20080625 Ver 1_Application_20080404

e.aSWFo
.r-
''~'~~~`
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
r~ , ,..
;~. .:~
~. ~
3,
. ,
.,, , .
,L ..
~j ~ ~~~ c
'~tiI ~ l~qT~ ~~lQ~
~srp~'~y~~"~C/~,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 28, 2008
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3321 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTENTION: Mr. John Thomas
NCDOT Coordinator, Division 9
Dear Sir:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
080625
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 23 and 33 for the
Replacement of Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River on US 158
(Clemmons Road), Davie and Forsyth Counties, Division 9. Federal Aid
Project Number BRSTP-158(12), WBS Element No., 33283.1.1, TIP No.
B-3835.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No. 35 on US 158 over the Yadkin River. The project involves constructing the new
bridge just upstream (North) of the existing bridge while maintaining trafl:ic on the
existing bridge during construction. The existing bridge is in poor condition and in need
of replacement. The new bridge will provide a safer bridge structure consistent with
federal and state bridge standards. The project proposes to utilize the existing structure to
maintain traffic while constructing a 72 inch Prestressed Concrete Modified Bulb Tee
Girder bridge just on the upstream side of the existing bridge. This new structure will
consist of 9-Spans at 127 feet-6 inches and will be approximately 1,148 feet long. The
proposed cross-section for this structure includes a 60 foot clear roadway width. This
width includes two 12 foot inside lanes, two 14 foot outside lanes to accommodate _
bicycles, a 4 foot interior median width, and a 2 foot offset to the curb on the south side
and a 2 foot offset to the rail base on the north side. A 5.5 foot sidewalk will be provided
on the south side of the bridge. After the new bridge is opened to traffic the existing
structure will be removed. Two temporary work pads will be utilized during bridge
construction (Stage 1 and Stage 2) and two temporary work pads will be utilized during
bridge demolition (Stage 3 and Stage 4). Only one causeway will be in place at any one
time. Please see the enclosed copies of the permit drawings, design plans, correspondence
with Tanglewood park, and Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) for the above referenced
project. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) for this project was approved in January 2004
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] or LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 919-715-1335 2728 CAPITAL BLVD. SUITE 240
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS RALEIGH NC 27604
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT UNIT FAX: [phone]
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598 WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG

and the Construction Consultation was completed in August 2007; each was distributed
shortly thereafter. Additional copies of these documents are available upon request.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
The project is located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin (sub-basin 03-07-02) and
USGS hydrologic accounting unit 03040101 of the South Atlantic-Gulf Coast Region.
The section of the Yadkin River crossed by the subject bridge has been assigned Stream
Index Number 12-(86.7) by the NC Division of Water Quality. The Yadkin River in the
project study area is classified as Class WS-IV. No designated Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply I (WS-I), or Water Supply II
(WS-II) waters occur within 1.0 mile of the study corridor. This portion of the Yadkin
River is not listed on the Final 2006 303(d) list of impaired waters nor does it drain into
any 303(d) waters within 1 mile of the project area.
Jurisdictional resources consist of three perennial streams (Yadkin River, UT1 and UT2)
and three riverine wetlands. Wetland 1 is located approximately 140 feet on the north side
of the existing alignment outside the limit of work and near the existing western end bent
of the existing bridge. Wetland 2 is located on the north side of the existing alignment
adjacent to the western end bent of the existing bridge. Wetland 3 is located
approximately 160 feet on the north side of the existing alignment and on the east side of
the driveway into the soccer complex outside the limit of work. Stream UT1 flows out of
Wetland 2 into stream UT2 on the north side of the existing alignment. Stream UT2 flows
south out of Wetland 1 under the proposed and existing bridges.
Streams and wetlands were originally verified by the United States Army Corp of
Engineers (USAGE) representative Eric Alsmeyer in April 2003. Jurisdictional areas
were reverified by USAGE representative John Thomas in May 2007 and it was
determined that there have been no changes to the original jurisdictional determinations.
Per John Thomas (pers. comm. On February 2, 2008), NCDOT will not be required to
submit Approved Jurisdictional Determination (Rapanos) Form with this permit
application.
Permanent Impacts
The new alignment will result in 0.06 Acre (Ac.) of permanent fill in riverine wetlands
which is a total take of Site 1.
Four bridge bents will be constructed in the Yadkin River resulting in 159 square feet
(<0.01 Ac) of permanent surface water impacts.
Temporary Impacts
The total temporary impact due to the four temporary causeways required to construct the
proposed bridge and demolish the existing bridge is 1.33 Ac. This consists of 0.71 Ac. of
temporary surface water impacts due to two temporary causeways required to construct
Final B-3835 Permit Application
Page 2 of 6

the proposed bridge (Stage 1 and Stage 2 causeways) and 0.62 Ac. of temporary surface
water impact due to two temporary causeways required to demolish the existing bridge
(Stage 3 and Stage 4/4A causeways).
During the demolition of the existing bridge the Stage 4 /Stage 4A causeway will
encroach on more than 50% of the conveyance area of the river, however, the Stage 4A
causeway will be immediately removed once the demolition of existing bent number 11 is
complete. The Stage 4A portion of the causeway exceeds 50% of the conveyance area
because existing bent 11 is in the approximate center of the river and the contractor
requires this size of causeway around this bent to safely remove the bent and to help
prevent debris from entering the river during demolition.
All causeways will be removed upon the completion of the stage of work for which they
are constructed and the contractor will restore the river bed impacted to its original
contour upon removal of each causeway.
Utility Impacts
Overhead power, cable and phone lines located within the project area will be impacted
by the proposed construction. The proposed construction of the new bridge will require
relocation of selective poles supporting these utilities. These poles are not presently or
proposed to be relocated in or near any wetlands. Also attached to the bridge is a force
main sewer line. It will be relocated and attached to the new bridge and tie to the existing
line under the east bridge span where no wetlands exist. There are no anticipated impacts
to wetlands or streams resulting from the relocation of these utilities.
Bridge Demolition
The existing bridge was constructed in 1940 and is a two-lane, fifteen span, 1,083-foot
long, continuous steel beam structure with a reinforced concrete deck on reinforced
concrete post and beam piers. During removal of the existing bridge, there is potential for
components of the existing deck and rails to be dropped into waters of the U.S. The
resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete deck and rails is approximately 546
cubic yards. NCDOT's Best Management practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal
(BMP-BDR) will be applied for the removal of this bridge.
RESTORATION PLAN
Following construction of the bridge, all material used in the construction of the structure
will be removed and the streambed will be restored to preconstruction contours and
elevation. The impact area associated with the bridge is expected to recover naturally
since the natural streambed and plant material will not be removed. NCDOT does not
propose any additional planting in this area. Class II riprap and filter fabric will be used
for bank stabilization.
Final B-3835 Permit Application
Page 3 of 6

REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL PLAN
The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for the removal of and
disposal of all material off-site at an upland location. The contractor will use excavation
equipment for removal of any earthen material. Heavy-duty trucks, dozers, cranes and
various other pieces of mechanical equipment necessary for construction of roadways and
bridges will be used on site. All material placed in the stream will be removed from the
stream at that time. The contractor will have the option of reusing any of the materials
that the engineer deems suitable in the construction of project. After the erosion control
devices are no longer needed, all temporary materials will become the property of the
contractor.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under the provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 31, 2008 the US Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) website lists four federally protected species for Davie and
Forsyth Counties (Table 2).
Tahlp ~. Farlr•rally Prnte~terl Cne~iec in Fnrcvth (Fl and Davie ~Dl COUnt1eS. NC.
Common Scientific Federal County Biological Habitat
Name Name Status Conclusion Present
Michaux's Rhus Endangered D No Effect Yes
sumac michauxii
Red- No Effect No
cockaded picoides Endangered F
borealis
wood ecker
Threatened Not Required No

Bog Turtle Clemmys (Due to
F
muhlenbergi Similarity of
A earance)
Small- No Effect No
anthered Cardamine Endangered F
micranthera
Bittercress
Suitable habitat is located within the project area for Michaux's sumac; however, no
specimens were observed during surveys conducted on August 18, 2003 and May 1,
2007. The North Carolina Natural Heritage (NCNHP) database (updated February 14,
2008) indicates no known populations of Michaux's sumac within 1-mile of the project
area. A biological conclusion of "May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect" was given
in the CE for Michaux's sumac, however, due to a change in terminology the biological
conclusion has been revised to "No Effect".
There is no potential habitat within the project study area for the red-cockaded
woodpecker or the small antlered bittereress, and no biological conclusion is required for
the bog turtle because it is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance. The
Final B-3835 Permit Application
Page 4 of 6

NCNHP database indicates no known populations of either species within 1-mile of the
project area. A biological conclusion of "No Effect", issued in the CE remains valid.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features
to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation
of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken
during the planning and NEPA compliance stages; minimization measures were
incorporated as part of the project design.
According to the Clean Water Act (CWA) §404(b)(1) guidelines, NCDOT must avoid,
minimize, and mitigate, in sequential order, impacts to waters of the US. The greensheet
included in the CE stated that Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds would be
utilized. However, no designated ORW, HWQ, WS-I, or WS-II, waters occur within 1.0
mile of the study corridor; therefore Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds are not
required under 15A NCAC 04B.0124.
The following is a list of the project's jurisdictional stream avoidance/minimization
activities proposed or completed by NCDOT:
Avoidance/Minimization
• Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be
minimized through implementation of stringent erosion control methods and use
of Best Management Practices (BMPs).
• Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters and Bridge
Demolition and Removal will be implemented during the entirety of this project.
• A preformed scour hole will be constructed on the northeast side of the bridge.
• During construction, traffic will use the existing bridge as an on-site detour.
• The number of bents in the Yadkin River will be reduced from the six existing to
the four proposed resulting in a reduction in the permanent surface water impacts.
• Where possible, 2:1 and 1.5:1 slopes were used to reduce the project footprint
thereby reducing impacts to wetlands and the Yadkin River.
Compensatory iti agation
The project will result in a total take of the riverine wetland at Site 1, however, no
mitigation is proposed because the impact is minimal (0.06 acre).
SCHEDULE
This is a Design/Build project that has already been awarded. The contractor will begin
construction in April, 2008 once the permits have been received.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Final B-3835 Permit Application
Page 5 of 6

Section 404 Permit: The project has been processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (72 FR
11092; March 19, 2007) and a Nationwide Permit 33 for the temporary causeways to be
placed in the Yadkin River required to construct the proposed bridge and demolish the
existing bridge.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate General Certification numbers 3701 and 3688 will
apply to this project. NCDOT will adhere to all general conditions; therefore written
concurrence is not required. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and
15A NCAC 2B.0200 we are providing two copies of this application to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality,
as notification.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Erica McLamb at [phone].
Sincerely,
/(j/T
r
~d/ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
w/ attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (2 Copies)
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
w/o attachment (see permits website for attachments)
Dr. Davis Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. S.P. Ivey, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Kent Boyer, DEO
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P.E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillian, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Pam Williams, PDEA
Final B-3835 Permit Application
Page 6 of 6

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20080625
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to thls project, please enter "loot ppphcable" or "N/a".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 23 & 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D., Environmental Manager Director
Mailing Address: NC Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page l of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bride No. 35 over the Yadkin River
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3835
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Davie / Forsyth Nearest Town: Clemmons
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take I-40W, take Exit
182 and then left onto Harper Road take right onto US 158 (Clemmons Road), first bride
crossm¢
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line,
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): °N
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Yadkin River
8. River Basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: US 158 is classified as a Rural Minor Arterial in the NC
Statewide Functional Classification System. The existing land use along US 158 in the
project vicinity is mixed residential commercial and recreational.
attach a sheet that
oW
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: See cover
letter.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The existing bridge was constructed in 1940 and
Bride Maintenance Unit records indicate the bride has a sufficiency ratins? of 23.0 out of a
possible 100 for a new structure. The existin>; bridge is considered functionally obsolete.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are. any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and .provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: See cover letter.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
cPr,aratPly list impacts due t~ h~th structure and floodins?.
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bo etc.)
g° Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Site 1 Permanent Forested Yes 100 0.06

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.06
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.06
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must he included. To calculate acreage. multiply leneth X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial o~
Intermittent. Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Site 1 Yadkin River Temporary Impact perennial 335 200 l .33
Site 1 Yadkin River Permanent Impact perennial 335 63 0.004

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 1.334
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dred>tin>?. flooding. drainage. bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 8

6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro'ect:
Stream Im act (acres): 1.334
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.06
O en Water Im act (acres):
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 1.394
Total Stream Im act (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, t~•out pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. See cover letter,
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 8

including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
andlor upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No miti atg ion proposed for this project since only 0.06 acre of riverine wetland are impacted,
0 004 Ac. Of Waters of the US and since all other impacts associated with the project are
temporary
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 8

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multi Tiers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
N/A
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
~~~~ ~l -i.o~
Applic~ntlA~ent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 8

U~p625
US 158
Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River
Davie County
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-158(12}
State Project No. 8.1611401
T.I.P. No. B-3835
~~
A ~ ~~
1
t 3:
~FN
p~4R. ~:;,,~:.
., ,~~~
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
and
PROGRANIlvIATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS.
APPROVED:
08n°"5.
01~0$~0 ~ ~ ~-
DATE ~ Gregory J. orpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Duector
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
DATE ~ John F. Sullivan, III, PE
Division Administrator, FHWA

.~
~~pg25
US 158
Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River
Davie County
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-158(12)
State Project No. 8.1611401
T.I.P. No. B-3835
Q~
~ KE~3 ;~U
QFN
a4R ~sr~', .
,r.?~
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
and
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNISION OF HIGHWAYS.
APPROVED:
OSn°"y
01.08 • v ~ r~l~~l~r~l~-
DATE ~ Gregory J. orpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Duector
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
DATE ~ ~' John F. Sullivan, III, PE
Division Administrator, FHWA

US 158
Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River
Davie County
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-158(12)
State Project No. 8.1611401
T.I.P. No. B-3835
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
and
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
January 2004
J. Kenneth Burleson, PE
Project Manager
Documentation Prepared by:
TGS Engineers
;:
a~~ ~ ..,
e f.; r, ~
o c i ... ~
o ~~~~[
~~
e
°o ..~,..
r „J Yair:
a.r:slaco.:a:e.s
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
~~ ~. ~ ~~
Elmo E. Vance
Project Manager
Consultant Engineering Unit

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMIVIITMENTS
US 158
Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River
Davie County .
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-158(12)
State Project No. 8.1611401
T.I.P. No. B-3835
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit No. 23 Conditions, the General Nationwide
Permit Conditions, Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions; State Consistency
Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters, Design Standards for Sensitive Wetlands, Best Management Practices for
Bridge Demolition and Removal, General Certification Conditions, and Section 40l
Conditions of Certification, the following special commitments have been agreed to by
NCDOT:
Resident Engineer, Roadway Design Unit, Roadside Environmental and
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch.
The proposed 5-lane curb and gutter section on the east approach will be contained within
existing right of way along the south side of US 158 and therefore the project will have
"no effect" on Tanglewood Park.
NCDOT will prepare a landscape design in consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Office (HPO} and the property owner of Win-Mock Farm resulting in a "no
adverse effect" on Win-Mock Farm.
Structure Design Unit and Hydraulics Unit
Curb and gutter sections will be utilized on the immediate bridge approaches
NCDOT will pipe the stormwater from the proposed curb and gutter sections on the
approaches to grassed Swale areas. No weep holes will discharge stormwater from the
bridge directly into the Yadkin River.
The project floodway and floodplain impacts will be coordinated with the Winston-
Salem/Forsyth County Planning Department and the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County
Inspections Department.
Categorical Exclusion
January 2004 Green Sheet

US 158
Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River
Davie County
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-158(12)
State Project No. 8.1611401
T.I.P. No. B-3835
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No. 35 is included in the 2004-2010 North Cazolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Program and Federal-Aid Bridge
Replacement Program. The location is shown in Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts
are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion".
L PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 23.0 out
of a possible 140 for a new structure. The bridge is considered functionally obsolete. The
replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient traffic
operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Davie County Bridge No. 35, built in 1940, is a two-lane, fifteen-span, 1,083-foot (330-
meter) long, continuous steel beam structure with a reinforced concrete deck on
reinforced concrete post and beam piers. The structure has a 25-foot, 10-inch (7.9-meter)
clear roadway width. There are 2-foot 2-inch (0.7-meter) sidewalks on both sides. The
current posted weight limit is 37 tons for single vehicles and legal gross weight for truck-
tractor semi-trailers.
US 158 is classified as a Rural Minor Arterial in the NC Statewide Functional
Classification System. US 158 currently carries 17,300 vehicles per day {vpd) and is
estimated to carry approximately 35,400 vpd by the year 2030. The daily traffic volumes
include an estimated 4 percent dual-tired trucks (DTT) and 5 percent truck-tractor semi-
trailers {TTST). A portion of US 158 east of Bridge No. 35 is a designated bicycle route
(NC Bike Route No. 2) (See Figure 1). The current posted speed limit along US 158 is
55 Holes per hour.
The existing land use along US 158 in the project vicinity is mixed residential,
commercial and recreational. Tanglewood Park is located southeast of the bridge. The
park is owned by Forsyth County. River Oaks at Tanglewood, a subdivision of
townhouses, is located northeast of the bridge. Bermuda Run Country Club is located in
the southwest quadrant. This is ahigh-income residential gated community. Two
eighteen hole golf courses in the surrounding upscale residential communities . are
accessed via US 158. Eight acres of land located to the northwest of the project along
US 158 is currently being developed. This community is part of a large development on
both sides of I-40 called "Kinderton". The particular portion of the development along
US 158 will consist of residential, office, and retail development. A remaining portion of
the land in the northwest quadrant is a remnant of Win-Mock Farm.

Numerous utilities aze located along US 158 in the immediate vicinity of the bridge.
These utilities include Southern Bell, Piedmont Natural Gas, Time Warner, power lines,
and fiber optic cable along the south side of US 158 and Bridge No. 35. An 8-inch (20.3-
centimeter) sanitary sewer line is attached to the south side of the bridge. Utility impacts
are expected to be medium. The City of Winston-Salem has requested that provisions be
made to suspend a water line on the new structure at a future date.
A cathodic protection system is associated with a 6-inch (IS-centimeter) steel gas line
that runs under the Yadkin River. The system is located in the west side of the Yadkin
River on the south side of US 158 in the existing right of way. A raw sewerage pumping
station is located on the west side of the Yakin River on the north side of US 158 just off
the existing right of way.
Seven (7) accidents were reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 35 during the period from
June 1, 2000 to May 31, 2003. Six (6) of the accidents occurred at the intersection of US
158 with the Bermuda Run entrance. There were no fatal accidents reported. Two (2) of
the accidents were injury accidents. The total crash rate is 124.81 accidents per hundred
million vehicle miles of travel. For North Carolina Waal U.S. routes with 2 lanes
undivided, the compazative rate is 167.73 accidents per 100mvmt.
The Yadkin River is the county line boundary between Forsyth and Davie Counties. No
school busses cross this bridge.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The existing bridge will be replaced by a bridge of approximately the same grade.
The proposed bridge will be widened in response to the estimated 2030 design
yeaz traffic of 35,400 vehicles per day and will be approximately 1085 feet (330
meters) long. The proposed bridge will have spill through abutments and the piers
will be placed pazallel to the direction of flow to reduce constriction of the bridge
opening area due to the collection of debris. This bridge is in a detailed FEMA
flood study; there will be no increase in backwater.
The proposed cross section for the replacement structure is 56 feet (17.1 meters)
cleaz roadway width. This width would include two 12-foot (3.6-meter) inside
travel lanes, two 14-foot (4.3-meter) outside travel lanes to accommodate bicycles
and 2-foot (0.6-meter) offset to the curb on the south side and 2-foot (0.6-meter)
offset to the rail base on the north side. A sidewalk, 5.5 feet (1.7 meters) wide,
will be provided on the south side of the bridge.
B. Build Alternatives
Alternative 1 (Preferred) proposes to replace Bridge No. 35 with a 4-lane bridge
utilizing staged construction to the north side of the existing structure. Two lanes
will be constructed along the north side of the existing bridge and the existing
z

bridge will be used to maintain traffic. Upon completion of the new lanes to the
north, traffic will be shifted to the new section, the existing bridge removed and
the remaining lanes will be constructed. The design speed is 50 miles per how
{80 kilometers per how). The east approach is approximately 1300 feet (396
meters) .in length and the west approach is approximately 1100 feet (335 meters)
in length (See Figwe 2).
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Fnrt6er Study
The "do-nothing" or no-build alternative will eventually necessitate closwe of the
bridge. Due to the overall traffic service provided and the connectivity provided
by Bridge No. 35, closwe is not acceptable to the residents, businesses and
recreational opportunities along US 158.
"Rehabilitation" of the old bridge is not feasible due to its age and deteriorated
condition. There are widespread cracks, spalling of the concrete and rusted
bearing plates and beams on the existing structure.
D. Preferred Alternative
The proposed bridge will be widened and will be approximately 1085 feet (330
meters) in length. Spill-through abutments and the piers will be placed parallel to
the direction of flow to reduce constriction of the bridge opening area due to the
collection of debris (See Figure 3).
On the west approach, the cwb and gutter section on the new structure will be
continued for approximately 120 feet (39 meters), then transition to a four-lane
shoulder section with 4-foot (1.2-meter) paved shoulders, and transitioning to the
existing two-lane section just west of the Bermuda Run entrance. On the east
approach, the cwb and gutter section on the new structwe will be continued
eastward, then transition to a five-lane curb and gutter section, and transitioning to
the existing cross section at the Tanglewood Park entrance.
NCDOT will pipe the stonnwater from the proposed cwb and gutter sections on
the approaches to grassed swale areas.

IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs, based on current prices, are as follows:
Alternative 1
Structure $ 4,770,000
Roadway Approaches 771,500
Structure Removal 223,500
Miscellaneous & Mobilization 770,000
Engineering & Contingencies 965,000

Total Construction Cost _..:.
~`"` $ 7;540,000
Right-of-way Costs 267,000
Total Project Cost ~ $ 7;'i'67.400
The estimated cost of the project, shown in the 2004-2010 NCDOT
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), is $8,270,000; including
$500,000 spent in prior years, $270,000 for right-of--way and $7,500,000 for
construction.
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
A. Methodology
Materials and research data in support of this investigation have been derived
from a number of sources including applicable U.S. Geological Survey (iJSGS)
topographic mapping (Clenunons, NC 7.5 minute quadrangle, 1994), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping (FWS
NWI 1994), and aerial photography (scale: finch=100 feet).
Bridge No. 35 was visited on December 6, 2001 and again on August 18, 2003.
During the site visit, a study corridor was walked and visually surveyed for
substantial features. For purposes of the field investigation and to assure proper
area coverage, the study corridor length was assumed to include 2000 feet (609.6
meters) extending from each end of the bridge and a width extending 300 feet
(91.4 meters) south and 300 feet (91.4 meters) north of the US 158 centerline.
Plant community area calculations provided in this report are based on a 100 foot
alignment centered on the US 158 centerline. Final impacts will be limited to cut-
and-fill boundaries. Special concerns evaluated in the field include 1) potential
habitat for protected species and 2) wetlands and water quality protection in the
Yadkin River.
Plant community descriptions are based on a classification system utilized by
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
a

When appropriate, community classifications were modified to better reflect field
observations. Vascular plant names follow nomenclature found in Radford et al.
(1968), with adjustments made to reflect more current nomenclature (ICartesz
1998). Jurisdictional areas were evaluated using the three-parameter approach
following U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) delineation guidelines (DOA
1987). Jurisdictional areas were characterized according to a classification
scheme established by Cowardin et al. (1979). Geographical distribution and
habitat requirements of terrestrial wildlife and aquatic organisms mentioned in
this document were obtained by supportive literature (Webster et al. 1985, Potter
et al. 1980, Hamel 1992, Martof et al. 1980, Rohde et al. 1994, Menhinick 1991,
Palmer and Braswell 1995). Fish and wildlife nomenclature follow current
standards. Water quality information for area streams and tributaries was derived
from available sources (DWQ 1997, DWQ 1999). Quantitative sampling was not
undertaken to support existing data.
The most current US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) listing of federally
protected species with ranges extending into Forsyth and Davie Counties was
obtained prior to initiation of the field investigation. In addition, NHP records
documenting presence of federally yr state listed species were consulted before
commencing the field investigation.
Bridge No. 35 is located along US 158 at the Yadkin River on the Forsyth/Davie
County border (Figure 1). The study corridor is 2.5 miles (4.0 kilometers)
northeast from the community of Hillsdale, NC. The Yadkin River crossing of
bridge No. 35 is approximately 800 feet (243.8 meters) south of the Interstate 40
crossing of the Yadkin River. The study corridor lies within the Yadkin River
channel, floodplain, and adjacent uplands. The western portion of the study
corridor contains a wide, flat floodplain bordered by a steep incline into the
uplands. The eastern portion of the study corridor includes a narrow levee that
quickly slopes into the uplands. Within the study corridor, the Yadkin River
flows from north to south.
Land use includes pasture, unmanaged forest, and residential development. East
of the river, the levee and steep floodplain slope support mature hardwood forest.
An apartment complex occupies the northeast quadrant while a municipal park
(Tanglewood) of mixed pines and hazdwoods, occurs in the southeast quadrant.
West of the river, the broad floodplain has been developed primarily as pasture
land and contains a small pond and plot of land supporting natural vegetation at
varying stages of early succession. The northwest quadrant, outside of the
floodplain, contains a mix of pasture and mature forest. The southwest quadrant,
outside of the floodplain, contains a gated residential development which includes
a golf course.
B. Phvsio,~aphv and Soils
The study corridor is located in the Charlotte and Milton Belt geologic formations
within the Inner Piedmont physiographic province of North Carolina. Within the

Piedmont soil region, the study corridor is included in the felsic crystalline soil
system. The landscape is characterized by broad, gently sloping uplands, narrow
convex ridges, and moderately steep valley slopes with wide floodplains. Soil
systems in this central, western portion of the Piedmont are determined by the
local bedrock which is granite, granite gneiss, mica gneiss, and mica schist
(Daniels et al. 1999). The floodplain is flat west of the Yadkin River and slopes
rapidly upward from the eastern bank. Within the study corridor, elevations rise
from approximately 680 feet (207.3 meters) National Geodetic Vertical Datum
(NGVD) in the river channel to approximately 790 feet (240.8 meters) NGVD at
the extremes of the study corridor (USGS Clemmons, NC quadrangle).
The Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) indicates the following soils
within the study corridor: Chewacla loam (fine-loamy, mixed, thermic Aquic
Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts) is mapped adjacent to the toe of the slope in the
floodplain. Riverview loam (fine-loamy, mixed, thermic Fluventic Dystrochrepts)
is mapped on the western floodplain. Gaston clay loam (clayey,mixed, thermic,
Humic Hapludults) and Wilkes soils (loamy, mixed, shallow thermic Typic
Hapludalfs) are mapped on the eastern slopes (SCS 1976, 1995). Although the
Riverview series lies within the floodplain, it is a non-hydric soil. The Chewacla
series is non-hydric but can contain small inclusions of Wehadkee soils, a
classified hydric soil in both Forsyth and Davie Counties (MRCS, 1996). None of
the remaining soil series mapped within the study corridor aze considered hydric.
The Chewacla series consists of very frequently flooded, somewhat poorly
drained, moderately permeable soils on floodplains. These soils formed in recent
alluvium and slope is less than 2 percent. Chewacla soils have loamy A and B
horizons that extend to a depth of more than 35 inches (88 centimeters). Depth to
bedrock is more than 48 inches (l.2 meters). These soils range from medium acid
to strongly acid unless lime has been added. Frequent flooding and a seasonal
high water table limit the use of these soils. This series is non-hydric but can
contain small inclusions of Wehadkee soils, a classified hydric soil.
The Riverview series is awell-drained, moderately permeable soil found on
floodplains. These soils form from continuous alluvial deposits and are frequently
flooded. The surface layer is yellowish brown and 10 inches (25 centimeters)
deep, while the subsoil is 30 inches (76 centimeters) deep and brown. Bedrock is
found at or below 60 inches (1.5 meters). Shrink-swell potential is low and water
movement is moderate. Frequent flooding is the primary limiting factor in soil
cultivation and urban uses.
The Wilkes series consists of well-drained soils sloping to steep upland soils. The
surface horizon is thin and comprised of dark, fine, sandy loam. The subsoil is 10
inches (25 centimeters) deep and ayellowish-brown firm clay loam. The sub-soil
is 54 inches (1.4 meters) deep and yellowish brown with mottles. These soils
have medium fertility but low organic content. Available water capacity is low
with moderate permeability. Excessive slope and moderate permeability are
limiting factors in the use of these soils.

The Gaston series is swell-drained, moderately permeable soil on ridges and side
slopes in uplands. The surface layer is dark red-brown and typically 10 inches (25
centimeters) deep. The subsoil is over 60 inches (1.5 meters) deep and dark red.
This soil has a moderate shrink-swell potential with bedrock occurring at 80
inches (2.0 meters). Available water capacity is moderate and the soil is highly
erodible when not covered by vegetation.
C. Water Resources
1. Waters Impacted
The study corridor is located within sub-basin 03-07-02 of the Yadkin-Pee
Dee River Basin (DWQ 1997). This area is part of USGS accounting unit
03040101 of the South Atlantic-Gulf Coast Region. The section of the
Yadkin River crossed by the subject bridge has been assigned Stream
Index Number 12-(86.7) by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ
1999). The river is approximately 310 feet (95 meters) wide where it is
crossed by the existing US 158 bridge. At the existing crossing, the
Yadkin River has a drainage azea of approximately 1923 square miles.
2. Water Resource Characteristics
The Yadkin River is a high-order river within a watershed primarily
characterized by suburban residential and agricultural uses. Within the
study corridor, the Yadkin River is a reservoir with fluctuating depths due
to the downstream Fries Manufacturing & Power dam. The banks and
well-formed levee range from 8-15 feet (2.4-4.6 meters) above the water's
surface. During the field visit, the river width averaged approximately 320
feet (97.5 meters), and water depth was estimated to range from 1 to 6 feet
(30 to 182 centimeters). Two unnamed tributaries (UT) to the Yadkin
River were found in the northwest quadrant of the study corridor. One UT
flowed east from aman-made pond in the uplands and into the larger UT
on the floodplain. The floodplain UT showed evidence of ditching and
straightening. At the confluence of the two UTs, the stream flowed south
under Bridge No. 35 and out of the study corridor before its eventual
confluence with the Yadkin River. In the Yadkin River, visibility was
approximately 12 inches (30.5 centimeters), and flow was moderate to
swift. The substrate is composed of coarse sand, pebbles, and large
exposed boulders, with deposits of mud in deeper pools. Large, loose
cobble is scattered through the channel, and occasionally forms rocky
islands in the river channel. The stream banks are composed of fine- to
coarse-textured soil, and rise steeply to the floodplain. Persistent emergent
aquatic vegetation was not observed.
Classifications are assigned to waters of the State of North Cazolina based
on the existing or contemplated best usage of various streams or segments

of streams in the basin. A best usage classification of WS-IV has been
assigned to the Yadkin River. Class WS-IV waters are protected as water
supplies which are generally in moderately to highly developed
watersheds. The designation WS-IV also denotes waters that are suitable
for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, agriculture, and
secondary recreation. Secondary recreation refers to wading, boating, and
other uses not involving human body contact with waters on an organized
or frequent basis. No designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW),
High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply I (WS-I), or Water Supply II
(WS-II) waters occur within 1.0 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the study
corridor. No watershed Critical Area (CA) occurs within ] .0 mile (1.6
kilometers) of the study corridor.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has initiated awhole-basin
approach to water quality management for the 17 river basins within the
state. Water quality for the proposed study corridor is summarized in the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin management plan. Water quality in Yadkin
River currently has a use support rating of Fully Supporting. Sub-basin
03-07-02 supports three major and 30 minor point-source dischazgers
which are responsible for the discharge of 8.3 million gallons per day
(MGD) (31.4 million liters per day [MLD]) and 1.9 MGD (7.2 MLD),
respectively. Non-point and point source pollution and agriculture are the
prime sources of impairment within this sub-basin (DWQ 1997). The
study corridor supports forest vegetation and residential development so
the residential azeas and existing road and road shoulders are the prime
sources of non-point source pollution within the study corridor.
3. Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources_
The proposed project includes bridging of the Yadkin River to maintain
the current water quality, aquatic habitat, and flow regime. Temporary
construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be minimized
through implementation of a stringent erosion control schedule and the use
of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The contractor will follow
contract specifications pertaining to erosion control measures as outlined
in 23 CFR 650 Subpart B and Article 107-13 entitled "Control of Erosion,
Siltation, and Pollution" (NCDOT, Specifications for Roads and
Structures). These measures include the use of dikes, berms, silt basins,
and other containment measures to control runoff; elimination of
construction staging areas in floodplains and adjacent to waterways; re-
seeding of herbaceous cover on disturbed sites; management of chemicals
(herbicides, pesticides, de-icing compounds) with potential negative
impacts on water quality; and avoidance of direct discharges into streams
by catch basins and roadside vegetation. Long-term impacts resulting
from construction aze expected to be negligible. In order to minimize
impacts to water resources, NCDOT BMPs for the Protection of Surface
Waters will be strictly enforced during the entire life of the project.

4. Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
During the removal of the existing bridge, there is potential for
components of the existing deck and rails to be dropped into the waters of
the U.S. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete deck
and rails is approximately 546 cubic yards (418 cubic meters). This
project is Case 3. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR) will be applied for removal of this
bridge.
D. Biotic Resources
1. Plant Communities
Four distinct plant communities were identified within the study corridor:
Piedmont Levee Forest, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest, mixed pine forest,
and distwbed/maintained land. These communities are described below.
Communities designated by capital letters approximate descriptions
provided by Schafale and Weakley (1990).
Piedmont Levee Forest -This community exists in a riparian fringe
approximately l40 feet (42.7 meters) wide along the eastern bank and 410
feet (125.0 meters) wide along the western bank of the Yadkin River. The
UT to the Yadkin River is bordered by this community for its full length
through the project corridor. -The community grades into Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest at the toe of the slope away from the river banks.
Canopy tree components include tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
bitternut hickory (Carya cordiformis), red maple (Ater rubrum), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), river birch {Betula nigra), black walnut (Juglans
nigra), box elder (Ater negundo), and sweetgum (Liguidambar
styraciflua). A dense shrub layer is composed of downy arrowwood
(Viburnum raf nesquianum), box elder, swamp dogwood (Corpus
amomum), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense),
elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), bittemut hickory, and winged elm
(Ulmus alata). Vines include cross vine (Bignonia capreolata), greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia).
The herb assemblage contains Nepal microstegium (Microstegium
vimineum), panic grass (Panicum sp.), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea),
golden rods (Solidago spp.), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica),
jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), and smartweed (Polygonum
hydropiperoides). .
Mesic Mined Hardwood Forest -The Mesic Mixed Hazdwood Forest
occurs primarily in the eastern portion of the project corridor. The
dominant canopy species found in this community are black locust

(Robinia pseudoacacia), bitternut hickory, tulip poplar, white oak
(Quercus alba), white ash (Fraxinus americana), northern red oak
(Quercus rubra), scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea), and American beech
(Fagus grandifolia). Shrubs include blackberry (Rubus argutus), redbud
(Cercis canadensis), downy arrowwood, Chinese privet and bitternut
hickory. Vines proliferate in sunny azeas and edges, and include poison
ivy, Japanese honeysuckle, trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), and
Cazolina jessamine (Gelsemium sempervirens). The herb layer is sparse
and includes rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera pubescens}, Christmas fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides), giant cane, and ebony spleenwort
(Asplenium platyneuron).
Mined Pine Forest -The mixed pine forest occurs in the southeastern
portion of the project corridor, occupying the eastern corridor high point.
The canopy is moderately dense with primarily loblolly pine (Pious taeda)
and a few scattered shortleaf pine (Pious echinata) and Virginia pine
(Pious virginiana). The subcanopy is poorly developed with a few
scattered sweetgums and red maples. The shrub and sapling area is
developing and contains young sweetgum, tulip poplar, flowering
dogwood (Corpus Jlorida), American beech, and sourwood (Oxydendrum
arboreum). The herbaceous layer is sparse and contains mainly vines such
as poison ivy, muscadine grape, and greenbrier.
Disturbed/Maintained Land - Disturbed/maintained land occurs along
the shoulders of US 158, on residential lots, and within active agricultural
fields north of US 158. Roadside right-of--way areas aze approximately 10
feet (3.0 meters) wide. Roadsides and lawns are planted with grasses,
including Bermuda grass (Cynodon dacrylon), and contain weedy species
such as goldenrod (Solidago sp.), dandelion (Taraxacum of~jicinale), lyre-
leaved sage (Salvia lyrata), dogbane (Erigeron sp.), wild onion (Allium
canadense), dock (Rumex crispus), wood sorrel (Oxalis sp.), and horse
nettle (Solanum carolinense). Agricultural pasture fields aze well
maintained and contain several species of forage grasses.
Plant community areas within potential construction boundaries are
estimated based on a 100-foot wide alignment centered on the roadway.
Final impacts resulting from cuts and fills may be less than these azeas. A
listing of plant community areas is presented in Table 1.
~o

Table 1: Plant Community Areas within the Potential Constriction
Boundaries. Measurements are given in acres (hectares).
Plant Community Plant Community Areas
Piedmont Levee Forest 0.06 (0.02)
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.10 (0.04)
Mixed Pine Forest 0.27 (0.11)
Disturbed/Maintained Land 1.06 (0.43)
TOTAL 1.49 (0.60)
No new fragmentation of natural plant communities (Piedmont Levee
Forest, Mesic Mixed Hazdwood Forest, Mixed Pine Forest) will be created
by the bridge replacement, as the project will result only in relocation of
community boundaries. The proposed alignment may only claim narrow
strips of adjacent natural communities.
Roadside-forest ecotones typically serve as vectors for invasive species
into local natural communities. An example of an undesirable invasive
species utilizing roadsides is kudzu (Pueraria montana). The
establishment of a hardy groundcover on road shoulders as soon as
practicable will limit the availability of construction areas to invasive and
undesirable plants.
2. Wildlife
Terrestrial
Two mammal species were observed within the study corridor during the
site visit: gray squirrels (Sciurus caroli»ensis) were seen throughout the
study corridor, and signs of beaver (Castor canadensis) were seen in the
floodplain and at the banks of the Yadkin River. Mammals expected to
occur within the study corridor include white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossum (Didelphis
virginiana), northem short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda), eastern
mole (Scalopus aguaticus), eastern pipistrelle (Pipistrellus subflavus), red
bat (Lasiurus borealis), long-tailed weasel (Mustela frenata), striped
skunk (Mephitis mephitis), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus ~loridanus),
white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), and gray fox {Urocyon
cinereoargenteus).
Bird species identified during the field visit are northern cardinal
(Cardinalis cardinalis), Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis), turkey
vulture (Cathartes aura), Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus),
eastem phoebe (Sayornis phoebe), Canada goose (Branta canadensis),
11

white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), American crow (Corvus
brachyrhynchos), American goldfinch (Carduelis tristis), northern
mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), great blue heron (Ardea herodias),
cedar waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum), savannah sparrow (Passerculus
sandwichensis), eastern towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), white-throated
sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis), and killdeer (Charadrius vociferus).
No aquatic amphibian or reptile was observed within the study corridor.
Terrestrial reptilian or amphibian species that might be expected in this
area aze eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), rat snake (Elaphe
obsoleta), eastern worm snake (Carphophis amoenus), eastern fence lizard
(Sceloporus undulatus), eastern box turtle (Terrapene Carolina), spotted
salamander (Ambystoma maculatum), dusky salamander (Desmognathus
fuscus), southern two-lined salamander (Eurycea cirrigera), red
salamander (Pseudotriton ruber), slimy salamander (Plethodon glutinous),
Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhousei), American toad (Bufo americanus),
upland chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata), and gray tree frog (Hyla
chrysoscelis).
Aquatic
No water snakes were observed within the study corridor. The Yadkin
River provides suitable habitat for other aquatic and semi-aquatic reptiles
including painted turtle (Chrysemys pitta), eastern musk turtle
(Sternotherus odoratus), and queen snake (Regina septemvittata). Typical
amphibian species for this habitat include green frog (Rana clamitans) and
pickerel frog (Rana palustris).
No sampling was undertaken in the Yadkin River to detennine fishery
potential. Small minnows were seen during visual surveys, but no larger
fish were noted. Species which may be present in the Yadkin River
include rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides), bluehead chub (Nocomis
leptocephalus), whitefin shiner (Notropis niveus), spottail shiner (N.
hudsonius), white sucker (Catostomus commersoni), flat bullhead
(Ameiurus platycephalus), margined madtom (Noturus insignis), and
redbreast sunfish (Lepomis auritus).
3. Anticipated Impacts to Wildlife
Due to the • limited extent of infringement on natural communities, the
proposed bridge replacement will not result in substantial loss or
displacement of known terrestrial or aquatic animal populations. No
substantial habitat fragmentation is expected since potential improvements
will be restricted to or adjoining existing roadside mazgins. Construction
noise and associated disturbances will have short-term impacts on
avifauna and migratory wildlife movement patterns. Long-term impacts
are expected to be inconsequential. Impacts associated with turbidity and
12

suspended sediments resulting from bridge installation will affect benthic
populations on a short-term basis. Temporary impacts to downstream
habitats from increased sedimentation during construction will be
minimized by the implementation of stringent erosion control measures.
E. Special Topics
1. Waters of the United States
Surface waters are subject to jurisdictional consideration under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act as "waters of the United States" (33 CFR
section 328.3). Within the study corridor, surface waters include the
Yadkin River, an unnamed tributary (UT) to the Yadkin River, and a man-
made pond. According to NWI mapping, the Yadkin River is classified as
a lacustrine, limnetic, permanently flooded system with an unconsolidated
bottom (L1UBHh), (Cowardin et al. 1979). Observations during the site
visit verified this designation. This portion of the Yadkin River is
considered "lacustrine" rather than "riverine" due to the existence of a dam
in the river channel approximately 3.0 miles (4.8 kilometers) downstream
of the study corridor. This dam was constructed by Fries Manufacturing &
Power in 1898 and was the first source of hydroelectric power in North
Carolina. Duke Power indicates that this dam no longer contributes to
their power production and a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) permit will not be required.
The open water of the UT to the Yadkin River is not depicted by NWI
mapping. Observations during the site visit determined the UT to possess
modified characteristics such as straighteting and ditching to facilitate
agricultural uses. Outside of the study comdor, the UT flows from a pond
located north of the study comdor. The open water of the man-made pond
is classified as palustrine, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded
and impounded (PUBHh). Outflow from the pond flows into the on-site
UT. Observations during the site visit verified the open water
classification. At the time of the site visit, no discharge was present from
the pond.
Vegetated wetlands are defined by the presence of three primary criteria:
hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and evidence of hydrology at or near
the surface for a portion (12.5 percent) of the growing season (DOA
1987). The field investigation determined that vegetated wetlands subject
to jurisdictional consideration under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
as "waters of the United States" (33 CFR section 328.3) occur within the
study corridor.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas will be limited to the removal of support
bents from the existing bridge and construction of support bents for the
new bridge. The remaining jurisdictional areas in the vicinity of the bridge
13

replacement will be bridged. The exact area of stream bed involved in this
work will not be known until bridge replacement plans have been
finalized.
2.
3.
During the removal of the existing bridge, there is potential for
components of the deck and rails to be dropped into the waters of the U.S.
The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete deck and rails is
approximately 546 cubic yards (4l8 cubic meters). NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR)
will be applied for removal of this bridge. In consideration of surface
water, this project can be classified as Case 3, where there are no special
restrictions beyond those outlined in BMPs for Protection of Surface
Waters.
Permits
This project is being processed as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. The COE has made
available Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 23 (67 FR 2020, 2082; January
15, 2002) for CEs due to potential impacts. DWQ has made available a
General 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) (GC 3403) for NWP No.
23. However, authorization for jurisdictional area impacts through use of
this permit requires written notice to DWQ. In the event that NWP #23
will not since, minor impacts attributed to bridge replacement and
associated approach improvements are expected to qualify under
Nationwide Permits No. 3 (Maintenance) (67 FR 2020, 2078, January 1 S,
2002) and No. 33 {Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering) (67
FR 2020, 2084, January 15, 2002) and their associated General 401 WQC
(GC 3376 and GC 3366, respectively) or General Bridge Permit 031 and
its associated General 401 WQC (GC 3404). Notification to the
Wilmington COE office is required if NWP No. 33 or the general permit is
utilized.
Mitigation
Fill or alteration of streams may require compensatory mitigation in
accordance with 15 NCAC 2H .0506(h). Compensatory mitigation is not
expected to be offered for this project due to expected avoidance of
impacts to jurisdictional azeas. Utilization of BMPs is recommended in an
effort to minimize indirect impacts. A fmal determination regarding
mitigation rests with the COE and DWQ.
~a

F. Rare and Protected Species
1. Federally Protected Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered, Threatened, or
officially Proposed for such listing are protected under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The
term "Endangered species" is defined as "any species which is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range", and the term
"Threatened species" is defined as "any species which is likely to become
an Endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range""(16 U.S.C. 1532). Federally protected
species listed for Forsyth and Davie Counties (February 18, 2003 and
February 11, 2003, respectively) are listed in Table 2.
Table 2: Federally Protected Species. Species name and status for
federally protected species in Forsyth (F) and Davie (D) Counties
(February 18, 2003 and February 11, 2003, respectively).
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Coun
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauzii Endangered D
Red-cockaded
wood cker* Picoides borealis Endangered F
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergi Threatened (Due to
Similari of A eatrance F
Small-anthered
Bittercress Cardamine micranthera Endangered F
• Historicrecord -obscure and incidental record.
Red-cockaded Woodpecker -This small woodpecker (7 to 8.5 inches [18
to 22 centimeters] long) has a black head, prominent white cheek patches,
and ablack-and-white barred back. Males often have red markings
(cockades) behind the eye, but the cockades may be absent or difficult to
see (Potter et al. 1980). Primary habitat consists of mature southern pine
forests dominated by loblolly, long-leaf (P. palustris), slash (P. elliottii),
and pond (P. serotina) pines (Thompson and Baker 1971). Nest cavities
are constructed in the heartwood of living pines, generally older than 70
years, that have been infected with red-heart disease. Nest cavity trees
tend to occur in clusters, which are refened to as colonies (FWS 1985).
The woodpecker drills holes into the bark around the cavity entrance,
resulting in a shiny, resinous buildup around the entrance that allows for
easy detection of active nest trees. Pine flatwoods or pine-dominated
savannas which have been maintained by frequent natural fires serve as
ideal nesting and foraging sites for this woodpecker. Development of a
thick understory may result in abandonment of cavity trees. The
woodpeckers utilize pine stands in close proximity to the colony site for
15

foraging. Foraging areas, depending on the quality of habitat, have been
found to range from 84 acres (33.9 hectares} to over 409 acres (165.5
hectazes). Food sources include wood-boring insects, grubs, beetles, corn
worms, and other invertebrates found within 0.5 mile (0.8 kilometer) of
the colony site. Stands preferred by foraging birds are dominated by pines
greater than 30 years of age, although mixed pine/hardwood stands are
also used.
The study corridor contains a stand of loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, and
Virginia pine, but no specimens that are old enough to be cavity tree
candidates. Few pines within the mixed pine forest are large and old
enough for foraging, and the canopy and sub-canopy contain a dense
hardwood composition, reducing suitability for the woodpecker. NHP
records have no documentation of red-cockaded woodpeckers within 5.0
miles (8.1 kilometers) of the study corridor. No red-cockaded
woodpeckers were observed during the field visit.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: The study corridor contains no suitable
foraging or nesting habitat for red-cockaded woodpeckers. NHP records
document no occurrences of red-cockaded woodpeckers within 5.0 miles
(8.0 kilometers) of the study corridor. Based on NHP records, field
observations, and professional judgement, the proposed project will not
affect the red-cockaded woodpecker. NO EFFECT
Bog turtle -T'he bog turtle is a small turtle reaching an adult size of
approximately 3 to 4 inches (8 to l0 centimeters). This otherwise darkly-
colored species is readily identifiable by the presence of a bright orange or
yellow blotch on the sides of the head and neck (Martof et al. 1980). The
bog turtle has declined drastically within the northern portion of its range
due to over-collection and habitat alteration. As a result, the FWS
officially proposed in the January 29, 199? Federal Register (62 FR 4229)
to list bog turtle as threatened within the northern portion of its range, and
within the southern portion of its range, which includes North Carolina,
the bog turtle is proposed for listing as threatened due to similarity of
appearance to the northern population. The proposed listing would allow
incidental take of bog turtles in the southern population resulting from
otherwise lawful activity.
The bog turtle is typically found in bogs, mazshes, and wet pastures,
usually in association with aquatic or semi-aquatic vegetation and small,
shallow streams over soft bottoms (Palmer and Braswell 1995). In North
Carolina, bog turtles have a discontinuous distribution in the Mountains
and western Piedmont.
The bog turtle is listed as Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T
S/A). T S/A species are not subject to Section 7 consultation and a
biological conclusion is not required. However, this project is not
16

expected to affect the bog turtle as no bogs, marshes, or wet grasslands
occur within the study corridor. In addition, the Yadkin River is
chazacterized by moderate- to high-flow volumes with a sand and gravel
substrate which is an unsuitable habitat for bog turtles. NHP records
indicate that bog turtles have not been documented within 1.0 mile {1.6
kilometers) of the study corridor, and no bog turtles were observed during
field surveys.
Small-anthered Bittenress - Small-anthered bittercress is a low, erect,
biennial or perennial herb with simple, slender stems. The plant has
crenate, lobed basal leaves 0.3 to 0.7 inch (1 to 2 centimeters) in length,
and unlobed, crenate stem leaves that aze slightly shorter. The small
flowers have white petals to 0.1 inch (3 millimeters) long and bloom in the
late spring. Small-anthered bittercress requires open habitat in low moist
woods and along small stream banks with rock crevices and seepages.
This species is endemic to the Dan River sub-basin of the Roanoke River
Basin. The Dan River sub-basin occurs in the northern portion of Forsyth
County. NHP records indicate that this species has not been documented
within any portion of Forsyth County in the past 20 years. The southern
portion of Forsyth County, where the study corridor is located, is within
the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. The small-anthered bittercress has never
been documented within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. In terms of
suitable habitat for this species, the study corridor contains no rock
outcroppings or seepages along the banks, and is characterized by dense
vegetation along both banks of the Yadkin River. Sunlight is greatly
limited within l0 feet (3.1 meters) on both banks of the Yadkin River by
the levee forest which provides poor habitat for small-anthered bittercress.
The upland periphery of the study corridor contains maintained
agricultural lands, and drainage from these fields consists of maintained
ditches.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: The range of small-anthered bittercress
is limited to the Dan River Basin, and the study corridor is located in the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. NHP files document no occurrences of
small-anthered bittercress within the vicinity of the study corridor and no
occurrences of this species in Forsyth County in the past 20 yeazs. The
reach of stream and stream bank within the study corridor provides
unsuitable habitat for small-anthered bittercress. Based on this species'
range, unsuitable habitat, available information concerning documented
occurrences, and professional judgement, the proposed project will not
affect small-anthered bittercress. NO EFFECT.
Michauz's Sumac - Michaux's sumac is a densely pubescent, deciduous,
rhizomatous shrub, usually less than 2 feet (0.6 meter) high. The alternate,
compound leaves consist of 9 to 13 hairy, round-based, toothed leaflets
borne on a hairy rachis that may be slightly winged (Radford et al. 1968).
t~

Small male and female flowers aze produced during June on separate
plants; female flowers aze produced on terminal, erect clusters followed by
small, hairy, red fruits (drupes) in August and September. Michaux's
sumac tends to grow in disturbed areas where competition is reduced by
periodic fire or other disturbances, and may grow along roadside margins
or utility right-of--ways. In the Piedmont, Michaux's sumac appears to
prefer clay soil derived from mafic rocks or sandy soil derived from
granite; in the Sandhills, it prefers loamy swales (Weakley 1991).
Michaux's sumac ranges from south Virginia through Georgia in the inner
Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont.
The study corridor supports areas of maintained, early successional
roadside/disturbed land suitable for Michaux's sumac. A systematic
survey for Michaux's sumac was conducted within suitable habitat of the
study corridor on August 18, 2003. The survey involved establishing
transects through suitable habitat and walking the transects while looking
for the plant. This survey found no evidence of the presence of this
species. All roadsides, meadows, lawns, and woodland edges within the
study corridor were surveyed.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: Portions of this project occur in azeas
which contain roadside/disturbed and early successional vegetation along
road shoulders, maintained lawn, and forest edges. However, NHP files
have no documentation of this species within 1.0 mile (1.6 kilometers) of
the study con-idor, and this species was not identified during a survey
conducted by ESC biologists on August 18, 2003. MAY AFFECT, NOT
LILLY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT.
2. Federal Species of Concern
The February l 1 and 18, 2003 FWS lists also include a category of species
designated as "Federal species of concern" (FSC) in Davie and Forsyth
Counties. A species with this designation is one that may or may not be
listed in the future (formerly C2 candidate species or species under
consideration for listing for which there is insufficient information to
support listing). A list of FSC species occurring in Davie (D) and Forsyth
(F) Counties is given in Table 3.
~s

Table 3: Federal Species of Concern. Species name, habitat potential within the
study corridor, and state status for species federally designated as FSC within
Davie (D) and Forsyth (F) Counties.
Common Name Scientific Name Potential Habitat State Status Coun

Heller's trefoil Lotus helleri Yes SR-T D
Creamy tick-trefoil Desmodium ochroleucum No SR-T D
Robust redhorse Moxostoma robustum Yes SR-PE D
Brook floater Alasmidonta varicosa Yes E F
** E =Endangered; T =Threatened; SC =Special concern; SR =Significantly Rare; C =
Candidate; P =Species has been formally proposed for listing as Endangered, Threatened, or
Special Concern; WS = NC Plant Watch List: rare because of severe decline (Amoroso 2002;
LeGrand and Ha112002).
The FSC designation provides no federal protection under the ESA for
species listed. NHP files do not document any occurrences of FSC species
within l .0 mile (l .6 kilometers) of the study corridor.
3. State Protected Species
Plant and animal species which are on the North Carolina state list as
Endangered, Threatened, Special Concern, Candidate, Significantly Rare,
or Proposed (Amoroso 2002, LeGrand and Hall 2002) receive limited
protection under the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (G.S. 1 ] 3-
331 et seg.) and the North Carolina Plant Protection Act of 1979 (G.S.
106-202 et seg.). The Robust redhorse (Moxotoma robustrum) is state
listed as Significantly Rare. No species with these designations are
documented within 1.0 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the study corridor.
NHP records indicate the occurrence of a Regionally Significant Natural
Heritage Area in the vicinity of the study corridor. The Carters Creek
Forest, is located approximately 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) south
(downstream) of the study corridor along the Yadkin River in Davie
County. The proposed project will not affect this Regionally Significant
Natural Heritage Area.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and implemented by the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified
at 36 CFR Part 800. Section I06 requires Federal agencies to take into account
the effect of their undertakings (federally-funded, licensed, or permitted) on
19

properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the Nationa] Register of Historic
Places and to afford the Advisory Council a reasonable opportunity to comment
on such undertakings.
B. Historic Architecture
In a letter of February 20, 2001, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)
recommended that an evaluation of Bridge No. 35 be conducted relative to its
eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, SHPO
requested a survey to identify any structures more than 50 years old. A Historic
Architectural Resources Survey Report -Phase II Intensive -Final Identiltcation
and Evaluation, B-3835. November 2002. was conducted by NCDOT historic
azchitecture staff. The findings of the report indicate Bridge No. 35 is not eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places but recommends that Tanglewood
Park and Win-Mock Farm are eligible for the National Register. The SHPO
concurred with the findings of the report in a letter dated November 17, 2002. A
copy of this letter may be found in the Appendix.
A curb and gutter cross section v,~ill be used on the east approach to contain the
right of way and avoid impacts to Tanglewood Park. The taking of a narrow strip
of right of way adjacent to US 158 from Win-Mock Farm can not be avoided if
the recommended project cross section is implemented. NCDOT will develop a
landscape plan in conjunction with the SHPO and property owner to mitigate
impacts to Win-Mock Farm resulting in "No Adverse Effect".
C. Archaeology
In their letter of February 20, 2001, the SHPO stated "if the bridge is to be
replaced on existing location, we recommend no archaeological survey." The
bridge is being widened along the existing alignment; therefore no archaeological
survey is required. A copy of this letter may be found in the Appendix.
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of
substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
substantial change in land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
20

No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right of way acquisition
will be minimized by the preferred alternative.
In compliance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations) a review was conducted to
determine whether minority or low income populations were receiving disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental impacts as a result of this project. The
investigation determined the project would not disproportionately impact any minority or
low income populations.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated. The project is not
expected to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives
to consider the potential impacts to prime and important farmland soils by all land
acquisition and construction projects. Prime and important farmland soils aze defined by
the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NCRS). Since there are no prime or
important farmlands in the immediate vicinity as a result on the urban character of the
land uses, the Farmland Protection Policy does not apply.
The project is located in Davie County, which has bin determined to be in compliance
with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93 aze not
applicable because the proposed project is located in an attainment area. This project is
not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area.
The project is located in Forsyth County, which is within the Greensboro-Winston-
Salem-High Point nonattainment area for ozone (03) and the Winston-Salem
nonattainment are for carbon monoxide (CO) as defined by the EPA. The 1990 Clean Air
Act Amendments (CAAA) designated these azeas as "moderate nonattainment areas for
03 and CO. However, due to improved monitoring data, these areas were redesignated as
maintenance for 03 on November 8, 1993 and for CO on November 7, 1994. Section 176
(c) of the CAAA requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to the
intent of the state air quality implementation plan (SIP). The current SIP does not contain
any transportation control measures for Forsyth County. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth
County Urban Area 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the 2002-2008
Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) have been determined to
conform to the intent of the SIP. The USDOT air quality conformity approval of the
LRTP was 5!28/02 and the USDOT air quality conformity approval of the MTIP was
5/28/02. The current conformity determination is consistent with the final conformity
rule found in 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93. There have been no significant changes in the
projects' design concept or scope, as used in the conformity analyses.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the
regional emission analysis (if applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not required.
The traffic volumes will not increase or decrease because of this project. The project's
impact on noise and air quality will not be substantial.
21

Noise leveis could increase during construction but will be temporary. If any vegetation
is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and regulations of the North Cazolina SIP for air quality in compliance with I S
NCAC 2D.0520. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway
traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and for air quality (1990 CAAA and NEPA) and no
additional reports are required.
Forsyth and Davie Counties are participants in the National Flood Insurance Regulaz
Program. The floodplain in the project area is shown in Figure 5. The proposed project
will not modify the flow in the Yadkin River.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse
environmental effects will result from implementation of the project.
VIII. PUBLIC IlWOLVEMENT
This project was coordinated with local officials and stakeholders at a meeting held on
April 23, 2003 in the Village Nall, Village of Clemmons. No comments were received as
a result of that meeting. A Citizens' Informational Workshop was held on July 10, 2003.
Thirty (30) citizens and local officials signed the sign-in sheet. Two written comments
were received. One asked for provisions to suspend an additional future water line on the
new structure and one opposed the widening of the new structure. Oral comments from
local officials and stakeholders support the project as proposed.
IX. AGENCY COMMENTS
United States Deuartment of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
Our records indicate there is a known location of the federally endangered
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) near the project. If this species occurs in the
project azea, additional consultation will be required.
Response: Portions of this project occur in areas which contain
roadside/disturbed and early successional vegetation along road shoulders,
maintained lawn, and forest edges. However, NHP files have no documentation
of this species within 1.0 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the study corridor, and this
species was not identified during a survey conducted on August 18, 2003. MAY
AFFECT, NOT LILLY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
We request that High Quality Sedimentation an Erosion Control Measures be used
due to the DWQ water quality classification of WS-IV. We request that the new
bridge span the adjacent wetlands entirely. The old fill causeways should be then
be removed and graded to ~ natural ground level. We aze not awaze of any
threatened or endangered species in the project vicinity.
Response: The existing structure is 1083 feet long and spans the adjacent
wetlands entirely. The replacement structure replaces the existing in-kind.
22

Forsyth County City-Counri Planning B~ oazd
Traffic volumes along US 158 in this area are around 14,000 vehicles per day.
We would like more detailed information regarding how traffic flow will be
managed in this area during construction. This information will be needed so that
emergency services can be informed of changes that may impact the timely
delivery of services.
Response: The existing bridge will be replaced using staged construction and two
lanes of traffic will be maintained on-site during construction. Traffic control
plans will be developed during the design phase of the project.
The bridge is located within the designated floodway and 100-yeaz floodplain.
Response: The project floodway and floodplain impacts will be coordinated with
the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Planning Department and the
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Inspections Department.
X. SECTION 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966
Tanglewood, in the southeast quadrant, is a public recreational facility ov~med by Forsyth
County. Tanglewood began as a square mile area of land purchased by William Johnson
in 1757. The Johnson heirs sold the property to William Neal Reynolds in 1921. The
Tanglewood tract was enlarged to 1,100 acres and the Manor House expanded to 28
rooms. Today the Manor House is a Bed & Breakfast Inn with 10 guest rooms. In 1951,
the Reynolds willed the Tanglewood property to the citizens of Forsyth County as a
public recreational park. The preliminary plans for the replacement of Bridge No. 35 do
not use any land from the Tanglewood property and thereby avoid potential Section 4(f)
impacts.
Win-Mock Farm is in the northwest quadrant and survives from the estate built by S.
Clay Williams, a former president of Reynolds Tobacco Company. When originally
organized, the farm is said to have been one of the largest dairies in North Carolina. In
1949, the Bahnson brothers bought 1,200 acres of the Williams estate and gave it the
name Win-Mock Farm because it was half way between Winston-Salem and Mocksville.
The integrity of the developed portion of the farm has been maintained. This portion
contains examples of "the grandest and most opulent representatives of the twentieth
century farm buildings in Davie County" ("Win-Mock Farm, Hillsdale" Survey Files, NC
Historic Preservation Office, Raleigh). The buildings in question are located between
400 -600 feet (122 - 183 meters) north of existing US 158. The widened west approach
to the new bridge will require a narrow strip of additional right of way along the north
side of existing US 158. The required strip is approximately 15 feet (4.6 meters) wide
and 1300 feet (396 meters) long.
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 19b6, as amended, states in part
"The Secretary may approve a transportation project or program requiring the use of
23

publicly owned land of a public park, recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or
land of a historic site of national, state, or local significance (as determined by the
Federal, State or local officials having jurisdiction over the park, recreation area, refuge,
or site) only if -
(1) there is no prudent and feasible alternative to using that land; and
(2) the program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the park,
recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or historic site resulting from such
use."
Since it is anticipated that the proposed project will require use of property from a
National Register-eligible historic resource, Win-Mock Farm, a Section 4(f) Evaluation is
required.
24

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS WITH MINOR INVOLVEMENTS WITH
HISTORIC SITES
F. A. PROJECT BRSTP-158(12)
STATE PROJECT 8.1611401
T. I. P. NO. B-3835
Description:
YES NO
l . Is the proposed project designed to
improve the operational chazacteristics,
safety, and/or physical condition of the X
existing highway facility on essentially
the same alignment?
2. Is the project on new location? ^
X
3. Is the historic site adjacent to the
existing highway? X
4. Does the project require the removal or
alteration of historic buildings, X
structures, or objects?
5. Does the project disturb or remove
archaeological resources which are ~ X
important to preserve in place rather
than to recover for archaeological
research?
6. a. Is the impact on the Section 4(f)

site considered minor (i.e. no effect, a
X
no adverse effect)?
b. If the project is determined to have
"no adverse effect" on the historic ~ X
site, does the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation object to the
determination of "no adverse effect"?
7. Has the SHPO agreed, in writing, with the a
assessment of impacts and the proposed X
mitigation?
8. Does the project require the preparation
of an EIS? ~ X
25

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE AND
PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and found not
to be feasible and prudent:
1. Do nothine Yes No
Does the "do nothing" alternative: X
(a) correct capacity deficiencies?
or (b) correct existing safety hazards?
or (c) correct deteriorated conditions?
and (d) create a cost or impact of
extraordinary measure?
2. Improve the highway without using the
adiacent historic site
(a) Have minor alignment shifts, changes
in standards, use of retaining walls,
etc., or traffic management measures
been evaluated?
(b) The items in 2(a) would result in:
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) substantial adverse environmental
impacts
or (ii) substantial increased costs
or (iii) unique engineering,
transportation, maintenance, or
safety problems
or (iv) substantial social, environmental,
or economic impacts
o (v a project which does not meet
the need
or (vi) impacts, costs, or problems which
are of extraordinary magnitude
^-
^-
^-
^-
x^
-^
26

Yes No
3. Build an improved facility on new ^
location without using the historic site. X
(a) An alternate on new location would
result in: (circle, as appropriate)
(i) a project which does not solve
the existing problems
or (ii) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or (iii) a substantial increase in
project cost or engineering
difficulties
and (iv) such impacts, costs, or
difficulties of truly unusual
or unique or extraordinary
magnitude
MI1~IIMIZATION OF HARM
Yes No
1. The project includes all possible planning ^
to minimize harm necessary to preserve the X
historic integrity of the site.
2. Measures to minimize harm have been
agreed to, in accordance with 36 CFR X
Part 800, by the FHWA, the SHPO,
and as appropriate, the ACHP.
3. Specific measures to minimize harm are
described as follows:
A Historic Architectural Resources Survey Report -Phase II has been conducted by the
NCDOT architectural history staff and has been concurred in by the SHPO. Two National
Register-eligible properties were identified, Tanglewood Park and Win-Mock Farm.
Tanglewood Pazk in the southeast project quadrant has been avoided by judicious design.
A strip of right of way approximately 15 feet wide by 1300 feet long along the north side of
US 158 will be required from Win-Mock Farm. The taking will be adjacent to the existing
right of way and the NCDOT will prepare a Landscape Design in consultation with SHPO
and the property owner of Win-Mock Farm to mitigate the minor additional right of way
requirements. This action will result in a "no adverse effect" on Win-Mock Farm.
27

COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
a. State Historic Preservation Officer see attachment
b. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
c. Property owner
d. Local/State/Federal Agencies see attachment
e. US Coast Guard not applicable
(for bridges requiring bridge permits)
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on December
23,1986.
All required alternatives have been evaluated and the findings made are clearly applicable to this
project. There are no feasible and prudent alternatives to the use of the historic site.
The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and the measures to minimize harm
will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed with local and state agencies.
Approved:
~r~~
Date Project De elopment Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
i f3 oy ~.~.~;~ o%.~
Date k~ Division Administrator, FHWA
28

REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L. 2002. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC.
Cowazdin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS -79/31. Fish and Wildlife Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. 103 pp.
Daniels, R.B, S.W. Buol, H.J. Kleiss, and C.A. Ditzler. 1999. Soil Systems in North Carolina.
North Cazolina State University Soil Science Department, Raleigh, North Carolina. 118
PP~
Department of the Army (DOA). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Tech. Rpt. Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
100 pp.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1997. Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basinwide Water Quality
Management Plan: Draft. North Cazolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Raleigh.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1999. Classifications and Water Quality Standards Assigned
to the Waters of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). 1985. Red-cockaded Woodpecker Recovery Plan. U.S.
Department of the Interior, Southeast Region, Atlanta, Georgia. 88 pp.
Hamel, P.B. 1992. Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature Conservancy,
Southeastern Region, Chapel Hill, NC. 437 pp.
Kartesz, J. 1998. A Synonymized Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the United States, Puerto
Rico and the Virgin Islands. Biota ofNorth America Program.
LeGrand, H. E. and S. P. Hall. 2002. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species
of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and Reptiles
of the Carolinas and Virginia. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
264 pp.
Menhinick, E.F. 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, Raleigh. 227 pp.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 1996. Hydric Soils; Forsyth County, NC.
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
29

Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 1996. Hydric Soils; Davie County, NC. U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
Palmer, W.M. and A.L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Cazolina. The University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 412 pp.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell, and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Cazolinas.
The University of North Cazolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
Rohde, F.C., R.G. Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater Fishes of the
Cazolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. The University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill, N.C. 222 pp.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh.
325 pp.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1995. Soil Survey of Davie County, North Carolina. U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1976. Soil Survey of Forsyth County, North Carolina. U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
Thompson, RL. and W.W. Baker. 1971. Asurvey ofred-cockaded woodpeckers nesting habitat
requirements (pp. 170-186). In R.L. Thompson ed., The Ecology and Management of the
Red-cockaded Woodpecker. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL.
Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell, and W.C. Biggs, Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia,
and Maryland. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 255 pp.
30

'' ~:~~.
\ \•y
\`
~• ~~ 1100 s..
'~.
1502
1452
- - / '~/
3684 i - ~ 1891
i
/ 1 ~~ jl%'
~ '+.~
~\
:~ \
~_',. ~
Bridge No. 3S
40 ~
158

lbz~
801
,~..

~soi
...... ~?/~ r4..
}
F a,m~n

1
6~ ~
+4 ,.
,
Y

!!~ f
~
MlstikSYlSe Otk
i ~:.

J::~.
~~1~; i ~

DAME/FORSYTH COUNTIES
Davie Co. Bridge No. 35
on US 158
over Yadkin River
TIP No. B-3835
Figure 1 ~,
„ T ~ North Carolina
. - -~ Department of Transportation
~' Project Development
a~ ,,, & Environmental Analysis Branch
~i
1218 , ~~
• ~ - ~.,_
~~~ k
. ' ~ r
.-~ -I
i 158
.' i
' ~
i
i
' 4298 ~ 3004
_~
.~ '~~
s ~
_ ,
l
:~
.,~ ___,,
~i~ ~,;~ , iu ~
~,
!)i
i
i; ~ ~
~j• ' ~
~ Meters 800
~ Miles 0;5
APPROXIMATE SCALE

ORIGI
;OUND
D
SECTION NO.1 FOR:
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
VAR. 24'-0" TO 26'-0' _ VAR. 24'-0' TO 26'-0'
t 26'-0' 4~' t 26'-0'
tt VAR. 26'-0' TO 32'-0' tt VAR. 26'-0" TO 32'-0' rrrr 4'-0'
ttt 32'-0' rtt 32'-0" 10'-0" ~ y,
_. _ f i~~~r w.ru 1 . Mr" ORIGINAL GROUND
GRADE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
~ -~-
-L- STA. 10+00 TO STA. 19+70
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.2 FOR:
-lr STA 19+70 TO STA. 20+92+.~ (BEG. BRIDGE)
r -Ir STA. 31+88+~ (END BRIDGE) TO SfA.32+00
~'~ tr -Ir STA. 32+00 TO STA 35+60
ORIGINAL GROUND
rrr -l. STA. 35+60 TO STA. 45+33.88
rrrr -1. STA. 33+SO TO STA. 45+33.88
North Carolina
~, Department of Transportation
Project Development
& Environmental Analysis Branch
FORSYTH / DAVIE COUNTIES
Bridge No. 35
on US 158
over YADK/N RIVER
TIP No. B-3835
Figure 4
BRIDGE SKETCH NO. 1

ZONFd A ~

~~~...
+ - 1 \
'~' .I rill ~~• ,
1

` ~~. L

4 i i
1 '
~ 1

ty ',
) .
}
~
EGEND ' r `" • t
~'
L
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED
~
~ ~ >
Br.# 35 on US 158
{
a
BV 100-YEAR FL006
I {
I -

, ~
.
`i
~. ZONE A No hoe hood sdewsians determined ).
- }
' k
ZONE AE flex Pots ekwtiom d:krminM.
1 - '
I -
ZONE AH flood dgdhs d 1 so d feet Wswlly erto of +
t ,..
pondlnU; Lax flood edeadom deemned. ~ ~
` ~ ~ ' - ~ .. ~.
ZONE AO Hood depths of 1 x 7 fees luswlry sheer Bwv E
.. -
onskgngseraiN; wesgdeptlisdmmsisrtd. 7 ~
farasasdallwdd kn flooding, xlocisks alx.
~
I
determined s{
:
~ -
I ZONE A99bbl praecredhom loB-rysfloodM (Meal !
BoodsPmsenioneWem ants omsanion; no -
bex deeBons deksmhiM.
20NE V Caesul BondwMvekcp Aeadlnneacrionl; i
sa hex AoM ekwfions deremihiM. ~ , - -
ZONE VE CmstlBoodwah wlodsY haadlvaxxoonl,
~
box flats alese0ons desnsminM. ~ ~ '
-l
Tt i~ ~
1
-
FLOOD1A91Y AREAS IN ZONE AE '
, ~ 1
~r1dC OTHER FLOOD AREAS I ! .-
~ . ,
ZONEX nnsasd5B0.yassBood;:reudlBB-lea Prod
` {
wish+rn+Bm depshs d kss Than f foa a wid,
damage near kxlhanlfpwrt mlk;aM wren -.1 - _
prptecled W kwes hom IW-leas Bond. -
I ~~
OTHER AREAS i
ZONE% Areat decmdnedbha oumide 300.yeu flwd
pkin. ,
ZONED Maslnwh'rfi Basil baadsare undnsemdned - -
® UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS . ' `
Eked Boundzry i ~t ~ -s _ .
v
.
~
.E
~ ~ - -
~
- - -- FbMssay Bwndary #
- - - 7mse D Boundary ~
.. 1 1
Boundary Dividing Special HoM Hazed
~
Zones. end BouMery OnldinB Nos d
®
DNkrem Cassel Bne Flood Elawsions szfllhin
~
Speclel Flood Hwd lane. t -
-
+667 &x Flood fksation Line; Elenoon m feei• ~
A A Cross Smion line
d ~ ~ ~? i
-
~~~~ - - ,
- i
IEL 191 Base Flood EMalion m fees where Unilam
Within Zone• ~
RM5 Ekwsion Rekrence MaA
x
A
1
"'
M3.0 a Mik aad< r ~
•fhlerenced o the National Geodeli< sknrcal Dalum d 1929 ~ ~ -
FEMA Flood Maps
Davie & Forsyth Counties, NC
(from FEMA Flood Insurance Study)
Panels = 243 of 377, 4S of 125, 50 of 125
Scale 1' = 1000'
1~lorth Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Enviromnental Analysis Branch
DAME/FORSYTH COUNTIES
Davie County Bridge No. 35
on US 1.58
over Yadkin River
TIP No. B-3835
Figure ,5
+eee~re~e~~ i

Q'P ~, r F ry~'y
T
~• 9
.~ ~ - .q
,q x a ,s
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
January 25, 2001
Mr. William D. Crihnore, P.E., Manager
Proj ect Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
154$ Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27b99-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Subject: Bridge Replacements: B-3677, Mecklenburg County; B-3822, Catawba County;
B-3840, Gaston County; B-3704, Stanly County; B-3828, Cleveland County; B-3839,
B-3454, Forsyth County; B-3421, Cabamis County; B-3637, Davie County; B-3835,
Davie-Forsyth Counties; B-3404, Anson County; DOT contractor TGS Engineers
We have reviewed these projects and provide comments in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
The information we received for these 11 projects does not include descriptions of the structures
that will replace the existing bridges, nor does it include any environmental information
regarding the streams or whether or not habitat assessments or surveys for rare species have been
conducted for any of these projects. Therefore, our comments are primarily limited to the known
locations of listed species and species of federal concern. When the Categorical Exclusions are
prepazed and more information is available regarding environmental effects we can offer mere
substantive comments.
Enclosed are species lists from the nine counties included in this package. These lists provide
the names of species that are on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants, as well as species of federal concern. Species of federal concern are not legally protected
under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, unless they aze
formally proposed or listed as endangered of threatened. We aze including these species in our
response to give you advance notification and to request your assistance in protecting theta if any
aze found in the vicinity of your projects. Our records indicate the following:
1. B 822 Catawba County- B- 3$40iGaston County B-3839 B~4,~4,,Fo County:
B-3421 Cabazrus County B-3637 avie Cou~y. There are no known locations of species of
concern near these projects. However, we recommend surveying each of the project areas for

species prior to any further planning or on-the-ground activities to ensure no adverse impacts
occur.
2. 1677 Mecl lenburi ly;~,23700Stanly~~Y;,~-3404. Anson County. Our records
for these counties indicate known locations for the federally endangered Schweinitz's
sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzic~ in the vicinity of these projects. If this species occurs in
the project areas, additional consultation will be required
3. ~~828 Cleveland County. Our records for Cleveland County indicate there is a known
location of the federally threatened dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan~ora) near the
project. If this species occurs in the project area, additional consultation will be required.
4. ~~~i Davie-F'orsvth Counties. Our records indiczte there is a known locaticn of the
federally endangered Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxi:~ near the project. If this species.
occurs in the project area, additional consultation will be required.
We are interested in the types of structures that will replace these existing bridges and would
recommend spanning structures, preferably bridges, in all cases. We look forward to reviewing
the completed categorical exclusion documents.
If you have questions about these comments, please contact Ms. Mazella Buncick of our staff at
828!258-3939, Ext. 237. In any future correspondence concerning these projects, please
reference our Log Number 42-01-252.
Sincerely,
.~~~
vU~,
Brian P. Cole
State Supervisor
Enclosure
cc:
John Conforti, Project Development and Envirornnental Analysis Branch, North Carolina
Department of Transportation,1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1548
Mr. Ron Linville, Western Piedmont Region Coordinator, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, 3855 Idlewild Road, Kemersville, North Carolina 27284-9180
Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele, North Cazolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands Section, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-1621

ENDANGERED, THI2EATENED, AND CANDIDATE SPECIES AND FEDERAL
SPECIES OF CONCERN, BY COUNTY, IlV NORTH CAROLINA
This list was adapted from the North Carolina Natural Httitagc Program's County Species List. It is a listing
of North Carolina's federally listed and proposed endangered, threatened, and candidate species and Federal
species of concern {for a comple#e list of rare species in the state, please contact the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program). The information in this list is compiled from a variety of sources, including field
surveys, museums and herbariums, literature, and personal communications. T'he North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program's database is dynamic, with new records being added and old records being revised as new
information is received. Please note that this list camnot be considered a definitive record of listed species
and Federal species of concern, and it should not be considered a substitute for field surveys.
Critical habitat: Critical habitat is noted, with a description, for the counties where it is designated.
Aquatic species: Fishes and aquatic invertebrates are noted for counties where they arc known to occur.
However, projects may have effects on downstream aquatic systems in adjacent counties.
Sea turtles: Sea turtles occur in coastal waters and nest along beaches. This list includes sea turtles
in the counties where they are known to nest. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has
jurisdiction over sea turtle issues on terrestrial systems; the National Marine Fisheries
Service has authority over sea turtles in coastal waters.
Manatees: Manatees occur throughout North Carolina's coastal waters; this list includes manatees
in counties where there are known concentrations. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has
consultation and recovery respons~biIity for manatees.
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS
ANSON COUNTY
Vertebrates
Shortnose sturgeon
Bald eagle
Carolina redhorse
Robust redhorse
Red-cockaded woodpecker
Vascular Plants
Bog spicebush
Schweinitz's sunflower
CABARRUS COUNTY
Vertebrates
Carolina darter
Acipenser brevirostrum Endangered
Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened
(proposed for delisting)
Moxostoma sp. FSC
Moxostoma robustum FSC
Picoides borealis Endangered
Lindera subcoriacea FSC
Helianthus schweinitaii Endangered
Etheostoma collis collis FSC

Invertebrates
Pee Dee crayfish ostracod Dactylocythere peedeensis FSC*
Carolina heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered**
Vascular Plants
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
Heller's trefoil Lotus helleri ~ FSC
CATAWBA COUNTY
Invertebrates
Catawba crayfish osttacod Dactyloctythere isabelae FSC
Vascular Plants
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora Threatened
Sweet pinesap Monotropsis odorata FSC
CLEVELAND COUNTY
Vascular Plants
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf Hexastylis nan j~ora Threatened
Sweet pinesap ~ Monotropsis odorata FSC
Carolina saxifiage Saxifraga caroliniana FSC
DAVE COUNTY
vascular Plants
Heller's trefoil Lotus helleri FSC*
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
FORSYTH COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii T{S/A)1
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered****
Vascular Plants
Small-anthered bittercress Cardamine micranthera Endangered

GASTON COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bog turtle
Bald eagle
Vascular Plants
Georgia aster
Schweinit2's sunflower
Clemmys muhlenbergii
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Aster georgianus
Helianthus schweinitzii
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Vertebrates
Carolina darter Etheostoma.collis Collis
Bald eagle Haliaeelus leucocephalus
Invertebrates
Carolina heelsplitter
Carolina creekshell
Lasmigona decorata
Ydlosa vaughaniana
Vascular Plants
Georgia aster
Tall larkspur
Smooth coneflower
Sehweinitz's sunflower
Virginia quillwort
--Heller's trefoil
Michaux's sumac
STANLY COUNTY
Vertebrates
Carolina darter
Bald eagle
Invertebrates
Brook floater
Carolina creekshell
Vascular Plants
Georgia aster
Schweinitz's sunflower
Butternut
Heller's trefoil
Aster georgianus
Delphinium exaltatum
Echinacea laevigala
Helianthus schweinitzii
Isoetes virginica.
Lotus helleri
Rhus michauxii
Etheostoma Collis Collis
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Alasmidonta varicosa
Villosa vaughaniana
Aster georgianus
Helianthus schweinitzii
Juglans cinerea
Lotus helleri
T(S/A)'
Threatened
(proposed for delisting)
C1
Endangered
FSC
'Threatened
(proposed for delisting)
Endangered
FSC
C1
FSC*
Endangered*
Endangered
FSC
FSC
. Endangered*
FSC
Threatened
(proposed for delisting)
FSC
FSC
C1
Endangered
FSC
FSC

Savanna cowbane Oxypolis ternata FSC
Yadkin River goldenrod Solidago plumosa FSC*
Riverbank vervain Verbena riparia FSC*
KEY:
Status Definition
Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Threatened A taxon "Ir7cely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
Proposed A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
Cl A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to
support listing.
FSC A. Federal species of eoaeesn-a species that may or may not be listed in the future (formerly
C2 candidate species or species under consideration for listing for which there is insufficient
inforaration to support listing).
T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance (e.g., American alligator )-a species that is
threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection.
These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and aze not subject to Section 7
consultation.
EXP A taxon that is listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened on public land, for
consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Species with 1, 2, 3, or 4 asterisks behind them indicate historic, obscure, or incidemal records.
*Iiistoric record -the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
**Obscure record -the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
***hacidenta]/migrant record -the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
****Iiistoric record -obscure and incidental record.
'In the November 4, 1997, Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (fiom Virginia south to
Georgia)was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international conunercial bade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T(S/A)
designation has no effect on land-management activiti.s by private landowners in North Carolina, "p'art of the
southern population of the species. In addition to its oiiaal status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due m habitat loss.

® North Carolina:'Wildlife ~~esources Conlmission®
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Direcuor
T0: John Conforti
Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project C for
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: ~ January 2, 2001
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements in Anson, Cabarrus, Catawba, Cleveland, Davie,
Forsythe, Gaston, Guilford, Mecklenburg, Randolph, Rockingham, and Stanly
counties of North Carolina. TIP Nos. B-3404,.B-3421, B-3822, B-3828, B-3637,
B-3835, B-3454, B-3839, B-3840, B-3337; B-3652, B-3851, B-3677, B-350 B-
3694, and B-3700.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments aze provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; l6
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should

Bridge Memo 2 January 2, 2001
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the azea should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the azea with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and m;n;m;~ps disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12,1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within I S days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to m;n;m;7e Sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe azches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts aze
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If

Bridge Memo 3 January 2, 2001
multiple cells aze required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similaz to Lyonsfield design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry durug normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Itiprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, r1Lin;mi~e the need for clearing and to avoid destabihung
stream banks. ~If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the•100-yeaz floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with, grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the azea to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
projector other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-3404 -Anson County -Bridge No. 314 over South Fork Jones Creek. We have no specific
comments. We are not awaze of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
2. B-3421- Cabarrus County -Bridge No. 266 over Norfolk and Southern Railway. No
comment.
3. B-3822 -Catawba County - Bridge No. 8 over unnamed tributary to the Catawba River. We
request that High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures be used due to the
DWQ water quality classification of WS-IV. VJe are not aware of any threatened of
endangered species in the project vicinity.
4. B-3828 -Cleveland County - Bridge No. 233 over Buffalo Creek. We have no specific
comments. We are not aware of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
S. B-3637 -Davie County - Bridge No. 37 over I-40. No comment.
6. B-3835 -Davie-Forsyth counties - Bridge No. 35 over the Yadkin River. We request that
High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures be used due to the DWQ water
quality classification of WS-IV. We request that the new bridge span the adjacent wetlands

Bridge Memo
January 2, 2001
entirely. The old fill causeways should then be removed and graded to natural ground level.
We aze not awaze of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
7. B-3454 -Forsyth County - Bridge No. 260 over Muddy Creek. We have no specific
comments. We are not aware of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
8. B-3839 -Forsyth County - Bridge No.l 39 over Fishers Branch. We have no specific
comments. We are not aware of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
9. B-3840 -Gaston County - Bridge No. 52 over South Crowders Creek. We have no specific
comments. We are not aware of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
10. B-3337 -Guilford County - Bridge No. 527 over North Buffalo Creek. We have no specific
comments. We are not aware of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
11. B-3652 -Guilford County - Bridge No. 20 over the Deep River. SR 4121 crosses the Deep
River just below the dam of High Point City Lake. This azea supports good numbers of
sunfish and may support a tailrace fishery. Therefore, we request that no in-water work be
preformed from April l to May 31. We request that High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion
Control Measures be used due to the DWQ water quality classification of WS-lV. We are
not awaze of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
12. B-3851-Guilford County - Bridge No. 21 over US 29/70. No comment.
13. B-3677 -Mecklenburg County - Bridge No. 36 over Greasy Creek. We have no specific
comments. We aze not aware of any threatened of endangered species in the project vicinity.
14. B-3506 -Randolph County -Bridge No. 226 over Richland Creek. Richland Creek is a
medium sized stream that supports good populations of sunfish. Therefore, we request that
no in-water work be preformed from Apnl l to May 31. We are not aware of any threatened
of endangered species in the project vicuuty.
15. B-3694 -Rockingham County - Bridge No. 55 over the Belews Lake Spillway. This bridge
appears to be just downstream of the Belews Lake dam. This area supports good numbers of
sunfish and may support a tailrace fishery. Therefore, we request that no in-water work be
preformed from Apnl 1 to May 31. We request that High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion
Control Measures be used due to the DWQ water quality classification of WS-N. We are
not aware of any threatened of endangered species in~the project vicinity. -
16. B-3700 - Stanly County - Bridge No. 187 over Long Creek. This segment of Long Creek
may support the state listed Carolina darter. Therefore, we request that High Quality
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures be used to minimise project impacts to this
species.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges wifih spanning
structures of some type; as opposed to pipe or box culverts; is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.

Bridge Memo
January 2, 2001
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.

DAVIE COUNTY
PLANNING & ZONING
JOHtJ S. GALLIMORE
Director
723 SOUTH MAIN ST., ROOM 307
MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27028
336751 X340
FAX:[phone]
December 15, 2000
w.yn~ -
4I'i~l~.
,~ ,
/2. ?o C~ ~
/~ o o ~ N~
Mr. William Gilmore, P.E.
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 ~ - 3 g 3 ~ ~ ~
$-3
RE: Bridge Replacements No. 35 and No. 37 ~~
Dear Mr. Gilmore,
This letter is in response to your letter requesting comments in regard to the bridge
replacements for Bridge No. 35 on US 158 across the Yadkin River and Bridge No. 37
on NC 801 across interstate 40 both located in the Hillsdale area of northeastern Davie
County.
Please refer to an enclosed copy of my letter to Mr. Pat Ivey, Division Engineer in regard
to the necessary improvements to NC 801 around the area of Bridge No. 37. !n addition,
Bridge No. 35 serves as a critical~link between Davie County and Forsyth County and is
one of only two connections~to the east across the Yadkin River. Our understanding is
that Bridge No. 35 is scheduled to be replaced within the 2000-2006 TIP with a widened
facility to accommodate future traffic. We are anticipating these improvements to the
bridge as necessary for the efficient handling of traffic expected to be caused by
increasing development in northeastern Davie County. However, we have learned that
there are no scheduled improvements to US 158 leading from Bridge No. 35 to NC 809.
Effectively, the bridge may be widened with no improvement to the travel lanes of US
158. ~ Improvements to US'158 are necessary to increase safety and reduce accidents at
the~US 158 entrance to the Town of Bermuda Run. At the exit of the Yadkin River
bridge, there is very limited sight distance, a 55 mph speed limit, very minimal shoulders,
..and no right or left turn lane into the Town's US 158 entrance. At a minimum, we would
respectfully request improvements to US 158 by widening or the addition of turn lanes at
the Bermuda Run entrance to improve safety and reduce traffic hazards at this Location.
We also understand the Town of Bermuda Run is willing to provide some participation in
the addition of turning lanes to US 158 at the entrance to the Town. In the future, a four
lane section with center median may be necessary to limit turn movements and maintain
efficiency. These improvements may be necessary through the full length of US 158
from the bridge to NC 801 at Hillsdale. The developer of the Kinderton Village
commercial section has improved a section of US 158 a{ong the area of their
development. But, this has had no benefit to those vehicles travelling past the entrance
to the Town of Bermuda Run or~the traffic entering or exiting the Town.
As this area of our County continues to develop and traffic levels increase, we anticipate
longer delays and traffic problems should these bridges not be upgraded to multi-lane
facilities. We hope you will consider our request to include with these bridge

replacements the necessary improvements to both US 158 and NC 801 as crucial to
effectively handling the expected future traffic along these roads.
Thank you in advance for your consideration. 1 gladly offer our assistance in evaluating
the transportation improvements in northeast Davie County as you develop plans for
these bridge replacements. Please contact my office for any additional information.
Sincerely,
~~~
John Gallimore
.Planning Director
cc: Margaret Kfuttz, Board of Transportation
Representative Julia Howard
Pat Ivey, Division Engineer
John Davenport, Division Traffic Engineer
Mike Shaffner, District Engineer
Michael Allen, Chairman, County Commissioners
Ed Vogler, Chairman, Davie County Planning Board
Ken Windley, County Manager
Beth Dirks, Bermuda Run Town Manager

JOHN S. GALLIMORE
Director
336-751-3340
FAX: 336-751 X497
December_14, 2000
DAVIE COUNTY ~vl..
PLANNING & ZONING ~ ,»~F
123 SOUTH MAIN ST., ROOM 307
MOCKSVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 27028 ~Q U ~.~
Mr. Patrick Ivey, P.E.
Division Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2125 Cloverdale Avenue
Winston Salem, NC 27103
RE: NC 801 and Project B-3637
Dear Mr. Ivey,
Thank you for the opportunity to meet the other day in regard to roadway improvements
and expected construction along Highway 801 in the Hillsdale area of Davie County. I
certainly appreciate your assistance as we evaluate the needs of that area.
In that regard, as I look at the development patiems and recent traffic numbers along US
158 and NC 801 between Yadkin Valley Road and south of the Oak Valley development,
it appears that future expected traffic will be significant. In researching future road
projects and the 2002-2008 TIP, I noticed there is an un-funded project, R-3610 which
describes the widening to multi-lanes of NC 801 from SR 1650(Hillcrest Drive) to US
158. It also appears that the Project B-3637(replacement of Bridge No.37 across
Jnterstate 40) has been reduced in estimated construction cost from the previous TIP.
While we certainly appr-eciate the demand on DOT funds and the limitations on bridge
replacements through Federal funds, it is imperative that we look at improving Hwy 80i
from the area north of Yadkin Valley Road.to at least south of the 801 gate into the Town
of Bermuda Run. This section of NC 801 is expected to only become more congested
and bottle-necked as future planned and expected developments are built. Most
notably, the Kinderton Village(currently planned for 715 homes and 220 acres of higher-
density commercial), the 34 acres of commercially zoned property opposite Kinderton off
the west side of NC 801, the adjoining 115 acres of land to the immediate north being
marketed at this time, and approximately 5 acres of commercially zoned property at the
northeast intersection of US 158 and NC 801 will drastically impact traffic demands on
both NC 801, US 158, and the ramps onto Interstate 40. In addition, Bermuda Run
West(i53 homes), Oak Valley(750 homes), and several smaller developments around
the Advance area and Baltimore Road area approximately 200 homes) in recent years
have created a serious demand on NC 801. Should Bridge No. 37 be widened and no
improvements made to NC 801 and the intersection at US 158, severe traffic delays.are
expected when developments begin to build-out. With no other alternative routes
through this area to Forsyth County and Winston Salem to the east, this particular
intersection of NC 801 and US 158 and Bridge No. 35(Kathryn Crosby Bridge) across
the Yadkin River are critical to transportation in northeast Davie County.
At this time, we would respectfully request that the un-funded project No. R-3610 be
funded in part and be phased to coincide with the improvements to the NC 801 bridge.

In addition we would request to expand the scope to include improvements to NC 801
north of Interstate 40 tv just north of Yadkin Valley Road and include widening and
improvements to NC 801 south of US 158 to below the Town of Bermuda Run--NC 801
gate. By funding this project and coordinating improvements to NC 801 with the bridge
replacement, the NCDOT can more efficiently plan and construct the needed ;
improvements along that corridor in a more timely manner. These improvements should
also provide along-term solution to the expected traffic growth in that area.
I am enclosing a map to detail the areas of development along that highway corridor.
Please feel free to contact our office for additional information or details concerning
development in the Hillsdale area.
Thank you in advance for your consideration
Sincerely,
w
John Gallimore
Planning Director
cc: Margaret Kluttz, Board of Transportation
Representative'Julia Howard
John Davenport, Division Traffic Engineer
Mike Shaffner, District Engineer
Michael Allen, Chairman, County Commissioners
Ed Vogler, Chairman, Davie County Planning Board
Ken Windley, County Manager

~a~r
.~

,`\, TclbsyW COnO'
t .'~
~.~____
~. _~~
Badge Na 37 .,/"~•
,~,
1~
ee~n„rm ~,
Mc aor «~
eermuda R,m
west
~ ~! a-
~D
;.
o~
x~~
..,~
__~
~~
::
® NC 807 Corridor
W~E lm rovements Request
s p
Davie County, North Carolina
0.2 0 0.2 04 NYles
Davh Coviry plaminp
Dcoember 14, 3000

DAVIE COUNTY
PLANNING & ZONING
JOHN 5. GALLIMORE
Director
'123 SOUTH MAtN ST.. ROOM 30T
MOCKSVtLLE. NORTH CAROLINA 27028
. 336-751 3340
FAX: [phone]
December 14, 2000
Mr. Patrick Ivey, P.E.
Division Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2125 Cloverdale Avenue
Winston Salem, NC 27103
RE: NC 801 and Project B-3637
Dear Mr. Ivey,
o ~`~!~
o ~ ~•~
Thank you for the opportunity to.meet the other day in regard to roadway improvements
and expected construction along Highway 801 in the Hillsdale area of Davie County. 1
certainly appreciate your assistance as we evaluate the needs of that area.
In that regard, as 1 look at the development patterns and recent traffic numbers along US.
158 and NC 801 between Yadkin Valley Road and south of the Oak Valley development,
it appears that future expected #raffic will be significant. in researching future road
projects and the 2002-2008 TIP, (noticed there is ~n un-funded project, R-3610 which
describes the widening to multi-lanes of NG 801 from SR~ 1650(Hillcrest Drive) to US
158. It also~appears that the Project B-3637(repiacement of Bridge No.37 across
Interstate 40). has been reduced in estimated construction cost from the Previous TIP: ~~~
~IVhile we certainly appreciate the demand on DOT funds and the limitations on bridge
replacements through Federal funds, it is imperative that we look at improving Hwy 801.
from the area north of Yadkin Valley Road to at least south of the 801 gate into the Town
of Bermuda Run. This section of NC 801 is expelled to only become more congested
and bottle-necked as future planned and expelled developments are bui~. Most.
notably, the Kinderton Vllage(currently planned for 715 homes and 220 acres of higher
density commercial), the 34 acres of commercially zoned property opposite Kinderton off
the west side of NC 801, the adjoining 115 acres of land to the immediate north being
marketed at this time, and approximately 5 acres of commercially zoned property at the
northeast intersection of US 158 and NC 801 will drastically impact traffic demands on
both NC 801, US 158, and the ramps onto Interstate 40. In addition, Bermuda Run
West(153 homes), Oak Valley(750 homes), and several smaller developments around
the Advance area and Baltimore Road area approximately 200 homes) in recent years
have created a serious demand on NC 801. Should Bridge No. 37 be widened and no
improvements made to NC 801 and the intersection at US 158, severe traffic delays are
expected when developments begin to build-out. Wth no other alternative routes
through this area to Forsyth County and Winston Salem to the east, this particular
intersection of NC 801 and US 158 and Bridge No. 35(Kathryn Crosby Bridge) across
the Yadkin River are critical to transportation in northeast Davie County.
At this time, we would respectfully request that the un-funded project No. R-3610 be
funded in part and be phased to coincide with the improvements to the NC 801 bridge.

In addition we would request to expand the scope to include improvements to NC 801
north of Interstate 40 to just north of Yadkin Valley Road and include widening and
improvements to NC 801 south of US 1 ~8 to below the Town of Bermuda Run--NC 801
gate. By funding this project and coordinating improvements to NC 801 with the bridge
replacement, the NCDOT can more efficiently plan and construct the needed .
improvements along that corridor in a more timely manner. These improvements should
also provide along-tens solution to the expected traffic growth in that area.
I am enclosing a map to detail the areas of development along that highway corridor.
Please feel free to contact our office for additional information or details concerning
development in the Hllsdale area.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely, _
C`~~
/J
John Galiimore
Planning Director
cc: Margaret Kluttz, Board'of Transportation
Representative Julia Howard
John~Davenport, Division Traffic Engineer
Mike Shaffner, District Engineer
Michael Allen, Chairman, County Commissioners
Ed Vogler, Chairman, Davie County Planning Board
Ken Windley, County Manager

_.-
~ ~`+...
... 1 ~ ~~
._._. ._ _
., ~ J ~:. ~... ; ~ ~ ,
~1- ~ ~ -~
a~z o / ~ /~
~ YY ~ ~ _ J '~- ;
a 1 ~C,.,. ~ J ~
~ `f ~ >`~ ..,,,~ '~..,< .aro~r.,~.~l~~ ' ` :c- - }r.~' -•1;.,: ~~ Y fit:
.- . emu' ..' ,. ~-.
a ~ ~\ `~~ ~4 ' //

.:. _ City.-C~un~y _._. _......._.C'~-~=
e~~ N~ BQl].LW
NONT'H GA01lNA
December 22, 2000
Mr: William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NG Deparlnient of Transportation ~. ~ .
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
10D E FlRST ST. P.O. BOX 2511 • WINS7DN•SALfM, N.C. 27102
336.727.2087 ~x 336.748.3163 • planningQci.winston-sa~n.nc.us
RE: Bridge Replacement Project B-3835, Forsyth County, Replace Bridge 35, on US 158 over
'', Yadkin River, Davie-Forsyth Counties
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
t The City-County Planning Department has reviewed the above referenced bridge replacement
project and oiler the following comments:
• The project is located in the Yadkin River Conservation Area identified in Vision 2005. A
Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County. NC. This GMA recognizes the need to protect
conservation areas from development and too retain the aesthetic characteristics of the
area. The replacement of this bridge is not inconsistent with Vision 2005.
• This is a very high growth corridor for residential development with both single-family and
multi-family development. US 158 faces tremendous traffic pressure from adjacent
residential development in Davie County. Kinderton, a Traditional Neighborhood
Development, is now under construction in close proximity to this project and will add
_ additional traffic volumes to US 158.
~~ Lnmediately adjacent to the bridge project on the north is amulti-family development, and
'• to the south is Tanglewood Park. Due to the regional significance of Tanglewood Park
US 158 is an important thoroughfare to the day-today operations at the Park.
• Traffic volumes along US 158 in this area are around 14,000 vehicles per day. We would
like more detailed information regarding how traffic flow will be managed in this area
during construction. This information will be needed so that emergency services can be
. informed of changes that may impact the timely delivery of services.

page 2
Mr. William Gilmore
This bridge is located within the designated floodway and i 00-year floodplain. To meet
the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinances (CTDO) a "No Impact
Certification" must be submitted to the Winston-Salem Inspections Department. Ifthere
is impact less than or equal to'/z foot rise in the base elevation of the river then Federal
Emergency Management Authority (FEMA) regulations must be satisfied before local
pemuts can be issued. If impacts to the creek are greater than'/z foot rise in the base
elevation of the creek then the project will not meet the regulations as specified in the
UDO.
While the vision 2005 Greenway System Plan does not identify a greenway along the
Yadkin River, we would like to request consideration of greenway access under the bridge
as a part of this bridge replacement project.
Please contact if you require additional information regarding this project.
Sincerely,
G~~-
oretta W. Barren
Principal Planner
pc: Mr. Graham Pervier, Forsyth County Manager
Mr. Paul Norby, Director, City-County Planning Board
Iv1r. Jeff Kopf, Winston-Salem Inspections Department

•r~t~~
••~.~•
~~~~~
j8~3,5
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F..Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crowx Director
Febrta year 20, 2001
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Env~iron`m~en/ta~l,A,n~alfylsis Branch
From David Brook /~~~1 Lam. ~ ~ ` w "`-'
Deputy State Histori eservation Officer
Re: Replace Bridge No 35 on US 158 over Yadkin River, TIP No. B-3835, Davie County,
ER 01-8193
Thank you for your letter of November I5, 2000, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following structures of
historical or arehitectlu~al importance within the general area of the project.
Bridge No. 35 was built in 1940.
We recommend that an architectural historian on your staff evahtate the above property to
deternune its eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and report the
findings to us.
In addition, we have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of historical
or architectural importance located within the planning area. However, since a survey has not
been conducted in over a decade, there may be structures of which we aze unawaze located
within the planning area
If there are any structures more than fifty years old.on or adjacent to the project site, please send
us photographs (Polaroid type snapshots are find) of each structure. These photographs should
be keyed to a map that clearly shows the site location. If there are no buildmg over fifty years
old on or adjacent to the project, please notify us of this in writing.
If the bridge is to be replaced on existing location, we recommend .no archaeological survey. If
the bridge is replaced on new location we recommend that an archaeological survey be
conducted. Please forward plans, as they are available.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section
106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].733-8653
Restoration 51 S N. Blount St, Raleigh , NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone] .715-4801
Survey 3c Planning S1S N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC x618 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone].715-4801

,.,
~.
,4
Federcrl Aicl # BRSTP-158(]2) TIP # B-3835 County: Davie-Forsyth
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 35 on US 158 over the Yadkin River
On 17 December 2002 ~ representatives of the
® North Carolina Deparunent of Transportation (NCDO'[~
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
® North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
^ There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
^ There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effects} ate listed on
the reverse.
[g' There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The propertylproperties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
NCDOT Date

FHWA, `r the Divisio Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date

Representative, HPO
r~~ ~~~-~
<~ ~/ State Historic Preservation Officer
S .. ~ 1~~1'7~0
. I
Date

~'ederul Aid # BRSTP-158(12) TIP # B-3835 County: Davie-Forsyth
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
~'~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ Na ~~~~`C"
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
1~J t N - M OLIt F ~?- ~l C'DE~ .
Nth Pt'P ~~ S~ ~~F~G l t~,+. ~ "~ ~nJ V 1 ~ ~N ~ ~=JJt'~C.
~ol~ ~T~~S
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
'~St bN CN C, (,YV S ~ T .~-'Tt o N W t ~~
S. ~. P. v ~~ ~ ~ Q R-a-P>~ Y C~vU~~-
oF- W~ (v -ntio~ IF T-~1w~ . .
Initialed: NCDOT~LS FHWA ~ HPO ~ -~.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:kgc
cc: Mary Pope Fury, NCDOT
Tom Padgett, NCDOT

•'" srnrt •
A>~
,E"
-~ r.~'
North Caroliaa Department of Cultural Resources
State Nlatoric Preservation O{lice
David L. S. Brock, Administrator
Miclwnl F. Enylry, Govemtx
Lisbah C. (:vans. Secretary
Jctlihey J. Crow, Deputy Sa:retary
November 17, 200?
M~ti{OR11NllUlvi
TC): Greg Thnrpt:, Manager
Project Development and f nvicontnenta! Analysis Aranch
NCDO'1 Division of Highways
FROb{: David Ilrook L~,~~
Division of Historical Resources
R~ ~ ~~ ~\
0
Noy .t:~ ^-,
. •~a
k~l et -Y ~
SUB)L•CT: Phase 1l }{istoric Architectural Resources Survey Report, Replace Aridge No. 35 on US 158
over the Yadkin River, l3-3835, Davie-Forryth Counties, ER 01-8193
Thank you for your letter of November 4, 2U.U2, transtt>itting nc~ survey report by Richard Silverman,
concerning the above project.
For purposes of compliance with Section lOG of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the
foDoving properties arc eligible for fisting in the National Register of Historic Places under the csiterioa cited:
Tanglewood, William Neal Reynolds Property, 4061 Clcmmons Road (US 158) 'T'own of Cletttmons,
Forsyth County, under Criterion I3 for its association with William Neal Reynolds, pre~iderlt of the R J.
Rernolds'I'obacc~ Company. The company rose to become a nationally significant corporation. The
property i. also significant under Criterion C as an important and largely intact collection of buildings and
landscapes designed as a gentleman's rural estate and equestrian farm. The prc~Pt:rty recalls the period of
rural estate dcvcl~pmcnt by the wealthy in the early avcttticrh century.
\X'in-Mock Fann, l;S 158,1'o+vn of $ecmuda Run, Davie Counryr under Criterion ~\ as an example of the
plan, layout, and function. of a second quaver. twentieth-century dairy ojteration and for iii assc)ciatinn
with modern dairy farmutg itt Ncrrth Catr.~lina. The property is also eligible for the-Nationat Register under
C:ritt:+•irnt C; as a rare example of a large dain~ farm complex that includes some of the gzantlcst and mint
t~hulcnt represcn[ati+•~~ of hvcrtrit:ch-ecnrurv farm t~uildin)s in I~a+•ie County.
\L'c caacur.+vith the Ivarinnal Rclrister bnundarics as dc•cribcd and deGneatcd in the survey repou for both
eligible rtupcrticti.
'Chr following ltrort:rtt• is determined nnr cli};i614 fnr liwin~ in the ,Jatirtnal Register <,f Hiscaric Place.:
Rri.lec•Nr,. 35 <»t l'$ 15R r,+•e:r the Yadkin ltiecr, i~etrs+•rh and Davie C.t>unprs. Phis stntcture is a aimmott
example ttf a creel strin);er Isritl),-c :tntl ig nett histrrricalh- r:t tcehnrrk,};icall+• :rie;nifieant.
'lhc :-hnrr; Crmtntcntx are tttAdc rur~u:utr nt $ccair»t lpfi ttf•nc~ N:ttiirn:tl I••G,rinic Prescrvaractn :\cr anti the
.\tl+'tsrtn• C:cnutcil tin !-li+u-ri~ I'rc~cr+•aritan'• ltag-ttl;ttirms tree f;r>mplianec with Sccti<m IQh eatiiEi~ti at 3(t C:FR
fart SUU. ......._
!-ucntiun hlstiling AAArcts 'Cclcphouc/Fax
:vlntinistrntiun 5117 N. l31~wm Sr. Raleigh, NC Ab17 Muit ServiceCentcr. R:dcigh 276`aU-0fi17 (gh1733-4763.733•d63J
ttestnruioa S IS N. L91aw» St, Ral.tigh , NC 4611 Mail S~h~.iec Center, Raleigh 37699-4613 (919) 733-b547 .715.4801
tncvpy & Plenoing $ I S N. Bluunt St, Ra1cyU, N(' aG 1 K Muil $c.v:cv C~~ncr. Ralcigir 27600-4618 (919) 733-476] .71 S-4801

Page 2
Greg Thorpe
November 17, 2{)D2
Thank you fot your cooperation and consideration. if you have questions concerning the above cotntnent,
contact Renee tiledhill•L-arky, environmenral review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. 1n all future
communication eontcriunA this project, please cite the above refuenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr
TOTAL. P.03

Sh~~ Gc~~((~~,~~~
.-~•.~
~~
..~_.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTIVIENI' OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPE7T
C,pVERNOR SECRETARY
January 31, 2001
MEMORANDUM TO: William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Prgject evelopment and Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: Curtts B Yates, Director
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 35 on US 158
Over Yadkin River,
Davie/Fotsyth Counties, TIP Project No. B-3835
This memo is to respond to your request for continents on the subject bridge replacement
project.
This section of US 158 in Davie/Forsyth Counties has the only noncontrolled-access
bridge aver the Yadkin River in the area. Tanglewood Park in Forsyth County is a nearby
destination for bicyclists. A North Carolina Bicycling Highway (NC-2 Mountains to Sea) utilizes
a section of US 158 just to the east of the subject bridge replacement project. For these reasons
AASHTO standard bicycle accommodations are recommended for the replacement bridge and
approaches.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the subject project. If there is a need for
additional information, please contact T. P. Norman, Engineering Unit Head, at 715-2342.
•~ CBY/tpn
MAILING ADDRESS.
NC DEPARTMENT OF TruNSPORTA7ION
DnnSION OF BICYCLE 8 PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION
1552 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27689-1552
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX [phone]
WEBSITE: W1HW.D07STATE.NC.US/lRANSIT/91CYCLF/
SNAIL' TNORMAII~DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPDRTATIDN BUILDING
1 SOUiH WILMINGTON STREET
ROOM 304
RALEIGH NC

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(fl EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS WITH MINOR INVOLVEMENTS
WITH HISTORIC SITES
F. A. Project RR4TP-158(121
State Project 8.1611401
T. I. P. No. B-3835
Description: Replace Bridge No. 35 on US 158 over the Yadkin River in Davie County
1. Is the proposed project designed to
improve the operational characteristics,
safety, and/or physical condition of the
existing highway facility on essentially
the same aligrunent?
2. Is the project on new location?
3. Is the historic site adjacent to the
existing highway?
4. Does the project require the removal or
alteration of historic buildings,
structures, or objects?
5. Does the project disturb or remove
archaeological resources which are
important to preserve in place rather
than to recover for archaeological
research?
6. a. Is the impact on the Section 4(f)
site considered minor (i.e. no effect,
no adverse effect)?
b. If the project is determined to have
"no adverse effect" on the historic
site, does the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation object to the
determination of "no adverse effect"?
YES NO
X ^
^-
-^
-^
^-

7. Has the SHPO agreed, in writing, with the ^
assessment of impacts and the proposed X
mitigation?
8. Does the project require the preparation ^
of an EIS? X
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE AND
PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and found not
to be feasible and prudent:
1. Do nothing
Does the "do nothing" alternative:
(a) correct capacity deficiencies?
Yes

No
X
or (b) correct existing safety hazards?
or (c) correct deteriorated conditions?
and (d) create a cost or impact of
extraordinary measure?
2. Improve the hi iway without using the
adiacent historic site
(a) Have minor alignment shifts, changes
in standards, use of retaining walls,
etc., or traffic management measures
been evaluated?
(b) The items in 2(a) would result in:
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) substantial adverse environmental
impacts
(ii) substantial increased costs
or (iii) unique engineering,
transportation, maintenance, or
safety problems
or (iv) substantial social, environmental,
or economic impacts
X
X
X
,^
x^

r (v) a project which does not meet
e need
(vi impacts, costs, or problems which
are of extraordinary magnitude
3. Build an improved facility on new
location without using the historic site.
(a) An alternate on new location would
result in: (circle, as appropriate)
(i) a project which does not solve
the existing problems
or (ii) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or (iii) a substantial increase in
project cost or engineering
difficulties
an (iv) such impacts, costs, or
difficulties of truly unusual
or unique or extraordinary
magnitude
MINIMIZATION OF HARM
Yes No
1. The project includes all possible planning ^
to minimize harm necessary to preserve the X
historic integrity of the site.
2. Measures to minimize harm have been ^
agreed to, in accordance with 36 CFR X
Part 800, by the FHWA, the SHPO,
and as appropriate, the ACHP.
Specific measures to minimize harm are
described as follows:
Two properties eligible for the National Register of Historic Places were identified
adjacent to this project, Tanglewood Park in the southeast quadrant and Win-Mock
Farm in the northwest quadrant.
Tanglewood Park impacts will be minimized by use of curb and gutter from the
entrance of the park to the bridge. NCDOT will provide, as requested by the Park, a
lateral/vertical slope of 4:1. Permanent drainage easement will be required at the

end of the existing 24 inch and 36 inch cross-drain pipes for maintenance. The
taking will be adjacent to the existing right of way and the NCDOT will prepare a
Landscape Design in consultation with the representative of Tanglewood Park, who
has jurisdictional authority, to mitigate the minor permanent drainage easement
requirements. The additional permanent drainage requirements that affect
Tanglewood Park are approximately 0.04 acre. This action will result in a "no
adverse effect" on Tanglewood Park.
Win-Mock Farm impacts will be minimized by use of curb and gutter from the
bridge to the end of the four-lane roadway section, approximately 550 feet. The
drainage design will incorporate measures to minimize ditching along the four-lane
roadway section. The taking will be adjacent to the existing right of way and the
NCDOT will prepare a Landscape Design in consultation with SHPO and the
property owner of Win-Mock Farm to mitigate the minor additional right of way
requirements. The additional right of way requirements is approximately 0.50 acre.
Temporary construction easement will be required on a portion of Win-Mock Farm
for site access and possible staging and material storage. The area used for staging
and storage will be restored to present condition if actually used. This action will
result in a "no adverse effect" on Win-Mock Farm.
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
~tate Historic Preservation Officer see attachment
b. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
~roperty owner
d~. ,ocal/State/Federal Agencies
e. US Coast Guard
(no bridge permit required)
Win-Mock Farm's property owner was
coordinated with during the driveway access
permit process for a new development that is
being constructed. Tanglewood Farm
representatives meet with NCDOT on
January 11, 2007 at the park and received a
letter dated February 19, 2007.
FHWA/SHPO
N/A
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on
December 23, 1986.
All required alternatives have been evaluated and the findings made are clearly applicable
to this project. There are no feasible and prudent alternatives to the use of the historic site.
The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and the measures to minimize
harm will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed with local and state agencies.

Approved:
3 3~
w
ate Manager, Plannin Enviro ental Branch, NCDOT
Date ~~ Division Administrator, FHWA

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS WITH MINOR INVOLVEMENT
WITH PUBLIC PARKS, RECREATION LANDS, AND WILDLIFE AND
WATERFOWL REFUGES
F. A. Project BRSTP-158(12)
State Project 8.1611401
T. I. P. No. B-3835
Description: Replace Bridge No. 35 on US 158 over the Yadkin River in Davie County
Yes No
1. Is the proposed project designed to
improve the operational characteristics,
safety, and/or physical condition of ^
existing highway facilities on X
essentially the same location?
2. Is the project on new location? ~ X
3. Is the Section 4(f) land a publicly
owned public park, recreation land, or ^
wildlife and waterfowl refuge located X
adjacent to the existing highway?
4. Does the amount and location of the land
to be used impair the use of the
remaining Section 4(f) land, in whole or
in part, for its intended purpose? X
(See chart below) -
Total size of section 4(fl site Maximum to be acquired
less than 10 acres ............ 10 percent of site
10 acres-100 acres ............ 1 acre
greater than 100 acres ............ 1 percent of site

Yes No
5. Do the proximity impacts of the project
(e.g., noise, air and water pollution,
wildlife and habitat effects, aesthetic
values) on the remaining Section 4(f)
land impair the use of such land for its ^ X
intended purpose?
6. Do the officials having jurisdiction
over the Section 4(f) land agree, in
writing, with the assessment of the
impacts of the proposed project on, and ^
the proposed mitigation for, the Section X
4(f J lands?
7. Does the project use land from a site
purchased or improved with funds under
the Land and Water Conservation Act
(Section 6(f)), the Federal Aid in Fish
Restoration Act (Dingell-Johnson Act),
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Act
(Pittman-Robertson Act), or similar
laws, or are the lands otherwise
encumbered with a Federal interest ^ X
(e.g., former Federal surplus property)?
8. If the project involves lands described
in Item 7 above, does the appropriate
Federal Agency object to the land ^ X
conversion or transfer?
Does the project require preparation of
an EIS? ^ X

IB
Yes No
The following alternatives were evaluated and ^
found not to be feasible and prudent: X
1. , Do-nothing.
Does the "do nothing" alternative:
(a) correct capacity deficiencies? ^ X
or (b) correct existing safety hazards? ^ X
or (c) correct deteriorated conditions? ^ X
and (d) create costs, unusual problems, or X ^
impacts of extraordinary measure?
2: Improvement of the highway without using a
the adiacent~ublic~ark~recreational X
land, or wildlife waterfowl refuge.
(a) Have minor alignment shifts,
changes in standards, use of ^
retaining walls, etc., or traffic X
management measures been evaluated?
(b) The items in 2(a) would result in
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) substantial adverse community impact
or (ii) substantial increased costs
or (iii unique engineering, transportation,
maintenance, or safety problems
or (iv) substantial social, environmental,
or economic impacts
or (v) a project which does not meet the need
and (vi) impacts, costs, or problems which are
extraordinary magnitude

Yes No
3. Build an improved facility on new
location without using_the~ublic park,
recreational landLor wildlife and ^
waterfowl refuge. (This would be a X
localized "run around."1
(a) An alternate on new location would
result in: (circle, as appropriate)
(i) project which does not solve
the existing problems
or (ii) ubstantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or (iii a substantial increase in
project cost or engineering
difficulties
and (iv) such impacts, costs, or
difficulties of truly unusual
or unique or extraordinary
magnitude

MINIMIZATION OF HARM
Yes No
1. The project includes all possible ^
planning to minimize harm. X
2. Measures to minimize harm include the
following:
(circle those which are appropriate)
a. Replacement of lands used with lands
of reasonably equivalent usefulness
and location and of at least
comparable value.
b. Replacement of facilities impacted
by the project including sidewalks,
paths, benches, lights, trees, and
other facilities.
cO Restoration and landscaping of
disturbed areas.
Od. Incorporation of design features (such as curb & gutter)
And habitat features, where necessary,
to reduce or minimize impacts to the
Section 4(f) property.
O Payment of the fair market value of
the land and improvements taken or
improvements to the remaining
Section 4(f) site equal to the fair
market value of the land and
improvements taken.
O Additional or alternative mitigation
measures as determined necessary
based on consultation with the
officials having jurisdiction over
the parkland, recreation area, or
wildlife or waterfowl refuge.
3. A discussion of specific mitigation measures is provided as follows:
The propose project will consist of the following as mitigation measures for minor
impacts to Tanglewood Park, located in the southeast quadrant of Bridge No. 35:
a) Install continuous curb and gutter from the Park to the bridge;
b) Grade the property adjacent to the construction easement with at least a 4:1
lateral/vertical slope;
c) Install pre-approved, mutually agreeable landscaping from the Park entrance to the
bridge;

d) Investigate replacing overhead utilities underground along US 158 during the final
design;
e) Maintain access to the Park entrance and to the canoe launch access throughout
construction; and
f) Maintain the existing drainage pattern and/or investigate minimizing additional
stormwater dischazge into the park.
g) Keep the County, who have junsdiction over the Park, informed as to the status of
this project throughout its planning and construction.
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
Oa. Officials having jurisdiction over the Section 4(fJ Land (see attachment)
Ob. Local/State/Federal Agencies
c. US Coast Guard (no bridge permit from USCG is required.)
d. DOI, no Section 6(f) lands are involved
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on
December 23, 1986.
All required alternatives have been evaluated and the findings made are cleazly applicable
to this project. There are no feasible or prudent alternatives, which avoid use of the
Section 4(f) land.
The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and there are assurances that
the measures to minimize harm will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed.
Approved:
3 30
at Project Development and Env onmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
3 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~-~
Date 4 Division Administrator, FHWA

Federu! Aid # BRSTP-158(12) TIP # B-3835 County: Davie-Forsyth
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 35 on US 158 over the Yadkin River
On 17 December 2002 ,representatives of the
® North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
[] Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
[~ There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
(~ There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
the proj,ect's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
[~' There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
l~
ftep esentative, NCDOT Date
FHWA, f~fr the Divisio Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
Representative, HPO
,. -~-~,% State E-Iistoric Preservation Officer
l
,~
"D~
Date

Federal Aid # BRSTP-158(12) TIP # B-3835 County: Davie-Forsyth
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
~:7
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect. ~~~>v~2S C ~~'~~
w ~ ~- ~ An oar ~~- f~ C'DE~ '~ s ~ .~ ~° 1 z'~ (~ ~-
C.o non t T'N«S
T,~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ -
Iz- s
~~ ~
1V,~
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable). '~~
t~ ~~ ~
e tiwo~ ~~~~ ~sz-c~~ ~ ~~s~E
'SCSI (~N CN L(~V S~'~ '`~~ o~V W l~~
~~ a vas -~i I~~. ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~ wl ~~ `~~ v s~
N`5`o5
Initialed: NCDOT~L> FHWA J~~_ HPO S~ 1'~
~~~
_^ -'jll
~~,,; ~, ,
~. ~6~
~ ~ - ~~D~
a~
5b~ ~1~1a5

~OARt~ OF COMMISSIONERS
GLORIA D. WHISENHUNT, Chair
DEBRA CONRAD, Vice Chair
BEAUFORT 0. BAILEY
TED KAPLAN
RICHARD V. LINVILLE
WALTER MARSHALL
BILL WHITEHEART
~~ ,
ro ~~
~J

FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
February 19, 2007
Mr. William Goodwin
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1551 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1551
Dear Mr. Goodwin:
J. DUDLEY WATTS, JR.
County Manager
A. EDWARD JONES
Deputy County Manager
RONALD GRAHAM
Deputy County Manager
JANE F. COLE
Clerk to the Board/
Assistant to the Manager
DAMON SANDERS-PRATT
Special Assistant to the Manager
This letter is pursuant to your letter dated December 27, 2006 and plans dated
December 22, 2006, concerning TIP B-3835 which proposes to replace Bridge No. 35,
the Kathryn Crosby Bridge, over the Yadkin River in Davie County, and the impact that
the construction of the new bridge will have on the Tanglewood Park. It is my
understanding that the Tanglewood Park is protected under Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of 1966. The current bridge replacement alternative
under review will widen US 158 beside Tanglewood Park. You have indicated that the
proposed project will require a temporary construction easement along the existing right
of way and, possibly, permanent drainage easements at the discharge of the existing 24
inch and 36 inch cross-drain pipes into Tanglewood Park. The area in the easements will
be graded to tie the proposed slopes back to natural ground, requiring the removal of
several trees and shrubs from a wooded area of the park property. If necessary, the
liC:lilin.l7%ilt lir aiiiag~: ~..ai.~...+~r''t txr~,lld m;17.1 t?in ±hP (~Zltlet of the twn• Gress-~1Sain nines.
Forsyth County concurs that NCDOT shall ensure that there will be no adverse
impacts from any work performed pursuant to these plans and in relation to the proposed
easements within Tanglewood Park. As per 23 CFR 771.135, if granted, the temporary
construction easement will be subject to the following:
A. Be of a short duration and less than the time needed for the construction of the
entire project.
B. Not change the ownership or result in the retention of long-term or indefinite
interest in the land for transportation purposes.
C. Not result in any temporary or permanent adverse changes to the activities,
features, or attributes which are important to the purposes of functions that
of ~
T7ttrNOR~ o~
~ ()f1
ForsythCounlyGovernmenCCenter • 201 N.Chesrnut5treet Winslon-Salem,Nor(hCarolina ?7101-4120
Telephon^ (3361 703-2020 • fA)C (336) ?2~-6446

qualify the resource for protection under Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966.
D. Include only a minor amount of land.
E. The easements shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as shall be
agreed upon by Tanglewood and NC DOT and shall include a provision that
NCDOT shall indemnify and hold Tanglewood harmless from any liability
incurred during construction of the easement in and along the Tanglewood
property.
If the easements are granted, Forsyth County also requires that NCDOT:
1. Install continuous curb and gutter from the Park entrance to the bridge;
2. Grade the property adjacent to the construction easement with at least a 4:1
lateral/vertical slope;
3. Install pre-approved, mutually agreeable landscaping from the Park entrance
to the bridge;
4. Investigate replacing overhead utilities with underground utilities along US
158 during the final design
5. Maintain access to the Park entrance and to the canoe launch access
throughout construction; and
6. Maintain the existing drainage pattern without increasing drainage into
Tanglewood Park and investigate minimizing stormwater discharge into the
Park.
We also understand and require that NCDOT will keep the County informed as to
the status of this project throughout its planning and construction. We appreciate your
assistance in this matter.
Yours very tru ,
Ronald Graham
Deputy County Manager

L~TT1:.R5 ~F C-0O~,p~ntATlalt! 8tiw~.~u T,ve At'S~c>ni ~3uic.v T~A~ a~D -~~~•boD PARK.
Rodney Money
From: Rodney Money [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:10 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Attachments: TanglewoodParkSlope4-1.pdf
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Thank you for taking time to speak with me today regarding the Yadkin River Bridge replacement project.
As we discussed, in nn agreement dated February 19, 2007 a 4:1 grade is prescribed along the property
adjacent to US-158. We have developed a preliminary design based on this information and would like to
share this with Tanglewood Park and Forsyth County. Attached, please find a plan view drawing with the 4:1
slope stoke line, where the new construction will be graded to natural ground. In n separate email, I will
attach a plan view drawing showing n 2:1 slope stake line. This 2:1 slope will provide less impact to the
wooded area of the park. I would like to confirm with the Park/County the acceptable slope when taking
into consideration the impact to the wooded are.
If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me.
Regards,
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
-- ---~
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0064 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
A ~'
~_+ ~~l
pPR o ~ 2ooU
DENR - WATER QUAl17ti
~+4NAg~ S~~S:4TER ~'IGH
3/5/2008

\\
\\
TO SHEET H0. 5
~~
~~
~4
'~
8
a4
$~~ O
•'~~ 0
4 b
/I q
~~~
!; ~ +~
,~
a ~ `` `~
i ~~ ~`
~~ `~
i ~
fps
~ $ 4
~~ i
~~~ 11
I
~E~~

.~~i
P/SYa pH5b0
D ~3~N~(LT)
L ~ dB5f O
/ry~~yy ~ s+u aus ton~w~ rare atwwnox W
Yd < !5 Sa Plons " "~7 Q ~9
22~'~••
~p ~ `~1 G~
f
-YI- PC IOi0000 ~ ~d l ~ d!
~. I ~~ ~
61N OWYSTAYICIKIII~ e~ ~" o nv.rzs ~ . na!?rN...._
Q~ ~ ~,~ r m e aNSs
a ~ i ~ \ ~ msc f ' ~ ~ ~ ~ rv "~ a. ' I~ ~'
~~ ~~ ~ a '> ~ ~~_~ L~~=.~ ~1 Q,r.~~,~ ~ a yip =cam ~ i
wss ~ ~-~, =tMa~o[ mN~ HOIf ~
~ 44 \~\ ~ ~ ©~~\ ~ N a.sss ~ -n Q ^~ `,o ~ ~ T ~-t J-Z` p ~ m„~ ~+~ C~_
~ ~ `F~! ~ /
\~~ 1 ' ~ ,o ~ 4 ~ ,m """
.v
us% 4 w ..._ t .. ... .. .. ... .r.eoe
sr. a+v w•.am
w.awx-~o~
~ F f F wss N 6T ]T NlE F F~f
~ o m v.Mta WN ~ our
__ .~
_ ~ _.~.~- _ un++ _ - --
QCI11~i O ~ F ADO r -_ _- ----~-_ -- --~~~-_ "m'
-~..~~ w.• ~ --_-_ S .-~.-_ n-
W _.y« ..-..-q 1Sr -
,ti,~ ~ ~ - .. ...... f _ _
e
s ° _
o
~ ~ u.w~w
. .. .. '°mc esi: i, sn ~ '0mr 'e .mm
~~r wmFSrcu Y!- P[1f Ni65b5 ~ Dose me +r.•+b • wm ri
rms NEW E -L- PIDI 38i6/dS •en• POT iy}.cc
~E.fbTl.YFJKA, .. .. ro.m ra°°r ro.m ,'
.mo,
.mm ~ : I SIOPG ~ ,
~"
^ P ~
'~ ~ ~ l' ~ `ems \i~ sr
u /
~ ~`o ~ A~ m ~~F'Ir~© a~
• ~~ I • ~g~ ~~ auss
~Q~ y~ 7 uua A
~o; ~~~,C! GS \
~ mn'
• ~ •. ~ m.s: ,~
,~ ~~~Q 0
' •~~ ~~ ~ onyy~ls ASSOQATWI
i ~~ aarL i5 M.E "6 1~2 q0
•i- i- ~' - oT lA
~~ L
~ ,.,, ~ ~ -
~~ ,
qtr? ci ~ ` ~ ,~„~ p p p
1 _
i. CS -----RO'a!'Q --
0.00' -{.- • i i ~ y
i a
'1
- --~ __----`- ---- ---'0'-_
~ ~ smt
~ -
Mn-_ -~~_ ;~rtr ~..
eusr~a .. .. .. . `` S
-ert-roT ar~aa ~ .
.mmi ror~ssreiw.Er~n .ems ~.
-- --~---- 9.~~

s~ sr~er a r-a4 ups t- ,wn -Yh
Pwa~xES ,wo oaaEs

Rodney Money
From: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:01 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Money please give me a call at 336 703 2008. I would like to have someone show us what the 4 to 1 vs 2 to 1 slope
difference would mean with respect to going into the woods. The drawings didn't have a legend with the scale on it.
---- Original Message -----
From: Rodney Money <[e-mail]>
To: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L
Sent: Mon Dec 17 18:13:45 2007
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Attached, please find a plan view drawing with the 2:1 slope stake line highlighted.
Again, please contact me if you have any questions regarding this project.
Regards,
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
NO'I'.E: 'This is a Forsyth County operated e-mail system..AI..i.. e-.M.ai1 communication is subject to be accessed by the
news media and the public pursuant to the Public Records La~v of North Carolina.
3/5/2008

Rodney Money
From: Rodney Money [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:46 AM
To: 'Sanders-Pratt, Damon L'
Subject: RE: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Attachments: TanglewoodParkSlope.pdf
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Attached, please find a plan view drawing that shows both a 2:1 and a 4:1 slope stake line. In addition, I
have included offset distances from the existing edge of pavement to each of the slope stake lines at
several locations along the park property.
Highlighted in yellow is the existing edge of pavement.
Highlighted in green is the limit of the slope stake line using a 2:1 slope.
Highlighted in pink is the limit of the slope stake line using a 4:1 slope.
I will follow this email with a call to you shortly.
Regards,
Rodney
From: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:01 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Money please give me a call at 336 703 2008. I would like to have someone show us what the 4 to 1 vs 2 to 1 slope
difference would mean with respect to going into the woods. The drawings didn't have a legend with the scale on it.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rodney Money <[e-mail]>
To: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L
Sent: Mon Dec 17 18:13:45 2007
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Attached, please find a plan view drawing with the 2:1 slope stake line highlighted.
Again, please contact me if you have any questions regarding this project.
Regards,
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
3/5/2008

919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
DOTE: This is a Fors}~th County operated e-mail system. AL.1.: a-Mail communication is subject to be accessed by the
news media and the public pursuant to the Public Records Law of North Carolina.
3/5/2008

Rodney Money
From: Rodney Money [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:41 PM
To: 'Sanders-Pratt, Damon L'
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
It was nice meeting with you and your staff last week to discuss the subject project.
I am preparing project notes from the meeting and would like to include the names of those who attended.
Can you assist me with the names and positions of staff from Forsyth County/Tanglewood Park?
Thank you.
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
3101 Poplnrwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
3/5/2008

Rodney Money
From: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 7:11 PM
To: Rodney Money
Subject: RE: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Damon Sanders-Pratt, Assistant County Manager
Hank Barnum, Tanglewood Park Business Manager
Clint Ingram, Tanglewood Park Maintenance Manager
Chris Weavil, Tanglewood Park Maintenance Assistant Manager
From: Rodney Money [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:41 PM
To: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
It was nice meeting with you and your staff last week to discuss the subject project.
I am preparing project notes from the meeting and would like to include the names of those who attended.
Can you assist me with the names and positions of staff from Forsyth County/Tanglewood Park?
Thank you.
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
~^'
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
NOTE: This is a Forsyth County operated a-mail system. ALL e-Mail cammunicatiou is subject to be accessed by the
news media and the public pursuant to the :Public Records I..aw of Korth Carolina.
3/5/2008

_ I \ ( )
\ , 4'ti t ~ J r ~I' ~,, ' L I rel ,f 1 1 ,* L,••
`- X17+ ,, "~1 ~r f'/ J+ ~.~;~ '•i ~I•ti~l,..~ ~ f '' ~ II ~ Irf I r r_ ~
.,,\` , . ~;~ '~`- ,•~ rJl rrJ ;+ ill f' 'I~~~ :~``.~ ' ~ ,1 I ~ ~~;~ x~~~' ~ 1 4
~.~ _~= ~ • .~_- :~~~ry, r 'y+ Lr i,r ~~.' _.7 yf ~:xi,~~ ~.~y r''j°.~< ~~ ^ y t I 51y\'` ~`+s.''
~~ ~ ~1. •r,~''' • - .''~~'C ~~T'~ ~yk,l`' II!!'. ~~_r/_ 14~ k~. -~~• - 1~'t~~t. ~~ ~'~}~C'~C~_,,~1. /f!i'•
I I ;~;}y }'~y\.•.,rl ~ I - F•!f ~t_ ~~LJ { \ •- ,,rr. f~ri
... r. _ ,~~ r:~.'~LI~'r f r.,•Fr':' -- .ate/
' .y\k~\ ~ ~''~~.\ 1 • ~4'_ .rte ~ , , ~.r 1 , •r.'~'~~ F' J
~.ry, _. - / 'f'~ ~+'~ t _ ~ti `~-'~~; ~ r<•' { 1.-_ ~ ~ - -
'~' ,ti 1' .7 1 •LJ '
.rte ~', , ~ ^.'~ , ~ ~ rY f • ~ti~~- ~' ~1~~ ~. \ ~ ~ ~ •_k. - ' ~, ~ 1~ -~ 1 ~~r~ ~,' ' ~~II~~, -r+'~'
_ ,
•l' J.,I:••,'+~~, ~ fr• ~. rf .,~ ~ III'ti • '~ . ~'~~Iti 15 ' -~r~!~:_-
~fff ri' 'irfi 1 ~ ~•• ~\. J t,~ '\
~ f' X41 ., ~:: ~; „ 1; ~ ..
~r~ fr \ ~ ~, I', lV ~'1 j • ; ~j'~' i%• ? ~~.../ I ,'~1 • ~f$.%`• ~`'•ti ~'~ ~~ 4~r {+- ~ .+I .;"/ . ~ , yrj _
"=
~t 11,1 ~' ? +i ~ ~^ .•., ~~ '~ ;'r i •r•~ ~~ '~~~~.. ~~ti ,, ~ ~ ~',r+r~k5~ ~i,~ ~--
1 '1 '1 ti's ~ I y'
' ~ ! ~'',,~ ~i i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ,.~ ~,' ~~ L.\~• , ~}}. ~ •r 1 ~~ yip 1
+~l r--~>~ ~ i~ •j~* I it li r-,- ~' ~ *,I ~ r. - rk', '•,+'L~ i ~ t- 1,'
•. ^ 1 '3 • ) i f:' -` ~*: i t. ~`\ f t!*' of.lit ;'', tiJt.;_ ti.
\~J~ f + / , L,`JY 1 Ir :::::::. ~ ~''y5'~ / ` *~, .I ^'i'•`~1': 11 1 ~_-' ~'`'
Jf~ ' r/ '\ \ i'• 1 ,~ -.! *5:.k,/ice 7', ',+r L •~', 55
I• •~y- •Y I'~ `I •f~ L f*~•, k'w y'~I i ''~ ~ I ~ '~''1 tip' ~' ; ti~ ~ I •
1 \• I
~~'L ^ , ~ '~ ` ~`*-f \:\IF,.1\. fI~'_ ~• ~ I-_~ ~ I ,~^ ~k.•: 1 , `a•~l I !'' ~,I I
_ . rr
N. C. DEPT. ~F TRANSP®RTATIDN
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHW?~YS
1f ~ ~j Dr1VIE % F®RSYTH C®UNTI'
1l 1Le PR®JECT:33283.3.1 (B-3835)
BRIDGE N®. 35 ®VER
THE I'ADKIN RIVER
®N US 158 (CLEMM®NS RDJ
SHEET ~ ®F ~ ~~ 02,E 270.08

i
.~
~~~
11~
o~,~tQ $
\~~
~~
~~ ..~
K
~i i
~ C~
'~~ ~°~
1Q. ~~ a ft 4
a b ~'.
~,,, ..
O i
0 o C
o p /
Q
S°
7
~~
~~

S 'ON 133XS Ol H'J1tlN 00'00+5E 'tl15 3N1lX:Jltlp

Rodney Money
From: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:01 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Money please give me a call at 336 703 2008. I would like to have someone show us what the 4 to 1 vs 2 to 1 slope
difference would mean with respect to going into the woods. The drawings didn't have a legend with the scale on it.
---- Original Message -----
From: Rodney Money <[e-mail]>
To: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L
Sent: Mon Dec 17 18:13:45 2007
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Attached, please find a plan view drawing with the 2:1 slope stake line highlighted.
Again, please contact me if you have any questions regarding this project.
Regards,
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
Nt)'I'E: 'this is a Forsyth County operated e-mail system..~-L1: e-.1~7.ai1 communication is subject to be accessed by the
news media and the public pursuant to the Public Records Law of North C'az•olina.
3/5/2008

Rodney Money
From: Rodney Money [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:46 AM
To: 'Sanders-Pratt, Damon L'
Subject: RE: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Attachments: TanglewoodParkSlope.pdf
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Attached, please find a plan view drawing that shows both a 2:1 and a 4:1 slope stake line. In addition, I
have included offset distances from the existing edge of pavement to each of the slope stake lines at
several locations along the park property.
Highlighted in yellow is the existing edge of pavement.
Highlighted in green is the limit of the slope stake line using a 2:1 slope.
Highlighted in pink is the limit of the slope stake line using a 4:1 slope.
I will follow this emnil with a call to you shortly.
Regards,
Rodney
From: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:01 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Money please give me a call at 336 703 2008. I would like to have someone show us what the 4 to 1 vs 2 to 1 slope
difference would mean with respect to going into the woods. The drawings didn't have a legend with the scale on it.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rodney Money <[e-mail]>
To: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L
Sent: Mon Dec 17 18:13:45 2007
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
Attached, please find a plan view drawing with the 2:1 slope stake line highlighted.
Again, please contact me if you have any questions regarding this project.
Regards,
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
3/5/2008

919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
NOTF: 'T'his is a Forsyth County operated e-mail system. ALI.. e-1~•Iail communication is subject to be accessed by the
news media and the public pursuant to the Public Records I.aw of North Carolina.
3/5/2008

Rodney Money
From: Rodney Money [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:41 PM
To: 'Sanders-Pratt, Damon L'
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
It was nice meeting with you and your staff last week to discuss the subject project.
I am preparing project notes from the meeting and would like to include the names of those who attended.
Can you assist me with the names and positions of staff from Forsyth County/Tanglewood Park?
Thank you.
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
3101 Poplnrwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
3/5/2008

Rodney Money
From: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 7:11 PM
To: Rodney Money
Subject: RE: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Damon Sanders-Pratt, Assistant County Manager
Hank Barnum, Tanglewood Park Business Manager
Clint Ingram, Tanglewood Park Maintenance Manager
Chris Weavil, Tanglewood Park Maintenance Assistant Manager
From: Rodney Money [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:41 PM
To: Sanders-Pratt, Damon L
Subject: B-3835 Yadkin River Bridge -Tanglewood Park
Mr. Sanders-Pratt:
It was nice meeting with you and your staff last week to discuss the subject project.
I am preparing project notes from the meeting and would like to include the names of those who attended.
Can you assist me with the names and positions of staff from Forsyth County/Tanglewood Park?
Thank you.
Rodney E. Money, P.E.
~- ~
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 127
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919.875.0084 Phone
919.995.4366 Mobile
NOTE: This is a Forsyth County operated a-mail system. ALL e-Mail communication is subject to be accessed by the
news media and the public pursuant to the 1'ubiic Records I..a~~ of North Carolina.
3/5/2008

~,
~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ „oo
~~
,~
•. TOWN OF
~,~.0 : ' . CLEMMONS
~a. ~-
~ ~ „o,
BEG/N ~ ~ G~e~~i ~ az e
PROJECT
~ -
~ ~. -c`
'~ Asa \
~ I ~~ ~~\
~ c~ \
n ~ ~\\
~.._ '`.
., z~ ~ - -
I'
~ ~',

~~~
PROJECT
~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIE/FORSYTH COUNTY
PROJECT: 33283.3.1 (B•3835)
BRIDGE N0.35 OVER
THE YADKIN RIVER
ON US 158 (CLEMMONS RD.>
SHEET ~ OF ~~~ 2/28/08
NORTH CAROLINA

`, '`xx;:,-' ~ r ~ ~ . ,541 : I '~'S ti i * I . y*~ri`:.
' ~•' ,~+,
~ .,;., ~ ~. ~'~ J~' 1,.,.-ter fr ~ ~ ~,__1r ~fr, ~~ _ _ _-,_+r. ~,~-.
'+ ~.
'I i ~~ r _ __'~ •~_. ~__- qty yam. ~r; ~.~"•~~ 11,-r. Ir ___-- r
I ~ 1 t _
~\~ mfr-'" ~• •'. {',',•',,~'',},y.~- L ~ \'~•• , y , •.y ~'' .,,+ ~ •-~, ~~ ^ ~ ~:- __
,~ -fr1~:•'''.~~~ I ~'~ ,;f~ J .•h~+ `•, ~~~II ;~'r ~ i ;'~il•` 1 5 4 f ~ ~r~-r -__ ~ r
,! :y}'~ Y '' ~~ ~ ~ ~1 , 1 , • ••±~• ~,, , ~~~'''`I',,• 'I +! ''~11,' Lam- /J+ ' •\\ ~{
I 7~ •t ~ 11 •Z ~' ti_ ,
__~r ~'i ~. ~ ~ ,, ~~~'~ 1ti'~. III '. t ~ ~ti _•~•-/~.+s,.~
r k ''J I In •'y ' + ~ ~ j^ ~ i ''', ~ ~~''' ~''+~~ •',,' ~~ •~]; • ~ - ~ ~;• - ~
' ~5 y'll 'ti-" \ •~ 't ~ * '+^ ~ '~' f • ^k `'•~ ''' •'`;}•••' by '' i ~ ,~~~'j~~ 3•'k ~,\
'E'li ''- ~/ w • ~~-.\+~-•!__~ - - ''x :ri,.•,~ ; ti ~'' _•~1ti+~~ ti, ~ 5 ~' ~7,.'-~ 1 .
l - ~ ; ~•-. ~ ~~ I ,f:• =~ =ir ',rte ~''~,'~'' __~~ - - t , i,'
__ '.-+ ',i ~~,~, I~ *; a''.SSA n\, ~ ~ ~` , ~ _y~{~ I I ~ \,! ii i I~ I ''.': ',+I I ~+' f-~-v
^ ^ .~ ~.4,~ ,+~yqr t ;f re \ `1~, , ' ' 'tiJ ~' r' f ~ ~ I' , ~; J I ~ ~~ ;' ~ ~ '
'+•\•L ^ i ? • ~ ' •. it ~~ / ~.kIF~'~. ~~~ .I~• } I-= + I i' ^ • 4', ~' , ~'_~ I ~
N. C. DEPT. ®F TRANSP®RTATI®N
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
DAVIE % F®RSYTH C®UNTY
PRGJECT:33283.3.1 (B-3835)
~~" ~ ~ FRIDGE N®. 35 ®VER
~V'~, THE YADKIN RIVER
®N US 158 (CI,EMM®NS RD.)
SHEET ~ ®F ~ `'~ 02.d 27 ,~ 08

NAMES AND AI)E)RESSES
PARCEL N~. NAMES ADDRESSES
~erE ]~enneE ~a~nson I ~8® ~'adkin ~al~eg
Advance, NC 2700

TOP PAD ELEVe=674096'
2" CLASS ~A' STONE

NORMAL WSEL=672096'
~z
~ooooo00 _ ~?o
~ooooo00 /
~ 0 0 00
0 00 0
- _ ~-
RIVER BED
CLASS 'I' RIPRAP
1[D~7°.~I~,
N. C. DEPT. GF TRANSP®RTATI®N
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHW.esYS
DAVIE% F®RSYTH C®UNTY
PR®JECT:33283.3.1 (8-3835)
FRIDGE N.®. 35 ®VER
THE YADKIN RIVER
®N US 158 (CLEMM®NS RD.)
SHEET ~ ®F ~ L{ 02 ~ 27 % OS

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACT SURFACE WATER IMPAC

Site
No.

Station
(FromlTo)

Structure
Size /Type
Permanent
Fiflln
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) an
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1 -L- 20+25 to 22+60 Lt. Roadway Fill 0.06 - - - - - - - - -

2-Stage 1 -L- 29+48 to 31 +58 M. Temporary Causeway -Stage 1 0.34

2-Stage 2 -L- 27+00 to 29+38 M. Temporary Causeway -Stage 2 0.37

2-Stage 3 -L- 26+73 to 28+50 Rt. Temporary Causeway -Stage 3 0.27

2-Stage 4 -L- 28+69 to 30+66 Rt. Temporary Causeway -Stage 4 0.35

TOTALS: 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0 0 0
Permanent Surface Water Impacts Due To Bents = 159.0 SF
H~vgW Y!1/05

H
0
\ nax rvcwxco ex. P0.0JECT 0.EPfRENCE N0, SHEET
\\ PARSONS
8-3835 4
~ iti:~°w~' RW SHEET N0.
w'" «.a.. Ina 0.0ADWAY D61GN HIDRAUUC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
a
No.
' V `O
~a
a PG ~.~:~--' - -
~a ~ ~Q~
~'~°'~
4>: .,~ °~ ~:.,
~.~ Perms Dtawitx~ ~'
o ~rc, . << °~ ~, ~ Shed '~ of ~i, ~~
~,~
~, O
THE HL' 5DkLE L7i0un ~; , , : ~.~ ~ N
A9 R~ PG 3D5
P; ~
O 1 1~ I
,~ ~.d p
(,,
t ~~ :~ ~~.~a eEar ~ a~ iesNSOr
/ ~ O C
/ //
la ~ ~~~ .~~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~a i ~~i r _. ~~~ ~~
T. ~ i //////+
r I ,..
,, ~ ~; +~
~, ,,,,r ~ +~:'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~, ~ ., ~
COLIA0. AND E)(iEND I ~ v !}~, /~" ~~~ ~ ~ _ ,.7 ~ _ ~~~ 2
y,
ErJSr.7e' RCP f BO~NOAle' fAP1~PAOX ~` ~ 7 '
~~ //Ny~~~T~~yyW1 ;. ~ ~ ~:.
IA~f wYti MI~ l0. wRIH ' I` ~ I~ ( ,. / ,% '~ ~ ~ ~ W
i ~ `- / f
L _ __. a
_ _... k r ;~' _~, ~ F ~
. :'
~. ~ 1 ~ ya °~.; , I c a„~ x
,. ~ , 1
r~., l,y t ~ ~ ' ( ~ N
' ~ r ~ ~, . r
i ~ f~~, 1
0
N ~
.., -- -.- -' ~,, -___ ' ......~:...... ~ ~.. , ~I ~; III,,: -
_ ae,.r;,I 1 i
- ~ ~` ;( ~ ark' 1 p ~ y., ~~ "~' ~ ~..
____. ,
'. SPKIAL CUT DRCH ,., . ~...... ~ ` ~ {, r4 u. ; - C C .. ._ ~ ~ p
~' SEE DETAIL +^_ ,~,
I
--.._. ...._.... a ... ' ' _ C. r,E _.._.- E_._.._.._ ..C.! _ ~' ,~ ""'~?~ C ~~_~ _ ..
~- C.. ~ ~ IF `-~ ~ ~~~ .~~ ~ V r i v CB r~n~
_ _
.., x
z~
,-
r x K._xce
_ ~_,.. _. ._ ~' _.._~',~,.. _ _ s ,_._ 7 , x
_.; ,----
>
~;; ,,4 ~ _ 3 - -
`'~
15' _. ~ ".
• -...~, .,max - ° - °- '=- tr ~... _ _ .__ - -e ~~~ H
r v1 . - ;~ ..... _
LB C6
._. .. ~--AfTAN .~ CR„ _ -~
RETAIN _.,_ ~ ~ C
_. _
` l`
~ f
} A.
i. ~ _.. ~ F
d
~ ~~ ~~ s~ >
t'... ~ ~_, ~C3
y
:. _.: ~ a _._._._....~_ ...._.. .~. ,,~ ..... ~ _
;.
~,
", ,
:, ., ,'
~... ~ '
-F ~ ~ '~ ,~
,,,...`s ._,. '~' L._.. =+e ~ ,: *e~ ~ .;y . ..~ ~ tJ OCL R'AIP RN _
.-
_.. -:. .:4~. "c .., -' ~~; ;~, „. ., s ~ .. ESi.7 TONS
•' SPECIAL UT M1"DRCH ., ~ r,, ID;- .:ti~ ". .~ ~ _~. ;.,..: _.,, _1- ,,,~
_ n
- ,~ n !. I
i <-. .. ,.. ~~'" ESC 7 SYFF
'uf .. -
" - .. SE@"GF7NL _ ~ ~ '~t 0.F)AQVE DI _ F. .,
~~ 71: E~{.STEFNEN TPoP:.EI * . ~~ ~ ~',~ CONSTRUCT TRIB ~ .
~,
' ~ ... T PL 7W ""
< ~ ,- ... i
~. ~". E ~ y r - ~ E ~ C ~
;~
~ ~ n, n
~ `." _. 51; _. ~~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~3U~PG~~S
r, . -; sn „ RET~1J
,. ; „ s
rc
~ ~ ,
~~ ~:.
,.
aEMo
0 ,,.,,<
r
qt < 11 CCAV
.,.
=. Y.
r
_ x...a .f ,.., .. „ ,,r s.~ N .. - , ~
~. ... i.; .:>.F.S ~ 11 ... .,
i :-.
,, ,,
' : is HkRRT TDL9.L450N f;~... ., c' / "..
~- ~ el OB IT5 W e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4
x ..
..
.~, ~ ,
<, t
<; ~ 1
,,. ~ i
" ~" N' 1T, ~~ KENFeETH B t13kt~91E
_, <
~-
' ... .. .: ~ i r .,. ~
". `
_ ., ` _
.;
r BOST '. i ~, 4', fi
>-: 5.FgALEY "
~ ,
~ <:
/// ,
DE IT3 1'G T35 ! ~,~ n. ~ .',a>;
Hfr T9
,. .. - , . ,
.vim ~y ~, ~4~,.., ~ ` .. c, .~ y,. ,< ~~.
,.
.:
t. g ~
K
` ~f Y
~,
' :+ ~`.,
f ~..
Egg LL
..i~ ~' `. `r ~~ ~! ` ~ ~ "" ~J. ~ ~ F (.~~ F DENOTE FI l IN
.. .-.. 'k P W TLANO
e'.
/ A ~~~
NCB®7C
D~AI~ ~ ~~ *,-~ ~~; '; ~ r~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DETAIL SPECIAL CUT DITCH r, DAME/ FORSYTH COUNTY
SPECIAL LITERAL N' DRCH (Not to Sc°H( „, 1 DETAIL FSL 6• DECR GRAINS ARE TO RE WSTAl1ID ~ 6'CENTEAS M
(Notts Swk( Y [ .,1"~,ct~ FALSE SUMP d~ '-'~ ACCORDANCE WRM 7HE FOLLOWING: 0.T 7°+9/ TO 13+18 PROJECT:33ZB3.3.[ B•38351
NeMal FBI NNwd ~ ,,cqL• Ouhid. DRah RT: Z3+A6 TO 16+SZ
...L ~a slop. Gmund F c ~ traAkHaw ~ ~sdr RT:P6+5R TO 72+ZS FRIDGE N0.35 OVER
Gmu;d 3. o L~ ~ _ ~ zon _
wo.D._LQP ~.7 ea ~ _° _ - THE YADK[N RIVER
-~ 7z+oo 10 7++0o RT G'°o"d e.l ortcH PRORIf \\\ -s- (Nara Sal. ( SEE SHEET 5 FOR ARIDGE /ROADWAY SKETCH oN Us Isa ICLEMMONS RDJ
b 9+50 N 11+ffi LT, a~oRd, slw. y_ 77+3Z LT PArd.+ clan SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -l- PROFILE AND GRADE
'"'` "- ~ 5EE SHEET 8 FOR LINES -Y- & -YA- PROFILES AND GRADES SHEET of s/sv/oa
a
w
N
a
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
W N°i Vb6 PO C°NSTRUCTION
INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO N°T U36 P0R /A ACOVISRI°N

N
z
0
PUN PREPIREO EYi PROIECi REFERENCE N0. SMEEf N0.
• ~ P~s~onis 8-3835 4
^ E M~e~P~e
• xW~Fe RW SHFET N0.
~`•Y eon '^ ROADWAY DESIGN NYDRAl1I1C5
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R
R ~~ ~
(?~ ANA -
•
!~ "`~.
~• ~~ ~ ~~
` C~ `
O~%tl „4•
\ `* ~
~~~`
r• ~%
{i
~,
i `. ' VI
~`
;, t ~ ~~ ~ R~w ~/ 1, ~ ~ ~ 1
I ,1 P h 7 , ~ 1 ; t ~; ~p ~
itE mLLSDALE TiROIF' Z~ , ' ~ y~' I I N
~ ~5 ~c 3G3 ~ ~ ~"~' , ~ ~ ~ t,
,~
'., ~ ~ s ; ~ /' ~ j-'~ ~ ~ BEAT t~,er~ B~;nBarl
,' , , ' ~ ~ ?~ ~ ~zas
s„ :, `
~i~ ~,~~ 1~ ~ ~
1 '' .. , ~ ,
k
.~ /
_„ .-.. :..: L,': ~.'_`,..--~ .i .. ' 1 ~~y , ~ ~ . b3 i . " ~ ~. {l~r-,~ g ;~ , ~ &~ ~, i 1 V 't ~ ~ :. -~ t. , ~t I
~,
' ~ ~i ~ ~ }~
1 ~ "
/ ~ ?" `' „ - a
., .-
~ ~ F
~nE1rLn/'e~ f
'~ ~ COLIAIE AND E7PTEN(D ,~ --""- . 1+ ~-~ i~'V• ~ ~py~~p~p}y~ ~I \\
/ 1
" ~,,,,`"~ ~ E%ISf.1R 0.CP ~ / .. ~.., '1; F r~ttpt]!kw 1 1 1r,~ ~ ~,, ~y ~
.r ~
~: x
., ~ ~
~,
w .___. ~ .-- ;
f ~, ; ~ ~b
:
.I .
i ~ ~ ` ~( ~,
~ ,
;~ 1 ~, ~ ~
o
~1 I ~n,v
_.._ ~... ~ 1 y. ,l ,~.,,~,, ~ rl j.
~• • ' •%
.. v ._.. ,. .- . _. PSAM ~..-,.... ,:: .. "~ ,.. ~~'. ~ f:n ilk, t"•~ G~ x /\/ 2
3DSRCl (., ~
,..
____~_ ~ .
_~_ _---._'--~. -_..~ ~ ....... 'f.y v -,bf. t e' ~~°~ .16~A'r,. r I / ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~`.i:' 1 i ' ~ \k a H
~. r x~ _; ./ ~'' ~.
.:: __
r~ ~' x
~~~ ~ r '= SPECLtI ~•DfICH~ .. ~ .. ,"'~~ ~I ,~,~, _ ~$ _.~~ i~:3 y,~,, 1 ~
SEE. :. ..
i. 1 ~ - _ _
_- s„
.. ...__. rE~ i ~. 4s I r ~ ri / ._ \ ~ ~ ~T."
.._ ~ ., ~ i
-,
~,
,..rr'
_ _~ _,...._ ~ r
/ '
--~ ~ .,,% .~ i ,FSL
d '
^~
.~~. ~
-..
.. ~ y, _,
,.o
z~. ',in .. / N~Y .~ _v..-._. ~ : ..~ CB ',15' 4 ~ $ 4S ~ CB ~ 5.. r,FcYZa ~ ><PrRac~ Uf
• ~ E,- RETAIN
~ IIETAN --~ ~ ---'
lL
_ i ~_ :..,
+~' - :: , .m.....~ ' ' .~ .. T.r ~TJ""~'_ ~ ~- Imo' Z
. '- w. ~ ~
~ ~ F1
,-~ .,
-
r~ _. ~ ~
,,~_~ ~
,;
Mme, '
w. - _,. '~, -a~ - ~ ,
.. -
;;
i'
~ ._
_ ~ ~
,.:~,~ n -
. _. __ .
~, -~-u
.- s_. ~ ~ ...~-- ~ -
I ~ f
,. , •~. ,. - .. r~r -
,- ~ _... ~. ,~, ~ t,
..
~ t
. w ~` 1
c . ~ i ... . e ,. \ .` ... . ~ x ~% / ~\ ~ GL R~1P RAF I~
:: .:ti ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aE@~4TAn ~ ~'1^ DrtcN :.: Z ~ 4: J.te~ ~ 1 s p r ~ Q.
,~ , ~ _ T ~ .._. . _._-.- ~ ~~ 1l Sf 7 SYFPS
' ~ EFAW4EDI' l ~ )M1
. ~ •~ ~ ~ nuA ~ ==-- ~' ; ~`><. coNmucr Tale l:"
~,,-- ~ 6sr~e~eN iRrP~E1i r ~, ~, I ~ ~ -~-.::~`
.~.
~`
, - ~ 06 97 i'GIG ~ - v '
~~ ~ , : ~ 1•y 1 ~~ E E
ia- r, ;, f 9 ~ l Ea \\ s E
r. !,
~. 2 '~
. ~ :9 f
. ,.
- .,
y :.s' t i f
- -
,.
.x ~ ~--,
. ~ €r4 x REregN 1
' ~- ~ ~
_._ . ~~
33
,. ~1~ ~ ., ... ~ J .' V.R. ~'~ fi _ I~ I ii d
..' ~ I
~ s~ ~ ~ 1 'I~ ° n.
,. / t o. ti ~. r '~ 1 I
..
,., , . ~' ~ .,; i i ~ ~ jr
T ~~: I x r I
.:,
~ 4ML7NSON x z•, .. _
ff .F ~` ! k" jjj
` f ~ `;, <x ~ ~ f Kk FiEtY~(~BJF~.t+ItTE
a }. ) 1
M
~A~6E~~9 ~ , / 1 ~ ! I i
,~ L
.~ \ },
i i/
,: s a D F„_ ~/ ~ i
i ~5 i~ ~T '~ ~ ~ '1~ I I
a. 'N
)~ 4
,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ( a, r o-"i ~ r i ' ~ -
{.,
.. :. -, f' .~ . ,. ~,.. 1 r ~- .. ~ ~ ~ ~ F F OENDiE5 FILL IN
~ C ~ t ~ ;~~ r ,~/ ~' ~ ~' WEiLANO
DH 2O Po i05 ~ I I
p5?' x I 1 , J
i`. I> - / ~ ICJ i N~~®~°
~_ ~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DETAIL ~`' ~ <%~
DETAIL sPECUL cur DITCH > .,,,, t s. DETAIL FSL 6' DECR DIWNS ARE i0 & INSTALLED Q d'CENIEAS IN DAME/FOASYTH COUNTY
SPECIAL UTERAI'V' DRCH INDHo kale) , a'',.;;e, •' FALSE SUMP
(Nofro SmIR) Y t .Ka''•~5•" ~I~>~ ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWWG: RT:20+91 TO 23+2R PROJECT:33PB3.3.1 (B-3835)
~~ FRI Nalwd ~ Ou546R Dkh ~L RT: 23+16 TO 26+57
~~ 1 s,`d Sbps Gmmd P 9 TAlfic Flow ` 7D•1 I 2~ RT: 26+58 TO 32+28 BRIDGE N0.35 DVER
q.1 D ~' 'EEC d:l ~ ~~ - `0_.--- "'I THE YAD%IN RIVER
Min D-1_DR ~9 \
-L-12+oo ro I4+oo RT G'a'"d dl DDCH PROFrEE s s~ 5~ I"a'° ka' I Pq~ ~ SEE SHEET 5 FOR BRIDGE /ROADWAY SKETCH aN US 158 (CLEMMONS RD)
-L. v+so ro n+u u' -L n+3z LT SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -L- PROFILE AND GRADE
`~"'~" `' SEE SHEEP 6 FOR LINES -Y- & -YA- PROFILES AND GRADES SHEET OF s/29/oB
M
M
x
x
x
N
N
m
N
dt
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
Do NOT use CON6IAOCI'LON
INCOMPLE E PLANS
W NOT 1158 FOR /~ ACpU6T1fON

P
P
n
E E E E ;~E :~ E
NOTE:
HISTORICAL MARKER AT
L STA 5/+DO+/- LT IS
TO RE RELOGTED.
W
a ~
V~ ;
NOTE: ONLY ONE CAUSEWAY WILL BE
~FO ~ !,~ IN PLACE AT A TIME,
1
O Pnrolxwo~r,l
_ ' PAR5~ON5
I~uWen~a N~mMwl
ni m
PROIECi REFEPENCE N0. I SHEET
RAY SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER

PRELIMINA RY PLANS
DO NUT UAH FO CUNStpUR1UN
INCOMPLE E PLANS
W NUT U8R Mp /W ALbODIT10N
Permtt Drawing ~.~
snit ~ ot, r,~,
M
0
b
M
m
f~
.
~.
~':
84t,
I
A` ~ `
*.~

a A
& ~~
I .r ~ ~~
V
I .~ :~
z ~ ~
~
I
W
_ ~
:~
I~H ~ a , 1
~
~ ~I
~
,
U) ~
Re ~ J~
o ,, F~
_E
~ -S19'E`T Y- ~~_
O ~"~~
O
O
N R '.
N
Q
N s~ aegoc~. c~=acc mar= ~xaxa
{'..
s +,
W ~-
FZ+ - ~ssx ->~n -.s-~aa
J
/` /' TENPpt1AY qIP
f / .. f/I15EWAY ITYP.I
~/ ~'~ ~E ~~ E E-
~ 'Y 15Y
' ~.
/fi
rc /
I
,.,., ~...._. , . ...,,,,.,_. ti
;.3::5
0
PokE1d OARS TONHHGNE HOi1EDkt&RS kSSOCiATK))f
oe NBS RC zzsz
Fs ~D rc xiD
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
B-5' D=2'
~
nA W-5 d=1 ~~
/
~
n
+ t~ ,
/
/ "x
IP 1

1 ~ 1
J `
~' .:
\
1
~
f
/
E-i-~- ~E ~
.
Y
' r ., ,.
/
'
Isa i
1 `'

11 S7AGE 1
~~ } ~
a "~

it ~ 1B~IH - E e ~

I ~ 9 ~~~'~ C ..16'.IVF `AFM -, u~„'- -
_ ~-1B•
/ / ~.
.~
, 6T1GE 2 ~ • j IU 1 ' ~ CB
,
A „~, ;~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~__. ~~
____ _.. __. .....a.. _... y ~~ : ,Ir
v '
~ /
f ~
:. ." /
.,.
e
i _ 's1 m ... "-
__ ; .
R .. . ,1- .;- Yh
:,
~.?~ 4 //-~./
I . a .,
y/
.. Y f~ :~/
j' ~' ~ ~ -~~` .... ~ ~<
a
~A~ 1 t ~,~.:. ~r7"°
' ~ I t /
A ~ >r
J ~ .,,,
~.~% /I~ r
!~0 PREFORMED S O R`HDLE
1 PLIN Y LL
' -~.` F F DENDWEF~SLANpL IN FORSYTH COUNTY
OEI R93 PC 3t6 g~ vp~
1 ® DENOTES TEMPORARY 0 N~D® d
INPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
.~ ~ 6' DECK GRAINS ARE TO BE INSTAllED ®6'CENTERS IN DIVISION OP HIGHWAYS
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: RT:40+BP TO 43+46 DAME/ FOASYTH COUNTY
RT: Z7+16 TO 26+54
RT: 46+SB TO 42+48 PROJECT: 33483.3.1 LB-3835)
uciax A-/ BRIDGE N0.35 OVER
a - THE YAD%IN A[VER
F" ~ SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -L- PROFILE AND GRADE oN US 158 TcLEMMONS RD.>
-{r 34+55 LT SEE SHEET 8 FOR LINE -0RIVEI- PROFILE AND GRADE
SHEET OF 4/49/08

N
Q
!~O PREFORM 0 S fOL{: ~
PLAN V
F F DENOW~SLANLL IN FC~SYTH Otk9iTY
.., . 7.m,~-+..^.,~ L 1 D DB R93 PG ~T€
........... ...rw'w;""
~~' A ® INPACTS NESURFALE W0.TER 6 1V ~~® ll
~~ ~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
d' DELI( DAMNS ARE TO RE INSTALLED ~ d' CENTERS IN
... M.~
ACCORDANCE wfiff THE FOLLOWING: RT:70+92 TO 79+76 DAVIE/FORSYTH COUNTY
RT: 79116 TO 76+97
_ ,. ,._...._ RT; 76+sA m 97+7A PROdECT:33P83.3,1 IB-38351
'-- ~""" ~ sfcrwx A~A FRIDGE NO.bS OVER
~,~„ THE YADBIN RIVER
` SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -L- PROFILE AND GRADE ON US ISB (CLEMMONS RD)
+ss LT SEE SHEET 8 FOR LINE -DRIVEL- PROFILE AND GRADE
SHEET OF 2/
1 ' t SHE NO
r ~ E-_~'~t J j ! 1, r I ~ P~,r, P~P,Pm aY~ rRaEa ~PERENtE No. Er
r
P
aAasonES 8-3835 5
E E E ` ~ E J~ ^'1
! ~
.... ..: ' ~ ~ .. o.wM n R N RAUUC
`` ~ . i ` / ~ ~ OADNGINEER IG HE ENG 5
" _ . 9 ~
~ 1 ~ NO7E ; aiY'
I
M1 r j MLSi~ A4IAIDA AT ~ A ~ i I ~ / ~ ~ ~ ..... _ .. `.. ~~ I 1 ':. WEER
3l+OD+!- LT'IS r ~
TO BE RELOCAlEO. 1 ~'"~~ ' ~~.: j
uc , - f
\ ~
~~ ~ I ~ j ~ i, t„ ~
l I IJ'd; i ,.
_.
... ~ ~ I ~, r ; ~ I
v~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ,~~ r' ~ TE. ONLY ONE ,CAUSEWAY WILL B~ I t.
QQ ~(~. 1 ,.NO
' i f
IN PLACE TIM ~'
` ~ ~ ' ~ W ; f r ~ _. _. AT~A E. ~; / y '1 t, IF 1 _ ---•~.
;'~ I
_.
' ~i ` t ( If ~ t ~ ., ' 1 ~ P@ttrlit
I ~ ~~ q
ii ~1 jE i i ~T A ~1 ~ I( tl' ~ 1~
` f r ~ f r t r .....~II-
` ,
.. d ~ 1 ~ ! ' - ~'~ # i i
,~ r , ' / r' I ~! 1 ~i I
f , k
... .~A ` [ # fy i ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ t
` ~ . ~ ~ ,. E ~~ .~f s
I f ~ ~ Rj t ~ ..--- lT ~ i i ~ J
' //
` f l N ,. t M I
I
t
~~ ,,
i
/ I
/~ E e~ ~
eT BENFICTi BArtNSOPi
I
5 t
,;
~~ > ~ . /,~ ~;~ ~ f
_,
~:., ~ ` C ~~ J R OAKS TD *~e~ ~'J1A. i~RS A53~li Tf~i'i
? ~ A '. A 2 w^i 25'..
1 1
''. ~. x,~ ~ ~ ~i PE <0 PuiAdi ~
.. I ,
I
;~ ,' J
/ f~ ~; rt ' 1 ,/ l~l ~ ~I ~ rREEOnA~D scouR Hgir i ~
~'
,_;,; ,, .
~, .... f~~ ~:
i
_, _,
a J wsaT
~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ . 6 ~~~ -~ ,. / /,1 ~
- -- - ,
~ r ~„ ,~
,. /
1 ~ 1 ,. -... ~ -.., fd f
~ a '~ ,` i
+ ~ .,.
r' .~
.:
~~r ~ `" ~ ,: z-._.. ,,` SITE 2 J x, ~ r
+ , ~.
,~
z ;l ~ .. n ~.....~ ~ ii r,/ ~ ~ ~,~~', ~ ,,
~.
...,
H ~ \ ,j ~ ~ /~~ ~ ~~ TEMPORARY AIP AAP ~ lr ~1/ / / ~~ f F ~~~
W .~ , '~ ~ ~ ~0 / v / fAUSEWAY IiYP,I ! C' 7 / ~' ,
N (`~Re ~ 1~ \'~ ~~ ~~~" t` ~~ Au 6 /'~~ r ~ f". ~. FLEV:61S0' I, E ~~`. % ~ // / i ~ ~'fr,:'~~',
N ~
o > ~F ~,~, _~ ~
_ ~ pr ~~ ~
d i ~`-~
~ ',. ~'.~ ~ , ' , ~ ~ L ~ ,` 6iA6E 1 I~
er `. r ~
..
~r
U _ v
.... ~ ,.
F ". ~. ~..,< ~ ,ar., w; ~,, ;
,;,,~~
~k
~ ~ ,: ~~ F ,
..: ,,;
~/~ i`4
,; ,.:
,,,.., t ~ ~ ~.
.' ,.
e ~,,~
` 1 \ ~_ _. ~
o _,
+ _._. . __._- .~.~ .....~... ~.._._ _.._.. _._ .. r___._. ___ _ _
i
.'S
N :.
~t
,,. .. ~/
.:--~
,, ~ ~- ~ id'NC/6 ~=~~= j~ / J'
~. _ , > ~ ~ '_ ~ u:rnr~ ~ ~~„ 'sue , ~.
h ~'"l' aNalmjc~c -fit ~=c"t»'aucRS~aas _~.. W --- __-- _--"- wt!- -- _ -- _ -
w --
1 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ 6rAGE 7 ,~ / - r ~F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~...
~ i 1
H --6F'x m,_.._.. --,A2c~ -asitzrr.+sv,:,,.Ic "~ mss.-. _ ~ = - _ ~,.,, i - ,~~ '"~~ -
J. i i ~ ~ "` s ! ... ~_
~:~.. _ _ ~~ ~, Y si Iu ~. ~ „c, _ ~r~ I
+~ /'
~ . /'~/y/
/ ,, `•,x,11+
, ` ~,
M ~. 1 t
~-
.~ ..
! ,'
' , f ~V _
, r / q I l
_ Y
~". ~. ~ _ ~ ~ t ~ j~ "7 .., '4' 1.
,-.. - ~ ,-
. ~ / 4, ~ U
.- ~ c~ ~
~ r~~ ~,
` `
~ .
~.
j ~ S ,~ ~,~ - _ _._.._._ _ ., ~ ~: _.
.; ..
' , ~• ,
f
I I 4. ~ ,~ ~ f.. ~ ~ra~~ ~
._:
- /
E E E E E E ~ / ~ _{ ~ ~ I
`'1s ~ ~ ~_, Y ~
e ! Y ' I ~° ~+ v ~~ ,,' +' ~ 1 r; ,s;
I~ ., ~~ ~~ ~ 77 1 ~ ~ .azri /, ~~
~~ '~ ~ KENNETH gt&L ~lRE$YTE ~jP{, 1 : ~ ~ ~ f ~: ~ ~ ~q % i ~ ,
~k ~ 'T, C9 HIT P4 5A2 ~ y E ,% ~ y , ,
/
' Fg5 #GS ~- ~~
t
~` Y >r~~
JZ `~ ~ ,, ~ ~'..
+~
i1 ~ ,' r .
0 . ~ i~ ? `~~ ~ k
f i~
l
"w
M
M
M
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
OO Nal' U9R PO CONSTRVCTIVN
INCOMPLE E PLANS
OO NM V66 FOR /Y ACDUI3RION

N
Z
0
_N
c
P
P
m
w
w
a
a
a
x
w
a
x
x
w
x

0
Z
W
W
S
N
O
H
I
U
F
O
O
O
O
N
N
Q
F
N
W
2
N
J
2
U
F
E E E E
NOTE:
HI3TOWGIL MARKER AT
TO RE RELOGTE~.
t
~'
^.

NOTE: ONLY ONE CAUSEWAY WILL BE
IN PLACE AT A TIME.
STAGE 4A CAUSEWAY WILL BE IMMEDIATELY
REMOVED ONCE THE DEMOLITION OF
DENOTES TEHPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
_' P~FIS~ONS
O LW MEP~LrOMreY iN06
„.~iiw`
SHEET
ENGINEE0.
PRELIMIN
DO NDT USE FO RY PLANS
CONSTRUCTION
INCOMPLE
00 NOS USB POR E PLANS
/R AWUISITH)N
Penult Rrdwing
NCB®°1[°
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAME/FORSYTH COUNTY
P R03 ECT: 33483.3.[ 18-3535)
BR[DGfi N0.35 OVER
THE YAD6[N RIVER
ON US 158 (CLEMMONS RD)
SHEET
4/29

z
0
. t I
I
j
^~-"_-
~y~~
_ I` ~ : 7
Q0 }I~
_ ~ - EPEXEO BYE
e~ 1 ~ l ; J S Pux PX
;, d ~ t 1f I PAAy50N5
1
,1 E E E E ~~E t}. \ , f i r,~moKS ~N ~.rA
V ~
r ~ ' ~ ~ i~ ' 't ~ a>a~ 1'a
_ ~ ~ t I
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ _ ~ .,, 17 ~ ~+~f. ! n s
NOTE: //
I HISTONCAl MARKE0. AT ~ - ~ ~ ~ s i / !
j -l- SYA 31+00+F- lT'13 I t ! j ' v„_~.--~ ~` d~ ; i J7) I` // I
TO BE RELOCATED t ~~ 1 „-_.--° ~~ ,~ {~~
t , ,(
j t% iI
1 a 1~.~ 1t I .. a.'~ i
i~, 1, j ~ ~ '
/j 1
I i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ U EWAY W L E~ '" l~
PROTECT pEFEAENCE N0. SHEET
8-3835 5
RAV SHEET NO.
_
IOADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEE0. HfDRAWC
ENGINEER

PRELIMIN RY PLANS
DO NOT UE8 PO CONBTAUC170N
INCOMPLE E PLANS
00 NOT IINB POR /R ACOIITNT70N
I t~ ~ TE, CAS I L 8 1,
f ~ IN PLACE A t
~' II Ilfl NO STAGE 4AE TEA Tl~tf:- - 1 i, f1 'I ~ '' ~
I .. ~ W ` ~_ CAUSEWAY WILL BE IMMEDii~~'ftLY '~ ~ , ~P f ~ ~ -
,- ~
~, ~I j" ~ ~ ' { ; REMOVED ONE THE-DEF~OLITION OF, ~ I , ;
' ',I Penult Ming
1 I ~ I t- I EXISTING BE
~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ Y r ~ ~,~ ~ Nip #11 IS COMPLETE ,'~ ~ ' ' 'I i ~I ~` ~ ~ )L
I
r
~~ ~ ~ ~ ( I r t f ,~ ~ I i f ~ .~ , ~ .
1
1
I ;~
3 r.
' r~ t
t
O
~;
~ ~ l ', ;
1 ;
.•
t\ ,~., ~ ~Ht BEI~Ti BAtaI50h ~ j _ _ _ ., ' i IS J r~ ,
~ ,;, '~ ~ K5 TMi 2E5 ~ . \ f I I ;
r ~ ~
`, ~. a.,~ j ~ 1 1 ~ ~ i tiIYER QARS Tpyt TARS A596CIh.i •;7h:
' a-, I /
,k \A .. ~~~;.. ~ ~;,;)~ ~ ;~ i ~i ~~ P~61~i0r f
•' ~` tl j 1 -,i/ f jj' r g' RREEORA~EO scouR NoLE j~ f f
x~ !~ r ~= ~ ' ~~ I R-s' 0-2. i
' _
' ~.
;I ;
~ ~
,.
~r . ~
J
1 ~~
/ i
., ,,_..
,~' ~ a ~~ ~ '~!~
t..,
, -~~
111
,.
0 ~qP ,E ,. ~~ b r ~ ~ £""~~' E E E-~~E ~ y" ~,/~
,'
,.
.,
r ~~
s '' ` SIB t - Y / v
,.
~ '' > ~ G~~
-° ~ :, ,p? _
~ ~ <
~ ~ ,, ~
.... - .n '
~~
m.k
'-' _.____-- ~ - f - - - ~ Ncbc
' i,. '. s 'i;r.. ,.. ,
~ ~. ..
,.. - + ,. _
.~ ,r ~ ,
r, ~. .~ .~, - • .r .
.. „
..,TR''
q
a
a
x
a
~STACE 3 67AGE 4A
_..... _~ _ . L..
r
iENPORAAY AIP RAP
CA06ENAY I7TP.1
ELEY:675.0'
T~ 1
I
PE'`
2 : ~2
J:0
~~ ~!
,~~,..~z
O~,'P l~O~ PREFORME
PLAN
..w.~.~aa°~
_... .. ._. ___. a„.,~ .
- =-
- __ce ...
.. E2 ~' I . ----se ~ - TR:.
~~-
/ ""P
-.145 795 ~~~ ~ I f t / `F (~ _.' /f~ ~~~ ~
Su0E 4 ~~ Y. m I
,r,Yyy,~ '
.~ f
AY AIP AAP ~ Q ~ ~ /, ~ TJ //
r IIYP.1 ~ l.,a ~, ~'~ I Y I ~, ~' : ~ / t
L0 ; r~~ f~ ~` ~ ~ ~''~'~~ /fj~//r/~
jjfj f .~~ ~ { / /i/
f t' I I ,~..... ,~ 1,..)
1f T Jf ~ ~ A ~~ ~ f
.; }
I f ~' , ~ ~ ~~, ~~.
,,
' ~~ {
-' ;~ 1:~ ) ~r~
;.
. ~ `.
R OL EE55 LL
1 .m.~.. F F UENOWETLANOL IN ~ a43RFG 6Y
` ® MFF'ACTS INFSURFACF WATER O LV ~lll'® Y
1
ti .m ~ d' DECK DAAIN3 ARF N BE INSGLLlD ®d' CENTERS IN
ACCORDANCE WIEN THE FOLLOWING: RT: 20+92 TO 23+26
RT: 23+46 TO 26+52
RT: 26+SR TO 32+28
_... ...
---""'" ~~ ~- ~ SECiON A-A
~~ SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -L- PROFILE AND GRADE
LT SEE SHEET 8 FOR LINE -DRIVEi- PROFILE AND GRADE
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAME/FORSYTH COUNTY
PR03ECT:33483.31 (8-38351
BRIDGE NO. SS OVER
THE YADBIN R]VER
ON US 158 ICLEMMONS RDJ
SHEET OF 4/49/08

a
6Ri GE NY[ ~AULIC EjATA'
ORAIBA ~E AREA • l9 5'Sq.Mi7
DESLI ...:
DB51~ FAEOUENCY
C15CNAgCE • i0
' ~ • 1 Yq5
00 a}s
D6516N N9'E[EYA1 ON +~ 69 9 ft '
#00;1'E -DISDN • e1 00`efs ,
OVEA lNG ;FlIE NCY • y5~ 0t 'tAS
Dv~gr;
03EpT t Nc o I sc
ING ~gaE ~ N!A
- 7t1
5 }f

P
m
mM
M
I
ti
U
0
a
O
N
ti
U
O
U
See Sheef i-A for Index of Sheets
Sheet f-8 For CanvenBonolSymbols
~ 1 , -
4~ / ~ 190
,~ -
ravN OF
~,p C[EMMONS 49 2
~1'iG
1 e d.
~o % / not
G10~/ 4298
l ENO
' PROJE
/ T
158
I ~ ~m 1~
P E ~ a 3~
~ ~~' -
I
VI('INITY h1AP
70 M(
E
~~CA~~ ®~ N®~T][~ CAS®L~N~ en vEnv~wanv
~~V~~~®N ®]F ~][~GIE~~~~~ .C. 8-38:
van wnw eu
SE'18E.A1 BA9'CP
DAVIE ~ FORSYTH COU11tTIES
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.35 OVER YADKIN RIVER ON US 158 (CLEMMONS ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, PAVING, STRUCTURES, DRAINAGE, TRAFFIC CONTROL, GUARDRAIL,
PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNING, UTILITY RELOCATION AND EROSION CONTROL
Ti~~~ Nivlcu ~~ rvnnnl ule f11Uf11~1(JQI UOUnaarlBS OT I.IBmmOnS.
Clearing on this project shall be performed
to the limits established by Method III.
~~~0 -
~G
PRELIMIIdARY PLAN9
m Ror uo r°R °vanac~(r
INCOMPLETE PLANB
m Rm uae roR R/w AC°-N11°N

GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DAT PLANS PREPARRD RY: PLANS PREPARED FOR: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

0 25 o so too A

ADT 2007 = 19,388 PROJECT LENGTH

~ ~ ncrvm en
PAF75oNS
"""
~
~
DIVISION OF fIIGXWAYS

1090 Birrh Ridge Dr. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

ADT 2030 = 35
400
LENGTH ROADWAY a++~ Raleigh, NC 176/0

PLANS , TIP PROJECT B 3835 = 0.472 MI Ippy STANDARD SPRCfFICAr/ON5

50 25 50 100 DHV = 12 %
D = 65 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B 3835 = 0.217 MI VICTOR M. CHAVEZ. P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER P.R
Sff,NA7URE:
P8
T = 9 0~ TOTAL LENGTH OF T1P PROJECT B-3835 = 0.689 MI ROADWAY DESIGN srArE DESrcN ENCnvEER
PROFILE ~HORIZONTAL~
10 5 0 10 2 V = 50 MPH LETTING DATE;

SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 DAVID GARRETT

PROJECT DRSIGN excDfEER ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIMSTRATIO
' ITTST 5% + DUAL 4°k)
PROFILE ~VERTICAL~ P~ nPPn~~
DMS10N ADSDMSFRA7'DR DAiE
SlGNA7VRE:

.-
P
N
SURVEY CONTROL SHEET B-3835
BL

POINT
OESC,
NORTH
EAST
ELEVAT]ON
L STATION
OFFSET BM1 ELEVATION 753.08
N 825420 E 1576347
3 BL•3 825311.2422 1578346,9959 754.89 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS L STATION 9.50
4 BL•4 825745.8135 1578979.4655 747.51 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS S 6B' 11' 57.3' W DIST 841.94
1 8-3635-1 826146
2150 1579550
4290 726
73 14.13
32 22
99 R 2.5' CHISEO SQUARE IN SE CORNEA
!L BLit .
826531.1199 .
1580109.3274 .
713.55 .
28.93.19 ,
38,61 T
RT OF CONCRETE SECTION AT ENTRANCE
5 BL•5 827151
6832 3764
1581010 713
58 3l •87
26 42 TO K[NIDERTON 61' FROM CENTERLINE
2 8.3835.2 .
827576,5610 ,
1581572,4660 .
720.47 .
38.88.11 40,
45.32 RT
LT OF US 156 18.2' FROM HYDRANT
6 BL•6 827873.3816 1582169,4211 730.94 45.54.76 42,87 LT 19,5' FROM CENTERLINE OF OI
7 BL•7 828816.7728 1582583,3113 738.20 OUTSIDE PROJECT L1M]TS ~~~~~~~~~•~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ A R
~ $ ~
~, Y Y Y
~ ~ 31
E ;~1~ _ n
~, '' ~n ;-., n
CPS
tic
~9~ eR~O
/1~ r
1V
SHEET N0.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
co w°r vs w caaTxanaE
INCOMPLRTE PLANS
00 N°I' °R P°R R/R ~°p9i11m1
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEIf DEVEIOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED Ok THE STATE PUWE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BI
NCDOl FOR LtONUIIENT "I2102~"
WITH NAD B3 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHINf>r8288029093ffDEASTING 15844451T1Mft1
THE AVERAGE L1~ItBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
fGRDUND TO GRIDI IS; 0999Ai054
THE NL.UWBERT GRID BEARING AND
IOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FR011
"I2102.8" TO.1• STATION 9+0000 1S
S 61 ° OB' 1520" W 6.OB2,81'
All LINEAR DIBENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERT ICAL DATUM USED IS NGVD 29
"~P
~J
~~
0
.................... .......
BM2 ELEVATION 711.42
N 827150 E 1581983
L STATION 32.54.75 111.40 RIGHT
R/R SPIKE IN BASE OF l8' ELM
~~Q ,
~ ~
/ ~~ ~
1

i
F~
~~•
a!`'
••
P0.01ECT REFERENCE N0.
BM3 ELEVATION 732.87
N 927699 E 1562666
L STATION 47.93,79
S 89' 25' 41.7' E DIST 298.89
R/A SPIKE [N BASE OF 24' PINE
-"-- R= Rsl• °~~Rr ~
_.--~._
GPS MONUMENT 83835-2
N= 821576.561D
E_ 1581572.4680
NOTES:
THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING
PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:
HTTP: \WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC. USPRECONSTR UCT/HIGHWAY/LOCATION/PROJECT
SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.
IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
®INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL
BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
PROJECT CONTROL ESTARI,ISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.
NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE

~,,' ,

N
m W
za W
?a
U~
N- Z
~ _L_ UH
~ z
'
" ~
10
-0
6'-0" 12'-0" B'-0" VAR. 12'-0' TO 3Y-0" VAR. 12'-0" TO 32'-0`
11'-0" WiGR (SEE PLANS) ISEE PIANSJ 11'-'
VARIES 0' TO 11,78' VARIES 0' TO 6.51' •

ORIGINAL GROUND VARIES D' TO 29.50' • • VARIES 0' TO 18.98' •
0 5 4--0" Cl Dl El 15" GRADE W 15" El Dl Cl 4'-p"
?~ a U FDPS POINT FDPS
ORIGINAL GROUND S OPE LE ~ 0 p,08 D,_02 0,,_,02 0.02 0.02
Z LL
6;1
T U
GRADE TO THIS UNE
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.1 FOR:
-L- STA. 9+00.00 TO STA. 14+40.00 +/-
-L- STA. 35+00.00 +/- TO 45+37.73 • •
-L-
VAR. 24'-0" TO 30'-0" VAR. 24'-0" TO 30'-0"
SEE PLANS
ORIGINAL I 1 (SEE PLANS)
GROUND 4' OR 10' VARIES 11.78' TO 26.00' VARIES 0' TO 16.18'
!'q 14'WiGR (FROM 14+40 TO 17+001 (FROM 14+40 TO 17+
lS R SEE X SECT.
F~xSFOPjo 0.02 ~ 6"_ I R1 C1 D1 POINT W D1
s~ -x-'11 p,_pz D.oz
ORIGINAL ~P~•~'~G 0151 L! t:' ;i:.i
GROUND E'~~ - - - - - -
ls~ T s_~~
zl
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
C1 PROP. APPROS. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SVRFACE COURSE, TYPE 59.50,
AT AN AVERAGE PATE DF 168 L93. PER 60. YD. IN EACH OI TWO LAYERS,
[/2 POOP. APPRD%. I1"V" ASPHAL7 CONCRETE SVRFRLE COUflSE, TYPE Se.SL,
AT AN AVEAAf,E RATE DF 169 LAS. Pf.R S0. YD.

~3 PROP. VAR. DEPTH A6PHALi LOIICRETE SVRFACE COURSE TYPE 59.5L,
PLALEOAIN~LAYERSTNOTFLESS THAN P17"STN OEPTHEOR IGAEATfA' TD BE
THAN 2" IN DEPTH.
Dl PROP. APPRD%. 1" q$PHAIT COIICREIE INTEflNEDIAIE LDVASE,
TVPE I19.OC, A7 AN AVERAGE BATE OF 456 LBS. PEA 30. Y0.

DZ PROP. YAR. DEPTX ASPHALT INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE I19.OC,
AT AN AYEPAOE RATE OF 114 LBS. PEfl 30. YO. PEA 7" DEPTH,
TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS N07 LE55 THAN 41~" IN DEPTH OA
GAEA7EA THAN 4' 1N DEPTH.
E1 PROP. APPRD%. 6" ASPHAL7 CONCRETE BAbE GOUR6E, TYPE NiS.Ot, AT
AN AVERAGE RATE OF 158 CBS. PEA 90. YO. IN EACX DF TWO LAYERS,

EZ PROP. VAR. OFPTM ASPHALT RA6E COVRSE, TVPE BES.OC,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 106. PEA 54. YO. PEfl 1" DEPTH,
70 BE PLALEC IN LAYERS fIOT LE33 i114N 3" iN DEPTH OA
GREATER THAN SN," IN DEPTH.
R1 2' 6" CONCRETE CVRB AND GUTTER.
RZ 9" k IB" CONCRETE CVRB,
R3 5" MONOLITHIC CONCRETE I9LAND (KEVFD~INI.
S /" CONCRETE bIDEWALK.
T EARTH MATERIAL.
EXISTING PAVENENT.
IN VAR, DEP7H ASPMALI PAVENENT, ISEE SiD. WEDGING DEIAIIS, TNI6 9NEET)
NOTE: PAVEMEN7 EDGE SLOPES AAE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHEARISE.
O PLW RYVIIO Nn PROJECT REFERENCE N0. SMEET N0.
~ ~ PARS_DNS B-3835 2
_~•/ °1F ~ ROADWAY DESIGN PAVFAAEM DESIGN
~pnWR Nlq ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRBLIMIN RY PLANS
IJO NOT tlu CONrf1LiJCF10N
INCOMPLE E PLANS
DD Nor vu L94 w ,LwEmmolE
6;1 O
T ORIGINAL GROUND

Z ?'/
K

~
j •
VARIABLE
LL SLOPE
~ ~
z o
L
ORIGINAL GROUND
30'-0"
1Q = FROM -L- STA, 9+50 TO 14+00,-L-, RT SIDE
SEE CROSS SECTIONS
ORIGINAL
4' OR 10' GRO D
la' w,GR
SEE % SECT.
1
S
~
0.02 ti.1 ,~~Ot
~~~',~ 5EG
~ `S
-- yqR
~---
1 ~
_
7
k F
"~Y ORIGINAL
,,, ~rlp,_ GROUND

1 12" MIN.
v Wedging Detail for Resurfacing
E2 El Is" - ls"
U El
GRADE TO THIS LINE
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.2 FOR:
-L- STA. 14+40.00 TO STA. 21+02.00 +/- BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA. 32+50+/- (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 35+00.00 +/-
CL -L- IUS 158)
E2
USE INSET A FOR:
-L- STA. 35+00+/- TO 45+37.73 RT. & LT,

INSET A
W ~
z
4' OR 10'-D" = w
14'-0" W/GR ~ '~
ORIGINAL SEE X SECT. g
GROUND z
/sFF~gR ?.7
k R1
sFCr'k~k
IpN o.02
~
1,-D„
SI

~ ~~51
ORIGINAL NPR ~cEGS10

~ snwcuT

C~
TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE
-L- STA, 21 + 02 +/- TO 32 + 50 +/-
FL SURVEY
Detail Showing Method of Wedging

N
~ -Y-
p-0,.
SAWCUT
y
J
VAR.
VAR. 4'
VAR.
~ (SEE PUNS) (SEE PLANS) (SEE PUNS',
m GRADE VV
POINT
~? a~ o.oz
X

U
CONCRETE ISUND

1
~
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 3

-YA-
3 VAR. (SEE PUNS) VAR. (SEE PLANS VAR. ~
Y Y
m Cl GRADE R3 W ~ m
POINT
F Ve AR. Ve A_R. ~ F
N VI
W ~ ~ >C
PROP. COII NCRETE
El Dl IS RNOCATEON}NS U T
GRADE TO THIS LINE 4
TYPICAL SECTION N0.
CL -Yl-
ORIGINAL
4' GRO D
SEE z SECT. 5
~l
11 S\0~
F ~ 0.02 ~~~ ~, 5~'C
`5
~q
~ /s R.
1 AF k, F~ "I'L' ORIGINAL
GRADE TO THIS LINE
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.4 FOR:
-YA- STA. 10+70.30 TO STA. 11+25.00
VAR. SEE PUNS VAR. SEE PUNS
Use exist.xslope GRADE use a%iaf.%61OPC USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.5 FOR;
or as dvecled POINT or Ds directed
EXIST. by E~ n_gineer by Engineer EzlsT. -Yl- $TA,10+44.00 TO $TA.10+93.80
~- -~
~ .. .. ~ ~ ~
i ~
T U T
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 5
CE -DRIVE 1-
VAR. VAR.
4' (SEE PUNSI ISEE PUNSI 4' b'
rs~ z,,~
k ff
~Nfy
,.~ ~ / E1 ~~'~ E~~
ORIGINAL GROUND (~ GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION N0. b
PL0.N IIIPARm Hn PROTECT REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
Pr AR5~~5 8-3835 2-A
~ ~ R ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
~sa+ms ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
Da Nar WH CONAT'RDCDION
INCOMPLE PLANS
DO NOT DRH IDM /~ ACOUARIDN
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.3 FOR;
-Y- STA. 10 + 74.20 TO STA,11 + 15.00
ORIGINAL GROUND
Npa M1.~ E~OYL51
,SEED'S USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.6 FOR:
-DRIVEL- STA. 10+52.02 TO STA. 11+30.00
_ ORIGINAL GROUND
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
C1 3" ,TYPE G9.5C.
D~ 9" ,TYPE I19.OC.
ET 8" TYPE 825.OC.
EZ VAAIABIE DfPTH, TYPE B26.OC.
RT 2'-6" CONCRETE CRAB ANO CUTTER.
RZ 9" z 1B" CONCRETE CURB.
A3 E" MONOLITHIC CONGAETE ISLAND (KEYED~IN).
T EAflTH MATER [AL.
[J E%ISTING PAVEMENT,
W VAAIABIE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
I SEF STD. WEDGING DETAILS, SHEET 2)
NOTE: PAVEMENT E06E 9LOPFS AAE 1:1 UNLE65 SHONN OTHERWISE.
SEE SHEET 2 FDA DETAILED P0.YENENT SCHEDULE.

-L -
PlSlo I3+7189
D = 4'4l`P8B(Ul PI Sia Zd+3~30
~ = 917'289'(RT
D =0'3/'(23' D = ~2P511
T
~
7= =
10D0'
= 92 ~= 4
~
SE
R+mlcff ^ N/A RLxblf = 90'
Vd = 50 mph Yd = 50 mph
1
~-
PISb N+7065
~= 33'2f 059(Rfl
D = 38'N'~9'
T = ~45~
R = 150110'
SE ^ See X Sedlau
V4~25 mph
r ~'~

, uF Y ~
Pr Sla I(+3098 PI Slo J2'h9!]7
' ~
'
' '`
£
3'39'331(Rfl
~ _ 3P296(LTl
~ = 5 R ~ fi "~
~
~
_
~_ ~2' f5l D =!5539'156' n + ~,' ,~
R
7 R d ~ ~
=
228800'
Vd = 5D mph = 11200'
Vd = 50 mpA ~ I
;~ + ` °-q1'`~.
~ ` , °'
1 d Y 1
9 N ~3)
l s i

d 1
y
O ~ ~ t ~
"
~ ~ ,
JY
n t ,. " -Y-
I
?I d rj ~ _
-
L
si
r~~ I
f•
t'~ ~~'
~ I

-
-

S~
`~
~'~ r 1 (
t
r , ~
~ ,~ ~
,
, ' ~ ' 1~
' ` ~~

~
ii
.
' P17T 9+0000
L . ,
' ~
;~
r r
'; BEGIN PARIECT 8-3835 r 1 r ~, ~
,d
"~
~ #'~" ~9 R
, ,~
r ~ E It
.
< t:a:a ,I.:+~ iM ~ r
t 1 .
' ~ Ij
~ '~ COLLAR AND E%TEND f,~n ~" ~N 1~ ~
Z EXIST IB ACP E ~~f~nrE~~~"fu' "'~B~w~MH
y a A _ ~ ~,h4T 'N m d 1 rp °<~t G2R5$ YNN NIAI COVER y.
»-.: _ ._: _: . ._ iw. ~ ~, Y _ t't7 f s ~ £ ~ rr~ ~">"`~1!'e~Lr(3T SM0.00 ~~ .. . ~ .~ ~3.2~
~ 63.00 t 33 "n,;T"EX' YY t 1 03~.0f0 '1
-i ~x1.A:,ta 6800 FQ`~r,{ ~E%IST. RaY '' s~ jia`f ~ Itl - yl
~;? _ ,~~ a.PSw+r.. ~ ~~e,~.~aaa .6~~90'TMER ao"RCP
= ~'~=, ..- '" + " -" .., ". PrapDrAro see i Ij ~~ +aoo •_'~ vdnw ~~
EX6T RW I a
r7~R7
N0.
~b
\, MN 10.P0.0.E00.Rr
~ PAR5ON5 _- -
8-3835 _. __.
4
~~, RA4 SHEET N0.
Y DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ROADW
~.,:~, h?w RP19h A
ENGINEER ENGINEER
` f'~
~

,~ ' ° aarXU e-a YI JYY04 ~. ,, `'q 4~°~
~
f,;,'"` F ~,,
r pAAIL SLEEVE M EMO r ~.
' •.., \,,
~ e 4
~
+
,,~
r'"' SUSPEAD fY F1P7Y DEq
eEnEElr liEAYS '~'» ~"`° ~ \
,
'~\
~ ~
a
~~ ,, ~ ~., ~.,
~ Y y
~ ~ ~
J 1115 it C
r N~~ ~a
~. ~ ~Ai
6 /
P' 1 ~
~,
fiF~,
a
t~' _~ ~ ~~
,F.',.,E *,...S,E ~'3' y,') it vR
~, ~'
~`3yr
~'.....i I, 9R14FlJI1rNw
1
,. •:
+ ~ ~ %l VY
b. .
, OVE SPECIAL CUt DITCN ? ~ t i _~ ~ r`i I E%IST W~,Y X '~ ~~, ` ~t f, ~I i +d _ ~ l~'rgi C
' SEE DETAIL 4~ S. ~ I 1N a{i ~ .. t. ~
~:- am _ .~. _ .... E.,_ ...... ___ (~.'a.,.......,..C ° , h..1.1 ..._...,y..'.°'f {~.~ ~ _ 0 9 ~ C 6RAll
~_,..:_..._._.,.........~,...... ...,~. _,....., ,_._ ~ ~ r
/ &4.W .d;'~- N. r' .. GRAU 150 REM.. ~ PI li ~( - gm1L~Y'R?S?._..._-~
ry
4
rY ..
- A art'""
""'~ _.. ~ e 'zXrn~ i +z •"^. F o.- m Zpa6 - C! ,^rea.
f
o ~ ,
p.' R t FtSP~ " N 1 '~ M cR 15" ~p
c • .+ 1
~h ~--RETAIN ~j -I~t ETAM-. \ /..
~ t
.. r... ~.
rc w-YCVeavX' wrrw ~1.1~ .. ,. .,. _ - :. _ _ e ... .....". _ s, P` _ ~ .. ; s-.^ .°.~+~'.-w rre. Y' i ~Y'F. V"LZr*rr
~}'' , +t ~~,»~ ~ ,r >R a. _ ,. ~ ~ a . ~~ r~ ~ t~ V'y~3.c~ xT _r,~ r x
~ .,~ .~:...,..,. ~ _...t ~ .,~.~.~.. mom. x~~
... ~`x~~. ~ a aiAS3 ~ ~ --'='~r - " ""~,-~r ,'~ - ~---~ _,....~, I ~~ " ,~ ~.zc ..... ... "'""°as",°a,
~'refit}'~u'a~~':3~'`Etis~'ta°`'~`° °~~ my- ° b:ct €m -T--,..,"^ w..J i
r~~ '
~~~sr~c~r?ATT~ ~ 7
ra T,4':A ~ X "0"PY LF_P Yki .,, ° ~~~~, "~~ ~. ~S ~IAT 'Y'DITCH S 'r~"'.~,~~~q~ ~+u^ EA99T. RN! ~r''. -~~ ~"'Liv,
eta:g i E&'A5g +. :^ ~ SETaR D2n~t 0 S 7GRf G>'F6 d r ''~a* .a 'v,~, RE~ItOVE DI //~~ _ ~'.,,,~' ~ - ~w
h ~ ~' f'~ EG'7 PSAM "°~ CSc;r"4! La iAk 8 96.' ^~ tXRY«G ~ CON Cl TB1B p'g( ~ i~ ~.i ~~
! !? '~ _ ~ _ ~3 5'tECh~11 TI'~L T ' ~'``. 7
3 ~ T"~`ti-. 3 ) 4 +~e.6T
._ ~ r~ ~ pF~K: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~a tad ~~ ..~~ "` ' ~# k,~•.
w °'w, j .„.~ I ~ Z EXIST a„
__ c8 ~ r.§&.,-^ PiOdT,WE "~ y o-~~ ~. ,id dY h~",1
I ?. ~xJ) S T' I •~~ : i> `y'wl ~ '£1"° End CBG ~=d +7R,oo kT3ELY:, 4l.C ~ ~ k '~'~
3tl ~1 ~ ~. ~ ;~;'~„ ~-~ S ~~~_...~,~.,,1~fi1~' tL~ _ + ~ 2R~ a~c:aa2at>~G ws ~ W '~
i >d~~ ]' ~ ,~~ ~ p1 ~ a ' r
s.....__...1 ! ~ ". `^,,. R 4!": ~ y it 40 ~ ~ - i rr PLUCa17" CMP ~ ,4~ 1 ~~ F~S£
~ t~r~ [~ x x ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ soap ~ t ._ ~. ~ ~ ~~ `y~l~
. ~ p ~ ar~p cap ~ 1 ~ '"`~- - t'- r + dp ~ tr
c•a_, .I ~# NR~TN~Q*~i`.€.+3d ~~A a l 3 .} .~'.. dP
5 tl L ~'r F6 4 fG 7s I4r .'"~ ~ ~ A ~` ~ T @ WA6'AT7 ~ y'
~~~ "~t`3~ ~~ ./°~~s~,dt~x; ~ Q ~I<g~~~ ~ ro 1, 'a~ ~ ~ `~ .~ 'J {/ ~ $' ~r~~~"''a,A.
~~ ~,Frt~a.ee audr ~. 'ter ~,1 ~ Y y ,: ~ ~' a ~ ~ a~RSS ~+~''R<
Lacs I'd3 PG tan ~ ,r'~ ,f~ %~° `~ 4' J /j d ,,~ ~~`'*, /}
Ft3 a, r6 79 ,,••. / a6 F~~ G~^`~~tl }~,//~ ~ _> 49~g C~ ¢ f of ~ °~S~ }'~`k"t sL' ~~`tif^
y ' a0 ~ 41 ~ ~~4'~"'~ ~1~ ~p tr ` r , ~ ~{ t^ • A ';~/ t"~^ `~ 1 °"r~m
~~~"` W III J ~ ~ `~ sY~tsw~ly/°~£~ r'41 °!~ - `~ r /jl..- r~r~ ~ ~'
ELEtg1~1~A0'N ~'A- POI' 12+5ID0 ~ ` ~ DENOTES PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED
I s 60'psT.Y1 8A91' DETAIL ~ /. ~^'~~`
(~ DETAIL SPECIAL CUT DITCN k(L DETAIL FSL d' DECK DR41N$ ARE TO
~I sPECIALIATERAL'V' DITCH (Not to Swl.l ~~~ FALSE SUMP of °.~ ACCORDANCEWIIH THE
v
( No11o Scale! ~ Dw,ld. ouch
Nmurd ( NHII Nahttol ..Ei~~,~~ TmR~ Flow 2.
Grwnd U,1 p ~~t ~~ Grourd Y'CC u~ ~ =~._ -QI ~ I
D:t y )(
_ -L- 12100 k 14+0 RT - I_D N ~~ 6.I +~ pIT03E PROFILE ~ , -S"' I Netro Smle 1 «;.
h+•..,,,,. -l- 9+50 b 11+32 lT. ~ S•Olkh Slop ¢ ProPmN Okh t
'\ -1-11+32 LT kf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
~1
1
Z1
~ I
I
~p0~1D
~ i§ i;?
.- ~
t
..r 1232 `r~ .
1 ~,
S ~r \s
Q
Fr": ~' 4.
~a .. L~E`4T 5 a-~T"E L3f::txa'C"i
~~~
R ` O
,/ teS~ ~
Y 1E6.BJ ~ t ,1 ~~' `9
~ ~,da 7T `~EG1N BRrDGE
' ~ ~~, ~ dr} t. e% fai S4 N
,: ~~. Cry ~ a t ~h. %~ W ) 4
~,ry >• r. 1, r R f ~ ~'~ ~~ ~dT Z
+ :4 rr ° ! H
w,.
M 4
_t. 1
pruL
w~~
tt~YE°SN~$i
CL ~~^rY
I @ d'
RT: 70t
RT: 27+
0.i; 26+
j .`
s
i
F~D @ Ud
r~ -`

`y i .fit. ...
~ ~ ~1 ~ y .. ~{' 4
~ +
~ p
F
~
~ Q +10.00 cA
P '~1 F7~'~ { ~
~' ~
~ ~
~
,
a
i~ fJ
~
~~~ E
~~
TYP u~
~
a O

? Rln~ ~ ~
f
N - O
o
_1
,... ... .....,~,
"~-!AI o
a fV
N
~~ !L R ~ EE
w „°eg, r ~~ ..
Q

~ ~ ~ ~~~ttPHll~ Y~~3 t-
~
C
M I
~ w

.. ~
.
i "~.Yf"... H
.
y "'~~(( L Y
~~I.AT'•~ PL9„ i d -~`• •~ wvwr: r+"T`+'M•
' _ Y '~r~ "~ XEC7rz~nr
~
k
'.~
v
r{~
~.~M....~
G.,
t"~ 9D'iuDR'
L'
~
R
~f
ti
4~
O
~
~
~
TI~Z,
F
.~....
AI
__....., .~:,~ _. ...,
LL 'B'RIP RAP ~ G 6~ » •-
~" EST. 2 TONS I - .. w -` w,
~i: s .. e.rwESm...Y~. I ~ E+~+aS '~+ ~A`+'~
R,tA "~.„lsT do ~~.Yyy Ertnn E
~4~.ft ~ 4d NX t I
~~
)p~ ~~'~l~r.t
' ~ G"G55 7 ~7 ~ ~ Fp"x'0
/ "~....
>~
i,
,~"' li E~
s%i'i"4t
'j EY Tc TM>r'Y`
S-
)!
r; r
r

j L'~M PQ ~ r-0d1
~M ~A' 55 ~?J
4~~ SSEwS rl.
(
~ (. „
~ yl
r ~
EalA:a
.
~~
,n.P~,,
~.~.
SEE SHEET 5 FOR BRIDGE /ROADWAY SKETCH
SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -l- PROFILE AND GRADE
CFF C41FFT A FfIR I INFS _V_ A _VA- PROFILES AI
PRBLIAIIN
0o HVE pa Y PLANB
cm>ecxucE7^R
INC~MPL& PLANS
IKI TROT vm ToR • eWUD1770H

m E E E E +)
516.50 NOTE: 1r
HISTOFICAL MARKER Ai {
-L- STA 34+00+F lT IS
i0 RE RELOCATED.
W
~~`0 ~~
P~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
l` P 1
W ~~ f
1~ t
tib ti. f
~.. ~~ , ~ 1 ~ ~~
~. t
;~
~~~
e ~ ~~~ a>ta sd~ s~ ~3 ~ i ,'~
w e~ ~ f~, f r ~.
~ u ~ ~
j~3 .,, 3 dJ r
4 ~ ~ ) ~{ 105.1] ~ ,~^ ~ ~
Jf P,~y ~' ^,,~,tyt+~'~x 7~ r4 w'`,.. -..~_..~_-..,~ .r ~,rsP' ~,,*' • ,r Z
r
0 ~ 30.57 ~' ~ ~ 4.~r '-~.., .. .,,_ N/rr"N J 95.001 'v~
Z w ~ ~E ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .. - ~ ~ f ~ 0
p = l +i i t ~ ~?,~ tS~ I 66,60 w ~ ter`
O Y ~^^^w~ ~ ( E
F. »:
.. .. ~ ., F..• ,. ..
O ,
O ~
°o '~' N 5520P51rE
N eaY
~ ~ • • lb PVC
Q
W
Z ..._... , _ _
^+~ "~"m~"^PYL tl N 55'26'39.1'E .,. u:e.,,: xr"oxt~^i r;ue
a ~ EX~ enrosE
~ r c~><s, ~< r ?~
._. ___._... .._ .._._. C.
_-._
t ..C._ _. . -w6«. E%IST 0.AV
t
~,4 r~r~s six'v
~ o : ~(~ ~
'~ 1", KE,'!!c~TN 84k3, EUP•tdeTtE ~ ~ 4!
i - ~~5 f~8~
"' .~
~'~ ~
~Y`S ~~Vt r" ~ ~ '
GS'~55' Ui1•tY4'1 JJJ V:Xraa £
_.._.u .z6....v _.,..._.,.__ -.~...,___.._,-. ,._ _~ ,,. r
=yt S ll
21+00 32+00
~ac 71R r -62P as
lIP£ M
Z /~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ "' 3
2YPt dr ~ ' TYPE Hf
AT-I
BRIDGE/ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
rAlor ro scA>Fl
~~
A
P! S1a 20+330 P Pt SM J2i64B0
n - sm26s~r~ri o = 6~arro6.4rt;~r
D - r2r5rr D = r2q 2e~
S
T ^R~ T'
1~'
R ° ~,2DDQ7 !{ = 4+ww

Vd = 50 moh VO = 50 rtph
-DRNE1-
PI SM ~fi4lJ~
~ ^ 30'O3'OTD'rA?!
D ^ 57'IT'M6'
T=5~4'
R = IODOD'
SE ^ See X-Secflal'a
RwoEt ^ N/A
VG^15
NI ~
f
r
i
I
~ PREFORMED SCOUR F10LE
I R B=5' D-2' ~
I W=5' d I
' • 'Y ~ 1
,T"f •°~~ i '~{u/~ "
S~ ~
r tD" 3.93 j~ ~~ m
~ / 95.00 j a.! H'+T?
T~ ~h1 ~~
END BRIDGE 4s 77 F
:ice s: ?3a
I
r
f
I
_,.,_ j__._.._.....,.._.._ ._
I
r
i
!~
A
of?,;~2
~O
V ~
,~~ ~~~~
Q~~,~~
P Q~
I

~~I ~:~ iYPp ..~/~fd ~~ ~~
~ ~ I \f: !"~f ts~~ ~ TYPE-III
1
1#~ cr-~n.'xaru.rur L~ 7 ~„
O PLAIT IIV4^D m
p.A.-RS,~~. m5
. ~~P
~»
P0.01ECf A6ERENCE N0. I SHEET
ENGNEER
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
m xor ua ro aoHrlwvcrwN
INCOMPLE E PLANS
W 1R0'T WB }pll /~ ACODL4f10N
0
n?s i ".And iRUP ~' ~ NR4tiG'#t~flS h~54:3AY{f>;11
C6 19dA E ©:YG97
FC kQ Fu !sD
-L- PT St0.31+2516
k<:is'5

~ x7 ~?"
~BL- STA 7T+94~16, ~a
'
-~
/ ~ r REW7VE ~
~`.~ EXIST.PNEYEA7 J 8
``~~

,< ~
jr ~ .

•~! ~.a
~y,
,~7 / ~

n
(
S d j
d" DECK DRAINS A0.E TO BE INSTALLED @ d' CENTE
RS IN
Ft1tbTTN COl
VY1Y
ACCO0.DANCE WITH TH E FOLLOWNG: RT; 20+92 TO 24+26
0.7:23+46 TO 76+57 .
116 Ek4 PG ISi¢
RT: 26153 TO 32+2E
,
O
6
~~PAYf4EMf~
1~~J.. ,C
kS ~
~e~M
f~~ _°-
dr
DENOTES PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED
SEE SHEET 7 FOR LINE -L- PROFILE AND GRADE
SEE SHEET B FOR LINE -DRIVEL- PROFILE AND GRADE
LxI1
~;L

-YI-
PI Sta N)fi45560
~~ 33'49'!53'(LT!
D = ~~
i
SE _ SecNafs
Rwaft' = N/A
Vd = 25

-YI- PC IOf00rD0
M

~~ Q
0 a c~
R':`cE=t t:'n%s T4!~1Gifk~%E 9J2}:ti.~sti~4's hw%CinAil"?i `Q
## Cll 1~4 i'G ii~/d j
rl,aR ERpAIMp ~n PROTECT REFERENCE rvu. SHEET
PARSONS 8-3835
Rte.
~~ RM' SHEET N0.
°~~ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAWC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMIN
Ro Aar Do Y PLAINS
cannR7crwer
INCQMPL E PLANS
Ro Ear w aR /• AavmmmR
"~ r~~ ~ . `~, ~3
s "" °'' { '; r "'~ a?,z'~4,P'y?"~pp n. 1 ~ ~atss %;~ ~~~ tx< ,o. ~ `~~ I,, E ~ / ~ ~ t;~~..• Tas
~rd ~*Y~f ~ ,~~_ ,,;;, ,.nsd*"a.'d ~'~'~;`~ i _~„1 Gs~1 "''~`~.3I R I au7; ~ €isfi 1+41 itzt r~~, '~\y 1; 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ „sxsx
rra ~% ,."v ..xiY,-.. _.~ OT. #'" ~°t,.lz~„- ...s~ _._.~_....~•° S ~. d.~~,,.. ~ ~S\
,,,,+ I ~, ..qy . `2m °~ 1~ par I ~143s °-'k," $ n~2A,Rrl ~ ~i \. •~3 ~ ¢i ~snrM ~./,-'" ~C}
w ="~..~.t"f 4'~ ~ ~~ as ?~~ ~~~ `~~~,",~,~.,~ E~~ { i. ~ },,a~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 n.;~:a.~''~~r~"~j<~' ~ \ 6~ ~ t~"~~ ~''`
b.
~;€~3,' to ".>„ L• Av'~.g,~ a ~~~ ~"t ~< ~E ~ zrx r rl~',~~ ` r)tss ! ~~~ c"'
j y ~', "A ! t "t.r'S { ~ k~•J?~3 tar 'r'11 e c' r 4 \ ~ . ~ '4
~..._ y.4, a P ~ # ~, .,;.,,, } ~''r~' ~ ~q, .u' ~ '.I f~ ~ti.'13 %."ii d.,• 1 ~.. ~~ i_ ~ A 'i ,+`j C,w
~;;r ~~• ~~ ~ti ~°. . ,•t~~f~v 'J~y `~~ ~ ~' •~B~ a 1 5~ ~i>rr ~ ~ ~ ra~rr~l ~/ ~ '~t=:~rs ~ ~ , ~e- sulr€1t ~ r ~s~;,.~ say ~ E~; :~j~`a`~-0 \ \t~ '° c,
DIY ~ ~ ~.,`~., Srk ! kHcAi ~. °< GT ~' jj y3, On \ ~ ~s+~
F ~
~ `'~3~» aTt...l ~ ~.. ?r ,>z ~,~ , fi~ -_ i~"1S~er`~ ~ ..E?„ExiS"ra __.;,~.~ ~~ ,...,E % ffe ~ > .LL \a r
' ` " ~' 1 t C.¢ASS i a~ ~ rr € I r,~sss ~ t \ A r ~LSY e'SPE GCh t +
i ,v1' at 4 +YP , r°j ~~ 1"Y -#-rn k i?~ ~ ,~L \' tx~a` ,~ ~ C,LSSe~} (~a~ ~i y. 4 ~~ t1G~ ~ t'~ 1 ~\ . }Y~ ~<~ ~ ~- ~
~.. .3...,..
' "'`~ ~- _._..... ,...s ,CP ~' 1~~ ~1 \ .~'v"^~ Qvti~.ti A5aQ~lA d#N
r r ~~
f
.^. W
~ ~ ~, "~bm. ~ ~ ~ ~T ~# a~~xT~t ~csa ~ ~~'~aSSE~i POT ~ ~ t: sa! ru .,;9
u -., , ~, } _x .,..... -. r, ~ ~`' "1 3 `'a ih` § r I ~. 100,
:~rnf~~r~~trz;<r°~, ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ;._ ., ~ ,~„ .1T` ~ raa ,tt.,
,.,..... ~.,. «.,.--- '~ r1~N <'-Y+ '~Ifa J d~e ^~. ~~,,.~.~- 4 ! ~. 4 ~I,y I i..Yn ~ _.. ~ S,P~~i r r 1..,, ~(ti "~y i 5.,-.~ ~ s,~~H LT ~
,,•- { t, ` \ 1 ,~ ',;; wi: '^.r ~ ~ ~'; ~~-t ~ 3 $ ,.. '~, E s} 1; ~"~e"~ ~, ~„~ ,,~ ~ ~G - r > t,~ ~ ~. ~, ~ ~;.-~,-tr~ ~~ ~,~tm~ g 1 .~" 4„~ .:, ~,...„~~,1;~ - -PUT' Ste ~fTf0379
{
.._
""Y9 'r ~~~ ~ a ~ („~ vi ~°~~ ,~',~ ,,.f J+fkj-.~ ".,.,_ ~ i z,:,~l` ,xa u: i~ ~ ____.',...~~ ~- w1~ .._.~..^...^a~ _..ri ~~~ r3 ,* I~ s.. ~.~
~ MM~ ~ F ~ Z5 Do k,H c ... . ~{ i i ~ .~ ~ ~x~t i Y' ~ i • . S Vn v t<
o ~~~7;», rz`" use: '~z'`i .I ~ t s 8 ~~^~I~; :~ I.~ ;1t~ a `:; ~f ~; ~~ "° tn~ ~ ~ Z 5 ,/ sa 1
_ O ~eL Tir7,Erv ~, + o.oo~.. ~,. , t F.,~ ~3 ` '°~~' ~w< J JI ar r , i,-'1 s~:t ~ "i S r~.1 ~ ~ r? w.
z ~ )) 7 +R On Asraw - ~ 3~ '~ ` ~ 'j ~ ~ ~ '' f f , Y,;;
y.l . E m t 000 y,~'t 5600 ,t E RM/ ~ 'S~ 1 ~., k:. ~ RETAIN V k hO PT^`ka 7{ I~ 1 i1 ~ ,~O ~ _~ ;; ~. '
~ ~ L. sa.GO .9"+ a75a' #~" t ~'~~' ;.I t ' ~ 'ar s..tK~i ~ d • i a. ~ r~E- a ~, r ; ~ M~ i ~ r F'
rN~i ;" ~ rzx
~.,,,.- ,EXISTA i A , ~u: ~ k.• I a~ ~,~ ~ a ~ ! 1 1;1 3
w s sPn. ~ RErAI ~ ,y~,. ~~,,,~ ~ , o- I a ) ~ ;~-~' , ~~-;, 3 a wc~z<,5 ~, fit"" . ~~. .~ ~" ;i~ t 1 b 13,.., !r -q'.,
W IYP ~ r^ ~ 4'~lX'~.,--,aRGI g ~" ~ d5~~ ~ ).F f,. ~ a {pit ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~, t(~ 0
x ~ _ 'rw £ ~•b7 ~ y s~ 't3 ~ b f,: «.,~.,~~~5 s°4f'1". ~ ~. ~ ~^m+~ *",til' 7 ai" , 2°' ^ 3 5 .
(n ,.-~' J~fi+ ~~ ~~ a? ~._<'y.{~~ a~ 'G ~P:3m~ ^l u°l'i s; - a , k ~ '}y,5
& + .59 , Ur ~ w } `.1 r1~r' 3 41Ff SdTrP. * 3 : Yr9'rt 43. ~ '% 2 %r,~LT'
I n` . 1 ., Y FXI51 AAV l~ Srs LYA 1 ... 96 .LS~:S + ~ 3 ~ I.F %~ , ij d ? t+ °tG.. a<
4 -„ _
~,„ ~ ~ ~" F ~ mss. ce F" ~-ctto a .F.. _-_.,.~......._. .F.~..._ ~F. _ ~ Fs"+i,SS~ ~, ',~,~{ I ~.
..
.. -. ... .
U .y ~ ~ ~ CB .. ,'
i -BL- ,~ N.
,.,... x _.. ,-+r^ ,~ k~.ibi?4~ '" 67'9'°lT6~f
. ,.. ,..
,.
,.~
~ - - t~ at ias ter' ,f !ra7arr 63'2('055 1~ vi; ¢ r ~~
0 0 .....
O .~-
o -- _
o .~ ._-_... ,, _.. ......
AIN
x. ... TsH~i cB - ~ ,,~r r~s^,: r°. tl ~,~ ~.._.,°~~" ~ I~~-cs EAR ~ di, n-.,.,, .,~r~~¢&~~ .,~ 'r =xr ~ r
+ _.. ,. ... ., ~ .v 4 .. x'. ,. .,-.._. ,,~' * M.mw ~<^~~".~-~~~K~~'~',d'S3i .sse. ~ ~~'.'+}~ `~
M »- ._""~~! w CB rw+~y`-4` s14~L. .. .. r ,r>~"-- -...~.~.sa ~--~.,;~ 5-~ ur x"' ,r .. ... 4.,s1r• ,...~. - ~ _ r~
~ %`:_ r A. tts~,,,ry ="i~biiR ~`~f
4~, , ' ~ _ „..,,-.,.. 4~ ~, ,. ,~~. w -- ~ _ __ _ 36 ,sr" ~''!x.r!1~. rh x° ~.~'!bf. -. i '+.~ta~~ :>,s*. \ ~! ~, ~; ~ '. ii
N ~ fi4~~ -^_E~'(C~E 50.00 E%Aryy~L'RRIPRAP F FE E E~ ~ § E E ExrsT.ww 1`~, ~ 'c~~
.?'ry.t^) -•Jr .ft:^...rrr~~~. ""~ r `i+C7'S ESi 5 i0N5 "rY:"'+S \~Sfc; 7 . ~ ~ r
w + o o E ~ rt~x, Ez. PAY -~~~ -BY2- POT 815604
LQ9,44 EST. 14 SYFF E%. AAY EX. RN4
2 Ex15 . RM' 75,00 ~ ~, +00.00 S'~3:AT's'L' POT 45*565T (4L3T lTl ,.a 'k~ 1
~., - PlKI°,2'~CdG 83835-2 PNC 44H212
85.00 CE'T' RIP AAP
~ea~5 -YI- PUf N~64J5 ~ -BYh POT 6~3T.66 ,~, ,~ s.oo ~~ ~,,
= EST. 15 TONS C
~ -L- POf 38+6129 {~ PO 49Z ( L EST. 30 SYFF ~ ~r^ } -L- ~}
~ ~' ~`~ ~`
~ ;~,~rvyw+;,~wa-~~t;.~~. ~;,;~",- r,,,, .="*,n, ''`^Jr~,..~`a .4^~r.~ ~t~~ 75.00 s,^^;;s 7s.oo S{ ~;~ sa.oo pNROJEGT 8 3&3~ ~ ,'F2 ~s
' ~~G*URS' .;"..r :i, s,. is„Ll i ^.a . er.;.t ~..'-u?v°i+ G?S7iN i"NsiTY 60.00 ~f
txiE:3 fBffrA ~•y ~E
0~~~!
O ~ 8 E1E1: ;,~ ~~ f
t^~`5 ~ Icy
~ ~f`
inwk ~ ~
~' ~~~
-&.- STA 55+653 ~+~~ i ;`~¢~
~, ~: -L-Pot 47103.79 ~ 1 ,
ri S 8945'47' E 28608' 4: t
7
~, ,$ P
i
0 1 k
~~~ .
SEE SHEET 8 FOR LINES -L- AND -Yl-
PROFILES AND GRADES
3
a

BM #1 ELEV. 753.00
2.5" CHISLED SQUARE IN SE CORNER
OF CONCRETE SECTION AT ENTRANCE
TO KINDERTON, 61' FROM CENTERLINE
OF US 158,18.2' FROM HYDRANT, 19.5'
FROM CENTERLINE OF DI.
~- POT STA. B+50.00 S 60^11'57.3" W
DIST. 841.94'
OJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET N0.
B-3B~5
~DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEF0.
PRELIMINARY -PLANS
ro NOM A18 Mak EaRilAOC7mN
INCOMPL B PLANS
0o Nor oa AOl iw AfAU191foN
SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- LINE PIAN
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

BM #3 ELEV. 732.87
Rot SPIKE IN BASE OF 24° PINE
-L- POT STA. 47+03.79 5 89^25'41.7" E
DIST. 288.Q8'
PAOIECT REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
8-3835 8
)AGWAY DESIGN HYDAAUUCS
FNGINEEA ENGINEER
PRELIMIIdARY PLANS
~~~~~~
INCOMPLB PLANS
Ro Nm v$ eat n AcarmTmN
SEE SHEET 6 FOR -L- LINE PLAN
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
SEE SHEET' ~ Ftw -Y- M'D -YA- uxE nws
SEE s~EEr s FTMt -owv~- PLw
SEE SHEET 6 fQ4 i'1- IIAYE PLW
10 11 12 10 11 12 10 11 10 11

2.5 5 PRO1. REFERENCE NO. SHEEP N0.

1 1 1 1 5 E O E 7 0 5

S.S. 42. 4
~ ' ~?a
0.0
0
0
02
_~
--

w -- -- -
~"
\

i~
10+ 0.00
_
_
` ~
~.

_ ` .

_ .
~' 6 ,1 0.0 0 0 020
3
-- -- - -- _ :1
73 .820
S.S,
38.9
2
-
- _
+ .
--
_
_' ,
_?
_~
3
~ ,
-
--
--
-
:l
41.2 0
+
0.00 S. .741. 3l

-
- -- -
-
---
__

i 1

I
I ~\
\I
^ .

~~ '~

r
I
1
'~
~.

.a

EGIN

PR

9 +

JECT

0.00

9+

0

m
0
D
1
1 - -
1
1

0_ 2, 5 5 PROD. REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
~
t 1 1 1 0 6 0 E 0 i

TIE 0 E IST. RIVE
-
- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - r -
7 9.17

S.S. 33. 37

_ -
30.8 0

- -- - -- -- 3' 3: 6 1 0.0 0 .020
S. . 73 .52
11 + 0.00

~,
o
C
__

- S.S. 39.4 5
J
K
-
-
_
6
1
0.0
0
0
020
t .~/
h
n
n
~,

7

.8

0

S.

. 734 ~

414
..
~~
~ -

'
~.

T
/I-
16
11 +
0.00

'~ > > i i b o e o

0 2.5 5 PRO1, REFERENCE N0, SHEET N0,
~ -85 3
t t t t G o

ti~1 o.o a
-
-- .020
-
--
-
-

' S
72
475
~ -- - --
. . .

14 + 0.00

- - -- -- -- -- - 4'l
3' - --
~ ,~ 24. 00

--
_/
14 + 0.00

.S. 7 6.64
_ _ - -- - -- - _ 4:1 3;1
-- - -
~•.
72
.50

_ _ .~
n
6 1 0.0 0
- .020
-
o .~ - t - -

v
o
o
i
v
',~

-

~

_

-
-

~

^'

~ _
_

_
C
LQ

PROJ. REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
B- 5
~ ~ ~ ~ 5 E O 1 0 5

M
XIST.
BRIC
W
LL

~ M ~
i

N
~
~
~ ~
~

--
J
i -
i
i
i
i

i
_ _ 16 + 0.00

N
~~ 0.0 0 .020 ~ '

~--
--
-- __ --

-- -J
15+
0.00

m

0
L
Y
TIE
0 E
IST.
RIVE
J
J
1
Z

0.0

0

•020
M
m
~
~
^ ~
N . . ~~
s
a 15+ 0.00
- -
m
ti

03-MAR-20D8 12:19
8/23/99
J~\83 3835\T IPATRg4CZe3u
~ _~~sc~tsJn.7a _nu i _nr~_~ n~v.ogn
I
I

I I
I I
I

~
I
I
I I
I
,
~
1 I
I I
I

'
I
' ' I
I

~ J I
~
`
V I -Q
I I N ~
I
C.,,~ \
~ ~ ti ~
I
1 ~
~

I
I I I
~
1722 23 72 .~ 7 72 .512
I
I I
I 1

~
J 1
~
N ~ ~ I
0 o w

/ ~
~ /

I J ~J
O . O
O
Q O
O 1

O Q
I N N N
I
I
I 1
I
I I
7 2.2 72 .17 72 .33

I I
I I
~ I
~ I ~ I
~
O
~ ~
N
~ ~ ~
O
~
~ I
i
\ ` o
N
N
\ \
\ \ 9
A

1 O
A

`

\ T
m
m
` 0

\ \
` \
2
` m
y
~ Z

03-MAR-2008 12:19
~ ~ or~~ A/72/4Q
6~3dd~7 ~ A7 PbJZJ' I~tCi-- -
I -
I
I
I
I I
I I
I

I
I I

1 I
i
I
I
I
I
I

~I
~ I
I

~
I C3~ I
N I
r? ~
N
O

C~,,~ •~

I I
.J

I I
~
172 .30 I
I 72 .33 72 .48
I
I I
I I
I

~` I
I

°ol
I
~ I
I
~
I
I I
I
~
~
1 J
T~

I
I
I
i o
0 / o
0 I I
i
~ o
N I
I a
N I
I
I ~ I
I I I
I
j 719. 73 I 719. 7 I 719. 4
I
I
I

~ I
I I
I

I ,~., I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I f ~ o
~ I I
\ I p
m

~ ~ I
I ~
W Z
m
Z
\ \
2

\
~ m
O

0 2. PROI. REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0,
~.~ B-38 5
1 1 1 1 E D E D

,~ W
Z
-- -- -- F
0 025
:~

' S. . 714. 73

"- _~
z "

20+ o.oo

M

~ N
~
025
. .

- - -- - - -
_~
'
" S. . 715 434

p

.¢ -- - -

S.S
-
708.
-
34
-'

9 +

.00
m 1 1 1 1

U3-gMAgtt L35UUtl IL:Iy
J0038~02\TIR~R~$c~~a~ '
~sc\83835_RDY_XPL_LREV.dgn
~ T LI ~
\ ~
~~ I
~
r? I
I
1 ~
~ , ~~

1 TC LIN
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
r

0
~

1 o
N
~

I N
O
+ ~
~
~
O
O ~
~

I
I
1

I
I
I
I
~,
~ I
0
N
U
U
0
A

I T
T
A
Z
m
Z

m
Z
O

03-MAR-2008 12:19
A/7'3/99

T LI

I ~ ~
I ~
I ;p
~ ~ I
( r? I

I 1
I ~
I ~
I AT HLIN E
I

~ rn
1 ~
1` W
N I v
+
rn
~ ~ ~

CO
O r
+
N
\ ~

18.3

I
I
I
I
I
,~vJ^~) ~
' ~, o
N
\
'
_V

~
(
W ~ ~

I A
0
A
I r
m
A
Z
n
z
O

N
S.
~D m
y
Z

03-MAR-2008 12:19
A/~'i/99
J0p3~~,}~~ ~ lA~~~S~Z`.J~ 1C1,c~tf~a~~ _nur _nr~_~ ncv.agr,
MA HLI E A LI E 1

` ; 1
\

I
1 I

\ ~~ \
\ ~I \

~~ 1 1
~ \ r? \
\ J ~ ~ , \ ~
1
~ 1 \ •:
\ 1 1
~ MA CHL NE \
1 TC

\
1 1

716 7
\ .
\ 1
~
1
I
I

\ o I o

~
Z
~
I 0
o
\ 0
\ ~ 1
i

N
\
rn w
(.J
1
I ~- \ -F-

O
\ N
-{- o
O \ ~ ~
1
1 ~. 1
1 0 1 0
0 1 0

~ 0
~ 0
1
1 1
1

i ~
~ ~~
~~ ~
~ ~
~~
rn
~

i ~ o
~

i ~
~
I ~ a
A
T

~ m
m
Z
n
z
O

1

/
0 m
~1
r o

0 5 PROI.REFERENLE N0. SHEET N0.

1 1 1 1 5 D '' 0

--
~-
- __
- _
- ,-
.S.
5.07
34 + 0.00

0 034
~.~ 0.0 4 4;
- -- - -_ _
S. _
.71
316 _ _ _ _ - S.S 714. 3
34 + 0.00

•~ 0 040
0.0
0 ~
- - -- - -'
,..

~
t
.Q
- -
- -
-'
_
.S.71
.456

33 +

0.00
m ~ ~ ~ ~
PD
N/
~0
O/
N~
'~a
an
~d
o~

0 2. 5 5 PROJ. REFERENCE N0. SH EEf N0.
2
1 1 1) 1 2 0 f 0 0

S. . 720 536
_ ~:
r,
~ ~
~
r
• ~'~
_ _ ~ ~ ~ 0.0 0 . 20

.S. 71
.43 ~
h ~
°~
~o
, _ _ _
- - - 0. 08 0. 20 ~ '

a~

~ ~
~ ~
~

-
_ _
~'
~
,
1 ~~
-

a - -- - - _
S.S.
13.7 -
6

5 +

.00

.S. 11

.813
m 1 1 1 1

03-M ~R-,POOB o?'19 oooc onv voi
B/23/99
t \ t
t
t ` t
t
t `, t

\
I t
I
` I
I I

I r~
v J I
I
~

n _
I I^v1
I V

/ r ^
v J
f R~
v I
~/ ~ I
~ ~
~ 17.9 718.5 719. 1
I I
I
I I

I

i

' I

I

i I I

I
I I
I I
I

~ t
I ~
+ I
I ~
+ t
I
I o
0 I o
0 I
~
I I
I i
I
I
i I i
t
I
~ ~

~
17.9 \
71 .5
71~'
1
~
~ ~
~
~ I
I
l I
I I
I
I I ~
I
I
I I I
I I
I
9
.T
T

I I I

I W
m m
A
m
Z
O
I
I I
N

I
~ m
Z
p

_ o
w
~,
m
Q
e
t
r
~~
Na
mf
O
Nu'
F
Kq
gP
m<
o~
0 2 5 5 PRO1. REFERENCE NO. SHEET N0.
-383
1 7 t 1 E O 0 5
- - -~
~

~
~
~
~
0
~~
1 ~ 0.0 0 0 020 ~ 4: ~

.S.7 0.75 -- -- - -- - - -- -_
S. .719 93
39 + 0.00

r• r.
~ ~ ~
~ 1
~' N
~`
0.0
0
0
020 N
'` ~.~
_

.S. 20.6 8
39 + 0.00

0 0 S
7 3
56
.
. .
0 020 -
.

38 + 0.00

- M M
~ ,r.- -
--
-
\
~
\ ~
~ 1
~ ~
'`
0
0
0
0
020
~ ~
~` ~~
.

S.S. 19.6

0
Q
38 +
0.00
0
m
M
0

1

1
~

1

1

E

O

7

'I

a
Z
~~
Nn
my.
O~
O~
Nr
C~
Q~
~Q
O^
0 2. 5 5 P0.0J, REFERENCE N0. SH EET N0.
~ -383 1
> > > o o ~

'
\~ ~p
N ~0
N

~ _

1
--
~~
--
- -
~
-
-
.-
_ 1
~I
\
\ ' r - `
S. . 721. 30 `' - - _
41 + 0.00

-

\ (+~
r M
~
N N
~ ~` 0.0 0 0 020 ~
~~ __ _ _ - -- - -- - -- -- 4:~
_,
S. .72 .050 ~ ~ ,
~_ -- --
.S.7! .l29
40 + 0.00

- - ~
~
~
~

~` 0.0 0 0 020 ~
~ - - - -- - - - - - 4:

-

N
h
. - --
O

Q
40 +
a.oo
m
O
M
9

^
~U

0
~
~

03-MAR-2006 12:20
8/23/99
J~\B3 3~~~\TI
0 9 A~R~B~Ie~\ ~Isc\~3:its»_ fiu r _ xr~_~n t v.agn
I
I
I

I I /

J
I
~
// ~ ~ /

1
1 /
I I
I

/ I

! / ~ ~ /

• ~ ~ ~ ~I
.J ' •j ~
(_)l .J
2
I 23.1 I
i 723. 8 724. 0 724 7

I
I I
I I i
I
i I
I I
I I
I

I I
I I I o
o
I
I I
~ I ° I
I

I
I
i I
I I
i

~ ~
~. ~ I
I N
+ I
i W
+
I
_ .
t o
o
0 I ~ o
o
0 I o
o J
I
I I
I I I
I
I I I
1
0 I
t
o

I
I
I
i 0
o
I I
I
I 23.1 / 723. 8 1 724. 0 I 724 72

I
1

I
I I
I
~ ~ I
~
v ~
~ I
i I
I I
I
~ I N
O
• I N
I ~
~ ~ a
N
~,
~ I
t~
I I
I
<o I
I
~'
rn l ~ I i
A
I
I I i W n
m
z
O
I
I I
I I
i
H
m
O1 ~

4
tt
r
2
Y
r
i
z
o~
Np
NQ
O~
N~
Q
K~
2~
6
O~
0 2.5 5 PROD. REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
~ - 35
> > > > ~ s o 0

M M
~'
~
~• N 00
N
- - - , ^
_
- -- -- -_
S. .72 _ _ _ -- -- _- -
45 + 0.00

d' M
~~ ~
N ~
~- - _
--
~ 0.0 5 0 020 ~`
'I
~ - - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- -

S. . 724 13
44 + 0.00
~ ~
N N
~ ~0 ~0
~ -- -- n 0.0 0 0 020 ~` 4
~ - -- - -- - _ _ _ _ :1
.S. 7 5.70 ~ , _ _ _
44 + 0.00
~
M ~
(~
'1 ~ o.a o 0 020
- - -- - -- --
-
-
-- 4•
_
S.7 4.69 - _
o S.S. 21.3 5
a 43 + 0.00
m
~
M
m
.
-

i~
SIDE VIEW
LOOKING WEST
WEST APPROACH
LOOKING EAST
EAST APPROACH
LOOKING WEST
~~ ~ , ,,. ," ,.:~ k,,
,.
ti
°'w' ......... ...~
;,
,;,
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Bra
DAME/FORSYTH COUNTIES
Davie County Bridge No. 35
on US 158
over Yadkin River
TIP No. B-3835
' Figure 3

0
y~
uV
V

O

O
F~1

~ y
~ ~
~
n

r
o c C~
~ ~

d

Cy C
°e ~• ~
=~ c n
-C ~ o O
~ Ro
~
b
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
H °~ ~ ~
~ A ~ C
~ ~ ~ .r .~ .~
z
~ o
~ ~ d °~ ~
"'!
w
cn
z !~
5 ~p

° y

~ ~
~yyy ~, •
~ c
~7
C/1 ~.
~
a o ~'
~„kd m

A
C ~
r•
N
'::<
";•'
~ ~ x~
t"'~' ' ~''.iy',i
'« fd,~ ~ ~ ~ wbd
i