The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160886 Ver 1_Application_20160912 Carpenter,Kristi From:Rivenbark, Chris Sent:Monday, September 12, 2016 12:13 PM To:Ridings, Rob Cc:Al-Ghandour, Majed N; Chapman, Amy; Eric Alsmeyer (eric.c.alsmeyer@usace.army.mil); gary_jordan@fws.gov; Hopkins, Joey; Koch, Thomas K; Carpenter,Kristi; Lauffer, Matthew S; Mellor, Colin; Murray, Christopher A; NCDOT Service Account - Roadway Design; Staley, Mark K; Wilson, Travis W.; Wilkins, Ronald B; Riffey, Deanna; Al-Sharawneh, Ahmad A Subject:Permit Application for B-4655, Wake County Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed The permit application for B-4655 has been prepared. The electronic copy can be viewed/downloaded at https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/ This email serves as our permit application submittal to the N.C. Division of Water Resources. Chris Rivenbark Project Development & Environmental Analysis Natural Environment Section North Carolina Department of Transportation 919-707-6152 office crivenbark@ncdot.gov 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27610 Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 Transportation September 9, 2016 North Carolina Department of Environinental Quality Division of Water Resources 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 ATTN: Mr. Rob Ridings NCDOT Coordinator F'AT McCRORY Governor NICHC>LAS J. TENNYSON Secretary Subject: Application for Section 401 Nationwide Permit 3 and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 277 over Black Creek on SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) in Walce County, North Carolina; TIP No. B-4655; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1006(40); Debit $270 from WBS No. 38455.1.2 Dear Sir, The North Carolina Deparnnent of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 60- foot, two-span bridge no. 277 with an 85-foot, single-span bridge on existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained on an offsite detoLir. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), stormwater management plan, permit drawings, and design plans for the above referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in ALigust 2015 and distributed shortly after. Additional copies are available at the NCDOT website: https://connect.ncdot. �ov/resources/�nvironmental/. This project calls for a letting date of March 21, 2017 and a review date of January 31, 2017. The project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available. Regulatory Approvals Section 401 Permit: We anticipate that a 401 Water Quality Certification 3883 and a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization will be authorized for this project. NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources. Section 404 Permit Under the current design, written concurrence is not required by the USACE. NCDOT will adhere to all conditions and descriptions in the attached Permit Drawings and Nationwide Permit 3 General Conditions. �l�lothing Compares�_ State of North Carolina I Department of Transportation � PDCA-Nahiral L,nvironme�t Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 I 1598 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted at the NCDOT website at https:/Iconnect.ncdot.gov/r•esoul•ces/Environmental/. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Deanna Riffey at (919) 707-6151 or driffey@ncdot.gov Sincerely, ''-^--- - - _ _ —��,,,_ ,� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. Natural Environment Section Head cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List o� WqTFA Office Use Only: i i oa Q� Corps action ID no. �,�,� a Y DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2Q08 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 277 on SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) over Black Creek 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Fuquay Varina 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g�655 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6151 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: driffey@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.562796 Longitude: -78.690015 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 2 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Black Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The land use is mostly forested with a few residential houses 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.3 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 227 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a two span, 60-foot bridge with a single span, 85-foot bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn Name (if known): Beth Reed Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. PJD package submitted 4/10/12 and PJD package (after field visit) submitted 6/13/12. Field Visit May 30, 2012. JD was not received from USACE. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T Site 1� P❑ T Fill Riparian � Yes � Corps 0.08 ❑ No � DWQ Mechanized � Yes � Corps Site 2� P❑ T Clearing Riparian � No � pWQ 0.01 Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.9 Permanent 0 Temporary 2h. Comments: Additional impacts —Duke Energy will be relocating 4 poles and the guy wires for poles. There will be <0.01 acre of permanent fill for poles and <0.01 acre impacts for hand clearing. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1� P❑ T Bank Black Creek � PER � Corps 30 43 Stabilization ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 43 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent 0 Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. � Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? 61 � P❑ T Bridge Impact Black Creek � Nos 985 625 62 � P❑ T Bridge Impact Black Creek � Nos 1,709 1,017 B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 2,694 1,642 6i. Comments: Impacts to wetlands in buffers total 782 sq ft. in zone 1 and 353 sq ft in zone 2. Duke Energy will be relocating poles in buffer area. The utility buffer impacts fall in the exempt category, which include 252 sq. ft of impacts in Zone 1 and 284 sq. ft. of impacts in Zone 2. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 25 feet longer than the existing bridge; the replacement bridge will be a single span, so no bents in the water; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade and alignment as the existing structure; the new bridge will have no deck drains or direct discharge to Black Creek. An off-site detour will be used during construction. See Stormwater Management Plan for addition information. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will implemented during the removal of the existing bridge and Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be employed. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: Im acts are minimal. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. See attached Jeffrey's Warehouse Mitigation Site debit summary 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: See attached permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Wake County, which includes red-cockaded woodpecker, Dwarf wedgemussel, and Michaux's sumac. The species received a Biological Conclusions of "No EfFecY'. Habitat for Michaux's sumac is found within the study area. A survey for the species on 10/13/15 resulted in no specimens being found. Northern long-eared bat has been added to the species list for Wake County. A programmatic biological opinion (PBO) has been issued for the species. The PBO covers projects in Divisions 1-8. The programmatic determination for NLEB for this project is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely AffecY'. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. �� "� ' Z4�6 �,UF Applicant/Agent's Printed Name � , —� Date Applicant/Agent s Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 1� Hi�;hWay North Carolina Department of Transportation �1 StOCY17W�1teY I ,,,,,..,�.., Highway Stormwater Program �_� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: B-4655 County(ies): Wake Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: TIP Number: B-4655 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 3/9/2016 NCDOT Contact: William Elam Contractor / Designer: Brandon Barham, PE - Ecological Engineerin Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Raleigh, NC 27610 Suite 101 Car , NC 27518 Phone: 919-707-6718 Phone: 919-557-0929 Email: belam@ncdot. ov Email: bbarham@ecolo icalen .com Cit /Town: Willow S rin s Count (ies : Wake River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet): 0.19 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Forest, agricultural, and residential Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.5 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11 ft lane, 4.3 ft shoulders, with total bridge width of 33.0 ft and total bridge length of 2@ 12 ft lane with total bridge witdh of 26 ft and total bridge length of 60 ft. 85 ft. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 6909 Year: 2037 Existin : 4822 Year: 2017 General Project Narrative: State Project B-4655 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #910277 on SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) over Black Creek. Bridge #910277 consists of 2@30' (Description of Minimization of Water concrete deck on concrete caps on timber piles with timber abutments. The existing bridge has horizontal deck drains that allow direct runoff into the surface waters. The Quality Impacts) proposed bridge at #910277 will be a 1@85' 33" box beam with 2'-6" caps and sloping abutments. The proposed bridge is located in Zone AE of FIRM Map number 3720069600J and was studied by "Limited Detailed" methods. The proposed bridge will provide more hydraulic opening than the exising bridge. Two stormwater outfalls are proposed which will be placed at a distance to minimize disturbance to adjacent wetlands. A Rip Rap pad will be utilized to dissipate the energy. No deck drains are required for the proposed bridge. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Black Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-45-02 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Sup iemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Other Stream Ciassification: None Impairments: None A uatic T&E S ecies? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse Pro'ect Includes Bridge S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) c m a � a � E L Q I l(1 � Q m / N � C � v L 0 i 0 � c m � c 0 L > c w vi � � � w � � U� ��. aa L �a. ..T mx oi o��. .� �O I � � V W 0 � � � � � See SheEt �-A For Irrdex ofi SheEts See SheEt �-8 Far ConveMlonal5ymbols — TO JOHNSTON COL �� N�� V�S��N �lF ]H[IG]H[�A�S wAxE coU�� LOCATIOK: BRIDGE NO. 277 OVER BLACK CREEK ON SR 1006 (OLD STAGE RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 8 � ayq5 PRELIb�TARY PLANS m Hor v� aaq memqvenma CLEARING ON TH15 PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMIT$ ESTABL15HED USING MEfHOD III. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. P"�61"d "+'� ��" � HYDR4ULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH 2017 ADT = 4 822 VPD �' � �°� �� °�,P�„� � LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4b55 = 0.172 mi. ,� � � �,� � �, � � n� 5�0 25 0 50 �40 2Q37 ADT = 6,909 VPD .� � z' LOGI{:AL " DHY = q% LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4655 = 0.016 mi. �� m �a GIIVEERING PLANS p= �flgb TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-d655 = 0.188 mi. � n'� ��5 p,& a � 5ip 25 4 5p 14p T= 3% * RIGHT OF WAY DATB: �DY YOUNG. PE ' ' � Y= 6fl MPH �� A RORDWAY DESIGIIT S11[GINEEIe � AAARCH 18.2016 PROFILE (FiORIZONTAL] *(TTST 1°� + DUAL 2%j MICHAEL BURNS, EI r 10 �5 4 10 z0 RURAL MINOR LSTTIXG DRT& �� m� �� FUNC. CLASS. = rR� COLLECTOR MARCH 21. 2017 TONY HOUSER, P.E. PROFILE (VERTICALj SUBREGIONAL TIER �°Or Q0�'�`� p$ smwaxrne� �- e, DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 DETAIL 3 DETAIL 4 SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH RIP RAP AT EMBANKfv1ENT SPECIAL CUT DITCH SPECIAL GUT DITCH � N � to s<ulcl I N�� 5«lel � � fo s (Nof o Scalel � No cale� 10'min. a fra F Front �,ai � o� r�u on�n nm�,oi � T` °� o�� No� on�n 7. 1' SIoPe 1.0'min. Z� .�e� Slopa Graund z:l �E\ �e� SIoPe ./ D F�Ne` Grade Go��d �� p F�° d D o u Min. D=1 Ft. Min.0-1 Ff. Gco�e.r�ie + 8-2 Ft. GEOTEXTILE Max. d-1 Ft. Typc of Liner= CLASS I R'i�Rop � Type of Line�= i3 �ONS,CL il R�p-anp FROM $TA. 19+20 TO S7A 22+75 -L- RT FROM STA.18+78 TO STA.21 ��.-90 -L- LT Geoie.��ie- zo z FROM STA. 10-73 TO STA.12-58 -Y- RT FROM STA.141-00 TO STA.Ib�l�65 -L- LT FROM STA. 18+66 TO STA. 18+78 -L- LT FROM $TA. 14+00 TO $TA. 15+77 -l- RT Y S�a 16 �r85 -L- LT � w,o= s cFs , . ,_, -- �o o.i FPs \� � ' � SPECIAL CUT DITCH _ _ �' � p t� � SEE DETAIL 4 . :'. CW55 I RIP RAP ,.., KRRL ENAN DIXON Q p � �� - EST 256 TON � DB 7557 POG 20 ; p__�f3 ..;., �,,..,, _... EST 415 SY GEOTE%TILE 4.� � €� � � \ ' ,. � 2SF0 �}. � �'ti�.:�� _.' GRAVEL_ � _ a €so p\ � � /a � �,� \ n, \ '� J . .. _. _ . fl �0 � /� . .. . woaos �� I I c � v � a Y � E a ISFD � C � Q t3 F3 .. .. .. _ � \I I I �✓ �: � ! P. BARD .. ,�a61PG 904I _�' JUDYOP. BARO DB 1205 PG 00-E- NOTE: REMOVE ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING ABUTMENTS AND INSTALL BANK STABALIZATION WITH CLASS II RIP RAP TO AREA SHOWN ON BOTH STREAM BANKS. USE IMPERVIOUS DIKE NCDOT STANDARD BMP ALONG $TREAMBANK TO DEWATER AND ISOLATE ADIACENT WORK AREA TO REMOVE THE ABUTMENTS AND INSTAIL BANK STABALIZATION IN THE DRY. THE PL4CEMENT OF THE IMPERVIOU$ DIKE I$ CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO REMOVAL OF THE ABUTMENTS AND INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP BANK STABALIZATION. ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING TIMBER PILES AND CONCRETE JACKET$ $HOUlO BE COMPLETELY REMOVED OR REMOVED ONE FOOT BELOW THE MUD LINE. 50' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE � DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 8 ET� PDE C —� _ CUT DITCH � SEE DETAIL 5 E\— E CLASS B RIP RAP EST 56 TON SPECIAL GUT DITCH EST 168 SY EOTEXTILE SEE DETAIL 4 CLA55 I RIP RAP BRICK �' EST 159 TON WELL�U'.t�_ EST 258 SY GEOTE%TILE m zssrco �� \ � � %� \ \ �'-�. SPECIAL NT DITCH � � � SEE DETAIL 3 f O \ �\�'—`� � JUDY P. BrtRD r^�'n� .^ � \ ... DB 8T61PC ' I C _... �� r �� 3aR0 .. . .. �,n_F.. l� w00D5 OGBLrtW FAAIILY LLC DB 95J0 PG 1137 DETAIL 5 DETAIL b �Hoii�sTolH BANK STABILIZATION ��i�cF Grode �o Follow INoflo Scole) Raodwoy Protiico F.a�i 3.0'min. ,o� ` on�n G�ound z:I O �F\o s� SIoPe ��NWS d Q Gcolcneile Min. �=1 F. GEOTE%TILE Type of Liner= CLA55 B Ri�Rap Max. d=1 Ft. FROM STA. 12+85 TO STA. 14+00 -L- RT Troe ol �'��e, � e�nss n xir xnr 1 FROM , TA 17+95 TO STA 18+22 -L- FROM �STA 18 I 49 TO STA 18+84 -L- 7 i_,_ N � RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT � W SEE DETAIL 2 2 � V Sta= 18�18-L-LT J � �to= lts CFS SPECIAL LATERAL V10- 10 FPS m BASE DITCH CLA55 II RIP RAP SEE DETAIL i (STRUCTURE ITEMJ ' �- r � � r� �- a'EY � � � � � � � �' M� � 1� � � � � �1� � 1� � � µ � � � � �� 1� � � � � � 1�� 'H . � � �� /' k `k 1E 1E I .K- � 1t N- 'k 1F 1t- VF 'k 1E � / �1t 'k� 1t � �1t ��. K' �1E � 1E � � � �` �1F � 1F 1` �` � � �1F � 1F �/ K ��C�: A5fr B �RIP R � � � Y'� � � � � � � �1F '� �t � �" � � �� YE � �k�. � k_ $ ,k � � K k � � � K-� 'k � 1t N- � �fK k � �, '.k/ �.. _�. E T 2 T�ON � k � 'F- k µ � � �t K- µ ��, ��. K- �� MEST�7 ,¢Y k- �1` ' k 1�' � M- k K 1E � 1e 1� 1E� M" � 1F ,� It' � ✓ µ � � � I µ � , GE�E�(tiLE� � ' k �� -� �L4S5 & RI�`�¢4P� � �. 1E � � � � �� ` I �� r� � � `� �� '• � �� `� � � '� �',� '� M�� r`a�rcYN � � � � � r�� I � � � `�� 'k � k �+20� � k �M-� � r- K � � � � � �k � EYT $`k '� � `� � � � � � . � �T � � � � f � . ,� � � �,� � � cSEo��rii€ `� v `�� `� ,� k ,� � � ,� �: � � � � ,� � � � � � � � , � �_ � 1 µs�T� � �K�`� � � � �r��" `�µso�s� � � ��-�`� � �."��'�� -�.—, *'� ` � � '� � _ "� �7' � � � � � � � � � '� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �p � \ \ u: �-� � * � - - C � --_ —_—___----_ — F � — ! � i ! z4" � �--- LL�i �i.:i� . R O \\\ . —/— f� �iii� i.. i , T6 2GI I , , � yq5 % i F --- F /� p� P — i___ i__—_ ` ..�.�—_— �— _ iY R ��__�j �S` ��\�,��I 1 �' / � �/ C TB e l ( �w� , �� ,s ,�N CLASS 8 RIP wQY \ \ � EST 5 TON ��S e NK $TABILIZATION GEOTEX�ILE ��'q�,� EST 1D50 TONS GLASS IIRIP RAP 00 '\� EST 200 SY GEOTEXTILE LT 40' LT 4" RCP-�III SITE 2 ��. �:NING JR .... _..,�.. .-�r1 2JI3 �5 � / k �� /' � J / �t � � ' � K F � 'f � I r � � f�' � �� k� � ., k " � � ,� � �` .,_ ..� LCLA55 B RIP RPP EST 3 TON EST ,� 5Y GEOTEXTILE \, ` CLA55 B RIP ftAP � � EST 1 TON EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE END BEhT EXCAVATION SEE STRUCTURE PL/uVS (STRUCTURE PAY ITEM) SPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL 3 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4655 4 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER I�RE]LIMIN R� IDLANS DO NOT UeE PO CON3T2UCTION ""`°` �ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING �ISBND ` --��u�- *� � �\ �. RETAI�f Exl�r=�. PAVEMENT-BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKEI"CH (NOT TO SCALE) BE6/N APPROACN SLAB END BRl06E —L—SYo.17+82+/— —L—Sto.18+78+/— VAR.PS. END � VAR.PS. SBG+36 I GRAU-350 � GRAU-350 TL-3 TYPE-III Q NPE-ill � TL-3 4' FDPS o —(/ — \ � �— \ No — N N \ / N \ N N O M � � O 4'FDPS ' ` FDPS nvE-m � TvvE-w GRAU-350 � GRAU-350 TL-3 `t TL-3 VAR. PS. VAR. PS. � END SBG+13 BEGIN BRIDGE —L—Sta.17+93+/— END APPROACH SLAB —L—Sta.18+89+/— N � � � v s a Y 3 i Q � a m � � � � 0 N C m E c 0 c w � � � � DETAIL 1 SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH �No��o s<ai�� _i � a r�u cro�� 7.� p F� He� Slope o u Min. D=1 Ft. + 8-2 Ft. � FROM STA.18+78 TO STA.21 ��.-90 -L- LT _�: � ��— �- � ��- � PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4655 4 DETAIL 2 DETAIL 3 DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5 DETAIL b ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS RAP AT EMBANKMENT GUT DITCH BANK STABILIZATION ENGINEER ENGINEER ��va+�o 5«iel SPECIAL CUT DITCH SPECIAL GUT DITCH �Hoim s�oie� �Har�o s�oie� (Nof�o Scalel �No�fo Scale� ��i�cF Grode �o Follow 10'min. fran� � Front Raodwoy Protilc� Fra�� 3.0'min. Di�ch � °� 0'�kh �.om��. Z, Ho��,oi � ti`°,��e� s'o� �°o��a z:� 'Ew�"` sioPe c°o��c z:� °F�os` sioPe 20, 95 IDIZEILIMIN IZ�' IDLAN3 Go��d �� F�° D � Nw5 � d d Q � DO NOT USE �O CONST2UCTI0� Min.0-1 Ff. Gco�e.r�ie Gco�cneile :OTEXTILE Min. D-1 FI. Min. �=1 F. GEOTE%TILE Typc of Liner= CLASS I RI�Rop Max. d-1 Ft. 7yPe of Liner= CLA55 B Ri�Rap Max. d=1 Ft. i3 �ONS,CL il R�p-anp FROM $TA. 19+20 TO S7A 22+75 -L- RT Geoie.��ie- zo t FROM STA.10-73 TO STA.12-58 -Y- RT FROM STA.141-00 TO STA.Ib�l�65 -L- LT FROM STA.12+85 TO STA.14+00 -L- RT Troe ol�'��e,� e�nss nxir xnr 18+66 TO STA. 18+78 -L- LT FROM STA.14+00 TO STA.15+77 -l- RT FROM ,STA 17+95 TO STA 18+22 -L- FROM � STA 18 I 49 TO STA 18+84 -L- OGBLrtW FAAIILY LLC � � DB 95J0 PG 1137 " � _ �-�� N �� ' N °T � OLOGICAL S�a. 16 85 L- LT �- � �� BETP w�o a2 crs � �� 7.;.,^ . � oe +: ��o= o.i FPs GINEERING �{� ,_.' J '� � �� RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT / d} W SEE DETAIL 2 �� W \ - � _ � V Sta 18+18 �- LT ' � ' �' _- SPECIAL CUT DITCH Y � pto- lts CFS -, - �\\ SEE DETAIL 4 S I T E I�� I `� �na= t.o Frs SPECIAL LATERAL \�\ �- �„� CLQ.55 I RIP RAP m BASE DITCH -�' .. .. \ �_�� ES 256 TON � CL455 IIR�P RAP \�\�� \._��—, -��; 11�,SY GEOTE%TILE \ (STRUCTURE ITEM) � SEE DETAIL i � // u- � � /� � � ] �.�� r �/ � � � �k v � � � � k�� ,NJ�_ //i \ � � � 4�" � � K� � � � � � �' i � ,3 �� \�� I ' / i� o�� ' / , � � � '� �� k .'�� - `� � � � � ��- � � � '� � � �� / � . � � . i h � � � x � � � �� '�.;'�,�' � � ' /x �� / � � •� � � ` \�. GRAV � � I � 9�+' K w c� A51# B �RIP R � � k � � � 1F µ � � � 1E " E �i . /�. � � � �- � � �- � �- � � ��' Q � �� .J � � � � � � � I � / � � � '� � � '� e51� rmH'� � ,� � �� - � �� r� � ,� � � � � � � � �� `� � � � �„� ✓ .�� Q I � €3 ,_� :��-� � /�� /,�� , � �sr�,�r v-� � s,� `� ,� � "� '� r� � � �' � � `� � � � � �" ,� � k�1 � �, p �� .�t �� ' � � . ,i l i�� '; / I� � � � c�,FExti�e � k �� v. �k . `� � � � ��.s� �u�ss � RiWign.p�' �. � � � � � w; � � , � � ., � ' �` '� r , ,� �j � � �- �5r 3�1dN � '� � '� � � I ' � . ' . ''� I � ! �� ' � � 1 / �l i j' � � � .� ,� �� ,- 4� ir�, 4 ' � �,� " ,� � �+zo� � k,� � �F � � � " � �� egr� s� � � � ,� ��'�� `� � � '� ,� 'h I , . . � ' LT� '�� H-� � � r 1 � � � 1t� �� lSEO F�TIL'C � u-� �� , x �t ^ ISBKD ` p 1� Kk � µ$ Tk K y . , '�. 1� �5"�NJ/��1� '` . K µ �� k �F��-µk � .-�\ _ /'� � u „ '� , 1 1� M- �E�BOWS � r � � � . .�F , N l PDE � � � k � � k � �� k ra. ��j 24}_— E — - � . � ° � � �. ' �k � .. � � � � � �- y - v� i —��c YE ,� — . r„ -- * �- `� � + r �- , � � �,� � � P � � — -- — r,�� _ � �� .�.�_�� `�,�.-:. 18, _,:. :� �iYT'..� \\��__ *� i,*� k��.lJI �—_ � — �—_—_— K�--_ � C4„ �\ RETAIN =rW�—�\ ` C F 2 wc �F u�ii� �.ti_ � � Enno R � \ � F . — T6 7GI � f_. �t.� � - � - .»�' TB 2GI ... _.;-�_ .. F� - --- � � i C / I—� _`'_"`y-�-,."a -,. - �'�--A 'di�-L-`tP-i.rft�� __ i.a x„1_ _.— s--- —i-----�-----i--�� I �� _ --� . _ . . . — TR� , / / / wz . "9'� — ,� F %"�— �.��u , , � _ - C � - �� .. � � � � � l � �., ... --- x"� �-�� _ � i F F � � �. . � �v � — - _.� � , _ �� . i � R � R �� — _ .a . / CU7 DITCH �_ _ C � � � �` ". / �' �� saecinc C�rY�oircN � ,� � , see oelni� s E � p F � P PUE � PU i��I see oe�/.0 a , � / i� / .' CLASS 8 RIP RAP 'r , / � � � / rv � U /� EST 56 TON SPKIAL CUT DITCH � i PUE % I i . � �- � � � � / esT iea sv�c�o exn� see oerni� 4 M � u, �� s � s. :��1 '" ,� ,�� ,� I ; � I/ / / // / � / �� CLASS I RIP RP.P 1 Q I � . � I � � ' �- � IC V . EST 159 TON �w�a � �K �'� � � � � I � � / , ' � y�"�u�� EST 258 SX GEO�EXT m C � Te\ ( k k, K LL � �t � / ' ' � 0 '� � �' � . / -, � \ JUD P. BARO � � � �� '� DB 05 PG 00-E' � � �. . � ' ` �� I I � ✓s ��15 � � CLA55 B RIP RAP � � '� ( /- ` / J N ; � ,'f � . \� i � � l /: �.� l � / EST 5 TON ��JS e/ �\ NK TA8ILIZA� N �\ � EST 3 TON �. ... j , . .. J� / j 258K� CLASS 8 RIP P � / II \ EST 10 SY � V _ �/ `� '� S O GEOTEXTILE ��/// r� NOTE: \\ / / K- � GEOTEXTILE �" �, EE DETAIL 6 IO � � � � 'flFF,� E5T l50 TONS GLASS II RIP RAP � �� \ / � , / � ��- / I�`� +00 '\ � EST 200 SY GEOTEXTILE .�04s'ii E.AfIO LYI7NE�E.OAKLEY � �� /�� REMOVE ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING j �� \� :� � / µ� 63� �7 ti �B P904 PG 168i � _—� � �� ABUTMENTS AND INSTALL BANK �-'( PJBARD STABALIZATION WITH CLASS II RIP RAP TO � �'� �SPECIAL CUT DITCH I 40' LT CLA55 B RIP RAP � �'a61PG 90 , AREA SHOWN ON BOTH STREAM BANKS. USE � �/ ��SEE DETAIL 3 / � � N� � 24" RCP-�III EST 1 TON � I . IMPERVIOUS DIKE NCDOT STANDARD BMP j // ��/ � �' � EST 5 SY � ALONG $TREAMBANK TO DEWATER AND ISOLATE �� .� � / S I T E �� .. .- .. .. � ABUTMENTS AOND ANSTALL BANKOVE THE /., l�,jAj i \'".� / / `. . GEOTEXTILE / . STABALIZATION IN THE DRY. THE � / / �4 � �-- JUDY -B�A /�. . � , . PL4CEMENT OF THE IMPERVIOU$ DIKE I$ DB��6PG�0��' � � CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO REMOVAL OF THE ' ' � �� j �/ . I / ABUTMENTS AND INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP � � % �� . / i 7 BANK STABALIL4TION. � � -� - ,aI' � \ j ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING TIMBER � �/ / / ��/ / � � / PILES AND CONCRETE JACKEfS $HOUlO BE � � �j � Wpp � COMPLETELY REMOVED OR REMOVED ONE FOOT � � �� ae�ow me nnuo uNe. � F OO PAVEMENT—BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKEI"CH � � � . � ��- �_ � (NOT TO SCALE) 50' 0' 100' � JOSEPH M. DENWNG JR \ �- ' � A_ DB 8562 PQ 2JI3 � t,.�.� � _ � . GRAPHIC SCALE � . � � �,\ � DENOTES MECHANIZED \ I CLEARING � �li�� ( �� DENOTES IMPACTS IN \ . I,�I WOOD � SURFACE WATER �.3ARD � oa \\\ � I \` � � DENOTES EXCAVATION . � I' I _ IN WETLAND / PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 8 ,� � Yi�/�/ .. __-____. � / / hl � / / / i �,�/ / � � �j �_ �- � � / �/� _� I�/ ;;%„i �, � �_ � �� - ,�,; � � I `�° � =_� -�, END BEhT EXCAVATION SEE STRUCTURE PL/uVS (STRUCTURE PAY ITEM) �5 � BE6/N APPROACN SLAB END BRl06E —L—SYo.17+82+/— —L—Sto.18+78+/— VAR.PS. END � VAR.PS. SBG+36 I GRAU-350 � GRAU-350 TL-3 TYPE-III Q NPE-ill � TL-3 4' FDPS o -(/ - \ � �— \ No - N N \ / N \ N N O � M � � � O 4'FDPS ' ` FDPS nvE-m � TvvE-w GRAU-350 � GRAU-350 TL-3 `t TL-3 VAR. PS. VAR. PS. � END SBG+13 BEGIN BRIDGE —L—Sta.17t93+/— END APPROACH SLAB —L—Sta.18+89+/— N Z O � �Z�- o, z50- SITE 1(16 + 9G TO 18 + 23 —L— LT} GRAPHIC SCALE • �� •T• r• +•�•�•� _•_•_• � �►�'''�'�+�I�h�il��.�,� �ii�'� �.. �' ,��il�I;'�I ��'�- � �� v %101�:_;�~-:�. :�_ r �� 125' 0' 250' GRAPHIC SCALE �� a+ 6o To 21 + 89 —L— LT) — ------- � --�— � ----_ L�------ �— + � R ,,� � � SPECIAL CUT DITCH �I sFF n�reii � '25' °' 25°' SITE 2{20 + O6 TO 21 + 99 —L— RTj GRAPHIC SCALE SITE 2 (19 + 57 TQ 19 + 72 —L— RTy 375' 0' 750' GRAPHIC SGALE SITE 2 (18 + 58 TO 18 + 63 —L— RT) I500' 0' 3000' GRAPHIC SCALE PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 8 �---- — ' � SITE 1 �18 +49 TO 18 + fi5 —L—} 375' 0' 750' GRnPHIG SGnLE SITE 1 (18 +12 To is+�� -� � 375' 0' i50° GRAPHIC SCALE PROJECf RffERENGE NO. SNEEf ND. 8,4655 5 ,OAAWAY PBIGN NYPRMJIlCS ENGINEER ENGINEE0. PRELIbIIN RY PL�iN5 m�� .�� „ �, ��u� t , a u�� * • w +� DENOTES MECHANIZED r'�r* �� r CLEARING �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND z O � � �`' 1� , � � .,., >1�5�'�T � � � 1� r � � � � � r � � � �- '� �- � !� _, - � -� '- I -,� *'� � * _.. F � --------- :` I _. — � I 125' 0' 250' SITE 1(16 + 9G TO 18 + 23 -L- LT} GRAPHIC SCALE � � � � � � r � � �. �r� . . � l� .T.�� ---- � , � , � _�.' � A •;.i �! - . 125' 0' 250° GRAPHIC SCALE ��3U�/$ � � � � lE � k= ,, '� 1� T` � � I� � � � � ,y � 1� � � � � ,. !� . 11� . � +� � � � � � „_ I� l PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 5 OF 8 --��-- ---- -----� ------- -- ,_�-- �,__---------- � - ` ` � r.�., _ : �� ...I S TE 1(18 + 60 T4 21 + 89 -L- LT) SITE 1�18 + 49 TO 18 + fi5 -L-} - ------- � --�- � ----_ L�------ �— + � R ,,� � � SPECIAL CUT DITCH �I sFF n�reii � '25' °' 25°' SITE 2{20 + O6 TO 21 + 99 -L- RTj GRAPHIC SCALE SITE 2 (19 + 57 TQ 19 + 72 -L- RTy 375' 0' 750' GRAPHIC SGALE SITE 2 (18 + 58 TO 18 + 63 -L- RT) I500' 0' 3000' GRAPHIC SCALE 375' 0' 750' GRnPHIG SGnLE SITE 1 (18 +12 To is+�� -� � 375' 0' i50° GRAPHIC SCALE PROJECf RffERENGE NO. SNEEf ND. 8,4655 5 ,OAAWAY PBIGN NYPRMJIlCS ENGINEER ENGINEE0. PRELIbIIN RY PL�iN5 m�� .�� „ �, ��u� t, a �� * • w +� DENOTES MECHANIZED r'�r* �� r CLEARING �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND .......... .......... ...�..x.� ... .. . .......... .......... .......... ■u�ur�r- ■uuu�� i ■uu�u� ■ ■ ■�■ ■�■ �■ ■��■ ■��■ ■u�u�u■ ■u�ur�� ■ ■uuuu ■ ■uuuu ■ ...�...�.. ... ... .. :::::::::: :::C:::C:� .......... .......... .......... ■u�uuu ■��■ uuuuu .................. � .................. ....... ........ .......C........ ■ ................. .................. �C................ ■u�uuu��uu ■��■ ��uuuuuuuuu WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY Surtaceandwetiandaackage: WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 16+96 to 21+89 -L- LT 1@ 85' 33" Box Beam w/ 2'-6" Caps <0.01 0.08 1 18+20 to 18+60- L- Bank Stabilization <0.01 43 2 18+58 to 21+gg -L- RT 1@ 85' 33" Box Beam w/ 2'-6" Caps <0.01 TOTALS: <0.01 0.09 <0.01 43.00 Re�.isetl 3/31/OS � �- � m m m C � � L N + L� � m i � T 2 � � lG R m / N � C � v L 0 � 6 � C m E C 0 L y w � � � � �o UL � ��° a6C pL0 �� T� O/ � v�n r � � � � � V W 0 � � � � � 5ee 51�et 1-A For Index of Sh�ets See Shaet �-B For Corn�entloRal Symbols � ra �ayNsroN coc ��1 ]l�� A \ �� 1 ��A\ 1 � ll/��A �I �JL � ��1LJL 7■ � JL � WAKE C�U11tTY LQCATIOK: BRIDGE NQ. 277 OVER BLACK CREFK U11t SR 1006 (OLD STAGE RD.) TYPE OF WORK: GREIDING, DRAINAGE, PAVIII�G, AND STRUCTURE BUFFER INIPACTS PERMIT [`ITC 7 � I � BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 w� �e� PRELIMINARY PLANS m �or v� so� cm�eravcnar CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING MEfHOD III. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. �� R � � � rimivaLres ffivcr�.sx GRAPHIC SCf1LES DESIG11f DATA PROJECT LE11fGTH 2017 ADT = 4,822 VP� ' ` { , �=.,� � ��a:�� LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJEGT B-4655 = 0.172 mi. , � t�, �� ,' �,,, 50 5 50 1 U 2037 ADT = 6,909 VPD �ENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4G55 = O.OIb mi. � "° No DHV = 996 I �� . �� PLANS TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECf B-4655 = 0.788 mi. zan sz'ahm�uan srBcn'Rc,+rra�vs p$ � � � _ �a% �o �s Q sa iQo T= 3% * ANDY YOUNG, PE � � � � i RIGAT OF WAY DATIs: ��r sxcn�t ROADWAY DBSIGN E1ITGINEER � V= GO MPH MARCH 18.2016 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) �k (7'TST 1% + DUAL 296j MICHAEL BURNS. EI p� �� TRA �p �fl �o FUNC. CLASS. RURAL MINOR LETTIII�G DATE: � � Q ' ' COLLECTOR TONY HOUSER, P.E. SUBREGIONAL TIER MARCH 21, 2017 PROFILE (VERTICAL} xt�or coxrAcr Pg src�usrnee: i O � `►-1 oer,v� i DEfAIL 2 SPKUL IATEML BItiiE DRCH p�p p�y}��i �j�M DEfAIL DETAIL 4 f� oRCH �nab swy INrm aoaq SPECIM CIIT �IfCH SPfiCIAL LlR �ITCH Na�, �„y � num s.rM � f No�b sd.l � �� a"d'r�i� °'. R„n iam�. FI Y�di Oidi .... . o '� I� aon � i.nm r � �0w p �°P' �,,,, p a°^' ' o d d a �. o-i �r. w�. o-i a. ^ -. c.d.nb �w�. o-i n. B=4 k. GFO�E MYa O-1 k. �, d-1 R. Type ofllrr= C1A66 II�-IOOP A�.d=1 R. T oFlimr� CIASS 6 PiP-�P FIIfJM STA 1B+7a T4 STA 71+90 k Li T�T° a�"" �� 7D�,� ;� F OM STA 10+79 7O STA 17+SB Y R�T pppµ STA 14+00 70 STA.16+95 � L7 FROM SfA 12+85 TO SfA 1�+00 k 0.T FROM STA 18+66 TD STA 18+76 � LT FROM 3TA.14+U0 TO 3TA 15+77 � RT samn � GK�I�fI�E *rw a u�..= cusa n ar �ar PROJECf RffERENGE NO. SNEEf ND. ENGINEER ENGINEE0. y95 PRELIbIIN RY PL�iN5 �� m aavr os cm�rnvcr�r � ,. ;fJ � •� ��"�' ., ,� ,� �" u ��tigu,. � 0 �OF�197� � �� pro icxno° �e°' ,,9 ��n .. SId� 16+i5 k Lf .� pp � ... . �,•� M o . . � w; � � .,. ,k . , �s ,1 � � t >', � - OIa- aa crs < .� .. . . YIO- 07 F!5 ' . ' IIIP RAP AT FM&�NKMEN� A �'' � "� �� A � � Sff OEfAIL 2 � SPECIAL CIlf DIfCN � � � 4 CEl/SS I WP RAP .r FAR 61iW m{tll [y Q� O� FST 256 TON � T$T� p�\ i� C} — �L3 q, y,:.,,,,,, 6T �15 SY GEOTFXTILE .. "wJ Py ��t�� . -:f. . � , ` -- r -- -- L �� , raaos �Fo a � p O €> Fo p i. „" -, .::'t;:;, `''' .` rq�— � ^ � �R+t2~--` *°G � �r . CS �� ,� 't3 Q Sy 4y ;.L� � .� 4 � � � y. s Q �^...... �- _ � � _ � � � air o cr+ — SEE DEfAIL 5 � OASS 9 RIP RAP esi s6 7oN Esr ibs sr �Ees 6 I "� rtF.11 Rgr,6;�,-�z� "nb SITE I(17+55 TO 18+20 —L— LT) ..��. .� ��'�'�t� ��i�� , �Z�� t' :L'�' � {�s..... .,.....• = � ��;'::::::!•, : '�:��;N::'::':.:.:.' r,-....,.,.,.,. 1�11+1N\1\1\ . /y/ �`�+��.+- y � ui �• �iiiu � 7�7�l.�» .�ri✓/ l��.., - i�i��i�ii'�1%�% � %�/%��I �� • / � SPECLLL tXlT 6RGF1 � � �- see oEw� � Cl/SS IRIP RAP �� f 15q TON ESf 258 SY GEbTEA'f1LE .':y,SPECVLL CllT DRCH GETAIL 9 SITE 2(1�+94 TO 18+�6 —L— RT) � � � � � ab.= ie+�a � �T . S I T E I- J� no_ A �� u,�� iilSE ORCX . M45 II RIP MP SEE DEdIL 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 , . {5TRllCRlRE IIEM) . ,Y•„�." � � � F �klt � 1E � lt � 7t �kp� F M � � M` � Ik K`1tr�� k � � � � � YP �1V 1F � 1k �1t � � 1t �5t IF lk � Y� � Vt � 1t � N� M 14� 1F � 1� 1t M 74 lF k IF It Ik lE lF 1t lk �k / � � rtw � �, �'eo- � � rrw �r � w w � �rw w �r � � w �r� x� � µ� � � 1� c�s� B YU M' � �t k� � y� w M' � k�1� �' 1r w N� � ��W � 1t � � ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 ��r '� �r �r �o� � �� +� "� � '� � w�r ��' w � w � w � � ��'��' w � � � w "� � r��w �j �� w � �� w �C Ik � '�� +� � � ��r � � w ��'�f �� x� � � w � • � �w � va � w� w � r� w � �� '� � w�"�w�� w �I �� `� � � i� � �r w�� +� � w� � �1�"�r��` � ��w�` � ��r�� w � �x �' � w k, y ��„ , � � �r T w�.- � � �� w- r� N � �r �� w � � �r � � � � �� w� r� � w g ws e�� w �r �w � w w �r � � � a .,�� w � � � �\ .1PDE .y- f � � �'�, w w w� �� w w � +� � � � �r '�� w �`� w .. �„� � ' -�-k:.� �k�� .J,aa�..�` � -- � � . . �+' �— F� �— �. -- �� ! ` i ' �� rNn I�.. �_vF ` / F + / F� ' y P � � � � 1 I 1 � �, � � �U155 6 WP A�P��. \ � � � . ESf 5 TON � � K STA911JZkTIDN i � GEDTFXf1LE �� E UEfAII 6 '�� +� ESf 150 TONS CIISS II WP RAP � � \ ESf i00 SY CEOTE7Cf11E ypx, 63' LT I� 40' LT �t� u•�� SITE 2� . C� • � � / � • �-- 'v ..r��r��r�a..a� r'n.':i>iir%iriiiri�'>ri�'>� ; v.� a �«««««««««• .� iri)iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii v.�«t�«t��.....��• .��<�i�� «iii �` ♦ ..............,�: :.. •�`✓�`�n ;:::::`:::::.`: : ii: yr?� ��:'i l��ii�i,iii _%�•_;i� �-��— ��'� r r i��s�t♦ �♦��r� ��1� � C �'� �SPECIAL M DIfCX w� SEE DEfA1L 3 � f 1� � � 1k i .. .. r � �t �� ° iF�� t � Y`�.�16 � Fo.- �v+ss � xr cus5 e u� ItM o,o- a� crs EST 3 TON Y�0- 0.F Rd EST 10 SY GED7EXIIlE s�.' : CL�4$ B WP MP EST 1 TON EST 5 SY r,EoiFxn� BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 4 50' �' 100' CRAPHIC SCALE iso� o� 300� IM5ET CRAPHIC SCALE PAVEAfENT—BRIOIGE RELATI�NSNlP SKETCH fNOT TO SCALE) �EAW APPAOACH SLA9 END BRIl,1f�E -c� ►t�r�2+i- -c� ►a+�a+i- v�wPs SBG+36 v,�.p.� GNAlH350 R'1 GNAU-.i50 7� II �, ME-III 7� *'FqpS —L— � � � 5 �� ,vr�ni � ,rnwn cxnu-3eo 5 7L-S � 7L-S v�w.Ps. v,�P„� END SBG+13 s�x e�ra� -L�lf�►93t/- ENU AP?RiDACH SLA9 -L-SYa ��h99+/- BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT ROAD PARALLEL ZONE1 ZONE2 TOTAL ZONE1 ZONE2 TOTAL ZONE1 ZONE2 SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE / TYPE STATION (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ftZ) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) 1 1@85' 33" Box Beam w/ 2'- 17+55 TO 19+21 -L- LT X 528.0 625.0 6" Ca s 1 1@85' 33" Box Beam w/ 2'- 1 �+77 TO 18+82 -L- LT X 457.0 6" Ca s 2 1@85' 33" Box Beam w/ 2'- 16+94 TO 19+03 -L- RT X 980.0 1014.0 6" Ca s 2 1@85' 33" Box Beam w/ 2'- 14+35 TO 18+74 -L- RT X 729.0 3.0 6" Ca s TOTAL: zssa.o 1642.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rev.Jan 2009 � C � � ' I' . �� " I' I ��: C�) I ��' \ (!) I'� " I' I I t � . �� I'� C�) I . I \� . �� II�I �'I�IC�)\ C�)I�� I—I I� a�I I`��.�� "� WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER 11VIPACTS PERMIT BEGIN TIP PROJECT -L- STA.12+85.00 STP�TE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. LQCATl�11t: BRIDGE 11tD.277 aVER BLACK CREEK D11t SR IQa6 {UI�D STAGE RD,) TYPE OF W�RK: PDW�R DISTRIB UTID11t, TELEPH011�E A11 tD CABLE TELE TlISI011 � REL O CA T1011 t � To �aHNsron� couNrY___��"-__fi___—_—______ CLEARING 4N THIS PRQJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL B4UNDARIES. GRAPHIC SCAI�ES 5a �5 a 50 �oo PLANS 50 25 0 50 100 PR4FILE {HORIZ4NTAL� 10 5 0 10 20 PR4FILE {VERTICAL) UTILITY OW1I�ERS 411t PRDJECT (A) DUKE E11tERGY (POWER DISTRIB UTIDN) (B) CE11tTURYLINK �COMMU11tICATl011tS) (C) TIME WARNER CA.BLE {CABLE TELEYISID11t) SITE 1 INTERNATIONAL Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600 Cary, NC 27518 919�63-5488 UTILITIES COORDINATION CO11tS ULTANT Brandy Creech SHEET NO. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 3 —� ----- T0 END TIP PROJECT -L- STA. 22+75.00 PREPARL�D IN THE OFFICE OF: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS UTILITIES UNIT UTILITIES E11 tGINEERIII tG rsss � s�vrcEs cEx•r� R.9LEIGH NC 27b99—ISSS PHONE (919j 707�690 FAX (919) 250-4119 1 Roger Worthington, P.E. UTILITIES SECTI411t ENGI11iEER Carl Barclay, P.E. UTILITIES SQUAD LEADER PR4JECT ENGINEER Carl Barclay, P.E. UTILITIES PROJECT DESIGNER / 0�1 C WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Design (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (m) U1 -L- 21+71, LT GUY WIRE <0.01 <0.01 U1 -L- 19+58 OH POWER/TV <0.01 TOTALS: <0.01 <0.01 Guy Wire located in wetlands = 4 sqft Revised 2/03/05 � • � C � � ' I' . �� " I' I ��: C�) I ��' \ (!) I'� " I' I I t � . �� I'� C�) I . I \� . �� II�I �'I�IC�)\ C�)I�� I—I I� a�I I`��.�� "� � To �aHNsron� couNrY ___�� `� BUFFER IIVIPACTS PERMIT L�CATI411t: BRIDGE 11tD.277 DTIER BLACK CREEK 011t SR 1006 �DLD STAGE RD.} TYPE OF WORK; �'OWER DIS�'RIB UT�O�, TELEPH011tE A11tD CABLE TELET�ISI�11t REL�CATI�11t I:��ll►►� �,_.. '�: ��al ��:�:�•�•� STP�TE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � BU FFER DRAWI NG SH EET 1 QF 3 - - � 8�95 NAD CLEARING 4N THIS PRQJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL B4UNDARIES. GRAPHIC SCAI�ES 5a �5 a 50 �oo PLANS 50 25 0 50 100 PR4FILE {HORIZ4NTAL� 10 5 0 10 20 PR4FILE {VERTICAL) UTILITY OW1I�ERS 411t PRDJECT (A) DUKE E11tERGY (POWER DISTRIB UTIDN) (B) CE11tTURYLINK �COMMU11tICATl011tS) (C) TIME WARNER CA.BLE {CABLE TELEYISID11t) INTERNATIONAL Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600 Cary, NC 27518 919�63-5488 UTILITIES COORDINATION CO11tS ULTANT Brandy Creech �0 NC 42 � PREPARL�D IN THE OFFICE OF: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS UTILITIES UNIT UTILITIES E11 tGINEERIII tG rsss � s�vrcEs cEx•r� R.9LEIGH NC 27b99—ISSS PHONE (919j 707�690 FAX (919) 250-4119 Roger Worthington, P.E. UTILITIES SECTI411t ENGI11iEER Carl Barclay, P.E. UTILITIES SQUAD LEADER PR4JECT ENGINEER Carl Barclay, P.E. UTILITIES PROJECT DESIGNER w z / � � � � 1 1 � � � 1 � � � � � • � � � � � � � � � � . . � � � � � � : � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � • i � � _ _____- � � � � _ _____- _ _____- � � � � i � i _ _____- � � � � i • � � i � � _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- _ _____- � � � �� _---- Buffer impacts on this project fall under the exeption status per Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules Site 1 Exempt Zone 1= 131.9 sqft Zone 2= 113.1 sqft Site 1 Exempt Zone 1= 120.1 sqft Zone 2= 170.8 sqft Totals Zone 1= 252.0 sqft Zone 2= 283.9 sqft