HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150712 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160825 (2)Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project
2016 - Project Description
Background
The project consists of Site A
(Figure 1) located on National
Forest System lands, Tusquitee
Ranger District, in Clay County,
North Carolina, approximately 9
miles northeast of the town of
Hayesville, NC.
The goals and objectives of this
project are to improve the health of
the stream ecosystem by improving
channel stability and habitat
quality, along with improving
riparian and streamside vegetation
conditions. The desired condition
is to have high quality riparian
areas and aquatic habitat features
that maintain hydrologic function,
enhance stream stability, and
minimize erosion. The proposed
action is needed at this time, at
these locations, because taking no
action would lead to further
erosion and sedimentation which,
in tum, would cause further
damage to aquatic habitat and the
maintenance of designated uses.
This action will restore natural
drainage patterns in the Little Buck
Creek drainage; a state identified
Outstanding Resource Water. The
existing pond was created by the
previous land owners for private
use. The earthen dam impounded
approximately 0.6 acre of Little
Buck Creek in its headwaters
(Figure 2).
Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
Legend
— Roatl Route
—TmH Route
— hlBhoap
Figure 1. Location of the Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project.
L1Fage
Figure 2. Photo of existing dam of Little Buck Creek.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service is proposing to remove a portion of the earthen dam structure to reconnect
approximately 0.2 mile of streams by eliminating an aquatic organism passage barrier, restore
natural drainage patterns and reduce the potential impacts of a high hazard dam (Figures 3 & 4).
Past inspections show indications of structural and seepage problems with the dam. This project
is locatedjust upstream from two road crossings which may be affected in the event of a dam
failure. Upstream of the earthen dam a large volume of sediment is stored. This area has been
drained by a constructed opening in the dam over the past year. As a result, the ponded
sediments have mostly dried, a stream channel and wetland has formed, and vegetation has
begun to establish.
This project proposes to leave that sediment in place, thereby maintaining a wetland/meadow
environment that adds desired diversity to the area. To maintain this ecosystem, this project
proposes to do the following:
1. With a tracked excavator setting on the earthen dam, excavate along the length of the
earthen dam to an elevation near the level of the sediments in the pond.
21Page
Difle Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
2. There is a concrete drain structure in the dam. This will be excavated out of the fill and
hauled off site by the contractor.
3. Place earthen dam material in the downstream valley bottom to fill the gullied channel
below the dam with excavated materials. Use quarried boulders as needed to fill this area
to design elevation.
4. Where the channel currently resides upstream of the data, set up a pump to divert
streamflow around the construction work. Construct a boulder/log structure to hold grade
at the lower end of the meadow. From this point continue in the existing channel
reconstructing the channel to pass fish with numerous boulder and log structures.
5. Construct a channel with dimension, pattern, and profile to fit the site as defined by
existing bedrock and boulders, and the reference reach located up and down stream. See
Table 1 and Figure 5 for design information.
Table 1. Design Channel Calculations (see also Figure 5):
Current reach length: 212 feet
Current reach drop: 25 feet
Current reach slope: 25'/212' = 0.118 = 11.8%
There can be a 5.9% slope between steps. Step mean depth is 0.5 feet,
therefore:
Slope = Rise/Run
0.059 = 0.5'/Run
Run = 0.5'/0.059 = 8.5'stream length with a 0.5' step
Therefore, the 212' reach will have 20-25 sections of 8.5' length with a
6% slope and a step or cascade drop of 0.4-0.6'. Pools will have a mean
depth of 12-18" and a Pool to Pools acing of 7-10 feet.
6. Incorporated into the channel design would be structures that mimic the natural
involvement of trees and boulders into the aquatic system. These structures could
include J -hook vanes, vanes, root wads, and toe -wood (see Appendix A and
attachments).
7. Constructed stream banks would be covered with native seed and Coir matting, and
planted with live stakes and potted plants. The remaining disturbed soil would be seeded
and mulched and planted with potted plants.
3 1 P a g e
tattle Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
41Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
LITTLE BUCK CREEK DAM REMOVAL PROJECT 2016
STREAM CHANNEL& STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
mthe dmde— IopetoLte
pl nm.c_
o v ur,SG ti er r:aody
N ca nta
[ebrG$eetl, MUId,' Punt -'
-1 I¢Y(m 11 unobinnhe
Biu
poeotlal uyslopebeavca damp
NnnnStrtlex'[I echanleI araaae a steaeaVa pool
chanll, ul,tirrlncandbomdervanrry,a-
suul I, "I'll"." 10—It,
Iaev!an v eo ea,ez h1 f.t cle-r irl
Malnc3inE fin_e9ream
Typical Longitudinal Profile
Typical Cross Section
9eNb1 KKa60 Btl y
0116.=.11 svi
'Shen cea beg 5.946 slope bemem;steps, st .bum,
d,A u 05 fi tL .adore
-0:os9'Q.SR1.®
1 a 0 3'/0:059 = 85'i . IMA w8A s 0 5'
zwp
'Ih ., the 212',®6 wa; heves 20-25
seams d S 5'11.0 weh a 6% ftp a.
stepm .s drop of 0406': Pads wJt. pave
a mem ftffi 41218".
Figure 5. Little Buck Creek channel reconstruction design information.
61Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Removes/Project 2016
Appendix A - Typicals
71Page
Lalle Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
Little Buck Cre,&Da Removal Proposal- STRUMTRETYPICALS
.ate
G
i v
74:a:ss�.
o:
8Page
Little Buck creek Dam Removal Project 2016
ConsWctetl
pool
Lag Cross Vane
Detail
LOGS PLACED AT 20 —
300 ANGLE FROM BANK
AND AT A2-6%'SLOPE
FROM APPROX.'
RANKFULL ELEVATION,
€XiENUING FROM BANK
TOATO 113 OF
CHANNEL WIDTH
I SILL LOGS I
9lPage
Lode Ruck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
101Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
11 Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
Construction of TOE WOOD (with Transplants)
& Bankfull Bench Typical:
51NUweWlll be cen.V,A.d uso, WAditndH,dmlq 2012 Oct,
roew me k
CroseSectlort
�
�.� E%CAVAPB)
BANK
MATEWAL
UPPER HANK
NM-�'surn—
Orvrt ra[a ENle. i.:
INE STAKES
Fa[ewHUPPe Wnl'Io consW[Iammwem aailopPhom,�`ap
W[A(uY Fo lenareekua0nrt
:. e¢nkeH
Umrta4elivMwnom ben4.
......... ...... .......... .... �.....
e
eearaiee�ov:w[Imewooae:o�namvew�tisonetpow
hahrebss ionrc&aeucepoilNmwion<.
g
eL[ermPdamv bg mMven®[nf°myk &oo;bavkana
i SPt ISOIL Y BALES
pUee:aoe:.aabgv [awlevmMowt damn mgs.
PIaaNl.maNw ba. aa¢i.bis.�c Pbdidemf[}paava
b[aolwad[:.
P
6
nda fempmaryenunmwmpirroaubmn8ebpy epm==+'laPuw
.BgCIKFILL&LV[IINGS uwpww
Iwtl9lonb
Sfa9e - -
RemweteIDpa[Wx'mPN8P1aee4reeWr[ultmpwlce
wwtl, avdPNeehacMllow[utNlp.
R W_ I' Ch_e_n_ne boHoni �
e
PlazerortmaKeegbulb Ne baoP..lemmgremammgmatlmg
___ ____
�r
imav&weathelmn[P[NebewooabbeyuWtlupovee Na.
TOE WOOD
q
trawplmtilwfluxbNmmaFm¢c CONS1RHClEO
Eixmatealwb aoapw (eb,alevatbo,
ffi—wAor)md
laye{edloxeach
picewtne wum pb baoWWltlevamm Nmemay oeeabbe WOOD BENCHCONSIR
\\
WoHW elmwrtPN eEashlxmlpgaj
•e
_+_____
beRve<.nlayers(wMn avaSiWe1-
� .+'++CHMNEL CTPD
�e
geedlmkx�a.nameaeMmmrz[mwPBvmava sbpeatiank.
HMINEL 607OM
waheutr ervmuwfarolmeNvg:
PbNtrre Aa4es mb men[plaet4.fhaYbaaaoabanifohelp'yirt..
.tiavl.
ti..
Plant
Plant menmdah[tim-:uppe[beNc
tt, ¢.
NFNCNpYo
11 Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Removal Project 2016
Fox, Tim
From:
Dodd, Brady N -FS <bdodd@fs.fed.us>
Sent:
Thursday, August 25, 2016 11:13 AM
To:
Brown, David W SAW; Leslie, Andrea J; Fox, Tim; Walker, Fred; Loftis, C. Scott
Cc:
Jones, James B -FS; Farmer, Jason -FS
Subject:
Proposed Amendment to PCN Action ID: 2015-00458 and DWR# 15-0712 - LITTLE
BUCK CREEK DAM REMOVAL, CLAY COUNTY
Attachments:
ProjectDescription LittleBuckCrk_DamRemovalPrcject2016.docx; PCN Amendment
Little BuckCrU 5 FS.pdf
Hello All,
I wanted to inform you of the changes made to the Little Buck Creek Dam Removal project in Clay Co.
The change was made at the dam removal site. Specifically, the existing approvals permit the removal of pond
sediments and complete removal of the dam, and construction of about 500 feet of new channel. The change is to leave
the sediments behind the dam, lowering the dam to the sediment elevation, filling the downstream gullied discharge
channel, and reconstructing the bypass channel as the new fish passable channel.
I amended the approved PCN (attached), changes are in bold type. Also attached is the Project Description for your
review.
Please let me know if I can provide any needed detail.
brady
Brady Dodd
Hydrologist
Forest Service
National Forests in North Carolina
p: 828-267-4214
c: 828-620-3176
bdodd(Mfs.fed.us
160 Zillicoa St., Suite A
Asheville, NC 28801
w w.fs.fed.us
1011rin
Caring for the land and serving people
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the
law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.