormwater discharge control facilities shall be inspected a minimum of
once annually by a licensed professional engineer, and inspection reports
submitted to the Town Engineer during the period of December 1 to
December 31 annually. At a minimum, the inspection reports shall
include the information listed in the sample inspection reports included in
Appendix B of this policy.
12.0 Maintenance Agreement for Privately Owned Facilities
12.1 A proposed maintenance agreement (Appendix A) shall be submitted to
the Town for all private on-site stormwater discharge control facilities
prior to the approval of the stormwater discharge control design plan and
recordation of lots in a subdivision to be served by the discharge control
facility. The agreement shall be recorded by the landowner with the Wake
County Register of Deeds prior to subdivision recording and/or building
permit, and shall be binding on all subsequent owners of land served by
the discharge control facility. Such agreement shall be in a form and
content acceptable to the Town and shall be the responsibility of the
private owner. At a minimum, the agreement shall include the following:
12.1.1 The agreement shall identify who will have the maintenance
responsibility.
12.1.2 The maintenance agreement shall specify how proper maintenance
of the facilities will be accomplished.
12.1.3 The maintenance agreement shall provide for access to the facility
by virtue of non-exclusive perpetual easements, minimum 25-feet
in width, in favor of the Town, at reasonable times for inspection
by the Town to ensure that the discharge control facilities are
maintained in proper design working condition.
12.1.4 The frequency of inspection of the facilities and submission of
inspection reports to the Town.
12.1.5 Establishment of an escrow account at the time of subdivision/plat
recordation in the amount of 15% of the construction cost of the
facility solely for the maintenance and management of the facility.
The escrow account shall be supplemented annually with a sinking
fund from homeowner association dues or property owner
payments in accordance with an anticipated maintenance schedule
identified under paragraph 9.1.6 of this policy and in addition, 60%
of initial construction costs shall be deposited in the escrow
account within 10-years following initial construction (such that
the escrow account has 75% of initial construction costs in addition
to maintenance costs), and 100% of initial construction costs
within 20-years. A certified annual audit of the escrow account
shall be submitted to the Town for its records.
12.1.6 If at any time the Town accepts the facility for public management
and maintenance, the portion of the sinking fund based on initial
construction costs shall be remitted to the Town at time of
acceptance.
12.1.7 Allowance for the Town to recover from the landowner(s) any and
all costs the Town expends to maintain or repair the facilities.
12.1.8 Statements that the Town is not obligated for the maintenance or
repair of the facilities and that the Town shall not be liable for the
condition or operation of the facility.
13.0 Exceptions from Requirements
13.1 The Town Board of Commissioners may grant an exception from the
requirements of this policy if there are unique circumstances applicable to
the site such that strict adherence to the provisions of the policy will result
in unnecessary hardship and not fulfill the intent of the policy.
13.2 A written request for an exception shall be required and shall state the
specific exception sought and the justification therefore. It shall include
descriptions, drawings, calculations and any other information that is
necessary to evaluate the proposed exception.
14.0 Liability
Neither the approval of a plan under the provisions of this policy nor the
compliance with the provisions of this chapter shall relieve any person from the
responsibility for damage to any person or property otherwise imposed by law nor
shall it impose any liability upon the Town of Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina for
damages to any person or property.
APPENDIX A
Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement
APPENDIX B
Standard Maintenance Inspection Reports
DRAINAGE COMPUTATIONS FOR
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WATER QUALITY POND CALCULATIONS
Project Name
Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project Number
4068-0001
Date
October 25, 2005
3rd revision
2nd revision
1st revision
Water Quality Pond Drainage Area Data
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05
Total site area 751,650 square feet = 17.26 acres
Dra inage area to and Other Drai nage Area

Impervious areas Existing
s Proposed
s Change
s Existing
s Proposed
s
On-site buildings 0 337,434 337,434 0 0
On-site streets 0 92,275 92,275 0 0
On-site parking 0 0 0 0 0
On-site sidewalks 0 0 0 0 0
Other on-site 0 0 0 0 0
Total off-site impervious 0 0 0 0 0
-
Total Impervious 0 429,709 429,709 0 0
Dra inage area to and Other Dra inage Area

Non-impervious areas Existing
s Proposed
s Change
Isf] Existing
f] s Proposed
s
On-site grass/landscape 751,650 321,941 -429,709 0 0
On-site woods 0 0 0 0 0
Other undeveloped 0 0 0 0 0
Total off-site non-impervious 0 0 0 0 0
Total non-impervious 751,650 321,941 -429,709 0 0
Total Drainage Area 751,650 751,650 0 3,167,850 3,167,850
Percent Impervious 0.0 57.2 57.2 0.0 0.0
Notes:
102505.Water Quality Pond Calcs.xls
Site Drainage Area Data Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
Water Quality Pond Surface Area Calculations
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05
Total on-site drainage area to pond 751,650 square feet
Total impervious area in drainage area 429,709 square feet
Average water depth of basin at normal pool 5.0 feet
Location of site
Site region
% Impervious cover
Fuquay-Varina
Piedmont
57.2 percent
If the site is in a coastal area, will a vegetative filter be used? n/a
Surface Area/Drainage Area Ratios:
For a site in the Piedmont 1.7 percent
For a site in a Coastal County w/ Vegetative Filter 3.1 percent
For a site in a Coastal County w/out Vegetative Filter 4.1 percent
Required surface area of pond:
For a site in the Piedmont 12,410.0 square feet
For a site in a Coastal County w/ Vegetative Filter 22,990.0 square feet
For a site in a Coastal County w/out Vegetative Filter 30,620.0 square feet
Notes:
102505.Water Quality Pond Calcs.xls
Pond Surface Area Calcs
Page 1 of 1
Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
Water Quality Pond Stormwater Runoff Volume Calculations
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05
Drainage area
Impervious area
Rainfall depth
Percent Impervious
751,650 square feet
429,709 square feet
1.00 inches

57.2
percent
R(v)=0.05+0.009*(Percent impervious)
Runoff coefficient - R(v) 0.56 in/in
Runoff volume=(Design rainfall)*(R(v))*(Drainage area)
Runoff volume 35,360.1 cubic feet
Notes:
102505.Water Quality Pond Calcs.xls
Runoff Volume Calcs Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
Water Quality Pond Volume Calculations
Stage-Storage Data for Pond
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05

Contour ID
Stage
Area
[s q. ft.
Area
acres Incremental
Area
[s q. ft. Incremental
Area
acres Incremental
volume
cu. ft Incremental
volume
acre-ft Cumulative
volume
cu. ft Cumulative
volume
acre-ft
375 0 3,116.0 0.072 3,116.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
376 1 4,391.0 0.101 1,275.0 0.0 3,753.5 0.1 3,753.5 0.1
377 2 5,702.0 0.131 1,311.0 0.0 5,046.5 0.1 8,800.0 0.2
378 3 7,288.0 0.167 11-58-6.0- 0.0 6,495.0 0.1 15 295.0 0.3
379 4 9,265.0 0.213 1,977.0 0.0 8,276.5 0.2 23 571.5 0.3
380 5 17 787.0 0.408 8,522.0 0.2 13 526.0 0.3 37 097.5 0.5

102505.Water Quality Pond Calcs.xls
Pond Storage Data-Perm Pool Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
Water Quality Pond Volume Calculations
Stage-Storage Data for Pond
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05

Contour ID
Stage
Area
[s q. ft.
Area
acres Incremental
Area
[s q. ft. Incremental
Area
acres Incremental
volume
cu. ft Incremental
volume
acre-ft Cumulative
volume
cu. ft Cumulative
volume
acre-ft
380 0 17 787.0 0.408 17 787.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
381 1 22 245.0 0.511 4,458.0 0.1 20 016.0 0.5 20 016.0 0.5
381.67 1.67 25 248.0 0.580 7,461.0 0.2 35 934.2 0.8 35 934.2 0.8
382 2 26 760.0 0.614 41-51-510- 0.1 24 502.5 0.6 44 518.5 1.0
383 3 31 331.0 0.719 4,571.0 0.1 29 045.5 0.7 73 564.0 1.2

102505.Water Quality Pond Caics.xis
Pond Storage Data - Temp Pool Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
Water Quality Pond Volume Calculations
Stage-Storage Data for Pond
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05

Contour ID
Stage
Area
[s q. ft.
Area
acres ental
ea
ft.
; Incremental
Area
acres Incremental
volume
cu. ft Incremental
volume
acre-ft Cumulative
volume
cu. ft Cumulative
volume
acre-ft
376 0 365.0 0.008 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
377 1 696.0 0.016 .0
331 0.0 530.5 0.0 530.5 0.0
378 2 1234.0 0.028 8.0 0.0 965.0 0.0 1495.5 0.0
379 3 1,857.0 0.043 623.0 0.0 1,545.5 0.0 3 041.0 0.1
380 4 8,534.0 0.196 6,677.0 0.2 5,195.5 0.1 8.236:5 0.2

102505.Water Quality Pond Calcs.xls
Forebay Storage Data Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
Water Quality Basin Dewatering Time Calculations
Project
Project No.
Date
Southview Pointe Subdivision
4068-0001
25-Oct-05
Maximum surface area of basin 25,248 square feet
Maximum head of water above dewatering hole 1.67 feet
Orifice coefficient
Diameter of each hole
Number of holes
Cross sectional area of each hole =
Cross sectional area of each hole =
Cross sectional area of dewatering hole(s) _
Cross sectional area of dewatering hole(s) _
Dewatering time for basin =
Dewatering time for basin =
0.90
2.0 inches
0.022 square feet
3.1 square inches
0.022 square feet
3.1 square inches
115.0 hours
4.8 days
Calculations based on NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual
Page 8.07.8
Notes:
Water Quality Pond Summary Information
Project Southview Pointe Subdivision
Project No. 4068-0001
Date 25-Oct-05
Drainage area to pond 751,650 square feet = 17.26 acres
Impervious area in drainage area 429,709 square feet = 9.86 acres
Bottom of pond elevation. 375.00 feet
Normal pool elevation 380.00 feet
Pond volume at normal pool 37,097 cubic feet
Required volume for design rainfall 35,360 cubic feet
Required surface area for pond 12,410 square feet
Volume provided for storage of design rainfall = 35,934 cubic feet at elevation 381.67
Surface area provided at normal pool 17,787 square feet
102505.Water Quality Pond Calcs.xls
Summary Data Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2006 11:18 AM
•
1 a DATE
710812005 DESIGN PHASE
PRELIM / X 1 DATE
7!08/2005 DESIGN
PRELIM
4,ri:,•nwr,•u
¦aQJI NFiftllY 14:0 qiN JVpv.
.? +?'»? w PROJECT NAME

Southviaw Pointe Subdivision PROJECT NO

4068-0001 CONSTR /

REVISION / PROJECT NAME Sadhview Pointe

Southview Parris Subdiv Subdivision PROJECT NO

4068-0001 CONSTR

REVISION
LOCATON
Fu ua Varina North Carolina BY
GCA RECORD /
OTHER / /
/ LOCATION
F ua Varina Location:
North Ca Fu ua -Varina NC BY
GCA RECORD
OTHER
CHECKED BY (SPECIFY) CHECKED BY
GML (SPECIFY)
rF am
9= 195
fF 22 ONSITE TO OFFSITE THRU SWOU STORM DRAINAGE SCHEDULE CONTINUED --? STORM DRAINAGE SCHEDULE - CO NTINUED
INLET Tc I Cc a a

FROM
TO
AREAS
INLETS INLET
AREA
AC Cc
RUNOFF
COEFF. INLET
DISCHARGE
CFS TOTAL
AREAS
AC INLET
TIME
MI PIPE
TIME
MIN TIME
OFCONC.
MIN
INTENSITY
(IN/HR) RUNOFF
COEFF.
DISCHARGE
fCFS) SIDE-
STREAM
CFS
SLOPE
DIA
IN CAPACITY
..;. (F,[IIL);
VFULL
FPS
LENGTH SEGMENT
TIME
MIN UPPER
INV. LOWER
INV.

CI-16 CIAO CB16 021 0.75 1.14 ! 0.21 5.00 000 5.00 722 0.75 1.14 0.00 i 0.0100 15 ' 6.5 5.3 70 012 389.05 388.35

CI-15 CI-9 CI-15 0.60 0.70 1 3.05 0.60 5.00 ODO _ 5.00 7.22 010 3.05 0.00 0.0109 15 6.7. 5.5 18 0.06 385.35 385.15
i
CI-14 -- CIA CI-14 0.07 0.90 0.43 0.07 500 1 0.00 T 5.00 7.22 090 0.43 0.00 i 00109 15 6.7 5.5 _ 8 0.06 383.95 383.75
_ _,^
f i
1
10 5
00 ~
0
00

5
00
722
0
36
288

0
00

0
0099

15

4
T 6

52 127 0.40 ? 385.00 383.75
CI-43 CIA CI-43 . . . . . . . . . .
-
CI-13 CI-3 CI-13 079 0.60 3.40 0.79 5.00 1 0.00 5.00 722 0.60 340 0.00 0.0096 15 6.3 5.1 21 0.07 380.70 380.50
_ _ _ }
CI-22 CI-17 CI-22 0.67 0.60 2.89 0.67 5.00 0.00 5.00 712 0,60 289 0.00 0.0049 15 4.5 37 20 0.09 385.50 385.40
T
CI-21 CI-20 CI-21 0.84 0.66 4.00 0.84 5.00 0.00 5.00
l 7.22 066 4.00 r 0.00 0.0098 15 6.4
- 5.2 _ 20 0.07 386.70 386.50
CI-20 CI-19 CI-20 0.15 0.85 0.94 0.99 5.00 0.07 5.07 ' 7.20 0.69 4.93 0.00 0.0096 15 ' 6.3
T 5.1 _ 31 010 386.40 386.10
G-19 CI-18 _
CI-19 _
0.05 0.85 0.28 ~1.04 5.00 0.17 523 7.16
- 030 5.17 000 0.0098 15 ' 6.4 5.2 1 20 0.07 386.00 385.80
G•18 CI-17 CI-18 0.16 0.80 , 0.90 1,19 5.00 023 _ 5.46 7.10 071 6.01 0.00 0.0101 15 6.5 5.3 I 194 0.61 385.70 383.75
CI-17 CIA CI-17 0.14 0.80 0.83 134 5.00 0.85 6.31 6.89 0.72 9.52 2.89 0.0100 18 105 5.9 245 0.69 383.65 38120

CI-12 CIAI CI-12 0.60 -- 0.70 3.05 0.60 500 0.00 5.00 7.22 0.70 3.05 0.00 0.0155 15 8.0 6.5 1 58 0.15 389.80 388.90
CI-11 CI-10 CI.11 ---- T005 0.90 0.33 066 5.00 0.15 5.15 7.18 0.72 _ 3.37 0.00 0.0145 15 7.8 6.3 31 0.08 388.80 388.35
CI-10 CI-9 CI-10 0.16 _
0.66 0.77 082 5.00 0.23 5.23 7.16 0.70 527 1.14 j 0.0150 15 7.9 6.4 207 0.54 38825 385.15
CI-9
CIA CIA
CI.7 CI-9
CIA 0,61
0.09 _ 0.60
0.75 2.63
0.51 1.43
1.52 ?S.OD
5.00 0.77
0.96 5.77
5.96 7.02
6.97 0.66
0.67 10.80
14.54 3.05
329 0.0153
0.0100 18
24 13.0
_ 22.6 73
T2 85
130 0.19
0.30 385.05
383.65 383.75
382.35
CI-7
CIA CIA
CIS CI-7
CIA _ 0.90
0.D9 0.60
0.90 3.91
0.57 2.42
2.51 NO
5.00 ' 1.26
1.30 6.26
6.30 6.90
6.89 0.64
0.65 18.20
18.73 0.00
0.00 0.0109
0.0104 30
30 429
418 8.7
8.5 18
34 0.03
0.07 38225
381.95 382.06
381.60
CI-5 G3 CI-5 0.03 0.90 11.16 2.54 5.00
T 1.36 636
Y 6.88 0.65 28.38 9.52 0.0097 30 40.4 82 31 0.06 381.50 381.20
G

?
G3
IA

C
FES-2

I?
C
CIA

0.16

0.06

0 90

0.90 1.04

i
0.36 2.70

.75 5.00

,

! 5.00 1.42

I
1.58 6.42 6.86 0.67

6.58 -6.82 067 29.30

3.01 0.00

.40 O.ODB6

.0054 30

0 38.0

02 7.7

.2 70

2 0.15

.25 381.10

80.50 380.50

80.00

s11351WW1wkA10252005.SWm HGL,ft 10-YEAR Dab. 1112f2000 T-.. 1121 AM Pap 1 0(4
;E
/ x! • ' -: - • DATE
7(0812005 DESIGN PHASE
PRELIM I X I ... . ,
f . , - ,
?w?P•Nw«:.raau:
4rlX MAH CMQ?r iM:?. pih :w?14
,. W ! /

0 PROJECT NAME

SOUN1VIeW Pointe Subdivision PROJECT NO

4068-0001 CONSTR r

REVISION r

0 PROJECT NAME

SOUthV18W Pointe Subdivision
! I
! I LOCATION
Fu ua -Varina North Carolina BY
GCA RECORD I
OTHER I !
! LOCATION
F ua Varina North Carolina
CHECKED BY
0 (SPECIFY)
n=
¢
h= 0.013
195
22 HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

90 DEG=0.7
BEND LOSS
KS
30 DEG=0.28 CONTINUED HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE - CONTINUED
UPSTREAM 60 DEG=0.55 15 DEG-O.10 INLET W.S. ELEV .
TOP PIPE HYDRAULIC SIDESTR HEAD LOSS BEND FRICTION FRICTION OUTLET OUTLET INLET USE FLOW FRS
FROM TO ELEV. AREA RADIUS SUMMATIO
CFS W Ht He Hb Ht LOSS
K SLOPE
(FTIFT) VELOCITY
FPS W.S. ELEV CONTROL CONTROL CONDITION
CONTROL BOARD` COMMENTS

CI-16 CIAO 396.00 12272 0.3125 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.0003 0.93 389.35 389.38 389.71 389.71 INLET 6.29 1 OK
_
G•15 CI-9 392
00
- 1
2272 3125 ?
0 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.0022 2.48 386.15 386.21_ 386,24 386.24 INLET 5.76 OK
T _ .
. .
_
_ .
i _ 1
0 I . OK
I 7 N
CI-43 CIA 7
392.9 12272 0.3125 0.00 I 0.25 0 0.00 ODO 0
2 0.00 0.0020 2.32 38475 385.02 38586 385.86 LET
I
? 7.11
OK
I I
CI-13 CI-3 38440 1.2272 0.3125 '. 0.00 0.06 003 0.00 0.00
_ 009-- 00 0.00028 276 -
38t50 38t59 'T 381.66 381.66 INLET 2.74 OK
_ 0 -
CI-22 I CI-17 390
47 '-
1.2272 03125 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.00 -
0.00 0.06 0.00 0.0020 2.35 386.40 38646 38636 386,46 OUTLET _ 4.01 _ OK
,
. - - - -- , -.. - fi r

CI-21
CI-20
392.36
12272
02125
0.00
' 008
0.04
I 0.00
000
0.12
0.00
00038
125
388.52
388.64
387.78`
388.64
-'
OUTLET
-----
3.72
OK
CI-20 CI-19 _
392.00 1.2272 0.3125. 0.00 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.39 0.55 0.0058 4.00 38813 388.52 38772 388.52 OUTLET 3.48 OK
CI-19

C1-17 CI-18

CI.17
C14 392.00 _

392.00
390
30 12272

1,2272 ?
1.7671 0.3125

0.3125
0.3750 I 000

0.00
2.89 0.13

1.67
2.00 0.07
.07
0.09
i 0.11 0.09

,I 010
0.13 0.14

0.19
0.00 _0.42

205
224 0.55

0.70
ODO '. 0.0064

I 0.0086
0.0082 420

4.88
5.36 387.70

3&5.65
382.40 388.13

38770_
384.64 36.39

36.36
385.65 _
388.13
-.387-70--
38565 OUTLET

_ OUTLET
INLET 3.87! OK

4.301 OK
4.65; OK
_ .
_ __,
_
CI-12 CIA 1 394 07 1,2Z7
2 0.3125
_ 3 0.02
I 0.00 0.00 015 0.00 0.0022 2.48 389.90 390.05 390.69 390,69 INLET 138 OK
CIA1 CI-10 39500 12272 0,3125 0.00 0.08 0.03
I 003 003 _ 0.17 0.28 0.0027 1 2.73 389.67 38984 389.75 389.84 OUTLET 5.6 OK
CIAO CIA 39500 1.2272 0.3125 114 1.37 I
O.D7 0.04 001 _ 1.49 010 0.0066 427 36.68 389.17 389.67 389.67 INLET 5.33 OK
G-9 CIA 392.00 1.7671 03750 4.20 0.89 0.14 0.10 0.03 1.16 0.10 0.0105 6.09 386.51 38768 36.41 36_.68 _ OUTLET 4.32 ' OK
CIA _
CI-7 _
391.00 3.1416 0.5000 749 0.53 0.08 020 0.06 0.87 0.10 0.0041 4.60 385.64 386.51 38557 386.51 _ OUTLET 4.49 OK
G•7 CIA 389.05 4.9087 0.6250 7.49 0.04 0.05 0.12 0.23 0.43 0.70 0.0020 3.69 385.21 385.64 384.09 385.64 OUTLET
l 3.41 OK
~
CIA CIS 389.05 4.9087 06250 7.49 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.12 0.32 0.55 0.0021 '. 3.79 384.89 38521 383.83 38521
T _OUTLET 184 OK
CI-5
C14 CI-4
CIA 388.17
388.07 - 4.9087
---4.9087 _
0.6250
0.6250 17.00
17.00 015
0.35 0.13
0.14 008
0.18 0.02
0.14 _ 0.38
0.82 0.10
028 0.0047 .
0.0051 5.75
5.94 384.52
383.70 384.89
384.52 384.19
383.89 384.89_
384.52 OUTLET
OUTLET 328
3.55 OK
OK
CIJ FES-2 384.30 4.9087 0.6250 20.40 0.59 0.17 019 0.38 1.34 0.70 0.0064 689 382.00 383.34 383.70 383.70 INLET 0.60 OK

s?1351b0o1%nb%lG2520055tmm.-+hrw,L.m 10-YEM Da:. 1112R006 hro 1121AM Page 2 of4
i • • , s • • . 6 DATE DESIGN PHASE 0 • DATE DESIGN PHA!
NNONV iCRM) t 710812005 PRELIM / X 1 710812005 PRELIM
??"?? •""?r•'"?"?
. noa?C.. ?u:a-xau. PROJECT NAME

Southview Pdnte Subdivision PROJECT NO

4068-OWI CONSTR l

REVISION I PROJECT NAME Southview Pointe

vion
Southview Pointe Subdiv Subdiis PROJECT NO

4068-0001 CONSTR

REVISION
ION
-Varina North Carding
rLM BY
GCA RECORD !
OTHER I I
/ LOCATN Location:

Varina NC
F ua Varina North Ca F
uguay BY

GCA RECORD

OTHER
g CHECKED BY (SPECIFY) CHECKED BY
GML (SPECIFY)
rF
9-
h= 0.013
195
22 ONSITE TO OFFSITE THRU SWQU STORM DRAINAGE SCHEDULE CONTINUED ----* STORM DRAINAGE SCHEDULE • CONTINUED
INLET Tc I Cc -: Q D

FROM
TO
AREAS
INLETS INLET
AREA
AC Cc
RUNOFF
COEFF. INLET
DISCHARGE
CFS TOTAL
AREAS
AC INLET
TIME
MIN PIPE
TIME
MIN TIME
OF CONC.
(MIN) i
INTENSITY
IN1HR RUNOFF
COEFF. SIDE-
DBCHARC;E STREAM
CFS
SLOPE
DA-
IN CAPACITY
Oull
VFULL
FPS
LENGTH SEGMENT
TIME
MIN UPPER
INV.
F LOWER
INV.

i
CI-38 CI-36 CI-38 0.14 0.90 090 0.14 5.00 000 5.00
-- 7.22 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.0049 15 4.5 3.7 18 0.08 386.00 385.91
_
GI-00 CI32 GI-00 0
87 056 3.28 0.81 5.00 0.00 5,00 7.22 0.56 3.28 0.00 1 0.0915 15 19.5 _ 15.9 20 0.02 385.95 ''. 384.12
CI
32 CI-31 CI-32
.

0
15

90

1
00

-
.97
_
-
7

4.28
0.00
0.0050
15
.8
3.7
20

.09

83.92

83.62
-
CI CI30
-
CI-31 .
0.09 0 90 .
0.5 1.05 _
5.00 0.11 503 _ -
_
7.19 0.64 4.84 0.00 00043 16 -
s6.9 3.9 137 0.59 383.62 383.03
_
GI-02 CI-41 -
_--GL12 062 r
0.36 1.61 O62 5.00 500
_ 7.22 0.36 1.61 0.00 0.0050 15 4.6 9.7 129 0.58 383.45 382.81
CI-41 CI-29 _
CI-41 037 - 0.60 1.61 0.99 5.00 058 5.58___
-- _7.07
- 0.45 3.16 0.00 0.0032
i
15 3.7 1 ao ! 28 0.16 382.61 ! 382.52
.. - - - i t 1
CI-u CI-33 CB34 007 ! 0.90 0.46 0.07 5.00 -
0.00 - -5.00
- 722
- 0.90 0.46 0.00 0.0251 15 10.2 81 18 0.04 383.50 383.04
CI-33 CI-27 -
CI-33 0
24 90
0 1.53 0.31 5.00 0.08 508 720 0.90 1.98 0.00 0.0175 15 8.5 _ 69 79 1 0.19 382.84 381.47
_ . . __ `
___ _ -
CI-39 CI-37 CB32 026 0.90
.90 168 0.25 5.00 0.02 5.00_ r ._7.22 0.90 1.68 0.00 0.0049 15 4.5 3 20 0.09 381.14 381.04
- ` 1
CI-38 CI-40 0.32 0.60 1.71 022 5
.00 0.00 5D0 7,22 060 1.37 000 0.0109 15 6.7 5,5 18 0.06 1 388.00 38780
C138 C137 CI-38 0-17 0.75 0.74 D.49 5.00
T 0.06 5.06 721 0.65 2.29 0.00 0.0099 15 6.4 52 161 0.51 i 387.70 386.10
CI37
CI36 _
C1-36
CI-30 CI-37
CI-36 0.66
0.41 0.60
0.60 ' 2.84
2.69 7.14
1.56 5.00 1
5.00 0.57
0.66 _
5.57
566 707
_ 705 0.62
0.62 5.92
7.66 0.90
0.00 0.0095
0.0093 18
18 10.2
10.1 5.8
57 32
27 0.09
0.Is 386.00
! 385.60 385.70
! 385.35
CI-30 CI-29 CI-30 006 0.90 0.37 ! 1.61 5.00 0.74 5.74 7.03 0.63 12.84 4.84 0.0098 24 22.4 7.1 77 0.18 38515 384.50
CI.29 0-28 _
CI-29 0.05 0.90 0.34 1.67 5.00 ?i 0.92 592-- _--6.99
- 0.64 16.28 3.16 0.0102 24 22.8 7.3 59 0.14 1 384.40 383.80
CI-28
CI-27 CI-27
CI-26 _
CI-28
G•27 0.01
0.03 1.90
0.9 0.09
0.20 168
1.71 5.00
5.00 1.05 605_
1.17 6.17 895
_ _6.92 0.65
0.65 16.43
18.56 0.00
1.98 0.0099
0.0092 24

24 22.6

21.7 Zi

6.9 51

1 33 0.12

0.08 383.70

383.10 i 383.20

1 382.80
CI-26 CI-25 G-26 0
06 90
0 0.40 1.77 5.00 1.25 6.25 6.90 0.66 20.60 1.68 0.0101 24 22.9 7.3 49 0.17 382.70 38210
CI-25 GI-24 _
CI-25 .
0.05 .
0.90 0.00 1.82 5.00 1.36 _
_ 6.36 6.88
- 0.67 20.88 0.00 0.0103
? 24 22.9 7.3 122 0
28 382.10
I 380.85

GI
24

SDMH?dd _

GI-2d

000

0
00

0
00

1.82

5.00
'
1.64
664
681
0.67
20.79 '
0.00
0.0097
' 24
22.3
' 7.1
1 67 0.16

380.75

380.10

-
SOMH-44
FES-05
CB44
.
0.00
.
0.00
.
0.00
1.82
5.00 !
1.80 -
. _
6.80
6.17
0.67
20.75
0.00
0.0101
24
22.7
7.2
199
0.46
380.00
378.00
s.%135n000Pnb110252005SbWn HGLxh 10-YEAR Dm 111X1006 Tm: 11'21111 Pp"3d4

(A

S N

n n
N ?
N

n n
V OND

CNN)
t0

JCJ)??
b

CJ/)??
8i

C) n_/?
JI
3

C]
? I

/C_/I?
TG

(/_/???
?1

/Q
S

Q
?

0 10
N r+ ? I
I
0 _f??
ii
rJ ?

T
;

}

y '
A I I

TW
m
0
A N
NAN 0
V
cN?
IcN??
V
?
V
0
/n '
0N
0 0
I l
0
r+ N
O _.T
'
OI OD 10 s bl m Til f0 F]
I bi
N N W

W

y,++ W

w

W

W

W

W I?

W

W

W

W

W

W I

W

W

m
-? ?
c

X m
? ? ? ?
II II
WW
0 IJ1 Q?pp
0i 8
88
ON
O
H+
B
I
8 g}
O g
H a
N
H I ?p
N U
I p
8 (m'0
IO
1
Q
m m m +al m+m a,+m ? :4
J?
?

N

N
?

N
?

+
?

? fJ
??

N

m

C

Z
2
-
P -
P

f?
O --L

f?
O I _
P P _ _
P P
P
P P -
P
O I
?
I
o
O ?
O -
o
!d -
O
W-4
P P
si -
O =

4 O

fl1 y 2.m
0 0 0 ON N N N N N N fS NU N
C g

- - - - - - - - - - - - mu_, m
•
N N N
f? N
? O Oo
m8 0D N
8? 0
8 0 0
88 0
8 O
8 O
8 O
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0 0
88 O
8 (?
M ?
'
0
-
W UOU
OI -p+
W OOp
O O 0
V W 0W 0
O A 0
A 0 1. 0
O 8 O
s O P
V IP
H Pi
V p o
m O p O
8 O
8 O
8
'

•
0
V 0
V 0
V 0
V 0
W 0
+ 00
p
O 8 0
O 00
R O 0
8 O
O
+ O
O
+ O
8 O
8 P
O 0
$ 0
R 0
8 O
8
0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,00 0 00 0 O P O O O 0 9 0 O O
A A W 10 N A 100 0? p
N° 8 8 $ 8 ° 8 ° Q 8 8 m
m

0 C) o D
O IS
4 O
9I O
s O
8 o t
R o
tR O O
8 o
8 0 0
29 o
8 O
8 10
18 0
8 , 0,
8 0'
8, ! O
8 0,
81 0
8I ' O
8 z n
fi D Qo 2 m
o?$
1 fI CA ° M

,
f -
? + O O OO O O
O O O O p O O O O O p
p
W pp
A Q
?pp
fD W N
(?
A p
ppp
O p
A fA 0 OND (
V f ?
f ? p
N o
p
m H O p
p
fO W?1
OD V p
p
m ? '? 7, 7(
??0SS N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O p p p p P O O o ai
&" o o o +C Lg'a' d8 88 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o

A m m
0 0
gg 0
gg 0
gg 0
St 0 0 0 0 0 0
g 0
gg 0 0
gg 0
gg 0
St
a 0
g 0
52 0
gg 0
gg
o
gg 22
3 to '
5
& & R4 R S 8 9 $ 93 Z z

O m
a I
I Ix
I
O
V (O(J!?
m 01
+? (ONBI
N N
? fl1
? N
O App (A("?
N N (W(?? ?m
A Q p
1 + H pp??
O O
V ?N?}}
W +
-W+ N
? W
V N
? O
LVI '
-
? \
1 \
2 10

O -n r
e KS it 8v 25 U S 23 8 8 8 i i GS S (A
m N m •
p?
O Q?pp
GD WW
N
+ yy
A
8 pp??
fp y Qp
W N pp
ID
? 1A0 p
R
J
S
N
m
W pp
P°i
+
10

-I
-)
ZZ
? j' ?
9 ? 9
w
?p
O
w
??pp
O tp
9 w
O (p??
N ?Wp
iN (??p
A pWp
U
0 0
,n
m
Z
m
_
O

+
9
I
.
1
I - ? r
? I r
m N.
g g g 7
4
I
z
r
Oo A'8 (n +? Oo
GD cn
M V +m 0 9 jP,
`
`

N
O

z

? -
? i- I i
!
? z
1 3 8
3 I N m
C
I S ° ng m
S ?? 9 , A te ? ? ??? •

-

NNO
Wo
p
pN?
Ol
A
W
?
N ?
?
O
pp p
O
pAp?? A
A
tOp
O?ppl
Ol
(w
O
Ol
pAp
A
V
App m
c
! III111111
d
N W V + V W+ A N f
0 A N N OD V j N OD s
G

?c ?c ?t ?c ?c ?c ?c ?c x x x x A R A A R
m

to
TOWN OF FUQUAY-VARINA'S
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
s 2 2-,5-
0XW January 13, 2006
R[N@[RRW9!0
Rummel, North Carolina Division of Water Quality Klepper 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit JAN 1 3 2006
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Kahl, LLP Raleigh, NC 27604 WEruuv SAwD TORMwq, BTRANCH
William K. Hellmann Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Emeritus
David W. Wallace Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly,
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz In response to your letter dated January 3, 2006 (letter attached) and per the
1. Michael Potter phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on January 5, 2006 (memo
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
attached), we are submitting additional information per DWQ's request to
expedite the 401 permitting process. We have included five copies of the
Charles M. Easter, Jr. following:
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill • NCEEP letter accepting mitigation payment
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Michael W. Myers . Site plan and spreadsheet showing the riprap area as permanent impact
Martin C. Rodgers rather than temporary impact
Kenneth A. Goon . Site plan showing contour lines
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier • Site plan showing the stream feature identified in blue color
Barbara J. Hoage • Zoning Map for Town of Fuquay-Varina
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery • USGS topographic map with project footprint
Nancy R. Bergeron • Soil survey map with project footprint
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr
' Also included is a full size copy of the construction plans for the Southview
Peter C. D
Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Pointe Subdivision (including the Stormwater Management Plan and Sediment
Robert J. Andryszak and Erosion Control Plan) with drainage computations, a full size copy of the
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr
ith Ski
B
K Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for Judd Parkway Extension with drainage
.
e
nner
Karen B. Kahl
computations, and the Town's draft Stormwater Management Plan.
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Comment #3 on DWQ's January 3, 2006 letter addressed concerns for the
Eric M. Klein downstream water quality impacts resulting from potential development
adjacent to the Judd Parkway Extens
adjacent to the Judd Parkway Extension.
900 Ridgefield
Ridgefield Orive
Suite 350
Raleigh, North Carom,
Per conversation with Mr. Mike Soronsen, Town of Fuquay-Varina planner, on
27609-3960 January 11, 2006, there are no impervious surface restrictions for development
Ph: 919-878-9500 in the Cape Fear River basin for the Town at this time

Eia: 919-790-8382 .
www.rkkerrgineC11`our Zoning adjacent to the extension is identified as R8 (Conditional) (Multi-family
district), R15 (Single family homes) and R20 (Single family homes). See the
attached zoning map for more details. Additional information is available at
littp://www.fuquay-varina.or www/departure-4 asp` (1=10&s=detail.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
J,
The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local Cape Fear River buffer ordinances protecting the 50-foot
buffer of the pond and tributary. Buffer impacts are being coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-
Varina (Jay Meyers- Town Engineer).
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods, the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative downstream impacts. The
residential community will be relatively small, will not involve commercial development, and is
located in a relatively developed landscape (see construction plans attached). The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. Southview Pointe's stormwater will
be collected in catch basins and curb inlets and will gravity flow into two retention ponds. These
ponds have been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will
provide control from the 10-year return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions
per the Town of Fuquay-Varina's stormwater requirements (draft policy is attached).
The Judd Parkway Extension will alleviate construction truck traffic on Sunset Drive, which is
currently being used to access the proposed Southview Pointe Subdivision. The developer has
offered to build this section of the road (and be reimbursed by the town) which provides better
access to the property and avoids neighborhood roads. The majority of the area southward and
eastward is essentially built-out with limited opportunities for infill development. A parcel
located directly west of the extension may provide development opportunities however are
limited by jurisdictional features and buffer restrictions. The Judd Parkway Extension is not
likely to stimulate future development or influence intraregional land development location
decisions. It is not in conflict with local plans, does not have an explicit economic purpose, and
does not contain notable features within the impact area (other than the tributary and wetlands
discussed in the PCN). Adherence to federal, state and local regulations directly protecting
features such as "Waters of the US", floodplains, and riparian buffers ensure that long-term
indirect and cumulative impacts do not occur on a regional basis due to the proposed project.
Within the next twelve months, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is implementing a Stormwater
Management Policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased runoff due to the
development of land. This draft is attached and is available on-line at htip://www.fuguay_
varina.org/www/departme-4.asp?d=17&s=detail. The proper management of stormwater runoff
will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a functional drainage system, reduce
the effects of development on land and stream channel erosion, assist in the attainment and
maintenance of water quality standards, enhance the local environment associated with the
drainage system, reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic development by
mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts. The town engineer, Mr. Jay Meyers, stated
that any new development as a result of the Judd Parkway Extension of 675 feet, will likely
occur after the policy's approval and will be required to follow this stormwater management
policy. Besides the Southview Pointe Subdivision, which currently follows the Town's
stormwater management policy, there are no other proposed developments adjacent to the
extension at this time. All parcels south of Judd Parkway (i.e. Southern Oaks and Carriage
Heights Subdivision) are approved and under development. Although the Town of Fuquay-
Varina implemented buffer rule protection for Cape Fear River Basin in November 2005, both
Ab,
the Southern Oaks and Carriage Heights Subdivision have proactively followed these buffer
rules. The Southview Pointe Subdivision is required to follow these buffer rules as well.
We hope that the above and attached information will suffice in answering Comment #3. Please
let me know if you need more information.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc: Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO
Mr. Monte Matthews, USAGE
Mr. Jay Meyers, Town of Fuquay-Varina
ESW
JTP
JMH
MTM
THS
JWM
305-078-A01
F.- I WORDIDOCUMEN71305-0781 CorrIDWQ-00 /. doc
-OC .. - '' cqp Michael F. Easley, Governor
,??
?O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O `C Alan W, Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3,2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review
your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide a copy of the approval letter from NCEEP indicating their willingness to
accept payment for the 0.114 acres of wetland mitigation.
2. Please be advised that riprap is considered a permanent impact by the DWQ. Therefore,
the stream impact at Site 1, currently labeled as "Temporary", should be labeled as
permanent. Please make this correction in your tables and on your map, and re-submit
five copies of this page of the PCN and the map of Site 1.
3. With respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in
additional parcels which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the
case, then please address how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for
these parcels.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hLtR://h2o,enrstatc.nc.us/ncwctlands
Non` Caro na
turaA
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
1?
INTER
OFFICE MEMO
To: file
From: Liz Workman
Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision in Fuquay-Varina
Date: January 5, 2006
In response to DWQ's response letter, dated January 3, 2005, 1 sent an email to Ian McMillan, DWQ,
providing additional information on the Cumulative Impacts portion of the PCN dated December 22,
2005. This email was to ensure that our response sufficiently answered DWQ's "Comment 3".
Ian called with his comments and will be sending a letter as well. He stated that any new development,
not only Southview Pointe, around the extension must have stormwater controls in place to protect
cumulative impacts to water quality. The Town of Fuquay-Varina should have zoning ordinances that
limit impervious surfaces in this area. Ian would like to know what the land use is zoned as and who is
responsible for stormwater controls on new development in the area of the extension.
Ian would like to see the Stormwater Management Plan for the Southview Pointe Subdivision,
including calculations for drainages and sedimentlerosion control methods and locations (silt fencing,
etc.).
The site map should be resubmitted with topographic lines.
The steam should be clearly defined on the site map.
The soil survey and USGS maps should show the subdivision and roadway footprint, not the project
study area. We can zoom in on the area.
305-078
F:\W ord\Docu ment\305-078\Memo\Memo-004.doc
.
r '11w-
41; Jj
F o stem
,k
?y
a±y.,
PROGRAM
January 3, 2006
Elizabeth Workman
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
Project: Judd Parkway Ext. and Southview Pointe County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging Unit (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0.114 0 0 0 0 115 0 0
03030004
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
incerely,
lliam D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
kutorigg... F ... Prot", oar Sta t&
ej,A
CCDEEIR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE 1;'RB-lu-1001; THU 08:30
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL 917;336893
PHONE [phone]
PAGES ?/2
START TIME FEB-I b OS: 29
ELAPSED TIME OOt 30tr
MODE ECM
RESULTS OK
F IRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
r,Q VV R.rF Mrludr .t.kp - ,o,.a
?tt•• fj /J ',ty0im, tl. P.nva h.. f?. ?.?nnr.?
y' `F .V?n?C..n,l_'ra nrya?'.atv?(FCWnnmertvk l?anuvl l:+.??,:e•
C I)i•.iv,.x of xat
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
4111 OversigbUExpress Review, Program Development anti
Transportation Permitting Units
Sttvct AddrW: 2321 Crabtmc 13-1evard. Suae 2501
Raleiyta NC 27604-2260
}lolling Addrm,; 1630 Mail Service Center
R.alei&. NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone r!: 919-733-1796
Faa if: 910-733-689: -
t• r? _.I1 ? _ ll?U l
4) Fax
Cotvpnny till -" u\' Ltp? ?, dI0\ Date: _ 1l fi C:1 G
Front; --
Number of pages lucludine cover sheet: ._i
Notcs or special instructions: i
. J 1_ ?' %1 I? ' }
r,? . ??•??+J' ? ?, ? v U ?4 `=r?-?.. 1 ? 1;?; it ?j Gr161. 1??
I
U,-,.?n M We?a :4101'. Wcaaid. anl>larmrv.kr Rraw4 , t'n/N!R //J
I Em MnP ^.;-., a, NN3¢h Vwlb 0.ndcr Y.".W-0hAl
nMT nRtl?nMt Sm.G:Y/. PDIriCX, Nrnk 4ml.na l r61M
c i? O.rJJ-I-Jt'F'.V(/1•)-?Jtwtal,I.Mne: ll?UvirC ?._?i^_+??I°?
,.nVT+nl pp.•mn?.v.,\rmmti.e ?,tla+l?'Ivrvo Wn Rw..:h
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review, Program Development and
Transportation Permitting Units
Street Address:
To: .4:s
Mailing Address:
Contact Information:
MCompany:
f?
-
From:C K,
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax #:
Date: 2?l ?l
Number of pages including cover sheet
Notes or special instructions:

S ul?
wo
?na
C Caro
at!lCUllj?
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone] /Internet: htto://h2o.mr.state.nc.us/ncwedands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
r TowN
NUyor Nancy Kelly
Commissioner Ronnie CurriE
Commissioner Frank Eagles.
Corttm,issioner Frank Hodge
Commissioner Betty Whitake
Commissioner Jacky Wilson
September 30, 2005
OF ROLESVIL,LE First Incorporated 1837
200 Bast Young Street
1 Post Office Box 25.0.,
M1layor Pro-TemPore Rolesville, North Cacolitta 275'71
Phone: [phone]
r. Facsimile: 919.S56.6852
www ci.rolesville.nc.us
Mr. John Dorney
NC DENR - DWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Reference: DWQ # 05-1429
Dear Mr. Dorney;
The Town of Rolesville received your letter regarding the review of DWQ # 05-1429 involving the Granite Falls
Boulevard Thoroughfare. In response, the Town of Rolesville commits to requiring on-site stormwater
management measures (such as level spreaders, bioretention, or constructed wetlands) for any addition
development on parcels adjacent to this thoroughfare.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 556-3506.
With respect,
Van ' cks
ning Director
Q12 @? [1oere,
OCT 4 _ 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLAMS AND STORMOTER BRANCH
A74LA.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
January 20, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Dear Mr. Meyers;
RE: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
UT to Kenneth Creek
DWQ # 2005-2254
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Thank you for your consultant's letter dated January 13, 2006 concerning permitting
issues for the above-mentioned project. This letter addresses cumulative impact issues that
must be managed before we can issue the 401 Certification for this project. I believe that a
meeting with your staff and consultants as well as DWQ staff is needed to clarify and address
this issue since it is clear from the maps provided that this road will result in additional
development in adjacent parcels. In short, DWQ will need to be able to state that any additional
development will not violate downstream water quality standards. The discussion that your
consultant had in her January 13 letter will need additional clarification and discussion before
we can be certain that downstream water quality will be protected. We will also need to discuss
the alignment of Judd Parkway - according to the map in your consultant's letter, it appears that
the road does not have logical termini since it starts and stops in open fields.
Please call me at 733-9646 to find a time when we can all meet to discuss this matter.
At that meeting, we can discuss any other issues in relation to this road that DWQ may have
once we review the other material that was submitted on January 13, 2006. Until this matter is
addressed, this project will remain on hold due to incomplete information.
Si

Cc: Ian McMillian, DWQ
Elizabeth Workman; Rummel, lepp r and Kahl; 900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350;
Raleigh, NC 27609-3960
File copy
Central files
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Mr. Monte Matthews, Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650 ?7One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 1? O hCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctiands Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
OCT F b5-22Z q
Permit Class Permit Number
NEW a' g I bs 30-06
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Coastal Resources Commission
r
ikrmtt ?006
for 57oRw??ury.
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
ArFRe?a??c?t
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Christopher D. Senior, 8232 Bald Eagle Lane, Wilmington, NC 28405
Authorizing development in New Hanover County at adj. to AIWW, 8232 Bald Eagle Lane,
Wilmington , as requested in the permittee's application dated 11/18/05 (MP-1), and
12/9/05 (MP-4), inc. attached workplan drawings (2), 1 of 1 dated 11/21/05, & 1 dated "received" 12/19/05.
This permit, issued on February 21, 2006 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Docking Facility
1) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes only the 6 ft. x 185 ft. pier terminating in a 10
ft. x 12 ft. covered platform, the 6 ft. x 12 ft, ramp leading to a 4 ft. x 38 ft. floating dock, and the two 4
ft. x 16 ft. floating docks with the 4 associated mooring pilings, all as expressly and specifically set forth
in the permit application and attached workplan drawings. No other structure, whether floating or
stationary, shall become a permanent part of this docking facility without permit modification. No non-
water dependent uses of structures may be conducted on, in or over public trust waters without permit
modification.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be.
This permit shall be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work shall cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2009
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Cfiarles S. Jones, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program. Signature of Permittee
Christopher D. Senior
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit # 30-06
Page 2 of 3
2) No sewage, whether treated or untreated, shall be discharged at any time from any boats using the
docking facility. Any sewage discharge at the docking facility shall be considered a violation of this
permit for which the permittee is responsible. This prohibition shall be applied and enforced throughout
the entire existence of the permitted structure.
3) The docking facility and associated structures shall have a minimum setback distance of 15 feet between
any parts of the structure and the adjacent property owner's riparian access corridor. This corridor is
determined by drawing a line parallel to the channel, then drawing a line perpendicular to the channel,
line that intersects with the shore at the point where the upland property line meets the water's edge.
4) No portion of the permitted structure shall be located within 80 feet of the near bottom edge of the
federally maintained AIWW channel.
5) In order to ensure compliance with Condition Nos. 3 and 4 of this permit, and to ensure that the
authorized docking facility does not extend past the established pier head line, an as-built survey shall be
performed on the docking facility, and copies of the survey shall be provided to the U.S. Army Corp. of
Engineers and the Division of Coastal Management, within 60 days of completion of construction.
NOTE: Failure to provide such documentation may result in a violation of this permit.
6) All portions of the fixed pier located over coastal wetlands shall not exceed a width of 6 feet and shall be
elevated a minimum of 3 feet over the marsh substrate as measured from the bottom of the decking.
7) The authorized covered platform shall not be enclosed. Any material used on the sides shall not obstruct
view and shall be permeable to air and water. Screen or wire on the sides along with benches and knee
walls are permitted. Lattice is specifically excluded from being used under this authorization.
8) The roof of the covered platform shall not be designed for second story use.
9) No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable
waters at or adjacent to the authorized work.
10) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
11) This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project, and the
permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage to the authorized structure or work, or injury
that may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public
interest.
12) The permittee shall install and maintain at his expense any signal lights or signals prescribed by the U.S.
Coast Guard, through regulation or otherwise, on the authorized facilities. At a minimum, permanent
reflectors shall be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during hours of darkness or
inclement weather.
Christopher D. Senior
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
13) This permit authorizes a maximum of 4 boat slips.
General
Permit # 30-06
Page 3 of 3
14) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the
removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the
opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause
unreasonable obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee shall be required,,,
upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter the structural work or`"
obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No
claim shall be made against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such
removal or alteration.
15) No wetlands or open water areas shall be excavated or filled, even temporarily, without permit
modification.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non-water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Quality has assigned the proposed project DWQ Project No.
052224.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorized the proposed project under General Permit No.
197800056 (COE Action Id. No. 200600357) which was issued on 1/25/06.
2 2s
D
1/4 .J S D N January 13, 2006
?. p
DSDSprlr? .;.Sl.(1
Rummel, North Carolina Divisionr Quality
10e er 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
pp 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Kahl, LLP Raleigh, NC 27604
William K Hellmann
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz
J. Michael Potter
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Michael W. Myers
Martin C. Rodgers
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier
Barbara J. Hoage
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron
StuartA. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
B. Keith Skinner
Karen B. Kahl
Seyed A. Saadat
John C Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein
900 Ridgefield Drive
Suite 350
Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly,
In response to your letter dated January 3, 2006 (letter attached) and per the
phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on January 5, 2006 (memo
attached), we are submitting additional information per DWQ's request to
expedite the 401 permitting process. We have included five copies of the
following:
• NCEEP letter accepting mitigation payment
• Site plan and spreadsheet showing the riprap area as permanent impact
rather than temporary impact
• Site plan showing contour lines
• Site plan showing the stream feature identified in blue color
• Zoning Map for Town of Fuquay-Varina
• USGS topographic map with project footprint
• Soil survey map with project footprint
Also included is a full size copy of the construction plans for the Southview
Pointe Subdivision (including the Stormwater Management Plan and Sediment
and Erosion Control Plan) with drainage computations, a full size copy of the
Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for Judd Parkway Extension with drainage
computations, and the Town's draft Stormwater Management Plan.
Comment #3 on DWQ's January 3, 2006 letter addressed concerns for the
downstream water quality impacts resulting from potential development
adjacent to the Judd Parkway Extension.
Raleigh, North Carolina Per conversation with Mr. Mike Soronsen, Town of Fuquay-Varina planner, on
27609-3960 January 11, 2006, there are no impervious surface restrictions for development
Ph: 969-878-9560 in the Cape Fear River basin for the Town at this time.
FaA 919-790-8382
ivivw. rkkengiim'erccom
Zoning adjacent to the extension is identified as R8 (Conditional) (Multi-family
district), R15 (Single family homes) and R20 (Single family homes). See the
attached zoning map for more details. Additional information is available at
littp://www.fuquay-varina.org/www/departure-4 asp?d=10&s=detail.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local Cape Fear River buffer ordinances protecting the 50-foot
buffer of the pond and tributary. Buffer impacts are being coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-
Varina (Jay Meyers- Town Engineer).
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods, the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative downstream impacts. The
residential community will be relatively small, will not involve commercial development, and is
located in a relatively developed landscape (see construction plans attached). The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. Southview Pointe's stormwater will
be collected in catch basins and curb inlets and will gravity flow into two retention ponds. These
ponds have been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will
provide control from the 10-year return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions
per the Town of Fuquay-Varina's stormwater requirements (draft policy is attached).
The Judd Parkway Extension will alleviate construction truck traffic on Sunset Drive, which is
currently being used to access the proposed Southview Pointe Subdivision. The developer has
offered to build this section of the road (and be reimbursed by the town) which provides better
access to the property and avoids neighborhood roads. The majority of the area southward and
eastward is essentially built-out with limited opportunities for infill development. A parcel
located directly west of the extension may provide development opportunities however are
limited by jurisdictional features and buffer restrictions. The Judd Parkway Extension is not
likely to stimulate future development or influence intraregional land development location
decisions. It is not in conflict with local plans, does not have an explicit economic purpose, and
does not contain notable features within the impact area (other than the tributary and wetlands
discussed in the PCN). Adherence to federal, state and local regulations directly protecting
features such as "Waters of the US", floodplains, and riparian buffers ensure that long-term
indirect and cumulative impacts do not occur on a regional basis due to the proposed project.
Within the next twelve months, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is implementing a Stormwater
Management Policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased runoff due to the
development of land. This draft is attached and is available on-line at htip://www.fuquay-
varina.org?www/dgpartnie-4.asp?d=17&s=detail. The proper management of stormwater runoff
will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a functional drainage system, reduce
the effects of development on land and stream channel erosion, assist in the attainment and
maintenance of water quality standards, enhance the local environment associated with the
drainage system, reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic development by
mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts. The town engineer, Mr. Jay Meyers, stated
that any new development as a result of the Judd Parkway Extension of 675 feet, will likely
occur after the policy's approval and will be required to follow this stormwater management
policy. Besides the Southview Pointe Subdivision, which currently follows the Town's
stormwater management policy, there are no other proposed developments adjacent to the
extension at this time. All parcels south of Judd Parkway (i.e. Southern Oaks and Carriage
Heights Subdivision) are approved and under development. Although the Town of Fuquay-
Varina implemented buffer rule protection for Cape Fear River Basin in November 2005, both
the Southern Oaks and Carriage Heights Subdivision have proactively followed these buffer
rules. The Southview Pointe Subdivision is required to follow these buffer rules as well.
We hope that the above and attached information will suffice in answering Comment #3. Please
let me know if you need more information.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc: Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Jay Meyers, Town of Fuquay-Varina
ESW
JTP
JMH
MTM
THS
JWM
305-078-AOI
F:1 WORDIDOCUMEN713 0 5-0 781CorrIDWQ-001. doc
?OC " '' c90 Michael F. Easley, Governor
?O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O 'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3,'2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review
your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide a copy of the approval letter from NCEEP indicating their willingness to
accept payment for the 0.114 acres of wetland mitigation.
2. Please be advised that riprap is considered a permanent impact by the DWQ. Therefore,
the stream impact at Site 1, currently labeled as "Temporary", should be labeled as
permanent. Please make this correction in your tables and on your map, and re-submit
five copies of this page of the PCN and the map of Site 1.
3. With respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in
additional parcels which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the
case, then please address how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for
these parcels.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
N Caro ina
?tarra1lg
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina,
Page 2 of 2
January 3, 2006
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSouthViewPointeSD(W ake)On_Hold
INTER
OFFICE MEMO
To: file
From: Liz Workman
Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision in Fuquay-Varina
Date: January 5, 2006
In response to DWQ's response letter, dated January 3, 2005,1 sent an email to Ian McMillan, DWQ,
providing additional information on the Cumulative Impacts portion of the PCN dated December 22,
2005. This email was to ensure that our response sufficiently answered DWQ's "Comment 3".
Ian called with his comments and will be sending a letter as well. He stated that any new development,
not only Southview Pointe, around the extension must have stormwater controls in place to protect
cumulative impacts to water quality. The Town of Fuquay-Varina should have zoning ordinances that
limit impervious surfaces in this area. Ian would like to know what the land use is zoned as and who is
responsible for stormwater controls on new development in the area of the extension.
Ian would like to see the Stormwater Management Plan for the Southview Pointe Subdivision,
including calculations for drainages and sediment/erosion control methods and locations (silt fencing,
etc.).
The site map should be resubmitted with topographic lines.
The steam should be clearly defined on the site map.
The soil survey and USGS maps should show the subdivision and roadway footprint, not the project
study area. We can zoom in on the area.
305-078
F:\W ord\Docu ment\305-078\Memo\Memo-004.doc
o stem
PROGRAM
January 3, 2006
Elizabeth Workman
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
Project: Judd Parkway Ext. and Southview Pointe County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging Unit (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0.114 0 0 0 0 115 0 0
03030004
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
incerely,fl, IfV
lliam D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
kmtoriptg... F ... Protects' ow state,
-?A
IW EE R
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 91 9-71 5-0476 / www.nceep.net
0
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)

1 16+65 TO 18+96 66" RCP

INTERMITTENT STREAM - - - - 0.0004 0.008 - 81

BEAVER POND - - - 0.017 0.007 - - -

PERENNIAL STREAM - - - - 0.021 0.001 134 5 -

WETLANDS 0.114 0.006 - 0.038 - - - -

TOTALS: 0.114 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.038 0.039 0.017 134 86 0
JA
DENT
WETLANDS
DETAIL
A
LATERAL N' DITCH
I Not to So
wIa p rte 40p° J J
ulll o = Ls Fr. l
Max. G = L5 Ft.
D=2A Ft. _
l3T
Type of LlDer= PSRM O
FROM S1A16+65 U.TO SA.17+58 RT.
C CAPIT L GROU
E 4 _- S W

E F

ti -- ----- --

EEC VA ION IN
/ WE LAN S

2 F
2 CB
I CB nAR
2AII F F
------ ---
C - ------ F - --- F ---
__ _-- - E E
''I E LATE D CH ? I
E SEE DETAI

L
T
?L

I

I<
N 1 3 2006 IF

- AT QUALITY
1N ST ATER BRANCH
L
I? kL

L
T
k-
y
25' 0' 25' 0' N a? REFERENCE No. sir No.
JUDD PARKWAY EXT.
CAGE: Y= 50' RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDAAUUCS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
P CE A TONS L I RIP
W 89 S FILTER FABRIC
N B NKS ONLY
DO
F o
-- a
IF ?
O
SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC -
EXISTING POND
I
INCOMPLE
W NOT I= PoR E PLANS
/W AMI ITION
PRELIMIN
NOT 0 RY PLANS
CONR19OCrWN
X
N
m
N
N
X
m
N
22
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
NC CAPI AL GROUP (POND)
DENOTES FILL IN
® I
DENOTES EXCAVATION
®
SURFACE WATER I
IN WETLAND

® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
® DENOTES HAND I
CLEARING

WATER I

English
't
X
PLANS PREPARED BY :
RUMNIEL KT.EPPER & KAHI., LLP
consulTlnq engfneers
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE !SO
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 21609-3960
I9 191 91e-9560
FOR
THE TOTi'N OF FUQUAY VARINA
NORTLL CAROLINA

Ptr
R20 Residential 20
_ R30 Residential 30
12113/05
1' = 2,000 ft

I
assumes no responsibility for errors arising from misuse of
this map or misuse of the measurement scale.

? v
z?
•
s
E

S`JUDD •
PKWY. now
` • ??
o
la n ?/ • • •

r
r
f ? J,I
J
1
r a a +
? 1r
JUDD PARK WAY SITE MAP
FUQUAY-VARINA, NC
January 2005 WAKE COUNTY Figure 2
} RUMMEL, KLEPPER 6 KAHL, LLP
consulting engineers Town
• Fuqua
y-Varina ,
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
uat'o 1.3 mroare Vraaranyre, rogoay varnna, rc
fall
JM
January 2005
RUMMEL, KLEPI
consullin�
RALEIGH, NW
Joill .00

Triage Check List
13 ?0 E
Date:
FILE
Project Name: tjj A J60,fk V, ew .
o, So tui3ic h
DWQ#: 0 5'z z 5 q
COPY County:
To: ? - ARO Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Mike Horan
From: ?Telephone : (919) 7C 3q 7 5
The idle attached. Is being forwardedo . our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need" Lance.
4
LI Stream length impacted.
? Stream determination `.
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-lime surface,.waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond M
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: eko,5e G" //.p s`-
?0F WATF9 p Michael F. Easley, Governor
?O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?2W 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3,2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [03 0607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review
your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide a copy of the approval letter from NCEEP indicating their willingness to
accept payment for the 0.114 acres of wetland mitigation.
2. Please be advised that riprap is considered a permanent impact by the DWQ. Therefore,
the stream impact at Site 1, currently labeled as "Temporary", should be labeled as
permanent. Please make this correction in your tables and on your map, and re-submit
five copies of this page of the PCN and the map of Site 1.
3. With respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in
additional parcels which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the
case, then please address how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for
these parcels.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hhqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Caro ma
N,M(MAY
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 2 of 2
January 3, 2006
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSouth ViewPointeSD(W ake)On_Hold
DWQ # 05-2254 Judd Parkway Ext & Southview Pointe S/D
Subject: DWQ # 05-2254 Judd Parkway Ext & Southview Pointe S/D
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:50:51 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related to your recent
application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you electronically so that you may
expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via
fax. The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy
to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise
noted.
A52254TOFuquayV arinaJuddExtandSouthViewPointeSD(Wake)On_Hold.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 1/4/2006 3:51 PM
?0F W A TF9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
?? G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?/1 r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 ?
p -r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 6, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [030607, 18-16-1-(1), CJ
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A.
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Per our conservation yesterday with Ms. Elizabeth Workman, in addition to
the items requested in our letter to you dated January 3, 2005, please also provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide five copies of a site plan that includes contour lines, and all streams, and
wetland areas and open waters (ponds) clearly demarked at a scale of 1" = 50'.
2. Please provide complete stormwater plans for the Southview Pointe Subdivision.
3. With respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in
additional parcels which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the
case, then please address how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for
these parcels.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Caro ina
turallly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Page 2 of 2
January 6, 2006
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
,t
C di Karoly, Supervi or
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield'Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquay VarinaJuddExtandSouth VlewPointeSD(W ake)On_Hold
Indirect and Cumulative Impacts
for the Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
DWQ Request for More Information (January 3, 2006), Project # 05-2254, Comment 3: With
respect to cumulative impact, please address whether the road will result in additional parcels
which can now be developed with their improved access. If this is the case, then please address
how downstream water quality impacts will be addressed for these parcels.
The PCN (December 22, 2005) states the following:
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods, the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative impacts, based upon
reasonably anticipated future growth. The residential community will be relatively small,
will not involve commercial development, and is located in a relatively developed
landscape. The project may result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff.
This is particularly important because the impacted stream, unnamed tributary to Kenneth
Creek, is listed on the 2002 List of Impaired Waters [303(d)] for the Cape Fear River
Basin from its source to the Wake-Harnett County line.
Southview Pointe's stormwater will be collected in catch basins and curb inlets and will
gravity flow into two retention ponds. These ponds have been sized for water quality
according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will provide control from the 10-year return
period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions per the Town of Fuquay-Varina's
stormwater requirements.
The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local ordinances protecting the 50-foot buffer of the
pond and tributary. Buffer impacts are being coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-
Varina (Jay Meyers- Town Engineer).
Additional supporting information to be added to the Cumulative Impacts:
The Judd Parkway Extension will alleviate construction truck traffic on Sunset Drive, which is
currently being used to access the proposed Southview Pointe Subdivision. The developer has
offered to build this section of the road (and be reimbursed by the town) which provides better
access to the property and avoids neighborhood roads. The majority of the area eastward is
essentially built-out with limited opportunities for infill development. The majority of the area
westward is limited by jurisdictional features, permitted new developments and some agricultural
areas. Recent and future development will occur with or without this extension since access is
provided by other existing roadways. The Judd Parkway Extension is not likely to stimulate
future development or influence intraregional land development location decisions. It is not
in conflict with local plans, does not have an explicit economic purpose, and does not
contain notable features within the impact area (other than the tributary and wetlands
discussed in the PCN). Adherence to federal, state and local regulations directly protecting
features such as "Waters of the US", floodplains, and riparian buffers ensure that long-
term indirect and cumulative impacts do not occur on a regional basis due to the proposed
project. A detailed analysis was not considered for this project.
F: I Word I Document 1305-0781 PermitAppUClinfoPCN. doc
TOWN POLICY
TOWN OF FUQUAY-VARINA
Subject: Number: Effective Date: No. of Pages: 39
Stormwater

Management Supercedes: Prepared By: Recommended By:
All Previous Engineering Dept.
Adopted this day of , 2004
Rose John, Town Clerk
TOWN POLICY FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Subject: Implementation of a policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased
runoff due to development of land.
1.0 Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is to protect, maintain, and enhance the public health,
safety, and general welfare by establishing minimum requirements and procedures
to control the adverse effects of increased stormwater runoff associated with land
development within the Town of Fuquay-Varina. Proper management of
stormwater runoff will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a
functional drainage system, reduce the effects of development on land and stream
channel erosion, assist in the attainment and maintenance of water quality
standards, enhance the local environment associated with the drainage system,
reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic
development by mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts.
The application of this policy and the provisions expressed herein shall be the
minimum stormwater discharge control requirements and shall not be deemed a
limitation or repeal of any other obligations imposed by State statute or judicial
decisions. Consequently, if site characteristics indicate that complying with these
minimum requirements will not provide adequate designs or protection for local
property or residents, it is the designer's responsibility to exceed the minimum
requirements as necessary. The Town Engineer or designee shall be responsible
for the coordination and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter.
2.0 Departments Involved:
Administration
Planning Department
Engineering Department
Public Works Department
3.0 Jurisdiction:
This policy shall apply to all areas within the Planning Jurisdiction (Town Limits
and ET J) as defined on official Town maps that may be amended from time to
time.
4.0 Definitions:
As used in this policy, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the
following terms, phrases and words, and their derivatives, shall have the meaning
given herein:
As-built plan. Plans reflecting actual field conditions which may include the
construction plans with any changes identified and shown on the plan.
Designer. A professional who is permitted by the Town of Fuquay-Varina to
prepare and submit plans and studies required by this policy.
Detention structure. A permanent structure for the temporary storage of
stormwater runoff that is designed so as not to create a permanent pool of water.
Develop. The construction, landscaping, clearing projects or any other project
that in any manner alters the natural structure of the landmass.
Development. Any site plan or subdivision.
Developed peak discharge rates. The peak discharge rates, in cubic feet per
second, calculated using Town approved methods and based on developed land
use conditions.
Easement. Right of use over the property of another for a specific purpose or
reservation by the owner of the land for the use of such land by others for a
specific purpose or purposes, and which must be included in the conveyance of
land affected by such easement.
Existing land use conditions. The land use conditions existing at the time the
design plans are submitted for approval, including previously approved upstream
developments.
Impervious surface. Any material that significantly reduces and prevents natural
infiltration of water into the soil. Impervious surfaces include but are not limited
to roof, patios, balconies, decks, streets, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, and
any concrete, stone, brick, asphalt or compacted gravel surface.
Infiltration. The passage or movement of water into the soil sub-surface.
Maintenance. Any action necessary to preserve drainage and flood control
facilities in proper working condition, so that such facilities shall continue to
comply with the standards of this chapter and to prevent failure of such facilities.
Maintenance shall not include actions taken solely for the purpose of enhancing
the aesthetics aspects associated with the stormwater discharge control facilities.
Off-site stormwater runoff rate. The stormwater runoff resulting from a
designated design storm which flows through the subject site either naturally or
via storm drainage systems from off the subject site. Off-site stormwater runoff
rate shall be calculated assuming contributing offsite properties are fully
developed.
On-site stormwater discharge control facilities. The design and construction of a
facility necessary to control stormwater runoff within and for a single
development.
Opaque Screening. A substance that cannot be seen through when viewed
perpendicularly at the same elevation from the ground to at least a height of six
(6) feet. Composition of the opaque screen may include a wall, fence, landscaped
earthen berm, planted vegetation, existing vegetation, or any appropriate
combination of the elements. At least 75 percent of the planted vegetation shall be
evergreen species locally adapted to the area.
Predevelopment stormwater runoff rate. Stormwater runoff resulting from a
designated design storm with the subject site in its natural condition prior to any
development activity.
Post development stormwater runoff rate. The stormwater runoff resulting from a
designated design storm after the site has been fully developed.
L ,
Regional retention detention facilities. The design and construction of a facility
to control stormwater runoff within or outside a development and for one or more
developments.
Retention structures. A permanent structure that provides for the storage of
runoff and is designed to maintain a permanent pool of water.
Storm drainage facilities. The man-made system of inlets, conduits or other such
facilities, and appurtenances which collect, store and convey stormwater.
Stormwater discharge control design plan. The set of drawings and other
documents that comprise all of the information and specifications for the drainage
systems, structures, concepts and techniques that will be used to control
stormwater discharges as required by this chapter. Also included are the
supporting engineering calculations, input data for any computer analysis, and
results of any computer analysis.
Ten-year and one hundred-year design storms. The stormwater runoff resulting
from a rainfall intensity based on statistical data and of a duration that will
produce the maximum peak rate of runoff for the watershed of interest under
average moisture conditions. A ten-year storm has statistically a 10% chance of
occurring in any given year and a 100-year storm has statistically a I% chance of
occurring in any given year.
5.0 Scope and Exclusions
5.1 No person shall develop any land without having provided for appropriate
stormwater discharge control measures to control or manage stormwater
runoff, in compliance with this policy, unless exempted under paragraph
5.2.
5.2 The following development activities are exempt from the provisions of
this policy:
5.2.1 Projects grandfathered based on the following criteria:
5.2.1.1 Industrial and commercial projects under construction as of
the effective date of this policy
5.2.1.2 Industrial and commercial projects with approved
construction plans as of the effective date of this policy
5.2.1.3 Industrial and commercial projects within the Town's
review cycle prior to the effective date of this policy
5.2.1.4 Residential single phase projects within the Town's review
cycle, with approved preliminary subdivision plat,
approved construction plans, or under construction as of the
effective date of this policy
5.2.1.5 Residential multi-phase projects within the Town's review
cycle, with approved preliminary subdivision plat,
approved construction plans, or under construction as of the
effective date, with the provision that exempt phases must
be under construction within 5-years of the effective date of
this policy. If changes to the approved preliminary sub-
division plat result in an increase in the number of lots
and/or an increase in the overall impervious surface area by
ten percent or more, this policy would then apply to that
changed phase of the project.
5.3 Additions or modifications to existing detached single-family dwellings.
5.4 Residential site plans consisting of one single family or one duplex
dwelling, or one structure of a two-unit townhouse dwelling.
5.5 Expansion of existing developments that increases stormwater runoff less
than 10 percent.
5.6 Compliance with this policy would result in greater adverse downstream
impact, such as local flooding, as determined by Town approved
engineering studies.
6.0 Minimum Runoff Control Requirements
The minimum stormwater runoff control requirements shall provide:
6.1 Control measures necessary to control velocities of flow from stormwater
discharge control facilities to a level which will comply with the "North
Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973";
6.2 Compliance with any applicable local, state, and/or federal Neuse River
Basin and Cape Fear River Basin rules;
6.3 Reduce post-development runoff rate to pre-development runoff rate for
the 1-year, 24-hour design storm and the 10-year, 24-hour design storm,
by installing stormwater discharge control facilities.
6.4 Provide sufficient storage volume to retain on-site the runoff from the first
inch of rainfall (first flush) for 24 to 72 hours.
6.5 The Town reserves the right to require additional stormwater management
measures for projects complying with this policy if stormwater runoff
from the project will cause adverse effects on other properties including
without limitation public streets, sidewalks, greenways, and utility
easements.
7.0 Stormwater Control Facilities:
7.1 Stormwater discharge control facilities may include both structural and
nonstructural elements. Natural swales and other natural runoff conduits
shall be retained where practicable, but where additional stormwater
discharge control facilities are required to satisfy the minimum control
requirements, the following measures are examples of what may be used:
7.1.1 Stormwater detention structures (dry basins).
7.1.2 Stormwater retention structures (wet ponds).
7.1.3 Detention swales.
7.1.4 Bio-retention areas (requires geotechnical report to establish
suitability of fill material for bioretention area).
7.1.5 Other methods acceptable to the Town Engineer that meets the
policy requirements and assures no harm to downstream
properties.
7.2 Where detention and retention structures are used, designs that consolidate
these facilities into a limited number of large structures will be preferred
over designs that utilize a large number of small structures.
7.3 Stormwater discharge control design plans can be rejected by the Town
Engineer if they incorporate structures and facilities that will demand
considerable maintenance, will be difficult to maintain, or utilize
numerous small structures if other alternatives are physically possible.
8.0 Design Procedures
All stormwater discharge control facilities shall be designed in accordance with
procedures approved by the Town Engineer. Pre-approved procedures include:
8.1 Peak Runoff Calculation
8.1.1 For drainage areas less than 100-acres - Rational Method. The
following Intensity-Duration-Frequency chart shall be utilized:
Table 8.1.1- Fu ua -Varina I-D-F Table
Duration
(minutes) 1-year
(in/hr) 10-year
(in/hr) 25-year
(in/hr) 50-year
(in/hr) 100-year
(in/hr)
5 5.10 7.22 8.19 8.96 9.72
10 4.20 6.13 7.01 7.71 8.40
15 3.50 5.25 6.03 6.64 7.24
30 2.38 3.28 4.32 4.80 5.28
60 1.50 2.41 2.84 3.17 3.50
120 0.89 1.37 1.62 1.81 2.00
180 0.65 1.02 1.21 1.35 1.50
360 0.38 0.65 0.77 0.86 0.96
720 0.23 0.39 0.46 0.52 0.57
1440 0.13 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.33
24-hour
rainfall 3.00 inches 5.38 inches 6.41 inches 7.21 inches 8.00 inches
8.1.2 For drainage areas 26-acres to 640-acres - U.S. Geological Survey
Water -Resources Investigations Reports 01-4207 (Table 5 - Rural
Flood-Frequency Coastal equations) and 96-4084 (Table 7 - North
Carolina Flood-Frequency Equations).
8.1.3 For drainage areas greater than 640-acres - United States Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center computer
programs HEC-1 or HEC-MMS, or Haestad Methods "Pondpack".
These programs shall include evaluation of multiple sub-basins and
storage areas.
8.2 Runoff Volume Calculation
8.2.1 The "Simple Method" as described by Schueler (1987) and
referenced in NCDENR's "Stormwater Best Management
Practices" dated April 1999 shall be used for calculating the post
development runoff volume resulting from the first inch of rainfall.
8.2.2 For drainage areas up to 640-acres - Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds, TR-55 (Technical Release 55) published by the
Engineering Division, United States Natural Resource
Conservation Service (formerly known as the Soil Conservation
Service) United States Department of Agriculture, June 1986,
except as noted in 8.2.1.
8.2.3 For drainage areas greater than 640-acres - United States Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center computer
programs HEC-1 or HEC-MMS, or Haestad Methods "Pondpack".
These programs shall include evaluation of multiple sub-basins and
storage areas.
8.3 Hydrograph Development
8.3.1 For drainage areas less than 100-acres - Unit Hydrograph per
"Elements of Urban Stormwater Design" by H. Rooney Malcom,
P.E.
8.3.2 For drainage areas up to 640-acres - Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds, TR-55 (Technical Release 55) published by the
Engineering Division, United States Natural Resource
Conservation Service (formerly known as the Soil Conservation
Service) United States Department of Agriculture, June 1986.
8.3.3 For drainage areas greater than 640-acres - United States Army
Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center computer
programs HEC-1 or HEC-MMS, or Haestad Methods "Pondpack".
These programs shall include evaluation for multiple sub-basins
and storage areas.
8.4 Other hydraulic methods may be used if the designer demonstrates that the
methods are appropriate for the intended use and calibrated to local
conditions.
9.0 Stormwater Discharge Control Design Plan and Report Requirements
9.1 Stormwater discharge control design plans/reports shall include the
following:
9.1.1 Delineation of drainage basins
9.1.2 All project existing and proposed impervious surfaces clearly
delineated and listed in square feet.
9.1.3 All surface waters: FEMA 100-year floodplain and floodway lines;
flood hazard soils areas; wetlands; reserved open spaces; and the
location, dimensions and arrangements of all drainage ways;
watershed, riparian, and other buffers including associated
setbacks.
9.1.4 A determination that the proposed stormwater discharge control
facility will not create flooding or drainage problems for adjacent
structures for the 10- and 100-year flood events.
9.1.5 A designation of all easements needed for inspection and
maintenance of the stormwater discharge control facilities. The
location of all stormwater management facilities shall be specified
prior to recording of easements.
9.1.6 A plan for maintenance of all stormwater discharge control
facilities shall be included as part of the stormwater discharge
control design plan. The maintenance plan should include an
estimated maintenance budget.
9.1.7 Landscaping/screening to enhance the aesthetic qualities of the
stormwater discharge control facilities. Landscaping inside
detention/retention basins side slopes is allowed as long as the
landscaping does not significantly decrease storage volume or
create maintenance problems. Any screening used shall be opaque
in nature.
9.2 The hydrologic criteria to be used for the stormwater discharge control
design plans and calculations included on the plans or in the report shall
be as follows:
9.2.1 Post development discharge shall be at pre-development levels for
the 1-year, 24-hour and 10-year, 24-hour design storms for all
stormwater discharge facilities.
9.2.2 Emergency spillways will be designed at a minimum for 50-year
storms.
9.2.3 All stormwater discharge control designs shall be checked using
the 100-year storm for analysis of local flooding and possible flood
hazards to adjacent structures and/or property.
9.3 Record (as-built) drawings (reproducible mylars and magnetic form in
Awg or Axf files) for all stormwater management facilities depicting as-
built conditions including, but not limited to, size, depth, field location and
elevations, must be certified by an authorized registered professional as to
the completeness of the as-builts and that the stormwater management
devices and their installation are in compliance with this policy and the
approved plans, and a copy provided to the Town of Fuquay-Varina for
permanent record.
10.0 Professional Registration Requirements
10.1 Stormwater discharge control design plans shall be prepared by a qualified
registered North Carolina Professional Engineer, using acceptable
engineering standards and practices.
11.0 Ownership and Maintenance of Stormwater Discharge Control Facilities
11.1 Any stormwater discharge control facility that serves a single lot or
development other than detached single-family dwellings and their
accessory uses will be privately owned and continuously maintained by
the served property owners. Stormwater discharge control facilities that
serve detached single-family dwelling developments and their accessory
uses will be privately owned and continuously maintained by the
individual homeowner associations.
11.2 The ownership and continuous maintenance of the stormwater discharge
control facility shall also apply to non-exclusive perpetual easements in
favor of the Town for access to the facility. The Town will not be
responsible for the maintenance of the access easements.
11.3 Maintenance requirements identified under paragraph 9.1.6 of this policy
shall be a part of the deed for the affected property and recorded with the
Wake County Register of Deeds.
11.4 The location and description of the stormwater discharge facility along
with access/maintenance easements shall be indicated on subdivision
map(s) and site plats recorded with the Wake County Register of Deeds.
11.5 Stormwater discharge control facilities shall be inspected a minimum of
once annually by a licensed professional engineer, and inspection reports
submitted to the Town Engineer during the period of December 1 to
December 31 annually. At a minimum, the inspection reports shall
include the information listed in the sample inspection reports included in
Appendix B of this policy.
12.0 Maintenance Agreement for Privately Owned Facilities
12.1 A proposed maintenance agreement (Appendix A) shall be submitted to
the Town for all private on-site stormwater discharge control facilities
prior to the approval of the stormwater discharge control design plan and
recordation of lots in a subdivision to be served by the discharge control
facility. The agreement shall be recorded by the landowner with the Wake
County Register of Deeds prior to subdivision recording and/or building
permit, and shall be binding on all subsequent owners of land served by
the discharge control facility. Such agreement shall be in a form and
content acceptable to the Town and shall be the responsibility of the
private owner. At a minimum, the agreement shall include the following;
12. 1.1 The agreement shall identify who will have the maintenance
responsibility.
12.1.2 The maintenance agreement shall specify how proper maintenance
of the facilities will be accomplished.
12.1.3 The maintenance agreement shall provide for access to the facility
by virtue of non-exclusive perpetual easements, minimum 25-feet
in width, in favor of the Town, at reasonable times for inspection
by the Town to ensure that the discharge control facilities are
maintained in proper design working condition.
12.1.4 The frequency of inspection of the facilities and submission of
inspection reports to the Town.
12.1.5 Establishment of an escrow account at the time of subdivision/plat
recordation in the amount of 15% of the construction cost of the
facility solely for the maintenance and management of the facility.
The escrow account shall be supplemented annually with a sinking
fund from homeowner association dues or property owner
payments in accordance with an anticipated maintenance schedule
identified under paragraph 9.1.6 of this policy and in addition, 60%
of initial construction costs shall be deposited in the escrow
account within 10-years following initial construction (such that
the escrow account has 75% of initial construction costs in addition
to maintenance costs), and 100% of initial construction costs
within 20-years. A certified annual audit of the escrow account
shall be submitted to the Town for its records.
12.1.6 If at any time the Town accepts the facility for public management
and maintenance, the portion of the sinking fund based on initial
construction costs shall be remitted to the Town at time of
acceptance.
12.1.7 Allowance for the Town to recover from the landowner(s) any and
all costs the Town expends to maintain or repair the facilities.
12.1.8 Statements that the Town is not obligated for the maintenance or
repair of the facilities and that the Town shall not be liable for the
condition or operation of the facility.
13.0 Exceptions from Requirements
13.1 The Town Board of Commissioners may grant an exception from the
requirements of this policy if there are unique circumstances applicable to
the site such that strict adherence to the provisions of the policy will result
in unnecessary hardship and not fulfill the intent of the policy.
13.2 A written request for an exception shall be required and shall state the
specific exception sought and the justification therefore. It shall include
descriptions, drawings, calculations and any other information that is
necessary to evaluate the proposed exception.
14.0 Liability
Neither the approval of a plan under the provisions of this policy nor the
compliance with the provisions of this chapter shall relieve any person from the
responsibility for damage to any person or property otherwise imposed by law nor
shall it impose any liability upon the Town of Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina for
damages to any person or property.
APPENDIX A
Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement
APPENDIX B
Standard Maintenance Inspection Reports
w
/'7l 1G/j tr?-In 11, - -_-D0Q
N-U Januaryx006
7 2006
Rummel, North Carolina Division of Water Quality c 'TEE QU g"
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit WERA
IQepper 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
&. Dahl, LLP Raleigh, NC 27604
William K Hellmann Subject: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Emeritus
David W. Wallace Dear Ms. Cyndi Karoly,
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz In response to your letter dated January 3, 2006 (letter attached) and per the
1. Michael Potter phone conversation with Mr. Ian McMillan on January 5, 2006 (memo
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
attached), we are submitting additional information per DWQ's request to
expedite the 401 permitting process. We have included five copies of the
Charles M. Easter, Jr. following:
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill • NCEEP letter accepting mitigation payment
1. Tommy Peacock, A
Michael W. Myers • Site plan and spreadsheet showing the riprap area as permanent impact
Martin C. Rodgers rather than temporary impact
Kenneth A. Goon • Site plan showing contour lines
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier • Site plan showing the stream feature identified in blue color
Barbara J Hoage • Zoning Map for Town of Fuquay-Varina
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery • USGS topographic map with project footprint
Nancy R. Bergeron • Soil survey map with project footprint
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
' Also included is a full size copy of the construction plans for the Southview
Peter C. D
Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Pointe Subdivision (including the Stormwater Management Plan and Sediment
Robert J. Andryszak and Erosion Control Plan) with drainage computations, a full size copy of the
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
B
K
i
h Ski Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for Judd Parkway Extension with drainage
.
e
t
nner
Karen B. Kahl
computations, and the Town's draft Stormwater Management Plan.
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Comment #3 on DWQ's January 3, 2006 letter addressed concerns for the
Eric M. Klein downstream water quality impacts resulting from potential development
adjacent to the Judd Parkway Extension.
900 Ridgefield
Drive
Suite 350
Raleigh, North Carolina
Per conversation with Mr. Mike Soronsen, Town of Fuquay-Varina planner, on
7609-3960 January 11, 2006, there are no impervious surface restrictions for development
I'll: 919-S78-9500 in the Cape Fear River basin for the Town at this time

Fru' 919-790-S3S'2 .
wrvrv. rkkengineerc. eom
Zoning adjacent to the extension is identified as R8 (Conditional) (Multi-family
district), R15 (Single family homes) and R20 (Single family homes). See the
attached zoning map for more details. Additional information is available at
littp://www.fquay-varina.org/www/departme-4 asp?d=10&s=detail.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC

The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local Cape Fear River buffer ordinances protecting the 50-foot
buffer of the pond and tributary. Buffer impacts are being coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-
Varina (Jay Meyers- Town Engineer).
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods, the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative downstream impacts. The
residential community will be relatively small, will not involve commercial development, and is
located in a relatively developed landscape (see construction plans attached). The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. Southview Pointe's stormwater will
be collected in catch basins and curb inlets and will gravity flow into two retention ponds. These
ponds have been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will
provide control from the 10-year return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions
per the Town of Fuquay-Varina's stormwater requirements (draft policy is attached).
The Judd Parkway Extension will alleviate construction truck traffic on Sunset Drive, which is
currently being used to access the proposed Southview Pointe Subdivision. The developer has
offered to build this section of the road (and be reimbursed by the town) which provides better
access to the property and avoids neighborhood roads. The majority of the area southward and
eastward is essentially built-out with limited opportunities for infill development. A parcel
located directly west of the extension may provide development opportunities however are
limited by jurisdictional features and buffer restrictions. The Judd Parkway Extension is not
likely to stimulate future development or influence intraregional land development location
decisions. It is not in conflict with local plans, does not have an explicit economic purpose, and
does not contain notable features within the impact area (other than the tributary and wetlands
discussed in the PCN). Adherence to federal, state and local regulations directly protecting
features such as "Waters of the US", floodplains, and riparian buffers ensure that long-term
indirect and cumulative impacts do not occur on a regional basis due to the proposed project.
Within the next twelve months, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is implementing a Stormwater
Management Policy for the Town to manage the impact of increased runoff due to the
development of land. This draft is attached and is available on-line at http://www.fuquay-
varina.org/www/dgpartme-4.asp?d=17&s=detail. The proper management of stormwater runoff
will minimize damage to public and private property, insure a functional drainage system, reduce
the effects of development on land and stream channel erosion, assist in the attainment and
maintenance of water quality standards, enhance the local environment associated with the
drainage system, reduce local flooding and drainage problems, maintain as nearly as possible the
pre-developed runoff characteristics of the area, and facilitate economic development by
mitigating associated flooding and drainage impacts. The town engineer, Mr. Jay Meyers, stated
that any new development as a result of the Judd Parkway Extension of 675 feet, will likely
occur after the policy's approval and will be required to follow this stormwater management
policy. Besides the Southview Pointe Subdivision, which currently follows the Town's
stormwater management policy, there are no other proposed developments adjacent to the
extension at this time. All parcels south of Judd Parkway (i.e. Southern Oaks and Carriage
Heights Subdivision) are approved and under development. Although the Town of Fuquay-
Varina implemented buffer rule protection for Cape Fear River Basin in November 2005, both
01
the Southern Oaks and Carriage Heights Subdivision have proactively followed these buffer
rules. The Southview Pointe Subdivision is required to follow these buffer rules as well.
We hope that the above and attached information will suffice in answering Comment #3. Please
let me know if you need more information.
Sincerely,
(-
Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc: Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
Mr. Eric Kuhl, NCDWO
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Jay Meyers, Town of Fuquay-Varina
ESW
JTP
JMH
MTM
THS
JWM
305-078-A01
F. -I WORDIDOCUMEN71305-0781 Corr1 DWQ-001. doc
?0r W AT?Rp Michael F. Easley, Governor
?Q G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cq r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 8, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-2254
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Subject Property: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Ut to Kenneth Creek [03 0607, 18-16-1-(1), C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Meyers:
On December 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
December 22, 2005, to impact 0.158 acres of wetland and 220 linear feet of stream to construct
the proposed Judd Parkway extension. The DWQ received more information from you on
January 5, 2006 and January 13, 2006. However, the DWQ has determined that your application
remains incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will
require this additional information in order to process your application to impact protected
wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required
by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide complete stormwater plans for the Southview Pointe Subdivision.
Additionally, please provide a digital copy of the complete stormwater plans for the
Southview Pointe Subdivision on CD.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider
the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetiands
One
Caro ma
Np
turallly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Fuquay-Varina '
Page 2 of 2
February 8, 2006
McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
?4
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Elizabeth Workman, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 900 Ridgefield Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSouth ViewPointeSD(W ake)On_Hold3
D j'Q 05-11,54 Judd Parkway Extension & Southview Pointe Subdivision
Subject: DWQ 05-2254 Judd Parkway Extension & Southview Pointe Subdivision
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:18:04 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related to your recent
application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you electronically so that you may
expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via
fax. The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy
to the 401 oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise
noted.
052254TOFuquayVarinaJuddExtandSouthViewPointeSD(Wake)On_Hold3.doc I Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 2/9/2006 2:19 PM
kPIA
?Aa"jf"A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
January 20, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jay Meyers
Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Dear Mr. Meyers;
RE: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
UT to Kenneth Creek
DWQ # 2005-2254
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Thank you for your consultant's letter dated January 13, 2006 concerning permitting
issues for the above-mentioned project. This letter addresses cumulative impact issues that
must be managed before we can issue the 401 Certification for this project. I believe that a
meeting with your staff and consultants as well as DWQ staff is needed to clarify and address
this issue since it is clear from the maps provided that this road will result in additional
development in adjacent parcels. In short, DWQ will need to be able to state that any additional
development will not violate downstream water quality standards. The discussion that your
consultant had in her January 13 letter will need additional clarification and discussion before
we can be certain that downstream water quality will be protected. We will also need to discuss
the alignment of Judd Parkway - according to the map in your consultant's letter, it appears that
the road does not have logical termini since it starts and stops in open fields.
Please call me at 733-9646 to find a time when we can all meet to discuss this matter.
At that meeting, we can discuss any other issues in relation to this road that DWQ may have
once we review the other material that was submitted on January 13, 2006. Until this matter is
addressed, this project will remain on hold due to incomplete information.
Si rel ours,
n rney
Cc: Ian McMillian, DWQ
Elizabeth Workman; Rummel,
Raleigh, NC 27609-396
and Kahl; 900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350;
File copy
Central files
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Mr. Monte Matthews, Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands Naturallff
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
52254
1
i December 22, 2005
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
6508 Falls of Neuse Road
Rummel, Raleigh, NC 27615 r
IQepper Attention: Mr. Monte Matthews
& Dahl, LLP Subject: Nationwide 14 Permit Application for the extension of Judd Parkway
over an unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek and for the Southview
William K. Hellmann Pointe subdivision on the Smith Property in Wake County, NC.
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J. Halbert Dear Mr. Matthews:
Stephen G. Zentz
1. Michael Potter The Town of Fuquay-Varina and developer Henderson and Associates are extendin

Thomas E. Mohler g
Judd Parkway 675 feet to access Southview Pointe, a residential development. This
James A. Zito extension travels over an unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek. Construction of the Judd

Charles M. Easter, A Parkway Extension and adjacent residential development will result in impacts to
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr jurisdictional waters. There will be 0.114 acre of riverine wetlands permanently
Michael L. Krupsaw impacted.
Lars E. Hill
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr
,'Michael W. Myers The subject project is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists the
Martin C. Rodgers Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) characteristics of independent utility of a
Kenneth A. Goon project:
Richard J. Adams, Jr
John A. d'Epagnier . The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address
Barbara J. Hoage environmental matters on a broad scope;
Christopher F. Wright 0 The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional
(liven L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron transportation improvements are made in the area;
Stuart A. Montgomer
y
• The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably
David G. Vanscoy foreseeable transportation improvement

Henry J. Bankard, Jr. .
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Prior to August 2, 2005, this extension project did not include the adjacent residential
Robert J. Andryszak development. However, after meeting with the USACE to begin the permittin
rocess

Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
8. Keith Skinner g p
,
it was noted that the extension has no logical terminus. In order to permit the
Karen B. Kali! Jurisdictional imhacts the Judd Parkway Extension project now includes the Smith
Seyed A. Saadat property (proposed Southview Pointe subdivision).
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
900 Riel field Drive The project study area is located within the subbasin 03-06-07 of the Cape Fear River
Suite 350 Basin and is part of U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) hydrologic unit 03030004. The
Raleigh. :North Carolina headwaters of Kenneth Creek stretch east, west and south of Fuquay-Varina. The North
27609-39(,0 Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Index Number (SIN) is 18-16-1-
Ph: 1) 19-.47b_1)500 (1) from its source to the Wake - Harnett County line.
Fru': 919-790-s3S2
rmntrkke'ngiueeciCO1n Wetland and stream delineations were performed for the Judd Parkway Extension
project on May 9, 2005. Wetland delineations for the Smith property were performed
on October 11, 2005. Jurisdictional review by the USACE occurred on November 18,
2005 and DWQ occurred on November 28, 2005. Impacts are reported in the
Preconstruction Notification application.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
There is one unnamed tributary of Kenneth Creek within the project study area. Years ago, this channel
was dammed and is now an abandoned farm pond. The pond's dam is currently clogged and therefore
dysfunctional. Its water level has risen beyond capacity and is seeping over the top of the dam and around
the eastern corner of the pond. This flow around the eastern corner of the pond has created a channel
along the back side of the dam. Incised from the irregular flow conditions, this channel is approximately 4
feet in width carrying mainly substrate of silt. Kenneth Creek has been assigned a NCDWQ Best Usage
Classification of C. No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), WS-1, or WS-11 Waters occur within 3.0
miles of the project study area.
Kenneth Creek is listed on the 2002 List of Impaired Waters [303(d)] for the Cape Fear River Basin from
its source to the Wake - Harnett County line due to unknown causes. Potential sources of impairment
include a major municipal point source, urban runoff, and storm sewers.
Kenneth Creek is not designated as a National Wild and Scenic River or a North Carolina Natural and
Scenic River.
There are two wetland areas located within the project study area. Wetland A is located within the Judd
Parkway Extension design. Wetland C (which is connected to Wetland A on the back side of the pond) is
within the Smith property boundaries proposed for future residential development by Henderson and
Associates. These wetlands are described below.
Wetland A is a palustrine emergent area adjacent to the pond containing hydrology due to the water
spilling over the dam (due to clogged outlet pipe). Wetland A extends into the project corridor (100' of
each side of the alignment) and is shown as Site 1 on the permit drawings. Hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils are present on many areas of the dam. Tree vegetation is dominated by sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Ater rubrum), and water oak (Quercus nigra). Wetland shrub
vegetation is dominated by elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Herb vegetation is dominated by Japanese grass (Microstegium viminea), muscadine grape (Vitis
rotundifolia), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia). Primary hydrologic indicators include
saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil and drainage patterns in wetlands. Secondary hydrologic
indicators include oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of soil as well as water-stained leaves.
Hydric soil indicators include an aquic moisture regime, reducing conditions, and low-chroma colors.
Wetland C is approximately 0.6 acre within the Smith property boundary. A retention basin was
redesigned to avoid all impacts to Wetland C. Tree vegetation is dominated by American sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Wetland
shrub vegetation is dominated by elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
and red maple (Ater rubrum). Herb vegetation is dominated by Japanese grass (Microstegium viminea),
netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), and blackberry (Rubus betulifolius). Primary hydrologic
indicators include saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil. Secondary hydrologic indicators
include oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of soil as well as water-stained leaves. Hydric soil
indicators include reducing conditions and low-chroma colors.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, and
Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists
four federally protected species for Wake County These species include the Bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Surveys for the bald eagle, red-cockaded
woodpecker and Michaux's sumac were completed on October 11, 2005. Habitat for the bald eagle and
red-cockaded woodpecker was not present within the project study area. Habitat for Michaux's sumac
was present however field surveys indicated that no specimens are located on the Smith property or along
the impacted areas of the dam. The dwarf wedgemussel only occurs in the Cape Fear River drainage and
therefore is not found in this watershed.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
With regard to the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404(b)(1) guidelines, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is
committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize
jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable
jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the planning stages; minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
The following is a list of the project's jurisdictional stream avoidance/minimization activities:
Avoidance/Minimization:
• Fill slopes along the extension are at a 1.5:1 ratio in most areas of the roadway to avoid fill in the
stream and to minimize fill in wetlands.
• The extension was shifted south to avoid the dam and the new channel running parallel to the
dam.
• A retention basin on the Smith Property was moved and redesigned to avoid Wetland C.
• Permanent perennial stream impacts are limited to the 66" RCP. RipRap will be placed along the
banks of the stream to add reinforcement. No RipRap will be put into the channel.
• All wetlands not directly affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary
encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be
allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
Based on the above considerations, it is determined that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed
construction in jurisdictional Waters of the United States, and that the proposed action includes all
practicable methods to avoid and/or minimize jurisdictional wetland impacts that may result from such
use.
Compensation: The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) will be paid accordingly to assume responsibility for satisfying the federal
Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for this project.
The remaining necessary compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts to waters that are
jurisdictional under the federal Clean Water Act will be provided by the EEP. An acceptance letter from
EEP is pending and will be sent to USACE and DWQ after approval. The offsetting mitigation will be
derived from an inventory of assets already in existence within the same 8-digit cataloguing unit. The
Town of Fuquay-Varina and Henderson & Associates have avoided and minimized impacts to
jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible as described above. The unavoidable permanent
impacts to 0.114 acre of a riverine wetland will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the
EEP program.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Attached for your information is a copy of the Pre-construction Notification, permit drawings, maps, field
data forms, agent authorization letter and meeting minutes from DWQ and USACE coordination for the
subject project. Application is hereby made for the Department of Army Section 404 Nationwide 14 for
the above described activities. We are also hereby requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the
Division of Water Quality. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC we will provide
$475.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application. We are providing seven
copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality, for review.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please call me at [phone] ext. 21.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
cc: Mr. Jay Meyers, P.E. - Town of Fuquay-Varina
Mr. Tom Goodwin - Henderson and Associates
Mr. Brandon Jones, NCDOT - Division 5 District Engineer
Ms. Glenda Gibson - Gibson Engineers
F: I Word Document 1305-0781PernnitAppUuddPkwycoverletter2.doc
2'254
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Jay Meyers, PE
Mailing Address: Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina NC 27526
(Henderson and Associates is a co-applicant - please see agent authorization letter attached)
Telephone Number: 919-567-3911 Fax Number: 919-552-7481
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Rummel, Klepper & Kahl LLP
Company Affiliation: Attn: Elizabeth Workman
Mailing Address: 900 Ridgefield Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh NC 27609
Telephone Number: 919-878-9560 Fax Number: 919-790-8382
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuquay-Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Southview Pointe (88 lots planned)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): from Raleigh, NC, take
401 south to Fuquay-Varina, turn left onto Judd Parkway and follow to the end. Project
begins where the existing road ends.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35° 34' 33.4 °N 78° 48' 36.1 °W
6. Property size (acres): 0.53 acre along Judd Parkway Extension and 20.49 acres on Southview
Pointe Subdivision
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at httl2:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site has been significantly disturbed. The USGS
topographic maps and soil survey show that a pond has been around for many years. This
pond has a dysfunctional outlet pipe and is adjacent to the proposed road. The proposed road
Page 2 of 10
travels over a sediment basin used to collect runoff from nearby residential construction
activities. Gullies have formed to this basin. Vegetation to the sides of the basin are
dominated by thickets of blackberry, sweetgum and red maple The Southview Pointe
subdivision is planned on the Smith property, adjacent to the proposed Judd Parkway
Extension. This property is a fallow farm field with several old or dilapidated buildings The
eastern corner of the property dips downward into a lucustrine wetland connecting to the
pond.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed 675-foot extension will extend Judd Parkway northwestward from the end of the
existing roadway with three 12-foot lanes, and curb and gutter section with 4-foot bike lanes
and 5-foot sidewalks. The proposed road extension will cross an unnamed tributary to
Kenneth Creek below the dam. The Smith property will be developed into a residential
community (Southview Pointe subdivision) of approximately 88 single-family homes
Construction equipment will consist of heavy duty trucks earth moving equipment cranes
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Judd Parkway will be extended northwestward
675 feet across a tributary to provide access to the planned Southview Pointe subdivision
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Per conversation with USACE (Ms. Jean Manuele) on August 2 2005,
there is little or no project history in the database associated with Judd Parkway.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The Town of Fuquay-Varina's Thoroughfare Plan shows Judd Parkway extending Past the Smith
property and eventually connecting to Hwy 42 and onward circling the Town of Fuquay-Varina
The Judd Parkway Extension was planned as a 675-foot extension to terminate just after the
unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek was crossed. Due to permit requirements for a logical
terminus and per conversation with Ms. Jean Manuele on August 2 2005 (see attached meeting
minutes), this extension has been merged with the Smith property residential development
Page 3 of 10
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The Judd Parkway Extension will impact
a small area of riverine wetlands occurring on the dam Although this wetland (Wetland A) is on
the side of the dam and is a low quality system it exhibits soils hydrology and vegetation
required by the USACE. The pond no longer drains from its outlet pipe but instead flows over
and around the dam during rainy conditions. Fill will occur on 0 114 acre of the wetland due to
building up the roadbed. Excavation will occur in 0.006 acre of the wetland which will be the
location of a ditch tying into the intermittent/unimportant portion of the channel NCDOT
requires a 10-foot mechanized clearance zone beyond the slope stakes This zone has been
incorporated in this project as an area of hand clearing in 0.038 acre of the wetland
The stream channel that begins on the eastern end of the wetland travels along the backside of
the dam and empties into the original outlet area which is currently plugged by beaver activity
From the beginning of the stream to the beaver pond (outlet area) the USACE has deemed this
portion as intermittent and unimportant; impacts may be reported as acreage rather than linear
feet in this section. Due to consistency in this permit application we reported all acreages and
linear feet, even for this unimportant section. The channel will be shifted temporarily on 81
linear feet and 0.008 acre. Fill will occur on 0.0004 acre to build the roadbed
The beaver pond area is an open water impact and mitigation is not needed Permanent fill will
be placed in the beaver pond on 0.017 acre Temporary dewatering will occur to 0.007 acre to
access the 66" RCP.
From the beaver pond and downstream the stream is deemed as perennial and mitigation may be
necessary. A 66" RCP will be used for drainage under Judd Parkway Extension along 115 linear
feet and 0.018 acre. Temporary impacts will occur along 24 linear feet and 0.005 acre where
RipRap will be used as reinforcement along the banks All RipRap will be placed at the top of
bank, avoiding impacts to the ordinary high water in the stream channel A dissipater pad is not
included in this design because flow from the 66" RCP is at four feet per second
The Smith property includes a wetland area (Wetland C) which was formed from the backup of
the pond. The developer has redesigned the retention basin to avoid this wetland
Page 4 of 10
Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland
Impact Type of Wetland Located within Area of
Site Type of
marsh 100-year Distance to Nearest Impact
Number Impact ,
herbaceous
aceous
bog
etc.) Floodplain Stream (linear feet) (acres
)
(indicate on ,
,
, (yes/no)
map)
Site 1 Fill/Permanent Herbaceous, disturbed, No 0 0
114
along dam .
Site 1 Excavation Herbaceous, disturbed, No 0 0
006*
along dam .
Site 1 Hand Clearing Herbaceous, disturbed, No 0 0
038*
along dam .
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.158
mirigarion is not considered for these impacts
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.58 acres -
includes all wetlands around the pond which extend onto the Smith property.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multinlv length X width- then clivit p. by a1 r%Afl
Site Number Perennial Average Impact Area of
(indicate on map) Stream Name Type of Impact or Stream Width Length Impact
Intermittent Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)

Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. 66" RCP/Permanent Perennial 7 feet 115 0.018
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. RipRap on stream Perennial 7 feet 24* 0
005
banks/Temporary .
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. Relocation
/Temporary Intermittent 4 feet 81* 0.008
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. Fill/Permanent Intermittent 4 feet 0.0004
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 220 0.0314
rruuguiton is nor consiaerea for inese impacts
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 5 of 10
5.
Open Water Impact Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number applicable) )
(if ap Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Creek FiIVPermanent Beaver impoundment 0.017*
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Creek Dewatering/Temporary Beaver impoundment 0.007*
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.024
*mitigation is not considered for these impacts
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0314
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.158
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.024
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 220
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed road was shifted
south to avoid or minimize impacts to the dam, surrounding wetlands and stream flowing around
the dam and parallel to the project. Previously, the project included breaching the dam at the time
of construction and building Judd Parkway Extension adjacent to the breached dam. However,
impacts to wetlands surrounding the pond would be significant and costly to mitigate Fill slopes
Page 6 of 10
were adjusted from 3:1 to 1.5:1 or 2:1, where necessary, to avoid most of the stream The dam-
facing slope of the new roadway will be reinforced with Rip Rap to protect it in case the dam
fails in the future. The developer of the Southview Pointe subdivision has redesigned the
retention basin on the northeastern end of their property to avoid wetland impacts to Wetland C
Hand clearing along 10 feet of slope stakes will be used to lessen impacts to Wetland A Rip
Rap at the outlet of pipe will be placed on stream banks for reinforcement and kept out of the
ordinary high water mark of the stream channel.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation for DWO is not required. The project does not impact over one acre of freshwater
wetlands or over 150 linear feet of perennial stream Mitigation by the USACE is not
required for the 115 linear feet of perennial stream because the amount is under the 150
linear feet threshold for permanent impacts. However, mitigation is required by the USACE
for the 0.114 acre of riverine wetland impacts which will be purchased through the NCEEP
Page 7 of 10
program. The dam will not be breached and most surrounding wetlands will not be impacted
by this project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are willing to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.114
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
The project will be paid for and built by the developer (Henderson and Associates) but reimbursed
later by the Town of Fuquay-Varina.
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 8 of 10
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify)? Yes ? No
3.
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 N/A 1.5
Total N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A - The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local
ordinances to protect a 50-foot buffer area alons this tributarv. Buffer impacts are beinLy
coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-Varina (Jay Meyers-Town Engineer).
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious surfaces on the project include
paved roads, single family homes and drivewavs. Proposed impervious surfaces for the
Southview Pointe Subdivision total approximately 9.86 acres versus total acreage of 20.49 acres.
Stormwater from the proposed Southview Pointe subdivision is to be collected in catch basins in
open areas and in curb inlets along the proposed on site streets. The stormwater collected in
these catch basins and curb inlets will gravity flow into two detention ponds. These ponds have
been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will provide control
from the 10-vear return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions per the Town of
Fuquay-Varina's stormwater requirements.
Proposed impervious surfaces for the Judd Parkway Extension total approximately 1.064 acre
versus total acreage of 1.273 acres for the area within the right-of-way (not easements) from the
beginning of the project (resurfacing intersection) to the property line at the end of the project.
Stormwater for the Judd Parkway Extension will collect along curbs and drain into gutters which
empty into the 66"RCP and onto the unnamed tributary of Kenneth Creek.
Page 9 of 10
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sewage will be tied into Town of Fuquay-Varina which has adequate capacity at this time
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative impacts based upon reasonably
anticipated future growth. The residential community will be relatively small will not involve
commercial development, and is located in a relatively developed landscape The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. This is particularly important
because the impacted stream, unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek is listed on the 2002 List of
Impaired Waters 1303(d)1 for the Cape Fear River Basin from its source to the Wake-Harnett
Countv line. Cumulative impacts for temporary and permanent impacts include approximately
0.0314 acre of stream, 220 linear feet of stream 0.024 acre of open water, and 0.158 acre of
riverine wetlands.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
&.,, r f ??FC/?rr a.•d /+ C L P
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
WETLAND LEGEND I
---WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL
® SURFACE WATER
R
(POND) SINGLE TREE
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND WOODS LINE
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DRAINAGE INLET

® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER

ROOTWAD
•
•
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
•
• • • CLEARING
.*- FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP
TB
TB TOP OF BANK
_ WE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
EDGE OF WATER 5 OR PARCEL NUMBER
__ C___ PROP. LIMIT OF CUT IF AVAILABLE
---F -- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL

A PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
\- PROP, RIGHT OF WAY
-/
--- NG--- NATURAL GROUND
---P?-- PROPERTY LINE LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
--EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED GRASS SWALE
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
--EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-•.-• ••-••-••-••-•• WATER SURFACE
x x x x x LIVE STAKES
x x x
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
BOULDER JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION
&
- - - CORE FIBER ROLLS
HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY
R:\HYDRAULICS\•05 -555-PMT -LEGEND.DGN
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACT

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)

1 16+65 TO 18+96 66" RCP

INTERMITTENT S TREAM - - - - - 0.0004 0.008 - 81 -

BEAVER POND - - - - 0.017 0.007 - - -

PERENNIAL STREAM - - - - - 0.018 0.005 115 24 -

WETLANDS 0.114 - 0.006 - 0.038 - - - _ _

TOTALS: 0.114 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.038 0.036 0.020 115 105 0
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION
&
HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY
ATN Revised 3/31105
12/21/2005
PROP. NO. PROPERTY OWNER NAME PROP. OWNER MAILING ADDRESS
1 NC CAPITAL GROUP 4000 WESTCHASE BLVD, SUITE 500
SOUTHERN OAKS, LLC RALEIGH, NC 27607-3965
2 NC CAPITAL GROUP 1009 SMOKEWOOD DRIVE
SOUTHERN OAKS, LLC APEX, NC 27502-8525
3 SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC 8366 SIX FORKS ROAD #203
RALEIGH, NC 27615
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION

HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY
12/21/2005
miz-misanyaro/juao varxway tstmprop.xls
SITE MAP

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
DD PARKWAY EXT.
-RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN XYDRAWCS
ENGNHR ENGNM

INCOMPLE
W NOi UM 106 E PLANS
A A00VL9Tgi7
PRELIMIN
w NOT un RY PLANS
CONMUCTM
English

SUNSET DR.
rJ
r
? r
SITE I
r
i
r
r
r

SEQUOIA RIDGE DR.
100' 0, 100' 200'
SCALE: r= 200'
PLANS PREPARED BY
RUMMEL KL.EPPER & KAHI., LI
consufing enplneers
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE SSO
RALEIGM. NORTH CAROLINA 17609-7960
1919) 676-9560
FOR
THE TOWN OF FUQUAY VAREU
NORM CAROLINA
05
.?o
JUDD PARKWAY
I¦0t to scow
¦
cW 6 Y,-t. S
¦im D = LS Ft.
¦ax.0 = LS Ft*
a = 2.0 Ft.
Type of Llnw= PSR¦
FROM STA.16+65 R.TO SU17+59 R.
l31 O
+ I
° NC CAPITAL GROUP

SITE I
Ile F v
-J,
C A
EXCAVATION IN
WETLANDS
OCB
R
N 1 CB
3
4
25' 0' 25' 50'
SCALE: r= 50'
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
O
RO1EC7 RS:Mlla No. SHM N0.
DD PARKWAY EXT.
6W SHM NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN NYDAAUIICS

INCOMPLE E PLANS
00 NOf U8 !0¦ /f A0ila01MN
PRELIMIN
W NOT W¦ RY PLANS
ONAT¦VcmN
LU
`y
--- ----------- F --------------- FF P --------
C H --~-
_ -- ---_ E ---- E E C E
E I E LATERAL V D CH k-
F
English
P
?m he fF fF flc i x
P
IC R' ? ? ? ? T ? O
P
SOUTHVIEWE POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC k
fC
L? EXISTING POND
Ir I B CD
IC ? L ? ' p
?' {F I N
20 ® DENOTES FILL ® DENOTES FILL IN I
SURFACE WATER R WETLAND I
NC CAPITAL GROUP (POND) ?
® DENOTES FILL IN ® DENOTES EXCAVATION I I PLANS PREPARED BY
I1< SURFACE WATER IN WETLAND RUAPdM El"PER & KAHI,LI
consulting engineers
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SMITE 350
IE DENOTES TEMPORARY R.LEIGH.NORTN CAROLNU :7600-3060
® FILL IN SURFACE ® DENOTES HAND niv¦T¦-ssso
WATER CLEARING FOR
k? I THE TOWN OF FUQUAY VAMNA
NORTH CAROLINA
G
x
F_. H
a

a
x

w

c
1,000/ 2,
RALE]
LBON
x
w
w
a
x
z
TAMPA
ELMSLE ^x
4' ASHLEY
201
0
9d BENGAL
z PENMON
r ,o
ESTFIE > PITTSBORO 6 9A
LD G SWO
? w? 11
q BURTON
w `SOIy CHARLOTTE 55
P P0? w
w ?MCLEAN w z T? z ?0
o q 4?
? q a 5?00? z ? °E-
?I E-?q y MAIN ?T
p 3 401 v o
w .:
P7 O x '? O 3 9
q ¢ Q FAUCETTE x z
CONOVER p G
3 O A
9 11
WASHINGTON OLD HONEYCUTT
p OAK y ; AR
0
Q 401 .CHURCH ?t CURE G?
w JONES o 4yP
AIKEN
ii w ,? a \ S?yy r-
F FALCON a?? z
`' 3 d r 4 3 E-
¢ v ¢ x x T
a O ¢ l{ [A
N
PROD,
W E
z
m
t?
S
r
Y
x
t?
?, 5 m a w z
?P ? w w z .o q w e? n
Al g, I LA x z 9 m Y
MOSSY OAK FUQUAY VARINA ¢ RALEIGH
m
42 x ??P ?VANCE VANCE a
q
P z ?L
CP?E Y AREER q ?S'\ Q BARNES
A o ?? SPRING SPRING ?? ¢ WyCk
z
SUNSET a 6 py w
Project Study Area \? 3 W
w RANSOM q G
a a P
O PINE
C&Rn
SENTERWOOD QUEST 51- ff
EMING LOOP r RIDGE
£ ARNOLD (C:ORWOOD -? DON O
JUDD z GINWOOD?
w
z ? V La
o w
WILLHAVEN
Ov1 q
V
?tiy 3 ,w' JUDD PARKWAY VICINITY MAP
_Io d 44 FUQUAY-VARINA, NC
o WAKE COUNTY
? m 401 December 2005 Figure 1
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
5 4,000 consulting engineers Town of
iiii 01i Fee \ P? A RueicHNORTH caaouNa Fuquay-Varina
SHEET NUMBER 97
Wac Nec
Me Nob Wac
-- WA was WgA
oc -
WeC
Wa ;
1 WaA
kw LY
W?Blwac
(Joins sheet 90) 97
WgA / a
?.
WaB B
A ` ik
?
N
1 =. wac ?
- °? • ?
'
.
.
. was
F '
`
W,Fi
Wp.A M
k. - WgA
a aC
WgA
y ? waB --rte

a io Tower NoB y
Wac 'i ' WgA
Wa8 NoC
F % e s? M e

• $' g_ WBA ?r_ Nob ;. ??. F ua a Nor s
..
"
,10 '
aka
?
0
aB
abatuAr a Wo ?
\
Chapel
Wa8
T; WgA WaC fi
WgA
` WgA
c War WaB. WgA ?
?q
?W s
?
W G t' a
WaC
? ., ?i /??82

WaG °
,v ?.
06

W W
A
W

I a
a B ?-
Wa8 s
Wa8 oC No s o d
00
WaC
{ LO
NOC2 N002
No § F .;
WgA
U
y we

Was . • . NoC2
N6 FugY yy r`
" S o
°o
gA
LY
?? ? Ra
?
'. ° • ? 1 oG2
, bch ch

08

n
weB
?, ._ IO

..
NoG2

r
fob

N?

os

? ,. ?
NQS

o
° WgA
Wgl1
No
b '.
.. , . '$ NOR
s
? NoC2 " ? r
'
aB a* ' WaB NoCY
'
WaA Wa8 Go `? `
C
p * o
?W a Wa Io62. No
2
\ e
p6 p8 u
WaA
f? ?
1
rFS2 a.
1
AP62
B ec t A ^Q
WgA N(C7 .
0
a ,
1yP Wal o
WaA
Was
1
V 91) PARA If
I 1 1
1 HA810
Ra ,
.
. ApB

\ FUQUAY-VAR/NA, NC
•
` .' n
6 i a
A WAKE COUNTY
2
Fi a
e
4? hfoA gure $
In
Ao62 t Nos 1

,' AaC2 a NoC2 maruaarnrxu?uv
.ve
n..

1
Fuqua
>iy-var?
Da

16

WaB

4 (

062

NOC2 oBp
"SO1L.PDF Woli (Joins sheet 101)

.?'; _! ?? ? r a^..? ' ? ?I • • fK t4"?• a :? /
_.! \ ;•. ST-? .f-?_ ?.r ? \'.?J_/ ..r?/
S

0
c

?
• , > ? 1, ? '_ '` /": l! 1 , ,_ ? : ,

_ i

-l \'\
fp '

i
' If
p ?
l?
• l? f I VI

x3?
??O L
9

Rummel,
Klepper
& Kahl, LLP
William K Hellmann
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz
1. Michael Potter
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Michael W. Myers
Martin C Rodgers
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier
Barbara J. Hoage
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Robert J Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
B. Keith Skinner
Karen B. Kahl
Sayed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein
December 19, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Reference: Agent Authorization Letter for the Judd Parkway Extension and
Southview Pointe Subdivision in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
Dear U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):
The Preconstruction Notification application requires the property owner to
sign an Agent Authorization Letter to authorize a given person to act on the
property owner's behalf for obtaining the jurisdictional determination and filling out a
nationwide permit application. That given person becomes the "Agent" and may
enter the property with the USACE for the purpose of making the jurisdictional
determination.
Below are the property owner signatures which give consent to Rummel,
Klepper, and Kahl, LLP to act as their Agent for the purposes of completing the
permit process.

Bill KErnZTdffr85r - " Date
W.R. Henderson and Associates
8366 Six Forks Road, Suite 203
Raleigh, NC 27615
( her- ®-6-
Jay,.KAey
ToWn of
401 Old
Fuquay-
P.E
.iav-Vari
na, NC 27526
Date
Very Truly Yours,
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive
Suite 350
Raleigh, North Carolina
%7600-39110
Ph: 919-878-950
lo.t:919-790-5382
rvww. rkkerrgincers. cony
J ?? ! .Cs2WV7`??
J.T. Peacock, Jr., PE
Associate
JTP/jb
cc: BKS
MTM
ESW
305-078
F:\Word\Document\305-078\PermitApp\agency authorization letter.doc
Baltimore, AM Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA- Stanntom, VA-
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
ProjecVSite:
Applicant/Owi
Investigators:
Judd Parkway
Fuquay-Varina
WES, ESW
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project No: 1
Date: 9-May-2005
County: Wake
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Flag A4 WeflaM A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes (!To) Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VFGFTATION (USFWS Reaion No. 21
Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Parthenocissus quinquefolia Vine FAC Parthenocissus quinquefolia Herb FAC
Creeper,Virginia Creeper,Virginia
Sambucus canadensis Shrub FACW- Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
Elder,American Ivy,Poison
Symplocos tinctoria Shrub FAC Vitis rotundifolia Herb FAC
Horse-Sugar Grape,Muscadine
Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC Liquidambarstyraciflua Tree FAC+
Privet,Chinese Gum,Sweet
Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- Acerrubrum Tree FAC
Honeysuckle,Japanese Maple,Red
Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ Quercus nigra Tree FAC
Microstegium, Nepal Oak,Water

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 11/12 =91.67% FAC Neutral: 1/1 =100.00%
Numeric Index: 35/12 = 2.92
Remarks:
HYDROLnGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data
- NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: = 18 (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 1 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormlm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Droject/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: 1 Date: 9-May-2005
kpplicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: Wake
nvestigators: WES, ESW State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Flag A4
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam
Map Symbol: ApC Drainage Class: good Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-3 Oi 10YR4/2 N/A N/A N/A Loam
3-8 A 10YR5/4 N/A N/A N/A Sand
8-18 B 10YR4/2 10YR5/4 Common Distinct Sandy loam
18+ C 10YR4/1 N/A N/A N/A Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Res No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WeTorm"°
Judd Parkway
homer: Fuquay-Varina
rs: WES
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua
Project No:
Date: 9-May-2005
County: (None)
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: other
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant S cies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Rubus betulifolius Shrub FAC Campsis radicans Vine FAC
Blackberry T......._. r•______
Liquidambar styraciflua Shrub FAC+ Campsis radicans Herb FAC
Gum,Sweet Trumpet-Creeper
Eupatorium /eptophyllum Herb FAC+ Lonicera japonica Herb FAC-
Fennel Honeysuckle, Japanese
Pinus taeda Shrub FAC Lonicera japonica Vine FAC-
Pine,Loblolly Honeysuckle,Japanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/8 = 75.00% FAC Neutral: 0/0 = 0.00%
Numeric Index: 24/8 = 3.00
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (EXDlaln in Remarkal
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 9-May-2005
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
Investigators: WES State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland A
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam
Map Symbol: ApC Drainage Class: Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-4 A 10YR4/4 N/A N/A N/A Sandy clay loam
4-18+ B 2.5YR6/4 N/A N/A N/A Clay
Hydric Soil Indicator:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime UNK Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Explanation for response to: Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation ? Potential Problem Area ?
Sediment pond
Panty 2 of 2 Wet_Form-
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No:
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina
Investigators: ESW,JMH
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Reaion No. 21
Date: 11-Oct-2005
County: (None)
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Wetland C
Palustrine shrub/scrub
Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Sambucus canadensis Shrub FACW- Rubus betulifolius Herb FAC
Elder,American Blackberry
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Shrub FACW Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC
Ash,Green Greenbrier, Common
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree FACW Lonicera japonica Vine FAC-
Ash,Green Honeysuckle,Japanese
Acerrubrum Shrub FAC Salix nigra Tree OBL
Maple,Red Willow,Black
Woodwardia areolata Herb OBL Platanus occidentalis Tree FACW-
Chainfern, Netted Sycamore,American
Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+
Microstegium,Nepal

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 10/ 11 =90.91% FAC Neutral: 6/6 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 25/ 11 =2.27
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 5 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(7987 CoE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 11-Oct-2005
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
Investigators: ESW,JMH State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Wetland C
5011-5
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam
Map Symbol: ApC Drainage Class: Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-4 Oi 10YR2/2 N/A N/A N/A Clay loam
4-10 A 10YR4/1 10YR5/3 Many Distinct Sandy clay loam
10+
1 B
6 10YR3/1 N/A N/A N/A Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime LINK Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Aes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetForm1f0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 11-Oct-2005
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
Investigators: ESW,JMH State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Palustrine shrub/scrub
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Reaion No. 21
Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Diospyros virginiana Tree FAC Liquidambar styraci/lua Tree FAC+
Persimmon,Common Gum,Sweet
Quercus phellos Tree FACW- Eupatorium leptophyllum Herb FAC+
Oak,Willow Fennel
Solidago austrina Herb OBL Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
Golden-Rod Ivy,Poison
Acer rubrum Shrub FAC Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC
Maple, Red Greenbrier, Common
Acerrubrum Tree FAC Lespedeza sp. Herb NI
Maple, Red lespedeza
Liquidambar styraciflua Shrub FAC+
Gum,Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 10/ 10 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 27/10 =2.70
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydrology
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
>roject/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 11-Oct-2005
lpplicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
nvestigators: ESW,JMH State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland C
5011-5
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wagram loamy sand
Map Symbol: WaB Drainage Class: somewhat excessively drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Arenic Paleudul ts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-8 A 10YR4/4 10YR3/1 Few Distinct Sandy clay
8-12+ B 10YR4/4 10YR6/8 Many Faint Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime UNK Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes nNo
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 wetForm'm
North Carolina Division of Water Ouality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: -J jj PG/k Latitude:
Evaluator g tj/07: ?£ tf?lw? 3Re:s ? S? G? LonpR
Total Points: Other
Stream J east Intermittent County: k? e.g. Uuad Name:
Ilk 19 orpefennial Wk 30 1
I I
A. Geolno hole subtotal Absent. Weak Moderate Strong
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. SinuoWty 0 1
3
3. In-channel stricture: rtMe- I usnoe 0 1 2 3
4. SON texture or stream substrate sorts 0 1 2 3
5. ActNe/reNc floodplain 1 2 3
8. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9 a Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Heedcuts 0 2 3
11: Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drains wa 0 0.5 1 1
5
13. Second or greater order channel on eAstin .
USGS or NRCS map or other documented 0=0) Yes = 3
evidence.
•_ -
B_ HvdM1nnv MI IM0001 , --7 ?
14. Groundwater flow/dIscharge 0 1 2

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, g
0 3

Water In channel - d or rows season 2 3
18. L.eafNtter 1 0.5 0
17. Sedment on plants 0 1

18.Organic debris lines or piles rack lines
0
0
1 1.5

19. Hydric soils redoximo hk: features) resent?
No = 0 1.5
ea = 1.5
C. Blolo Subtotal a
2. Fibrous roots in channel
0 3 2 1 0
21
. Rooted plants in channel 2 1

22. Crayfish
0 0.5
1 0
1.6
23. Bivalves 1 2
3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.6
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1
5
28. Macrobenthos (note diverslty and abunds O j 0 1 .

27. Filamentous algae; p"hyton
0.5
1 1.5
1
5
28. Iron O)kiizi bacterlaft us. 0 0. 1 .
1
5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 .
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, hem 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use batik side of this form for additional motes.) Sketch:

0 kfi /F-7- e, It V f
-- 5 FpQ'rn 4n-(- ?c-h b,-. p.n ? I a:.n S s?1 C ? s
?
71?0??C-' 9 9
1 soy P.j (5,j)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3 /-q, 0 Project: 7.- d a? Latitude:
Evaluator: A/t, She: ?dFI ?J o?' d £ ,n5 Longhude:
Total Points: Other
Stream !a at least kWom )Rent county: 0 C' F-
NZ 19 or rsnnial YZ 30 k e. p. Ouad Name:

A. Goomo holo Subtotal =
1 a. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Wes
1 Moderate
2 8 q
3
2. Sinuosity 1 2 3
3. In-channel stnicture: riffle-pool uence 1 2 3
4. SoN texture or stream substrate nortina 1 2 3
5. Actlve/re0c floodpialn 0 2 3
8. Depositional bare or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent aituviel osits
9 a Nature) levees 0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Fleadcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural vaNey and draina wa 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No =
Yes = 3
._? ?? ....w r. rv. .mow.., .lVp .uw.wwwppi W WYIWY
B. Hydrology Subtotal = ?P
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, g 0
Water in channel - d or rows season 2 3
18. Leaflitter 111 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants 5.7 0. S. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles rack lines O. S 1 1.5
19. Mydrk: soils redoAmo hic features) resent? No = 0 Yea = 1.5
C. 01010Subtotal - S ----- ------
20b. Fibrous roots in channel
0 3 2 1 0
21
. Rooted lants in channel 3 1 0
22. Cra 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 1 1.5

25. Amphibians if
0.
1
1.5
28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abwxkme) 0 (
w
k 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; a on 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oAdizi bacteria/hi us. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland (ants in streambed
15 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75 OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
1terns 20 sad 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on die presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use bade side of thb form for additional rates.) Sketch:

?s. 7 Yea J

CIO ? S 0?1
als0 col(??t?
tog kc
Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Meeting with the DWQ Field Office
Date: November 28, 2005
Place: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision (Smith Property)
Time: 9am to loam
Subject: Verify stream impacts for project
Attendees: Mike Horan (DWQ), Joanna Harrington (RK&K), and Elizabeth Workman (RK&K)
RK&K met with the DWQ in the DWQ conference room (Barrett Drive in Raleigh, NC) to discuss the
Judd Parkway Extension project and adjacent residential development, Southview Pointe Subdivision, on
the Smith property. The purpose of the meeting was to verify stream delineations, establish linear feet and
acreage of jurisdictional impacts, and to clarify portions of the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for the
Nationwide Permit #23 application. RK&K began the meeting with an overview of the project, a
discussion of project history, and review of prior coordination with USACE and DWQ.
Downstream of the beaver impoundment, the unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek does exhibit perennial
characteristics. Approximately 105 linear feet of the perennial stream will be contained within a 66" pipe.
Approximately 24 feet of class I rip rap and filter fabric will be placed at the end of the pipe. From the
beaver impoundment and upstream to Wetland A, the stream channel is deemed intermittent by the
USACE. DWQ does not require mitigation unless there is over 150 linear feet of perennial stream
impacts. However, all impacts to the stream (perennial and intermittent) should be listed on the PCN.
DWQ does not require buffer mitigation for locally mandated buffer protection. The Town of Fuquay-
Varina plans to breach the dam at the time of construction. The stream channel will reform naturally and
then be planted with native vegetation along the 50-foot buffer.
DWQ instructed RK&K to include all wetland, stream, and open water impacts in the Cumulative Impacts
section. Because the cumulative impacts of streams totals greater than 150 linear feet, the fee for the PCN
is $475. Mail the seven copies to the following street address (rather than the P.O. Box address) for faster
delivery:
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/Stormwater Branch
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Horan will contact USACE (Monte Matthews) to discuss the project during the permitting process.
cc: JTP
MTM
THS
JWM
ES W
JMH
file
F:\W6r(ADocumentV05-07ffiMemo\DWQ meeting 11-28-05.doc
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 30, 2005
Judd Parkway Extension and Smith Property
Coordination with the USACE Raleigh Field Office
November 18, 2005
RK&K (Pete Stafford and Elizabeth Workman) met on site with the USACE (Monte Matthews) to discuss
the Judd Parkway Extension project and adjacent residential development on the Smith property. The
purpose of the meeting was to verify wetland and stream delineations, establish linear feet and acreage of
jurisdictional impacts, and to clarify portions of the Nationwide Permit #23 application. RK&K began the
meeting with an overview of the project, a discussion of project history, and review of prior coordination
with USACE and DWQ.
The field review began on the Smith property at Wetland C. Because the retention basin is planned to be
in 0.10 acre of the wetland, the developer will need to mitigate for these impacts, unless the developer can
adjust the retention basin to avoid the wetland area.
Mr. Matthews reviewed hydric conditions at Wetland D. This site is planned for several residential lots.
Although the soils present low chroma conditions, hydrologic indicators were very weak and vegetation
rated as facultative. Mr. Matthews decided to discard the jurisdiction of Wetland D. No impacts will
occur at Wetland D.
For an unknown amount of time, the farm pond's outlet pipe was not functional, probably due to
blockage. Water levels had risen to form wetlands around the pond and even over the dam itself. Due to
current drought conditions during this field review, the pond's water level was significantly lower than
during previous visits. Water was not overflowing the dam as it was previously. Wetland A on the dam
lacked hydrology and appeared dry although hydric vegetation and soils were present.
Also due to the dysfunctional outlet pipe, a stream channel had formed from the east end of Wetland A,
around the backside of the dam and drained into the original outlet area of the pond. The channel
contained water just upstream of the outlet area (mostly due to beaver activity causing the backup of
water). However, the upper limit of the channel, near Wetland A, was dry. Mr. Matthews deemed this
section as intermittent and unimportant. He stated to report the acreage of impact, rather than the linear
feet of impact, in the Preconstruction Notification (PCN); therefore, the area of impact would be
minuscule.
Mr. Matthews stated that the beaver impoundment at the original outlet pipe should be reported as an
open water impact on the PCN. No mitigation is required for the open water area within this beaver
impoundment.
Downstream of the beaver impoundment, the unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek does exhibit perennial
characteristics. Impacts will be reported on the PCN. Approximately 105 linear feet of the perennial
stream will be contained within a 66" pipe. Approximately 24 feet of class I rip rap and filter fabric will
be placed at the end of the pipe. DWQ does not require mitigation unless there is over 150 linear feet of
stream impacts.
Although USACE wetland criteria exists, Wetland B is a sediment retention basin and will be discarded
from jurisdictional impacts. No impacts will occur at Wetland B.
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 19, 2005
F: \Word\Document\3 05 -0MMemo\U S ACE field meeting 11-18-05.doc Updated December 20, 2005
Mr. Matthews stated that if the dam is breached, fill from the breaching must be placed in upland areas.
After the dam is breached and the stream channel reformed, those wetlands that may form and the stream
become jurisdictional and will be protected by the Section 404 Clean Water Act. If a pond is then put
back into place, the owner is required to report the wetlands and stream as impacts. No stormwater
features can be placed in these wetlands or stream after the site has restored to natural conditions.
Because the pond's water level has risen due to a dysfunctional outlet pipe, wetlands have formed around
the pond. These wetlands extend outside of the study area (and were delineated after this field review).
The dam is scheduled to be breached at the time of construction. As a result of breaching the dam, the
wetlands surrounding the pond will drain and therefore be considered as an impact. Breaching the dam
will result in greater than 0.5 acre wetland impacts and consequently push the project into individual
permit requirements.
Per conversation with USACE on August 2, 2005, RK&K understood that the issue of logical termini
would be resolved by tying the Judd Parkway Extension with the Smith property development. Therefore,
RK&K received approval from the developer to do their permit application in conjunction with Judd
Parkway Extension.
If a Nationwide 14 is not used for the Smith property, then a Nationwide 39 can be used for residential
development with a Nationwide 18 for the retention basin up to 0.10 acre of wetland impact.
December 1, 2005
Per phone conversation with Mr. Matthews on December 1, 2005, he instructed that the wetlands
surrounding the pond and the wetlands on the dam (Wetland A) will be impacted by the breached dam.
These wetlands must be reported as impacts in the permitting process and therefore is very likely to result
in over 0.5 acre of wetland impacts, the threshold for a nationwide 14 permit. (The dam may be breach
without a permit only if the breaching is independent of jurisdictional impacts.) If the dam is breached and
impacts result in over 0.5 of wetlands and/or 300 linear feet of stream, an individual permit will be needed
for this project. The individual permit process involves several agencies and mitigation will be determined
by these agencies. Mr. Matthews asked if the dam must be breached rather than repaired or if the road
could be shifted away from the dam. He wants to clarify with Ms. Manuele whether or not repairing the
dam would impact the wetlands currently along the dam and around the pond. It is likely that fixing the
dam will draw down hydrology as well. But he prefers this option over breaching. He will also look into
options on separating the projects since the developer will have no wetland impacts after moving the
retention basin. One issue remains though - the NWP 14 requires a logical termini, which would no
longer occur without the subdivision. Mr. Matthews understands that the developer planned to use Judd
Parkway Extension to build the subdivision.
i
December 2, 2005
Mr. Matthews called to inform us that his office is looking into ways to avoid an individual permit for the
Judd Parkway project. They too feel that an individual permit is excessive for this small project. However,
they must exercise their existing policies to remain consistent with all projects. In the next few days, they
will be discussing our project with other USACE offices to come up with a strategy and set a standard for
this type of situation.
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 19, 2005
F:\Word\Document\3 05-078\Memo\US ACE field meeting 11-18-05.doc Updated December 20, 2005
December 6, 2005
Mr. Matthews called with an update on the permit procedures. He stated that we have two options:
• Repair the dam and apply for the NWP #3 and 14
• Breach the dam and apply for the Individual 404/401 Permit.
NWP #3 allows repair of the dam, including impacts to any surrounding wetlands and open water (but
you still have to list them on the PCN form). No mitigation is required to wetlands or open water. NWP
#14 allows for stream crossings up to 300 linear feet, but mitigation is needed if over 150 linear feet.
Individual permit allows you to breach the dam, build the road, drain the wetlands, etc. But all impacts on
wetlands are mitigatable. Therefore, all wetlands on the dam, around the sides and in headwaters will be
totaled.
David and Elizabeth completed the wetland delineations in the areas outside of the project corridor and
Smith property on Wednesday December 7, 2005. There are 2.58 acres of wetlands surrounding the pond.
cc: JTP
MTM
THS
JWM
ESW
file
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 19, 2005
F:\Word\Document\305-078\Memo\USACE field meeting 1 I-I8-05.doc Updated December 20, 2005

Rummel,
Klepper
&. Kahl, LLP
William K Hellmann
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz
J. Michael Potter
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill
J. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Michael W. Myers
Martin C. Rodgers
Kenneth A. Gaon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier
Barbara J. Hoage
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron
Stuart A. Montgomey
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
B. Keith Skinner
Karen B. Kahl
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein
900 Ridgefield Drive
Suite 350
Raleigh, North Carolina
27609-3960
Ph: 919-578-9560
Fax: [phone]
iwvw. rkkengineerc. cam
December 22, 2005
Ms. Carol Shaw
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Subject: Extension of Judd Parkway by the Town of Fuquay-Varina and the
development of Southview Pointe Subdivision by Henderson and
Associates in Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Shaw,
The purpose of this letter is to request that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) provide confirmation that you are willing to provide compensatory
mitigation for the subject project.
The Town of Fuquay-Varina proposes to extend Judd Parkway 675 feet over an
unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek. The extension will terminate at the Smith
property. Henderson and Associates plan to develop the Smith property into an 88 home
residential community. Construction of the Judd Parkway Extension and adjacent
residential development will result in impacts to jurisdictional waters. There will be
0.114 acre of riverine wetlands impacted.
RESOURCES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 AND 401 OF
THE CLEAN WATER ACT
The project study area is located within the subbasin 03-06-07 of the Cape Fear River
Basin and is part of U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) hydrologic unit 0303004. The North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Index Number (SIN) is 18-16-1-
(1) from its source to the Wake - Harnett County line.
Wetland and stream delineations were performed for the Judd Parkway Extension
project on May 9, 2005. Wetland delineations for the Smith property were performed
on October 11, 2005. Jurisdictional review by the USACE and DWQ occurred on
November 18, 2005 and November 28, 2005, respectively. Impacts are reported in
Table 1.
Table 1: Stream and Wetland Impacts
Impact Site DWQ Index
No. Stream Impacts Wetland
Impacts
Wetland A 1 N/A 0.114 acre
TOTALS N/A 0.114 acre
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
We propose to mitigate for these impacts by using the EEP.
In addition to sending Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP a letter of confirmation, please also send the letter
of confirmation to Mr. Monte Matthews (USAGE Coordinator) at U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 in Raleigh, NC 27615. Mr. Matthew's
fax number is [phone].
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed, the NCDWQ requires a formal
letter from EEP indicating their willingness and ability to provide the mitigation work requested by the
Town of Fuquay-Varina. To expedite the permitting process, please also forward copy of the letter to
Mr. Mike Horan of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/Stormwater Branch, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604, fax number [phone].
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc:
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
JTP
ESW
WES
JMH
305-078-A01
F: I WORDI DOCUMEN71305-0781 CorrIF,EP-001.doc
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 9/15/05
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes.
- --- --- ------ ---- ------ - - - ---- --- -- --
1. Name of Applicant or Agent I £? I
o(
t 2. Name of Business of Applicant or Agent
--. --- ----- - - - - - - - - --- ---- i RUM M1_r I f ._ - ? I L L 1
F{' ---- ---- --------?
3. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
_ ? E G PVC. SN,
4. City, State, Zip
5. Telephone (eg, 919-555-1212)
6. Fax (optional)
7. E-mail (optional)
£_tJoTkv??a?1 ?_C k f 1!?j n F£('S. C.a,-,
8. Project Name CC `J
(?arkw cZn? ?bwrt?vifln? ?ir1fiL
9. Project Location (nearest town, city) Q
76 n_ u__q,-tea
10 Lat-Long Coordinates (optional) o e , o
3S-_-
__3?! 33,
y ?S yg_3? 'J- -
11. Project County a k
12 River Basin
- - --- - C? c Ra r
13. Cataloging Unit (8-digit)
03,0 3 0C)
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
17. Stream Impacts-Cold (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
18. Stream Impact-Cool (ft.)
- revision to a current acceptance, or
_ re-submission of an expired acceptance /
Date: / l °ta/o S
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
http://cfi)ub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205 or [e-mail]
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)

1 16+65 TO 18+96 66" RCP

INTERMITTENT STREAM - - - - - 0.0004 0.008 - 81 -

BEAVER POND - - - - 0.017 0.007 - -

PERENNIAL STREAM - - - 0.021 0.001 134 5

WETLANDS 0.114 - 0.006 - 0.038 - - - - -

TOTALS: 0.114 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.038 0.039 0.017 134 86 0
TAI A
LATERAL N' DITCH
(Not to Sod.)
FR
oVq a r t. 900°
"In 0 = LS Ft.
Max. G = LS Ft.
D=2.0 Ft.
Tyae of Llner= PSRU
L

cn
° I
° C CAPIT L GROU

1 ,?CB
S
E
c .-
EXCJ VAION IIN
WETLANDS
2 / 2 CB
24" F
------- - - - - - - - --- - F
__---c- F -- F ---
E E
E LATE D CH F
SEE DETAI
?ao
?
? kc ? IF ? ? ? fF
L
IC' kL
I<
JAN 1 3
DENR- WATER QUALITY IE
AND STORMATER BRANCH
EXISTING PON

25' a 25' PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
JUDD PARKWAY EXT.
CAGE: r= 5a IbY SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYORALAICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
P E 4 TONS L I RIP
W 89 S FILTER FABRIC
N NKS ONLY
\/
V
IF ?
O
SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC -
D
I
I
I
I
22
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN I
WETLAND
NC CAPI AL GROUP
® (POND)
DENOTES FILL I
DENOTES EXCAVATION

SURFACE WATER R ® I
IN WETLAND

k-

® DENOTES TEMPORARY

FILL IN SURFACE

® DENOTES HAND
I
CLEARING
WATER
I

INCOMPLE E PLANS
00 NOT U MR /9 ACpIL4'IION
PRELIMIN
00 NOT UY RY PLANS
CONTMUCTI N
Ip
N
a
x
N
English
?a
m
N
PLANS PREPARED BY:
RIJNEW .L KLEPPER & RAHI- LLP
consulting engineers
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 77609-3960
19 191 676-9560
FOR
THE TOWN OF FUQUAY FARINA
NORTH CAROLINA
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
'Not to scowl
FO
aurq C ?; t. SbJw
NIn.O : 45 Ft.
uo.. o = L5 Ft.
D=2.0 Ft.
Type of Llnw= PSRH
FROM STA.16+65 RT. TO STA.17+58 RT.
U1 0
+ I
° NC CAPITAL GROUP

CB
R
SITE I
E F 10
C
„ (?) 2 CB
EXCAVATION IN
WETLANDS
3
n
5
25' a 25' 50
SCALE: P= 50'
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
F °
PROJECT REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
DD PARKWAY EXT.
PIW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER

INCOMPLE E PLANS
W NOT Um FoR /• ACOU MON
PRELIMINA
DO NOT UM Po RY PLANS
L CCI 9 UCTION
W
--------------------------------------- r r r
C F F H -------- -----
-------- E--E E C E
E E j?LALATERAL V D CH
English
-/? SEE DETAIL Im- K?-
o If IF !F x
K 0
SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC p I
m
IF Ke i<
EXISTING POND
I
K4 k
a
x
k / N
k- K, I co
??k
K'- 1
I N
20 {<- k- k ® DENOTES FILL IN ® DENOTES FILL IN I
SURFACE WATER WETLAND I
NC CAPITAL GROUP ? (POND)
PLANS PREPARED BY
DENOTES FILL IN DENOTES EXCAVATION I R
SURFACE WATER ® IN WETLAND 1 RUN MEL KLEPPER & KAHL LLP
r consulting englneers
900 RIDGEFIE LD DRIVE SUITE 350
IE II? DENOTES TEMPORARY DE RALEIDH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960
f? ® ® NOTES HAND 1919)676
FILL IN SURFACE CLEARING FOR -9560
kL WATER I THE TOWN OF FUQUAY MARINA
NORTH CAROLINA
a
12l13M6
1' = 2,000 ft
Information depicted hereon is for reference purposes
only, compiled from best available sources. Fuquay-Varina
aswmes no responsibility for errors arising from misuse of
this map or misuse of the measurement scale.

miource: u5G& 7.s minute Quadrangle, Fugoay varina, NC
r ti
1) i ?0052254
' December 22, 2005
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
6508 Falls of Neuse Road
Rummel Raleigh, NC 27615
10epper Attention: Mr. Monte Matthews
& Kahl, LLP Subject: Nationwide 14 Permit Application for the extension of Judd Parkway
over an unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek and for the Southview
William K. Hellmann Pointe subdivision on the Smith Property in Wake County, NC.
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J Halbert Dear Mr. Matthews:
Stephen G. Zentz
1. Michael Potter The Town of Fuquay-Varina and developer Henderson and Associates are extendin

nromas E. Mohler g
Judd Parkway 675 feet to access Southview Pointe, a residential development. This
James A. Zito extension travels over an unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek. Construction of the Judd

Charles M. Easter, Jr. Parkway Extension and adjacent residential development will result in impacts to
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr. jurisdictional waters. There will be 0.114 acre of riverine wetlands permanently
Michael L. Krupsaw impacted.
Lars E. Hill
J Tommy Peacock, Jr
Michael W. Myers The subject project is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists the
Martin C. Rodgers Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) characteristics of independent utility of a
Kenneth A. Goon project:
Richard J. Adams. Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier . The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address
Barbara J. Hoage environmental matters on a broad scope;
Christopher F. Wright . The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional
Owen L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron transportation improvements are made in the area;
Stuart A. Montgomery • The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably
David G. Vanscoy foreseeable transportation improvement

Henry J. Bankard, Jr. .
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Prior to August 2, 2005, this extension project did not include the adjacent residential
Robert J. Andryszak development. However, after meeting with the USACE to begin the permittin
rocess

Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr
B. Keith Skinner g p
,
it was noted that the extension has no logical terminus. In order to permit the

Karen B. Kahl jurisdictional imPacts the Judd Parkway Extension project now includes the Smith
>
Seyed A. Saadat property (proposed Southview Pointe subdivision).
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
900 Ridgefield Drive The project study area is located within the subbasin 03-06-07 of the Cape Fear River
Suite 350 Basin and is part of U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) hydrologic unit 03030004. The
Raleigh. North Carolina headwaters of Kenneth Creek stretch east, west and south of Fuquay-Varina. The North
27609-3960 Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Index Number (SIN) is 18-16-1-
Ph: 919-S78-9500 (1) from its source to the Wake - Harnett County line.
Far: 919-790-S382
wwrv.rkkerr4inec, .rom Wetland and stream delineations were performed for the Judd Parkway Extension
project on May 9, 2005. Wetland delineations for the Smith property were performed
on October 11, 2005. Jurisdictional review by the USACE occurred on November 18,
2005 and DWQ occurred on November 28, 2005. Impacts are reported in the
Preconstruction Notification application.
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
There is one unnamed tributary of Kenneth Creek within the project study area. Years ago, this channel
was dammed and is now an abandoned farm pond. The pond's dam is currently clogged and therefore
dysfunctional. Its water level has risen beyond capacity and is seeping over the top of the dam and around
the eastern corner of the pond. This flow around the eastern corner of the pond has created a channel
along the back side of the dam. Incised from the irregular flow conditions, this channel is approximately 4
feet in width carrying mainly substrate of silt. Kenneth Creek has been assigned a NCDWQ Best Usage
Classification of C. No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), WS-1, or WS-II Waters occur within 3.0
miles of the project study area.
Kenneth Creek is listed on the 2002 List of Impaired Waters [303(d)] for the Cape Fear River Basin from
its source to the Wake - Harnett County line due to unknown causes. Potential sources of impairment
include a major municipal point source, urban runoff, and storm sewers.
Kenneth Creek is not designated as a National Wild and Scenic River or a North Carolina Natural and
Scenic River.
There are two wetland areas located within the project study area. Wetland A is located within the Judd
Parkway Extension design. Wetland C (which is connected to Wetland A on the back side of the pond) is
within the Smith property boundaries proposed for future residential development by Henderson and
Associates. These wetlands are described below.
Wetland A is a palustrine emergent area adjacent to the pond containing hydrology due to the water
spilling over the dam (due to clogged outlet pipe). Wetland A extends into the project corridor (100' of
each side of the alignment) and is shown as Site 1 on the permit drawings. Hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils are present on many areas of the dam. Tree vegetation is dominated by sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), and water oak (Quercus nigra). Wetland shrub
vegetation is dominated by elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Herb vegetation is dominated by Japanese grass (Microstegium viminea), muscadine grape (vitis
rotundifolia), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia). Primary hydrologic indicators include
saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil and drainage patterns in wetlands. Secondary hydrologic
indicators include oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of soil as well as water-stained leaves.
Hydric soil indicators include an aquic moisture regime, reducing conditions, and low-chroma colors.
Wetland C is approximately 0.6 acre within the Smith property boundary. A retention basin was
redesigned to avoid all impacts to Wetland C. Tree vegetation is dominated by American sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Wetland
shrub vegetation is dominated by elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
and red maple (Acer rubrum). Herb vegetation is dominated by Japanese grass (Microstegium viminea),
netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), and blackberry (Rubus betulifolius). Primary hydrologic
indicators include saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil. Secondary hydrologic indicators
include oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of soil as well as water-stained leaves. Hydric soil
indicators include reducing conditions and low-chroma colors.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, and
Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists
four federally protected species for Wake County These species include the Bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Surveys for the bald eagle, red-cockaded
woodpecker and Michaux's sumac were completed on October 11, 2005. Habitat for the bald eagle and
red-cockaded woodpecker was not present within the project study area. Habitat for Michaux's sumac
was present however field surveys indicated that no specimens are located on the Smith property or along
the impacted areas of the dam. The dwarf wedgemussel only occurs in the Cape Fear River drainage and
therefore is not found in this watershed.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
With regard to the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404(b)(1) guidelines, the Town of Fuquay-Varina is
committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize
jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable
jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the planning stages; minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
The following is a list of the project's jurisdictional stream avoidance/minimization activities:
Avoidance/Minimization:
• Fill slopes along the extension are at a 1.5:1 ratio in most areas of the roadway to avoid fill in the
stream and to minimize fill in wetlands.
• The extension was shifted south to avoid the dam and the new channel running parallel to the
dam.
• A retention basin on the Smith Property was moved and redesigned to avoid Wetland C.
• Permanent perennial stream impacts are limited to the 66" RCP. RipRap will be placed along the
banks of the stream to add reinforcement. No RipRap will be put into the channel.
• All wetlands not directly affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary
encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be
allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
Based on the above considerations, it is determined that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed
construction in jurisdictional Waters of the United States, and that the proposed action includes all
practicable methods to avoid and/or minimize jurisdictional wetland impacts that may result from such
use.
Compensation: The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) will be paid accordingly to assume responsibility for satisfying the federal
Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for this project.
The remaining necessary compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts to waters that are
jurisdictional under the federal Clean Water Act will be provided by the EEP. An acceptance letter from
EEP is pending and will be sent to USACE and DWQ after approval. The offsetting mitigation will be
derived from an inventory of assets already in existence within the same 8-digit cataloguing unit. The
Town of Fuquay-Varina and Henderson & Associates have avoided and minimized impacts to
jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible as described above. The unavoidable permanent
impacts to 0.114 acre of a riverine wetland will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the
EEP program.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Attached for your information is a copy of the Pre-construction Notification, permit drawings, maps, field
data forms, agent authorization letter and meeting minutes from DWQ and USACE coordination for the
subject project. Application is hereby made for the Department of Army Section 404 Nationwide 14 for
the above described activities. We are also hereby requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the
Division of Water Quality. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC we will provide
$475.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application. We are providing seven
copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality, for review.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please call me at [phone] ext. 21.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
cc: Mr. Jay Meyers, P.E. - Town of Fuquay-Varina
Mr. Tom Goodwin - Henderson and Associates
Mr. Brandon Jones, NCDOT - Division 5 District Engineer
Ms. Glenda Gibson - Gibson Engineers
F. I Word (Document 1305-0781PermitApp UuddPktivycoverletter2, doc
2 5 4
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
krr any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name:_ Jay Meyers PE
Mailing Address: Town of Fuquay-Varina - Engineering Department
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina NC 27526
(Henderson and Associates is a co-applicant - please see agent authorization letter attached)
Telephone Number: 919-567-3911 Fax Number: 919-552-7481
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Rummel Klepper & Kahl LLP
Company Affiliation: Attn: Elizabeth Workman
Mailing Address: 900 Ridgefield Drive Suite 350
Raleigh NC 27609
Telephone Number: 919-878-9560 Fax Number: 919-790-8382
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuquay-Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Southview Pointe (88 lots planned)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): from Raleigh, NC, take
401 south to Fuquay-Varina, turn left onto Judd Parkway and follow to the end. Project
begins where the existing road ends.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35° 34' 33.4 °N 78° 48' 36.1 °W
6. Property size (acres): 0.53 acre along Judd Parkway Extension and 20.49 acres on Southview
Pointe Subdivision
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site has been significantly disturbed. The USGS
topographic maps and soil survey show that a pond has been around for many years. This
pond has a dysfunctional outlet pipe and is adjacent to the proposed road. The proposed road
Page 2 of 10
travels over a sediment basin used to collect runoff from nearby residential construction
activities. Gullies have formed to this basin. Vegetation to the sides of the basin are
dominated by thickets of blackberry, sweetg_um and red maple The Southview Pointe
subdivision is planned on the Smith property, adjacent to the proposed Judd Parkway
Extension. This property is a fallow farm field with several old or dilapidated buildings. The
eastern corner of the property dips downward into a lucustrine wetland connecting to the
pond.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed 675-foot extension will extend Judd Parkway northwestward from the end of the
existing roadway with three 12-foot lanes, and curb and gutter section with 4-foot bike lanes
and 5-foot sidewalks. The proposed road extension will cross an unnamed tributary to
Kenneth Creek below the dam. The Smith property will be developed into a residential
community (Southview Pointe subdivision) of approximately 88 single-family homes
Construction equipment will consist of heavy duty trucks earth moving equipment cranes
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Judd Parkway will be extended northwestward
675 feet across a tributary to provide access to the planned Southview Pointe subdivision
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Per conversation with USACE (Ms. Jean Manuele) on August 2 2005,
there is little or no project history in the database associated with Judd Parkway.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The Town of Fuquay-Varina's Thoroughfare Plan shows Judd Parkway extending past the Smith
property and eventually connecting to Hwy 42 and onward circling the Town of Fuquay-Varina
The Judd Parkway Extension was planned as a 675-foot extension to terminate just after the
unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek was crossed. Due to permit requirements for a logical
terminus and per conversation with Ms. Jean Manuele on August 2 2005 (see attached meeting
minutes), this extension has been merged with the Smith property residential development
Page 3 of 10
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The Judd Parkway Extension will impact
a small area of riverine wetlands occurring on the dam. Although this wetland (Wetland A) is on
the side of the dam and is a low quality system it exhibits soils hydrology and vegetation
required by the USACE. The pond no longer drains from its outlet pipe but instead flows over
and around the dam during rainy conditions. Fill will occur on 0 114 acre of the wetland due to
building up the roadbed. Excavation will occur in 0.006 acre of the wetland which will be the
location of a ditch tying into the intermittent/unimportant portion of the channel NCDOT
requires a 10-foot mechanized clearance zone beyond the slope stakes This zone has been
incorporated in this project as an area of hand clearing in 0.038 acre of the wetland
The stream channel that begins on the eastern end of the wetland travels along the backside of
the dam and empties into the original outlet area which is currently plugged by beaver activi!
From the beginning of the stream to the beaver fond (outlet area) the USACE has deemed this
portion as intermittent and unimportant; impacts may be reported as acreage rather than linear
feet in this section. Due to consistency in this permit application we reported all acreages and
linear feet, even for this unimportant section. The channel will be shifted temporarily on 81
linear feet and 0.008 acre. Fill will occur on 0.0004 acre to build the roadbed
The beaver pond area is an open water impact and mitigation is not needed Permanent fill will
be placed in the beaver pond on 0.017 acre. Temporary dewatering will occur to 0.007 acre to
access the 66" RCP.
From the beaver pond and downstream, the stream is deemed as perennial and mitigation may be
necessary. A 66" RCP will be used for drainage under Judd Parkway Extension along 115 linear
feet and 0.018 acre. Temporary impacts will occur along 24 linear feet and 0.005 acre where
RipRap will be used as reinforcement along the banks. All RipRap will be placed at the top of
bank, avoiding impacts to the ordinary high water in the stream channel A dissipater pad is not
included in this design because flow from the 66" RCP is at four feet per second
The Smith property includes a wetland area (Wetland C) which was formed from the backup of
the pond. The developer has redesigned the retention basin to avoid this wetland
Page 4 of 10
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland
Impact Type of Wetland Located within Area of
Site Type of
marsh 100-year Distance to Nearest Impact
Number Impact ,
aceous
bog
herbaceous
etc.) Floodplain Stream (linear feet) (acres)
(indicate on ,
,
, (yes/no)
map)
Site 1 Fill/Permanent Herbaceous, disturbed, No 0 0
114
along dam .
Site 1 Excavation Herbaceous, disturbed, No 0 0
006*
along dam .
Site I Hand Clearing Herbaceous, disturbed, No 0 0
038*
along dam .
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.158
mitigation is not considered for these impacts
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.58 acres -
includes all wetlands around the pond which extend onto the Smith property.
Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply leneth X width. then divide by 43 i6n
Site Number Perennial Average Impact Area of
(indicate on map) Stream Name Type of Impact or Stream Width Length Impact
Intermittent Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)

Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. 66" RCP/Permanent Perennial 7 feet 115 0.018
Site I UT to Kenneth Cr. RipRap on stream banks/Temporary Perennial 7 feet 24* 0.005
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. Relocation
/Temporary Intermittent 4 feet 81* 0.008
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Cr. Fill/Permanent Intermittent 4 feet 0.0004
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 220 0.0314
mitigation is not constaerea for these impacts
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 5 of 10
5.
Open Water Impact Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number applicable) )
(if ap Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Site 1 UT to Kenneth Creek Fill/Permanent Beaver impoundment 0.017*
Site I UT to Kenneth Creek Dewatering/Temporary Beaver impoundment 0.007*
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.024
*mitigation is not considered for these impacts
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): 0.0314
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.158
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.024
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 220
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed road was shifted
south to avoid or minimize impacts to the dam, surrounding wetlands and stream flowine around
the dam and parallel to the project. Previously, the project included breaching the dam at the time
of construction and building Judd Parkway Extension adjacent to the breached dam. However,
impacts to wetlands surrounding the pond would be significant and costly to mitigate. Fill slopes
Page 6 of 10
were adiusted from 3:1 to 1.5:1 or 2:1, where necessary, to avoid most of the stream The dam-
facing slope of the new roadway will be reinforced with Rip Rap to protect it in case the dam
fails in the future. The developer of the Southview Pointe subdivision has redesigned the
retention basin on the northeastern end of their property to avoid wetland impacts to Wetland C
Hand clearing alone 10 feet of slope stakes will be used to lessen impacts to Wetland A Rip
Rap at the outlet of pipe will be placed on stream banks for reinforcement and kept out of the
ordinary. high water mark of the stream channel.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation for DWO is not required The project does not impact over one acre of freshwater
wetlands or over 150 linear feet of perennial stream Mitigation by the USACE is not
required for the 115 linear feet of perennial stream because the amount is under the 150
linear feet threshold for permanent impacts. However, mitigation is required by the USACE
for the 0.114 acre of riverine wetland impacts which will be purchased through the NCEEP
Page 7 of 10
program. The dam will not be breached and most surrounding wetlands will not be impacted
by this project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are willing to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.114
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
The project will be paid for and built by the developer (Henderson and Associates) but reimbursed
later by the Town of Fuquay-Varina.
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 8 of 10
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify)? Yes ? No
3.
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 N/A 1.5
Total N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A - The Town of Fuquay-Varina has local
ordinances to protect a 50-foot buffer area along this tributarv. Buffer impacts are being
coordinated with the Town of Fuquay-Varina (Jay Meyers-Town Engineer).
.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious surfaces on the project include
paved roads. single familv homes and drivewavs. Proposed impervious surfaces for the
Southview Pointe Subdivision total approximately 9.86 acres versus total acreage of 20.49 acres.
Stormwater from the proposed Southview Pointe subdivision is to be collected in catch basins in
open areas and in curb inlets along the proposed on site streets. The stormwater collected in
these catch basins and curb inlets will gravity flow into two detention ponds. These ponds have
been sized for water quality according to the NCDENR BMP Manual and will provide control
from the 10-vear return period storm not to exceed pre-development conditions per the Town of
Fuguay-Varina's stormwater requirements.
Proposed impervious surfaces for the Judd Parkwav Extension total approximately 1.064 acre
versus total acreage of 1.273 acres for the area within the right-of-way (not easements) from the
beginning of the project (resurfacing intersection) to the property line at the end of the project.
Stormwater for the Judd Parkway Extension will collect along curbs and drain into gutters which
empty into the 66"RCP and onto the unnamed tributary of Kenneth Creek.
Page 9 of 10
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sewage will be tied into Town of Fuquay-Varina which has adequate capacity at this time.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Because existing roads access the surrounding neighborhoods the 675-foot extension and
residential development are not expected to result in cumulative impacts based upon reasonably
anticipated future growth. The residential community will be relatively small will not involve
commercial development and is located in a relatively developed landscape The project may
result in increased traffic and additional stormwater runoff. This is particularly important
because the impacted stream, unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek is listed on the 2002 List of
Impaired Waters f303(d)1 for the Cape Fear River Basin from its source to the Wake-Harnett
Countv line. Cumulative impacts for temporary and permanent impacts include approximately
0.0314 acre of stream, 220 linear feet of stream, 0.024 acre of open water, and 0.158 acre of
riverine wetlands.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
?L ? ^ ,eN..h [ r, i lFxor-/- C.,. -J 4,.C./, 6 t P / 2 f a 1 f ?
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
WETLAND LEGEND
--WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL IN
® SURFACE WATER
(POND) SINGLE TREE
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND _ WOODS LINE
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
? DRAINAGE INLET
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER

ROOTWAD
•
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
•• • • • CLEARING
E-- E- FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP
TB
?- TOP OF BANK
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER ................... EDGE OF WATER 5 OR PARCEL NUMBER
-- C--- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT IF AVAILABLE
---F- -- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
D
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
-?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
--- NG--- NATURAL GROUND
---EL.-- PROPERTY LINE LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
--EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED ? GRASS SWALE
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
--EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-••-•• ••-••-••-••-•• WATER SURFACE
x x
x x x LIVE STAKES
x
x
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
BOULDER JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION
&
- - - CORE FIBER ROLLS
HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY
R:\HYDRAULICS\=05-555-PMT _LEGEND.DGN
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACT

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)

1 16+65 TO 18+96 66" RCP

INTERMITTENT S TREAM - - - - - 0.0004 0.008 - 81 -

BEAVER POND - - - - - 0.017 0.007 - - -

PERENNIAL STREAM - - - - - 0.018 0.005 115 24 -

WETLANDS 0.114 - 0.006 0.038 - - - _ _

TOTALS: 0.114 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.038 0.036 0.020 115 105 0
PROP. NO. PROPERTY OWNER NAME PROP. OWNER MAILING ADDRESS
1 NC CAPITAL GROUP 4000 WESTCHASE BLVD, SUITE 500
SOUTHERN OAKS, LLC RALEIGH, NC 27607-3965
2 NC CAPITAL GROUP 1009 SMOKEWOOD DRIVE
SOUTHERN OAKS, LLC APEX, NC 27502-8525
3 SOUTHVIEW POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC 8366 SIX FORKS ROAD #203
RALEIGH, NC 27615
TOWN OF FUQUAY VARINA
JUDD PARKWAY EXTENSION

HENDERSON & ASSOCIATES
SOUTHVIEW POINTE SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY
12/21/2005
K:rz-misctNyaroijuaa varKway Burtprop.xls
FWACT REFEREma mo. I SH&T NO.
SITE MAP

wo SHW NO.
ROAOA'AY OESIC#J HYD&*A 1ICS
BIONHR -

INCOMPLE
DO DOT 056 1011 E PLANS
! ACOVISITI ,
PRELIMIN
Do DOT US RY PLANS
m"T"ucTm
English
%
SUNSET DR.
C9?
rn1 ? ?
SITE 1 JUDD PARKWAY
LI

SEQUOIA RIDGE DR.
!00' 0' 100' 200'
SCALE r= 200'
PLANS PREPARED BY :
RUMbtEL KLEPPER & RAHI, H
co-sultlnq e-glneers
!00 NIDOEiIELO ORIVE SUITE 350
RALEIGH. MORTM CAROLINA 3T60l-]9{0
1! I!) 676-9560
FOR
THE TORN OF FUQUAY MARINA
NORTH CAROLINA
DETAIL A
ur •v' DIrcN
("WIt to scow
9I,D=L5 Ft.
Max.0 = L5 Ft.
0 = LO Ft.
TyDe of Lln = PSRN
FROM STA. IS AS R TO STA 17+U rT
+ I
O
° NC CAPITAL GROUP

?C
C ?
EXCAVATION IN
WETLANDS
SITE I
CB q,R O 1 CB
4
a 25' 50'
scACE:I.= 50,
PLACE 48 TONS CL I RIP RAP
W/89 SY FILTER FABRIC
ON BANKS ONLY
F °
MOJECT REFEW E NO. Rim NO.
1W SN@r NO.
OWAY DE9GN NYDtAUM
D4GWE9 BIGINT9
INCOMPLE E PLANS
m NOT IM IQ ,. AcOuISttp"
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
DO Na 11,?[ M MIJCMN
W \'
24" F . . I
-----------------------------_-- F P IE
__ --C F F -------- -----
_____-_ - E-E E c H E
E
E LATERAL V D CH k F !? j<
F
English
I\ Q
fEm he IF kc IF X
L P
LL I\
T T O
N
SOUTHVIEWE POINTE DEVELOPERS, LLC x
EXISTING POND I
IF ? ? LT L I N
k- a)
C
X
I' N
20 IF ® DENOTES FILL ® DENOTES FILL IN I
SURFACE WATER R WETLAND I
NC CAPITAL GROUP ? (POND)
? ? PLANS PREPARED BY
® DENOTES FILL IN ® DENOTES EXCAVATION 1
SURFACE WATER IN WETLAND I R12AEL KLEPPER & KAHI,U
consulting englneers
I ' 900 RIDOEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 3SO
!? DENOTES TEMPORARY RALEIGN,NORTH CAROLINA 2T60S-3960
® FILL IN SURFACE ® DENOTES HANG 49.9) 11170-956D
WATER CLEARING FOR
I TILE 7-N OF FUQUAY NORTH CAROLDJAYARINA
FURAN
z
a
.e
a
a
S
W
x
¢
1,000/ 2,
lz
?LEGf -
v
70 4 ASHLEY
OD
L? G4RNER - > fQ 'S
WILBON r o
z d 90 BENGAL
M PENMON
?sl,e? x r A
t X ;ia .x > ?A
j FIELp PITTSBORO pG S?
? q BURTON
z w° CHARLOTTE 55 ¢
0?, w
w MCLEAN $ W z ?9 z
Johnston r o w q 4 N 4 0
County o x? o?p
w a 3 401 o
O
£ q ¢ o FAUCETTE x
3 O E-F P
CONOVER O G
TAMPA 3
WASHINGTON l
ELKSLEIGB OAK
z
xCHURCH
w JONES 401
AIKEN
w
`r z y ,
W ti a
a ¢
FALCON
a e
¢ 9 E-
c w 4 ¢ n x x
a ,? s x ¢ a ¢
¢ o
z
e S?? w z Q m
?L
p? A?/'
F, V
MOSSY OAK UYeiU/!4.F A INA RALEIGH f ¢
jI a
- 42 z ??P VANCE VANCE
q ?
P z ?d
AREER '? ?s\ y W
SPRING SPRING
Y 3 hS ?? 3 i
q
SUNSET
a
z
Project Study Area r?o 0
w RANSOM w
c? a
h PINE otl
SENTERWOOD QUEST d
LOOP r RIDGE
FLEMING O
£ ARNOLD CORWOOD
0 JUDD z GINWOOD?
w
z
?P4 5
O WILLHAVEN
0`? ca
a b
4", a w' J
H
¢ e £ tiG
($ o v?
e ? -w o
C, 401 December
0 o a/
3;000 sz°?4'000? ? ???4 • R
?N
PROD,
UW
C
?
z
m
t?
r
9

LD I
O HO1
yP
099
s
z
? H
a
? z
z
m x
m 9
E,g RN
EgWY
CR
OL9? w
0
W
q G
a ?
0 0
C&Izz
DON
i>
G4 I x
w
UDD PARK WAY VICINITY MAP
FUQUAY-VARINA, NC
2005 FAKE COUNTY Figure 1
UM<AEI, KI.EPPER & KAHL, LLP
consulting engineers Town of
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Fuquay-Varina
SHEET NUMBER 97
(Joins sheet 90) 97
N.13 ?? E\ O - WgA
WaC NoC 1 ?- /?
WaB T' WgA N
Nos WaC e,_\ d wac
Me
J? I i /r Was
was WaA WgA
it
•/ M
?
i wgA
aC1
wgn ! WaB - y
\ aG ?e
Wa w? -_ c = s NOB
a - $ io Tower ?
NofEY LY }. Was NoC /y
e ?? Mfl
Ws9 Sri ? d
Wa6 a
oe E WgA WgA
Wo
WaC vim. a ao0 WgA } Me G a\ s Wa
WaC - w C
- ' P WaB oc \ ? -
Was Nos
Noe F u e NoC j
ake 10
e8 a 3 Wo Chapel
A Wae ,N ,
WaC
WgA
j?
weA
C +ec WsB ? WgA
M
?? Was wac 2
??' Nb82
a6
.
WaC cis
0
w w F
- WaB _ s
Wa8O
• `s'9 ?- av N -o ado
Waf
NGC2 t n
p Nge2
WgA No
cf)
Y wa 1 Nac2 L
`• o
WaB Pugy Y o
•? ' • NoCl? Spr
BA CY \ gA Ra Sc 2 , m
NoC z
08 af, web
WgA
/?' NoB : • ? >baia ,e ?. ? NoB2
i - as_ - NoC
e8
7
t
,
O
waA co o
was -.??? r
a NoC2 ? ' z
1Na Ws OB2 ,
A?i ii? WaA _ \ A, jruz"
ApElz _ i /C?o a
WaB k Pr ' eCt_? sA a N NuC7 o
9 v
i= w r ° was
WaA ^
waB ma J1 DD PARA 11A) LA 111 S10A
---- = FUQUAY-VARINA, NC
n Y WAKE COUNTY o
AgB7 Y Figure 2 °o
NoA
Aae2 ? Nob
?V2 i it NOCZ auaeasurot
to aB? wRMcw.uu1189•v917II8
WaB
(. P87 NOC2
FVSOILPDF (Joins sheet 101)
I ?I

pal i

I

LL.

?J
i'

\ I

1 I. R
1
\ FYI C•\\

'E;7
P .
Ib
I?
}
i
E

j7.
r

7
;:r
December 19, 2005
Rummel,
Klepper
SL Kahl, LLP
William K. Hellmann
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz
J. Michael Potter
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Michael W. Myers
Martin C. Rodgers
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier
Barbara J Hoage
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Robert J Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
B. Keith Skinner
Karen B. Kahl
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein
900 Ridgefield Drive
Suite 350
Raleigh, North Caroline
?7609-3960
Ph: 919-878-9560
Far: 919-790-8382
wtvty. rdkeitgineers. cant
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Reference: Agent Authorization Letter for the Judd Parkway Extension and
Southview Pointe Subdivision in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
Dear U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):
The Preconstruction Notification application requires the property owner to
sign an Agent Authorization Letter to authorize a given person to act on the
property owner's behalf for obtaining the jurisdictional determination and filling out a
nationwide permit application. That given person becomes the "Agent" and may
enter the property with the USACE for the purpose of making the jurisdictional
determination.
Below are the property owner signatures which give consent to Rummel,
Klepper, and Kahl, LLP to act as their Agent for the purposes of completing the
permit process.
Jay,Mey
T4h of
401 Old
Fuquay-
P.E
a, NC 27526
ber- 0-691
Date
Very Truly Yours,
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
J.T. Peacock, Jr., PE
Associate
JTP/ib
cc: BKS
MTM
ESW
305-078
F:\Word\Document\305-078\PermitApp\agency authorization letter.doc
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC. Concord,-NC- - Virginia -Beach, [VA_ Richmond; VA- - Staunton; VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC
W.R. Henderson and Associates
8366 Six Forks Road, Suite 203
Raleigh, NC 27615
Project/Site:
Investigators
Judd Parkway
Fuquay-Varina
WES, ESW
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project No: 1
Date: 9-May-2005
County: Wake
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Flag A4 Wt's 100 A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes (!To) Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Reaion No. 2)
Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Parthenocissus quinquefolia Vine FAC Parthenocissus quinquefolia Herb FAC
Creeper,Virginia Creeper,Virginia
Sambucus canadensis Shrub FACW- Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
Elder,American Ivy,Poison
Symplocos tinctoria Shrub FAC Vitis rotundifolia Herb FAC
Horse-Sugar Grape,Muscadine
Ligustrum sinense
] Shrub FAC Liquidambar styracitlua Tree FAC+
Privet,Chinese Gum,Sweet
Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- Acerrubrum Tree FAC
Honeysuckle,Japanese Maple,Red
Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ Quercus nigra Tree FAC
Microstegium, Nepal Oak,Water

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 11 / 12 = 91.67% FAC Neutral: 1/1 =100.00%
Numeric Index: 35/12 = 2.92
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
- NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations YES Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
YES Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: = 18 (in.) NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 1 (in.)
YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
'roject/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: 1 Date: 9-May-2005
kpplicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: Wake
nvestigators: WES, ESW State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Flag A4
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam
Map Symbol: ApC Drainage Class: good Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-3 of 10YR4/2 N/A N/A N/A Loam
3-8 A 10YR5/4 N/A N/A N/A Sand
8-18 B 10YR4/2 10YR5/4 Common Distinct Sandy loam
18+ C 10YR4/1 N/A N/A N/A Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
YES Aquic Moisture Regime NO Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Res No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetForm'm
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 9-May-2005
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
Investigators: WES State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: other
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Region No. 2)
Dominant Plant S cies Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant SDecies(Latin/Common? str2?ii.n lnrfl . fnr
• •?•-?? •-?•? 0111 w I rr?t, 1 Lamps?s raa?cans j Vine I FAC
Blackberry Tn ?mnof_(`?nnne?
L/quidambar styraciflua Shrub FAC+ Campsis radlcans Herb FAC
Gum,Sweet Trumpet-Creeper
Eupatorium /eptophyllum Herb FAC+ Lonicera japonica Herb FAC-
Fennel Hone suckle,Japanese
Pinus taeda Shrub FAC Lonicera japonica Vine FAC-
Pine,Loblolly Honeysuckle, Japanese

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 6/8 = 75.00% FAC Neutral: 0/0 = 0.00%
Numeric Index: 24/8 = 3.00
Remarks:
VRVLV?7 I
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
M Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in,) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) NO FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
3roject/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 9-May-2005
kpplicanVOwner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
nvestigators: WES State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland A
AM A
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam
Map Symbol: ApC Drainage Class: Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-4 A 10YR4/4 N/A N/A N/A Sandy clay loam
4-18+ B 2.5YR614 N/A N/A N/A Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime UNK Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Explanation for response to: Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation ? Potential Problem Area ?
Sediment pond
- "
Project/Site: Judd Parkway
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina
Investigators: ESW,JMH
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua
Project No:
Date: 11-Oct-2005
County: (None)
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Wetland C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Palustrine shrub/scrub
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION IUSFWS Reason No. 21
Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Sambucus canadensis Shrub FACW- Rubus betulifolius Herb FAC
Elder,American Blackberry
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Shrub FACW Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC
Ash,Green Greenbrier, Common
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree FACW Lonicera japonica Vine FAC-
Ash,Green Honeysuckle,Japanese
Acerrubrum Shrub FAC Salix nigra Tree OBL
Maple,Red Willow,Black
Woodwardia areolata Herb OBL Platanus occidentalis Tree FACW-
Chai nfern, Netted Sycamore,American
Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+
Microstegium, Nepal

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 10/11 =90.91% [Numeric AC Neutral: 6/6 = 100.00%
Index: 25/11 = 2.27
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
Nom/ Other YES Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Field Observations NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) YES Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) YES Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: = 5 (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Page 1 of 2 WetFormtm

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 11-Oct-2005
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
Investigators: ESW,JMH State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Wetland C
zuiL1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam
Map Symbol: ApC Drainage Class: Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-4 Oi 10YR2/2 N/A N/A N/A Clay loam
4-10 A 10YR4/1 10YR5/3 Many Distinct Sandy clay loam
10+ B 10YR3/1 N/A N/A N/A Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulfidic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime UNK Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
YES Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
YES Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
W t I LAND Ut 1 LKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? es No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Page 2 of 2
WetFormim
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Judd Parkway Project No: Date: 11-Oct-2005
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina County: (None)
Investigators: ESW,JMH State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID: Palustrine shrub/scrub
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location:
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION (USFWS Reoion No. 21
Dominant Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies Latin/Common Stratum Indicator
Diospyros virginiana Tree FAC Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+
Persimmon, Common Gum,Sweet
Quercus phellos Tree FACW- Eupatorium leptophyllum Herb FAC+
Oak,Willow Fennel
Solidago austrina Herb OBL Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
Golden-Rod Ivy,Poison
Acerrubrum Shrub FAC Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC
Maple, Red Greenbrier, Common
Acerrubrum Tree FAC Lespedeza sp. Herb NI
Maple, Red lespedeza
Liquidambar styraciflua Shrub FAC+
Gum,Sweet

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 10/ 10 = 100.00% FAC Neutral: 2/2 = 100.00%
Numeric Index: 27/10 =2.70
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
NO Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
N/A Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
N/A Aerial Photographs NO Inundated
N/A Other NO Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
YES No Recorded Data NO Water Marks
NO Drift Lines

Field Observations NO Sediment Deposits
NO Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) NO Water-Stained Leaves
NO Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) YES FAC-Neutral Test
NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydrology
Page 1 of 2 WetForm'm
Project/Site: Judd Parkway
Applicant/Owner: Fuquay-Varina
Investigators: ESW,JMH
SOILS
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua
Project No:
Date: 11-Oct-2005
County: (None)
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: Upland C
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wagram loamy sand
Map Symbol: WaB Drainage Class: somewhat excessively drained Mapped Hydric Inclusion?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Arenic Paleudul ts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc
0-8 A 10YR4/4 10YR3/1 Few Distinct Sandy clay
8-12+ B 10YR4/4 10YR6/8 Many Faint Sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NO Histosol NO Concretions
NO Histic Epipedon NO High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
NO Sulffdic Odor NO Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
NO Aquic Moisture Regime UNK Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
NO Reducing Conditions NO Listed on National Hydric Soils List
NO Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors NO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wt I LAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Page 2 of 2 WetFormtm
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3 IWO S Project: IJJ pcv Latitude:
Evaluator. £S 0107- k£ t /?lw? 81te:s $ £ c% Long
Total Points: Other
Stream Is at least k9ormittent county: k?
Ha 10 or al Ma 30 e. p Quad Nar?ra:
S
A. Gwi no holo Subtotal _
10. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Weak
1 Moderate
2 Strong

2. Sinticift
0
1 -
3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool secluenoe 0 1 2 3
4. SON texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active?reUc Iloodplaln 1 2 3
8. Depositional bare or benches 0 1 2
617-
7. Braked channel (Sp 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees 0
1 2
2 3
3
10. Readmits 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drains a
13. Second or greater order channel on mpg
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. 0 0.5

o = 0 1 1.5

Yes = 3
B. Wdroloov tsuhtntnl _ --7 1
14. Groundwater flow/dIscharge 0 1 2

15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, g
0 3

Water in channel - d or rows season 2 3
18. LeafNtter 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants 0 1

18.Organic debris lines or ilea rack lines
0
1 1.5

19. Hydric soils redoArnorphk: features) present?
Ne a o 1.6
.,_ _ .
C. Blolo Subtotal - k
2. Fibrous roots In channel
0 3 U7 I 1 0
21
. Rooted plants In channel 2 1 0
22. Cra 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1
5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 .
1.5
28. Macrobenthos (note divers and abundance) 0 1 1
5
27. Filamentous algae; on Zq 1 .
1
5
28. Iron oxidizi bacteria/fu ua. 0 1 .
1
5
29 .Wetland plants in atreambed FAC = 0.5; FACW 0.75; OBL -1.5 .
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (toe back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
rr:.d ES
i So cc? ?Sc)
P
U"' l u G/ l ca.
- S?cP'`r,?-+.ch?, per, ? ItrMs s,1 C's?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Bate: 3 t7 Project: ? d d a? Latitude:
Evaluator: stilly?,-4 A/; ," Sib: Oit fAIJ Of a,,? ?, £ ns Longitude:
it 1 4v o-?&?
Total Pointe: Other
Stream is a feast IntemMent County: 11
#219 or perennial Wk 30 O a &a Ouad Name:

A. Goomo holo subtotal =
1a. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Wes
1 Moderate
2 Strong
3
2. Sinuosity 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riMe- I uence 1 2 3
4. Soo texture or stream substrate sorting 1 2 3
5. Actl Wrellc floodplain 0 2 3
8. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees 0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuta dL? 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drains wa
13. Second or greater order channel on gljpg
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. 0.5

No = 1 1.5

Yes = 3
In UnUU M
B_ Hvdrnlnnv nq,,htntai - (P 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain,
Water In channel - d or rowl season 0
0 1 2

2 3

3
18. LsaflRter 1. 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants 0_5' 1 1
5
18. Organic debris lines or lies rack lines
-4 O. S 1 .
1.5
19. HydrIc soils redoAmo hic features) resent? No = 0 (yes. 1.5
C. BI010(Subtotal. .-7 S
2. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants In channel 3 1 0
23. Bivalves 2 3
24. Fish 0 1 1.5
22. Crayfish 0 FO.7508L 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 1 1.5
28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; a on 1 1.5
28. Iron oxldizf bacteria/fu us. 0 1 1.5
29 . Wetland lants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW .5 SAV = 2.0; Other =0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, hem 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetiand plants.
Notes: (use back sole of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
ma
n iy;, ass/
S ?? I u afi QJ? -f I?cJ ?r??c? ?/i c? s. ?1 Ja? C[Vo S' Oyl luf?A?.
?o,?cl . rn2? a ?So LDI(£.L?, C)??11-,a?? ? - S??S
/loo / ?Q f? aiinF I 7`o%n f GI . (.D? F S ?. s (J
Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision
Meeting with the DWQ Field Office
Date: November 28, 2005
Place: Judd Parkway Extension and Southview Pointe Subdivision (Smith Property)
Time: 9am to loam
Subject: Verify stream impacts for project
Attendees: Mike Horan (DWQ), Joanna Harrington (RK&K), and Elizabeth Workman (RK&K)
RK&K met with the DWQ in the DWQ conference room (Barrett Drive in Raleigh, NC) to discuss the
Judd Parkway Extension project and adjacent residential development, Southview Pointe Subdivision, on
the Smith property. The purpose of the meeting was to verify stream delineations, establish linear feet and
acreage of jurisdictional impacts, and to clarify portions of the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for the
Nationwide Permit #23 application. RK&K began the meeting with an overview of the project, a
discussion of project history, and review of prior coordination with USACE and DWQ.
Downstream of the beaver impoundment, the unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek does exhibit perennial
characteristics. Approximately 105 linear feet of the perennial stream will be contained within a 66" pipe.
Approximately 24 feet of class I rip rap and filter fabric will be placed at the end of the pipe. From the
beaver impoundment and upstream to Wetland A, the stream channel is deemed intermittent by the
USAGE. DWQ does not require mitigation unless there is over 150 linear feet of perennial stream
impacts. However, all impacts to the stream (perennial and intermittent) should be listed on the PCN.
DWQ does not require buffer mitigation for locally mandated buffer protection. The Town of Fuquay-
Varina plans to breach the dam at the time of construction. The stream channel will reform naturally and
then be planted with native vegetation along the 50-foot buffer.
DWQ instructed RK&K to include all wetland, stream, and open water impacts in the Cumulative Impacts
section. Because the cumulative impacts of streams totals greater than 150 linear feet, the fee for the PCN
is $475. Mail the seven copies to the following street address (rather than the P.O. Box address) for faster
delivery:
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/Stormwater Branch
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Horan will contact USACE (Monte Matthews) to discuss the project during the permitting process.
cc: JTP
MTM
THS
JWM
ES W
JMH
file
FAWor(ADocumentV05-0713iMemo\DWQ meeting 11-28-05.doc
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 30, 2005
Judd Parkway Extension and Smith Property
Coordination with the USACE Raleigh Field Office
November 18, 2005
RK&K (Pete Stafford and Elizabeth Workman) met on site with the USACE (Monte Matthews) to discuss
the Judd Parkway Extension project and adjacent residential development on the Smith property. The
purpose of the meeting was to verify wetland and stream delineations, establish linear feet and acreage of
jurisdictional impacts, and to clarify portions of the Nationwide Permit #23 application. RK&K began the
meeting with an overview of the project, a discussion of project history, and review of prior coordination
with USACE and DWQ.
The field review began on the Smith property at Wetland C. Because the retention basin is planned to be
in 0.10 acre of the wetland, the developer will need to mitigate for these impacts, unless the developer can
adjust the retention basin to avoid the wetland area.
Mr. Matthews reviewed hydric conditions at Wetland D. This site is planned for several residential lots.
Although the soils present low chroma conditions, hydrologic indicators were very weak and vegetation
rated as facultative. Mr. Matthews decided to discard the jurisdiction of Wetland D. No impacts will
occur at Wetland D.
For an unknown amount of time, the farm pond's outlet pipe was not functional, probably due to
blockage. Water levels had risen to form wetlands around the pond and even over the dam itself. Due to
current drought conditions during this field review, the pond's water level was significantly lower than
during previous visits. Water was not overflowing the dam as it was previously. Wetland A on the dam
lacked hydrology and appeared dry although hydric vegetation and soils were present.
Also due to the dysfunctional outlet pipe, a stream channel had formed from the east end of Wetland A,
around the backside of the dam and drained into the original outlet area of the pond. The channel
contained water just upstream of the outlet area (mostly due to beaver activity causing the backup of
water). However, the upper limit of the channel, near Wetland A, was dry. Mr. Matthews deemed this
section as intermittent and unimportant. He stated to report the acreage of impact, rather than the linear
feet of impact, in the Preconstruction Notification (PCN); therefore, the area of impact would be
minuscule.
Mr. Matthews stated that the beaver impoundment at the original outlet pipe should be reported as an
open water impact on the PCN. No mitigation is required for the open water area within this beaver
impoundment.
Downstream of the beaver impoundment, the unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek does exhibit perennial
characteristics. Impacts will be reported on the PCN. Approximately 105 linear feet of the perennial
stream will be contained within a 66" pipe. Approximately 24 feet of class I rip rap and filter fabric will
be placed at the end of the pipe. DWQ does not require mitigation unless there is over 150 linear feet of
stream impacts.
Although USACE wetland criteria exists, Wetland B is a sediment retention basin and will be discarded
from jurisdictional impacts. No impacts will occur at Wetland B.
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 19, 2005
F:\Word\Document\305-078\Memo\USACE field meeting I I-I8-05.doc Updated December 20, 2005
Mr. Matthews stated that if the dam is breached, fill from the breaching must be placed in upland areas.
After the dam is breached and the stream channel reformed, those wetlands that may form and the stream
become jurisdictional and will be protected by the Section 404 Clean Water Act. If a pond is then put
back into place, the owner is required to report the wetlands and stream as impacts. No stormwater
features can be placed in these wetlands or stream after the site has restored to natural conditions.
Because the pond's water level has risen due to a dysfunctional outlet pipe, wetlands have formed around
the pond. These wetlands extend outside of the study area (and were delineated after this field review).
The dam is scheduled to be breached at the time of construction. As a result of breaching the dam, the
wetlands surrounding the pond will drain and therefore be considered as an impact. Breaching the dam
will result in greater than 0.5 acre wetland impacts and consequently push the project into individual
permit requirements.
Per conversation with USACE on August 2, 2005, RK&K understood that the issue of logical termini
would be resolved by tying the Judd Parkway Extension with the Smith property development. Therefore,
RK&K received approval from the developer to do their permit application in conjunction with Judd
Parkway Extension.
If a Nationwide 14 is not used for the Smith property, then a Nationwide 39 can be used for residential
development with a Nationwide 18 for the retention basin up to 0.10 acre of wetland impact.
December 1, 2005
Per phone conversation with Mr. Matthews on December 1, 2005, he instructed that the wetlands
surrounding the pond and the wetlands on the dam (Wetland A) will be impacted by the breached dam.
These wetlands must be reported as impacts in the permitting process and therefore is very likely to result
in over 0.5 acre of wetland impacts, the threshold for a nationwide 14 permit. (The dam may be breach
without a permit only if the breaching is independent of jurisdictional impacts.) If the dam is breached and
impacts result in over 0.5 of wetlands and/or 300 linear feet of stream, an individual permit will be needed
for this project. The individual permit process involves several agencies and mitigation will be determined
by these agencies. Mr. Matthews asked if the dam must be breached rather than repaired or if the road
could be shifted away from the dam. He wants to clarify with Ms. Manuele whether or not repairing the
dam would impact the wetlands currently along the dam and around the pond. It is likely that fixing the
dam will draw down hydrology as well. But he prefers this option over breaching. He will also look into
options on separating the projects since the developer will have no wetland impacts after moving the
retention basin. One issue remains though - the NWP 14 requires a logical termini, which would no
longer occur without the subdivision. Mr. Matthews understands that the developer planned to use Judd
Parkway Extension to build the subdivision.
1
December 2, 2005
Mr. Matthews called to inform us that his office is looking into ways to avoid an individual permit for the
Judd Parkway project. They too feel that an individual permit is excessive for this small project. However,
they must exercise their existing policies to remain consistent with all projects. In the next few days, they
will be discussing our project with other USACE offices to come up with a strategy and set a standard for
this type of situation.
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 19, 2005
F:\Word\Document\305-078\Memo\USACE field meeting I 1-I8-05.doc Updated December 20, 2005
December 6, 2005
Mr. Matthews called with an update on the permit procedures. He stated that we have two options:
• Repair the dam and apply for the NWP #3 and 14
• Breach the dam and apply for the Individual 404/401 Permit.
NWP #3 allows repair of the dam, including impacts to any surrounding wetlands and open water (but
you still have to list them on the PCN form). No mitigation is required to wetlands or open water. NWP
414 allows for stream crossings up to 300 linear feet, but mitigation is needed if over 150 linear feet.
Individual permit allows you to breach the dam, build the road, drain the wetlands, etc. But all impacts on
wetlands are mitigatable. Therefore, all wetlands on the dam, around the sides and in headwaters will be
totaled.
David and Elizabeth completed the wetland delineations in the areas outside of the project corridor and
Smith property on Wednesday December 7, 2005. There are 2.58 acres of wetlands surrounding the pond.
cc
JTP
MTM
THS
JWM
ESW
file
Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP November 19, 2005
F:\Word\Document\305-078\Memo\USACE field meeting I I-18-05.doc Updated December 20, 2005

December 22, 2005
Rummel,
Klepper
&, Kahl, LLP
William K Hellmann
Emeritus
David W. Wallace
Robert J. Halbert
Stephen G. Zentz
1. Michael Potter
Thomas E. Mohler
James A. Zito
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Michael L. Krupsaw
Lars E. Hill
1. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Michael W. Myers
Martin C. Rodgers
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
John A. d'Epagnier
Barbara J. Hoage
Christopher E Wright
Owen L. Peery
Nancy R. Bergeron
Stuart A. Montgomery
David G. Vanscoy
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
Peter C. D'Adamo
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
B. Keith Skinner
Karen B. Kahl
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
Sonya Y. Brown
Eric M. Klein
900 Ridgefield Drire
Suite 350
Raleigh, Noilh Carolina
27609-3960
Ph: 919-878-9560
Ffa: 919-790-8382
www. rkkengineere. can
Ms. Carol Shaw
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Subject: Extension of Judd Parkway by the Town of Fuquay-Varina and the
development of Southview Pointe Subdivision by Henderson and
Associates in Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Shaw,
The purpose of this letter is to request that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) provide confirmation that you are willing to provide compensatory
mitigation for the subject project.
The Town of Fuquay-Varina proposes to extend Judd Parkway 675 feet over an
unnamed tributary to Kenneth Creek. The extension will terminate at the Smith
property. Henderson and Associates plan to develop the Smith property into an 88 home
residential community. Construction of the Judd Parkway Extension and adjacent
residential development will result in impacts to jurisdictional waters. There will be
0.114 acre of riverine wetlands impacted.
RESOURCES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 AND 401 OF
THE CLEAN WATER ACT
The project study area is located within the subbasin 03-06-07 of the Cape Fear River
Basin and is part of U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) hydrologic unit 0303004. The North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Index Number (SIN) is 18-16-1-
(1) from its source to the Wake - Harnett County line.
Wetland and stream delineations were performed for the Judd Parkway Extension
project on May 9, 2005. Wetland delineations for the Smith property were performed
on October 11, 2005. Jurisdictional review by the USACE and DWQ occurred on
November 18, 2005 and November 28, 2005, respectively. Impacts are reported in
Table 1.
Table l: Stream and Wetland Impacts
Impact Site DWQ Index
No. Stream Impacts Wetland
Impacts
Wetland A 1 N/A 0.114 acre
TOTALS N/A 0.114 acre
Baltimore, MD Raleigh, NC Concord, NC Virginia Beach, VA Richmond, VA Staunton, VA
Dover, DE York, PA Norristown, PA Keyser, WV Washington, DC

We propose to mitigate for these impacts by using the EEP.
In addition to sending Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP a letter of confirmation, please also send the letter
of confirmation to Mr. Monte Matthews (USACE Coordinator) at U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 in Raleigh, NC 27615. Mr. Matthew's
fax number is [phone].
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed, the NCDWQ requires a formal
letter from EEP indicating their willingness and ability to provide the mitigation work requested by the
Town of Fuquay-Varina. To expedite the permitting process, please also forward copy of the letter to
Mr. Mike Horan of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/Stormwater Branch, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604, fax number [phone].
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Workman
Senior Environmental Planner
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
cc:
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE
Mr. Mike Horan, NCDWQ
JTP
ESW
WES
JMH
305-078-A01
F: I WORD I DOCUMEN71305-0781 Corrl EEP-00 /. doc

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 9/15/05
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes.
- - ------ --- --- _--------- --------------- -- -----------
1. Name of Applicant or Agent ' 1
t IJ -
12? ?£o r
2 Name of Business of Applicant or Agent -
RUMMY-> K?f?r
3. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) -
4. City, State, Zip
G X1(0 0
5. Telephone (eg, 919-555-1212)
?I--? 8-qs?----- 1 I -
6. Fax (optional)
7. E-mail (optional)
_ ?_1.JoTk??nan C ?.kF/??jih_f £?S, C.or1.
8. Project Name Q
`J
Park w bk1 N v i f (J
9. Project Location (nearest town, city)
7on_ o> is - V,
10. Lat-Long Coordinates (optional)
i 35`3y' 33 y °nJ ?8` tig" 3? I °?1
11. Project County
12 River Basin
r
Cc
F
- -- - -
13. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) p t-
R a
0303Oooy
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
i? AC
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
E 16. Coastal marsh Impact (ac.)
IT. Stream Impacts-Cold (-ft.)-(e-.g.-1,2-34--)-
16. Stream Impact-Cool (ft.)
- _ __ _
19. Stream Impact Warm (ft.)
20. Buffer Impact-Zone 1 (sq. ft.) (e.g. 12,345)
21. Buffer Impact Zone 2
Check (a) below If this request 1s a: Signature of Applicant or Agent:
- revision to a current acceptance, or
- re-submission of an expired acceptance

Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
http://cfpub.epa.oov/surf/locate/index.cfm
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205 or [e-mail]
k
cew5 kC/W,
r--
u e{pS ? C ev-) we
??- G?r?,J u s Gv
? s s A M.Ar
V f?