20100752_Voicemail_20160831

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Shannon Marshall <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:36 AM
To:[e-mail]; Wanucha, Dave
Subject:Re: Voicemail
Dave:

I went back up to the property yesterday afternoon to take another look at what has been staked relative to I thought was
the case below. I need to correct / expand upon a couple of items:

1) Blue "PDE" boundary stake: This does include the stream banks and stream bed itself.

2) Red "end of pipe" stake: This is inside the stream bank.

3) There is no doubt that the project incorporates access to the Bailey Camp Creek trout waters, based on the the colored
stakes that have been set. The project plan/map sent to me and forwarded to you yesterday does not have Bailey Camp
Creek noted on it.

Best regards,

Shannon

-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon Marshall <[e-mail]>
To: dave.wanucha <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tue, Aug 30, 2016 12:47 pm
Subject: Voicemail
Mr. Wanucha:

Thank you for the voicemail and follow up.

It is definitely a PDE project and it is clear in the documentation that DOT will maintain what is within the PDE boundary.

My concern is that the whole point of the PDE is to get the 24" CSP near enough to the creek for the storm water to drain
away.

If I or anyone disturbs the stream/steambank below the high water mark, then it is an issue. I don't think they are planning
to do that per se.

If I or anyone creates a new flow of water "near a stream" that we all know will enter the trout stream along with whatever
is in that flow at whatever rate of flow, who is going to be responsible for the impact of any erosion or contaminates as a
result of that flow? DOT wants to focus on the piece of land necessary to bury the pipe and a proposed "dissipation pad"
containing 12 SY of fabric and 4 tons of rip rap (I estimate about 10ft x 10ft).

My concern is what is coming from a 24" pipe flowing from a 4 lane highway at 18000 gallons per minute or 40ft3/sec
which makes it way into a 6 inch deep x 8 foot wide trout stream with est flow <26ft3/sec. The stream is supposedly
beyond the PDE. I will tell you that the stake that says end of pipe/PDE is as close as it can be without technically being
in the stream.

The stream has to suitable to handle the proposed outflow. I don't know if or how this has been evaluated at this point.
1

Thank you for your help. I look forward to hearing back from you.

Best regards,

Shannon

2