The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160894 Ver 1_Application_20160914 Carpenter,Kristi From:Rivenbark, Chris Sent:Wednesday, September 14, 2016 7:05 AM To:Eric Alsmeyer (eric.c.alsmeyer@usace.army.mil) Cc:Al-Ghandour, Majed N; Chapman, Amy; gary_jordan@fws.gov; Hopkins, Joey; Koch, Thomas K; Carpenter,Kristi; Lauffer, Matthew S; Mellor, Colin; Murray, Christopher A; NCDOT Service Account - Roadway Design; Ridings, Rob; Staley, Mark K; Wilson, Travis W.; Wilkins, Ronald B; Mason, James S; Al-Sharawneh, Ahmad A Subject:Permit Application for B-5166, Granville County Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed The permit application for B-5166 has been prepared. The electronic copy can be viewed/downloaded at https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/ This email serves as our permit application submittal to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Chris Rivenbark Project Development & Environmental Analysis Natural Environment Section North Carolina Department of Transportation 919-707-6152 office crivenbark@ncdot.gov 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27610 Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 3.a PAT McCRORY Covernor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary Transportation September 12, 2016 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer NCDOT Division 5 Project Coordinator SUBJECT: Application for Section 404 Nationwicie Permit Nos. 13 and 33 for the Replacement of Bridge No. 138 over Grassy Creek on SR 1300 (Cornwall Road), Division 5, Granville County, North Carolina. Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP — 1300(9), TIP Project No. B-5166. Dear Sir: Please find enclosed the Pre-Construction Notification, Stormwater Management Plan, permit drawings, and roadway plans for the subject project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project in October 2015. The proposed let date for this project is April 18, 2017, with a let review date of February 28, 2017. However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available. A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at https://connect.ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx, under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jim Mason at either jsmason@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6136. Sincerely, p`-.,-.• --� .� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. Natural Environment Section Head cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �Nothing Compares�_ State of North Carolina � Department of Transportation � PDEA-Natural Environment Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, Raleigh, NC 27610 � 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 919 707 6000 T � 919 212 5785 F o�� W A r�qQ� � � � � a � � , , , � o -c Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 138 over Grassy Creek on SR 1300 (Cornwall Rd) 2b. County: Granville 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cornwall 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5166 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6136 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jsmason@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.4725 Longitude: - 78.6642 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 2.68 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Grassy Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Roanoke 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: SR 1300 (Cornwall Rd) is classified as a Rural Minor Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System and is not a National Highway System Route. Land use within the vicinity primarily consists of Forested Land, Agriculture, and Residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 147 linear feet (Grassy Creek) 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient bridge 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project consists of replacing the existing 3-span 106-foot long bridge with a 2-span, 122-foot bridge on the existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained via off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT Name (if known): Jim Mason Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. No wetlands on site; only Grassy Creek (perennial) will be impacted. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Tem ora T Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0 ac Permanent 0 ac Temporary 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1� P❑ T Bank Grassy Creek � PER � Corps 35 88 Stabilization ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P� T Temp. Fill Grassy Creek � PER � Corps 35 46* (Causeways) ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 88 ft. Perm. 46 ft Temp. 3i. Comments: * Acreage of temp. causeway impacts is 0.02 acres. 2 causeways will be installed, but not simultaneously. Temp. channel impacts are concurrent with perm. channel impacts; however, since they extend into the creek beyond the bank stabilization footprint, it was decided that they should be listed separately. An additional 21 sq. ft. of perm. impact will occur due to the placement of the interior bent in the creek. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem ora T O ❑P❑T O ❑P❑T O ❑P❑T O ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 ac Permanent 0 ac Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surFace area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? Site ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No Site ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No Site ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No Site ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No Site ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 16 feet longer than the existing bridge; An off-site detour will be employed during construction; The proposed bridge will provide more hydraulic opening than the exising bridge. Two stormwater outFalls are proposed which will be placed at a distance to minimize disturbance to adjacent stream. A Rip Rap pad will be utilized to dissipate the energy. There are also a combination of special cut ditches, standard, 'V' ditches, and berm ditches present on the project, which are intended to reduce stormwater velocity. No deck drains are required for the proposed bridge. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities and Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be employed. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Bank stabilization impacts (which are less than 150 linear ft, do not re uire miti ation. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program data, USFWS website, NCDOT field surveys (harperella and smooth coneflower, habitat but No Effect, July 10, 2015; dwarf wedgemussel, No Effect due to the project being located in the Roanoke River basin); The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is covered by the Programmatic Biological Opinion for Divisions 1 through 8. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Philip �. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. �_� (1�'-12 —ZD/(, Applicant/Agent's Printed Name �-"-' T --------" Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided.) 11 E Il�;l l�r'fi!�` North Carolina Department of Transportation `'��y iiy��`;�'�� Highway Stormwater Program I�"f STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: B5166 County(ies): Wake Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: TIP Number: B5166 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 4/29/2016 NCDOT Contact: William Elam Contractor / Designer: Reid Robol, EI - Ecological Engineering Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Raleigh, NC 27610 Suite 101 Cary, NC 27518 Phone: 919-707-6718 Phone: 919-557-0929 Email: belam@ncdot.gov Email: rrobol@ecologicaleng.com City/Town: Stovall County(ies): W ake River Basin(s): Roanoke CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Project Description Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 0.17 Miles Surrounding Land Use: Forest, agricultural, and rural residential Proposed Project Existing Site Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.6 ac. 0.4 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11 ft lane, 4.3 ft shoulders, with total bridge width of 33.0 ft and total bridge length of 2@ 10 ft lanes, 2 ft shoulders with total bridge witdh of 24 ft and total bridge length of 120 ft. 105.4 ft. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 6909 Year: 2037 Existing: 4822 Year: 2017 General Project Narrative: State project B-5166 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #380138 on SR 1300 over Grassy Creek. Bridge #380138 consists of 1@35'-3", 1@35'-0", 1@35'- (Description of Minimization of Water 3" RC deck on I-beams with RC caps, and timber piles. The existing bridge has horizontal deck drains that allow direct runoff into the surface waters. The proposed crossing is Quality Impacts) located in Zone AE of FIRM Map number 3720099900J and was studied by Detailed methods. The proposed bridge will provide more hydraulic opening than the exising bridge. Two stormwater outfalls are proposed which will be placed at a distance to minimize disturbance to adjacent stream. A Rip Rap pad will be utilized to dissipate the energy. No deck drains are required for the proposed bridge. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Grassy Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 23-2-(1) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: None Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Threatened/Endangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � � ; � 3 � � � •� � V � � O V See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 9-B For Conventionol Symbols �� ][�][�� ][�� H�.�� GRA1�l VILLE C4 U1�lTY LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110.138 OVER GRASSY CREEK 0111 SR I300 (CORNWALL RD.) TYPE OF WORK GRADIIIIG, DRAIIVAGE, PAVI11lG, A11tD STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT BEGIN TlP PROJECT 8-5/66 -�- sra i2+o --- TO NC 96 ��''�As�,. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 7 _ � NAD 83/ NSRS 2007 END TlP PROJECT B-5/66 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. ro VA STATE LINE � DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepared �n the o�ces of• HyDRAULICS ENGINEER 2017 ADT = 1,146 VPD LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5166 = 0.147 mi. S T E V V A R T � aY ��^�� 50 25 0 5o i00 2037 ADT = 1,762 VPD �� ECOLOGICAL �� DHV = 12% LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-5166 — 0.023 mi. =y�� `°'' `"°""` ENGINEER[NG �,�� `�q� a PLAN$ D= 65% TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 6-5166 = 0.170 mi. znr2 sran•naHu srFcrFrcarroxs y� :� � 50 25 0 50 100 T=$% 'k ANDY YOUNG. PE srcNnzo,�: � � RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � � rao�Ecz Excrn�Esx ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER �, � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) *(TTST 4 o+DUAL�4H) APRIL 15, 2016 �� ° ° MICHAEL BURNS, EI �� .�� RURAL MINOR LETTING DATE: rno�scr nEs�cN sxciNssn �� pW�� 10 5 0 l0 2� FUNC. CLASS.= COLLECTOR TONY HOUSER, P.E. APRIL 18, 2017 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER �-cDor coNracr f,E SIGNATURE: Z 0 > � PERMIT DRAWING SHEET � OF 7 50� �� SCALE NOTE: ONLY ONE TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY IS PERMITTED IN THE STREAM AT ANY TIME BEGIN TlP PROJECT B-5/66 —L— POT STA12+00.00 : \'S\ SITE 1 \J \�\�S . � RSPAY RTEM) � ��`=J�� ,, ��\ \ m CLA55 B RIP RAP— -L- +45AC7 Esi l iON $O'CT & EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE aa cr R 15" WiEL80W5 F.-----------------�� —L— I Te TB �.___--_ F. —_----___—___` NOTE�. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED � PUE � PUE -L- +45.00 � 65' RT & sa Rr O � REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SLOPE (INCIDENTAL TO '. aEMovg�) . .. ..., ��J;�� l5" W/J / ELBOWS / CLASS B RIP RAP EST 1 TON 5 EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY SEE DETAIL 7 . - ,.S`/ S� � / O O Oo O � � + � � � C � +48.00 PAVEMENT—BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKETCH (NOT TO SCALE) RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT EST 145 TONS EST 165 SY GEOTEXTILE SEE DETAIL 2 �� — -g —__-- PUE � i � NAD 83 NSRS 2007 as�:L �� w000s TOE PROTECTION SEE DETAIL 5 CLASS B RIP RAP E5T 23 TONS EST 58 SY GEOTEXTILE c C 77; � 1 � ��---- - � ./ LRIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT / BERM DITCH J / EST 95 TONS SEE,DETAIL 3 EST 105 SY GEOTEXTILE CLA55 B RIP RAP SEE DETAIL 2 E5�'�t9 TONS BERM DITCH ESi,-146 SY GEOTEXTILE SEE DETAIL 6 4�� CLASS I RIP RAP '� STANDARD 'V' DITCH EST 90 TON SEE DETAIL 4 EST 183 SY GEOTEXTILE .� EST 1 TON FILL IN WITH CL4S5 II RIP RAP EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE AFTER REMOVAL OF EXISTING E5T DDE =14 CY INTERIOR BENT rF2 SLOPE = 0.3% (STR.PAY ITEM� DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 SPECIAL CUT DITCH RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT � H ��o s�oiel I Noi �o s<am� F,o�r to�m��,.-� p� o� Di�ch Ground z:l F\ �e SIoPe Dif<h 1.0'min. D Grode �� '� d Gao�e.nle Min. D- 1.0 Ft. GEOTEJRILE Type alLiner= CLA55 B RIP RAP Mox. d- 1.0 Ft. FROM STA. 18+55 TO STA.21+00 -L- LT Tvae aft��er= CuSs iixir wnP FROM STA. 17 +00 TO STA. 21 -i- 00 -L- RT FROM STA. 16 i� 40 TO STA. 17 i 00 -L- LT �ROM $TA. 16+50 TO $TA.17+00 -L- RT DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5 STANDARD 'V' DITCH TOE PROTECTION fNarro s�oial In �m s�io7 No��rol Na�ural O�� fii� Gro�nd z.� D 1.� Gro�nd GROUN� F�� SLOPE d d � cEolExmE ceo�e.nle Min. D=1.5 F. d= 1 Ft. Type of Liner= CLqSS I RIP RpP MaH. d� �1.0 Fi. Type of Li�er= C1A55 B RIP RAP STA.19-00 -L- RT FROM STA.18+00 TO STA.78+55 -L- LT STA. 19 - 63 -�- RT � N y .._ S�".i� _ ��' � / ., ��/ ��ys`/ sa tr �a'� `"'��/ 80' LT SPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL 1 CLASS 13 RIP RAP CLA55 I RIP RAP EST 720 TONS EST 23 TONS EST 356 SY GEOTE%TILE EST 50 SY GEOTEXTILE U R _____� � / PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5/66 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�M�LE E FLr1NS DO NOT USE FOA d W ACQUISITION �� STEWARI J �EN�INOEEIRNG DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED END TlP PROJECT B-5/66 -�- Por sra 2i+oo.00 � m i i �� . .�-h - y�� . � . / — � . , �r+'�Ee. .�... . .. / — R � � �"'' � � - � DUE , _ � =��r� � - . . . . ^U"Lr� � _ . BERM DITCH ��''-r'?LM � ��- � i,��; ` SEE DETAIL 3 � �. ��Z.f �,' CLASS B RIP RAP SPECIAL CUT DITCH �� EST 20 TONS SEE DETAIL 1 _ EST 59 SY GEOTE%TILE\ CLASS B RIP R.4P �� ' �.EST 195 TONS STANDARD 'V' DITCH E�T 582 SY GEOTEXTILE +... SEE DETAIL 4 � � E5T 10 TONS EST 25 SY GEOTEXTILE . EST DDE -22 CY $LOPE _ +/-19.0°o O 3 DETAIL 3 BERM DRCH 1�� s<oie) oa �E vAR 5.0' V 7.� D�P&. lo.o'v.C. d ceo�e.uie Min. �-1.0 Ft. Type of Liner= CL45S B RIP RAP MoK. d=1.0 FI. FROM STA.76+00 TO STA.19+40 -L- RT DETAIL 6 BERM DITCH �H ��o s�oial � O a w F y 5.0' S.0' V io.a'vc. �� pJP d Geo�e�tllv Min. D=1.0 Ft. DETAIL 7 TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY ino. ro scai � ELEV=36I.d CIASS B RIP RAP NG �' i __ NG__ GEOTE%TILE CLASS II RIP RAP �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER END BENT EXCAVATION SEE STRUCTURE P(ANS (57RUCTURE PAY /rEM! FOR -L- PROFILE.SEE SH£ET 5 � PROPoSED PAVED SHIXI[DER ALL ORNEWAY RADIIARE SUNLESS OrHEAWISE NOTED ON PUWS FOR STRUCfURE PLWS.SEE SHEETS S-ITHRII S-7 O � �. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 7 50� �� SCALE NOTE: ONLY ONE TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY IS PERMITTED IN THE STREAM AT ANY TIME BEGIN TlP PROJECT B-5/66 -L- POT STA12+00.00 1 �� ` �v . . �J I .. �ps ' � � ' \ . ..�"" ,-_�.r� � . __ .�_�� . I3iihcni�,. i ' �� ,� � �/ I�/, ��/ � �" / : � , \ SITE 1 - - :j�_.. ��\ �'1 \ -`..CLA55 II RIP RAP_ , ` �� -- - � ' �„ �STR. PAY ITEM) ..., ��r� � �.;.- � .,, .,, \ \ � \ � \ � � WDO�� ..\ � _ .. ' �. ,. �� .. � CL.4S5 B RIP RAP . �� -L- +45.00 Esi 1 iON SO'LT & EST 5 SY.GEOTEX7ILE - =.� 80' LT y�, U _ l\ � � 15" W/ELBOWS� � . F _ v _-�'�/- � / � � -L- I TR TB �____-_ F ^ ------------- \ �'., r��; ' \\\ \.� NOTE: NO DECK DRAINS REQ}JIR�D .. �- ___ - _ - _ - ! �� PUE � PUE -�` U PE- -L- +45.00 65' RT & sa Rr O 15" W/ 2 ELBOWS �.�- CLASS B RIP RAP EST 1 TON � � EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY - � SEE DETAIL 7 5� L=�" �`'��.� / O O Oo O � � + � � � C � +48.00 PAVEMENT-BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKETCH (NOT TO SCALE) m � i � NAD 83 NSRS 2007 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5/66 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER NC�M�LE�'E FLr1NS DO NOT USE FOA d W ACQUISITION �� STEWARI J �EN�INOEEIRNG DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED t = - _/; i i'!1��-/ �� _- �, � � - � �` - - - �- � �in �� _� -. �� ` - �/" � / /- �� / . . -__ `�.�-�5�-� . - � � � ��. �� . . - � / �SS'F�_ �� / S � � �+� - REMOVE EXISTING � - , �` r ,� CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION/ � _� + (INCIDENTAL TO STRUCTURf �/�� . � - �� ftEMOVA/L) '� ', .__ �lIlODS . / �f� {' �'� / � RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT -- � -- � EST 145 TONS .. ��.-t a[P RAP EST 165 SY GEO ILE EST 23 TONS SEE DETi�L 2� ... � -- - $p SY GEOTEXTILE �- _ -:. -'� � --- \- - � TOE�PROTECTION � �- - ` SEE DETAIL 5 UE �f � CLASS B RIP RAP E E5T 23 TONS � EST 58 SY GEOTEXTILE � �� i _ _ - - - .C.. : / �- - - � F _-.,-.,,. _ -� ._ - ._ �, �r � f `---� m � i . -. F � �= '� � � � /I/ m% �UE�� : .r `,� � ///� PUE ni �.- ` j '-RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT esr qs rqNs / EST�105 5Y GEOT£XTILE � SEE DETALL 2 �� ' � � � B M DITCH 1 % SEE DEfAIL6 � � ' CLASS I RIP RP.P _� � � EST 9R/40N EST� y83 SY GE( FILL IN WITH CL4S5 II RIY RAP � AFTER REMOVAL OF. EXISTING INTERIOR BENT 32 (STR.PAY ITEM� _ � / -L- +15.00 - � � ��/ - 50' LT & / 80' LT � _ � � .. - -- �� /// SPECIAL CUT DLL�FL _`� -�� / ' � SEE DETAIL 1 l / CLASS B R�Y RAP - j esr izo y6Ns � � END TlP PROJECT B-5/66 � E5T 35NSY GEOTE%TILE � -L- POT STA2/+00.00 � �/ m . _ _ .. .-�1 . -� ." ��--"J -% LBERM DITCH �'-r! SEE DETAIL 3 � � ��r / H / . ' CLA55 B RIP RAP SEECDET IL � DITG, � // BERM DITCH - -- EST 20 TONS � - � ' _ SEE,DETAIL 3 -� . 59 SY GEOTEI(TILE��`. ��SS 8 RIP R.4P ' � C1A55 B RIP RAP � f EST 195 TONS � / ESf"qi9 TONS - ------ STANDARD 'V' DITLH 2 SY GEO LE - . 5 ' ESfrl46 SY EOTEXTILE� - SEE.pETA1L 4 .� i -� � .-� . ES7 70 TONS - - � \ �� / � / � ��-SfANDARD 'V' DITCH - EST 25 SY GEOTEXTILE ' _ � � . � - - SEE DETAIL 4 �� . EST BDE =�22� CY � �� - {-�- � E5T 1 TON SLOPE _ +/-19.0"0 EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE O E5T DDE =14 CY 3 SLOPE = 0.3% DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 SPECIAL CUT DITCH RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT � H ��o s�oiel I Noi �o s<am� F,o�r to�m��,.-� p� o� Di�ch Ground z:l F\ �e SIoPe Dif<h 1.0'min. D Grode �� '� d Gao�e.nle Min. D- 1.0 Ft. GEOTEJRILE Type alLiner= CLA55 B RIP RAP Mox. d- 1.0 Ft. FROM STA. 18+55 TO STA.21+00 -L- LT Tvae aft��er= CuSs iixir wnP FROM STA. 17 +00 TO STA. 21 -i- 00 -L- RT FROM STA. 16 i� 40 TO STA. 17 i 00 -L- LT �ROM $TA. 16+50 TO $TA.17+00 -L- RT DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5 STANDARD 'V' DITCH TOE PROTECTION fNarro s�oial In �m s�io7 No��rol Na�ural O�� fii� Gro�nd z.� D 1.� Gro�nd GROUN� F�� SLOPE d d � cEolExmE ceo�e.nle Min. D=1.5 F. d= 1 Ft. Type of Liner= CLqSS I RIP RpP MaH. d� �1.0 Fi. Type of Li�er= C1A55 B RIP RAP STA.19-00 -L- RT FROM STA.18+00 TO STA.78+55 -L- LT STA. 19 - 63 -�- RT DETAIL 3 BERM DRCH 1�� s<oie) oa �E vAR 5.0' V 7.� D�P&. lo.o'v.C. d ceo�e.uie Min. �-1.0 Ft. Type of Liner= CL45S B RIP RAP MoK. d=1.0 FI. FROM STA.76+00 TO STA.19+40 -L- RT DETAIL 6 BERM DITCH �H ��o s�oial � O a w F y 5.0' S.0' V io.a'vc. �� pJP d Geo�e�tllv Min. D=1.0 Ft. DETAIL 7 TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY ino. ro scai � ELEV=36I.d CIASS B RIP RAP NG �' i __ NG__ GEOTE%TILE CLASS II RIP RAP �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER END BENT EXCAVATION SEE STRUCTURE P(ANS (57RUCTURE PAY /rEM! FOR -L- PROFILE.SEE SH£ET 5 � PROPoSED PAVED SHIXI[DER ALL ORNEWAY RADIIARE SUNLESS OrHEAWISE NOTED ON PUWS FOR STRUCfURE PLWS.SEE SHEETS S-ITHRII S-7 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 7 �� 25� SCALE Z O > � SITE 1 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5/66 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�M�LE E FLr1NS DO NOT USE FOA d W ACQUISITION �� STEWARI J �EN�INOEEIRNG DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 5 OF 7 �� 25� SCALE Z O > � SITE 1 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5/66 4 :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�M�LE E FLr1NS DO NOT USE FOA d W ACQUISITION �� STEWARI J �EN�INOEEIRNG DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 16+17/16+53 -L- Temporary Causeway 0.02 46 1 16+17/16+53 -L- Bank Stabilization < 0.01 88 TOTALS*: < 0.01 0.02 88 46 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: Temporary Channel Impacts are concurrent with Permanent Channel Impacts Permanent surface water impacts due to interior bent = 21 sq. ft. 2013 10 24 � V W 0 � � � � � � V � � 0 V See Sl�et 9-A For Index af Sl�ets See Sl�et 9-B For Conventfono! Sym6ols BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5lSS -L- STA12fG -- ro Nc s� �� GRA11tVILLE CQU11tTY LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.138 OVER GRASSY CREEK 011t SR 1300 (CORNWALL RD.} TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE � N�w sy NSRS 2007 END TIP PRQJECT B-5166 CLEARING 4N THIS PRQJECT SHALL BE TD LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. ro va srarF uNE � GOGYMEN7 NOT GONSI�ERm FINAL uN�ss ui sie�u►TURea eoM��ereo � "' �1f �"" � HI'DRAULICS ENGINBER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11i DATA PROJECT LENGTH 2017 ADT = 1,14G VPD �ENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT �51ei6 = 0.147 mi. S T EWART �a��°F�1� 50 25 0 50 lo0 2037 ADT = 1,762 VPD �(�GI��, 04 �oRry DHV = 1296 LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT �51G6 = 0.023 mi. �`�"' ��m'� mm GINEERING e�� cAo PLANS p= 650,�, TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT �51fi6 = D.170 mi. ~ T812 S75l11�4RL 3PBCCiFICA970NS p� + f= FI 50 25 0 50 l00 T= B% * RIGI�T OF WAY DATIs: ANDY YOUNG. PE 9 � rxcuacr � ROADWAY DBSIGII� BNGIIYE&R � a V= 60 MPH APRIL 15. 2016 " " PROFILE [HORIZONTAL] �k (TTST 4%+DUAL 4%) MICHAEL BUR�Nr�S,�EI ��r o a�° F � � � �w�� RURAL MINOR LBTTIXG D.4T& ia s o io zo FUNC. CLASS. = COLLECTOR APRIL 18. 2017 TONY HOUSER, P.E. PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER �°Or �`'� pg srcwx�n� BDUNDARIES �1ND PROPERTY State Line ----- ----- County Lina ---- ---- Township Line --- --- il� �I11B -- -- Reservation Lina — � — � — Properly Line Existing Iron Pin � Properly Comer —K Properly Monumeni � Parcel/Sequence Number iz3 Existing Fence Line -x—x—x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence � Proposed Chain Link Fance � Proposed Barbed �re Fence � 6cisting Wetland Boundary - - - -nB- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary �B 6cisting Endangered Animal Boundary E^� 6cisting Endangered Plani Boundary � 6cisFing Hisioric Properly Boundary � Known Confaminafion Area: 5oil � � Pafanfial Confaminafion Area: 5oil - � � Known Contamination Arsa: Water - � -- � Potsntial Contamination Area: Water - ,�? -- � Contaminated Sita: Known or Potantial 'r �% BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or WG Tank Cap o Sign � Wel I ° Small Mine 'Sz Foundation � Area Outline 0 Cemetary 0 Building � School � Church � Da m HYDROLOGY.• 5fream or Body of Wafer ---- ---- Hydro� Pool or Reservoir r----, Jurisdictional Str9sam —�S — Buffer Zone 1 ez i BuFfer Zone 2 ez s Flow ,4rrow �--- ---- Disappearing Sfream �--- ---- 5pring pr --•`_1-� - Wefland � Proposed Laferal, Tail, Head Difch � � �. False Sump �;_�,r� ��^ �� , �� s�� coNVENTioNA� PLAN SHEET SYIVIBOLS Noxe: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = SuBsurface Uaility Engi�reering R.4rr.noans• Srondard Gauqe RR Siqnal Milepost Switch RR Abpndoned RR dismantled RIGHT OF W1�Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with _ Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Cancrete or Granite RrW Mprker Proposed Control of Aacess Line with Concrete C/A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Aacess Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easemeni - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement— Proposed Permonent Drainage Easemeni — Proposed Permanent Droinpqe /Utiliiy Easement Proposed Permonenf Ufilify Easemenf Proposed Temporary Utiliiy Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � Orchard CSX 7R/WSPrylTiVfpM y,rF��.sr .0 �neyard 0 EXISTING STRUCTURES.• � � � � MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnal or Box CulverF Bridge �ng Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - � MINOR: 0 Head and End Woll Pipe Culvert � Footbridge lr:a'� �;L'/i1 E 7DE PDE PUE 7UE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin pnd Cap Marker � ROADS �4ND REIAT�'D FF4TURES.• Existing Edge of Povament --- FJCIStl11g CUfb --- Drainaga Box: Cafch Basin, DI or JB Ppved Ditch Guffer 5torm Sewer Manhola 5torm Sewer V s �LJ� l IIrV� POWER: 6cisfing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole 6cisfing Joinf Use Pola Proposed Joinf Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer lYG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole ll�G Power Line LOS B{S.U.E.'j lLG Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.') U�G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.•] — TELEPHONE: Proposed 51ope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed 51ope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp cR 6cisting Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T T T T 6cisting Cable Guiderail " ^ ^ Proposed Cable Guidemil ^ ^ ^ ^ Equaliiy Symbol � Pwement Removal � YEGET.4TION.- 5ingle Tree �i 5ingle Shru6 n Hedge � Woods Line �"'-'"'-'"'-'"'-'"'-' � � � � vmayo�d %'oN�.' ' caxc ww ( WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydmnt 11T Water Line L05 B(S.U.E*j 11T Water Line L05 C�S.U.E•] lYG Water Line L05 D(S.U.E"j A6ove Ground Waier Line lY: cowc �w lY Pedestal TV Tower �--------� lYG N Cable Hand Hole �� lYG N Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*j lYG N Cable LOS C(S.U.E.•� � lYG N Cable LOS D[S.U.E.*j g lYG Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) lYG Fiber Optic Cable LOS C{S.U.E.*j lYG Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*j • • O ►� r H 6cisiing Telephane Pole � Proposed Telephona Pole � Telephona Manhole OO Telephona Pedestal 0 Telephona Cell Tower .�, LLG Telephone Cable Hand Hole 0 LLG Telephone Cable L05 6 [S.U.E.*} - - - -�- - - - LLG Telephone Cable L05 C(S.U.E.'j ---�- -- LLG Telephone Cable L05 D(S.U.E.'j � LLG Telephone Conduit LOS B (S.U.E.•� — - - - -�_- - - - LLG Telephona Conduit LOS C[S.U.E.*}— ---��- -- LLG Telephona Conduit LOS D{S.U.E.•)— rc LLG Fi6er Optics Cable LOS B (S.U.E.*J — - - - -* �- - - � LLG Fi6er Optics Cable LOS C{S.U.E.•]— ---* ro- -- lLG Fi6er Optics Cable LOS D[S.U.E.*�— ��° GAS: Gas Vaha Gas Meter L1T Gas Line LOS B{S.U.E.'� L1T Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*} L1T Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*] A6ove Ground Gas Lina $ANITARY 5EWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanifary Sewer Cleanouf LYG 5aniiary Sewer Lina Above Ground Sanifary 5ewer S5 Forced Main Line L05 B(S.U.E."} S5 Forced Main Line L05 C(S.U.E.sj S5 Forced Main Line L05 D{S.U.E.•j MISCELLANEOUS: Utiliiy Pole Utiliiy Pole with Base Utiliiy Located 06ject Utiliiy TrafFic Signal Box Utiliiy Unknown WG Line L05 B(S.U.E.*} lLG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground 5torage Tank, Approx. Loc. - I4G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoerrrironmental 8oring lLG Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*j Abandoned According to Utiliiy Records - End of Information y Ivc wotar ---*�--- rv ----lVFO--- - - -lV FO- - rv ro • 0 0 m ,��— 0 u5T 0 � m AATU R E.O.I. rn � n � � � � � m � 0 � � ��. Op N �I �s� \ .I V :. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE lFfNAt PAVEMENT DESlGN7 C1 PROP. APPR�%. 1Y¢" ASPHALT CONCRETE Sl1RFACE COIIBSE� TYPE SF9.5A� AT AN AVERApE NATE OF 165 LQB. PER $p. Y0. PROP. YAR. �EPTH ASPHALT CONGNETE Sl1RFACE COl1RSE� TYPE SF8.5A� (�"z AT AN AVERAGE HATE OF 110 LBS. PEH SQ. Y0. PER 1 DEPTH TO BE PLACEU IN LAYERS NOT TO EICCEE� 71�" IN �EPTH. D1 PROP. APPROX. 9Y¢" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERME�IATE COIIRSE� TYPE I19.06� AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 89$ LBS. PER SR. Y�. PROP. YAR. OEPTH ABPHALT CONCHETE INTERNEOIATE COUR9E, D2 TYPE I7B.OB� AT AN AVERRGE HATE OF 774 LB3. PER SO. Y�. PER 1" �EPTH TO BE PLACEO [N LAYERS NOT LE$$ THAN 2L¢" IN UEPTH OR pREATER THAN 4" IN �EPTH. E1 PROP. APPRO%. 4" A9PHALT CONCRETE BA$E GOURBE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 458 LBS. PER Sfl. Y0. R BHOUL�ER BERM OUTTER T EARTH MATERIAL w ASPHALT WE09IN0 (SEE �ETAIL) NOTE: PAVEMENT EOOE 9LOPES ARE 1:1, UNLEB$ SHOMfN OTHERWI9E FULL �EPTFI PAVED SHOULDER 3'-0" 2 VARIES 4'�i" TO = 5'-5" c� � � 02 II El � ' ' DEfAIL SHOWING PAVING TO THE FACE OF GUARDRAIL d'-F d'-5" EDL =�-I �� U l�1 U � q. GRAbE TO THIS IJNE DETAIL SHOWING GUARDRAIL WITH SHOULDER BERM GUTTER USE SHOl1LDER BERM GUTfER AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: -L- STA.15+48.00 TO -L- STA.15+61.94 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB} LE -L- STA. 15+48.00 TO -L- STA. 15+61.94 ( EGIN APPROACH SLABj ( IGH ORIGINAL GROUND ��_ � �r 8' 6' 11' � 11' 6' [4' W/ Gltj u, I GRADE u, {9' VV/ Gltj 4, I POINT 4. Z Z e p � � G1 i C1 0� � �P .... " `--GRADE TO' THIS LINE `"` TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 -L- STA 12+00.00 TO -L- STA 15+72.81 BEGIN 6RIDG� -L- STA 16+95.19 �END BRIDGE} TO �- A. 21 +00.00 CE-L- i 3S' OUT-0UT [ll CORED SLAB UNITSj I _ 36'-10" jCLEAR ROADWAYJ 1' 1' 4'�' 11` � 11` 4'�� 1' 1' I � GRA�E 02 � ri � 02 I TYPICAL SECTION NO. Z -L- STA. 15+72.81 (BEGIN BRIdGE) TO � STA. 16+95.19 (ENd BRIDGEj CORED SLAB BRIDGE (SEE STRUCTURE PLANS7 4$8 Q AhIDSPAN DETAIL SHOWING METHOD OF WEDGING ON BRIDGE usE IN coNJUNC71oN WIrH TYPICAL sECT1oN No. 2 (SEE STRUGTURE PLANSj •••••• 42l Poyattm �I RalNph, NC �.�ro STEWART QRIGINAL GRQUND � i�i [� � BRG ii4 @ MI�SPAN PROJECf RffERBiGE NO. B-5166 IDAAWAY QESIGN ENGINEER SNEEf NO. 2A-1 �IENT �FSIGN ENGINEE0. �OGYMEN� MOT GONf1OEREO FIMAL YNLl56 ALL a16NA7URES OOMPLlTCU N z D � � � B L a � L t9 c9 u� m v �. BEGIN T!P PRQJECT B-5166 -L- PUT STAI2+0�0A0 i � ��., ..: �� _� �.+��r� .. _ ..�t:^.s.'h�,^i_r^+._.:,. i � b � _�; ��'�t.: C1A55 II WP A �:�`'. �•.- �,SfR PAY IISM \... n " _ _�� ClAtii B WP MP �EST 1 TON EST S SY GEOTEKIIL� �. i0'TAPER � �� \ CT.6 RT. � is• v�vaeows --r � F ��_� � :. .-�� .. � 4'FDP�`--4—�--�'-- @�� l— �II fi _ ' _ _I _ � Ol! ---�i�� atl F �---- � PUE � PUE � T6 NAD 83 NSRS 2007 g * � PROJECf RffERBiGE NO. I SNEEf NO. ENGINEER ENGINEE0. �� a �e. �� v�i�ae�r�� TEWART - oocuMFxr Mor �owsioeneo FiMu uN�ess w� a�oNwrurtes ooMr�er�o �,,u.,��" ` o r� �. _ �, ,a� RGMhQVE FXIS7ING '' " ' , .. . . . CONCREfE SLOPE PROTEGfIO�Y:�i�•'s.> . �!-�.vr„' _ _ �nN�o�a�r�u To sraucru� anir srecu� cur ortcH wr nnr �r r�a�w�Hr sff oeuu� i . �T 116 70N5 IXA55 6 WP RAP 50' LT �, 1- - 5au ��r i6c sr c�ohxn� � cuss i ar w�r esr izo roNs END TIP PROJECT 8-51bfi $EE �FfAll 4 EST S9 TONS EST 956 SY GE07IXTIIE �T $� s" �O7°�"� -L- Por sra2,�1�0o,oa ,5• Yb�� j . EIHONfS / ClAiS B RIP RAP ESf 1 TON ESf 5 SY GEOTQf1LE � 1 � f�m PAVEAfEHT -BRIOIGE REL4TIONSNIP SKETCH fNOT TO SCALEI BM •50 ` PUE � i� � - -�_ � RIP RAP AT EMB1INICMENf 67 95 iONB EdT 105 SY GEOTEXIILE sff oeru� z BENM DIfCN SEE DEfA1L 6 .. . G7AR5 I dP RAP EST 90 TON EST 163 SY GEOTEICf1LE RLL IN WfTH CUSR IIWP NAP AFfER REMOVAL OF F70S71NG IM9U0R BEIVT $i (SIR. PAY RFAy DETAIL 1 SPECVLL CUf �ffCH (wre smb n.M ► � � d� o c.�'°� Mn. o- �.o a Typs ef Ifnr� GlASS B RF RAP Mm�. d= 1.0 k RIDM STA 18+55 TO STA 41 +OQ � LT FROM STA 17+90 TO STA ZI+00 � 1[f TOE PROIECIION Sff DEfA1L 5 cuss a �ur w�r EST 49 TONS BEIIM IXTCM � $ff.DEfA1L 3 CIl35 B IUP RAP EST�19 TONS EST 746 SY GEOTEKIILE snwaun �r orrcri see o�rN� a EST 1 TON EST 5 SY GEO7FXfIlE E5f OGE -ld GY SIAPE = 0.9% oEra� z RIP RAP�E B�VKAAENf � Nrro se�q 77mn. Dlld� I.0' lA' �b aso,omu Typ oF Uwr- LIAES II A! Al1r DETAIL 4 DEfAIL 5 STAN�ARD N' GRCH TOE PROIECIION [Melb fid� [Ne�ro Srtl-0 Nm�rol NeuW FLL &OPE a ° "�e""° d � �� d= 1 R, AAin. D�1.5 R. T oF linw- ClABS I NIP NAP � d-1.0 H. Type aFliner� CIAiS 6 WP RM STA 19+DD � RT F0.0M STA 18+00 TO S7A.1B+Si k LT STA 19+49 � RT C 6ERM �IfCX �. �.t Sff UEGIL 3 G1A53 B WP IIAP ESf 70 TONS EST 59 SY CEOTE7Cf1LE suwo�,w � orrcH - $EE �EfAIL I EST 10 TONS ES'f 25 SY GEbTE]LIILE ESf UUE -22 CY SLOPE - +,U9.09G J �1 C . 5�:..� . . . . . . . . . . � � W ' � :..,;:'-qyrhjr�y'+"45,:r.... 7 � _ � -- ' s � 5U" HT n' �. V., SPECULL CLlT ORCH 50' AI +, �, �:. �. SEE DETAIL 1 � ry � ��1-r`+�._„� C7A55 B RIP RAP ' _.. E5T 195 TONS EST 582 SY GEOlEX11lE . . . . DEfAIL 3 BERM URCH �w'b so.W i e� �g� IUA'Y.C. d aw.e� AUM1O=IA F. T17r Y� li�w= CUSS B!I� W �� d.1.0 F. RqM STI�18+pp TO STI.19+d0 � R7 oEr,v� 6 BENM �fTCM �Nolb Sml� Z �� v a� 10-0'YC. d c.owar ►c�. o-i.o r�. rrw d u�..- cuss � er uv �. d-i.a n. iIOM STA17+00 TO STA1B+00 � 0.T 0 EHD 8EM EXCAVATNNi SEE 5TRULTIlRE PLAVS rsrr�ucruRe PAr RF�ri FOR 'L- PR(IFILE,SEE SffEET 5 O PHQADSEO PAVED SNWLD�R A!1 DRlVEN'AY RAQPARF YUNLESS OTHEAN7SE NOTED OH PYANS FOR STRUCiUldE PLAN.�SEE SHEETS 5-lTNAU S-T