Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160924 Ver 1_401 Application_2016091669 PANGLEF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Environmental Planning Environmental Permitting Environmental Consulting Environmental Construction Management Expert Testimony September 15, 2016 James Lastinger, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 RE: Pre -Construction Notification for Smith Farm Dear Mr. Lastinger, Please accept the enclosed submission of a Pre -Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit 29 which contains various supporting materials. This request is made on behalf of our client for the Smith Farms tracts located in Apex North Carolina. Records provided to us by our client (see attached Post USACE and Town of Apex Sketch Map) indicate that you made a field visit to this property on 7/23/14 with a representative of S&EC. It is my understanding that you concurred with S&EC's delineation as represented on the attached map but that a PJD or approved JD was not issued. Portions of the current project area exceeds the area that you reviewed in 2014. The portions of the project that were not included in the evaluation by S&EC have been delineated, flagged, and GPS'd by Spangler Environmental, Inc. (SEI) personnel. You conducted a site visit on 3/14/16 of a 230.8 acre area which included the areas delineated by SEI and S&EC. The project area associated with this submittal makes up a portion of the 230.8 acre area you reviewed on 3/14/16. Plans for the project area associated with this submittal have been approved by the Town of Apex and the project is designed so as to be single and complete. As of the time of submitting this Pre -Construction Notification, no additional plans have been submitted or approved for additional development beyond the project area. We are submitting data forms and supporting materials to document the delineation work performed by SEI as well as for the areas delineated by S&EC for which data forms were not previously submitted. Standard PJD forms have been included to support the documentation of jurisdictional resources on the property. We are requesting authorization of impacts depicted in the enclosed impact exhibits based on delineation efforts that incorporate the previous delineation that you reviewed in 2014 as well as SEI's delineation of the areas not included in the original S&EC delineation which were reviewed in 2016. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Spangler Environmental, Inc. Tomas Will Environmental Project Scientist Attachments: Impact Maps USGS Topographic Map USDA Soil Survey Maps Site Maps with Delineated Wetland Areas S&EC Post USACE and Town of Apex Sketch Map Agent Authorization Letter Wetland data forms Pre -Jurisdictional Determination Documentation Town of Apex Stream Buffer Documentation 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 phone 919-8754288 fax 919-875-4287 1-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com 69 PANGLEF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Environmental Planning Environmental Permitting Environmental Consulting Environmental Construction Management Expert Testimony September 15, 2016 Cherri Smith North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality — Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 RE: Pre -Construction Notification for Smith Farm Dear Ms. Smith, Please accept the enclosed submission of a Pre -Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit 29 which contains various supporting materials. This request is made on behalf of our client for the Smith Farms tracts located in Apex North Carolina. Records provided to us by our client (see attached Post USACE and Town of Apex Sketch Map) indicate that Mike Deaton at the Town of Apex made a field visit to this property on 8/5/14 with a representative of S&EC. It is my understanding based on discussions with Mr. Deaton that he concurred with S&EC's delineation as represented on the attached map but that a stream buffer call was not issued. Portions of the current project area exceeds the area that was reviewed by the Town of Apex in 2014. These areas were evaluated by James Lastinger at the Army Corps of Engineers on 3/14/16 and no jurisdictional features were determined to be located in the portion of the project area that was not evaluated in 2014. Plans for the project area associated with this submittal have been approved by the Town of Apex and the project is designed so as to be single and complete. As of the time of submitting this Pre -Construction Notification, no additional plans have been submitted or approved for additional development beyond the project area. We are submitting data forms and supporting materials to document the delineation work performed by SEI as well as for the areas delineated by S&EC for which data forms were not previously submitted. Standard Stream Buffer Call forms have been included to support the documentation of jurisdictional resources on the property. We are requesting authorization of impacts depicted in the enclosed impact exhibits based on delineation efforts that incorporate the previous delineation that were reviewed in 2014 as well as SEI's delineation of the areas not included in the original S&EC delineation which were reviewed in 2016. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Spangler Environmental, Inc. Tomas Will Environmental Project Scientist Attachments: Impact Maps USGS Topographic Map USDA Soil Survey Maps Site Maps with Delineated Wetland Areas S&EC Post USACE and Town of Apex Sketch Map Agent Authorization Letter Wetland data forms Pre -Jurisdictional Determination Documentation Town of Apex Stream Buffer Documentation 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 phone 919-8754288 fax 919-875-4287 1-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com LENFMAM March 10, 2016 To Whom It May Concern: The letter serves to inform you that Lennar Carolinas, LLC. located at 909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 1500, Morrisville, NC 27560, as the buyer of record and under contract with the project owner, Marlou Smith Family Limited Partnership and other adjacent Smith Family related parcels, hereby authorizes Spangler Environmental, Inc. to act as our technical agent for the purposes of environmental issues, including wetland and stream identification, permitting, mitigation planning and regulatory agency coordination at the property known as Smith Farm Assemblage (see attached parcel list) located North of Olive Chapel Road and south of US Highway 64 in Apex, NC. All site visits by regulatory personnel must be coordinated in advance with our agent, Spangler Environmental, Inc. This letter supercedes all previous Agent -related correspondence. The following contact should be copied on all correspondence: Agent: James A. Spangler, CEI, A.M.ASCE Spangler Environmental, Inc 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 (919)875-4288 Pcerely, A'_�rron Vice President of Land Development LENNAM 909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 1500, Morrisville, NC 27560 Phone: 919-337-9444•Fax: 919-337-9454 m 0-C Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes NX No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: NX Yes ❑ No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes NX No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. NX Yes ❑ No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes Q No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Smith Assemblage 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Apex 2d. Subdivision name: Smith Farm (proposed name, pending Town of Apex approval) 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: See attached parcel table and attached deeds 3b. Deed Book and Page No. See attached deeds 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Lennar Carolinas, LLC 3d. Street address: 909 Aviation Pkwy, Ste 700 3e. City, state, zip: Morrisville, NC 27560 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 337-9444 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Mitch. Barron@Lennar.com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Owner of Project 4b. Name: Lennar Carolinas, LLC 4c. Business name (if applicable): Lennar Carolinas, LLC 4d. Street address: 909 Aviation Pkwy, Ste 700 4e. City, state, zip: Morrisville, NC 27560 4f. Telephone no.: (919) 337-9444 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: Mitch.Barron@Lennar.com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Jim Spangler 5b. Business name (if applicable): Spangler Environmental, Inc. 5c. Street address: 4338 Bland Rd 5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27609 5e. Telephone no.: 919-875-4288 5f. Fax no.: 919-875-4287 5g. Email address: jspangler@spanglerenvironmental.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See attached parcel table 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.4364 Longitude: -78.5539 1 c. Property size: 57.34 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Reedy Branch 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV;NSW 2c. River basin: Cape Fear River Basin 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The subject property is partially wooded and partially developed with residential structures, barns, sheds, wells, and a dirt road. Ponds associated with historical agricultural use have been constructed on the property. There is a sanitary sewer easement just north of the property. The land use in the general vicinity is a residential or undeveloped. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.18 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 495 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to construct a residential subdivision on the subject property 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project is a residential subdivision that will involve grading/earth moving and utility work by using grading and excavating equipment 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project(including all priorphases) in thepast? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: see section 4d below 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Spangler Environmental Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Corps delineation verification site visits made on 7/23/14 & 3/14/16. A Town of Apex site visit was made on 8/5/14. Revised PJD request & Stream Buffer requests are attached to this submittal. To the best of our knowledge, no written regulatory determinations have been issued for the property. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes 0 No 6b. If yes, explain. This is a portion of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning area. No plans for further development of this PUD have been prepared, submitted, or approved by Apex. Future developments in this PUD may or may not ever occur. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of number Corps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 P Fill Unknown Yes Corps 0.019 W2 Choose one Unknown Yes/No W3 - Choose one Unknown Yes/No W4 - Choose one Unknown Yes/No W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.019 2h. Comments: Impact Area 1 consists of wetland impacts as a result of fill required for a road and associated grading. A culvert will be installed underneath the road to preserve wetland finctionality 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length Permanent (P) or width (linear Temporary (T) (feet) feet) S1 Choose one S2 - Choose one - S3 - Choose one - - S4 - Choose one - S5 - Choose one - S6 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: The sanitary sewer outfall identified as as Sewer Stream crossing will be bored underneath Stream N so as not to produce any permanent or temporary impacts to the jurisdictional resource. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 P unnamed pond Fill Pond 0.015 02 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 0.015 4g. Comments: Impact Area 2 consists of open water impacts to an impounded pond as a result ot till required for lotg and associated gra ing. n order to construct the retaining wall, the level of the pond will be temporarily drawn down. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 Yes/No B2 Yes/No B3 Yes/No B4 Yes/No B5 Yes/No B6 Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. During the design phase, various site layouts were explored. Design iterations took into account the importance of reducing the overall impact to jurisdictional features. Stormwater BMPs were designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional features as much as possible. A culvert will be installed in Impact Area 1 to preserve wetland functionality. The final design was chosen based, in large part, on the minimization of impacts to wetlands. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented in order to control runoff and other discharges from activities to be conducted in the fill areas. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? X El Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑X Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. The project is adjacent to protected riparian buffer areas. No stormwater is discharged into riparian buffer Stormwater to Town Apex Town Apex buffer ❑ Yes ❑X No areas. plans submitted of per of rules. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 28.7 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑x Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The Stormwater Management Plan submitted to Town of Apex for approval. Stormwater structures are shown on attached plans. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Apex 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? Apex ❑ Phase II ❑x NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs El USMP❑ apply (check all that apply): Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been El Yes ❑X No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes 0 No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Q Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes Q No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑Yes 0 No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑X Yes ❑ No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. To the greatest extent practicable, cumulative impacts for the project have been minimized. To reduce cumulative impacts that could effect downstream water quality, a culvert will be constructed underneath Water Tower Lane to avoid filling in the portion of Wetland I crossed by the road and preserve contiguous wetland function. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Municipal sanitary sewer will service the subject property Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Yes ❑ No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program element occurrence dataset 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? National Marine Fisheries Service essential fish habitat mapper 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NC Natural Heritage Program; Apex Historical Society 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: While the area that is designated as the project contains portions of the 100 year floodplain, the only development that will occur in the floodplain is the installation of sanitary sewer utility lines. The installation of these utility lines will adhere to the National Flood Insurance Program Floodplain Management Requirements published by FEMA. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA flood maps panel #s 33720072100J and 3720072200J with effective date of May 2, 2006 James A. Spangler Applicant/Agent's Printed Name gent's Signature Date V. signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 J C J C� 255 V C " , _ cd Lu E W m *01 Z a C � � C V rn lip� C 'C WATER TOWER LANE C C1 C m z 8u zn s� urra am room OM= "%W-1174 \ r � U 0 0 2/5 =z 0 Q 0 C:;7KADC OF w EXISTING L- z cn C:hKI4I4EC _ 6 u) 6" I7up Q CZ --1 _ (WI.1 FI HEADWALL ENDWACC _ LL z o 27U Q 0 3 0 3R 1526 2y5 _ 295 t,u;_ _ _ ; P o= 290 _. ___... .... ...4 _r. 29U o" m , h tom'' Z 255rn _... _• ..� _ _.� _. Nk��rUScv ; .. C AE)F 5 n X85 LL a ; } .00u �A,_TG i 1 GkUUNU P�oPILE 280 a v i _ PROPO ED FILL 1 3 71/5 V �` _... 275 C I� 270 s , 270 , 265, 265 r 0+00 1+00 z+uu 3100 4+uu F10FRIrZO CI.1,_5�' wA i CK i UwEK CAFE r[70FI EE 5M1 i M FAF7m PuD AL: 9/9/ 16 3 � J CL U / 4, Z C � 27 W RETAINING WALL 1 ; Z W 17AIMTENANCE ` I EASEMENT 1 i rERI7IAI4EI4T rul7lu i IMPACT AREA= 0 �N I E LD_ALLEY - - - - IO�Of Y! .��..� 10.01 5 AC. _------- C - - _ _. __. T BOND t ' � V Y _ L ► L I 'L j I I o cz IL i' -57 58 ', 55 i 54coC _58 GPAPHIC SCALE I�ze i LLJ h C45 T ING i GROUND'-\ L, 10 295 a <i� m Imo, Lo 290 PRQPC�SEQ._ e .i'. 255 255 _._ _ e nl .� ��.11 O1 I 25U _ o p I 280 r � 1 _. _KETAINNG a WA-L\,� I i 275275 ...... 270 e�- _ e e � , _ . _ .,� _- _� 270 i i 265_ �e > w m _ . e r n 265 n 2 e i 0+00 1 -f-Ou Zt00 3100 HORIZON I AL: 1 "=57 C;UFN ri LED AECEY PROFI CE n17111 n FA17171 rDD VERTICA7: 1"=5 9/g/16 5 Ex w,,E i LPN u5 \ O r \ , CONTRACTOR TO C17EE7\ I I V LI I \ \ \ \ TO I N5TALL 8�� 5AN . \\ 5EWER \ \ I� \ TOP OF vVC BANK F\ Of �I CREEK GRAPHIC SCALE CL -:1A �u W W Z LU mawalrt m1� m IOtlf iN Jurisdictional Determination Request A. PARCEL INFORMATION B. Street Address: 0 Olive Chapel Road City, State: Apex, NC County: Wake Directions: From highway 540 head west on Olive Chapel Road, the site will be located on the north side of Olive Chapel Road Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See attached parcel list REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: James Spangler Mailing Address: 4338 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone Number: 919-875-4288 Electronic Mail Address l: JSpangler@spanglerenvironmental.com Select one: ❑ I am the current property owner. ❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant ❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase ❑ Other, please explain. C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name: See attached parcel list Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address3: �✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data) 1 If available z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form 3 If available Version: December 2013 Page 3 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Property Owner (please print) Property Owner Signature E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE Select One: Date I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. This request does include a delineation. 1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminaa JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a delineation. ❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. ❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat). ❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not include a survey plat). ° For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. 5 Waters of the United States Version: December 2013 Page 4 F. ❑✓ ❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the area of evaluation. Size of Property or Project Area 59.8 acres III verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable. G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES (1) Preliminary JD Requests: ❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form. m . Project Coordinates: 35.4424 Latitude -78.5547 Longitude Maps (no larger than 1 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay: ❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns F✓ Aerial Photography of the project area W1 USGS Topographic Map ❑✓ Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) 6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008 Version: December 2013 Page 5 Jurisdictional Determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable)7: Wetlands: ❑✓ Wetland Data SheetS8 Tributaries: ❑ USACE Assessment Forms Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) ❑ Landscape Photos, if taken ✓❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: ■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify) ■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches ■ Locations of photo stations ■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources (2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation: ❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude Maps (no larger than I 1 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay: ❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns ❑ Aerial Photography of the project area ❑ USGS Topographic Map ❑ Soil Survey Map ❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps) 7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at: http://www.usace.army.miIZMissions/CivilWorks/RepulatoryProgramandPermits/res supp.aspx Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at: http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/set file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and, http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf 8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 6 Smith Farms Phase I Parcel List From Wake County GIS PIN Owner Mail Address Mail City Deed Book Deed Page Acres Site Address 0721293731 SMITH, STALEY C PO BOX 457 APEX NC 015965 01258 1.4 2740 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0721295598 EAKES, LEWIS WAYNE EAKES, BETSY BRUNT 2732 OLIVE CHAPEL RD APEX NC 009048 01304 2 2732 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0721298524 EAKES, JOHN M 2720 OLIVE CHAPEL RD APEX NC 016374 01559 2.26 2720 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0721390461 CARAWAY, SHIRLEY E 2708 OLIVE CHAPEL RD APEX NC 004551 00451 2.86 2712 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0721393402 CARAWAY, SHIRLEY E 2708 OLIVE CHAPEL RD APEX NC 004551 00451 2.01 2708 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0721394561 MARTHA SMITH FAMILY LP BACON, MARLOU 405 HUNTER ST APEX NC 016267 00943 2.35 2700 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0722108872 HOFFLER, HALEY MILLS SMITH 103 JORDAN CREEK DR CARY NC 006906 00181 13.18 0 OLIVE CHAPEL RD 0722209585 MARTHA SMITH FAMILY LTD PTNRP BACON, MARLOU S PO BOX 343 APEX NC 013327 01553 41.78 0 OLIVE CHAPEL RD ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: James Spangler 4338 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC 27609 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 0 Olive Chapel Road, Apex, NC (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Apex Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.4424 °N; Long. -78.5547 0W. Universal Transverse (Mercator: NAD83 Name of nearest waterbody: Reedy Branch Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non -wetland waters: 493 linear feet: 5 width (ft) and/or 3.18 acres. Cowardin Class: R4SB Stream Flow: Intermittent Wetlands: 3.18 acres acres. Cowardin Class: PF01 Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non -Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): THAT SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): ❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: ❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: -I 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): 2 or 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class Estimated Amount of Aquatic Resource in Review Area Class of Aquatic Resource stream N 35.7300 -78.9238 R4SB 493 linear feet Non -section 10 - non -wetland pond B 35.7280 -78.9234 L1 0.06 acres Non -section 10 - non -wetland pond H 35.7288 -78.9211 L1 1.71 acres Non -section 10 - non -wetland pond N 35.7293 -78.9237 L1 0.87 acres Non -section 10 - non -wetland wetland B 35.7275 -78.9211 PFO1 0.09 acres Non -section 10 - wetland wetland H 35.7278 -78.9212 PFO1 0.07 acres Non -section 10 - wetland wetland I 35.7302 -78.9208 PFO1 0.45 acres Non -section 10 - wetland wetland J 35.7323 -78.9207 PFO1 1.14 acres Non -section 10 - wetland wetland K 35.7315 -78.9227 PFO1 1.19 acres Non -section 10 - wetland wetland L 35.7300 -78.9273 PFO1 0.21 acres Non -section 10 - wetland wetland M 35.7299 -78.9259 PFO1 0.03 acres Non -section 10 - wetland li a, Legend Phase I boundary 11 S m _ % '-- •� • j 1 • :ate �f r I1r 1p o !a Ole It - M J �r Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence Topographic Map Olive Chapel Road SPANGLER p ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 2016 USGS 7.5' New Hill Quad Smith Assemblage Due Diligence �.0 Soil Survey Map Olive Chapel Road SPANGLER p ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey VsC2 f CrC2 y _ f! CrC2I N �. � W+ E S f - U _r_( a f D AA IWSC2 '`- C2 CrE ,� Au G fC 11 AfA Wn n `' ' _U lj CrC2 Au '�. ' C2 CrC2 t rE C2, ~4 rC2� t - r�2 Cr CrC2 rC ,f � Cry C'rB2 CrB2 % C,t CrC2 , CrC2 WvD3� Legend CrE WsC2 `. g Property boundary i fl) r Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence SPANGLER Paper -Bound Soil Survey Olive Chapel Road ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 1970 USDA Soil Survey of Wake County Wetland L Pond N� a Wetland I Pond H Wetland H " Pond B wl Wetland B tZ a.�. ori• � Non -jurisdictional pond in high ground t � 4 � k 0 130 260 520 Feet Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence Delineation Map Olive Chapel Road SPANGLER p ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 Jones & Cnossen Preliminary Site Plan Data y r• � Legend Phase I boundary Intermittent stream Wetlands Jurisdictional pond Pond N� a Wetland I Pond H Wetland H " Pond B wl Wetland B tZ a.�. ori• � Non -jurisdictional pond in high ground t � 4 � k 0 130 260 520 Feet Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence Delineation Map Olive Chapel Road SPANGLER p ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 Jones & Cnossen Preliminary Site Plan Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. Investigator(s): Tomas Will Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Soil Map Unit Name: White store sandy loam Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: Wake State: NC Section, Township, Range: Apex Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Lat. 35.9983 Long: -78.8202 Sampling Date: 8/21/15 Sampling Point: M-1 NWI classification: none Slope (%): 2 Datum: NAD1983 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: linear wetland HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) ❑ High Water Table (A2) L"J Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑. Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes N Water Table Present? Yes N Saturation Present? Yes x N (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) o x Depth (inches): o x Depth (inches): '12 inches o Depth (inches): 8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: M-1 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8 25 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 Ulmus americana 10 X FACW UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 3. 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 25 = Total Cover ❑• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 Smilax rotundifolia 10 X FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes X No 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: M-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-2 5YR 4/1 100 Loam 2-6 5YR 5/1 90 2.5YR 5/6 10 Sandy Loam 6-12 5YR 6/1 90 2.5YR 5/6 10 Sandy Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ,❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) ❑ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) 4 Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (176) ❑ (MLRA 1538) cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ,❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) H5 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ,❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. .❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. Investigator(s): Tomas Will Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee silt loam Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: Wake State: NC Section, Township, Range: Apex Local relief (concave, convex, none Lat: 35.7300 Long: -78.9 Sampling Date: 8/21/16 Sampling Point: L-1 ): concave Slope (%): 5 273 Datum: NAD1983 NWI classification: PF01/4A SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Data form for wetland J, wetland K, and wetland L floodplain wetlands HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) ® High Water Table (A2) L"J Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) L1 Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes N Water Table Present? Yes N Saturation Present? Yes x N (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) o x Depth (inches): o x Depth (inches): 8 inches o Depth (inches): 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: L-1 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8 25 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 Ulmus americana 10 X FACW UPL species x 5 = 3 Unidentified sapling Column Totals: (A) (B) 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 25 = Total Cover ❑• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 Smilax rotundifolia 10 X FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2 Toxicodendron radicans 10 X FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3' Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes X No 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: L-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-2 5YR 4/1 100 loam 2-6 5YR 5/1 90 2.5YR 5/6 10 silt loam 6-12 5YR 6/1 90 2.5YR 5/6 10 silt loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ,❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) ❑ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) 4 Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (176) ❑ (MLRA 1538) cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ,❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) H5 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ,❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. .❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 8/21/15 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: 1-1 Investigator(s): Tomas Will Section, Township, Range: Apex Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Lat: 36.7302 Long: -78.9208 Datum: NAD1983 Soil Map Unit Name: Creedmoor sandy loam NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) PI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) ® High Water Table (A2) L"J Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) L1 Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes N Water Table Present? Yes X N Saturation Present? Yes x N (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) o x Depth (inches): o Depth (inches): 6 o Depth (inches): 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 1_1 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Liriodendron tulipifera 10 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: MOON by: 8 20 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 5 X FAC UPL species x 5= Column Totals: (A) (B) 3. 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 15 = Total Cover ❑• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 Arundinaria gigantea 10 X FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2 Chasmanthium latifolium 10 X FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3 Juncus spp. 10 X FAC - Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes X No 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:1_1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-5 5YR 5/1 100 Silty Sand 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ,❑ Histosol (Al) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) f Stratified Layers (A5) nu Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Type Depth (inches): Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surface (176) (MLRA 1538) El Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 8/21/15 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: B-1 Investigator(s): Tomas Will Section, Township, Range: Apex Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Lat: 35.7275 Long: -78.9211 Datum: NAD1983 Soil Map Unit Name: Creedmoor sandy loam NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) PI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: form covers features typical of Wetland B and Wetland H HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) ® High Water Table (A2) L"J Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) L1 Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes N Water Table Present? Yes X N Saturation Present? Yes X N (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) o X Depth (inches): o Depth (inches): 4 o Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: B-1 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Acer rubrum 15 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8 35 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 unidentified grass shrub UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 3. 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.01 15 = Total Cover ❑• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 Arundinaria gigantea 15 X FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2 Osmunda cinnamomea 10 X FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3 unidentified grass Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. 25 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes X No 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: B-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-2 7.5YR 4/1 100 L 2-6 7.5YR 5/1 90 2.5YR 5/6 10 SL 6-12 5YR 6/1 90 2.5YR 5/6 10 SL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ,❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) ❑ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) 4 Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (176) ❑ (MLRA 1538) cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ,❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) H5 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ,❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. .❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 8/21/15 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: Upland M L Investigator(s): Tomas Will Section, Township, Range: Apex Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Lat: 35.7298 Long: -78.9265 Datum: NAD1983 Soil Map Unit Name: Mayodan sandy loam NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) PI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Upland data form for wetlands M and L HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) LL ❑ High Water Table (A2) Q rL L Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) F Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) rL L 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑. Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Saturation Present? Yes No (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Upland M L Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 15 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Liriodendron tulipifera 5 FAC Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8 30 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Pinus taeda 10 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 unidentified sapling UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 3. 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 10 = Total Cover ❑, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 unidentified grass be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes No X 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Upland M L Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 2.5YR 3/1 100 loam C Edi Pie'/ 3c7p� IIIIi Felt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ,❑ Histosol (Al) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) f Stratified Layers (A5) nu Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Type Depth (inches): Remarks: loam 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surface (176) (MLRA 1538) El Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 8/21/15 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: Upland J K I Investigator(s): Tomas Will Section, Township, Range: Apex Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 10 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Lat: 35.7304 Long: -78.9217 Datum: NAD1983 Soil Map Unit Name: Creedmoor sandy loam NWI classification: none Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) PI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Upland data form for wetlands J, K, and I HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) LL ❑ High Water Table (A2) Q rL L Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) F Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) rL L 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑. Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Saturation Present? Yes No (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Upland J K Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 30 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: MOON by: 8 40 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Pinus taeda 10 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 3. 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 20 = Total Cover ❑• Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 unidentified grass be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5• Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes No X 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Upland J K I Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-6 2.5YR 2.5/1 100 loam [.' 1 Si P. ��'I :ic7f►.�i [�Z� 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ,❑ Histosol (Al) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) f Stratified Layers (A5) nu Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Type Depth (inches): Remarks: silt loam 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surface (176) (MLRA 1538) El Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: Smith Farms City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 8/21/15 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: Upland B H Investigator(s): Tomas Will Section, Township, Range: Apex Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 136 Lat: 35.7285 Long: -78.9223 Datum: NAD1983 Soil Map Unit Name: Creedmoor sandy loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) PI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: form covers upland areas associated with Wetlands B and H HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: LJ Surface Water (Al) LL ❑ High Water Table (A2) Q rL L Saturation (A3) Q Water Marks (131) F Q Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) rL L 0 Algal Mat or Crust (134) Q Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑. Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Saturation Present? Yes No (includes caoillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream Remarks: Aquatic Fauna (1313) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): '12 Depth (inches): '12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Upland B H Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 sq ft ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer rubrum 30 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 unidentified tree Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8 55 = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) FAC species x 3 = 1 Quercus nigra 10 X FAC FACU species x 4 = 2 Acer rubrum 10 X FAC UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 3. 4• Prevalence Index = B/A = 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 20 = Total Cover ❑, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 sq ft ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 unidentified grass be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5 height. 6• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation Present? Yes No X 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Upland B H Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-6 5YR 5/2 100 LS [.'1SiP. IlMd:101iFelt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ,❑ Histosol (Al) .❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ,❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) f Stratified Layers (A5) nu Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ,❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Type Depth (inches): Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) I—I -IL—JI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Depleted Matrix (F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surface (176) (MLRA 1538) El Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0 BK093327P0553 . i�. WAKE COUNTY. NC 334 LAURA M RIDDICK REGISTER OF DEEDS PRESENTED 8 RECORDED ON 12?19/2008 AT 14:31:67 BOOK:013327 PAGE:01553 — 61555 Excise Tax:LO Tax Lot No. Parcel Identifier No. 111108 Verified by County on the day of , 20 by Mail after recording to: Stam Fordham &Danchi (185) This instrument was prepared by: Stam, Fordham & Danchi, P.A. Brief Description for the index 1 75% interest in 41.767 acres NORTH CAROLINA NON -WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED made this 1-1 day of December, 2008, by and between GRANTOR GRANTEE Martha M. Smith, widow I Martha Smith Family Limited Partnership P.O. Box 343 Apex, NC 27502 Enter in appropriate block for each parry: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g., corporation or partnership. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all the interest in that certain lot or parcel of land situated in White Oak Township, Wake County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: A 75% undivided interest in and to the following tract or parcel of land: 41.767 acres as described in Deed Book 2741, Page 478, Wake County Registry. Property is located on Olive Chapel Road in Apex, NC. Property acquired by Grantors by Deed recorded in Book 13314, Page 144 BR3327PI301554 y. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple. The Grantor makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the title to the property hereinabove described. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Martha M. Smith 0 ALAS �O •.......• 0 SEAt�-� =�P ,6A7ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF WAKE + V ENotary Public, certify that MARTHA M. SMITH, widow Grantor, personally appeared before J,x}cand acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. O h••a•..•• itness my hand and official seal, this the i 7 day of December, 2008. WAKE 0 �cp /� � My commission expires: (�,0 di10 Du rir_.art t.1C.�G/ of ry Public '1w7af tee A�Z_ The foregoing Certificate(s) of is/are certified to be correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof. REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR COUNTY By Deputy/Assistant-Register of Deeds. BK093327P0555 BOOK:013327 PAGE:01553 - 91555 Yellow probate sheet is a vital part of your recorded document. Please retain with original document and submit for rerecording. Wake County Register of Deeds WAKE Laura M. Riddick co�NrY Register of Deeds NOATH CAROLINA This Customer Group # of Time Stamps Needed This Document New Time Stamp # of PagesQ- ' 22.004.1120/06 1(6906P60 Is I Excise To x $0 Recording Tinw. Hook and Page Tax Lot No. .................................... Parcel Identifier No.?011474W OF O�ZZ.03 —bo- $si3. ... . Verified b County on the day of .. 19 ... .... ... __................... Stam, Fordham Danchi, P.A. Mai: after recording to ...... . P.O. Box 1600, Apex, NC 27502 ._ . ..... _ ...... ... .......................... ...... This instrument was prepared by. Stame Fordham.. &. Danchi.,...P.A. Brief description for the Index Tract 1, 15.825 acres NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED - - 7"" March In 96 _ by and between GRANTOR Staley Caraway Smith and wife, Glenda Holt Smith and Aaron Earl Smith, Jr. and wife, Princess Godley Smith GRANTEE Haley Mills Smith P.O. Box 457 Apex, NC 27502 Eater to appropriate block for each parr: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e -q• rogation or partnership. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that White Oak Township, certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of -- - ... ........... Wake. ............... ..County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: BEING all of Tract 1 containing 15.825 acres as shown on map and survey entitled "Aaron E. Smith, Jr., Staley C. Smith, and Haley M. Smith" by Smith and Smith Surveyors, dated September 28, 1993 and recorded in Book of Maps 1993, Page 1270, Wake County Registry. See also Book of Maps 1994, Page 1382, Wake County Registry. Together with and subject to rights of ingress and egress for 60' private roadway as shown on said map. ear AYIOc- Form No. J, 1976. VA%imd f 1977 _ J. r1.n.rw. • co . F,. 0-777. Yaur.rn..w , N C 77655 i nun.4 av Nn,.wn. nge.ti N C a,. nu,oa - 74a1 i OK6906PGO182 T The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded In ....... A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book 1 993..... page 1.27Q , TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple. And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions: IN WITNlSS 1 uSRU0r, the Grantor hits hereunto set his hand and al, or if corporate, as caused this instrument to be signed An No corporate wade by Its duly authorised offfcers and its seal to be hereunto a ed by aathorkt a B rd o! tors, the day and year firR above written. '----------(SRAL) --"--------`_`------------------------------------------------ iw --_ -- - - - - ------- ----^- (Corporate Name) aron Earl-l�riRi�h r o By:----------------------------------------------------------- ',t. _ - ----------------------(SICAL) rr ices G "0 mit --- �. y ----------------------------President NIl .ATYlST: v - - ---------------------(SEAL) ------------ - ------------ --------------------------------------------------------------- Stale Caraway Smith _pl __-Secretary (Corporate Seal) - r -a AY W� ----- ---- - -- ---- (SEAL) �► � [., Glenda Holt with T 1P �Pfi NORTH CAROLINA, ----Wake------------------_--county. 4 Aaron Earl Smith Jr. land a Notary Public of tate County and State aforesaid, certify that _____________________________f_-_-__------ «* t 9 and wife, Princess Godley Smith and Staley Caraway --Smith Grantor, + y ___ ---.. ___ ___ __________________________ p�, and-wifer GIenda Hb11~"-iliith- i ` personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument Witness My March _____, 1a96--. •+44�+�' ....•+'� Ch's}`~ p hand and official stamp or seat, this �3�_ day of ..--_-•_-- -------------------------- R'rrf COU%000 q+ttitre+s+ttet my commission expires: �y`t_ad-;���- -- - w.iti.t� ---- Notary Paine S!AL-STAMP NORTH CAROLINA. ----------------------------------County. 1, a Notary Public of the County A" State aforesaid, Certify that------------------------------------------ A ------------------------- -------.A personally ease before me this day and acknowledged that ---- he is --------------------------- Secretary of y ,------------------------------------------------------ a North Carolina eorporatioa,and that by authority duly u mgiven mita as the act of the cerporatien, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its --------------- President. sealed with Its torporate seal and attested by ----------- as its --------------------------- Secretary' P Wltatss my hand and of[ie)rl stamp of seal, this ------- day of --------------------------, 19_-__----. my commission expires:---------------------------------------------------------------------- Notary Public The foregoing Certificates) of --------------------------- - ---=------ -------- -------------- ------ ---- --- -- ----------------------------------------------------------- ------ ----------------------------- ----------------- Islare certified to be correct This iastnuineat and title certificate are duty registered at the date and time and L tie Boot aad Page shown on the tint page hereof. C. _ KENNETH C. WiLKINS -_-RlGISTEB air DssDs POs_---1----------------COVIrrn U -------------------- 1--=-�uG ------------- ---- ->teglster e[ Deeds N. C. Bw Assoc. Form No. 3 C- 1976. Revised 5' 1977 - J.r,r *4-r a C.. iM aa. 121. vao- . tw, N C ?TOSS ft Md to Alp .mw waw t1w H. C er A, - 1961 k BKO16267PGO0943 WAKE COUNTY, NC LAURA M RIDDICK REGISTER OF DEEDS PRESENTED & RECORDED ON 01-15-2016 AT 09:42:13 STATE OF NC REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX: $400.00 BOOK: 016267 PAGE: 00943 - 00944 NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED Excise Tax: $ 400.00 Parcel Identifier No part of 0190914 verified by County on the day of 120 By: Mail/Box to: Grantee This instrument was prepared by: David R Godfrey, P. O Box 845 Apex, NC 27502 (without title examination or tax advice) Brief description for the Index: Tract 3 2.349 acres THIS DEED made this 11th day of January, 2016, by and between GRANTOR SHIRLEY E CARAWAY, unmarried (aka Shirley E Carraway and Shirley O Caraway) Address: 2708 Olive Chapel Road Apex, NC 27502 GRANTEE MARTHA SMITH FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a 75% undivided interest And MARLOU BACON, a 25% undivided interest Address: 405 Hunter Street Apex, NC 27502 Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g. corporation or partnership. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in White Oak Township, Wake County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: BEING all of Tract 3, containing 2.349 acres net, Recombination Plat for Shirley O Caraway, John M Eakes, Martha Smith Family Limited Partnership & Marlou S Bacon, as recorded in Book of Maps 2015, Page 2160 Wake County Registry. submitted electronically by "Stam & Danchi, PLLC" in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents and the terms of the submitter agreement with the wake County Register of Deeds. NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised 9 1/1/2010 Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association BKO16267PGO0944 The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by Deed Book 4551 Page 751, Wake County Registry. All or a portion of the property herein conveyed includes or x_ does not include the primary residence of a Grantor. A map showing the above described property is recorded in Book of Maps 2015 Page 2160 . TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.. And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions: Subject to easements and restrictions of record, matters shown on recorded plats of the subject property, and ad valorem taxes for the current year. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written. (SEAL) SHIRLEY E/CARAWAY State of North Carolina County of Wake I, a Notary Public of the State and County aforesaid do hereby certify that Shirley E Cara ay unmarred (aka Shirley E Carraway, Shirley O Caraway) personally appeared before me this d y and acknowledged the due execut on of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal this the � day of January, 2016 n My Commission Ex 'res: Not%GODFREY Puic 1� ke coup , Nc y Commis20 sion Expires 9/i9/2C NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010 Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association BKO16374PGO1559 WAKE COUNTY, NC 150 LAURA h RIDDICK REGISTER OF DEEDS PRESENTED 8 RECORDED ON 0510412016 13:00:18 BOOK:016374 PAGE:01559 - 01561 NON -WARRANTY DEED Excise Tax:$none Tax Parcel ID No. 0115160 Verified by County on the day of , 20 By: Mail/Box to:Grantee This instrument was prepared by: David R Godfrey SAVAGE AND GODFREY (without title examination or tax advice) Brief description for the Index: THIS NON WARRANTY DEED, made this the 29th of April, 2016, by and between GRANTOR: SHIRLEY E. CARAWAY unmarried whose mailing address is 2708 Olive Chapel Road Apex NC 272502 (herein referred to collectively as Grantor) and GRANTEE: JOHN M. EAKES whose mailing address is 2720 Olive Chapel Road Apex, NC 27502 (herein referred to collectively as Grantee) and [Include mailing address for each Grantor and Grantee; marital status of each individual Grantor and Grantee; and type of entity, e.g., corporation, limited liability company, for each non -individual Grantor and Grantee.] WITNESSETH: For valuable consideration from Grantee to Grantor, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby gives, grants, quitclaims and conveys unto Grantee in fee simple the following described property located in White Oak Township, Wake County, State of North Carolina, more particularly described as follows: BEING all of that 0.424 acre tract, Recombination Plat for Shirley 0 Caraway, John M. Eakes, Martha Smith Family Limited Partnership & Marlou S Bacon, as recorded in Book of Maps 2015 Page 2160 Wake County Registry. Revised December 17, 2009 BKO16374PGO1560 Said property having been previously conveyed to Grantor by instrument(s) recorded in Book 4551 Page 751, Wake County. All or a portion of the property herein conveyed _ includes or _x_ does not include the primary residence of a Grantor. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee, together with all privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in fee simple. Grantor makes no warranty, express or implied, as to title to the property hereinabove described. All references to Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include the parties as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include the singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written. (Entity Name) By: By: Print/Type Name & Title: By: Print/Type Name & Title: By: Print/Type Name & Title: State of Northolipa a County of t-h,L 4�5" SEAL SHIRLEY E C WAY (SEAL) I certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day, each acknowledging to me that he or she signed the foregoing document: Shirley E Caraway unmarried Date: Z 2016 otaryPublic My Commission Expires: Revised December 17, 2009 (SEAL) (SEAL) (Official/Notarial Seal) SANDRA N. SHECKELLS Notary Public Wake County, NC My Commission Expires 9/04/2016 BKO16374PGO1561 BOOK:016374 PAGE:01559 - 01561 000-0-0�ww� 106"RR WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Please retain yellow trailer page It is part of the recorded document and must be submitted with the original for re- recording. Laura M. Riddick Register of Deeds Wake County Justice Center 300 South Salisbury Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC 27601 ❑ New Time Stamp ❑ Additional Document Fee This Customer Group # of Excessive Entities # of Time Stamps Needed ❑ $25 Non -Standard Fee ❑ Additional Reference Fee This Document _# of Pages �t BKO09048PGO1304 Excise Tax $ -0- Gift 561 r 0; Heeds Wake GSR dd ck Reglst8l2312001 j4n49=10 Pies „ted 8 Recorded 0 01304 _ 01306 Page 009048 Riiok Recording Time, Book and Page Tax Lot No. 0115161 Parcel Identifier No. Verified by County on the day of '19 - by 19by Mail after recording to Grantees This instrument was prepared by Robert S. Brooks Brief Description for the Index NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED made this 14 day of June 2001, by and between GRANTOR: GRANTEE: Shirley E. Caraway and husband, Lewis Wayne Eakes and wife, Harry F. Caraway Betsy Brunt Eakes 2732 Olive Chapel Rd. Apex, NC 27502 Enter in appropriate block for each patty: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.q. corporation or partnership. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors , and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot of parcel of land situated in the Township, County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: BEING all of Tract A of the survey and map for Pauline A. Olive as shown on that survey by Smith & Smith, Surveyors, dated March 1980, and recorded in Book of Maps 1980, page 613, Wake County Registry, containing 2.00 acres, more or less, reference to which is hereby made for a greater certainty of description. RSB 1994GW DEED BKO09048PGO1305 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple. And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions: • Subject to 2001 ad valorem taxes and subsequent years not yet due and payable • Restrictions, easements, covenants and rights-of-way of record, if any. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the day and year first above written. C 400Z�� �m ST 1� cn>O� � ¢ tL Wz�77� 0 7U The foregoing Certificate(s) of NORTH CAROLINA, (Seal) Shirley E.way (V7 ,/ (Seal) Harry F. Caraway Wake County. 1, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that Shirley E. Caraway and Harry F. Caraway, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 22°a day Augus Ol My commission expires: Notary P is/are certified to be correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof. REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR By Deputy/Assistant - Register of Deeds RSB1994GWDEED COUNTY ME 1 1' 1 ACI 1 1 • Laura 0 Riddick Register of Deeds Wake County, MC Book : 009048 Page : 01304 — 01306 Yellow probate sheet is a vital part of your recorded document. Please retain with original document and submit for rerecording. Wake County Register of Deeds E WAK Laura M. Riddick COUNTY Register of Deeds NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina - Wake County The foregoing certificate of Notary(ies) Public is (are) certified to be correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the book and page shown on the first page hereof. Laura M. Riddick, Register of "<�-I 6,� By: Assistant epu y Register of -bee s This Customer Group This Document # of Time Stamps Needed New Time Stamp # of Pages BKO15965PGO1258 NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED Excise Tax: $313.00 WAKE COUNTY, NC LAURA M RIDDICK REGISTER OF DEEDS PRESENTED & RECORDED ON 03-31-2015 AT 09:58:00 STATE OF NC REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX: $313.00 BOOK:015965 PAGE:01258 Parcel Identifier No. _14640 Verified by County on the day of 120 By: Mail/Box to: Stam & Danchi (Box 185) This instrument was prepared by: Stam & Danchi, PLLC Brief description for the Index: 2740 Olive Chapel Road THIS DEED made this day of March , 2015, by and between GRANTOR Jo Annette Cooke Goodwin, unmarried 915 Homestead Park Drive Apex, NC 27502 All or a portion of the property herein conveyed does include the primary residence of a Grantor. Staley C. Smith P.O. Box 457 Apex, NC 27502 GRANTEE Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g. corporation or partnership. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt ofwhich is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the White Oak Township, Wake County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: See the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated herein by reference. submitted electronically by "Stam & Danchi, PLLC" in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents and the terms of the submitter agreement with the wake County Register of Deeds. NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010 Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association 01260 BKO15965PGO1259 The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 2030, page 288 and Book 2188, Page 562 A map showing the above described property is recorded in Book of Maps TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple. And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions: 1. 2015 ad valorem taxes. 2. All easements, restrictions and rights of way of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written. (Entity Name) go Print/Type Name & Title: By: Print/Type Name & By: Print/Type Name & Title: C62G l4 - 6 0 oQ� ""— (SEAL) Jo Annette Cooke Goodwin (SEAL) Print/Type Name: (SEAL) Print/Type Name: State of North Carolina - County of Wake I, the undersigned Notary Public ofthe County of Wake and State aforesaid, certify that JO ANNETTE COOKE GOODWIN, unmarried, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledge due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed. Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this arch, 2015. 1 i %% ���s My C ss, On��p�l�Yes. o d"Notary Public (Affj • ®� Notary's Printed or Typed Name NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised OO 1/1/2010 Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association BKO15965PGO1260 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2740 OLIVE CHAPEL ROAD, APEX, NC 27502 TRACT ONE: BEGINNING at a railroad spike located in the centerline of the Apex Olive chapel Road, S.R. #1160, said point also being at the centerline intersection with S.R. #1145; runs thence with E.C. Smith's line North 3 degrees 01 minutes East 277.58 feet to an iron pipe; thence another line with Smith South 88 degrees 27 minutes East 198.90 feet to an iron pipe; thence another line with said Smith South 3 degrees 54 minutes West 336.50 feet to an iron pipe in the centerline of said S.R. #1160; thence along centerline of said road North 71 degrees 33 minutes West 201.80 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 1.40 acres, more or less, according to survey of E.C. Smith, R.L.S. dated October 26, 1971. TRACT TWO: BEGINNING at an iron pipe, said pipe being the Northeast corner of Jack Cooke's house lot and runs thence with said Cooke's line North 88 degrees 27 minutes West 198.90 feet to an iron pipe, the Northwest corner of said house lot; thence North 3 degrees 01 minutes East 25 feet to a stake, E.C. Smith's new corner; thence another new line with said Smith, South 88 degrees 27 minutes East 199.28 feet to a stake; thence another new line with said Smith, South 3 degrees 54 minutes West 25 feet, to the point of BEGINNING, containing .11 of an acre, more or less. Pat McCrory Governor Date Received NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III Director Secretary DWQ Use Only: Project # Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination Required Information 1. Owner Information (corporation/individual who is legally responsible for the property and its compliance) 1a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed See attached parcel table and deeds 1b. Responsible Party (for LLC) Lennar Carolinas, LLC 1c. Mailing Address 909 Aviation Pkwy, Ste 700 Morrisville, NC 27560 1d. Telephone Number Tomas@spanglerenvironmental.c lorn 1e. Email Address 5a. Name of project 2. Location of Project Site - please include the county, nearest named town and highway number: Olive Chapel Road (multiple addresses), Apex, Wake County, North Carolina. Nearest Town: Apex Nearest Highway: Highway 64 3. Has anyone from DWQ visited the site? I Y I Staff Name I Mike Deaton Date of Visit? 8/5/14 Additional Requested Information 4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 4a. Name, Company Spangler Environmental 4b. Mailing address 4338 Bland Rd., Raleigh, NC 27609 4c. Telephone no. 919-875-4288 4d. Email address Tomas@spanglerenvironmental.c lorn 5. Project and Site Information 5a. Name of project Smith Farm 5b. County Wake 5c. Nearest Named Stream Reedy Branch 5d. River Basin Cape Fear 5e. Provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available): Portions of this site are being considered for development. Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo and/or NRCS Soil Survey. If you are unable to locate either of these maps, please contact the Regional Office for assistance. DWQ Use Only: Is this stream call for the purpose of: buffer mitigation nutrient offset credit Please return form to: Sara Knies 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Fax: (919) 571-4718 Email: sara.knies d)-ncdenr.aov For DWR Staff. Email following documents to applicant: Q Riparian Buffer Authorization & Help Document D Session Law 2012-200 Note: Submittals on Friday after 12:00 pm will be stamped as received on the next business day. Q PCN & PCN Checklist Q Minor/Major Variance li a, % Legend Property boundary 11 S m _ % '-- •� • j 1 • :ate �f r I1r 1p o !a Ole It - f'00000 . --` IIr r r� M J �r Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence Topographic Map Olive Chapel Road SPANGLER p ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 2016 USGS 7.5' New Hill Quad GrC2 I N VsC2 MfI + CrC2 y S �� Ws ar / fD AA WsC2 e2'�A '�, CrE At, 11`AM M fc k -T W n W \ •-� - r CrC2 - - Au {,� 1132 � , CrC2 t r E C2, ~4 CrC2� t - rr ZX Cr CrC2 rC > 0 Cry C'rB2 CrB2 % C,t CrC2, CrC2 'wlll�r[73� *_ �►�'�, CrC2 f Legend VWsC2 g Property boundary 1 rE -, Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence SPANGLER Paper -Bound Soil Survey Olive Chapel Road ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 1970 USDA Soil Survey of Wake County N W E S Lak w>INMINOR- Stream N n w: srnr�. , �- Asx -.. _ .� �. ^, .--�—.,,-- • Pond �tJB All . � � " � �'; i � 'ids � Fq °• � _.�.. ,,...^ i 43 Legend Property boundary Non -jurisdictional pond in high ground Intermittent stream," k Wetlands ;,_. � � es ,. Jurisdictional pond " '$ 0 130 260 520 Feet -�, -2�, dk ' ',.. I I s Smith Assemblage AM Due Diligence Delineation Map Olive Chapel Road SPANGLER p ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Apex, Wake County, NC 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source: July, 2016 919-875-4288 Jones & Cnossen Preliminary Site Plan Data NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: ProjectfSite:Latitude: �-h �� rn .3 , 7300 Evaluator: 7 County:VA Longitude: 0 1 2 Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent 2 Stream Dete ircle one) Other r(% if z 19 or perennial 2 lif z 30' Ephemeral ntermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name: !"I A. ueomor holo (Subtotal= ) Absent Weak Mod rate Strong 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 0.5 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 T 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel= a = 0 Yes = 3 artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology Subtotal = 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles Foy- 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 0.5 C. Biology Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 1 1.5 25. Algae 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: Pc` �l NZ N3 1 "b t ' �