Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0085294_LV20160178_20160909— JUSTIFICATION FOR REAUSSION REQUEST Case Number: LV -2016-0178 Assessed Party: Pavillon International Permit No.: NC0085294 County: Polk Amount Assessed: 5362.94 Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the "Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B -282.1(c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors apply. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed). (a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B -282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil penalty assessment document); (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation (Le., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future occurrences); AZ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for); (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; (e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance). EXPLANATION: ,d,u-le-c�-e c .,A STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY OF POLK IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND STIPULATION OF FACTS Pavillon International ) Britten Creek WWTP ) PERMIT NO. NCO085294 ) CASE NO. LV -2016-0178 Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $362.94 for violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated August 31, 2016, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Resources within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment. This the Ith day of AcknUum 320 14 01)0)-9 SIGN , URE ames & .lames nvironmentat Management, Inc. P. Q. Box 519 Mountain Home, NC 23758 TELEPHONE a -toq') OeJ63 JAMES & JAMES ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC PO BOX 519, MOUNTAIN HOME, NC 28758 ����•(828) 697-0063 OFFICE 697-0065 September 7, 2016 Surface Water Protection Section Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 RE: Pavillon International Britten Creek WWTP NPDES Permit No. NC0085294 LV -2016-0178 Dear Mr. Davidson, This letter is in response to the above NOV dated August 31, 2016 and received by James & James on or about September 6, 2016. The violation was for the month of January 2016. This NOV was based solely upon an Act of God. The facility received a torrential rainfall which increased the flow from the facility. The well had produced 8000 gallons which is a typical flow from the well. With this flow, the facility typically receives about 3000 gallons of this water. We have not had this occur since this event. If we find this to be a normal occurrence, we will smoke test the lines to see where the issues are that need to be corrected. There were no monitoring violations due to this event and the facility maintained compliance throughout the episode. This rain was neither expected nor predicted in advance. There were no advanced procedures that we could have performed to have prevented this issue. We would appreciate consideration of any assessments. Thank you for your attention to this matter. With highest regards, J ita James