20080612 Ver 1_401 Application_20080408

DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388 ~ ~ g ~ 6 1 2
[phone] • Fax [phone]
' Letter of Transmittal
To DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WETLANDS UNIT Date: 4-2-08 Job # 0807
1650 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Attn: Ian McMillan
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1650 Re: Stream Restoration at Pinehurst No. 7
WE ARE SENDING YOU
Attached Reports x Maps
Copy of letter Plans Data
Prints Photos x Permit
COPIES DATE # P s DESCRIPTION
6 4-1-08 16 Permit A lication for
Stream Restoration at Pinehurst No. 7,
Pinehurst, Moore Coun , NC
1 N/A $240.00 check for DWQ fee

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED
X For approval Approved as noted
For your use Approved as submitted
As requested Returned for corrections
For review and comment For your information
REMARKS: Ian,
Please contact me with any questions or concerns. 1 sent the 7` copy directly
at the Fayetteville Regional Office.
o ~~od~ o
APR 3 2008
9~~D ST EOR~t~W ~BRp^
YS
to Ken
Thank you.
Jennifer
COPY TO:
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not noted, please contact us immediately
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Management Wetlands Mapping and Permitting

DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
2 Apri12008
Mr. Ian McMillan
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Mr. McMillan:
Enclosed is a permit application for a stream restoration project at The Fairwoods at Pinehurst
No. 7, Pinehurst, Moore County, North Carolina (see attached maps). I've enclosed 6 copies and a
check in the amount of $240.00 in this packet. One copy has been provided~to Mr. Ken Averitte at the
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office.
In general, the proposed project will restore approximately 205 linea~~feet of jurisdictional
stream channel. Restoration activities may require temporary impacts for sediment removal in the
pond and wetlands adjacent to the stream channel. No permanent impacts to jurisdictional areas
are anticipated from this project. Sediment removal is expected to improve the quality of the
wetlands and pond and the proposed stream restoration activities are expected to repair and improve
the quality of approximately 205 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel.
Please review the enclosed permit application and contact me if you need any additional
information. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
~'~"u~~' ~I.
J fifer Freeman
ildlife Biologist
~ ~VLS~ V
Enclosure: Check # ~~4~4 for $240.00 D
CC: Mr. Bob Farren APR 3 2008
Mr. Ken Averitte -DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office ~~~pST~~ e
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Management Wetlands Mapping and Permitting

DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
2 Apri12008
Ms. Emily Burton
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Q~c~~od~~
APR 3 2008
D~ . WATER QUAUTr
yyS'r4pNDS AND S70RM~NA'f ER BRANCH
Dear Emily:
Enclosed is a permit application for a stream restoration project at The Fairwoods at Pinehurst
No. 7, Pinehurst, Moore County, North Carolina (see attached maps). In general, the proposed project
will restore approximately 205 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel by stabilizing the current
conditions, which are causing extreme erosion and sedimentation. Sediment is currently being
deposited in adjacent jurisdictional wetlands and in the pond downstream from the reach proposed for
restoration. Restoration activities may require temporary impacts for sediment removal in the pond
and wetlands adjacent to the stream channel. No permanent impacts to jurisdictional areas are
anticipated from this project. Sediment removal is expected to improve the quality of the wetlands
and pond and the proposed stream restoration activities are expected to repair and improve the quality
of approximately 205 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel.
Please review the enclosed permit application and contact me if you need any additional
information. Thank you for your time.
Si cerely,
J fifer M. Freeman
Wildlife Biologist
CC: Mr. Bob Farren
NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Wetlands Unit
Mr. Ken Averitte -Division of Water Quality, Fayetteville Regional Office
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ $ ~ 6 ~ 2
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
NWP 13 and 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information ~ ~ ~ ~ a V
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 3 2008
Name: Pinehurst Inc. c/o Mr. Bob Farren
-WATER QUAU17
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4000 1AIFTI1~NnceuneTnn,nueTC000eunu
rw aroroa~ar
Pinehurst, NC 28374
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: X910) 255-3330
E-mail Address: bob.farren(a~pinehurst.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer M. Freeman
Company Affiliation: Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: 515 - F Midland Road
Southern Pines. NC 28387
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:~910) 695-3317
E-mail Address: jfreeman(a~jhcarterinc.com
Updated I I/1/2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Stream restoration at Pinehurst No. 7
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 856215637946 (LRK 24957)
4. Location
County: Moore Nearest Town: Pinehurst
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): The Fairwoods at No. 7
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Aberdeen, NC,
take US Hwy 15/501 North for approximately 3 miles. Turn left into the Fairwoods at No. 7
on Sweetwater Road. Park at the clubhouse. The project site is located on the >;olf course
between fairways 10 and 1.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.1853 °N 79.4472 °W
6. Property size (acres): The single parcel is approximately 100 acres.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Aberdeen Creek
8. River Basin: Lumber River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project site is located on a giolf course. Land use in the
vicinity consists of several other >;olf courses and residential communities.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project includes installing a concrete or large riprap barrier and plume pool below an
existing 32-inch pipe containing a small perennial stream and reducing the bank elevation
along the downstream reach. This reach extends to a pond approximately 205 feet
downstream Sediment stumps and debris will be removed from the channel and the channel
will be reshaped. Sediment will also be removed from the back of the pond and adiacent
wetlands Finally the golf cart bridge will be relocated over the wetland work area (no
jurisdictional impacts).
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The stream, a portion of which is piped under a
fairwa~iust upstream of the proposed work area, receives much more flow than it did under
natural conditions due to development and increased impervious surface in the watershed.
This increased water flow durin>; rain events results in a lame volume of water funnelin;;
throu hh~pipe at very high velocity. As water exits the pipe, it hits the stream bank,
causing severe erosion and resulting; in sedimentation of the pond located approximately 205
feet downstream of thepipe. Installing a barrier near the end of the pipe and a plunge pool
will significantly decrease water velocity helping; to preserve the natural structure of the
stream by reducing erosion and resulting in a reduction of downstream sedimentation.
Reducing the eastern bank elevation alon>; the reach downstream of the pipe will further
decrease water velocity and erosion by allowing water to flow over the bank during_periods
of heavy water flow.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Emily Burton of the USACE conducted a site visit with Dr. J.H. Carter
& Bill Mullin of JCA, Inc. in January 2008.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional waters will
be limited to stream restoration including a barrier plunge pool debris removal and stream bank
stabilization Total length of the reach is approximately 205 linear feet. There will be no
impacts to wetlands or open water however the project requires work in these areas to remove
sediment Sediment will be removed from wetlands adiacent to the stream bank and from the
back of the~ond near itsjunction with the stream.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized
clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
imnart.c dne to tenth ctrnctnre and fl~~din~.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
] temporary herbaceous no 0 ~ 0.01

Total Wetland Impact (acres) ~ 0.01
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Total acreage was not
delineated or estimated since the project will take place on a small portion of the ~ 100 acre
parcel which is only 1 of man parcels owned by_Pinehurst Inc within The Fairwoods at No. 7.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls,
gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and
profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Tn calculate acrea~e_ multiply length X width_ then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
stream UT to Aberdeen Ck stabilization perennial ~3.5 ft ~ 205 0.02

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) _ 205 -- 0.02
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13

Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation, dreds?in~, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
2 N/A temporary pond ~ 0.04

Total Open Water Impact (acres) ~ 0.04
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.01
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.04
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.07
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 205
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation - N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed stream
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

restoration and stabilization activity will improve the quality and function of the stream and
improve downstream water quality reducing erosion and sedimentation.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
None proposed -restoration project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Miti>;ation
1 I I 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total I I ~ N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The project does not include the addition of
impervious surface.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be produced by the project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project will not result in cumulative impacts. The proposed activity will improve downstream
water auality.
Updated ] 1/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The stream flows through an active red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis cluster
(Southern Pines-Pinehurst (SOPI) cluster 53). No pines will be removed.
~ ~ ,.y'
pplicant/Agent's Signature Date
Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

04/O:P~P P, ~~ 2~~89; 3. 58PMx 910 695 3317
Aptzi 1, 2048
To Whom It May Concern:
No. 2916 P, l~looz/ooz
Dr. J. H. Carter III & Associates, Inc. is authorized to prepare and submit the necessary
permits for the proposed stream restoration project at The Fairwoods at Pinehurst No. 7,
Pinehurst, Moore County, North Carolina. Additio~zally, this Ietler grants permission to
federal and state regulatory authorities to conduct site visits orgy our property to evaluate
wetland boundaries and project impacts.
Respectfully,
~~~"-'
/ G d
Mt. Bob Darren ~/~

~` Continue on Page 72 79.5833" KILOMETERS t o t __z ~ 4 ~
MILES 1 0 t 2 3 4 5 6

cap
\• ( ! `y� f � � Cab
1` J
4 -W APB
�
V\ �a CaB 4r.D
.. Vap�
a8� A
i
r
AeD aN
i ,tri` AeD �, � AeD '{�, - - -' Ae&"_?
i
�� VaD aa�s AeB T` CaB
�C \f ruy
BbBb
(C'
8baDVaBB ( l I r
1 5s
r ! � b , Va8
Jeb
UVaD ,
t Pit VaD
VaD ' �° ac
a CaB CbC
�(p
VaD Cb,
lBi3
a
b �Cab j
CaB CbC"' ' ' i ✓^ ; ` AeD
CbC
v�0 (2u Ca6
* CaB O ;
CbC Bb VaD
i CCC VaD
A
V [��� Va6 �� CaC _ 1
1 ` /
U ^< CC .,J VaD Cafl _ v VaD o
\\\ r
iVey a�
} \ -
��� CaB VaD
PinehurstCaC
Cas VaB
��.
GCC i\Bb AeB AeB
/
1f3ERDEEN
�4
CbC VaD ( % VaD
\ 1 CaB
CaB
CbC 5 AeB
VuQ '� '� VaD ) w : _ VaD VaB sot Ur
.� Tit
AeD / �—
��Vu'•� FuB � �- CaB Bb CaB w
\ � CnG
VaD AeB 'VaD,' C
CaB
C t AeB
\ _c5 CbC Gh8 u' AeD
P_�B � Bb � :�_ �_
VuD \ Y CaB F
�{ u v AeD CaE
VuD �C VaD CaB
�'\j CaB
CbC Bb
;t +. CbC AeB CbC vi'D
1 CaB �� w
VuDJ
/- /
VaD
Fu8
CbC VuD t
Ud CaB CbC l} 8b
BYO O \ ��
FuB Sand Pit t d �1�� d
Bb
VaD vun� ^"\,\ iw t �,\Wtt ,n
AeB I Jke
Cbl
F B .�.�..J
VaD CbG CeB
C V u 1
r
Vag
VaD CaB o
CaB Vas ( v
Ca6
C6
AeB
CbC

Figure L Location of the proposed stream restoration at Pinehurst No. 7, Pinehurst, Moore County, North Carolina.
0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Figure 2. Proposed stream restoration at Pinehurst No. 7, including installation of a barrier to slow water flow as it exits the
pipe, creation of a plunge pool to slow water flow and allow sediment to settle and relocation of the eastern
streambank with a reduction in grade to prevent further erosion. Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCS
trees shown near the restoration site are associated with active Southern Pines-Pinehurst (SOPI) cluster 53.
0 50 100 200 Feet

Existing Stream Channel Cross Section
Eroding bank
Existing bank
Streambed
Proposed Stream Channel Cross Section
3
1
Proposed stream bank
restoration Existing bank
Streambed
area of bank to be graded down creating "floodplain"
Figure 3: Cross-section (facing downstream) of the existing streambank and proposed
modification of the eastern streambank at Pinehurst No. 7, showing a
reduction in the bank height and slope.