20160843 Ver 1_401 Application_20160816

Charlotte -Mecklenburg
Charlotte Storm ater
w- STORM � ,K PA I D 600 E. Fourth St.,1411 Floorf
ces
WATER Charlotte, NC 28202-2844
Services
August 19, 2016
N.0 Division of Water Resources
Attention: Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1650
20160843
AW) 2 J 2016
Subject: Submittal of Pre -Construction Notification Package for 1114 Bearmore Drive Maintenance
Project
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) is hereby submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification package pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3/ WQC 3883 for approval to the NCDWR for the
1114 Bearmore Drive Maintenance Project.
The project consists of a culvert replacement on an intermittent tributary to McAlpine Creek in the Lower
Catawba River Basin (HUC: 03050103). The existing pipe is failing and in need of replacement. The
stream has steep and eroding banks at the culvert inlet which are proposed to be stabilized by gabion walls
and there is currently a small concrete pad at the inlet of the pipe. The pipe goes under Bearmore Drive and
between 2 homes (I 114 and 1108 Bearmore Drive) before the stream daylights at the rear of 1114
Bearmore Drive. There is a scour pool at the outfall of the culvert and rip rap has washed to the edge of the
scour pool with rip rap in concrete stabilizing the banks. At the outfall, CMSWS is proposing to construct a
new headwall and add a rip rap energy dissipater composed of appropriately sized rock to prevent it from
washing out.
Although CMSWS is proposing to replace the pipe on a linear foot -for -linear foot basis and maintain low
flow channel dimensions by adding alternating baffles throughout the proposed reinforced concrete box
culvert; we are requesting a waiver on the culvert burial condition. Alan Johnson with DWR visited the site
with CMSWS staff and agreed that as a result of the narrow access corridor and location of the zone of
influence of the 2 homes on Bearmore Drive he would grant a waiver to the burial condition. Burying the
pipe would warrant a larger sized pipe and thus create a nearly impossibly small area to work in between
the foundations of the homes; leaving great possibility of damaging them. Waiving the burial requirement
allows CMSWS to use a smaller pipe size and thus have more room for equipment access with less
probability of damaging those properties.
The impacts associated with this project are bank stabilization using gabion walls at the culvert inlet (7 LF
on each bank), 270 LF culvert replacement, and 44 LF rip rap apron. As there is currently (approximately
20 LF) rip rap in the channel downstream of the culvert outlet, the new permanent loss impacts associated
with this project to 24LF.
I have enclosed the following for your review: PCN form, Project Area Maps and Photos, Project Plans,
and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form. If you need any additional information or have any
questions concerning this project and its associated impacts, feel free to contact me by phone or via email.
Sincerely,
Erin Turner
Wetland Specialist
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services Division
Desk phone [phone]
erin.tumer(a-)ci.charlotte.nc.us
cc: Crystal Amschler, USACE
To report drainage problems: 704 -336 -RAIN http://Stormwater.charmeck.org

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
N Yes N No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
1114 Bearmore Drive Culvert Replacement
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
Stonehaven
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple Parcels
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
City of Charlotte, Storm Water Services
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Erin Turner
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Charlotte,Storm Water Services
4d. Street address:
600 E. 4th Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
704-336-3927
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
18907119, 18913101, 18913150
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.163254 Longitude: -80.765443
1 c. Property size:
0.21 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
McAlpine Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Lower Catawba; HU: 03050103
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Intermittent stream flows into the project area from the northwest, to the culvert under Bearmore Drive. The channel has bedrock outcropping in the
channel bottom and the banks are steep and eroding at the culvert inlet. The stream flows through the culvert, under the road and turns left before
outfalling at the southeast corner of 1114 Bearmore drive in a plunge pool. The area is a well established residential neighborhood.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 310
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace the failing corrugated metal pipe culvert under Bearmore Drive with a reinforced concrete box culvert and stabilize the inlet and outlet.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Typical construction equipment will be used to remove & replace the existing pipe, install gabion walls at the inlet and pour new headwalls.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands 0 Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Stream A
INT
Corps
3
44
S2 T
Culvert
Stream A
INT
Corps
3
270
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
314
3i. Comments:
Permanent loss impacts of 24 linear feet. Culvert replacement is on a linear foot -for -linear foot basis.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Channel grading has been minimized to the minimum practicable to install the new pipe. Gabion walls are minimized to the minimum needed to protect
the new headwall and pipe inlet from ongoing erosion. The pipe will be constructed to maintain the low flow channel dimensions using alternating
concrete baffles. The pipe will not be buried as a result of space constraints on site (see cover letter for additional information).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Typical erosion control measures will be utilized in accordance with the construction documents. Additionally, work will be conducted "in -the -dry" by
using cofferdams and a pump around operation to minimize disturbance to downstream waters during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
El Yes Q No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Storm water project will not increase imperviousness of the project area.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3,
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
E] Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes Eg No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge)
of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this stormwater project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑x Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the USFWS Critical Habitat ArcGIS Server demonstrates that this project does not fall within or near a Designated Critical Habitat. A
review of the NCNHP database of Element Occurrences shows no current occurrences of any listed or endangered species within 1 mile of the project
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
T ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat exists within Mecklenburg County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Server indicated that there are no properties listed or determined eligible for
listing within a 1 mile radius of the project area. See Figure 6.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Mecklenburg County GIS.
Erin Digitally signed Erin Turner
DN: —Erin Turner, of
ae
Water Charlotte, ou=Storm Water
Services,
Erin Turner
Turner email=erinturner�ci charlottenc.0
a, "= s
8/19/2016
Date'. 2016.08.19 07:48:33 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 8/11/16
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Erin Turner, City of Charlotte -Storm Water Services
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
1114 Bearmore Drive Culvert Replacement. Project will replace and upsize a failing pipe underneath Bearmore Drive.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg
City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.163254 ON; Long, -80.765443 °W,
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: McAlpine Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
310 linear feet: 3 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: intermittent
Wetlands: 0 acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑✓ Field Determination. Date(s): 8/3/16
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app i nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Charlotte East (1988); 1:24,000
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date):
Other (Name & Date): Figure 5.1114 Bearmore Drive Site Photos
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
D","ihy slg0e0 by Em Temer
Erin Turner eNrn•Enn timeerviceryoCabe.
ou all= .b`mWater SerNces,
m bn�lumer§d Marone—u, -Us
Dele'. 2016.08.1107 46:13 -04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Figure 1. 1114 Bearmore Drive Site Vicinity Map
Davidson
3
Cornelius
i6
73
Hunfersville 1211
26w
24
49
27
�29'�
VW
24
r _ Y
273
51
16
` 160
WecKlenbur staNrnys
A1arVr�=,vs
PI!Ievd _ 51
0
Legend
'W
City Limit
21
7k Site Location
Copyrghtf c) City or Chamtie. Med«W.burg Courtly, NC

unqmm=
mm -
uwqApuns"*A M
Auwq •rte
mam
sa pn-mm.a
Imo®
xopdum Pm�
unApin r4 pM
Pim wa+n+m
sLwqApun -vW
w.aAoPAX. VOOM
Qmq lA" @rWmlo
umqWU3
umqAmpApun Ivo
E*mwwa�
unqAooApmpM
umqApwg+®
3"Vmllf d
silos
am-lA3or-3
WW3tams *
wow
dew 91loS an»Q ajowea8 V� •z 9an6i,j

Figure 3. 1114 Beamore Drive Project Area and WOTUS Map
Leaend
Sm Lomwn
PIP-
�i� srl ms

Figure 4. 1114 Bearmore Drive USGS Topo Map
JTV
s • .
fqa
� . v � j � � a a 1• • ,
ti `e
t
• ` J
e1INA ..
is
s «
a +
Legend
Site Location

Photo 5. Space constraint between homes at 1108 Photo 6. Plunge pool at culvert outfall behind 1114
& 1114 Bearmore Drive (looking downstream). Bearmore Drive.

Figure 6. City of Charlotte Element Occurrences
& Historic Properties
24Ail
`t„t'yj-, �p / G 5•'� r� � I.• ;� ,y N�.�;�"� {y''`s..� ��iJ .�'�. \ ;[i
r•t ��a r'r4' it �' c.. .. 1 1 ''.Y } + `.�Y. TQC �a`�
t .t.usmul 1 w^.rsar- k'
•{. :gip r?j^•-.� , e � � � � . F •L _ i
Legend
• `'�-% ,f -il- Site trcatim
Y• t� • Nsticr, a l Register Hstcric ProperUSS
0 cay unit
, Natural Heritage Saes

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 /
Project/Site: (114 ���Mv�C
Latitude:
Evaluator: rV,-l-P>T
County: �h fJVYv
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent s
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* ?Ike ,
Ephemeral tenmi t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= U1'__>)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
t./
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1 1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
©
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal = `t .5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
CD
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
Q
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0.5
C. Biologv (Subtotal = 'l 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CLD
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1.5
25. Algae
0
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Qabgr =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
o C
Sketch:
��
�-
Li
- V�

INDEX OF SHEETS
Cover Sheet ..... . ............................................................................_..I
General Notes ....................................... _...........................................
Drainage Structure Table and Details.............................................3
Erosion & Sediment Control............................................................4
Plan & Profile ............................... »................................... _.............. 5
Gabions & Details.............................................................................6
Details............................................................................................»...7
AIeAMAair ao
+Y �
gro �,m Ro
P
�^ I
�b
Die
rxoacr ss
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PLANS PREPARED BY:
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
on
CHAPILMU.
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
CONSTRUCTION PLANS OF
BEARMORE DRIVE STORM WATER
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Project Features:
REMOVE EXISTING STORMWATER
INFRASTRUCTURE, INSTALL NEW BOX CULVERT,
RCP, CURB & GUTTER, ASPHALT PAVING, OUTFALL
PROTECTION, BANK GRADING AND STABILIZATION
I \
'^\
\_—
so \ y/ fpµ.
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
\
LOCATION MAP
NTS w
GRAPHIC SCALES
30 60 90
Plan View .................
30 60 90
Hon. profde............
6 12 18
Vert. Profile ............
CALL nC one -CALL
RU— YOU DIG
1—ao0-6}�—A949
AVOID UiIUW DAMAGE
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Proposed Property Line ............. ... ...............
Existing Property Line...................................—
ApparentR/W Line.......................................Existing Structures .........................................
Railroad Tracks ..............................................
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
Fence................................................................
Slope Stake Line .......................... _................. — c c —
Temporary Construction Easement ............. — e e —
Sidewalk/Utility Easement ............................ —sem SM—
Storm Drainage Easement ............................ — WE ;DE_
Existing Gas Line ........................................... — c G —
ExistingWater Line ....................................... w w —
Existing Sanitary Sewer ................................ — ss ss —
Existing Underground Telecommunications UT UT —
Existing Underground Electric ..................... — uE UE —
Existing Storm Drainage ...............................
Proposed Storm Drainage .............................
Flowable Fill Placement ................................
Existing Tree..........................................................................................Z:J
Existing Water Meter............................................................................. 0
Existing Water Valve ........... »........ ._........ .......................................... wy
Existing Gas Valve................................................................................. Pa
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole ................................... ... .................
0
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole.......................................................Os
Existing Storm Drain Manhole.............................................................Oo
ProposedStorm Drain Manhole...........................................................•
Existing Telephone Manhole.................................................................0
Proposed Telephone Manhole...............................................................0
Existing Electric Manhole ................. _............................. _................... 0
Proposed Electric Manhole...................................................................0
Existing Catch Basin..............................................................................8
Proposed Catch Basin ........ . ..................................................................�
Existing Light Pole.......................................»........................................ #
Proposed Light Pole .............. ...... .......................................... _..............
*
ExistingUtility Pole................................................................................
GuyWire.................................................................._........................—<
Proposed Utility Pole...............................................................................L
Iron Pin ... . ........................... »...................... ........................ _.................. 0
Existing Fire Hydrant............................................................................ .
Proposed Fire Hydrant ............. ......... ................ .................................
Existing YardInlet.................................................................................. j
Proposed YardInlet........................... _..... _............................................ M
Tree Removal......................................................................................... X
Accessible Ramp .............................. _................................ _........ _.......
®
TreeProtection.............................................................................
SiltFence.................... _.................................................................
Proposed Guardrail...................................................................
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk ................... �.
Proposed Asphalt Pavement........................................................
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch..............................................................
Proposed Gravel ........................ _.................................................
Proposed Pavement Removal ......................................................
Contract Administration
City of Charlotte
Ch&fdte-NeckIaIStorm
Water Services
RFOM600
East 4th Street
W1Charlotte,
AR
NC 28202
services x
Storm Water Project Manager
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
on
CHAPILMU.
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
CONSTRUCTION PLANS OF
BEARMORE DRIVE STORM WATER
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Project Features:
REMOVE EXISTING STORMWATER
INFRASTRUCTURE, INSTALL NEW BOX CULVERT,
RCP, CURB & GUTTER, ASPHALT PAVING, OUTFALL
PROTECTION, BANK GRADING AND STABILIZATION
I \
'^\
\_—
so \ y/ fpµ.
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
\
LOCATION MAP
NTS w
GRAPHIC SCALES
30 60 90
Plan View .................
30 60 90
Hon. profde............
6 12 18
Vert. Profile ............
CALL nC one -CALL
RU— YOU DIG
1—ao0-6}�—A949
AVOID UiIUW DAMAGE
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Proposed Property Line ............. ... ...............
Existing Property Line...................................—
ApparentR/W Line.......................................Existing Structures .........................................
Railroad Tracks ..............................................
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
Fence................................................................
Slope Stake Line .......................... _................. — c c —
Temporary Construction Easement ............. — e e —
Sidewalk/Utility Easement ............................ —sem SM—
Storm Drainage Easement ............................ — WE ;DE_
Existing Gas Line ........................................... — c G —
ExistingWater Line ....................................... w w —
Existing Sanitary Sewer ................................ — ss ss —
Existing Underground Telecommunications UT UT —
Existing Underground Electric ..................... — uE UE —
Existing Storm Drainage ...............................
Proposed Storm Drainage .............................
Flowable Fill Placement ................................
Existing Tree..........................................................................................Z:J
Existing Water Meter............................................................................. 0
Existing Water Valve ........... »........ ._........ .......................................... wy
Existing Gas Valve................................................................................. Pa
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole ................................... ... .................
0
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole.......................................................Os
Existing Storm Drain Manhole.............................................................Oo
ProposedStorm Drain Manhole...........................................................•
Existing Telephone Manhole.................................................................0
Proposed Telephone Manhole...............................................................0
Existing Electric Manhole ................. _............................. _................... 0
Proposed Electric Manhole...................................................................0
Existing Catch Basin..............................................................................8
Proposed Catch Basin ........ . ..................................................................�
Existing Light Pole.......................................»........................................ #
Proposed Light Pole .............. ...... .......................................... _..............
*
ExistingUtility Pole................................................................................
GuyWire.................................................................._........................—<
Proposed Utility Pole...............................................................................L
Iron Pin ... . ........................... »...................... ........................ _.................. 0
Existing Fire Hydrant............................................................................ .
Proposed Fire Hydrant ............. ......... ................ .................................
Existing YardInlet.................................................................................. j
Proposed YardInlet........................... _..... _............................................ M
Tree Removal......................................................................................... X
Accessible Ramp .............................. _................................ _........ _.......
®
TreeProtection.............................................................................
SiltFence.................... _.................................................................
Proposed Guardrail...................................................................
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk ................... �.
Proposed Asphalt Pavement........................................................
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch..............................................................
Proposed Gravel ........................ _.................................................
Proposed Pavement Removal ......................................................
Contract Administration
Charlotte -Mecklenburg
STORM
/`{ uT`
,, —.r,. _ WATER R
TE
Services %v
Storm Water Construction
Landscape Management
Utility Coordinator
CDOT-Design
CDOT - Implementation
APPROVED
ENGINEER DATE
CLTWater
Storm Water Project Manager
O
O
O

GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN
EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS:
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY:
CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI).
ASPHALT - (COMMERCIAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119 -OB
INTERMEDIATE COURSE.
(RESIDENTAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE
BASE (ABC) COURSE.
GRAVEL - SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE
SIDEWALK SHALL BEFOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS,
PER CITY STD. NO. 10.22.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES:
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS,
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION
BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE UP FOR CATCH BASINS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS
III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, A MINIMUM OF 1
WEEPHOLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF
STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER
FABRIC AND FILLED W//78 STONE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK.
UTILITIES:
UTIUTIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF UTILITY LOCATIONS. SIZES. DEPTHS. OR FOR
COMPLEXNESS OF U�LI�INFORMA�ON.OF U�LI�INFORMATION.
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITY
OWNERS, THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR WHOSE FACILITIES WILL BE
AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES
FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS FOR ANY THIRD -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK
OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE
CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBIUTY.
AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS
UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTIUTY OWNERS SO AS
NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY
OWNERS.
FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL O 1-800-632-4949
FOR LOCATES OF UTILITIES NOT MEMBERS OF NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL CONTACT
PROJECT MANAGER & UTILITY COORDINATOR.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER
VAULTS TO FINISHED GRADE. WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES.
GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTON.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER
ONES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL
IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER UNE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTON
OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID UNES,
VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY.
MAIL BOXES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REWIRED BY SECTION 107-12 OF THE
NCOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
FENCES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS. AND HEDGES WITHIN THE EMITS OF DISTURBANCE UNLESS
SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE THAT FALL WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT/FILL LINES IN ADDITION TO
THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES/SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS NECESSARY, CUT
ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING SHALL BE PER THE
LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL (TYP.) USE PLYWOOD FORMS
WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER OR SIDEWALK. USE CLD STD. 40.11 FOR
BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT CURBING MUST USE CLD STD.
40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLO STD. 40.02 AND WITH SECTION 1000 OF THE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. WHEN THE TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA
TREE PROTECTION CLD STD. 40.12 SHALL BE USED,
OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY TREES. IN ADDITION A
CONTRACTOR SHALL W ALL
TREES LOCATED WITHIN THE THAT ARE TO REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INSPECTED BE THE
CITY TO VERIFY THEY ARE SUITABLE TO REMNN.
FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION STAKING THE PROJECT TEAM (CONTRACTOR, CITY INSPECTOR, CITY ARBORIST AND
IF APPLICABLE WILL HOLD AN ON-SITE MEETING TO ENSURE THE EMITS OF DISTURBANCE AN
CONSULTANT, ) E D
THAT TREES PROPOSED FOR PROTECTION ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. THE TEAM WILL WALK THE PROJECT
A THE TREES N BE ANY A IID AND THOSE TO REMOVE DISCUSS PROPOSE
AREA AND GREE ON 0
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND IDENTIFY ANY ADDITIONAL TREES TO PROTECT THAT WERE NOT ORIGINALLY
MARKED IA SUCH. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE LIVEN APPROVAL FOR TREE REMOVAL, IN REMOVAL
AFTER
APPROPRIATE TREE PROTECTION HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR REMOVAL CAN BEGIN.
THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR TREE PROTECTION INSTALLED AROUND ADDITIONAL TREES
IDENTIFIED FOR PROTECTION. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR -IN-KIND- REPLACEMENT OF
TREES DAMAGED THAT HAVE BEEN MARKED FOR PROTECTION OR NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL.
GENERAL NOTES
TOLERANCE:
STRUCTURES INCLUDING STORM DRAIN PIPE, STORM STRUCTURES, SEWER PIPE, AND RETAINING
WALLS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF ±0.10 FEET. STRUCTURES INCLUDING RISERS, WEIRS,
AND ORIFICES, SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF ±0.05 FEET.
STREAM IMPROVEMENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF ±0.10 FEET,
AND A PLANIMETRIC TOLERANCE OF ±0.50 FEET,
SIDE SLOPES:
LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
EROSION CONTROL:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCES. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS
SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL FOLLOW THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON SHEETS......
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6 -INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT
INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS,
CONSTRUCTION PLANS & NCOOT STANDARD DRAWNGS.
SA WCU TS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR
TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE
1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE
REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TE -IN TO FACE OF
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER.
PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE:
CDOT HAS DETERMINED THAT NO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE IS TO BE ASSESSED.
CDOT AND E&PM HAVE AGREED ON THE STREET CUTS FOR WHICH A PAVEMENT DEGRADATION
FEE IS REWIRED. THE DEGRADATION FEE ASSESSMENT SHALL BE PAID VIA INTERNAL CITY
MECHANISMS (DTI) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
SUBSURFACE REPORTS:
A SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED FOR 1108 & 1114 BEARMORE DRIVE
AND A REPORT IS AVAILABLE FOR THIS PROJECT. A SEPARATE REPORT ASSESSING
PROPOSED REPAIRS TO THE STRUCTURES AT 1114 BEARMORE DRIVE IS ALSO AVAILABLE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE
CONDITIONS AND EXISTING STRUCTURES' CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHICH PROTECTION MEASURES, IF ANY, OR ADDITIONAL
MEASURES, IF ANY, ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE MEANS AND METHODS UTILIZED TO
CONSTRUCT THIS PROJECT. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
STRUCTURES WITHIN THE WORK AREA SAFE FROM DAMAGES RESULTING FROM
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OR CHANGES THAT ALTER THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA.
ABBREVIATIONS
ABAND............................ABANDONED
ILbE:
CURB AND GUTTER
NTS ..........................
NOT TO SCALE
A.D.................................ALGEBRAIC
R WAY TYPE I VALLEY CUTTER
SIDENTAL D IVE
RE ( )
O/H............................
OVER HEAD
DIFFERENCE ASPH
..............................ASPHALT
OC ............................
ON CENTER
APPROX..........................APPROXIMATELY
EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS & NOTES
PAVT. .......................
PAVEMENT
B/C.................................BACK
OF CURB
PC ............................
PONT OF CURVATURE
BIT_
BITUMINOUS
PERM ........................
PERMANENT
BM...................................BENCH
MARK
PG ............................
PAGE
BRG.................................BEARING
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
PI.. ............ ...............
POINT OF INT
CB...................................CATCH
BASIN
PK. ............. ..............PK
NAIL SET
C&G................................CURB
AND GUTTER
PP............................POWER
POLE
CL ..............................
CLEARANCE C/L
PROP ........................
PROPOSED
FENCE.....................CHAIN
LINK FENCE
PSE ..........................
PERM SW ESMT
CMP................................CORRUGATED
MTL
PT............................POINT
OF TANGENCY
PIPE CONIC ..............................CONCRETE
PVI...........................POINT
OF VERT INT
CONST.............................CONSTRUCTION
PUE..........................PERM
UIIUTY ESMT
DB...................................DEED
BOOK
r...............................RADIUS
DCB................................DOUBLE
CB
RT. .............................
RIGHT
01.
INLET
RCP ..........................
REINFORCED CONC
DIA..................................DIAMETER
PIPE RELOC ......................
RELOCATE
DW...................................DRIVEWAY
R/W..........................
RIGHT OF WAY
DIM..................................DIMENSION
5...............................SOUTH
E......................................EAST/EASTING
SO............................STORM
DRAIN
EA...................................EACH
SF............................SQUARE
FOOT S/R
ELEV................................ELEVATION
FENCE..............SPLIT
RAIL FENCE
EDP.................................EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
SS..... .......................SANITARY
SEWER
ESMT...............................EASEMENT
STA ..........................
STATION
EXIST...............................EXISTING
STD ..........................
STANDARD
F/C.................................FACE
OF CURB
SW............................SIDEWALK
FES..................................FLARED
END SECTION
TAN..........................TANGENT
FH...................................FIRE
HYDRANT
TCE ...........................
TEMP CONST ESMT
FOC.................................FIBER
OPTIC CABLE
TEMP .....................
...TEMPORART
GV...................................GAS
VALVE
TP ............................
TRAVERSE POINT
HORIZ..............................HORIZONTAL
T/W...................
....... TEST WIRE
INT..................................INTERSECTION
TYP..........................
TYPICAL
INV..................................INVERT
U/G............................
UNDER GROUND
IP....................................IRON
PIN SET
VC ............................
VERTICAL CURVE
L......................................LENGTH
VERT .........................
VERTICAL
LF....................................LINEAR
FOOTAGE
W ..............................
WEST
LT....................................LEFT
W/ .................
........... WITH
Ib....................................POUND
WM...........................
WATER METER W
LP...................................LIGHT
POLE
VAULT..................WATER
VAULT
MAX ........... ... ..........MAXIMUM
WV ...........................
WATER VALVE
MIN..................................MINIMUM
60p ..........................
SIXTY PENNY NAIL SE
MONO..............................MONOLITHIC
................................FOOT
mph................................MILES
PER HOUR
................................INCH
M TL.................................METAL
N.....................................NORTH/
IORTHING
TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES
A) ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST CURRENT
EDITIONS OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL
HANDBOOK (W.A.T.C.H.). THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D.), THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT) SUPPLEMENT TO THE M.U.T.C.D., THE NCOOT
ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NCOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES.
B) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY CDOT IN WRITING 10 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY ROAD
CLOSURE OR 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING ONE OR MORE TRAVEL LANES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 3 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK.
C) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH, INSTALL, RELOCATE, AND MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES. SIGNS. BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES FOR WORK SITES AND
DETOUR ROUTES AS SHOWN IN TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE
ENGINEER.
D) CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE THAT WHEN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA IS IN OR NEAR A VERTICAL
CREST OR HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE EXTENDED SO THAT LANE CLOSURE BEGINS
IN ADVANCE OF THE CURVE AND MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IS NET
E) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL HAZARDS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT 'NTH
WELL-MAINTAINED SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING ANO/OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES. ON CONNECTING
ROADS, ALL BARRICADES, SIGNS. WARNING, AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES SHALL BE MOVED,
SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED AS REQUIRED DURING THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AS
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
F) WORK ON THE PROJECT OR ANY SEPARATE ACTIMTY THEREIN SHALL NOT START UNTIL ALL OF THE
REQUIRED SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING, AND/OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES ARE INSTALLED AND APPROVED
BY THE ENGINEER.
G) THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DURING ALL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE ABILITY TO
FLAG TRAFFIC USING QUALIFIED FLAGGERS WHEN NECESSARY OR REQUIRED.
H) CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TENANTS ACCESS TO THEIR
PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIMITS, INCLUDING REASONABLE INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR
BUSINESSES. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PND TO FIRE HYDRANTS.
1) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY (BY MAIL) ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WHO HAVE
DIRECT ACCESS TO THE ROADWAY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS A MINIMUM OF 5 AND A MAXIMUM OF 10
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN FRONT OF THOSE PROPERTIES.
NOTIFICATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE CONTACT PERSONS NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER. EMAIL ADDRESS. AND
MAILING ADDRESS.
J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATROL THE WORK SITE AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF EACH WORK DAY
(AT A MINIMUM) TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING
PROPERLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND
FUNCTIONING AT ALL TIMES DURING PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY.
K) DURING PERIODS OF INACTIVITY OR AT NIGHT, EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN SUCH A MANNER
AS TO BLOCK SIDEWALKS, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR THE MOTORISTS' NEW OF TRAFFIC.
EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE TRAVEL LANE.
L) THE CITY ENGINEER OR DIRECTOR OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR THEIR
APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE AUTHORIZED TO STOP ANY WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT
DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE W.A.T.C.H. AND THE
M.U.T.C.D. UNTIL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
M) ADJACENT LANES TO CONSTRUCTION ZONES MAY REMAIN OPEN IF LATERAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN
EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE AND EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2 FEET (INCLUDING WIDTH OF
DRUM). IF A DROPOFF EXISTS WITHIN THE WORK ZONE, CONTRACTOR SHOULD FOLLOW SECTION 10 OF
THE W.A.T.C.H. MANUAL PERTAINING TO ADJACENT LANE CLOSURES DUE TO DROPOFFS.
N) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE PHASING AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN SEQUENCE. WHEN A CONSTRUCTION
PHASE IS DIVIDED INTO STEPS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH STEP
IN SEQUENCE. (EXAMPLE: THE REQUIREMENTS OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING
TO PHASE II; THE REQUIREMENTS OF STEP 1 OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO
STEP 2 OF PHASE 1). ALL WORK DESCRIBED IN THE PROJECT PHASING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE
CONTRACTOR, EXCEPT WHERE IT IS SPECIFIED FOR CERTAIN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
0) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO STOP TRAFFIC FOR MORE THAN 5 MINUTES AT A TIME
IN ANY ONE DIRECTION.
P) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SECTION VII (PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS) OF
THE W.A.T.C.H. MANUAL
STANDARDS
THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPLICABLE
TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS.
NCOOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MAY BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPLICABLE NCDOT STANDARD.
NCDOT:
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES - JANUARY 2012
$$Lj),, NO., TITLE:
200.02................................................................................METHOD OF CLEARING
300.01 .......................................... ......... .......METHOD OF PIPE INSTALLATION
840.01 .............................................BRICK CATCH BASIN - 12" THRU 54' PIPE
840.03......................................................................FRAME, GRATES. AND HOOD
840.32................................................................................BRICK JUNCTION BOX
840.34 ..............................................................TRAFFIC BEARING JUNCTION BOX
840.54...................................................................MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER
CHARLOTTE:
S !S . NO.,
10.17........................................................................................
ILbE:
CURB AND GUTTER
.. ..
10.22............................................................................
... CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
.....
. 7A ........... ..........
10 2 ...........
R WAY TYPE I VALLEY CUTTER
SIDENTAL D IVE
RE ( )
10.29 ....................................................CATCH
BASIN FRAME IN VALLEY GUTTER
20.03.....................................................................
DOUBLE BRICK CATCH BASIN
20.23...................................................................
RIP RAP APRONS AT OUTFALL
30.00 ...............................SPECIAL
EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS & NOTES
..........
30.13 ............................................
............. EROSION CONTROL DEWATERING
30.06A...............................................................................TEMPORARY
SILT FENCE
30.09 ...................................HARDWARE
CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
30.10...................................................................TEMPORARY
ROCK CHECK DAM
30'11A.......................................................STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
30.15 ...............................................................
AT BASIN INLET PROTECTION
30.17..................................................................TEMPORARY
SEEDING SCHEDULE
40.02..........................................................................
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
50.04............................................................................................SAFETY
RAIUNG
STORMWATER NOTES
1. REMOVE. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF. AND REPLACE EXISTING PIPE. NO CONSTRUCTION REFUSE SHALL BE
BURIED ON SITE.
2. CONCRETE TO BE REPLACED SHALL BE SAWCUT AND SHALL BE REMOVED IN FULL PANEL SECTIONS.
MATCH EXISTING CROSS-SECTIONS WHEN REPLACING CURB. GUTTER. SIDEWALK. AND DRIVEWAY.
3. CURB TRANSITIONS AROUND PROPOSED CATCH INLETS SHALL BE PER CLOS DETAIL 10.29.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 100% BIODEGRADABLE EROSION CONTROL MATTING OR APPROVED EQUAL
PER ENGINEER. MATRNG SHALL BE INSTALLED PER NCDENR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
5. VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS TAKEN FROM FIELD DATA GATHERED BY
MULKEY ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS DATED JANUARY 7. 2015 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6. REMOVE AND RESET OR REPLACE EXISTING FENCE AS NECESSARY CO SATISFACTION OF OWNER. A
CONTIGUOUS FENCE UNE MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES TO ENSURE SAFETY OF PETS AND
WORK CREWS.
8 y S dos
g8L3
zw�aQa? 6 ro
�£O
�U° WHa
m
w
i
1.0
0
0
W

\ \ \\
c\ \ \�
189-071-19
ROBERTMICHAEL CHAMPION \ \ \
OB 13830 PC ]SB \ \ \ \
6423 HONECCER DR. \ \ \
"co Ennc ucH)
\ I I 6E RELO
�(BY 01
IBI -131
20744
\
MICHAEL JOSEPH JR GRUSKA
DB 2071{ PC 859
1108 BEARMIXE DR.
w�
SEE NOTE
c
m
172 LF TREE �
PROTECTION FENCE
e
1
1
l
127 LF TREE
PROTECTION FENCE
EXIST. PROPERTY LINE ----------
[ ]
�W—
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
I \ I
/
199-131 49 �---
GEORGE V JR JOHNSON
SUSAN GOTTA JOHNSON
LT— I 1
OB 14890 PC 137
11-fio FPR I
W HARDIBEE NOTE
1122 BEARMORE OR
'FHGyI
D 28536 PG PG 78 ]80
1111 1 BEAREARMORE OR
-41,� ) ��
II U
- 110 LF TREE
-PROTECTION FENCE
55 LF SILT FENCE
� x /
672,
TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK
DAM PER CLDS 30.10
O
EXIST. RIPRAP TO REMAIN &
RESET AS NEEDED AT OUTLET
TO CONSTRUCT ENDWALL
\ KENNETH
\C
\ 22
♦ �m
�� ♦ ` / pIPF.fN10U3 pI�DETALL
ww�vl�Ew "�""_•`•"
N
�aO
rnsrx:su srornxnxr ro nevrmswrnsu+ou.o oEscx Mcmoo ronr�mevreur«we.xoswurursT useows sucx. NOTTTO SCALE
cH+RIOTTE AfECSUENBURC EXAMPLE PUMP AROUND FLOW DIVERSION 1 ora
RAID STORM WATER RU
ECES AND DEWATERING CONFIGURATION
nV\ERIC DETAIL REQuWX,,ETS
SEDIMENT REMOVAL DEVICE+��>�
\7
TEMPORARY STABILIZED Ou1LET 51—ON A
xsTr�a NOT TO SCALE
CRARMTTE-MECELENBCRG�EXAMPLE PUMP AROUND FLOW DIVERSION
STORM IFATER SERUCES AND DEWATERING CONFIGURATION - -
cE♦TMe neva IIeQnIREY@'IS -.
NOTES-.
1. HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION PER CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD (CLDS) 30.07.
2. STABRIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER OLDS 30.11A WITH EXCEPTIONS REGARDING
STONE TYPE AS NOTED ON THE PLANS BASE FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST
CONSIST OF FILTER FABRIC (CRUSHER RUN IS NOT ALLOWED).
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY PUMP AROUND MEASURES TO CONTROL STORM WATER
FLOW AND MINIMIZE EROSION THROUGH JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEE DETAIL ON
THIS SHEET.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig. 1 30
SCALE: 1'=20'
NAME SYMBOL
EXIST. PROPERTY LINE ----------
[ ]
o
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
TEMP. SILT FENCE ---iy--FBF—
EMSTNG FENCE
'FHGyI
rO1
EXISTING WATER x •
v(
EXISTING SEWER m n
O 11
FF�H
E%ISTING GAS s a
U'GROUND TIEPHOIE
U'GROUND POWER
U'GROUND CABLE TV '•' >" —
VGROUND FIRE OPTICrR — r9 —
r ,
F'.�iy
p�
OST
D. OW -#D ELECTRIC rc — a —
O
zv
EXIST. A!! PIPE --------------
o a
o
--------------
^I�
N•1
PROP. DRAIN PIPE ®
�^.I
(I1
STORM DRAINAGE ESMT SDE
�,
0
TEMPORARY EASEMENT e
W
PQ
E_
/�

`s
�g9
iT F TTMi
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
WA :_ice
-0+75 -0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
4
w$ g4s m Yds"�^
0
Hi
MEN El
Wep
RBaurt r4sr.
REwAa re v a• ---
n<SY. s' 4WrtR I I
P 62 LF 6'n6'RGBG
6'RCBC X402%
PR, 46 LF 6'x5'RC6C--
- 6$0.82%
"MEr" Msrvuu
GABION CHANNEL WALL
AND RENO MATTRESS
(SEE DETAILS. SHEET 6)
0+00
0+50 1+00 1+50
2+00 2+50
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO LOCATION SUITABLE FOR
- REPLACE 45 LL
TCE -
FPR 2. EXISTING HELICAL PIERS INSTALLED BY PROPERTY
4 -FT CHAIN LINK F, CE
/ \
PROP. 31 SY CIXIC D/W -
/ GABON CHANNEL WALL AND
\
rnmm ReSTABILIZATION1G
LF e- DIP w/
/
SEE SHEET 6 FOR DETAILS
1Y Sim. SLEEVE
Q
LF 6'x5 R_CSC
EXIST. HW TO BE REMOVED A O
D REPLACED PER DETAIL. SHEET
PR. 24 LF 6'x5 RCBC
SEENOTE 4
\\30 LF SAFETY RAIL
48 LF9 DF
\
PER ODS /J004A
354 LF 24- ROP
/ p
\
EXIST GAS MAIN TOE 6
ro E 11F310YED
ate,+ PR.6x LF
ea
}Q""O " 6'x5' R.
\ y
RELOCATED (BY GIHERS)
REVERE JB WING AND
sP.w
TITLE IS -REP--
10 E RENOVID
ND FE
COYER AND BLL WITH
PLOWABLE F7LL(3 2 CY1
3. TWO-INCH (2-) STEEL GAS MAIN TO REMAIN IN
PLUG EXIST. 15- ROP
REPAIR DAMAGED ASPHALTLF
\
\ REMOVE A REPLACE
\ AND REPLACE 24
REPLACE 17 SY
SPEED HUMP
\ VALLEY CAC
CONC. S/W
\ 71 lC W/ N SPLIT RAIL
RAIL
FENCE W/ L S UT KING
SCALE: 1'=30'
THE PRE -FABRICATED BENDS AND CONSTRUCTED ON TOP
EXIST. UE LINES
\ TO E RELOCATED
Oil -
REMAIN OPERABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION
(BY OTHERS)
ACTIVITIES.
\
— REPLACE 10 LF e- SAN. SWR.'
WITHDIP ENCASE NTH
12- STEEL SLEEVE
2+00 2+50
68 8 eo �-I 8
R.A6 .. 1yjm 3� rum
88,,�M�-yrca
(R) PE EA
ExBT. �
664
3+00
HORIZONTr L: 1--30'I
P/ R.42LF"FRCBC O
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO LOCATION SUITABLE FOR
s
• 16 LF C Oil 0 \\
FPR 2. EXISTING HELICAL PIERS INSTALLED BY PROPERTY
660
OWNERS AT 1108 AND 1114 BEARMORE DRIVE DEPTH
8 m
0+00 0+50
I.,,VIERS%
�PR.46
op
FLOW CHANNEL
LF 6'x5 R_CSC
INSTALLED AT STRUCTURES 2, 3, 4, AND 5. MATERIAL
3177 V \
SEENOTE 4
I x
u ' 356 LF EXIST. IV RCFTO
/ E6ST. 15- RCPTO E
\
INTO THE TOP OF THE BOX CULVERT WHERE JUNCTION
WIFLTH PLOWABLE FEL
(*3 C
(3e GV)
/ p
\
9
Im10VE EXIST. GB FAO AND
Fil WITH ROWAdE FILL
(3 1.5 CY)
ate,+ PR.6x LF
ea
}Q""O " 6'x5' R.
\ y
THE BOX CULVERT NEAR STRUCTURE 5 TO TIE IN 30• RCP.
REVERE JB WING AND
sP.w
WGROUND CABLE TV
ND FE
COYER AND BLL WITH
PLOWABLE F7LL(3 2 CY1
3. TWO-INCH (2-) STEEL GAS MAIN TO REMAIN IN
AS BRICK JUNCTION BOXES PER NCDOT DETAIL 840.32.
REPAIR DAMAGED ASPHALTLF
\
MAKE PROVISIONS TO SUPPORT PIPE, IF NEEDED, DURING
\ AND REPLACE 24
REPLACE 17 SY
TRAFFIC BEARING STRUCTURE. LOCATION OF STRUCTURES
\ VALLEY CAC
CONC. S/W
\ 71 lC W/ N SPLIT RAIL
RAIL
FENCE W/ L S UT KING
SCALE: 1'=30'
THE PRE -FABRICATED BENDS AND CONSTRUCTED ON TOP
EXIST. UE LINES
\ TO E RELOCATED
OF THE BOX CULVERT wTH THE TOP OF THE CULVERT
REMAIN OPERABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION
(BY OTHERS)
ACTIVITIES.
\
/
\ SEE NOTE 7 .../
10. EXISTING RIPRAP APRON TO BE RESET AND CLASS II
\
\55 LF -- SPLIT RAIL
PLACE RIP RAP FROM TOP OF BANK TO TOP OF BANK
FENCE W/ WIRE BACKING
— REPLACE 10 LF e- SAN. SWR.'
WITHDIP ENCASE NTH
12- STEEL SLEEVE
2+00 2+50
68 8 eo �-I 8
R.A6 .. 1yjm 3� rum
88,,�M�-yrca
(R) PE EA
ExBT. �
664
3+00
3+50
1 itu a,l•ac m
1e IF a- BP
vALLEr L;AC
PR 26 LF 16• RCP
34k0 LF
1s REY ro
E REMOVED
10
g AREA TO E MILLED
/O �aF AND OVERLAID (TYP)
0
• T45 IF, 24• RCI I 250 LF VALLEY CAC
REFOWD I
76 LF VALLEY C&G AND,
D s� �1 I� °3°e�i LF 15 R(s ro E REMoem
/eT-0
ST. LIE LINES Q © �
E RELOCATED jY OTHERS)
m -m FPR r a I uencn
r,M InrwE a 1 I QST. Rw
1 ro E REMOLCD
W AMD REPLACED PER
0[uX. O+ STILE, 7
IX111t. PImCH� I SS LL }RAIL
SPLIT RUL FEND
`W/ WIRE BACKING
on
RFRAP APRON (CLASS X)
Lr4Y. 111.TIO.B. TO LO.&
650.1.4', aEAX-21'. T-115'
(I.6 not- 00)
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FROM CULVERT
MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LEFT LOW FLOW
BAFFLES SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED AT STATIONS: D+16.
0+48. 0+80. 1+12. 1+44, 1+76. 2+08, 2+69
6'x5' REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH
I OW FLOW CHANNEL (LEFT) LOOKING UPSTREAM
NTS
HORIZONTr L: 1--30'I
INLETS SHALL BE PER CLDS DETAIL 10.29.
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO LOCATION SUITABLE FOR
_1
660
FPR 2. EXISTING HELICAL PIERS INSTALLED BY PROPERTY
660
OWNERS AT 1108 AND 1114 BEARMORE DRIVE DEPTH
8 m
0+00 0+50
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR 6'x5'
op
FLOW CHANNEL
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHICH PROTECTION
INSTALLED AT STRUCTURES 2, 3, 4, AND 5. MATERIAL
-m RUG EXIST. 15- ROP IY
A
_
I x
u ' 356 LF EXIST. IV RCFTO
fie•
I'f-[] I I-- BE
INTO THE TOP OF THE BOX CULVERT WHERE JUNCTION
FLOWA9.E F1LLu(ED3S C11
_ - _
9
OPENING SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED INTO THE SIDE OF
RUG EXIST. 15 RCP
THE BOX CULVERT NEAR STRUCTURE 5 TO TIE IN 30• RCP.
ALTER THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA.
�r -
3+50
1 itu a,l•ac m
1e IF a- BP
vALLEr L;AC
PR 26 LF 16• RCP
34k0 LF
1s REY ro
E REMOVED
10
g AREA TO E MILLED
/O �aF AND OVERLAID (TYP)
0
• T45 IF, 24• RCI I 250 LF VALLEY CAC
REFOWD I
76 LF VALLEY C&G AND,
D s� �1 I� °3°e�i LF 15 R(s ro E REMoem
/eT-0
ST. LIE LINES Q © �
E RELOCATED jY OTHERS)
m -m FPR r a I uencn
r,M InrwE a 1 I QST. Rw
1 ro E REMOLCD
W AMD REPLACED PER
0[uX. O+ STILE, 7
IX111t. PImCH� I SS LL }RAIL
SPLIT RUL FEND
`W/ WIRE BACKING
on
RFRAP APRON (CLASS X)
Lr4Y. 111.TIO.B. TO LO.&
650.1.4', aEAX-21'. T-115'
(I.6 not- 00)
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FROM CULVERT
MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LEFT LOW FLOW
BAFFLES SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED AT STATIONS: D+16.
0+48. 0+80. 1+12. 1+44, 1+76. 2+08, 2+69
6'x5' REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH
I OW FLOW CHANNEL (LEFT) LOOKING UPSTREAM
NTS
5'
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FROM CULVERT
MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. RIGHT LOW FLOW
BAFFLES SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED AT STATIONS 0+32,
G+64, 0+96, 1+28, 1+60. 1+92, 2+24
6'x5' REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH
LOW FLOW CHANNEL (RIGHT) LOOKING UPSTREAM
NTS
PROJECT NOTES
1. CURB TRANSITIONS AROUND PROPOSED CATCH
.4
INLETS SHALL BE PER CLDS DETAIL 10.29.
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO LOCATION SUITABLE FOR
PROP. a- THICK
PROPERTY OWNER AND ENGINEER.
FPR 2. EXISTING HELICAL PIERS INSTALLED BY PROPERTY
CONCRETE BAFFLE
OWNERS AT 1108 AND 1114 BEARMORE DRIVE DEPTH
& CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SHOP DRANNGS FOR
54- 6-x3' LOW
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR 6'x5'
AND MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
FLOW CHANNEL
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHICH PROTECTION
INSTALLED AT STRUCTURES 2, 3, 4, AND 5. MATERIAL
3' Y
SHALL CONSIST OF PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE.
ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE MEANS AND METHODS
fie•
UTIUZED TO CONSTRUCT THIS PROJECT. IT IS THE
INTO THE TOP OF THE BOX CULVERT WHERE JUNCTION
5'
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FROM CULVERT
MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. RIGHT LOW FLOW
BAFFLES SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED AT STATIONS 0+32,
G+64, 0+96, 1+28, 1+60. 1+92, 2+24
6'x5' REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT WITH
LOW FLOW CHANNEL (RIGHT) LOOKING UPSTREAM
NTS
PROJECT NOTES
1. CURB TRANSITIONS AROUND PROPOSED CATCH
PROJECT NOTES (CONY01:
7. RELOCATE SHED OUTSIDE PERMANENT STORM
INLETS SHALL BE PER CLDS DETAIL 10.29.
DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO LOCATION SUITABLE FOR
FULL OEM PAVEMENT REPAIR
PROPERTY OWNER AND ENGINEER.
FPR 2. EXISTING HELICAL PIERS INSTALLED BY PROPERTY
O
OWNERS AT 1108 AND 1114 BEARMORE DRIVE DEPTH
& CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SHOP DRANNGS FOR
AND INSTALLATION METHODS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR 6'x5'
AND MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
BOX CULVERT AND PRE -FABRICATED BENDS TO BE
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHICH PROTECTION
INSTALLED AT STRUCTURES 2, 3, 4, AND 5. MATERIAL
MEASURES, IF ANY, OR ADDITIONAL MEASURES, IF ANY,
SHALL CONSIST OF PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE.
ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE MEANS AND METHODS
PRE-CUT SQUARE OPENINGS SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED
UTIUZED TO CONSTRUCT THIS PROJECT. IT IS THE
INTO THE TOP OF THE BOX CULVERT WHERE JUNCTION
CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT STRUCTURES
BOXES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-CUT
wTHIN THE WORK AREA SAFE FROM DAMAGES RESULTING
OPENING SHALL BE PRE -FABRICATED INTO THE SIDE OF
FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES OR CHANCES THAT
THE BOX CULVERT NEAR STRUCTURE 5 TO TIE IN 30• RCP.
ALTER THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA.
�r -
WGROUND CABLE TV
9. STRUCTURES 2, 3, AND 4 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
3. TWO-INCH (2-) STEEL GAS MAIN TO REMAIN IN
AS BRICK JUNCTION BOXES PER NCDOT DETAIL 840.32.
SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
STRUCTURE 5 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS BRICK
MAKE PROVISIONS TO SUPPORT PIPE, IF NEEDED, DURING
JUNCTION BOX PER NCDOT DETAIL 840.34 OR OTHER
EXCAVATION OF SUPPORTING SOILS AND SHALL
TRAFFIC BEARING STRUCTURE. LOCATION OF STRUCTURES
COORDINATE ANY WORK VATH THE UTILITY COORDINATOR.
SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OR DOWNSTREAM OF
SCALE: 1'=30'
THE PRE -FABRICATED BENDS AND CONSTRUCTED ON TOP
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL HVAC UNITS
OF THE BOX CULVERT wTH THE TOP OF THE CULVERT
REMAIN OPERABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION
SERVING AS THE BOTTOM SLAB OF THE JUNCTION BOX.
ACTIVITIES.
5. ALL PROPOSED STORM PIPE SHALL BE CLASS III
10. EXISTING RIPRAP APRON TO BE RESET AND CLASS II
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
STONE ADDED AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE APRON DESIGN.
PLACE RIP RAP FROM TOP OF BANK TO TOP OF BANK
S. REPLACE ALL VALLEY CURB IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CLDS 10.178.
WHERE CHANNEL DISTURBANCE OCCURS.
I - 6
y
SCALE I' IW
NAME SYMBOL
v VL y
H
$ $ >�
6'2211
ztl6R
_ gal
r�=so
: uwmR
W�
FI
NEW CONCRETE
•..�
FULL OEM PAVEMENT REPAIR
WILLING 3 RESURFACING
O
ERSTING RIPRAP
PROPOSED RIPRAP
Oa
"ST. PROPERTY UNE
�
STORM DRAINAGE ESEAT
SDE
TEMPORARY EASENENT
e
EASTING FENCE -�-�
W
EASING WATER
+
E%ISTNG SEWER
ss ss
ENSTING GAS
>
c
UYROMND TE.EPHOHE
Call before you dig.
WGROUND POWER
�r -
WGROUND CABLE TV
TI n -
U'%MND FIRE OPTIC
m F<
DIIST. OHEN] ElECIRIC
USE. ORNN RPE --------------
_--________
PROP. DRAIN PIPE
PROP.
15 45
PLOWABLE FILL PACENENT
v VL y
H
$ $ >�
6'2211
ztl6R
_ gal
r�=so
: uwmR
W�
�U
3U
O
Oa
�
W
`L
A W
Know whan bel.
ow
>
c
a
a
Call before you dig.
a
0 30 60
15 45
SCALE: 1'=30'

0
0
0
W
I

I
1
� Xo�l M1 �� I
E
II p
GABION PLAN VIEW
FIRST COURSE OF BASKETS
SCALE: 1'=10'
TOP ELEV.= 668.75
BOTTOM ELEV- 667.75
2+70.30
GABION PLAN VIEW
SECOND COURSE OF BASKETS
SCALE: 1'=10'
TOP ELEV- 671.75
BOTTOM ELEV.- 668.75
MATTRESS
6a4
680
680
GABION BASKETS
TOV EL .=675.25
676
676
Q Q ELEV. 675.75
(LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT)
A A ELEY. 674.75
672
COURSE"M1ll
672
"A"
ELEV 671.75
..C.. ..D..
..E..
COURSE 1
"H��
668
ELEV: 666'75
668
8" DIP(SEWER)_xe.o
6'x3'x3'
RRL
12'x3'x3' 6'x3'x1.5'
eex
GABION TABLE
GABION PLAN VIEW
THIRD COURSE OF BASKETS
SCALE: 1'=10'
TOP ELEV.= 674.75
BOTTOM ELEV.- 671.75
GABION PLAN VIEW
FOURTH COURSE OF BASKETS
SCALE: 1'=10'
TOP ELEV- 675.75
BOTTOM ELEV- 674.75
o m
t"-
= 9 i 3 rc x
„f o
n
IE2
MATTRESS
GABION BASKETS
(LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT)
(LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT)
COURSE"M1ll
-M2"
"A"
"B"
..C.. ..D..
..E..
"F-1 "G��
"H��
12'x6'x1' 12'x9'x1'
6'x3'x3'
9'x3'x3'
12'x3'x3' 6'x3'x1.5'
9'x3'x1.5'
12'x3'x.5' 6'x3'x1'
9'x3'xt'
12'x3'x1' 4.5'xTx3'
12'x6'x1'
TOTAL
(2.66 CY) (4 CY)
(2 CY)
(3 CY)
(4 CY) (1 CY)
(1.5 Cy)
(2 CY) (0.66 CY)
(1 CY)
(1.33 CY) 0.5 CY)
(2.66 CY)
Icy)
2.66
2
- _
2
_
_ _
_
_ _
_
_
4
3
-
2
-
-
_ -
-
4
4
- 2
-
-
-
1.33
o m
t"-
= 9 i 3 rc x
„f o
n
IE2

C'A- COAT AN
r
-�
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
_TS TV
APPROVED SUITABI-E MA- AS
DIRECTED By THE ENGINEER
STREET
GENTERUNE
—PIK (DIAMETER VARIES) M EDGE " 'u",
•I
©®
IIII
•
SOON
SSSS
PARABOUG .rM 10 1 �M Zniff.
PAVEMENT REPAIR
Not to scale
_
.
1. PAVEMENT S HEDUU:
BIE,kRMORE DR.: sm. u-01 VAR'Es TYPE �yilm
10Z��KR CNT
1. SURFAC COURSE S'S.5A AS
SHO IN PAVEMENT SCHEDULE VOTES:
K Nn
MM. 'ASPHALT BASE COURSE NOT TO S­I_Ej
BUS ROUTES OR AS DIRECTED BY com De"B'Dee" cKvim
THE ENGINEER I— _'ACK COAT R NCCOT
SM
©®
®�
o®m
ROAD HUMP
Ni
Mth­
■■■■
APPRO D SUITABLE MATERIAL AS
CIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER ME■■■
0�__PAVEMENT REPAIR WITH MILLING AT CURB AND GUTTER
:��;
�m
WITH STORM DRAINAGE TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Not to scale
1. PA MT SCHEDULE
BEARBIORE DR.: sm. J-01
DIAGRAM 26
DETOUR PLAN FOR CLOSED ROAD
(USE FOR MINOR STREETS ONLY)
DIRECION
TR ­
VIII
I�
©...
���� ©■■■
-r
Bois
i ::
e •
o 00
1 115, 1
NOT TO SCA
0®,
M 1' OLIQLM v®® •
1 0®®
-
STOP
,�� ��ra®m®vm®®_r��xi�®®�®era®®m© •
a�.r+.x-a.r:,aira.xvrr.�c�.-a_aa_r,a�rz�crs- cisa�asmr��irn���sa�a��—max
txa�a�c�ru�icr�cs/ax•�a:v+_nr�z��!a�.:a.a+aaar_crsw�rs++�¢��nr�nn.�a�� •
WATCH MANUAL - DIAGRAM 26
._

Charlotte -Mecklenburg
STORM Charlotte Storm Water Services
600 E. Fourth St., 141, Floor
WATER Charlotte, NC 28202-2844
Services
September 20, 2016
Ms. Karen Higgins
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Submittal of Additional Fee for 1114 Bearmore Drive Maintenance Project
(DWR #:16-0843)
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) is hereby submitting additional
payment in the form of a check for $330.00 for the Bearmore Drive Maintenance Project.
CMSWS received a request for additional fee on 9/12/16.
If you need any additional information or have any questions concerning this project and its
associated impacts, feel free to contact me by phone or via email.
Sincerely,
n
Erin Turner
Wetland Specialist
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services Division
Desk phone [phone]
erin.turner(a,ci.charlotte.nc.us
cc: file
To report drainage problems: 704 -336 -RAIN hfp://stormwater.charmeck.org