20150712 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160825

w A r�9Qc
7
■
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number: n/a
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project
2b.
County:
Clay
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Hayesville, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
USDA Forest Service, Tusquitee Ranger District
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
USDA Forest Service
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Kristin Bail
3d.
Street address:
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite A
3e.
City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
3f.
Telephone no.:
828-257-4269
3g.
Fax no.:
828-259-0584
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Brady Dodd
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
USDA Forest Service, Hydrologist
4d.
Street address:
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite A
4e.
City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4h.
Email address:
bdodd aefs.fed.us
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) v
5a.
Name:
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
5c.
_
Street address:
5d.
City, state, zip:
5e.
Telephone no.:
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 15

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
USDA Forest Service, National Forest in NC, Tusquitee
R. D.
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): - if you can't get
these, just include a very good vicinity map
Latitude: 35.0604 Longitude: - 83.5721
1 c.
Property size:
755,200 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Little Buck Creek, Buck Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Tr; ORW
2c.
River basin: map is available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
Little Tennessee River Basin
Page 3 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site A: The earthen dam is located on National Forest System lands in. Clay County, North Carolina,
approximately 9 miles northeast of the town of Hayesville, NC, This action will restore natural drainage
patterns in the Little Buck Creek drainage; a state identified Outstanding Resource Water. The existing pond
was created by the previous land owners for private use. The earthen dam impounded approximately 0.6 acre
of Little Buck Creek in its headwaters.
Site B: An existing log check dam within Little Buck Creek has caused severe stream bank erosion and
channel widening. The log was installed at an elevation that is too high; therefore, it causes the stream
channel to be too wide and shallow. The site is located adjacent to a dispersed camp site and immediately
downstream of Forest Service Road 71.
Site C: A section of Forest Service Road 350A is located in close proximity to Buck Creek. Due to steep
terrain adjacent to the road, the road cannot be relocated away from the stream. Stream bank erosion is
occurring at this site and is threatening the existing road which also serves as the primary access for private
landowners downstream of the location.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
—0.4 acre of wetlands.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Site A —500 feet in the Little Buck Creek drainage.
Site B —50 feet in the Little Buck Creek drainage
Site C —50 feet in Buck Creek
Page 4 of 15

3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Site A: The Forest Service is proposing to remove a portion
of the earthen dam structure to reconnect approximately
0.2 mile of streams by eliminating an aquatic organism
passage barrier, restore natural drainage patterns and
reduce the potential impacts of a high hazard dam. Past
inspections show indications of structural and seepage
problems with the dam (see photo). Upstream of the
earthen dam a large volume of sediment is stored. This area
has been drained by a constructed opening in the dam over
the past year. As a result, the ponded sediments have
mostly dried, a stream channel and wetland has formed,
and vegetation has begun to establish.
Additionally, restoration of the stream channel at the pond site would reconnect approximately 0.2 mile of
streams by eliminating an aquatic organism passage barrier.
Site B: Removal of the log check dam in Little Buck Creek and
reconstruction of the stream bank would stabilize the stream
channel and restore it to a natural condition.
Site C: Installation of a boulder vane structure in lower Buck Creek
would direct stream flow away from the eroding stream bank
adjacent to the Forest Service Road and prevent further erosion.
This project would improve water temperatures within the Buck
Creek watershed and provide improved habitat conditions for the
native aquatic species within the watershed by restoring the stream
water temperatures and aquatic passage, and increasing stream
habitat complexity.
Page 5 of 15

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
SITE A:
This project proposes to leave that sediment in place, thereby maintaining a wetland/meadow environment that
adds desired diversity to the area. To maintain this ecosystem, this project proposes to do the following:
1. With a tracked excavator setting on the earthen dam, excavate along the length of the earthen dam to an
elevation near the level of the sediments in the pond.
2. There is a concrete drain structure in the dam. This will be excavated out of the fill and hauled off site by
the contractor.
3. Place earthen dam material in the downstream valley bottom to fill the gullied channel below the dam with
excavated materials. Use quarried boulders as needed to fill this area to design elevation.
4. Where the channel currently resides upstream of the dam, set up a pump to divert streamflow around the
construction work. Construct a boulder/log structure to hold grade at the lower end of the meadow. From
this point continue in the existing channel reconstructing the channel to pass fish with numerous boulder
and log structures.
Construct a channel with dimension, pattern, and profile to fit the site as defined by existing bedrock and
boulders, and the reference reach located up and down stream. See Table 1 for design information.
Fable I. Design Channel Calculations (see also PYoject DeseYt"ption Document Fi uYC S)
Current reach length: 212 feet
Current reach drop: 25 feet
Current reach slope: 25'/212' = 0.118 = 11.8%
There can be a 5.9% slope between steps. Step mean depth is 0.5
feet, therefore:
Slope = Rise/Run
0.059 = 0.5'/Run
Run = 0.5'/0.059 = 8.5'stream length with a 0.5' step
Therefore, the 212' reach will have 20-25 sections of 8.5' length with
a 6% slope and a step or cascade drop of 0.4-0.6'. Pools will have a
mean depth of 12-18" and a Pool to Pool spacing of 7-10 feet.
6. Incorporated into the channel design would be structures that mimic the natural involvement of trees
and boulders into the aquatic system. These structures could include J -hook vanes, vanes, root wads, and
toe -wood (see Appendix A and attachments).
7. Constructed stream banks would be covered with native seed and Coir matting, and planted with live
stakes and potted plants. The remaining disturbed soil would be seeded and mulched and planted with
potted plants.
Site B:
One existing log check dam within Little Buck Creek would be removed to restore the natural
width/depth ratio and to protect the stream banks. A new stream bank would be constructed and
revegetated.
Site C:
One boulder vane would be installed within Buck Creek adjacent to FS Road 350A using a trackhoe.
This structure will be placed at an elevation that will direct water away from the eroding stream bank
and also create a downstream scour pool.
Page 6 of 15

B.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
9.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
10.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
if yes, explain.
Page 7 of 15

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):.
M Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Z Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
--
- -- --_-
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
----,-
2a
------------ --
2b.
_ —..-._ --------T
2c.
2d.
_------ —
2e.
-- ----------
2f.
Wetland impact
I
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
_
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
-- ---- _--_-
—,�
❑ Yes
No
❑ Corps —
❑ D_W Q
--�
P
W3 ❑❑T
❑ Yes -
-- -- --
❑ Corps
_�
❑ No
❑DWQ
l
W4 ❑ P ❑ T El ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
_
W5 ❑-F F� T ___ _------------ El Yes ❑Corps
_ --- ❑ No ❑_DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes -- -- ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ _
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Cornrnents: The reservoir created wetland will be maintained as much as possible, but the extent will not
be known until -
the pond is drained.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
� 3a. 3b. -------- 3c.T- _-3d.__--------- _3e. ---------- 3f..--______ 3g' --
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non -404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Reconstruct
existing channel,
S1 ®P ❑ T
install in -stream
structures &
Little Buck Creek
® PER
INT
Z Corps
®DWQ
7
220
install vegetation
transplants on
banks
Remove log check
S2 ®P ❑ T
dam, construct
Little Buck Creek
PER
® Corps
6
50
new bank,
L-1 INT
® DWQ
revegetate
Z Corps
DWQ
20
50
S3 Z P ❑ T
Install boulder
vane, revegetate
Buck Creek, lower I I
Z PER
❑ INT®
eroding bank
-
i
--�---
S4 N P E] T
®PER
®Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 Z P❑ T
0 PER
M Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
Page 8 of 15

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
320
3i. Comments: Edits made to Site A on August 25, 2016
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ®P ❑ T
Little Buck Creek
Pond
Drain water. Restore stream
channel.
Reservoir
0.4
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0.4
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 9 of 15

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below.
If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you
MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d. —
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
7 No
r- - - -----
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 10 of 15

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Construction at the existing pond site would occur largely in the absence of streamflow since streamflow would be
pumped around the excavation work. Still, temporarily increases in turbidity are likely from the work, especially when
streamflow is first released to the new channel, but because of erosion control features (transplants, coir matting, etc.) the
amount would be minimal. Potential adverse impacts would be avoided by minimizing excessive excavation and adhering
to the State turbidity standard. Stream work is expected to be completed over a three week period.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A. Minimize the area and degree of soil disturbance that reduces infiltration capacity and permeability, and destroys protective
forest floor and ground cover.
B. All hazardous materials will be stored outside of flood -prone areas and surrounded with sediment fence to reduce the risk of
materials reaching the river.
C. Work activities would not be scheduled on rainy days.
D. Heavy Equipment Operation.
1. All equipment shall be cleaned before entering the project area and stream, so as to reduce the risk of fine grained
sediment and oils and grease from entering the stream. This would also reduce the risk of invasive weed spread
onto the Forest.
2. Do not operate on wet soils when they are most susceptible to damage and erosion.
3. Operate heavy equipment on slopes less than 12 percent so as to reduce the risk of soil erosion. Avoid operating
heavy equipment on over -hanging stream banks.
4. Move large woody debris in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor, exposure of mineral soil, or
degradation of stream bank stability.
E. Install sediment fence to trap potential sediment. Stabilize any disturbed area at the end of each workday.
F. Re -vegetate exposed soils as soon as possible to take advantage of the loose soil conditions for seeding.
1. Exposed soil will be covered with straw mulch or erosion control matting at the end of the project. Matting will be
secured in place with stakes and live stakes where conditions allow.
2. Temporary seeding will occur on all bare soil within five days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term
erosion control.
3. Stabilize channel banks with a native seed mix as work is completed.
G. Do not move sediment trap devices until the vegetation in the disturbed areas has been established.
H. During on-going operations inspect the site frequently; inspect occasionally during inactive periods.
1. Check for potentially damaging or failing situations that may cause unacceptable water quality impacts.
2. Correct failing situations as soon as practical.
i. Conduct visual inspections of streams while the work is being conducted to maintain acceptable turbidity levels.
Use a skilled heavy equipment operator, trained in stream restoration and construction of in -stream structures. Instruct the
operator to minimize disturbance to the streambed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 11 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
5. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ,
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form – please
contact the State for more information.
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
Zone 1
6c.
Reason for impact
��-----__.—
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 12 of 15

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes [;I No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The
current site contains less than
24% impervious area and an increase in impervious area is not planned from the
proposed work. Additionally, all
stormwater is transported primarily via vegetated conveyances.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Clay County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
® ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 13 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments: NEPA Decision Memo document is attached.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? El Yes No
3b. if you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage disposal is necessary.
Page 14 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A biological evaluation completed by the US Forest Service on February 3, 2015 determined that the project is
not likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared bat and Indiana bat. Concurrence with these
determinations of effect was made by the US Fish and Wildlife Service on May 20, 2014. There will be no
impacts to any other proposed, endangered, or threatened species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Data source is NOAA website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
An archeological review completed in March 2014 determined that the dam on Little Buck Creek is not
eligible for listing under § 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The State Historic Preservation Office
concurred with the Forest Service's determination on April 13, 2015.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
http://floodmaps.nc.gov/FMIS/
Brady N. Dodd
A � Z5� 4A
kkl
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
ppl can Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid onl if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 15 of 15