20160897 Ver 1_401 Application_20160916

SINCE FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
NC Engineering License # F-0266
310 Hubert Street
o Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 1 USA
1881
T 919.828.34411 F 919.582-0304
September 9, 2016
Ms. Karen Higgins
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP 14, WQC 3886, and Neuse River Buffer
Authorization
NCSU Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
Initiative Way
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F&R Project No. 66T-0330
Ms. Higgins:
Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F&R) is submitting this Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) to the
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for written concurrence for allowable impacts to "Waters
of the United States." F&R is also sending a copy to the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR). F&R has been contracted by McKim & Creed PA to perform wetland
consulting services on behalf of North Carolina State University for the above -referenced
project site located in Wake County, North Carolina within the Neuse River Basin.
NCSU is proposing to construct an approximate 1,500 linear feet of a two-lane asphalt roadway
with curb and gutter from the exiting terminus of Initiative Way at Blair Drive to connect with
Oval Drive near the existing park and ride facility. Additionally, there will be an extension of
approximately 325 linear feet of roadway constructed to tie Blair Drive eastward to intersect
with the existing Centennial Parkway. The purpose of this project is to provide better
connectivity for the NCSU Centennial Campus and to remain consistent with the Centennial
Campus Master Plan.
The impacts to Waters of the United States for this project will be 201 linear feet of permanent
stream impacts and 10 linear feet of temporary stream impacts for culvert placement at a
proposed road crossing from Blair Drive to Centennial Parkway intersection. The stream to be
impacted received a low quality rating using the NC Stream Assessment Method. Therefore
NCSU will be requesting for a 1:1 mitigation ratio for proposed impacts.
Buffer impacts associated with the road crossing (culvert placement) are allowable with
mitigation totaling 13,125 square feet for Zone 1 and 8,193 square feet for Zone 2.
HQ: 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD RICHMOND, VA 23228 USA T 804.264.2701 F 804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
A Minority -Owned Business

F&R is submitting this Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) with associated USGS Map, stream
and buffer impact drawings, and project plan drawings to the USACE and NCDWR for written
concurrence for the impacts listed previously. Should your office have questions pertaining to
any of the information presented within the following PCN or its attachments, please contact
the undersigned.
Respectfully Submitted,
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Elias N. Ruhl
Environmental Services Manager
NCSU Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension PCN Submittal September 9, 2016
Wake County, North Carolina Project No. 66T-0330

11"I 0�
I0� WAS �G
f] Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
NCSU Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina State Dept. of Administration, State Property Office
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 015950, Page 02766
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
116 W. Jones Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603-1300
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-807-4650
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Teresa. [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: NCSU
4b.
Name:
Mr. Steve Bostian, PE
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
NCSU Capital Project Management
4d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 7520
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27695-7520
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Mr. Elias Ruh[
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F&R)
5c.
Street address:
310 Hubert Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh NC 27603
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-828-3441
5f.
Fax no.:
919.828.5751
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0793520723
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.770683 Longitude: -78.670222
1 c.
Property size:
40.18 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Walnut Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW (Walnut Creek)
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is currently part of NCSU Centennial Campus with developed land and disturbed successional forest.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 500
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To provide better connectivity for the NCSU Centennial Campus and to remain consistent with the proposed Centennial Campus Master Plan.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Extend Initiative Way to Oval Drive; extend Blair Drive to connect to Centennial Campus. Standard road building equipment will be used.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:The stream is a blue -line stream on USGS To o Ma
p p
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
Corps
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
Corps
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
Corps
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
Corps
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
Corps
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Walnut Creek
PER
Corps
6
201
S2 T
Culvert
UT to Walnut Creek
PER
Corps
6
10
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
211
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open water impacts are proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
Pond or Lake construction is not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
X❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Road crossing/Culvert
LIT to Walnut Creek
Yes
13,125
8,193
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
13,125
8,193
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
NCSU worked diligently with Duke Energy to go with 2:1 side slopes to minimize stream impacts but had to concede with 3:1 side slopes due to Duke
Energy requiring a minimum of 3:1 side slopes for vehicle access to maintain/service utility lines.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
BMP's for culvert construction as well as erosion control measures will be strictly enforced throughout project construction.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):X❑
DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: EBX-Neuse sponsored Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Mitigation Bank - Buffalo Branch Site
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Type: Riparian buffer
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 201 linear feet
Quantity: 51,665 square feet
Quantity:
Proposed stream mitigation at mitigation ratio based on low -quality stream.
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑X Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Culvert installation for road
13,125
3 (2 for Catawba)
39,375
crossing
Zone 2
Culvert installation for road
8,193
1.5
12,290
crossing
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
51,665
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Payment to private mitigation bank (EBX Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank or EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation
Bank).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X- Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑X Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
9.83
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
NCSU began building its own stormwater management program in 1995 to accommodate NPDES requirements. In 1999, NCSU established the NC
State
university NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4). The University Stormwater Program is a
product of requirements under its MS4
permit and the Neuse River Basin buffer rules. The stormwater management plan for this project will capture
runoff in a series of storm pipe systems
and
outlets into dissipation devices prior to entering the protected buffers. The Blair Drive connection will be
established utilizing a buried culvert
crossing, which will provide a baffling system within the culvert to retain the stream bed material, create high and low flow passage, reduce velocity
and
ultimately promote aquatic life.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NCDEQ
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Raleigh / NCSU EH&S
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑R Other: NPDES MS4
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance
with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is part of the latest phase of the Centennial Campus Master Plan which was planned nearly 28 years ago.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No
wastewater will be generated from this project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Natural Heritage Program GIS Data and USFWS County list of Protected Species. Michaux's sumac habitat was surveyed on May 2, 2016; no
specimens found.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIS Data
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM
Elias N. Ruhl
J !
09-09-2016
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

Project Description —The project will consist of approximately 1500 linear feet of a two lane asphalt
roadway with curb and gutter to be constructed from the existing terminus of Initiative Way at Blair
Drive to connect with Oval Drive near the existing park and ride facility. Additionally, there will be an
extension of approximately 325 linear feel of roadway constructed to tie Blair Drive eastward to
intersect with the existing Centennial Parkway. The extension of Blair Drive will require the crossing of a
jurisdictional stream. The project will assess the potential options for a bridge span or the use of a
standard culvert during the design process. Crossing of this stream will require coordination and
permitting with NCDENR and USACOE for jurisdictional impacts as needed. Design will also include site
lighting and landscape architecture to provide consistency with the existing campus development.
Stormwater will be by sheet flow along the proposed roadway gutter system and then conveyed within
a stormwater pipe system prior to its outlet point downstream. Design process will follow standard
State Construction Office format, with a combined Schematic and Design Development phase. Design
will also incorporate NCSU Owner's Supplemental Designer Requirements (OSDR) accordingly.
Purpose and Need- The primary purpose for the proposed project is to provide better connectivity for
the NCSU Centennial Campus and to remain consistent with the proposed Centennial Campus Precinct
Master Plan. The NCSU Centennial campus is a vital part of the university that provides a collaborative
work environment for research and development. Differentiating itself from other research parks,
Centennial Campus provides a mixed-use property that couples labs, office space, student classrooms
with residential living and recreational opportunities. To provide this type of development, the campus
requires sufficient vehicular and pedestrian connectivity. Moving people within the campus, as well as
connections to the surrounding s is of utmost importance. The proposed project will complete the final
section of roadway that will fully connect Initiative Way with Main Campus Drive. Additionally, it will
provide a third connection to Centennial Parkway, which is a primary point for ingress and egress. The
proposed tie to Centennial Parkway will also allow an additional connection point for those persons
housed on campus, providing less congestion along Main Campus Drive.
Alternatives- the horizontal alignment for the extension of Initiative Way is somewhat established. The
existing Initiative Way is stubbed just north of the Wolf Ridge Apartments. Similarly, Main Campus Drive
terminates on the north end near the Oval Drive storage yards and in proximity to the perimeter parking
lots for park and ride. The horizontal alignment of Initiative Way is bounded to the east by the
jurisdictional stream and the existing park and ride lots. The proposed alignment would have much
more environmental impact if it were to shift eastward. The alternative to shift the horizontal alignment
to the west is possible, but it would lessen the amount of area for future development around the Oval,
based on the proposed master plan. The design should look to maximize this buildable area without
compromising environmental impacts.
The Blair Drive extension has alternatives for the jurisdictional crossing that will be assessed during
design. The alignment should attempt to cross as close as perpendicular as possible, yet still aligning
with the existing Blair Drive on the east side of Centennial Parkway. The proposed alignment will
require the crossing of the jurisdictional tributary in order to tie to Centennial Parkway. The crossing
can utilize a standard pipe or box culvert with associated fill. An alternate design for the crossing would
be a spanned bridge. Factors such as vertical constraints, environmental impacts, and prohibitive cost
will be evaluated for these alternatives.

August 12, 2016
Memorandum for Avoidance and Minimization Statement
Prepared by Steven R. Bostian, P.E.
Subject: Owner - NC State University
Project Name - Centennial Campus Extension of Initiative Way Project
NCSU Project No. - 201520009
SCO Project No. —15-11650-01A
This project will install a new section of Initiative Way and a new section of Blair Drive. Initiative Way will
be approximately 1500 linear feet of new, two lane asphalt pavement from the current end point of
Initiative Way at the Oval Drive Storage Lots south to the intersection of Blair Drive. Blair Drive will be
an extension of approximately 330 linear feet of new, two lane asphalt pavement to connect Initiative
Way to Centennial Parkway. The Blair Drive extension crosses over a perennial stream located between
Initiative Way and Centennial Parkway.
A short historical explanation will be helpful in the understanding of this road and the proposed
location. This large piece of property where Blair Drive will be constructed was originally part of the Dix
property. The property was transferred to NC State University in 1987 and was renamed Centennial
Campus in recognition of the 100 year anniversary of the founding of NC State. The founding vision was
to develop from a blank parcel of land a campus where industry and business worked in conjunction
with University staff and colleges on joint interests. The campus would also include housing, restaurants,
shops, and recreation facilities. It was to be a complete neighborhood where people could live, work,
and play. With a goal of minimizing disturbance to existing natural features, the University developed a
Master Plan for the phased growth using ridge lines and perennial streams to organize the building sites
and the supporting infrastructure.
The Master Plan introduced a network of new roads to serve the property. One of the first roads was a
large connecting road between Avent Ferry Road and Lake Wheeler Road. This road named, Centennial
Parkway, provided means for egress onto the entire east side of the Centennial Campus. One of the
roads to provide this egress is the Blair Drive connection to Centennial Parkway. Centennial Parkway was
designed such that there was a turnout and signalization poles installed for the future Blair Drive. Blair
Drive was considered to be a gateway to the northeast portion of the campus. As the campus has
developed, this northeast quadrant already has housing (The Greens Apartments for young
professionals and Wolf Ridge apartments for student housing), classroom and laboratories (Engineering
Building III), restaurants (student cafeteria), and also the Hunt Library. The Master Plan identifies
approximately six more future buildings and several new parking structures for this quadrant. The Blair
Drive connection will provide egress to all of these facilities. Blair Drive will also align with the
continuation of Blair Drive across Centennial Parkway into the Spring Hill Precinct and the future City of
Raleigh Park. NC State University is preparing plans at this time for the Spring Hill Campus Precinct to
compliment the Centennial Campus. It is envisioned that there will be significant interaction between
the Spring Hill Campus, the City of Raleigh Park and the Centennial Campus in the future years.
The University in conjunction with the design team prepared preliminary drawings that indicated that
the Blair Drive crossing over the perennial stream could be minimized by installing 2:1 side slopes down

from the road section to the stream channel. These preliminary design drawings indicated that the
impact to the stream using 2:1 side slopes would be under the 150 Linear Feet threshold. However,
discussions with Duke Energy Progress about construction within their right-of-way revealed that Duke
required a minimum of a 3:1 side slope so that Duke's vehicles could get onto the transmission lines
rights-of-way to perform maintenance and service. The University worked diligently with Duke Energy
Progress to come up with other options that would be satisfactory to both parties but Duke Energy
Progress was very firm in their requirements for construction within their right-of-way. So, in the end,
the 3:1 side slope for the Blair Drive connection was implemented into the design.
In summary, the Blair Drive connection between Initiative Way and Centennial Parkway has been in the
planning stages for almost 28 years. The road will serve as the primary gateway for the northeast
quadrant of the campus just like the other four gateways (Varsity Drive for the northwest, Oval Drive for
north, Achievement Drive for the southeast, and Main Campus Drive for the southwest). The original
master plan from the late 1980's and the early 1990's considered other options and alternatives and
determined that these five gateways (including Blair Drive) provided the optimum egress into Centennial
Campus based on the projected building layouts and traffic analysis as well as environmental impacts.
All efforts were made and have been made in both the design aspects and the negotiation aspects with
Duke Energy Progress to avoid and minimize impacts to the streams and water bodies on the Centennial
Campus. This crossing over a small perennial stream reflects the best design for the protection of the
environment and the functionality of the current and future projected campus.

Or
' -
WRAL
Mission Valley Wes
Shopping Center
cc pyw�
.A Campus 1)r
III games B. Hunt A Library
e.North
7
Carolina StateUniversity
�
Bender St
DrAM0 t Study
Area
SITE VICINITY MAP North
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Client: NCSU
FxrAF ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL Promect: Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
gCR 310 Hubert Street Location: Raleigh, Wake County, NC
r Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 1 USA F&R Project No: 66T-0268
aa, Source: Google Maps
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Date: September 2016 Scale Not Known Figure #1

!�•� 1 7 —�
ect Study
Area =
I e�
4e-1
61 -V-fer-I �-�
A.
9 � I rte-
L\
�Yrl'V
USGs.oPaMAP .,rt.
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
FarF
ENGINEERING e ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL Promect:
gCR 310 Hubert Street Location
r
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 1 USA F&R Proj
1 aa1 Source:
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Date: Se
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
No: 66T-0268
"Raleigh West Derita, NC" dated 2013
ber 2016
#2 1

9
Property Boundary
UT to Walnut Creek
AERIAL SITE MAP North 4
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Client: NCSU
FxrAF ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL Promect: Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
gCR 310 Hubert Street Location: Raleigh, Wake County, NC
r Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 1 USA F&R Project No: 66T-0268
ga, Source: Google Earth May 2015
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Date: September 2016 Scale Not Known Figure #3

mAr
Re 2
eD
ApS2
T
eD�
ceq
4: C'e D .
eC.2
+�. Ell
' e F
1 ..
I ' Ce
•
CeF eF
CL
"M eC2
a. 3 C7
c ec
SOIL SURVEY MAP North 4
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Client: NCSU
FxrAF ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL Promect: Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
gCR 310 Hubert Street Location: Raleigh, Wake County, NC
r Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 1 USA Project No: 66T 0268
Sou
Source: USDA NRCS Wake County Soil Survey
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Date: September 2016 Scale Not Known Figure #4

� Wetland
- rmshwaw Emergent `
Freshwater FmesdJhfub e
Esluahne and Marine Deepwater
Esivanne and Marine
Freshwater PondLam 13
-
E
ED
Riveryne
,.
Other
+
p
L2
Poo W
I SM
h "
W
m
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP North
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Client:
NCSU
FxrA ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL Project: Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
gCR 310 Hubert Street Location: Raleigh, Wake Count NC
1 _ F&R Project No: 66T-0268
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 1 USA Source: USFWS NWI Mapper
1 681
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Date: September 2016 Scale As Shown_FFigre #5

c- , •f a �.
ell I
IP
f
r
or
,
k
4, rawl L
*� '
,1 � .r
A
AL
hL
F
jA 10�
9
t
a ♦,
y�
+ ...
k .
fib �` `•
h
a T i
Li• , r f • sl
J
xv
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) North
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Client:
NCSU
FxrA ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL Promect: Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
gCR 310 Hubert Street Location: Raleigh, Wake Count NC
1 _ F&R Project No: 66T-0268
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2302 I USA Source: Map No. 3720079300K Preliminary 3/31/2015
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Date: September 2016 Scale Not Shown I Figure #6

Conifer
Dr
MAI
River
t
Pi
O1
a j
tou
rn�
o }W G00C
3 N,,,a Gak
r� Chi +: t
PIN: 0793520723
PIN Ext: 000
Real Estate ID: 0278462
Map Name: 0793 18
Owner: NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF
Mail Address 1: STATE PROPERTY OFFICE
Mail Address 2: 116 W JONES ST
Mail Address 3: RALEIGH NC 27603-1300
Deed Book: 015950
Deed Page: 02766
Deed Date: 03/18/2015
Deed Acres: 750.11
Building Value: $142,690,219
Land Value: $112,799,970
Total Value: $255,490,189
Billing Class: Exempt
Description: CENTENNIAL CAMPUS
Heat Area: 1109877
Lk
el
r
ir
BN a
t% SIL
Lake
Raleigh
4
e v e INre`
r
�rtr Creek
X297
P&
Gos✓, 41. �° Ir
°>`moo •,J�
° % ,_': Srerra pr
Dr Vii?
Joan<`e `et
Site Address: 1001 CAPABILITY DR
City: RALEIGH
Township: Raleigh
Year Built: 1987
Sale Price: $0
Sale Date:
Use Type: LABRATRY
Design Style: Conventional
Land Class: EXEMPT
Old Parcel Number: --
urnst
00,
V dr
Cir
rW
Diggs
k�rk�anC1
Dr
Sterro fz
N
0 750 1,500 3,000 ft
1 inch = 1,433 feet
Disclaimer
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

PIN: 0793520723
Site Address: 1001 CAPABILITY DR
PIN Ext: 000
City: RALEIGH
Real Estate ID: 0278462
Township: Raleigh
Map Name: 0793 18
Year Built: 1987
Owner: NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF
Sale Price: $0
Mail Address 1: STATE PROPERTY OFFICE
Sale Date:
Mail Address 2: 116 W JONES ST
Use Type: LABRATRY
Mail Address 3: RALEIGH NC 27603-1300
Design Style: Conventional
Deed Book: 015950
Land Class: EXEMPT
Deed Page: 02766
Old Parcel Number: --
Deed Date: 03/18/2015
Deed Acres: 750.11
Building Value: $142,690,219
Land Value: $112,799,970
Total Value: $255,490,189
Billing Class: Exempt
Description: CENTENNIAL CAMPUS
Heat Area: 1109877
0 220 440 880 ft
1 inch = 400 feet
Disclaimer
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
Nie most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use, or its interpretation

COFFERDAM
l - STREAM PERMANENT IMPACT (AREA A)
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
� III III II ������i///� �/ / �-- � / •�,� ���. , � I
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN /
BUFFER/ZONE 1 (EYP) 1/�\
1 /
PUMP
PUMP
/ / �'` •.�••`: � //ice
/� - - /// / f.i/'�,%.:.:�.:•:. �:.:% / ///// jai � � � � �
!1`i`a:.
lr /
�/� 184 LF 72" CMP CULVERT WITH
1' EMBEDMENT. INTERNAL
/ BAFFLES SPACED AT 10' O.C.
It
�\ // / •,�;�1��� � 11111111/ll///ll/I// /,_ /
r1 I I III //Ill/ lI 111 11
STREAM (TYP) I /
VA, � --' l / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111
FIL TER BAG &\
OUTLET PROTECTION \` /
FOR PUMP EFFLUENT . FILTER BAG & OUTLET PROTECTION
COFFERDAM I l FOR PUMP EFFLUENT
/"/\ ) l 11 / / / ) III,IIIII\\\ \\\\, _ h\
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
(PERMANEN T)
(4,095 SF,
0.09 AC,
201 LF)
STREAM
IMPACT
(TEMP ORA R Y)
(148 SF,
0.003 AC,
10 LF)
►��'d®rr�
ZONE 1
IMPACT
(PERMANEN T)
(13,125 SF,
0.30 AC)
ZONE 2
IMPACT
(PERMANEN T)
(8,193 SF,
0.19 AC)
Scale: 1"=40'
vWIQM&CREED Stream & Buffer Impacts
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 NCSU -Initiative Wa Date:
0: 919.233.8091 F: 919.233.8031 Y August 26, 2016

COFFERDAM
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
J. %'� // / /' // BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
\ I I III II \\\���//i/���/ / 3r�-- � / •�,� ��,�, , � I
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN /
-BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
STREAM PERMANENT IMPACT (AREA A)
PUMP
(2g
/PUMP /// i / / / � � .'/.;�. • / / // / / /✓ � % � %�
zz
184 LF 72" CMP CULVERT WITH
1EMBEDMENT. INTERNAL
BAFFLES SPACED A T 10' O. C.
;��r::f: I I I// /, 1111111I�IIIIIIIIIII/
i \ �� l/ ��••: ��f�• I I I �I I I I I lll/
v l l /f.{
\ \ / / / � ..>'':�1�• �:� I I I, �. •I 1 I 1/I I I I I I I II l/l//11111/ , _
/ � / /I•� I I '( I llll /lull /1111
l // //ill//•• / I V I �, I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII /// I // l �
STREAM (TYP) I
/H�/ \\,F\,\ / I I /III /IIIIIIIIII
/// /�/1\\ \ �/ / I Ii I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
FIL TER BAG &
OUTLET PROTECTION \`
FOR PUMP EFFLUENT .\ l FILTER BAG & OUTLET PROTECTION
COFFERDAM I l FOR PUMP EFFLUENT
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
(PERMANEN T)
(4,095 SF,
0.09 AC,
201 LF)
STREAM
IMPACT
(TEMPORARY)
(148 SF,
0.003 AC,
10 LF)
vNF M&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
0:919.233.8091 F: 919.233.8031
Stream Impacts
NCSU - Initiative Way
Scale: 1"=40'
0 10 20
Date:
August 26, 2016

COFFERDAM
'20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
1\ \ I I I I I I I I II III I �i �� // / /' i BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
IIIiIIlliili ��--�/ yam/ BUFFERZONE 1 (TYP)
PUMP/
PUMP
// 184 LF 72" CMP CULVERT WITH
/x EMBEDMENT. INTERNAL
('(//BAFFLES SPACED AT 10' 0. C.
i 111111111///
III 1111//////
11 111� 11//I//lll/l
STREAM (TYP) I /
�11W�111
/ / ///////11 \ / / / I I I 11111111IIIIlIIIIIII
FIL TER BAG & I 1 1111 1111111 II I I II 111' 11 ;
OUTLET PROTECTION \` /
FOR PUMP EFFLUENT.�� FILTER BAG & OUTLET PROTECTION
—� COFFERDAM I l FOR PUMP EFFLUENT
/'/\ J / // ,/ / / /) III�111II\\\ \\\\, _ h\
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
IMPACT IMPACT
(PERMANENT) (PERMANENT)
(13,125 SF, (8,193 SF,
0.30 A C) 0.19 A C)
Scale: 1"=40'
v�NFKIM&CREED Buffer Impacts
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500 io 20
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 NCSU -Initiative �XIa Date:
0: 919.233.8091 F: 919.233.8031 Y August 26, 2016

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any):
Initiative
3. Applicant/owner name:
NCSU
5. County:
Wake
7. River basin:
Neuse
Extension
Date of evaluation: 8/9/2016
Assessor name/organization:
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad:
Elias Ruhl / F&R
Walnut Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.770661; -78.670322
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ���
valley shape (skip for ®B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III DIV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
E
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
Submerged aquatic vegetation
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
❑H
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
Y tC
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
Sand bottom
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses-F,N
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
E
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
o
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Y tC
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
r
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ®No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>- 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ❑A
❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
®D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E
R < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure —
streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Mature forest
❑B ®B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ®B Low stem density
®C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 EIB 46 to < 67 EIC 67 to < 79 ❑ D 79 to < 230 FIE >_ 230
Notes/Sketch

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Initiative Way Extension Date of Assessment
8/9/2016
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization Elias Ruhl / F&R
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

NC DW9 Stream Tdentification Form Version 4.11
Rate: �! ProrecttSite: _ atitude: ?'5: 770&
Evaluator: e County: ,/ , Longitude: 703x
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other J?Ake. A We yl
Stream is at leasttntermittent Ephemeral Intermittent erennla e.g. QuadNume:
If z 19 or,oermrinrial !f t 30
A. Geonnor holo Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
Z
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool Sequence
0
13
U11
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relictfloodplaln
0
Na - 0
2
3
6. depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
`perennlal streams may also be identified using other methods. Sae p- 3s or manual.
1
2
3
8. Readouts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
.0 `
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Na
Yes W 3
artificial ditches are not rated see Cllscimrlons in manual
R I- vrirnlrernr f.qiehfnfnl - cf 1
12. Presence of gaseflow
0
1
2
CP
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14_ Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5 1
Na - 0
25. Algae
'Yes
r-_ RininCl Ih+nfnI = W 1
15. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Lo
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 T
1 2
3
22. Fish
1-00
n-5 1
1.5
23_ Crayfish
cv
0.5 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 - _
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACVV = 0.75; C SL � 1.5 Other
0
`perennlal streams may also be identified using other methods. Sae p- 3s or manual.
Nates:
Sketch: , ca Jai -+r ;,I hx�r .' '.ci 74z 4 a /f
Ar'I F 1/ G16+FF c -',eze :''3c L _Iv#-
-

USACE AIDS DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
,.,F STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name;,.`' 2. Evaluator's name: -
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation: _ f:
5. Name of stream: .. '= tri. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ­-��s - 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 7 ? Longitude (ex -77.55661 t): - . 17
Method location determined [cirelc}: GPS Topo Sheett {Aerigl) Phot IS Cthcr OIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (nate nearby roads and len arcs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed Channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 � ridal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
TTrout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters -,:�Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YESINO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES.,—NO
21_ Estimated watershed land use: -°/a Residential �% Commercial —% industrial —% Agricultural
% Forested _%4 Cleared / Logged —% Other
r"F
22. Bankfull width: �f�, -�- �---�.- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank);
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 21,114) _ZGentle (2 to 4%) --Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10°14)
25. Channel sinucrsity: Straight ccasional bends iFrequent meander ,.Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. )every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign paints
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there erre obvious changes in the character. of a stream under review (e.g„ the stream flaws from a pasture
into a forest), the strum may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's SignatureThis channel evaluation farm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners andbinvironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular relitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION
POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
0 4
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration - 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer - 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)c
4
Evidenceof nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)_
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0 v 4
no dischar a =,O s rin s sees wetlands etc. = max pints
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0• extensive flood lain =max Dints
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0- 2
(deep1y entrenched = 0• fre uent flooding = max dints
$
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 -4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points
10
Sediment input
0•-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment max points)
11
Size& diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
I
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
- -
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-.5
0--4
0-5
j�
(deeply incised , 0' stable bed & banks - max points)r
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
f
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)1
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
_
15
substantial impact =0• no evidence= max points)
0-5
0-4
16
Presence of riffle-pooVripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-dcvelo ed = maxpoints)
�
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
-�
lithe or no habitat= 0• frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
1$
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading,vegetation = 0; continuous cariopy = maxpoints)
Substrate embeddedness
14
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
NA*
0-4
0-4
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
4-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0• common numerous types = maxpoints)
4
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

IL7
41,
:1
1 r
Photo 1— A view looking down -stream (south) at the proposed crossing
Photo 2 — A view looking up -stream (north) at the proposed crossing

Photo 3 — A view of the proposed stream crossing area looking southwest
along the stream
Photo 4 — A general view of the proposed stream crossing area within the
power line corridor

fires
EBX Buffer Mitigation Banks
Statement of Availability September 2, 2016
NC Division of Water Resources
Karen Higgins
512 N. Salisbury St.
Archdale Building, 9th floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re Project: NCSU Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension
This document confirms that NCSU Capital Project Management (Applicant) for the NCSU
Centennial Campus Initiative Way Extension (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 51,665
Square Feet of Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits from one of the following banks, EBX Neuse
Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank or EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation
Bank. Specific bank sites that will be debited will either be Arrington Bridge I, Arrington Bridge 11,
Buffalo Branch, Selma Mill, Cedar Grove, Ezell, and/or Hatley, all located in HUC 03020201. As the
official Bank Sponsor, EBX, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1052 or cconderkres.us if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Best Regards,
Cara S. Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
North Carolina State University
Initiative Way
Raleigh, North Carolina
August 30, 2016
Prepared for:
Campus Box 7520
2701 Sullivan Drive, Suite 331
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7520
Prepared By:
v
� MCKIM£>CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
M&C Project No. 01371-0059
11 I I I!I!0��/
��H ... CARp '%,
-RXpFESS10#4 q�'''�
036348 -
Gi , 08/30/2016 =rte

Drainage Model

1S
42" RCP Drainag
Basin
c6
12P
42" RCP
8R
3S
36" RCP rainage
B in
cB
13P
36' CP
4R
(new Reach) (new each)
7S —� 14R
Additional Drainage (new Reach)
Area
S4
Reach on L
ink
Parking Area

Culvert Flows Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=5.04"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment1S: 42" RCP Drainage RunoffArea=13.610 ac 21.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.52"
Flow Length=600' Tc=26.6 min CN=78 Runoff=34.93 cfs 2.857 of
Subcatchment3S: 36" RCP Drainage Basin Runoff Area=9.780 ac 9.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.19"
Flow Length=613' Slope=0.0600 '/' Tc=22.8 min CN=74 Runoff=23.91 cfs 1.782 of
Subcatchment5S: Parking Area Runoff Area=13.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.15"
Tc=30.0 min CN=85 Runoff=38.45 cfs 3.443 of
Subcatchment7S: Additional Drainage Area Runoff Area=3.690 ac 2.17% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.12"
Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=12.92 cfs 0.651 of
Reach 4R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.72' Max Vel=13.01 fps Inflow=95.80 cfs 8.080 of
n=0.022 L=457.0' S=0.0503'/' Capacity=1,660.31 cfs Outflow=95.07 cfs 8.074 of
Reach 8R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=0.99' Max Vel=8.90 fps Inflow=34.93 cfs 2.857 of
n=0.022 L=260.0' S=0.0462'/' Capacity=2,619.49 cfs Outflow=34.74 cfs 2.855 of
Reach 14R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.52' Max Vel=16.95 fps Inflow=98.64 cfs 8.725 of
n=0.022 L=5.0' S=0.1000'/' Capacity=2,340.36 cfs Outflow=98.63 cfs 8.725 of
Pond 12P: 42" RCP Peak Elev=367.31' Inflow=34.93 cfs 2.857 of
42.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500 T Outflow=34.93 cfs 2.857 of
Pond 13P: 36" RCP Peak Elev=354.99' Inflow=23.91 cfs 1.782 of
36.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500 T Outflow=23.91 cfs 1.782 of
Total Runoff Area = 40.180 ac Runoff Volume = 8.733 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.61"
90.17% Pervious = 36.230 ac 9.83% Impervious = 3.950 ac

Culvert Flows Type// 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=5.04"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14
Summary for Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Inflow Area = 40.180 ac, 9.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.61" for 10 -Year event
Inflow = 98.64 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 8.725 of
Outflow = 98.63 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 8.725 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 16.95 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Avg. Velocity = 7.11 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Peak Storage= 29 cf @ 12.22 hrs
Average Depth at Peak Storage= 1.52'
Bank -Full Depth= 5.00' Flow Area= 62.5 sf, Capacity= 2,340.36 cfs
0.00' x 5.00' deep channel, n= 0.022 Earth, clean & straight
Side Slope Z -value= 2.5'/' Top Width= 25.00'
Length= 5.0' Slope= 0.10007'
Inlet Invert= 5.00', Outlet Invert= 4.50'
Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Hydrograph
-i __] —I — I — — I - FE -1 nflow
110— — — — ❑ Outflow
105 / ss.s3 cfs
- InflowArea=�0.�80aC
100 - —
95 ! - Av6_Fiowbeo �1 �'
90
85_ Aix V1C1= 1-0.95 fOs
80
70 / - +-1 0.022-
65-."
60/ 3�u'
3 55
451
40:/ E_a c' -2,30.- 6 cfs
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

Culvert Flows Type 11 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.99"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment1S: 42" RCP Drainage Runoff Area=13.610 ac 21.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.29"
Flow Length=600' Tc=26.6 min CN=78 Runoff=45.46 cfs 3.731 of
Subcatchment3S: 36" RCP Drainage Basin Runoff Area=9.780 ac 9.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91"
Flow Length=613' Slope=0.0600 '/' Tc=22.8 min CN=74 Runoff=31.87 cfs 2.375 of
Subcatchment5S: Parking Area Runoff Area=13.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.99"
Tc=30.0 min CN=85 Runoff=48.20 cfs 4.354 of
Subcatchment7S: Additional Drainage Area Runoff Area=3.690 ac 2.17% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.84"
Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=17.22 cfs 0.872 of
Reach 4R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.89' Max Vel=13.87 fps Inflow=123.57 cfs 10.459 of
n=0.022 L=457.0' S=0.0503'/' Capacity=1,660.31 cfs Outflow=122.89 cfs 10.451 of
Reach 8R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.09' Max Vel=9.51 fps Inflow=45.46 cfs 3.731 of
n=0.022 L=260.0' S=0.0462 T Capacity=2,619.49 cfs Outflow=45.23 cfs 3.729 of
Reach 14R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.68' Max Vel=18.08 fps Inflow=127.48 cfs 11.323 of
n=0.022 L=5.0' S=0.1000'/' Capacity=2,340.36 cfs Outflow=127.47 cfs 11.323 of
Pond 12P: 42" RCP Peak Elev=367.74' Inflow=45.46 cfs 3.731 of
42.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500'/' Outflow=45.46 cfs 3.731 of
Pond 13P: 36" RCP Peak Elev=355.39' Inflow=31.87 cfs 2.375 of
36.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500 T Outflow=31.87 cfs 2.375 of
Total Runoff Area = 40.180 ac Runoff Volume = 11.333 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.38"
90.17% Pervious = 36.230 ac 9.83% Impervious = 3.950 ac

Culvert Flows Type 11 24 -hr 25 -Year Rainfall=5.99"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25
Summary for Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Inflow Area = 40.180 ac, 9.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.38" for 25 -Year event
Inflow = 127.48 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 11.323 of
Outflow = 127.47 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 11.323 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 18.08 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Avg. Velocity = 7.50 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Peak Storage= 35 cf @ 12.21 hrs
Average Depth at Peak Storage= 1.68'
Bank -Full Depth= 5.00' Flow Area= 62.5 sf, Capacity= 2,340.36 cfs
0.00' x 5.00' deep channel, n= 0.022 Earth, clean & straight
Side Slope Z -value= 2.5T Top Width= 25.00'
Length= 5.0' Slope= 0.1000T
Inlet Invert= 5.00', Outlet Invert= 4.50'
3
0
LL
13
12
11
10
E
Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Hydrograph
f F fiow'Area=�O.�8"c
Av6. Fiow _ ejithi�1._68'
MixV.el=4-8.11$ foo
S=0.1- 00�/'
Ga�acity=2,340.6 c-fe
�TT
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
FE -1 n -f I —w
❑ Outflow
T
1
_ 127.47 cfs
T
T
T
T
T T
�4-
f F fiow'Area=�O.�8"c
Av6. Fiow _ ejithi�1._68'
MixV.el=4-8.11$ foo
S=0.1- 00�/'
Ga�acity=2,340.6 c-fe
�TT
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
FE -1 n -f I —w
❑ Outflow

Culvert Flows Type 11 24 -hr 50 -Year Rainfall=6.74"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment1S: 42" RCP Drainage Runoff Area=13.610 ac 21.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.92"
Flow Length=600' Tc=26.6 min CN=78 Runoff=53.91 cfs 4.443 of
Subcatchment3S: 36" RCP Drainage Basin Runoff Area=9.780 ac 9.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.51"
Flow Length=613' Slope=0.0600 '/' Tc=22.8 min CN=74 Runoff=38.33 cfs 2.863 of
Subcatchment5S: Parking Area Runoff Area=13.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.66"
Tc=30.0 min CN=85 Runoff=55.90 cfs 5.085 of
Subcatchment7S: Additional Drainage Area Runoff Area=3.690 ac 2.17% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.43"
Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=20.70 cfs 1.054 of
Reach 4R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=2.01' Max Vel=14.46 fps Inflow=145.82 cfs 12.388 of
n=0.022 L=457.0' S=0.0503'/' Capacity=1,660.31 cfs Outflow=145.05 cfs 12.380 of
Reach 8R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth= 1.17' Max Vel=9.92 fps Inflow=53.91 cfs 4.443 of
n=0.022 L=260.0' S=0.0462 T Capacity=2,619.49 cfs Outflow=53.66 cfs 4.441 of
Reach 14R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.79' Max Vel=18.86 fps Inflow=150.62 cfs 13.434 of
n=0.022 L=5.0' S=0.1000'/' Capacity=2,340.36 cfs Outflow=150.61 cfs 13.434 of
Pond 12P: 42" RCP Peak EIev=368.09' Inflow=53.91 cfs 4.443 of
42.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500'/' Outflow=53.91 cfs 4.443 of
Pond 13P: 36" RCP Peak EIev=355.75' Inflow=38.33 cfs 2.863 of
36.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500 T Outflow=38.33 cfs 2.863 of
Total Runoff Area = 40.180 ac Runoff Volume = 13.445 of Average Runoff Depth = 4.02"
90.17% Pervious = 36.230 ac 9.83% Impervious = 3.950 ac

Culvert Flows Type 11 24 -hr 50 -Year Rainfall=6.74"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36
Summary for Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Inflow Area = 40.180 ac, 9.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.01" for 50 -Year event
Inflow = 150.62 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 13.434 of
Outflow = 150.61 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 13.434 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 18.86 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Avg. Velocity = 7.94 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Peak Storage= 40 cf @ 12.21 hrs
Average Depth at Peak Storage= 1.79'
Bank -Full Depth= 5.00' Flow Area= 62.5 sf, Capacity= 2,340.36 cfs
0.00' x 5.00' deep channel, n= 0.022 Earth, clean & straight
Side Slope Z -value= 2.5'/' Top Width= 25.00'
Length= 5.0' Slope= 0.10007'
Inlet Invert= 5.00', Outlet Invert= 4.50'
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
U)
9
3 8
0
LL
Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Hydrograph
1 L I -i
150.61 cfs wiow Area=40.1T80ac
fi Av6. Fiawbejth�1.t9'
-� ! — I -M C-iX W, __ 8." fibs
L
fi
-i
1 i
f--
_-
+
I— 4--n-0.022
S=0.1- 00�/'
Qalac.&V=2,340.6 Afs
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
■ Inflow
❑ Outflow

Culvert Flows Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=7.50"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment1S: 42" RCP Drainage Runoff Area=13.610 ac 21.97% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.57"
Flow Length=600' Tc=26.6 min CN=78 Runoff=62.55 cfs 5.179 of
Subcatchment3S: 36" RCP Drainage Basin Runoff Area=9.780 ac 9.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.14"
Flow Length=613' Slope=0.0600 '/' Tc=22.8 min CN=74 Runoff=44.99 cfs 3.370 of
Subcatchment5S: Parking Area Runoff Area=13.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.34"
Tc=30.0 min CN=85 Runoff=63.70 cfs 5.831 of
Subcatchment7S: Additional Drainage Area Runoff Area=3.690 ac 2.17% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.05"
Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=24.29 cfs 1.244 of
Reach 4R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=2.12' Max Vel=14.99 fps Inflow=168.54 cfs 14.377 of
n=0.022 L=457.0' S=0.0503'/' Capacity=1,660.31 cfs Outflow=167.69 cfs 14.368 of
Reach 8R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.23' Max Vel=10.30 fps Inflow=62.55 cfs 5.179 of
n=0.022 L=260.0' S=0.0462 T Capacity=2,619.49 cfs Outflow=62.27 cfs 5.176 of
Reach 14R: (new Reach) Avg. Flow Depth=1.89' Max Vel=19.56 fps Inflow=174.27 cfs 15.611 of
n=0.022 L=5.0' S=0.1000'/' Capacity=2,340.36 cfs Outflow=174.26 cfs 15.611 of
Pond 12P: 42" RCP Peak Elev=368.57' Inflow=62.55 cfs 5.179 of
42.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.05007' Outflow=62.55 cfs 5.179 of
Pond 13P: 36" RCP Peak Elev=356.25' Inflow=44.99 cfs 3.370 of
36.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=100.0' S=0.0500 T Outflow=44.99 cfs 3.370 of
Total Runoff Area = 40.180 ac Runoff Volume = 15.623 of Average Runoff Depth = 4.67"
90.17% Pervious = 36.230 ac 9.83% Impervious = 3.950 ac

Culvert Flows Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=7.50"
Prepared by McKim & Creed Printed 8/30/2016
HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 04927 © 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47
Summary for Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Inflow Area = 40.180 ac, 9.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.66" for 100 -Year event
Inflow = 174.27 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 15.611 of
Outflow = 174.26 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 15.611 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 19.56 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Avg. Velocity = 8.33 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.0 min
Peak Storage= 45 cf @ 12.21 hrs
Average Depth at Peak Storage= 1.89'
Bank -Full Depth= 5.00' Flow Area= 62.5 sf, Capacity= 2,340.36 cfs
0.00' x 5.00' deep channel, n= 0.022 Earth, clean & straight
Side Slope Z -value= 2.5'/' Top Width= 25.00'
Length= 5.0' Slope= 0.10007'
Inlet Invert= 5.00', Outlet Invert= 4.50'
Reach 14R: (new Reach)
Hydrograph
L - - FE -1 nflow
190 174.26 cfs ❑outflow
180 (flaw �4rea=O.a 8Oc
160
w
_ - c_F60_WDeptl1.9�
150
140r MiX f"e =49.56 YPS
a
w 110
100
0 90
FL 80 z-
70 -
60
50
40]/ 4- -4
E
1— 1�=1�•(i�2-
Ga c' =x,340. s-
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Time (hours)

Culvert Report

HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report
Crossing Discharge Data
Discharge Selection Method: Specify Minimum, Design, and Maximum Flow
Minimum Flow: 98.63 cfs
Design Flow: 127.47 cfs
Maximum Flow: 174.26 cfs

Table 1 - Summary of Culvert Flows at Crossing: Crossing 1
Headwater Elevation
(ft)
Total Discharge (cfs)
Culvert 1 Discharge
(cfs)
Roadway Discharge
(cfs)
Iterations
329.56
98.63
98.63
0.00
1
329.62
106.19
106.19
0.00
1
329.67
113.76
113.76
0.00
1
331.61
121.32
121.32
0.00
1
331.83
127.47
127.47
0.00
1
332.15
136.44
136.44
0.00
1
332.45
144.01
144.01
0.00
1
332.63
151.57
151.57
0.00
1
332.96
159.13
159.13
0.00
1
333.29
166.70
166.70
0.00
1
333.64
174.26
174.26
0.00
1
345.00
346.49
346.49
0.00
Overtopping

Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: Crossing 1
340
344
342
0
340
aD
w 338
336
z
334
332
330
Total Rating Cun7e
crossing: Crossing 1
Total Discharge (ofs)

Table 2 - Culvert Summary Table: Culvert 1
Total
Discharge
(cfs)
Culvert
Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater
Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control
Depth (ft)
Outlet
Control
Depth (ft)
Flow
Type
Normal
Depth (ft)
Critical
Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth
(ft)
Tailwater
Depth (ft)
Outlet
Velocity
(ft/s)
Tailwater
Velocity
(ft/s)
98.63
98.63
329.56
2.699
3.058
1-JS1f
2.132
2.206
5.000
2.058
4.093
9.313
106.19
106.19
329.62
2.827
3.116
1-S2n
2.234
2.305
2.234
2.116
4.407
9.487
113.76
113.76
329.67
2.950
3.171
1-JS1f
2.332
2.405
5.000
2.171
4.721
9.651
121.32
121.32
331.61
3.070
5.113
1-S 1 f
2.427
2.495
5.000
2.224
5.034
9.808
127.47
127.47
331.83
3.165
5.325
1-S 1 f
2.505
2.564
5.000
2.266
5.290
9.930
136.44
136.44
332.15
3.299
5.655
1-S 1 f
2.618
2.668
5.000
2.325
5.662
10.100
144.01
144.01
332.45
3.410
5.954
1-S 1 f
2.713
2.758
5.000
2.372
5.976
10.237
151.57
151.57
332.63
3.519
6.134
4-FFf
2.808
2.841
5.000
2.418
6.290
10.369
159.13
159.13
332.96
3.627
6.457
4-FFf
2.902
2.929
5.000
2.463
6.604
10.496
166.70
166.70
333.29
3.734
6.792
4-FFf
2.996
3.011
5.000
2.506
6.917
10.619
174.26
174.26
333.64
3.841
7.139
4-FFf
3.090
3.089
5.000
2.548
7.231
10.737

Straight Culvert
Inlet Elevation (invert): 326.50 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 321.50 ft
Culvert Length: 172.07 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0291

Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Culvert 1
346
344
342
F-
io
340
°' 333
w
ID 336
334
= 332
330
Perfo -trance Cun7e
Cuh-ert: Cuh-ert 1
0 0
Inlet Control Elev +cutlet Control Elev
Total Discharge (Cfs)

Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Culvert 1
345
340
335
Crossing - Crossing 1, Design Discharge - 12.7.5 of
Culvert - CWvert L Cuh-ert Discharge - 127.5 cfs
w 330
325
320
tati an (ft)
Site Data - Culvert 1
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 325.50 ft
Outlet Station: 172.00 ft
Outlet Elevation: 320.50 ft
Number of Barrels: 1
Culvert Data Summary - Culvert 1
Barrel Shape: Circular
Barrel Diameter: 6.00 ft
Barrel Material: Corrugated Steel
Embedment: 12.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0240 (top and sides)
Manning's n: 0.0500 (bottom)
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Thin Edge Projecting
Inlet Depression: NONE

Table 3 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: Crossing 1)
Flow (cfs)
Water Surface
Elev (ft)
Depth (ft)
Velocity (f /s)
Shear (psf)
Froude Number
98.63
329.56
2.06
9.31
2.59
1.62
106.19
329.62
2.12
9.49
2.67
1.63
113.76
329.67
2.17
9.65
2.74
1.63
121.32
329.72
2.22
9.81
2.80
1.64
127.47
329.77
2.27
9.93
2.86
1.64
136.44
329.82
2.32
10.10
2.93
1.65
144.01
329.87
2.37
10.24
2.99
1.66
151.57
329.92
2.42
10.37
3.05
1.66
159.13
329.96
2.46
10.50
3.10
1.67
166.70
330.01
2.51
10.62
3.16
1.67
174.26
330.05
2.55
10.74
3.21
1.68

Tailwater Channel Data - Crossing 1
Tailwater Channel Option: Triangular Channel
Side Slope (H:V): 2.50 (_:1)
Channel Slope: 0.0202
Channel Manning's n: 0.0220
Channel Invert Elevation: 327.50 ft
Roadway Data for Crossing: Crossing 1
Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation
Crest Length: 78.00 ft
Crest Elevation: 345.00 ft
Roadway Surface: Paved
Roadway Top Width: 50.00 ft

X-10
i
State Environmental
Review Clearinghouse
ADMINISTRATION
F-137=1111WIM
Ms. Karen Trimberger
North Carolina State University
Environmental Health & Public Safety
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8007
Kathryn Johnston
Secretary
William W. Peaslee
General Counsel
Re: SCH File # 16-E-6030-0265; EA/FONSI; Proposed project is for the Initiative Way
Extension. Project will be constructed from the existing terminus of Initiative Way at
Blair Dr. to connect with Oval Dr. near the existing park and ride facility.
Dear Ms. Trimberger:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made in the review of this document. Because of the
nature of the comments, it has been determined that no further State Clearinghouse review
action on your part is needed for compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
The attached comments should be taken into consideration in project development.
Attachments
cc: Region J
Sincerely,
CrystM Best
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Nothing Compares'"
State of North Carolina 1 Administration
116 West ]ones St. 11301 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1301
[e-mail] 1 919 807 2419 T

Environmental
Quality
MEMORANDUM
To: Crystal Best
State Clearinghouse Coordinator
Department of Administration
FROM: Lyn Hardison t�
Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
Permit Assistance & Project Review Coordinator
PAT MCCRORY
Cavernar
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
RE: 16-0265
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
Proposed project is for the Initiative Way Extension, constructed from the existing terminus of
Initiative Way at Blair Dr. to connect with Oval Dr. near the existing park and ride facility
Wake County
Date: April 7, 2016
The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the proposal for the referenced project. Based on the
information provided, several of our agencies have identified permits that may be required and offered some
guidance to minimize impacts to the natural resources within the project area. The comments are attached for
the applicant's review.
The Department's agencies will continue to be available to assist the applicant through the environmental review
processes.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachment
-��Nathffiq Compares,,
State of North Carolina IEnvironmental Quality
943 Washington Square Mali I Washington, North Caro ina 27889
252-946-6481

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
TO: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDENR Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer -Services
FROM: Gabriela Garrison
Eastern. Piedmont Coordinator
Habitat Conservation
DATE: April 4, 2016
SUBJECT: Comments for Supplemental Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant
Impact: NCSU Centennial Campus, Initiative Way Extension, Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina, DENR Project No. 16-0265.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRQ have reviewed the subject
document and are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Comments are provided in accordance witb
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e),
North Carolina. Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 through 113A-10; 1 NCAC 25) and North
Carolina. General Statutes (G. S. 113-131 et seq.).
North Carolina State University proposes to construct a 1500 linear foot, two-lane asphalt road with curb
and gutters. The project will be located at the existing terminus of Initiative Way (at Blair Drive) and will
connect with Oval Drive near the park and ride facility. There will also be a 325 -foot extension of Blair
Drive, connecting this road to Centennial Parkway. A Master Plan Environmental Assessment for this
area of Centennial Campus was completed in 1996 to address construction activities. The proposed
project area is approximately two acres of undisturbed, forested land. An unnamed tributary to Walnut
Creek will be crossed; approximately 225 linear feet will be impacted. Centennial Campus is located off
of Varsity Drive in Raleigh.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recently listed the northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The northern long-eared bat may be
present or in the vicinity of the project site. As such, consultation with the USFWS may be required. For
more information, please see hqp://www.fws.cov/midwest/eridangered/maminals/nieb/KQLFinal
4dXLEB.html or contact the U�SFWS at [phone] to ensure that potential issues related to this
species are addressed.
There are historical records for the federal species of concern and state -endangered, Atlantic pigtoc
(Fusconafa masoni) downstream of the project in Walnut Creek. The following recommendations will
minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources:
Mailing Address. Habitat Conservation . 1721 Mail Service Center . Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telepbone: [phone] a Fax: [phone]

Page 2
April 4, 2016
NCSU Centennial Campus Expansion
DENR Project No. 16-0255
I . Maintain a minimum 100 -foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams,
and a minimum SO -foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining
undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and
terrestrial wildlife resources. Wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stream bank
stability. In addition, these buffers provide a travel corridor for wildlife species.
2. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands to
eliminate the need to fill and culvert, where practicable. if culverts must be used, the culvert
should be designed to allow aquatic life passage. fords may be appropriate and preferred for
intermittent stream crossings or where crossings will be used only once or twice a year. For
fords, crossings in riffles are preferred with the banks lowered upstream, and downstream of
the crossing. Stabilize the stream bottom with geo-textile fabric and rock; concrete should
not be used for bed stabilization.
3. Stormwater runoff to receiving surface waters can be minimized by reducing impervious
surfaces and increasing infiltration on site using Low Impact Development (LID) techniques.
LID techniques appropriate for this project may include permeable pavement and bioretention
areas that can collect stormwater from the parking areas. Additional alternatives include
narrower roads, swales versus curbs/gutters and permeable surfaces such as turf stone, brick
and cobblestone,
4. Re -seed disturbed areas with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife. Avoid fescue -
based mixtures as fescue is invasive and provides little benefit to wildlife. A list of wildlife -
friendly plants is available upon request. In addition, the use of non-invasive, native species
is recommended. Using native species instead of ornamentals should reduce the need for
water, fertilizers and pesticides.
S. If pesticides or chemicals will be used for site maintenance, stormwater runoff from the site
should be funneled to bio -retention areas prior to discharge to streams or wetlands.
Pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals should not be used near streams.
b. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing
activity. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices
is strongly recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -
weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical
and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should
be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and
sediment loads can have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of
spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs and clogging of gills.
The NCWRC encourages the applicant to consider additional measures to protect aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife species in developing landscapes. The NCWRC's Guidance Memorandum to Address and
Mitigate ,secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquadc and Terrestrial Wildlife Resources and Water
Quality (August 2002; htt ://www.ncwildlife,or . Ttals/O/C( nsetvin documents/2002
GuidanceMernorandLunfor5ecnndaryandCuinulatiyelmpacts.pdfl details measure s to minimize secondary
and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources; in addition, the Green Growth
Toolbox (http://216.27.39.101/greenaowth/1 provides information on nature -friendly planning.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance,
please contact me at (910) 409-735© or gabriela.garrisona newildlife.ora.

Waste Ntanagernerai
ENVIRONMENTAL nUALITV
Date:
To:
Through:
From:
Su bject:
PAT MCCRORY
r_'irnyrl7r�tr
DONALD R. VAN DER. VAART
MICHAEL SCOTT
March 14, 2016
Michael Scott, Acting Director
Division of Waste Management
Dave Lown, Head
Federal Remediation Branch
David B. Mattison, Federal Remediation Branch
SEPA Project #16-0265, Proposed Extension of Initiative Way, Wake County,
North Carolina
The Superfund Section has reviewed the proximity of CERCLIS and other sites under its
jurisdiction to the proposed extension of Initiative Way in Wake County. Under the proposed
project, Initiative Way will be extended from the existing terminus of Initiative Way at Blair Drive
to connect with Oval Drive near the existing park and ride facility.
Two sites were identified within an approximate 1 -mile radius of the proposed project as
noted on the map and in the table below. The identified sites are not anticipated to affect the
project or vice versa, however, if the construction encounters groundwater, it is recommended
that site files be reviewed so that appropriate health and safety precautions can be
implemented as needed. Superfund Section files can be viewed at:
http:/lportal.ncdenr.org/web/wrnlsf-file-records.
Please contact me at 919.707.8336 if you have any questions.
State ofNotthCarolina I Environmental Quality I Waste Mm agement
1646 Mail Service Centerl 217 West Jones Street I Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
919 707 8200 Telephone
I?- #-�fi yy � .c=�„ ��
� I Y x �' � Es �� � '� �
Open site on the Inactive Hazardous Sites
NONCDO001575
Dorothea Dix Property
Inventory
Old Raleigh Ldfl #11- Dorothea
Open Site on the Pre -Regulatory Landfill
NONCDO000610
Dix
Inventory
State ofNotthCarolina I Environmental Quality I Waste Mm agement
1646 Mail Service Centerl 217 West Jones Street I Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
919 707 8200 Telephone

$(
\(!{
\{/k
�\k{/
$(

Waste Alanagen en t
ENYERONHrNTAL QLJAL17Y
c
TO: Michael Scott, Acting Division Director through Sharon Brinkley
PAT MCCRO.RV
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
FROM: Jason M. Watkins, Field Operations Branch dead - Solid Waste Section
DATE: March 31, 2016
SUBJECT: Review: Project #;=16-0265 - Wake County (Initiative Way Extension)
N41CHAEL E. SCOTT
ZhIW'4 nrWO, "'
The Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section) has reviewed the scoping
document(s) for the proposed Initiative Way Extension on N'CSU's Centennial Campus in Wake
County. The Section has seen no adverse impact on the surrounding community and likewise
knows of no .situations in the community, which would affect this project.
During construction, NC State University and/or its contractors should make every feasible effort
to minimize the generation of waste, to recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to
use recycled .products and materials in the development of this project where suitable. Any waste
generated by this project that cannot be beneficially reused or recycled must be disposed of at a
solid waste management facility permitted by the Division. The Section strongly recommends
that the University require all contractors to provide proof of proper disposal for all waste
generated.
Facilities are listed on the Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section portal site at:
lata s://de .ne. ov/aiIotlt/divisions/waste-many,aenaent/waste-maria ement-rules-data/solid-Waste-
management-annual-re orts!solid-waste- ermined-facility-Iist
Questions regarding solid waste management should be directed to Ms. Elizabeth. Patterson,
Environmental Senior Specialist, Solid Waste Section, at [phone].
cc: Elizabeth Patterson, Environmental Senior Specialist
Jessica Montie, Compliance Officer
Szatc ofNostii Carul na I Environmental Quality 1 Waste Management
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill ?,*ad, Suite 3001 Winsto-t-Salem, NC 27105
336 776 9800

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Office: R4Leigh
Project Number 16-0265 Due Date: 4/412016
County Wake
After review of this project it has been determined that the ENR permits) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to comply with
North Carolina craw. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form. An applications, information
and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional office.
...................
i
Normal Process Time
PERM ITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIUMENTS
(statutory time limit)
❑
Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment facilities,
sewer system &sewer systems not discharging
Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction
30 days
extorsions
into state surface waters,
contracts. On-site inspection. Post -application technical conference usual.
(90 days)
❑
NPl)ES S - permit
it #o discharge into surface water and/or
facilities
Applicntian 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. Pre-
application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct
90-120 days
permit and construct wastewater
discharging into state surface waters.
wastewater treatment facility -granted after NPI)ES, Reply time, 30 days after
(NIA)
receipt ofplans or issue ofNPDES permit -whichever is later.
❑
Water Use Permit
Pre -application technical conference usually necessary
30 days
(N/A)
❑
Well Construction Permit
Complete application mustbe received and permit issued prior to the
7 days
installation of a well.
(15 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner,
F7
Dredge and Fill Permit
On-site inspection. Pre -application conference usual. )tilling array require
55 days
Easement to Pill from N.C. Department of Administration and
(90 days)
Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
❑
Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement
Emission 5au€ces l5 A NCAC
facilities22,1
Application must be submitted and permit received prior to
construction and operation ofthe source. rf a permit is required in an
90 days
and/or as per
(2Q.Olaa tluu 2Q.a30a)
arca without Local zoning, then there are additional requirements and
timelines (2Q.0113).
®Permit
to construct & operate Transportation Facility as per
Application must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction
90 days
15A NCAC (2D.08G0, 2Q.0601
or modification of the source,
®Any
open burning associated with subject proposal must be
i
in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
Demolition or renovations of structures containing asbestos
material must be in compliance with I5 A NCAC 20.1110
60 days
(a) (1) which requites notification and removal prior to
N/A
(90 days)
demolition. Contact Asbestos Controi Group 919.707-5950,
Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
2D.0800
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion & sedimentation
❑
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Section) At least 34
20 days
days before beginning activity. A fee of $65 for the first acre or any part of an acre. An express review option is available with additional
(30 days)
fees,
❑Sedimentation
and erosion control must be, addressed in accordance with NCDOT"s approved program. Particular attention should be given
(30 days)
to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable stormwater conveyances and outlets.
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with ENR Bond amount varies
®
Mining Permit
with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any arc mined greater
30 days
than one acre must be permitted. The appropriate bond must be received
(60 days)
before the permit can be issued.
On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit exceeds 4
1 day
❑
North Carolina Burning permit
days
(NIA)
❑On-siteinspection
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22
by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if more than
five acres of clearing activities are involved. Inspections should be
1 day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils
ground
(NIA)
requested at least ten days before actual bum is planned."
❑
Oil Relining Facilities
N1A
90-120 days
(NJA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant
must hire N,C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans, inspect construction.
certify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require
❑
° Dam Safety Permit
permit under mosquito control program, And a 404 permit from Corps of
30 days
Engineers. An inspection ofsite is necessary to verify Hazard Classification.
(60 days)
A minimum fee of $200.00 must accompany the application. An additional
processing fee based on. a percentage or the total project cost will be required
L�,t3
�nrs
upon completion.
--

County )ake Project plumber: 16-0265 Due Date; 4/4/2016
Initials
` No
Natural Process Time
Date
_.
(statutory time limit)
PERMITS
SPECIAL APP'LICAT'ION PROCEDUL 'E8 cr RE, QUIREMENTS
Review
❑
Permit to drill exploratory
File surety bond of $5,000 with ENR running to State of NC conditional that any well
by drill ENR
10
3/15/15
oil or gas well
opened operator shall, upon abandantrient, be plugged acowding to rules
Nay
IA
_
- A project that disturbs 1 acre or greater is required to secure an erosion
Geophysical Expicration Permit
and regulations.
rb
❑
Application filed with ENR at least 10 days prior to issue of pennit. Application by lemr.
10 days
No standard application form.
N/A
®
State Lakes Construction Permit
Application fee based on structure size is charged Must include descriptions &
15-20 days
-The project is in the Neuse River Basin (unnamed Tributary to Walnut
drawings of structure X' proof of ownership of riparian property.
NIA
❑
401 Water Quality Certification
NIA
60 days
The USGS Topographic map did depict a blue line stream and/or
(130da )
❑
CAMA, Permit for MAJOR development
$250.00 fee must accompany application.
55 days
(150 days)
LAMA Permit for MINOR development
$50.00 fee must accompany application
22 days
(25 days)
survey was not reviewed.)
Several geode€ r. monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monument needs to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
❑
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 2761 l
-1 recommend a site visit to ensure compliance with 404/401 requirements
®
Abandonment ofany wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 15A. Subchapter 2C.0100.
®
Notif cation of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered dining any excavation operation.
❑
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal Stonnwater Rules) is required.
45 days
(N/A)
proposed, this project will need to comply with/secure a 404 permit from
Catawba, Jordan Lake, Randalman, Tar Pamlico or Meuse Riparian Buffer Rules required.
Plans and specifications for the construction, expansion, or alteration of a public water system must be approved by the .Division of W ater
the USACE and obtain a 401 Water Quality Certification authorization and
❑
Resources/Public Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction. as per 15A NCAC 18C.0300 et. seq. PIans and
30 days
specifications should be submitted to 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634. All public water supply systems must comply
DWR-PWS
with state and federal drinking water monitoring requirements. For more, information, contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone],
❑
See last checked box
If existing water lines will be relocated during the construction, plans for the waterline relocation must be submitted to the Division of Water
DEMLR (LQ & SW)
JLH
Resower4iPublic Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634. For more information, contact the Public
30 days
3)31/16
Water Supply Section, [phone],
MRP
Other comments (attach additional nam as necessary. beine certain to eine comment authority)
Division
Initials
` No
Comments
Date
comment
Review
DAQ
ddm
1 ❑[
--
3/15/15
DWR-WQROS
ds
❑
_
- A project that disturbs 1 acre or greater is required to secure an erosion
= 4/2/16
(Aquifer & Surface)
rb
❑
and sedimentation control plan and must comply with construction
3/29/16
stormwater permit conditions (NCG010000)
-The project is in the Neuse River Basin (unnamed Tributary to Walnut
Creek Class C- NSW-).
The USGS Topographic map did depict a blue line stream and/or
crenulations that course through the project footprint. (Note: the soil
survey was not reviewed.)
-1 recommend a site visit to ensure compliance with 404/401 requirements
t
and riparian buffers requirements, If wetland or stream impacts are
proposed, this project will need to comply with/secure a 404 permit from
the USACE and obtain a 401 Water Quality Certification authorization and
obtain a riparian buffer authorization.
1
DWR-PWS
wah
❑
See last checked box
3/11/16
DEMLR (LQ & SW)
JLH
❑
Our issues appear to be addressed,
3)31/16
DWM - UST
MRP
—
3/31J15
REGIONAL OFFICE
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional O fice marked below.
❑ Asheville, Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
5wannancia, NC 28778
[phone]
February 11, 2015
❑ Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
❑ Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]

❑ Fayetteville Regional Office ❑ Raleigh Regional Office 0 Winston-Salem Regional Office
225 North Green Street, Suite 714 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043 Raleigh, NC 27699 Winston-Salem, NC 27105
( 910) 433-3300 [phone] [phone]
❑ Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
February 11, 2015

COUNTY - WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
IITERGOVERTUM NTA.L REVIEW
B02: SCI400LS (POST ,SECONDARY)
MS RENEE GLEDHIT..L-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF NATURAL & CUL'T'URAL RESOURCE
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
STATE NUMBER: 16-E-6030-0265
DATE RECEIVED: 03/08/2016
AGENCY RESPONSE: 04/04/2016
REVIEW CLOSED: 04/47/2016
C.,Lv 4 ('
DEPT
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
/l,(���`
DEPT
OF
NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
/J�� ^ �✓
DEFT
OF`
TRANSPORTATTON
}
DNCR - DIV OF PARKS AND RECREA'T'ION
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTW.�
TRIANGLE U COG vi.
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. State University ;
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Acts
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant impact V)
DESC: Proposed project is for the Initiative Way Extension. Project will be constructed
from the existing terminus of Initiative Way at Blair Dr. to connect with oval
Dr. near the existing park and ride facility.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THI.S, REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: 10
NO COMMENT ❑ COM1,1ENT,S A'T'TACHED
SIGNED BY: DATE:
MIAR 1 4 2016
jd �3d
14
2,018
l
i,.X3r
s
A
Vic" v
MIAR 1 4 2016

COUNTY: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
B02: SCHOOLS (POST SECONDARY)
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DNCR - DIV OF PARKS AND RECREATION
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
STATE SER.: 16-E-6030-0265
DATE RECEIVED: 03/08/2016
AGENCY RESPONSE: 04/04/2016
REVIEW CLOSET?: 04/07/2016
0_+1 I c, -- !
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
D. CR - DIV OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. State University
TYPE: State Environmental. Policy Act
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed project is for the Initiative inlay Extension. Project will be constructed
from the existing terminus of Initiative Way at Blair Dr. to connect with oval
Dr. near the existing park and ride facility.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW TETE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: � NO COMMENT ❑ COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: "" DATE,
m f i
.�a �S:M�sA ,

COUNTY: WAKE
WORTH 1
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVEnNMEVTAL REVIEW
B02:SCHOOLS zk OST SECONDARY)
MS CARRIE ATKINSON
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE PLANNING - MSC #1554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE.,
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - DIV OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DPS _ DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
STATE NUMBER: 16-E-6030-0265
HATE RECEIVED: 03/08/2016
AGENCY RESPONSE. 04/04/2016
REVIEW CLOSED: 04/07/2016
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. State University
TYPE: State Environmental Policy .Act
Environmental. Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed project is for the Initiative Way Extension. Project will be constructed
from the existing terminus of Initiative relay at Blair Dr. to connect with Oval.
Dr. near the existing park and ride facility.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: x i NO COMMENT r—] COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: DATE: g
�C-

COUNTY: WAKE,
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
B02: SCHOOLS ( POST SECONDARY)
MS PAULA COTTS
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DPS -- DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
FLOOD PTAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
MSC # 4218
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
MN'? 10
2'
4016
STATE NUMBER: 16-E-6030-0265
DATE RECEIVED: 03/08/2016
AGENCY RESPONSE: 04/04/2016
REVIEW CLOSED: 04/07/201.6
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF 'T'RANSPORTATION
DNCR DIV OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
.APPLICANT: N.C. State University
TYPE: State Environmental. Policy Act
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed project is for the Initiative Way Extension. Project will be constructed
from the existing terminus of Initiative Way at Blair Dr. to connect with Oval
Dr. near the existing park and ride facility.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED
SIGNED BY:
J`
NO COMMENT ❑ COMMENTS ATTACHED
DATE: &/C 6
17
9
� rr
c
�

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Susan Kluttz
Governor Executive Director Secretary
Clean Water Management Trust Fund
NCNHDE-1138
January 12, 2016
Paul Hughes
Froehling & Robertson
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
[e-mail]
RE: Roadway extension of Initiative Way from Blair to Oval Way; 66T-0268
Dear Paul Hughes:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there
are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed
areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of
natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area
may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for site-specific surveys
where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact
the NCNHP so that we may update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have
been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records
suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable
habitat exists and is included for reference.
Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any,
are also included in this report. The location of the natural areas and conservation/managed areas can be
viewed online on the Natural Heritage Data Explorer found at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species are documented near the
project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact John Finnegan at john.finnegan e ncdenr.gov or 919.707.8630.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Roadway extension of Initiative Way from Blair to Oval Way
Project No. 66T-0268
January 12, 2016
NCNHDE-1138
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group1 11 Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Bird 29948 Haliaeetus IeucocephalusBald Eagle 2011-12 Current 3 -Medium Bald/Golden Threatened G5 S3B,S3
Eagle N
Protection
Act
Butterfly
35199
Erynnis martialis
Mottled Duskywing
Dragonfly or
32043
Coryphaeschna ingens
Regal Darner
Damselfly
5 -Very
---
Freshwater
11071
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic Pigtoe
Bivalve
Rare
Mammal
32135
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern Long-eared Bat
Moth
34927
Acronicta albarufa
Barrens Dagger Moth
Natural
31591
Dry-Mesic Oak --Hickory
---
Community
G2G3
Forest (Piedmont
Rare
Subtype)
Natural
7296
Mesic Mixed Hardwood
---
Community
Low
Forest (Piedmont
Rare
Subtype)
---
Vascular Plant
26314
Clematis catesbyana
Coastal Virgin's -bower
1933-04-29
2004 -PRE
1951
1981
1938 -PRE
2012-09-25
Historical
Historical
Historical
Current
Historical
Current
1985-05-12 Current
1890-08-15 Historical
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Lake Raleigh Hardwood Forest R5 (General)
Page 2 of 4
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3
S2
Low
Rare
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Low
Rare
3 -Medium
Species of
Endangered
G2
S3
Concern
4 -Low
T -4(d)
Significantly
G2G3
S2
Rare
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S1S2
Low
Rare
3 -Medium
---
---
G4G5
S4
3 -Medium
5 -Very
Low
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
--- G3G4 S4
Significantly G4G5 S2
Rare Peripheral

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
North Carolina State University Conservation Land
North Carolina State University
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
Wake County Open Space Easement
Wake County: multiple local government
Owner Type
State
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on January 12, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE_1138: Roadway extension of Initiative Way from Blair to Oval Way
R 1aigh
L—M Pude r; .
cuum al = "'
NC stale
117
,044
January 12, 2016
Project Boundary F] Managed Area (MARBA)
Buffered Project Boundary
[� NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Page 4 of 4
1:23,513
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Ew HERE, LeLor , Yntermap. increment R Corp. GEBCO.
USGS. FAO. NPS, NRCAN, GeoHase. IGN. Nadaster NL. Ordnance Survey,

NITIATIVE WDRIVE
PCN SUBMITTAL
AUGUST 26,2016
NCSU PROJECT # 201520009
SCO PROJECT # 15-11650-01 A
M&C PROJECT # 0 1371-0059
WESTERN BLVD
i.
\� f r--, ) PROJECT AREA
)
BLAIRDR
.I r
I �
ACHIEVEMENT DR
i
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
v
v M�IIQMM&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
SHEET INDEX
C0.1
COVER SHEET
C0.4
EXISTING CONDITIONS/DEMOLITION PLAN
C0.5
STAGE 1 SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C0.6
STAGE 1 SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C1.0
SITE PLAN (OVERALL)
C1.1
SITE PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)
C1.2
SITE PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)
C2.1
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C2.2
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
D1.1
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS
D1.2
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS
D1.3
CULVERT DETAILS
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
\\01\11111111,,,,
OAR/�'''�,
�a�AL
036348
•, 08/26/2016
''%,�9'AF ' FNGINEE�..'�Q��`�•
////llllllllll\\\
PRELIMINARY
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
0
M
CD

CAI
CPR
/ °jO•a. /
/SUE -DEP
/ -VE-DEP
O�
SL
U pEP
UE -
UE -DEP
UE -DEP
-UE-DEP
-UE-DE
DED
OE -
,50 -D��OE-DEP q
!!-!!SD 5D
I/}�-BET-DE_DEP
DE -DEP -
_...:, _-DE-DEP z
111111 PROTECT EXISTING OAK TREES_
EXISTING 18" RCP
(PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION)
�EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE
(PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) -\
GRIND EXISTING CURB FOR
INSTALLATION OF NEW
ACCESSIBLE RAMP.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY, IN WRITING, OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS TO THE
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING THE LOCATION (HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL) OF ANY BURIED CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, AND STRUCTURES (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATER, GAS,
TELEVISION, TELEPHONE, ETC.) WHICH IMPACT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF
ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS VERSUS THE DATA CONTAINED IN THE CONSTRUCTION
PLANS. ANY COSTS INCURRED AS THE RESULT OF NOT CONFIRMING THE CONDUITS, PIPES, AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE BORNE
BY THE CONTRACTOR.
/41
a � _
- \ \ i.
TNG -w-DEP � I I, � \ I I
:9,)190' DUKE POWER R/W # \
M/LBURNIE SOUTH 115kV/CAPE FEAR PLANE-
MILBURN/E 230k V METHOD 115k V DF F
LOE-0� /METHOD- °�-�P
°-° RALEIGH 115kV�-DEP
DE- EP - _ .� �DE-DEP
-
OE -D _ PPT\
SDE -DEP REMOVE EXISTING CURB &GUTTER_�_ �' �j \��
COORDINA TE WITH NEW DRI VEWA Y�� ° \ O
ALTERNATE 3.• ADD DRI VEWA Y �/J� l l l I °F CIR w,"
(AL TERNA TE 3) / l I
M DEP REMOVE EXISTING PINE TREES l l I CONCRETE WALL wV
NO
`1
)-OE_DEP i 1 `�OO \ \S. \ �
(T- wv
Y
111 � . � � - ■ �__ -DEP
7111 D4V
♦ _-/VAVAA
LfI I LP LP! I
LP - LP_/-- 7i
CONCRETE WALL
\ EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL
��" ♦ / `�i� \ �_- _ �_ A i EXISTING SIGNS \
a�` \\ \ \ \ �" \ �\
EXISTING � ' \ \ I �
� \ ■ ■ S -�� ■ � � SIDEWALK � �� � � ` �� � WE �� \ �� � � � � \ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
v
RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTPOLE ���� �� �� DETENTION' V� v \ �- v `� \e EXISTING PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS
BASIN
000�
(ALTERNATE 3) FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY ADJUSTMENT
TO BE MADE BY NCSU
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
EXISTING RIPRAP
♦
NORMAL POOL.
Le (REMOVE AND REPLACE
A�
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLEJ)FORALT 1 ONLYAPPROXIMATE LOCATION (TYP)
T�
PROTECT EXISTING CURBING
10 / EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES \ _-
11;</
(PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) \� \ \� �i I ``� \ \ l I \ ,,\o \ PP \ ` J
-.11 PP \ � .r � '�+� V A V AAA \ \\ / � � \ . � � \ � � � � �
♦ \ A I VA \ V i ,� \ V `�\ �� A \ V 0 \ EXISTING SIDEWALK
\ A V A\ V A V ` PROTECT ALL
r NOTE.• CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE \ \ \ \ 1\\\ \� \ / Y
POWER POLES \ /1'"` \
NOTE. • PROTECT TELECOM AND ♦• � � UTILITIES IN THE FIELD. IF ANY ARE � \ \ �\\ � \ � \ •� \ --
ELECTRIC MANHOLES IN THE VICINITY ♦ �� FOUND THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON PROJECT LIMITS �A \ �, \ A _ --GUARDRAIL \ METAL BENCH (TYP)
REMOVE
OF THE IN OF INITIATIVE ♦ 1A \ \ \ ( )
/ THESE PLANS, COORDINATE WITH NC SILT FENCE TREE PP A
\ \ WAY AND OVAL DRIVE. ♦♦ / ` / STA TE, THE ENGINEER, AND THE PROTECT EXISTING WALL AROUND PONDS PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) \ ` / \ \\ \ /' LANDSCAPING �� \
APPROPRIATE UTILITY CONCERNING DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDED WEIGHT ( ) \ I \ \ \ '
\ V ♦ �\ ,I y�. (REMOVE) \ \ OVERHANG
PROTECTION ANDIOR RELOCATION OF SHALL BE ADDED TO ANY WALL DURING
EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE ♦ THE UTILITY.
V \ \ V \ SIGNS �\
(PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) ♦ �CONSTRUCTION (TYP) V �� \�, \ \V A (REMOVE)
/� ♦ �s EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER - \�N \
(PR \ OTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) �� n EXISTING STORM DRAINS
FIRE HYDRANT /
,(I 1 \" (PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) b
,/ i ♦ ALTERNATE 1: ADD CURB &GUTTER APPROXIMATE LOCATION \ \ sA
PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION ` /� -�" - _
( ) ♦ � � /i ADD 6' SIDEWALK EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES 4
EXISTING CULVERT A _
r, ♦ �"� �� 'j 30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN`\ - PROTECT EXISTING
��� ♦ \ �,
♦ (REMOVE FOR ALT 1 ONLY) \ Y �'. A\� �1 i V A �� A V BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP) �-', EXERCISE AREA
�e / \.\
\\\ �� �'°oF\, ♦• // /TOPSOIL
STOCKPILE % \ \\REMOVE CURB I GUTTER.
.9 \ ��,AA A \
z, / COORDINATE WITH NEW \ \ 120 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN l
EXISTING RIPRAP PP RAMPS. \ �\ \ BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP) I
\ N/F NORTH CAROLINA �• / \ I I
(REMOVE FOR ALT 1 ONLY) Y)
a STATE UNIVERSITY
PIN 0173520754 \ / �� '� -�� \� 1 �\ of \ V
"kDB 015950 PG 02766
o� a / �"�.p A EXISTING �� SIGNS
\ STRUCTURAL SOIL GUARDRAIL,
\ A V \ l 7
COORDINATE RAISING OF TELECOM a z \ (REMOVE)
20 STOCKPILE / \ V \ V l
dd o so-- \ MANHOLES BASED OF GRADING IF `� I / J F
�° r �� �� "� NOTE. TOPSOIL IS TO BE STORED (� 'a' i (REMOVE) \
ALTERNATE 1 IS ACCEPTED. 0- SEPERATEL Y FROM THE STRUCTURAL
i REMOVE EXISTING CURB &
� � � � � \ # Q� a o FILL. A � � � �
GAS MAIN \ M
(PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) \ �, CUT FOR INSTALLATION OF
I % i WA TER MANHOLESDnd
,Q /� (PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION) I �"
1-3
EXISTING STORM DRAINS
(PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION)
NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP.
VAV\
�/ � Vim, A � � �/ /� / �� / / ♦ � � � � / � V � �
EXISTING OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
� \ CONSTRUCTION \ � ♦
S TA GING
AREA
"o EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER \
\� - ♦ / ♦ J�Ci / (PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION)
At
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
ALTERNATE 2: ADD 8 SIDEWALK ♦♦%/l
A
`� w ss 8
W�
�LP •.
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
EN TRANCE
UALL N6L;. UNL
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
NORTH DAMAGE
60' 0 60' 120'
SCALE: 1"=60' (Horiz.)
�A
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
EXISTING CONDITIONS/
DEMOLITION PLAN
\
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP.
VAV\
�/ � Vim, A � � �/ /� / �� / / ♦ � � � � / � V � �
EXISTING OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
� \ CONSTRUCTION \ � ♦
S TA GING
AREA
"o EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER \
\� - ♦ / ♦ J�Ci / (PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION)
At
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
ALTERNATE 2: ADD 8 SIDEWALK ♦♦%/l
A
`� w ss 8
W�
�LP •.
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
EN TRANCE
UALL N6L;. UNL
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
NORTH DAMAGE
60' 0 60' 120'
SCALE: 1"=60' (Horiz.)
�A
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
EXISTING CONDITIONS/
DEMOLITION PLAN
\
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
C0.4
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C O . 4
N/A
STATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

EXISTING PARKING NORTHr mm
\
mm I
l — ® LP \ {Q
NORTH
LP
END CONSTRUCTION
a a ��
LP
1� °
iNi
00000� WAY O ° O ° O � � NOT T
/ /• INITIATI STRUCT —� O ° O O
� XISTING CON J ° O �° ° O ° \ �
O°°O O°
�-
�/TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE `LP
SEDIMENT DITCH \
/
2501 X 8'W X 2D, 2.-1 SIDE SLOPES
DRAINAGE AREA = 1.69 AC I
DISTURBED AREA = 0.52 AC
REQUIRED STORAGE = 940 CF I �\
1 \
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA = 1,960 SF I
e, \ \ \ L ���/ PROVIDED STORAGE 2,
= 500
e"' PROVIDED
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA = 2,000 SF \
_ /
\ \ ary f =
190' DUKE POWER EASEMENT
0000000,
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
\� BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP) WET DETENTION BASIN \ \� �
7777- — — — AFF
LP� \ \ \ SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP)
SF _ rp
EXISTING PARKING `\ \\ \ \ i /5F %rF
SEDIMENT DITCH `
\ ( �` \ \ 1052 X 7'W X 2 D, 2: 1 SIDE SLOPES \ /
I 1 \ i �!_ ��F - — \ \ ` DRAINAGE AREA = 0.45 AC
DISTURBED AREA = 0.45 AC \
REQUIRED STORAGE = 810 CF SILT FENCE OUTLET (TYP)
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA = 520 SF
PROVIDED STORAGE = 40 CF LU
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA = 735 SF \ 0\ ° \ Lu
LP TDD 1 \ \ \ O ° ° O O °
LINED W/ SYNTHETIC MAT \ A \ �\ �A ° O ° Q)
°O� OO OO O w
SF O ° O°°° O Uj
j
LU
SF ?
\ .4dL/-4S Ad VAS BEGIN CONSTRUCTION I J
SF 1 Z
N
CO is \ SILT FENCE (TYP)
NORTH
/ \ \ //
I
\ III II l/ I I EXISTING
STRUCTURAL SOIL I I
I % STOCKPILE \
` TOPSOIL 'III I / I I
I
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
FEATURE
PROPOSED
SILT FENCE
SF
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE—SF/7F
DESIGNED
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CHECKED
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET
PROD. MGR.
HARDWARE CLOTH &
GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
7
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
O O O
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT
REVISED SUBMITTAL
TREE WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING
'ICUN
DEWATERING PUMP
2016.08.18
FILTER BAG AND RIP RAP
REVISED SUBMITTAL
COFFER DAM
3
SEAL
\` STOCKPILE
SEDIMENT BASIN/SCOUR HOLE as I I
\ I I I I I DRAINAGE AREA = 2.37 AC
DISTURBED AREA = 0.31 AC / I
I I
REQUIRED STORAGE = 550 CF
I uI`i i REQUIRED SURFACE AREA = 2,750 SF /
= I�
I PROVIDED STORAGE - 4,785 CF J I
\ I — PROVIDED SURFACE AREA = 2,850 SF / —
\ �
O O
TDD 2
\ _ I o _
I = ~
CONCRETE LINED W/ STRAW W/ NET I CO;
U
WASHOUT - I X USI � uJ -
�S TEMPORARY I
l CONSTRUCTION l Q Z
ENTRANCE / I UO
\ I / is J C�
/ m
�
0-O-
0 o O0 0
STAGING AND MATERIAL O°° O IO
I I I LAYDOWN AREA O O
I iIs
i-
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
I
0
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
INITIATIVE WAY
STAGE 1 SEDIMENT &EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
NOTE.- ALL SIDEWALKS,
CROSSWALKS AND CURB RAMPS
ARE TO BE ADA COMPLIANT.
' CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID U11UTY
DAMAGE /
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
SEAL
\` STOCKPILE
SEDIMENT BASIN/SCOUR HOLE as I I
\ I I I I I DRAINAGE AREA = 2.37 AC
DISTURBED AREA = 0.31 AC / I
I I
REQUIRED STORAGE = 550 CF
I uI`i i REQUIRED SURFACE AREA = 2,750 SF /
= I�
I PROVIDED STORAGE - 4,785 CF J I
\ I — PROVIDED SURFACE AREA = 2,850 SF / —
\ �
O O
TDD 2
\ _ I o _
I = ~
CONCRETE LINED W/ STRAW W/ NET I CO;
U
WASHOUT - I X USI � uJ -
�S TEMPORARY I
l CONSTRUCTION l Q Z
ENTRANCE / I UO
\ I / is J C�
/ m
�
0-O-
0 o O0 0
STAGING AND MATERIAL O°° O IO
I I I LAYDOWN AREA O O
I iIs
i-
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
I
0
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
INITIATIVE WAY
STAGE 1 SEDIMENT &EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
NOTE.- ALL SIDEWALKS,
CROSSWALKS AND CURB RAMPS
ARE TO BE ADA COMPLIANT.
' CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID U11UTY
DAMAGE /
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
M&C FILE NUMBER
SCALE
C0.5
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C O . 5
N/A
;TATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

I I I I \\ \(
I / / \�
I
LP
1
I LP
HARDWARE CLOTH &
JULY 7, 2016
GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
01371-0059
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
o 0 0
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT
DCR
TREE WITH TREE PROTECTION
GCA
FENCING
CHS
DEWATERING PUMP
PCN SUBMITTAL
FILTER BAG AND RIP RAP
6
COFFER DAM
2016.08.23
I
SEAL)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
O
MATCHLINE - SEE
SHEET C0.5
v — —— _
r �
BLAIR DRIVE
(EXISTING CONSTRUCTION)
SEAL)
01
W
=n = W
26/207 y �\
L
R�
1
V,,
I m I I I I I I
II 11 \0 I IIIII II I
\ � IIII 111 IIIII III I I I III I
II 1 1 IIIII I I ' I
� d l 11 1 11 I I III m III
IIII II \ I I d I z l
I� I 11 I I I III
J I I I I l f of I I IIT I � I
,I �/I I III .III IIII I I I y
m i
I I
/ � l IIII
I
1 1 11 \ WER\ � E T I
l D KE P I I I I I I
COFFERDAM (TYP)
/11 i I SEE DETAIL, SHEET D 1.3 it I
I � C PPI
PP' I I I I
�� o, IIII \11/ �, I ► J
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PUMP
TO BYPASS FLOWS AROUND WORK
T I
AREA. REFER TO IMPLEMENTATION
SEQUENCE IN DETAIL ON SHEET
D1.3TYP
(`) I
DOUBLE LAYER SILT FENCE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE (TYP)
l
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE (AS NEEDED)
0000
0
o 0
o 0 0
O O
Im V,
l
—
1,
10
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
// o/
1 I CLASS B RIP RAP TYP
FILTER BAG (TYP)
o
I
z IIII, IIIII \
�o II I \ \ \
I� \
t
-
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION k -j I I I III, I 1
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP) \
IIIII. � I , \
v
vNpKINIIIIIII&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
- - 30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
l \
30' 0 30' 6 0'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
`SCO NO. 15-11650-01 A
I \ ^\ \ \ \ \
STREAM TOP OF BANK (T),P)
I I 1 \\
E ISTIN OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
O
9
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/GLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
STAGE 1 SEDIMENT & EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
END CONSTRUCTION
CENTENNIAL PARKWAY R/W
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROJ. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROJ. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
I
SEAL)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
O
MATCHLINE - SEE
SHEET C0.5
v — —— _
r �
BLAIR DRIVE
(EXISTING CONSTRUCTION)
SEAL)
01
W
=n = W
26/207 y �\
L
R�
1
V,,
I m I I I I I I
II 11 \0 I IIIII II I
\ � IIII 111 IIIII III I I I III I
II 1 1 IIIII I I ' I
� d l 11 1 11 I I III m III
IIII II \ I I d I z l
I� I 11 I I I III
J I I I I l f of I I IIT I � I
,I �/I I III .III IIII I I I y
m i
I I
/ � l IIII
I
1 1 11 \ WER\ � E T I
l D KE P I I I I I I
COFFERDAM (TYP)
/11 i I SEE DETAIL, SHEET D 1.3 it I
I � C PPI
PP' I I I I
�� o, IIII \11/ �, I ► J
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PUMP
TO BYPASS FLOWS AROUND WORK
T I
AREA. REFER TO IMPLEMENTATION
SEQUENCE IN DETAIL ON SHEET
D1.3TYP
(`) I
DOUBLE LAYER SILT FENCE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE (TYP)
l
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE (AS NEEDED)
0000
0
o 0
o 0 0
O O
Im V,
l
—
1,
10
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
// o/
1 I CLASS B RIP RAP TYP
FILTER BAG (TYP)
o
I
z IIII, IIIII \
�o II I \ \ \
I� \
t
-
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION k -j I I I III, I 1
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP) \
IIIII. � I , \
v
vNpKINIIIIIII&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
- - 30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
l \
30' 0 30' 6 0'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
`SCO NO. 15-11650-01 A
I \ ^\ \ \ \ \
STREAM TOP OF BANK (T),P)
I I 1 \\
E ISTIN OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
O
9
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/GLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
STAGE 1 SEDIMENT & EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
END CONSTRUCTION
CENTENNIAL PARKWAY R/W
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROJ. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROJ. MGR.
CHS
91
N
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
C0.5
HORIZONTAL'
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
CO -6
N/A
STATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

o
dV Miami
LP L* LP
LP
EXISTING PARKING
���• ■ 1�� 2oa
.01 ool
x
O
♦♦Ci
��J �g� y�x° / �1
♦ ♦ AL TERNA TE 1: ADD CURB & GUTTER
pp .♦ AND 6' SIDEWALK
tipx
G)yO�• O ♦♦
100N*4 rte♦
M
LEGEND:
----------- RIPARIAN BUFFER LINE
EX. POWER LINE EASEMENT
OVERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LP EXISTING LIGHT POLE
PP EXISTING POWER TRANSMISSION POLE
SEAL
CA
Cq ,
= W
?� 26/201 >
p SP
ul�mnlnnm"
TERNA Tom: -ADD
i L I
PP
pop
•� LP I ! SLP
I! m LP \
•
NEW 6' SIDEWALK
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIGHT POLE (TYP) PP
APPROXIMATE LOCA TION
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
N/F NOR
STATE 0
PIN 01i
OB 01595(. r -L7 VZ/UV
\
WET DETENTION
\
\ EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES
\
\
\ \ T
NEW 8' SIDEWALK
\ � \ \\ \ \
pp
- o `
00,
1 \
TOPSOIL \
STOCKPILEpp '000el Y,
\ EXISTING \ ��� •
STRUCTURAL SOIL
/ \ \ STOCKPILE �G�\' ♦�
♦/ �♦ ;
ALL STAGING AND STOCKPILE \ \\ ♦
AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED
WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS\ STAGING AND MATERIAL �\ .•/
COMPLETE (SEE SEEDING LAYOUT AREA \ G� �� ♦�`
SCHEDULE, SHEET C0.3) \ G ♦♦/
♦
V♦ ♦
AL TERNA TE 2: ADD 8' SIDEWALK ♦♦ ♦• O�1
♦♦ ♦ O� �� NOTE.- SIDEWALKS, CROSSWALKS
♦♦ ♦♦P G��
(j INI TIA T1 VE COMPLIANT
AND CURB RAMPS ALONG
• O WAY TO BE ADA
^)
,yx
• o \
NEW 8' SIDEWALK
10
STREAM TOP OF BANK
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
s� �/j 20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
/ IXBUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER
♦. ♦.
60' 0 60' 120'
•� •� SCALE: 1"=60' (Horiz.)
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
NORTH
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
INITIATIVE WAY
SITE PLAN (OVERALL)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
SEAL
CA
Cq ,
= W
?� 26/201 >
p SP
ul�mnlnnm"
TERNA Tom: -ADD
i L I
PP
pop
•� LP I ! SLP
I! m LP \
•
NEW 6' SIDEWALK
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIGHT POLE (TYP) PP
APPROXIMATE LOCA TION
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
N/F NOR
STATE 0
PIN 01i
OB 01595(. r -L7 VZ/UV
\
WET DETENTION
\
\ EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES
\
\
\ \ T
NEW 8' SIDEWALK
\ � \ \\ \ \
pp
- o `
00,
1 \
TOPSOIL \
STOCKPILEpp '000el Y,
\ EXISTING \ ��� •
STRUCTURAL SOIL
/ \ \ STOCKPILE �G�\' ♦�
♦/ �♦ ;
ALL STAGING AND STOCKPILE \ \\ ♦
AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED
WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS\ STAGING AND MATERIAL �\ .•/
COMPLETE (SEE SEEDING LAYOUT AREA \ G� �� ♦�`
SCHEDULE, SHEET C0.3) \ G ♦♦/
♦
V♦ ♦
AL TERNA TE 2: ADD 8' SIDEWALK ♦♦ ♦• O�1
♦♦ ♦ O� �� NOTE.- SIDEWALKS, CROSSWALKS
♦♦ ♦♦P G��
(j INI TIA T1 VE COMPLIANT
AND CURB RAMPS ALONG
• O WAY TO BE ADA
^)
,yx
• o \
NEW 8' SIDEWALK
10
STREAM TOP OF BANK
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
s� �/j 20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
/ IXBUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER
♦. ♦.
60' 0 60' 120'
•� •� SCALE: 1"=60' (Horiz.)
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
NORTH
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
INITIATIVE WAY
SITE PLAN (OVERALL)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
\
\
\
' CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
"S, DAMAGE /
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
C1.0
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C 1 . 0
N/A
STATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
SEE DETAIL, SHEET D2.4rkAhll�
i
NORTH
D
It last** allow
�,s to w a•
♦�♦� 21+00
♦♦♦♦♦• 22+00 C5 • 20+0 1
♦ INITIt IATNE WR CTIONi AN Im
0 Lg ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ AL TERNA TE 1: ADD CURB & GUTTER
2 ♦
��♦ AL TERNA TE 1: ADD DRIVEWAY APRON ADD 6' SIDEWALK `
♦♦♦ 190' DUKE POWER EASEMENT \ \
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
SLP
EXISTING PARKING
j.
1
4
15+00
' LIGHT POLE (TYP)
WET DETENTION BASIN
NORTH
SEAL
CA
Cq ,
= W
?� 26/201 y �`
p SP
unnlnlnnm"
JEUSE 011.1C-0 RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL WIPE DOWN CURB TO PROVIDE ACCESS
TO DUKE POWER EASEMENT
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET D2.1)
113 13+00 INITIATIVE WAY
14+00
� m
6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK
TOPSOIL
STOCKPILE
12+00
NEW 8' SIDEWALK
LP
EXISTING PARKING
LP AL TERNA TE 3: ADD DRIVEWA Y
END CONSTRUCTION LP \\\\
NEW HIGH— VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
BEGIN TRANSITION TO
WIDER SECTION TO
MATCH EXISTING ROAD LP
STA 18+45 .10 IN Ab \
NEW ROAD WAY TO MATCH
WIDTH OF EXISTING ROADWAY
NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
SEE DETAIL, SHEET 02.4
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK LIGHT POLE (TYP)
EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER
BEGIN TRANSITION TO
WIDER SECTION TO •
MA TCH EXISTING ROAD
STA 11+75
�4- DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE _
THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
� r �
v
v & CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
EXISTING
STRUCTURAL SOIL
STOCKPILE
STAGING AND MATERIAL
LAYDOWN AREA
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
LINE #
LENGTH
N
L6
U
N30 °53'40 "E
I—
28.90
LU
L8
W
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
15+00
' LIGHT POLE (TYP)
WET DETENTION BASIN
NORTH
SEAL
CA
Cq ,
= W
?� 26/201 y �`
p SP
unnlnlnnm"
JEUSE 011.1C-0 RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL WIPE DOWN CURB TO PROVIDE ACCESS
TO DUKE POWER EASEMENT
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET D2.1)
113 13+00 INITIATIVE WAY
14+00
� m
6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK
TOPSOIL
STOCKPILE
12+00
NEW 8' SIDEWALK
LP
EXISTING PARKING
LP AL TERNA TE 3: ADD DRIVEWA Y
END CONSTRUCTION LP \\\\
NEW HIGH— VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
BEGIN TRANSITION TO
WIDER SECTION TO
MATCH EXISTING ROAD LP
STA 18+45 .10 IN Ab \
NEW ROAD WAY TO MATCH
WIDTH OF EXISTING ROADWAY
NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
SEE DETAIL, SHEET 02.4
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK LIGHT POLE (TYP)
EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER
BEGIN TRANSITION TO
WIDER SECTION TO •
MA TCH EXISTING ROAD
STA 11+75
�4- DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE _
THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
� r �
v
v & CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
EXISTING
STRUCTURAL SOIL
STOCKPILE
STAGING AND MATERIAL
LAYDOWN AREA
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
NOT TO SCALE
STOP R1-1 .
1�
. LP �. RELOCATED LIGHT POLE
700, OC
(-TyAJ
w
I
6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK
10' GRASS STRIP
4" DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE
THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
ALIGNMENT LINE DATA
LINE #
LENGTH
N
L6
U
N30 °53'40 "E
I—
28.90
LU
L8
W
N29 °05 '28 "W
Q)
218.40
W
L10
W
S59 °03'56 "E
L 11
50.04
S69'58'21 "E
S64 21 '08 "E
W
•
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
U
0
STOP R1-1
4 WAY R1-3
I�
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
NOT TO SCALE
STOP R1-1 .
1�
. LP �. RELOCATED LIGHT POLE
700, OC
(-TyAJ
w
I
6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK
10' GRASS STRIP
4" DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE
THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
ALIGNMENT LINE DATA
LINE #
LENGTH
BEARING
L6
194.64
N30 °53'40 "E
L7
28.90
N24 28'22 "W
L8
1.72
N29 °05 '28 "W
L9
218.40
N57°30°26"W
L10
187.84
S59 °03'56 "E
L 11
50.04
S69'58'21 "E
ALIGNMENT CURVE DATA
CURVE #
RADIUS
ARCH LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD LENGTH
DELTA
C4
800.00'
773.07'
N3°12'39 "E
743.34'
5522'02"
C5
712.00'
1 353.12'
N43'1 7'57"W
349.57'
2824'59 "
C6
722.31'
137.50'
S64 21 '08 "E
137.29'
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTA
INITIATIVE WAY
SITE PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)
NOTE.- ALL SIDEWALKS,
CROSSWALKS AND CURB RAMPS
ARE TO BE ADA COMPLIANT.
' CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
DAMAGE /
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
M&C FILE NUMBER
SCALE
C1.x
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C 1 . 1
N/A
STATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

ALTERNATE 2. HIGH -VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
■■■■■■■■■■■
4" DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE
.. .. THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
. ALTERNATE 2. ADD 8' SIDEWALK
. NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
■ . SEE DETAIL, SHEET D2.4
■ ■ / / / / ■ / / / TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK STOP
• °11111 III \ •/■/■///�
nn
--- MATCHLINE - S
--------- ■ ■ � / / u mSHEET C1.1 0 .
------------ -
y
mail
///
■ : ALTERNATE 2. ACCESSIBLE RAMP ///■/////./■
Wwwwwwwwwa
■ ■ BLAIR DRIVE / ■ ■ / ISO
■ ■ (EXISTING CONSTRUCTION)
■ ■ NEW WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
■ ■ STRAIGHT/RIGHT TURN ARROW
■ ■ HIGH—VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
■ LP ■ STOP R1-1
■ ■ 4 WAY R1-3
■ ■ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
■ ■ NEW WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
■ ■ LEFT TURN ARROW II
NOTE.- ALL SIDEWALKS,
■ ■ CROSSWALKS AND CURB RAMPS
ARE TO BE ADA COMPLIANT. NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
■ ■
LP SEE DETAIL, SHEET D2.4
■ ■
■ I ■
ALIGNMENT LINE DATA
LINE #
LENGTH
BEARING
L 6
194.64
N30 °53'40 "E
L 7
28.90
N24 28'22 "W
L 8
1.72
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
ALIGNMENT LINE DATA
LINE #
LENGTH
BEARING
L 6
194.64
N30 °53'40 "E
L 7
28.90
N24 28'22 "W
L 8
1.72
N29 °05'28 "W
L9
218.40
N57°30'26 "W
L10
787.84
5,159'03`56 "F
L71
50.04
56958'2 / "E
A L I GNMEN T CURVE DA TA
CURVE #
RADIUS
ARCH LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD LENGTH
DELTA
C4
800.00'
772.07'
N3°12'39"E
7425.24'
5522'02"
C5
712.00'
352. 12'
543'17'57"W
249..5/'
2824'59 "
C6
722.31'
727.50'
S64°31'08"E
12729'
70°54'25'
SEAL
CA
Cq ,
= W
?� 26/201 y �`
p SP
yER
ul�mnlnnm"
J&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
LIGHT POLE
z
0
90
X
> z
Q O
F(D
_Zz
F=
w
d
80' STORAGE
U01
Rl-1
BIKE LANE
4 -WAY R1-3
F
I
I R3-17bP / j� PROPOSED 5' BICYCLE LANES
' I I
PROPOSED GUARDRAILS m
BEGIN TRANSITION TO c)
/ WIDER SECTION / /
LIGH
BIKE JAN
STOP R1-1
4 WAY R1-3
►W�
© - --_
--------------
-----------Oft
-
--------------
C6
LIGHT POLE s
PROPOSED 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALK p
12" YELLOW DIAGONAL THERMOPLASTIC
o
LINES SPACED 45' ON CENTER, 2.-1 SLOPE
I 4" WHITE 3'-9' MINI SKIP Q:
I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I1 4" SOLID WHITE
I 4" DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I I I 135' STORAGE
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
STREAM TOP OF BANK (TYP)
LIGHT POLE
13+0o JJN3�
_
\ R3-17
BIKE LANE
ENDS RJ\7bP
EXISTING OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
SITE PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)
CENTENNIAL PARKWA 1
PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING SIDEWALK
-REMOVE PORTIONS OF EXISTING MEDIAN CURB
BEYOND ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND REPLACE WITH
130" SPILL CURB & GUTTER
13+75
24" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
STOP BAR (TYP)
END CONSTRUCTION
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
�I
I�
I�
11
pp
II
�I
F
I
I R3-17bP / j� PROPOSED 5' BICYCLE LANES
' I I
PROPOSED GUARDRAILS m
BEGIN TRANSITION TO c)
/ WIDER SECTION / /
LIGH
BIKE JAN
STOP R1-1
4 WAY R1-3
►W�
© - --_
--------------
-----------Oft
-
--------------
C6
LIGHT POLE s
PROPOSED 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALK p
12" YELLOW DIAGONAL THERMOPLASTIC
o
LINES SPACED 45' ON CENTER, 2.-1 SLOPE
I 4" WHITE 3'-9' MINI SKIP Q:
I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I1 4" SOLID WHITE
I 4" DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I I I 135' STORAGE
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
STREAM TOP OF BANK (TYP)
LIGHT POLE
13+0o JJN3�
_
\ R3-17
BIKE LANE
ENDS RJ\7bP
EXISTING OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
SITE PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)
CENTENNIAL PARKWA 1
PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING SIDEWALK
-REMOVE PORTIONS OF EXISTING MEDIAN CURB
BEYOND ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND REPLACE WITH
130" SPILL CURB & GUTTER
13+75
24" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
STOP BAR (TYP)
END CONSTRUCTION
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
�I
I�
I�
11
pp
II
F
I
I R3-17bP / j� PROPOSED 5' BICYCLE LANES
' I I
PROPOSED GUARDRAILS m
BEGIN TRANSITION TO c)
/ WIDER SECTION / /
LIGH
BIKE JAN
STOP R1-1
4 WAY R1-3
►W�
© - --_
--------------
-----------Oft
-
--------------
C6
LIGHT POLE s
PROPOSED 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALK p
12" YELLOW DIAGONAL THERMOPLASTIC
o
LINES SPACED 45' ON CENTER, 2.-1 SLOPE
I 4" WHITE 3'-9' MINI SKIP Q:
I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I1 4" SOLID WHITE
I 4" DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING
I I I 135' STORAGE
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
STREAM TOP OF BANK (TYP)
LIGHT POLE
13+0o JJN3�
_
\ R3-17
BIKE LANE
ENDS RJ\7bP
EXISTING OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
SITE PLAN (ENLARGEMENT)
CENTENNIAL PARKWA 1
PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING SIDEWALK
-REMOVE PORTIONS OF EXISTING MEDIAN CURB
BEYOND ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND REPLACE WITH
130" SPILL CURB & GUTTER
13+75
24" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
STOP BAR (TYP)
END CONSTRUCTION
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
2
Cv
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
C1.x
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C1.2
N/A
;TATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

N
oG I
�0m I
0
'02
10
CB -A03
RIM = 388.05
INV OUT = 384.5%
��/'/�/
EXIST, PARKING
■ _ �, - o
- ° i
D
��
■ ■ _ � a � CB -15
__ 1! le-
� NORTH ; �
ALTERNATE 3
i
------ D
AL ADD DRIVEWAY �
--C
I
�� ° �� TEMPORARY \
° D \ 21+ �
CB
- -A03 � ����� /�� ' ° � � �0 � CONSTRUCTION CB -14
RIM = 399.50 �� ��� �2+00 ENTRANCE_
INV OUT = 395.75 ��� °
• 11N ;
�♦ ao �3��� �� O 01 ,,, VICINITY MAP
°
NOT TO SCALE
385 iso -
°
CB-A02Yl-A01 CB -16 S x
�0
CB -12
388.10
7 �
� � ' RIM - 377.44
INV IN = 384.45 INV OUT = 374.00
/
INV 384
OUT - 35
� �d(
T
ALTERNATE 1: ADD CURB & GUTTER `- ♦ �\
�� ADD 6' SIDEWALK
_ \ /
1� --- ��
000
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
�j
\ / 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK
o
' RIM = ♦ 399.25
INV IN - - 395.60 V �. ♦� \
� INV OUT = 395.50 A �A� � 20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
\ SSMH-A06------- ��\ ,. \
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP)
CONNECT -m EXISTING PIPE) - �
( \\ \ SILT FENCE OUTLET (TYP) SILT FENCE�TREE '
RIM = 402.24 \\
----------- PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) CB_ 13
INV IN = 398.06 (EXISTING) \� \� \\\ \ \ \ 30' NEUSE RI VER RIPARIAN
1 INV OUT= 397.15 \\\ \ \ ` \ BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP)
LP � \ EXISTING WET
DETENTION BASIN
EXISTING \
TS
OF CONSTRUCTION
_ \ LEVEL SPREADER
LIMI
A
--
DOUBLE LAYEfT SILT FENCEITREE
PRO T
ECTfQ(V "FENCE (TYP) N�
- - -- �� SF F CB -03
F�
SF SF
CB -09 --- � �m ,c•
SFTPF-
CB-04
IPF
wow
117
-
"-
\ 4+OQ 00 INITIATIVE WAY OS£
J�12+0
go-
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
FEATURE
PROPOSED
SILT FENCE
SF
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE-SF/7F-
ENCE
SF/TPFPROPOSED
PROPOSEDLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
348.91
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET
348.76
HARDWARE CLOTH &
GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
7
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
O O 0
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT
REVISED SUBMITTAL
TREE WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING
'ICUN
DEWATERING PUMP
2016.08.18
FILTER BAG AND RIP RAP
REVISED SUBMITTAL
COFFER DAM
3
SPREAD OUT FOR UNIFORM ICONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE SUITABLE SOIL FILL \� � I I � I �
\ \ \ I SO�PSTOCKPl STOCKPILE REMOVED I MATERIAL LOCATED WITHIN THIS STOCKPILE AREA AS 1 I I III I
\ NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE FINISH GRADE CONTOURS AS 1 I I
"OVER -EXCAVATE" ON THE PLANS. THIS AREA. CONTRACTOR AS THE CONCLUSION I I I I I I I
\ \ \ II OF BORROW ACTIVITIES, THE AREAS SHALL BE LEFT I \ \
SUCH THAT NO WATER PONDS AND A SMOOTH III I
FINISHED GRADE IS PROVIDED ACROSS THE ENTIRE
I' IIITEMPORARY SEEDING IN THIS AREA. SHOULD THE
\ \ I
STRUCTURAL URAL SOIL �\AREA CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR I I I
\ TOPSOIL I I I I STOCKPILE /� CONTRACTOR REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SIUTABLE FILL
\ \ MATERIAL TO ACHIEVE THE FINISH GRADE CONTOURS
I
NORTH - - STOCKPILE III AS
THE SOIL PLANSALTINHE CONCLUSION
OREA. I I
III
14 I
N ; / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR I I \
I I PROVIDING THIS OFF-SITE BORROW AS A PART OF THE I I I I
BASE BID. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY _
_ - ---
RESPONSIBLE FOR BALANCING THE EARTHWORK ON THIS I I I I z
- PROJECT. 0
I -
- �
CyONCRETE) I I
j I
--- �S. -- ---- WASHOUT
S ----- -
- J I\ I I co
� -- � z
-'d/ds O
Q
ANN
m
ftm ds CO
I
\0 Q
Q
J� PP I I
STAGING ANDOWN AREA
900/1
60 I
Q
SEE SHEET C2.0 FOR THE I _
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
� I � / � SlL T FENCE�TYP) TREE
PROTECTION � FENCE '� /
PROJECT IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN I / \j CALL N.C. ONE
-J I Js / CALL CENTER
TEMPORARY- CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION'ENTRANCE ' BEFORE YOU DIG
;
NOTE.- CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF PROJECT \ I � I dzl
STOP
PERIMIETER (2' CONTOURS) WERE OBTAINED I I ' 1-800-832-4849
FROM NCDOT LIDAR DATA. / I / / �� �dl/jg / 1 I / AVOID UTILITY
i
/
•lddS DAMAGE
i
SEAL
CA)?0,111111
4444AL
036348
�. 08/26/2016
C�I�����P`���\\
DR
t4ti
BARBOUR
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE NAME
RIM ELEVATION
CB -02
346.93
CB -03
346.70
CB -04
348.91
CB -05
348.76
CB -07
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
399.25
REVISIONS
399.50
SEAL
CA)?0,111111
4444AL
036348
�. 08/26/2016
C�I�����P`���\\
DR
t4ti
BARBOUR
STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE NAME
RIM ELEVATION
CB -02
346.93
CB -03
346.70
CB -04
348.91
CB -05
348.76
CB -07
354.91
CB -08
354.93
CB -09
358.49
CB -10
363.94
CB -11
363.95
CB -12
369.27
CB -13
369.28
CB -14
373.58
CB -15
377.91
CB -16
377.86
CB -A02
388.10
CB -A03
388.05
CB -A04
399.25
CB -A05
399.50
DBL CB -17
345.24
DBL CB -18
345.11
FES -01
337.02
SDMH-A06
402.24
YI-06
348.48
YI-AO1
377.44
STORM DRAINAGE SUMMARY TABLE
UPSTREAM
STRUCTURE
DOWNSTREAM
STRUCTURE
UPSTREAM
INVERT
DOWNSTREAM
INVERT
PIPE
DIAMETER
PIPE
MATERIAL
LENGTH
(ft)
SLOPE
GCA
PROD. MGR.
338.35
334.14
30"
RCP
60.2
7.00%
CB -03
CB -02
341.60
341.37
30"
RCP
45.5
0.50%
CB -04
CB -03
343.36
341.70
30"
RCP
54.0
3.08%
CB -05
CB -04
343.62
343.46
24"
RCP
33.6
0.50%
CB -07
CB -04
348.74
343.46
24"
RCP
228.9
2.31%
CB -08
CB -07
348.88
348.74
18"
RCP
26.5
0.50%
CB -09
CB -07
353.39
348.74
24"
RCP
137.2
3.38%
CB -10
CB -09
359.18
353.49
24"
RCP
187.2
3.04%
CB -11
CB -10
359.42
359.28
18"
RCP
26.5
0.54%
CB -12
CB -10
364.68
359.28
24"
RCP
162.2
3.33%
CB -13
CB -12
364.91
364.78
18"
RCP
26.5
0.50%
CB -14
CB -12
368.99
364.78
24"
RCP
129.6
3.25%
CB -15
CB -14
372.60
369.08
24"
RCP
129.5
2.72%
CB -16
CB -15
372.86
372.70
24"
RCP
31.2
0.50%
CB -A02
CB -16
384.35
372.96
24"
RCP
188.7
6.04%
CB -A03
CB -A02
384.51
384.35
15"
RCP
31.9
0.50%
CB -A04
CB -A02
395.50
384.45
24"
RCP
194.1
5.69%
CB -A05
CB -A04
395.75
395.60
24"
RCP
30.7
0.50%
DBL CB -17
CB -02
339.75
339.29
18"
RCP
92.2
0.50%
DBL CB -18
DBL CB -17
340.11
339.85
18"
RCP
51.0
0.50%
SDMH-A06
CB -A04
397.15
395.60
24"
RCP
31.1
5.00%
YI-06
CB -05
344.48
343.72
18"
RCP
33.1
2.28%
YI-A01
CB -16
374.00
372.96
15"
RCP
42.2
2.48%
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
1 CD SUBMITTAL
INITIATIVE WAY
NCSUPROJECT NO. 201520009 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
C2. 1
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
C2.X
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C2. 1
N/A
STATUS; REVISION
PRELIMINARY

EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
FEATURE
PROPOSED
SILT FENCE
SF
SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
SFMF
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CHECKED
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET
PROD. MGR.
HARDWARE CLOTH &
GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
7
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
0 O O
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT
REVISED SUBMITTAL
TREE WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING
5
DEWATERING PUMP
2016.08.18
FILTER BAG AND RIP RAP
REVISED SUBMITTAL
COFFER DAM
3
Y1-06
// CB -05
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET/C2 1
s
SILT FENCE OUTLET (TYP)
r
0
0
_ 0
BLAIR DRIVE
(EXISTING CONSTRUCTION)
j
/ \
EXISTING 30" RCP
0
Ilii I
i� 11 � l VIII
\ I I I I II I I I I I I I
/
No / I 1 I 1 C� IIII I m III I
/ II/l J m SII I \I I �I III I I � III
11 ,�
i / IIII I II I 1111 I IIVI I II IIII
1101
EXISTING OVERHEAD
0 I n III I
m/ I I POWER LINES I 2 ( I I I I 1
0\� I I IIII I
ri
INV = 323.17'POWE EA EM�N j I
TOP HEADWALL = 331.67' / / / / / 1 E 90' D I
PROPOSED HEADWALL SEE DETAIL,
COFFERDAM (TYP) I'
' l SHEET D1.3
I CLASS 1 RIPRAP' I I / �% PP, 1 I I( '
KSTREAMBA�K/ I l n//PP/�� / j 1 I
1 84 LF 72" CAP WITH 1' EMBEDMENT. I
PROTECTION TYP l l INTERNAL BAFFLES SPACED AT 10' 0. C.
TOTAL STRE AM IMPACT = 200 LF
bl i TO BYPASS CONTRACTOFLOWS AROUND WORK
SHALL PROVIDE P
�,: / AREA. REFER TO IMPLEMENTATION
SEQUENCE IN DETAIL ON SHEET
CB -04/ / /��� i / D1.3 (TYP)
Il''i
DOUBLE LAYER SILT FENCEITREE
PROTECTION FENCE (TYP)
e-03 l BL CB -18
BLAIR
B DRIVE
11/60 10
NO
•.. �� I IIII '�\
345
D� x
.34G
I d
'335-
/ °
w� Illi 33a
/ 1111111 % .
/ 'EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
Z�zo
IIi I I
1
I w h'llilll III ��
/ CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PUMP FES -01 I
FOR THE DEWA TERING OF THE
I,
WORK AREA IF NECESSARY (TYP) 11 III IIIII11I
DOUBLE LAYER SILT FENCE/TREE FILTER BAG (TYP)'
PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) I IIII I II I i
/ CLASS B RIP RAP (TYP)
/ j III LIMITS III F CONSTRUCTION (TYP) /
I - �INV = 318.38'
EXISTING WET
TOP HEADWALL = 326.88'
it
DETENTION BASIN OUTLET PROTECTION —
CLASS B RIP RAP
J61 X 18'W X 22'D
l EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER
I \ I z,
SEAL
SEAL
CA)?0,111111
9N444AA�%
036348
�. 08/26/2016
�pE
s-
X��
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL
III III /iS d� MATTING (TYP)
FIL TER BAG (TYP)
If
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE (IF NEEDED)
1
I — 20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP) \ \�
EXISTING 42" RCP
CLASS B RIP RAP (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN C� \
I BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP) l
PROPOSED HEADWALL
� o
-STREAM TOP F BANK
I O
I I / 0 / 10 I I
m I I
J&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
sO.
/
/
/
/
NOTE.- CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF PROJECT
PERIMETER (2' CONTOURS) WERE OBTAINED
FROM NCDOT LIDAR DATA.
PROJECT IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN
SEE SHEET C2.0 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV. NO.
I DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
l EXISTING LEVEL SPREADER
I \ I z,
SEAL
SEAL
CA)?0,111111
9N444AA�%
036348
�. 08/26/2016
�pE
s-
X��
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL
III III /iS d� MATTING (TYP)
FIL TER BAG (TYP)
If
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE (IF NEEDED)
1
I — 20' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER ZONE 2 (TYP) \ \�
EXISTING 42" RCP
CLASS B RIP RAP (TYP)
30' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN C� \
I BUFFER ZONE 1 (TYP) l
PROPOSED HEADWALL
� o
-STREAM TOP F BANK
I O
I I / 0 / 10 I I
m I I
J&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
sO.
/
/
/
/
NOTE.- CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF PROJECT
PERIMETER (2' CONTOURS) WERE OBTAINED
FROM NCDOT LIDAR DATA.
PROJECT IS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN
SEE SHEET C2.0 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
BLAIR DRIVE
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
CALL N.C. ONE
CALL CENTER
BEFORE YOU DIG
STOP
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTILITY
\ DAMAGE /
NORTH
30' 0 30' 60'
SCALE: 1"=30' (Horiz.)
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PROD. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
C2.X
HORIZONTAL:
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
C2.2
N/A
',TATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY

II
FILTER CLOTH P-1
�
A. COARSE AGGREGATE (2"-3" STONE) SHALL BE USED. PAD TO BE 100'L X 25'W X 6"D MIN. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 3" OF
STONE IN A CUT SECTION TO HELP SECURE FILTER CLOTH.
B. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS IS TO BE PROVIDED.
C. ENTRANCES SHOULD BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM UTILITY BY ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES.
D. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOP
DRESSING MAY BE NECESSARY. AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT
AS NECESSARY. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS.
E. TEMPORARY PADS MUST BE LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF ADJOINING ROADWAY.
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NTS
1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECPS), INCLUDING ANY
NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED.
2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE RECPS IN A 6" (15 CM) DEEP X 6" (15 CM) WIDE
TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) OF RECPS EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF
THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE RECPS WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM)
APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY
SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30 CM) PORTION OF RECPS BACK OVER SEED AND
COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE RECPS OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED
APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE RECPS.
3. ROLL THE RECPS (A.) DOWN (FOR SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER) OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY (FOR SLOPES LESS
THAN 3:1) ACROSS THE SLOPE. RECPS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL
SURFACE. ALL RECPS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN
APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM TM
STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE
APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN.
4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL RECPS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2" -5" (5 CM -12.5 CM)
OVERLAP DEPENDING ON RECP'S TYPE.
5. CONSECUTIVE RECPS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH
AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5 CM) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30
CM) APART ACROSS ENTIRE RECP'S WIDTH.
NOTE: *IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15 CM)
MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE RECPS.
TEMPORARY STABILIZATION FOR SLOPES
GREATER THAN 10 FEET
NTS
4' MAX. 19 -GAUGE
HARDWARE CLOTH
r (j" MESH OPENINGS)
MINIMUM 10
LINE WIRES
► 8'-0" MAXIMUM -
NOTE:
1. USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA
DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN
AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITED AS NEEDED TO
PROVIDE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN
AND TO REMOVE PRESSURE ON THE SILT
FENCE.
TOP OF
MUST BE
ABOVE T
THE WAS
STEEL FENCE F
WIRE FEN(
HARDWARE CLOT
FILTER OF #57
WASHED STONE
BURY WIRE FENCE AND HARDWARE CLOTH
PLAN VIEW UINUJJ z)tU I iUlNl
NOTES:
1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW DEPRESSION APPROACHING THE INLET.
2. DRIVE 5 -FOOT STEEL POSTS 2 FEET INTO THE GROUND SURROUNDING THE INLET. SPACE POSTS EVENLY
AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET, A MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART.
3. SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE MESH HARDWARE CLOTH. SECURE THE WIRE MESH TO THE STEEL POSTS
AT THE TOP, MIDDLE, AND BOTTOM. PLACING A 2 -FOOT FLAP OF THE WIRE MESH UNDER THE GRAVEL FOR
ANCHORING IS RECOMMENDED.
4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NC DOT #5 OR #57 STONE) ON A 2:1 SLOPE WITH A HEIGHT OF 16 INCHES AROUND
THE WIRE, AND SMOOTH TO AN EVEN GRADE.
5. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED, REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, AND
ESTABLISH FINAL GRADING ELEVATIONS.
6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND STABILIZED IT WITH GROUNDCOVER.
HARDWARE CLOTH & GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
NTS
IF
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PRO]. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03 23
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
FRONT VIEW
STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
SILT FENCE FABRIC
3'-0T
o FILL SLOPE
26"
m
j ---6" MINIMUM COVER
2'-0" OVER SKIRT *
ANCHOR SKIRT AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER *
STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCING
NTS
4' MIN_ - I SILT FENCE
40" *FOR REPAIR OF SILT
IMUM 12-1/2 GAUGE FENCE FAILURES, USE
ERMEDIATE WIRES No. 57 WASHED STONE.
FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT
PROTECTION AREA 18" FENCE IS PROTECTING
M DO NOT ENTER CATCH BASIN.
GRADE a
WARNING SIGN DETAILNOTES:
s' MAX. 1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MADE OF DURABLE, WEATHERPROOF MATERIAL.
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 2. LETTERS TO BE 3" HIGH MINIMUM, CLEARLY LEGIBLE AND SPACED AS DETAILED.
STEEL POST 3. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED AT 50' MAXIMUM INTERVALS.
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
WARNING SIGN 4. PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER
SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PROTECTION AREA THEREAFTER.
5. FOR TREE PROTECTION AREAS LESS THAN 200' IN PERIMETER, PROVIDE NO LESS THAN
MIN. 10 GA DO NOT ENTER ONE SIGN PER PROTECTION AREA.
MIN. 12-1 /2 GA.
0 N FILL SLOPE LINE WIRES INTERMEDIATE 6. ATTACH SIGNS SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS AND FABRIC.
M 3 WIRES 7. MAINTAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT.
SILT FENCE FABRIC 8. ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED BY CHATHAM COUNTY BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD
INSTALLED TO SECOND CONDITIONS.
rNi GRADE WIRE FROM TOP GRADE g PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER
_ _ f/ THEREAFTER.
s" MIN. COVER -IIIII-11111 =IIIII=IIIII=IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIA=1 =IIIII=11� 10. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
10 II OVER SKIRT * = ILII - IIIII 11. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
N IIIII - IIIII 12. SEE NCDENR PRACTICE & SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL SEDIMENTS FENCE SECTION FOR
EXTEND WIRE 6" MIN. INTO TRENCH CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA.
AND ANCHOR SKIRT AS IIII IIIII 13. SIGN SHALL BE IN BOTH ENGLISH AND SPANISH.
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER * -
SIDE VIEW ,SII VIII FRONT VIEW SII IIIII
PUMP
DISCHARGE
HOSE
3' FILTER FABRIC
ON GROUND
BURY 6" OF UPPER EDGE OF
FILTER FABRIC IN TRENCH
u AND HARDWARE
CLOTH IN TRENCH
STEEL FENCE POST
SET MAX 2' APART
MIN. 18" INTO SOLI
GROUND
NOTES:
1. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN HALF OF STONE OUTLET IS COVERED.
2. REPLACE STONE AS NEEDED TO ENSURE DEWATERING.
SECTION VIEW
STANDARD SILT FENCE OUTLET
NTS
FILTER BAG
n m- 1 I I N �
FILTERED
WATER
FLOW
WATER PUMP
TIE DOWN STRAP
INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES NOTES:
INSERT DISCHARGE HOSE FROM PUMP INTO FILTER BAG 1. LAY DOWN PLASTIC ON GROUND IN AREA WHERE
A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES (6") AND TIGHTLY SECURE BAG WILL SIT AND DISHARGE PATH.
WITH THE ATTACHED STRAP TO PREVENT WATER FROM
FLOWING OUT OF THE UNIT WITHOUT BEING FILTERED. IF 2• PLACE BAG ON LEVEL GRAVEL PAD TO ENSURE
USING OPTIONAL ABSORBENTS, PLACE ABSORBENT BOOM MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AND ALLOW EQUIPMENT TO PICK
INTO THE FILTER BAG. CLIP ABSORBENT BOOM TO UP TO HAUL OFF.
TETHER PROVIDED INSIDE THE UNIT.
3. PROP BAG UP AT SLIGHT ANGLE SO WATER
MAINTENANCE: REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF DISCHARGES TOWARD RIVER AND DOES NOT CREATE
SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOW A POOL WHEN DRAINING.
RATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL
RATE. IF USING OPTIONAL OIL ABSORBENTS; REMOVE 4. WHEN INSTALLING NEW BAG MOVE LOCATION OVER
AND REPLACE ABSORBENT WHEN NEAR SATURATION. AS NOT TO KILL GRASS AND PLANTINGS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO RETURN AREA TO EXISTING
CONDITIONS AFTER BAGS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED.
FILTER BAG DETAIL
NTS
SEAL
O�p ESS/pN Olj�y
.Q
AL
036348
• 08/26/2016 ,•
v
v &CMED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
COMBINATION SILTZ ITREE PROTECTION FENCE
NTS
PLAN VIEW CLEAN WATER COFFER DAM
(SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET)
CONTRACTOR TO STREAM DIVERSION
PROVIDE DEWATERING PUMPS
PUMP IN TRENCH.
PUMPS SHOULD
DISCHARGE ONTO A r- P INTAKE HOSE W/
STABLE VELOCITY INLET SCREEN
DISSIPATOR MADE OF
RIP RAP OR SANDBAGS
FLOW
FLOW �
l - 000000000000 00
SEDIMENT SUMP -HOLE OR
CONTAINMENT POOL
CO FER DAM
(SEE DETAIL THISWORK AREA WIDTH NOT TO EXCEED
SHEET) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON PLANS
SEDIMENT FILTER
PUMP -AROUND PRACTICE:
TEMPORARY MEASURE FOR DEWATERING STREAM CROSSING SITES.
DESCRIPTION:
THE WORK SHOULD CONSIST OF INSTALLING A TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND AND SUPPORTING
MEASURES TO DIVERT FLOW AROUND CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
SIZING PUMPS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO KEEP FLOW FROM ENTERING WORK AREA.
IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE:
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, PUMP -AROUND PRACTICES, AND ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION
SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE (REFER TO DETAIL).
1. INSTALL SCOUR HOLE AND FILTER BAGS WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS.
2. COFFER DAMS SHOULD BE SITUATED AT THE ENDS OF THE WORK AREA AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS, AND WATER ON THE UPSIDE OF THE DAM AREA SHOULD BE PUMPED AROUND THE
WORK AREA.
3. THE PUMP SHOULD DISCHARGE INTO THE FILTER BAGS AND SCOUR HOLES..
4. WATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHOULD BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE
SUCH AS A TEMPORARY WOOD CHIP DEWATERING BASIN, FILTER BAG OR OTHER APPROVED
SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE.
5. AFTER THE CULVERT IS INSTALLED AND THE SLOPES HAVE BEEN STABILIZED, THE PUMP
INTAKE HOSES, SCOUR HOLES AND FILTER BAGS SHOULD BE REMOVED AND THEN THE
COFFER DAMS SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6. A PUMP AROUND MUST BE INSTALLED ON ANY TRIBUTARY OR STORM DRAIN OUTFALL
WHICH CONTRIBUTES BASEFLOW TO THE WORK AREA. THIS SHOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED BY
LOCATING A COFFER DAM AT THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE TRIBUTARY OR STORM DRAIN
OUTFALL AND PUMPING THE STREAM FLOW AROUND THE WORK AREA. THIS WATER SHOULD
DISCHARGE ONTO THE SAME VELOCITY DISSIPATER USED FOR THE MAIN STREAM PUMP
AROUND.
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND DETAIL
NTS
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
S-0'
POLYETHYLENE MEMBRANE ON
FACE 20 MIL THICK
r
LIMITS
J.
DISTURBANCE '
°cr
(SEE NOTE 1) -
�:a�,
0
In _j
w
J
a
FLOW >
z
SANDBAGS, CLASS 1 RIP RAP
OR OTHER NON -ERODIBLE
MATERIAL
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC-
SILT
ABRIC-
LEVEL WITH TOP OF BANK
OR AS NECESSARY
CLASS 2 RIP RAP, NJ BARRIER
OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL C
(IF USING RIP -RAP DOWNSTREAM,
SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 2.0: 1)
PIPELINE
SEE PROFILE FOR
ELEVATION
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL COFFER DAMS WITH ENOUGH SEPARATION FROM THE
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO PLACE PUMP INTAKE AND DISCHARGE
HOSES, DISSIPATORS AND SEDIMENT FILTER STRUCTURES.
2. TEMPORARY PRE -FABRICATED COFFER DAMS SUCH AS PORT -A -DAM AND OTHERS MAY
BE USED IN SUBSTITUTION TO THE SANDBAG/RIP-RAP DAM WITH PRIOR APPROVAL BY
THE OWNER AND ENGINEER.
RIPRAP TO EXTENI
TOP
B
do
SILT FENCE TO I
INSTALLED OVER T(
OF FI
TEMPORARY COFFER DAM DETAIL
NTS
SILT FENCE
La
SECTION B -B
I
CHANNEL W
BOTTOM I
OUTLET Do La W DEPTH LINING
NO. (IN.) (FT.) (FT.) (IN.) CLASSIFICATION
CULVERT 15 10.0 18.0 22 CLASS B
D
STONE CLASSIFICATIONS OF CLASS B REQUIRE A SUBLAYER OF FILTER FABRIC
OR FS -2 FILTER STONE WITH A BEDDING THICKNESS OF 6".
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION
NTS
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTA
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL DETAILS
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PRO]. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
D1.X
HORIZONTAL'
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
D1.1
N/A
'STATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY ,

I., 11 A f1
PLAN VIEW
�iLT FENCE/TREE
ROTECTION FENCE
LONG TOP OF BERM
' MIN.
C
c
c
TYPICAL SECTION VIEW
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE
SEDIMENT AT SPILLWAY LOCATION
AS NEEDED TO PREVENT CLOGGING
SEDIMENT TRENCH
(SEE CROSS SECTION)
1� ter- 2' �CL. 1 RIP RAP
EXISTING ""` EXISTING
GRADEy` GRADE
3'
3' � #57 WASHED STONE
SECTION VIEW © SPILLWAY
STOCKPILE SEDIMENT TRENCH
NTS
_� III III � SII " —III 1II-
PLAN *BELOW GRADE
ICHOR PLASTIC LINER W/#57
'ONE
MIL. PLASTIC LINING
10 MIL PLASTIC
LINING
CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT DETAIL
NTS
IF
TOTAL LENGTH
(FT)
SLOPE
M
LINER
RECEIVING SLOPE
DRAIN SIZE (IN.)
DCR
PHASE 1
DCR
1 466
3.9
SYNTHETIC MAT
24
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2
CD PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03 23
REV. NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH TO BE USED TO INTERCEPT FLOW AND/OR DIVERT TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE OR BMP.
2. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN DITCH IS ONE-HALF FULL.
3. DITCH SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED WHEN DAMAGED BY EQUIPMENT OR COVERED BY FILL.
4. STABILIZE DIVERSION DITCH BERM WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING, MULCH WITH TAC, AND/OR EROSION CONTROL NETTING.
12"
VAR.
2' - 10'
7
WASTE MATERIAL -COMPACT,
SEED & MULCH AFTER
CONSTRUCTION OF DITCH
VAR. �Ifi
o' - 2' N 1I -
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW
2' MIN.
r N
STANDARD TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
TDD #
TOTAL LENGTH
(FT)
SLOPE
M
LINER
RECEIVING SLOPE
DRAIN SIZE (IN.)
DCR
PHASE 1
DCR
1 466
3.9
SYNTHETIC MAT
24
2 77
3.9
STRAW W NET
24
Z.V
I.0
I Z.0
Z.0
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
O
y�OQE
,S 1
I� I� III IIII IIII
SEC710N 'A"
NOTES:
1. ACTUAL LAYOUT TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD.
2. THE "CONCRETE WASHOUT" SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 30 FT OF THE TEMPROARY
CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY.
3. PIT CAPACITY IS MINIMUM OF 6 CU FT PER 10 CU YD OF CONCRETE.
4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH USACE CONTRACTING OFFICER FOR PROPER DISPOSAL
OF CONCRETE.
PLYWOOD 48" X 24"
PAINTED WHITE
SEAL
Olj�y
.Q
AL
036348
• 08/26/2016 ,•
/���/11111111100\\
X LETTERS 6"
HT
.AG SCREWS
WOOD POST
3"X3" X8'
ANCHOR PLASTIC LINER W/#57
STONE
v
v &CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
DIVER
i
A
DIVERSION DITCH
FLOW
X24"
SECTION A—A
SCOUR HOLE
LNCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
NTS
PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT MATTING
(PSRM)
NOTE: SEE SHEET CO.5 FOR SCOUR HOLE SHAPE AND SIZE
A
SEED AREAS WITH NATIVE GRASSES AT TIME OF INSTALLATION
1.0'
1
IIS3- --II
0.5' 1' TUCK EACH SIDE
CLASS B RIPRAP
\_6" CABC
FILTER FABRIC
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTAL
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL DETAILS
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PRO]. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
D1.X
HORIZONTAL'
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
D1.2
N/A
;TATU S : REVISION
PRELIMINARY

FLOW
CONSTRUCTION LOADS:
FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE LOADS, AN EXTRA AMOUNT OF COMPACTED COVER MAY BE REQUIRED OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE.
THE HEIGHT -OF -COVER SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TABLE BELOW. THE USE OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT NECESSITATES GREATER PROTECTION FOR THE PIPE THAN FINISHED GRADE COVER MINIMUMS FOR NORMAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC.
PIPE SPAN,
AXLE LOADS (kips)
INCHES
MINIMUM
18-50 1 50-75 1 75-110 1 110-150
LIMITS OF
COMPACTED SELECT GRANULAR
COMPACTE[
MINIMUM COVER (FT)
NORMAL
PROD. MGR.
ROAD FILL
-2' MIN. 2' MIN.
PCN SUBMITTAL
12-42
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
48-72
3.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
78-120
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.0
126-144
3.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
MINIMUM COVER MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON LOCAL CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR
MUST PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL COVER REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE PIPE.
MINIMUM COVER IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE TO THE TOP OF THE
MAINTAINED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY SURFACE.
CONSTRUCTION LOADING **
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
INVERT
\-BAFFLE & GOSSETS
(TYP.)
SECTION A -A
NTS
BAFFLE DETAIL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
MINIMUM
LIMITS OF
'OMPACTE[
NORMAL
ROAD FILL
MCI
I -I
ErAm
WAWI
Vol
BEDDING
SEE NOTE #5
SECTION
x
CRITICAL BACKFILL ZONE, SEE NOTE #5
INITIAL LIFTS OVER CROWN OF STRUCTURE AS INDICATED BY HATCHED AREA TO BE
COMPACTED TO REQUIRED DENSITY WITH HAND OPERATED EQUIPMENT OR WITH
SMALL TRACTOR (D-4 OR SMALLER) DRAWN EQUIPMENT.
SELECT GRANULAR STRUCTURAL BACKFILL LIMITS.
#57 STONE
NOTES:
1. ALL SELECT GRANULAR BACKFILL TO BE PLACED IN A BALANCED FASHION IN
THIN LIFTS (6"-8" LOOSE TYPICALLY) AND COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT
DENSITY PER AASHTO T-180.
2. COMPLETE AND REGULAR MONITORING OF THE CAP SHAPE IS NECESSARY DURING
ALL BACKFILLING OF THE STRUCTURE.
3. PREVENT EXCESSIVE DISTORTION OF SHAPE AS NECESSARY BY VARYING
COMPACTION
METHODS AND EQUIPMENT.
4. NCDOT #57 STONE BACKFILL MIN. 2' OUTSIDE OF PIPE (EACH SIDE) AND 12"
OVER TOP OF PIPE.
5. BEDDING ZONE SHOULD BE FREE OF DEBRIS. BEDDING MATERIAL SHALL BE #57
STONE AT MIN. THICKNESS OF 6" UNDER PIPE, COMPACTED TO 90% DENSITY.
6. PRESSURES FROM CAP PIPE -ARCH SHAPE WILL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE
LIFE OF INSTALLATION. THIS WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT
ENGINEER.
CAP BACKFILL DETAIL.
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
H
MCE PRO]. #
MINIMUM
MINIMUM LIMITS OF
LIMITS OF
COMPACTED SELECT GRANULAR
COMPACTE[
STRUCTURAL BACKFILL
NORMAL
PROD. MGR.
ROAD FILL
-2' MIN. 2' MIN.
PCN SUBMITTAL
SEE NOTE #4 rNORMAL
ABOVE M IN. LEVEL SEE NOTE #4
/
Vol
BEDDING
SEE NOTE #5
SECTION
x
CRITICAL BACKFILL ZONE, SEE NOTE #5
INITIAL LIFTS OVER CROWN OF STRUCTURE AS INDICATED BY HATCHED AREA TO BE
COMPACTED TO REQUIRED DENSITY WITH HAND OPERATED EQUIPMENT OR WITH
SMALL TRACTOR (D-4 OR SMALLER) DRAWN EQUIPMENT.
SELECT GRANULAR STRUCTURAL BACKFILL LIMITS.
#57 STONE
NOTES:
1. ALL SELECT GRANULAR BACKFILL TO BE PLACED IN A BALANCED FASHION IN
THIN LIFTS (6"-8" LOOSE TYPICALLY) AND COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT
DENSITY PER AASHTO T-180.
2. COMPLETE AND REGULAR MONITORING OF THE CAP SHAPE IS NECESSARY DURING
ALL BACKFILLING OF THE STRUCTURE.
3. PREVENT EXCESSIVE DISTORTION OF SHAPE AS NECESSARY BY VARYING
COMPACTION
METHODS AND EQUIPMENT.
4. NCDOT #57 STONE BACKFILL MIN. 2' OUTSIDE OF PIPE (EACH SIDE) AND 12"
OVER TOP OF PIPE.
5. BEDDING ZONE SHOULD BE FREE OF DEBRIS. BEDDING MATERIAL SHALL BE #57
STONE AT MIN. THICKNESS OF 6" UNDER PIPE, COMPACTED TO 90% DENSITY.
6. PRESSURES FROM CAP PIPE -ARCH SHAPE WILL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE
LIFE OF INSTALLATION. THIS WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT
ENGINEER.
CAP BACKFILL DETAIL.
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
CULVERT PLAN VIEW
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
SEAL
SEAL
/////
AL O�p ESS/pN O
.Q
AL
036348
• 08/26/2016 ,•-A.,
%9�PFNG10%. - Q�,`,
v
41INot NVIUM&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
0
TYPE 2 ENGINEERING FABRIC PER
SECTION 1056 OF 2006 NCDOT
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
OVERLAP AT TOP.
o�
�_
U p
aQ
O
O 0Of
U ,J
IQ
H:2
L� or
-O
J Z
1/2"0 BOLT
25 1/2"
SECTION
-25-112-
10C
CORRUGATED
BAND
2-2/3" x 1/2"
RIVETED PIPE
24" WIDE x k THICK
CONTINUOUS FLAT
GASKET
CONNECTION DETAIL
CORRUGATIONS PIPE PRODUCTS
2-2/3"X1/2" ALUMINUM
(2) 24" TECHO BAND
ANGLES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BANDS FOR PIPE -ARCH ARE THE SAME AS FOR EQUIVALENT DIAMETER ROUND PIPE.
2. BANDS ARE FURNISHED AS FOLLOWS:
12" THRU 48" 1 -PIECE
54" THRU 96" 2 -PIECE
102" THRU 144" 3 -PIECES.
3. BAND FASTENERS ARE ATTACHED WITH SPOT WELDS, RIVETS OR HAND WELDS..
4. REROLLED ANNULAR END CORRUGATIONS ARE 2-2/3" X 1/2".
5. DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES.
CONNECTING BAND DETAIL.
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
END VIEW - OUTLET HEADWALL
HEADWALL DETAILS-
CULVERT
ETA LS
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTA
CULVERT DETAILS
SUPPLIER CONTACT
*POMONA PIPE PRODUCTS INC
GREENSBORO, NC
CHRIS BEATY - [phone]
*OR APPROVED EQUAL
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PRO]. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
7
PCN SUBMITTAL
2016.08.26
6
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.23
5
j S&EC SUBMITTAL
2016.08.18
4
REVISED SUBMITTAL
2016.08.12
3
CD SUBMITTAL
2016.07.07
2CD
PROGRESS SET
2016.06.09
1
SD/DD SUBMITTAL
2016.03.23
REV.NO.
DESCRIPTIONS
DATE
REVISIONS
CULVERT PLAN VIEW
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
SEAL
SEAL
/////
AL O�p ESS/pN O
.Q
AL
036348
• 08/26/2016 ,•-A.,
%9�PFNG10%. - Q�,`,
v
41INot NVIUM&CREED
1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
F-1222
www.mckimcreed.com
0
TYPE 2 ENGINEERING FABRIC PER
SECTION 1056 OF 2006 NCDOT
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
OVERLAP AT TOP.
o�
�_
U p
aQ
O
O 0Of
U ,J
IQ
H:2
L� or
-O
J Z
1/2"0 BOLT
25 1/2"
SECTION
-25-112-
10C
CORRUGATED
BAND
2-2/3" x 1/2"
RIVETED PIPE
24" WIDE x k THICK
CONTINUOUS FLAT
GASKET
CONNECTION DETAIL
CORRUGATIONS PIPE PRODUCTS
2-2/3"X1/2" ALUMINUM
(2) 24" TECHO BAND
ANGLES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BANDS FOR PIPE -ARCH ARE THE SAME AS FOR EQUIVALENT DIAMETER ROUND PIPE.
2. BANDS ARE FURNISHED AS FOLLOWS:
12" THRU 48" 1 -PIECE
54" THRU 96" 2 -PIECE
102" THRU 144" 3 -PIECES.
3. BAND FASTENERS ARE ATTACHED WITH SPOT WELDS, RIVETS OR HAND WELDS..
4. REROLLED ANNULAR END CORRUGATIONS ARE 2-2/3" X 1/2".
5. DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES.
CONNECTING BAND DETAIL.
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
NCSU PROJECT NO. 201520009
SCO NO. 15-11650-01A
END VIEW - OUTLET HEADWALL
HEADWALL DETAILS-
CULVERT
ETA LS
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
INITIATIVE WAY/BLAIR DRIVE
CD SUBMITTA
CULVERT DETAILS
SUPPLIER CONTACT
*POMONA PIPE PRODUCTS INC
GREENSBORO, NC
CHRIS BEATY - [phone]
*OR APPROVED EQUAL
DATE:
JULY 7, 2016
MCE PRO]. #
01371-0059
DRAWN
DCR
DESIGNED
DCR
CHECKED
GCA
PROD. MGR.
CHS
SCALE
M&C FILE NUMBER
D1.X
HORIZONTAL'
DRAWING NUMBER
AS NOTED
VERTICAL:
D1.3
N/A
'STATUS: REVISION
PRELIMINARY ,