20071986 Ver 3_401 Application_20080308

r
J.
0 1-Ia9 (0 V3 sPAID
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL per,
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC
[phone] MAR 2 6 2008
Fax [phone]
DENR -YWER WAUTY
WETI.ANDS,,W ST j,,3M ?ATER BRANCe-
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: March 24, 2008
TO: NC Division of Water Quality
ATTENTION: Staff
RE: Richland Ridge Road Extension
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
® Pre-construction Notification (PCN) ® Plans
® Documents ? Other
® Maps
? Specifications
'D R iJ
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: I'
® For approval ® As requested ® For review & comment
Y11: l Aiv?.. c:: u?rAlt1
? Please reply ? See below ® For your files
? Regular Mail ? Fed-Ex ® Delivered by KE ? Picked Up
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
1 03-24-08 $240.00 Check
5 03-24-08 PCN Cover Letter
5 03-07-08 DWQ Return of Application
5 03-24-08 PCN
5 02-15-08 Agent Authorization
5 USGS Map
5 Soil Survey Map
5 Registry Stream & Aerial GIS Map
5 03-20-08 The Registry at Bennett Park Engineering Plan Sheets (7)
5 01-25-08 The Registry at Bennett Park Stormwater Calculations Package
5 02-18-08 Town of Wake Forest Stormwater Approval Letter
5 05-2003 Town of Wake Forest Transportation Plan
1 03-24-08 CD
Remarks:
THANK YOU! ?
Rec'd By: Signed / I
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
March 24, 2008
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands WQ Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Richland Ridge Road Extension
Keller Environmental Job No. 0674
DWQ Project # 07-1986, Ver. 2
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
We received the "Return of Application" March 7, 2008 letter from your office on
March 18, 2008. The information that we submitted to your office on February 28,
2008 attempted to provide clarifications in regards to the eight items on your February
8, 2008 letter. The incomplete information we provided to your office placed an
avoidable burden on your staff's time; we apologize for this. Please review the details
below. We hope that the information below and on the attached plans and documents
clarifies the scope of this project.
Richland Ridge Road Extension will be primary road in "The Registry at Bennett
Park." Allowing us to culvert the unnamed tributary to Richland Creek will allow
interconnectivity of the adjacent neighborhoods. We investigated bridging the perennial
stream; however, A 36-foot x 55-feet bridge would increase the stream crossing cost
approximately $250,000. This would create significant economic hardship on this 30-lot
project.
The Town of Wake Forest has requested us to stub-out Holding Avenue in its
current location in accordance with the attached Transportation Plan. Since the entire
stream area is located on the westerly-adjacent property, applicable permits will be
attained by the designated party (i.e., developer, town, etc.).
Regarding the stormwater, this project complies with the Stormwater
Management Plan Requirements for Applicants Other than the NCDOT Section a.
(SMP Requirements Where Another State Stormwater Program is in Effect). Please
refer to the attached February 18, 2008 Town of Wake Forest letter from Eric
Keravuori, P.E., Director of Engineering. The attached plans were approved according
to the Richland Creek Watershed requirements (WS WS-IV) and Neuse River Buffer
Rules. Since Richland Creek is immediately to the west of this project, 100-foot buffers
DWQ 401 Certification &
Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Richland Ridge Road Extension
March 24, 2008
Page 2 of 3
are provided. Moreover, in the Richland Creek Watershed, the Town of Wake Forest
limits impervious area to a maximum of 24%. Therefore, each lot will be limited to
2,187.5 s.f. of impervious area (including buildings, driveways, and sidewalks) to ensure
that this goal is achieved.
We are submitting the additional information requested from written correspondence
on March 7, 2008. We are requesting to fill of otherwise impact 146 linear feet of
perennial stream and 8,465 and 4,484 square feet of Zone 1 and 2 Neuse River basin
protected riparian buffers, respectively to construct the proposed residential subdivision.
We have addressed your included written comments in the following paragraphs.
1. Item 1 of the Required Items Checklist indicates that plans at a scale of 1"
= 50' or larger were included to show the design of the level spreader. The
plans that were submitted were at a much smaller scale.
Please refer to Sheets C-3, 3A, and 313. We've also included a CD for your
convenience. Sheet C-3 is a 50-scale plan and shows the entire site and the location of
the two level spreaders. Sheets 3A and 313 are 30-scale plans and illustrate the plan
and section views of level spreaders 2 and 1, respectively. Further details of the high
flow bypass system and level spreader are located on Sheets D-6 and D-7.
2. Item 2 of the Required Items Checklist indicates that plan details at a scale
of 1 "= 30' or larger were included to show the design and topography of
the level spreaders and filter strip. This information was not included at an
appropriate scale.
Please refer to Sheets 3A and 313. They are 30-scale plans and illustrate the
plan and section views of level spreaders 2 and 1, respectively. 1-foot topographical
contours are also shown to illustrate the slope area between Richland Creek and the
level spreaders. Further details of the high flow bypass system and level spreader are
located on Sheets D-6 and D-7.
3. Item 3 of t he Required Items Checklist indicates that a secion view of the
level spreader at a scale of 1 "= 20' or larger. This information was not
included at an appropriate scale.
Please refer to Sheets 3A and 313. Detailed (-10-scale) section views are shown
of level spreaders 2 and 1, respectively.
If you should have questions or require additional clarification please feel free to
contact me at 844-7437 (office), 749-8259 (cell) or email:
,flam. We welcome the opportunity to meet with your staff to
discuss this project if questions arise. Please let us know at your earliest convenience.
DWQ 401 Certification &
Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Richland Ridge Road Extension
March 24, 2008
Page 3 of 3
Sincerely,
Keller Environmental, LLC
65?4'1?
Jay Keller
Principal
Cc: Daryl Cady
Mike Allen, P.E.
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: La Scala Associates, LLC
Mailing Address: 123 S. White Street
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: dcady0nc.rr.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jay Keller
Company Affiliation: Keller Environmental, LLC
Mailing Address: 7921 Haymarket Lane
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jay@ dror _ _ am
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Richland Ridge Road Extension
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1830994619
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Wake Forest
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): The Registry at Bennett Park
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): West Holding Avenue
Proceed north on US 1 A (South Main Street) to West Holding Avenue. Turn left and
site is located at the end of existina road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): -78.4634 °N 35.9686 °W
6. Property size (acres): 12.24
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at'- h-a2o.en.
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The dedicated ROW is currently undeveloped. An
existing sewer easement crosses the site. Residential developments surround the
area.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of a single-family residential subdivision with public roads and
utilities. Typical construction equipment will be utilized.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Extend an existing road that is part of the
Town of Wake Forest's Transportation Plan to provide interconnectivity between
develoaments. Please refer to the attached Wake Forest Transportation Plan.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ Project # 07-1986, Ver. 2. No known permits have been
issued for this impact. No records can be found for the existing sanitary sewer line.;
Application submitted January 28, 2007 and additional information on February 28,
2008. The project was withdrawn on March 7, 2008. due to incomplete requested
items. These items have been addressed are contained within this PCN submittal
package.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are proposed. This construction will complete the road network for
Richland Ridge Road. The Town of Wake Forest has requested us to stub-out Holding
Avenue in its current location in accordance with the attached Transportation Plan.
Since the entire stream area is located on the westerly-adjacent property, applicable
permits will be attained by the designated party (i.e., developer, town, etc.).
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 9
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed permanent impacts
include 146 LF of perennial channel and approximately 0.22 acres of riparian buffer.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply len.th X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact t
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
RC-1 UT to Richland
Creek Road Crossing Perennial Approx. 1.5' 146 0.0116
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 146 0.0116
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, drehin2, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the Droiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.012
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.012
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 146
Page 4 of 9
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation (NOT APPLICABLE)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed impacts will
provide the necessary road and utilities to construct the proposed residential
neighborhood. Road impacts have been minimized by crossing the proposed stream at
a perpendicular angle and utilizing headwalls to decreasing the volume of fill and
subsequent fill slopes. The ROW for this extension was previously dedicated and the
existing road stubbed must short of the crossing so there was no opportunity to avoid this
connection and impacts. We are requesting to culvert the proposed Richland Ridge
Road Extension. A 36-foot x 55-feet bridge would increase the stream crossing cost
approximately $250,000. This would create significant economic hardship on this 30-lot
project. No additional wetlands or buffers are impacted by the proposed project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
Page 5 of 9
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ite.i
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project should not be required to provide mitigation for the proposed
impacts. This is due the efforts of the developer's team to avoid jurisdictional areas
to the maximum extent possible. Impacts to the perennial streams and wetlands are
less than 150 linear feet and 1/2 acre, respectively. As shown on the Site Plan,
sufficient room is provided for homes and driveways without encroachment into the
buffer areas. In addition, all on-site Neuse Riparian Buffers have been placed in
open space to be dedicated to the Town of Wake Forest or placed in a conservation
aacamant
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at :/, If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,465 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 4,484 1.5 0
Total 12,949 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. Riparian buffer mitigation is not required.
The road crossing results in 0.297 acres of impact.
Page 7 of 9
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream
from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. In the Richland Creek Watershed, the Town of
Wake Forest limits impervious area to a maximum of 24%. Therefore, each lot will be
limited to 2,187.5 s.f. of impervious area (including buildings, driveways, and sidewalks) to
ensure that this goal is achieved. This project complies with the Stormwater Management
Plan Requirements for Applicants Other than the NCDOT Section a. (SMP Requirements
Where Another State Stormwater Program is in Effect). Please refer to the attached
February 18, 2008 Town of Wake Forest letter from Eric Keravuori, P.E., Director of
Engineering. The attached plans were approved according to the Richland Creek
Watershed requirements (WS WS-IV) and Neuse River Buffer Rules. Please refer to the
attached stormwater calculations package and detail sheets for additional information,
including the two concrete level spreaders and bypass devices.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
To the Citv of Raleiah Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
4" ''- , , , . If no, please provide a short narrative description: It is
unlikely that the proposed project should result in cumulative stream impacts and
degrade downstream stream quality. Due to it's location at the terminus of Bennett Park,
no future development is anticipated. The Town of Wake Forest has requested us to
stub-out Holding Avenue in its current location in accordance with the attached
Transportation Plan. Since the entire stream area is located on the westerly-adjacent
property, applicable permits and bridge/culvert designs will be attained by the
designated party (i.e., developer, town, etc.). The surrounding commercial and retail
developments will be able to provide all necessary services for the additional 30 single
residences without expanding.
Page 8 of 9
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N./A
G
3-24-08
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Reijistiy C.A.& - Ri-Ahikil Riilije Ri�.id Ext
N
CO
WWEs
• 1
f .
GC ` APC
ApB
144:
,� F F" , w.
r
x yg. ' A nc--i l x�
x+41 F
CWF

3-D TopoQuads Copyright ©1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04096 Source Data: USGS 1 950 ft Scale: l : 24,000 Detail: 13-1 Datum: WGS84
WAKE
WAKE COUNTY AND THE CITY or RALEIGH
Number: 1830994619
0297331
=R1: LA SCALA ASSOC LLC
ti: 123 S WHITE ST
12: WAKE FOREST NC
27587-2739
13:
BOOK:
PAGE:
DATE:
) ACRES:
VAL:
VAL:
\JG CLASS:
,RIPTION
NAME
UM:
XT:
\JSHIP:
BUILT:
PRICE:
DATE:
USE:
aN STYLE:
3:
CLASS:
NG:
PARCEL NUMBER
iESS
JM:
SC:
REFIX:
aME:
'PE:
UFFIX:
12346
2016
1/5/2007
12.25
0
765625
CORPORATE LISTING
BENNETT PROP LLC PH2
BM2002-1457
183008
1830994619
000
WAK
WAKE FOREST
0
0
0
VACANT
R-8
217-00000-0000
0
W
HOLDING
AVE

?Al Creeks and Rivers
Streets
¦ Lakes
Parcels
Security Screen
2005 BAV
Orthophotography
[zoom to see p
2DO5 Color 0rthos:
County-wide [zoom to
see ?
1:1 Wake County
Boundary
Registry Streams
:roilx
4
(919)8444437
Fax [phone]
Phone: —L919) 562-0000
Project Narne/Description: Richland ick
To- US Army Corpsof Engineers
Raleighga " .
Attn: Staff
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, 27615
NC Division of a
401 OVOrsightand Express
a.
2321 Crabtree
Suite 250
RNorth 27604-2260
w��*"
".1 011111 115 LIVAIIIIa
210 IMIM
*:

a ?C. LI
?-
'1(l 1C- A 1'-II l l??!.'.I.

t 1

.. _ ... :. - 1 I` tG 27636 Pi : 1912 FAxl. 919-H51-191
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found, An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project, Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met, If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justificationi
I 'tia
a
I Plans (I" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
Design at ultimate build -out, d . -
Off-site drainage (if applicable), c_Atcva&:6
Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin), CA_r_,JLA,'n01ZS
-Forebay(if applicable), a*
- High flow bypass system,
-Maintenance access,-
Recorded
P0TS 14AVE 001-Seeu CompLera
Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), and
Boundaries of drainage easement. Is PA TC"
2. Plan details (1" = 30' or larger) for the level spreader showing:
Forebay (if applicable),
High flow bypass system, V-7
One foot topo lines between the level lip and top of stream bank,
Recorded drainage easement, and ' VLAr5 MANE Mr SEEN st "ow ve L
Design at ultimate build -out. GVe"LA-
3. Section view of the level spreader (11' = 20' or larger) showing:
Underdrain system (if applicable),
Level [in 0- 1'-
I
- Upslope channel, and
- Downslope filter fabric, P -(c
'�ALWLATIOMS 4. A date-stamped photograph of the filter strip that clearly shows the type of vegetation that is present.
Cov 45'?- 5. An assurance that the installed system will meet design specifications upon initial operation once the
project is complete and the entire drainage area is stabilized.
6, A construction sequence that shows how the level spreader will be protected from sediment until the entire
drainage area is stabilized,
�ALWLAO#uS 8. A copy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (10) agreement.
9. A copy of the deed restriction. '. pLkfs jAAvE W &sW To ipAT'e-
Form SW401 -Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer-Rev,3 Part 111, page 1 of 1

ihi-r .,

r" > -from NC Erosion Max.
'.UYl il, Q,", ',.F
iT
Iii I 1, 1 Eh=.
ChAnnr C . -itll ZCeq . /_:iv
Ic.Ulcli( z
f
F
3 _ _ a n r_ Sedirnert Panning a-,' r n(
'I'g kefardanceCle -
„r r 1' F
J 1.01
and i until Zreq Lav
_Ir ity, V
E: tO in

I ? I

' y(I i, / (] ;l li i(lil I 1 .I1 I() IICf - I ,?: I ,. (i)?I
I, c w (l I iii;, (ill(i (I(, ;11 1( )1 `11_1
i
? ..ii?I: 1 UI
il'I(!('?JII? ail it !?
I'll 11 i:oI i1£I' l:l ("i :1
Ii
1 t] it i III
1' i)I (iV
1 1 1 1 1 1,
C', V1
?: it %i ailli1111 'I illl:. OI iy',i

io" x:.i month,an-x wa, ,,..:avy 4u1..b{c -r.%I I11.`_3..
)G^ ?.•,;.) 1111 ,il',U I ,,, ?11111(a.. r,.0 IIi`.?

i. 1%(,ril
?i m
.q
w d ,
f Ifs 'I I > ?" -il ., i)'lit I ?iillil li=l1,

01.%,11 is ll(_,_ i_M,
litlC:C < i1(11J',.U1 1 1?.;.i1i`? I? fI,I? ?'i(.+I Il`
I :)f 2

s
li f R?l,;ly; r
I
I

I
,

r .

i ,

i
I
F,
_ Y
t
` S
j
r
Wake Forest
NorTh Carolima
February 18, 2008
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: August 20, 2007 Memorandum from Coleen H. Sullins and The Registry at Berment
Park
To Whorn It May Concern �
The Registry at Bennett Park has been approved by the Town of Wake Forest
Engineering and Planning Department. It meets the Richland Creek Watershed
requirements OVS WS -IV) as well as the Neuse Buffer Rules. The Master Plan was
approved in June 2007, which was prior to the Town of Wake Forest's Phase 11
StywattOrdinance.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 919-554-6122.
Sincerely,
Eric Kera vuori, P.E.
Director of Engineering
Town of Wake Forest
ekemvuori(d,-.wakefores c. ov.
919-554-6122
401 Elm Avenue *, Wake Forest., NC 2758'-2
758' , -29-32
Phone: [phone] , Fax: [phone] * www.wakeforestne.90V

M U LK EY
Level Spreader #1
lip,
3 i?a .' E
I rt ;
?0i v?[
will
Y
vy t.

.1
. J X140

MULKEY INC. 6750 TRYON ROAD CARY, NC 2751 1 PO BOX 33127 RALEIGH. NC 27636 PH: 919-051-1912 FAX: [phone] www.MULKEYINC.CONi
-r- MULKEY
Level Spreader #2
R
I Q °? y
G ? xr f

id

?L• ? ` ? .F ` F ? j ?? ?"Fn\A. ,? '- mss- _? t Yl
s

i
J t.
4
MULKEY INC. 6750 TRYON ROAD GARY, NC 2751 1 PO BOX 33127 RALEIGH, NC 27636 PH: 919-BS 1-1912 FAX: [phone] www.MULKEYINC.C01.1

Transportation Plan , _
Town of Wake Forest + ' IID[
j Registry Site

I
k ? 1t I?
i

J,. K

•
- .. __.. e. ._. . __
F

RA LEIGH I
I f'
?

_
5
. . `., ? ? Tuwgor':I on Pan
.. ,. -_ II - .vra-urr
,yam T

r

s
- --
OCnBr lPd6fI9181J46
I

RQLESVILE
-own -T WO ke Prares[
_ _. l•!.. f- 1'i3 k3 County, M,*Ih i.3roVna
- , .. _ May 2003