20160927 Ver 1_401 Application_20160916

K4%� LMG
LAND MANAGE:o1iENT GROUP Inc.
:aw Environmental Consultants
September 21, 2016
TO: Mr. Kyle Dahl
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: NWP 39 Application; Ogden Market Place
New Hanover County, NC
Action ID# SAW -2014-02256
Dear Kyle:
COURTES y
2 0 1 60 92 7
Enclosed is a NWP 39 application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of
Halpern Ogden, LLC for the construction of a commercial development at the intersection of Market
St. and Middle Sound Loop Rd. in Wilmington, NC. NC DOT is requiring the applicant to install a turn
lane off of Market Street. This will require 48 LF of permanent stream impact to extend an existing
42" culvert under the road and install a rip rap apron to accommodate stormwater that flows
through this pipe. Temporary impacts to 15 LF of stream are also needed during construction. LMG
staff has evaluated the stream channel at the area to be impacted using the NC Stream Assessment
Methodology and it received a Low rating. Therefore, no mitigation is proposed.
The Pre -Construction Notification form, associated maps, SAM assessment forms and
summary, and site plan are enclosed for your review. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely, Al
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
Cc: Mr. Charlie Worthen, Halpern Ogden LLC
Mr. John Townsend, Davenport
Mr. Chad Coburn, NC DWR
Ms. Jennifer Burdette, NC DWR
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

O� �'WAT6'9
COURTESY
COPY
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
A.
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form D
Applicant Information
O
1.
Processing p
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the�+
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ElSection 10 Perm
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
RMiRCF
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
Engineer spoke with Kyle Dahl
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Ogden Market Place
2b.
County:
New Hanover County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Wilmington
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Halpern Properties LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
5954 598
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. William D. Brown Jr.
3d.
Street address:
5200 Roswell Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA 30342
3f.
Telephone no.:
770-508-3327
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Mr. William D. Brown Jr.
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Halpern Ogden LLC
4d.
Street address:
5200 Roswell Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA 30342
4f.
Telephone no.:
770-508-3327
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Kim Williams
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
5d. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
R04409-001-002-000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.271638 Longitude: -77.818780
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
12.74 ac
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Howe Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SA; ORW
2c. River basin:
White Oak
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site currently contains several residential homes and commercial businesses. Other sections are undeveloped and
forested. Adjacent land use is commercial or residential. The stream section to be impacted is degraded because of the
large impervious cover of the watershed and amount of stormwater that runs through it (see attached SAM report).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.02 acre of isolated wetlands
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
915 LF of perennial stream along southwestern property boundary.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a commercial development with a grocery store and retail shops that
will serve the neighboring community. The commercial development must have good visibility and easy access from high-
traffic roads. NC DOT is requiring a right-in turn lane off of Market Street, which will require 48 LF of stream impacts for a
culvert extension and rip rap apron. An additional 15 LF of temporary stream impact is needed for construction.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes the construction of a commercial development that will include a 45,600-sf grocery store, retail
shops, parking, access ways (from both Market St and Middle Sound Loop Rd), and stormwater facilities. NC DOT is also
requiring the construction of a right-in turn lane off Market Street. The applicant is obtaining a driveway permit from DOT
for this. They will also need to extend the 42" culvert under Market Street by 18' and install a rip rap apron (7' x 30' x 34')
to accommodate heavy flows coming through the pipe. A 15 If construction impact is needed just downstream of the rip
rap for a check dam and possible dewatering. This work will occur within an existing drainage easement. The turn lane
and culvert work will be completed first. The check dam will be removed as soon as the pipe and rip rap are installed and
stabilized. Site will be cleared and graded. Stormwater facilities will be installed and roads/utilities will be constructed.
Then building construction will occur. Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment
will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Christian Preziosi
Land Management Group, Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Emily Hughes of the USACE issued the JD on 9/3/15 (Action ID# SAW-2014-02256).
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Non -riparian
®Yes
ElNo
El Corps
®DWQ
0.02
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.02
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert/rip rap
UT to Howe Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
20
48
Check dam/
® PER
® Corps
S2 ❑ P ®T
construction
UT to Howe Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
20
15
corridor
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
[:11 NT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
63
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts N/A
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction N/A
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) N/A
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
EJ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts were minimized as much as possible through careful site design. This commercial development is located at the
intersection of two busy roads (Market St and Middle Sound Loop Rd). NC DOT is requiring that a right tum lane off of Market
Street and into this development be constructed to aid in anticipated traffic congestion. There is currently a 42" culvert under
Market Street at this location that will need to be lengthened. It was also determined that a 7' x 30' x 34' rip rap outfall was
needed downstream of the new culvert to accommodate flows. The rip rap apron was sized per NCDEQs BMP manual and is
based on the flow and pipe size. The quality of the stream to be impacted rated Low using SAM (attached).
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Check dam will be used to ensure sediment does not flow downstream during construction. This check dam will be
removed as soon as the pipe and rip rap are installed and the area stabilized.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
No mitigation is proposed because of the degraded state of
the stream at the impact location (see SAM results).
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank N/A
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program N/A
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan N/A
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ N/A
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan N/A
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
55.7
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Project engineer is currently in the process of obtaining a stormwater permit.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Wilmington
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes E:1 No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review NIA
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes El No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated '
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B _0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent properties. No future stream impacts are anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated by this project would tie into the municipal system.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program GIS layer was used to determine the presence of federally -listed species. No rare
species are known to occur within the site. The Atlantic sturgeon and West Indian manatee are known to occur within a
one -mile radius of the site, likely within Howe or Pages Creek. The northern long-eared bat is also known to occur in New
Hanover County. Impacts to federally protected species are not anticipated to occur.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat. The project area is not considered EFH or HAPC for any species.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of
cultural or historic resources. Two surveyed houses are listed on the website at 7148 and 7158 Market St (NH 3427 and
NH3428). They are listed as ineligible for historic designation.
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
website was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Kim Williams
Z,
9/21/2016
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 11 of 11

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for Ogden Market Place project. All questions in regards to this project should be directed to
Land Management Group, Inc.
Sincerely,
Kppficant
-b- --arvU-4r, �3r
Print Name
Date

S
tr
Murraysvtlle
Ki ng
Grant
s
7� y4
windemere
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map
Ogden Market Place
New Hanover County, NC
September 2016
40-14-246P
\Wm
/ I
�OV
'SFP �5
DoQ'�Var_ ZQ�6
Sources: Esri, HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand).
TomTom, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
LMGLANLMLN I GROUP
www.lmgroup.net
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Figure 1
Vicinity Map

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Scotts Hill Quadrangle 7.5 minute
SCALE 1" = 700'
Ogden Market Place LMG
New Hanover County, NC _ Figure 2
September 2016 www.lmgroup.net USGS Topographic Map
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
40-14-246P Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

4 ,/y
e
r�• ✓ / 44,
'It. f SO Le4.
`
M/y
Mu,* SITE
1(0
Y P TTT3f 0
p
MU
rr+Q t J`
,
w , y
hr l K ,A C`r
i`S �� S � ��rvF�1tr� � ,.gip ��� � t'* F. �� . � :. , .✓ F'F,
Y k:.✓ x
dry•: r` r 1-4
9 y.
Kr
aN
-. .51 MU
Be
" 1
i5'
Legend
JO: Johnston soils
*Boundaries are approximate and are Kr: Kureb sand, 1-8%
not meant to be absolute. Le: Leon sand
Mu: Murville fine sand
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey SCALE 1" = 300'
FNeowgHanover
en Market Place LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT' GROUP;,,
County, NC °°,.°°me ° °nEt Figure 3
eptember 2016 www.lmgroup.net Soils Map
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
40-14-246P Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

:w 4 ; ► / �.
}'.' iR �►> . hy.� N`�'' fr,%:� ... 9ar�.r t: JP a � 4 ;�`. Wit.
e
t Y i
nN
�rX
o h
Ii�r 4
s f f a
I
A 14
4.
61
AL
ed
:A
rl
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source. 2012 NC One Map Aerial Photography SCALE 1" - 200'
Ogden Market Place 4LMG
New Hanover County, NC _ Figure 4
September 2016 www.lmgroup.net 2012 Aerial Photograph
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
40-14-246P Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

------------------- �_�.---_-a-----------------_----- - - - - -- --- - - - - ---- --------- - - - - -- -
= i7 �s iT`Tii .. _-. ... _. ' - a �'- - t1S t7 MARKET 5T)
- - - - - - - - - - - - i - - - - i - - - - 71�p6 t - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �.� — — — — — —. / a— — — — — — — — — _ — — _JI\AI�1� — �•c— — —. — — — — — r — — — — — — — — — — — — —
y� n i i — —
-------------
k. �.� — _ ` �. �� i
-
D,
o � � � •V Y o. ° o
Existing Building
't, I w, . a r 4 ' `! (out mrrah
Proposed Stream Impact:
1
-.--- ----- ------
48 LF perm
°.
a
#
15 LF tem p
° ._6
° °
�-
. •. °� °
rgkp. o off;
. _ ::: • � �� �}'Ds gi�pp. ��. � .
AR MI
• :.iC
ii MR111 Cal'
M.
45,600 sf
• � �I�s�' tt�kiifi'e �a�a �i .. _ �•
• �� flo. \SodSodtra �� r , i1 ••
�– IIII `bso ■ 1
• , Ipr� T
1
parking spaces)
LI----�
�75R•4'f'j ��
MIS 1'
A •1-i I
i'1 1I''1 nnnr
11>A1 113'1 i
, • • a•�i/r
I I 7
111 r!aNr'
11!!!•x.ll,`,j !'.1-O "I
Ii�1lI• �O!"�I1I II iill
1 3 ] ] i� F 1 Y1 1�P,Ys•�a,
.. I����ls• .������ls;!!-lel-.-.,
IE DDC'„MENT TDOErHEA Al TI LCNCER ANG%SCNS PRESEN.JIF_RkJN.6 AiENG:O jNLY=OR-i SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND L.IENI FOR VKtl�HI"WN PRE�AAEL. RkuEEO:CFIMPRC=ERR '.-U'DTH6XCUM=N-BYDll.,-1'r.i WAI-= AfLIY Bk A.VCV.rCNDE� u:HCEMEN'SE'WEENDPVENPORIAVDRSCtIEVi.
H
e: -- - - - - - - -- ---_`-
_ – – – –
w'" � `.'�.�1.1•-i1f` YW `lI`'wiifYi-'IW' 7i"i �."�filr'�e-li 7• i
b
if
E
r Vrit'PN•1 >rr_� ,
r
SD 25 0 50 100
1 100
N FINAL
I�
I–
z
W >�
J
0
LU <
> Z n U m
o a =
dK c
z 0 o a <
W U -IL 4 n
J v
Q
W
U
g U
CL Z
W
Z
Y O
H
Z
O
C7
O
m
X
w
Z
LLJ
J
rn
EX -02

I - . - Perennial Stream
Permanent Stream Impacts (48 LF)
Temporary Stream Impacts (15 LF)
US 17 (MARKET ST)
70+00
M 39' 39' 40B' F
NCDOT STD. 840.31 OR 840.32
STA. 70+17.57 -�
OFF: 46.67' RT
RIM: 41.00'
/ INV. IN.-30.87'
..................................._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._/-.._..INV- OUT..30.77'
... .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.
-A---------------------------
18
`--------------18 LF 42" RCP @ 1.00%
Proposed Turn Lane
R/W
7-R W R/W-
Permanent Stream Impact: 48 LF,
AUE AUE AUE AUE AUE
-Y 1-
70+17.40
-7 EXIST. 42" RCP
18 LF 42" RCP @ 1.00%
Temp Stream Impact: 15 LF
NCDOT STD. 840.31 OR 840.32
STA. 70+17.57
OFF: 46.67' RT
RIM: 41.00'
INV. IN: 30.87'
INV. OUT: 30.77' RIP RAP OUTFALL
7'x30'x34'
22 TONS CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
30 SY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
LU
U -i
Stream (Approx.) - 1
PDE PDYF
IF
k„
oil
THIS DOCUMENT TOGETHER WP-THECONWP"S AND DESIGNS PRESENED TFERWISINTER0E0 ON.Y -OR"RE SPECIFICPURPOSE AND CANT FOR MICH IT WASPREPARED REUSE OF OR IMPRC=ERRE C; WON THIS DOCUMENT BY OTHERS.WITIOUT WrENAUTHORWTION AND ARAE"ATECN BY DAVENPORT.SHALLPEWI_iCJT LIABWTY-DOAVEN'OR- ANDSHALL BEA VIOLATION OF THE AOREEWNT SETWEEA DAVENPORT AND ITS CLIENT.
I
N FINAL
Q
10 5 0 10 20
1" = 20'
SHEET W
EX -01

r
Ogden Market Place
NC SAM Summary
A perennial stream was identified along the southwestern property boundary of the Ogden
Market Place site, located in Wilmington, NC (New Hanover Co). This stream is considered to be
an urban stream with the watershed consisting mostly of impervious surface. Little to no
streamside interaction occurs. No wetlands are present in the streamside area. Anthropogenic
modification of the streamside area has resulted in accelerated drainage into the stream. Fill,
soil compaction, buildings, and drainage pipes have all contributed to severe alteration to water
storage capacity. The buffer on both banks consists only of weedy herbaceous vegetation less
than ten feet wide. The vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity.
Thermoregulation has been degraded by removal of trees and shrubs.
The presence of a culvert at the stream origin has resulted in degradation of several functions
including direct loss of bed and bank, decreasing floodplain access, channel destabilization,
altered geomorphology, and degradation of natural in -stream habitat (NC Stream Functional
Assessment Team 2014). The stream in the assessment area is deeply incised and relatively
straight. The stream profile and pattern are substantially altered. Foam was observed on the
water surface which indicates potential water quality stressors. Aquatic life is largely absent (only
one mosquito fish was observed). Please see the attached NC SAM assessment forms, site map,
and photo that further describes this on-site conditions.
NC Stream Functional Assessment Team. 2014. NC Stream Assessment Method (NC
SAM) User Manual, Version 2 (February 2014). 178 pp.

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
k.arcwaior version c
USACE AID* SAW -2014-02256 NCDWR *
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Publix, Market St. 2. Date of evaluation: 9/16/16
3. Applicantlowner name: Robert Berry 4. Assessor name/organization: Corey Novak / LMG, Inc.
5. County: New Hanover 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Cape Fear on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Howe Creek
B. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.270349, -77.820430
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 60
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 10 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 20 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ®No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ❑ Piedmont (P) ® Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A` l El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
El Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
[]Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
[]Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
n Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Strearnside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a.
❑Yes
❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses a N
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 6-2
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetationY L
Eli Sand bottom
EI C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) L tZ
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 02
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS
11. Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a.
❑Yes
❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b.
Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
❑B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ Cl ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/day (< 0.062 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
❑Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
® ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A > 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
®E ®E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
❑A
❑A
Mature forest
❑B
M
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C
®C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D
M
Maintained shrubs
❑E
❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or Gearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. [-]No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E 2:230
Notes/Sketch

Stream Site Name Publix, Market St.
Stream Category la1
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 2
Date of Assessment 9/16/16
Assessor Name/Organization Corey Novak / LMG, Inc.
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
LOW
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
LOW
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
LOW
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

N- ___ - -lam _ Z__ '
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances
are considered approximate. This represents a preliminary r
sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated
areas and review and approval by the US Army Corps of
;, Engineers has been completed. 3 t
(Map Source: 2012 NC One Map Aerial Photography.) +.► "'
- - - - — — ---- ;--rte _` --- ------ '�
SITE
1 r
�llq�� flit
• ! �a01 1
♦ /�N
�O
•
k4
,
s
a111� * i
4
r
fr
Ir
i
i, L -j- ir.
f ;
® Isolated Wetlands (0.04 acres +/-)
—> Stream (Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.) (tributary of Howe Creek)
SCALE 1" = 200'
Publix, Market -Middle Sound
New Hanover County, NC = NC SAM
September 2016 www.LMGroup.net
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078 Assessment Area
Fax [phone]
40-14-246 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

Y � c
414w
71
r •
MAI
i �ka f�i
Til 3 f •�X � ����: �
i •
1 }7j
,,,4`g'`.`:� '-�-ate s,�•1�'•i�..r`�".fi.`. '. "- ;.; ►4art, "��'�. ...r] � .�{'-t�.. +�"'' "'' �/�,. .1�+`µ�3F
Publix - Market Street, Middle Sound L Ni
New Hanover County, NC NC SAM
www.lmgroup.net Assessment Area Photograph
September 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-14-246 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2014-02256 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-SCOTTS HILL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Applicant: Christian Preziosi, Land Management Group
Address: 3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 12.7 Nearest Town Wilmington
Nearest Waterway Howe Creek River Basin New. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3030001 Coordinates Latitude: 34.2704550289828
Longitude: -77.8186536459367
Location description: Property is multiple parcels owned by different landowners located at the south corner of
Market Street (Hwy 17) and Middle Sound Loop Road, near Ogden, North Carolina. Parcel IDs: R04409-001-001-000,
R04409-001-002-000, R04409-001-003-000, R04409-001-004-000, R04409-001-007-000, R04410-004-017-000, R04410-
004-018-000, R04410-004-019-000, R04410-004-021-000 and R04410-004-025-000.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area
. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC 4 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S.s on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by
the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 9/3/2015. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Emily Hughes at 910-251-4635 or
Emily.B.Hughes(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as defined in the Corps of Engineers 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual and Reeional Coastal Plain Supplement and is adjacent to an unnamed tributary to
Howe Creek Howe Creek being a Section 10 tidally influenced Waters of the U.S. This determination was made by
information provided by Land Management Group Inc. and a desktop determination by Emily Hughes 12/9/2014.
D. Remarks: Please be aware that the 12.7 -acre project area contains 0.04 acre of non -jurisdictional, isolated
wetlands Please contact the North Carolina Division of Water Resources at [phone] to discuss the State's
regulations and requirements for these waters. It was determined that these wetlands are not bordering, neighboring
or contiguous with any jurisdictional waters.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/3/2015.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. * * DlglAy signed by HUGHES.EMILV.BURTON.1289073660
HUGHES.EMILY.BURTON.1289073 DIN -US,o U.S. Government, ou=DOD, o—M, ou=USA,
cn=HUGHES.EMILV.BURTON.1289073660
Corps Regulatory Official: 660 Date: 2015.09.03 11 ATA 6-04'00'
Date: September 3, 2015 Expiration Date: September 3, 2020
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please
complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at http://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/.

SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http:Ilwtivw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civi]Works/Re ulato Pro ramandl"ermits.aUx or
Corps regulations at 33 CPR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATINIE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Christian Preziosi, L1<1C, Inc. File Number: SAW -2011-02256 Date: 9/3/2015
Attached is: See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
®
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
F-11
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http:Ilwtivw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civi]Works/Re ulato Pro ramandl"ermits.aUx or
Corps regulations at 33 CPR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 11 -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Emily Hughes
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
[phone]
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investiations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Emily Hughes, 69 Darlington Ave., Wilmington, NC 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

LOT 5w2 J .Q
137 EL OLDEN OR %
i • is
J f —2
j i(; NON -JURISDICTIONAL
r 6 %o ISOLATED WETLAND "A'
-cm. °" % o L 946 SQ. FT.
0.02 AC.
_saa�oenlM7 azr.ar rr_EI
\/ w� MARION L. RODERICK, JR ETAL
% O@ 5544 O 349
200 Mm a SOUND LV
R—'S
169.03' ;
N40'09'47 -E uK
KAY BLAKE
DS 4443 PC 916 r
134 INGIM SOUND L• f
R-15 '
SITE
VICINITY MAP
(NOT_ TO SCALE)
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION
1. CHRISTOPHER JAMES GAGNE. PLS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WETLAND
AREAS SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE SURVEYED AND PLOTTED FROM WETLAND
LOCATIONS MARKED IN THE FIELD BY OTHER PARTIES. THIS CERTIFICATION
EXTENDS ONLY TO 7 HE LOCATION OF WETLAND FLAGS ESTABLISHED BY
OTHERS.
CHRIS P JAMES GAG , S p!fA E!(
USACOE CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFIES THA "r THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF TI IE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT
AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION
OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL.-
REGULATORY
ANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE HUGHES EMILY BU
FM�O5�e-O.3.F�em�erRvpre�DoO. owvN4
DATE RTON 1289073660 o";a,�.o o ;o^L„oTON1289023�°
USACE ACTION ID
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S15.28'06"W
21-65-
L2
S08'06'42'W
. ._.... ......_. IUfr 11li B1.IC Rt OX ._..... ___.. ._.� ,..._ ....__
_.... _._ .:- ._._... _.
S72'55'26"E
22.16'
L4
N28 '29"E
28.27'
L5
N36'02'29"W
17.56'
L6
_- -N40'09'47•E
17.01'
� 139.34
N40'09'47"E 298.15'
_ .,, L......._..
- �— - r-- - -
--IPF Nor
,.._ .. _._._..
Ips {
U
J
1
41 � RI CSS LLC
i I
�
08 5305 PC 924 t :
4
' LOT 2 LOT 3
, I
0 - 725ZZ rraN¢TST.
r; ' ,Ir
1
i I
w o ONE
Ot
ROWAN ASSET
1
!7
{
17134 MARKET STREET: LLC
COMPANY LLC
08 5491 PG 2227
{ {
/
J D@ 5697 PC 1813 :
/ n3a rwaEr sT.
/
/
�.
8x81, { 1
7100 MARKET Sr.
{ `
�
6-2 I
/
f i
•
1 i
:....._..:
J
{ {
EXISTING REifNT10N PUNA
r
i f 1
{ --------
wf
1515W 291.81'
we
1
{
1
}r r
LOT 1
121 EL OGDEN OR
`
f
f
LOT 2
125 0. OWEN OR
•{~---
01
1'.:.0(;1)1\ 1
__--_—
MB 14 PC 42
.10NED: R-15 i
r�
N j
i
TOP OF BANK
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
LOT 3 1
129 FL OCAET!
OF THE U.S.
'Op
J {
(TRIBUTARY OF HOWE
TOAL AREA
f
J
CREEK)
- - /
555,117± SO. FT.
OR 12.744±
J�
ACRES
1
' LOT /Q
133 Cl OCAEN OR • I �
y
r1 r'C
! Oh•/ �
Oj
—
{
z
h
LOT 5w2 J .Q
137 EL OLDEN OR %
i • is
J f —2
j i(; NON -JURISDICTIONAL
r 6 %o ISOLATED WETLAND "A'
-cm. °" % o L 946 SQ. FT.
0.02 AC.
_saa�oenlM7 azr.ar rr_EI
\/ w� MARION L. RODERICK, JR ETAL
% O@ 5544 O 349
200 Mm a SOUND LV
R—'S
169.03' ;
N40'09'47 -E uK
KAY BLAKE
DS 4443 PC 916 r
134 INGIM SOUND L• f
R-15 '
SITE
VICINITY MAP
(NOT_ TO SCALE)
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION
1. CHRISTOPHER JAMES GAGNE. PLS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WETLAND
AREAS SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE SURVEYED AND PLOTTED FROM WETLAND
LOCATIONS MARKED IN THE FIELD BY OTHER PARTIES. THIS CERTIFICATION
EXTENDS ONLY TO 7 HE LOCATION OF WETLAND FLAGS ESTABLISHED BY
OTHERS.
CHRIS P JAMES GAG , S p!fA E!(
USACOE CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFIES THA "r THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF TI IE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT
AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION
OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL.-
REGULATORY
ANUAL"
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE HUGHES EMILY BU
FM�O5�e-O.3.F�em�erRvpre�DoO. owvN4
DATE RTON 1289073660 o";a,�.o o ;o^L„oTON1289023�°
USACE ACTION ID
0 50 100 200 300 400
1
SCALE: 1"=100'
f f
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S15.28'06"W
21-65-
L2
S08'06'42'W
12.11'
L3
S72'55'26"E
22.16'
L4
N28 '29"E
28.27'
L5
N36'02'29"W
17.56'
L6
N88'41'07"W
17.01'
0 50 100 200 300 400
1
SCALE: 1"=100'
f f